ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Real-Time Online Monitoring for Assessing Removal of Bacteria by Reverse Osmosis

  • Takahiro Fujioka*
    Takahiro Fujioka
    Water and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagasaki University, 1-14 Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan
    *E-mail: [email protected]. Telephone: +81 095 819 2695. Fax: +81 95 819 2620.
  • Anh T. Hoang
    Anh T. Hoang
    Water and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagasaki University, 1-14 Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan
    More by Anh T. Hoang
  • Hidenobu Aizawa
    Hidenobu Aizawa
    Environment Management Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 16-1 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8569, Japan
  • Hiroki Ashiba
    Hiroki Ashiba
    Electronics and Photonics Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Central 5, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8565, Japan
  • Makoto Fujimaki
    Makoto Fujimaki
    Electronics and Photonics Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Central 5, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8565, Japan
  • , and 
  • Menu Leddy
    Menu Leddy
    Orange County Water District, 18700 Ward Street, Fountain Valley, California 92708, United States
    More by Menu Leddy
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2018, 5, 6, 389–393
Publication Date (Web):April 26, 2018
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00200

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

  • Open Access

Article Views

3566

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (1 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Rigorous monitoring of microbial water quality is essential to ensure the safety of recycled water after advanced treatment for indirect and direct potable reuse. This study evaluated real-time bacterial monitoring for assessing reverse osmosis (RO) treatment for removal of bacteria. A strategy was employed to monitor bacterial counts online and in real time in the RO feed and permeate water using a real-time continuous bacteriological counter. Over the course of 68 h pilot-scale testing, bacterial counts were monitored in real time over approximate ranges from 1 × 103 to 4 × 104 and from 4 to 342 counts/mL in the RO feed (ultrafiltration-treated wastewater) and permeate, respectively. The results indicate that the bacteriological counter can track the variations in bacterial counts in the RO feed and permeate. Bacterial concentrations were confirmed by epi-fluorescence microscopy for total bacterial counts. A high correlation (R2 = 0.83) was identified between the online bacterial counts and epi-fluorescence counts in the RO feed; a negligible correlation was observed for RO permeate. In this study, we evaluated a real-time bacteriological counter (i.e., counts per milliliter every second) to ensure continuous removal of bacterial contaminants by RO treatment.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Potable reuse (PR) has been increasingly used to augment potable water supplies in arid regions. (1,2) Potable reuse turns treated wastewater effluent into potable water; thus, the assurance of safety and reliability in recycled water quality, particularly microbiological quality, is a critical component for public health protection. This is especially important for direct potable reuse (DPR), in which highly treated wastewater at advanced water treatment plants (AWTPs) is directly used as a potable water source without going through an environmental buffer. (3) At AWTPs, a reverse osmosis (RO) membrane process can have an important role in removing most of the dissolved ions, trace organic chemicals, and microorganisms in treated wastewater. (4) However, the ability of RO membranes to remove microorganisms and pathogens has been undervalued. For example, current RO membrane integrity monitoring methods are mostly based on the removal of surrogate substances: total organic carbon (TOC) and electrical conductivity. These surrogate indicators provide up to a 2 log reduction (i.e., 99% removal) for viruses and protozoa. (5) Bacterial water quality has also attracted much attention in DPR to minimize the risk of infection from enteric bacterial pathogens such as Salmonella spp. (3,5,6) For example, a 9 log reduction of total coliform bacteria through the treatment processes has been suggested for DPR. (7)
Considering RO membrane deterioration over time and unforeseen spikes of bacteria in raw sewage, the implementation of continuous monitoring of bacterial contaminants at low concentrations after RO treatment or in RO permeate will considerably enhance monitoring for bacterial contaminants in recycled water for water quality disruptions. For this purpose, the analytical instruments must be fast, reliable, sensitive, and accurate. Many commercial devices are capable of detecting bacteriological cells within a short analysis time (every 5 min to several hours). (8) Among them, flow cytometric bacterial cell counters combined with general nucleic acid staining make up an emerging technology capable of rapidly counting total bacterial cells. (9,10) In recent years, several near real-time or real-time bacteriological sensing technologies (e.g., BioSentry sensor) (11) have been evaluated for relatively clean waters, including drinking water. (12) Nevertheless, to date, real-time monitoring techniques have not been fully established with respect to potable reuse because of limitations with availability and adaptability in analyzing treated wastewater.
In this study, a real-time continuous bacterial counting technique that is capable of monitoring bacterial counts as low as one count per second in ultrapure water at a flow rate of 0.16 mL/s was evaluated with the RO feed and permeate of ultrafiltration (UF)-treated secondary wastewater. The real-time bacteriological counter can differentiate bacterial and nonbacterial particles using autofluorescence light emitted from riboflavin and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-hydrogen (NADH) and their scattered light. (13) This technique has the following advantages: speed, no additional chemicals, and sensitivity over other bacteriological monitoring technologies, including flow cytrometry, that has a range of approximately 20–100 cells/mL. (14,15) In addition to continuous online monitoring for bacteria, this technique, when applied to the RO feed and permeate, has a potential application in real-time membrane integrity monitoring. However, a significant challenge for real-time RO monitoring in the RO feed is interference by humic-like substances that can mask the detection of bacterial counts. (16) To enable online monitoring of the RO feed, a new strategy was adopted for the RO feed that was continuously diluted on line in real time.
This study aimed to evaluate the ability of real-time bacteriological counters to ensure that microbial contaminants are being removed by RO treatment. The study was performed by tracking the variation in bacterial counts in the RO feed and permeate at a pilot scale. The reduction in bacterial counts by RO treatment was confirmed by determining the total bacterial counts using epi-fluorescence microscopy.

Materials and Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Analytical Techniques

Two real-time bacteriological counters (IMD-W, Azbil Corp., Tokyo, Japan) were used to monitor bacterial counts in the RO feed and RO permeate in real time. The real-time counter is capable of detecting the number of bacterial particles at 1 count/s by introducing part of the sample flow into the counter at a sampling flow rate of 0.16 mL/s. In other words, it can provide bacterial counts as low as 1 count/mL. The real-time bacteriological counter first exposes the running sample solution to the excitation light (wavelength of 405 nm), which primes the system to identify particles with scattered light (Figure S1). If the particle is a bacterium, intrinsic fluorescence emission is induced because of the autofluorescence property of riboflavin and NADH. The intensity of faint fluorescent light is received by two fluorescence detectors with different wavelength bands (wavelengths of approximately 415–450 and 490–530 nm) (Figure S1). Particles holding a certain level of autofluorescence light are recognized as bacteria and counted as biological particles. The real-time instrument counts all particles similar in size to bacteria in the sample and determines whether they are bacterial or nonbacterial particles. To confirm the real-time bacteriological counts, this study also analyzed total bacterial counts using a fluorescence microscope (Shibasaki, Inc., Chichibu, Japan) with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) dye (Text S1). Excitation emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence spectra were obtained using an Aqualog (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan). Details for the analytical conditions can be found elsewhere. (17)

Validation Protocol

A pilot-scale cross-flow RO filtration system comprised of a 4 in. spiral wound RO membrane element with the surface area of 7.43 m2 (ESPA2-LD-4040, Hydranautics/Nitto, Oceanside, CA) was used (Figure S2 and Text S2). The operation was performed by recirculating the RO permeate and concentrate into the feed reservoir and maintained at a permeate flux of 20 L m–2 h–1, a RO feed temperature of 14–16 °C, and a recovery of 20% (permeate and concentrate flow rates of 2.5 and 10 L/min, respectively). To stabilize the conditions of the process, the RO system was first operated using drinking water disinfected with chlorine (<5 mg/L) as the RO feed for 2 h. Thereafter, the RO feed was replaced with 50 L of ultrafiltration (UF)-treated wastewater, which was collected at a municipal wastewater treatment plant in Japan.
Bacterial counts in the RO permeate were determined by directly introducing the RO permeate into the real-time bacteriological counters (counter A) at a rate of 10 mL/min (Figure S2). In contrast, the RO feed sample (0.4 mL/min) was diluted 25-fold using a rate of 9.6 mL of purified water/min [i.e., microfiltration (MF)-treated RO permeate] prior to the entry into another real-time bacteriological counter (counter B). Online bacterial counts in the purified water were <2 counts/mL.

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Real-Time Bacteriological Monitoring

One challenge of the real-time bacteriological counter is counting bacterial particles in treated wastewater due to interference in a complex matrix. Treated wastewater likely contains humic acid-like substances as a source of fluorophores, which can be identified at excitation (Ex) and emission (Em) wavelengths of 350 and 425 nm, respectively, in the EEM spectrum. (18−20) In fact, in the UF-treated wastewater, a strong peak in the regions of the humic acid-like fluorophore, which was designated as A, was observed (Figure 1a). These humic acid-like substances in wastewater are too small (<1000 Da) to scatter the light, but they emit strong autofluorescence light that can exceed the light receiving capacity of fluorescence detectors and mask the detection of bacterial counts. (16) In this study, the regions of fluorescence detectors (Em wavelengths of approximately 415–450 and 490–530 nm) were overlapped with the fluorescence light of the UF-treated wastewater (Figure 1a). To reduce the impact of background interference in treated wastewater, this study employed an online 25-fold dilution method. After dilution with pure water, the humic-like substance- or other substance-derived autofluorescence in the matrix was substantially reduced (Figure 1b) and did not exceed the light receiving capacity of fluorescence detectors.

Figure 1

Figure 1. EEM fluorescence spectrum of UF-treated wastewater (a) without dilution and (b) with a 25-fold dilution.

The potential of conductivity monitoring along with real-time bacteriological counting for RO membrane integrity testing was evaluated using the UF-treated wastewater at a pilot scale (Figure 2). Conductivity in the RO permeate remained stable throughout this test (Figure 2a). Over the course of 68 h pilot-scale testing, bacterial counts were determined in real time at approximately 1 × 103 to 4 × 104 counts/mL in the RO feed (UF-treated wastewater) and at approximately 4–342 counts/mL in the RO permeate (Figure 2b). During the first 4–6 h, online bacterial counts monitored in the RO feed and permeate decreased. The effect of change in the water matrix (i.e., from pure water to UF-treated wastewater) on online bacterial counts took approximately 2 h in both the RO feed and the RO permeate. This suggests that fair evaluations of the removal of bacteria by the RO membrane can be conducted only after operation for several hours, which is generally not an issue for full-scale long-term operation. From 6 to 36 h, a gradual increase in online bacterial counts in the RO feed was observed. The rapid increase from 36 to 45 h was likely due to biological growth (e.g., exponential phase) in the RO feed. However, the transmembrane pressure remained constant at 570–580 kPa, indicating that the biological growth did not increase the hydraulic resistance through the RO membrane. From 45 to 68 h, online bacterial counts in the RO feed decreased possibly because bacteria died after consuming nutrients or because of limited nutrients. Overall, bacterial rejection calculated by online bacterial counts was within the range of 98.32–99.98%, which was more variable than the range of conductivity rejection (i.e., 98.5–99.3%).

Figure 2

Figure 2. RO treatment of the UF-treated wastewater at a pilot scale: (a) conductivity, (b) online-monitored bacterial counts (plotted every 10 min), and (c) total bacterial counts (determined by epi-fluorescence). The RO feed temperature was maintained at 14–16 °C (Figure S3).

The bacterial counts determined by the real-time bacteriological counter were confirmed by DAPI staining, which is routinely used as a nuclear counterstain in fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. (9) At eight manual sampling occasions during 68 h pilot-scale testing, total bacterial counts determined by epi-fluorescence microscopy were determined at 3.5 × 104 to 2.0 × 105 and 5.0 × 102 to 1.3 × 103 counts/mL in the RO feed (UF-treated wastewater) and permeate, respectively (Figure 2c). A high correlation (R2 = 0.83) was identified between the online bacterial counts and epi-fluorescence counts in the RO feed; a negligible correlation (R2 = 0.14) was observed for the RO permeate (Figure 3). For the RO feed, a higher correlation (R2 = 0.99) was observed until the seven manual sampling occasions were reached (i.e., until 50 h) while bacterial counts increased rapidly. Likewise, for the RO permeate, a higher correlation was obtained when counting was performed during earlier sampling occasions. Although a high correlation was not obtained for the RO permeate, the reduction in bacterial counts by RO treatment was confirmed by both online bacterial counts and epi-fluorescence microscopy.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Total bacterial count (determined by epi-fluorescence) as a function of online bacterial count during RO treatment of the UF-treated wastewater.

With regard to absolute bacterial counts, the total bacterial counts (determined by epi-fluorescence), which include both dead and live bacteria, were greater than the online bacterial counts (Figure 3). This is likely due to the differences in the detection mechanisms of the two techniques. In theory, total bacterial counts as determined by DAPI are the sum of dead and live cells and less dependent on viability due to the nature of the assay. In contrast, the real-time bacteriological counter does not differentiate between dead or live bacteria; however, dead or stressed (i.e., injured) bacterial cells that emit less autofluorescence are less likely to be counted. The detection of bacteria by the real-time bacteriological counters is influenced by the bacterial concentration and the state of the bacterial cells (i.e., starved/stressed cells that are smaller or cells that tend to clump and exist in clusters) in treated wastewater. Bacterial cells can adhere to pilot plant materials, including RO membrane surfaces and biofilms on RO membranes. (21) The aggregation of bacterial cells in the stream can also cause underestimation of bacterial counts because the aggregated bacterial cells will be recognized as one large bacterial size particle. One common limitation of bacterial counting that can be applied to heterotrophic plate counts, microscopy, and flow cytometry, is cell aggregation or clumping, in which several clumped cells are underestimated as a single cell or colony forming unit. (22) Because of this limitation, automated cell counting methods, including flow cytometry, have incorporated pretreatment steps such as ultrasonication to disperse and suspend bacterial cells prior to counting. (21) Moreover, bacteria propagate and die, resulting in large variations in their detection by continuous real-time monitoring, particularly during recirculation of the RO feed. For further validation, other counting methods similar to real-time bacteriological monitoring or other standard methods such as growth-based assays on a culture medium (e.g., R2A agar) should be applied.

Passage of Bacteria through the RO Membrane

The question of how bacterial cells pass through the RO membrane element remains. Although the size of a bacterium (typically >200 nm) is theoretically greater than the pore size (or free-volume hole size) of the RO membrane (<1 nm), (23) a number of bacterial cells passed through the RO membrane element in this study. This is consistent with previous studies reporting incomplete removal of bacteria by spiral wound style nanofiltration and RO membrane elements. (15,24−27) Although the RO membrane itself is a very tight membrane, passage of bacterial cells is possible through interconnectors of RO membrane elements fitted with O-ring seals. (24,28,29) These interconnectors separate the RO feed (high-pressure stream) and RO permeate (low-pressure stream in the RO permeate tube) with only one O-ring for each connection (Figure S4); thus, a small amount of bacteria could pass from the RO feed to the RO permeate. The cause of the bacterial passage to the RO permeate is not fully understood at present; this will be the scope of our future study. Despite our better understanding of the mechanism, this study provides a motivation for improving the tightness of RO membrane elements for greater bacterial removal.

Implications for On-Site Use

This study demonstrates the real-time online monitoring of bacterial counts in the RO feed and permeate. Real-time bacterial monitoring provided an online profile of bacterial counts to ensure continuous removal of bacterial contaminants by RO treatment. Further evaluations using wastewaters with different water matrices and bacterial concentrations are necessary to determine the versatility of online monitoring. As described in this study, this real-time bacteriological counting technology has three advantages over the other techniques: (a) Real-time bacteriological counters measure biomarkers produced by all bacteria using optical techniques, which differs from the conventional method for measuring a single indicator microorganism such as Escherichia coli; (b) It measures both biological and nonbiological particles and can differentiate between them; (c) It can measure bacterial cells at very low concentrations in real time.
Additionally, there are three other potential benefits of water treatment process control: (a) Online bacterial counts can function as process control indicators of treatment efficacy; (b) The real-time bacteriological counter has the ability to detect incremental failure of RO treatment; (c) The real-time bacteriological counter can be used at the back end of RO treatment to validate the decrease in bacterial concentration or to continuously validate nondetection of bacterial counts.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00200.

  • Additional text and figures (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Anh T. Hoang - Water and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagasaki University, 1-14 Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan
    • Hidenobu Aizawa - Environment Management Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 16-1 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8569, Japan
    • Hiroki Ashiba - Electronics and Photonics Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Central 5, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8565, Japan
    • Makoto Fujimaki - Electronics and Photonics Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Central 5, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8565, Japan
    • Menu Leddy - Orange County Water District, 18700 Ward Street, Fountain Valley, California 92708, United States
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The authors acknowledge Hydranautics for providing RO membrane elements. The authors also acknowledge Azbil Corp. for providing real-time bacteriological monitors.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 29 other publications.

  1. 1
    Burgess, J.; Meeker, M.; Minton, J.; O’Donohue, M. International research agency perspectives on potable water reuse. Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol. 2015, 1 (5), 563580,  DOI: 10.1039/C5EW00165J
  2. 2
    Harris-Lovett, S. R.; Binz, C.; Sedlak, D. L.; Kiparsky, M.; Truffer, B. Beyond User Acceptance: A Legitimacy Framework for Potable Water Reuse in California. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49 (13), 75527561,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00504
  3. 3
    Mosher, J. J.; Vartanian, G. M.; Tchobanoglous, G. Potable reuse research compilation: Synthesis of findings; National Water Research Institute and Water Environment & Reuse Foundation: Fountain Valley, CA, 2016.
  4. 4
    Henderson, R. K.; Baker, A.; Murphy, K. R.; Hambly, A.; Stuetz, R. M.; Khan, S. J. Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: A review. Water Res. 2009, 43 (4), 863881,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.027
  5. 5
    Tchobanoglous, G.; Cotruvo, J.; Crook, J.; McDonald, E.; Olivieri, A.; Salveson, A.; Trussell, R. S. Framework for direct potable reuse; WateReuse Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, National Water Research Institute: Alexandria, VA, 2015.
  6. 6
    Potable reuse: guidance for producing safe drinking-water; World Health Organization: Geneva, 2017.
  7. 7
    Examining the Criteria for Direct Potable Reuse. WateReuse Research Foundation Project 11-02; National Water Research Institute: Fountain Valley, CA, 2013.
  8. 8
    Lopez-Roldan, R.; Tusell, P.; Cortina, J. L.; Courtois, S.; Cortina, J. L. On-line bacteriological detection in water. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2013, 44, 4657,  DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2012.10.010
  9. 9
    Van Nevel, S.; Koetzsch, S.; Proctor, C. R.; Besmer, M. D.; Prest, E. I.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Knezev, A.; Boon, N.; Hammes, F. Flow cytometric bacterial cell counts challenge conventional heterotrophic plate counts for routine microbiological drinking water monitoring. Water Res. 2017, 113, 191206,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.065
  10. 10
    Prest, E. I.; Hammes, F.; Kötzsch, S.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S. Monitoring microbiological changes in drinking water systems using a fast and reproducible flow cytometric method. Water Res. 2013, 47 (19), 71317142,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.051
  11. 11
    Sherchan, S. P.; Gerba, C. P.; Pepper, I. L. Evaluation of Real-Time Water Quality Sensors for the Detection of Intentional Bacterial Spore Contamination of Potable Water. J. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 4 (4), 15,  DOI: 10.4172/2155-6210.1000141
  12. 12
    Miles, S. L.; Sinclair, R. G.; Riley, M. R.; Pepper, I. L. Evaluation of Select Sensors for Real-Time Monitoring of Escherichia coli in Water Distribution Systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77 (8), 28132816,  DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02618-10
  13. 13
    Ammor, M. S. Recent Advances in the Use of Intrinsic Fluorescence for Bacterial Identification and Characterization. J. Fluoresc. 2007, 17 (5), 455459,  DOI: 10.1007/s10895-007-0180-6
  14. 14
    Huang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Hernandez, D.; Jiang, S. Near Real-Time Flow Cytometry Monitoring of Bacterial and Viral Removal Efficiencies during Water Reclamation Processes. Water 2016, 8 (10), 464,  DOI: 10.3390/w8100464
  15. 15
    Miller, S. E.; Nelson, K. L.; Rodriguez, R. A. Microbiological Stability in Direct Potable Reuse Systems: Insights from Pilot-Scale Research Using Flow Cytometry and High-Throughput Sequencing. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation 2017, 2017 (14), 10161023,  DOI: 10.2175/193864717822153779
  16. 16
    Pepper, I. L.; Snyder, S. A. Monitoring for reliability and process control of potable reuse applications; Water Environment & Reuse Foundation and IWA Publishing: Alexandria, VA, 2016.
  17. 17
    Fujioka, T.; Kodamatani, H.; Aizawa, H.; Gray, S.; Ishida, K. P.; Nghiem, L. D. Role of membrane fouling substances on the rejection of N-nitrosamines by reverse osmosis. Water Res. 2017, 118, 187195,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.03.057
  18. 18
    Liu, T.; Chen, Z.-l.; Yu, W.-z.; You, S.-j. Characterization of organic membrane foulants in a submerged membrane bioreactor with pre-ozonation using three-dimensional excitation–emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy. Water Res. 2011, 45 (5), 21112121,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.12.023
  19. 19
    Nam, S.-N.; Amy, G. Differentiation of wastewater effluent organic matter (EfOM) from natural organic matter (NOM) using multiple analytical techniques. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 57 (7), 10091015,  DOI: 10.2166/wst.2008.165
  20. 20
    Chen, W.; Westerhoff, P.; Leenheer, J. A.; Booksh, K. Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37 (24), 57015710,  DOI: 10.1021/es034354c
  21. 21
    Prest, E. I.; Hammes, F.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S. Biological Stability of Drinking Water: Controlling Factors, Methods, and Challenges. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7 (45), 124,  DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00045
  22. 22
    Ou, F.; McGoverin, C.; Swift, S.; Vanholsbeeck, F. Absolute bacterial cell enumeration using flow cytometry. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 123 (2), 464477,  DOI: 10.1111/jam.13508
  23. 23
    Fujioka, T.; Oshima, N.; Suzuki, R.; Khan, S. J.; Roux, A.; Poussade, Y.; Drewes, J. E.; Nghiem, L. D. Rejection of small and uncharged chemicals of emerging concern by reverse osmosis membranes: The role of free volume space within the active skin layer. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 116, 426432,  DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.06.015
  24. 24
    Park, S.; Hu, J. Y. Assessment of the extent of bacterial growth in reverse osmosis system for improving drinking water quality. J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2010, 45 (8), 968977,  DOI: 10.1080/10934521003772386
  25. 25
    Ishida, K. P.; Cooper, W. J. Analysis of parameters affecting process efficiency, energy consumption, and carbon footprint in water reuse; WateReuse Research Foundation: Alexandria, VA, 2015.
  26. 26
    Liikanen, R.; Miettinen, I.; Laukkanen, R. Selection of NF membrane to improve quality of chemically treated surface water. Water Res. 2003, 37 (4), 864872,  DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00412-8
  27. 27
    Laurent, P.; Servais, P.; Gatel, D.; Randon, G.; Bonne, P.; Cavard, J. Microbiological quality: Before and after nanofiltration. J. - Am. Water Works Assoc. 1999, 91 (10), 6272,  DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1999.tb08716.x
  28. 28
    Pype, M.-L.; Lawrence, M. G.; Keller, J.; Gernjak, W. Reverse osmosis integrity monitoring in water reuse: The challenge to verify virus removal – A review. Water Res. 2016, 98, 384395,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.04.040
  29. 29
    Liu, G.; Lut, M. C.; Verberk, J. Q. J. C.; Van Dijk, J. C. A comparison of additional treatment processes to limit particle accumulation and microbial growth during drinking water distribution. Water Res. 2013, 47 (8), 27192728,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.02.035

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 23 publications.

  1. Elliot Reid, Thomas Igou, Yangying Zhao, John Crittenden, Ching-Hua Huang, Paul Westerhoff, Bruce Rittmann, Jörg E. Drewes, Yongsheng Chen. The Minus Approach Can Redefine the Standard of Practice of Drinking Water Treatment. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (18) , 7150-7161. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c09389
  2. Baixiang Ren, Yaxin Yu, Rama-Krishnan Poopal, Linlin Qiao, Baichuan Ren, Zongming Ren. IR-Based Novel Device for Real-Time Online Acquisition of Fish Heart ECG Signals. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (7) , 4262-4271. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c07732
  3. Takahiro Fujioka, My Thi Tra Ngo, Ryo Makabe, Sandrine Boivin, Keisuke Ikehata. Pretreatment of Surface Waters and Wastewater by a Hemodiafilter for Online Bacterial Counting. ACS ES&T Water 2021, 1 (1) , 101-107. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.0c00008
  4. Wiley Helm, Shifa Zhong, Elliot Reid, Thomas Igou, Yongsheng Chen. Development of gradient boosting-assisted machine learning data-driven model for free chlorine residual prediction. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering 2024, 18 (2) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-024-1777-6
  5. Deepa Suresh, Pei Sean Goh, Ahmad Fauzi Ismail, Tuck Whye Wong. Insights into biofouling in reverse osmosis membrane: A comprehensive review on techniques for biofouling assay. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2023, 11 (3) , 110317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.110317
  6. Sandrine Boivin, Shuji Tanabe, Takahiro Fujioka. Online evaluation of bacterial cells in sand filter effluents during full-scale treatment of drinking water. Science of The Total Environment 2022, 814 , 152508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152508
  7. Mengya Zhang, Lei He, Xiangwei Zhang, Shuai Wang, Boaiqi Zhang, Lichun Hsieh, Kun Yang, Meiping Tong. Improved removal performance of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria in sand filtration system with arginine modified biochar amendment. Water Research 2022, 211 , 118006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.118006
  8. Mohaned Sousi, Sergio G. Salinas-Rodriguez, Gang Liu, Jos Dusseldorp, Antoine J.B. Kemperman, Jan C. Schippers, Walter G.J. Van der Meer, Maria D. Kennedy. Comparing the bacterial growth potential of ultra-low nutrient drinking water assessed by growth tests based on flow cytometric intact cell count versus adenosine triphosphate. Water Research 2021, 203 , 117506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117506
  9. Sihan Pan, Xiaowen Chen, Chenyue Cao, Zhuo Chen, Huu Hao Ngo, Qi Shi, Wenshan Guo, Hong-Ying Hu. Fluorescence analysis of centralized water supply systems: Indications for rapid cross-connection detection and water quality safety guarantee. Chemosphere 2021, 277 , 130290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130290
  10. Ratna E. Putri, Lan Hee Kim, Nadia Farhat, Mashael Felemban, Pascal E. Saikaly, Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder, . Evaluation of DNA extraction yield from a chlorinated drinking water distribution system. PLOS ONE 2021, 16 (6) , e0253799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253799
  11. Vo Nguyen Xuan Que, Doan Van Tuan, Nguyen Nhat Huy, Vo Le Phu. Design and performance of small-scale reverse osmosis desalination for brackish water powered by photovoltaic units: a review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2021, 652 (1) , 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/652/1/012024
  12. Yumiko Ohkouchi, Tomonobu Ase. Determination of log removal values of bacteria by spiral-wound reverse osmosis modules and a hollow fiber ultrafiltration module using Escherichia coli and indigenous heterotrophic bacteria as indicators. Journal of Water and Health 2020, 18 (6) , 956-967. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2020.153
  13. Takahiro Fujioka, Sandrine Boivin. Assessing bacterial infiltration through reverse osmosis membrane. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2020, 19 , 100818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.100818
  14. Scott E. Miller, Roberto A. Rodriguez, Kara L. Nelson. Removal and growth of microorganisms across treatment and simulated distribution at a pilot-scale direct potable reuse facility. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2020, 6 (5) , 1370-1387. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EW01087D
  15. Takahiro Fujioka, Sandrine Boivin. Dialysis as a new pre-treatment technique for online bacterial counting. Science of The Total Environment 2020, 714 , 136768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136768
  16. Kurt D Benkstein, Sandra M Da Silva, Nancy J Lin, Dean C Ripple. Evaluating changes to Ralstonia pickettii in high-purity water to guide selection of potential calibration materials for online water bioburden analyzers. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 2019, 46 (11) , 1469-1478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-019-02192-4
  17. Niroj Aryal, Dongyang Deng, Manoj K. Jha, Andrea Ofori‐Boadu. Monitoring, sampling, and automated analysis. Water Environment Research 2019, 91 (10) , 1288-1293. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1224
  18. Takahiro Fujioka, Tetsuro Ueyama, Fang Mingliang, Menu Leddy. Online assessment of sand filter performance for bacterial removal in a full-scale drinking water treatment plant. Chemosphere 2019, 229 , 509-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.197
  19. Takahiro Fujioka, Ryo Makabe, Naomichi Mori, Shane A. Snyder, Menu Leddy. Assessment of online bacterial particle counts for monitoring the performance of reverse osmosis membrane process in potable reuse. Science of The Total Environment 2019, 667 , 540-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.339
  20. Shotaro Torii, Takashi Hashimoto, An Thuan Do, Hiroaki Furumai, Hiroyuki Katayama. Impact of repeated pressurization on virus removal by reverse osmosis membranes for household water treatment. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2019, 5 (5) , 910-919. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EW00944A
  21. Takahiro Fujioka, Anh T. Hoang, Tetsuro Ueyama, Long D. Nghiem. Integrity of reverse osmosis membrane for removing bacteria: new insight into bacterial passage. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2019, 5 (2) , 239-245. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EW00910D
  22. Syun-suke KADOYA, Ken USHIJIMA, Ryusei ITO, Yoshiki HASEGAWA, Takayuki MIURA, Michihiro AKIBA, Osamu NISHIMURA, Daisuke SANO. Health Risk Management for the Users of a household-installed water supply system Based on Water Safety Planning Approach. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research) 2019, 75 (7) , III_403-III_412. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejer.75.7_III_403
  23. Mohaned Sousi, Gang Liu, Sergio G. Salinas-Rodriguez, Aleksandra Knezev, Bastiaan Blankert, Jan C. Schippers, Walter van der Meer, Maria D. Kennedy. Further developing the bacterial growth potential method for ultra-pure drinking water produced by remineralization of reverse osmosis permeate. Water Research 2018, 145 , 687-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.09.002
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. EEM fluorescence spectrum of UF-treated wastewater (a) without dilution and (b) with a 25-fold dilution.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. RO treatment of the UF-treated wastewater at a pilot scale: (a) conductivity, (b) online-monitored bacterial counts (plotted every 10 min), and (c) total bacterial counts (determined by epi-fluorescence). The RO feed temperature was maintained at 14–16 °C (Figure S3).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Total bacterial count (determined by epi-fluorescence) as a function of online bacterial count during RO treatment of the UF-treated wastewater.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 29 other publications.

    1. 1
      Burgess, J.; Meeker, M.; Minton, J.; O’Donohue, M. International research agency perspectives on potable water reuse. Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol. 2015, 1 (5), 563580,  DOI: 10.1039/C5EW00165J
    2. 2
      Harris-Lovett, S. R.; Binz, C.; Sedlak, D. L.; Kiparsky, M.; Truffer, B. Beyond User Acceptance: A Legitimacy Framework for Potable Water Reuse in California. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49 (13), 75527561,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00504
    3. 3
      Mosher, J. J.; Vartanian, G. M.; Tchobanoglous, G. Potable reuse research compilation: Synthesis of findings; National Water Research Institute and Water Environment & Reuse Foundation: Fountain Valley, CA, 2016.
    4. 4
      Henderson, R. K.; Baker, A.; Murphy, K. R.; Hambly, A.; Stuetz, R. M.; Khan, S. J. Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: A review. Water Res. 2009, 43 (4), 863881,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.027
    5. 5
      Tchobanoglous, G.; Cotruvo, J.; Crook, J.; McDonald, E.; Olivieri, A.; Salveson, A.; Trussell, R. S. Framework for direct potable reuse; WateReuse Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, National Water Research Institute: Alexandria, VA, 2015.
    6. 6
      Potable reuse: guidance for producing safe drinking-water; World Health Organization: Geneva, 2017.
    7. 7
      Examining the Criteria for Direct Potable Reuse. WateReuse Research Foundation Project 11-02; National Water Research Institute: Fountain Valley, CA, 2013.
    8. 8
      Lopez-Roldan, R.; Tusell, P.; Cortina, J. L.; Courtois, S.; Cortina, J. L. On-line bacteriological detection in water. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2013, 44, 4657,  DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2012.10.010
    9. 9
      Van Nevel, S.; Koetzsch, S.; Proctor, C. R.; Besmer, M. D.; Prest, E. I.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Knezev, A.; Boon, N.; Hammes, F. Flow cytometric bacterial cell counts challenge conventional heterotrophic plate counts for routine microbiological drinking water monitoring. Water Res. 2017, 113, 191206,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.065
    10. 10
      Prest, E. I.; Hammes, F.; Kötzsch, S.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S. Monitoring microbiological changes in drinking water systems using a fast and reproducible flow cytometric method. Water Res. 2013, 47 (19), 71317142,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.051
    11. 11
      Sherchan, S. P.; Gerba, C. P.; Pepper, I. L. Evaluation of Real-Time Water Quality Sensors for the Detection of Intentional Bacterial Spore Contamination of Potable Water. J. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 4 (4), 15,  DOI: 10.4172/2155-6210.1000141
    12. 12
      Miles, S. L.; Sinclair, R. G.; Riley, M. R.; Pepper, I. L. Evaluation of Select Sensors for Real-Time Monitoring of Escherichia coli in Water Distribution Systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77 (8), 28132816,  DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02618-10
    13. 13
      Ammor, M. S. Recent Advances in the Use of Intrinsic Fluorescence for Bacterial Identification and Characterization. J. Fluoresc. 2007, 17 (5), 455459,  DOI: 10.1007/s10895-007-0180-6
    14. 14
      Huang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Hernandez, D.; Jiang, S. Near Real-Time Flow Cytometry Monitoring of Bacterial and Viral Removal Efficiencies during Water Reclamation Processes. Water 2016, 8 (10), 464,  DOI: 10.3390/w8100464
    15. 15
      Miller, S. E.; Nelson, K. L.; Rodriguez, R. A. Microbiological Stability in Direct Potable Reuse Systems: Insights from Pilot-Scale Research Using Flow Cytometry and High-Throughput Sequencing. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation 2017, 2017 (14), 10161023,  DOI: 10.2175/193864717822153779
    16. 16
      Pepper, I. L.; Snyder, S. A. Monitoring for reliability and process control of potable reuse applications; Water Environment & Reuse Foundation and IWA Publishing: Alexandria, VA, 2016.
    17. 17
      Fujioka, T.; Kodamatani, H.; Aizawa, H.; Gray, S.; Ishida, K. P.; Nghiem, L. D. Role of membrane fouling substances on the rejection of N-nitrosamines by reverse osmosis. Water Res. 2017, 118, 187195,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.03.057
    18. 18
      Liu, T.; Chen, Z.-l.; Yu, W.-z.; You, S.-j. Characterization of organic membrane foulants in a submerged membrane bioreactor with pre-ozonation using three-dimensional excitation–emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy. Water Res. 2011, 45 (5), 21112121,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.12.023
    19. 19
      Nam, S.-N.; Amy, G. Differentiation of wastewater effluent organic matter (EfOM) from natural organic matter (NOM) using multiple analytical techniques. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 57 (7), 10091015,  DOI: 10.2166/wst.2008.165
    20. 20
      Chen, W.; Westerhoff, P.; Leenheer, J. A.; Booksh, K. Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37 (24), 57015710,  DOI: 10.1021/es034354c
    21. 21
      Prest, E. I.; Hammes, F.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Vrouwenvelder, J. S. Biological Stability of Drinking Water: Controlling Factors, Methods, and Challenges. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7 (45), 124,  DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00045
    22. 22
      Ou, F.; McGoverin, C.; Swift, S.; Vanholsbeeck, F. Absolute bacterial cell enumeration using flow cytometry. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 123 (2), 464477,  DOI: 10.1111/jam.13508
    23. 23
      Fujioka, T.; Oshima, N.; Suzuki, R.; Khan, S. J.; Roux, A.; Poussade, Y.; Drewes, J. E.; Nghiem, L. D. Rejection of small and uncharged chemicals of emerging concern by reverse osmosis membranes: The role of free volume space within the active skin layer. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 116, 426432,  DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.06.015
    24. 24
      Park, S.; Hu, J. Y. Assessment of the extent of bacterial growth in reverse osmosis system for improving drinking water quality. J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2010, 45 (8), 968977,  DOI: 10.1080/10934521003772386
    25. 25
      Ishida, K. P.; Cooper, W. J. Analysis of parameters affecting process efficiency, energy consumption, and carbon footprint in water reuse; WateReuse Research Foundation: Alexandria, VA, 2015.
    26. 26
      Liikanen, R.; Miettinen, I.; Laukkanen, R. Selection of NF membrane to improve quality of chemically treated surface water. Water Res. 2003, 37 (4), 864872,  DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00412-8
    27. 27
      Laurent, P.; Servais, P.; Gatel, D.; Randon, G.; Bonne, P.; Cavard, J. Microbiological quality: Before and after nanofiltration. J. - Am. Water Works Assoc. 1999, 91 (10), 6272,  DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1999.tb08716.x
    28. 28
      Pype, M.-L.; Lawrence, M. G.; Keller, J.; Gernjak, W. Reverse osmosis integrity monitoring in water reuse: The challenge to verify virus removal – A review. Water Res. 2016, 98, 384395,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.04.040
    29. 29
      Liu, G.; Lut, M. C.; Verberk, J. Q. J. C.; Van Dijk, J. C. A comparison of additional treatment processes to limit particle accumulation and microbial growth during drinking water distribution. Water Res. 2013, 47 (8), 27192728,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.02.035
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00200.

    • Additional text and figures (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect