logo
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Detection of Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in U.S. Drinking Water Linked to Industrial Sites, Military Fire Training Areas, and Wastewater Treatment Plants

View Author Information
Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States
§ Environmental Working Group, Washington, D.C. 20009, United States
National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States
University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
# Silent Spring Institute, Newton, Massachusetts 02460, United States
@ University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882, United States
Green Science Policy Institute, Berkeley, California 94705, United States
California Department of Toxic Substances Control, 1001 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814, United States (Formerly at the Green Science Policy Institute, Berkeley, California 94705, United States)
Colorado School of Mines, 1500 Illinois Street, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
*Address: 128 Pierce Hall, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138. Phone: 1-617-384-8839. E-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2016, 3, 10, 344–350
Publication Date (Web):August 9, 2016
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00260
Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society
ACS Editors’ ChoiceACS Editors’ Choice
Article Views
52066
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

PDF (799 KB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Drinking water contamination with poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) poses risks to the developmental, immune, metabolic, and endocrine health of consumers. We present a spatial analysis of 2013–2015 national drinking water PFAS concentrations from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (US EPA) third Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR3) program. The number of industrial sites that manufacture or use these compounds, the number of military fire training areas, and the number of wastewater treatment plants are all significant predictors of PFAS detection frequencies and concentrations in public water supplies. Among samples with detectable PFAS levels, each additional military site within a watershed’s eight-digit hydrologic unit is associated with a 20% increase in PFHxS, a 10% increase in both PFHpA and PFOA, and a 35% increase in PFOS. The number of civilian airports with personnel trained in the use of aqueous film-forming foams is significantly associated with the detection of PFASs above the minimal reporting level. We find drinking water supplies for 6 million U.S. residents exceed US EPA’s lifetime health advisory (70 ng/L) for PFOS and PFOA. Lower analytical reporting limits and additional sampling of smaller utilities serving <10000 individuals and private wells would greatly assist in further identifying PFAS contamination sources.

  Note

There was a text error in the Results and Discussion section in the version published ASAP August 9, 2016; the corrected version was published ASAP August 11, 2016.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) make up a large group of persistent anthropogenic chemicals used in industrial processes and commercial products over the past 60 years.(1) Widespread use and extreme resistance to degradation have resulted in the ubiquitous presence of these compounds in the environment. The 2011–2012 U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey reported detectable serum PFAS concentrations in virtually all individuals (97%).(2, 3) Human PFAS exposure has been linked to cancer, elevated cholesterol, obesity, immune suppression, and endocrine disruption.(4-6) Health concerns in the early 2000s prompted manufacturers in Europe and North America to phase out production of some long-chain PFASs.(7-10) Declines in production of these compounds have been offset by increases in developing regions such as Asia.(8) Limited available data suggest widespread exposure to replacement (short-chain) PFASs may also adversely affect human health.(11, 12)
Human PFAS exposure includes dietary sources, household dust, air, and drinking water.(13, 14) Exposure from drinking water is a serious concern because of the high aqueous solubility of many PFASs.(15, 16) Relatively low PFAS concentrations can lead to elevated exposures in the general population.(17) Elevated PFAS concentrations in U.S. drinking water have been reported in numerous regions,(15, 16, 18, 19) especially near industrial sites that produce or use them.(6, 16, 20) For example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) concentrations 190-fold higher than the lifetime health advisory (70 ng/L) recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA)(21) were measured in drinking water near a fluorochemical facility in Washington, WV, where PFOA was used in fluoropolymer production.(18)
Many civilian airports and military fire training areas have been contaminated by PFASs contained in aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs) that are widely used during firefighting training activities. Groundwater and surface waters surrounding these sites containing PFAS concentrations that are 3–4 orders of magnitude higher than the US EPA health advisory level for drinking water have been reported.(22, 23) Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are another important PFAS source because these compounds are not removed by standard treatment methods(24) and labile precursors biodegrade, increasing concentrations in effluent relative to influent.(25, 26) Land application of approximately half of the biosolids generated by WWTPs may contribute to human exposure through subsequent contamination of water, food, livestock, and wildlife.(27)
Understanding nationwide PFAS exposures from drinking water is important for identifying potentially vulnerable populations. However, previous studies have mainly focused on individual point sources of PFAS contamination and site-specific drinking water exposures.(15, 16) Here we develop a statistical framework for investigating whether increased PFAS concentrations in drinking water are associated with the number of point sources within a watershed (represented by an eight-digit hydrologic unit code, hereafter abbreviated HUC). We used publicly available drinking water concentration data for six PFASs from the US EPA’s third Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR3), including perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS), perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA), PFOA, perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) (Table S1).(28) We discuss the utility of the UCMR3 database for identifying sources of PFASs to U.S. drinking water supplies, locations of vulnerable populations, and priorities for future monitoring.

Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Drinking Water Data

Our analysis included analytical results for six PFASs in 36149 drinking water samples from the US EPA’s UCMR3 program collected between January 2, 2013, and December 9, 2015.(28) Samples cover all 4064 public water supplies serving >10000 individuals. Data are also available for 800 public water supplies serving <10000 individuals, but this represents only a small fraction (0.5%) of the 144165 in this category. Minimum reporting levels (MRLs) for the six PFASs analyzed are listed in Table S1.
One limitation of the UCMR3 database is that national data on system intakes for public water supplies are classified,(29) making it difficult to place them within a specific hydrological network. We therefore extracted the zip codes for areas served and aggregated data within eight-digit HUCs(30) to capture the most detailed hydrologic information that exceeds the spatial resolution of PFAS data (zip code areas). We used the highest reported PFAS concentrations when multiple systems were located within a single zip code and/or when multiple zip code areas were located within the same HUC.

PFAS Point Sources

Our spatial analysis (Figure S1) included point source information for (a) 16 industrial sites listed in the US EPA’s 2010/2015 PFOA Stewardship Program (Table S2),(31) (b) 8572 WWTPs,(32) (c) 290 military fire training areas that contain 664 military fire training sites,(33) and (d) 533 civilian airports that are compliant with Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 139 for personnel trained in the use of AFFF (hereafter termed “AFFF-certified airports”).(34) PFASs produced and/or used vary across industrial sites, and not all compounds were associated with all sites. For example, a fluorochemical manufacturing facility in Decatur, AL, produced both PFOS and PFOA,(35) while only PFOA was used in the manufacturing process of another fluorochemical production facility in Parkersburg, WV.(36) We conducted a sensitivity analysis to examine the potential production misclassification bias by limiting industrial sites to include the ones that only produced or used each specific compound (Table S3). We used the Google Maps application program interface (API) to geocode coordinates based on addresses. Potentially important PFAS sources such as landfills, biosolids, and small industrial PFAS users could not be included in this analysis because comprehensive geospatial data are not available.

Spatial and Statistical Analysis

We used ArcMap 10.3.1 (ESRI) to explore statistical differences between the number of point sources in eight-digit HUCs with PFAS levels above and below the level of detection. We developed a multivariate spatial regression model for watersheds with detectable PFASs that adjusts for correlations and co-location among point sources. A natural log transformation was used to normalize the distribution of individual PFASs. PFNA and PFBS were excluded from the spatial regression analysis due to a low detection frequency (15 and 14 of 1601 watersheds, respectively). We used Moran’s I statistic to test for spatial dependence in the model residuals from an ordinary least-squares (OLS) regression and correct for spatial dependence in the final spatial regression model. Akaike Information Criterion(37) was used to compare the OLS and spatial regression models, where a lower value implies a better model fit. A series of cross-validation tests were also completed to assess the predictive capacity and stability of the final set of models. The OLS and spatial regression models were constructed using GeoDa 1.6 software,(38) and cross-validation was implemented in R version 3.1.3.

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

PFASs in U.S. Drinking Water

PFASs were detected at or above the MRLs in 194 of 4864 public water supplies, serving 16.5 million residents in 33 different states, three American territories (American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam), and the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community. Drinking water from 13 states accounted for 75% of detections, including, by order of frequency of detection, California, New Jersey, North Carolina, Alabama, Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, New York, Georgia, Minnesota, Arizona, Massachusetts, and Illinois (Figure 1). Detection frequencies for PFASs across the 4864 public water supplies were 2.2% for PFOA, 2.0% for PFOS, 1.7% for PFHpA, 1.1% for PFHxS, and <0.003% for others.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Hydrologic unit codes (eight-digit HUCs) used as a proxy for watersheds with detectable PFOA and PFOS in drinking water measured in the US EPA’s UCMR3 program (2013–2015). Blank areas represent regions where no data are available.

Many detectable PFAS concentrations in the UCMR3 database are above chronic drinking water and water quality standards for other regions (i.e., surface water European Union, PFOS, <1 ng/L; drinking water Sweden, sum of seven PFASs, <90 ng/L; groundwater State of New Jersey, PFNA, <10 ng/L; drinking water State of Vermont, sum of PFOS and PFOA, <20 ng/L).(39-42) A recent analysis developed a benchmark dose for immunotoxicity in children and suggested a drinking water limit of approximately 1 ng/L for PFOS and PFOA.(26) Data from rodents that measured sensitive end points such as mammary gland development support a similar level.(26)
Six million people were served by 66 public water supplies that have at least one sample at or above the US EPA’s 2016 health advisory for PFOS and PFOA (70 ng/L individually or combined). Concentrations ranged as high as 349 ng/L for PFOA, 1800 ng/L for PFOS, and 56 ng/L for PFNA.
The detection frequency in drinking water sourced from groundwater was more than twice that from surface water (Table S4). Long-chain PFASs(43) (PFHxS, PFOS, PFOA, and PFNA) were more frequently detected in groundwater, and short-chain compounds (PFHpA and PFBS) were detected more frequently in surface waters. This may be due to both the original mode of environmental release (as an aerosol, application to soil, and aqueous discharge) and the inverse relationship between PFAS mobility and chain length.(44) The MRLs (10–90 ng/L) in the UCMR3 database are up to 2 orders of magnitude higher than the limit of quantitation in most published studies,(45-49) and more than 10 times higher than the drinking water limit (1 ng/L) suggested by human and animal studies.(26, 50) Because PFASs are detectable in virtually all parts of the environment,(5, 7, 9, 13, 14, 20, 44, 51) we infer that the large fraction of samples below reporting limits (Table S4) is driven in part by high MRLs.

Sources Surrounding Locations with Detectable PFASs

Our analysis indicates point sources are significantly more abundant in HUCs with detectable PFASs [two-sided t test, p < 0.05 (Table 1 and Figure S2)]. This includes drinking water samples from 1601 of the 2158 total U.S. HUCs. For example, HUCs with detectable PFOA levels (8% of the total) have more industrial sites, military fire training areas, AFFF-certified airports, and WWTPs than those with concentrations below detection. These trends can be observed across all PFASs. Similarly, HUCs with point sources have higher detection frequencies for PFASs (Table S5). For example, the presence of a military fire training area within a HUC increases the frequency of detection of at least one PFAS from 10.4% to 28.2%. One caveat is that imprecise information about public water supply intakes can cause misclassification bias. Systems that draw water upstream from point sources, such as Minneapolis and St. Paul in Minnesota, may not actually be affected as indicated by the aggregated spatial analysis.
Table 1. Mean Abundance of Point Sources within Eight-Digit Hydrologic Unit Codes (HUCs) with Drinking Water PFAS Concentrations above and below the Method Reporting Limit in the UCMR3 Program
 mean abundancea within eight-digit hydrologic unit codes
compoundmajor industrial sitesbmilitary fire training areasAFFF-certified airportsWWTPsc
PFBS    
<90 ng/L (n = 1587)0.010.150.294.9
>90 ng/L (n = 14)0.210.710.5014.6
p-valued0.2060.1050.1480.069
PFHxS    
<30 ng/L (n = 1507)0.010.130.274.8
>30 ng/L (n = 94)0.060.600.638.8
p-value0.056<0.001<0.001<0.001
PFHpA    
<10 ng/L (n = 1509)0.010.130.264.7
>10 ng/L (n = 92)0.090.570.679.7
p-value0.016<0.001<0.001<0.001
PFOA    
<20 ng/L (n = 1473)0.010.130.264.6
>20 ng/L (n = 128)0.050.520.569.5
p-value0.038<0.001<0.001<0.001
PFOS    
<40 ng/L (n = 1487)0.010.130.264.7
>40 ng/L (n = 114)0.050.540.578.9
p-value0.064<0.001<0.001<0.001
PFNA    
<20 ng/L (n = 1586)0.010.150.284.9
>20 ng/L (n = 15)0.131.131.1320.1
p-value0.3660.0140.0080.007
a

The mean abundance is calculated as the mean number of point sources within HUCs with PFASs above or below the level of detection.

b

Only the major industrial sites participating in the US EPA’s 2010/2015 PFOA Stewardship Program were included.

c

Wastewater treatment plant.

d

Two-sample t-test p-values.

Results of the Spatial Regression Model

Spatial regression modeling explains 38–62% of the variance in drinking water concentrations for the four PFASs considered (Table 2). Each additional industrial site within a HUC is associated with an 81% increase in PFOA (p < 0.001), which is the strongest statistical association across compounds and point sources. Increasing PFOS concentrations are positively associated with the number of industrial sites, but this relationship is not statistically significant (p = 0.124). The small number of sites that have manufactured or used PFOS likely accounts for the lack of a statistically significant relationship.
Table 2. Spatial Regression Models for Drinking Water PFAS Concentrations as a Function of the Abundance of Point Sources
compoundmajor industrial sitesaMFTAsbAFFF-certified airportsWWTPscλdR2
PFHxS      
coefficiente24%20%–13%1%94%0.62
p-valuef0.2490.0020.0730.045<0.001 
PFHpA      
coefficient10%10%–2%0.5%72%0.40
p-value0.5690.1550.7610.436<0.001 
PFOA      
coefficient81%10%–6%2%52%0.38
p-value<0.0010.1110.3530.006<0.001 
PFOS      
coefficient46%35%–6%2%79%0.46
p-value0.124<0.0010.5120.007<0.001 
a

Only the major industrial sites participating in US EPA’s 2010/2015 PFOA Stewardship Program were included.

b

MFTA = military fire training area.

c

WWTP = wastewater treatment plant.

d

Coefficient for the spatial error term characterizing spatial influence.

e

Results have been transformed to reflect expected changes in drinking water concentrations per increase in the abundance of different sources. Positive coefficients in the results indicate increasing concentrations with an increasing abundance of point sources within the same hydrologic unit.

f

p-values for the spatial error regression model. The spatial error term is used to incorporate spatial autocorrelation structures into a linear regression model.

The number of military fire training areas within each HUC is positively associated with increasing levels of all PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, and PFHpA, and is statistically significant for PFHxS (p = 0.045) and PFOS (p = 0.007). Each additional military fire training area within the same HUC is associated with a 20% increase in PFHxS (p = 0.002), a 10% increase in PFHpA (p = 0.155), a 10% increase in PFOA (p = 0.111), and a 35% increase in PFOS (p < 0.001). AFFFs typically contain relatively high concentrations of PFOS and PFHxS and their polyfluorinated precursors compared to the concentrations of other perfluorinated carboxylates,(23, 52-54) which is consistent with these statistical results.
We find a small but significant increase in PFOS and PFOA (2%; p < 0.01) with each additional WWTP within the same HUC. This is consistent with the greater abundance but smaller quantities of PFASs released by WWTPs.(55) Similarly, results of Valsecchi et al.(51) show PFAS releases from WWTPs are important but less significant than those from fluorochemical manufacturing facilities in Italy. The number of WWTPs may also be a proxy for other population-driven PFAS sources.
The number of AFFF-certified airports is not significantly associated with PFAS concentrations in the current data set. This may reflect misclassification bias because the certification used to identify airports indicates eligibility but not actual use of AFFF. The UCMR3 database contains limited data for smaller drinking water systems where localized reports of contamination from airports have been most abundant.(22, 56)

Current Data Limitations and Future Monitoring Efforts

The UCMR3 database has several limitations that restrict its predictive power for identifying U.S. drinking water supplies likely to contain elevated levels of PFASs. Classification of geospatial data on intakes for public water supplies limits the spatial resolution of the current data set and associated statistical models to a radius of 50 km (median radius of watersheds).(57, 58) Many of the impacted drinking water systems are groundwater systems, and contaminated groundwater plumes are often much smaller than 50 km.(23, 53, 59)
Geospatial data are lacking for many potentially important PFAS point sources such as a wide range of industries, landfills, biosolids application, and other AFFF-impacted sites where relatively smaller volumes of AFFF were released.(27, 54, 60-67) Data on PFAS releases from smaller industrial facilities (e.g., plastics, textiles, paper, and lubricants) are usually withheld as confidential business information, and little information about airborne emissions is available for characterizing the importance of atmospheric releases and potential long-range transport. For example, biosolids application resulted in one of the largest PFAS drinking water contamination events in Europe(68) but could not be included in this analysis because U.S. use data are not available on a national scale.
Sources not included in our spatial analysis are represented by the highly significant lambda (λ) coefficients (Table 2). Areas with high model residuals (greater than 1.5 standard deviation) mean that current information about sources cannot fully explain the high observed PFAS concentrations. The map of model residuals (Figure S3) can thus be used to guide high-priority sampling regions in future work.
We found a statistically greater abundance of point sources in watersheds with detectable PFASs, including AFFF-certified airports. However, multivariate spatial regression models did not show a significant association between AFFF-certified airports and concentrations of PFASs in nearby drinking water. Other studies have reported elevated PFAS concentrations in groundwater wells adjacent to AFFF-certified airports.(22) Small drinking water systems and private wells may be disproportionately affected by PFASs originating from AFFF use at civilian airports, but representative data for these small drinking water systems are not included in the UCMR3 program.(69)
Approximately 44.5 million U.S. individuals rely on private drinking water wells,(70) and 52 million individuals rely on smaller public water supplies (<10000 served). The UCMR3 program includes 0.5% testing incidence for smaller public water supplies(71) and no testing of private wells, meaning that information about drinking water PFAS exposures is therefore lacking for almost one-third of the U.S. population.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00260.

  • Additional tables and figures (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
    • Xindi C. Hu - Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United StatesHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • David Q. Andrews - Environmental Working Group, Washington, D.C. 20009, United States
    • Andrew B. Lindstrom - National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States
    • Thomas A. Bruton - University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
    • Laurel A. Schaider - Silent Spring Institute, Newton, Massachusetts 02460, United States
    • Philippe Grandjean - Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
    • Rainer Lohmann - University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882, United States
    • Courtney C. Carignan - Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
    • Arlene Blum - University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United StatesGreen Science Policy Institute, Berkeley, California 94705, United States
    • Simona A. Balan - California Department of Toxic Substances Control, 1001 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814, United States (Formerly at the Green Science Policy Institute, Berkeley, California 94705, United States)
    • Christopher P. Higgins - Colorado School of Mines, 1500 Illinois Street, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
    • Elsie M. Sunderland - Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United StatesHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States
  • Notes

    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We acknowledge financial support for research at Harvard from the Smith Family Foundation and a private donor. We thank Marcia Castro (Harvard) for her feedback on an earlier version of the manuscript and Jahred Liddie (Harvard) for his assistance with the sensitivity analysis. T.A.B. was supported by the U.S. National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Superfund Research Program (Grant P42 ES004705) and the Superfund Research Center at the University of California, Berkeley. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 71 other publications.

  1. 1
    Kissa, E. Fluorinated surfactants and repellents, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2001.
  2. 2
    Lewis, R. C.; Johns, L. E.; Meeker, J. D. Serum Biomarkers of Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Relation to Serum Testosterone and Measures of Thyroid Function among Adults and Adolescents from NHANES 2011–2012 Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12 (6) 6098 6114 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120606098
  3. 3
    Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, 2015.
  4. 4
    Grandjean, P.; Andersen, E.; Budtz-Jørgensen, E.; Nielsen, F.; Mølbak, K.; Weihe, P.; Heilmann, C. Serum vaccine antibody concentrations in children exposed to perfluorinated compounds JAMA 2012, 307 (4) 391 397 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.2034
  5. 5
    Braun, J. M.; Chen, A.; Romano, M. E.; Calafat, A. M.; Webster, G. M.; Yolton, K.; Lanphear, B. P. Prenatal perfluoroalkyl substance exposure and child adiposity at 8 years of age: The HOME study Obesity 2016, 24, 231 237 DOI: 10.1002/oby.21258
  6. 6
    Barry, V.; Winquist, A.; Steenland, K. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) exposures and incident cancers among adults living near a chemical plant Environ. Health Perspect 2013, 121 (11–12) 1313 1318 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1306615
  7. 7
    Land, M.; de Wit, C. A.; Cousins, I. T.; Herzke, D.; Johansson, J.; Martin, J. W. What is the effect of phasing out long-chain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances on the concentrations of perfluoroalkyl acids and their precursors in the environment? A systematic review protocol Environmental Evidence 2015, 4 (1) 1 13 DOI: 10.1186/2047-2382-4-3
  8. 8
    Working Towards a Global Emission Inventory of PFASs; Environment Directorate, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: Paris, 2015.
  9. 9
    Wang, Z.; Cousins, I. T.; Scheringer, M.; Buck, R. C.; Hungerbühler, K. Global emission inventories for C 4–C 14 perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acid (PFCA) homologues from 1951 to 2030, Part I: production and emissions from quantifiable sources Environ. Int. 2014, 70, 62 75 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.013
  10. 10
    Butenhoff, J. L.; Chang, S.-C.; Ehresman, D. J.; York, R. G. Evaluation of potential reproductive and developmental toxicity of potassium perfluorohexanesulfonate in Sprague Dawley rats Reprod. Toxicol. 2009, 27 (3) 331 341 DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.01.004
  11. 11
    Birnbaum, L. S.; Grandjean, P. Alternatives to PFASs: Perspectives on the Science Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 123 (5) A104 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1509944
  12. 12
    Caverly Rae, J. M.; Craig, L.; Slone, T. W.; Frame, S. R.; Buxton, L. W.; Kennedy, G. L. Evaluation of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity of ammonium 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)-propanoate in Sprague–Dawley rats Toxicology Reports 2015, 2, 939 949 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2015.06.001
  13. 13
    Vestergren, R.; Cousins, I. T. Tracking the Pathways of Human Exposure to Perfluorocarboxylates Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (15) 5565 5575 DOI: 10.1021/es900228k
  14. 14
    D’Hollander, W.; de Voogt, P.; De Coen, W.; Bervoets, L. Perfluorinated Substances in Human Food and Other Sources of Human Exposure. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; De Voogt, P., Ed.; Springer: New York, 2010; Vol. 208, pp 179 215.
  15. 15
    Emmett, E. A.; Shofer, F. S.; Zhang, H.; Freeman, D.; Desai, C.; Shaw, L. M. Community exposure to perfluorooctanoate: relationships between serum concentrations and exposure sources J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2006, 48 (8) 759 770 DOI: 10.1097/01.jom.0000232486.07658.74
  16. 16
    Landsteiner, A.; Huset, C.; Williams, A.; Johnson, J. Biomonitoring for Perfluorochemicals in a Minnesota Community With Known Drinking Water Contamination Journal of Environmental Health 2014, 77 (5) 14 19
  17. 17
    Hurley, S.; Houtz, E.; Goldberg, D.; Wang, M.; Park, J.-S.; Nelson, D. O.; Reynolds, P.; Bernstein, L.; Anton-Culver, H.; Horn-Ross, P.; Petreas, M. Preliminary Associations between the Detection of Perfluoroalkyl Acids (PFAAs) in Drinking Water and Serum Concentrations in a Sample of California Women Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2016, 3, 264 269 DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00154
  18. 18
    Hoffman, K.; Webster, T. F.; Bartell, S. M.; Weisskopf, M. G.; Fletcher, T.; Vieira, V. M. Private Drinking Water Wells as a Source of Exposure to Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) in Communities Surrounding a Fluoropolymer Production Facility Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 92 97 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1002503
  19. 19
    Shin, H.-M.; Vieira, V. M.; Ryan, P. B.; Detwiler, R.; Sanders, B.; Steenland, K.; Bartell, S. M. Environmental Fate and Transport Modeling for Perfluorooctanoic Acid Emitted from the Washington Works Facility in West Virginia Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (4) 1435 1442 DOI: 10.1021/es102769t
  20. 20
    Perfluorochemical Serum Sampling in the vicinity of Decatur, Alabama, Morgan, Lawrence, and Limestone Counties; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, 2013.
  21. 21
    Lifetime Health Advisories and Health Effects Support Documents for Perfluorooctanoic Acid and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2016.
  22. 22
    Ahrens, L.; Norstrom, K.; Viktor, T.; Cousins, A. P.; Josefsson, S. Stockholm Arlanda Airport as a source of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances to water, sediment and fish Chemosphere 2015, 129, 33 8 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.136
  23. 23
    Moody, C. A.; Hebert, G. N.; Strauss, S. H.; Field, J. A. Occurrence and persistence of perfluorooctanesulfonate and other perfluorinated surfactants in groundwater at a fire-training area at Wurtsmith Air Force Base, Michigan, USA J. Environ. Monit. 2003, 5 (2) 341 5 DOI: 10.1039/b212497a
  24. 24
    Schultz, M. M.; Higgins, C. P.; Huset, C. A.; Luthy, R. G.; Barofsky, D. F.; Field, J. A. Fluorochemical mass flows in a municipal wastewater treatment facility Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40 (23) 7350 7357 DOI: 10.1021/es061025m
  25. 25
    Loganathan, B. G.; Sajwan, K. S.; Sinclair, E.; Senthil Kumar, K.; Kannan, K. Perfluoroalkyl sulfonates and perfluorocarboxylates in two wastewater treatment facilities in Kentucky and Georgia Water Res. 2007, 41 (20) 4611 20 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.045
  26. 26
    Post, G. B.; Cohn, P. D.; Cooper, K. R. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), an emerging drinking water contaminant: a critical review of recent literature Environ. Res. 2012, 116, 93 117 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2012.03.007
  27. 27
    Lindstrom, A. B.; Strynar, M. J.; Delinsky, A. D.; Nakayama, S. F.; McMillan, L.; Libelo, E. L.; Neill, M.; Thomas, L. Application of WWTP biosolids and resulting perfluorinated compound contamination of surface and well water in Decatur, Alabama, USA Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (19) 8015 8021 DOI: 10.1021/es1039425
  28. 28
    Third Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC (https://http://www.epa.gov/dwucmr/occurrence-data-unregulated-contaminant-monitoring-rule-3) (accessed May, 23, 2016) .
  29. 29
    Why is only certain information made available to the public (PWS ID), but not facility location information (longitude and latitude)? Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC (https://safewater.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/212078697-Why-is-only-certain-information-made-available-to-the-public-PWS-ID-but-not-facility-location-information-longitude-and-latitude-).
  30. 30
    U.S. Geological Survey. 1:250,000-scaleHydrologic Unitsof the United States (http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/metadata/usgswrd/XML/huc250k.xml).
  31. 31
    Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) under TSCA; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC (https://http://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/and-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfass-under-tsca).
  32. 32
    Database associated with the Clean Watersheds Needs Survey (CWNS) 2008 Report to Congress; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2008, (https://http://www.epa.gov/cwns/clean-watersheds-needs-survey-cwns-2008-report-and-data) (accessed March 2014).
  33. 33
    DoD Inventory of Fire/Crash Training Area Sites (as of the end of FY 2014) ; U.S. Department of Defense: Washington, DC [https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2647381/List-of-Fire-amp-Crash-Training-Areas-EOY14.pdf(12-23)].
  34. 34
    Programs for Training of Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Personnel; U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration, AC No. 150/5210-17C, 2015.
  35. 35
    3M. Map, 3M-Decatur Manufacturing Facility. In U.S. EPA Docket AR226-1484; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2003.
  36. 36
    DuPont. DuPont Telomer Manufacturing Sites: Environmental Assessment of PFOA Levels in Air and Water. In U.S. EPA Docket AR226-1534; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2003.
  37. 37
    Akaike, H. A new look at the statistical model identification IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1974, 19 (6) 716 723 DOI: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
  38. 38
    Anselin, L.; Syabri, I.; Kho, Y. GeoDa: an introduction to spatial data analysis Geographical analysis 2006, 38 (1) 5 22 DOI: 10.1111/j.0016-7363.2005.00671.x
  39. 39
    Livsmedelsverket, Riskhantering - PFAS i dricksvatten och fisk; National Food Agency: Uppsala, Sweden, 2016, (http://www.livsmedelsverket.se/livsmedel-och-innehall/oonskade-amnen/miljogifter/pfas-poly-och-perfluorerade-alkylsubstanser/riskhantering-pfaa-i-dricksvatten/).
  40. 40
    New Jersey DEP Ground Water Quality Standards-Class IIA by Constituent (http://www.nj.gov/dep/standards/groundwater.pdf) (accessed February 18, 2016).
  41. 41
    EU. Directive 2013/39/EUof the European Parliament andof the Council of 12 August 2013 amending Directives 2000/60/EC and2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy.In EU Environmental Quality Standards; 2013.
  42. 42
    Vermont Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) Vermont Drinking Water Health Advisory (https://anrweb.vt.gov/PubDocs/DEC/PFOA/PFOA%20-%20PFOS%20Health%20Advisories/Vermont/PFOA_PFOS_HealthAdvisory_June_22_2016.pdf).
  43. 43
    Buck, R. C.; Franklin, J.; Berger, U.; Conder, J. M.; Cousins, I. T.; de Voogt, P.; Jensen, A. A.; Kannan, K.; Mabury, S. A.; van Leeuwen, S. P. J. Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in the Environment: Terminology, Classification, and Origins Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. 2011, 7 (4) 513 541 DOI: 10.1002/ieam.258
  44. 44
    Bergström, S. Transport of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances in soil and groundwater in Uppsala, Sweden. 2014.
  45. 45
    Thompson, J.; Eaglesham, G.; Mueller, J. Concentrations of PFOS, PFOA and other perfluorinated alkyl acids in Australian drinking water Chemosphere 2011, 83 (10) 1320 1325 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.04.017
  46. 46
    Taniyasu, S.; Kannan, K.; Wu, Q.; Kwok, K. Y.; Yeung, L. W. Y.; Lam, P. K. S.; Chittim, B.; Kida, T.; Takasuga, T.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Yamashita, N. Inter-laboratory trials for analysis of perfluorooctanesulfonate and perfluorooctanoate in water samples: Performance and recommendations Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 770, 111 120 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.01.056
  47. 47
    Eriksson, U.; Kärrman, A.; Rotander, A.; Mikkelsen, B.; Dam, M. Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in food and water from Faroe Islands Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20 (11) 7940 7948 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-1700-3
  48. 48
    Happonen, M.; Koivusalo, H.; Malve, O.; Perkola, N.; Juntunen, J.; Huttula, T. Contamination risk of raw drinking water caused by PFOA sources along a river reach in south-western Finland Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 541, 74 82 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.008
  49. 49
    Munoz, G.; Vo Duy, S.; Budzinski, H.; Labadie, P.; Liu, J.; Sauvé, S. Quantitative analysis of poly- and perfluoroalkyl compounds in water matrices using high resolution mass spectrometry: Optimization for a laser diode thermal desorption method Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 881, 98 106 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.04.015
  50. 50
    Grandjean, P.; Budtz-Jorgensen, E. Immunotoxicity of perfluorinated alkylates: calculation of benchmark doses based on serum concentrations in children Environ. Health 2013, 12 (1) 35 DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-35
  51. 51
    Valsecchi, S.; Rusconi, M.; Mazzoni, M.; Viviano, G.; Pagnotta, R.; Zaghi, C.; Serrini, G.; Polesello, S. Occurrence and sources of perfluoroalkyl acids in Italian river basins Chemosphere 2015, 129, 126 134 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.044
  52. 52
    Hebert, G. N.; Odom, M. A.; Craig, P. S.; Dick, D. L.; Strauss, S. H. Method for the determination of sub-ppm concentrations of perfluoroalkylsulfonate anions in water J. Environ. Monit. 2002, 4 (1) 90 95 DOI: 10.1039/b108463c
  53. 53
    Houtz, E. F.; Higgins, C. P.; Field, J. A.; Sedlak, D. L. Persistence of perfluoroalkyl acid precursors in AFFF-impacted groundwater and soil Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47 (15) 8187 8195 DOI: 10.1021/es4018877
  54. 54
    Anderson, R. H.; Long, G. C.; Porter, R. C.; Anderson, J. K. Occurrence of select perfluoroalkyl substances at U.S. Air Force aqueous film-forming foam release sites other than fire-training areas: Field-validation of critical fate and transport properties Chemosphere 2016, 150, 678 85 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.014
  55. 55
    Sinclair, E.; Kannan, K. Mass Loading and Fate of Perfluoroalkyl Surfactants in Wastewater Treatment Plants Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40 (5) 1408 1414 DOI: 10.1021/es051798v
  56. 56
    Schaider, L. A.; Rudel, R. A.; Ackerman, J. M.; Dunagan, S. C.; Brody, J. G. Pharmaceuticals, perfluorosurfactants, and other organic wastewater compounds in public drinking water wells in a shallow sand and gravel aquifer Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 468–469, 384 393 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.067
  57. 57
    Pascual, P.; Stiber, N.; Sunderland, E. Draft guidance on the development, evaluation, and application of regulatory environmental models; The Council for Regulatory Environmental Modeling, Office of Science Policy, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2003.
  58. 58
    NRC. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making; National Research Council, Committee on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2007.
  59. 59
    Houtz, E. F.; Sutton, R.; Park, J.-S.; Sedlak, M. Poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances in wastewater: Significance of unknown precursors, manufacturing shifts, and likely AFFF impacts Water Res. 2016, 95, 142 149 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.055
  60. 60
    Konwick, B. J.; Tomy, G. T.; Ismail, N.; Peterson, J. T.; Fauver, R. J.; Higginbotham, D.; Fisk, A. T. Concentrations and patterns of perfluoroalkyl acids in Georgia, USA surface waters near and distant to a major use source Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2008, 27 (10) 2011 2018 DOI: 10.1897/07-659.1
  61. 61
    Clara, M.; Scheffknecht, C.; Scharf, S.; Weiss, S.; Gans, O. Emissions of perfluorinated alkylated substances (PFAS) from point sources--identification of relevant branches Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 58 (1) 59 DOI: 10.2166/wst.2008.641
  62. 62
    Zhang, C.; Peng, Y.; Niu, X.; Ning, K. Determination of perfluoroalkyl substances in municipal landfill leachates from Beijing, China Asian J. Chem. 2014, 26 (13) 3833
  63. 63
    Busch, J.; Ahrens, L.; Sturm, R.; Ebinghaus, R. Polyfluoroalkyl compounds in landfill leachates Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158 (5) 1467 1471 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.12.031
  64. 64
    Huset, C. A.; Barlaz, M. A.; Barofsky, D. F.; Field, J. A. Quantitative determination of fluorochemicals in municipal landfill leachates Chemosphere 2011, 82 (10) 1380 1386 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.072
  65. 65
    Blaine, A. C.; Rich, C. D.; Hundal, L. S.; Lau, C.; Mills, M. A.; Harris, K. M.; Higgins, C. P. Uptake of perfluoroalkyl acids into edible crops via land applied biosolids: Field and greenhouse studies Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47 (24) 14062 14069 DOI: 10.1021/es403094q
  66. 66
    Sepulvado, J. G.; Blaine, A. C.; Hundal, L. S.; Higgins, C. P. Occurrence and fate of perfluorochemicals in soil following the land application of municipal biosolids Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (19) 8106 8112 DOI: 10.1021/es103903d
  67. 67
    Rich, C. D.; Blaine, A. C.; Hundal, L.; Higgins, C. P. Bioaccumulation of perfluoroalkyl acids by earthworms (Eisenia fetida) exposed to contaminated soils Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49 (2) 881 8 DOI: 10.1021/es504152d
  68. 68
    Hölzer, J.; Midasch, O.; Rauchfuss, K.; Kraft, M.; Reupert, R.; Angerer, J.; Kleeschulte, P.; Marschall, N.; Wilhelm, M. Biomonitoring of Perfluorinated Compounds in Children and Adults Exposed to Perfluorooctanoate-Contaminated Drinking Water Environ. Health Perspect. 2008, 116 (5) 651 657 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.11064
  69. 69
    Report of Investigation Activities at Select Firefighting Foam Training Areas and Foam Discharge Sites in Minnesota; Minnesota Pollution Control Agency: St. Paul, MN, 2010.
  70. 70
    Maupin, M. A.; Kenny, J. F.; Hutson, S. S.; Lovelace, J. K.; Barber, N. L.; Linsey, K. S. Estimated use of water in the United States in 2010. Report 2330-5703; U.S. Geological Survey, 2014.
  71. 71
    Factoids: Drinking Water and Ground Water Statistics for 2009; Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water: Washington, DC, 2009.

Cited By


This article is cited by 356 publications.

  1. Chase Nau-Hix, Nicholas Multari, Raj Kamal Singh, Stephen Richardson, Poonam Kulkarni, Richard Hunter Anderson, Thomas M. Holsen, Selma Mededovic Thagard. Field Demonstration of a Pilot-Scale Plasma Reactor for the Rapid Removal of Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Groundwater. ACS ES&T Water 2021, 1 (3) , 680-687. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.0c00170
  2. Yunkun Wang, Ines Zucker, Chanhee Boo, Menachem Elimelech. Removal of Emerging Wastewater Organic Contaminants by Polyelectrolyte Multilayer Nanofiltration Membranes with Tailored Selectivity. ACS ES&T Engineering 2021, 1 (3) , 404-414. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.0c00160
  3. Bridger J. Ruyle, Heidi M. Pickard, Denis R. LeBlanc, Andrea K. Tokranov, Colin P. Thackray, Xindi C. Hu, Chad D. Vecitis, Elsie M. Sunderland. Isolating the AFFF Signature in Coastal Watersheds Using Oxidizable PFAS Precursors and Unexplained Organofluorine. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, Article ASAP.
  4. Shilai Hao, Youn-Jeong Choi, Boran Wu, Christopher P. Higgins, Rula Deeb, Timothy J. Strathmann. Hydrothermal Alkaline Treatment for Destruction of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Aqueous Film-Forming Foam. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (5) , 3283-3295. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06906
  5. Paige Jacob, Krista A. Barzen-Hanson, Damian E. Helbling. Target and Nontarget Analysis of Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances in Wastewater from Electronics Fabrication Facilities. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (4) , 2346-2356. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06690
  6. Anthony C. Yu, Mac Reinhart, Rachel Hunter, Katie Lu, Caitlin L. Maikawa, Nishanta Rajakaruna, Jesse D. Acosta, Craig Stubler, Chip Appel, Eric A. Appel. Seasonal Impact of Phosphate-Based Fire Retardants on Soil Chemistry Following the Prophylactic Treatment of Vegetation. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (4) , 2316-2323. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05472
  7. Gordon J. Getzinger, Christopher P. Higgins, P. Lee Ferguson. Structure Database and In Silico Spectral Library for Comprehensive Suspect Screening of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in Environmental Media by High-resolution Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (5) , 2820-2827. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04109
  8. James N. Dodds, Nancy Lee M. Alexander, Kaylie I. Kirkwood, MaKayla R. Foster, Zachary R. Hopkins, Detlef R. U. Knappe, Erin S. Baker. From Pesticides to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: An Evaluation of Recent Targeted and Untargeted Mass Spectrometry Methods for Xenobiotics. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (1) , 641-656. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04359
  9. Bridger J. Ruyle, Colin P. Thackray, James P. McCord, Mark J. Strynar, Kevin A. Mauge-Lewis, Suzanne E. Fenton, Elsie M. Sunderland. Reconstructing the Composition of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Contemporary Aqueous Film-Forming Foams. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2021, 8 (1) , 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00798
  10. Anastasia Nickerson, Alix E. Rodowa, David T. Adamson, Jennifer A. Field, Poonam R. Kulkarni, John J. Kornuc, Christopher P. Higgins. Spatial Trends of Anionic, Zwitterionic, and Cationic PFASs at an AFFF-Impacted Site. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (1) , 313-323. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04473
  11. Thi Minh Hong Nguyen, Jennifer Bräunig, Kristie Thompson, Jack Thompson, Shervin Kabiri, Divina A. Navarro, Rai S. Kookana, Charles Grimison, Craig M. Barnes, Christopher P. Higgins, Michael J. McLaughlin, Jochen F. Mueller. Influences of Chemical Properties, Soil Properties, and Solution pH on Soil–Water Partitioning Coefficients of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs). Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (24) , 15883-15892. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05705
  12. David Q. Andrews, Olga V. Naidenko. Population-Wide Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances from Drinking Water in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2020, 7 (12) , 931-936. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00713
  13. Ri Wang, Casey Ching, William R. Dichtel, Damian E. Helbling. Evaluating the Removal of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances from Contaminated Groundwater with Different Adsorbents Using a Suspect Screening Approach. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2020, 7 (12) , 954-960. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00736
  14. Jelena Radjenovic, Nick Duinslaeger, Shirin Saffar Avval, Brian P. Chaplin. Facing the Challenge of Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Water: Is Electrochemical Oxidation the Answer?. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (23) , 14815-14829. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06212
  15. Raj Kamal Singh, Nicholas Multari, Chase Nau-Hix, Steven Woodard, Michael Nickelsen, Selma Mededovic Thagard, Thomas M. Holsen. Removal of Poly- and Per-Fluorinated Compounds from Ion Exchange Regenerant Still Bottom Samples in a Plasma Reactor. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (21) , 13973-13980. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02158
  16. Jingzhi Yao, Yitao Pan, Nan Sheng, Zhaoben Su, Yong Guo, Jianshe Wang, Jiayin Dai. Novel Perfluoroalkyl Ether Carboxylic Acids (PFECAs) and Sulfonic Acids (PFESAs): Occurrence and Association with Serum Biochemical Parameters in Residents Living Near a Fluorochemical Plant in China. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (21) , 13389-13398. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02888
  17. Jinghua Wang, Yitao Pan, Xiaofei Wei, Jiayin Dai. Temporal Trends in Prenatal Exposure (1998–2018) to Emerging and Legacy Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in Cord Plasma from the Beijing Cord Blood Bank, China. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (20) , 12850-12859. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01877
  18. Casey Ching, Max J. Klemes, Brittany Trang, William R. Dichtel, Damian E. Helbling. β-Cyclodextrin Polymers with Different Cross-Linkers and Ion-Exchange Resins Exhibit Variable Adsorption of Anionic, Zwitterionic, and Nonionic PFASs. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (19) , 12693-12702. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04028
  19. Charles E. Schaefer, Dung Nguyen, Veronika M. Culina, Jennifer Guelfo, Naveen Kumar. Application of Rapid Small-Scale Column Tests for Treatment of Perfluoroalkyl Acids Using Anion-Exchange Resins and Granular Activated Carbon in Groundwater with Elevated Organic Carbon. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2020, 59 (38) , 16832-16837. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c02290
  20. Anna Yang, Casey Ching, Maeghan Easler, Damian E. Helbling, William R. Dichtel. Cyclodextrin Polymers with Nitrogen-Containing Tripodal Crosslinkers for Efficient PFAS Adsorption. ACS Materials Letters 2020, 2 (9) , 1240-1245. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00240
  21. Carol F. Kwiatkowski, David Q. Andrews, Linda S. Birnbaum, Thomas A. Bruton, Jamie C. DeWitt, Detlef R. U. Knappe, Maricel V. Maffini, Mark F. Miller, Katherine E. Pelch, Anna Reade, Anna Soehl, Xenia Trier, Marta Venier, Charlotte C. Wagner, Zhanyun Wang, Arlene Blum. Scientific Basis for Managing PFAS as a Chemical Class. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2020, 7 (8) , 532-543. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00255
  22. Graham F. Peaslee, John T. Wilkinson, Sean R. McGuinness, Meghanne Tighe, Nicholas Caterisano, Seryeong Lee, Alec Gonzales, Matthew Roddy, Simon Mills, Krystle Mitchell. Another Pathway for Firefighter Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Firefighter Textiles. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2020, 7 (8) , 594-599. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00410
  23. Jacqueline Bangma, Lauren A. Eaves, Kirsi Oldenburg, Jessica L. Reiner, Tracy Manuck, Rebecca C. Fry. Identifying Risk Factors for Levels of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in the Placenta in a High-Risk Pregnancy Cohort in North Carolina. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (13) , 8158-8166. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07102
  24. Jason E. Galloway, Anjelica V. P. Moreno, Andrew B. Lindstrom, Mark J. Strynar, Seth Newton, Andrew A. May, Linda K. Weavers. Evidence of Air Dispersion: HFPO–DA and PFOA in Ohio and West Virginia Surface Water and Soil near a Fluoropolymer Production Facility. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (12) , 7175-7184. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07384
  25. Chen Liu, James Hatton, William A. Arnold, Matt F. Simcik, Kurt D. Pennell. In Situ Sequestration of Perfluoroalkyl Substances Using Polymer-Stabilized Powdered Activated Carbon. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (11) , 6929-6936. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00155
  26. Raul Tenorio, Jinyong Liu, Xin Xiao, Andrew Maizel, Christopher P. Higgins, Charles E. Schaefer, Timothy J. Strathmann. Destruction of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) with UV-Sulfite Photoreductive Treatment. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (11) , 6957-6967. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00961
  27. Jinjin Chen, Linbin Tang, Wei-Qiang Chen, Graham F. Peaslee, Daqian Jiang. Flows, Stock, and Emissions of Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances in California Carpet in 2000–2030 under Different Scenarios. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (11) , 6908-6918. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06956
  28. Sarah B. Gewurtz, Paula Guerra, Min Gu Kim, Frankie Jones, Jane Challen Urbanic, Steven Teslic, Shirley Anne Smyth. Wastewater Treatment Lagoons: Local Pathways of Perfluoroalkyl Acids and Brominated Flame Retardants to the Arctic Environment. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (10) , 6053-6062. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06902
  29. Cressa Ria P. Fulong, Mary Grace E. Guardian, Diana S. Aga, Timothy R. Cook. A Self-Assembled Iron(II) Metallacage as a Trap for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Water. Inorganic Chemistry 2020, 59 (10) , 6697-6708. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b03405
  30. Jessica C. Moreton, Joseph M. Palomba, Seth M. Cohen. Liquid-Phase Applications of Metal–Organic Framework Mixed-Matrix Membranes Prepared from Poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate). ACS Applied Polymer Materials 2020, 2 (5) , 2063-2069. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.0c00230
  31. Elango Kumarasamy, Irene M. Manning, Leonard B. Collins, Orlando Coronell, Frank A. Leibfarth. Ionic Fluorogels for Remediation of Per- and Polyfluorinated Alkyl Substances from Water. ACS Central Science 2020, 6 (4) , 487-492. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b01224
  32. Anastasia Nickerson, Andrew C. Maizel, Poonam R. Kulkarni, David T. Adamson, John J. Kornuc, Christopher P. Higgins. Enhanced Extraction of AFFF-Associated PFASs from Source Zone Soils. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (8) , 4952-4962. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00792
  33. Zhanghao Chen, Chen Li, Juan Gao, Hailiang Dong, Yi Chen, Bing Wu, Cheng Gu. Efficient Reductive Destruction of Perfluoroalkyl Substances under Self-Assembled Micelle Confinement. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (8) , 5178-5185. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06599
  34. Junkui Cui, Panpan Gao, Yang Deng. Destruction of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) with Advanced Reduction Processes (ARPs): A Critical Review. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (7) , 3752-3766. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05565
  35. Yanyan Zhang, Jinxia Liu, Audrey Moores, Subhasis Ghoshal. Transformation of 6:2 Fluorotelomer Sulfonate by Cobalt(II)-Activated Peroxymonosulfate. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (7) , 4631-4640. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07113
  36. Jessica Trowbridge, Roy R. Gerona, Thomas Lin, Ruthann A. Rudel, Vincent Bessonneau, Heather Buren, Rachel Morello-Frosch. Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances in a Cohort of Women Firefighters and Office Workers in San Francisco. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (6) , 3363-3374. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05490
  37. Nicholas J. Herkert, John Merrill, Cara Peters, David Bollinger, Sharon Zhang, Kate Hoffman, P. Lee Ferguson, Detlef R. U. Knappe, Heather M. Stapleton. Assessing the Effectiveness of Point-of-Use Residential Drinking Water Filters for Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs). Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2020, 7 (3) , 178-184. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00004
  38. Alix E. Rodowa, Emerson Christie, Jane Sedlak, Graham F. Peaslee, Dorin Bogdan, Bill DiGuiseppi, Jennifer A. Field. Field Sampling Materials Unlikely Source of Contamination for Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Field Samples. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2020, 7 (3) , 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00036
  39. Yongfeng Liu, Chenyu Wang, Rebecca M. Jarrell, Sithara Nair, Kenneth J. Wynne, Duolong Di. Icephobic, Pt-Cured, Polydimethylsiloxane Nanocomposite Coatings. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (9) , 11180-11189. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b20989
  40. Katie M. Lynch, Patricia A. Fair, Magali Houde, Derek C. G. Muir, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Gregory D. Bossart, Scott M. Bartell, Matthew O. Gribble. Temporal Trends in Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) of Indian River Lagoon, Florida and Charleston, South Carolina. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (24) , 14194-14203. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04585
  41. Shasha Yang, Sujan Fernando, Thomas M. Holsen, Yang Yang. Inhibition of Perchlorate Formation during the Electrochemical Oxidation of Perfluoroalkyl Acid in Groundwater. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2019, 6 (12) , 775-780. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00653
  42. Akber Raza, Sharmistha Bardhan, Lihua Xu, Sharma S. R. K. C. Yamijala, Chao Lian, Hyuna Kwon, Bryan M. Wong. A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Defluorination of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) for Their Efficient Treatment and Removal. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2019, 6 (10) , 624-629. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00476
  43. Raj Kamal Singh, Nicholas Multari, Chase Nau-Hix, Richard H. Anderson, Stephen D. Richardson, Thomas M. Holsen, Selma Mededovic Thagard. Rapid Removal of Poly- and Perfluorinated Compounds from Investigation-Derived Waste (IDW) in a Pilot-Scale Plasma Reactor. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (19) , 11375-11382. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02964
  44. Yanyan Zhang, Audrey Moores, Jinxia Liu, Subhasis Ghoshal. New Insights into the Degradation Mechanism of Perfluorooctanoic Acid by Persulfate from Density Functional Theory and Experimental Data. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (15) , 8672-8681. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b00797
  45. Sarah B. Gewurtz, Lisa E. Bradley, Sean Backus, Alice Dove, Daryl McGoldrick, Hayley Hung, Helena Dryfhout-Clark. Perfluoroalkyl Acids in Great Lakes Precipitation and Surface Water (2006–2018) Indicate Response to Phase-outs, Regulatory Action, and Variability in Fate and Transport Processes. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (15) , 8543-8552. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01337
  46. Dushyant Barpaga, Jian Zheng, Kee Sung Han, Jennifer A. Soltis, Vaithiyalingam Shutthanandan, Sagnik Basuray, B. Peter McGrail, Sayandev Chatterjee, Radha Kishan Motkuri. Probing the Sorption of Perfluorooctanesulfonate Using Mesoporous Metal–Organic Frameworks from Aqueous Solutions. Inorganic Chemistry 2019, 58 (13) , 8339-8346. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00380
  47. Nicholas A. Lundquist, Martin J. Sweetman, Kymberley R. Scroggie, Max J. H. Worthington, Louisa J. Esdaile, Salah F. K. Alboaiji, Sally E. Plush, John D. Hayball, Justin M. Chalker. Polymer Supported Carbon for Safe and Effective Remediation of PFOA- and PFOS-Contaminated Water. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2019, 7 (13) , 11044-11049. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01793
  48. Youn Jeong Choi, Rooney Kim Lazcano, Peyman Yousefi, Heather Trim, Linda S. Lee. Perfluoroalkyl Acid Characterization in U.S. Municipal Organic Solid Waste Composts. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2019, 6 (6) , 372-377. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00280
  49. Charles E. Schaefer, Dung Nguyen, Paul Ho, Jihyon Im, Alan LeBlanc. Assessing Rapid Small-Scale Column Tests for Treatment of Perfluoroalkyl Acids by Anion Exchange Resin. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2019, 58 (22) , 9701-9706. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00858
  50. Mehvish Mumtaz, Yixiang Bao, Liquan Liu, Jun Huang, Giovanni Cagnetta, Gang Yu. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Representative Fluorocarbon Surfactants Used in Chinese Film-Forming Foams: Levels, Profile Shift, and Environmental Implications. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2019, 6 (5) , 259-264. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00154
  51. James McCord, Mark Strynar. Identification of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in the Cape Fear River by High Resolution Mass Spectrometry and Nontargeted Screening. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (9) , 4717-4727. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06017
  52. Raj Kamal Singh, Sujan Fernando, Sadjad Fakouri Baygi, Nicholas Multari, Selma Mededovic Thagard, Thomas M. Holsen. Breakdown Products from Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) Degradation in a Plasma-Based Water Treatment Process. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (5) , 2731-2738. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b07031
  53. Ignacio A. Rodríguez-Jorquera, R. Cristina Colli-Dula, Kevin Kroll, B. Sumith Jayasinghe, Maria V. Parachu Marco, Cecilia Silva-Sanchez, Gurpal S. Toor, Nancy D. Denslow. Blood Transcriptomics Analysis of Fish Exposed to Perfluoro Alkyls Substances: Assessment of a Non-Lethal Sampling Technique for Advancing Aquatic Toxicology Research. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (3) , 1441-1452. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03603
  54. Po-Jung Huang, Myung Hwangbo, Zheyuan Chen, Yina Liu, Jun Kameoka, Kung-Hui Chu. Reusable Functionalized Hydrogel Sorbents for Removing Long- and Short-Chain Perfluoroalkyl Acids (PFAAs) and GenX from Aqueous Solution. ACS Omega 2018, 3 (12) , 17447-17455. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b02279
  55. Hongru Feng, Haiyan Zhang, Huiming Cao, Yuzhen Sun, Aiqian Zhang, Jianjie Fu. Application of a Novel Coarse-Grained Soil Organic Matter Model in the Environment. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (24) , 14228-14234. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03116
  56. Mohamed Ateia, Mohamed F. Attia, Amith Maroli, Nishanth Tharayil, Frank Alexis, Daniel C. Whitehead, Tanju Karanfil. Rapid Removal of Poly- and Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances by Poly(ethylenimine)-Functionalized Cellulose Microcrystals at Environmentally Relevant Conditions. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2018, 5 (12) , 764-769. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00556
  57. Paul M. Bradley, Dana W. Kolpin, Kristin M. Romanok, Kelly L. Smalling, Michael J. Focazio, Juliane B. Brown, Mary C. Cardon, Kurt D. Carpenter, Steven R. Corsi, Laura A. DeCicco, Julie E. Dietze, Nicola Evans, Edward T. Furlong, Carrie E. Givens, James L. Gray, Dale W. Griffin, Christopher P. Higgins, Michelle L. Hladik, Luke R. Iwanowicz, Celeste A. Journey, Kathryn M. Kuivila, Jason R. Masoner, Carrie A. McDonough, Michael T. Meyer, James L. Orlando, Mark J. Strynar, Christopher P. Weis, Vickie S. Wilson. Reconnaissance of Mixed Organic and Inorganic Chemicals in Private and Public Supply Tapwaters at Selected Residential and Workplace Sites in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (23) , 13972-13985. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04622
  58. Erika Houtz, Miaomiao Wang, June-Soo Park. Identification and Fate of Aqueous Film Forming Foam Derived Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in a Wastewater Treatment Plant. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (22) , 13212-13221. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04028
  59. Woojung Ji, Leilei Xiao, Yuhan Ling, Casey Ching, Michio Matsumoto, Ryan P. Bisbey, Damian E. Helbling, William R. Dichtel. Removal of GenX and Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances from Water by Amine-Functionalized Covalent Organic Frameworks. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2018, 140 (40) , 12677-12681. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b06958
  60. Xiaojian Shao, Fenfen Ji, Yawei Wang, Lin Zhu, Zhen Zhang, Xiubo Du, Arthur Chi Kong Chung, Yanjun Hong, Qian Zhao, Zongwei Cai. Integrative Chemical Proteomics-Metabolomics Approach Reveals Acaca/Acacb as Direct Molecular Targets of PFOA. Analytical Chemistry 2018, 90 (18) , 11092-11098. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02995
  61. Tomislav Stefanac, Robert McCrindle, Alan J. McAlees, Nicole Riddell, Allison L. Brazeau, Brock C. Chittim. Characterization of Nine Isomers in Commercial Samples of Perfluoroethylcyclohexanesulfonate and of Some Minor Components Including PFOS Isomers. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (17) , 9937-9945. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02369
  62. Chanhee Boo, Yunkun Wang, Ines Zucker, Youngwoo Choo, Chinedum O. Osuji, Menachem Elimelech. High Performance Nanofiltration Membrane for Effective Removal of Perfluoroalkyl Substances at High Water Recovery. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (13) , 7279-7288. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01040
  63. Feng Xiao, Ryan A. Hanson, Svetlana A. Golovko, Mikhail Y. Golovko, William A. Arnold. PFOA and PFOS Are Generated from Zwitterionic and Cationic Precursor Compounds During Water Disinfection with Chlorine or Ozone. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2018, 5 (6) , 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00266
  64. Sarah B. Gewurtz, Pamela A. Martin, Robert J. Letcher, Neil M. Burgess, Louise Champoux, John E. Elliott, Abde Idrissi. Perfluoroalkyl Acids in European Starling Eggs Indicate Landfill and Urban Influences in Canadian Terrestrial Environments. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (10) , 5571-5580. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06623
  65. Jinyong Liu, Daniel J. Van Hoomissen, Tianchi Liu, Andrew Maizel, Xiangchen Huo, Seth R. Fernández, Changxu Ren, Xin Xiao, Yida Fang, Charles E. Schaefer, Christopher P. Higgins, Shubham Vyas, Timothy J. Strathmann. Reductive Defluorination of Branched Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances with Cobalt Complex Catalysts. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2018, 5 (5) , 289-294. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00122
  66. Shan Yi, Katie C. Harding-Marjanovic, Erika F. Houtz, Ying Gao, Jennifer E. Lawrence, Rita V. Nichiporuk, Anthony T. Iavarone, Wei-Qin Zhuang, Martin Hansen, Jennifer A. Field, David L. Sedlak, Lisa Alvarez-Cohen. Biotransformation of AFFF Component 6:2 Fluorotelomer Thioether Amido Sulfonate Generates 6:2 Fluorotelomer Thioether Carboxylate under Sulfate-Reducing Conditions. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2018, 5 (5) , 283-288. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00148
  67. Laura Gobelius, Johanna Hedlund, Wiebke Dürig, Rikard Tröger, Karl Lilja, Karin Wiberg, Lutz Ahrens. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Swedish Groundwater and Surface Water: Implications for Environmental Quality Standards and Drinking Water Guidelines. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (7) , 4340-4349. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05718
  68. Clifton Dassuncao, Xindi C. Hu, Flemming Nielsen, Pál Weihe, Philippe Grandjean, Elsie M. Sunderland. Shifting Global Exposures to Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) Evident in Longitudinal Birth Cohorts from a Seafood-Consuming Population. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (6) , 3738-3747. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06044
  69. Susan D. Richardson and Thomas A. Ternes . Water Analysis: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues. Analytical Chemistry 2018, 90 (1) , 398-428. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04577
  70. Thomas A. Bruton and David L. Sedlak . Treatment of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam by Heat-Activated Persulfate Under Conditions Representative of In Situ Chemical Oxidation. Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51 (23) , 13878-13885. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03969
  71. Leilei Xiao, Yuhan Ling, Alaaeddin Alsbaiee, Chenjun Li, Damian E. Helbling, and William R. Dichtel . β-Cyclodextrin Polymer Network Sequesters Perfluorooctanoic Acid at Environmentally Relevant Concentrations. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2017, 139 (23) , 7689-7692. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b02381
  72. Xin Xiao, Bridget A. Ulrich, Baoliang Chen, and Christopher P. Higgins . Sorption of Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) Relevant to Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF)-Impacted Groundwater by Biochars and Activated Carbon. Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51 (11) , 6342-6351. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00970
  73. Zhanyun Wang, Jamie C. DeWitt, Christopher P. Higgins, and Ian T. Cousins . A Never-Ending Story of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs)?. Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51 (5) , 2508-2518. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04806
  74. Balakrishna Maddi, Ellen Panisko, Thomas Wietsma, Teresa Lemmon, Marie Swita, Karl Albrecht, and Daniel Howe . Quantitative Characterization of Aqueous Byproducts from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Municipal Wastes, Food Industry Wastes, and Biomass Grown on Waste. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2017, 5 (3) , 2205-2214. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02367
  75. Krista A. Barzen-Hanson, Simon C. Roberts, Sarah Choyke, Karl Oetjen, Alan McAlees, Nicole Riddell, Robert McCrindle, P. Lee Ferguson, Christopher P. Higgins, and Jennifer A. Field . Discovery of 40 Classes of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Historical Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFFs) and AFFF-Impacted Groundwater. Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51 (4) , 2047-2057. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05843
  76. Gunnar R. Stratton, Fei Dai, Christopher L. Bellona, Thomas M. Holsen, Eric R. V. Dickenson, and Selma Mededovic Thagard . Plasma-Based Water Treatment: Efficient Transformation of Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Prepared Solutions and Contaminated Groundwater. Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51 (3) , 1643-1648. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04215
  77. Mei Sun, Elisa Arevalo, Mark Strynar, Andrew Lindstrom, Michael Richardson, Ben Kearns, Adam Pickett, Chris Smith, and Detlef R. U. Knappe . Legacy and Emerging Perfluoroalkyl Substances Are Important Drinking Water Contaminants in the Cape Fear River Watershed of North Carolina. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2016, 3 (12) , 415-419. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00398
  78. Thanh Wang, Robin Vestergren, Dorte Herzke, Junchao Yu, and Ian T. Cousins . Levels, Isomer Profiles, and Estimated Riverine Mass Discharges of Perfluoroalkyl Acids and Fluorinated Alternatives at the Mouths of Chinese Rivers. Environmental Science & Technology 2016, 50 (21) , 11584-11592. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03752
  79. Yuan Wang, Robin Vestergren, Yali Shi, Dong Cao, Lin Xu, Yaqi Cai, Xiaoli Zhao, and Fengchang Wu . Identification, Tissue Distribution, and Bioaccumulation Potential of Cyclic Perfluorinated Sulfonic Acids Isomers in an Airport Impacted Ecosystem. Environmental Science & Technology 2016, 50 (20) , 10923-10932. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01980
  80. An Su, Krishna Rajan. A database framework for rapid screening of structure-function relationships in PFAS chemistry. Scientific Data 2021, 8 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00798-x
  81. Liquan Liu, Yingxi Qu, Jun Huang, Roland Weber. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in Chinese drinking water: risk assessment and geographical distribution. Environmental Sciences Europe 2021, 33 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00425-3
  82. Ruth F. Menger, Emily Funk, Charles S. Henry, Thomas Borch. Sensors for detecting per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): A critical review of development challenges, current sensors, and commercialization obstacles. Chemical Engineering Journal 2021, 417 , 129133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129133
  83. Sibel Barisci, Rominder Suri. Electrooxidation of short- and long-chain perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) under different process conditions. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2021, 9 (4) , 105323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105323
  84. Anna L. Hagstrom, Paul Anastas, Andrea Boissevain, Alexandre Borrel, Nicole C. Deziel, Suzanne E. Fenton, Cheryl Fields, John D. Fortner, Nikolas Franceschi-Hofmann, Raymond Frigon, Lan Jin, Jae-Hong Kim, Nicole C. Kleinstreuer, Jeremy Koelmel, Yu Lei, Zeyan Liew, Xiuqi Ma, Lori Mathieu, Sara L. Nason, Kari Organtini, Youssef Oulhote, Shannon Pociu, Krystal J. Godri Pollitt, James Saiers, David C. Thompson, Brian Toal, Eric J. Weiner, Shannon Whirledge, Yawei Zhang, Vasilis Vasiliou. Yale School of Public Health Symposium: An overview of the challenges and opportunities associated with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Science of The Total Environment 2021, 778 , 146192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146192
  85. Javad Roostaei, Sarah Colley, Riley Mulhern, Andrew A. May, Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson. Predicting the risk of GenX contamination in private well water using a machine-learned Bayesian network model. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2021, 411 , 125075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125075
  86. Mario Rodríguez-Varela, Juan C. Durán-Álvarez, Blanca Jiménez-Cisneros, Olivia Zamora, Blanca Prado. Occurrence of perfluorinated carboxylic acids in Mexico City's wastewater: A monitoring study in the sewerage and a mega wastewater treatment plant. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 774 , 145060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145060
  87. Citlalli Osorio-Yáñez, Marco Sanchez-Guerra, Andres Cardenas, Pi-I. D. Lin, Russ Hauser, Diane R. Gold, Ken P. Kleinman, Marie-France Hivert, Abby F. Fleisch, Antonia M. Calafat, Thomas F. Webster, Edward S. Horton, Emily Oken. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and calcifications of the coronary and aortic arteries in adults with prediabetes: Results from the diabetes prevention program outcomes study. Environment International 2021, 151 , 106446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106446
  88. Jennifer Bräunig, Christine Baduel, Craig M. Barnes, Jochen F. Mueller. Sorbent assisted immobilisation of perfluoroalkyl acids in soils – effect on leaching and bioavailability. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2021, 412 , 125171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125171
  89. Hamidreza Sharifan, Majid Bagheri, Dan Wang, Joel G. Burken, Christopher P. Higgins, Yanna Liang, Jinxia Liu, Charles E. Schaefer, Jens Blotevogel. Fate and transport of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in the vadose zone. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 771 , 145427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145427
  90. Victoria R. Propp, Amila O. De Silva, Christine Spencer, Susan J. Brown, Sara D. Catingan, James E. Smith, James W. Roy. Organic contaminants of emerging concern in leachate of historic municipal landfills. Environmental Pollution 2021, 276 , 116474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116474
  91. Melanie Kah, Danielle Oliver, Rai Kookana. Sequestration and potential release of PFAS from spent engineered sorbents. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 765 , 142770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142770
  92. Heejeong Ryu, Baikun Li, Sylvain De Guise, Jeffrey McCutcheon, Yu Lei. Recent progress in the detection of emerging contaminants PFASs. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2021, 408 , 124437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124437
  93. Yachen Zhu, Annie Ro, Scott M. Bartell. Household low pile carpet usage was associated with increased serum PFAS concentrations in 2005–2006. Environmental Research 2021, 195 , 110758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110758
  94. Gregory Glenn, Randal Shogren, Xing Jin, William Orts, William Hart‐Cooper, Lauren Olson. Per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances and their alternatives in paper food packaging. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2021, 4 https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12726
  95. Håkon A. Langberg, Hans Peter H. Arp, Gijs D. Breedveld, Gøril A. Slinde, Åse Høiseter, Hege M. Grønning, Morten Jartun, Thomas Rundberget, Bjørn M. Jenssen, Sarah E. Hale. Paper product production identified as the main source of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in a Norwegian lake: Source and historic emission tracking. Environmental Pollution 2021, 273 , 116259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116259
  96. Lindsey Garnick, Andrey Massarsky, Adam Mushnick, Claire Hamaji, Paul Scott, Andrew Monnot. An evaluation of health-based federal and state PFOA drinking water guidelines in the United States. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 761 , 144107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144107
  97. Kyle Steenland, Andrea Winquist. PFAS and cancer, a scoping review of the epidemiologic evidence. Environmental Research 2021, 194 , 110690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110690
  98. Amila O. De Silva, James M. Armitage, Thomas A. Bruton, Clifton Dassuncao, Wendy Heiger‐Bernays, Xindi C. Hu, Anna Kärrman, Barry Kelly, Carla Ng, Anna Robuck, Mei Sun, Thomas F. Webster, Elsie M. Sunderland. PFAS Exposure Pathways for Humans and Wildlife: A Synthesis of Current Knowledge and Key Gaps in Understanding. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2021, 40 (3) , 631-657. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4935
  99. Gerald T. Ankley, Philippa Cureton, Robert A. Hoke, Magali Houde, Anupama Kumar, Jessy Kurias, Roman Lanno, Chris McCarthy, John Newsted, Christopher J. Salice, Bradley E. Sample, Maria S. Sepúlveda, Jeffery Steevens, Sara Valsecchi. Assessing the Ecological Risks of Per‐ and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Current State‐of‐the Science and a Proposed Path Forward. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2021, 40 (3) , 564-605. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4869
  100. Anithadevi Kenday Sivaram, Panneerselvan Logeshwaran, Aravind Surapaneni, Kalpit Shah, Nicholas Crosbie, Zoe Rogers, Elliot Lee, Kartik Venkatraman, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Ravi Naidu, Mallavarapu Megharaj. Evaluation of Cyto‐genotoxicity of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) to Allium cepa. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2021, 40 (3) , 792-798. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4905
Load more citations
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Hydrologic unit codes (eight-digit HUCs) used as a proxy for watersheds with detectable PFOA and PFOS in drinking water measured in the US EPA’s UCMR3 program (2013–2015). Blank areas represent regions where no data are available.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 71 other publications.

    1. 1
      Kissa, E. Fluorinated surfactants and repellents, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2001.
    2. 2
      Lewis, R. C.; Johns, L. E.; Meeker, J. D. Serum Biomarkers of Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Relation to Serum Testosterone and Measures of Thyroid Function among Adults and Adolescents from NHANES 2011–2012 Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12 (6) 6098 6114 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120606098
    3. 3
      Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, 2015.
    4. 4
      Grandjean, P.; Andersen, E.; Budtz-Jørgensen, E.; Nielsen, F.; Mølbak, K.; Weihe, P.; Heilmann, C. Serum vaccine antibody concentrations in children exposed to perfluorinated compounds JAMA 2012, 307 (4) 391 397 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.2034
    5. 5
      Braun, J. M.; Chen, A.; Romano, M. E.; Calafat, A. M.; Webster, G. M.; Yolton, K.; Lanphear, B. P. Prenatal perfluoroalkyl substance exposure and child adiposity at 8 years of age: The HOME study Obesity 2016, 24, 231 237 DOI: 10.1002/oby.21258
    6. 6
      Barry, V.; Winquist, A.; Steenland, K. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) exposures and incident cancers among adults living near a chemical plant Environ. Health Perspect 2013, 121 (11–12) 1313 1318 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1306615
    7. 7
      Land, M.; de Wit, C. A.; Cousins, I. T.; Herzke, D.; Johansson, J.; Martin, J. W. What is the effect of phasing out long-chain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances on the concentrations of perfluoroalkyl acids and their precursors in the environment? A systematic review protocol Environmental Evidence 2015, 4 (1) 1 13 DOI: 10.1186/2047-2382-4-3
    8. 8
      Working Towards a Global Emission Inventory of PFASs; Environment Directorate, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: Paris, 2015.
    9. 9
      Wang, Z.; Cousins, I. T.; Scheringer, M.; Buck, R. C.; Hungerbühler, K. Global emission inventories for C 4–C 14 perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acid (PFCA) homologues from 1951 to 2030, Part I: production and emissions from quantifiable sources Environ. Int. 2014, 70, 62 75 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.013
    10. 10
      Butenhoff, J. L.; Chang, S.-C.; Ehresman, D. J.; York, R. G. Evaluation of potential reproductive and developmental toxicity of potassium perfluorohexanesulfonate in Sprague Dawley rats Reprod. Toxicol. 2009, 27 (3) 331 341 DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.01.004
    11. 11
      Birnbaum, L. S.; Grandjean, P. Alternatives to PFASs: Perspectives on the Science Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 123 (5) A104 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1509944
    12. 12
      Caverly Rae, J. M.; Craig, L.; Slone, T. W.; Frame, S. R.; Buxton, L. W.; Kennedy, G. L. Evaluation of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity of ammonium 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)-propanoate in Sprague–Dawley rats Toxicology Reports 2015, 2, 939 949 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2015.06.001
    13. 13
      Vestergren, R.; Cousins, I. T. Tracking the Pathways of Human Exposure to Perfluorocarboxylates Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (15) 5565 5575 DOI: 10.1021/es900228k
    14. 14
      D’Hollander, W.; de Voogt, P.; De Coen, W.; Bervoets, L. Perfluorinated Substances in Human Food and Other Sources of Human Exposure. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; De Voogt, P., Ed.; Springer: New York, 2010; Vol. 208, pp 179 215.
    15. 15
      Emmett, E. A.; Shofer, F. S.; Zhang, H.; Freeman, D.; Desai, C.; Shaw, L. M. Community exposure to perfluorooctanoate: relationships between serum concentrations and exposure sources J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2006, 48 (8) 759 770 DOI: 10.1097/01.jom.0000232486.07658.74
    16. 16
      Landsteiner, A.; Huset, C.; Williams, A.; Johnson, J. Biomonitoring for Perfluorochemicals in a Minnesota Community With Known Drinking Water Contamination Journal of Environmental Health 2014, 77 (5) 14 19
    17. 17
      Hurley, S.; Houtz, E.; Goldberg, D.; Wang, M.; Park, J.-S.; Nelson, D. O.; Reynolds, P.; Bernstein, L.; Anton-Culver, H.; Horn-Ross, P.; Petreas, M. Preliminary Associations between the Detection of Perfluoroalkyl Acids (PFAAs) in Drinking Water and Serum Concentrations in a Sample of California Women Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2016, 3, 264 269 DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00154
    18. 18
      Hoffman, K.; Webster, T. F.; Bartell, S. M.; Weisskopf, M. G.; Fletcher, T.; Vieira, V. M. Private Drinking Water Wells as a Source of Exposure to Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) in Communities Surrounding a Fluoropolymer Production Facility Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 92 97 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1002503
    19. 19
      Shin, H.-M.; Vieira, V. M.; Ryan, P. B.; Detwiler, R.; Sanders, B.; Steenland, K.; Bartell, S. M. Environmental Fate and Transport Modeling for Perfluorooctanoic Acid Emitted from the Washington Works Facility in West Virginia Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (4) 1435 1442 DOI: 10.1021/es102769t
    20. 20
      Perfluorochemical Serum Sampling in the vicinity of Decatur, Alabama, Morgan, Lawrence, and Limestone Counties; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, 2013.
    21. 21
      Lifetime Health Advisories and Health Effects Support Documents for Perfluorooctanoic Acid and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2016.
    22. 22
      Ahrens, L.; Norstrom, K.; Viktor, T.; Cousins, A. P.; Josefsson, S. Stockholm Arlanda Airport as a source of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances to water, sediment and fish Chemosphere 2015, 129, 33 8 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.136
    23. 23
      Moody, C. A.; Hebert, G. N.; Strauss, S. H.; Field, J. A. Occurrence and persistence of perfluorooctanesulfonate and other perfluorinated surfactants in groundwater at a fire-training area at Wurtsmith Air Force Base, Michigan, USA J. Environ. Monit. 2003, 5 (2) 341 5 DOI: 10.1039/b212497a
    24. 24
      Schultz, M. M.; Higgins, C. P.; Huset, C. A.; Luthy, R. G.; Barofsky, D. F.; Field, J. A. Fluorochemical mass flows in a municipal wastewater treatment facility Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40 (23) 7350 7357 DOI: 10.1021/es061025m
    25. 25
      Loganathan, B. G.; Sajwan, K. S.; Sinclair, E.; Senthil Kumar, K.; Kannan, K. Perfluoroalkyl sulfonates and perfluorocarboxylates in two wastewater treatment facilities in Kentucky and Georgia Water Res. 2007, 41 (20) 4611 20 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.045
    26. 26
      Post, G. B.; Cohn, P. D.; Cooper, K. R. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), an emerging drinking water contaminant: a critical review of recent literature Environ. Res. 2012, 116, 93 117 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2012.03.007
    27. 27
      Lindstrom, A. B.; Strynar, M. J.; Delinsky, A. D.; Nakayama, S. F.; McMillan, L.; Libelo, E. L.; Neill, M.; Thomas, L. Application of WWTP biosolids and resulting perfluorinated compound contamination of surface and well water in Decatur, Alabama, USA Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (19) 8015 8021 DOI: 10.1021/es1039425
    28. 28
      Third Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC (https://http://www.epa.gov/dwucmr/occurrence-data-unregulated-contaminant-monitoring-rule-3) (accessed May, 23, 2016) .
    29. 29
      Why is only certain information made available to the public (PWS ID), but not facility location information (longitude and latitude)? Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC (https://safewater.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/212078697-Why-is-only-certain-information-made-available-to-the-public-PWS-ID-but-not-facility-location-information-longitude-and-latitude-).
    30. 30
      U.S. Geological Survey. 1:250,000-scaleHydrologic Unitsof the United States (http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/metadata/usgswrd/XML/huc250k.xml).
    31. 31
      Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) under TSCA; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC (https://http://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/and-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfass-under-tsca).
    32. 32
      Database associated with the Clean Watersheds Needs Survey (CWNS) 2008 Report to Congress; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2008, (https://http://www.epa.gov/cwns/clean-watersheds-needs-survey-cwns-2008-report-and-data) (accessed March 2014).
    33. 33
      DoD Inventory of Fire/Crash Training Area Sites (as of the end of FY 2014) ; U.S. Department of Defense: Washington, DC [https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2647381/List-of-Fire-amp-Crash-Training-Areas-EOY14.pdf(12-23)].
    34. 34
      Programs for Training of Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Personnel; U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration, AC No. 150/5210-17C, 2015.
    35. 35
      3M. Map, 3M-Decatur Manufacturing Facility. In U.S. EPA Docket AR226-1484; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2003.
    36. 36
      DuPont. DuPont Telomer Manufacturing Sites: Environmental Assessment of PFOA Levels in Air and Water. In U.S. EPA Docket AR226-1534; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2003.
    37. 37
      Akaike, H. A new look at the statistical model identification IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1974, 19 (6) 716 723 DOI: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
    38. 38
      Anselin, L.; Syabri, I.; Kho, Y. GeoDa: an introduction to spatial data analysis Geographical analysis 2006, 38 (1) 5 22 DOI: 10.1111/j.0016-7363.2005.00671.x
    39. 39
      Livsmedelsverket, Riskhantering - PFAS i dricksvatten och fisk; National Food Agency: Uppsala, Sweden, 2016, (http://www.livsmedelsverket.se/livsmedel-och-innehall/oonskade-amnen/miljogifter/pfas-poly-och-perfluorerade-alkylsubstanser/riskhantering-pfaa-i-dricksvatten/).
    40. 40
      New Jersey DEP Ground Water Quality Standards-Class IIA by Constituent (http://www.nj.gov/dep/standards/groundwater.pdf) (accessed February 18, 2016).
    41. 41
      EU. Directive 2013/39/EUof the European Parliament andof the Council of 12 August 2013 amending Directives 2000/60/EC and2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy.In EU Environmental Quality Standards; 2013.
    42. 42
      Vermont Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) Vermont Drinking Water Health Advisory (https://anrweb.vt.gov/PubDocs/DEC/PFOA/PFOA%20-%20PFOS%20Health%20Advisories/Vermont/PFOA_PFOS_HealthAdvisory_June_22_2016.pdf).
    43. 43
      Buck, R. C.; Franklin, J.; Berger, U.; Conder, J. M.; Cousins, I. T.; de Voogt, P.; Jensen, A. A.; Kannan, K.; Mabury, S. A.; van Leeuwen, S. P. J. Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in the Environment: Terminology, Classification, and Origins Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. 2011, 7 (4) 513 541 DOI: 10.1002/ieam.258
    44. 44
      Bergström, S. Transport of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances in soil and groundwater in Uppsala, Sweden. 2014.
    45. 45
      Thompson, J.; Eaglesham, G.; Mueller, J. Concentrations of PFOS, PFOA and other perfluorinated alkyl acids in Australian drinking water Chemosphere 2011, 83 (10) 1320 1325 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.04.017
    46. 46
      Taniyasu, S.; Kannan, K.; Wu, Q.; Kwok, K. Y.; Yeung, L. W. Y.; Lam, P. K. S.; Chittim, B.; Kida, T.; Takasuga, T.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Yamashita, N. Inter-laboratory trials for analysis of perfluorooctanesulfonate and perfluorooctanoate in water samples: Performance and recommendations Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 770, 111 120 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.01.056
    47. 47
      Eriksson, U.; Kärrman, A.; Rotander, A.; Mikkelsen, B.; Dam, M. Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in food and water from Faroe Islands Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20 (11) 7940 7948 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-1700-3
    48. 48
      Happonen, M.; Koivusalo, H.; Malve, O.; Perkola, N.; Juntunen, J.; Huttula, T. Contamination risk of raw drinking water caused by PFOA sources along a river reach in south-western Finland Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 541, 74 82 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.008
    49. 49
      Munoz, G.; Vo Duy, S.; Budzinski, H.; Labadie, P.; Liu, J.; Sauvé, S. Quantitative analysis of poly- and perfluoroalkyl compounds in water matrices using high resolution mass spectrometry: Optimization for a laser diode thermal desorption method Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 881, 98 106 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.04.015
    50. 50
      Grandjean, P.; Budtz-Jorgensen, E. Immunotoxicity of perfluorinated alkylates: calculation of benchmark doses based on serum concentrations in children Environ. Health 2013, 12 (1) 35 DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-35
    51. 51
      Valsecchi, S.; Rusconi, M.; Mazzoni, M.; Viviano, G.; Pagnotta, R.; Zaghi, C.; Serrini, G.; Polesello, S. Occurrence and sources of perfluoroalkyl acids in Italian river basins Chemosphere 2015, 129, 126 134 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.044
    52. 52
      Hebert, G. N.; Odom, M. A.; Craig, P. S.; Dick, D. L.; Strauss, S. H. Method for the determination of sub-ppm concentrations of perfluoroalkylsulfonate anions in water J. Environ. Monit. 2002, 4 (1) 90 95 DOI: 10.1039/b108463c
    53. 53
      Houtz, E. F.; Higgins, C. P.; Field, J. A.; Sedlak, D. L. Persistence of perfluoroalkyl acid precursors in AFFF-impacted groundwater and soil Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47 (15) 8187 8195 DOI: 10.1021/es4018877
    54. 54
      Anderson, R. H.; Long, G. C.; Porter, R. C.; Anderson, J. K. Occurrence of select perfluoroalkyl substances at U.S. Air Force aqueous film-forming foam release sites other than fire-training areas: Field-validation of critical fate and transport properties Chemosphere 2016, 150, 678 85 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.014
    55. 55
      Sinclair, E.; Kannan, K. Mass Loading and Fate of Perfluoroalkyl Surfactants in Wastewater Treatment Plants Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40 (5) 1408 1414 DOI: 10.1021/es051798v
    56. 56
      Schaider, L. A.; Rudel, R. A.; Ackerman, J. M.; Dunagan, S. C.; Brody, J. G. Pharmaceuticals, perfluorosurfactants, and other organic wastewater compounds in public drinking water wells in a shallow sand and gravel aquifer Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 468–469, 384 393 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.067
    57. 57
      Pascual, P.; Stiber, N.; Sunderland, E. Draft guidance on the development, evaluation, and application of regulatory environmental models; The Council for Regulatory Environmental Modeling, Office of Science Policy, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2003.
    58. 58
      NRC. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making; National Research Council, Committee on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2007.
    59. 59
      Houtz, E. F.; Sutton, R.; Park, J.-S.; Sedlak, M. Poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances in wastewater: Significance of unknown precursors, manufacturing shifts, and likely AFFF impacts Water Res. 2016, 95, 142 149 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.055
    60. 60
      Konwick, B. J.; Tomy, G. T.; Ismail, N.; Peterson, J. T.; Fauver, R. J.; Higginbotham, D.; Fisk, A. T. Concentrations and patterns of perfluoroalkyl acids in Georgia, USA surface waters near and distant to a major use source Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2008, 27 (10) 2011 2018 DOI: 10.1897/07-659.1
    61. 61
      Clara, M.; Scheffknecht, C.; Scharf, S.; Weiss, S.; Gans, O. Emissions of perfluorinated alkylated substances (PFAS) from point sources--identification of relevant branches Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 58 (1) 59 DOI: 10.2166/wst.2008.641
    62. 62
      Zhang, C.; Peng, Y.; Niu, X.; Ning, K. Determination of perfluoroalkyl substances in municipal landfill leachates from Beijing, China Asian J. Chem. 2014, 26 (13) 3833
    63. 63
      Busch, J.; Ahrens, L.; Sturm, R.; Ebinghaus, R. Polyfluoroalkyl compounds in landfill leachates Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158 (5) 1467 1471 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.12.031
    64. 64
      Huset, C. A.; Barlaz, M. A.; Barofsky, D. F.; Field, J. A. Quantitative determination of fluorochemicals in municipal landfill leachates Chemosphere 2011, 82 (10) 1380 1386 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.072
    65. 65
      Blaine, A. C.; Rich, C. D.; Hundal, L. S.; Lau, C.; Mills, M. A.; Harris, K. M.; Higgins, C. P. Uptake of perfluoroalkyl acids into edible crops via land applied biosolids: Field and greenhouse studies Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47 (24) 14062 14069 DOI: 10.1021/es403094q
    66. 66
      Sepulvado, J. G.; Blaine, A. C.; Hundal, L. S.; Higgins, C. P. Occurrence and fate of perfluorochemicals in soil following the land application of municipal biosolids Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (19) 8106 8112 DOI: 10.1021/es103903d
    67. 67
      Rich, C. D.; Blaine, A. C.; Hundal, L.; Higgins, C. P. Bioaccumulation of perfluoroalkyl acids by earthworms (Eisenia fetida) exposed to contaminated soils Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49 (2) 881 8 DOI: 10.1021/es504152d
    68. 68
      Hölzer, J.; Midasch, O.; Rauchfuss, K.; Kraft, M.; Reupert, R.; Angerer, J.; Kleeschulte, P.; Marschall, N.; Wilhelm, M. Biomonitoring of Perfluorinated Compounds in Children and Adults Exposed to Perfluorooctanoate-Contaminated Drinking Water Environ. Health Perspect. 2008, 116 (5) 651 657 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.11064
    69. 69
      Report of Investigation Activities at Select Firefighting Foam Training Areas and Foam Discharge Sites in Minnesota; Minnesota Pollution Control Agency: St. Paul, MN, 2010.
    70. 70
      Maupin, M. A.; Kenny, J. F.; Hutson, S. S.; Lovelace, J. K.; Barber, N. L.; Linsey, K. S. Estimated use of water in the United States in 2010. Report 2330-5703; U.S. Geological Survey, 2014.
    71. 71
      Factoids: Drinking Water and Ground Water Statistics for 2009; Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water: Washington, DC, 2009.
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00260.

    • Additional tables and figures (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

OOPS

You have to login with your ACS ID befor you can login with your Mendeley account.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE