ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Material Flow Analysis with Multiple Material Characteristics to Assess the Potential for Flat Steel Prompt Scrap Prevention and Diversion without Remelting

  • Iain P. Flint
    Iain P. Flint
    Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom
  • André Cabrera Serrenho
    André Cabrera Serrenho
    Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom
  • Richard C. Lupton
    Richard C. Lupton
    Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom
  • , and 
  • Julian M. Allwood*
    Julian M. Allwood
    Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom
    *E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: +44 1223 748 271.
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 4, 2459–2466
Publication Date (Web):January 21, 2020
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03955

Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

  • Open Access

Article Views

2665

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (6 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Thirty-two percent of the liquid metal used to make flat steel products in Europe does not end up in a final product. Sixty percent of this material is instead scrapped during manufacturing and the remainder during fabrication of finished steel products. Although this scrap is collected and recycled, remelting this scrap requires approximately 2 MWh/t, but some of this material could instead be diverted for use in other applications without remelting. However, this diversion depends not just on the mass of scrapped steel but also on its material characteristics. To enhance our understanding of the potential for such scrap diversion, this paper presents a novel material flow analysis of flat steel produced in Europe in 2013. This analysis considers the flow of steel characterized not only by mass but, for the first time, also by grade, thickness, and coating. The results show that thin-gauge galvanized drawing steel is the most commonly demanded steel grade across the industry, and most scrap of this grade is generated by the automotive industry. There are thus potential opportunities for preventing and diverting scrap of this grade. We discuss the role of the geometric compatibility of parts and propose tessellating blanks for various car manufacturers in the same coil of steel to increase the utilization rates of steel.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

With wide ranges of available strength, formability, weldability, toughness, and hardness, there is a grade of steel suitable for most engineering applications. By combining this variety with abundant ores and a relatively cheap cost of production, steel has become ubiquitous across the globe. 1.63 billion tonnes of steel were produced in 2016, (1) more than any other material apart from cement. (2) This ubiquity has its price: According to Allwood et al., (3) steel accounts for 6% of global CO2 emissions, giving it the largest footprint of any material in use today. With the combined pressures of emission targets, overcapacity of blast furnaces, and cheaper production in developing economies, it is pertinent to ask: is this a good time to change the way we use steel?
Improvements in energy efficiency over the last 50 years have already substantially decreased CO2 emissions from the steel industry to half of what they were per tonne in the 1960s. (4) However, over that same period, demand for steel has quadrupled, leading to a net doubling in emissions, a trend that is likely to continue as global economies develop. As an alternative, Allwood et al., (5) Milford et al., (6) and Pauliuk and Müller, (7) among others, have shown that pursuing material efficiency strategies can substantially reduce the carbon footprint of the steel industry. However, not all steel is created equal. The World Steel Association estimates that there are approximately 3500 grades in use today, each tailored for particular applications. Evaluation of material efficiency strategies such as process scrap diversion across different manufacturing sectors requires an understanding of the physical dimensions, mechanical properties, and corrosion protection required by each sector. For this reason, more than just measuring the mass flow of steel for each application, additional resolution of the grade, thickness, and coating of steel products would provide new insights into the most efficient uses of all steel products.
Material flow analysis (MFA) applies conservation of mass within a well-defined system boundary to determine the flow of material between the elements of that system. (8) Over the past two decades, MFA has been used to calculate the trade flow of materials between nations, (9) estimate material stocks, (10) and project trends of steel scrap supply. (11) MFA studies can be classified as top-down if they rely upon nationally collected statistics to form their data set, or bottom-up if the data is gathered by the inventory of the stocks within a system.
Top-down studies determine the flow in each time interval, from which stocks can be deduced. Previous top-down studies have calculated the flow of energy required during steelmaking, (12) mapped global production and consumption of steel, (13) and estimated the future demand for steel and the availability of scrap. These studies have been applied to inform decisions, including the requirement for new blast furnace or electric arc furnace capacity. (7,11,14,15)
Conversely, bottom-up studies involve the determination of stocks within a system boundary, from which the flow could in theory be determined. This would require knowledge of stock levels over consecutive time intervals, but in practice this has not yet been attempted. Bottom-up studies have calculated stocks of iron at the municipal, (16) state, (17) and national (18) levels through the direct inventory of iron-containing goods, as well as at state and national levels using correlations with proxy measures such as nighttime light intensity (19−21) and GDP/capita. (22)
A review of 50 MFA studies calculating stocks and flow of steel in the Supporting Information reveals that methods to date provide compelling insights into both the aggregate flow of steel at the global and national scale, as well as determination of steel stocks at a remarkably fine level of spatial resolution. However, two major gaps were identified in this literature: steel flow has only been disaggregated for few types of steel, and, where this detail is provided, higher-resolution steel flow has only been assessed for a small set of manufacturing industries.
In most assessments, steel is treated as a single material type, whereas, because of the range of available grades, coatings, and thicknesses, it is in reality a class of many different material types. A few studies have considered various steel grades. For example, Nakajima et al. (23) used input–output methods to assess the flow of three alloying elements of steel in Japan. More recently, Ohno et al. (24) have assessed the flow of steel in vehicles, with detail on the alloying elements present in steel to minimize their losses in steel recycling. However, for all previous studies, manufacturing with steel has only been disaggregated for a small set of industry sectors, most of them only for the automotive industry. But yield losses vary considerably across manufacturing processes and grades of steel, and therefore the availability of prompt scrap varies substantially for different grades of steel. Lack of detail on the quantities of prompt scrap by grade has been preventing the identification of opportunities for scrap diversion as feedstock across different industries, and further opportunities for reducing the generation of the prompt scrap. However, a higher-resolution MFA, capable of tracking not only flow of steel by grade, but also other material characteristics, such as thickness and coating, in addition to mass, coupled with a detailed assessment of manufacturing processes across industries, could enable the identification of novel opportunities to reduce steel production and to prevent unnecessary recycling and consequent energy use and emissions.
In this paper, for the first time, an MFA is constructed from commercial, statistical, and interview data, disaggregated by both material characteristics and the manufacturing process for Europe. This assessment enables the identification of potential opportunities for scrap diversion of flat steel across European industries, and it provides new insights into the novel opportunities to combine similar grades of steel in the same coils by tessellation across products.

Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The following sections outline how adapting conventional MFA to allow for material characteristics can open the path to assessing the real potential for scrap diversion across manufacturing sectors. Then, the creation of a data set detailed around material characteristics and production stages in both steelmaking and manufacturing is described, created from three main data sources.

Allowing for Material Characteristics

Conventional MFA considers flow described by four dimensions:
1.

Source: where the flow originates

2.

Target: where the flow is sent

3.

Time: when the flow occurred

4.

Measure: the quantity and units of the flow

However, a fifth dimension can be introduced to differentiate between multiple material types in the same study:
5.

Material: the composition of the flow

The material dimension could simply differentiate between a few different metals, or be as complex as tracking the elemental composition, microstructure, and geometry of flow of steel through a system. In the framework devised by Lupton and Allwood, (25) the material dimension for each flow, along with the source, target, and time dimensions, can be assigned an ID that describes the characteristics of that material within a “Dimension Table”. These four IDs when paired with a measure then form a flow within the “Fact Table”, with all the tables together constituting the MFA database.
For conservation of mass across all materials, MFA requires the satisfaction of two equalities, which can therefore be adapted to include material characteristics as
(1)
(2)
where fi,p,m,t and fp,i,m,t are the quantities of material characteristic m flowing to and from process p from and to process i, respectively, during time t, cp,m,t and dp,m,t are the quantities of the material created and destroyed, respectively, in p during t, and Sp,m,t is the total stock in p at time t.

Data Required for a Disaggregated Steel MFA

To produce an MFA with disaggregation in material and manufacturing processes, three types of data were collected. First, a large European steelmaker provided shipment data for 2013 that describes the physical dimensions, mechanical properties, and surface quality of each order sold along with its mass. Second, top-down data from Eurofer, the European Steel Trade Association, describing the flow of each product category of steel into each industry sector was used to scale the commercial data to represent all European flat steel. Third, models for the production of each type of intermediate steel product and each manufacturing sector were developed based on data gathered from industry interviews and site visits. These models, which we will call process maps, determine the sequence of processes required to produce each coil of steel and to convert each coil into the final goods or scrap. Figure 1 shows examples of these process maps for (a) the production of a unit of galvanized steel and (b) the conversion of a unit of steel by the light vehicles sector.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Example process maps for (a) a backward-allocated order of hot-dip galvanized steel and (b) a forward-allocated order to the light vehicles sector.

The following sections provide an overview of how the data was gathered and processed to produce the data set, and associated analyses are shown in the Results section. Full details of how this MFA was constructed and the Supporting Information associated with each of the following sections are available in the Supporting Information.

Shipment Data

The shipment database acquired for this study comprises all orders of flat steel delivered by one European steelmaking company for the year 2013. Each order is associated with many pieces of information, including the physical characteristics of the steel sold, such as its grade and thickness, as well as the mill of origin, the end user, and other commercially relevant data. To describe each order as a flow in eqs 1 and 2, five classes of information were extracted from the database:
  • Source: Where the flow originates, determined by the product category of each order; one of seven types of intermediate steel products (see Table 2) was chosen, since this allows estimation of what steelmaking processes must have occurred to produce this order.

  • Target: The destinations of steel orders from the commercial data set were consolidated into 22 industry sectors within the broad classifications of transport, construction, machinery, and goods. Some orders were shipped via distributors, providing stock holding and coil processing services. Two interviews and three site visits to steel stockists and service centers were conducted to estimate the proportion of each sector served by distributors. It was assumed that orders sent directly to an end user and those sent via distribution would lead to the same levels of scrap.

  • Material: The physical dimensions of width and thickness, the grade and grade family of steel, and the types and thicknesses of metallic or organic coatings were used to classify the material.

  • Time: This study used data from 2013 only.

  • Measure: The mass of each order in tonnes was used as the measure of flow, written as fi,j,m,t, where i, j, m, and t represent the source, the target, the material, and the timeframe of the flow, respectively.

EU Flat Steel Production

The shipment database describes the flat steel produced in Europe in 2013 by one European steelmaking company. Although data for only one company was used, their production volumes and the market share of this company were sought to gain insight into European flat steel flow. Therefore, this data was scaled up to European levels using specific ratios of the steel company’s output to that of the EU, for each end user and product category. Table 1 shows the mass of EU-produced steel for each of the seven product categories consumed by each of the eight manufacturing sectors. This table was produced by combining a linear interpolation of similar tables for 2010 and 2015 from Eurofer with other publicly reported data. (26) The flow extracted from the commercial database was categorized into one of these 56 product–sector pairs to allow scaling, with the total mass summing correctly to 88.4 Mt, the total output of the European flat steel industry in 2013.
Table 1. Estimates of Shipments of Flat Steel Products to Different Industry Sectors in Europe in 2013a
steel product categoryconstructionmechanical engineeringautomotiveelectricalother transporttubesmetal goodsother sectors
hot rolled65504910513058048099004060760
plate3530326022020124017001150230
cold rolled20502270369017902509703800360
hot-dip galvanized5170123099506402207802060390
electrocoated280901990170902034070
organic coated3080210240340300250140
tin plate01010000161010
a

All numbers in kt.

Modeling Steelmaking and Manufacturing Sectors

The flow upstream and downstream of each order of steel were determined by process maps. Each flow in the scaled database was assigned an upstream process map based on its product category and a downstream process map based on its target location and material composition. The upstream maps describe the series of steelmaking processes from creating liquid metal through to rolling and coating. The downstream maps describe the series of manufacturing processes from blanking and stamping through to the final assembly required to produce final goods. The upstream and downstream maps together depict the full production history of that order from iron ore and scrap inputs to the output of goods and the new process scrap, allowing calculations of material efficiency at the process level and up to the whole system level.
The steel industry process maps were developed from those of Llewellyn and Hudd. (27) Each process leads to yield losses (scrap), which were determined from values in the literature (13,28) and consultation with technicians during visits to an integrated steel mill in Belgium. The production outputs and associated losses for each process map are displayed in Table 2.
Table 2. Production Output and Steelmaking Losses Associated with Each Flat Steel Product in Europe in 2013a
 output
product categorylossescoils out
hot-rolled nonpicked1.07.0
hot-rolled picked3.926.6
cold rolled2.113.5
hot-dip galvanized3.018.8
electrogalvanized0.52.9
organic coated0.63.9
tin coated0.53.4
plate1.510.8
total13.087.0
a

All values in Mt.

Thirty-four interviews, 12 of which included site visits, were conducted to develop the downstream manufacturing process maps. For some sectors, distinct production pathways were identified for a material of different thicknesses, and thus some sectors are represented by multiple process maps. Table 3 summarizes this research and lists the demand, output, and scrap rate of each sector. The full details of these are provided in the Supporting Information.
Table 3. Twenty-Two Manufacturing Sectors Considered in this Study with the Number of Interviews and Site Visits Used to Determine the Process Map for Each Sectora
sectorsubsectorinterviews and site visitsdemand (kt)output (kt)scrap (kt)scrap rate (%)
transportcomponents12630168095036
 heavy vehicles1119076043036
 light vehicles316 5009400710043
 rail12502005020
 shipbuilding173056017023
constructioncivil engineering32120189023011
 exterior210 20096904905
 interior25600465095017
machineryagricultural149903790119024
 domestic appliances139302870106027
 electrical266404190246037
 other machinery140202810121030
 yellow goods12170154053029
goodspackaging35570499058010
 profiles115401450906
 containers122102120904
 drums and barrels14070358049012
 racking2313029701605
 tubes2898086203604
 boilers27206309013
 pressure vessels16405608013
 radiators1590560304
a

The calculated demand for steel in each sector, as well as the output of final goods and the scrap, is listed in thousands of tonnes (kt), as well as the scrap rate for each sector.

Results

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The procedure described in the previous section was followed to produce an MFA data set of flat steel production and manufacturing in the EU for the year 2013. This data set has been visualized as a Sankey diagram in Figure 2 with no differentiation of steel characteristics and with all steelmaking processes shown in detail, while manufacturing processes are aggregated at the sector level. Figure 2 demonstrates that the method employed in this study achieved the same level of detail as previous top-down studies for a single year, like the one produced by Cullen et al., (13) albeit at the European rather than global scale.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Sankey diagram visualization of the European steel flow for 2013. All values are in million tonnes of iron.

Figure 2 shows that, in 2013, a total input of 116.6 Mt of iron contained in ore, process scrap, and home scrap was converted into 67.9 Mt of final products, an overall material efficiency of 58.3%. Process scrap (19.1 Mt) was produced in manufacturing. Production of light vehicles created the most losses, with a yield of only 57%. Out of a total material demand of 16.5 and 7.1 Mt of scrap was produced in this sector, most of which is galvanized and of relatively high value compared with other flat steel.
Figure 3 shows alternate views of the data set with the flow separated into bundles defined by one material category. The left side of each diagram shows inputs of steel to each manufacturing sector group, while the right side shows the products of each manufacturing sector and the scrap generated in processing. Figure 3a–d shows the flow divided by intermediate steel product category, thickness, grade family, and coating, respectively, while Figure 3e,f shows the data set with uncoated flow filtered out colored by material and manufacturing sector, respectively. From Figure 3b,c, it is clear that steel with a thickness below 2 mm or made of a drawing grade is required by all four manufacturing sectors, suggesting that there may be potential for substituting materials across different industries. Further details are provided in Section 4 of the Supporting Information file.

Figure 3

Figure 3. EU steel flow for 2013, divided by material characteristics. Each view shows inputs of steel to manufacturing from steelmaking and outputs of end-use goods, as well as scrap from each of the four main manufacturing sectors: transport, construction, machinery, and goods. The views are differentiated by (a) product category, (b) thickness, (c) grade, and (d) coating. Diagrams (e) and (f) show the steel flow, excluding all uncoated material, colored by coating (e) and by manufacturing sector (f).

Figure 4a is in the same format as Figure 3, filtered for drawing-grade, thin-gauge galvanized steel, with the characteristics shown in Figure 3b–f in demand across multiple sectors. Figure 4b shows the demand for this material in each manufacturing sector, as well as the scrap produced. The highest demand and the greatest scrap output of any sector for this material type are in the light vehicles sector, which creates more scrap than the total demand of most other sectors.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) European flow of galvanized drawing steel with a thickness of 1–2 mm. (b) Demand for galvanized drawing steel with a thickness of 1–2 mm, and scrap generated by the industry sector.

Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The results show that thin-gauge galvanized drawing steel is the most common steel grade demanded across the European manufacturing sectors and is thus the easiest grade of flat steel scrap that could be prevented or diverted as feedstock to other manufacturing industries. The European automotive industry produces 190 kt of this grade per year (Figure 4), as a result of 43% yield losses in their manufacturing processes. Various interventions can improve material utilization rates in this sector, but even if only current best practices were implemented by all manufacturers (29) this would create savings of 32–42 M€ and 125–171 kt CO2 in the EU every year, at €570–730 (30) and 2.2–3.0 t CO2 per tonne of flat steel. (1)
The results show that 37% of manufacturing scrap is generated by light vehicle manufacturers, even though this sector accounts for just 19% of the demand. Approximately 30% of this scrap comes from blanking, where both the scrap and parts leaving the blanking dies remain flat, and thus hold higher chances of having geometries compatible with other uses. Although there are opportunities for improving material utilization in the automotive industry, (29) part of its high yield losses arises from the production of each component from a different coil of steel. Since automotive manufacturers are simultaneously the greatest producers and users of 1–2 mm hot-dip galvanized drawing grade, there may be opportunities to reuse this scrap within this sector. However, this is unlikely to take place, unless the steel industry tessellates blanks for various automotive manufacturers from the same coil.
The potential improvements of tessellating components could be enhanced by relaxing the specifications for steel grade for individual components across the industry, which would allow for more components to be obtained from the same coil and by matching component geometries. (31) Further opportunities may exist across industries if other sectors using identical materials were able to communicate their part geometry to the steelmaker alongside the requirements of the vehicle manufacturer. Steelmakers could thus provide blanks rather than coils of steel, avoiding fabrication scrap downstream of the supply chain. In doing so, the same service to consumers could be provided with less metal production. This would reduce supply-side costs without reducing the demand-side value, saving both emissions and resources in the process.
The results shown in the previous section reveal a potential opportunity for diversion of thin-gauge galvanized drawing steel, by assessing the compatibility of mass and material grade across the EU flat steel supply chain. The opportunities for scrap reuse depend not only on grade compatibility but also on geometry and size. An assessment of automotive sheet metal components by Horton et al. (32) shows that the excess material from blanking in the automotive industry does not result in small fragments. Since this is one of the most abundant sources of flat steel scrap, blanking scrap can thus be used in other applications. However, real opportunities for scrap diversion would also require detailed information on the geometry of scrap parts produced. Although this information is not currently available, the methodology demonstrated in this analysis could be used to estimate this opportunity by adding eventual data on geometry as a material dimension in the model described in eqs 1 and 2.
Steel scrap generated by all manufacturers is collected by scrap merchants and sold for remelting and recycling. Although steel recycling produces up to three times less emissions than primary steel production, this is still a very energy-intensive process, requiring an average of 2 MWh/t of recycled steel. (33) However, the method demonstrated in this article enables the identification of opportunities to divert fabrication scrap for use as feedstock by other manufacturers, potentially avoiding unnecessary recycling. This is possible by the identification of material grades with the highest potential for scrap diversion because they are widely used across various industries. Moreover, this identification can provide important insights into the material grade choice, since relaxing grade tolerances across many applications could increase the uses of the most common grades, thus enhancing the opportunities for scrap diversion. For example, as shown in Figure 4, galvanized drawing steel with a thickness of 1–2 mm is the most common grade of steel across most European manufacturing sectors, and therefore relaxing the thickness tolerances within this grade would create potential diversion opportunities.
Manufacturing practices evolve as a result of changes in demand and progress in engineering and manufacturing technology. Consequently, the demand for material grades in each sector is equally likely to evolve, and thus the opportunities for scrap diversion depend on the dynamics of the demand for different grades and quantities of steel products over time. The method described in this paper could be applied to update potential opportunities according to the dynamics of the steel demand at each time. This method could also be applied to other material industries where significant differences in material characteristics could be exploited and large companies in possession of reliable commercial data could provide a similar starting database to the one used in this study. This might be of particular interest to aluminum suppliers.
Rigorous data on the national flow of steel, scrap arisings, and on the allocation of grades of steel to manufacturers is difficult to obtain, since there are no official statistics reporting them, and there is a lack of national studies quantifying this flow. The analysis presented here is thus subject to uncertainty. A shipment database of a big European steelmaking company was used to represent European flow, and the material flow analysis required several assumptions described in detail in the Supporting Information file. Despite these limitations, the data used in this paper is the best available data for the entire European flow of flat steel and it is sufficient to determine the scale of flow, since the market share of the company considered for this assessment is big enough to be representative of the European market, and the assumptions used here resulted from several interviews conducted across various European countries.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b03955.

  • Full literature review; extended discussion of the methodology employed in this study; data gathered and generated to create the MFA flow data set; EU flat steel production; modelling steelmaking and manufacturing sectors (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Iain P. Flint - Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom
    • André Cabrera Serrenho - Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom
    • Richard C. Lupton - Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The authors would like to acknowledge the help of all the companies that provided data and facilitated site visits. The authors were supported by ArcelorMittal and a grant provided by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC grant reference EP/N02351X/1).

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 33 other publications.

  1. 1
    The World Steel Association. World Steel in Figures 2017 ; 2017; pp 117.
  2. 2
    U.S. Geological Survey. Mineral Commodity Summaries 2017 ; 2017; p 202.
  3. 3
    Allwood, J. M.; Braun, D.; Music, O. The effect of partially cut-out blanks on geometric accuracy in incremental sheet forming. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2010, 210, 15011510
  4. 4
    The World Steel Association. Energy Use in the Steel Industry ; 2015; pp 13.
  5. 5
    Allwood, J. M.; Cullen, J. M.; Milford, R. L. Options for achieving a 50% cut in industrial carbon emissions by 2050. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 188894,  DOI: 10.1021/es902909k
  6. 6
    Milford, R. L.; Pauliuk, S.; Allwood, J. M.; Müller, D. B. The Roles of Energy and Material Efficiency in Meeting Steel Industry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 34483454,  DOI: 10.1021/es3031424
  7. 7
    Pauliuk, S.; Müller, D. B. The role of in-use stocks in the social metabolism and in climate change mitigation. Global Environ. Change 2014, 24, 132142,  DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.006
  8. 8
    Fischer-Kowalski, M. Society’s Metabolism: The Intellectual History of Materials Flow Analysis, Part I, 1860-1970. J. Ind. Ecol. 1998, 2, 6178,  DOI: 10.1162/jiec.1998.2.1.61
  9. 9
    Wang, T. A. O.; Müller, D. B.; Graedel, T. F. Forging the Anthropogenic Iron Cycle. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 51205129,  DOI: 10.1021/es062761t
  10. 10
    Müller, D. B.; Wang, T.; Duval, B. Patterns of Iron Use in Societal Evolution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 182188,  DOI: 10.1021/es102273t
  11. 11
    Pauliuk, S.; Milford, R. L.; Müller, D. B.; Allwood, J. M. The steel scrap age. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 344854,  DOI: 10.1021/es303149z
  12. 12
    Andersen, J. P.; Hyman, B. Energy and material flow models for the US steel industry. Energy 2001, 26, 137159,  DOI: 10.1016/S0360-5442(00)00053-0
  13. 13
    Cullen, J. M.; Allwood, J. M.; Bambach, M. D. Mapping the global flow of steel: from steelmaking to end-use goods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 1304855,  DOI: 10.1021/es302433p
  14. 14
    Hatayama, H.; Daigo, I.; Matsuno, Y.; Adachi, Y. Outlook of the world steel cycle based on the stock and flow dynamics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 645763,  DOI: 10.1021/es100044n
  15. 15
    Yellishetty, M.; Mudd, G. M.; Ranjith, P.; Tharumarajah, A. Environmental life-cycle comparisons of steel production and recycling: sustainability issues, problems and prospects. Environ. Sci. Policy 2011, 14, 650663,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.008
  16. 16
    Drakonakis, K.; Rostkowski, K.; Rauch, J.; Graedel, T.; Gordon, R. Metal capital sustaining a North American city: Iron and copper in New Haven, CT. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 2007, 49, 406420,  DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.05.005
  17. 17
    Eckelman, M.; Rauch, J.; Gordon, R.; Coppock, J. In-Use Stocks of Iron in the State of Connecticut, USA; Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, 2007.
  18. 18
    Tanikawa, H.; Fishman, T.; Okuoka, K.; Sugimoto, K. The Weight of Society Over Time and Space: A Comprehensive Account of the Construction Material Stock of Japan, 1945-2010. J. Ind. Ecol. 2015, 19, 778791,  DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12284
  19. 19
    Hsu, F.-C.; Daigo, I.; Matsuno, Y.; Adachi, Y. Estimation of Steel Stock in Building and Civil Construction by Satellite Images. ISIJ Int. 2011, 51, 313319,  DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.51.313
  20. 20
    Hattori, R.; Horie, S.; Hsu, F.-C.; Elvidge, C. D.; Matsuno, Y. Estimation of in-use steel stock for civil engineering and building using nighttime light images. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 2014, 83, 15,  DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.11.007
  21. 21
    Liang, H.; Tanikawa, H.; Matsuno, Y.; Dong, L. Modeling In-Use Steel Stock in China’s Buildings and Civil Engineering Infrastructure Using Time-Series of DMSP/OLS Nighttime Lights. Remote Sensing 2014, 6, 47804800,  DOI: 10.3390/rs6064780
  22. 22
    Rauch, J. N. Global mapping of Al, Cu, Fe, and Zn in-use stocks and in-ground resources. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 1892018925,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0900658106
  23. 23
    Nakajima, K.; Ohno, H.; Yasushi, K.; Matsubae, K.; Takeda, O.; Miki, T.; Nakamura, S.; Nagasaka, T. Simultaneous Material Flow Analysis of Nickel, Chromium, and Molybdenum Used in Alloy Steel by Means of Input-Output Analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 46534660,  DOI: 10.1021/es3043559
  24. 24
    Ohno, H.; Matsubae, K.; Nakajima, K.; Yasushi, K.; Nakamura, S.; Fukushima, Y.; Nagasaka, T. Optimal Recycling of Steel Scrap and Alloying Elements: Input-Output based Linear Programming Method with Its Application to End-of-Life Vehicles in Japan. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 1308613094,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04477
  25. 25
    Lupton, R. C.; Allwood, J. M. Hybrid Sankey diagrams: Visual analysis of multidimensional data for understanding resource use. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 124, 141151,  DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.05.002
  26. 26
    Eurofer. European Steel in Figures - 2017 Edition ; 2017.
  27. 27
    Llewellyn, D.; Hudd, R. Steels: Metallurgy and Applications; Butterworth-Heinemann, 1998.
  28. 28
    Milford, R. L.; Allwood, J. M.; Cullen, J. M. Assessing the potential of yield improvements, through process scrap reduction, for energy and CO2 abatement in the steel and aluminium sectors. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 55, 11851195,  DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.05.021
  29. 29
    Horton, P. M.; Allwood, J. M. Yield improvement opportunities for manufacturing automotive sheet metal components. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2017, 249, 7888,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.05.037
  30. 30
    MEPS International Ltd. MEPS EU Carbon Steel Prices; 2018, http://www.meps.co.uk.
  31. 31
    Flint, I. P.; Allwood, J. M.; Serrenho, A. C. Scrap, carbon and cost savings from the adoption of flexible nested blanking. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 104, 11711181,  DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-03995-6
  32. 32
    Horton, P. M.; Allwood, J. M.; Cleaver, C. Implementing material efficiency in practice: A case study to improve the material utilisation of automotive sheet metal components. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 145, 4966,  DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.012
  33. 33
    IEA. IEA World Energy Balances ; 2017.

Cited By

This article is cited by 6 publications.

  1. Yunhan Cui, Jingwen Chen, Zhongyu Wang, Jiayu Wang, David T. Allen. Coupled Dynamic Material Flow, Multimedia Environmental Model, and Ecological Risk Analysis for Chemical Management: A Di(2-ethylhexhyl) Phthalate Case in China. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (15) , 11006-11016. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c03497
  2. W. Hagedorn, S. Jäger, L. Wieczorek, P. Kronenberg, K. Greiff, S. Weber, A. Roettger. More than recycling – The potential of the circular economy shown by a case study of the metal working industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 2022, 377 , 134439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134439
  3. Sui Guo, Ze Wang, Xing Zhou, Yanan Wang. Multiscale Price Lead-Lag Relationship between Steel Materials and Industry Chain Products Based on Network Analysis. Entropy 2022, 24 (7) , 865. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24070865
  4. Jonathan M. Cullen, Daniel R. Cooper. Material Flows and Efficiency. Annual Review of Materials Research 2022, 52 (1) , 525-559. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-125903
  5. Pei-Chiun Li, Hsiu-Ching Shih, Hwong-wen Ma. Applying probabilistic material flow analysis for quality control and management of waste recycling in steelmaking. Waste Management 2022, 144 , 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.03.011
  6. Tomasz Błażejewski, Stuart RJ Walker, Rukayya Ibrahim Muazu, Rachael H Rothman. Reimagining the milk supply chain: Reusable vessels for bulk delivery. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2021, 27 , 1030-1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.030
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Example process maps for (a) a backward-allocated order of hot-dip galvanized steel and (b) a forward-allocated order to the light vehicles sector.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Sankey diagram visualization of the European steel flow for 2013. All values are in million tonnes of iron.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. EU steel flow for 2013, divided by material characteristics. Each view shows inputs of steel to manufacturing from steelmaking and outputs of end-use goods, as well as scrap from each of the four main manufacturing sectors: transport, construction, machinery, and goods. The views are differentiated by (a) product category, (b) thickness, (c) grade, and (d) coating. Diagrams (e) and (f) show the steel flow, excluding all uncoated material, colored by coating (e) and by manufacturing sector (f).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) European flow of galvanized drawing steel with a thickness of 1–2 mm. (b) Demand for galvanized drawing steel with a thickness of 1–2 mm, and scrap generated by the industry sector.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 33 other publications.

    1. 1
      The World Steel Association. World Steel in Figures 2017 ; 2017; pp 117.
    2. 2
      U.S. Geological Survey. Mineral Commodity Summaries 2017 ; 2017; p 202.
    3. 3
      Allwood, J. M.; Braun, D.; Music, O. The effect of partially cut-out blanks on geometric accuracy in incremental sheet forming. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2010, 210, 15011510
    4. 4
      The World Steel Association. Energy Use in the Steel Industry ; 2015; pp 13.
    5. 5
      Allwood, J. M.; Cullen, J. M.; Milford, R. L. Options for achieving a 50% cut in industrial carbon emissions by 2050. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 188894,  DOI: 10.1021/es902909k
    6. 6
      Milford, R. L.; Pauliuk, S.; Allwood, J. M.; Müller, D. B. The Roles of Energy and Material Efficiency in Meeting Steel Industry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 34483454,  DOI: 10.1021/es3031424
    7. 7
      Pauliuk, S.; Müller, D. B. The role of in-use stocks in the social metabolism and in climate change mitigation. Global Environ. Change 2014, 24, 132142,  DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.006
    8. 8
      Fischer-Kowalski, M. Society’s Metabolism: The Intellectual History of Materials Flow Analysis, Part I, 1860-1970. J. Ind. Ecol. 1998, 2, 6178,  DOI: 10.1162/jiec.1998.2.1.61
    9. 9
      Wang, T. A. O.; Müller, D. B.; Graedel, T. F. Forging the Anthropogenic Iron Cycle. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 51205129,  DOI: 10.1021/es062761t
    10. 10
      Müller, D. B.; Wang, T.; Duval, B. Patterns of Iron Use in Societal Evolution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 182188,  DOI: 10.1021/es102273t
    11. 11
      Pauliuk, S.; Milford, R. L.; Müller, D. B.; Allwood, J. M. The steel scrap age. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 344854,  DOI: 10.1021/es303149z
    12. 12
      Andersen, J. P.; Hyman, B. Energy and material flow models for the US steel industry. Energy 2001, 26, 137159,  DOI: 10.1016/S0360-5442(00)00053-0
    13. 13
      Cullen, J. M.; Allwood, J. M.; Bambach, M. D. Mapping the global flow of steel: from steelmaking to end-use goods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 1304855,  DOI: 10.1021/es302433p
    14. 14
      Hatayama, H.; Daigo, I.; Matsuno, Y.; Adachi, Y. Outlook of the world steel cycle based on the stock and flow dynamics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 645763,  DOI: 10.1021/es100044n
    15. 15
      Yellishetty, M.; Mudd, G. M.; Ranjith, P.; Tharumarajah, A. Environmental life-cycle comparisons of steel production and recycling: sustainability issues, problems and prospects. Environ. Sci. Policy 2011, 14, 650663,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.008
    16. 16
      Drakonakis, K.; Rostkowski, K.; Rauch, J.; Graedel, T.; Gordon, R. Metal capital sustaining a North American city: Iron and copper in New Haven, CT. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 2007, 49, 406420,  DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.05.005
    17. 17
      Eckelman, M.; Rauch, J.; Gordon, R.; Coppock, J. In-Use Stocks of Iron in the State of Connecticut, USA; Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, 2007.
    18. 18
      Tanikawa, H.; Fishman, T.; Okuoka, K.; Sugimoto, K. The Weight of Society Over Time and Space: A Comprehensive Account of the Construction Material Stock of Japan, 1945-2010. J. Ind. Ecol. 2015, 19, 778791,  DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12284
    19. 19
      Hsu, F.-C.; Daigo, I.; Matsuno, Y.; Adachi, Y. Estimation of Steel Stock in Building and Civil Construction by Satellite Images. ISIJ Int. 2011, 51, 313319,  DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.51.313
    20. 20
      Hattori, R.; Horie, S.; Hsu, F.-C.; Elvidge, C. D.; Matsuno, Y. Estimation of in-use steel stock for civil engineering and building using nighttime light images. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 2014, 83, 15,  DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.11.007
    21. 21
      Liang, H.; Tanikawa, H.; Matsuno, Y.; Dong, L. Modeling In-Use Steel Stock in China’s Buildings and Civil Engineering Infrastructure Using Time-Series of DMSP/OLS Nighttime Lights. Remote Sensing 2014, 6, 47804800,  DOI: 10.3390/rs6064780
    22. 22
      Rauch, J. N. Global mapping of Al, Cu, Fe, and Zn in-use stocks and in-ground resources. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 1892018925,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0900658106
    23. 23
      Nakajima, K.; Ohno, H.; Yasushi, K.; Matsubae, K.; Takeda, O.; Miki, T.; Nakamura, S.; Nagasaka, T. Simultaneous Material Flow Analysis of Nickel, Chromium, and Molybdenum Used in Alloy Steel by Means of Input-Output Analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 46534660,  DOI: 10.1021/es3043559
    24. 24
      Ohno, H.; Matsubae, K.; Nakajima, K.; Yasushi, K.; Nakamura, S.; Fukushima, Y.; Nagasaka, T. Optimal Recycling of Steel Scrap and Alloying Elements: Input-Output based Linear Programming Method with Its Application to End-of-Life Vehicles in Japan. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 1308613094,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04477
    25. 25
      Lupton, R. C.; Allwood, J. M. Hybrid Sankey diagrams: Visual analysis of multidimensional data for understanding resource use. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 124, 141151,  DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.05.002
    26. 26
      Eurofer. European Steel in Figures - 2017 Edition ; 2017.
    27. 27
      Llewellyn, D.; Hudd, R. Steels: Metallurgy and Applications; Butterworth-Heinemann, 1998.
    28. 28
      Milford, R. L.; Allwood, J. M.; Cullen, J. M. Assessing the potential of yield improvements, through process scrap reduction, for energy and CO2 abatement in the steel and aluminium sectors. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 55, 11851195,  DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.05.021
    29. 29
      Horton, P. M.; Allwood, J. M. Yield improvement opportunities for manufacturing automotive sheet metal components. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2017, 249, 7888,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.05.037
    30. 30
      MEPS International Ltd. MEPS EU Carbon Steel Prices; 2018, http://www.meps.co.uk.
    31. 31
      Flint, I. P.; Allwood, J. M.; Serrenho, A. C. Scrap, carbon and cost savings from the adoption of flexible nested blanking. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 104, 11711181,  DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-03995-6
    32. 32
      Horton, P. M.; Allwood, J. M.; Cleaver, C. Implementing material efficiency in practice: A case study to improve the material utilisation of automotive sheet metal components. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 145, 4966,  DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.012
    33. 33
      IEA. IEA World Energy Balances ; 2017.
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b03955.

    • Full literature review; extended discussion of the methodology employed in this study; data gathered and generated to create the MFA flow data set; EU flat steel production; modelling steelmaking and manufacturing sectors (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect