ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Modeling Ozone in the Eastern U.S. using a Fuel-Based Mobile Source Emissions Inventory
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
    Article

    Modeling Ozone in the Eastern U.S. using a Fuel-Based Mobile Source Emissions Inventory
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    • Brian C. McDonald*
      Brian C. McDonald
      Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
      Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
      *Phone: (303) 497-5094; e-mail: [email protected]
    • Stuart A. McKeen
      Stuart A. McKeen
      Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
      Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
    • Yu Yan Cui
      Yu Yan Cui
      Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
      Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
      More by Yu Yan Cui
    • Ravan Ahmadov
      Ravan Ahmadov
      Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
      Global Systems Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
    • Si-Wan Kim
      Si-Wan Kim
      Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
      Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
      More by Si-Wan Kim
    • Gregory J. Frost
      Gregory J. Frost
      Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
    • Ilana B. Pollack
      Ilana B. Pollack
      Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
      Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
    • Jeff Peischl
      Jeff Peischl
      Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
      Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
      More by Jeff Peischl
    • Thomas B. Ryerson
      Thomas B. Ryerson
      Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
    • John S. Holloway
      John S. Holloway
      Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
      Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
    • Martin Graus
      Martin Graus
      Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
      Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
      More by Martin Graus
    • Carsten Warneke
      Carsten Warneke
      Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
      Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
    • Jessica B. Gilman
      Jessica B. Gilman
      Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
    • Joost A. de Gouw
      Joost A. de Gouw
      Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
      Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
    • Jennifer Kaiser
      Jennifer Kaiser
      Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States
    • Frank N. Keutsch
      Frank N. Keutsch
      Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States
    • Thomas F. Hanisco
      Thomas F. Hanisco
      Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, United States
    • Glenn M. Wolfe
      Glenn M. Wolfe
      Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, United States
      Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland 21228, United States
    • Michael Trainer
      Michael Trainer
      Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (1)

    Environmental Science & Technology

    Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 13, 7360–7370
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00778
    Published June 5, 2018
    Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    Recent studies suggest overestimates in current U.S. emission inventories of nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO + NO2). Here, we expand a previously developed fuel-based inventory of motor-vehicle emissions (FIVE) to the continental U.S. for the year 2013, and evaluate our estimates of mobile source emissions with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s National Emissions Inventory (NEI) interpolated to 2013. We find that mobile source emissions of NOx and carbon monoxide (CO) in the NEI are higher than FIVE by 28% and 90%, respectively. Using a chemical transport model, we model mobile source emissions from FIVE, and find consistent levels of urban NOx and CO as measured during the Southeast Nexus (SENEX) Study in 2013. Lastly, we assess the sensitivity of ozone (O3) over the Eastern U.S. to uncertainties in mobile source NOx emissions and biogenic volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions. The ground-level O3 is sensitive to reductions in mobile source NOx emissions, most notably in the Southeastern U.S. and during O3 exceedance events, under the revised standard proposed in 2015 (>70 ppb, 8 h maximum). This suggests that decreasing mobile source NOx emissions could help in meeting more stringent O3 standards in the future.

    Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00778.

    • Tables S1–S4 and Figures S1–S9 (PDF)

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article is cited by 66 publications.

    1. Karn Vohra, Eloise A. Marais, Ploy Achakulwisut, Gongda Lu, Jamie M. Kelly, Colin Harkins, Brian McDonald. Influence of Oil and Gas End-Use on Summertime Particulate Matter and Ozone Pollution in the Eastern US. Environmental Science & Technology 2024, 58 (44) , 19736-19747. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c10032
    2. Katelyn A. Yu, Meng Li, Colin Harkins, Jian He, Qindan Zhu, Bert Verreyken, Rebecca H. Schwantes, Ronald C. Cohen, Brian C. McDonald, Robert A. Harley. Improved Spatial Resolution in Modeling of Nitrogen Oxide Concentrations in the Los Angeles Basin. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (49) , 20689-20698. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c06158
    3. Sreejith Sasidharan, Yicong He, Ali Akherati, Qi Li, Weihua Li, David Cocker, Brian C. McDonald, Matthew M. Coggon, Karl M. Seltzer, Havala O. T. Pye, Jeffrey R. Pierce, Shantanu H. Jathar. Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Volatile Chemical Product Emissions: Model Parameters and Contributions to Anthropogenic Aerosol. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (32) , 11891-11902. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c00683
    4. Isabella M. Dressel, Mary Angelique G. Demetillo, Laura M. Judd, Scott J. Janz, Kimberly P. Fields, Kang Sun, Arlene M. Fiore, Brian C. McDonald, Sally E. Pusede. Daily Satellite Observations of Nitrogen Dioxide Air Pollution Inequality in New York City, New York and Newark, New Jersey: Evaluation and Application. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (22) , 15298-15311. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c02828
    5. Barbara Dix, Colby Francoeur, Meng Li, Raquel Serrano-Calvo, Pieternel F. Levelt, J. Pepijn Veefkind, Brian C. McDonald, Joost de Gouw. Quantifying NOx Emissions from U.S. Oil and Gas Production Regions Using TROPOMI NO2. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry 2022, 6 (2) , 403-414. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00387
    6. Israel Lopez-Coto, Xinrong Ren, Anna Karion, Kathryn McKain, Colm Sweeney, Russell R. Dickerson, Brian C. McDonald, Doyeon Y. Ahn, Ross J. Salawitch, Hao He, Paul B. Shepson, James R. Whetstone. Carbon Monoxide Emissions from the Washington, DC, and Baltimore Metropolitan Area: Recent Trend and COVID-19 Anomaly. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (4) , 2172-2180. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06288
    7. Gary A. Bishop, Molly J. Haugen, Brian C. McDonald, Adam M. Boies. Utah Wintertime Measurements of Heavy-Duty Vehicle Nitrogen Oxide Emission Factors. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (3) , 1885-1893. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06428
    8. Hansen Cao, Daven K. Henze, Karen Cady-Pereira, Brian C. McDonald, Colin Harkins, Kang Sun, Kevin W. Bowman, Tzung-May Fu, Muhammad O. Nawaz. COVID-19 Lockdowns Afford the First Satellite-Based Confirmation That Vehicles Are an Under-recognized Source of Urban NH3 Pollution in Los Angeles. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2022, 9 (1) , 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00730
    9. Colby B. Francoeur, Brian C. McDonald, Jessica B. Gilman, Kyle J. Zarzana, Barbara Dix, Steven S. Brown, Joost A. de Gouw, Gregory J. Frost, Meng Li, Stuart A. McKeen, Jeff Peischl, Ilana B. Pollack, Thomas B. Ryerson, Chelsea Thompson, Carsten Warneke, Michael Trainer. Quantifying Methane and Ozone Precursor Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Regions across the Contiguous US. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (13) , 9129-9139. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07352
    10. Tong Sha, Xiaoyan Ma, Huanxin Zhang, Nathan Janechek, Yanyu Wang, Yi Wang, Lorena Castro García, G. Darrel Jenerette, Jun Wang. Impacts of Soil NOx Emission on O3 Air Quality in Rural California. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (10) , 7113-7122. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06834
    11. Daniel C. Anderson, Andrew Lindsay, Peter F. DeCarlo, Ezra C. Wood. Urban Emissions of Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, and Methane Determined from Ground-Based Measurements in Philadelphia. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (8) , 4532-4541. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c00294
    12. Gary A. Bishop, Timothy H. DeFries, James A. Sidebottom, James M. Kemper. Vehicle Exhaust Remote Sensing Device Method to Screen Vehicles for Evaporative Running Loss Emissions. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (22) , 14627-14634. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05433
    13. Mary Angelique G. Demetillo, Aracely Navarro, Katherine K. Knowles, Kimberly P. Fields, Jeffrey A. Geddes, Caroline R. Nowlan, Scott J. Janz, Laura M. Judd, Jassim Al-Saadi, Kang Sun, Brian C. McDonald, Glenn S. Diskin, Sally E. Pusede. Observing Nitrogen Dioxide Air Pollution Inequality Using High-Spatial-Resolution Remote Sensing Measurements in Houston, Texas. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (16) , 9882-9895. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01864
    14. Alan M. Dunker, Gary Wilson, Josephine T. Bates, Greg Yarwood. Chemical Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty Analysis of Ozone Production in the Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions Applied to Eastern Texas. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (9) , 5391-5399. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07543
    15. Siqi Ma, Daniel Tong, Colin Harkins, Brian C. McDonald, Chi‐Tsan Wang, Yunyao Li, Bok H. Baek, Jung‐Hun Woo, Yang Zhang. Impacts of On‐Road Vehicular Emissions on U.S. Air Quality: A Comparison of Two Mobile Emission Models (MOVES and FIVE). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2024, 129 (20) https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041494
    16. Jonathan D. Krug, Theran P. Riedel, Michael Lewandowski, William A. Lonneman, John M. Turlington, Jose Zavala, Sarah H. Warren, Tadeusz E. Kleindienst, David M. DeMarini. Mutagenic atmospheres generated from the photooxidation of NOx with selected VOCs and a complex mixture: Apportionment of aromatic mutagenicity for reacted gasoline vapor. Atmospheric Environment 2024, 334 , 120668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120668
    17. Andres Gonzalez, Derek Mallia, John C. Lin, Logan Mitchell, Taylor Y. Wilmot, Nancy Daher, Mark Sghiatti, Colin Harkins. Examining the sensitivity of ozone to NOx and VOCs in the Salt Lake City urban region from spatiotemporal patterns observed using stationary and mobile observations collected from a light-rail public transit platform. Atmospheric Environment 2024, 334 , 120686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120686
    18. Chia‐Hua Hsu, Daven K. Henze, Arthur P. Mizzi, Gonzalo González Abad, Jian He, Colin Harkins, Aaron R. Naeger, Congmeng Lyu, Xiong Liu, Christopher Chan Miller, R. Bradley Pierce, Matthew S. Johnson, Brian C. McDonald. An Observing System Simulation Experiment Analysis of How Well Geostationary Satellite Trace‐Gas Observations Constrain NO x Emissions in the US. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2024, 129 (2) https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039323
    19. Matthew M. Coggon, Chelsea E. Stockwell, Megan S. Claflin, Eva Y. Pfannerstill, Lu Xu, Jessica B. Gilman, Julia Marcantonio, Cong Cao, Kelvin Bates, Georgios I. Gkatzelis, Aaron Lamplugh, Erin F. Katz, Caleb Arata, Eric C. Apel, Rebecca S. Hornbrook, Felix Piel, Francesca Majluf, Donald R. Blake, Armin Wisthaler, Manjula Canagaratna, Brian M. Lerner, Allen H. Goldstein, John E. Mak, Carsten Warneke. Identifying and correcting interferences to PTR-ToF-MS measurements of isoprene and other urban volatile organic compounds. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 2024, 17 (2) , 801-825. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-801-2024
    20. Fei Liu, Steffen Beirle, Joanna Joiner, Sungyeon Choi, Zhining Tao, K. Emma Knowland, Steven J. Smith, Daniel Q. Tong, Siqi Ma, Zachary T. Fasnacht, Thomas Wagner. High-resolution mapping of nitrogen oxide emissions in large US cities from TROPOMI retrievals of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide columns. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2024, 24 (6) , 3717-3728. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3717-2024
    21. Amy Christiansen, Loretta J. Mickley, Lu Hu. Constraining long-term NO x emissions over the United States and Europe using nitrate wet deposition monitoring networks. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2024, 24 (7) , 4569-4589. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4569-2024
    22. Qindan Zhu, Rebecca H. Schwantes, Matthew Coggon, Colin Harkins, Jordan Schnell, Jian He, Havala O. T. Pye, Meng Li, Barry Baker, Zachary Moon, Ravan Ahmadov, Eva Y. Pfannerstill, Bryan Place, Paul Wooldridge, Benjamin C. Schulze, Caleb Arata, Anthony Bucholtz, John H. Seinfeld, Carsten Warneke, Chelsea E. Stockwell, Lu Xu, Kristen Zuraski, Michael A. Robinson, J. Andrew Neuman, Patrick R. Veres, Jeff Peischl, Steven S. Brown, Allen H. Goldstein, Ronald C. Cohen, Brian C. McDonald. A better representation of volatile organic compound chemistry in WRF-Chem and its impact on ozone over Los Angeles. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2024, 24 (9) , 5265-5286. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5265-2024
    23. Brittany Antonczak, Tammy M. Thompson, Mindi W. DePaola, Gregory Rowangould. 2020 Near-roadway population census, traffic exposure and equity in the United States. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2023, 125 , 103965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103965
    24. Xiaokang Chen, Min Wang, Tai‐Long He, Zhe Jiang, Yuqiang Zhang, Li Zhou, Jane Liu, Hong Liao, Helen Worden, Dylan Jones, Dongyang Chen, Qinwen Tan, Yanan Shen. Data‐ and Model‐Based Urban O 3 Responses to NO x Changes in China and the United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2023, 128 (20) https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038228
    25. Bo Wang, Jeffrey A. Geddes, Taylor J. Adams, Elena S. Lind, Brian C. McDonald, Jian He, Colin Harkins, Dan Li, Gabriele G. Pfister. Implications of Sea Breezes on Air Quality Monitoring in a Coastal Urban Environment: Evidence From High Resolution Modeling of NO 2 and O 3. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2023, 128 (11) https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037860
    26. Samuel Orth, Armistead G. Russell. Assessment of light-duty versus heavy-duty diesel on-road mobile source emissions using general additive models applied to traffic volume and air quality data and COVID-19 responses. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 2023, 73 (5) , 374-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2023.2185315
    27. G. C. Cuchiara, A. Fried, M. C. Barth, M. M. Bela, C. R. Homeyer, J. Walega, P. Weibring, D. Richter, S. Woods, A. Beyersdorf, T. V. Bui, J. Dean‐Day. Effect of Marine and Land Convection on Wet Scavenging of Ozone Precursors Observed During a SEAC 4 RS Case Study. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2023, 128 (5) https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037107
    28. Shanshan Qiu, Rongguang Du, Guangtian Tang, Kunpeng Zang, Yi Lin, Yuanyuan Chen, Xuemei Qing, Jiaxin Li, Haoyu Xiong, Kai Jiang, Haixiang Hong, Shuangxi Fang. Characteristics of Surface Ozone and Nitrogen Oxides over a Typical City in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Atmosphere 2023, 14 (3) , 487. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14030487
    29. Claire Granier, Catherine Liousse, Brian McDonald, Paulette Middleton. Anthropogenic Emissions Inventories of Air Pollutants. 2023, 1-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2527-8_5-1
    30. Claire Granier, Catherine Liousse, Brian McDonald, Paulette Middleton. Anthropogenic Emissions Inventories of Air Pollutants. 2023, 3-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2760-9_5
    31. Bok H. Baek, Carlie Coats, Siqi Ma, Chi-Tsan Wang, Yunyao Li, Jia Xing, Daniel Tong, Soontae Kim, Jung-Hun Woo. Dynamic Meteorology-induced Emissions Coupler (MetEmis) development in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ): CMAQ-MetEmis. Geoscientific Model Development 2023, 16 (16) , 4659-4676. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4659-2023
    32. Maryam Abdi‐Oskouei, Behrooz Roozitalab, Charles O. Stanier, Megan Christiansen, Gabriele Pfister, R. Bradley Pierce, Brian C. McDonald, Zac Adelman, Mark Janseen, Angela F. Dickens, Gregory R. Carmichael. The Impact of Volatile Chemical Products, Other VOCs, and NO x on Peak Ozone in the Lake Michigan Region. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2022, 127 (22) https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037042
    33. Jeffrey A. Geddes, Sally E. Pusede, Anthony Y. H. Wong. Changes in the Relative Importance of Biogenic Isoprene and Soil NOx Emissions on Ozone Concentrations in Nonattainment Areas of the United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2022, 127 (13) https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036361
    34. Rebecca H. Schwantes, Forrest G. Lacey, Simone Tilmes, Louisa K. Emmons, Peter H. Lauritzen, Stacy Walters, Patrick Callaghan, Colin M. Zarzycki, Mary C. Barth, Duseong S. Jo, Julio T. Bacmeister, Richard B. Neale, Francis Vitt, Erik Kluzek, Behrooz Roozitalab, Samuel R. Hall, Kirk Ullmann, Carsten Warneke, Jeff Peischl, Ilana B. Pollack, Frank Flocke, Glenn M. Wolfe, Thomas F. Hanisco, Frank N. Keutsch, Jennifer Kaiser, Thao Paul V. Bui, Jose L. Jimenez, Pedro Campuzano‐Jost, Eric C. Apel, Rebecca S. Hornbrook, Alan J. Hills, Bin Yuan, Armin Wisthaler. Evaluating the Impact of Chemical Complexity and Horizontal Resolution on Tropospheric Ozone Over the Conterminous US With a Global Variable Resolution Chemistry Model. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 2022, 14 (6) https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002889
    35. Xiurui Guo, Yao Liu, Dongsheng Chen, Xiaoqian Gong. Prediction of Emission Reduction Potential from Road Diesel Vehicles in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) Region, China. Atmosphere 2022, 13 (5) , 776. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13050776
    36. Jun Wang, Yanli Zhang, Zhenfeng Wu, Shilu Luo, Wei Song, Xinming Wang. Ozone episodes during and after the 2018 Chinese National Day holidays in Guangzhou: Implications for the control of precursor VOCs. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2022, 114 , 322-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2021.09.009
    37. Si‐Wan Kim, Brian C. McDonald, Seunghwan Seo, Kyoung‐Min Kim, Michael Trainer. Understanding the Paths of Surface Ozone Abatement in the Los Angeles Basin. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2022, 127 (4) https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035606
    38. Alan M. Dunker, Uarporn Nopmongcol, Greg Yarwood. Uncertainty analysis of modeled ozone changes due to anthropogenic emission reductions in Eastern Texas. Atmospheric Environment 2022, 268 , 118798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118798
    39. Tienan Ju, Mei Lei, Guanghui Gun, Jinglun Xi, Yang Zhang, Yuan Xu, Qijia Lou. A New Prediction Method of Industrial Atmospheric Pollutant Emission Intensity Based on Pollutant Emission Standard Quantification. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 124 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4016135
    40. Amy Christiansen, Loretta J. Mickley, Junhua Liu, Luke D. Oman, Lu Hu. Multidecadal increases in global tropospheric ozone derived from ozonesonde and surface site observations: can models reproduce ozone trends?. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2022, 22 (22) , 14751-14782. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14751-2022
    41. M. Li, B. C. McDonald, S. A. McKeen, H. Eskes, P. Levelt, C. Francoeur, C. Harkins, J. He, M. Barth, D. K. Henze, M. M. Bela, M. Trainer, J. A. de Gouw, G. J. Frost. Assessment of Updated Fuel‐Based Emissions Inventories Over the Contiguous United States Using TROPOMI NO 2 Retrievals. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2021, 126 (24) https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035484
    42. S. Kondragunta, Z. Wei, B. C. McDonald, D. L. Goldberg, D. Q. Tong. COVID‐19 Induced Fingerprints of a New Normal Urban Air Quality in the United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2021, 126 (17) https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034797
    43. Mary Angelique G. Demetillo, Colin Harkins, Brian C. McDonald, Philip S. Chodrow, Kang Sun, Sally E. Pusede. Space‐Based Observational Constraints on NO 2 Air Pollution Inequality From Diesel Traffic in Major US Cities. Geophysical Research Letters 2021, 48 (17) https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094333
    44. Matthew M. Coggon, Georgios I. Gkatzelis, Brian C. McDonald, Jessica B. Gilman, Rebecca H. Schwantes, Nader Abuhassan, Kenneth C. Aikin, Mark F. Arend, Timothy A. Berkoff, Steven S. Brown, Teresa L. Campos, Russell R. Dickerson, Guillaume Gronoff, James F. Hurley, Gabriel Isaacman-VanWertz, Abigail R. Koss, Meng Li, Stuart A. McKeen, Fred Moshary, Jeff Peischl, Veronika Pospisilova, Xinrong Ren, Anna Wilson, Yonghua Wu, Michael Trainer, Carsten Warneke. Volatile chemical product emissions enhance ozone and modulate urban chemistry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2021, 118 (32) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026653118
    45. Colin Harkins, Brian C McDonald, Daven K Henze, Christine Wiedinmyer. A fuel-based method for updating mobile source emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Environmental Research Letters 2021, 16 (6) , 065018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac0660
    46. Claudia Toro, Kristen Foley, Heather Simon, Barron Henderson, Kirk R. Baker, Alison Eyth, Brian Timin, Wyat Appel, Deborah Luecken, Megan Beardsley, Darrell Sonntag, Norm Possiel, Sarah Roberts. Evaluation of 15 years of modeled atmospheric oxidized nitrogen compounds across the contiguous United States. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 2021, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.00158
    47. Jiekun Zhu, Hongtao Kao. Numerical Simulation of Co-Combustion of Pulverized Coal and Different Proportions of Refused Derived Fuel in TTF Precalciner. Journal of Renewable Materials 2021, 9 (7) , 1329-1343. https://doi.org/10.32604/jrm.2021.015079
    48. Jianfeng Li, Yuhang Wang, Ruixiong Zhang, Charles Smeltzer, Andrew Weinheimer, Jay Herman, K. Folkert Boersma, Edward A. Celarier, Russell W. Long, James J. Szykman, Ruben Delgado, Anne M. Thompson, Travis N. Knepp, Lok N. Lamsal, Scott J. Janz, Matthew G. Kowalewski, Xiong Liu, Caroline R. Nowlan. Comprehensive evaluations of diurnal NO 2 measurements during DISCOVER-AQ 2011: effects of resolution-dependent representation of NO x emissions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2021, 21 (14) , 11133-11160. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11133-2021
    49. Chelsea E. Stockwell, Matthew M. Coggon, Georgios I. Gkatzelis, John Ortega, Brian C. McDonald, Jeff Peischl, Kenneth Aikin, Jessica B. Gilman, Michael Trainer, Carsten Warneke. Volatile organic compound emissions from solvent- and water-borne coatings – compositional differences and tracer compound identifications. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2021, 21 (8) , 6005-6022. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6005-2021
    50. Raj M Lal, Anu Ramaswami, Armistead G Russell. Assessment of the Near-Road (monitoring) Network including comparison with nearby monitors within U.S. cities. Environmental Research Letters 2020, 15 (11) , 114026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8156
    51. Dolly L. Hall, Daniel C. Anderson, Cory R. Martin, Xinrong Ren, Ross J. Salawitch, Hao He, Timothy P. Canty, Jennifer C. Hains, Russell R. Dickerson. Using near-road observations of CO, NOy, and CO2 to investigate emissions from vehicles: Evidence for an impact of ambient temperature and specific humidity. Atmospheric Environment 2020, 232 , 117558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117558
    52. G. C. Cuchiara, A. Fried, M. C. Barth, M. Bela, C. R. Homeyer, B. Gaubert, J. Walega, P. Weibring, D. Richter, P. Wennberg, J. Crounse, M. Kim, G. Diskin, T. F. Hanisco, G. M. Wolfe, A. Beyersdorf, J. Peischl, I. B. Pollack, J. M. St. Clair, S. Woods, S. Tanelli, T. V. Bui, J. Dean‐Day, L. G. Huey, N. Heath. Vertical Transport, Entrainment, and Scavenging Processes Affecting Trace Gases in a Modeled and Observed SEAC 4 RS Case Study. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2020, 125 (11) https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031957
    53. Qianru Zhang, Peifeng Tong, Maodian Liu, Huiming Lin, Xiao Yun, Haoran Zhang, Wei Tao, Junfeng Liu, Shuxiao Wang, Shu Tao, Xuejun Wang. A WRF-Chem model-based future vehicle emission control policy simulation and assessment for the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Journal of Environmental Management 2020, 253 , 109751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109751
    54. Rebecca H. Schwantes, Louisa K. Emmons, John J. Orlando, Mary C. Barth, Geoffrey S. Tyndall, Samuel R. Hall, Kirk Ullmann, Jason M. St. Clair, Donald R. Blake, Armin Wisthaler, Thao Paul V. Bui. Comprehensive isoprene and terpene gas-phase chemistry improves simulated surface ozone in the southeastern US. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2020, 20 (6) , 3739-3776. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3739-2020
    55. John T. Walker, Michael D. Bell, Donna Schwede, Amanda Cole, Greg Beachley, Gary Lear, Zhiyong Wu. Aspects of uncertainty in total reactive nitrogen deposition estimates for North American critical load applications. Science of The Total Environment 2019, 690 , 1005-1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.337
    56. J.T. Walker, G. Beachley, H.M. Amos, J.S. Baron, J. Bash, R. Baumgardner, M.D. Bell, K.B. Benedict, X. Chen, D.W. Clow, A. Cole, J.G. Coughlin, K. Cruz, R.W. Daly, S.M. Decina, E.M. Elliott, M.E. Fenn, L. Ganzeveld, K. Gebhart, S.S. Isil, B.M. Kerschner, R.S. Larson, T. Lavery, G.G. Lear, T. Macy, M.A. Mast, K. Mishoe, K.H. Morris, P.E. Padgett, R.V. Pouyat, M. Puchalski, H.O.T. Pye, A.W. Rea, M.F. Rhodes, C.M. Rogers, R. Saylor, R. Scheffe, B.A. Schichtel, D.B. Schwede, G.A. Sexstone, B.C. Sive, R. Sosa Echeverría, P.H. Templer, T. Thompson, D. Tong, G.A. Wetherbee, T.H. Whitlow, Z. Wu, Z. Yu, L. Zhang. Toward the improvement of total nitrogen deposition budgets in the United States. Science of The Total Environment 2019, 691 , 1328-1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.058
    57. Weishu Wang, Yihan Liao, Jun Liu, Zhihao Huang, Miao Tian. Numerical Simulation and Optimization of Staged Combustion and NOx Release Characteristics in Precalciner. Journal of Thermal Science 2019, 28 (5) , 1024-1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-019-1164-y
    58. Russell R. Dickerson, Daniel C. Anderson, Xinrong Ren. On the use of data from commercial NOx analyzers for air pollution studies. Atmospheric Environment 2019, 214 , 116873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116873
    59. Melissa Day, George Pouliot, Sherri Hunt, Kirk R. Baker, Megan Beardsley, Gregory Frost, David Mobley, Heather Simon, Barron B. Henderson, Tiffany Yelverton, Venkatesh Rao. Reflecting on progress since the 2005 NARSTO emissions inventory report. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 2019, 69 (9) , 1023-1048. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2019.1629363
    60. Shuai Pan, Anirban Roy, Yunsoo Choi, Ebrahim Eslami, Stephanie Thomas, Xiangyu Jiang, H. Oliver Gao. Potential impacts of electric vehicles on air quality and health endpoints in the Greater Houston Area in 2040. Atmospheric Environment 2019, 207 , 38-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.03.022
    61. Linda Hembeck, Hao He, Timothy P. Vinciguerra, Timothy P. Canty, Russell R. Dickerson, Ross J. Salawitch, Christopher Loughner. Measured and modelled ozone photochemical production in the Baltimore-Washington airshed. Atmospheric Environment: X 2019, 2 , 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100017
    62. Momei Qin, Haofei Yu, Yongtao Hu, Armistead G. Russell, M Talat Odman, Kevin Doty, Arastoo Pour-Biazar, Richard T. McNider, Eladio Knipping. Improving ozone simulations in the Great Lakes Region: The role of emissions, chemistry, and dry deposition. Atmospheric Environment 2019, 202 , 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.01.025
    63. Jianfeng Li, Yuhang Wang. Inferring the anthropogenic NOx emission trend over the United States during 2003–2017 from satellite observations: was there a flattening of the emission trend after the Great Recession?. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2019, 19 (24) , 15339-15352. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15339-2019
    64. Rachel F. Silvern, Daniel J. Jacob, Loretta J. Mickley, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Katherine R. Travis, Eloise A. Marais, Ronald C. Cohen, Joshua L. Laughner, Sungyeon Choi, Joanna Joiner, Lok N. Lamsal. Using satellite observations of tropospheric NO2 columns to infer long-term trends in US NOx emissions: the importance of accounting for the free tropospheric NO2 background. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2019, 19 (13) , 8863-8878. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8863-2019
    65. Jingqiu Mao, Annmarie Carlton, Ronald C. Cohen, William H. Brune, Steven S. Brown, Glenn M. Wolfe, Jose L. Jimenez, Havala O. T. Pye, Nga Lee Ng, Lu Xu, V. Faye McNeill, Kostas Tsigaridis, Brian C. McDonald, Carsten Warneke, Alex Guenther, Matthew J. Alvarado, Joost de Gouw, Loretta J. Mickley, Eric M. Leibensperger, Rohit Mathur, Christopher G. Nolte, Robert W. Portmann, Nadine Unger, Mika Tosca, Larry W. Horowitz. Southeast Atmosphere Studies: learning from model-observation syntheses. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2018, 18 (4) , 2615-2651. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2615-2018
    66. Jennifer Kaiser, Daniel J. Jacob, Lei Zhu, Katherine R. Travis, Jenny A. Fisher, Gonzalo González Abad, Lin Zhang, Xuesong Zhang, Alan Fried, John D. Crounse, Jason M. St. Clair, Armin Wisthaler. High-resolution inversion of OMI formaldehyde columns to quantify isoprene emission on ecosystem-relevant scales: application to the southeast US. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2018, 18 (8) , 5483-5497. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5483-2018

    Environmental Science & Technology

    Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 13, 7360–7370
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00778
    Published June 5, 2018
    Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    1670

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.