ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Urban Stormwater: An Overlooked Pathway of Extensive Mixed Contaminants to Surface and Groundwaters in the United States

Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 17, 10070–10081
Publication Date (Web):August 21, 2019
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02867

Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

  • Open Access

Article Views

12603

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (6 MB)
Supporting Info (2)»

Abstract

Increasing global reliance on stormwater control measures to reduce discharge to surface water, increase groundwater recharge, and minimize contaminant delivery to receiving waterbodies necessitates improved understanding of stormwater–contaminant profiles. A multiagency study of organic and inorganic chemicals in urban stormwater from 50 runoff events at 21 sites across the United States demonstrated that stormwater transports substantial mixtures of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, bioactive contaminants (pesticides and pharmaceuticals), and other organic chemicals known or suspected to pose environmental health concern. Numerous organic-chemical detections per site (median number of chemicals detected = 73), individual concentrations exceeding 10 000 ng/L, and cumulative concentrations up to 263 000 ng/L suggested concern for potential environmental effects during runoff events. Organic concentrations, loads, and yields were positively correlated with impervious surfaces and highly developed urban catchments. Episodic storm-event organic concentrations and loads were comparable to and often exceeded those of daily wastewater plant discharges. Inorganic chemical concentrations were generally dilute in concentration and did not exceed chronic aquatic life criteria. Methylmercury was measured in 90% of samples with concentrations that ranged from 0.05 to 1.0 ng/L.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Urban stormwater runoff is a recognized contributor to surface water impairment in the United States. (1,2) Nutrients, heavy metals, bacteria, chlorophenols, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are commonly reported in stormwater runoff. (3−12) Limited research has shown that stormwater also can contain contaminants such as pesticides, pharmaceuticals, personal care products, alkyphenol surfactants, and phthalates. (13−16) Stormwater runoff is often collected in retention ponds and constructed wetlands where additional contaminants, such as methylmercury (MeHg), can be produced at rates similar to those seen in natural wetlands. (17) Stormwater runoff events discharging into rivers and reservoirs can adversely affect macroinvertebrates, (18) particularly benthic organisms, (19−21) and may pose a risk to human health through recreational exposures or possible harvesting of aquatic or terrestrial organisms. (10,18,20−25)
Municipalities and water-management agencies worldwide are increasingly using stormwater control measures (SCMs) at various scales to minimize contaminant transport to receiving waterbodies, reduce stormwater volumes, collect stormwater for reuse, and increase groundwater recharge. (26−34) Current stormwater reuse applications range from indirect potable reuse through enhanced aquifer recharge to creation of stormwater-retention wetlands/ponds/lakes that provide aquatic habitats and serve as recreational locations in urban settings or are used as a water source for irrigation in urban and agricultural landscapes. A recent review of >100 studies indicated that SCMs can be an effective approach for reducing concentrations of select contaminants, including total suspended solids, nutrients, copper, and zinc. (35) At the national scale, however, little is known about the potential chemical exposures resulting from organic and inorganic contaminants in urban stormwater runoff or the potential effects on groundwater/surface water quality or ecosystem health.
To address this nationwide data gap, the U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, in collaboration with municipalities, conducted a national-scale study of 438 organic (e.g., biogenic hormones, halogenated chemicals, household/industrial chemicals, methylmercury, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and semivolatiles) and 62 inorganic (e.g., anions, cations, rare-earth elements, trace metals, and total mercury) chemicals in urban stormwater. This article analyzes results from 50 storm events at 21 sites across the U.S. to better understand the contaminant contribution of stormwater to surface water, groundwater, and the potential contaminant-exposures to sensitive organic receptors. In addition, correlations between select ancillary stormwater/catchment characteristics and the less understood organic chemicals were analyzed to better understand the factors that control organic-chemical concentrations. This research provides a foundation for future investigations of fate, exposure, toxicity, and risk from stormwater–contaminant mixtures discharged to surface waterbodies or infiltrated to groundwater.

Materials and Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Urban Stormwater Runoff Sites

From August 2016 to December 2017, 50 stormwater samples and 7 field quality-assurance samples were collected across 21 sites in 17 states (Figure SI-1 and Table SI-1). Sample sites were in stormwater conveyance infrastructure that discharged mixed stormwater runoff from buildings, parking lots, roads, and other infrastructure in residential, commercial, and industrial landscapes prior to surface water discharge or groundwater infiltration. Samples were collected in conveyance infrastructure constructed of concrete culverts that were buried underground, open concrete canals, or open dirt channels (Table SI-1). Catchment areas ranged from 0.1 to 1 000 km2 (Figure SI-2A). A total of 18 of 21 sites were characterized by >90% developed (cumulative developed low-medium-high intensity and urban open space) land-use/land-cover based on the 2011 National Land Cover Data set (LULC, Figure SI-2B). (36) In total, 13 (62%) of the 21 sample sites discharged to surface water, whereas the remainder infiltrated stormwater to groundwater. State abbreviations were used as field names with concatenated “-I” to indicates sites that infiltrated stormwater to groundwater. For all sites, sampling occurred in conveyance infrastructure at or near outfalls before discharge to urban surface water networks or upstream of SCMs prior to treatment and infiltration.

Sampling Protocols

Sampling equipment, tubing, and composite-sample containers used to collect stormwater were (1) cleaned using tap water and anionic detergent and thoroughly rinsed with tap water followed by deionized water, (2) soaked overnight in a 5% hydrochloric acid bath, (3) rinsed with pesticide-free methanol, and (4) air-dried and placed in clean reclosable plastic bags. (37) In total, 43 flow-weighted composite samples were collected at 14 sites using refrigerated-automated samplers (Teledyne, Thousand Oaks, CA) and 7 time-weighted composite samples were collected manually (1000 mL collected every 10 min at the beginning of the runoff event) using a polytetrafluoroethylene DH-81 isokinetic water-quality sampler (Table SI-1). (37) Both automated and manual sampling approaches targeted a 10-L composite sample (consisting of 10–30 subsamples of 250–1000 mL each) collected across the storm-runoff hydrograph (Figure SI-3).
Automated samplers were equipped with polytetrafluoroethylene tubing and intake screens, 30 cm in length silicone peristaltic-pump tubing, and a 10-L glass container. Four sampling sites (AZ1, AZ2, CA1, and CA2-I) with ongoing automated-sampler monitoring efforts had dedicated polyethylene tubing. Automated samplers were programmed to perform a field rinse of the sample tubing from the intake screen to the peristaltic pump head upon initiation and prior to collection of each subsample. Retrieval of composite samples occurred within 48 h of sample collection. Composite samples were labeled, double bagged, and shipped overnight on ice to the laboratory for processing and splitting into subsamples for analyses. A 14-L polytetrafluoroethylene churn-splitter was used to split composite samples into subsamples for specific chemical analyses with all subsamples analyzed at U.S. Geological Survey laboratories using published methods (Table SI-2). (37) Additional information on the calculation of storm-event discharges, organic-chemical loads and yields, and statistical analysis are provided in the Supporting Information.

Analytical Methods

Eight analytical methods were used to determine concentrations of 438 organic chemicals in urban stormwater samples, including 109 liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) pharmaceuticals and related chemicals, (38) 21 gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) hormones and related chemicals, (39) 67 GC-MS household and industrial chemicals, (40) 147 GC-MS and LC-MS/MS pesticides, (41,42) 56 GC-MS semivolatile chemicals, (43) methylmercury, (44) and 60 GC-MS halogenated chemicals (Table SI-3; method details in the Supporting Information). Samples were analyzed for 62 inorganic chemicals/parameters, including alkalinity, concentrations of anions and cations, (45) trace elements and rare-earth elements, (46) total mercury, (47) and stable isotopes of oxygen and hydrogen. (48,49)
All analytical data are available in the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System at http://dx.doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN or in the associated data releases that follow the Public Access Plan. (50,51)

Quality Assurance

Quality-assurance (QA) samples typically consisted of 10% laboratory reagent water blanks and reagent water spikes, three field equipment blanks, and four field replicates (Tables SI-4–SI-8). Equipment blanks were prepared in the field and the laboratory by processing certified organic and inorganic blank water through the sampling equipment in the same manner that field samples were collected and processed (Table SI-6). In addition, isotope-dilution standards (IDSs) or surrogate compounds were added to all organic samples prior to extraction or analyses. Chemical concentrations falling outside the calibration range for each method (i.e., exceeding the analytical calibration curve or falling between the limit of quantitation (LOQ) and long-term method detection limit (LT-MDL)) were considered estimated detections with reduced precision and accuracy and included as is herein. Of the 3 563 total detections, approximately 25% exceeded the highest-calibration point and approximately 27% were estimated between the LOQ and LT-MDL. Field detections less than blank sample concentrations were reported as nondetections, and the LOQ was raised to the concentration of the blank sample. Only N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET) and phenol had field blank concentrations exceeding their LOQ (40 and 160 ng/L, respectively). All DEET and phenol data were retained in this paper, but the LOQs were raised (47 ng/L and 511 ng/L, respectively) and 38 concentrations of DEET and 10 concentrations of phenol that were <10 times the blank concentration were coded “V” (but used in interpretations) to indicate that the reported concentration may be influenced by contribution occurring during collection or analysis.
Median relative percent differences (RPDs) for replicate samples of organic chemicals ranged from 4% for GC-MS/MS biogenic hormones, GC-MS pesticides, and LC-MS/MS pesticides to 18% for GC-MS household and industrial chemicals (Table SI-7). Median RPDs were 1–5% for total mercury, alkalinity, anions, trace elements, and methylmercury (Table SI-7). Larger RPDs generally occurred in low-concentration samples. Overall median recoveries for laboratory reagent-spike samples ranged from 77 to 100% for organic methods (Table SI-8). Median recoveries for IDS and surrogate standards ranged 72–106% for 5 of 7 trace organic methods; recoveries for the other two methods, GC-MS halogenated chemicals and GC-MS/MS hormones, were 47% and 61%, respectively (Table SI-8). Additional quality-assurance data for anions, cations, and trace elements can be found in the associated data releases. (50,51)

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Organic Chemical Mixtures in Urban Stormwater Runoff

Increased implementation of stormwater capture and reuse as a common method of stormwater management underscores the importance of assessing organic contamination in urban stormwater and potential risks to surface water, aquatic organisms, and groundwater. Of the 438 organic chemicals analyzed, 215 (49%) were detected in one or more stormwater samples (Table SI-9) with 223 (51%) not detected in any sample (Table SI-10). The number of organic chemicals detected in a single stormwater sample ranged from 18 to 103 (median = 73; Figure 1A). Pesticides were the most frequently detected chemical group (accounting for 35% of total detections; Figure 1A). Cumulative organic-chemical concentrations of samples ranged from 4 370 ng/L to 263 000 ng/L (median = 48 500 ng/L); with 7 samples having a total concentration exceeding 100 000 ng/L (Figure 1B). Of the 215 organics detected, 69 (32%) were frequently detected in >50% of samples (Figure 2). The 69 frequently detected organic chemicals accounted for 70% of the cumulative total 3 563 detections (Figure SI-4A) and were composed of 21 pesticides, 16 PAHs, 11 industrial chemicals, 11 household chemicals, 5 nonprescription pharmaceuticals, 3 plant/animal sterols, and 2 prescription pharmaceuticals (Figure 2). The 69 frequently detected organic chemicals that accounted for 70% of the total detections also accounted for 90% of the cumulative organic-chemical concentration (Figure 2 and Figure SI-4A). Concentrations of the 215 detected organic chemicals spanned over 6 orders of magnitude from less than 1.0 to over 100 000 ng/L (Figure 3A).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Total number of detected organic chemicals for sampled sites, sorted from left to right by decreasing number of detections (A) and total measured organic-chemical concentration for sampled sites (B).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Box-plot distributions of measured concentrations for the 69 organic chemicals detected in 50% or more of 49 urban stormwater samples. Sorted alphabetically from top to bottom by chemical class and decreasing median concentrations.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Box plot distributions of measured concentrations for organic chemicals in urban stormwater samples (A) and percent of total measured organic chemicals concentration by chemical class (B). Sorted from left to right by decreasing number of detections.

Eleven organic contaminants were pervasive across all samples (>90% detection): DEET (insect repellent, 98%), nicotine (alkaloid stimulant, 98%), caffeine (psychoactive stimulant, 96%), carbendazim (broad-spectrum fungicide and benomyl metabolite, 94%), methyl-1H-benzotriazole (corrosion inhibitor, 92%), p-cresol (wood preservative, 92%), cotinine (nicotine metabolite, 92%), desulfinyl fipronil (fipronil-insecticide metabolite, 90%), bisphenol A (plastics, paper receipts, and epoxy resin production, 90%), fluoranthene (PAH, 90%), and pyrene (PAH, 90%). Combined results from two recent studies in California and Minnesota have documented similar detection frequencies of these 11 stormwater contaminants. (13,16) Although pesticides were the most frequently detected chemical group in the current study (accounting for 35% of all detections), they only accounted for 5% of the total organic concentrations, whereas PAHs accounted for 19% of total detections and 33% of total concentrations (Figures 1A and 3B and Figure SI-4B). Of the 16 frequently detected PAHs, benzo[a]anthracene, chrysene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, and indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene are designated as probable human carcinogens and 13 are designated priority pollutants. (52) Six of the frequently detected PAHs had maximum concentrations of >10 000 ng/L, including fluoranthene (36 700 ng/L), pyrene (29 100 ng/L), phenanthrene (28 800 ng/L), benzo[b]fluoranthene (18 500 ng/L), chrysene (14 700 ng/L), and benzo[a]pyrene (13 500 ng/L) (Figure 2). For two of these PAHs (pyrene and benzo[a]pyrene), previous research documented acute biological effects to embryo-larva of the pacific oyster following exposure to concentrations of 5 000 ng/L in the laboratory. (53) In addition, PAH concentrations measured for our study were substantially larger (∑PAHs up to 180 000 ng/L, with 42% of sites >10 000 ng/L) than concentrations in runoff from unsealed-asphalt pavement (∑PAHs ranged from 160 to 340 ng/L) and similar to concentrations in runoff from parking lots treated with coal-tar and asphalt-emulsion sealcoats (∑PAHs ranged from 3 800 to 21 000 ng/L). (10,11) Thus, the frequency and concentrations of PAHs measured in urban stormwater runoff are of concern considering the documented detrimental effects of coal-tar based sealcoats and PAHs on terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. (54−61)
Concentrations of 21 frequently detected (>50%) pesticides spanned 5 orders of magnitude from <1 to >10 000 ng/L (Figure 2). Detected pesticides with maximum concentrations >1 000 ng/L including carbendazim (fungicide, 9 570 ng/L), pentachlorophenol (restricted-use insecticide, 3 500 ng/L), and diuron (urea herbicide, 1 790 ng/L) were measured at substantially larger (>1 magnitude) concentrations than previously reported in stormwater runoff from residential and commercial catchments in Wisconsin and Minnesota. (13,14) Carbendazim has been shown to alter gene expression related to oxidative stress, apoptosis, and immune and endocrine disruption in aquatic organisms during larvae development when exposed to concentrations as low as 4 000 ng/L. (62) Extensively used agricultural herbicides atrazine and metolachlor, dithiopyr (pre-emergent), DCPMU (diuron degradate), along with the insecticides imidacloprid (neonicotinoid) and fipronil (broad-spectrum), generally ranged in concentration from 3 to 300 ng/L (Figure 2). Recent studies also documented similar concentrations for atrazine and metolachlor in stormwater runoff from a residential landscape (13) and imidacloprid and fipronil concentrations in urban creeks sampled during runoff events. (13,63) Temporally increasing imidacloprid detection has been reported in urban streams and attributed to increased home and garden use. (64)
In our study, 74% (37) of the detected imidacloprid concentrations exceeded the 10 ng/L U.S. EPA chronic aquatic life benchmark (ALB) for invertebrates, and 44% (22) of detected fipronil concentrations exceeded the 11 ng/L ALB. (65) The frequently detected banned insecticides, technical chlordane (cis-chlordane, trans-chlordane, trans-nonachlor, cis-nonachlor) and dieldrin, restricted-use insecticide chlorpyrifos, and the pentachlorophenol degradant pentachloroanisole generally ranged in concentration from 0.2 to 14 ng/L. The historical targeted treatment of urban residential and commercial properties with now banned insecticides for uses such as termite control (i.e., technical chlordane, USA banned >30 years) can provide a continuous source of these persistent legacy insecticides. (66) The frequent detection of such legacy insecticides illustrates the importance of continued monitoring and management of persistent compounds that are no longer used but may still pose aquatic or human health risks. (67)
Urban stormwater is frequently contaminated with human waste via sources such as leaks from aging-sewage infrastructure. (68) The frequent detection of prescription pharmaceuticals (i.e., metformin 73%) and nonprescription pharmaceuticals (i.e., acetaminophen 84% and lidocaine 69%) in this study also suggests a potential human waste component in stormwater. Although 27 prescription pharmaceuticals were detected at least once in stormwater samples (Table SI-9), only 2 were detected in >50% of samples, metformin and methenamine (Figure 2). Guanylurea (metformin degradate) was detected in 27% of samples. Metformin is a prevalent environmental contaminant (69−71) with documented health effects to fish. (71−73) The median metformin concentration (102 ng/L) in our study (herein, all reference to median values are based on distribution of detected concentrations) distribution was about 7 times higher than from a previous study of urban stormwater. (13) Two antibiotic concentrations of 6 030 ng/L for sulfamethoxazole and 3 420 ng/L for methenamine were the highest measured prescription pharmaceuticals in stormwater samples. Research has documented negative effects on growth, nitrate reduction activity, and microbial community structure from exposure to sulfamethoxazole at concentrations as low as 1 110 ng/L. (74,75)
Caffeine and nicotine were the most frequently detected (>96%) nonprescription pharmaceuticals and measured at the highest concentrations (maximum of 32 200 ng/L and 18 300 ng/L, respectively), composing 89% of the total nonprescription pharmaceutical concentration. When including their degradants (dimethylxanthine and cotinine), caffeine and nicotine comprised 96% of the total nonprescription pharmaceutical concentration. There are multiple pathways within the urban landscape for caffeine and nicotine (and their degradants) to enter stormwater including the improper disposal of caffeinated products and cigarette butts (76) and leaking sewage infrastructure. (68) Median detected concentrations of caffeine (942 ng/L), nicotine (782 ng/L), and acetaminophen (113 ng/L) measured in composite stormwater samples for this study were generally 4 times larger than median concentrations (207, 205, and 23.9 ng/L, respectively) reported in a recent stormwater study (using identical analytical methods) in which grab samples were collected. (13)
Overall, polychlorinated biphenyl/polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PCB/PBDEs) and biogenic hormones were detected less frequently and at lower concentrations than other chemical groups (Figures 1A and 3B), possibly in part from restricted PCB/PBDE use and limited sources of biogenic hormones across the urban landscape. The most frequently detected congeners were PBDE (22%) and PCB 138 (18%). Total PCB/PBDE concentrations in 12 samples from 6 sites ranged from 2 to 84 ng/L, with 6 samples exceeding the 14 ng/L chronic ALB for freshwater species. (77) cis-Androsterone was the most frequently detected (24%) biogenic hormone in this study and had a maximum concentration of 25 ng/L. Effects from exposure to cis-androsterone and other biogenic hormones in urban streams at low ng/L (5 ng/L) concentrations have been linked to reproductive and physiological effects in fish. (78)
Results indicate that urban stormwater is transporting an extensive mixture of organic contaminants with highly variable individual-component concentrations (Figures 13). The potential environmental effects from exposure to individual chemicals or chemical mixtures in stormwater samples are currently unknown or not well understood. (79) The organic chemicals detected in stormwater cause concern for aquatic organisms because many of the chemicals persisting in the environment are known carcinogens (PAHs and PCBs), bioactive (pesticides and pharmaceuticals), or hormonally active (biogenic hormones). The multiple detections per site (median of 73 compounds), the ng/L to μg/L individual concentrations, and sites with cumulative mixture concentrations exceeding 100 000 ng/L are concerning as adverse environmental effects have been documented for some individual designed-bioactive contaminants even at low ng/L concentrations. (72,79−82) This study provides a snapshot of stormwater runoff derived from randomly sampled sites and sampling days from across the U.S. and measured concentrations could vary temporally and spatially.

Influence of Hydrologic and Watershed Characteristics on Organic-Chemical Compositions, Concentrations, Loads, and Yields

Hydrologic/watershed characteristics (Table SI-1) and LULC metrics from the NLCD (36) (Table SI-11) were used to assess relations of these characteristics with cumulative-organic chemical detections, concentrations, loads (Table SI-12, Figure SI-5), and yields (Table SI-13, Figure SI-6). Spearman rank-order correlation identified significant (p-value <0.05) correlations between cumulative detections in stormwater samples and selected hydrologic/watershed characteristics (Table SI-14). There were positive correlations observed between cumulative detections and drainage area (p-value = 0.026, ρ = 0.317), developed high-intensity LULC (p-value <0.001, ρ = 0.492), and impervious LULC (p-value = 0.009, ρ = 0.368). Positive correlations were identified between cumulative concentrations in stormwater samples and developed high-intensity LULC (p-value = 0.014, ρ = 0.350, Table SI-15) and impervious LULC (p-value = 0.015, ρ = 0.346). Negative correlations were identified between cumulative concentrations and storm-event precipitation (p-value = 0.021, ρ = −0.328) and runoff volumes (p-value = 0.048, ρ = −0.284), emphasizing the importance of precipitation dilution as a potential control on stormwater organic contamination.
Expected positive correlations were observed between organic-chemical loads and site-specific runoff volumes (p-value <0.001, ρ = 0.883), drainage areas (p-value <0.001, ρ = 0.594), and storm event precipitation (p-value = 0.006, ρ = 0.385, Table SI-16). A positive correlation also was observed between organic-chemical loads and duration of antecedent dry days (p-value = 0.009, ρ = 0.368), consistent with previous findings that the duration of antecedent dry days is a driver of stormwater contaminant input. (8) A negative correlation was present between cumulative stormwater loads and developed low-intensity (e.g., residential) LULC (p-value = 0.008, ρ = −0.376). Positive correlations were identified between cumulative yields (load per unit area) and developed medium-intensity LULC (p-value = 0.014, ρ = 0.350), developed high-intensity LULC (p-value 0.001, ρ = 0.456), and impervious LULC (p-value <0.001, ρ = 0.528, Table SI-17). These results, which were generated using the largest national data set on organic stormwater contaminants to date, are consistent with previous studies with limited sites, geography, and chemical coverage and support the utility of LULC metrics as predictors of mixed-organic-contaminant complexity and the importance of developed LULC and impervious surfaces as stormwater-contaminant sources. (14,83)

Comparison of Organic Contamination in Urban Stormwater Runoff, Streams, and Treated Wastewater Discharge

Streams across the U.S. contain a diverse mixture of organic chemicals. (83−85) How compositions and concentrations of organic chemicals in U.S. streams compare with those in urban stormwater runoff is poorly documented, however. A comparison of results of the present stormwater study with a previous national study of 38 agricultural/developed impacted streams (83) (most organic chemicals analyzed using identical analytical methods) revealed many of the same chemicals in both stormwater runoff and agricultural/developed impacted streams with concentrations generally an order of magnitude greater in untreated stormwater runoff assessed in this study. A greater detection frequency (86%) and higher maximum concentrations (331 ng/L) of imidacloprid (agricultural and urban neonicotinoid insecticide) were observed in urban stormwater compared to a previous study of agricultural streams in the Midwestern U.S. following precipitation events (23% and 42.7 ng/L, respectively). (84)
Concentrations and loads observed in urban stormwater samples were compared with those reported in wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent (a source that is systematically monitored and regulated) to assess the relative contribution of untreated stormwater (infrequently monitored and regulated) as an episodic source of organic contamination to surface waters. Such a comparison revealed concentrations of pesticides (i.e., atrazine, carbendazim, diuron, and metolachlor) were generally larger in untreated stormwater samples compared with previous studies of pesticides in treated effluent from WWTPs. (86,87) However, the range of imidacloprid concentrations (4.9 to 331 ng/L, mean 48.2 ng/L) in our study were similar to those reported in a study of effluent from 13 WWTPs in the U.S. (20 to 143 ng/L, mean 48.6 ng/L). (88) Comparison with two previous studies on the occurrence and fate of PAHs in treated wastewater effluent (89,90) revealed 2 to 3 orders of magnitude greater PAH concentrations in urban stormwater. A global comparison of urban stormwater in our study to WWTP effluent in Asia, North America, Europe, and Italy (87,91−96) revealed: larger concentrations in urban stormwater for PAHs and bisphenol A; similar measured concentrations for metformin, acetaminophen, caffeine, lidocaine, household chemicals (DEET, tri(2-chloroethyl) phosphate, benzophenone, camphor, and triphenyl phosphate); and generally smaller concentrations in urban stormwater for prescription pharmaceuticals, cotinine, and biogenic hormones compared to WWTP effluent.
The length of the single-event storm durations ranged from 0.3 to 48 h with a median storm-event duration of 5 h (Table SI-1). Single-event total organic-chemical loads observed in urban stormwater spanned 5 orders of magnitude ranging from 4.0 to 104 500 g, with a median of 176 g (Figure SI-5, Table SI-12). By comparison, a study of 42 priority pollutants (including PAHs, industrial chemicals, and PCBs) in treated effluent from a WWTP with a daily treatment capacity of up to 30 million L/day from a highly industrial (44%) sewage grid reported a total load of 825 g/day (industrial chemicals 819 g/day, PAHs = 5.6 g/day, PCBs = <0.1 g/day). (97) Twenty-eight storm events in our study (median duration of 2.5 h) produced runoff volumes between 1 to 25 million L and contributed total loads up to 725 g for industrial chemicals, 562 g for PAH, and 0.5 g for PCBs. Eight storm events in this study (median duration of 7 h) produced runoff volumes ranging from 0.1 to 2.5 billion L and contributed substantially higher (up to 40 times) total industrial chemical loads (range 165 to 40 100 g, Table SI-12; mean 8 200 g, Figure SI-7).
A previous study of 21 PAHs and 13 PCBs in treated wastewater effluent from a larger-scale WWTP with a daily treatment capacity of 1.3 billion L/day from a domestic (85%) sewage grid reported a total load of 703 g/day (PAHs 700 g/day, PCBs 3 g/day). (90) In the present study, large single-event (7 h median duration) untreated urban runoff volumes (0.1 to 2.5 billion L) contributed substantially larger total PAH loads that ranged from 9.6 to 2 820 g (mean 822 g, Figure SI-7) and substantially larger total PCBs loads up to 211 g (mean 27.1 g) than daily loads from WWTPs. In a national mass-balance assessment of neonicotinoid insecticides in 13 WWTPs across the U.S., imidacloprid was shown to persist through the wastewater treatment process of one example WWTP (870 million L/day treatment capacity) with loads of 12 g/day to surface waters. (88) Imidacloprid loads in untreated urban stormwater samples were generally larger and ranged from 2 to 68 g (mean 19 g) in large single-event stormwater runoff volumes (0.1–2.5 billion L). In contrast, a comparison of prescription pharmaceutical and biogenic hormone loadings in the present stormwater study with two comprehensive reviews of WWTP loads (98,99) suggests generally lower pharmaceutical and biogenic hormone loadings from stormwater.
Organic-chemical concentrations and loads from single-event runoff volumes that were similar to daily treated volumes for WWTPs indicate that untreated urban stormwater potentially contributes (1) substantially larger loads of PAHs, pesticides, and PCBs; (2) similar loads of household chemicals, industrial chemicals, and nonprescription pharmaceuticals; and (3) generally smaller loads of prescription pharmaceuticals, biogenic hormones, and plant animal sterols. The results indicate untreated stormwater is an important episodic source to surface waters of organic contaminants at levels comparable to and often exceeding those from the well-recognized, persistent treated WWTP effluent sources.

Inorganic Characterization of Urban Stormwater Runoff

In general, the inorganic chemical concentrations in the urban stormwater samples were relatively dilute as suggested by specific conductance values that ranged from 38 to 1 074 μS/cm (median of 164 μS/cm) and low concentrations of trace elements, anions, and cations (Figure SI-8, Tables SI-18 and SI-19). (50,51) Chloride (Cl) and bicarbonate (HCO3, as alkalinity) were the most abundant anions ranging from 817 to 196 000 μg/L and 22 700 to 379 000 μg/L, respectively (Table SI-19). By comparison, Cl ranged from 46 000 to 199 000 μg/L in a study of tertiary treated wastewater effluent. (100) No stormwater Cl concentrations exceeded the 230 000 μg/L chronic ALB. (77) Sulfate (SO42–) in stormwater had a maximum of 102 000 μg/L. Fluoride and phosphate (PO43–) were both rarely observed in detectable concentrations (each detected in two samples). Dissolved phosphorus (P) was detected in all samples with concentrations that ranged from 4 to 778 μg/L with a median = 92 μg/L, with 73% of the stormwater samples exceeding the total P criteria of 37 μg/L for scenic rivers in states developing numeric water-quality criteria for total phosphorus. (101) Elevated levels of nutrients, such as P, and PO43– can cause water-quality and ecological problems in aquatic systems including fish kills, toxic algal blooms, depleted oxygen, and loss of biodiversity of species important for commerce and recreation. (102) Decreasing P inputs to surface waters is a priority for many stormwater managers and SCM projects. (103)
The major cation composition of urban stormwater was dominated by Na+ and Ca2+ (Table SI-19). The maximum Ca2+ concentration of 89 200 μg/L was measured in the same water as the maximum alkalinity, whereas the maximum Na+ concentration of 95 900 μg/L was measured in the same water as the maximum Cl concentration. Magnesium (Mg2+) concentrations ranged from 488 to 26 800 μg/L, with the highest concentration found at MN-I, a calcium–carbonate dominated water. Both Ca2+ and Mg2+ are considered beneficial components of drinking water and provide numerous health benefits. (104) In contrast, there is global concern about the increasing salinization of freshwater from anthropogenic sources, such as road deicing salt, (105,106) and the costs associated with the loss of ecosystem services, biodiversity, recreational opportunities, and effects on human health. (107) Cl and Na+ concentrations in our national study, which included stormwater samples collected across all seasons and all climates, were substantially smaller than those reported in urban stormwater from sites in cold climates (108) and similar to concentrations in previous stormwater studies. (106,109)
Dissolved metals measured in the present stormwater study are more likely than particulate-associated metals to infiltrate into groundwater when stormwater is infiltrated into the subsurface. (110) According to a recent study, cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), lead (Pb), manganese (Mn), aluminum (Al), and iron (Fe) in stormwater can pose human or recreational health risks even at low concentrations when heavy metals are present as a mixture. (23) Median concentrations for Cd, Cr, Pb, Mn, Al, and Fe in the stormwater samples from this study were lower than the concentrations predicted from previous research to cause negative effects to aquatic organisms (Tables SI-18 and SI-19). (23) Metals such as barium (Ba), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn) are closely linked to stormwater runoff because of their widespread use in construction and transportation activities. (111) In this study, the median stormwater concentrations of Ba (16 μg/L), Cu (5.5 μg/L), and Zn (15 μg/L) were lower than median concentrations reported in previous stormwater studies. (112,113) Other metal concentrations were also generally low in stormwater samples and maximum concentrations for Cd (0.37 μg/L), Pb (2.1 μg/L), arsenic (As, 3.2 μg/L), nickel (Ni, 15 μg/L), total mercury (Hg, 0.18 μg/L), and Fe (325 μg/L) did not exceed chronic ALB (0.72, 2.5, 150, 52.0, 0.77, and 1000 μg/L, respectively). (77)
In a recent review, rare earth elements (REEs) were described as an overlooked group of emerging contaminants that pose human and ecological health risks and warrant further assessment of potential impacts on surface water and groundwater systems. (114,115) The use of REEs is expected to continue to increase due to their importance in many emerging industries, including the alternative energy sector (i.e., wind turbines, electric cars, solar panels). The REEs consist of 14 elements with similar charge and ionic radius and have been widely used as geochemical indicators of hydrogeological processes. (116,117) Measurements of REEs in stormwater can be especially useful for identifying natural versus anthropogenic sources of contaminants. (115,118) For example, anthropogenic gadolinium (Gdanthro) is a synthetic organic Gd complex used in medical diagnostics, (119,120) and a Gdanthro/Gdbackground ratio >1.5 is a useful indicator of municipal wastewater effluent contribution. (120) Based on ratios from samples in this study, the presence of wastewater was greatest at the CA2-I and IN sites and to a lesser extent at sites NY-I, MI, and AZ1 (Figure SI-9). The analysis of REEs to indicate municipal wastewater coupled with frequent detection of pharmaceutical waste indicators (metformin, acetaminophen, and lidocaine) in the current study supports previous research that stormwater is often contaminated with human waste. (68)
Even though total Hg was measured in stormwater samples at low concentrations that ranged from 0.004 to 0.18 μg/L (well below the 0.77 μg/L chronic ALB), stormwater remains a substantial source of Hg and could pose negative implications for SCMs that favor methylation of inorganic Hg to MeHg (Table SI-18 and Figure SI-10). MeHg is a highly toxic bioaccumulative neurotoxin that is widely recognized as a concern in surface waters, natural wetlands, (121,122) and more recently in stormwater retention ponds and constructed wetlands. (17) MeHg was measured in 90% of stormwater samples at concentrations that ranged from 0.05 to 1.0 ng/L (Table SI-18, Figure SI-10). The median MeHg concentration for this national study of urban stormwater (0.19 ng/L) was similar to medians reported in a national study of U.S. streams (0.11 ng/L) (123) and streams draining abandoned Hg mines (0.04 ng/L). (124) Total Hg and MeHg concentrations observed in this study suggest that SCMs that incorporate stormwater retention ponds or constructed wetlands should consider the potential exposure implications in these environments.

Implications for Environmental Receptors and Stormwater Reuse

This national-scale study provides the most comprehensive representative snapshot of the urban stormwater-contaminant profile derived from randomly sampled sites and sampling days from across the U.S. to date. The effects from exposure to complex organic and inorganic contaminant mixtures at low concentrations are poorly understood, and a range of potential mixture effects are possible even when each individual chemical is present in a mixture at low concentrations determined not to have individual effects. (79,81,82) Many organic and inorganic chemicals detected in the untreated stormwater samples in the present study are known to persist in the environment and, therefore, might be of priority concern for stormwater SCMs or municipal reuse and in terms of potential biological exposures and effects to receiving streams. This study underscores the need for continued assessment of exposures and potential synergistic effects of contaminant mixtures in stormwater, potential contaminant source tracking and mitigation methods, and studies of the fate, transport, and persistence of stormwater contaminants infiltrated to groundwater.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02867.

  • Method details, sampling information, and additional sample results (PDF)

  • Additional sampling information and characterization data (XLSX)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This research was conducted and funded by the Toxic Substances Hydrology and Contaminant Biology programs of the U.S. Geological Survey Environmental Health Mission Area and the Office of Research and Development of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The authors thank William Battaglin, Martin Brown, Robert Darner, David Fairbairn, Shawn Fisher, Ken Fossum, and Teresa Rasmussen for help with the field samples, Kelly Smalling and Tim Canfield for the manuscript review, and Rose Jordan for help with the graphics. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 124 other publications.

  1. 1
    United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2000 National Water Quality Inventory Report to Congress, https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/2000_national_water_quality_inventory_report_to_congress.pdf (accessed April 12, 2019).
  2. 2
    Eckley, C. S.; Branfireun, B. Mercury Mobilization in Urban Stormwater Runoff. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 403, 164177,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.05.021
  3. 3
    Göbel, P.; Dierkes, C.; Coldewey, W. G. Storm Water Runoff Concentration Matrix for Urban Areas. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2007, 91 (1–2), 2642,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.08.008
  4. 4
    Zgheib, S.; Moilleron, R.; Chebbo, G. Priority Pollutants in Urban Stormwater: Part 1 - Case of Separate Storm Sewers. Water Res. 2012, 46 (20), 66836692,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.012
  5. 5
    Zgheib, S.; Moilleron, R.; Saad, M.; Chebbo, G. Partition of Pollution between Dissolved and Particulate Phases: What about Emerging Substances in Urban Stormwater Catchments?. Water Res. 2011, 45 (2), 913925,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.032
  6. 6
    Brown, J. N.; Peake, B. M. Sources of Heavy Metals and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Urban Stormwater Runoff. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 359, 145155,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.05.016
  7. 7
    Paul, M. J.; Meyer, J. L. Streams in the Urban Landscape. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2001, 32 (1), 333365,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040
  8. 8
    Pitt, R.; Field, R.; Lalor, M.; Brown, M. Urban Stormwater Toxic Pollutants: Assessment, Sources, and Treatability. Water Environ. Res. 1995, 67 (3), 260275,  DOI: 10.2175/106143095X131466
  9. 9
    Tedoldi, D.; Chebbo, G.; Pierlot, D.; Branchu, P.; Kovacs, Y.; Gromaire, M. C. Spatial Distribution of Heavy Metals in the Surface Soil of Source-Control Stormwater Infiltration Devices – Inter-Site Comparison. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 881892,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.226
  10. 10
    Mahler, B. J.; Van Metre, P. C.; Crane, J. L.; Watts, A. W.; Scoggins, M.; Williams, E. S. Coal-Tar-Based Pavement Sealcoat and PAHs: Implications for the Environment, Human Health, and Stormwater Management. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46 (6), 30393045,  DOI: 10.1021/es203699x
  11. 11
    Mahler, B. J.; Van Metre, P. C.; Bashara, T. J.; Wilson, J. T.; Johns, D. A. Parking Lot Sealcoat: An Unrecognized Source of Urban Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39 (15), 55605566,  DOI: 10.1021/es0501565
  12. 12
    Van Metre, P. C.; Mahler, B. J.; Furlong, E. T. Urban Sprawl Leaves Its PAH Signature. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34 (19), 40644070,  DOI: 10.1021/es991007n
  13. 13
    Fairbairn, D. J.; Elliott, S. M.; Kiesling, R. L.; Schoenfuss, H. L.; Ferrey, M. L.; Westerhoff, B. M. Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Urban Stormwater: Spatiotemporal Patterns and Removal by Iron-Enhanced Sand Filters (IESFs). Water Res. 2018, 145, 332345,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.08.020
  14. 14
    Burant, A.; Selbig, W.; Furlong, E. T.; Higgins, C. P. Trace Organic Contaminants in Urban Runoff: Associations with Urban Land-Use. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 242, 20682077,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.066
  15. 15
    Eriksson, E.; Baun, A.; Mikkelsen, P. S.; Ledin, A. Risk Assessment of Xenobiotics in Stormwater Discharged to Harrestrup Å, Denmark. Desalination 2007, 215 (1–3), 187197,  DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.12.008
  16. 16
    Gan, J.; Bondarenko, S.; Oki, L.; Haver, D.; Li, J. X. Occurrence of Fipronil and Its Biologically Active Derivatives in Urban Residential Runoff. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46 (3), 14891495,  DOI: 10.1021/es202904x
  17. 17
    Strickman, R. J.; Mitchell, C. P. J. Methylmercury Production and Accumulation in Urban Stormwater Ponds and Habitat Wetlands. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 221, 326334,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.082
  18. 18
    Chong, M. N.; Sidhu, J.; Aryal, R.; Tang, J.; Gernjak, W.; Escher, B.; Toze, S. Urban Stormwater Harvesting and Reuse: A Probe into the Chemical, Toxicology and Microbiological Contaminants in Water Quality. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185 (8), 66456652,  DOI: 10.1007/s10661-012-3053-7
  19. 19
    Gołdyn, R.; Szpakowska, B.; Świerk, D.; Domek, P.; Buxakowski, J.; Dondajewska, R.; Barałkiewicz, D.; Sajnóg, A. Influence of Stormwater Runoff on Macroinvertebrates in a Small Urban River and a Reservoir. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 625, 743751,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.324
  20. 20
    Pratt, J. M.; Coler, R. A.; Godfrey, P. J. Ecological Effects of Urban Stormwater Runoff on Benthic Macroinvertebrates Inhabiting the Green River, Massachusetts. Hydrobiologia 1981, 83, 2942,  DOI: 10.1007/BF02187149
  21. 21
    Ma, Y.; Liu, A.; Egodawatta, P.; McGree, J.; Goonetilleke, A. Assessment and Management of Human Health Risk from Toxic Metals and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Urban Stormwater Arising from Anthropogenic Activities and Traffic Congestion. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 202211,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.015
  22. 22
    Haile, R. W.; Witte, J. S.; Gold, M.; Cressey, R.; McGee, C.; Millikan, R. C.; Glasser, A.; Harawa, N.; Ervin, C.; Harmon, P. The Health Effects of Swimming in Ocean Water Contaminated by Storm Drain Runoff. Epidemiology 1999, 10 (4), 355363,  DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199907000-00004
  23. 23
    Ma, Y.; Egodawatta, P.; McGree, J.; Liu, A.; Goonetilleke, A. Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Urban Stormwater. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 557–558, 764772,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.067
  24. 24
    Soller, J.; Bartrand, T.; Ravenscroft, J.; Molina, M.; Whelan, G.; Schoen, M.; Ashbolt, N. Estimated Human Health Risks from Recreational Exposures to Stormwater Runoff Containing Animal Faecal Material. Environ. Model. Softw. 2015, 72, 2132,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.05.018
  25. 25
    Young, A.; Kochenkov, V.; McIntyre, J. K.; Stark, J. D.; Coffin, A. B. Urban Stormwater Runoff Negatively Impacts Lateral Line Development in Larval Zebrafish and Salmon Embryos. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2830,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21209-z
  26. 26
    Datry, T.; Malard, F.; Gibert, J. Dynamics of Solutes and Dissolved Oxygen in Shallow Urban Groundwater below a Stormwater Infiltration Basin. Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 329 (1–3), 215229,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.02.022
  27. 27
    Edwards, E. C.; Harter, T.; Fogg, G. E.; Washburn, B.; Hamad, H. Assessing the Effectiveness of Drywells as Tools for Stormwater Management and Aquifer Recharge and Their Groundwater Contamination Potential. J. Hydrol. 2016, 539, 539553,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.059
  28. 28
    Fischer, D.; Charles, E. G.; Baehr, A. L. Effects of Stormwater Infiltration on Quality of Groundwater Beneath Retention and Detention Basins. J. Environ. Eng. 2003, 129 (5), 464471,  DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:5(464)
  29. 29
    Lewellyn, C.; Lyons, C. E.; Traver, R. G.; Wadzuk, B. M. Evaluation of Seasonal and Large Storm Runoff Volume Capture of an Infiltration Green Infrastructure System. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2016, 21 (1), 04015047  DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001257
  30. 30
    Mrowiec, M. Road Runoff Management Using Improved Infiltration Ponds. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 14, 26592667,  DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.435
  31. 31
    Pitt, R.; Clark, S.; Field, R. Groundwater Contamination Potential from Stormwater Infiltration Practices. Urban Water 1999, 1 (3), 217236,  DOI: 10.1016/S1462-0758(99)00014-X
  32. 32
    Tedoldi, D.; Chebbo, G.; Pierlot, D.; Branchu, P.; Kovacs, Y.; Gromaire, M. C. Spatial Distribution of Heavy Metals in the Surface Soil of Source-Control Stormwater Infiltration Devices – Inter-Site Comparison. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 881892,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.226
  33. 33
    Tedoldi, D.; Chebbo, G.; Pierlot, D.; Kovacs, Y.; Gromaire, M. C. Impact of Runoff Infiltration on Contaminant Accumulation and Transport in the Soil/Filter Media of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems: A Literature Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 569–570, 904926,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.215
  34. 34
    Luthy, R. G.; Sharvelle, S.; Dillon, P. Urban Stormwater to Enhance Water Supply. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 5534,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05913
  35. 35
    Center for Watershed Protection. National Pollutant Removal Performance Database, http://www.stormwaterok.net/CWP%20Documents/CWP-07%20Natl%20Pollutant%20Removal%20Perform%20Database.pdf (accessed September 20, 2018).
  36. 36
    Homer, C.; Dewitz, J.; Yang, L.; Jin, S.; Danielson, P.; Xian, G.; Coulston, J. W.; Herold, N.; Wickham, J.; Megown, K. Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the Conterminous United States - Representing a Decade of Land Cover Change Information. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 2015, 81, 345354
  37. 37
    Wilde, F. D., Radtke, D. B., Gibs, J., Iwatsubo, R. T., Eds. Processing of Water Samples (ver. 2.2). In U.S. Geological Survey Techniques for Water Resources Investigations, Book 9, Section A, Chapter A5; U.S. Geological Survey, 2002; p 166.
  38. 38
    Furlong, E. T.; Kanagy, C. J.; Kanagy, L. K.; Coffey, L. J.; Burkhardt, M. R. Determination of Human-Use Pharmaceuticals in Filtered Water by Direct Aqueous Injection–High-Performance Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry. In U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods; Book 5, Section B, Chapter B10, U.S. Geological Survey, 2014; DOI: 10.3133/tm5B10 .
  39. 39
    Foreman, W. T.; Gray, J. L.; ReVello, R. C.; Lindley, C. E.; Losche, S. A.; Barber, L. B. Determination of Steroid Hormones and Related Compounds in Filtered and Unfiltered Water by Solid-Phase Extraction, Derivatization, and Gas Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometry. In U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, Book 5, Chapter B9; U.S. Geological Survey, 2012; DOI: 10.3133/tm5B9 .
  40. 40
    Zaugg, S. D.; Smith, S. G.; Schroeder, M. P.; Barber, L. B.; Burkhardt, M. R. Determination of Wastewater Compounds by Polystyrene-Divinylbenzene Solid-Phase Extraction and Capillary-Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. In U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, Book 5, Chapter B2; U.S. Geological Survey, 2006.
  41. 41
    Hladik, M. L.; Smalling, K. L.; Kuivila, K. M. A Multi-Residue Method for the Analysis of Pesticides and Pesticide Degradates in Water Using HLB Solid-Phase Extraction and Gas Chromatography-Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2008, 80 (2), 139144,  DOI: 10.1007/s00128-007-9332-2
  42. 42
    Hladik, M. L.; Calhoun, D. Analysis of the Herbicide Diuron, Three Diuron Degradates, and Six Neonicotinoid Insecticides in Water—Method Details and Application to Two Georgia Streams. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5206; U.S. Geological Survey, 2012.
  43. 43
    Fishman, M. J. Methods of Analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory; Determination of Inorganic and Organic Constituents in Water and Fluvial Sediments, Open-File Report 93-125, U.S. Geological Survey, 1993.
  44. 44
    De Wild, J. F.; Olson, M. L.; Olund, S. D. Determination of Methyl Mercury by Aqueous Phase Ethylation, Followed by Gas Chromatographic Separation with Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescene Detection, Open-File Report 01-445, U.S. Geological Survey, 2002.
  45. 45
    Masoner, J. R.; Kolpin, D. W.; Furlong, E. T.; Cozzarelli, I. M.; Gray, J. L.; Schwab, E. A. Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Fresh Leachate from Landfills in the Conterminous United States. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2014, 16 (10), 23352354,  DOI: 10.1039/C4EM00124A
  46. 46
    Barber, L. B.; Paschke, S. S.; Battaglin, W. A.; Douville, C.; Fitzgerald, K. C.; Keefe, S. H.; Roth, D. A.; Vajda, A. M. Effects of an Extreme Flood on Trace Elements in River Water—From Urban Stream to Major River Basin. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 10344,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01767
  47. 47
    U.S. EPA. Method 1631: Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry, Document 821-R-96-012, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002.
  48. 48
    Révész, K.; Coplen, T. B. Determination of the d(18O/16O) of Water: RSIL Lab Code 489. In Methods of the Reston Stable Isotope Laboratory, Book 10, Section C, Chapter 2, U.S. Geological Survey; 2008; p 28.
  49. 49
    Révész, K.; Coplen, T. B. Determination of the δ(2H/1H) of Water: RSIL Lab Code 1574. In Methods of the Reston Stable Isotope Laboratory, Book 10, Section C, Chapter 2, U.S. Geological Survey, 2008; p 27.
  50. 50
    Jaeschke, J. B.; Cozzarelli, I. M.; Masoner, J. R.; Fleger, K. L. Geochemical Composition of Urban Stormwater Runoff Within the Conterminous United States from Samples Collected in 2016–2017 , U.S. Geological Survey data release, 2018; DOI: 10.5066/P9Q7MD9J .
  51. 51
    Keefe, S. H.; Barber, L. B.; Roth, D. A.; Masoner, J. R.; Bradley, P. M.; Kolpin, D. W. Survey of Major and Trace Elements in Stormwater Runoff from across the United States, 2016 to 2017 , U.S. Geological Survey data release, 2018; DOI: 10.5066/P90YU8VB .
  52. 52
    Bojes, H. K.; Pope, P. G. Characterization of EPA’s 16 Priority Pollutant Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Tank Bottom Solids and Associated Contaminated Soils at Oil Exploration and Production Sites in Texas. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2007, 47 (3), 288295,  DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.11.007
  53. 53
    Lyons, B. P.; Pascoe, C. K.; McFadzen, I. R. B. Phototoxicity of Pyrene and Benzo[a]Pyrene to Embryo-Larval Stages of the Pacific Oyster Crassostrea Gigas. Mar. Environ. Res. 2002, 54 (3), 627631,  DOI: 10.1016/S0141-1136(02)00124-1
  54. 54
    Douben, P. E. T. PAHs: An Ecotoxicological Perspective; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: West Suxxex, England, 2003.
  55. 55
    Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=122&tid=25 (accessed April 14, 2019).
  56. 56
    van Brummelen, T. C.; van Hattum, A. G. M.; Crommentuijn, T.; Kalf, D. F. Bioavailability and Ecotoxicity of PAHs. In The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Vol. 3, Part J: PAHs and Related Compounds; Springer-Verlag, 1998; pp 203263.
  57. 57
    Ireland, D. S.; Burton, G. A., Jr.; Hess, G. G. In Situ Toxicity Evaluations of Turbidity and Photoinduction of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1996, 15 (4), 574581,  DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620150424
  58. 58
    Diamond, S. A.; Milroy, N. J.; Mattson, V. R.; Heinis, L. J.; Mount, D. R. Photoactivated Toxicity in Amphipods Collected from Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Sites. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2003, 22, 27522760
  59. 59
    Douben, P. E. T. Assessing Risks from Photoactivated Toxicity of PAHs to Aquatic Organisms. In PAHs: Ecotoxicological Perspective; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2003; pp 275296.
  60. 60
    Bryer, P. J.; Elliott, J. N.; Willingham, E. J. The Effects of Coal Tar Based Pavement Sealer on Amphibian Development and Metamorphosis. Ecotoxicology 2006, 15, 241247,  DOI: 10.1007/s10646-005-0055-z
  61. 61
    Bommarito, T.; Sparling, D. W.; Halbrook, R. S. Toxicity of Coal-Tar Pavement Sealants and Ultraviolet Radiation to Ambystoma Maculatum. Ecotoxicology 2010, 19, 11471156,  DOI: 10.1007/s10646-010-0498-8
  62. 62
    Jiang, J.; Wu, S.; Wang, Y.; An, X.; Cai, L.; Zhao, X.; Wu, C. Carbendazim Has the Potential to Induce Oxidative Stress, Apoptosis, Immunotoxicity and Endocrine Disruption during Zebrafish Larvae Development. Toxicol. In Vitro 2015, 29 (7), 14731481,  DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2015.06.003
  63. 63
    Weston, D. P.; Chen, D.; Lydy, M. J. Stormwater-Related Transport of the Insecticides Bifenthrin, Fipronil, Imidacloprid, and Chlorpyrifos into a Tidal Wetland, San Francisco Bay, California. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 527–528, 1825,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.095
  64. 64
    Hladik, M. L.; Kolpin, D. W. First National-Scale Reconnaissance of Neonicotinoid Insecticides in Streams across the USA. Environ. Chem. 2016, 13 (1), 1220,  DOI: 10.1071/EN15061
  65. 65
    United States Environmental Protection Agency. Aquatic Life Benchmarks and Ecological Risk Assessments for Registered Pesticides, https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/aquatic-life-benchmarks-and-ecological-risk (accessed April 9, 2019).
  66. 66
    Gerecke, A. C.; Scharer, M.; Singer, H. P.; Muller, S. R.; Schwarzenbach, R. P.; Sagesser, M.; Ochsenbein, U.; Popow, G. Sources of Pesticides in Surface Waters in Switzerland: Pesticide Load through Waste Water Treatment Plants––Current Situation and Reduction Potential. Chemosphere 2002, 48, 307315,  DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00080-2
  67. 67
    Rasmussen, J. J.; Wiberg-Larsen, P.; Baattrup-Pedersen, A.; Cedergreen, N.; McKnight, U. S.; Kreuger, J.; Jacobsen, D.; Kristensen, E. A.; Friberg, N. The Legacy of Pesticide Pollution: An Overlooked Factor in Current Risk Assessments of Freshwater Systems. Water Res. 2015, 84, 2532,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.07.021
  68. 68
    Sidhu, J. P. S.; Ahmed, W.; Gernjak, W.; Aryal, R.; McCarthy, D.; Palmer, A.; Kolotelo, P.; Toze, S. Sewage Pollution in Urban Stormwater Runoff as Evident from the Widespread Presence of Multiple Microbial and Chemical Source Tracking Markers. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 463–464, 488496,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.020
  69. 69
    Oosterhuis, M.; Sacher, F.; ter Laak, T. L. Prediction of Concentration Levels of Metformin and Other High Consumption Pharmaceuticals in Wastewater and Regional Surface Water Based on Sales Data. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 442, 380388,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.046
  70. 70
    Tisler, S.; Zwiener, C. Formation and Occurrence of Transformation Products of Metformin in Wastewater and Surface Water. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 628–629, 11211129,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.105
  71. 71
    Bradley, P. M.; Journey, C. A.; Button, D. T.; Carlisle, D. M.; Clark, J. M.; Mahler, B. J.; Nakagaki, N.; Qi, S. L.; Waite, I. R.; Vanmetre, P. C. Metformin and Other Pharmaceuticals Widespread in Wadeable Streams of the Southeastern United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2016, 3, 243249,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00170
  72. 72
    Niemuth, N. J.; Klaper, R. D. Emerging Wastewater Contaminant Metformin Causes Intersex and Reduced Fecundity in Fish. Chemosphere 2015, 135, 3845,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.060
  73. 73
    Bradley, P. M.; Barber, L. B.; Duris, J. W.; Foreman, W. T.; Furlong, E. T.; Hubbard, L. E.; Hutchinson, K. J.; Keefe, S. H.; Kolpin, D. W. Riverbank Fi Ltration Potential of Pharmaceuticals in a Wastewater-Impacted Stream. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 193, 173180,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.06.028
  74. 74
    Underwood, J. C.; Harvey, R. W.; Metge, D. W.; Repert, D. A.; Baumgartner, L. K.; Smith, R. L.; Roane, T. M.; Barber, L. B. Effects of the Antimicrobial Sulfamethoxazole on Groundwater Bacterial Enrichment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (7), 30963101,  DOI: 10.1021/es103605e
  75. 75
    Haack, S. K.; Metge, D. W.; Fogarty, L. R.; Meyer, M. T.; Barber, L. B.; Harvey, R. W.; LeBlanc, D. R.; Kolpin, D. W. Effects on Groundwater Microbial Communities of an Engineered 30-Day In Situ Exposure to the Antibiotic Sulfamethoxazole. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46 (14), 74787486,  DOI: 10.1021/es3009776
  76. 76
    Roder Green, A. L.; Putschew, A.; Nehls, T. Littered Cigarette Butts as a Source of Nicotine in Urban Waters. J. Hydrol. 2014, 519, 34663474,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.046
  77. 77
    United States Environmental Protection Agency. National Recommended Water Quality Criteria- Aquatic Life Criteria Table, https://www.epa.gov/wqc/national-recommended-water-quality-criteria-aquatic-life-criteria-table (accessed April 18, 2019).
  78. 78
    Barber, L. B.; Brown, G. K.; Nettesheim, T. G.; Murphy, E. W.; Bartell, S. E.; Schoenfuss, H. L. Effects of Biologically-Active Chemical Mixtures on Fish in a Wastewater-Impacted Urban Stream. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409 (22), 47204728,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.039
  79. 79
    Vasquez, M. I.; Lambrianides, A.; Schneider, M.; Kümmerer, K.; Fatta-Kassinos, D. Environmental Side Effects of Pharmaceutical Cocktails: What We Know and What We Should Know. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 279, 169189,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.069
  80. 80
    Kidd, K. A.; Paterson, M. J.; Rennie, M. D.; Podemski, C. L.; Findlay, D. L.; Blanchfield, P. J.; Liber, K. Direct and Indirect Responses of a Freshwater Food Web to a Potent Synthetic Oestrogen. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., B 2014, 369, 20130578,  DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0578
  81. 81
    Kong, L.; Kadokami, K.; Duong, H. T.; Chau, H. T. C. Screening of 1300 Organic Micro-Pollutants in Groundwater from Beijing and Tianjin, North China. Chemosphere 2016, 165, 221230,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.084
  82. 82
    Futran Fuhrman, V.; Tal, A.; Arnon, S. Why Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) Challenge Traditional Risk Assessment and How to Respond. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 286, 589611,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.012
  83. 83
    Bradley, P. M.; Journey, C. A.; Romanok, K. M.; Barber, L. B.; Buxton, H. T.; Foreman, W. T.; Furlong, E. T.; Glassmeyer, S. T.; Hladik, M. L.; Iwanowicz, L. R. Expanded Target-Chemical Analysis Reveals Extensive Mixed-Organic-Contaminant Exposure in US Streams. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51 (9), 47924802,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00012
  84. 84
    Hladik, M. L.; Kolpin, D. W.; Kuivila, K. M. Widespread Occurrence of Neonicotinoid Insecticides in Streams in a High Corn and Soybean Producing Region, USA. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 193, 189196,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.06.033
  85. 85
    Kolpin, D. W.; Furlong, E. T.; Meyer, M. T.; Thurman, E. M.; Zaugg, S. D.; Barber, L. B.; Buxton, H. T. Pharmaceuticals, Hormones, and Other Organic Wastewater Contaminants in U.S. Streams, 1999–2000: A National Reconnaissance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36 (6), 12021211,  DOI: 10.1021/es011055j
  86. 86
    Köck-Schulmeyer, M.; Villagrasa, M.; López de Alda, M.; Céspedes-Sánchez, R.; Ventura, F.; Barceló, D. Occurrence and Behavior of Pesticides in Wastewater Treatment Plants and Their Environmental Impact. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 458–460, 466476,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.010
  87. 87
    Margot, J.; Rossi, L.; Barry, D. A.; Holliger, C. A Review of the Fate of Micropollutants in Wastewater Treatment Plants. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Water 2015, 2, 457487,  DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1090
  88. 88
    Sadaria, A. M.; Supowit, S. D.; Halden, R. U. Mass Balance Assessment for Six Neonicotinoid Insecticides during Conventional Wastewater and Wetland Treatment: Nationwide Reconnaissance in United States Wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50 (12), 61996206,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01032
  89. 89
    Sun, S.; Jia, L.; Li, B.; Yuan, A.; Kong, L.; Qi, H.; Ma, W.; Zhang, A.; Wu, Y. The Occurrence and Fate of PAHs over Multiple Years in a Wastewater Treatment Plant of Harbin, Northeast China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 624, 491498,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.029
  90. 90
    Pham, T.-T.; Proulx, S. PCBs and PAHs in the Montreal Urban Community (Quebec, Canada) Wastewater Treatment Plant and in the Efflent Plume in the ST Lawrence River. Water Res. 1997, 31 (8), 18871896,  DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00025-0
  91. 91
    Castiglioni, S.; Davoli, E.; Riva, F.; Palmiotto, M.; Camporini, P.; Manenti, A.; Zuccato, E. Mass Balance of Emerging Contaminants in the Water Cycle of a Highly Urbanized and Industrialized Area of Italy. Water Res. 2018, 131, 287298,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.047
  92. 92
    Tran, N. H.; Reinhard, M.; Gin, K. Y. H. Occurrence and Fate of Emerging Contaminants in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants from Different Geographical Regions-a Review. Water Res. 2018, 133, 182207,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.029
  93. 93
    Cabeza, Y.; Candela, L.; Ronen, D.; Teijon, G. Monitoring the Occurrence of Emerging Contaminants in Treated Wastewater and Groundwater between 2008 and 2010. The Baix Llobregat (Barcelona, Spain). J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 239–240, 3239,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.032
  94. 94
    Luo, Y.; Guo, W.; Ngo, H. H.; Nghiem, L. D.; Hai, F. I.; Zhang, J.; Liang, S.; Wang, X. C. A Review on the Occurrence of Micropollutants in the Aquatic Environment and Their Fate and Removal during Wastewater Treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 473–474, 619641,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.065
  95. 95
    Rúa-Gómez, P. C.; Püttmann, W. Impact of Wastewater Treatment Plant Discharge of Lidocaine, Tramadol, Venlafaxine and Their Metabolites on the Quality of Surface Waters and Groundwater. J. Environ. Monit. 2012, 14 (5), 13911399,  DOI: 10.1039/c2em10950f
  96. 96
    Ratola, N.; Cincinelli, A.; Alves, A.; Katsoyiannis, A. Occurrence of Organic Microcontaminants in the Wastewater Treatment Process. A Mini Review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 239–240, 118,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.040
  97. 97
    Sánchez-Avila, J.; Bonet, J.; Velasco, G.; Lacorte, S. Determination and Occurrence of Phthalates, Alkylphenols, Bisphenol A, PBDEs, PCBs and PAHs in an Industrial Sewage Grid Discharging to a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407 (13), 41574167,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.03.016
  98. 98
    Yang, Y.; Ok, Y. S.; Kim, K. H.; Kwon, E. E.; Tsang, Y. F. Occurrences and Removal of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs) in Drinking Water and Water/Sewage Treatment Plants: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 596–597, 303320,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.102
  99. 99
    Verlicchi, P.; Al Aukidy, M.; Zambello, E. Occurrence of Pharmaceutical Compounds in Urban Wastewater: Removal, Mass Load and Environmental Risk after a Secondary Treatment-A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 429, 123155,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.028
  100. 100
    Lubello, C.; Gori, R.; Nicese, F. P.; Ferrini, F. Municipal-Treated Wastewater Reuse for Plant Nurseries Irrigation. Water Res. 2004, 38, 29392947,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.037
  101. 101
    United States Environmental Protection Agency. State Progress Toward Developing Numeric Nutrient Water Quality Criteria for Nitrogen and Phosphorus, https://www.epa.gov/nutrient-policy-data/state-progress-toward-developing-numeric-nutrient-water-quality-criteria (accessed April 18, 2019).
  102. 102
    Carpenter, S. R.; Caraco, N. F.; Correll, D. L.; Howarth, R. W.; Sharpley, A. N.; Smith, V. H. Nonpoint Pollution of Surface Waters with Phosphorus and Nitrogen. Ecol. Appl. 1998, 8 (3), 559568,  DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO;2
  103. 103
    Selbig, W. R. Evaluation of Leaf Removal as a Means to Reduce Nutrient Concentrations and Loads in Urban Stormwater. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 571, 124133,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.003
  104. 104
    World Health Organization. Calcium and Magnesium in Drinking-Water: Public Health Significance; Cotruvo, J., Bartram, J., Eds.; World Health Organization Press: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
  105. 105
    Marsalek, J. Road Salts in Urban Stormwater: An Emerging Issue in Stormwater Management in Cold Climates. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 48 (9), 6170,  DOI: 10.2166/wst.2003.0493
  106. 106
    Moore, J.; Bird, D. L.; Dobbis, S. K.; Woodward, G. Nonpoint Source Contributions Drive Elevated Major Ion and Dissolved Inorganic Carbon Concentrations in Urban Watersheds. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2017, 4 (6), 198204,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00096
  107. 107
    Schuler, M. S.; Canedo-Arguelles, M.; Hintz, W. D.; Dyack, B.; Birk, S.; Relyea, R. A. Regulations Are Needed to Protect Freshwater Ecosystems from Salinization. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., B 2019, 374, 20180019,  DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0019
  108. 108
    Taka, M.; Kokkonen, T.; Kuoppamäki, K.; Niemi, T.; Sillanpää, N.; Valtanen, M.; Warsta, L.; Setälä, H. Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Major Ions in Urban Stormwater under Cold Climate. Hydrol. Process. 2017, 31 (8), 15641577,  DOI: 10.1002/hyp.11126
  109. 109
    Corsi, S. R.; De Cicco, L. A.; Lutz, M. A.; Hirsch, R. M. River Chloride Trends in Snow-Affected Urban Watersheds: Increasing Concentrations Outpace Urban Growth Rate and Are Common among All Seasons. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 508, 488497,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.012
  110. 110
    Maniquiz-Redillas, M. C.; Kim, L.-H. Evaluation of the Capability of Low-Impact Development Practices for the Removal of Heavy Metal from Urban Stormwater Runoff. Environ. Technol. 2016, 37 (18), 22652272,  DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2016.1147610
  111. 111
    Barber, L. B.; Paschke, S. S.; Battaglin, W. A.; Douville, C.; Fitzgerald, K. C.; Keefe, H.; Roth, D. A.; Vajda, A. M. Effects of an Extreme Flood on Trace Elements in River Water-From Urban Stream to Major River Basin. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 1034410356,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01767
  112. 112
    Bay, S.; Jones, B. H.; Schiff, K.; Washburn, L. Water Quality Impacts of Stormwater Discharges to Santa Monica Bay. Mar. Environ. Res. 2003, 56 (1), 205223,  DOI: 10.1016/S0141-1136(02)00331-8
  113. 113
    Trowsdale, S. A.; Simcock, R. Urban Stormwater Treatment Using Bioretention. J. Hydrol. 2011, 397 (3), 167174,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.023
  114. 114
    Gwenzi, W.; Mangori, L.; Danha, C.; Chaukura, N.; Dunjana, N.; Sanganyado, E. Sources, Behaviour, and Environmental and Human Health Risks of High-Technology Rare Earth Elements as Emerging Contaminants. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 636, 299313,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.235
  115. 115
    Lerat-hardy, A.; Coynel, A.; Dutruch, L.; Pereto, C.; Bossy, C.; Gil-diaz, T.; Capdeville, M.; Blanc, G.; Schäfer, J. Rare Earth Element Fluxes over 15 Years into a Major European Estuary (Garonne-Gironde, SW France): Hospital Effluents as a Source of Increasing Gadolinium Anomalies. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 656, 409420,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.343
  116. 116
    Haskin, L. A.; Haskin, M. A.; Frey, F. A.; Wildeman, T. R. Relative and Absolute Terrestrial Abundances of the Rare Earths. In Origin and Distribution of the Elements; International Series of Monographs in Earth Sciences; Elsevier, 1968; pp 889912, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-012835-1.50074-X
  117. 117
    Gromet, L. P.; Haskin, L. A.; Korotev, R. L.; Dymek, R. F. The “North American Shale Composite”: Its Compilation, Major and Trace Element Characteristics. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1984, 48 (12), 24692482,  DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(84)90298-9
  118. 118
    Barber, L. B.; Paschke, S. S.; Battaglin, W. A.; Douville, C.; Fitzgerald, K. C.; Keefe, H.; Roth, D. A.; Vajda, A. M. Effects of an Extreme Flood on Trace Elements in River Water-- From Urban Stream to Major River Basin. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 1034410356,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01767
  119. 119
    Verplanck, P. L.; Taylor, H. E.; Nordstrom, D. K.; Barber, L. B. Aqueous Stability of Gadolinium in Surface Waters Receiving Sewage Treatment Plant Effluent, Boulder Creek, Colorado. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39 (18), 69236929,  DOI: 10.1021/es048456u
  120. 120
    Rabiet, M.; Togola, A.; Brissaud, F.; Seidel, J.-L.; Budzinski, H.; Elbaz-Poulichet, F. Consequences of Treated Water Recycling as Regards Pharmaceuticals and Drugs in Surface and Ground Waters of a Medium-Sized Mediterranean Catchment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40 (17), 52825288,  DOI: 10.1021/es060528p
  121. 121
    Hall, B. D.; Aiken, G. R.; Krabbenhoft, D. P.; Marvin-DiPasquale, M.; Swarzenski, C. M. Wetlands as Principal Zones of Methylmercury Production in Southern Louisiana and the Gulf of Mexico Region. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 154 (1), 124134,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.12.017
  122. 122
    Marvin-DiPasquale, M.; Lutz, M. A.; Brigham, M. E.; Krabbenhoft, D. P.; Aiken, G. R.; Orem, W. H.; Hall, B. D. Mercury Cycling in Stream Ecosystems. 2. Benthic Methylmercury Production and Bed Sediment–Pore Water Partitioning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (8), 27262732,  DOI: 10.1021/es802698v
  123. 123
    Scudder, B. C.; Chasar, L. C.; Wentz, D. A.; Bauch, M. E.; Moran, P. W.; Krabbenhoft, D. P. Mercury in Fish, Bed Sediment, and Water from Streams Across the United States, 1998–2005; Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5109, U.S. Geological Survey, 2009.
  124. 124
    Domagalski, J. L.; Alpers, C. N.; Slotton, D. G.; Suchanek, T. H.; Ayers, S. M. Mercury and Methylmercury Concentrations and Loads in the Cache Creek Watershed, California. Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 327, 215237,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.01.013

Cited By

This article is cited by 124 publications.

  1. Analise R. Lindborg, Kirsten E. Overdahl, Bernadette Vogler, Diana Lin, Rebecca Sutton, P. Lee Ferguson. Assessment of Long-Chain Polyethoxylate Surfactants in Wastewater Effluent, Stormwater Runoff, and Ambient Water of San Francisco Bay, CA. ACS ES&T Water 2023, 3 (4) , 1233-1242. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.3c00024
  2. Haoqi Nina Zhao, Ximin Hu, Zhenyu Tian, Melissa Gonzalez, Craig A. Rideout, Katherine T. Peter, Michael C. Dodd, Edward P. Kolodziej. Transformation Products of Tire Rubber Antioxidant 6PPD in Heterogeneous Gas-Phase Ozonation: Identification and Environmental Occurrence. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (14) , 5621-5632. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c08690
  3. Skuyler P. Herzog, Jason Galloway, Eddie W. Banks, Malte Posselt, Anna Jaeger, Andrea Portmann, René Sahm, Björn Kusebauch, Jörg Lewandowski, Adam S. Ward. Combined Surface-Subsurface Stream Restoration Structures Can Optimize Hyporheic Attenuation of Stream Water Contaminants. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (10) , 4153-4166. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05967
  4. Jason R. Masoner, Dana W. Kolpin, Isabelle M. Cozzarelli, Paul M. Bradley, Brian B. Arnall, Kenneth J. Forshay, James L. Gray, Justin F. Groves, Michelle L. Hladik, Laura E. Hubbard, Luke R. Iwanowicz, Jeanne B. Jaeschke, Rachael F. Lane, Richard Blaine McCleskey, Bridgette F. Polite, David A. Roth, Michael B. Pettijohn, Michaelah C. Wilson. Contaminant Exposure and Transport from Three Potential Reuse Waters within a Single Watershed. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (3) , 1353-1365. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c07372
  5. Yuanzhen He, Yanyan Zhang, Feng Ju. Metformin Contamination in Global Waters: Biotic and Abiotic Transformation, Byproduct Generation and Toxicity, and Evaluation as a Pharmaceutical Indicator. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (19) , 13528-13545. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c02495
  6. Markus Brinkmann, David Montgomery, Summer Selinger, Justin G. P. Miller, Eric Stock, Alper James Alcaraz, Jonathan K. Challis, Lynn Weber, David Janz, Markus Hecker, Steve Wiseman. Acute Toxicity of the Tire Rubber-Derived Chemical 6PPD-quinone to Four Fishes of Commercial, Cultural, and Ecological Importance. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2022, 9 (4) , 333-338. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00050
  7. Katherine T. Peter, Jessica I. Lundin, Christopher Wu, Blake E. Feist, Zhenyu Tian, James R. Cameron, Nathaniel L. Scholz, Edward P. Kolodziej. Characterizing the Chemical Profile of Biological Decline in Stormwater-Impacted Urban Watersheds. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (5) , 3159-3169. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c08274
  8. Zhenyu Tian, Melissa Gonzalez, Craig A. Rideout, Haoqi Nina Zhao, Ximin Hu, Jill Wetzel, Emma Mudrock, C. Andrew James, Jenifer K. McIntyre, Edward P. Kolodziej. 6PPD-Quinone: Revised Toxicity Assessment and Quantification with a Commercial Standard. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2022, 9 (2) , 140-146. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00910
  9. Larry B. Barber, Kaycee E. Faunce, David W. Bertolatus, Michelle L. Hladik, Jeramy R. Jasmann, Steffanie H. Keefe, Dana W. Kolpin, Michael T. Meyer, Jennifer L. Rapp, David A. Roth, Alan M. Vajda. Watershed-Scale Risk to Aquatic Organisms from Complex Chemical Mixtures in the Shenandoah River. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (2) , 845-861. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04045
  10. Laura E. Hubbard, Dana W. Kolpin, Carrie E. Givens, Brett R. Blackwell, Paul M. Bradley, James L. Gray, Rachael F. Lane, Jason R. Masoner, Richard Blaine McCleskey, Kristin M. Romanok, Mark W. Sandstrom, Kelly L. Smalling, Daniel L. Villeneuve. Food, Beverage, and Feedstock Processing Facility Wastewater: a Unique and Underappreciated Source of Contaminants to U.S. Streams. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (2) , 1028-1040. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06821
  11. J. K. Challis, H. Popick, S. Prajapati, P. Harder, J. P. Giesy, K. McPhedran, M. Brinkmann. Occurrences of Tire Rubber-Derived Contaminants in Cold-Climate Urban Runoff. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2021, 8 (11) , 961-967. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00682
  12. Xinyao Gu, Timothy F. M. Rodgers, Sylvie Spraakman, Tim Van Seters, Robert Flick, Miriam L. Diamond, Jennifer Drake, Elodie Passeport. Trace Organic Contaminant Transfer and Transformation in Bioretention Cells: A Field Tracer Test with Benzotriazole. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (18) , 12281-12290. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c01062
  13. Megan L. Fork, Jerker B. Fick, Alexander J. Reisinger, Emma J. Rosi. Dosing the Coast: Leaking Sewage Infrastructure Delivers Large Annual Doses and Dynamic Mixtures of Pharmaceuticals to Urban Rivers. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (17) , 11637-11645. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c00379
  14. Kelsey Flanagan, Godecke-Tobias Blecken, Heléne Österlund, Kerstin Nordqvist, Maria Viklander. Contamination of Urban Stormwater Pond Sediments: A Study of 259 Legacy and Contemporary Organic Substances. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (5) , 3009-3020. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07782
  15. Hui Zhi, Dana W. Kolpin, Rebecca D. Klaper, Luke R. Iwanowicz, Shannon M. Meppelink, Gregory H. LeFevre. Occurrence and Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Pharmaceuticals in a Temperate-Region Wastewater Effluent-Dominated Stream: Variable Inputs and Differential Attenuation Yield Evolving Complex Exposure Mixtures. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (20) , 12967-12978. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02328
  16. Jiajie Qian, Andres Martinez, Rachel F. Marek, Matthew R. Nagorzanski, Hui Zhi, Edward T. Furlong, Dana W. Kolpin, Gregory H. LeFevre, David M. Cwiertny. Polymeric Nanofiber-Carbon Nanotube Composite Mats as Fast-Equilibrium Passive Samplers for Polar Organic Contaminants. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (11) , 6703-6712. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00609
  17. Katherine T. Peter, Fan Hou, Zhenyu Tian, Christopher Wu, Matt Goehring, Fengmao Liu, Edward P. Kolodziej. More Than a First Flush: Urban Creek Storm Hydrographs Demonstrate Broad Contaminant Pollutographs. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (10) , 6152-6165. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00872
  18. Sabine Anliker, Martin Loos, Rahel Comte, Matthias Ruff, Kathrin Fenner, Heinz Singer. Assessing Emissions from Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Based on Temporal High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Data. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (7) , 4110-4120. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07085
  19. Melina Kotti, Androniki Papafilippaki, George Stavroulakis. Simultaneous determination of selected pharmaceuticals and plasticisers in urban stormwater in Chania (Greece). International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 2023, 103 (16) , 3790-3800. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2021.1913583
  20. Sarah E. Hobbie, Rachel A. King, Tessa Belo, Paula Kalinosky, Lawrence A. Baker, Jacques C. Finlay, Christopher A. Buyarski, Ross Bintner. Sources of variation in nutrient loads collected through street sweeping in the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Area, Minnesota, USA. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 905 , 166934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166934
  21. Ali Beryani, Kelsey Flanagan, Maria Viklander, Godecke-Tobias Blecken. Performance of a gross pollutant trap-biofilter and sand filter treatment train for the removal of organic micropollutants from highway stormwater (field study). Science of The Total Environment 2023, 900 , 165734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165734
  22. Longbo Li, Haiyan Li, Hongtao Zhao. Modeling the wash-off of road-deposited sediments with different particle-sizes on asphalt and concrete roads. Journal of Hydrology 2023, 625 , 130115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130115
  23. Carly M. Maas, Sujay S. Kaushal, Megan A. Rippy, Paul M. Mayer, Stanley B. Grant, Ruth R. Shatkay, Joseph T. Malin, Shantanu V. Bhide, Peter Vikesland, Lauren Krauss, Jenna E. Reimer, Alexis M. Yaculak. Freshwater salinization syndrome limits management efforts to improve water quality. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2023, 11 https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1106581
  24. Iqra Rabani, Muhammad Shoaib Tahir, Won-Il Lee, Hai Bang Truong, Ghulam Dastgeer, Young-Soo Seo. Palladium nanoparticle formation on boron nitride nanotubes and their photocatalytic performance with visible light. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023, 420 , 138324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138324
  25. Mert Gokgoz, Wuhuan Zhang, Nimna Manage, Mery Mbengue, Stephanie Bolyard, Jiannan Chen. Survey on the current leachate treatments of public municipal solid waste landfills and the potential impact of per- and polyfluorinatedalkyl substances in the Eastern and Northwestern United States. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 2023, 73 (8) , 638-648. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2023.2235313
  26. Kaycee E. Faunce, Larry B. Barber, Steffanie H. Keefe, Jeramy R. Jasmann, Jennifer L. Rapp. Wastewater reuse and predicted ecological risk posed by contaminant mixtures in Potomac River watershed streams. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2023, 59 (4) , 779-802. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13110
  27. Sujay S. Kaushal, Megan L. Fork, Robert J. Hawley, Kristina G. Hopkins, Blanca Ríos-Touma, Allison H. Roy. Stream restoration milestones: monitoring scales determine successes and failures. Urban Ecosystems 2023, 26 (4) , 1131-1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01370-8
  28. Kelly L. Smalling, Kristin M. Romanok, Paul M. Bradley, Mathew C. Morriss, James L. Gray, Leslie K. Kanagy, Stephanie E. Gordon, Brianna M. Williams, Sara E. Breitmeyer, Daniel K. Jones, Laura A. DeCicco, Collin A. Eagles-Smith, Tyler Wagner. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in United States tapwater: Comparison of underserved private-well and public-supply exposures and associated health implications. Environment International 2023, 178 , 108033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.108033
  29. Naim Edwards, Nicholas Medina, Elizabeth Asker. Mixing cover crops suppresses weeds and roto-till reduces urban soil penetration resistance and improves infiltration. Soil and Tillage Research 2023, 231 , 105708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2023.105708
  30. Alexandra Müller, Heléne Österlund, Kerstin Nordqvist, Jiri Marsalek, Maria Viklander. Releases of micropollutants from building surface materials into rainwater and snowmelt induced runoff. Chemosphere 2023, 330 , 138730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138730
  31. Ali Beryani, Kelsey Flanagan, Maria Viklander, Godecke-Tobias Blecken. Occurrence and concentrations of organic micropollutants (OMPs) in highway stormwater: a comparative field study in Sweden. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2023, 30 (31) , 77299-77317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27623-9
  32. Miao Jing, Estanislao Pujades, Jin Liu, Anna Jurado, Chunhui Lu. Effect of underground structures on groundwater residence time distributions in confined aquifers. Journal of Hydrology 2023, 572 , 129938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129938
  33. Piatã Marques, Almir Cunico. Integrating the influence of untreated sewage into our understanding of the urban stream syndrome. Freshwater Science 2023, 42 (2) , 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1086/724823
  34. Jasmina Lukač Reberski, Ana Selak, Dan J. Lapworth, Louise D. Maurice, Josip Terzić, Wayne Civil, Andrej Stroj. Emerging organic contaminants in springs of the highly karstified Dinaric region. Journal of Hydrology 2023, 621 , 129583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129583
  35. Daeun Yun, Daeho Kang, Kyung Hwa Cho, Sang-Soo Baek, Junho Jeon. Characterization of micropollutants in urban stormwater using high-resolution monitoring and machine learning. Water Research 2023, 235 , 119865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.119865
  36. Jeroen G. Langeveld, Johan Post, Konstantinos F. Makris, Bert Palsma, Melanie Kuiper, Erik Liefting. Monitoring organic micropollutants in stormwater runoff with the method of fingerprinting. Water Research 2023, 235 , 119883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.119883
  37. Nurul Syuhada Haji Baharudin, Harlina Ahmad. A Study of the Photodegradation Carbofuran and its Metabolites in Paddy Water Samples. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 2023, 11 (2) , 394-404. https://doi.org/10.18006/2023.11(2).394.404
  38. Jennifer T. Le, Jennifer P. Gonzalez, Richard T. Carson, Richard F. Ambrose, Lisa A. Levin. Integrating Non-Targeted Ecosystem Services into Assessment of Natural Stormwater Treatment Systems. Water 2023, 15 (8) , 1460. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15081460
  39. Nathaniel Maynard, H. Rodger Harvey. Distribution and source assignments of polycyclic aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons in sediments and biota of the Lafayette River, VA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2023, 30 (16) , 47527-47543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25563-y
  40. Lixiang Chen, Xinyu Yan, Xudong Zhou, Pin Peng, Qian Sun, Feng Zhao. Advances in the on-line solid-phase extraction-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of emerging organic contaminants. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2023, 160 , 116976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2023.116976
  41. Yohan Lebon, Clémentine François, Simon Navel, Félix Vallier, Ludovic Guillard, Lucie Pinasseau, Laurent Oxarango, Laurence Volatier, Florian Mermillod-Blondin. Aquifer recharge by stormwater infiltration basins: Hydrological and vadose zone characteristics control the impacts of basins on groundwater chemistry and microbiology. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 865 , 161115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161115
  42. Sylvester M. Tongu, Rufus Sha’Ato, Geoffrey A. Wase, Jonathan O. Okonkwo, Rebecca N. Vesuwe. Organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in city drains in Makurdi, central Nigeria: Seasonal variations, source apportionment and risk assessment. Heliyon 2023, 9 (3) , e14324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14324
  43. Chelsea J. Mitchell, Anand D. Jayakaran, Jenifer K. McIntyre. Biochar and fungi as bioretention amendments for bacteria and PAH removal from stormwater. Journal of Environmental Management 2023, 327 , 116915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116915
  44. Matthew Nagorzanski, Jiajie Qian, Andres Martinez, David M. Cwiertny. Electrospun nanofiber mats as sorbents for polar emerging organic contaminants: Demonstrating tailorable material performance for uptake of neonicotinoid insecticides from water. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances 2023, 9 , 100219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100219
  45. Maria Prieto-Espinoza, Raphaël Di Chiara Roupert, Benjamin Belfort, Sylvain Weill, Gwenaël Imfeld. Reactive transport of micropollutants in laboratory aquifers undergoing transient exposure periods. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 856 , 159170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159170
  46. Paul M. Bradley, Kristin M. Romanok, Kelly L. Smalling, Jason R. Masoner, Dana W. Kolpin, Stephanie E. Gordon. Predicted aquatic exposure effects from a national urban stormwater study. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2023, 36 https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EW00933A
  47. Lena Mutzner, Kefeng Zhang, Richard G. Luthy, Hans Peter H. Arp, Stephanie Spahr. Urban stormwater capture for water supply: look out for persistent, mobile and toxic substances. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2023, 53 https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EW00160A
  48. K. S. D. Premarathna, Jayanta Kumar Biswas, Manish Kumar, Sunita Varjani, Bede Mickan, Pau Loke Show, Sie Yon Lau, Luís A. B. Novo, Meththika Vithanage. Biofilters and bioretention systems: the role of biochar in the blue-green city concept for stormwater management. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2023, 396 https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EW00054K
  49. Craig Divine, Amar Wadhawan, Vivek Pulikkal, Prashanth Khambhammettu, Jay Erickson. Polyfluoroalkyl substances requiring a renewed focus on groundwater‐surface water interactions. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation 2023, 43 (1) , 14-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwmr.12569
  50. Tolessa Deksissa. Urban Stormwater Runoff for Potable Use: Potential and Challenges. 2023https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2023_1020
  51. H. Popick, M. Brinkmann, Kerry McPhedran. Assessment of stormwater discharge contamination and toxicity for a cold-climate urban landscape. Environmental Sciences Europe 2022, 34 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00619-x
  52. Inge Scharpf, Sylwia Cichocka, Dang Tri Le, Anna von Mikecz. Peripheral neuropathy, protein aggregation and serotonergic neurotransmission: Distinctive bio-interactions of thiacloprid and thiamethoxam in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Environmental Pollution 2022, 314 , 120253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120253
  53. Sara E. Breitmeyer, Heather L. Walsh, Vicki S. Blazer, John F. Bunnell, Patrick M. Burritt, Jeff Dragon, Michelle L. Hladik, Paul M. Bradley, Kristin M. Romanok, Kelly L. Smalling. Potential health effects of contaminant mixtures from point and nonpoint sources on fish and frogs in the New Jersey Pinelands. Science of The Total Environment 2022, 851 , 158205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158205
  54. Robert Furén, Kelsey Flanagan, Ryan J. Winston, R. Andrew Tirpak, Jay D. Dorsey, Maria Viklander, Godecke-Tobias Blecken. Occurrence, concentration, and distribution of 38 organic micropollutants in the filter material of 12 stormwater bioretention facilities. Science of The Total Environment 2022, 846 , 157372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157372
  55. Marc Teixidó, Joseph A. Charbonnet, Gregory H. LeFevre, Richard G. Luthy, David L. Sedlak. Use of pilot-scale geomedia-amended biofiltration system for removal of polar trace organic and inorganic contaminants from stormwater runoff. Water Research 2022, 226 , 119246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.119246
  56. Thuy Thi Nguyen, Markus Pahlow, Rubianca Benavidez, Frances J. Charters, Bethanna Jackson. Implementation and application of an urban pollutant load modelling tool within an ecosystem services assessment modelling framework to assess water purification capabilities of blue-green infrastructure under climate change. Urban Water Journal 2022, 19 (9) , 945-961. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2022.2105724
  57. Cassandra Johannessen, Chris D. Metcalfe. The occurrence of tire wear compounds and their transformation products in municipal wastewater and drinking water treatment plants. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2022, 194 (10) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10450-9
  58. Alexandra Müller, Heléne Österlund, Jiri Marsalek, Maria Viklander. Exploiting urban roadside snowbanks as passive samplers of organic micropollutants and metals generated by traffic. Environmental Pollution 2022, 308 , 119723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119723
  59. Lena Mutzner, Viviane Furrer, Hélène Castebrunet, Ulrich Dittmer, Stephan Fuchs, Wolfgang Gernjak, Marie-Christine Gromaire, Andreas Matzinger, Peter Steen Mikkelsen, William R. Selbig, Luca Vezzaro. A decade of monitoring micropollutants in urban wet-weather flows: What did we learn?. Water Research 2022, 223 , 118968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118968
  60. Anna M. O’Brien, Zhu Hao Yu, Clara Pencer, Megan E. Frederickson, Gregory H. LeFevre, Elodie Passeport. Harnessing plant-microbiome interactions for bioremediation across a freshwater urbanization gradient. Water Research 2022, 223 , 118926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118926
  61. Yaru Cao, Shaopeng Xu, Kai Zhang, Huiju Lin, Rongben Wu, Jia-Yong Lao, Danyang Tao, Mengyang Liu, Kenneth M.Y. Leung, Paul K.S. Lam. Spatiotemporal occurrence of phthalate esters in stormwater drains of Hong Kong, China: Mass loading and source identification. Environmental Pollution 2022, 308 , 119683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119683
  62. Mark D. Jankowski, David J. Fairbairn, Joshua A. Baller, Benjamin M. Westerhoff, Heiko L. Schoenfuss. Using the Daphnia magna Transcriptome to Distinguish Water Source: Wetland and Stormwater Case Studies. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2022, 41 (9) , 2107-2123. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5392
  63. Megan L. Fork, Ryan A. McManamay, James B. Heffernan. Propagation of inflowing urban stormwater pulses through reservoir embayments. Urban Ecosystems 2022, 25 (4) , 1043-1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-022-01218-7
  64. Guodong Chai, Dongqi Wang, Jiaqi Shan, Chunbo Jiang, Zhangjie Yang, Enyu Liu, Haiyu Meng, Hui Wang, Zhe Wang, Lu Qin, Jiayao Xi, Yuenan Ma, Huaien Li, Yishi Qian, Jiake Li, Yishan Lin. Accumulation of high-molecular-weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon impacted the performance and microbial ecology of bioretention systems. Chemosphere 2022, 298 , 134314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134314
  65. Xuan Chang, Ziliang Jia, Jiashen Feng, Tingting Duan, Ying-Xia Li. Refining the diagnostics of non-point source metals pollution to urban lakes based on interaction normalized PMF coupled with Bayesian network. Environmental Pollution 2022, 304 , 119194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119194
  66. Li Huang, Xiaoying Han, Xuelei Wang, Yaodong Zhang, Jinfeng Yang, Aiping Feng, Jiaguo Li, Nanhuanuowa Zhu. Coupling with high-resolution remote sensing data to evaluate urban non-point source pollution in Tongzhou, China. Science of The Total Environment 2022, 831 , 154632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154632
  67. Hui Zhi, Danielle T. Webb, Jerald L. Schnoor, Dana W. Kolpin, Rebecca D. Klaper, Luke R. Iwanowicz, Gregory H. LeFevre. Modeling risk dynamics of contaminants of emerging concern in a temperate-region wastewater effluent-dominated stream. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2022, 8 (7) , 1408-1422. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EW00157H
  68. Stephanie Spahr, Marc Teixidó, Sarah S. Gall, James C. Pritchard, Nikolas Hagemann, Brigitte Helmreich, Richard G. Luthy. Performance of biochars for the elimination of trace organic contaminants and metals from urban stormwater. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2022, 8 (6) , 1287-1299. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EW00857A
  69. Alyssa T. Kullberg, Gail L. Carlson, Serena M. Haver, William G. McDowell. Contamination of Maine lakes by pharmaceuticals and personal care products. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 2022, 12 (2) , 248-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-021-00733-x
  70. Hanna E. Fuchte, Natascha Beck, Evelyn Bieg, Viviane J. Bayer, Christine Achten, Martin Krauss, Andreas Schäffer, Kilian E.C. Smith. A look down the drain: Identification of dissolved and particle bound organic pollutants in urban runoff waters and sediments. Environmental Pollution 2022, 302 , 119047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119047
  71. . Stormwater Quality. 2022, 65-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119339786.ch5
  72. Andrea C. Portmann, Gregory H. LeFevre, Rennosuke Hankawa, David Werner, Christopher P. Higgins. The regenerative role of biofilm in the removal of pesticides from stormwater in biochar-amended biofilters. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2022, 8 (5) , 1092-1110. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EW00870F
  73. Keith A. Maruya, Wenjian Lao, Darcy R. Vandervort, Richard Fadness, Michael Lyons, Alvine C. Mehinto. Bioanalytical and chemical-specific screening of contaminants of concern in three California (USA) watersheds. Heliyon 2022, 8 (5) , e09534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09534
  74. Thorsten Knappenberger, Anand D. Jayakaran, John D. Stark. A Bayesian modeling framework to predict stormwater pollutant reduction in bioretention media. Ecological Engineering 2022, 178 , 106582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106582
  75. Emily C. Edwards, Connie Nelson, Thomas Harter, Chris Bowles, Xue Li, Bennett Lock, Graham E. Fogg, Barbara S. Washburn. Potential effects on groundwater quality associated with infiltrating stormwater through dry wells for aquifer recharge. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2022, 246 , 103964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2022.103964
  76. Boluwatife Awonaike, Abha Parajulee, Ying Duan Lei, Frank Wania. Traffic-related sources may dominate urban water contamination for many organic contaminants. Environmental Research Letters 2022, 17 (4) , 044030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5c0e
  77. Sai Thejaswini Pamuru, Erica Forgione, Kristen Croft, Birthe V. Kjellerup, Allen P. Davis. Chemical characterization of urban stormwater: Traditional and emerging contaminants. Science of The Total Environment 2022, 813 , 151887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151887
  78. Daniel Wicke, Roberto Tatis-Muvdi, Pascale Rouault, Patricia Zerball-van Baar, Uwe Dünnbier, Mirko Rohr, Michael Burkhardt. Emissions from Building Materials—A Threat to the Environment?. Water 2022, 14 (3) , 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14030303
  79. Paweł Jakubowicz, Karolina Fitobór, Magdalena Gajewska, Małgorzata Drewnowska. Detection and Removal of Priority Substances and Emerging Pollutants from Stormwater: Case Study of the Kołobrzeska Collector, Gdańsk, Poland. Sustainability 2022, 14 (3) , 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031105
  80. Narges Esfandiar, Rominder Suri, Erica R. McKenzie. Competitive sorption of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn from stormwater runoff by five low-cost sorbents; Effects of co-contaminants, humic acid, salinity and pH. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2022, 423 , 126938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126938
  81. Sarah M. Elliott, Richard L. Kiesling, Andrew M. Berg, Heiko L. Schoenfuss. A pilot study to assess the influence of infiltrated stormwater on groundwater: Hydrology and trace organic contaminants. Water Environment Research 2022, 94 (2) https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.10690
  82. Eulalia Maria Beltrán, María Victoria Pablos, Miguel González-Doncel. Pharmaceuticals effects in the environment. 2022https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824315-2.00099-3
  83. Linbo Yu, Luchun Duan, Ravi Naidu, Fanbo Meng, Kirk T. Semple. Effects of Source Materials on Desorption Kinetics of Carcinogenic Pahs from Contaminated Soils. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 50 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4135025
  84. Sarah Stone, Darren Koppel, Monique T. Binet, Stuart L. Simpson, Dianne F. Jolley. Pulse‐Exposure Toxicity of Ammonia and Propoxur to the Tropical Copepod Acartia sinjiensis. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2022, 41 (1) , 208-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5235
  85. Marc W. Beutel, Thomas C. Harmon, Thomas E. Novotny, Jeremiah Mock, Michelle E. Gilmore, Stephen C. Hart, Samuel Traina, Srimanti Duttagupta, Andrew Brooks, Christopher L. Jerde, Eunha Hoh, Laurie C. Van De Werfhorst, Van Butsic, Ariani C. Wartenberg, Patricia A. Holden. A Review of Environmental Pollution from the Use and Disposal of Cigarettes and Electronic Cigarettes: Contaminants, Sources, and Impacts. Sustainability 2021, 13 (23) , 12994. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132312994
  86. Alexandra Müller, Heléne Österlund, Jiri Marsalek, Maria Viklander. Comparison of three explorative methods for identifying building surface materials contributing pollutants to stormwater. Journal of Environmental Management 2021, 299 , 113574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113574
  87. Boluwatife Awonaike, Ying Duan Lei, Abha Parajulee, Frank Wania. Phase partitioning, transport and sources of Benzotriazole Ultraviolet Stabilizers during a runoff event. Water Research X 2021, 13 , 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2021.100115
  88. Laura C. Naslund, Jacqueline R. Gerson, Alexander C. Brooks, Amy D. Rosemond, David M. Walters, Emily S. Bernhardt. Ecosystem modification and network position impact insect-mediated contaminant fluxes from a mountaintop mining-impacted river network. Environmental Pollution 2021, 291 , 118257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118257
  89. C. Caldelas, R. Gurí, J.L. Araus, A. Sorolla. Effect of ZnO nanoparticles on Zn, Cu, and Pb dissolution in a green bioretention system for urban stormwater remediation. Chemosphere 2021, 282 , 131045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131045
  90. Lisa H. Nowell, Patrick W. Moran, Laura M. Bexfield, Barbara J. Mahler, Peter C. Van Metre, Paul M. Bradley, Travis S. Schmidt, Daniel T. Button, Sharon L. Qi. Is there an urban pesticide signature? Urban streams in five U.S. regions share common dissolved-phase pesticides but differ in predicted aquatic toxicity. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 793 , 148453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148453
  91. Kelly L. Smalling, Sara E. Breitmeyer, John F. Bunnell, Kim J. Laidig, Patrick M. Burritt, Marilyn C. Sobel, Jonathan A. Cohl, Michelle L. Hladik, Kristin M. Romanok, Paul M. Bradley. Assessing the ecological functionality and integrity of natural ponds, excavated ponds and stormwater basins for conserving amphibian diversity. Global Ecology and Conservation 2021, 30 , e01765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01765
  92. Hui Zhi, Alyssa L. Mianecki, Dana W. Kolpin, Rebecca D. Klaper, Luke R. Iwanowicz, Gregory H. LeFevre. Tandem field and laboratory approaches to quantify attenuation mechanisms of pharmaceutical and pharmaceutical transformation products in a wastewater effluent-dominated stream. Water Research 2021, 203 , 117537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117537
  93. Paul M. Bradley, Matt A. Kulp, Bradley J. Huffman, Kristin M. Romanok, Kelly L. Smalling, Sara E. Breitmeyer, Jimmy M. Clark, Celeste A. Journey. Reconnaissance of cumulative risk of pesticides and pharmaceuticals in Great Smoky Mountains National Park streams. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 781 , 146711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146711
  94. Martin Richardson, Mikhail Soloviev. The Urban River Syndrome: Achieving Sustainability Against a Backdrop of Accelerating Change. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, 18 (12) , 6406. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126406
  95. Ida Järlskog, Ann-Margret Strömvall, Kerstin Magnusson, Helén Galfi, Karin Björklund, Maria Polukarova, Rita Garção, Anna Markiewicz, Maria Aronsson, Mats Gustafsson, Malin Norin, Lena Blom, Yvonne Andersson-Sköld. Traffic-related microplastic particles, metals, and organic pollutants in an urban area under reconstruction. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 774 , 145503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145503
  96. Sarah McDonald, Kathryn Hassell, Tom Cresswell. Effect of short-term dietary exposure on metal assimilation and metallothionein induction in the estuarine fish Pseudogobius sp.. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 772 , 145042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145042
  97. Danielle T. Webb, Hui Zhi, Dana W. Kolpin, Rebecca D. Klaper, Luke R. Iwanowicz, Gregory H. LeFevre. Emerging investigator series: municipal wastewater as a year-round point source of neonicotinoid insecticides that persist in an effluent-dominated stream. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 2021, 23 (5) , 678-688. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EM00065A
  98. Nash Jett D. G. Reyes, Franz Kevin F. Geronimo, Kimberly Ann V. Yano, Heidi B. Guerra, Lee-Hyung Kim. Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products in Different Matrices: Occurrence, Pathways, and Treatment Processes. Water 2021, 13 (9) , 1159. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091159
  99. Daniel Wicke, Andreas Matzinger, Hauke Sonnenberg, Nicolas Caradot, Rabea-Luisa Schubert, Robert Dick, Bernd Heinzmann, Uwe Dünnbier, Dörthe von Seggern, Pascale Rouault. Micropollutants in Urban Stormwater Runoff of Different Land Uses. Water 2021, 13 (9) , 1312. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091312
  100. Sarfaraz Alam, Annesh Borthakur, Sujith Ravi, Mekonnen Gebremichael, Sanjay K. Mohanty. Managed aquifer recharge implementation criteria to achieve water sustainability. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 768 , 144992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.144992
Load all citations
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Total number of detected organic chemicals for sampled sites, sorted from left to right by decreasing number of detections (A) and total measured organic-chemical concentration for sampled sites (B).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Box-plot distributions of measured concentrations for the 69 organic chemicals detected in 50% or more of 49 urban stormwater samples. Sorted alphabetically from top to bottom by chemical class and decreasing median concentrations.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Box plot distributions of measured concentrations for organic chemicals in urban stormwater samples (A) and percent of total measured organic chemicals concentration by chemical class (B). Sorted from left to right by decreasing number of detections.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 124 other publications.

    1. 1
      United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2000 National Water Quality Inventory Report to Congress, https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/2000_national_water_quality_inventory_report_to_congress.pdf (accessed April 12, 2019).
    2. 2
      Eckley, C. S.; Branfireun, B. Mercury Mobilization in Urban Stormwater Runoff. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 403, 164177,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.05.021
    3. 3
      Göbel, P.; Dierkes, C.; Coldewey, W. G. Storm Water Runoff Concentration Matrix for Urban Areas. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2007, 91 (1–2), 2642,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.08.008
    4. 4
      Zgheib, S.; Moilleron, R.; Chebbo, G. Priority Pollutants in Urban Stormwater: Part 1 - Case of Separate Storm Sewers. Water Res. 2012, 46 (20), 66836692,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.012
    5. 5
      Zgheib, S.; Moilleron, R.; Saad, M.; Chebbo, G. Partition of Pollution between Dissolved and Particulate Phases: What about Emerging Substances in Urban Stormwater Catchments?. Water Res. 2011, 45 (2), 913925,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.032
    6. 6
      Brown, J. N.; Peake, B. M. Sources of Heavy Metals and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Urban Stormwater Runoff. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 359, 145155,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.05.016
    7. 7
      Paul, M. J.; Meyer, J. L. Streams in the Urban Landscape. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2001, 32 (1), 333365,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040
    8. 8
      Pitt, R.; Field, R.; Lalor, M.; Brown, M. Urban Stormwater Toxic Pollutants: Assessment, Sources, and Treatability. Water Environ. Res. 1995, 67 (3), 260275,  DOI: 10.2175/106143095X131466
    9. 9
      Tedoldi, D.; Chebbo, G.; Pierlot, D.; Branchu, P.; Kovacs, Y.; Gromaire, M. C. Spatial Distribution of Heavy Metals in the Surface Soil of Source-Control Stormwater Infiltration Devices – Inter-Site Comparison. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 881892,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.226
    10. 10
      Mahler, B. J.; Van Metre, P. C.; Crane, J. L.; Watts, A. W.; Scoggins, M.; Williams, E. S. Coal-Tar-Based Pavement Sealcoat and PAHs: Implications for the Environment, Human Health, and Stormwater Management. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46 (6), 30393045,  DOI: 10.1021/es203699x
    11. 11
      Mahler, B. J.; Van Metre, P. C.; Bashara, T. J.; Wilson, J. T.; Johns, D. A. Parking Lot Sealcoat: An Unrecognized Source of Urban Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39 (15), 55605566,  DOI: 10.1021/es0501565
    12. 12
      Van Metre, P. C.; Mahler, B. J.; Furlong, E. T. Urban Sprawl Leaves Its PAH Signature. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34 (19), 40644070,  DOI: 10.1021/es991007n
    13. 13
      Fairbairn, D. J.; Elliott, S. M.; Kiesling, R. L.; Schoenfuss, H. L.; Ferrey, M. L.; Westerhoff, B. M. Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Urban Stormwater: Spatiotemporal Patterns and Removal by Iron-Enhanced Sand Filters (IESFs). Water Res. 2018, 145, 332345,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.08.020
    14. 14
      Burant, A.; Selbig, W.; Furlong, E. T.; Higgins, C. P. Trace Organic Contaminants in Urban Runoff: Associations with Urban Land-Use. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 242, 20682077,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.066
    15. 15
      Eriksson, E.; Baun, A.; Mikkelsen, P. S.; Ledin, A. Risk Assessment of Xenobiotics in Stormwater Discharged to Harrestrup Å, Denmark. Desalination 2007, 215 (1–3), 187197,  DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.12.008
    16. 16
      Gan, J.; Bondarenko, S.; Oki, L.; Haver, D.; Li, J. X. Occurrence of Fipronil and Its Biologically Active Derivatives in Urban Residential Runoff. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46 (3), 14891495,  DOI: 10.1021/es202904x
    17. 17
      Strickman, R. J.; Mitchell, C. P. J. Methylmercury Production and Accumulation in Urban Stormwater Ponds and Habitat Wetlands. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 221, 326334,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.082
    18. 18
      Chong, M. N.; Sidhu, J.; Aryal, R.; Tang, J.; Gernjak, W.; Escher, B.; Toze, S. Urban Stormwater Harvesting and Reuse: A Probe into the Chemical, Toxicology and Microbiological Contaminants in Water Quality. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185 (8), 66456652,  DOI: 10.1007/s10661-012-3053-7
    19. 19
      Gołdyn, R.; Szpakowska, B.; Świerk, D.; Domek, P.; Buxakowski, J.; Dondajewska, R.; Barałkiewicz, D.; Sajnóg, A. Influence of Stormwater Runoff on Macroinvertebrates in a Small Urban River and a Reservoir. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 625, 743751,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.324
    20. 20
      Pratt, J. M.; Coler, R. A.; Godfrey, P. J. Ecological Effects of Urban Stormwater Runoff on Benthic Macroinvertebrates Inhabiting the Green River, Massachusetts. Hydrobiologia 1981, 83, 2942,  DOI: 10.1007/BF02187149
    21. 21
      Ma, Y.; Liu, A.; Egodawatta, P.; McGree, J.; Goonetilleke, A. Assessment and Management of Human Health Risk from Toxic Metals and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Urban Stormwater Arising from Anthropogenic Activities and Traffic Congestion. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 202211,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.015
    22. 22
      Haile, R. W.; Witte, J. S.; Gold, M.; Cressey, R.; McGee, C.; Millikan, R. C.; Glasser, A.; Harawa, N.; Ervin, C.; Harmon, P. The Health Effects of Swimming in Ocean Water Contaminated by Storm Drain Runoff. Epidemiology 1999, 10 (4), 355363,  DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199907000-00004
    23. 23
      Ma, Y.; Egodawatta, P.; McGree, J.; Liu, A.; Goonetilleke, A. Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Urban Stormwater. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 557–558, 764772,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.067
    24. 24
      Soller, J.; Bartrand, T.; Ravenscroft, J.; Molina, M.; Whelan, G.; Schoen, M.; Ashbolt, N. Estimated Human Health Risks from Recreational Exposures to Stormwater Runoff Containing Animal Faecal Material. Environ. Model. Softw. 2015, 72, 2132,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.05.018
    25. 25
      Young, A.; Kochenkov, V.; McIntyre, J. K.; Stark, J. D.; Coffin, A. B. Urban Stormwater Runoff Negatively Impacts Lateral Line Development in Larval Zebrafish and Salmon Embryos. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2830,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21209-z
    26. 26
      Datry, T.; Malard, F.; Gibert, J. Dynamics of Solutes and Dissolved Oxygen in Shallow Urban Groundwater below a Stormwater Infiltration Basin. Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 329 (1–3), 215229,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.02.022
    27. 27
      Edwards, E. C.; Harter, T.; Fogg, G. E.; Washburn, B.; Hamad, H. Assessing the Effectiveness of Drywells as Tools for Stormwater Management and Aquifer Recharge and Their Groundwater Contamination Potential. J. Hydrol. 2016, 539, 539553,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.059
    28. 28
      Fischer, D.; Charles, E. G.; Baehr, A. L. Effects of Stormwater Infiltration on Quality of Groundwater Beneath Retention and Detention Basins. J. Environ. Eng. 2003, 129 (5), 464471,  DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:5(464)
    29. 29
      Lewellyn, C.; Lyons, C. E.; Traver, R. G.; Wadzuk, B. M. Evaluation of Seasonal and Large Storm Runoff Volume Capture of an Infiltration Green Infrastructure System. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2016, 21 (1), 04015047  DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001257
    30. 30
      Mrowiec, M. Road Runoff Management Using Improved Infiltration Ponds. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 14, 26592667,  DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.435
    31. 31
      Pitt, R.; Clark, S.; Field, R. Groundwater Contamination Potential from Stormwater Infiltration Practices. Urban Water 1999, 1 (3), 217236,  DOI: 10.1016/S1462-0758(99)00014-X
    32. 32
      Tedoldi, D.; Chebbo, G.; Pierlot, D.; Branchu, P.; Kovacs, Y.; Gromaire, M. C. Spatial Distribution of Heavy Metals in the Surface Soil of Source-Control Stormwater Infiltration Devices – Inter-Site Comparison. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 881892,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.226
    33. 33
      Tedoldi, D.; Chebbo, G.; Pierlot, D.; Kovacs, Y.; Gromaire, M. C. Impact of Runoff Infiltration on Contaminant Accumulation and Transport in the Soil/Filter Media of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems: A Literature Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 569–570, 904926,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.215
    34. 34
      Luthy, R. G.; Sharvelle, S.; Dillon, P. Urban Stormwater to Enhance Water Supply. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 5534,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05913
    35. 35
      Center for Watershed Protection. National Pollutant Removal Performance Database, http://www.stormwaterok.net/CWP%20Documents/CWP-07%20Natl%20Pollutant%20Removal%20Perform%20Database.pdf (accessed September 20, 2018).
    36. 36
      Homer, C.; Dewitz, J.; Yang, L.; Jin, S.; Danielson, P.; Xian, G.; Coulston, J. W.; Herold, N.; Wickham, J.; Megown, K. Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the Conterminous United States - Representing a Decade of Land Cover Change Information. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 2015, 81, 345354
    37. 37
      Wilde, F. D., Radtke, D. B., Gibs, J., Iwatsubo, R. T., Eds. Processing of Water Samples (ver. 2.2). In U.S. Geological Survey Techniques for Water Resources Investigations, Book 9, Section A, Chapter A5; U.S. Geological Survey, 2002; p 166.
    38. 38
      Furlong, E. T.; Kanagy, C. J.; Kanagy, L. K.; Coffey, L. J.; Burkhardt, M. R. Determination of Human-Use Pharmaceuticals in Filtered Water by Direct Aqueous Injection–High-Performance Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry. In U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods; Book 5, Section B, Chapter B10, U.S. Geological Survey, 2014; DOI: 10.3133/tm5B10 .
    39. 39
      Foreman, W. T.; Gray, J. L.; ReVello, R. C.; Lindley, C. E.; Losche, S. A.; Barber, L. B. Determination of Steroid Hormones and Related Compounds in Filtered and Unfiltered Water by Solid-Phase Extraction, Derivatization, and Gas Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometry. In U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, Book 5, Chapter B9; U.S. Geological Survey, 2012; DOI: 10.3133/tm5B9 .
    40. 40
      Zaugg, S. D.; Smith, S. G.; Schroeder, M. P.; Barber, L. B.; Burkhardt, M. R. Determination of Wastewater Compounds by Polystyrene-Divinylbenzene Solid-Phase Extraction and Capillary-Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. In U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, Book 5, Chapter B2; U.S. Geological Survey, 2006.
    41. 41
      Hladik, M. L.; Smalling, K. L.; Kuivila, K. M. A Multi-Residue Method for the Analysis of Pesticides and Pesticide Degradates in Water Using HLB Solid-Phase Extraction and Gas Chromatography-Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2008, 80 (2), 139144,  DOI: 10.1007/s00128-007-9332-2
    42. 42
      Hladik, M. L.; Calhoun, D. Analysis of the Herbicide Diuron, Three Diuron Degradates, and Six Neonicotinoid Insecticides in Water—Method Details and Application to Two Georgia Streams. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5206; U.S. Geological Survey, 2012.
    43. 43
      Fishman, M. J. Methods of Analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory; Determination of Inorganic and Organic Constituents in Water and Fluvial Sediments, Open-File Report 93-125, U.S. Geological Survey, 1993.
    44. 44
      De Wild, J. F.; Olson, M. L.; Olund, S. D. Determination of Methyl Mercury by Aqueous Phase Ethylation, Followed by Gas Chromatographic Separation with Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescene Detection, Open-File Report 01-445, U.S. Geological Survey, 2002.
    45. 45
      Masoner, J. R.; Kolpin, D. W.; Furlong, E. T.; Cozzarelli, I. M.; Gray, J. L.; Schwab, E. A. Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Fresh Leachate from Landfills in the Conterminous United States. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2014, 16 (10), 23352354,  DOI: 10.1039/C4EM00124A
    46. 46
      Barber, L. B.; Paschke, S. S.; Battaglin, W. A.; Douville, C.; Fitzgerald, K. C.; Keefe, S. H.; Roth, D. A.; Vajda, A. M. Effects of an Extreme Flood on Trace Elements in River Water—From Urban Stream to Major River Basin. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 10344,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01767
    47. 47
      U.S. EPA. Method 1631: Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry, Document 821-R-96-012, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002.
    48. 48
      Révész, K.; Coplen, T. B. Determination of the d(18O/16O) of Water: RSIL Lab Code 489. In Methods of the Reston Stable Isotope Laboratory, Book 10, Section C, Chapter 2, U.S. Geological Survey; 2008; p 28.
    49. 49
      Révész, K.; Coplen, T. B. Determination of the δ(2H/1H) of Water: RSIL Lab Code 1574. In Methods of the Reston Stable Isotope Laboratory, Book 10, Section C, Chapter 2, U.S. Geological Survey, 2008; p 27.
    50. 50
      Jaeschke, J. B.; Cozzarelli, I. M.; Masoner, J. R.; Fleger, K. L. Geochemical Composition of Urban Stormwater Runoff Within the Conterminous United States from Samples Collected in 2016–2017 , U.S. Geological Survey data release, 2018; DOI: 10.5066/P9Q7MD9J .
    51. 51
      Keefe, S. H.; Barber, L. B.; Roth, D. A.; Masoner, J. R.; Bradley, P. M.; Kolpin, D. W. Survey of Major and Trace Elements in Stormwater Runoff from across the United States, 2016 to 2017 , U.S. Geological Survey data release, 2018; DOI: 10.5066/P90YU8VB .
    52. 52
      Bojes, H. K.; Pope, P. G. Characterization of EPA’s 16 Priority Pollutant Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Tank Bottom Solids and Associated Contaminated Soils at Oil Exploration and Production Sites in Texas. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2007, 47 (3), 288295,  DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.11.007
    53. 53
      Lyons, B. P.; Pascoe, C. K.; McFadzen, I. R. B. Phototoxicity of Pyrene and Benzo[a]Pyrene to Embryo-Larval Stages of the Pacific Oyster Crassostrea Gigas. Mar. Environ. Res. 2002, 54 (3), 627631,  DOI: 10.1016/S0141-1136(02)00124-1
    54. 54
      Douben, P. E. T. PAHs: An Ecotoxicological Perspective; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: West Suxxex, England, 2003.
    55. 55
      Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=122&tid=25 (accessed April 14, 2019).
    56. 56
      van Brummelen, T. C.; van Hattum, A. G. M.; Crommentuijn, T.; Kalf, D. F. Bioavailability and Ecotoxicity of PAHs. In The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Vol. 3, Part J: PAHs and Related Compounds; Springer-Verlag, 1998; pp 203263.
    57. 57
      Ireland, D. S.; Burton, G. A., Jr.; Hess, G. G. In Situ Toxicity Evaluations of Turbidity and Photoinduction of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1996, 15 (4), 574581,  DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620150424
    58. 58
      Diamond, S. A.; Milroy, N. J.; Mattson, V. R.; Heinis, L. J.; Mount, D. R. Photoactivated Toxicity in Amphipods Collected from Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Sites. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2003, 22, 27522760
    59. 59
      Douben, P. E. T. Assessing Risks from Photoactivated Toxicity of PAHs to Aquatic Organisms. In PAHs: Ecotoxicological Perspective; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2003; pp 275296.
    60. 60
      Bryer, P. J.; Elliott, J. N.; Willingham, E. J. The Effects of Coal Tar Based Pavement Sealer on Amphibian Development and Metamorphosis. Ecotoxicology 2006, 15, 241247,  DOI: 10.1007/s10646-005-0055-z
    61. 61
      Bommarito, T.; Sparling, D. W.; Halbrook, R. S. Toxicity of Coal-Tar Pavement Sealants and Ultraviolet Radiation to Ambystoma Maculatum. Ecotoxicology 2010, 19, 11471156,  DOI: 10.1007/s10646-010-0498-8
    62. 62
      Jiang, J.; Wu, S.; Wang, Y.; An, X.; Cai, L.; Zhao, X.; Wu, C. Carbendazim Has the Potential to Induce Oxidative Stress, Apoptosis, Immunotoxicity and Endocrine Disruption during Zebrafish Larvae Development. Toxicol. In Vitro 2015, 29 (7), 14731481,  DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2015.06.003
    63. 63
      Weston, D. P.; Chen, D.; Lydy, M. J. Stormwater-Related Transport of the Insecticides Bifenthrin, Fipronil, Imidacloprid, and Chlorpyrifos into a Tidal Wetland, San Francisco Bay, California. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 527–528, 1825,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.095
    64. 64
      Hladik, M. L.; Kolpin, D. W. First National-Scale Reconnaissance of Neonicotinoid Insecticides in Streams across the USA. Environ. Chem. 2016, 13 (1), 1220,  DOI: 10.1071/EN15061
    65. 65
      United States Environmental Protection Agency. Aquatic Life Benchmarks and Ecological Risk Assessments for Registered Pesticides, https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/aquatic-life-benchmarks-and-ecological-risk (accessed April 9, 2019).
    66. 66
      Gerecke, A. C.; Scharer, M.; Singer, H. P.; Muller, S. R.; Schwarzenbach, R. P.; Sagesser, M.; Ochsenbein, U.; Popow, G. Sources of Pesticides in Surface Waters in Switzerland: Pesticide Load through Waste Water Treatment Plants––Current Situation and Reduction Potential. Chemosphere 2002, 48, 307315,  DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00080-2
    67. 67
      Rasmussen, J. J.; Wiberg-Larsen, P.; Baattrup-Pedersen, A.; Cedergreen, N.; McKnight, U. S.; Kreuger, J.; Jacobsen, D.; Kristensen, E. A.; Friberg, N. The Legacy of Pesticide Pollution: An Overlooked Factor in Current Risk Assessments of Freshwater Systems. Water Res. 2015, 84, 2532,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.07.021
    68. 68
      Sidhu, J. P. S.; Ahmed, W.; Gernjak, W.; Aryal, R.; McCarthy, D.; Palmer, A.; Kolotelo, P.; Toze, S. Sewage Pollution in Urban Stormwater Runoff as Evident from the Widespread Presence of Multiple Microbial and Chemical Source Tracking Markers. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 463–464, 488496,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.020
    69. 69
      Oosterhuis, M.; Sacher, F.; ter Laak, T. L. Prediction of Concentration Levels of Metformin and Other High Consumption Pharmaceuticals in Wastewater and Regional Surface Water Based on Sales Data. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 442, 380388,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.046
    70. 70
      Tisler, S.; Zwiener, C. Formation and Occurrence of Transformation Products of Metformin in Wastewater and Surface Water. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 628–629, 11211129,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.105
    71. 71
      Bradley, P. M.; Journey, C. A.; Button, D. T.; Carlisle, D. M.; Clark, J. M.; Mahler, B. J.; Nakagaki, N.; Qi, S. L.; Waite, I. R.; Vanmetre, P. C. Metformin and Other Pharmaceuticals Widespread in Wadeable Streams of the Southeastern United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2016, 3, 243249,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00170
    72. 72
      Niemuth, N. J.; Klaper, R. D. Emerging Wastewater Contaminant Metformin Causes Intersex and Reduced Fecundity in Fish. Chemosphere 2015, 135, 3845,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.060
    73. 73
      Bradley, P. M.; Barber, L. B.; Duris, J. W.; Foreman, W. T.; Furlong, E. T.; Hubbard, L. E.; Hutchinson, K. J.; Keefe, S. H.; Kolpin, D. W. Riverbank Fi Ltration Potential of Pharmaceuticals in a Wastewater-Impacted Stream. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 193, 173180,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.06.028
    74. 74
      Underwood, J. C.; Harvey, R. W.; Metge, D. W.; Repert, D. A.; Baumgartner, L. K.; Smith, R. L.; Roane, T. M.; Barber, L. B. Effects of the Antimicrobial Sulfamethoxazole on Groundwater Bacterial Enrichment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (7), 30963101,  DOI: 10.1021/es103605e
    75. 75
      Haack, S. K.; Metge, D. W.; Fogarty, L. R.; Meyer, M. T.; Barber, L. B.; Harvey, R. W.; LeBlanc, D. R.; Kolpin, D. W. Effects on Groundwater Microbial Communities of an Engineered 30-Day In Situ Exposure to the Antibiotic Sulfamethoxazole. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46 (14), 74787486,  DOI: 10.1021/es3009776