Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Phosphorus Removal from Dirty Farmyard Water by Activated Anaerobic-Digestion-Derived Biochar
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Separations

Phosphorus Removal from Dirty Farmyard Water by Activated Anaerobic-Digestion-Derived Biochar
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Chen Zhang
    Chen Zhang
    School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Queens University Belfast, BelfastBT7 1NN, United Kingdom
    More by Chen Zhang
  • Shuzhuang Sun
    Shuzhuang Sun
    School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Queens University Belfast, BelfastBT7 1NN, United Kingdom
  • Shaojun Xu
    Shaojun Xu
    School of Chemistry, Cardiff University, CardiffCF10 3AT, United Kingdom
    UK Catalysis Hub, Research Complex at Harwell, DidcotOX11 0FA, United Kingdom
    More by Shaojun Xu
  • Chris Johnston
    Chris Johnston
    The Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, BelfastBT9 5PX, United Kingdom
  • Chunfei Wu*
    Chunfei Wu
    School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Queens University Belfast, BelfastBT7 1NN, United Kingdom
    *Email: [email protected]
    More by Chunfei Wu
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Cite this: Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2023, 62, 45, 19216–19224
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c02668
Published December 5, 2022

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The management of anaerobic digestate is important to realize the value of the waste and enhance the whole system sustainability of anaerobic digestion. In this study, the phosphorus treatment of dirty irrigation water by biochar samples derived from digestate of anaerobic digestion were investigated. The biochars were further activated by steam activation with different duration time and KOH activation with different introducing ratios; the textural properties of biochars were optimized after activation from the aspect of biochar characterization. Notably, AD-N2 demonstrates a remarkable adsorption effect of phosphorus, with an adsorption efficiency of 8.99 mg g–1. Besides the effect of biochar dosage on phosphorus removal, adsorption kinetics and thermodynamic isotherms are studied. According to the adsorption kinetics, the adsorption of phosphorus from dirty water fits the Elovich equation (R2 = 0.95). Furthermore, the thermodynamic isotherm results illustrate the process of phosphorus removal by biochar is endothermic (ΔH0 = 17.93 kJ mol–1) and spontaneous (ΔS = 96.24 J mol–1 K–1). Therefore, this work suggests a promising solution to phosphorus-related environmental challenges in industry and agriculture.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

SPECIAL ISSUE

This article is part of the Vivek Ranade Festschrift special issue.

1. Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Phosphorus-rich water can cause severe environmental problems. (1) The increasing phosphorus concentration in surface and groundwater systems can cause eutrophication due to rapid socio-economic development. (2) Consequently, phosphorus pollution in the ecological system can gradually evolve into the phenomenon of eutrophication, which could have devastating impacts on aquatic ecosystems (3) and environmental sustainability. (4) Typically, the main origins of phosphorus entering the environment are related to industrial discharge (5) (phosphorus-contained detergents), agricultural activities (6) (waste from animal husbandry and misuse of phosphorus fertilizers), and municipal sewage. Hence, it is essential to avoid phosphorus discharge and remove phosphorus from the eutrophic aqueous system.
Nowadays, the typical phosphorus removal and adsorption methods are chemical precipitation, (7) biological methods, (8) and solid sorbents adsorption. (9) Solid sorbent adsorption is the comprehensive method to achieve phosphorus removal and due to the wide variety of adsorbents. The leading candidates of the adsorbents are fly ash, (10) steel slag, (11) activated carbons, (12) and metal oxides. (13) However, although metal oxides (especially iron oxides) are recognized as state-of-the-art adsorbents for phosphorus removal, the high cost and the difficulties of sorbent recycling are the main problems. (14) Therefore, compared to metal oxide sorbents, carbonous materials are promising for phosphorus adsorption due to their low costs, environmentally benign, and easy modification.
Biochar, a carbonous material, has been used as an efficient solid sorbent for phosphorus removal, carbon capture and soil amendment. (15) It is a carbon-rich, highly aromatic, and stable solid substance produced from biomass pyrolysis under total or partial hypoxia. (16) Nonactivated biochar has lower phosphorus removal abilities than activated biochar, (17) which is attributed to the negative surface charge that promotes electrostatic repulsive interaction with phosphorus molecules. (18) Consequently, the biochar activation process suggests a positive effect on phosphorus adsorption performance via modifying the surface area, functional group, and porosity of biochar sorbents. (19) Moreover, the phosphorus adsorption performance of biochar is also related to the feedstock of biochars. According to the reported works, (20) nonactivated biochar has various phosphorus removal abilities in a range between 1.37 and 193 mg g–1. (20) However, not all biochars reduce phosphorus in wastewater, and some biochars with high P content would discharge phosphorus from the inside when immersed in an aqueous solution. (21) Therefore, suitable biomass feedstock and biochar activation are essential for phosphorus removal.
Digestate from anaerobic digestion (AD) is a common waste produced by biogas plants and agricultural activities, (22) and the management methods of the digestate are mainly as a fertilizer and a soil amendment compound. (23) However, combustion and landfill of AD digestate may create various environmental concerns potentially, (24) such as greenhouse gas emissions and eutrophication of soil and water systems, due to the poor biological stability and nutrient loss. Hence, to explore alternative applications of AD digestate in various fields, AD digestate has been applied to generate biochar by hydrothermal carbonization (25) and one-pot synthesis. (23) Presently, AD digestate biochar has been utilized in the field of fertilizer, (26) carbon capture, (23) and fuel production. (27) To our knowledge, AD biochar has the advantages of large production yield, abundant elements, easy preparation, and luxuriant surface functional groups, which are the potential possibilities for applying AD biochar in wastewater treatment. However, although Alberto et al. (28) reported that digestate-generated biochar could be determined as a potential sorbent for phosphorus adsorption, (28) the deficiency of evidence about phosphorus removal by AD digestate biochar still exists.
Notably, though the adsorption of phosphorus from aqueous solution by biochar has been investigated over the past decades, (20,29) studying the P removal performance of biochars when dealing with actual wastewater is rare. (30) Herein, the phosphorus solution in this work was obtained from real agricultural irrigation dirty water. Meanwhile, to promote the idea of using wastes to treat wastes, AD digestate biochar was chosen to explore its feasibility in phosphorus removal from dirty water. Therefore, the present study has examined the phosphorus removal by AD digestate biochar under different sorbent activation conditions, considering the effect of steam activation and chemical activation on phosphorus adsorption from dirty water.

2. Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

2.1. Activation of the Biochar

The AD digestate solids were derived from AFBI by anaerobically digesting dairy cow slurry and silage. The digestate was dehydrated with the use of a FAN Press Screw Separator. The crude AD digestate solids were ground and sieved, then dried to a powder in an oven overnight at 105 °C. The dry precursor was named AD-Origin. Around 5 g of AD-Origin was placed into a quartz tube, and a syringe pump was used to introduce water at a flow rate of 10 mL h–1 to introduce water vapor carried by nitrogen gas at a gas flow rate of 100 mL min–1. The horizontal tube furnace was then heated to 550 °C before steam was introduced into the reactor. The activation processes were conducted at 550 °C for 30 and 60 min, respectively, and the corresponding activated samples were named AD-Steam-0.5h and AD-Steam-1.0h. Additionally, the sample not treated with water vapor is regarded as AD-N2.
Dried AD digestate solids were mixed with KOH powder by mortar and pestle at the ratio of 1:0.5 and 1:1. Afterward, the sample was calcined at 550 °C for 1 h in the horizontal tube furnace under an atmosphere of N2 (100 mL min–1). Then, the sample was washed with hydrochloride solution and deionized water until neutral and dried at 110 °C overnight. The final samples were denoted as AD-KOH-1:0.5 and AD-KOH-1:1.

2.2. Measurement of Phosphorus in Dirty Water

Typically, definite AD biochar was immersed into the sewage supplied by Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI), stirring the mixture solution at a particular time. First, 0.1 g samples of different biochars are immersed in 20 mL of dirty water to determine the phosphorus removal ability of various biochar samples. Next, we added different amounts of AD-N2 and AD-Steam-1.0h separately in 20 mL of dirty water to evaluate the effect of biochar dosages on P removal ability and percentage. Moreover, 0.25 g of biochar was added to 100 mL of dirty water to study the kinetics and thermodynamics (adsorption temperatures are 298, 308, and 318 K) of phosphorus removal by AD biochars.
From the perspective of phosphorus detection, a small amount of solution was collected for each sample at different adsorption times. 0.2 mL sample solutions were added for specific sample vials with 2.8 mL of distilled water, and 3 mL phosphorus determination reagent (the preparation of the regent is shown in the Supporting Information) was added to the vials. The samples were kept in a 45 °C water bath for 25 min to ensure the samples entirely achieve coloration. The phosphorus coloration with determination reagent has a characterized peak at 820 nm detected by UV–vis spectrometer chromatography (PerkinElmer Lambda 800). The phosphorus concentration can be calculated using a calibration curve and UV–vis adsorption values (Figure S1).

2.3. Characterization

The content and composition of C, H, and N in the biochar samples were determined by CHNS Element Analyzer (PerkinElmer PE2400). Temperature-programmed oxidation (TPO) analysis was performed using a TA Instruments TGA 2950 thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) under an air atmosphere to measure moisture, ash, and volatile matter contents. Around 20 mg of sample was heated to 850 °C at 10 °C min–1 under N2 flowing (100 mL min–1) to obtain the content of moisture and volatiles. The presence of functional and aromatic groups on the surface of biochar samples was determined by ATR-FTIR (Agilent Cary 630 spectrometer), and the spectra in the range of 3000–1400 cm–1 band were analyzed. The multipoint BET surface area was measured with a Quantachrome instrument, using the adsorption of N2 at 77 K. The surface morphology of the material was determined by scanning electron microscope (SEM) using JEOL JSM-6610LV, and the distribution of elements on the surface of samples was monitored using an energy-dispersive X-ray analyzer (SEM-EDX).

3. Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

3.1. Biochar Characterization

C, H, O, N, and metallic elements are the main components of biochar. (31)Table 1 provides an overview of the elementary constituents of AD biochar. The precursor has 41.46% carbon element, and H can reach 5.45%, which has hydrogen content similar to the other digestate. (23,32) Additionally, proximate analysis results detected by TG and TPO are shown in Table 1, which indicates that the volatile matters of different types of biochar decreased significantly, from 79.71% to about 60% after pyrolysis. After pyrolysis and activation, biochar samples exhibit higher C content values than AD-Origin because volatile matter escapes under moderate pyrolysis temperature. Besides, AD-KOH-1:1 has 33.24% carbon content, possibly due to the high quantity of KOH introduced during activation, and the potassium content transformed to metal oxide as ash content. Even though the hydrochloride solution was used to extract potassium from biochar, it is difficult to entirely eliminate the potassium element in KOH-acctivated biochar sample.
Table 1. Proximate Analysis Results and CHNS Contents (wt %)
 proximate analysiselement analysis 
sample namemoisture (%)volatile matter (%)fixed carbon (%)ash (%)CHNSSBET(m2 g–1)a
AD-Origin4.7533.2146.5015.5441.465.451.85<0.303.13
AD-N24.146.1354.5235.2152.441.361.58<0.307.78
AD-Steam-0.5h2.295.1654.7937.7649.611.381.41<0.3020.52
AD-Steam-1.0h3.804.9860.3730.8554.191.681.41<0.30117.94
AD-KOH-1:0.54.285.9353.2736.5243.291.551.22<0.3039.52
AD-KOH-1:11.746.4447.2444.5833.241.620.86<0.30189.48
a

BET surface area.

The BET surface area of the AD biochar sample is shown in Table 1. The dry precursor does not exhibit a promising surface area (3.13 m2 g–1), and the activated biochar samples show significant enhancement. Specifically, the surface area of physically activated biochar increased with the activation time postponed to 1.0 h, which suggests 117.94 m2 g–1. While the potassium hydroxide activated biochar shows the same trend of surface area change, it has a surface area of 189.48 m2 g–1 when the ratio of biochar and KOH is 1:1.
Furthermore, Figure 1 presents the results of TG and TPO analysis. The DTG-TPO profile of AD-Origin shows the oxidation peaks at 310 and 475 °C. However, the oxidation peaks are merged and shifted when AD-Origin is carbonized and activated. AD biochars generated under nitrogen and moisture show broad peaks in the range of 350–475 °C, while the oxidation peaks of KOH-activated biochar have a similar oxidation temperature range compared to AD-Origin. Generally, the lower temperature oxidation peak suggests the presence of volatile matter and amorphous carbon, and the peak at higher temperatures illustrates the oxidation of the main carbon of the biochar samples. The high oxidation temperature of biochar also suggests a more stable char structure, (33) possibly because the cellulose and lignin within AD-Origin were oxidized during biochar production and activation. (34)

Figure 1

Figure 1. TGA-TPO and DTG-TPO profiles of the AD biochars with the varied activated method.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) indicates the microcosmic morphology of AD biochars. Figure 2a shows the structure of AD-Origin, and the noncorrosive and less-porous form is revealed. Additionally, the tubular structure appeared on high-temperature pyrolysis biochar (AD-N2). Moreover, Figure 2c,d and 2e,f show intense contrast due to the effects of different activation methods on biochar morphological structure. Steam activation and KOH activation also formed tubular structures. More crucially, the canal structures facilitated the diffusion of KOH into the interior of biochar to generate porosity (Figure 2f). (35)

Figure 2

Figure 2. SEM micrographs of (a) AD-Origin, (b) AD-N2, (c) AD-Steam-0.5h, (d) AD-Steam-1.0h, (e) AD-KOH-1:0.5, and (f) AD-KOH-1:1.

Furthermore, the distribution of elements in the biochar samples was analyzed by SEM-EDX, and the results are shown in Figure S2. The subtle color differences of C, N, and O demonstrate that the activation showed little effect on main element content changing. On the contrary, the content of the potassium element is dramatically elevated in AD-KOH-1:0.5 and AD-KOH-1:1 due to the introduction of the KOH.
Furthermore, FTIR is applied to understand the surface functional groups, including −OH, C═C, C–C, −CHx (x = 1, 2, 3), C═O, and aromatic bonds. As shown in Figure 3, the FTIR results of AD-Origin illustrate the N–O stretching at 1587 and 1505 cm–1, while 1400–1000 cm–1 generally suggests oxygen-contained bending and the 1259 and 1215 cm–1 correspond to the C–O stretching of aromatic ester and alkyl aryl ether. Additionally, the wide strong appearance at 1021 cm–1 shows the CO-O–CO stretching of anhydride. Moreover, all the AD biochars exhibit a peak at 872 cm–1, which illustrates the N–H stretching. (23) In addition, the activated AD biochars show a decrease of absorbance at a high adsorption wavelength range, whereas peaks in 2500–1900 cm–1 become the main characters of the sorbents. C═O groups have a specific peaks appearing in the ranges of 2000–1650 cm–1 and 1500–850 cm–1, which still contain the weak signal of aromatic C–H bending. (36) It is worth noting that the central double bond groups, such as O═C═O, C═N, and C═C═C, give an intense appearance at 2400–2000 cm–1. Herein, the −OH stretching (3500–3200 cm–1) vanishing occurs when the AD biochars are activated. He et al. (37) examined the appearance trend of −OH stretching and aliphatic −CH (2314 cm–1) and reported that the intensity of signals was reduced after increasing the pyrolysis temperature. Hence, the hydroxide surface group in AD biochar could easily be decomposed at 550 °C.

Figure 3

Figure 3. ATR-FTIR spectra of AD biochar samples.

3.2. Phosphorus Adsorption

Figure 4a indicates phosphorus removal efficiency using 0.1 g of steam- and chemical-activated samples when 20 mL of dirty water was used for the adsorption at room temperature. AD-Origin, as the feedstock, demonstrates the ability to remove phosphorus in dirty water; however, the removal capacity is only 2.50 mg g–1. The removal abilities of the biochars are higher than AD-Origin. In particular, AD-N2 and AD-Steam-1.0h show high P removal capacities at 5.89 and 5.56 mg g–1, respectively. Generally, the physical-activated biochar samples (N2 and steam) are more active in removing phosphorus from the dirty water than KOH-activated biochar. AD-KOH-1:0.5 and AD-KOH-1:1 only show P removal abilities of 3.38 and 3.17 mg g–1, respectively. Typically, phosphorus uptake by biochar can not be attributed to intraparticle diffusion by surface textural structure. (38) Although many studies have reported high phosphorus uptake due to the high surface area and well-developed mesoporous, (39) the key contribution of P uptake should be ascribed to the electrostatic interaction between sorbent and phosphorus. (18) Notably, mesopores (>3 nm) of activated carbon show a high correlation with the process of phosphorus adsorption in low P concentration. (40) Therefore, KOH-activated biochars are unsuitable for adsorbing phosphorus because of the preference for micropores generation after KOH activation. (41)

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Phosphorus removal ability of different activated AD biochar samples. (b) Effect of biochar dosage on phosphorus adsorption ability and percentage.

As AD-N2 and AD-Steam-1.0h show excellent performance of P removal, these biochar samples were used to detect the effect of dosage on P removal ability. From Figure 4b, the phosphorus removal rates of the two selected biochar samples are significantly reduced when the biochar dosage is increased. The P removal capacity of AD-N2 decreases from 9.22 to 0.99 mg g–1. Moreover, for AD-Steam-1.0h, the ability of P removal is decreased from 7.37 to 1.73 mg g–1 when the amount of biochar increases from 0.05 to 0.5 g due to the enhanced adsorption sites. (42) Furthermore, phosphorus removal percentage is evaluated as the typical standard to measure the performance of adsorbents in phosphorus adsorption, which is also enhanced with the augment of biochar dosage. AD-N2 phosphorus removal percentage is maintained at 72–91%; by contrast, the removal rate of AD-Steam-1.0h continues to increase from 47% to ∼90%, also ascribed to the increase of adsorption. (43) Therefore, according to the removal efficiency and the sample input amount, the biochar dosage of 2.5 g L–1 was selected for the following kinetic and thermodynamic analysis.
It is noted that kinetics is important for phosphorus adsorption using biochar. In order to investigate the adsorption kinetics of phosphorus removal by biochar, the Elovich equation, pseudo-first-order, and pseudo-second-order models are used to describe the adsorption process. The Elovich equation is generally used for the adsorption of solid adsorbents and is typically uniquely representative of the absorption and release of phosphorus in the soil. (44) Meanwhile, pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetics models (45) are widely modeled in adsorption experiments. Therefore, these three equations simulate the investigation of AD biochar adsorption of phosphorus in dirty water. For the parameters of the kinetic models, c (mg g–1) is the phosphorus removal ability (mg g–1); c1 (mg g–1) and c2 (mg g–1) are the theoretical efficiencies when adsorption reaches equilibrium; a and b are the constants for the Elovich equation; and k1 (g mg–1 min–1) and k2 (g mg–1 min–1) are the pseudokinetic equation constants.

Elovich:

c=1alnt+1aln(a×b)
(1)

Pseudo-first-order equation:

c=c1(1ek1t)
(2)

Pseudo-second-order equation:

c=c22k2t1+c2k2t
(3)
As shown in Figure 5 and Table 2, AD-N2 and AD-Steam-1.0h reach stable phosphorus adsorption with increased stirring time. The adsorption processes are in equilibrium after ∼300 min, and the average adsorption abilities of AD-N2 and AD-Steam-1.0h are 8.99 and 7.98 mg g–1, respectively. Moreover, the theoretical P adsorption abilities of AD-N2 obtained from the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order are 8.44 and 8.69 mg g–1, while the removal efficiencies of AD-Steam-1.0h shown from the pseudokinetic models are 6.68 and 7.09 mg g–1, respectively. Typically, the higher coefficient of determination (R2) of the pseudo-second-order model illustrates the preference of chemisorption processes during the phosphorus adsorption by biochar as in previous studies, (39,46) which formed the valency forces entailed from exchanging electrons between sorbents and phosphorus. (47) Besides the pseudokinetic models, the Elovich model shows a high correlation. The R2 value of the P adsorption process by AD-N2 is higher than 0.95, proving that the Elovich equation can simulate the adsorption process of phosphorus in dirty water by AD biochar sample. As reported by Wang, (42) the Elovich kinetic is more suitable for the actual nonuniform surface with solid absorbent varied dramatically during the reaction process.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Adsorption kinetic fitting curves of phosphorus removal by AD-N2 and AD-Steam-1.0h.

Table 2. Parameters of Kinetic Equations for ADB Phosphorus Removal
 Elovichpseudo-first-orderpseudo-second-order
 abR2c1k1R2c2k2R2
AD-N21.56140.630.958.440.360.348.690.060.64
AD-Steam-1.0h1.53122.980.966.680.260.497.090.050.75
Adsorption isotherms can be implemented to explore the adsorption capacity of AD biochars at various P concentrations under constant temperatures. Langmuir, Freundlich, and Langmuir–Freundlich are used for curve fitting. In the simulated equations, c0 (mg g–1) is the theoretical P removal ability; KL (L mg–1), KF (L mg–1), and n are constants for the Langmuir and Freundlich equations.

Langmuir:

c=c0KLcx1+KLcx
(4)

Freundlich:

c=KFcx1/n
(5)

Langmuir–Freundlich:

c=c0KLcxn1+KLcxn
(6)
As shown in Figure 6, the phosphorus removal efficiency of AD-Steam-1.0h increases as the concentration of phosphorus increases. The results show that the theoretical maximum adsorption capacities obtained by Langmuir and Langmuir–Freundlich equations are 37.37 and 22.40 mg g–1 (shown in Table 3), with the R2 values of uptake higher than 0.95, respectively. The difference between the two theoretical adsorption abilities (c0) from Langmuir and Langmuir–Freundlich equations could not be neglected. The Langmuir model is generally suitable for homogeneous surface adsorption, and on the contrary, the Freundlich model is ideal for irregular morphology adsorbents (e.g., biochar). (48) Typically, the Langmuir and Freundlich models are widely used to fit isotherms in phosphorus removal, so the results obtained from the Langmuir–Freundlich equation may be more reliable. However, although more observed data samples can obtain more accurate fitting results, the phosphorus concentration in the dirty water can not be concentrated. Hence, only five observed values are fitted for the isothermal models, and it is suggested that all three models (R2 > 0.9) are suitable to simulate phosphorus adsorption when the phosphorus concentration is in the range of 0–70 mg g–1.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Adsorption isotherm and simulation of AD-Steam-1.0h for phosphorus removal at 298 K.

Table 3. Parameters of Isotherm Adsorption Equations for AD-Steam-1.0h Phosphorus Removal
 c0KLKFnR2
Langmuir37.370.0034  0.949
Freundlich  0.0780.9250.953
Langmuir–Freundlich22.400.0022 1.2780.966
The Gibbs free energy was used to detect the adsorption thermodynamics of AD-Steam-1.0h phosphorus removal at 298, 308, and 318 K. In the meantime, the change in enthalpy (ΔH0) and the entropy(ΔS0) were calculated by eqs 79. In the following equations, R (8.314 J K–1 mol–1) is the molar gas constant; T (K) is adsorption temperature; and KL (L mol–1) is the constant for the Langmuir equation.

Gibbs free energy equations:

ΔG°=RTlnKL
(7)
ΔG°=ΔH°TΔS°
(8)
According to eqs 7 and 8, we can conclude that
lnKL=ΔH°RT+ΔS°R
(9)
Table 4 shows the thermodynamic parameters for phosphorus removal by AD-Steam-1.0h. The Langmuir equation illustrates the isotherms of phosphorus adsorption by AD-Steam-1.0h under different temperature conditions. The Langmuir constant (KL) increases when the adsorption temperature changes from 298 K to 318 K. Besides, the absolute value of Gibbs free energy is also enhanced due to the variation of KL. As shown in Figure 7b, the curve of the Van ’t Hoff equation (eq 9) is plotted with three coordinate points to obtain the slope (−ΔH°/R) and intercept (ΔS°/R) of the curve of the first order function; then ΔH° and ΔS° are calculated. According to the results, ΔH° and ΔS° show values of 17.93 kJ mol–1 and 96.24 J mol–1 K–1, respectively. The phosphorus removal process by biochar is a spontaneous endothermic reaction because of the negative Gibbs free energy exhibition. (42,49) Therefore, phosphorus removal by biochar is feasible from the thermodynamic point of view.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Adsorption thermodynamics of AD-Steam-1.0h phosphorus removal at different adsorption temperatures.

Table 4. Thermodynamic Parameters for Phosphorus Removal by AD-Steam-1.0h
temperature (K)KL(L mol–1)ΔG(kJ mol–1)ΔH0(kJ mol–1)ΔS(J mol–1 K–1)
29879.21–10.8317.9396.24
30890.13–11.53
318125.17–12.77

4. Conclusion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This work illustrates a promising anaerobic digestate-derived biochar sample for agricultural dirty water phosphorus removal. The physical-gas-activated biochar samples performed better than the chemical-activated samples from the aspect of phosphorus removal efficiency. AD-N2 shows the highest phosphorus removal ability of 8.99 mg g–1, and AD-Steam-1.0h also suggests an impressive phosphorus removal ability of 7.98 mg g–1. Moreover, kinetic studies prove that the removal of phosphorus from dirty water adsorption by AD biochar prefers the Elovich kinetic model because of the rough adsorbent surface. Furthermore, the phosphorus removal process by biochar is spontaneous and endothermic, according to the thermodynamic analysis. Therefore, using solid waste from the same institution to treat agricultural irrigation dirty water is a sustainable development concept, which may achieve substantial results in economy and efficiency

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c02668.

  • Additional methods details (phosphorus determination reagent and calibration curve determination), phosphorus calibration curve and linear fitting, SEM-EDX elemental mapping images, and average yearly concentration of components in the irrigation dirty water (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Chen Zhang - School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Queens University Belfast, BelfastBT7 1NN, United Kingdom
    • Shuzhuang Sun - School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Queens University Belfast, BelfastBT7 1NN, United Kingdom
    • Shaojun Xu - School of Chemistry, Cardiff University, CardiffCF10 3AT, United KingdomUK Catalysis Hub, Research Complex at Harwell, DidcotOX11 0FA, United KingdomOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8026-8714
    • Chris Johnston - The Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, BelfastBT9 5PX, United Kingdom
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 823745. UK Catalysis Hub is kindly thanked for the resources and support provided via our membership of the UK Catalysis Hub Consortium and funded by EPSRC grant: EP/R026939/1, EP/R026815/1, EP/R026645/1, EP/R027129/1, or EP/M013219/1 (biocatalysis). This research has been performed with the use of facilities at the Research Complex at Harwell including scanning electron microscope equipped with Energy Dispersive X-ray Analyser (SEM-EDX). The authors thank the Research Complex for access and support to these facilities and equipment.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 49 other publications.

  1. 1
    Awual, M. R. Efficient phosphate removal from water for controlling eutrophication using novel composite adsorbent. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019, 228, 13111319,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.325
  2. 2
    Li, Y.; Shang, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, W.; Niu, L.; Wang, L.; Zhang, H. The role of freshwater eutrophication in greenhouse gas emissions: A review. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 768, 144582,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144582
  3. 3
    Zhang, Y.; Song, C.; Ji, L.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, J.; Cao, X.; Zhou, Y. Cause and effect of N/P ratio decline with eutrophication aggravation in shallow lakes. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 627, 12941302,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.327
  4. 4
    Xia, R.; Zhang, Y.; Critto, A.; Wu, J.; Fan, J.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, Y. The potential impacts of climate change factors on freshwater eutrophication: implications for research and countermeasures of water management in China. Sustainability 2016, 8 (3), 229,  DOI: 10.3390/su8030229
  5. 5
    Mehrabinia, P.; Ghanbari-Adivi, E.; Samimi, H. A.; Fattahi, R. Phosphate Removal from Agricultural Drainage Using Biochar. Water Conserv. Sci. Eng. 2022,  DOI: 10.1007/s41101-022-00150-3
  6. 6
    Zhang, L.; Liu, J.; Guo, X. Investigation on mechanism of phosphate removal on carbonized sludge adsorbent. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2018, 64, 335344,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2017.06.034
  7. 7
    Lu, N. C.; Liu, J. Removal of phosphate and fluoride from wastewater by a hybrid precipitation-microfiltration process. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 74 (3), 329335,  DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.06.023
  8. 8
    Mino, T.; Van Loosdrecht, M.; Heijnen, J. Microbiology and biochemistry of the enhanced biological phosphate removal process. Water research 1998, 32 (11), 31933207,  DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00129-8
  9. 9
    Ning, P.; Bart, H.-J.; Li, B.; Lu, X.; Zhang, Y. Phosphate removal from wastewater by model-La (III) zeolite adsorbents. J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 20 (6), 670674,  DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62111-7
    Huang, W.; Wang, S.; Zhu, Z.; Li, L.; Yao, X.; Rudolph, V.; Haghseresht, F. Phosphate removal from wastewater using red mud. Journal of hazardous materials 2008, 158 (1), 3542,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.061
  10. 10
    Lu, S.; Bai, S.; Zhu, L.; Shan, H. Removal mechanism of phosphate from aqueous solution by fly ash. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009, 161 (1), 95101,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.123
  11. 11
    Yu, J.; Liang, W.; Wang, L.; Li, F.; Zou, Y.; Wang, H. Phosphate removal from domestic wastewater using thermally modified steel slag. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2015, 31, 8188,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.12.007
  12. 12
    SHI, Z.-l.; LIU, F.-m.; YAO, S.-h. Adsorptive removal of phosphate from aqueous solutions using activated carbon loaded with Fe (III) oxide. New carbon materials 2011, 26 (4), 299306,  DOI: 10.1016/S1872-5805(11)60083-8
  13. 13
    Wu, B.; Wan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, B.; Lo, I. M. Selective phosphate removal from water and wastewater using sorption: process fundamentals and removal mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54 (1), 5066,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05569
  14. 14
    Zhang, L.; Wan, L.; Chang, N.; Liu, J.; Duan, C.; Zhou, Q.; Li, X.; Wang, X. Removal of phosphate from water by activated carbon fiber loaded with lanthanum oxide. Journal of hazardous materials 2011, 190 (1–3), 848855,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.021
  15. 15
    Singh, T.; Arpanaei, A.; Elustondo, D.; Wang, Y.; Stocchero, A.; West, T.; Fu, Q. Emerging technologies for the development of wood products towards extended carbon storage and CO2 capture. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. 2022, 4, 100057,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100057
  16. 16
    Weber, K.; Quicker, P. Properties of biochar. Fuel 2018, 217, 240261,  DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.054
    Qiao, Y.; Wu, C. Nitrogen enriched biochar used as CO2 adsorbents: a brief review. Carbon Capture Science & Technology 2022, 2, 100018,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccst.2021.100018
  17. 17
    Qiu, B.; Duan, F. Synthesis of industrial solid wastes/biochar composites and their use for adsorption of phosphate: From surface properties to sorption mechanism. Colloids Surf., A 2019, 571, 8693,  DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.03.041
  18. 18
    Liu, R.; Chi, L.; Wang, X.; Sui, Y.; Wang, Y.; Arandiyan, H. Review of metal (hydr) oxide and other adsorptive materials for phosphate removal from water. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2018, 6 (4), 52695286,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2018.08.008
  19. 19
    Shyam, S.; Arun, J.; Gopinath, K. P.; Ribhu, G.; Ashish, M.; Ajay, S. Biomass as source for hydrochar and biochar production to recover phosphates from wastewater: A review on challenges, commercialization, and future perspectives. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131490,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131490
  20. 20
    Zhang, M.; Song, G.; Gelardi, D. L.; Huang, L.; Khan, E.; Mašek, O.; Parikh, S. J.; Ok, Y. S. Evaluating biochar and its modifications for the removal of ammonium, nitrate, and phosphate in water. Water Res. 2020, 186, 116303,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116303
  21. 21
    Cui, X.; Hao, H.; He, Z.; Stoffella, P. J.; Yang, X. Pyrolysis of wetland biomass waste: potential for carbon sequestration and water remediation. Journal of environmental management 2016, 173, 95104,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.049
  22. 22
    Garlapalli, R. K.; Wirth, B.; Reza, M. T. Pyrolysis of hydrochar from digestate: Effect of hydrothermal carbonization and pyrolysis temperatures on pyrochar formation. Bioresource technology 2016, 220, 168174,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.071
  23. 23
    Qiao, Y.; Zhang, S.; Quan, C.; Gao, N.; Johnston, C.; Wu, C. One-pot synthesis of digestate-derived biochar for carbon dioxide capture. Fuel 2020, 279, 118525,  DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118525
  24. 24
    Bustamante, M.; Alburquerque, J.; Restrepo, A.; De la Fuente, C.; Paredes, C.; Moral, R.; Bernal, M. Co-composting of the solid fraction of anaerobic digestates, to obtain added-value materials for use in agriculture. Biomass and bioenergy 2012, 43, 2635,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.04.010
  25. 25
    Cao, Z.; Jung, D.; Olszewski, M. P.; Arauzo, P. J.; Kruse, A. Hydrothermal carbonization of biogas digestate: Effect of digestate origin and process conditions. Waste Management 2019, 100, 138150,  DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.09.009
  26. 26
    Ronga, D.; Caradonia, F.; Parisi, M.; Bezzi, G.; Parisi, B.; Allesina, G.; Pedrazzi, S.; Francia, E. Using digestate and biochar as fertilizers to improve processing tomato production sustainability. Agronomy 2020, 10 (1), 138,  DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10010138
  27. 27
    Ambaye, T. G.; Rene, E. R.; Dupont, C.; Wongrod, S.; Van Hullebusch, E. D. Anaerobic digestion of fruit waste mixed with sewage sludge digestate biochar: influence on biomethane production. Front. Energy Res. 2020, 8, 31,  DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2020.00031
  28. 28
    Rodríguez Alberto, D.; Tyler, A. C.; Trabold, T. A. Phosphate adsorption using biochar derived from solid digestate. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2021, 16, 100864,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100864
  29. 29
    Gong, Y.-P.; Ni, Z.-Y.; Xiong, Z.-Z.; Cheng, L.-H.; Xu, X.-H. Phosphate and ammonium adsorption of the modified biochar based on Phragmites australis after phytoremediation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2017, 24 (9), 83268335,  DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-8499-2
  30. 30
    Almanassra, I. W.; Mckay, G.; Kochkodan, V.; Ali Atieh, M.; Al-Ansari, T. A state of the art review on phosphate removal from water by biochars. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 409, 128211,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.128211
  31. 31
    Ippolito, J. A.; Spokas, K. A.; Novak, J. M.; Lentz, R. D.; Cantrell, K. B. Biochar elemental composition and factors influencing nutrient retention. In Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation; Lehmann, J., Joseph, S., Eds.; Routledge, 2015; pp 139163.
  32. 32
    Shen, Y.; Linville, J. L.; Ignacio-de Leon, P. A. A.; Schoene, R. P.; Urgun-Demirtas, M. Towards a sustainable paradigm of waste-to-energy process: Enhanced anaerobic digestion of sludge with woody biochar. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016, 135, 10541064,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.144
  33. 33
    Han, J.; Li, W.; Liu, D.; Qin, L.; Chen, W.; Xing, F. Pyrolysis characteristic and mechanism of waste tyre: A thermogravimetry-mass spectrometry analysis. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 2018, 129, 15,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2017.12.016
    Wang, M.; Zhang, L.; Li, A.; Irfan, M.; Du, Y.; Di, W. Comparative pyrolysis behaviors of tire tread and side wall from waste tire and characterization of the resulting chars. Journal of environmental management 2019, 232, 364371,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.091
  34. 34
    Tian, Y.; Liu, P.; Wang, X.; Zhong, G.; Chen, G. Offgas analysis and pyrolysis mechanism of activated carbon from bamboo sawdust by chemical activation with KOH. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed. 2011, 26 (1), 1014,  DOI: 10.1007/s11595-011-0157-9
  35. 35
    Gao, X.; Yang, S.; Hu, L.; Cai, S.; Wu, L.; Kawi, S. Carbonaceous materials as adsorbents for CO2 capture: synthesis and modification. Carbon Capture Science & Technology 2022, 3, 100039,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100039
  36. 36
    Madzaki, H.; KarimGhani, W. A. W. A.B.; NurZalikhaRebitanim; AzilBahariAlias Carbon dioxide adsorption on sawdust biochar. Procedia Eng. 2016, 148, 718725,  DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.591
  37. 37
    He, P.; Yu, Q.; Zhang, H.; Shao, L.; Lü, F. Removal of copper (II) by biochar mediated by dissolved organic matter. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7 (1), 110,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07507-y
  38. 38
    Wang, Z.; Shen, D.; Shen, F.; Li, T. Phosphate adsorption on lanthanum loaded biochar. Chemosphere 2016, 150, 17,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.004
  39. 39
    Jung, K.-W.; Hwang, M.-J.; Ahn, K.-H.; Ok, Y.-S. Kinetic study on phosphate removal from aqueous solution by biochar derived from peanut shell as renewable adsorptive media. International journal of environmental science and technology 2015, 12 (10), 33633372,  DOI: 10.1007/s13762-015-0766-5
  40. 40
    Suresh Kumar, P.; Prot, T.; Korving, L.; Keesman, K. J.; Dugulan, I.; van Loosdrecht, M. C.M.; Witkamp, G.-J. Effect of pore size distribution on iron oxide coated granular activated carbons for phosphate adsorption-Importance of mesopores. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 326, 231239,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.147
  41. 41
    Akhil, D.; Lakshmi, D.; Kartik, A.; Vo, D.-V. N.; Arun, J.; Gopinath, K. P. Production, characterization, activation and environmental applications of engineered biochar: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters 2021, 19 (3), 22612297,  DOI: 10.1007/s10311-020-01167-7
  42. 42
    Wang, B.; Lian, G.; Lee, X.; Gao, B.; Li, L.; Liu, T.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, Y. Phosphogypsum as a novel modifier for distillers grains biochar removal of phosphate from water. Chemosphere 2020, 238, 124684,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124684
  43. 43
    Liu, J.; Ren, S.; Cao, J.; Tsang, D. C.; Beiyuan, J.; Peng, Y.; Fang, F.; She, J.; Yin, M.; Shen, N. Highly efficient removal of thallium in wastewater by MnFe2O4-biochar composite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 401, 123311,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123311
  44. 44
    Chien, S.; Clayton, W. Application of Elovich equation to the kinetics of phosphate release and sorption in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1980, 44 (2), 265268,  DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400020013x
  45. 45
    Yuan, X.; Xia, W.; An, J.; Yin, J.; Zhou, X.; Yang, W. Kinetic and thermodynamic studies on the phosphate adsorption removal by dolomite mineral. J. Chem. 2015, 2015, 1,  DOI: 10.1155/2015/853105
  46. 46
    Zhang, Z.; Yan, L.; Yu, H.; Yan, T.; Li, X. Adsorption of phosphate from aqueous solution by vegetable biochar/layered double oxides: fast removal and mechanistic studies. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 284, 6571,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.113
  47. 47
    Vikrant, K.; Kim, K.-H.; Ok, Y. S.; Tsang, D. C.; Tsang, Y. F.; Giri, B. S.; Singh, R. S. Engineered/designer biochar for the removal of phosphate in water and wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 616, 12421260,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.193
  48. 48
    Nakarmi, A.; Bourdo, S. E.; Ruhl, L.; Kanel, S.; Nadagouda, M.; Kumar Alla, P.; Pavel, I.; Viswanathan, T. Benign zinc oxide betaine-modified biochar nanocomposites for phosphate removal from aqueous solutions. J. Environ. Manage 2020, 272, 111048,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111048
  49. 49
    Yin, Q.; Liu, M.; Ren, H. Biochar produced from the co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and walnut shell for ammonium and phosphate adsorption from water. Journal of environmental management 2019, 249, 109410,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109410

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 2 publications.

  1. Hasara Samaraweera, Kumuduni Niroshika Palansooriya, Pavani Dulanja Dissanayake, Afzal Husain Khan, Mika Sillanpää, Todd Mlsna. Sustainable phosphate removal using Mg/Ca-modified biochar hybrids: Current trends and future outlooks. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering 2023, 8 , 100528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100528
  2. Wei Wang, Jo-Shu Chang, Duu-Jong Lee. Digestate-derived carbonized char and activated carbon: Application perspective. Bioresource Technology 2023, 381 , 129135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129135
Open PDF

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Cite this: Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2023, 62, 45, 19216–19224
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c02668
Published December 5, 2022

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

1970

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. TGA-TPO and DTG-TPO profiles of the AD biochars with the varied activated method.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. SEM micrographs of (a) AD-Origin, (b) AD-N2, (c) AD-Steam-0.5h, (d) AD-Steam-1.0h, (e) AD-KOH-1:0.5, and (f) AD-KOH-1:1.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. ATR-FTIR spectra of AD biochar samples.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) Phosphorus removal ability of different activated AD biochar samples. (b) Effect of biochar dosage on phosphorus adsorption ability and percentage.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Adsorption kinetic fitting curves of phosphorus removal by AD-N2 and AD-Steam-1.0h.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Adsorption isotherm and simulation of AD-Steam-1.0h for phosphorus removal at 298 K.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Adsorption thermodynamics of AD-Steam-1.0h phosphorus removal at different adsorption temperatures.

  • References


    This article references 49 other publications.

    1. 1
      Awual, M. R. Efficient phosphate removal from water for controlling eutrophication using novel composite adsorbent. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019, 228, 13111319,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.325
    2. 2
      Li, Y.; Shang, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, W.; Niu, L.; Wang, L.; Zhang, H. The role of freshwater eutrophication in greenhouse gas emissions: A review. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 768, 144582,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144582
    3. 3
      Zhang, Y.; Song, C.; Ji, L.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, J.; Cao, X.; Zhou, Y. Cause and effect of N/P ratio decline with eutrophication aggravation in shallow lakes. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 627, 12941302,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.327
    4. 4
      Xia, R.; Zhang, Y.; Critto, A.; Wu, J.; Fan, J.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, Y. The potential impacts of climate change factors on freshwater eutrophication: implications for research and countermeasures of water management in China. Sustainability 2016, 8 (3), 229,  DOI: 10.3390/su8030229
    5. 5
      Mehrabinia, P.; Ghanbari-Adivi, E.; Samimi, H. A.; Fattahi, R. Phosphate Removal from Agricultural Drainage Using Biochar. Water Conserv. Sci. Eng. 2022,  DOI: 10.1007/s41101-022-00150-3
    6. 6
      Zhang, L.; Liu, J.; Guo, X. Investigation on mechanism of phosphate removal on carbonized sludge adsorbent. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2018, 64, 335344,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2017.06.034
    7. 7
      Lu, N. C.; Liu, J. Removal of phosphate and fluoride from wastewater by a hybrid precipitation-microfiltration process. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 74 (3), 329335,  DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.06.023
    8. 8
      Mino, T.; Van Loosdrecht, M.; Heijnen, J. Microbiology and biochemistry of the enhanced biological phosphate removal process. Water research 1998, 32 (11), 31933207,  DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00129-8
    9. 9
      Ning, P.; Bart, H.-J.; Li, B.; Lu, X.; Zhang, Y. Phosphate removal from wastewater by model-La (III) zeolite adsorbents. J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 20 (6), 670674,  DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62111-7
      Huang, W.; Wang, S.; Zhu, Z.; Li, L.; Yao, X.; Rudolph, V.; Haghseresht, F. Phosphate removal from wastewater using red mud. Journal of hazardous materials 2008, 158 (1), 3542,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.061
    10. 10
      Lu, S.; Bai, S.; Zhu, L.; Shan, H. Removal mechanism of phosphate from aqueous solution by fly ash. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009, 161 (1), 95101,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.123
    11. 11
      Yu, J.; Liang, W.; Wang, L.; Li, F.; Zou, Y.; Wang, H. Phosphate removal from domestic wastewater using thermally modified steel slag. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2015, 31, 8188,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.12.007
    12. 12
      SHI, Z.-l.; LIU, F.-m.; YAO, S.-h. Adsorptive removal of phosphate from aqueous solutions using activated carbon loaded with Fe (III) oxide. New carbon materials 2011, 26 (4), 299306,  DOI: 10.1016/S1872-5805(11)60083-8
    13. 13
      Wu, B.; Wan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, B.; Lo, I. M. Selective phosphate removal from water and wastewater using sorption: process fundamentals and removal mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54 (1), 5066,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05569
    14. 14
      Zhang, L.; Wan, L.; Chang, N.; Liu, J.; Duan, C.; Zhou, Q.; Li, X.; Wang, X. Removal of phosphate from water by activated carbon fiber loaded with lanthanum oxide. Journal of hazardous materials 2011, 190 (1–3), 848855,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.021
    15. 15
      Singh, T.; Arpanaei, A.; Elustondo, D.; Wang, Y.; Stocchero, A.; West, T.; Fu, Q. Emerging technologies for the development of wood products towards extended carbon storage and CO2 capture. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. 2022, 4, 100057,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100057
    16. 16
      Weber, K.; Quicker, P. Properties of biochar. Fuel 2018, 217, 240261,  DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.054
      Qiao, Y.; Wu, C. Nitrogen enriched biochar used as CO2 adsorbents: a brief review. Carbon Capture Science & Technology 2022, 2, 100018,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccst.2021.100018
    17. 17
      Qiu, B.; Duan, F. Synthesis of industrial solid wastes/biochar composites and their use for adsorption of phosphate: From surface properties to sorption mechanism. Colloids Surf., A 2019, 571, 8693,  DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.03.041
    18. 18
      Liu, R.; Chi, L.; Wang, X.; Sui, Y.; Wang, Y.; Arandiyan, H. Review of metal (hydr) oxide and other adsorptive materials for phosphate removal from water. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2018, 6 (4), 52695286,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2018.08.008
    19. 19
      Shyam, S.; Arun, J.; Gopinath, K. P.; Ribhu, G.; Ashish, M.; Ajay, S. Biomass as source for hydrochar and biochar production to recover phosphates from wastewater: A review on challenges, commercialization, and future perspectives. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131490,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131490
    20. 20
      Zhang, M.; Song, G.; Gelardi, D. L.; Huang, L.; Khan, E.; Mašek, O.; Parikh, S. J.; Ok, Y. S. Evaluating biochar and its modifications for the removal of ammonium, nitrate, and phosphate in water. Water Res. 2020, 186, 116303,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116303
    21. 21
      Cui, X.; Hao, H.; He, Z.; Stoffella, P. J.; Yang, X. Pyrolysis of wetland biomass waste: potential for carbon sequestration and water remediation. Journal of environmental management 2016, 173, 95104,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.049
    22. 22
      Garlapalli, R. K.; Wirth, B.; Reza, M. T. Pyrolysis of hydrochar from digestate: Effect of hydrothermal carbonization and pyrolysis temperatures on pyrochar formation. Bioresource technology 2016, 220, 168174,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.071
    23. 23
      Qiao, Y.; Zhang, S.; Quan, C.; Gao, N.; Johnston, C.; Wu, C. One-pot synthesis of digestate-derived biochar for carbon dioxide capture. Fuel 2020, 279, 118525,  DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118525
    24. 24
      Bustamante, M.; Alburquerque, J.; Restrepo, A.; De la Fuente, C.; Paredes, C.; Moral, R.; Bernal, M. Co-composting of the solid fraction of anaerobic digestates, to obtain added-value materials for use in agriculture. Biomass and bioenergy 2012, 43, 2635,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.04.010
    25. 25
      Cao, Z.; Jung, D.; Olszewski, M. P.; Arauzo, P. J.; Kruse, A. Hydrothermal carbonization of biogas digestate: Effect of digestate origin and process conditions. Waste Management 2019, 100, 138150,  DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.09.009
    26. 26
      Ronga, D.; Caradonia, F.; Parisi, M.; Bezzi, G.; Parisi, B.; Allesina, G.; Pedrazzi, S.; Francia, E. Using digestate and biochar as fertilizers to improve processing tomato production sustainability. Agronomy 2020, 10 (1), 138,  DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10010138
    27. 27
      Ambaye, T. G.; Rene, E. R.; Dupont, C.; Wongrod, S.; Van Hullebusch, E. D. Anaerobic digestion of fruit waste mixed with sewage sludge digestate biochar: influence on biomethane production. Front. Energy Res. 2020, 8, 31,  DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2020.00031
    28. 28
      Rodríguez Alberto, D.; Tyler, A. C.; Trabold, T. A. Phosphate adsorption using biochar derived from solid digestate. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2021, 16, 100864,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100864
    29. 29
      Gong, Y.-P.; Ni, Z.-Y.; Xiong, Z.-Z.; Cheng, L.-H.; Xu, X.-H. Phosphate and ammonium adsorption of the modified biochar based on Phragmites australis after phytoremediation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2017, 24 (9), 83268335,  DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-8499-2
    30. 30
      Almanassra, I. W.; Mckay, G.; Kochkodan, V.; Ali Atieh, M.; Al-Ansari, T. A state of the art review on phosphate removal from water by biochars. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 409, 128211,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.128211
    31. 31
      Ippolito, J. A.; Spokas, K. A.; Novak, J. M.; Lentz, R. D.; Cantrell, K. B. Biochar elemental composition and factors influencing nutrient retention. In Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation; Lehmann, J., Joseph, S., Eds.; Routledge, 2015; pp 139163.
    32. 32
      Shen, Y.; Linville, J. L.; Ignacio-de Leon, P. A. A.; Schoene, R. P.; Urgun-Demirtas, M. Towards a sustainable paradigm of waste-to-energy process: Enhanced anaerobic digestion of sludge with woody biochar. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016, 135, 10541064,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.144
    33. 33
      Han, J.; Li, W.; Liu, D.; Qin, L.; Chen, W.; Xing, F. Pyrolysis characteristic and mechanism of waste tyre: A thermogravimetry-mass spectrometry analysis. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 2018, 129, 15,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2017.12.016
      Wang, M.; Zhang, L.; Li, A.; Irfan, M.; Du, Y.; Di, W. Comparative pyrolysis behaviors of tire tread and side wall from waste tire and characterization of the resulting chars. Journal of environmental management 2019, 232, 364371,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.091
    34. 34
      Tian, Y.; Liu, P.; Wang, X.; Zhong, G.; Chen, G. Offgas analysis and pyrolysis mechanism of activated carbon from bamboo sawdust by chemical activation with KOH. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed. 2011, 26 (1), 1014,  DOI: 10.1007/s11595-011-0157-9
    35. 35
      Gao, X.; Yang, S.; Hu, L.; Cai, S.; Wu, L.; Kawi, S. Carbonaceous materials as adsorbents for CO2 capture: synthesis and modification. Carbon Capture Science & Technology 2022, 3, 100039,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100039
    36. 36
      Madzaki, H.; KarimGhani, W. A. W. A.B.; NurZalikhaRebitanim; AzilBahariAlias Carbon dioxide adsorption on sawdust biochar. Procedia Eng. 2016, 148, 718725,  DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.591
    37. 37
      He, P.; Yu, Q.; Zhang, H.; Shao, L.; Lü, F. Removal of copper (II) by biochar mediated by dissolved organic matter. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7 (1), 110,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07507-y
    38. 38
      Wang, Z.; Shen, D.; Shen, F.; Li, T. Phosphate adsorption on lanthanum loaded biochar. Chemosphere 2016, 150, 17,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.004
    39. 39
      Jung, K.-W.; Hwang, M.-J.; Ahn, K.-H.; Ok, Y.-S. Kinetic study on phosphate removal from aqueous solution by biochar derived from peanut shell as renewable adsorptive media. International journal of environmental science and technology 2015, 12 (10), 33633372,  DOI: 10.1007/s13762-015-0766-5
    40. 40
      Suresh Kumar, P.; Prot, T.; Korving, L.; Keesman, K. J.; Dugulan, I.; van Loosdrecht, M. C.M.; Witkamp, G.-J. Effect of pore size distribution on iron oxide coated granular activated carbons for phosphate adsorption-Importance of mesopores. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 326, 231239,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.147
    41. 41
      Akhil, D.; Lakshmi, D.; Kartik, A.; Vo, D.-V. N.; Arun, J.; Gopinath, K. P. Production, characterization, activation and environmental applications of engineered biochar: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters 2021, 19 (3), 22612297,  DOI: 10.1007/s10311-020-01167-7
    42. 42
      Wang, B.; Lian, G.; Lee, X.; Gao, B.; Li, L.; Liu, T.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, Y. Phosphogypsum as a novel modifier for distillers grains biochar removal of phosphate from water. Chemosphere 2020, 238, 124684,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124684
    43. 43
      Liu, J.; Ren, S.; Cao, J.; Tsang, D. C.; Beiyuan, J.; Peng, Y.; Fang, F.; She, J.; Yin, M.; Shen, N. Highly efficient removal of thallium in wastewater by MnFe2O4-biochar composite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 401, 123311,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123311
    44. 44
      Chien, S.; Clayton, W. Application of Elovich equation to the kinetics of phosphate release and sorption in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1980, 44 (2), 265268,  DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400020013x
    45. 45
      Yuan, X.; Xia, W.; An, J.; Yin, J.; Zhou, X.; Yang, W. Kinetic and thermodynamic studies on the phosphate adsorption removal by dolomite mineral. J. Chem. 2015, 2015, 1,  DOI: 10.1155/2015/853105
    46. 46
      Zhang, Z.; Yan, L.; Yu, H.; Yan, T.; Li, X. Adsorption of phosphate from aqueous solution by vegetable biochar/layered double oxides: fast removal and mechanistic studies. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 284, 6571,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.113
    47. 47
      Vikrant, K.; Kim, K.-H.; Ok, Y. S.; Tsang, D. C.; Tsang, Y. F.; Giri, B. S.; Singh, R. S. Engineered/designer biochar for the removal of phosphate in water and wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 616, 12421260,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.193
    48. 48
      Nakarmi, A.; Bourdo, S. E.; Ruhl, L.; Kanel, S.; Nadagouda, M.; Kumar Alla, P.; Pavel, I.; Viswanathan, T. Benign zinc oxide betaine-modified biochar nanocomposites for phosphate removal from aqueous solutions. J. Environ. Manage 2020, 272, 111048,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111048
    49. 49
      Yin, Q.; Liu, M.; Ren, H. Biochar produced from the co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and walnut shell for ammonium and phosphate adsorption from water. Journal of environmental management 2019, 249, 109410,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109410
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c02668.

    • Additional methods details (phosphorus determination reagent and calibration curve determination), phosphorus calibration curve and linear fitting, SEM-EDX elemental mapping images, and average yearly concentration of components in the irrigation dirty water (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.