logo
My Activity
Recently Viewed
You have not visited any articles yet, Please visit some articles to see contents here.
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Ambient PM2.5 Reduces Global and Regional Life Expectancy

  • Joshua S. Apte*
    Joshua S. Apte
    Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas, 301 East Dean Keeton Street, Stop C1700, Austin, Texas 78712, United States
    *E-mail: [email protected]
  • Michael Brauer
    Michael Brauer
    School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T1Z3, Canada
  • Aaron J. Cohen
    Aaron J. Cohen
    Health Effects Institute, 75 Federal Street, Suite 1400, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, United States
  • Majid Ezzati
    Majid Ezzati
    MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom
    More by Majid Ezzati
  • , and 
  • C. Arden Pope III
    C. Arden Pope, III
    Department of Economics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, United States
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2018, 5, 9, 546–551
Publication Date (Web):August 22, 2018
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00360
Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society
ACS AuthorChoiceACS AuthorChoice
Article Views
24336
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

PDF (2 MB)
Supporting Info (2)»

Abstract

Exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution is a major risk for premature death. Here, we systematically quantify the global impact of PM2.5 on life expectancy. Using data from the Global Burden of Disease project and actuarial standard life table methods, we estimate global and national decrements in life expectancy that can be attributed to ambient PM2.5 for 185 countries. In 2016, PM2.5 exposure reduced average global life expectancy at birth by ∼1 year with reductions of ∼1.2–1.9 years in polluted countries of Asia and Africa. If PM2.5 in all countries met the World Health Organization Air Quality Guideline (10 μg m–3), we estimate life expectancy could increase by a population-weighted median of 0.6 year (interquartile range of 0.2–1.0 year), a benefit of a magnitude similar to that of eradicating lung and breast cancer. Because background disease rates modulate the effect of air pollution on life expectancy, high age-specific rates of cardiovascular disease in many polluted low- and middle-income countries amplify the impact of PM2.5 on survival. Our analysis adds to prior research by illustrating how mortality from air pollution substantially reduces human longevity.

1. Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution causes important adverse health outcomes that result in premature death, including ischemic heart disease, strokes, lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and respiratory infections. Despite the well-documented global burden of disease from PM2.5(1−3) (∼4.1 million deaths in 2016),(4) prior research has not systematically explored how global variations in PM2.5 exposure affect life expectancy. Here, we use an actuarial modeling approach and data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2016 study to address the question: "How much does PM2.5 air pollution shorten human life expectancy around the world?"
How air pollution affects human longevity has been a topic of continued interest for analysts at the science–policy interface of air pollution over at least the past five decades.(5−13) For the lay public and policymakers alike, health risks that substantially reduce survival time are more compelling than those that merely hasten death by a few days. In the 1980s and 1990s, much research investigated the so-called “harvesting” hypothesis that air pollution might most strongly influence the mortality of those who were already at risk of imminent death.(8−10) By the mid-2000s, the weight of evidence from several large, carefully designed long-term cohort studies suggested a substantial decrement in survival associated with air pollution mortality, because the risks of long-term PM2.5 exposure were approximately an order of magnitude greater than risks from day-to-day air quality variation.(9,14) Baccarelli and colleagues demonstrated that the U.S. communities with the most exceptional aging (e.g., populations of >85 or >100) had low ambient air pollution in addition to low rates of smoking, poverty, and obesity, providing suggestive evidence of the benefits of clean air for longevity.(15) Several groups have estimated the relationship between changes in air pollution and changes in life expectancy.(11−13,16,17) For example, Correia et al.(12) used a differences-in-differences approach to model the relationship between PM2.5 and life expectancy for 545 U.S. counties and determined that decadal-scale improvements in regional air quality resulted in ∼0.35 year of increased life expectancy at birth per 10 μg m–3 change in PM2.5. Similarly, Ebenstein et al. used a regression discontinuity approach to evaluate spatial contrasts in PM10 across China to estimate ∼0.64 year of increased life expectancy per 10 μg m–3 increment in PM10.(12,13)
The advent of globally consistent age-resolved estimates of mortality from PM2.5 from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) collaboration(3,4) now enables systematic assessment of the global variation in the decrement from air pollution. Here, we build upon the actuarial approach of Brunekreef, Dockery, and Pope, who combined data on baseline survival curves with illustrative examples of excess mortality risk from PM2.5 to arrive at approximate estimates of life expectancy decrements for simplified exposure scenarios.(10,18)

2. Materials and Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

2.1. Estimation Approach

We used a standard life table method(19) to estimate the baseline life expectancy at birth e0 for each of 185 countries. For each country, we estimated abridged (i.e., multiyear interval) life tables using all-cause death rates for 23 age strata in the Global Burden of Disease 2016 data set. The Supporting Information describes procedures for computing life tables and baseline life expectancy from age-specific death rates. The standard life expectancy at birth (e0) can be interpreted as the expected lifespan for an individual born into a population where current age-specific death rates are held constant over time. As such, the life expectancy metric is an actuarial construct (in reality, the structure of mortality for most populations is dynamic) but one that usefully summarizes the comparative survival of different populations in time and space. Our analyses emphasize one common life expectancy metric, life expectancy at birth (e0). We refer to the general concept of life expectancy with the acronym LE and to decrements in life expectancy at birth that arise from pollution exposure as ΔLE.
We use a cause-deleted life table approach to simulate the life expectancy decrement that is attributable to PM2.5 risk factors.(10,18−20) This approach involves four steps: (i) estimating the age-specific death rate attributable to ambient PM2.5 for each location, (ii) assuming that in the absence of this risk factor, age-specific death rates would be proportionally lower, (iii) recomputing a counterfactual “cause-deleted” or “cause-eliminated” life table that would exist in the absence of this risk factor (see the Supporting Information),(19,20) and (iv) estimating the counterfactual life expectancy at birth (e0′). The life table approach requires an assumption that the baseline health status of those who die prematurely from air pollution is similar to that of the general population.(10,18−20) Finally, we attribute the difference between the baseline life expectancy and the cause-deleted counterfactual life expectancy to the life expectancy decrement caused by PM2.5: ΔLE = e0′ – e0. Figure 1 illustrates baseline and cause-deleted survival curves for two countries.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Example survival curves for observed life tables (solid lines) and simulated cause-deleted life tables (dashed lines) where ambient PM2.5 exposure is eliminated as a mortality risk factor. Life expectancy e0 can be visualized as the integral of the survival curve over the age spectrum. Life expectancy for the counterfactual case is increased after removing PM2.5 as a mortality risk. For a given country, the reduction in life expectancy attributed to PM2.5 (ΔLE) relative to a counterfactual scenario with no excess mortality risk from PM2.5 can be visualized as the area between the solid and dashed curves.

2.2. Attributable Mortality

We used data from the Global Burden of Disease 2016 study to obtain age-specific attributable death rates for each country for ambient PM2.5. Briefly, the GBD approach(3,21) involves estimating age-specific attributable mortality for each analysis region as the product of (i) age-resolved populations, (ii) age-specific background disease rates for five key causes, and (iii) regionally population-weighted age-specific population attributable fractions for PM2.5 mortality for each of the five causes, computed on the basis of nonlinear integrated-exposure-response (IER) functions(22,23) and a 0.1° × 0.1° gridded PM2.5 exposure surface.(24−26) The five GBD causes of death for which PM2.5 is a risk factor are ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease (stroke), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and lower respiratory infections. As described by Cohen et al.,(3) relative risks for the IER functions are estimated relative to a distribution of the theoretical minimum risk exposure level (TMREL) that ranges from 2.4 to 5.9 μg of PM2.5 m–3, consistent with the lowest concentrations observed in long-term epidemiological studies. We input age-specific mortality into our life table analysis as the sum of the five cause-specific death rates. Uncertainties in the GBD approach include (i) the fact that underlying cause-specific mortality data are modeled and therefore uncertain for some countries,(27) (ii) contributions to attributable mortality from diseases other than the five major causes considered here, and (iii) the assumption that the IER functions reasonably describe mortality risk from PM2.5 over the full ambient concentration spectrum.(21,28) In addition to using the published GBD attributable death rates for ambient PM2.5, we obtained(4,29) similar age-specific mortality data sets for other risk factors (e.g., tobacco smoking) and other major causes of death (e.g., cancers) to provide comparison and context.
Following Apte et al.,(21) we performed a mortality analysis for ambient PM2.5 wherein we simulate the disease burden for alternative hypothetical exposure distributions where global PM2.5 is limited to specific target concentration(s). To do so, we updated the gridded PM2.5 mortality model of Apte et al.(21) with year-2016 data to reproduce the central-tendency GBD 2016 results for ambient PM2.5 to within ±1–2% for each country. We then re-estimated attributable mortality for PM2.5 under hypothetical scenarios in which the ambient exposure concentration distribution for each grid cell was assigned to an alternative concentration, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) annual-average air quality guideline PM2.5 concentration of 10 μg m–3.

3. Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

In 2016, global the population-weighted median life expectancy at birth was 72.6 years [interquartile range (IQR) of 68.2–76.3 years]. For high-income countries, the average life expectancy was 80.9 years (Table 1). The lowest life expectancies are generally in sub-Saharan Africa (average of ∼62.8 years). Global population exposures to ambient PM2.5 are unequally distributed (Figure 2a). For the 2016 population,(26) 95% of the global population lived in regions where PM2.5 concentrations exceed the WHO guideline concentration of 10 μg m–3. Ambient PM2.5 concentrations for the 10th and 90th percentiles of the global concentration–population distribution span nearly an order of magnitude (11 and 97 μg m–3, respectively).
Table 1. Global and Regional Life Expectancy and Life Expectancy Decrements for Selected Risk Factors and Causes of Death
 globalEast AsiaSouth AsiaNorth Africa and Middle Eastsub-Saharan AfricaLatin Americahigh income
baseline LE (years)72.576.368.773.162.875.880.9
all air pollution1.651.902.541.541.970.730.40
ambient PM2.51.031.241.561.290.940.540.37
ambient ozone0.050.070.100.030.010.020.03
household air pollution0.720.711.220.301.320.200.01
tobacco1.822.391.511.600.731.231.82
water sanitation0.570.021.020.191.530.130.01
dietary risks2.673.102.583.131.541.821.91
unsafe sex0.370.080.160.042.030.270.07
all cancer2.373.031.261.701.522.313.53
lung cancer0.410.670.120.260.090.260.72
breast cancer0.140.090.100.140.120.160.23

Figure 2

Figure 2. Relationship among the global distribution of ΔLE, the life expectancy decrement from PM2.5, and global PM2.5 concentrations C. ΔLE is generally higher in countries with higher PM2.5 levels. (a) Global distribution of population with respect to annual-average PM2.5 for year 2016. Plotted data reflect local smoothing of bin-width-normalized distributions computed over 400 logarithmically spaced bins: equal-sized plotted areas reflect equal populations. Each country is colored proportionally to the ΔLE from PM2.5 exposure. (b) Cumulative distribution of ΔLE over the global population. The global population-weighted median value for ΔLE is 1.22 years, corresponding to conditions in China. Shading for each country shows the national population-weighted mean PM2.5, illustrating how ΔLE has a strong but imperfect association with PM2.5. (c) National decrements in ΔLE vs PM2.5. Owing to the supralinear concentration–response relationship of mortality with PM2.5, the slope of this distribution is higher for countries with lower average PM2.5 concentrations.

Figures 2 and 3 show the global distribution of life expectancy impacts from PM2.5. Globally, ambient PM2.5 pollution was associated with a population-weighted mean decrement in global life expectancy of 1.03 years. Among 185 countries, the population-weighted median decrement in life expectancy from PM2.5 (ΔLE) was 1.22 years [IQR of 0.67–1.51 years (Figure 2b)]. As shown in Figure 3, the life expectancy impact of ambient PM2.5 is especially large in polluted countries of Asia, Africa, and the Middle East, including Bangladesh (1.87 years), Egypt (1.85 years), Pakistan (1.56 years), India (1.53 years), Saudi Arabia (1.48 years), Nigeria (1.28 years), and China (1.25 years).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Global maps of the life expectancy decrement ΔLE from PM2.5. Panel a shows baseline ΔLE for year-2016 concentrations (global population-weighted mean and median of 1.03 and 1.22 years, respectively). Panel b shows hypothetical gains in life expectancy for an alternative exposure distribution where concentrations are limited to a maximum of 10 μg m–3, the WHO air quality guideline concentration (global-average ΔLE of ∼0.59 year). See also Table S2.

Life expectancy decrements from PM2.5 are positively correlated with national-average PM2.5 concentrations [r = 0.79 (Figure 2c)]. For countries with PM2.5 concentrations below 25 μg m–3 (including nearly all high-income countries), ΔLE and population-weighted mean PM2.5 track closely and approximately linearly, with a slope that is roughly consistent with the directly measured relationship between LE and PM2.5 of Correia et al. (average of 0.35 year LE increase per 10 μg m–3 reduction in exposure for 545 U.S. counties).(12) At higher concentrations, the nonlinear integrated exposure–response functions used to estimate mortality attributable to PM2.5 generally lead to a decreasing marginal risk change per increment in PM2.5. Further, national differences in the structure of underlying disease burden modulate the relationship between PM2.5 and life expectancy, contributing to the scatter in Figure 2c. In particular, ΔLE from PM2.5 is sensitive to age-specific death rates in each country, while death rates from PM2.5 (but not ΔLE) are also strongly influenced by the age distribution of a country’s population (see Figure S1).
To place our findings in context, we used published GBD cause- and age-specific mortality data to estimate the life expectancy decrements that are attributable to other key diseases and risks (Table 1). Relative to our core global finding of a global mean ΔLE of 1.03 years for ambient PM2.5, the full set of air pollution risk factors [including ambient O3 and household air pollution (HAP)] decreases global life expectancy by an average of 1.65 years. In regions where both ambient PM2.5 and HAP are major risk factors, the ΔLE for the combined set of household and ambient air pollutants is even larger (2.5 years in South Asia and 2.0 years in sub-Saharan Africa). For context, other major global risk factors for reduced life expectancy include dietary risks (2.7 years), tobacco smoking (1.8 years), unsafe water and sanitation (0.57 year), and unsafe sex (0.37 year). Globally, cancers result in ∼2.4 years of reduced life expectancy, while the most common cancer types (e.g., lung and breast) individually reduce life expectancy by ∼0.2–0.4 year. In the United States, the ΔLE for PM2.5 (0.38 year) is substantially larger than the impact of breast cancer (0.23 year), while in South Asia, the ΔLE for PM2.5 (1.6 years) substantially exceeds the combined impact of all cancers (1.3 years). In short, the burden of disease from air pollution results in life expectancy decrements of a magnitude similar to those of other high-priority risk factors and diseases.
Because air pollution has a disproportionate effect on the elderly, air pollution reduces life expectancy predominantly by increasing the probability of death above age 60 (Figure S2). We utilized our estimated standard life tables for each country to understand how PM2.5 affects survival from age 60 to 85, expressed as the metric 25q60 (Table S1). In high-income countries with a low PM2.5, baseline survival rates for this 25-year interval are high (∼50%) and PM2.5 exposure reduces 25q60 by ∼3%. In contrast, for high-PM2.5, high-mortality countries (e.g., South Asia), 25q60 at baseline is low (∼20–30%) and the impact of PM2.5 on elderly survival is quite large. For example, across South Asia, the probability of surviving from age 60 to 85 would have been 20% higher if PM2.5 exposure were removed as a mortality risk factor.
To illustrate how improvements in PM2.5 might result in increased life expectancy, we estimate ΔLE for alternative global exposure distributions (Figure 3 and Table S2). These simulations must be interpreted with care (see below), as they most properly reflect the LE for a hypothetical alternative reality where the distribution of PM2.5 concentrations is held constant over time at a specific value. If PM2.5 concentrations worldwide were limited to the WHO air quality guideline concentration of 10 μg m–3, global life expectancy would be on average 0.59 year longer. The benefit of reaching this stringent target would be especially large in countries with the highest current levels of pollution, with approximately 0.8–1.4 years of additional survival in countries such as Egypt, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, China, and Nigeria. In contrast, many high-income countries already nearly meet the WHO guideline and would have much smaller LE benefits. Because limiting the maximum PM2.5 concentration in one area may also have air quality benefits for less polluted surroundings, our estimates may understate the possible LE benefits of reaching specific air quality guidelines. Halving PM2.5 globally would increase e0 globally by 0.33 year, and about 0.40–0.55 year in the most polluted countries of Asia and Africa. These benefits are large in absolute magnitude. However, because the relationship for PM2.5 and mortality has a declining slope at higher concentrations,(21−23,28,30−33) the LE benefit of halving PM2.5 for the highly polluted countries is only 25–30% of the total national ΔLE for PM2.5.
Predictions about possible improvements in life expectancy must be interpreted carefully. Mortality for any risk factor will evolve over time as a result of demographic and epidemiological transitions.(34,35) LE is strongly dependent on age-specific death rates, which tend to decrease over time in countries where general population health is improving. Thus, the life expectancy benefit of PM2.5 reductions in many polluted lower- and middle-income countries might be 20–40% lower than our core estimates if those countries also had age-specific death rates that were typical of high-income economies (Table S3). As low-income, high-mortality countries undergo epidemiological transitions, one hallmark is a trend toward “aging” populations: reducing age-specific mortality increases survival to higher ages. Because air pollution disproportionately affects the elderly, the attributable death rate for PM2.5 is expected to increase over time in many lower- and middle-income countries where populations are just beginning to “age”.(3,21) Thus, the paradoxical result is that per-capita mortality from air pollution may increase in some countries even as its life expectancy impacts fall (see Figure S1). This result can be understood in terms of diminishing returns: as populations live longer, reducing any individual risk factor will have a smaller impact on additional survival, while at the same time, competing risks for mortality will become more important. Reducing air pollution in countries at all levels of economic development could lead to substantial gains in life expectancy, gains on a par with reducing other well-recognized threats to public health.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00360.

  • Detailed information about life table methods, supporting figures, and supporting tables (PDF)

  • Data file with results for 185 countries (XLSX)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Michael Brauer - School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T1Z3, CanadaOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-9103-9343
    • Aaron J. Cohen - Health Effects Institute, 75 Federal Street, Suite 1400, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, United States
    • Majid Ezzati - MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom
    • C. Arden Pope - Department of Economics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, United States
  • Notes

    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The authors thank K. Walker and J. Marshall for comments on this analysis. This publication was developed under Assistance Agreement R835873 awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. It has not been formally reviewed by EPA. The views expressed in this document are solely those of authors and do not reflect those of the Agency. EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in this publication. A.J.C. was supported by the Health Effects Institute.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 35 other publications.

  1. 1
    Lim, S. S.; Vos, T.; Flaxman, A. D.; Danaei, G.; Shibuya, K.; Adair-Rohani, H.; Amann, M.; Anderson, H. R.; Andrews, K. G.; Aryee, M. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012, 380, 22242260,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8
  2. 2
    Cohen, A. J.; Anderson, H. R.; Ostro, B.; Pandey, K. D.; Krzyzanowski, M.; Künzli, N.; Gutschmidt, K.; Pope, A.; Romieu, I.; Samet, J. M.; Smith, K. The global burden of disease due to outdoor air pollution. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part A 2005, 68, 13011307,  DOI: 10.1080/15287390590936166
  3. 3
    Cohen, A. J.; Brauer, M.; Burnett, R.; Anderson, H. R.; Frostad, J.; Estep, K.; Balakrishnan, K.; Brunekreef, B.; Dandona, L.; Dandona, R. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet 2017, 389, 19071918,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6
  4. 4
    Gakidou, E.; Afshin, A.; Abajobir, A. A.; Abate, K. H.; Abbafati, C.; Abbas, K. M.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdulle, A. M.; Abera, S. F.; Aboyans, V. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017, 390, 13451422,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32366-8
  5. 5
    Lave, L. B.; Seskin, E. P. Does air pollution shorten lives? In Statistical and Mathematical Aspects of Pollution Problems; Pratt, J., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1974; pp 223244.
  6. 6
    Lave, L. B.; Seskin, E. P. An analysis of the association between U.S. mortality and air pollution. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1973, 68, 284290,  DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1973.10482421
  7. 7
    Thibodeau, L. A.; Reed, R. B.; Bishop, Y. M.; Kammerman, L. A. Air pollution and human health: a review and reanalysis. Environ. Health Persp. 1980, 34, 165183,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8034165
  8. 8
    Schwartz, J. Harvesting and long term exposure effects in the relation between air pollution and mortality. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2000, 151, 440448,  DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010228
  9. 9
    Künzli, N.; Medina, S.; Kaiser, R.; Quenel, P.; Horak, F., Jr.; Studnicka, M. Assessment of deaths attributable to air pollution: Should we use risk estimates based on time series or on cohort studies?. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001, 153, 10501055,  DOI: 10.1093/aje/153.11.1050
  10. 10
    Brunekreef, B. Air pollution and life expectancy: is there a relation?. Occup. Environ. Med. 1997, 54, 781784,  DOI: 10.1136/oem.54.11.781
  11. 11
    Pope, C. A.; Ezzati, M.; Dockery, D. W. Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 376386,  DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0805646
  12. 12
    Correia, A. W.; Pope, C. A., III; Dockery, D. W.; Wang, Y.; Ezzati, M.; Dominici, F. Effect of air pollution control on life expectancy in the United States. Epidemiol. 2013, 24, 2331,  DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182770237
  13. 13
    Ebenstein, A.; Fan, M.; Greenstone, M.; He, G.; Zhou, M. New evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China’s Huai River Policy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017, 114, 10384,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1616784114
  14. 14
    Pope, C. A.; Dockery, D. W. Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: Lines that connect. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2006, 56, 709742,  DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485
  15. 15
    Baccarelli, A. A.; Hales, N.; Burnett, R. T.; Jerrett, M.; Mix, C.; Dockery, D. W.; Pope, C. A. Particulate air pollution, exceptional aging, and rates of centenarians: A nationwide analysis of the United States, 1980–2010. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124, 17441750,  DOI: 10.1289/EHP197
  16. 16
    Chen, Y.; Ebenstein, A.; Greenstone, M.; Li, H. Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China’s Huai River policy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110, 1293612941,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1300018110
  17. 17
    Fann, N.; Kim, S.-Y.; Olives, C.; Sheppard, L. Estimated changes in life expectancy and adult mortality resulting from declining PM2.5 exposures in the contiguous United States: 1980–2010. Environ. Health Perspect. 2017, 125, 097003  DOI: 10.1289/EHP507
  18. 18
    Pope, C. A.; Dockery, D. W. Air pollution and life expectancy in China and beyond. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110, 12861,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1310925110
  19. 19
    Arias, E.; Heron, M.; Tejada-Vara, B. United States life tables eliminating certain causes of death, 1999–2001. National Vital Statistics Reports 2013, 61, 9
  20. 20
    Tsai, S. P.; Lee, E. S.; Hardy, R. J. The effect of a reduction in leading causes of death: Potential gains in life expectancy. Am. J. Public Health 1978, 68, 966971,  DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.68.10.966
  21. 21
    Apte, J. S.; Marshall, J. D.; Brauer, M.; Cohen, A. J. Addressing global mortality from ambient PM2.5. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 80578066,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01236
  22. 22
    Burnett, R. T.; Pope, C. A.; Ezzati, M.; Olives, C.; Lim, S. S.; Mehta, S.; Shin, H. H.; Singh, G.; Hubbell, B.; Brauer, M. An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 397403,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1307049
  23. 23
    Nasari, M. M.; Szyszkowicz, M.; Chen, H.; Crouse, D.; Turner, M. C.; Jerrett, M.; Pope, C. A.; Hubbell, B.; Fann, N.; Cohen, A. A class of non-linear exposure-response models suitable for health impact assessment applicable to large cohort studies of ambient air pollution. Air Qual., Atmos. Health 2016, 9, 961972,  DOI: 10.1007/s11869-016-0398-z
  24. 24
    Brauer, M.; Freedman, G.; Frostad, J.; van Donkelaar, A.; Martin, R. V.; Dentener, F.; Dingenen, R. v.; Estep, K.; Amini, H.; Apte, J. S. Ambient air pollution exposure estimation for the Global Burden of Disease 2013. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 7988,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03709
  25. 25
    Shaddick, G.; Thomas, M. L.; Green, A.; Brauer, M.; van Donkelaar, A.; Burnett, R.; Chang, H. H.; Cohen, A.; van Dingenen, R.; Dora, C. Data integration model for air quality: A hierarchical approach to the global estimation of exposures to ambient air pollution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics 2018, 67, 231253,  DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12227
  26. 26
    Shaddick, G.; Thomas, M.; Amini, H.; Broday, D. M.; Cohen, A.; Frostad, J.; Green, A.; Gumy, S.; Liu, Y.; Martin, R. V. Data integration for the assessment of population exposure to ambient air pollution for global burden of disease assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02864
  27. 27
    Ke, C.; Gupta, R.; Xavier, D.; Prabhakaran, D.; Mathur, P.; Kalkonde, Y. V.; Kolpak, P.; Suraweera, W.; Jha, P.; Allarakha, S. Divergent trends in ischaemic heart disease and stroke mortality in India from 2000 to 2015: a nationally representative mortality study. Lancet Global Health 2018, 6, e914e923,  DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30242-0
  28. 28
    Marshall, J. D.; Apte, J. S.; Coggins, J. S.; Goodkind, A. L. Blue skies bluer?. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 1392913936,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03154
  29. 29
    Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. GBD 2016 Results Tool. http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool, 2017 (accessed July 11, 2018).
  30. 30
    Pope, C. A.; Burnett, R. T.; Turner, M. C.; Cohen, A.; Krewski, D.; Jerrett, M.; Gapstur, S. M.; Thun, M. J. Lung cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality associated with ambient air pollution and cigarette smoke: Shape of the exposure–response relationships. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 16161621,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1103639
  31. 31
    Pope, C. A.; Burnett, R. T.; Krewski, D.; Jerrett, M.; Shi, Y.; Calle, E. E.; Thun, M. J. Cardiovascular mortality and exposure to airborne fine particulate matter and cigarette smoke: Shape of the exposure-response relationship. Circulation 2009, 120, 941948,  DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.857888
  32. 32
    Smith, K. R.; Peel, J. L. Mind the gap. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118, 16431645,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1002517
  33. 33
    Pope, C. A.; Cropper, M.; Coggins, J.; Cohen, A. Health benefits of air pollution abatement policy: Role of the shape of the concentration-response function. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2015, 65, 516522,  DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2014.993004
  34. 34
    Smith, K. R.; Ezzati, M. How environmental health risks change with development: The epidemiologic and environmental risk transitions revisited. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resources 2005, 30, 291333,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144424
  35. 35
    Salomon, J. A.; Murray, C. J. L. The epidemiologic transition revisited: Compositional models for causes of death by age and sex. Population & Development Review 2002, 28, 205228,  DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00205.x

Cited By


This article is cited by 120 publications.

  1. Yang Lei, Zhuoyue Tian, Hanxue Sun, Fang Liu, Zhaoqi Zhu, Weidong Liang, An Li. Low-Resistance Thiophene-Based Conjugated Microporous Polymer Nanotube Filters for Efficient Particulate Matter Capture and Oil/Water Separation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (4) , 5823-5833. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c20484
  2. Kanan Patel, Sahil Bhandari, Shahzad Gani, Mark Joseph Campmier, Purushottam Kumar, Gazala Habib, Joshua Apte, Lea Hildebrandt Ruiz. Sources and Dynamics of Submicron Aerosol during the Autumn Onset of the Air Pollution Season in Delhi, India. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry 2021, 5 (1) , 118-128. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00340
  3. Robert T. Nishida, Tyler J. Johnson, Joshua S. Hassim, Brian M. Graves, Adam M. Boies, Simone Hochgreb. A Simple Method for Measuring Fine-to-Ultrafine Aerosols Using Bipolar Charge Equilibrium. ACS Sensors 2020, 5 (2) , 447-453. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.9b02143
  4. David H. Hagan, Shahzad Gani, Sahil Bhandari, Kanan Patel, Gazala Habib, Joshua S. Apte, Lea Hildebrandt Ruiz, Jesse H. Kroll. Inferring Aerosol Sources from Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Measurements: A Case Study in Delhi, India. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2019, 6 (8) , 467-472. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00393
  5. Wyatt M. Champion, Andrew P. Grieshop. Pellet-Fed Gasifier Stoves Approach Gas-Stove Like Performance during in-Home Use in Rwanda. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (11) , 6570-6579. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b00009
  6. Kyle P. Messier, Sarah E. Chambliss, Shahzad Gani, Ramon Alvarez, Michael Brauer, Jonathan J. Choi, Steven P. Hamburg, Jules Kerckhoffs, Brian LaFranchi, Melissa M. Lunden, Julian D. Marshall, Christopher J. Portier, Ananya Roy, Adam A. Szpiro, Roel C. H. Vermeulen, Joshua S. Apte. Mapping Air Pollution with Google Street View Cars: Efficient Approaches with Mobile Monitoring and Land Use Regression. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (21) , 12563-12572. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03395
  7. Aifang Gao, Junyi Wang, Jianfei Luo, Aiguo Li, Kaiyu Chen, Pengfei Wang, Yiyi Wang, Jingyi Li, Jianlin Hu, Hongliang Zhang. Temporal variation of PM2.5-associated health effects in Shijiazhuang, Hebei. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering 2021, 15 (5) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1376-0
  8. Bujin Bekbulat, Joshua S. Apte, Dylan B. Millet, Allen L. Robinson, Kelley C. Wells, Albert A. Presto, Julian D. Marshall. Changes in criteria air pollution levels in the US before, during, and after Covid-19 stay-at-home orders: Evidence from regulatory monitors. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 769 , 144693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144693
  9. Vahid Jalali Farahani, Ehsan Soleimanian, Milad Pirhadi, Constantinos Sioutas. Long-term trends in concentrations and sources of PM2.5–bound metals and elements in central Los Angeles. Atmospheric Environment 2021, 253 , 118361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118361
  10. Michael Brauer, Barbara Casadei, Robert A. Harrington, Richard Kovacs, Karen Sliwa, . Taking a Stand Against Air Pollution—The Impact on Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation 2021, 143 (14) https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.052666
  11. Michael Brauer, Barbara Casadei, Robert A. Harrington, Richard Kovacs, Karen Sliwa, Michael Brauer, Narantuya Davaakhuu, Michael Hadley, Daniel Kass, Mark Miller, Maria Consuelo Escamilla Nuñez, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Ta-Chen Su, Ilonca C.H. Vaartjes, Rajesh Vedanthan. Taking a Stand Against Air Pollution—The Impact on Cardiovascular Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2021, 77 (13) , 1684-1688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.003
  12. Yumeng Zhang, Ruizhi Jin, Sijie Dong, Yanlei Wang, Kejun Dong, Yi Wei, Bo Wang. Heterogeneous condensation combined with inner vortex broken cyclone to achieve high collection efficiency of fine particles and low energy consumption. Powder Technology 2021, 382 , 420-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2021.01.003
  13. Shan Zhang, Xiangjun Tian, Hongqin Zhang, Xiao Han, Meigen Zhang. A nonlinear least squares four-dimensional variational data assimilation system for PM2.5 forecasts (NASM): Description and preliminary evaluation. Atmospheric Pollution Research 2021, 12 (4) , 122-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2021.03.003
  14. Abdulmalik Altuwayjiri, Milad Pirhadi, Sina Taghvaee, Constantinos Sioutas. Long-term trends in the contribution of PM 2.5 sources to organic carbon (OC) in the Los Angeles basin and the effect of PM emission regulations. Faraday Discussions 2021, 226 , 74-99. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0FD00074D
  15. Luisa T. Molina. Introductory lecture: air quality in megacities. Faraday Discussions 2021, 226 , 9-52. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0FD00123F
  16. Feng Zhu, Lan Chen, Zhengmin (Min) Qian, Yuxue Liao, Zhen Zhang, Stephen Edward McMillin, Xiaojie Wang, Hualiang Lin. Acute effects of particulate matter with different sizes on respiratory mortality in Shenzhen, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2021, 224 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13118-y
  17. Shivani, Ranu Gadi. Oxidative potential of ambient fine particulate matter for ranking of emission sources: an insight for emissions reductions. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 2021, 5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-021-01005-x
  18. Heejung Jung, David Quiros, Yang Li, Shaohua Hu, Yue Lin. Application of a Diffusion Charger to Quantify Real-Time Particle Emissions from Light-Duty Vehicles: a Comparison Study with a Particle Size Spectrometer. Emission Control Science and Technology 2021, 7 (1) , 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40825-020-00179-7
  19. Jingjing Zheng, Xuefeng Shao, Wei Liu, Jie Kong, Gaoshan Zuo. The impact of the pilot program on industrial structure upgrading in low-carbon cities. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021, 290 , 125868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125868
  20. Khusniddin Khamraev, Daniel Cheriyan, Jae-ho Choi. A review on health risk assessment of PM in the construction industry – Current situation and future directions. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 758 , 143716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143716
  21. Gina Kanhai, Julius N. Fobil, Betty A. Nartey, Joseph V. Spadaro, Pierpaolo Mudu. Urban Municipal Solid Waste management: Modeling air pollution scenarios and health impacts in the case of Accra, Ghana. Waste Management 2021, 123 , 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.01.005
  22. Zhong Fang, Pei-Ying Wu, Yi-Nuo Lin, Tzu-Han Chang, Yung-ho Chiu. Air Pollution’s Impact on the Economic, Social, Medical, and Industrial Injury Environments in China. Healthcare 2021, 9 (3) , 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030261
  23. Xingcheng Lu, Dehao Yuan, Yiang Chen, Jimmy C.H. Fung. Impacts of urbanization and long-term meteorological variations on global PM2.5 and its associated health burden. Environmental Pollution 2021, 270 , 116003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116003
  24. Azhar Siddique, Asif Shahzad, Jenny Lawler, Khaled A. Mahmoud, Dae Sung Lee, Nisar Ali, Muhammad Bilal, Kashif Rasool. Unprecedented environmental and energy impacts and challenges of COVID-19 pandemic. Environmental Research 2021, 193 , 110443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110443
  25. Ning Zhang, Ying Mao. Spatial Effects of Environmental Pollution on Healthcare Services: Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, 18 (4) , 1784. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041784
  26. Michael Brauer, Barbara Casadei, Robert A Harrington, Richard Kovacs, Karen Sliwa, , Michael Brauer, Narantuya Davaakhuu, Michael Hadley, Daniel Kass, Mark Miller, Maria Consuelo Escamilla Nuñez, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Ta-Chen Su, Ilonca C H Vaartjes, Rajesh Vedanthan. Taking a stand against air pollution – the impact on cardiovascular disease. European Heart Journal 2021, 396 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1025
  27. Michael Brauer, Barbara Casadei, Robert A. Harrington, Richard Kovacs, Karen Sliwa. Taking a Stand Against Air Pollution – The Impact on Cardiovascular Disease. Global Heart 2021, 16 (1) https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.948
  28. Suravi Kalita, Hrishikesh Talukdar. COVID-19 Pandemic: An Unprecedented Blessing for Nature. 2021,,, 349-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66490-9_15
  29. Pierre Sicard, Paola Crippa, Alessandra De Marco, Stefano Castruccio, Paolo Giani, Juan Cuesta, Elena Paoletti, Zhaozhong Feng, Alessandro Anav. High spatial resolution WRF-Chem model over Asia: Physics and chemistry evaluation. Atmospheric Environment 2021, 244 , 118004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118004
  30. Zhuolun Niu, Ye Bian, Tongling Xia, Li Zhang, Chun Chen. An optimization approach for fabricating electrospun nanofiber air filters with minimized pressure drop for indoor PM2.5 control. Building and Environment 2021, 188 , 107449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107449
  31. Qingbin Guo, Kang Luo. The spatial convergence and drivers of environmental efficiency under haze constraints - Evidence from China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2021, 86 , 106513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106513
  32. Willian Lemker Andreão, Taciana Toledo de Almeida Albuquerque. Avoidable mortality by implementing more restrictive fine particles standards in Brazil: An estimation using satellite surface data. Environmental Research 2021, 192 , 110288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110288
  33. Mahlatse Kganyago, Kogieluxmie Govender, Lerato Shikwambana, Venkataraman Sivakumar. Study on blazing wildfires at the outeniqua pass in South Africa during the october/november 2018 period. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 2021, 21 , 100464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100464
  34. Luisa María Gómez Peláez, Jane Meri Santos, Taciana Toledo de Almeida Albuquerque, Neyval Costa Reis, Willian Lemker Andreão, Maria de Fátima Andrade. Air quality status and trends over large cities in South America. Environmental Science & Policy 2020, 114 , 422-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.09.009
  35. Kefei Zhang, Jesse Thé, Guangyuan Xie, Hesheng Yu. Multi-step ahead forecasting of regional air quality using spatial-temporal deep neural networks: A case study of Huaihai Economic Zone. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020, 277 , 123231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123231
  36. Daniel Cheriyan, Kim Young Hyun, Han Jaegoo, Jae-ho Choi. Assessing the distributional characteristics of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 exposure profile produced and propagated from a construction activity. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020, 276 , 124335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124335
  37. Phuong T.M. Tran, Teron Nguyen, Rajasekhar Balasubramanian. Personal exposure to airborne particles in transport micro-environments and potential health impacts: A tale of two cities. Sustainable Cities and Society 2020, 63 , 102470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102470
  38. Huanbi Yue, Chunyang He, Qingxu Huang, Dan Yin, Brett A. Bryan. Stronger policy required to substantially reduce deaths from PM2.5 pollution in China. Nature Communications 2020, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15319-4
  39. Sagnik Dey, Bhavesh Purohit, Palak Balyan, Kuldeep Dixit, Kunal Bali, Alok Kumar, Fahad Imam, Sourangsu Chowdhury, Dilip Ganguly, Prashant Gargava, V. K. Shukla. A Satellite-Based High-Resolution (1-km) Ambient PM2.5 Database for India over Two Decades (2000–2019): Applications for Air Quality Management. Remote Sensing 2020, 12 (23) , 3872. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12233872
  40. Dimitris Evangelopoulos, Roman Perez-Velasco, Heather Walton, Sophie Gumy, Martin Williams, Frank J. Kelly, Nino Künzli. The role of burden of disease assessment in tracking progress towards achieving WHO global air quality guidelines. International Journal of Public Health 2020, 65 (8) , 1455-1465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01479-z
  41. Chul-Hee Lim, Jieun Ryu, Yuyoung Choi, Seong Woo Jeon, Woo-Kyun Lee. Understanding global PM2.5 concentrations and their drivers in recent decades (1998–2016). Environment International 2020, 144 , 106011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106011
  42. Racha Dejchanchaiwong, Perapong Tekasakul, Surajit Tekasakul, Worradorn Phairuang, Nobchonnee Nim, Chaiyoth Sresawasd, Kunchira Thongboon, Thunyapat Thongyen, Panwadee Suwattiga. Impact of transport of fine and ultrafine particles from open biomass burning on air quality during 2019 Bangkok haze episode. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2020, 97 , 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.04.009
  43. Raj M Lal, Anu Ramaswami, Armistead G Russell. Assessment of the Near-Road (monitoring) Network including comparison with nearby monitors within U.S. cities. Environmental Research Letters 2020, 15 (11) , 114026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8156
  44. Charlotte Park, Anthonie S. Johnston, Hyukmin Kweon. Physical filtration efficiency analysis of a polyaniline hybrid composite filter with graphite oxide for particulate matter 2.5. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2020, 137 (38) , 49149. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.49149
  45. Brian Sergi, Inês Azevedo, Steven J Davis, Nicholas Z Muller. Regional and county flows of particulate matter damage in the US. Environmental Research Letters 2020, 15 (10) , 104073. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abb429
  46. Rishiraj Adhikary, Nipun Batra. Computational tools for understanding air pollution. 2020,,, 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1145/3410530.3414327
  47. Rishiraj Adhikary, Nipun Batra. Do we breathe the same air?. 2020,,, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3410530.3414414
  48. Fabian Thiel. Die Low-Cost-Hypothese. Ein empirischer Test am Beispiel der Befürwortung einer City-Maut. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 2020, 72 (3) , 429-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-020-00712-0
  49. Peng Yin, Michael Brauer, Aaron J Cohen, Haidong Wang, Jie Li, Richard T Burnett, Jeffrey D Stanaway, Kate Causey, Samantha Larson, William Godwin, Joseph Frostad, Ashley Marks, Lijun Wang, Maigeng Zhou, Christopher J L Murray. The effect of air pollution on deaths, disease burden, and life expectancy across China and its provinces, 1990–2017: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet Planetary Health 2020, 4 (9) , e386-e398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30161-3
  50. Xiang Ren, Zhongyuan Mi, Panos G. Georgopoulos. Comparison of Machine Learning and Land Use Regression for fine scale spatiotemporal estimation of ambient air pollution: Modeling ozone concentrations across the contiguous United States. Environment International 2020, 142 , 105827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105827
  51. Lili Zhang, John P. Wilson, Beau MacDonald, Wenhao Zhang, Tao Yu. The changing PM2.5 dynamics of global megacities based on long-term remotely sensed observations. Environment International 2020, 142 , 105862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105862
  52. Willian Lemker Andreão, Janaina Antonino Pinto, Rizzieri Pedruzzi, Prashant Kumar, Taciana Toledo de Almeida Albuquerque. Quantifying the impact of particle matter on mortality and hospitalizations in four Brazilian metropolitan areas. Journal of Environmental Management 2020, 270 , 110840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110840
  53. Wen Zheng, Yichi Zhang, Jianjun Xia, Yi Jiang. Cleaner heating in Northern China: potentials and regional balances. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2020, 160 , 104897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104897
  54. Edward W Butt, Luke Conibear, Carly L Reddington, Eoghan Darbyshire, William T Morgan, Hugh Coe, Paulo Artaxo, Joel Brito, Christoph Knote, Dominick V Spracklen. Large air quality and human health impacts due to Amazon forest and vegetation fires. Environmental Research Communications 2020, 2 (9) , 095001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/abb0db
  55. Perry Hystad, Salim Yusuf, Michael Brauer. Air pollution health impacts: the knowns and unknowns for reliable global burden calculations. Cardiovascular Research 2020, 116 (11) , 1794-1796. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvaa092
  56. Lei Zhu, Qingxu Huang, Qiang Ren, Huanbi Yue, Chentai Jiao, Chunyang He. Identifying urban haze islands and extracting their spatial features. Ecological Indicators 2020, 115 , 106385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106385
  57. Jiraporn Chomanee, Kunchira Thongboon, Surajit Tekasakul, Masami Furuuchi, Racha Dejchanchaiwong, Perapong Tekasakul. Physicochemical and toxicological characteristics of nanoparticles in aerosols in southern Thailand during recent haze episodes in lower southeast Asia. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2020, 94 , 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.03.021
  58. Tielin Gao, Donghai Xu, Yanxiang Mi, Yue Lu. Simulation Analysis of NO2 Pollution Diffusion Law Based on Gauss Plume Model: A Case Study from Hebei Province. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2020, 555 , 012090. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/555/1/012090
  59. Amina Kunovac, Quincy A. Hathaway, Mark V. Pinti, Andrew D. Taylor, John M. Hollander. Cardiovascular adaptations to particle inhalation exposure: molecular mechanisms of the toxicology. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 2020, 319 (2) , H282-H305. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00026.2020
  60. Beth Friedman. Source apportionment of PM 2.5 at two Seattle chemical speciation sites. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 2020, 70 (7) , 687-699. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2020.1765898
  61. William Mueller, Hilary Cowie, Claire J. Horwell, Fintan Hurley, Peter J. Baxter. Health Impact Assessment of Volcanic Ash Inhalation: A Comparison With Outdoor Air Pollution Methods. GeoHealth 2020, 4 (7) https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GH000256
  62. Sasan Faridi, Ramin Nabizadeh Nodehi, Saeed Sadeghian, Masih Tajdini, Mohammad Hoseini, Masud Yunesian, Shahrokh Nazmara, Mohammad Sadegh Hassanvand, Kazem Naddafi. Can respirator face masks in a developing country reduce exposure to ambient particulate matter?. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 2020, 30 (4) , 606-617. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-0222-6
  63. Jiamao Zhou, Xuexi Tie, Yunbo Yu, Shuyu Zhao, Guohui Li, Suixin Liu, Ting Zhang, Wenting Dai. Impact of the Emission Control of Diesel Vehicles on Black Carbon (BC) Concentrations over China. Atmosphere 2020, 11 (7) , 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11070696
  64. Hari Prasad Dasari, Srinivas Desamsetti, Sabique Langodan, Rama Krishna Karumuri, Shyamcharan Singh, Ibrahim Hoteit. Atmospheric conditions and air quality assessment over NEOM, kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Atmospheric Environment 2020, 230 , 117489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117489
  65. Richard Burnett, Aaron Cohen. Relative Risk Functions for Estimating Excess Mortality Attributable to Outdoor PM2.5 Air Pollution: Evolution and State-of-the-Art. Atmosphere 2020, 11 (6) , 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060589
  66. Scott D. Chambers, Agnieszka Podstawczyńska. Characterizing urban pollution variability in Central Poland using radon-222. Nukleonika 2020, 65 (2) , 59-65. https://doi.org/10.2478/nuka-2020-0008
  67. Yunquan Zhang, Jiaying Fang, Feiyue Mao, Zan Ding, Qianqian Xiang, Wei Wang. Age- and season-specific effects of ambient particles (PM1, PM2.5, and PM10) on daily emergency department visits among two Chinese metropolitan populations. Chemosphere 2020, 246 , 125723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125723
  68. Daniel Cheriyan, Jae-ho Choi. A review of research on particulate matter pollution in the construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020, 254 , 120077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120077
  69. Ming Zhang, Xinran Sun, Wenwen Wang. Study on the effect of environmental regulations and industrial structure on haze pollution in China from the dual perspective of independence and linkage. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020, 256 , 120748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120748
  70. M.D. Wright, J.C. Matthews, H.G. Silva, A. Bacak, C. Percival, D.E. Shallcross. The relationship between aerosol concentration and atmospheric potential gradient in urban environments. Science of The Total Environment 2020, 716 , 134959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134959
  71. Bing Xu, Weiran Lin, Syed Ali Taqi. The impact of wind and non-wind factors on PM2.5 levels. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2020, 154 , 119960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119960
  72. Mingyi Wang, Weimeng Kong, Ruby Marten, Xu-Cheng He, Dexian Chen, Joschka Pfeifer, Arto Heitto, Jenni Kontkanen, Lubna Dada, Andreas Kürten, Taina Yli-Juuti, Hanna E. Manninen, Stavros Amanatidis, António Amorim, Rima Baalbaki, Andrea Baccarini, David M. Bell, Barbara Bertozzi, Steffen Bräkling, Sophia Brilke, Lucía Caudillo Murillo, Randall Chiu, Biwu Chu, Louis-Philippe De Menezes, Jonathan Duplissy, Henning Finkenzeller, Loic Gonzalez Carracedo, Manuel Granzin, Roberto Guida, Armin Hansel, Victoria Hofbauer, Jordan Krechmer, Katrianne Lehtipalo, Houssni Lamkaddam, Markus Lampimäki, Chuan Ping Lee, Vladimir Makhmutov, Guillaume Marie, Serge Mathot, Roy L. Mauldin, Bernhard Mentler, Tatjana Müller, Antti Onnela, Eva Partoll, Tuukka Petäjä, Maxim Philippov, Veronika Pospisilova, Ananth Ranjithkumar, Matti Rissanen, Birte Rörup, Wiebke Scholz, Jiali Shen, Mario Simon, Mikko Sipilä, Gerhard Steiner, Dominik Stolzenburg, Yee Jun Tham, António Tomé, Andrea C. Wagner, Dongyu S. Wang, Yonghong Wang, Stefan K. Weber, Paul M. Winkler, Peter J. Wlasits, Yusheng Wu, Mao Xiao, Qing Ye, Marcel Zauner-Wieczorek, Xueqin Zhou, Rainer Volkamer, Ilona Riipinen, Josef Dommen, Joachim Curtius, Urs Baltensperger, Markku Kulmala, Douglas R. Worsnop, Jasper Kirkby, John H. Seinfeld, Imad El-Haddad, Richard C. Flagan, Neil M. Donahue. Rapid growth of new atmospheric particles by nitric acid and ammonia condensation. Nature 2020, 581 (7807) , 184-189. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2270-4
  73. Ameerah Su’ad Abdul Shakor, Muhammad Alfatih Pahrol, Mohamad Iqbal Mazeli. Effects of Population Weighting on PM 10 Concentration Estimation. Journal of Environmental and Public Health 2020, 2020 , 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1561823
  74. Yi Zhou, Lianshui Li. Complex PM 2.5 Pollution and Hospital Admission for Respiratory Diseases over Big Data in Cloud Environment. Complexity 2020, 2020 , 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1301047
  75. Thiago Nogueira, Prashant Kumar, Adelaide Nardocci, Maria de Fatima Andrade. Public health implications of particulate matter inside bus terminals in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Science of The Total Environment 2020, 711 , 135064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135064
  76. Ionica Oncioiu, Tatiana Dănescu, Maria-Alexandra Popa. Air-Pollution Control in an Emergent Market: Does It Work? Evidence from Romania. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020, 17 (8) , 2656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082656
  77. David Aguiar-Gil, Luisa M. Gómez-Peláez, Tatiana Álvarez-Jaramillo, Mauricio A. Correa-Ochoa, Julio C. Saldarriaga-Molina. Evaluating the impact of PM2.5 atmospheric pollution on population mortality in an urbanized valley in the American tropics. Atmospheric Environment 2020, 224 , 117343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117343
  78. Guohong Liu, Xiliang Yan, Alexander Sedykh, Xiujiao Pan, Xiaoli Zhao, Bing Yan, Hao Zhu. Analysis of model PM2.5-induced inflammation and cytotoxicity by the combination of a virtual carbon nanoparticle library and computational modeling. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2020, 191 , 110216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110216
  79. Zhe Wang, Youfang Zhang, Xiu Yun Daphne Ma, Jiaming Ang, Zhihui Zeng, Bing Feng Ng, Man Pun Wan, Shing-Chung Wong, Xuehong Lu. Polymer/MOF-derived multilayer fibrous membranes for moisture-wicking and efficient capturing both fine and ultrafine airborne particles. Separation and Purification Technology 2020, 235 , 116183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116183
  80. Jing-Shiang Hwang, Tsuey-Hwa Hu. Later-Life Exposure to Moderate PM2.5 Air Pollution and Life Loss of Older Adults in Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020, 17 (6) , 1873. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061873
  81. Kathleen E. Berg, Kaylee M. Clark, Xiaoying Li, Ellison M. Carter, John Volckens, Charles S. Henry. High-throughput, semi-automated dithiothreitol (DTT) assays for oxidative potential of fine particulate matter. Atmospheric Environment 2020, 222 , 117132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117132
  82. Milad Pirhadi, Amirhosein Mousavi, Sina Taghvaee, Martin M. Shafer, Constantinos Sioutas. Semi-volatile components of PM2.5 in an urban environment: Volatility profiles and associated oxidative potential. Atmospheric Environment 2020, 223 , 117197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117197
  83. Yunquan Zhang, Qianqian Xiang, Chuanhua Yu, Zhiming Yang. Asthma mortality is triggered by short-term exposures to ambient air pollutants: Evidence from a Chinese urban population. Atmospheric Environment 2020, 223 , 117271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117271
  84. Beidi Diao, Lei Ding, Qiong Zhang, Junli Na, Jinhua Cheng. Impact of Urbanization on PM2.5-Related Health and Economic Loss in China 338 Cities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020, 17 (3) , 990. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030990
  85. Wilmar Hernandez, Alfredo Mendez, Rasa Zalakeviciute, Angela Maria Diaz-Marquez. Robust Confidence Intervals for PM2.5 Concentration Measurements in the Ecuadorian Park La Carolina. Sensors 2020, 20 (3) , 654. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030654
  86. Mark R. Miller, Jennifer B. Raftis. Evidence from toxicological and mechanistic studies. 2020,,, 229-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818122-5.00010-7
  87. C.N. Maesano, G. Morel, A. Matynia, N. Ratsombath, J. Bonnety, G. Legros, P. Da Costa, J. Prud'homme, I. Annesi-Maesano. Impacts on human mortality due to reductions in PM10 concentrations through different traffic scenarios in Paris, France. Science of The Total Environment 2020, 698 , 134257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134257
  88. Qiuxuan Wu, Yongmei Jiang, Ting Shi, Jinzi Miao, Bing Qi, Rongguang Du, Yanbin Luo, Xiaoni Chi. Quantifying Analysis of the Impact of Haze on Photovoltaic Power Generation. IEEE Access 2020, 8 , 215977-215986. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3041505
  89. Quanyang Lu, Benjamin N. Murphy, Momei Qin, Peter J. Adams, Yunliang Zhao, Havala O. T. Pye, Christos Efstathiou, Chris Allen, Allen L. Robinson. Simulation of organic aerosol formation during the CalNex study: updated mobile emissions and secondary organic aerosol parameterization for intermediate-volatility organic compounds. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2020, 20 (7) , 4313-4332. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4313-2020
  90. Shahzad Gani, Sahil Bhandari, Kanan Patel, Sarah Seraj, Prashant Soni, Zainab Arub, Gazala Habib, Lea Hildebrandt Ruiz, Joshua S. Apte. Particle number concentrations and size distribution in a polluted megacity: the Delhi Aerosol Supersite study. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2020, 20 (14) , 8533-8549. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8533-2020
  91. David H. Hagan, Jesse H. Kroll. Assessing the accuracy of low-cost optical particle sensors using a physics-based approach. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 2020, 13 (11) , 6343-6355. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6343-2020
  92. Scott D. Chambers, Agnieszka Podstawczyńska. Improved method for characterising temporal variability in urban air quality part II: Particulate matter and precursors in central Poland. Atmospheric Environment 2019, 219 , 117040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117040
  93. T. Sayahi, D. Kaufman, T. Becnel, K. Kaur, A.E. Butterfield, S. Collingwood, Y. Zhang, P.-E. Gaillardon, K.E. Kelly. Development of a calibration chamber to evaluate the performance of low-cost particulate matter sensors. Environmental Pollution 2019, 255 , 113131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113131
  94. Liang Zhao, Wenyan Wu, Shengming Li. Design and Implementation of an IoT-Based Indoor Air Quality Detector With Multiple Communication Interfaces. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 2019, 6 (6) , 9621-9632. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2019.2930191
  95. Haina Zheng, Ke Xiong, Pingyi Fan, Zhangdui Zhong. Data Analysis on Outdoor–Indoor Air Quality Variation: Buildings’ Producing Dynamic Filter Effects. IEEE Systems Journal 2019, 13 (4) , 4386-4397. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2019.2910594
  96. Zeng, Du, Zhang. Spatial-Temporal Effects of PM2.5 on Health Burden: Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019, 16 (23) , 4695. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234695
  97. Hanna Boogaard, Katherine Walker, Aaron J Cohen. Air pollution: the emergence of a major global health risk factor. International Health 2019, 11 (6) , 417-421. https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihz078
  98. Mark R Miller, David E Newby. Air pollution and cardiovascular disease: car sick. Cardiovascular Research 2019, 380 https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvz228
  99. Weiwu Zou, Baoshan Gu, Shiqing Sun, Shidong Wang, Xin Li, Haoqi Zhao, Peiyan Yang. Preparation of a graphene oxide membrane for air purification. Materials Research Express 2019, 6 (10) , 105624. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab3eec
  100. Qucheng Deng, Yongping Wei, Lijuan Chen, Wei Liang, Jijun Du, Yuling Tan, Yinjun Zhao. Relationship between Air Pollution and Regional Longevity in Guangxi, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019, 16 (19) , 3733. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193733
Load all citations
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Example survival curves for observed life tables (solid lines) and simulated cause-deleted life tables (dashed lines) where ambient PM2.5 exposure is eliminated as a mortality risk factor. Life expectancy e0 can be visualized as the integral of the survival curve over the age spectrum. Life expectancy for the counterfactual case is increased after removing PM2.5 as a mortality risk. For a given country, the reduction in life expectancy attributed to PM2.5 (ΔLE) relative to a counterfactual scenario with no excess mortality risk from PM2.5 can be visualized as the area between the solid and dashed curves.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Relationship among the global distribution of ΔLE, the life expectancy decrement from PM2.5, and global PM2.5 concentrations C. ΔLE is generally higher in countries with higher PM2.5 levels. (a) Global distribution of population with respect to annual-average PM2.5 for year 2016. Plotted data reflect local smoothing of bin-width-normalized distributions computed over 400 logarithmically spaced bins: equal-sized plotted areas reflect equal populations. Each country is colored proportionally to the ΔLE from PM2.5 exposure. (b) Cumulative distribution of ΔLE over the global population. The global population-weighted median value for ΔLE is 1.22 years, corresponding to conditions in China. Shading for each country shows the national population-weighted mean PM2.5, illustrating how ΔLE has a strong but imperfect association with PM2.5. (c) National decrements in ΔLE vs PM2.5. Owing to the supralinear concentration–response relationship of mortality with PM2.5, the slope of this distribution is higher for countries with lower average PM2.5 concentrations.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Global maps of the life expectancy decrement ΔLE from PM2.5. Panel a shows baseline ΔLE for year-2016 concentrations (global population-weighted mean and median of 1.03 and 1.22 years, respectively). Panel b shows hypothetical gains in life expectancy for an alternative exposure distribution where concentrations are limited to a maximum of 10 μg m–3, the WHO air quality guideline concentration (global-average ΔLE of ∼0.59 year). See also Table S2.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 35 other publications.

    1. 1
      Lim, S. S.; Vos, T.; Flaxman, A. D.; Danaei, G.; Shibuya, K.; Adair-Rohani, H.; Amann, M.; Anderson, H. R.; Andrews, K. G.; Aryee, M. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012, 380, 22242260,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8
    2. 2
      Cohen, A. J.; Anderson, H. R.; Ostro, B.; Pandey, K. D.; Krzyzanowski, M.; Künzli, N.; Gutschmidt, K.; Pope, A.; Romieu, I.; Samet, J. M.; Smith, K. The global burden of disease due to outdoor air pollution. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part A 2005, 68, 13011307,  DOI: 10.1080/15287390590936166
    3. 3
      Cohen, A. J.; Brauer, M.; Burnett, R.; Anderson, H. R.; Frostad, J.; Estep, K.; Balakrishnan, K.; Brunekreef, B.; Dandona, L.; Dandona, R. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet 2017, 389, 19071918,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6
    4. 4
      Gakidou, E.; Afshin, A.; Abajobir, A. A.; Abate, K. H.; Abbafati, C.; Abbas, K. M.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdulle, A. M.; Abera, S. F.; Aboyans, V. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017, 390, 13451422,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32366-8
    5. 5
      Lave, L. B.; Seskin, E. P. Does air pollution shorten lives? In Statistical and Mathematical Aspects of Pollution Problems; Pratt, J., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1974; pp 223244.
    6. 6
      Lave, L. B.; Seskin, E. P. An analysis of the association between U.S. mortality and air pollution. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1973, 68, 284290,  DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1973.10482421
    7. 7
      Thibodeau, L. A.; Reed, R. B.; Bishop, Y. M.; Kammerman, L. A. Air pollution and human health: a review and reanalysis. Environ. Health Persp. 1980, 34, 165183,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8034165
    8. 8
      Schwartz, J. Harvesting and long term exposure effects in the relation between air pollution and mortality. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2000, 151, 440448,  DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010228
    9. 9
      Künzli, N.; Medina, S.; Kaiser, R.; Quenel, P.; Horak, F., Jr.; Studnicka, M. Assessment of deaths attributable to air pollution: Should we use risk estimates based on time series or on cohort studies?. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001, 153, 10501055,  DOI: 10.1093/aje/153.11.1050
    10. 10
      Brunekreef, B. Air pollution and life expectancy: is there a relation?. Occup. Environ. Med. 1997, 54, 781784,  DOI: 10.1136/oem.54.11.781
    11. 11
      Pope, C. A.; Ezzati, M.; Dockery, D. W. Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 376386,  DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0805646
    12. 12
      Correia, A. W.; Pope, C. A., III; Dockery, D. W.; Wang, Y.; Ezzati, M.; Dominici, F. Effect of air pollution control on life expectancy in the United States. Epidemiol. 2013, 24, 2331,  DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182770237
    13. 13
      Ebenstein, A.; Fan, M.; Greenstone, M.; He, G.; Zhou, M. New evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China’s Huai River Policy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017, 114, 10384,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1616784114
    14. 14
      Pope, C. A.; Dockery, D. W. Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: Lines that connect. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2006, 56, 709742,  DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485
    15. 15
      Baccarelli, A. A.; Hales, N.; Burnett, R. T.; Jerrett, M.; Mix, C.; Dockery, D. W.; Pope, C. A. Particulate air pollution, exceptional aging, and rates of centenarians: A nationwide analysis of the United States, 1980–2010. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124, 17441750,  DOI: 10.1289/EHP197
    16. 16
      Chen, Y.; Ebenstein, A.; Greenstone, M.; Li, H. Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China’s Huai River policy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110, 1293612941,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1300018110
    17. 17
      Fann, N.; Kim, S.-Y.; Olives, C.; Sheppard, L. Estimated changes in life expectancy and adult mortality resulting from declining PM2.5 exposures in the contiguous United States: 1980–2010. Environ. Health Perspect. 2017, 125, 097003  DOI: 10.1289/EHP507
    18. 18
      Pope, C. A.; Dockery, D. W. Air pollution and life expectancy in China and beyond. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110, 12861,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1310925110
    19. 19
      Arias, E.; Heron, M.; Tejada-Vara, B. United States life tables eliminating certain causes of death, 1999–2001. National Vital Statistics Reports 2013, 61, 9
    20. 20
      Tsai, S. P.; Lee, E. S.; Hardy, R. J. The effect of a reduction in leading causes of death: Potential gains in life expectancy. Am. J. Public Health 1978, 68, 966971,  DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.68.10.966
    21. 21
      Apte, J. S.; Marshall, J. D.; Brauer, M.; Cohen, A. J. Addressing global mortality from ambient PM2.5. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 80578066,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01236
    22. 22
      Burnett, R. T.; Pope, C. A.; Ezzati, M.; Olives, C.; Lim, S. S.; Mehta, S.; Shin, H. H.; Singh, G.; Hubbell, B.; Brauer, M. An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 397403,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1307049
    23. 23
      Nasari, M. M.; Szyszkowicz, M.; Chen, H.; Crouse, D.; Turner, M. C.; Jerrett, M.; Pope, C. A.; Hubbell, B.; Fann, N.; Cohen, A. A class of non-linear exposure-response models suitable for health impact assessment applicable to large cohort studies of ambient air pollution. Air Qual., Atmos. Health 2016, 9, 961972,  DOI: 10.1007/s11869-016-0398-z
    24. 24
      Brauer, M.; Freedman, G.; Frostad, J.; van Donkelaar, A.; Martin, R. V.; Dentener, F.; Dingenen, R. v.; Estep, K.; Amini, H.; Apte, J. S. Ambient air pollution exposure estimation for the Global Burden of Disease 2013. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 7988,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03709
    25. 25
      Shaddick, G.; Thomas, M. L.; Green, A.; Brauer, M.; van Donkelaar, A.; Burnett, R.; Chang, H. H.; Cohen, A.; van Dingenen, R.; Dora, C. Data integration model for air quality: A hierarchical approach to the global estimation of exposures to ambient air pollution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics 2018, 67, 231253,  DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12227
    26. 26
      Shaddick, G.; Thomas, M.; Amini, H.; Broday, D. M.; Cohen, A.; Frostad, J.; Green, A.; Gumy, S.; Liu, Y.; Martin, R. V. Data integration for the assessment of population exposure to ambient air pollution for global burden of disease assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02864
    27. 27
      Ke, C.; Gupta, R.; Xavier, D.; Prabhakaran, D.; Mathur, P.; Kalkonde, Y. V.; Kolpak, P.; Suraweera, W.; Jha, P.; Allarakha, S. Divergent trends in ischaemic heart disease and stroke mortality in India from 2000 to 2015: a nationally representative mortality study. Lancet Global Health 2018, 6, e914e923,  DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30242-0
    28. 28
      Marshall, J. D.; Apte, J. S.; Coggins, J. S.; Goodkind, A. L. Blue skies bluer?. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 1392913936,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03154
    29. 29
      Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. GBD 2016 Results Tool. http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool, 2017 (accessed July 11, 2018).
    30. 30
      Pope, C. A.; Burnett, R. T.; Turner, M. C.; Cohen, A.; Krewski, D.; Jerrett, M.; Gapstur, S. M.; Thun, M. J. Lung cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality associated with ambient air pollution and cigarette smoke: Shape of the exposure–response relationships. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 16161621,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1103639
    31. 31
      Pope, C. A.; Burnett, R. T.; Krewski, D.; Jerrett, M.; Shi, Y.; Calle, E. E.; Thun, M. J. Cardiovascular mortality and exposure to airborne fine particulate matter and cigarette smoke: Shape of the exposure-response relationship. Circulation 2009, 120, 941948,  DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.857888
    32. 32
      Smith, K. R.; Peel, J. L. Mind the gap. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118, 16431645,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1002517
    33. 33
      Pope, C. A.; Cropper, M.; Coggins, J.; Cohen, A. Health benefits of air pollution abatement policy: Role of the shape of the concentration-response function. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2015, 65, 516522,  DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2014.993004
    34. 34
      Smith, K. R.; Ezzati, M. How environmental health risks change with development: The epidemiologic and environmental risk transitions revisited. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resources 2005, 30, 291333,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144424
    35. 35
      Salomon, J. A.; Murray, C. J. L. The epidemiologic transition revisited: Compositional models for causes of death by age and sex. Population & Development Review 2002, 28, 205228,  DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00205.x
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00360.

    • Detailed information about life table methods, supporting figures, and supporting tables (PDF)

    • Data file with results for 185 countries (XLSX)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

OOPS

You have to login with your ACS ID befor you can login with your Mendeley account.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE