ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Origin of Hexavalent Chromium in Drinking Water Wells from the Piedmont Aquifers of North Carolina

View Author Information
Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, Arkansas 72204, United States
*E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: 919-681-8050. Fax: 919-684-5833.
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2016, 3, 12, 409–414
Publication Date (Web):October 26, 2016
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00342

Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

  • Open Access
  • Editors Choice

Article Views

7122

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (2 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] is a known pulmonary carcinogen. Recent detection of Cr(VI) in drinking water wells in North Carolina has raised public concern about contamination of drinking water wells by nearby coal ash ponds. Here we report, for the first time, the prevalence of Cr and Cr(VI) in drinking water wells from the Piedmont region of central North Carolina, combined with a geochemical analysis to determine the source of the elevated Cr(VI) levels. We show that Cr(VI) is the predominant species of dissolved Cr in groundwater and elevated levels of Cr and Cr(VI) are found in wells located both near and far (>30 km) from coal ash ponds. The geochemical characteristics, including the overall chemistry, boron to chromium ratios, and strontium isotope (87Sr/86Sr) variations in groundwater with elevated Cr(IV) levels, are different from those of coal ash leachates. Alternatively, the groundwater chemistry and Sr isotope variations are consistent with water–rock interactions as the major source for Cr(VI) in groundwater. Our results indicate that Cr(VI) is most likely naturally occurring and ubiquitous in groundwater from the Piedmont region in the eastern United States, which could pose health risks to residents in the region who consume well water as a major drinking water source.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Since the early findings of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] in drinking water in the Hinkley community of San Bernardino County, California, presumably from Cr(VI) additives at water-cooling towers from gas compressor facilities, there has been a persistent controversy about the sources of Cr(VI) in groundwater and its human health impacts. (1) Most Cr in aquatic systems occurs as either the trivalent chromium [Cr(III)] cation Cr3+ or Cr(VI) oxyanions, such as the monovalent HCrO4 and divalent CrO42– species. (2-4) All Cr(VI) compounds are strong oxidizing agents and are recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) as “carcinogenic to humans (Group 1)”, (15) and Cr(VI) is recognized as a pulmonary carcinogen. (5-14) However, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) does not regulate individual Cr species, and the drinking water standard includes only total Cr [CrT, maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 100 μg/L]; (4) the most updated 2003 WHO guidelines for drinking water include only total Cr with an upper limit of 50 μg/L. (15) The absence of Cr(VI) from the drinking water regulations was explained by analytical limitation and the assumption that the speciation of Cr favors the predominance of the less toxic Cr(III) under typical environmental conditions. (4, 15) To date, only the state of California has issued a specific MCL of 10 μg/L and a public health goal (PHG) of 0.02 μg/L for Cr(VI) in drinking water. (16)
It is commonly assumed that the occurrence of Cr(VI) in drinking water wells is directly associated with human activities, and any detection of Cr(VI) infers anthropogenic contamination. (4, 15) However, recent reports have established that naturally occurring Cr(VI) is prevalent in groundwater from specific aquifer systems composed of ultramafic rocks, known to be enriched with Cr relative to other rock types. (17) Elevated Cr(VI) levels were reported in groundwater associated with ultramafic aquifers in California, (18-21) Arizona, (22) Mexico, (23) Argentina, (24) Brazil, (25) Italy, (26) and Greece. (27) Experimental work demonstrated that the presence of manganese oxide minerals within ultramafic- and serpentinite-derived soils and/or sediments can trigger the oxidation of Cr, leading to the presence of naturally occurring Cr(VI) in aquifers. (28)
Recent detection of Cr(VI) in drinking water wells near coal ash ponds in North Carolina (29) has been attributed to leaking from nearby coal ash ponds because an elevated Cr levels have been reported in coals and coal ash residuals (CCRs). (30-33) This study aims to determine whether coal ash ponds are causing the Cr(VI) contamination in local aquifers or if Cr(VI) is naturally occurring and ubiquitously distributed in groundwater across the Piedmont region. The study is based on systematic measurements of CrT and Cr(VI) in groundwater from different aquifers and varying distances from coal ash ponds in the Piedmont region of North Carolina, combined with geochemical and strontium isotope tracers known to be indicative of coal ash contamination and water–rock interactions. (34-36) Previous studies have observed elevated Sr (>150 μg/L) and B (>100 μg/L) levels and distinct Sr isotope ratios (87Sr/86Sr = 0.7095–0.7120) in effluent discharged from coal ash ponds and in contaminated surface and groundwater. (34-36) The Sr and B tracers are particularly useful for delineating the release of coal ash pond water because they are sensitive to very small contributions of contaminated water to the environment. (35, 36) We hypothesize that Cr(VI) contamination from coal ash ponds will be associated with modification of the chemical and isotope compositions of the groundwater toward a coal ash geochemical signature. (34-36)

Materials and Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Water samples in the study were collected from domestic groundwater wells in central North Carolina and were analyzed for major and trace elements (n = 376). A subset of these groundwater samples were analyzed for Cr(VI) (n = 77) and stable isotopes of strontium (87Sr/86Sr; n = 45). Water samples were collected before any treatment systems following standard methods. (37) Anions were measured by ion chromatography (IC) on a Dionex IC DX-2100 instrument; major cations were measured by direct current plasma optical emission spectrometry (DCP-OES) and trace elements by a VG PlasmaQuad-3 inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). The DCP and ICP-MS instruments were calibrated to the National Institute of Standards and Technology 1643e standard. The detection limit of ICP-MS for each element was determined by dividing 3 times the standard deviation of repeated blank measurements by the slope of the external standard. Cr(VI) was measured as chromate according to a modified version of U.S. EPA Method 218.6. (38) This method is based on anion exchange chromatography on a Thermo Scientific Dionex IonPac AS7 column (4 mm × 250 mm) with a method detection limit (MDL) for chromate of 0.004 μg/L and a reporting limit of 0.012 μg/L (see the text of the Supporting Information). Strontium isotopes were analyzed by thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) on a ThermoFisher Triton instrument at Duke University. The external reproducibility of 87Sr/86Sr ratios was comparable to standard NIST987 (0.710265 ± 0.000006).
Geospatial analysis of data was conducted using ArcMap version 10.3.1. The background on the hydrogeology and geological map is provided in the text of the Supporting Information. Statistical analyses were performed using R (version 3.2.0). All correlations were Spearman nonparametric correlations, and the reported r is the Spearman rank coefficient, rho. The nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to determine if concentration mean ranks differ between different populations.

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Geochemical Characteristics of Piedmont Groundwater

Total Cr (CrT) concentrations ranged from below the reporting limit (0.0016 μg/L) to 33.8 μg/L (Figure 1). In the subset of samples (n = 77) analyzed for Cr(VI), Cr(VI) concentrations varied from below the reporting limit (0.012 μg/L) to 22.9 μg/L and were highly correlated to CrT [slope of ∼1; r2 = 0.93; p < 0.001 (Figure 2)]. Our data are consistent with data reported by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (25) for residents near coal ash impoundments (n = 129) that show the same range of Cr(VI) concentrations and a high correlation between Cr(VI) and CrT [slope of ∼0.9; r2 = 0.90; p < 0.001 (Figure 2)]. The average Cr(VI)/CrT ratio of ∼1 indicates that Cr(VI) is the predominant species of dissolved Cr in groundwater and accounts for nearly all of the dissolved Cr. While the NC-DEQ data are restricted to wells located near coal ash ponds, our data collection included wells located far (up to 75 km) from coal ash impoundments (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Distribution of total Cr concentrations (ranked by color, in micrograms per liter) in drinking water wells, coal ash ponds, and selective geological formations in the Piedmont region of North Carolina. The small inset map at the top left shows the distribution of the Piedmont geology in the southeastern United States. The bottom inset map shows the distribution of Cr near coal ash ponds close to Salisbury, NC. The felsic metavolcanic rock and granitic rock categories are primarily felsic formations. The Cid, Floyd Church, metamorphosed mafic rock, and metavolcanic formations are of mixed character with varying levels of mafic components. The biotite gneiss and schist and phyllite and schist categories are characterized as general metamorphic bodies. The Cr concentrations in groundwater from the different formations are reported in Table S2. Geological data and location of coal ash ponds were retrieved from U.S. Geological Survey database (44) and Southern Alliance for Clean Energy. (45)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Hexavalent chromium concentration vs total Cr concentration in groundwater analyzed in this study (red circles) and reported by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (25) (○). Note the high correlation of Cr(VI) to CrT in both data sets with an r2 of 0.93 (p < 0.001; n = 77) reported in this study and an r2 of 0.90 (p < 0.001; n = 129) in NC-DEQ data. The ∼1:1 ratio in most of the samples indicates that Cr(VI) is the predominant species of dissolved Cr in the Piedmont groundwater.

Strontium concentrations in the groundwater ranged from the detection limit (0.25 μg/L) to 3426 μg/L, with low Sr/Ca ratios [<0.006 (Figure 3A)]. Groundwater from a Cr(VI)-rich metavolcanic aquifer in Rowan County located near a coal ash pond (n = 16) (Figure 1) and aquifers containing mafic rocks from other counties in the Piedmont region (n = 7) had low 87Sr/86Sr ratios [0.7041 ± 0.0005 (Figure 3A)]. Groundwater from the other aquifers showed large variations in 87Sr/86Sr (a range of 0.7052–0.7119), with higher 87Sr/86Sr ratios in the felsic and phyllite and schist aquifers [0.7074–0.7119 (Figure S3)]. Boron concentrations from the Piedmont region were low (a range of 0.09–159.2 μg/L, median of 3.7 μg/L) with low B/CrT ratios [median of 8.6 (Figure 3B)]. In particular, groundwater from wells from the metavolcanic aquifer near coal ash ponds with high Cr(VI) concentrations in Rowan County (see the inset map in Figure 1) had systematically low B concentrations [median of 2.3 ± 17.3 μg/L (Figure S4)] and low B/CrT ratios (<200).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Variations of (A) 87Sr/86Sr vs Sr/Ca and (B) B vs total Cr (log scale) in groundwater from the Piedmont region (red and purple circles) as compared to that of effluent discharge from coal ash ponds’ outfalls in North Carolina (black squares; data from ref 31). The data show systematically lower 87Sr/86Sr, Sr/Ca, and B/Cr ratios in groundwater than in coal ash effluents. Groundwater from aquifers composed of metavolcanic rocks (purple circles) is characterized by distinctively lower 87Sr/86Sr, Sr/Ca, and B contents relative to those of groundwater from other aquifers and coal ash effluents. The combined data indicate that the chemistry of the Piedmont groundwater is different from the composition of coal ash waters, particularly for groundwater from metavolcanic aquifers that are located near coal ash ponds (n = 16), thus ruling out the possibility of the contamination of drinking water wells by coal ash ponds.

Tracing the Source of Hexavalent Chromium

Previous studies have shown that coal ash effluents and coal ash-contaminated groundwater have high concentrations of B and Sr with distinctive radiogenic Sr isotope ratios, which are different in some cases from those in natural waters. (34-36, 39-41) Waters impacted by CCR effluents typically have high B and Sr concentrations (above background levels of 100 and 150 μg/L, respectively), high Sr/Ca ratios (>0.006), and high 87Sr/86Sr ratios (>0.70975). (34-36) In shallow groundwater monitoring wells around coal ash ponds in North Carolina, the B levels reached 5000 μg/L. (36) The low B concentrations and B/CrT, Sr/Ca (<0.006), and 87Sr/86Sr ratios of the Cr(VI)-rich groundwater in this study, including wells located near (<5 km) a coal ash pond, are inconsistent with the geochemistry expected for CCR-impacted water (Figure 3A). The low 87Sr/86Sr ratios observed in the groundwater in Rowan County are consistent with a nonradiogenic Sr isotope composition that is typical for the mafic rocks that are prevalent in this aquifer, indicating that Sr is derived from water–rock interactions and not from coal ash pond contamination. Higher 87Sr/86Sr ratios were observed in felsic aquifers and other nonmafic aquifers (Figure S3); however, these aquifers were not associated with high Cr(VI) and in many cases were located far from coal ash ponds.
Data from coal ash pond effluents in North Carolina (34) show that B is strongly correlated to CrT [r2 = 0.68; p < 0.001 (Figure 3B)], with high B/CrT ratios of ∼297. In contrast, all groundwater from the Piedmont region had much lower B concentrations and B/CrT ratios. In particular, groundwater wells in Rowan County near the coal ash pond with a high Cr(VI) concentration had B levels and B/CrT ratios 2–3 orders of magnitude lower than those of coal ash pond effluents from North Carolina (Figure 3B).
In addition to the groundwater in Rowan County, samples were collected from wells in formations containing mafic rocks located in counties that did not have any coal ash ponds. Elevated Cr(VI) concentrations were detected in wells from mafic-rich aquifers in Forsyth County that are located more than 30 km from a coal ash pond. These samples had elevated Cr(VI) concentrations of up to 10 μg/L with Sr/Ca (<0.006), B/CrT (<20), and 87Sr/86Sr ratios similar to those of the mafic-containing aquifer near the coal ash ponds in Rowan County.
It is important to note that coal ash effluents that discharge from coal ash ponds in NC have high concentrations of sulfate, arsenic, selenium, molybdenum, and thallium relative to those of natural waters, (34) which are not present in the groundwater near coal ash ponds tested in this study. Furthermore, the range of CrT concentrations found in coal ash effluents [0.4–8.6 μg/L (Figure S5)] is lower than those measured in nearby groundwater. Overall, the geochemical and isotopic data clearly indicate that the drinking water wells tested in this study are not impacted by CCR effluents, and therefore, the coal ash ponds are not a likely source of the elevated CrT and Cr(VI) concentrations found in the Piedmont groundwater. These results are further supported by the presence of Cr(VI)-rich groundwater that has similar geochemistry in wells located more than 30 km from a coal ash pond (Figure 1 and Figure S2). Total Cr concentrations were not strongly correlated with distance (r = 0.09) but showed a significant (p < 0.05) increase with distance from coal ash ponds, and concentrations of up to 34 μg/L were found in wells more than 50 km from the nearest coal ash pond. These results indicate that high Cr concentrations can be found in wells located far from coal ash ponds, which is inconsistent with the expected trend if coal ash ponds were the source of Cr contamination in nearby groundwater. The geospatial analysis therefore supports the conclusions drawn from the geochemical data.

Distribution of Chromium in the Piedmont Aquifers

While our geochemical analysis rules out contamination from nearby coal ash ponds, we present evidence of a geogenic source of Cr and Cr(VI) to drinking water aquifers. First, we show that Cr [and Cr(VI)] can be found throughout the different aquifers of the Piedmont region (Figure 1). Second, the association of 87Sr/86Sr ratios with aquifer lithology (Figure S3) indicates that the local aquifer rocks are the source of dissolved Sr and apparently Ca in groundwater, given the high correlation between Sr and Ca (Figure S6). Third, the association of Ca and Cr in groundwater from some aquifers (Figure S7) suggests that Cr, like Ca, is derived from water–rock interactions rather than an external (i.e., anthropogenic) source. The distribution of CrT varies among the different types of lithology (Figure S8), with the highest to lowest median CrT values observed in groundwater from the Floyd Church Formation, Cid Formation, mafic metavolcanic, phyllite and schist, biotite gneiss schist, felsic mica gneiss, felsic metamorphic, and granitic rocks, respectively (Table S2). The data show that groundwater from intermediate or mixed mafic metavolcanic formations has CrT concentrations (p < 0.05) significantly higher than those of groundwater from felsic formations (Table S3). These results are consistent with previous studies that have shown high Cr(VI) concentrations in groundwater from ultramafic rocks, (18-27) yet the data presented in this study infer Cr(VI) prevalence in groundwater from aquifers composed of metamorphic mafic rocks and even felsic rocks, which are highly common in the Piedmont region of the eastern United States. (42)

Environmental Health Implications

Assuming that Cr(VI) is the predominant Cr species in drinking water wells, we show that only 14 of 376 wells (∼4%) had CrT above the California MCL limit of 10 μg/L. At the same time, only 8 of 77 (∼10%) wells had Cr(VI) levels below the detection level (0.004 μg/L), meaning that 90% of the study wells had detectable Cr(VI), and furthermore, all of the detectable Cr(VI) was above the California PHG of 0.02 μg/L. While our sample collection was conducted in the Piedmont region of North Carolina, the distribution of the Piedmont rocks extends to other states in the eastern United States (see the top inset map in Figure 1), and a large population is potentially consuming drinking water with detectable and, in some cases, high Cr(VI) levels. Given the global distribution of aquifers composed of mafic and igneous rocks, (43) we hypothesize that the occurrence of Cr(VI) in shallow drinking water wells is much more widespread than previously thought, with possibly millions in the eastern United States and other parts of the world directly exposed to detectable Cr(VI) from drinking water wells. The lack of a national Cr(VI) standard for drinking water (4) impedes a large scale evaluation of the distribution of Cr(VI) in groundwater systems. Monitoring and screening for Cr(VI) levels in public and private wells are therefore essential for protecting human health in the Piedmont region and beyond.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00342.

  • Eight figures, three tables, information about the analytical procedure of hexavalent chromium, and background on the hydrogeology of the Piedmont area (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
    • Avner Vengosh - Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Rachel Coyte - Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
    • Jonathan Karr - Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
    • Jennifer S. Harkness - Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
    • Andrew J. Kondash - Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
    • Laura S. Ruhl - Department of Earth Sciences, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, Arkansas 72204, United States
    • Rose B. Merola - Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
    • Gary S. Dywer - Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Foundation for the Carolinas to the Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, and a grant from the North Carolina Water Resources Research Institute (NC-WRRI).

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 45 other publications.

  1. 1
    Fryzek, J. P.; Mumma, M. T.; McLaughlin, J. K.; Henderson, B. E.; Blot, W. J. Cancer Mortality in Relation to Environmental Chromium Exposure J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2001, 43, 635 640 DOI: 10.1097/00043764-200107000-00011
  2. 2
    Sengupta, A. D.; Clifford, S.; Subramonian, S. Chromate Ion-Exchange Process at alkaline pH Water Res. 1986, 20, 1177 1184 DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(86)90064-3
  3. 3
    Bartlett, R. J. Chromium Cycling in Soils and Water: Links, Gaps, and Methods Environ. Health Perspect 1991, 92, 17 24 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.919217
  4. 4
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA). (2016. Basic Information about Chromium in Drinking Water. (http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/chromium.cfm) (accessed September, 23, 2016).
  5. 5
    Barceloux, D. G.; Barceloux, D. Chromium J. Toxicol., Clin. Toxicol. 1999) 37, 173 194 DOI: 10.1081/CLT-100102418
  6. 6
    Cohen, M. D.; Kargacin, B.; Klein, C. B.; Costa, M. Mechanisms of chromium carcinogenicity and toxicity Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 1993, 23, 255 281 DOI: 10.3109/10408449309105012
  7. 7
    Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Control (ATSDR). ATSDR’s Toxicological Profiles: Chromium; Lewis Publishers, CRC Press, Inc.: Boca Raton, FL, 1997.
  8. 8
    International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Chromium, Nickel and Welding Fumes; IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; IARC: Lyon, France, 1990; No. 49, pp 1 648 (http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol100C/100C-04-Index-tables.php) (accessed Septermber, 23, 2016).
  9. 9
    Saha, R.; Nandi, R.; Saha, B. Sources and toxicity of hexavalent chromium J. Coord. Chem. 2011, 64, 1782 1806 DOI: 10.1080/00958972.2011.583646
  10. 10
    Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium Fed. Regist. 2006, 71, 10099 10385
  11. 11
    Toxicological Review of Hexavalent Chromium. EPA/635/R-10/004A; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2010.
  12. 12
    Beaumont, J. J.; Sedman, R. M.; Reynolds, S. D.; Sherman, C. D.; Li, L. H.; Howd, R. A.; Sandy, M. S.; Zeise, L.; Alexeeff, G. V. Cancer mortality in a Chinese population exposed to hexavalent chromium in drinking water Epidemiology 2008, 19, 12 23 DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31815cea4c
  13. 13
    Smith, A. H.; Steinmaus, C. M. Health effects of arsenic and chromium in drinking water: recent human findings Annu. Rev. Public Health 2009, 30, 107 122 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100143
  14. 14
    Rowbotham, A. L.; Levy, L. S.; Shuker, L. K. Chromium in the environment: an evaluation of exposure of the UK general population and possible adverse health effects J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part B 2000, 3, 145 178 DOI: 10.1080/10937400050045255
  15. 15
    World Health Organization (WHO). Chromium in drinking-water. Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 2nd ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, 2004; Vol. 2 (health criteria and other supporting information).
  16. 16
    California Chromium-6 Drinking Water MCL (http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/Chromium6.shtml) (accessed September 23, 2016) .
  17. 17
    Guertin, J.; Jacobs, J. A.; Avakian, C. P., Eds. Chromium(VI) Handbook; CRS Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2005.
  18. 18
    Ball, J. W.; Izbicki, J. A. Occurrence of hexavalent chromium in ground water in the western Mojave Desert, California Appl. Geochem. 2004, 19, 1123 1135 DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.01.011
  19. 19
    Gonzalez, A. R.; Ndung'u, K.; Flegal, A. R. Natural occurrence of hexavalent chromium in the Aromas Red Sands Aquifer, California Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 5505 5511 DOI: 10.1021/es048835n
  20. 20
    Gough, L. P.; Meadows, G. R.; Jackson, L. L.; Dudka, S. Biogechemistry of a highly serpentized chromite-rich ultra mafic area, Tehama County, California U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 1989, 1901, 1 24
  21. 21
    Manning, A. H.; Mills, C.; Morrison, J. M.; Ball, L. B. Insights into controls on hexavalent chromium in groundwater provided by environmental tracers, Sacramento Valley, California, USA Appl. Geochem. 2015, 62, 186 199 DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.05.010
  22. 22
    Robertson, F. N. Hexavalent Chromium in the Ground Water in Paradise Valley, Arizona Groundwater 1975, 13, 516 527 DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1975.tb03621.x
  23. 23
    Robles-Camacho, J.; Armienta, M. A. Natural chromium contamination of groundwater of Leon Valley, Mexico J. Geochem. Explor. 2000, 68, 167 181 DOI: 10.1016/S0375-6742(99)00083-7
  24. 24
    Farías, S. S.; Casa, V. A.; Vázquez, C.; Ferpozzi, L.; Pucci, G. N.; Cohen, I. M. Natural contamination with arsenic and other trace elements in ground waters of Argentine Pampean Plain Sci. Total Environ. 2003, 309, 187 199 DOI: 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00056-1
  25. 25
    Bertolo, R.; Bourotte, C.; Hirata, R.; Marcolan, L.; Sracek, O. Geochemistry of natural chromium occurrence in a sandstone aquifer in Bauru Basin, São Paulo State, Brazil Appl. Geochem. 2011, 26, 1353 1363 DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.05.009
  26. 26
    Fantoni, D.; Brozzo, G.; Canepa, M.; Cipolli, F.; Marini, L.; Ottonello, G.; Zuccolini, M. V. Natural hexavalent chromium in groundwaters interacting with ophiolitic rocks Environ. Geol. 2002, 42, 871 882 DOI: 10.1007/s00254-002-0605-0
  27. 27
    Kazakis, N.; Kantiranis, N.; Voudouris, K. S.; Mitrakas, M.; Kaprara, E.; Pavlou, A. Geogenic Cr oxidation on the surface of mafic minerals and the hydrogeological conditions influencing hexavalent chromium concentrations in groundwater Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 514, 224 238 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.080
  28. 28
    Oze, C.; Bird, C. D.; Fendorf, S. Genesis of hexavalent chromium from natural sources in soil and groundwater Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104, 6544 6549 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701085104
  29. 29
    North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NC-DEQ). Well test information for residents near Duke Energy coal ash impoundments (https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-hot-topics/dwr-coal-ash-regulation/well-test-information-for-residents-near-duke-energy-coal-ash-impoundments) (accessed May 16, 2016) .
  30. 30
    Meij, R. Trace elements behavior in coal fired power plants Fuel Process. Technol. 1994, 39, 199 217 DOI: 10.1016/0378-3820(94)90180-5
  31. 31
    Shah, P.; Strezov, V.; Prince, K.; Nelson, P. F. Speciation of As, Cr, Se and Hg under coal fired power station conditions Fuel 2008, 87, 1859 1869 DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.12.001
  32. 32
    Kingston, H. M. S.; Cain, R.; Huo, D.; Mizanur Rahman, G. M. Determination and evaluation of hexavalent chromium in power plant coal combustion by-products and cost-effective environmental remediation solutions using acid mine drainage J. Environ. Monit. 2005, 7, 899 905 DOI: 10.1039/b504724b
  33. 33
    Darakas, E.; Tsiridis, V.; Petala, M.; Kungolos, A. Hexavalent chromium release from lignite fly ash and related ecotoxic effects J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2013, 48, 1390 1398 DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2013.781886
  34. 34
    Ruhl, L.; Vengosh, A.; Dwyer, G. S.; Hsu Kim, H.; Schwartz, G.; Romanski, A.; Smith, S. D. The impact of coal combustion residue effluent on water resources: A North Carolina example Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 12226 12233 DOI: 10.1021/es303263x
  35. 35
    Ruhl, L.; Dwyer, G. S.; Hsu-Kim, H.; Hower, J. C.; Vengosh, A. Boron and strontium isotopic characterization of coal combustion residuals: Validation of new environmental tracers Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 14790 14798 DOI: 10.1021/es503746v
  36. 36
    Harkness, J.; Sulkin, B.; Vengosh, A. Evidence for coal ash ponds leaking in the southeastern United States Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 6583 6592 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01727
  37. 37
    Warner, N. R.; Jackson, R. B.; Darrah, T. H.; Osborn, S. G.; Down, A.; Zhao, K.; White, A.; Vengosh, A. Geochemical evidence for possible natural migration of Marcellus formation brine to shallow aquifers in Pennsylvania Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 11961 11966 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1121181109
  38. 38
    Zaffiro, A.; Zimmerman, M.; Wendelken, S.; Smith, G.; Munch, D. U.S. EPA Method 218.7: Determination of hexavalent chromium in drinking water by ion chromatography with post-column derivatization and UV-visible spectroscopic detection. Office of Water (MLK140) EPA Document No. EPA 815-R-11-005; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2011.
  39. 39
    Davidson, G. R.; Bassett, R. L. Application of boron isotopes for identifying contaminants such as fly ash leachate in groundwater Environ. Sci. Technol. 1993, 27, 172 176 DOI: 10.1021/es00038a020
  40. 40
    Dreesen, D. R.; Gladney, E. S.; Owens, J. W.; Perkins, B. L.; Wienke, C. L.; Wangen, L. E. Comparison of levels of trace elements extracted from fly ash and levels found in effluent waters from a coal-fired power plant Environ. Sci. Technol. 1977, 11, 1017 1019 DOI: 10.1021/es60133a001
  41. 41
    Brubaker, T. M.; Stewart, B. W.; Capo, R. C.; Schroeder, K. T.; Chapman, E. C.; Spivak-Birndorf, L. J.; Vesper, D. J.; Cardone, C. R.; Rohar, P. C. Coal fly ash interaction with environmental fluids: Geochemical and strontium isotope results from combined column and batch leaching experiments Appl. Geochem. 2013, 32, 184 194 DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.09.001
  42. 42
    Chapman, M. J.; Cravotta, C. A.; Szabo, Z.; Lindsey, B. D. Naturally occurring contaminants in the Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifers and Piedmont Early Mesozoic basin siliciclastic-rock aquifers, eastern United States, 1994–2008. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigation Report 5072; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, 2013.
  43. 43
    Winkel, L.; Berg, M.; Amini, M.; Hug, S. J.; Johnson, C. A. Predicting groundwater arsenic contamination in Southeast Asia from surface parameters Nat. Geosci. 2008, 1, 536 542 DOI: 10.1038/ngeo254
  44. 44
    Dicken, C. L.; Nicholson, S. W.; Horton, J. D.; Foose, M. P.; Mueller, J. A. L. Preliminary integrated geologic map databases for the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report (2005-1323); U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, 2005, (http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1323/) (accessed September 29, 2016).
  45. 45
    Southeast Coal Ash Impoundments, 2013. Southern Alliance for Clean Energy (http://www.southeastcoalash.org/) (accessed September 29, 2016) .

Cited By

This article is cited by 84 publications.

  1. Donglei Zhang, Xiaolei Liu, Yuefei Ding, Juan Liu, Hongchen Jiang, Hailiang Dong. Enhanced Oxidation of Cr(III)–Fe(III) Hydroxides by Oxygen in Dark and Alkaline Environments: Roles of Fe/Cr Ratio and Siderophore. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (35) , 13172-13181. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c04151
  2. Huaming Guo, Yi Chen, Huiying Hu, Kai Zhao, Haitao Li, Song Yan, Wei Xiu, Rachel M. Coyte, Avner Vengosh. High Hexavalent Chromium Concentration in Groundwater from a Deep Aquifer in the Baiyangdian Basin of the North China Plain. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (16) , 10068-10077. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02357
  3. Rachel M. Coyte, Avner Vengosh. Factors Controlling the Risks of Co-occurrence of the Redox-Sensitive Elements of Arsenic, Chromium, Vanadium, and Uranium in Groundwater from the Eastern United States. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (7) , 4367-4375. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06471
  4. Xiaodi Sun, Daniel B. Gingerich, Inês L. Azevedo, Meagan S. Mauter. Trace Element Mass Flow Rates from U.S. Coal Fired Power Plants. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (10) , 5585-5595. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01039
  5. Ying Hu, Qiang Xue, Honghan Chen, Huaming Guo, Kenneth C. Carroll, Song Wang. Mechanistic insight into Cr(VI) retention by Si-containing ferrihydrite. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2024, 139 , 217-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2023.05.040
  6. Wendi Fan, Song Yan, Bingying Gao, Wei Xiu, Yi Zhao, Huaming Guo. Linking groundwater microbiome and functional ecological clusters to geogenic high hexavalent chromium from deep aquifers in a loess plateau. Water Research 2023, 244 , 120545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.120545
  7. Amanda Darling, Hannah Patton, Md Rasheduzzaman, Rachel Guevara, Joshua McCray, Leigh-Anne Krometis, Alasdair Cohen. Microbiological and chemical drinking water contaminants and associated health outcomes in rural Appalachia, USA: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 892 , 164036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164036
  8. Sreejata Kamila, Pallab Shaw, Shehnaz Islam, Ansuman Chattopadhyay. Ecotoxicology of hexavalent chromium in fish: An updated review. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 890 , 164395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164395
  9. Xinwan Zhang, Guangyuan Meng, Jinwen Hu, Wanzi Xiao, Tong Li, Lehua Zhang, Peng Chen. Electroreduction of hexavalent chromium using a porous titanium flow-through electrode and intelligent prediction based on a back propagation neural network. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering 2023, 17 (8) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1697-x
  10. Sumant Kumar Verma, ShriRam Chaurasia. A hydrogeochemical study of groundwater of district Ballia, U.P., India. Water Supply 2023, 23 (8) , 3221-3238. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2023.166
  11. Ratna Dwi Puji Astuti, Anwar Mallongi, Ridwan Amiruddin, Muhammad Hatta, Annisa Utami Rauf. Hexavalent chromium contamination in groundwater and its implication to human health: a Monte Carlo model approach in Indonesia. Sustainable Water Resources Management 2023, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-022-00806-x
  12. Conny P. Mokgohloa, Mary S. Thomas, Ntebogeng S. Mokgalaka, Abayneh A. Ambushe. Speciation of inorganic chromium in river water by graphite furnace-atomic absorption spectrometry after chromabond NH 2 column based solid phase extraction. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 2022, 102 (16) , 4042-4057. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2020.1779243
  13. Arnab Mukherjee, Subhajit Kundu, Deblina Chatterjee, Debasis Dhak. A Critical Review on Photoreduction Using Metal–Organic Frameworks: Kinetics, pH and Mechanistic Studies and Anthropogenic/Natural Sources of Cr(VI). Chemistry Africa 2022, 5 (6) , 1783-1796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-021-00295-z
  14. Avner Vengosh, Zhen Wang, Gordon Williams, Robert Hill, Rachel M. Coyte, Gary S. Dwyer. The strontium isotope fingerprint of phosphate rocks mining. Science of The Total Environment 2022, 850 , 157971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157971
  15. Ceren Yilmaz Akkaya, James P. Dombrowski, Erika Colin-Ulloa, Lyubov V. Titova, Timothy J. Lawton, Todd E. Alexander, Eric Brack, Christopher Drew, Pratap M. Rao. Improved synthesis and transient absorption spectroscopy of CuBiW 2 O 8 with demonstration of visible-light-driven photocatalysis and mechanistic insights. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2022, 10 (46) , 24888-24895. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TA03086A
  16. Tomi Mantel, Sarah Glass, Muhammad Usman, Anastasios Lyberis, Volkan Filiz, Mathias Ernst. Adsorptive dead-end filtration for removal of Cr( vi ) using novel amine modified polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membranes. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2022, 8 (12) , 2981-2993. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EW00570K
  17. Monika Mahmud, Md. Sahadat Hossain, Mashrafi Bin Mobarak, Md. Saiful Quddus, Muhammad Shahriar Bashar, Umme Sarmeen Akhtar, Shirin Akter Jahan, Dipa Islam, Samina Ahmed. Engineering GO@Zn–Hap@CA porous heterostructure for ultra-fast and ultra-high adsorption efficacy: investigation towards the remediation of chromium and lead. Environmental Science: Advances 2022, 1 (5) , 827-848. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2VA00142J
  18. Hannah R. Peel, Fatai O. Balogun, Christopher A. Bowers, Cass T. Miller, Chelsea S. Obeidy, Matthew L. Polizzotto, Sadeya U. Tashnia, David S. Vinson, Owen W. Duckworth. Towards Understanding Factors Affecting Arsenic, Chromium, and Vanadium Mobility in the Subsurface. Water 2022, 14 (22) , 3687. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14223687
  19. Huiying Hu, Huaming Guo, Yi Chen, Song Yan. Sediment geochemistry and its influence on chromium enrichment in porewater from a deep aquifer in the Baiyangdian Basin, China. Journal of Soils and Sediments 2022, 22 (10) , 2815-2826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03259-z
  20. A.R. Laiju, Sudipta Sarkar. A novel hybrid ferrous sulfide impregnated anion exchanger for trace removal of hexavalent chromium from contaminated water. Chemosphere 2022, 305 , 135369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135369
  21. Archisman Bhunia, Dibyajit Lahiri, Moupriya Nag, Vijay Upadhye, Soumya Pandit. Bacterial biofilm mediated bioremediation of hexavalent chromium: A review. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 2022, 43 , 102397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2022.102397
  22. Rayan A. Alyousef, Hussain J. Alfaifi, Faisal K. Zaidi, Mansour Al-Hashim. Geostatistical and pollution index-based approach for assessing heavy metal pollution in the Cambro-Ordovician Saq Aquifer in Central Saudi Arabia. Environmental Earth Sciences 2022, 81 (14) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10498-3
  23. Marija Petrović, Željka Fiket. Environmental damage caused by coal combustion residue disposal: A critical review of risk assessment methodologies. Chemosphere 2022, 299 , 134410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134410
  24. Lei Wang, Peiyue Li, Rui Duan, Xiaodong He. Occurrence, Controlling Factors and Health Risks of Cr6+ in Groundwater in the Guanzhong Basin of China. Exposure and Health 2022, 14 (2) , 239-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-021-00410-y
  25. Song Yan, Huaming Guo, Jiahong Yin, Huiying Hu, Di Cui, Bingying Gao. Genesis of high hexavalent chromium groundwater in deep aquifers from loess plateau of Northern Shaanxi, China. Water Research 2022, 216 , 118323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118323
  26. Kirthiram K. Sivakumar, Jone A. Stanley, Jonathan C. Behlen, Liga Wuri, Sudipta Dutta, John Wu, Joe A. Arosh, Sakhila K. Banu. Inhibition of Sirtuin-1 hyperacetylates p53 and abrogates Sirtuin-1-p53 interaction in Cr(VI)-induced apoptosis in the ovary. Reproductive Toxicology 2022, 109 , 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2022.03.007
  27. Eric Tobechukwu Anthony, Nurudeen Abiola Oladoja. Process enhancing strategies for the reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) via photocatalytic pathway. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022, 29 (6) , 8026-8053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17614-z
  28. Rachida Bouallouch, Mohammed Kebir, Noureddine Nasrallah, Faouzi Saib, Atef El Jery, Lotfi Khezami, Mohamed Trari. Synthesis, structural, and opto-electrochemical properties of cobalt aluminate type spinel and its use with ZnO for Cr(VI) photoreduction. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022, 29 (8) , 12237-12248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16625-0
  29. Abayneh Kebede, Kassim Kedir, Fekadu Melak, Tsegaye Girma Asere, . Removal of Cr(VI) from Aqueous Solutions Using Biowastes: Tella Residue and Pea (Pisum sativum) Seed Shell. The Scientific World Journal 2022, 2022 , 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7554133
  30. Aisha Farhana, A. Jenifer Selvarani, Antony V. Samrot, Abdullah Alsrhani, P. Raji, Chamarthy Sai Sahithya, P. J. Jane Cypriyana, P. Senthilkumar, Mok Pooi Ling, Simon Yishak, . Utilization of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (SPIONs) Impregnated Activated Carbon for Removal of Hexavalent Chromium. Journal of Nanomaterials 2022, 2022 , 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4326939
  31. Mahmood Reza Rahimi, Soleiman Mosleh. Magnetic and electrical-assisted adsorption processes. 2022, 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821411-4.00005-5
  32. Liga Wuri, Joe A. Arosh, John Z. Wu, Sakhila K. Banu. Exposure to hexavalent chromium causes infertility by disrupting cytoskeletal machinery and mitochondrial function of the metaphase II oocytes in superovulated rats. Toxicology Reports 2022, 9 , 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2022.02.002
  33. Gunnam Venkata Ratnalu, Ratnakar Dhakate. Human health hazard evaluation with reference to chromium (Cr+3 and Cr+6) in groundwater of Bengaluru Metropolitan City, South India. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 2021, 14 (23) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08671-2
  34. Gopal Krishan, Ajay Kumar Taloor, Natarajan Sudarsan, Prosun Bhattacharya, Sumant Kumar, Naranyan Chandra Ghosh, Surjeet Singh, Anupma Sharma, M. Someshwar Rao, Sanjay Mittal, Balwinder Singh Sidhu, Rajesh Vasisht, Ramnik Kour. Occurrences of potentially toxic trace metals in groundwater of the state of Punjab in northern India. Groundwater for Sustainable Development 2021, 15 , 100655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2021.100655
  35. Mavromatidou Charoula, Samiotis Georgios, Batsi Anna, Amanatidou Elisavet. Correlation of hexavalent chromium concentration to groundwater hydrochemical zones chemistry. Groundwater for Sustainable Development 2021, 15 , 100672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2021.100672
  36. Hai Liu, Guipeng Tian, Wenyi Wang, Jiachunxiu Zhang, Tianshu Wu, Xinye Ni, Yin-Hu Wu. Carbon fiber-based flow-through electrode system (FES) for Cr(VI) removal at near neutral pHs via Cr(VI) reduction and in-situ adsorption of Cr(III) precipitates. Chemical Engineering Journal 2021, 420 , 127622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127622
  37. Ajit Pratap Singh Yadav, Lalit Goswami, Vinay Dwivedi, Satyendra Kumar. Leveraging the biosorption potential of Leptolyngbya boryana for Cr (VI) removal from aqueous solution. Cleaner Engineering and Technology 2021, 281 , 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100198
  38. Jialiang Liang, Xinmiao Huang, Jingwen Yan, Yunyi Li, Zhiwei Zhao, Yuanyuan Liu, Jiangyu Ye, Yunmei Wei. A review of the formation of Cr(VI) via Cr(III) oxidation in soils and groundwater. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 774 , 145762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145762
  39. Sushant D. Bamane, Vinod Bhojwani, Pradeep L. Balkunde, Mainak Bhattacharya, Ishan Gupta, Ashwini K. Mohapatra, Aditya Shekhar, Abhas Singh. Smartphone-enabled field monitoring tool for rapid hexavalent chromium detection in water. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2021, 413 (13) , 3455-3469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-021-03291-x
  40. Willis Gwenzi. Toxic Geogenic Contaminants in Serpentinitic Geological Systems: Occurrence, Behavior, Exposure Pathways, and Human Health Risks. 2021, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119710134.ch1
  41. Susom Dutta, Thomas M. Christy, Wesley McCall, Pradeep Kurup. Field evaluation of 1.75 groundwater profiler and field screening device for on-site contamination profiling of chromium(VI) in groundwater. Environmental Earth Sciences 2021, 80 (7) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09568-9
  42. Ashwani Kumar Tiwari, Enrico Suozzi, Adriano Fiorucci, Stefano Lo Russo. Assessment of groundwater geochemistry and human health risk of an intensively cropped alluvial plain, NW Italy. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 2021, 27 (3) , 825-845. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2020.1775484
  43. I. Gusti Made Ngurah Budiana, Jasman Jasman, Yantus A.B. Neolaka, Arsel A.P. Riwu, Hicham Elmsellem, Handoko Darmokoesoemo, Heri Septya Kusuma. Synthesis, characterization and application of cinnamoyl C-phenylcalix[4]resorcinarene (CCPCR) for removal of Cr(III) ion from the aquatic environment. Journal of Molecular Liquids 2021, 324 , 114776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114776
  44. Salaheldeen Enbaia, Abdurrahman Eswayah, Nicole Hondow, Philip H. E. Gardiner, Thomas J. Smith, . Detoxification, Active Uptake, and Intracellular Accumulation of Chromium Species by a Methane-Oxidizing Bacterium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2021, 87 (2) https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00947-20
  45. Jingjing Liu, Baruch F. Spiro, Shifeng Dai, David French, Ian T. Graham, Xibo Wang, Lei Zhao, Jingtao Zhao, Rongshu Zeng. Strontium isotopes in high- and low-Ge coals from the Shengli Coalfield, Inner Mongolia, northern China: New indicators for Ge source. International Journal of Coal Geology 2021, 233 , 103642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2020.103642
  46. Ratna Dwi Puji Astuti, Anwar Mallongi, Ridwan Amiruddin, Muhammad Hatta, Annisa Utami Rauf. Risk identification of heavy metals in well water surrounds watershed area of Pangkajene, Indonesia. Gaceta Sanitaria 2021, 35 , S33-S37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.12.010
  47. Eric T. Anthony, Nurudeen A. Oladoja. Oxyanions in Groundwater System—Prevalence, Dynamics, and Management Strategies. 2021, 69-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70757-6_3
  48. Aliya Naz, Abhiroop Chowdhury, Brijesh Kumar Mishra. Source, Pollution and Remediation of Carcinogenic Hexavalent Chromium from Industrial, Mining Effluents. 2021, 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80334-6_12
  49. Anna Dabizha, Michael Kersten. Exothermic adsorption of chromate by goethite. Applied Geochemistry 2020, 123 , 104785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2020.104785
  50. Nayuesh Sharma, Arnab Kumar Dey, Rohit Y. Sathe, Ajay Kumar, Venkata Krishnan, T. J. Dhilip Kumar, C. M. Nagaraja. Highly efficient visible-light-driven reduction of Cr( vi ) from water by porphyrin-based metal–organic frameworks: effect of band gap engineering on the photocatalytic activity. Catalysis Science & Technology 2020, 10 (22) , 7724-7733. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CY00969E
  51. Haizhou Liu, Xuejun Yu. Hexavalent chromium in drinking water: Chemistry, challenges and future outlook on Sn(II)- and photocatalyst-based treatment. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering 2020, 14 (5) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1267-4
  52. Alka Banchhor, Madhurima Pandey, Meena Chakraborty, Piyush Kant Pandey. Hazardous Waste Disposal in Stromatolitic-Limestone Terrain and Hexavalent Chromium Contamination in Chhattisgarh State, India. Journal of Health and Pollution 2020, 10 (27) , 200907. https://doi.org/10.5696/2156-9614-10.27.200907
  53. Amelia Bergeson, Travis Reed, Allen W. Apblett. Reduction and Immobilization of Chromate Using Nanometric Pyrite. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 2020, 29 (9) , 5557-5563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-04801-1
  54. Rishi Karan Singh Rathour, Jayanta Bhattacharya, Abhijit Mukherjee. Selective and multicycle removal of Cr(VI) by graphene oxide–EDTA composite: Insight into the removal mechanism and ionic interference in binary and ternary associations. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2020, 19 , 100851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.100851
  55. Chao He, Baogang Zhang, Wenyue Yan, Dahu Ding, Jianhua Guo. Enhanced Microbial Chromate Reduction Using Hydrogen and Methane as Joint Electron Donors. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2020, 395 , 122684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122684
  56. Rachel M. Coyte, Kristen L. McKinley, Sheng Jiang, Jonathan Karr, Gary S. Dwyer, Amy J. Keyworth, Christina C. Davis, Andrew J. Kondash, Avner Vengosh. Occurrence and distribution of hexavalent chromium in groundwater from North Carolina, USA. Science of The Total Environment 2020, 711 , 135135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135135
  57. Zhen Wang, Rachel M. Coyte, Gary S. Dwyer, Laura S. Ruhl, Heileen Hsu-Kim, James C. Hower, Avner Vengosh. Distinction of strontium isotope ratios between water-soluble and bulk coal fly ash from the United States. International Journal of Coal Geology 2020, 222 , 103464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2020.103464
  58. Bingcai Luo, Donghui Yu, Jianqiang Huo. Polynuclear Cd(II) coordination polymer with unique configuration for chromium pollutants removal. Journal of Solid State Chemistry 2020, 283 , 121137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2019.121137
  59. Junyan Yan, Huarong Huang, Zuping Liu, Jiayuan Shen, Jian Ni, Jiwei Han, Renjun Wang, Derong Lin, Baowei Hu, Lifang Jin. Hedgehog signaling pathway regulates hexavalent chromium-induced liver fibrosis by activation of hepatic stellate cells. Toxicology Letters 2020, 320 , 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.11.017
  60. Peng Liao, Binrui Li, Lin Xie, Xiaoao Bai, Han Qiao, Qianqian Li, Biwei Yang, Chongxuan Liu. Immobilization of Cr(VI) on engineered silicate nanoparticles: Microscopic mechanisms and site energy distribution. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2020, 383 , 121145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121145
  61. M. Sumathi, A. Prakasam, P. M. Anbarasan. Fabrication of Ultrathin Nanosheets of Graphitic Carbon Nitride Heterojunction with Spherical Shaped Bi2O3 Nanoparticles for High Performance Visible Light Photocatalyst. Journal of Cluster Science 2020, 31 (1) , 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-019-01645-1
  62. . Bibliography. 2020, 469-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819126-2.00013-3
  63. Willis Gwenzi. Occurrence, behaviour, and human exposure pathways and health risks of toxic geogenic contaminants in serpentinitic ultramafic geological environments (SUGEs): A medical geology perspective. Science of The Total Environment 2020, 700 , 134622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134622
  64. Joey Nelson, Claresta Joe-Wong, Kate Maher. Cr(VI) reduction by Fe(II) sorbed to silica surfaces. Chemosphere 2019, 234 , 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.039
  65. Martha Scott Tomlinson, Paige Bommarito, Andrew George, Sarah Yelton, Peter Cable, Rachel Coyte, Jonathan Karr, Avner Vengosh, Kathleen M. Gray, Rebecca C. Fry. Assessment of inorganic contamination of private wells and demonstration of effective filter-based reduction: A pilot-study in Stokes County, North Carolina. Environmental Research 2019, 177 , 108618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108618
  66. Kate Maher, Alexis Navarre-Sitchler. Reactive Transport Processes that Drive Chemical Weathering: From Making Space for Water to Dismantling Continents. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 2019, 85 (1) , 349-380. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2018.85.12
  67. Kyeong Pil Kong, Timothy B. Fischer, Peter J. Heaney, Jeffrey E. Post, Joanne E. Stubbs, Peter J. Eng. Mineralogical and geochemical constraints on chromium oxidation induced by birnessite. Applied Geochemistry 2019, 108 , 104365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2019.104365
  68. Eleni Vasileiou, Panagiotis Papazotos, Dimitrios Dimitrakopoulos, Maria Perraki. Expounding the origin of chromium in groundwater of the Sarigkiol basin, Western Macedonia, Greece: a cohesive statistical approach and hydrochemical study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2019, 191 (8) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7655-1
  69. Ashwani Kumar Tiwari, Simone Orioli, Marina De Maio. Assessment of groundwater geochemistry and diffusion of hexavalent chromium contamination in an industrial town of Italy. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2019, 225 , 103503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2019.103503
  70. P. KARUNASRI MEGHANA, K. VENKATA PRAVALIKA, P. JANAKI SRIRAM, K. RAVINDHRANATH. Effective Removal of Hexavalent Chromium from Polluted Water using Phoenix sylvestris Seed Powder as Adsorbent. Asian Journal of Chemistry 2019, 31 (6) , 1327-1331. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2019.21760
  71. Xiangyu Zhu, Yao Deng, Peicong Li, Dongxing Yuan, Jian Ma. Automated syringe-pump-based flow-batch analysis for spectrophotometric determination of trace hexavalent chromium in water samples. Microchemical Journal 2019, 145 , 1135-1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2018.12.040
  72. Rongan He, Kaiyu Cheng, Zheying Wei, Shiying Zhang, Difa Xu. Room-temperature in situ fabrication and enhanced photocatalytic activity of direct Z-scheme BiOI/g-C3N4 photocatalyst. Applied Surface Science 2019, 465 , 964-972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.217
  73. Pallab Shaw, Paritosh Mondal, Arindam Bandyopadhyay, Ansuman Chattopadhyay. Environmentally relevant concentration of chromium activates Nrf2 and alters transcription of related XME genes in liver of zebrafish. Chemosphere 2019, 214 , 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.104
  74. Shuai Liu, Huaming Guo, Hai Lu, Zhuo Zhang, Weiguang Zhao, , , , , . The provenance of deep groundwater and its relation to arsenic distribution in the northwestern Hetao Basin, Inner Mongolia. E3S Web of Conferences 2019, 98 , 09015. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199809015
  75. Shuping Wu, Xiangzi Dai, Tingting Cheng, Songjun Li. Highly sensitive and selective ion-imprinted polymers based on one-step electrodeposition of chitosan-graphene nanocomposites for the determination of Cr(VI). Carbohydrate Polymers 2018, 195 , 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.077
  76. G. Ceriotti, L. Guadagnini, G. Porta, A. Guadagnini. Local and Global Sensitivity Analysis of Cr (VI) Geogenic Leakage Under Uncertain Environmental Conditions. Water Resources Research 2018, 54 (8) , 5785-5802. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022857
  77. Nathaniel P. Homan, Peter G. Green, Thomas M. Young. Evaluating Ferrous Chloride for Removal of Chromium From Ion‐Exchange Waste Brines. Journal AWWA 2018, 110 (4) https://doi.org/10.5942/jawwa.2018.110.0022
  78. Rongan He, Jiaqian Zhou, Huiqing Fu, Shiying Zhang, Chuanjia Jiang. Room-temperature in situ fabrication of Bi 2 O 3 /g-C 3 N 4 direct Z-scheme photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Applied Surface Science 2018, 430 , 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.191
  79. Andrew H. Whitaker, Jasquelin Peña, Mathilde Amor, Owen W. Duckworth. Cr( vi ) uptake and reduction by biogenic iron (oxyhydr)oxides. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 2018, 20 (7) , 1056-1068. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EM00149A
  80. Amarendra Dhar Dwivedi, Rega Permana, Jitendra Pal Singh, Hakwon Yoon, Keun Hwa Chae, Yoon-Seok Chang, Dong Soo Hwang. Tunichrome mimetic matrix, its perspective in abatement for carcinogenic hexavalent chromium and specific coordination behavior. Chemical Engineering Journal 2017, 328 , 629-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.078
  81. John Regan, Douglas C. Huntington, Joseph F. Capitani. Bidentate reagents form cyclic organic-Cr(VI) molecules for aiding in the removal of Cr(VI) from water: density functional theory and experimental results. Structural Chemistry 2017, 28 (5) , 1461-1465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-017-0971-6
  82. L.J.N. Bradley. Coal ash in context. 2017, 415-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100945-1.00018-6
  83. Jesse M. Meik, A. Michelle Lawing. Considerations and Pitfalls in the Spatial Analysis of Water Quality Data and Its Association With Hydraulic Fracturing. 2017, 227-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apmp.2017.08.013
  84. Kelly A. Shipkowski, Christopher M. Sheth, Matthew J. Smith, Michelle J. Hooth, Kimber L. White, Dori R. Germolec. Assessment of immunotoxicity in female Fischer 344/N and Sprague Dawley rats and female B 6 C 3 F 1 mice exposed to hexavalent chromium via the drinking water. Journal of Immunotoxicology 2017, 14 (1) , 215-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547691X.2017.1394932
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Distribution of total Cr concentrations (ranked by color, in micrograms per liter) in drinking water wells, coal ash ponds, and selective geological formations in the Piedmont region of North Carolina. The small inset map at the top left shows the distribution of the Piedmont geology in the southeastern United States. The bottom inset map shows the distribution of Cr near coal ash ponds close to Salisbury, NC. The felsic metavolcanic rock and granitic rock categories are primarily felsic formations. The Cid, Floyd Church, metamorphosed mafic rock, and metavolcanic formations are of mixed character with varying levels of mafic components. The biotite gneiss and schist and phyllite and schist categories are characterized as general metamorphic bodies. The Cr concentrations in groundwater from the different formations are reported in Table S2. Geological data and location of coal ash ponds were retrieved from U.S. Geological Survey database (44) and Southern Alliance for Clean Energy. (45)

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Hexavalent chromium concentration vs total Cr concentration in groundwater analyzed in this study (red circles) and reported by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (25) (○). Note the high correlation of Cr(VI) to CrT in both data sets with an r2 of 0.93 (p < 0.001; n = 77) reported in this study and an r2 of 0.90 (p < 0.001; n = 129) in NC-DEQ data. The ∼1:1 ratio in most of the samples indicates that Cr(VI) is the predominant species of dissolved Cr in the Piedmont groundwater.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Variations of (A) 87Sr/86Sr vs Sr/Ca and (B) B vs total Cr (log scale) in groundwater from the Piedmont region (red and purple circles) as compared to that of effluent discharge from coal ash ponds’ outfalls in North Carolina (black squares; data from ref 31). The data show systematically lower 87Sr/86Sr, Sr/Ca, and B/Cr ratios in groundwater than in coal ash effluents. Groundwater from aquifers composed of metavolcanic rocks (purple circles) is characterized by distinctively lower 87Sr/86Sr, Sr/Ca, and B contents relative to those of groundwater from other aquifers and coal ash effluents. The combined data indicate that the chemistry of the Piedmont groundwater is different from the composition of coal ash waters, particularly for groundwater from metavolcanic aquifers that are located near coal ash ponds (n = 16), thus ruling out the possibility of the contamination of drinking water wells by coal ash ponds.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 45 other publications.

    1. 1
      Fryzek, J. P.; Mumma, M. T.; McLaughlin, J. K.; Henderson, B. E.; Blot, W. J. Cancer Mortality in Relation to Environmental Chromium Exposure J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2001, 43, 635 640 DOI: 10.1097/00043764-200107000-00011
    2. 2
      Sengupta, A. D.; Clifford, S.; Subramonian, S. Chromate Ion-Exchange Process at alkaline pH Water Res. 1986, 20, 1177 1184 DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(86)90064-3
    3. 3
      Bartlett, R. J. Chromium Cycling in Soils and Water: Links, Gaps, and Methods Environ. Health Perspect 1991, 92, 17 24 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.919217
    4. 4
      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA). (2016. Basic Information about Chromium in Drinking Water. (http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/chromium.cfm) (accessed September, 23, 2016).
    5. 5
      Barceloux, D. G.; Barceloux, D. Chromium J. Toxicol., Clin. Toxicol. 1999) 37, 173 194 DOI: 10.1081/CLT-100102418
    6. 6
      Cohen, M. D.; Kargacin, B.; Klein, C. B.; Costa, M. Mechanisms of chromium carcinogenicity and toxicity Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 1993, 23, 255 281 DOI: 10.3109/10408449309105012
    7. 7
      Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Control (ATSDR). ATSDR’s Toxicological Profiles: Chromium; Lewis Publishers, CRC Press, Inc.: Boca Raton, FL, 1997.
    8. 8
      International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Chromium, Nickel and Welding Fumes; IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; IARC: Lyon, France, 1990; No. 49, pp 1 648 (http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol100C/100C-04-Index-tables.php) (accessed Septermber, 23, 2016).
    9. 9
      Saha, R.; Nandi, R.; Saha, B. Sources and toxicity of hexavalent chromium J. Coord. Chem. 2011, 64, 1782 1806 DOI: 10.1080/00958972.2011.583646
    10. 10
      Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium Fed. Regist. 2006, 71, 10099 10385
    11. 11
      Toxicological Review of Hexavalent Chromium. EPA/635/R-10/004A; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2010.
    12. 12
      Beaumont, J. J.; Sedman, R. M.; Reynolds, S. D.; Sherman, C. D.; Li, L. H.; Howd, R. A.; Sandy, M. S.; Zeise, L.; Alexeeff, G. V. Cancer mortality in a Chinese population exposed to hexavalent chromium in drinking water Epidemiology 2008, 19, 12 23 DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31815cea4c
    13. 13
      Smith, A. H.; Steinmaus, C. M. Health effects of arsenic and chromium in drinking water: recent human findings Annu. Rev. Public Health 2009, 30, 107 122 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100143
    14. 14
      Rowbotham, A. L.; Levy, L. S.; Shuker, L. K. Chromium in the environment: an evaluation of exposure of the UK general population and possible adverse health effects J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part B 2000, 3, 145 178 DOI: 10.1080/10937400050045255
    15. 15
      World Health Organization (WHO). Chromium in drinking-water. Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 2nd ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, 2004; Vol. 2 (health criteria and other supporting information).
    16. 16
      California Chromium-6 Drinking Water MCL (http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/Chromium6.shtml) (accessed September 23, 2016) .
    17. 17
      Guertin, J.; Jacobs, J. A.; Avakian, C. P., Eds. Chromium(VI) Handbook; CRS Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2005.
    18. 18
      Ball, J. W.; Izbicki, J. A. Occurrence of hexavalent chromium in ground water in the western Mojave Desert, California Appl. Geochem. 2004, 19, 1123 1135 DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.01.011
    19. 19
      Gonzalez, A. R.; Ndung'u, K.; Flegal, A. R. Natural occurrence of hexavalent chromium in the Aromas Red Sands Aquifer, California Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 5505 5511 DOI: 10.1021/es048835n
    20. 20
      Gough, L. P.; Meadows, G. R.; Jackson, L. L.; Dudka, S. Biogechemistry of a highly serpentized chromite-rich ultra mafic area, Tehama County, California U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 1989, 1901, 1 24
    21. 21
      Manning, A. H.; Mills, C.; Morrison, J. M.; Ball, L. B. Insights into controls on hexavalent chromium in groundwater provided by environmental tracers, Sacramento Valley, California, USA Appl. Geochem. 2015, 62, 186 199 DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.05.010
    22. 22
      Robertson, F. N. Hexavalent Chromium in the Ground Water in Paradise Valley, Arizona Groundwater 1975, 13, 516 527 DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1975.tb03621.x
    23. 23
      Robles-Camacho, J.; Armienta, M. A. Natural chromium contamination of groundwater of Leon Valley, Mexico J. Geochem. Explor. 2000, 68, 167 181 DOI: 10.1016/S0375-6742(99)00083-7
    24. 24
      Farías, S. S.; Casa, V. A.; Vázquez, C.; Ferpozzi, L.; Pucci, G. N.; Cohen, I. M. Natural contamination with arsenic and other trace elements in ground waters of Argentine Pampean Plain Sci. Total Environ. 2003, 309, 187 199 DOI: 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00056-1
    25. 25
      Bertolo, R.; Bourotte, C.; Hirata, R.; Marcolan, L.; Sracek, O. Geochemistry of natural chromium occurrence in a sandstone aquifer in Bauru Basin, São Paulo State, Brazil Appl. Geochem. 2011, 26, 1353 1363 DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.05.009
    26. 26
      Fantoni, D.; Brozzo, G.; Canepa, M.; Cipolli, F.; Marini, L.; Ottonello, G.; Zuccolini, M. V. Natural hexavalent chromium in groundwaters interacting with ophiolitic rocks Environ. Geol. 2002, 42, 871 882 DOI: 10.1007/s00254-002-0605-0
    27. 27
      Kazakis, N.; Kantiranis, N.; Voudouris, K. S.; Mitrakas, M.; Kaprara, E.; Pavlou, A. Geogenic Cr oxidation on the surface of mafic minerals and the hydrogeological conditions influencing hexavalent chromium concentrations in groundwater Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 514, 224 238 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.080
    28. 28
      Oze, C.; Bird, C. D.; Fendorf, S. Genesis of hexavalent chromium from natural sources in soil and groundwater Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104, 6544 6549 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701085104
    29. 29
      North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NC-DEQ). Well test information for residents near Duke Energy coal ash impoundments (https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-hot-topics/dwr-coal-ash-regulation/well-test-information-for-residents-near-duke-energy-coal-ash-impoundments) (accessed May 16, 2016) .
    30. 30
      Meij, R. Trace elements behavior in coal fired power plants Fuel Process. Technol. 1994, 39, 199 217 DOI: 10.1016/0378-3820(94)90180-5
    31. 31
      Shah, P.; Strezov, V.; Prince, K.; Nelson, P. F. Speciation of As, Cr, Se and Hg under coal fired power station conditions Fuel 2008, 87, 1859 1869 DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.12.001
    32. 32
      Kingston, H. M. S.; Cain, R.; Huo, D.; Mizanur Rahman, G. M. Determination and evaluation of hexavalent chromium in power plant coal combustion by-products and cost-effective environmental remediation solutions using acid mine drainage J. Environ. Monit. 2005, 7, 899 905 DOI: 10.1039/b504724b
    33. 33
      Darakas, E.; Tsiridis, V.; Petala, M.; Kungolos, A. Hexavalent chromium release from lignite fly ash and related ecotoxic effects J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2013, 48, 1390 1398 DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2013.781886
    34. 34
      Ruhl, L.; Vengosh, A.; Dwyer, G. S.; Hsu Kim, H.; Schwartz, G.; Romanski, A.; Smith, S. D. The impact of coal combustion residue effluent on water resources: A North Carolina example Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 12226 12233 DOI: 10.1021/es303263x
    35. 35
      Ruhl, L.; Dwyer, G. S.; Hsu-Kim, H.; Hower, J. C.; Vengosh, A. Boron and strontium isotopic characterization of coal combustion residuals: Validation of new environmental tracers Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 14790 14798 DOI: 10.1021/es503746v
    36. 36
      Harkness, J.; Sulkin, B.; Vengosh, A. Evidence for coal ash ponds leaking in the southeastern United States Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 6583 6592 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01727
    37. 37
      Warner, N. R.; Jackson, R. B.; Darrah, T. H.; Osborn, S. G.; Down, A.; Zhao, K.; White, A.; Vengosh, A. Geochemical evidence for possible natural migration of Marcellus formation brine to shallow aquifers in Pennsylvania Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 11961 11966 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1121181109
    38. 38
      Zaffiro, A.; Zimmerman, M.; Wendelken, S.; Smith, G.; Munch, D. U.S. EPA Method 218.7: Determination of hexavalent chromium in drinking water by ion chromatography with post-column derivatization and UV-visible spectroscopic detection. Office of Water (MLK140) EPA Document No. EPA 815-R-11-005; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2011.
    39. 39
      Davidson, G. R.; Bassett, R. L. Application of boron isotopes for identifying contaminants such as fly ash leachate in groundwater Environ. Sci. Technol. 1993, 27, 172 176 DOI: 10.1021/es00038a020
    40. 40
      Dreesen, D. R.; Gladney, E. S.; Owens, J. W.; Perkins, B. L.; Wienke, C. L.; Wangen, L. E. Comparison of levels of trace elements extracted from fly ash and levels found in effluent waters from a coal-fired power plant Environ. Sci. Technol. 1977, 11, 1017 1019 DOI: 10.1021/es60133a001
    41. 41
      Brubaker, T. M.; Stewart, B. W.; Capo, R. C.; Schroeder, K. T.; Chapman, E. C.; Spivak-Birndorf, L. J.; Vesper, D. J.; Cardone, C. R.; Rohar, P. C. Coal fly ash interaction with environmental fluids: Geochemical and strontium isotope results from combined column and batch leaching experiments Appl. Geochem. 2013, 32, 184 194 DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.09.001
    42. 42
      Chapman, M. J.; Cravotta, C. A.; Szabo, Z.; Lindsey, B. D. Naturally occurring contaminants in the Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifers and Piedmont Early Mesozoic basin siliciclastic-rock aquifers, eastern United States, 1994–2008. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigation Report 5072; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, 2013.
    43. 43
      Winkel, L.; Berg, M.; Amini, M.; Hug, S. J.; Johnson, C. A. Predicting groundwater arsenic contamination in Southeast Asia from surface parameters Nat. Geosci. 2008, 1, 536 542 DOI: 10.1038/ngeo254
    44. 44
      Dicken, C. L.; Nicholson, S. W.; Horton, J. D.; Foose, M. P.; Mueller, J. A. L. Preliminary integrated geologic map databases for the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report (2005-1323); U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, 2005, (http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1323/) (accessed September 29, 2016).
    45. 45
      Southeast Coal Ash Impoundments, 2013. Southern Alliance for Clean Energy (http://www.southeastcoalash.org/) (accessed September 29, 2016) .
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00342.

    • Eight figures, three tables, information about the analytical procedure of hexavalent chromium, and background on the hydrogeology of the Piedmont area (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect