ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Dissolved Elemental Mercury [Hg(0)aq] Reactions and Purgeability in the Presence of Organic and Inorganic Particulates
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Occurrence, Fate, and Transport of Aquatic and Terrestrial Contaminants

Dissolved Elemental Mercury [Hg(0)aq] Reactions and Purgeability in the Presence of Organic and Inorganic Particulates
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Hongxia Du
    Hongxia Du
    Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
    College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, P. R. China
    More by Hongxia Du
  • Xiangping Yin
    Xiangping Yin
    Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
  • Xin Gu
    Xin Gu
    Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
    More by Xin Gu
  • Dingyong Wang
    Dingyong Wang
    College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, P. R. China
  • Eric M. Pierce
    Eric M. Pierce
    Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
  • Baohua Gu*
    Baohua Gu
    Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
    Department of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, United States
    *[email protected], (865)-574-7286
    More by Baohua Gu
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2023, 10, 8, 691–697
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00275
Published June 30, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Dissolved elemental mercury [Hg(0)aq] widely exists in natural waters, but its reactivity and purgeability in the presence of suspended particulate matter (SPM) remain controversial. This study investigated reactions between Hg(0)aq and various types of organic and inorganic SPM and found that Hg(0)aq reacted weakly with the inorganic mineral SPM (i.e., kaolinite, montmorillonite, and hematite) but strongly with organic matter (OM) or OM-coated minerals in water. Nearly 100% of Hg(0)aq could be recovered as purgeable gaseous Hg(0) after reactions with mineral SPM, irrespective of the mineral types, concentrations, and reaction time. However, incomplete Hg(0)aq recoveries were observed in the presence of OM or OM-coated minerals and in natural water containing OM and SPM, but the addition of borohydride, a reducing agent, immediately restored the Hg(0)aq purgeability and recovery. The results suggest that Hg(0)aq was oxidized and then retained by OM or OM-coated minerals. These findings clarify previous observations of so-called particulate Hg(0)aq in water and have important implications for understanding the role of Hg(0)aq in affecting Hg transformation and bioavailability in the aquatic environment.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
  • nc licence
  • nd licence
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Dissolved elemental mercury [Hg(0)aq] is an important Hg species widely observed in natural water and sediments, (1−7) resulting from the dissolution of elemental Hg(0) in water (with a solubility of ∼60 μg/L). Hg(0)aq can be emitted as gaseous Hg(0) (e.g., via evasion and purging) and/or transformed into the oxidized mercuric Hg(II) species via chemical, photochemical, and biological processes, affecting Hg water–atmospheric exchange, global transport, and cycling. (3,5,8) Hg(0)aq is generally stable in water but can be oxidized in seawater, (1,3) in brackish or high-chloride water, (1,4,5) and to a lesser extent in freshwater. (2,4,9) Hg(0)aq can also be transformed into monomethylmercury (MeHg), a potent neurotoxin, by some strains of anaerobic microorganisms, (10−12) leading to the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of MeHg in food webs. (13−15)
Hg(0)aq is commonly determined via purging with high-purity air or N2 and detecting gaseous Hg(0) directly or first trapped on gold traps followed by desorption and detection using cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry (CVAAS) or cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry (CVAFS). (1,2,4,5,9,16−18) This assay technique is rapid and efficient, as Hg(0) shows limited affinity and capacity to sorb onto inorganic mineral particles, such as silica gel, alumina, or zeolites. (19) However, several studies reported that the presence of sediments and suspended particulate matter (SPM) may significantly underestimate Hg(0)aq in water due to its adsorption onto particles. (6,7) High-affinity adsorption of Hg(0)aq onto SPM was reported in natural waters (e.g., Florida Everglades), and the adsorbed Hg(0)aq was nonpurgeable. (7) These findings led to the speculation of the potentially widespread occurrence of particulate Hg(0)aq in natural waters due to the ubiquity of SPM, (7) although the physicochemical properties of the adsorbed Hg(0)aq and SPM were not characterized. Some early studies also observed adsorption of Hg(0) vapor onto both wet and dry soils, (20,21) but soil organic matter and microorganisms are thought to have played a major role in Hg(0) sorption. Similarly, Bouffard et al. (6) showed that Hg(0)aq could be rapidly adsorbed onto lake sediments, and the sorption is strongly correlated to the organic matter (OM) content, indicating that OM is responsible for Hg(0)aq adsorption in the sediments.
These previous observations raised an important yet unanswered question of whether the adsorption or reactions between Hg(0)aq and OM and microorganisms likely altered Hg(0)aq chemical speciation (e.g., oxidation), thereby rendering it nondetectable by conventional purging and detection. The proposed natural occurrences of nonpurgeable particulate Hg(0)aq (7) may well be attributed to the reactions between Hg(0)aq and particulate organic matter (POM) or OM-coated minerals and microbes, as Hg(0)aq could be oxidized by OM and microorganisms. (10,12,22−25) All natural SPM is expected to contain some levels of OM and microbial cells, which can react with and oxidize Hg(0)aq via thiolate functional groups. (10,12,22−25) It is therefore necessary to revisit whether the existence of so-called particulate Hg(0)aq results from the adsorption or oxidation of Hg(0)aq by OM or OM-coated minerals, preventing it from being purged from the solution. Specifically, we aimed (1) to examine and compare the reactions and purgeability of Hg(0)aq in aqueous suspensions containing various inorganic SPM (i.e., kaolinite, smectite, and hematite) without or with OM coatings and (2) to determine whether decreasing purgeability is caused by Hg(0)aq adsorption on particulates or oxidation by OM.

Materials and Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

SPM and OM Samples, Chemical Reagents, and Preparations

Aluminosilicate minerals, kaolinite (KGa-2) and Na-montmorillonite (Swy-2) powders, were obtained from the Clay Minerals Society and washed three times with 1% HCl, followed by rinsing with deionized (DI) water until a circumneutral pH was obtained. Hematite (α-Fe2O3) was purchased from Strem Chemicals. These minerals were selected to represent clays and oxides commonly observed in natural water and sediments and had been previously used in studies of biogeochemical transformations of Hg(II). (26−28) Their basic physicochemical properties are listed in Table S1. Elliott soil humic acid (HA) was obtained from the International Humic Substances Society (IHSS). The as-received HA is termed the oxidized HAox, as it was isolated decades ago with a long shelf life. (29) The stock HAox solution (1000 mg/L) was prepared by dissolving HA in DI water, adjusting the pH to ∼7, and filtering it through 0.2 μm membrane filters before use. For comparisons, the reduced HAre was prepared by reduction with H2 in the presence of Pd catalysts, as previously described. (23,24,30) Additionally, a natural water sample was obtained from East Fork Poplar Creek (EFPC) in Oak Ridge, TN, and used to evaluate the roles of natural OM and SPM in affecting Hg(0)aq sorption and purgeability. The EFPC water is contaminated with Hg, (31,32) with measured Hg(0)aq and total Hg (HgT) concentrations of 1.1 and 94.0 ng/L, respectively, a SPM concentration of 5.6 mg/L, a dissolved organic carbon (DOC) value of 2.9 mg/L, and pH 7.7.
Sodium borohydride (NaBH4) was purchased from Alfa Aesar, and stannous chloride (SnCl2) was obtained from Fisher Scientific. All chemicals were analytical grade reagents and used without further purification. The NaBH4 stock solution (5 M) was freshly prepared in 1 M NaOH prior to each batch experiment, (33,34) and SnCl2 (1 M) was prepared in 10% HCl, as previously described. (17,35)

Hg(0)aq and OM-Coated Mineral Preparations

The Hg(0)aq stock solution was prepared by submerging a sealed silicone tube containing a small droplet of liquid Hg(0) in deoxygenated DI water, as previously described. (24,36) The solution attained a Hg(0)aq concentration of ∼25–40 μg/L within 1–3 days. It was used usually within 1–2 weeks and then replaced with fresh water to ensure minimal oxidation of Hg(0)aq occurred [typically <1% Hg(II), analyzed prior to each batch experiment]. (23,24) Stock mineral SPM suspensions (20 mg/mL) were prepared in DI water. HAre-coated minerals (kaolinite and hematite, 2 mg/mL) were prepared in a glove chamber by mixing the minerals with HAre (0.2 mg/mL), and after equilibration for 3 days, the mixtures were centrifuged at 6500g for 20 min; the supernatant was decanted to obtain HAre-coated minerals. The remaining HAre or DOC in the supernatant was determined so that the adsorbed HAre on minerals could be calculated, ∼7.3 and ∼17.8 mg of HA/g of kaolinite and hematite, respectively. The HAre-coated minerals were then redispersed in water prior to Hg(0) sorption and purgeability studies.

Hg(0)aq Reactions and Purgeability with SPM

Systematic studies were performed to examine reactions between Hg(0)aq and SPM at varying mineral types (kaolinite, Na-montmorillonite, and hematite), mineral concentrations (0, 10, 50, and 100 mg/L), Hg(0)aq concentrations (0.1, 1, 5, and 10 μg/L), and reaction times (∼0, 1, 4, 24, and 72 h). Stock solutions of Hg(0)aq and mineral suspensions were pipetted into 4 mL glass vials to the desired concentrations in an anoxic chamber, and the final volume was 4 mL [to minimize headspace loss of Hg(0)]. The vials were then wrapped with aluminum foil to prevent potential photochemical reactions and placed on a rotary shaker for equilibration. At selected time points, an aliquot (1 mL) was taken without filtration to avoid potential loss of Hg(0)aq and then immediately analyzed for purgeable Hg(0) by direct purging with ultrapure N2 and detection using a CVAAS (RA-915+ analyzer, Ohio Lumex Co.). The purging time was typically <3 min, verified by real-time monitoring of the Hg(0) signal returning to the baseline, as previously reported. (17,18,35) For HgT analysis, another unfiltered aliquot was transferred to a 4 mL clean vial prefilled with bromine monochloride [BrCl, 5% (v/v) in 0.2 M HCl], (37,38) preserved at 4 °C overnight or longer, and subsequently measured for HgT. (17,18,35,39) DI water without SPM was prepared as a control and analyzed in the same manner.

Hg(0)aq Reactions and Purgeability with OM or OM-Coated Minerals

Similar reactions were examined between Hg(0)aq and HAox or HAre, as well as the filtered and unfiltered EFPC waters. These experiments were performed at varying Hg(0)aq concentrations and equilibrium times but a fixed concentration of HAox or HAre (10 mg/L) or OM (2.9 mg/L DOC) in EFPC water. To evaluate whether OM coatings on minerals played a role in Hg(0)aq adsorption or oxidation, reactions between Hg(0)aq and HAre-coated kaolinite and hematite were examined in the same manner, except that a fixed Hg(0)aq concentration of 1 μg/L was used. A low ratio of Hg(0)aq (1 μg/L) to SPM (100 mg/L) was used in these experiments to maximize the potential of Hg(0)aq sorption or oxidation by OM-coated minerals. Following the reactions at predetermined time intervals, purgeable Hg(0) and HgT were again determined, and this was followed by the addition of 0.4 mL of NaHCO3 (1 M, as a buffer) (33,34) and 0.1 mL of NaBH4 stock to determine whether Hg(0)aq was oxidized during reactions with OM or OM-coated minerals. After 3 min, reducible Hg(0) was again quantified by CVAAS, and this fraction of Hg(0) was termed oxidized Hg(II). For selected samples, SnCl2 (0.1 mL) was also used as a reductant. The mass balance was monitored throughout the experiments by determining both purgeable Hg(0) (with or without reducing agents) and HgT concentrations. Each batch experiment contained duplicate samples and was repeated at least once (up to four times). Data represent averages from all replicate samples (4−8) with error bars showing one standard deviation.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Reactions between Hg(0)aq and SPM

Purgeable Hg(0) recoveries following reactions between Hg(0)aq and SPM or minerals (i.e., kaolinite, Na-montmorillonite, and hematite) were nearly complete (95–98%), regardless of the reaction time (∼0, 1, 4, 24, and 72 h) (Figure 1A), mineral types or concentrations (10, 50, and 100 mg/L) (Figure 1B), or added Hg(0)aq concentrations (0.1, 1, 5, and 10 μg/L) (Figure 1C). In all control samples (DI water without SPM), purgeable Hg(0) recoveries were also ∼98 ± 3% (Figure 1), regardless of the reaction time or the added Hg(0)aq concentration. There were no statistical differences between samples treated with or without SPM by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise comparisons (Bonferroni test) at a significance threshold of p = 0.05. (40) The result suggests that little or no reactions occurred between Hg(0)aq and kaolinite, montmorillonite, and hematite minerals so that the added Hg(0)aq could be readily purged from the SPM suspensions. A good mass balance was obtained in all samples (Figure S1), and no significant loss of Hg(0)aq occurred in the course of the experiments and analyses.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Measured purgeable Hg(0) following reactions between dissolved elemental Hg(0)aq and kaolinite, montmorillonite, or hematite (α-Fe2O3) suspensions: (A) effects of reaction time [at 1 μg/L Hg(0)aq and 10 mg/L mineral SPM], (B) effects of mineral concentrations [at 1 μg/L Hg(0)aq and 1 h reaction time], and (C) effects of Hg(0)aq concentrations (at 10 mg/L mineral SPM and 1 h reaction time).

Reactions between Hg(0)aq and OM

Unlike inorganic mineral SPM, reactions between Hg(0)aq and OM (both HAox and HAre) led to a substantially decreased purgeable Hg(0), particularly with the reduced HAre [10 mg/L (Figure 2A,B)]. At the initial Hg(0)aq concentration of 0.1 μg/L, purgeable Hg(0) in the presence of HAre decreased to 0.042 ± 0.004 μg/L after 72 h (Figure 2A), equivalent to ∼58% of Hg(0)aq reacted with HAre or 42% of Hg(0)aq recovered. Similarly, at a higher Hg(0)aq concentration (1 μg/L), ∼41.6% of Hg(0)aq was recovered following its reaction with HAre at 72 h (Figure 2B), whereas >95% of Hg(0)aq was recovered in all control samples (without HA). However, substantially larger amounts of Hg(0)aq (75–85%) were recovered after its reactions with the oxidized HAox (Figure 2A,B), indicating that the reduced HAre had a higher capacity and/or affinity to react with Hg(0)aq than did the oxidized HAox. This result is consistent with previous observations that the reduced OM is capable of oxidizing Hg(0)aq to Hg(II) species due to thiolate-induced oxidation of Hg(0)aq in the dark. (22,23,41) It is therefore not surprising that a smaller amount of purgeable Hg(0) was recovered in the presence of HAre than in the presence of HAox (Figure 2A,B). The oxidized Hg(II) is known to form strong complexes with OM or HA, (17,22,35,42) thereby preventing it from being purged from the suspension.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Purgeable Hg(0) concentrations following reactions between dissolved elemental Hg(0)aq and the oxidized or reduced humic acid (HA) at initial Hg(0)aq concentrations of (A) 0.1 and (B) 1 μg/L. (C and D) Total purgeable Hg(0) concentrations following the reduction by NaBH4 in the 24 and 72 h samples from panels A and B, respectively. The added HA concentration was 10 mg/L.

After measurements of the purgeable Hg(0) at 24 and 72 h, we further evaluated the conclusions mentioned above by adding a strong reducing agent, NaBH4, to convert the oxidized Hg(II) into Hg(0)aq, which would again become purgeable if Hg(0)aq was oxidized by HA. Conversely, if the physical adsorption was the mechanism, the addition of NaBH4 would not alter the speciation or purgeability of Hg(0)aq. Indeed, immediately after the addition of NaBH4 (<3 min), a large fraction of the previously nonpurgeable Hg(II) was released as Hg(0) (Figure 2C,D), and a good mass balance observed (Figure S2). More than 90% of Hg(0)aq was recovered after reactions with HAox or HAre for 24 h, although a slightly lower recovery (∼80%) was observed in samples treated with HAre after 72 h (Figure 2D). These results clearly illustrate that the oxidation of Hg(0)aq by HA was responsible for decreasing purgeable Hg(0) concentrations (Figure 2A,B), as Hg(II) became reduced by NaBH4. However, some strongly complexed Hg(II) may not be completely reduced, (17,35,42,43) which explains why a slightly lower recovery of Hg(0) was observed in samples treated with HAre at 72 h (Figure 2C,D). The observation was not caused by Hg(0)aq loss, as evidenced by a good mass balance (Figure S2). As previously described, (44−46) Hg(II)–OM complexation and stability may vary due to heterogeneous and multicompositional properties of natural organic matter. The stability can also increase with reaction time, as Hg(II) competitively binds from weakly to strongly bound functional groups on OM. (17,29) Therefore, Hg(II) reducibility would depend on the nature of the Hg(II)–OM complexes and the strength of the reducing agent. As such, weaker reducing agents, such as Sn(II), could reduce only a small fraction of the Hg(II)–OM complexes. (17,35) As shown in Figure S3, when NaBH4 was replaced with SnCl2 as a reductant following reactions between HA and Hg(0)aq at 0.1 and 1 μg/L, only ∼0.002 μg/L complexed Hg(II) and 0.12 μg/L complexed Hg(II) were reduced, respectively, which were much lower than those observed with NaBH4 reduction (Figure 2C,D). The results again confirm that the oxidation of Hg(0)aq by HA was responsible for decreasing purgeable Hg(0) concentrations in HA suspensions (Figure 2A,B). A previous study, however, reported that HA samples from IHSS and Acros Organics showed little or no reactions with Hg(0)aq, (7) which is not surprising on the basis of our results (Figures 2A,B), as these HA isolates were collected decades ago and the thiol functional groups on HA could have been oxidized. (29)

Reactions of Hg(0)aq with OM-Coated Minerals and Natural Water

To validate whether the presence of OM or OM coatings on minerals may cause Hg(0)aq oxidation and decrease its purgeability, we also examined reactions between Hg(0)aq and OM-coated minerals or SPM in natural waters (Figure 3). Purgeable Hg(0) was again determined by mixing Hg(0)aq with HAre-coated kaolinite or hematite, which was used to mimic naturally occurring SPM. The results showed consistently decreased purgeable Hg(0) in the presence of either of the HAre-coated minerals (Figure 3A). These observations differed from those with uncoated kaolinite or hematite SPM showing negligible interactions between Hg(0)aq and these minerals (Figure 1) and thus demonstrate the important roles of the adsorbed OM on minerals in reacting or oxidizing Hg(0)aq. The oxidation of Hg(0)aq was again validated by substantially increased purgeable Hg(0) following the addition of NaBH4 to reduce complexed Hg(II) (Figure 3B). Slightly smaller amounts of Hg(0) were recovered in HAre-coated hematite than in HAre-coated kaolinite (Figure 3B). This result differed from a previous study, in which an increased Hg(0) recovery (≤25%) was observed by NaBH4 reduction in the presence of soluble iron (Fe2+). (47) While the exact mechanism is unknown, the difference could have resulted from reactions between hematite and the reductant NaBH4 in our study. We next examined reactions between Hg(0)aq and the filtered or unfiltered natural EFPC water, and as expected, purgeable Hg(0) decreased following the reactions (Figure 3C). A slightly smaller amount of purgeable Hg(0) was recovered in the unfiltered than in the filtered EFPC water after 72 h because of the presence of DOM (2.9 mg of C/L) and small amounts of SPM (5.6 mg of C/L). Similarly, the addition of NaBH4 to these samples resulted in a nearly complete recovery of the added Hg(0)aq as purgeable Hg(0) (Figure 3D), indicating that Hg(0)aq was oxidized following its reactions with the EFPC water. (22−24)

Figure 3

Figure 3. (A and B) Purgeable Hg(0) concentrations following reactions between dissolved elemental Hg(0)aq and humic acid (HA, reduced)-coated minerals [kaolinite and hematite (α-Fe2O3)] (A) before and (B) after reduction with NaBH4. The initial Hg(0)aq concentration was 1 μg/L, and the mineral concentration was 100 mg/L. (C and D) Purgeable Hg(0) concentrations following reactions between Hg(0)aq and the filtered and unfiltered EFPC water before and after reduction with NaBH4, respectively.

Together, our results reveal that dissolved Hg(0)aq reacts weakly with the inorganic mineral SPM (kaolinite, montmorillonite, and hematite) but strongly with OM or OM-coated minerals in water. All inorganic SPM is more or less associated with OM and microbes in natural aquatic systems, (32,48) which in turn could react with Hg(0)aq and cause its oxidation or speciation changes and thus affect its purgeability. These findings suggest that previously observed occurrences of so-called particulate Hg(0)aq were likely due to speciation changes after Hg(0)aq reactions with SPM in the Everglades water, (7) in which the presence of POM or OM-coated SPM and microbes is not unexpected due to its eutrophication. (49−52) DOM and POM are ubiquitous in nature, (48,50,51) albeit their reactivities and interactions with mineral particles are often overlooked. POM was also shown as a major component of SPM responsible for Hg(0)/Hg(II) sorption in the San Francisco Bay estuary. (48) Therefore, previous observations of Hg(0) sorption in soils, sediments, and natural waters could be at least partially attributed to interactions of Hg(0)aq with OM or humic substances in those experimental systems. (6,7,20,21) As such, novel measurement techniques for determining various Hg species are needed to further understand the reaction rates and transformations of Hg(0)aq with SPM. Techniques, such as thermodesorption and isotope dilution, (6,7,53) cannot unambiguously distinguish Hg(0)aq from Hg(II) species. Rapid isotope exchange reactions between Hg(0)aq and Hg(II) species could obscure the speciation analysis, (35,36) whereas thermodesorption may be affected by different complexing ligands and solid matrices, as well as localized heating and temperature variations. Our research indicates that direct purging and detection of Hg(0) are effective for quantifying Hg(0)aq in environmental media either with or without SPM. However, caution should be taken when handling environmental samples containing low concentrations of Hg(0)aq and SPM, as Hg(0)aq readily reacts with DOM or OM on SPM and/or evades during sample filtration and storage. Future studies should be directed to better characterize Hg(0)aq–SPM reactions and Hg speciation changes under environmentally relevant and natural systems to fully understand the role of Hg(0)aq in affecting Hg transformation and bioavailability in the environment.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00275.

  • Physicochemical properties of the mineral samples (Table S1), mass balance analyses following the reactions between Hg(0)aq and inorganic particulates (Figure S1), total Hg recovery following reactions between Hg(0)aq and the oxidized or reduced HA (Figure S2), and Sn(II)-reducible Hg(II) after reactions between Hg(0)aq and the oxidized or reduced HA (Figure S3) (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Baohua Gu - Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United StatesDepartment of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7299-2956 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Hongxia Du - Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United StatesCollege of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, P. R. China
    • Xiangping Yin - Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
    • Xin Gu - Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
    • Dingyong Wang - College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, P. R. ChinaOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1157-7617
    • Eric M. Pierce - Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4951-1931
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This research was sponsored in part by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science, as part of the Critical Interfaces Science Focus Area project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). H.D. was supported in part by the Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC). ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with DOE, which will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 53 other publications.

  1. 1
    Amyot, M.; Gill, G. A.; Morel, F. M. M. Production and loss of dissolved gaseous mercury in coastal seawater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 31 (12), 36063611,  DOI: 10.1021/es9703685
  2. 2
    Amyot, M.; Mierle, G.; Lean, D.; McQueen, D. J. Effect of solar radiation on the formation of dissolved gaseous mercury in temperate lakes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1997, 61 (5), 975987,  DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7037(96)00390-0
  3. 3
    Mason, R. P.; Lawson, N. M.; Sheu, G. R. Mercury in the Atlantic Ocean: factors controlling air-sea exchange of mercury and its distribution in the upper waters. Deep-Sea Res. Part II 2001, 48 (13), 28292853,  DOI: 10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00020-0
  4. 4
    Lalonde, J. D.; Amyot, M.; Kraepiel, A. M. L.; Morel, F. M. M. Photooxidation of Hg(0) in artificial and natural waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35 (7), 13671372,  DOI: 10.1021/es001408z
  5. 5
    Hines, N. A.; Brezonik, P. L. Mercury dynamics in a small Northern Minnesota lake: water to air exchange and photoreactions of mercury. Mar. Chem. 2004, 90 (1–4), 137149,  DOI: 10.1016/j.marchem.2004.03.013
  6. 6
    Bouffard, A.; Amyot, M. Importance of elemental mercury in lake sediments. Chemosphere 2009, 74 (8), 10981103,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.10.045
  7. 7
    Wang, Y. M.; Li, Y. B.; Liu, G. L.; Wang, D. Y.; Jiang, G. B.; Cai, Y. Elemental Mercury in Natural Waters: Occurrence and Determination of Particulate Hg(0). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49 (16), 97429749,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01940
  8. 8
    Zhang, H.; Lindberg, S. E. Air/water exchange of mercury in the Everglades I: the behavior of dissolved gaseous mercury in the Everglades Nutrient Removal Project. Sci. Total Environ. 2000, 259 (1–3), 123133,  DOI: 10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00577-5
  9. 9
    Zhang, H.; Lindberg, S. E. Sunlight and iron(III)-induced photochemical production of dissolved gaseous mercury in fresh water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 928935,  DOI: 10.1021/es001521p
  10. 10
    Hu, H.; Lin, H.; Zheng, W.; Tomanicek, S. J.; Johs, A.; Feng, X.; Elias, D. A.; Liang, L.; Gu, B. Oxidation and methylation of dissolved elemental mercury by anaerobic bacteria. Nature Geosci 2013, 6 (9), 751754,  DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1894
  11. 11
    Colombo, M. J.; Ha, J.; Reinfelder, J. R.; Barkay, T.; Yee, N. Anaerobic oxidation of Hg(0) and methylmercury formation by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2013, 112, 166177,  DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2013.03.001
  12. 12
    Wang, Y. W.; Schaefer, J. K.; Mishra, B.; Yee, N. Intracellular Hg(0) Oxidation in Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50 (20), 1104911056,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03299
  13. 13
    Mason, R. P.; Reinfelder, J. R.; Morel, F. M. M. Bioaccumulation of mercury and methylmercury. Water Air Soil Poll. 1995, 80 (1–4), 915921,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01189744
  14. 14
    Chen, C. Y.; Dionne, M.; Mayes, B. M.; Ward, D. M.; Sturup, S.; Jackson, B. P. Mercury bioavailability and bioaccumulation in estuarine food webs in the gulf of Maine. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (6), 18041810,  DOI: 10.1021/es8017122
  15. 15
    Zhang, Y. X.; Soerensen, A. L.; Schartup, A. T.; Sunderland, E. M. A global model for methylmercury formation and uptake at the base of marine food webs. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 2020, 34 (2), e2019GB00634,  DOI: 10.1029/2019GB006348
  16. 16
    Amyot, M.; Southworth, G.; Lindberg, S. E.; Hintelmann, H.; Lalonde, J. D.; Ogrinc, N.; Poulain, A. J.; Sandilands, K. A. Formation and evasion of dissolved gaseous mercury in large enclosures amended with (HgCl2)-Hg-200. Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38 (26), 42794289,  DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.002
  17. 17
    Liang, X.; Lu, X.; Zhao, J.; Liang, L.; Zeng, E.; Gu, B. Stepwise reduction approach reveals mercury competitive binding and exchange reactions within natural organic matter and mixed organic ligands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 1068510694,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02586
  18. 18
    Du, H. X.; Gu, X.; Johs, A.; Yin, X. P.; Spano, T.; Wang, D. Y.; Pierce, E. M.; Gu, B. H. Sonochemical oxidation and stabilization of liquid elemental mercury in water and soil. J. Haz. Mater. 2023, 445, 130589,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130589
  19. 19
    Lee, J. Y.; Ju, Y. H.; Keener, T. C.; Varma, R. S. Development of cost-effective noncarbon sorbents for Hg0 removal from coal-fired power plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40 (8), 27142720,  DOI: 10.1021/es051951l
  20. 20
    Fang, S. C. Sorption and transformation of mercury-vapor by dry soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1978, 12 (3), 285288,  DOI: 10.1021/es60139a004
  21. 21
    Fang, S. C. Studies on the sorption of elemental mercury-vapor by soils. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1981, 10 (2), 193201,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01055621
  22. 22
    Gu, B.; Bian, Y.; Miller, C. L.; Dong, W.; Jiang, X.; Liang, L. Mercury reduction and complexation by natural organic matter in anoxic environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108 (4), 14791483,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1008747108
  23. 23
    Zheng, W.; Liang, L.; Gu, B. Mercury reduction and oxidation by reduced natural organic matter in anoxic environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 292299,  DOI: 10.1021/es203402p
  24. 24
    Zheng, W.; Demers, J. D.; Lu, X.; Bergquist, B. A.; Anbar, A. D.; Blum, J. D.; Gu, B. H. Mercury stable isotope fractionation during abiotic dark oxidation in the presence of thiols and natural organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53 (4), 18531862,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05047
  25. 25
    Hu, H.; Lin, H.; Zheng, W.; Rao, B.; Feng, X. B.; Liang, L.; Elias, D. A.; Gu, B. Mercury reduction and cell-surface adsorption by Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 1092210930,  DOI: 10.1021/es400527m
  26. 26
    Boszke, L.; Kowalski, A.; Glosinska, G.; Szarek, R.; Siepak, J. Environmental factors affecting speciation of mercury in the bottom sediments; an overview. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2003, 12 (1), 513
  27. 27
    Farrell, R. E.; Huang, P. M.; Germida, J. J. Biomethylation of mercury(II) adsorbed on mineral colloids common in freshwater sediments. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 1998, 12 (8–9), 613620,  DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0739(199808/09)12:8/9<613::AID-AOC769>3.0.CO;2-7
  28. 28
    Zhao, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, J.; Pierce, E. M.; Gu, B. Mercury adsorption on minerals and its effect on microbial methylation. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2019, 3, 13381345,  DOI: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00039
  29. 29
    Miller, C. L.; Liang, L.; Gu, B. Competitive ligand exchange reveals time dependant changes in the reactivity of Hg–dissolved organic matter complexes. Environ. Chem. 2012, 9 (6), 495501,  DOI: 10.1071/EN12096
  30. 30
    Peretyazhko, T.; Sposito, G. Reducing capacity of terrestrial humic acids. Geoderma 2006, 137 (1–2), 140146,  DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.08.004
  31. 31
    Brooks, S. C.; Southworth, G. R. History of mercury use and environmental contamination at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159 (1), 219228,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.09.009
  32. 32
    Gu, B.; Mishra, B.; Miller, C.; Wang, W.; Lai, B.; Brooks, S. C.; Kemner, K. M.; Liang, L. X-ray fluorescence mapping of mercury on suspended mineral particles and diatoms in a contaminated freshwater system. Biogeosciences 2014, 11 (18), 52595267,  DOI: 10.5194/bg-11-5259-2014
  33. 33
    Margel, S.; Hirsh, J. Reduction of organic mercury in water, urine, and blood by sodium-borohydride for direct determination of total mercury content. Clin. Chem. 1984, 30 (2), 243245,  DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/30.2.243
  34. 34
    Kenduzler, E.; Ates, M.; Arslan, Z.; McHenry, M.; Tchounwou, P. B. Determination of mercury in fish otoliths by cold vapor generation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CVG-ICP-MS). Talanta 2012, 93, 404410,  DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.02.063
  35. 35
    Zhang, L.; Liang, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, X.; Lu, X.; Pierce, E. M.; Gu, B. Isotope exchange between mercuric [Hg(II)] chloride and Hg(II) bound to minerals and thiolate ligands: implications for enriched isotope tracer studies. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2021, 292, 468481,  DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2020.10.013
  36. 36
    Wang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Liang, X.; Yin, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, W.; Pierce, E. M.; Gu, B. Rates and mechanisms of isotope exchange between dissolved elemental Hg(0) and Hg(II)-bound to organic and inorganic ligands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 1553415545,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06229
  37. 37
    Zhang, L.; Wu, S.; Zhao, L.; Lu, X.; Pierce, E. M.; Gu, B. Mercury sorption and desorption on organo-mineral particulates as a source for microbial methylation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 24262433,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06020
  38. 38
    Yin, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, L.; Chen, H.; Liang, X.; Lu, X.; DiSpirito, A. A.; Semrau, J.; Gu, B. Synergistic effects of a chalkophore, methanobactin, on microbial methylation of mercury. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e00122-20,  DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00122-20
  39. 39
    Lu, X.; Zhao, J.; Liang, X.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Yin, X.; Li, X.; Gu, B. The application and potential artifacts of Zeeman cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry in mercury stable isotope analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2019, 6, 165170,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00067
  40. 40
    Zhang, L.; Kang-Yun, C.; Lu, X.; Chang, J.; Liang, X.; Pierce, E. M.; Semrau, J.; Gu, B. Adsorption and intracellular uptake of mercuric mercury and methylmercury by methanotrophs and methylating bacteria. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 331, 121790,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121790
  41. 41
    Zheng, W.; Lin, H.; Mann, B. F.; Liang, L.; Gu, B. Oxidation of dissolved elemental mercury by thiol compounds under anoxic conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 1282712834,  DOI: 10.1021/es402697u
  42. 42
    Lamborg, C. H.; Tseng, C. M.; Fitzgerald, W. F.; Balcom, P. H.; Hammerschmidt, C. R. Determination of the mercury complexation characteristics of dissolved organic matter in natural waters with ″reducible Hg″ titrations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 33163322,  DOI: 10.1021/es0264394
  43. 43
    Miller, C.; Southworth, G.; Brooks, S. C.; Liang, L.; Gu, B. Kinetic controls on the complexation between mercury and dissolved organic matter in a contaminated environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 85488553,  DOI: 10.1021/es901891t
  44. 44
    Dong, W.; Bian, Y.; Liang, L.; Gu, B. Binding constants of mercury and dissolved organic matter determined by a modified ion exchange technique. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (8), 35763583,  DOI: 10.1021/es104207g
  45. 45
    Skyllberg, U.; Qian, J.; Frech, W. Combined XANES and EXAFS study on the bonding of methyl mercury to thiol group in soil and aquatic organic matter. Phys. Scr. 2005, T115, 894896,  DOI: 10.1238/Physica.Topical.115a00894
  46. 46
    Song, Y.; Jiang, T.; Liem-Nguyen, V.; Sparrman, T.; Bjorn, E.; Skyllberg, U. Thermodynamics of Hg(II) bonding to thiol groups in suwannee river natural organic matter resolved by competitive ligand exchange, Hg L-III-edge EXAFS and H-1 NMR spectroscopy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52 (15), 82928301,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00919
  47. 47
    Yu, C. H. Interference from Soluble Iron on Mercury Determination in Water by Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (CV-AAS) with Sodium Borohydride as Reductant. Anal. Sci. 2021, 37 (8), 11811184,  DOI: 10.2116/analsci.20N035
  48. 48
    Choe, K. Y.; Gill, G. A. Distribution of particulate, colloidal, and dissolved mercury in San Francisco Bay estuary. 2. Monomethyl mercury. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2003, 48 (4), 15471556,  DOI: 10.4319/lo.2003.48.4.1547
  49. 49
    Aiken, G. R.; Gilmour, C. C.; Krabbenhoft, D. P.; Orem, W. Dissolved organic matter in the Florida Everglades: Implications for ecosystem restoration. Crit Rev. Env Sci. Tec 2011, 41, 217248,  DOI: 10.1080/10643389.2010.530934
  50. 50
    Aiken, G. R.; Hsu-Kim, H.; Ryan, J. N. Influence of dissolved organic matter on the environmental fate of metals, nanoparticles, and colloids. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (8), 31963201,  DOI: 10.1021/es103992s
  51. 51
    Larsen, L. G.; Harvey, J. W.; Crimaldi, J. P. Morphologic and transport properties of natural organic floc. Water Resource Research 2009, 45, W01410,  DOI: 10.1029/2008WR006990
  52. 52
    Hurley, J. P.; Krabbenhoft, D. P.; Cleckner, L. B.; Olson, M. L.; Aiken, G. R.; Rawlik, P. S. System controls on the aqueous distribution of mercury in the northern Florida Everglades. Biogeochem 1998, 40 (2–3), 293310,  DOI: 10.1023/A:1005928927272
  53. 53
    Revis, N. W.; Osborne, T. R.; Holdsworth, G.; Hadden, C. Mercury in soil - a method for assessing acceptable limits. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1990, 19 (2), 221226,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01056090

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 2 publications.

  1. João Pereira Santos, David Amouroux, Vera I. Slaveykova. Dissolved elemental mercury accumulation by freshwater phytoplankton species: A pilot study. Journal of Hazardous Materials Letters 2024, 5 , 100128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazl.2024.100128
  2. Peter Olusakin Oladoye, Kang Wang, Kate Aguilar, Guangliang Liu, Yong Cai. Particles-involved photochemical processes: A review for the case of mercury reduction in relation to aquatic mercury cycling. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 931 , 172845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172845

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2023, 10, 8, 691–697
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00275
Published June 30, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Article Views

626

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Measured purgeable Hg(0) following reactions between dissolved elemental Hg(0)aq and kaolinite, montmorillonite, or hematite (α-Fe2O3) suspensions: (A) effects of reaction time [at 1 μg/L Hg(0)aq and 10 mg/L mineral SPM], (B) effects of mineral concentrations [at 1 μg/L Hg(0)aq and 1 h reaction time], and (C) effects of Hg(0)aq concentrations (at 10 mg/L mineral SPM and 1 h reaction time).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Purgeable Hg(0) concentrations following reactions between dissolved elemental Hg(0)aq and the oxidized or reduced humic acid (HA) at initial Hg(0)aq concentrations of (A) 0.1 and (B) 1 μg/L. (C and D) Total purgeable Hg(0) concentrations following the reduction by NaBH4 in the 24 and 72 h samples from panels A and B, respectively. The added HA concentration was 10 mg/L.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (A and B) Purgeable Hg(0) concentrations following reactions between dissolved elemental Hg(0)aq and humic acid (HA, reduced)-coated minerals [kaolinite and hematite (α-Fe2O3)] (A) before and (B) after reduction with NaBH4. The initial Hg(0)aq concentration was 1 μg/L, and the mineral concentration was 100 mg/L. (C and D) Purgeable Hg(0) concentrations following reactions between Hg(0)aq and the filtered and unfiltered EFPC water before and after reduction with NaBH4, respectively.

  • References


    This article references 53 other publications.

    1. 1
      Amyot, M.; Gill, G. A.; Morel, F. M. M. Production and loss of dissolved gaseous mercury in coastal seawater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 31 (12), 36063611,  DOI: 10.1021/es9703685
    2. 2
      Amyot, M.; Mierle, G.; Lean, D.; McQueen, D. J. Effect of solar radiation on the formation of dissolved gaseous mercury in temperate lakes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1997, 61 (5), 975987,  DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7037(96)00390-0
    3. 3
      Mason, R. P.; Lawson, N. M.; Sheu, G. R. Mercury in the Atlantic Ocean: factors controlling air-sea exchange of mercury and its distribution in the upper waters. Deep-Sea Res. Part II 2001, 48 (13), 28292853,  DOI: 10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00020-0
    4. 4
      Lalonde, J. D.; Amyot, M.; Kraepiel, A. M. L.; Morel, F. M. M. Photooxidation of Hg(0) in artificial and natural waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35 (7), 13671372,  DOI: 10.1021/es001408z
    5. 5
      Hines, N. A.; Brezonik, P. L. Mercury dynamics in a small Northern Minnesota lake: water to air exchange and photoreactions of mercury. Mar. Chem. 2004, 90 (1–4), 137149,  DOI: 10.1016/j.marchem.2004.03.013
    6. 6
      Bouffard, A.; Amyot, M. Importance of elemental mercury in lake sediments. Chemosphere 2009, 74 (8), 10981103,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.10.045
    7. 7
      Wang, Y. M.; Li, Y. B.; Liu, G. L.; Wang, D. Y.; Jiang, G. B.; Cai, Y. Elemental Mercury in Natural Waters: Occurrence and Determination of Particulate Hg(0). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49 (16), 97429749,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01940
    8. 8
      Zhang, H.; Lindberg, S. E. Air/water exchange of mercury in the Everglades I: the behavior of dissolved gaseous mercury in the Everglades Nutrient Removal Project. Sci. Total Environ. 2000, 259 (1–3), 123133,  DOI: 10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00577-5
    9. 9
      Zhang, H.; Lindberg, S. E. Sunlight and iron(III)-induced photochemical production of dissolved gaseous mercury in fresh water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 928935,  DOI: 10.1021/es001521p
    10. 10
      Hu, H.; Lin, H.; Zheng, W.; Tomanicek, S. J.; Johs, A.; Feng, X.; Elias, D. A.; Liang, L.; Gu, B. Oxidation and methylation of dissolved elemental mercury by anaerobic bacteria. Nature Geosci 2013, 6 (9), 751754,  DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1894
    11. 11
      Colombo, M. J.; Ha, J.; Reinfelder, J. R.; Barkay, T.; Yee, N. Anaerobic oxidation of Hg(0) and methylmercury formation by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2013, 112, 166177,  DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2013.03.001
    12. 12
      Wang, Y. W.; Schaefer, J. K.; Mishra, B.; Yee, N. Intracellular Hg(0) Oxidation in Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50 (20), 1104911056,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03299
    13. 13
      Mason, R. P.; Reinfelder, J. R.; Morel, F. M. M. Bioaccumulation of mercury and methylmercury. Water Air Soil Poll. 1995, 80 (1–4), 915921,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01189744
    14. 14
      Chen, C. Y.; Dionne, M.; Mayes, B. M.; Ward, D. M.; Sturup, S.; Jackson, B. P. Mercury bioavailability and bioaccumulation in estuarine food webs in the gulf of Maine. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (6), 18041810,  DOI: 10.1021/es8017122
    15. 15
      Zhang, Y. X.; Soerensen, A. L.; Schartup, A. T.; Sunderland, E. M. A global model for methylmercury formation and uptake at the base of marine food webs. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 2020, 34 (2), e2019GB00634,  DOI: 10.1029/2019GB006348
    16. 16
      Amyot, M.; Southworth, G.; Lindberg, S. E.; Hintelmann, H.; Lalonde, J. D.; Ogrinc, N.; Poulain, A. J.; Sandilands, K. A. Formation and evasion of dissolved gaseous mercury in large enclosures amended with (HgCl2)-Hg-200. Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38 (26), 42794289,  DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.002
    17. 17
      Liang, X.; Lu, X.; Zhao, J.; Liang, L.; Zeng, E.; Gu, B. Stepwise reduction approach reveals mercury competitive binding and exchange reactions within natural organic matter and mixed organic ligands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 1068510694,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02586
    18. 18
      Du, H. X.; Gu, X.; Johs, A.; Yin, X. P.; Spano, T.; Wang, D. Y.; Pierce, E. M.; Gu, B. H. Sonochemical oxidation and stabilization of liquid elemental mercury in water and soil. J. Haz. Mater. 2023, 445, 130589,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130589
    19. 19
      Lee, J. Y.; Ju, Y. H.; Keener, T. C.; Varma, R. S. Development of cost-effective noncarbon sorbents for Hg0 removal from coal-fired power plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40 (8), 27142720,  DOI: 10.1021/es051951l
    20. 20
      Fang, S. C. Sorption and transformation of mercury-vapor by dry soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1978, 12 (3), 285288,  DOI: 10.1021/es60139a004
    21. 21
      Fang, S. C. Studies on the sorption of elemental mercury-vapor by soils. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1981, 10 (2), 193201,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01055621
    22. 22
      Gu, B.; Bian, Y.; Miller, C. L.; Dong, W.; Jiang, X.; Liang, L. Mercury reduction and complexation by natural organic matter in anoxic environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108 (4), 14791483,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1008747108
    23. 23
      Zheng, W.; Liang, L.; Gu, B. Mercury reduction and oxidation by reduced natural organic matter in anoxic environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 292299,  DOI: 10.1021/es203402p
    24. 24
      Zheng, W.; Demers, J. D.; Lu, X.; Bergquist, B. A.; Anbar, A. D.; Blum, J. D.; Gu, B. H. Mercury stable isotope fractionation during abiotic dark oxidation in the presence of thiols and natural organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53 (4), 18531862,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05047
    25. 25
      Hu, H.; Lin, H.; Zheng, W.; Rao, B.; Feng, X. B.; Liang, L.; Elias, D. A.; Gu, B. Mercury reduction and cell-surface adsorption by Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 1092210930,  DOI: 10.1021/es400527m
    26. 26
      Boszke, L.; Kowalski, A.; Glosinska, G.; Szarek, R.; Siepak, J. Environmental factors affecting speciation of mercury in the bottom sediments; an overview. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2003, 12 (1), 513
    27. 27
      Farrell, R. E.; Huang, P. M.; Germida, J. J. Biomethylation of mercury(II) adsorbed on mineral colloids common in freshwater sediments. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 1998, 12 (8–9), 613620,  DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0739(199808/09)12:8/9<613::AID-AOC769>3.0.CO;2-7
    28. 28
      Zhao, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, J.; Pierce, E. M.; Gu, B. Mercury adsorption on minerals and its effect on microbial methylation. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2019, 3, 13381345,  DOI: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00039
    29. 29
      Miller, C. L.; Liang, L.; Gu, B. Competitive ligand exchange reveals time dependant changes in the reactivity of Hg–dissolved organic matter complexes. Environ. Chem. 2012, 9 (6), 495501,  DOI: 10.1071/EN12096
    30. 30
      Peretyazhko, T.; Sposito, G. Reducing capacity of terrestrial humic acids. Geoderma 2006, 137 (1–2), 140146,  DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.08.004
    31. 31
      Brooks, S. C.; Southworth, G. R. History of mercury use and environmental contamination at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159 (1), 219228,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.09.009
    32. 32
      Gu, B.; Mishra, B.; Miller, C.; Wang, W.; Lai, B.; Brooks, S. C.; Kemner, K. M.; Liang, L. X-ray fluorescence mapping of mercury on suspended mineral particles and diatoms in a contaminated freshwater system. Biogeosciences 2014, 11 (18), 52595267,  DOI: 10.5194/bg-11-5259-2014
    33. 33
      Margel, S.; Hirsh, J. Reduction of organic mercury in water, urine, and blood by sodium-borohydride for direct determination of total mercury content. Clin. Chem. 1984, 30 (2), 243245,  DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/30.2.243
    34. 34
      Kenduzler, E.; Ates, M.; Arslan, Z.; McHenry, M.; Tchounwou, P. B. Determination of mercury in fish otoliths by cold vapor generation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CVG-ICP-MS). Talanta 2012, 93, 404410,  DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.02.063
    35. 35
      Zhang, L.; Liang, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, X.; Lu, X.; Pierce, E. M.; Gu, B. Isotope exchange between mercuric [Hg(II)] chloride and Hg(II) bound to minerals and thiolate ligands: implications for enriched isotope tracer studies. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2021, 292, 468481,  DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2020.10.013
    36. 36
      Wang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Liang, X.; Yin, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, W.; Pierce, E. M.; Gu, B. Rates and mechanisms of isotope exchange between dissolved elemental Hg(0) and Hg(II)-bound to organic and inorganic ligands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 1553415545,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06229
    37. 37
      Zhang, L.; Wu, S.; Zhao, L.; Lu, X.; Pierce, E. M.; Gu, B. Mercury sorption and desorption on organo-mineral particulates as a source for microbial methylation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 24262433,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06020
    38. 38
      Yin, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, L.; Chen, H.; Liang, X.; Lu, X.; DiSpirito, A. A.; Semrau, J.; Gu, B. Synergistic effects of a chalkophore, methanobactin, on microbial methylation of mercury. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e00122-20,  DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00122-20
    39. 39
      Lu, X.; Zhao, J.; Liang, X.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Yin, X.; Li, X.; Gu, B. The application and potential artifacts of Zeeman cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry in mercury stable isotope analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2019, 6, 165170,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00067
    40. 40
      Zhang, L.; Kang-Yun, C.; Lu, X.; Chang, J.; Liang, X.; Pierce, E. M.; Semrau, J.; Gu, B. Adsorption and intracellular uptake of mercuric mercury and methylmercury by methanotrophs and methylating bacteria. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 331, 121790,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121790
    41. 41
      Zheng, W.; Lin, H.; Mann, B. F.; Liang, L.; Gu, B. Oxidation of dissolved elemental mercury by thiol compounds under anoxic conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 1282712834,  DOI: 10.1021/es402697u
    42. 42
      Lamborg, C. H.; Tseng, C. M.; Fitzgerald, W. F.; Balcom, P. H.; Hammerschmidt, C. R. Determination of the mercury complexation characteristics of dissolved organic matter in natural waters with ″reducible Hg″ titrations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 33163322,  DOI: 10.1021/es0264394
    43. 43
      Miller, C.; Southworth, G.; Brooks, S. C.; Liang, L.; Gu, B. Kinetic controls on the complexation between mercury and dissolved organic matter in a contaminated environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 85488553,  DOI: 10.1021/es901891t
    44. 44
      Dong, W.; Bian, Y.; Liang, L.; Gu, B. Binding constants of mercury and dissolved organic matter determined by a modified ion exchange technique. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (8), 35763583,  DOI: 10.1021/es104207g
    45. 45
      Skyllberg, U.; Qian, J.; Frech, W. Combined XANES and EXAFS study on the bonding of methyl mercury to thiol group in soil and aquatic organic matter. Phys. Scr. 2005, T115, 894896,  DOI: 10.1238/Physica.Topical.115a00894
    46. 46
      Song, Y.; Jiang, T.; Liem-Nguyen, V.; Sparrman, T.; Bjorn, E.; Skyllberg, U. Thermodynamics of Hg(II) bonding to thiol groups in suwannee river natural organic matter resolved by competitive ligand exchange, Hg L-III-edge EXAFS and H-1 NMR spectroscopy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52 (15), 82928301,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00919
    47. 47
      Yu, C. H. Interference from Soluble Iron on Mercury Determination in Water by Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (CV-AAS) with Sodium Borohydride as Reductant. Anal. Sci. 2021, 37 (8), 11811184,  DOI: 10.2116/analsci.20N035
    48. 48
      Choe, K. Y.; Gill, G. A. Distribution of particulate, colloidal, and dissolved mercury in San Francisco Bay estuary. 2. Monomethyl mercury. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2003, 48 (4), 15471556,  DOI: 10.4319/lo.2003.48.4.1547
    49. 49
      Aiken, G. R.; Gilmour, C. C.; Krabbenhoft, D. P.; Orem, W. Dissolved organic matter in the Florida Everglades: Implications for ecosystem restoration. Crit Rev. Env Sci. Tec 2011, 41, 217248,  DOI: 10.1080/10643389.2010.530934
    50. 50
      Aiken, G. R.; Hsu-Kim, H.; Ryan, J. N. Influence of dissolved organic matter on the environmental fate of metals, nanoparticles, and colloids. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (8), 31963201,  DOI: 10.1021/es103992s
    51. 51
      Larsen, L. G.; Harvey, J. W.; Crimaldi, J. P. Morphologic and transport properties of natural organic floc. Water Resource Research 2009, 45, W01410,  DOI: 10.1029/2008WR006990
    52. 52
      Hurley, J. P.; Krabbenhoft, D. P.; Cleckner, L. B.; Olson, M. L.; Aiken, G. R.; Rawlik, P. S. System controls on the aqueous distribution of mercury in the northern Florida Everglades. Biogeochem 1998, 40 (2–3), 293310,  DOI: 10.1023/A:1005928927272
    53. 53
      Revis, N. W.; Osborne, T. R.; Holdsworth, G.; Hadden, C. Mercury in soil - a method for assessing acceptable limits. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1990, 19 (2), 221226,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01056090
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00275.

    • Physicochemical properties of the mineral samples (Table S1), mass balance analyses following the reactions between Hg(0)aq and inorganic particulates (Figure S1), total Hg recovery following reactions between Hg(0)aq and the oxidized or reduced HA (Figure S2), and Sn(II)-reducible Hg(II) after reactions between Hg(0)aq and the oxidized or reduced HA (Figure S3) (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.