logo
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

An “EAR” on Environmental Surveillance and Monitoring: A Case Study on the Use of Exposure–Activity Ratios (EARs) to Prioritize Sites, Chemicals, and Bioactivities of Concern in Great Lakes Waters

View Author Information
Mid-Continent Ecology Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 6201 Congdon Blvd., Duluth, Minnesota 55804, United States
Wisconsin Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 8505 Research Way, Middleton, Wisconsin 53562, United States
§ National Center for Computational Toxicology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States
National Research Council, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 6201 Congdon Blvd., Duluth, Minnesota 55804, United States
Great Lakes National Program Office, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Blvd., Chicago, Illinois 60604, United States
# Math, Science, and Technology Department, University of Minnesota Crookston, 2900 University Avenue, Crookston, Minnesota 56716, United States
Badger Technical Services, 6201 Congdon Blvd., Duluth, Minnesota 55804, United States
*Phone: (218)-529-5078; fax: (218)-529-5003; e-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 15, 8713–8724
Publication Date (Web):July 3, 2017
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01613
Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society
Article Views
981
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

Read OnlinePDF (2 MB)
Supporting Info (3)»

Abstract

Abstract Image

Current environmental monitoring approaches focus primarily on chemical occurrence. However, based on concentration alone, it can be difficult to identify which compounds may be of toxicological concern and should be prioritized for further monitoring, in-depth testing, or management. This can be problematic because toxicological characterization is lacking for many emerging contaminants. New sources of high-throughput screening (HTS) data, such as the ToxCast database, which contains information for over 9000 compounds screened through up to 1100 bioassays, are now available. Integrated analysis of chemical occurrence data with HTS data offers new opportunities to prioritize chemicals, sites, or biological effects for further investigation based on concentrations detected in the environment linked to relative potencies in pathway-based bioassays. As a case study, chemical occurrence data from a 2012 study in the Great Lakes Basin along with the ToxCast effects database were used to calculate exposure–activity ratios (EARs) as a prioritization tool. Technical considerations of data processing and use of the ToxCast database are presented and discussed. EAR prioritization identified multiple sites, biological pathways, and chemicals that warrant further investigation. Prioritized bioactivities from the EAR analysis were linked to discrete adverse outcome pathways to identify potential adverse outcomes and biomarkers for use in subsequent monitoring efforts.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01613.

  • Figures showing examples of point of departure estimates and a chemical–assay coverage heatmap. Details on T47D assay methods. (PDF)

  • Tables showing chemical occurrence and ACC values, assay categorization and activity cutoff values, alignment of CAS registry numbers, flag IDs and descriptions, chemical–assay combinations, coverage of analyzed chemicals, EARmixture matrices and cumulative values, an EAR value matrix, and EEQs. (XLSX)

  • EAR calculation functions. (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Cited By


This article is cited by 25 publications.

  1. Mari Ochiai, Nozomi Kurihara, Masashi Hirano, Akifumi Nakata, Hisato Iwata. In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Risk Assessments of Environmental Pollutants Using Fibroblasts of a Stranded Finless Porpoise (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis). Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (11) , 6832-6841. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07471
  2. Milo L. de Baat, Nienke Wieringa, Steven T. J. Droge, Bart G. van Hall, Froukje van der Meer, Michiel H. S. Kraak. Smarter Sediment Screening: Effect-Based Quality Assessment, Chemical Profiling, and Risk Identification. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (24) , 14479-14488. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02732
  3. Corey M. G. Carpenter, Lok Yee J. Wong, Danyeh L. Gutema, Damian E. Helbling. Fall Creek Monitoring Station: Using Environmental Covariates To Predict Micropollutant Dynamics and Peak Events in Surface Water Systems. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (15) , 8599-8610. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02665
  4. Brett R. Blackwell, Gerald T. Ankley, Paul M. Bradley, Keith A. Houck, Sergei S. Makarov, Alexander V. Medvedev, Joe Swintek, Daniel L. Villeneuve. Potential Toxicity of Complex Mixtures in Surface Waters from a Nationwide Survey of United States Streams: Identifying in Vitro Bioactivities and Causative Chemicals. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (2) , 973-983. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05304
  5. Paul M. Bradley, Dana W. Kolpin, Kristin M. Romanok, Kelly L. Smalling, Michael J. Focazio, Juliane B. Brown, Mary C. Cardon, Kurt D. Carpenter, Steven R. Corsi, Laura A. DeCicco, Julie E. Dietze, Nicola Evans, Edward T. Furlong, Carrie E. Givens, James L. Gray, Dale W. Griffin, Christopher P. Higgins, Michelle L. Hladik, Luke R. Iwanowicz, Celeste A. Journey, Kathryn M. Kuivila, Jason R. Masoner, Carrie A. McDonough, Michael T. Meyer, James L. Orlando, Mark J. Strynar, Christopher P. Weis, Vickie S. Wilson. Reconnaissance of Mixed Organic and Inorganic Chemicals in Private and Public Supply Tapwaters at Selected Residential and Workplace Sites in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (23) , 13972-13985. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04622
  6. Jennifer T. McGuire, Isabelle M. Cozzarelli, Barbara A. Bekins, Hannah Link, Dalma Martinović-Weigelt. Toxicity Assessment of Groundwater Contaminated by Petroleum Hydrocarbons at a Well-Characterized, Aged, Crude Oil Release Site. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (21) , 12172-12178. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03657
  7. Olga Malev, Mario Lovrić, Draženka Stipaničev, Siniša Repec, Dalma Martinović-Weigelt, Davor Zanella, Tomislav Ivanković, Valnea Sindičić Đuretec, Josip Barišić, Mei Li, Göran Klobučar. Toxicity prediction and effect characterization of 90 pharmaceuticals and illicit drugs measured in plasma of fish from a major European river (Sava, Croatia). Environmental Pollution 2020, 266 , 115162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115162
  8. Christine M. Custer, Thomas W. Custer, Paul M. Dummer, Sandra Schultz, Chi Yen Tseng, Natalie Karouna‐Renier, Cole W. Matson. Legacy and Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Tree Swallows Along an Agricultural to Industrial Gradient: Maumee River, Ohio. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2020, 39 (10) , 1936-1952. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4792
  9. William Battaglin, James Duncker, Paul Terrio, Paul Bradley, Larry Barber, Laura DeCicco. Evaluating the potential role of bioactive chemicals on the distribution of invasive Asian carp upstream and downstream from river mile 278 in the Illinois waterway. Science of The Total Environment 2020, 735 , 139458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139458
  10. Paul M. Bradley, Maria Argos, Dana W. Kolpin, Shannon M. Meppelink, Kristin M. Romanok, Kelly L. Smalling, Michael J. Focazio, Joshua M. Allen, Julie E. Dietze, Michael J. Devito, Ariel R. Donovan, Nicola Evans, Carrie E. Givens, James L. Gray, Christopher P. Higgins, Michelle L. Hladik, Luke R. Iwanowicz, Celeste A. Journey, Rachael F. Lane, Zachary R. Laughrey, Keith A. Loftin, R. Blaine McCleskey, Carrie A. McDonough, Elizabeth Medlock-Kakaley, Michael T. Meyer, Andrea R. Putz, Susan D. Richardson, Alan E. Stark, Christopher P. Weis, Vickie S. Wilson, Abderrahman Zehraoui. Mixed organic and inorganic tapwater exposures and potential effects in greater Chicago area, USA. Science of The Total Environment 2020, 719 , 137236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137236
  11. Lang Chen, Shibin Li, Yanming Zhou, Xinxin Zhou, Hui Jiang, Xingang Liu, Shankui Yuan. Risk assessment for pesticide mixtures on aquatic ecosystems in China: a proposed framework. Pest Management Science 2020, 76 (2) , 444-453. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5529
  12. Paul M. Bradley, Kristin M. Romanok, Jeffrey R. Duncan, William A. Battaglin, Jimmy M. Clark, Michelle L. Hladik, Bradley J. Huffman, Luke R. Iwanowicz, Celeste A. Journey, Kelly L. Smalling. Exposure and potential effects of pesticides and pharmaceuticals in protected streams of the US National park Service southeast region. Science of The Total Environment 2020, 704 , 135431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135431
  13. Paul M. Bradley, Celeste A. Journey, Daniel T. Button, Daren M. Carlisle, Bradley J. Huffman, Sharon L. Qi, Kristin M. Romanok, Peter C. Van Metre, . Multi-region assessment of pharmaceutical exposures and predicted effects in USA wadeable urban-gradient streams. PLOS ONE 2020, 15 (1) , e0228214. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228214
  14. Johanna Nyffeler, Clinton Willis, Ryan Lougee, Ann Richard, Katie Paul-Friedman, Joshua A. Harrill. Bioactivity screening of environmental chemicals using imaging-based high-throughput phenotypic profiling. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 2020, 389 , 114876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2019.114876
  15. Sally Gaw, Andrew Harford, Vincent Pettigrove, Graham Sevicke‐Jones, Therese Manning, James Ataria, Tom Cresswell, Katherine A Dafforn, Frederic DL Leusch, Bradley Moggridge, Marcus Cameron, John Chapman, Gary Coates, Anne Colville, Claire Death, Kimberly Hageman, Kathryn Hassell, Molly Hoak, Jennifer Gadd, Dianne F Jolley, Ali Karami, Konstantinos Kotzakoulakis, Richard Lim, Nicole McRae, Leon Metzeling, Thomas Mooney, Jackie Myers, Andrew Pearson, Minna Saaristo, Dave Sharley, Julia Stuthe, Oliver Sutherland, Oliver Thomas, Louis Tremblay, Waitangi Wood, Alistair BA Boxall, Murray A Rudd, Bryan W Brooks. Towards Sustainable Environmental Quality: Priority Research Questions for the Australasian Region of Oceania. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 2019, 15 (6) , 917-935. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4180
  16. Steven R. Corsi, Laura A. De Cicco, Daniel L. Villeneuve, Brett R. Blackwell, Kellie A. Fay, Gerald T. Ankley, Austin K. Baldwin. Prioritizing chemicals of ecological concern in Great Lakes tributaries using high-throughput screening data and adverse outcome pathways. Science of The Total Environment 2019, 686 , 995-1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.457
  17. Levi D. Rose, Denise M. Akob, Shea R. Tuberty, Steven R. Corsi, Laura A. DeCicco, Jeffrey D. Colby, Derek J. Martin. Use of high-throughput screening results to prioritize chemicals for potential adverse biological effects within a West Virginia watershed. Science of The Total Environment 2019, 677 , 362-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.180
  18. Russell S Thomas, Tina Bahadori, Timothy J Buckley, John Cowden, Chad Deisenroth, Kathie L Dionisio, Jeffrey B Frithsen, Christopher M Grulke, Maureen R Gwinn, Joshua A Harrill, Mark Higuchi, Keith A Houck, Michael F Hughes, E Sidney Hunter, Kristin K Isaacs, Richard S Judson, Thomas B Knudsen, Jason C Lambert, Monica Linnenbrink, Todd M Martin, Seth R Newton, Stephanie Padilla, Grace Patlewicz, Katie Paul-Friedman, Katherine A Phillips, Ann M Richard, Reeder Sams, Timothy J Shafer, R Woodrow Setzer, Imran Shah, Jane E Simmons, Steven O Simmons, Amar Singh, Jon R Sobus, Mark Strynar, Adam Swank, Rogelio Tornero-Valez, Elin M Ulrich, Daniel L Villeneuve, John F Wambaugh, Barbara A Wetmore, Antony J Williams. The Next Generation Blueprint of Computational Toxicology at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Toxicological Sciences 2019, 169 (2) , 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfz058
  19. Paul M. Bradley, Celeste A. Journey, Jason P. Berninger, Daniel T. Button, Jimmy M. Clark, Steve R. Corsi, Laura A. DeCicco, Kristina G. Hopkins, Bradley J. Huffman, Naomi Nakagaki, Julia E. Norman, Lisa H. Nowell, Sharon L. Qi, Peter C. VanMetre, Ian R. Waite. Mixed-chemical exposure and predicted effects potential in wadeable southeastern USA streams. Science of The Total Environment 2019, 655 , 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.186
  20. Andrea M. Brunner, Milou M.L. Dingemans, Kirsten A. Baken, Annemarie P. van Wezel. Prioritizing anthropogenic chemicals in drinking water and sources through combined use of mass spectrometry and ToxCast toxicity data. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2019, 364 , 332-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.044
  21. Daniel L. Villeneuve, Katie Coady, Beate I. Escher, Ellen Mihaich, Cheryl A. Murphy, Tamar Schlekat, Natàlia Garcia-Reyero. High-throughput screening and environmental risk assessment: State of the science and emerging applications. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2019, 38 (1) , 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4315
  22. Sarah M. Elliott, William T. Route, Laura A. DeCicco, David D. VanderMeulen, Steven R. Corsi, Brett R. Blackwell. Contaminants in bald eagles of the upper Midwestern U.S.: A framework for prioritizing future research based on in-vitro bioassays. Environmental Pollution 2019, 244 , 861-870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.093
  23. Rebecca H. Weissinger, Brett R. Blackwell, Kristen Keteles, William A. Battaglin, Paul M. Bradley. Bioactive contaminants of emerging concern in National Park waters of the northern Colorado Plateau, USA. Science of The Total Environment 2018, 636 , 910-918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.332
  24. Gerald T. Ankley, Stephen W. Edwards. The adverse outcome pathway: A multifaceted framework supporting 21st century toxicology. Current Opinion in Toxicology 2018, 9 , 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2018.03.004
  25. Kellie A Fay, Daniel L Villeneuve, Joe Swintek, Stephen W Edwards, Mark D Nelms, Brett R Blackwell, Gerald T Ankley. Differentiating Pathway-Specific From Nonspecific Effects in High-Throughput Toxicity Data: A Foundation for Prioritizing Adverse Outcome Pathway Development. Toxicological Sciences 2018, 163 (2) , 500-515. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfy049

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

OOPS

You have to login with your ACS ID befor you can login with your Mendeley account.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE