ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Pilot-Scale Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production from Combined Treatment of Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste and Sewage Sludge
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Article

Pilot-Scale Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production from Combined Treatment of Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste and Sewage Sludge
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Francesco Valentino*
    Francesco Valentino
    Department of Chemistry, “La Sapienza” University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
    *E-mail: [email protected]
  • Giulia Moretto
    Giulia Moretto
    Department of Environmental Science, Informatics and Statistics, Via Torino 155, 30170 Venezia Mestre, Italy
  • Laura Lorini
    Laura Lorini
    Department of Chemistry, “La Sapienza” University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
    More by Laura Lorini
  • David Bolzonella
    David Bolzonella
    Department of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Strada Le Grazie 15, 37134 Verona, Italy
  • Paolo Pavan
    Paolo Pavan
    Department of Environmental Science, Informatics and Statistics, Via Torino 155, 30170 Venezia Mestre, Italy
    More by Paolo Pavan
  • Mauro Majone
    Mauro Majone
    Department of Chemistry, “La Sapienza” University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
    More by Mauro Majone
Open PDF

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Cite this: Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 27, 12149–12158
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01831
Published June 10, 2019

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Although the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) and sewage sludge (SS) originate from the same urban area and contain similar organic matter, they are collected separately and handled with different technologies. In this work, a combined treatment of OFMSW–SS mixture was investigated at pilot scale, by using a three-step mixed microbial culture (MMC) process in order to produce polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) as final high value biobased product. Biomass selection efficiency was quantified by PHA-specific storage rate that was 258 mg CODPHA/g CODXa/h under the optimized process condition. In fed-batch tests, PHA-storing MMC was able to accumulate up to 46 wt % PHA. In the perspective of a full-scale application and taking into account the mass flows in each process step, an overall yield of 65 g PHA/kg TVS was estimated.

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society

1. Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In the frame of applied microbiology and bioprocess engineering, the use of mixed microbial cultures (MMCs) is attracting remarkable attention for the development of novel bioprocesses that respond to changing environmental frameworks. A well-established example of MMC application consists of the production of a particular family of polyester, namely, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA). These biopolymers are synthesized as intracellular carbon and energy source mainly by numerous species of Gram-positive and/or Gram-negative microorganisms but also by anaerobic photosynthetic bacteria and Archea. (1) Since they are completely biodegradable and have thermoplastic properties, the interest in these biopolymers is progressively increasing, also in consideration of the possibility to use renewable resources (instead of fossil fuels) as carbon source for their synthesis. (2,3)
However, more investments are necessary to promote feasibility studies, possibly at a pilot-scale level, in order to quantify a reasonable range of PHA productivity and final polymer quality. These are crucial aspects for MMC derived PHA commercialization and relative market scenario, which presently does not exist yet. (4)
Nowadays, industrial-scale PHA production focuses on pure-culture systems, which are based on refine feedstock and sterile cultivation conditions. Both features entail a high-energy requirement that strongly increases the PHA production cost. (5) This is why the PHA production from microorganisms’ cultivation accounts for only a small percentage of global plastic production so far.
The possibility to integrate MMC–PHA production into infrastructures typically adopted for biowaste residuals and wastewater treatment could make this technology economically and environmentally sustainable. In the past decade, this basic concept has led to the scaling-up of the process from laboratory- to pilot-scale facilities with demonstrative plants. (2) The examples that have been reported in the literature show the integration of MMC–PHA production with municipal wastewater treatment, (6,7) excess sludge fermentation liquid, (8) and dairy and food-processing wastewater. (9,10)
Independent from the possible configurations, consistently explained in recent reviews, (2,4) MMC technology provides for the use of activated sludge as inoculum, the microbial composition of which needs to be enriched in bacteria with high polymer accumulation capacity. This approach is known as “feast–famine” selection strategy and is realized by applying dynamic feeding to microorganisms in sequencing reactors. (11) Under these process conditions, the microorganisms are submitted to consecutive periods of external substrate excess and lack. Those species able to store the substrate in the form of PHA during the feast phase have a competitive advantage over the others, because they can use the stored polymer as an intracellular carbon source when the substrate is no more available (famine phase). Fermented waste feedstock rich in volatile fatty acid (VFA) are usually the election substrates for this purpose.
Since our food supply chain has recently been recognized as being inefficient, producing large quantities of waste, (12) the need to both avoid waste production and find new renewable resources has led to the use of food waste as a renewable feedstock. Food waste includes the organic waste produced at household level or by the food service sector, and the waste produced at retail level. This source can be valorised with available practises and technologies (including composting, landfilling, anaerobic digestion, bioenergy production). In addition, the interest for biopolymer production from urban organic waste is relatively recent. In fact, few studies described different methods for PHA production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW), (13) and related sources such as leachate, (14) percolate, (15) mixture of OFMSW, and primary sludge (PS). (16) In the context of a possible integration in the existing wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), pilot-scale demonstrations are of primary importance.
The study proposed herein describes PHA production by MMC using pretreated OFMSW and excess thickened secondary sludge (SS), applying the feast–famine approach in the traditional three-step process scheme, developed at pilot scale. The paper is focused on the treatment of these two relevant organic urban wastes since they have the same origin but are still separately collected and handled with different technologies. In this work, a single process technology has been proposed for the simultaneous treatment of both streams, collected in Treviso (northeast of Italy) municipality and presently valorized in a full-scale anaerobic digestion plant. If compared to the conventional anaerobic digestion technology, then PHA biobased products can offer a more profitable way to recover the organic matter, with the concrete option of retrofitting existing facilities of waste or wastewater treatment. The piloting facilities for PHA production from organic urban biowaste are located in the Treviso municipal WWTP.

2. Materials and Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

2.1. Pilot Plant Experimental Platform

A process schematic of the units installed at the Treviso WWTP is presented in Figure 1. A fermentation reactor produced a hydrolyzed and fermented OFMSW–SS mixture rich in VFA. The fermented feedstock was subjected to a first solid/liquid separation unit (C) for suspended solid removal before feeding in the first aerobic reactor (sequencing batch reactor, SBR). The SBR stimulated the storage response of initial activated sludge (inoculum), selecting a PHA-accumulating consortium. This selection was performed by applying a dynamic feeding condition, also known as feast-famine regime. (11) The second aerobic reactor (PHA production) produced PHA inside the harvested surplus biomass from SBR, when fed with VFA-rich stream after second solid/liquid separation unit (F).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Process scheme developed at pilot scale for OFMSW and SS valorization toward PHA production.

The start-up of the pilot units was realized in close times: acidogenic fermenter was started up in January 2017, and the SBR commenced biomass production from the end of March 2017. The first accumulation trials were made after pseudo steady state was achieved in the selection reactor. The operation of reactors is automated and controlled via a programmable logic controller (myRio Labview by National Instrument) except for the transfer of biomass from the selection/enrichment step to accumulation, and the treatment of VFA-rich stream in the second solid/liquid separation unit, which are manually operated/conducted.

2.1.1. Sewage Sludge (SS) and Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW) Collection

The feedstock was collected weekly inside the Treviso municipal WWTP facility. The source-sorted collection of OFMSW was made throughout the whole Treviso municipality and transferred to the full-scale WWTP after its squeezing and homogenization in a dedicated plant. The squeezed OFMSW was then mixed with SS produced in the WWTP. The chemical features of the feedstock changed as a function of relative volume percentage of the substrates and mixed in two different ratios as it follows: OFMSW and SS at a volumetric fraction of 40–45% and 60–55%, respectively; OFMSW and SS at a volumetric fraction of 30–35% and 70–65%, respectively. Both mixtures were characterized in terms of total and volatile solids (TS and TVS), Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), and organic phosphorus (P), ammonium and phosphate, total and soluble chemical oxygen demand (CODTOT, CODSOL), and VFA. The main features of both mixtures are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Physical–Chemical Features of the Two Influent Mixtures of Urban Origin
 unfermented feedstock
parameterOFMSW 40–45%/SS 60–55%aOFMSW 30–35%/SS 70–65%a
TS (g/kg)92 ± 556 ± 3
TVS (g/kg)75 ± 444 ± 3
CODTOT (g/L)97 ± 862 ± 5
CODSOL (g/L)38 ± 220 ± 1
CODVFA (g/L)3.1 ± 0.92.5 ± 0.5
TKN (g N/kg TS)24 ± 225 ± 3
phosphorus (P; g P/kg TS)2.0 ± 0.12.3 ± 0.1
ammonia (N–NH4+; mg/L)327 ± 35342 ± 28
phosphate (P–PO43–; mg/L)163 ± 6113 ± 7
a

Each percentage refers to a volumetric fraction.

2.1.2. Pilot Units

The acidogenic fermentation unit included an anaerobic batch reactor (V = 380 L) and a filter-bag equipped centrifuge (unit “C”). The anaerobic reactor consisted of a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR), mechanically stirred and under temperature control by using a thermostatic jacket. The hydraulic retention time (HRT) was set at 6 days (equal to sludge retention time, SRT). The pH (5.0–5.5) was not controlled since the alkalinity of the feedstock ensured enough buffer capacity. A centrifugation unit was used for solids/liquid separation after fermentation: a coaxial centrifuge equipped with 5.0 μm porosity nylon filter bag for solids removal. This step was crucial for obtaining a cleaner filtered fermented stream (fFL), with a suspended solid level below 10.0 g/L, to be used for the following aerobic selection step after dilution with tap water.
Acidogenic fermentation has been conducted in continuous mode, by investigating different mixture composition and temperature (T); more specifically, different fermentation liquids (FL) were produced according to the following parameters: (FL-I) OFMSW 40–45% v/v, SS 55–60% v/v mixture, T 55 °C; (FL-II) OFMSW 30–35% v/v, SS 65–70% v/v mixture, T 55 °C; (FL-III) OFMSW 30–35% v/v, SS 65–70% v/v mixture, T 42 °C.
The three conditions have been tested without interruption of the fermentation process, by changing the OFMSW content first (from I to II) and then by changing the T from thermophilic (II) to mesophilic (III) conditions. The first trial tested condition I up to day 120, condition II from day 121 to 185, and condition III from day 185 to 255. The applied OLR was different between the three experimental conditions and strongly affected by the content of OFMSW in the feedstock: 12.2 ± 0.3 (condition I) and 6.6 ± 0.1 g TVS/L day (conditions II and III).
A SBR (working volume 120 L) was utilized for the PHA-accumulating biomass production. The SBR was inoculated with activated sludge from the Treviso full-scale WWTP. The aerobic run was conducted for approximately 7 months, at 1.0 day of HRT (equal to SRT) and a cycle length of 6 h. Each operating cycle was divided into four aerobic phases: biomass withdrawal (0.5 min), first aeration (10 min), feeding (0.5 min), and second aeration (349 min). The reactor was aerated by means of linear membrane blowers (Bibus EL-S-250), which allowed stirring the system. The temperature (22–25 °C, maintained with immersion heater) and pH (8.0–9.0) were continuously measured but not controlled. The applied OLR was set at 4.0 g CODSOL/L day. In order to maintain such OLR, the fFLs were 6- to 10-fold diluted with tap water. Feedstock shifts were made at day 93 (from fFL-I to fFL-II) and day 160 (from fFL-II to fFL-III). The SBR performance was monitored by measurement of biomass concentration, as volatile suspended solid (VSS), PHA, and CODSOL.
The accumulation potential of the biomass was exploited through fed-batch tests (V = 50–70 L), performed with both synthetic (acetic acid with no nutrient addition) and filtered fFL (ffFL; specifically ffFL-II and ffFL-III). The fFLs were further filtered with a stainless-steel filter press (unit “F”) equipped with 0.2 μm paper filter (CKP V28), in order to remove all the suspended solids and to obtain a clear feeding solution. The biomass (X) was loaded from the SBR at the end of the 6 h cycle and the initial ffFL/X ratio was chosen to be ≤2.0 COD basis, in order to prevent any possible substrate or pH inhibition phenomena. (17)

2.2. Sampling and Analytical Methods

Feedstock mixture was characterized after each collection (weekly basis). The analysis were performed on dry solid material at first, specifically for TS and TVS, COD, TKN, and P. CODSOL, VFA, alkalinity, ammonium, and phosphate were measured on filtered (0.2 μm) samples. The same approach has been followed for fermented feedstock characterization even though with more frequent analysis (at least twice a week). In the aerobic reactors, the quantified parameters were total and volatile suspended solids (TSS and VSS), CODSOL, ammonium, phosphate, VFA, and PHA. In the SBR, the mixed liquor was sampled at the end of the cycle (for CODSOL, ammonium, phosphate, and PHA quantification) and at the end of the feast phase (for TSS, VSS, CODSOL, and PHA quantification), according to a previous laboratory-scale study. (18) In the batch reactor, the mixed liquor was sampled at the beginning of each test and every hour (for VFA and PHA quantification). The CODSOL and VSS were analyzed at the beginning and at the end of each test. All the analyses, except for VFA and PHA, were carried out in accordance with the standard methods. (19)
VFA were quantified using a gas chromatography (GC) method (Carlo Erba instruments) with hydrogen as gas carrier. The GC was equipped with a Fused Silica Capillary Column (Supelco Nukol TM, 15 m × 0.53 mm × 0.5 mm film thickness) and with a flame ionization detector (200 °C). During analysis, the temperature (T) increased from 80 to 200 °C with a rate of 10 °C/min.
For PHA measurements, 5.0 mL of unfiltered mixed liquor were treated with 1.0 mL of NaClO solution (5% active Cl2) and then stored at −4 °C for following analysis. In accordance to Braunegg et al., (20) the polymer was extracted, hydrolyzed, and esterified to 3-hydroxyacyl methyl esters and quantified by GC method. The abundance of hydroxybutyric (HB) and hydroxyvaleric (HV) monomers were quantified using P(3HB-co-3HV) Sigma-Aldrich standard polymer at 5 wt % HV content.

2.3. Calculations

All the parameters characterizing reactor performances were calculated after steady states or pseudosteady state (for SBR) was achieved.
The fermentation process was considered under steady-state when a stable VFA distribution was observed, after 3.0 SRTs approximately (at day 20). Solubilization and fermentation yield (YVFA) were quantified with respect to the features of initial unfermented feedstock, in particular total COD (CODTOT(0)) and TVS(0). CODTOT was quantified as sum of separated COD analysis on dry matter and filtered liquid sample as explained in the above paragraph.
In the SBR, the pseudo steady state was recognized when the feast phase length remained approximately constant (within a 5% deviation from average) for at least 10 SRTs. (18) In each SBR cycle, the dissolved oxygen (DO) was continuously monitored in order to identify the period in which the readily biodegradable substrates (mainly VFA) were exhausted (end of feast phase), as indicated by a sudden increase of the O2 concentration. The nonpolymer biomass (or active biomass, XA) was calculated as the difference between VSS and PHA concentrations: XA = VSS – PHA. The biomass PHA content (g PHA/g VSS) was defined as the ratio between the PHA and VSS concentrations. For rates and yields calculation, the mass values of XA, PHA and VFA were converted into COD units by using the relative conversion factor from oxidation stoichiometry. (21) The specific VFA uptake rate was calculated as ratio between the removed VFA and the length of feast phase (t), per unit of XA: (−qVFAfeast) = ΔVFA/(t·XA). The specific CODSOL removal rate was similarly calculated: (−qSfeast) = ΔCODSOL/(t·XA). The PHA production rate was defined by the produced PHA divided by the feast phase length (t), per unit of XA: qPfeast = ΔPHA/(t·XA). The storage yields were defined by the ratio between the produced PHA and the consumed CODSOL or VFA in the feast phase: YP/Sfeast = ΔPHA/ΔCODSOL; YP/VFAfeast = ΔPHA/ΔVFA. The observed yield was calculated as it follows: YOBSSBR = VSS/(OLR·HRT). In fed-batch accumulations, the specific PHA production rate (qPbatch) was calculated by linear regression of data versus time. Only the initial period (2.0 h from the beginning of each test) at constant rate was considered. The volumetric rate was transformed into specific rate using the XA concentration at the beginning of the test. The growth yield was calculated as the ratio between the produced XA and the removed VFA (YX/VFAbatch) or CODSOL (YX/Sbatch) at the end of each test. The storage yield was calculated as the ratio between the produced PHA and the removed VFA (YP/VFAbatch) or CODSOL (YP/Sbatch) at the end of the test. The final PHA content in the biomass was calculated at the end of each test as explained above.

3. Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

3.1. Fermentation of Feedstock for PHA Production

Acidogenic fermentation was feasible to good extent under each condition tested, even though some variations of performance were observed, particularly associated with the system stability.
Figure 2A shows the evolution of VFA production, CODSOL, and pH from the process start-up; the three different periods at different feedstock composition and/or temperature are separated by vertical axis. Average data are reported in Table 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2. VFA, CODSOL, and pH evolution in the fermented feedstock (A); VFA distribution under the three different conditions tested (B).

Table 2. Fermented Feedstock Characteristics and Related Fermentation Performances
parameterFL-IFL-IIFL-III
fermented feedstock characteristics
TS (g/kg)82 ± 656 ± 457 ± 3
TVS (g/kg)68 ± 446 ± 446 ± 2
CODTOT (g/L)98 ± 1061 ± 860 ± 4
CODSOL (g/L)45 ± 832 ± 526 ± 3
CODVFA (g/L)23 ± 621 ± 319 ± 2
CODVFA/CODSOL0.53 ± 0.110.64 ± 0.070.75 ± 0.09
alkalinity (mg CaCO3/L)5910 ± 4694811 ± 7414451 ± 498
TKN (g N/kg TS)28 ± 423 ± 420 ± 2
phosphorus (P; g P/kg TS)2.0 ± 0.32.2 ± 0.42.1 ± 0.3
ammonia (N–NH4+; mg/L)698 ± 55724 ± 138562 ± 44
phosphate (P–PO43–; mg/L)155 ± 28127 ± 22110 ± 9
CODSOL/N/P100/5.3/0.4100/4.1/0.4100/4.4/0.5
[C3/(C3+C2)]VFA (mol/mol)0.15 ± 0.030.17 ± 0.020.16 ± 0.02
fermentation performance
solubilizationg CODSOL/g CODTOT(0)0.08 ± 0.050.17 ± 0.020.10 ± 0.03
g CODSOL/g TVS(0)0.10 ± 0.060.26 ± 0.020.15 ± 0.03
yield (YVFA)g CODVFA/g CODTOT(0)0.23 ± 0.040.27 ± 0.030.25 ± 0.02
g CODVFA/g TVS(0)0.24 ± 0.060.39 ± 0.040.40 ± 0.03
In the FL-I, the higher OLR (due to the higher OFMSW content in the feedstock) resulted in lower conversion yield of total COD into CODSOL and VFA, in accordance to what reported by Hao et al. (22) In spite of this, both higher CODSOL and VFA concentration were observed. In particular, VFA trend was characterized by significant fluctuation of VFA concentration with maximum value up to 35 g CODVFA/L. As a consequence, the pH was lower than in the following periods, on average, and often below 5.0. Moreover, even though both VFA concentration and CODSOL were higher in FL-I (23 ± 6 g CODVFA/L and 45 ± 8 g CODSOL/L), the CODVFA/CODSOL ratio was consistently lower (0.53 ± 0.11), meaning that a significant fraction of solubilized COD (or TVS) was not converted into VFA.
By decreasing the OFMSW content (and correspondingly the OLR), a more stable VFA production was observed, even with lower average value 21 ± 3 (FL-II). Girotto and co-workers also observed lower VFA production by decreasing food waste load in batch acidogenic fermentation test. (23) The authors negatively highlighted this fact; however, in continuous process configuration as used in this platform, lower OLR allowed for a better control of acidogenic activity since the pH of the system was easily maintained slightly above 5.0. Thermophilic conditions led to a significant CODTOT and TVS solubilization, even higher than those measured in condition I, which performances were strongly affected by system stability. Higher COD and TVS conversion into VFA were also observed (CODVFA/CODSOL ratio 0.64 ± 0.07).
Despite the lowest average VFA concentration (19 ± 2), FL-III seemed to be more suitable, giving the highest CODVFA/CODSOL ratio at 0.75 ± 0.09, a crucial parameter for an efficient selection/enrichment of a PHA-accumulating consortium. (6,18) The temperature of 42 °C led to lower COD solubilization (0.10 g CODSOL/g CODTOT(0) and 0.15 g CODSOL/g TVS(0)) but comparable VFA yields to thermophilic condition (FL-II). The measured yield was 0.40 g CODVFA/g TVS(0), lower than those reported in some literature examples for OFMSW, 0.5–0.9 g CODVFA/g TVS. (24) This difference could be reasonably attributed to the presence of sewage sludge in the mixture.
In terms of composition, butyric acid was predominant in FL-I (46% of total VFA, COD basis), followed by acetic (22%) and propionic (9%) acids. Other VFAs with higher molecular weight (up to C7) had lower concentrations (Figure 2B). By decreasing the OFMSW content and OLR in FL-II, a remarkable increase of acetic acid was quantified (28%), whereas the amount of butyric acid was considerably reduced to 28%. In addition, the content of caproic acid increased up to 15%, as well as for heptanoic acid (6%). A further increase of acetic (33%) and heptanoic (11%) acids was obtained in FL-III. On the contrary, butyric acid was further reduced to 25%. Despite of these differences in concentration, the VFA composition in FL-III was more similar to that of FL-II rather than FL-I. This similarity suggested that temperature did not have relevant effect on the final acids distribution (at least in the explored range).
For the three conditions tested, despite some differences in VFA distribution, the molar fraction of acids containing an odd number of carbon atoms (propionic, valeric, isovaleric and heptanoic etc.) with respect to total VFA [C3/(C3 + C2)VFA] was similar and strongly oriented to the predominance of acids with even number of C atoms (0.17 ± 0.02 mol/mol at maximum in FL-II). It is well-known that this parameter can be used to characterize complex VFA mixtures and to predict polymer composition in terms of monomers stoichiometry. (6,25)
In terms of continuous process operation, the process stability was strongly affected by the relative OFMSW and SS content (and consequent change of OLR); in particular, OFMSW volumetric percentage between 40 and 45% led to frequent spots of high VFA content not balanced by mixture buffering capacity. This caused an unstable VFA production for both concentration and composition with possible difficulties in the operations of the two following aerobic stages and likely affecting final polymer composition. (26) By decreasing OFMSW content to 30–35%, the OLR decreased, whereas the buffer capacity increased. As a result, VFA production was steadily maintained for the whole operation period and, importantly, the effluent presented a lower fraction of CODSOL other than VFA. As mentioned above, a centrifuge filter has been used to obtain a filtered VFA-rich stream for selection and production of PHA-accumulating biomass.
The characterization of the fermented effluent after filtration (fFL) indicated a high volumetric recovery of filtrate (90–95% v/v of the feeding slurry) having TSS level between 5 and 8 g/L in the filtrate. Soluble COD and VFA were not affected by the filtration at all as well as for soluble nutrient level.

3.2. Biomass Selection/Enrichment under Aerobic Dynamic Feeding

After the inoculum, the adaptation of the biomass to the imposed dynamic feeding was easily evaluated by monitoring the dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration as illustrated in the representative example of Figure 3A. The DO concentration decreased to around 2.0 mg/L at the beginning of the cycle (fFL feeding), as a consequence of the increase of the metabolic activity. (27) After VFA (or most of CODSOL) depletion, DO concentration started to increase and it stabilized approximately at 6.0 mg/L and slowly returned back to the initial value during the slowly biodegradable COD consumption. Indeed, the sharp increase of DO concentration was due to the consumption of the readily biodegradable COD, mainly consisting of VFA. This point has been recognized as “feast phase length”. PHA concentration profile confirmed the occurrence of feast–famine regime: The maximum PHA level was quantified at the end the feast phase (with almost complete VFA exhaustion) and then degraded over the course of remaining part of the cycle (Figure 3A).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Main parameters monitored in SBR: VFA, CODSOL, PHA, ammonium, and phosphate in a typical SBR FL-III cycle (A). Feast phase/cycle length ratio (B), maximum and minimum PHA concentration (C), and storage rate and yield (D) in the three different SBR runs.

The ratio “feast phase/cycle length” was regularly measured and used to monitor biomass adaptation and process stability. From Figure 3B, acclimating biomass needed less than 1 week of operation (∼4/5 SRT) to achieve a stable response to the imposed dynamic feeding condition. Despite of the different CODVFA/CODSOL ratio of fFL-I, -II, and -III, the biomass behavior showed a certain stability as indicated by the low feast/cycle time ratio during the whole SBR run, with a maximum of 0.22 h/h, (with the exception of the first day after inoculum) and the short fluctuations casually recorded were no more than 1 day long or even less (Figure 3B). This indicated that the process was technically feasible for long-term operation, despite the presence of changing inputs. Average values of feast phase were 0.14 ± 0.05, 0.11 ± 0.02, and 0.10 ± 0.02 h/h in runs FL-I, FL-II, and FL-III, respectively, abundantly lower than largely recognized threshold of 0.2 h/h, necessary to achieve an efficient biomass selective pressure. (4,11) A slight decrease of F/F ratio was observed when moving from FL-I to FL-III, which can be likely linked to the corresponding increase of VFA/CODSOL ratio in the feed.
The storage response was consequently expected to be strong and robust, and it was verified especially in run FL-II and FL-III where the difference between PHA concentration at the end of feast and the end of famine were higher and characterized by less variability with respect to run FL-I (Figure 3C).
Consequently, based on increasing effectiveness of dynamic feeding regime, biomass storage properties progressively increased as also indicated by the evolution of specific storage rate and yield (Figure 3D). (28) It is reasonable to suppose that the higher stability of biomass storage response was primarily favored by the equally more stable fermentation performance (in particular yield and VFA concentration), which made easier the operation of SBR. In addition, it was observed from recorded cycles profiles that non-VFA CODSOL contributed only in minor part to PHA storage, as also reported in literature. (16,29) This observation was confirmed by the quite similar average storage yields quantified in run FL-III: YP/Sfeast and YP/VFAfeast were equal to 0.36 ± 0.04 and 0.40 ± 0.04, respectively. This non-VFA CODSOL can favor the growth of nonstoring bacteria during the famine phase, causing a less efficient culture selection. (30) Therefore, the progressive increase of VFA/CODSOL ratio along the SBR operation had a significant impact on selective pressure and, as a consequence, on biomass storage properties.
Quantitatively, both specific storage rate and storage yield were strongly correlated with the increasing VFA/CODSOL ratio of used fFL, as easily deducible from Table 3, where the main parameters measured in the three periods of SBR run are reported.
Table 3. Main Parameters (Average Values and Standard Deviations) Monitored in the SBR Runs
  average value
parameterunitrun FL-Irun FL-IIrun FL-III
TSSmg TSS/L2717 ± 1321912 ± 641930 ± 101
VSSmg VSS/L2136 ± 951510 ± 611718 ± 78
VSS/TSS 0.79 ± 0.020.80 ± 0.010.88 ± 0.01
feast phase/cycle length ratioh/h0.14 ± 0.050.11 ± 0.020.10 ± 0.02
PHA (end of feast)mg PHA/L228 ± 58196 ± 30200 ± 16
PHA (end of famine)mg PHA/L104 ± 2434 ± 1220 ± 9
HV fractiong HV/g PHA (%)13.7 ± 0.416.1 ± 0.814 ± 1
specific PHA storage rate (qPfeast)mgCODPHA/gCODXa/h101 ± 52212 ± 35258 ± 44
specific VFA removal rate (−qVFAfeast)mgCODVFA/gCODXa/h332 ± 62619 ± 54634 ± 53
specific COD removal rate (−qSfeast)mgCODSOL/gCODXa/h509 ± 84840 ± 77725 ± 62
storage yield (YP/Sfeast)CODPHA/CODSOL0.22 ± 0.050.26 ± 0.060.36 ± 0.04
storage yield (YP/VFAfeast)CODPHA/CODVFA0.30 ± 0.060.34 ± 0.050.40 ± 0.04
observed yield (YOBSSBR)CODVSS/CODSOL0.49 ± 0.050.42 ± 0.060.54 ± 0.08
effluent ammonia (N–NH4+)mg N–NH4+/L2.6 ± 1.20.8 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.9
effluent phospahte (PO43–)mg P–PO43–/L1.8 ± 0.51.9 ± 0.42.1 ± 0.3
effluent CODSOLmg CODSOL/L204 ± 37102 ± 24116 ± 8
Ammonium, phosphate, and CODSOL concentrations were systematically measured in SBR effluent (Table 3). Despite different characteristics of the three fFL, the selection stage provided stable performance for carbon and nutrients removal. The percentage of removal from the influent was in a narrow range between the three runs: 85–97%, 69–82%, and 86–92% for ammonium, phosphate, and CODSOL respectively.

3.3. PHA Accumulation

The PHA accumulation capacity of selected PHA-storing biomass was evaluated in fed-batch accumulation tests by means of multispike feeding strategy. (27) To do so, fFLs effluents were further refined by means of filtration on the filter press above-described (for fFL-II and fFL-III only) in order to obtain a refined filtered fermented liquids (ffFLs) characterized by no content of suspended solids.
Multiple pulsed additions of ffFL-II and ffFL-III was used to overcome any potential substrate inhibition phenomena. (14,27,31) As an example, Figure 4 shows the profile of PHA biomass content, VFA and PHA concentration during a typical accumulation test performed with run FL-III biomass, fed with either acetate as benchmark (Figure 4A) or ffFL-III (Figure 4B). In both cases, PHA production occurred linearly for at least 3 h, although at different rate. In the case of acetate, the PHA biomass content increased linearly up to 0.40 g PHA/g VSS; then, PHA production was no longer sustained and acetate uptake rate was remarkably reduced after the last pulse addition (4 h). On the other hand, a faster VFA depletion was observed with ffFL-III, at least within the four initial hours. This relatively high VFA uptake rate was associated with a considerable polymer production, since PHA concentration increased almost linearly in the first 4 h of accumulation and its biomass content reached 0.45 g PHA/g VSS. Afterward, VFA started to be consistently accumulated in the reactor and PHA was produced with a lower rate, achieving a final concentration above 2.0 g/L and PHA biomass content of 0.48 g PHA/g VSS. Quantitatively, PHA concentration was almost doubled, and PHA biomass content was roughly 20% higher than those obtained with acetate accumulation. This was likely due to the presence of nutrients in the carbon source, which probably did not limit the microbial activity in terms of PHA storage and new PHA-storing biomass growth. On the contrary, the acetate synthetic solution did not allow the growth of new biomass, and as a consequence, the whole PHA production potential of the consortium was limited.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Fed-batch accumulations conducted with biomass enriched in SBR FL-III run: synthetic acetate (A) and ffFL-III (B) as feeding solutions.

These results highlighted the importance of the nutrients in the expression of storage potential of biomass appropriately selected. Lack of nutrients is not always better than excess and/or partial limitation of nutrients, (32,33) especially if biomass response needs to be exploited to a large extent. (6) In the examined examples, PHA storage had been favored by the presence of nutrients (partially limiting respect to CODSOL) and consequently by the simultaneous growth of PHA-storing organisms. However, better performance with ffFLs than that with acetate can also be due to the SBR biomass having been selected with a very similar fFL mixture instead of with pure acetate.
Table 4 summarizes the main outcomes of conducted accumulations. A first comparison with previous lab-scale investigation adopting an identical process configuration highlighted the promising results obtained in this study. (18) Similar PHA content and yield were achieved with even higher polymer productivity (up to 0.36 g PHA/L h), favored by the presence of nutrients and, as a consequence, by the growth of new active PHA-storing biomass during accumulation. Other investigations utilizing OFMSW sources have been mostly conducted at laboratory scale, at least for the aerobic process steps. (14−16,34) Amulya and co-workers proposed an integrated multistage approach for food waste valorization. (34) In that study, PHA production was strongly limited by low VFA level in the fermented feedstock (approximately 6.0 g CODVFA/L), which made it difficult to operate at relatively high OLR. Hence, enriched biomass produced PHA with a specific rate of 11–42 mg CODPHA/g CODXa/h, 1 order of magnitude lower than this study, 279–301 mg CODPHA/g CODXa/h. Maximal PHA content achieved was 0.24 g PHA/g VSS, negatively affected by the abundant amount of CODSOL other than VFA. Basset et al. used OFMSW FL alternatively mixed with PS. (16) The approach proposed by the authors was different from this pilot-scale demonstration, since it consisted in an integration of MMC selection with nitrogen removal (through aerobic–anoxic feast–famine regime) in a municipal WW treatment line. As a consequence, the storage performances quantified in fed-batch tests were still far, even though not properly comparable, from those exhibited by the fully aerobically selected biomass.
Table 4. Summary of Main Results Obtained in Fed-Batch Accumulations and Comparison with Previous Studies Focused on Food Waste Valorization
VFA-rich streamPHA content (gPHA/gVSS)PHA composition (wt % HB/HV)YP/SbatchaYP/VFAbatchaYX/SbatchaYX/VFAbatchaqPbatch (mgCODPHA/gCODXa/h)PHA productivity (gPHA/L h)refs
acetate (synth.)b0.40 ± 0.02100/0 0.67 ± 0.05 0.08 ± 0.01202 ± 330.20 ± 0.04this study
OFMSW-SS mixture (ffFL-II)f0.43 ± 0.0187/130.37 ± 0.060.44 ± 0.030.22 ± 0.050.24 ± 0.07301 ± 810.29 ± 0.04this study
OFMSW-SS mixture (ffFL-III)f0.46 ± 0.0590/100.41 ± 0.050.50 ± 0.040.21 ± 0.010.26 ± 0.08279 ± 410.36 ± 0.05this study
pretreated OFMSW0.39–0.527–13/93–870.39–0.470.43–0.570.18–0.240.19–0.28255–4360.28–0.49 (13)
leachate0.78c,d  0.33c–0.40d     (14)
percolatef0.41–0.4854–57/46–430.44–0.520.66–1.13   0.18–0.29 (15)
OFMSWf0.11 0.080.220.770.3620  (16)
OFMSW-PSe mixturef0.09 0.0030.0110.790.4711 
VFA mixture (synth.)b0.48 ± 0.0388/12 0.53 ± 0.03  196 ± 130.17 ± 0.02 (18)
food waste (FW)f0.2460/400.09–0.17   11–42  (34)
a

COD basin.

b

No nutrients addition (COD/N/P = 100:0:0).

c

Biomass enriched with synthetic VFA mixture (90% v/v) and leachate (10% v/v).

d

Biomass enriched with synthetic VFA mixture (75% v/v) and leachate (25% v/v).

e

Primary sludge.

f

Fermented feedstock.

Better performance was obtained with leachate and percolate. (14,15) In the first case, the biomass was able to accumulate high level of polymer (0.78 g PHA/g VSS), but it has to be considered that its enrichment in SBR had been performed with a synthetic mixture mainly composed of acetate (75–90% v/v). The storage performances obtained with percolate were comparable with those obtained with ffFL-III with the exception for the composition of produced PHA. Percolate was characterized by higher level of HV precursor (mainly propionic acid, 29–46% w/w); HB and HV monomer fractions were consequently closer (54–57% and 46–43% g/g for HB and HV respectively) if compared to those fractions derived from ffFL-III (90% HB and 10% HV weight basis).
More recently, Valentino et al. (13) described a multistep pilot-scale platform for the conversion of pretreated OFMSW (not mixed with sludge) into PHA and biogas. Regarding the aerobic stage performances, the obtained results were comparable in terms of PHA production rate and yield, volumetric productivity, and polymer composition. However, compared to the previous approach, (13) the process scheme herein proposed offers the possibility for a simultaneous treatment of two different streams collected in the same urban area. In this way, a single technology can be used for efficient and integrated urban waste management.

3.4. Overall PHA Yield and Possible Future Perspective

Data analysis of each pilot unit, including the two solid/liquid separation units (“C” and “F”), have been related to the quantification of the overall PHA yield. This number indicates the amount of TVS necessary for the production of 1.0 kg of PHA, which corresponds to 1.70 kg of CODPHA, based on quantified HB–HV wt % monomers composition. The relative mass flow diagram of PHA production is depicted in Figure 5. The backward calculation started from the final PHA biomass content of 0.46 g PHA/g VSS, obtained with fFL-III as feed solution (Table 3). This PHA content means a production of 1.17 kg (or 1.66 kg of COD) of active biomass XA. For both produced XA and PHA, it has been estimated a total consumption of 6.24 kg of CODVFA, of which 3.38 kg of CODVFA for polymer production in batch accumulation reactor and 2.86 for XA production in SBR enrichment reactor. These separated contributions have been quantified based on the process yields the storage yield (YP/VFAbatch) of 0.50 CODPHA/CODVFA (Table 3), and the XA observed yield (YXaSBR) of 0.58 CODXa/CODVFA, for PHA and XA production, respectively. Since the use of filter press reduced the volumetric load of fFL of 5% v/v with respect to influent FL, the equivalent amount of VFA has to be increased up to 3.56 kg of CODVFA. This led to 6.42 kg of CODVFA in the centrifuged FL, as quantified VFA consumption in both aerobic stages for each kilogram of produced PHA. In addition, taking into account the slight retention of FL in the filter bag centrifuge (roughly 5%), it has been overall estimated a total consumption of 6.76 kg of CODVFA, which corresponds to 356 L of FL-III at a VFA level of 19.0 g COD/L. By considering the TVS concentration of 43 g/kg in the initial feedstock (before acidogenic fermentation), the amount of TVS needed for the production of 1.0 kg PHA is 15.3 kg of TVS, which corresponds to an overall yield of 65 g PHA/kg TVS. Such deep analysis is rarely reported in the literature, and the recent practical advancements of the MMC technology on the pilot-scale platforms showed yields in the same order of magnitude. Colombo and co-workers reported a global yield in the range 62.9–114 g PHA/kg TS by using the percolate fraction of fermented OFMSW; however, only the first fermentation step was performed at pilot scale. (15) In a more recent study, a complete pilot system was developed for the valorization of the OFMSW as the only carbon source. (13) From the mass balance assessment, the authors quantified an overall yield of 37 g PHA/kg TVS. Hence, the approach described in this study increased the yield of 40% approximately.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Mass flow diagram of PHA production from OFMSW-SS mixture.

In the perspective of a future market scenario for PHA synthesized by MMC, the maximization of the yield could have a remarkable impact on the process sustainability. Moreover, in a multisteps biorefinery approach, the simultaneous bioproducts and biogas production from the same organic feedstock could be more beneficial compared to a single product recovery. With reference to the same urban scenario described in this study, Moretto and co-workers quantified a maximum economic income of 245 000 €/year from the electrical energy produced in the Treviso full-scale anaerobic digestion (AD) plant. (35) The 2000 m3 AD reactor was designed for the treatment of OFMSW-SS mixture (roughly 1150 ton TVS/year), produced in an urban scenario of 70 000 Person Equivalent (PE). (35)
With the introduction of a designed PHA line, it can be estimated a request of the 60% of the organic solids (690 ton TVS/year) for the fermentation step and the production of a liquid VFA-rich stream amenable for PHA synthesis. (36) Based on the calculated yield (65 g PHA/kg TVS), a production of 45 ton PHA/year can be counted. Following the approach described in Valentino et al., the residual TVS amount (overflows) is represented by the sum of the 40% unfermented solids (460 ton TVS/year) and the solid-rich prefermented fraction (“cake”), which is discharged from the solid/liquid separation unit (80% of the fermentation TVS influent; 552 ton TVS/year). (36) From the specific gas production (SGP) quantified in the mesophilic AD treatment of the overflows (0.40 m3 biogas/kg TVS), (36) the estimated biogas production is 1124 m3/day. The technical feasibility of this approach has been recently demonstrated; (36) a revenue of 134 591 €/year is achievable from the sale of generated electricity (13.03 MWh/day). (36) In theory, taking into account an average PHA value of 4000 €/ton, (5) an additional revenue of 180 000 €/year has to be considered, potentially making the biorefinery platform a more profitable solution if compared to the traditional AD process.

4. Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The present pilot-scale plant is an example of novel “biorefinery” for urban waste valorisation, providing an option to implement a synergic treatment of relevant organic waste streams produced and collected in the same urban area. The overall process yield of PHA production from selected organic waste has been estimated to 6.5 wt % with respect to the TVS on untreated waste stream, composed by the source sorted OFMSW and sewage sludge. In addition, a possible integration of the proposed approach could be the valorization of the solid-rich overflow, mainly produced by the filter bag centrifuge and basically composed by fermented OFMSW–SS through anaerobic digestion (AD). (35) This solution allows using one main technology for the conversion of urban biowastes into PHA, while also minimizing any residual or consequent waste to be disposed.
This work demonstrated how the innovation in urban waste management could contribute to better waste collection and processing for the production of higher value biobased products.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Giulia Moretto - Department of Environmental Science, Informatics and Statistics, Via Torino 155, 30170 Venezia Mestre, Italy
    • Laura Lorini - Department of Chemistry, “La Sapienza” University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
    • David Bolzonella - Department of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Strada Le Grazie 15, 37134 Verona, Italy
    • Paolo Pavan - Department of Environmental Science, Informatics and Statistics, Via Torino 155, 30170 Venezia Mestre, Italy
    • Mauro Majone - Department of Chemistry, “La Sapienza” University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This work was supported by the REsources from URban BIo-waSte” - RES URBIS (GA 7303499) project in the European Horizon2020 (Call CIRC-05-2016) program.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 36 other publications.

  1. 1
    Morgan-Sagastume, F. Characterisation of open, mixed microbial cultures for polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2016, 15, 593625,  DOI: 10.1007/s11157-016-9411-0
  2. 2
    Kourmentza, C.; Plácido, J.; Venetsaneas, N.; Burniol-Figols, A.; Varrone, C.; Gavala, H. N.; Reis, M. A. M. Recent advances and challenges towards sustainable polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production. Bioengineering 2017, 4, 55,  DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering4020055
  3. 3
    Rodriguez-Perez, S.; Serrano, A.; Pantión, A. A.; Alonso-Farinas, B. Challenges of scaling-up PHA production from waste streams. A review. J. Environ. Manage. 2018, 205, 215230,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.083
  4. 4
    Valentino, F.; Morgan-Sagastume, F.; Campanari, S.; Villano, M.; Werker, A.; Majone, M. Carbon recovery from wastewater through bioconversion into biodegradable polymers. New Biotechnol. 2017, 37, 923,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2016.05.007
  5. 5
    Gholami, A.; Mohkam, M.; Rasoul-Amini, S.; Ghasemi, Y. Industrial production of polyhydroxyalkanoates by bacteria: opportunities and challenges. Minerva Biotechnol. 2016, 28, 5974
  6. 6
    Morgan-Sagastume, F.; Hjort, M.; Cirne, D.; Gérardin, F.; Lacroix, S.; Gaval, G.; Karabegovic, L.; Alexandersson, T.; Johansson, P.; Karlsson, A.; Bengtsson, S.; Arcos-Hernández, M.; Magnusson, P.; Werker, A. Integrated production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) with municipal wastewater and sludge treatment at pilot scale. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 181, 7889,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.046
  7. 7
    Bengtsson, S.; Karlsson, A.; Alexandersson, T.; Quadri, L.; Hjort, M.; Johansson, P.; Morgan-Sagastume, F.; Anterrieu, S.; Arcos-Hernandez, M.; Karabegovic, L.; Magnusson, P.; Werker, A. A process for polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production from municipal wastewater treatment with biological carbon and nitrogen removal demonstrated at pilot-scale. New Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 4253,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2016.11.005
  8. 8
    Jia, Q.; Xiong, H.; Wang, H.; Shi, H.; Sheng, X.; Sun, R.; Chen, G. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) by bacterial consortium from excess sludge fermentation liquid at laboratory and pilot scales. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 171, 159167,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.059
  9. 9
    Chakravarty, P.; Mhaisalkar, V.; Chakrabarti, T. Study on polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production in pilot scale continuous mode wastewater treatment system. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 28962899,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.097
  10. 10
    Tamis, J.; Luzkova, K.; Jiang, Y.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Kleerebezem, R. Enrichment of Plasticicumulans acidivorans at pilot-scale for PHA production on industrial wastewater. J. Biotechnol. 2014, 192, 161169,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.10.022
  11. 11
    Reis, M. A. M.; Albuquerque, M. G. E.; Villano, M.; Majone, M. Mixed culture processes for polyhydroxyalkanoate production from agroindustrial surplus wastes as feedstocks. Comprehensive Biotechnology 2011, 669683,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-088504-9.00464-5
  12. 12
    Pfaltzgraff, L. A.; De bruyn, M.; Cooper, E. C.; Budarin, V.; Clark, J. H. Food waste biomass: a resource for high-value chemicals. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 307,  DOI: 10.1039/c2gc36978h
  13. 13
    Valentino, F.; Gottardo, M.; Micolucci, F.; Pavan, P.; Bolzonella, D.; Rossetti, S.; Majone, M. Organic fraction of municipal solid waste recovery by conversion into added-value polyhydroxyalkanoates and biogas. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 1637516385,  DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03454
  14. 14
    Korkakaki, E.; Mulders, M.; Veeken, A.; Rozendal, R.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Kleerebezem, R. PHA production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW): Overcoming the inhibitory matrix. Water Res. 2016, 96, 7483,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.033
  15. 15
    Colombo, B.; Favini, F.; Scaglia, B.; Sciarria, T. P.; D’Imporzano, G.; Pognani, M.; Alekseeva, A.; Eisele, G.; Cosentino, C.; Adani, F. Enhanced polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste by using mixed microbial culture. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2017, 10, 201,  DOI: 10.1186/s13068-017-0888-8
  16. 16
    Basset, N.; Katsou, E.; Frison, N.; Malamis, S.; Dosta, J.; Fatone, F. Integrating the selection of PHA storing biomass and nitrogen removal via nitrite in the main wastewater treatment line. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 200, 820829,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.063
  17. 17
    Valentino, F.; Morgan-Sagastume, F.; Fraraccio, S.; Corsi, G.; Zanaroli, G.; Werker, A.; Majone, M. Sludge minimization in municipal wastewater treatment by polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 72817294,  DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3268-y
  18. 18
    Valentino, F.; Beccari, M.; Fraraccio, S.; Zanaroli, G.; Majone, M. Feed frequency in a Sequencing Batch Reactor strongly affects the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) from volatile fatty acids. New Biotechnol. 2014, 31, 264275,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2013.10.006
  19. 19
    Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed.; American Public Health Association, 1998.
  20. 20
    Braunegg, G.; Sonnleitner, B.; Lafferty, R. M. A. Rapid gas chromatographic method for the determination of poly-b-hydroxybutyric acid in microbial biomass. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1978, 6, 2937,  DOI: 10.1007/BF00500854
  21. 21
    Valentino, F.; Brusca, A. A.; Beccari, M.; Nuzzo, A.; Zanaroli, G.; Majone, M. Start up of biological sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and short-term biomass acclimation for polyhydroxyalkanoates production. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2013, 88, 261270,  DOI: 10.1002/jctb.3824
  22. 22
    Hao, J.; Wang, H. Volatile fatty acids productions by mesophilic and thermophilic sludge fermentation: Biological responses to fermentation temperature. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 175, 367373,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.106
  23. 23
    Girotto, F.; Lavagnolo, M. C.; Pivato, A.; Cossu, R. Acidogenic fermentation of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and cheese whey for bio-plastic precursors recovery – Effects of process conditions during batch tests. Waste Manage. 2017, 70, 7180,  DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.09.015
  24. 24
    Bolzonella, D.; Fatone, F.; Pavan, P.; Cecchi, F. Anaerobic fermentation of organic fraction of municipal solid waste for the production of soluble organic compounds. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 34123418,  DOI: 10.1021/ie048937m
  25. 25
    Bengtsson, S.; Pisco, A. R.; Johansson, P.; Lemos, P. C.; Reis, M. A. M. Molecular weight and thermal properties of polyhydroxyalkanoates produced from fermented sugar molasses by open mixed cultures. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 147, 172179,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.03.022
  26. 26
    Pittmann, T.; Steinmetz, H. Polyhydroxyalkanoate production on waste water treatment plants: process scheme, operating conditions and potential analysis for german and european municipal waste water treatment plants. Bioengineering 2017, 4, 54,  DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering4020054
  27. 27
    Campanari, S.; e Silva, F. A.; Bertin, L.; Villano, M.; Majone, M. Effect of the organic loading rate on the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates in a multi-stage process aimed at the valorization of olive oil mill wastewater. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 71, 3441,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.06.006
  28. 28
    Dionisi, D.; Majone, M.; Papa, V.; Beccari, M. Biodegradable polymers from organic acids by using activated sludge enriched by aerobic periodic feeding. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 85, 569579,  DOI: 10.1002/bit.10910
  29. 29
    Albuquerque, M. G. E.; Torres, C. A. V.; Reis, M. A. M. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) production by a mixed microbial culture using sugar molasses: effect of the influent substrate concentration on culture selection. Water Res. 2010, 44, 34193433,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.03.021
  30. 30
    Majone, M.; Massanisso, P.; Carucci, A.; Lindrea, K.; Tandoi, V. Influence of storage on kinetic selection to control aerobic filamentous bulking. Water Sci. Technol. 1996, 34, 223232,  DOI: 10.2166/wst.1996.0554
  31. 31
    Albuquerque, M. G. E.; Eiroa, M.; Torres, C.; Nunes, B. R.; Reis, M. A. M. Strategies for the development of a side stream process for polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production from sugar cane molasses. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 130, 411421,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.05.011
  32. 32
    Valentino, F.; Karabegovic, L.; Majone, M.; Morgan-Sagastume, F.; Werker, A. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) storage within a mixed-culture biomass with simultaneous growth as a function of accumulation substrate nitrogen and phosphorus levels. Water Res. 2015, 77, 4963,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.03.016
  33. 33
    Morgan-Sagastume, F.; Valentino, F.; Hjort, M.; Zanaroli, G.; Majone, M.; Werker, A. Acclimation process for enhancing polyhydroxyalkanoate accumulation in activated-sludge biomass. Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 10, 10651082,  DOI: 10.1007/s12649-017-0122-8
  34. 34
    Amulya, K.; Jukuri, S.; Venkata Mohan, S. Sustainable multistage process for enhanced productivity of bioplastics from waste remediation through aerobic dynamic feeding strategy: Process integration for up-scaling. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 188, 231239,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.070
  35. 35
    Moretto, G., Ardolino, F., Piasentin, A., Girotto, L., Cecchi, F. Integrated anaerobic codigestion system for the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge treatment: an Italian case study. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2019,  DOI: 10.1002/jctb.5993 .
  36. 36
    Valentino, F.; Moretto, G.; Gottardo, M.; Pavan, P.; Bolzonella, D.; Majone, M. Novel routes for urban bio-waste management: A combined acidic fermentation and anaerobic digestion process for platform chemicals and biogas production. J. Cleaner Prod. 2019, 220, 368375,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.102

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 115 publications.

  1. Gaia Salvatori, Angela Marchetti, Anna Maria Russo, Jesus Rodriguez, Vadim Scerbacov, Francesco Fianelli, Sara Alfano, Simona Crognale, Alessio Massimi, Simona Rossetti, Giacomo Canali, Tiziana De Micheli, David Bolzonella, Marianna Villano. Pilot-Scale Acidogenic Fermentation of Reground Pasta Byproduct for Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production with Mixed Microbial Cultures. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2025, 13 (8) , 3024-3035. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c03754
  2. Tijo Cherian Karthika Rajendran Beena Cherian Shibin Eranhottu Fahmeeda Parveen Panikkaveetil Shahulhameed . Transformation of Biochar for Removal of Noxious Contaminants from Industrial Effluents: A Green Technology for Sustainable Future. , 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2024-1478.ch011
  3. Gaia Salvatori, Sara Alfano, Andrea Martinelli, Marco Gottardo, Marianna Villano, Bruno S. Ferreira, Francesco Valentino, Laura Lorini. Chlorine-free Extractions of Mixed-Culture Polyhydroxyalkanoates Produced from Fermented Sewage Sludge at Pilot Scale. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2023, 62 (43) , 17400-17407. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c02684
  4. Cecilia Bruni, Alessia Foglia, Anna Laura Eusebi, Nicola Frison, Çağrı Akyol, Francesco Fatone. Targeted Bio-Based Volatile Fatty Acid Production from Waste Streams through Anaerobic Fermentation: Link between Process Parameters and Operating Scale. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2021, 9 (30) , 9970-9987. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c02195
  5. Mariana Matos, Rafaela A. P. Cruz, Pedro Cardoso, Fernando Silva, Elisabete B. Freitas, Gilda Carvalho, Maria A. M. Reis. Combined Strategies to Boost Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production from Fruit Waste in a Three-Stage Pilot Plant. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2021, 9 (24) , 8270-8279. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c02432
  6. Chin-San Wu, Dung-Yi Wu, Shan-Shue Wang. Biodegradable Composite Nanofiber Containing Fish-Scale Extracts. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2021, 4 (1) , 462-469. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c00955
  7. Giulia Moretto, Laura Lorini, Paolo Pavan, Simona Crognale, Barbara Tonanzi, Simona Rossetti, Mauro Majone, Francesco Valentino. Biopolymers from Urban Organic Waste: Influence of the Solid Retention Time to Cycle Length Ratio in the Enrichment of a Mixed Microbial Culture (MMC). ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2020, 8 (38) , 14531-14539. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c04980
  8. Beatriz Melendez-Rodriguez, Sergio Torres-Giner, Laura Lorini, Francesco Valentino, Chris Sammon, Luis Cabedo, Jose Maria Lagaron. Valorization of Municipal Biowaste into Electrospun Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) Biopapers for Food Packaging Applications. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2020, 3 (9) , 6110-6123. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c00698
  9. Fabiano Asunis, Paolo Dessì, Giorgia De Gioannis, Aldo Muntoni. VFA extraction through silicone membrane fosters PHA production from nutrient-rich biowaste. Bioresource Technology 2025, 426 , 132314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132314
  10. Jordana Georgin, Claudete Gindri Ramos, Jivago Schumacher de Oliveira, Younes Dehmani, Noureddine El Messaoudi, Lucas Meili, Dison S. P. Franco. A Critical Review of the Advances and Current Status of the Application of Adsorption in the Remediation of Micropollutants and Dyes Through the Use of Emerging Bio-Based Nanocomposites. Sustainability 2025, 17 (5) , 2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052012
  11. Irene Izarra, Irene Álvarez, F. Javier Pinar, Javier Mena. Urban Biorefinery Demonstration: Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoates from a Municipal Solid Waste. Applied Sciences 2025, 15 (6) , 3272. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15063272
  12. Laura Pozo-Morales, Antonio Rosales Martínez, Enrique Baquerizo, Germán del Valle Agulla. Simulation Tool for the Techno-Economic Assessment of the Integrated Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoates as Value-Added Byproducts of a Wastewater Treatment Plant. Processes 2025, 13 (2) , 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13020295
  13. Cora M. Laumeyer, Julia Zimmer, Heidrun Steinmetz. From fruit juice wastewater to biopolymer – How the mixed microbial culture and PHA content develop over time. Chemical Engineering Journal 2025, 503 , 158314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.158314
  14. Antonio Mineo, Mark M.C. van Loosdrecht, Giorgio Mannina. From waste activated sludge to polyhydroxyalkanoate: Insights from a membrane-based enrichment process. Chemical Engineering Journal 2025, 506 , 160089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.160089
  15. Ghazal Srivastava, Kaoutar Aboudi, Vinay Kumar Tyagi, Absar Ahmad Kazmi. Role of intracellular storage polymers in simultaneous biological nutrient removal and resources recovery. Journal of Environmental Management 2025, 373 , 123720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123720
  16. Vishal Ahuja, Pankaj Kumar Singh, Chandan Mahata, Jong-Min Jeon, Gopalakrishnan Kumar, Yung-Hun Yang, Shashi Kant Bhatia. A review on microbes mediated resource recovery and bioplastic (polyhydroxyalkanoates) production from wastewater. Microbial Cell Factories 2024, 23 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-024-02430-0
  17. Giovanna Pesante, Chiara Tesoriero, Emma Cadoria, Marco Andreolli, Silvia Lampis, Andrea Vettori, Nicola Frison. Valorisation of agricultural residues into Thauera sp. Sel9 microbial proteins for aquaculture. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2024, 36 , 103772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2024.103772
  18. Éamonn Walsh, Lekha Menon Margassery, Alejandro Rodriguez-Sanchez, David Wall, Paul Bolger, Marcel A.K. Jansen, Niall O'Leary. Integration of microbial bioreactors and Lemna minor cultivation for sustainable treatment of dairy processing wastewater. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2024, 67 , 106290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106290
  19. Rui Guo, Xiaotong Cen, Bing-Jie Ni, Min Zheng. Bioplastic polyhydroxyalkanoate conversion in waste activated sludge. Journal of Environmental Management 2024, 370 , 122866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122866
  20. Pema Lhamo, Biswanath Mahanty, Shishir Kumar Behera. Optimization of biomass and polyhydroxyalkanoate production by Cupriavidus necator using response surface methodology and genetic algorithm optimized artificial neural network. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2024, 14 (17) , 20053-20068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04043-w
  21. Shina Gautam, Alok Gautam, Juily Pawaday, Rekha Karshanbhai Kanzariya, Zhitong Yao. Current Status and Challenges in the Commercial Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoate-Based Bioplastic: A Review. Processes 2024, 12 (8) , 1720. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12081720
  22. Giorgio Mannina, Antonio Mineo. A comprehensive comparison between two strategies to produce polyhydroxyalkanoates from domestic sewage sludge. Journal of Cleaner Production 2024, 468 , 143052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143052
  23. Emmanuel da Silva Côgo Miguel, Beatriz Santos Machado, Ana Paula Silva Teles, Thalita Ferreira da Silva, Fernando Jorge Corrêa Magalhães Filho, Priscila Sabioni Cavalheri. Optimizing sewage treatment by UV/H2O2 process and vertical flow constructed wetland integration. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2024, 64 , 105580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105580
  24. Zixin Zhang, Yufen Wang, Xiaomin Wang, Yaobin Zhang, Tingting Zhu, Lai Peng, Yifeng Xu, Xueming Chen, Dongbo Wang, Bing-Jie Ni, Yiwen Liu. Towards scaling-up implementation of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production from activated sludge: Progress and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production 2024, 447 , 141542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141542
  25. Zain Ali, Muhammad Abdullah, Muhammad Talha Yasin, Kinza Amanat, Khurshid Ahmad, Ishfaq Ahmed, Muther Mansoor Qaisrani, Jallat Khan. Organic waste-to-bioplastics: Conversion with eco-friendly technologies and approaches for sustainable environment. Environmental Research 2024, 244 , 117949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.117949
  26. Sundramurthy Venkatesa Prabhu, Abas Siraj Hamda, Mani Jayakumar, Selvakumar Periyasamy, Subramanian Manivannan, Workisa Bacha. Production strategies and potential repercussion of sewage sludge biochar as a futuristic paradigm toward environmental beneficiation: A comprehensive review. Environmental Quality Management 2024, 33 (3) , 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.22007
  27. Jeniffer Gracia, Armando Espinosa, Nubia Moreno, Iván Cabeza. Evaluation of the production and extraction of polyhydroxybutyrate from volatile fatty acids and using mixed cultures of PTAR and B. cepacia. Environmental Research 2024, 96 , 118448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118448
  28. J.R. Almeida, E. Serrano León, F. Rogalla, J.C. Fradinho, A. Oehmen, M.A.M. Reis. Polyhydroxyalkanoates production in purple phototrophic bacteria ponds: A breakthrough in outdoor pilot-scale operation. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 912 , 168899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168899
  29. Guangbao Zhang, Weishuang Zheng, Xinyi Bai, Libo Xu, Kang Li, Mengjun Zhang, Yi Huang. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) biological recovery approaches and protein-mediated secretion model hypothesis. Journal of Cleaner Production 2024, 440 , 140851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140851
  30. Francesco Traina, Santo Fabio Corsino, Marco Capodici, Enrico Licitra, Gaetano Di Bella, Michele Torregrossa, Gaspare Viviani. Combined recovery of polyhydroxyalkanoates and reclaimed water in the mainstream of a WWTP for agro-food industrial wastewater valorisation by membrane bioreactor technology. Journal of Environmental Management 2024, 351 , 119836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119836
  31. Wafa Al-Gethami, Muhammad Azam Qamar, Mohammad Shariq, Abdel-Nasser M. A. Alaghaz, Ahmad Farhan, Ashwaq A. Areshi, M. Hisham Alnasir. Emerging environmentally friendly bio-based nanocomposites for the efficient removal of dyes and micropollutants from wastewater by adsorption: a comprehensive review. RSC Advances 2024, 14 (4) , 2804-2834. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA06501D
  32. Constantinos Noutsopoulos, Victoria Gkoutzioupa, Evina Katsou, Nicola Frison, Francesco Fatone, Simos Malamis. Integrated selection of PHA-storing biomass and nitrogen removal via nitrite from sludge reject water: a mathematical model. Environmental Technology 2024, 45 (1) , 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2022.2099311
  33. S. Mann, J. G. Sharma, R. Kataria. Microbial accumulation of bioplastics from waste stream: recent advancements and applications. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2024, 21 (2) , 2279-2306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05126-x
  34. Paolo Costa, Marina Basaglia, Sergio Casella, Christian Kennes, Lorenzo Favaro, María C. Veiga. Autotrophic production of polyhydroxyalkanoates using acidogenic-derived H2 and CO2 from fruit waste. Bioresource Technology 2023, 390 , 129880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129880
  35. Saima Jan, Awdhesh Kumar Mishra, Mujtaba Aamir Bhat, Mudasir Ahmad Bhat, Arif Tasleem Jan. Pollutants in aquatic system: a frontier perspective of emerging threat and strategies to solve the crisis for safe drinking water. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2023, 30 (53) , 113242-113279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30302-4
  36. Tanlong Zhou, Shunli Wang, Wanqin Zhang, Fubin Yin, Qitao Cao, Tianjing Lian, Hongmin Dong. Polyhydroxyalkanoates production from lactic acid fermentation broth of agricultural waste without extra purification: The effect of concentrations. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2023, 32 , 103311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103311
  37. Laura Isern-Cazorla, Antonio Mineo, María Eugenia Suárez-Ojeda, Giorgio Mannina. Effect of organic loading rate on the production of Polyhydroxyalkanoates from sewage sludge. Journal of Environmental Management 2023, 343 , 118272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118272
  38. Lalit Goswami, Anamika Kushwaha, Suchada Chanprateep Napathorn, Beom Soo Kim. Valorization of organic wastes using bioreactors for polyhydroxyalkanoate production: Recent advancement, sustainable approaches, challenges, and future perspectives. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2023, 247 , 125743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125743
  39. Chiara Bastianelli, Giovanna Pesante, Stefano Ambrosini, Anita Zamboni, Nicola Frison. Upcycling of PHA-producing bacteria for biostimulants production and polyhydroxyalkanoates recovery. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 888 , 164238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164238
  40. Bruno C. Marreiros, Mónica Carvalheira, Cláudia Henriques, Daniela Pequito, Yen Nguyen, Runar G. Solstad, J. Johannes Eksteen, Maria A.M. Reis. Pilot-scale valorisation of salmon peptone into polyhydroxyalkanoates by mixed microbial cultures under conditions of high ammonia concentration. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2023, 11 (3) , 110100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.110100
  41. Richa Prasad Mahato, Saurabh Kumar, Padma Singh. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates from renewable resources: a review on prospects, challenges and applications. Archives of Microbiology 2023, 205 (5) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-023-03499-8
  42. Truus de Vrije, Ricardo M. Nagtegaal, Ruud M. Veloo, Frans H.J. Kappen, Frits A. de Wolf. Medium chain length polyhydroxyalkanoate produced from ethanol by Pseudomonas putida grown in liquid obtained from acidogenic digestion of organic municipal solid waste. Bioresource Technology 2023, 375 , 128825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.128825
  43. Tülin Yılmaz Nayır, Selver Konuk, Serdar Kara. Extraction of polyhydroxyalkanoate from activated sludge using supercritical carbon dioxide process and biopolymer characterization. Journal of Biotechnology 2023, 364 , 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2023.01.011
  44. Roberto Lauri, Emma Incocciati, Biancamaria Pietrangeli, Lionel Nguemna Tayou, Francesco Valentino, Marco Gottardo, Mauro Majone. Hazop Analysis of a Bioprocess for Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Production from Organic Waste: Part A. Fermentation 2023, 9 (2) , 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9020099
  45. Roberto Lauri, Emma Incocciati, Biancamaria Pietrangeli, Lionel Nguemna Tayou, Francesco Valentino, Marco Gottardo, Mauro Majone. Hazop Analysis of a Bioprocess for Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Production from Organic Waste: Part B. Fermentation 2023, 9 (2) , 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9020154
  46. Giovanna Pesante, Nicola Frison. Recovery of bio-based products from PHA-rich biomass obtained from biowaste: A review. Bioresource Technology Reports 2023, 21 , 101345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101345
  47. Dario Presti, María Eugenia Suárez-Ojeda, Giorgio Mannina. Integration of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) production into urban wastewater treatment plants. 2023, 31-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99920-5.00001-9
  48. Giuseppe Gallo, Walter Arancio, Emilia Palazzotto, Fanny Claire Capri, Rosa Alduina. Microbial biotechnology for wastewater treatment into circular economy. 2023, 333-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99920-5.00003-2
  49. Mateo Saavedra del Oso, Miguel Mauricio-Iglesias, Almudena Hospido, Bernhard Steubing. Prospective LCA to provide environmental guidance for developing waste-to-PHA biorefineries. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023, 383 , 135331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135331
  50. Anamika Kushwaha, Nidhi Hans, Ishrat Jahan Badruddin, Won-Gyun Oh, Rishabh Shukla, Lalit Goswami, Beom Soo Kim. Polyhydroxyalkanoates production from biowastes: A route towards environmental sustainability. 2023, 143-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91149-8.00013-2
  51. Elena Rossi, Isabella Pecorini, Antonio Panico, Renato Iannelli. Impact of reactor configuration and relative operating conditions on volatile fatty acids production from organic waste. Environmental Technology Reviews 2022, 11 (1) , 156-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622515.2022.2139641
  52. Chris M. Vermeer, Maaike Nielsen, Vincent Eckhardt, Matthijs Hortensius, Jelmer Tamis, Stephen J. Picken, Gabrie M.H. Meesters, Robbert Kleerebezem. Systematic solvent screening and selection for polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHBV) recovery from biomass. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2022, 10 (6) , 108573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.108573
  53. Shuping Wu, Weijian Shi, Kanghui Li, Jiawei Cai, Lingyun Chen. Recent advances on sustainable bio-based materials for water treatment: Fabrication, modification and application. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2022, 10 (6) , 108921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.108921
  54. Paola Critelli, Giovanna Pesante, Stefania Lupinelli, Michele Modesti, Silvia Zanatta, Federico Battista, David Bolzonella, Nicola Frison. Production and characterisation of PHAs by pure culture using protein hydrolysates as sole carbon source. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2022, 28 , 102919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102919
  55. Fabiano Asunis, Alessandra Carucci, Giorgia De Gioannis, Gianluigi Farru, Aldo Muntoni, Alessandra Polettini, Raffaella Pomi, Andreina Rossi, Daniela Spiga. Combined biohydrogen and polyhydroxyalkanoates production from sheep cheese whey by a mixed microbial culture. Journal of Environmental Management 2022, 322 , 116149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116149
  56. Naima Khan, Iftikhar Ali, Sumaira Mazhar, Sajida Munir, Rida Batool, Nazia Jamil. Co-Culture of Halotolerant Bacteria to Produce Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) Using Sewage Wastewater Substrate. Polymers 2022, 14 (22) , 4963. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224963
  57. Fabiano Asunis, Giovanna Cappai, Alessandra Carucci, Giorgia De Gioannis, Paolo Dessì, Aldo Muntoni, Alessandra Polettini, Raffaella Pomi, Andreina Rossi, Daniela Spiga, Cristina Trois. Dark fermentative volatile fatty acids production from food waste: A review of the potential central role in waste biorefineries. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy 2022, 40 (11) , 1571-1593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X221103940
  58. Federico Battista, Giuseppe Strazzera, Francesco Valentino, Marco Gottardo, Marianna Villano, Mariana Matos, Fernando Silva, Maria.A. M. Reis, Joan Mata-Alvarez, Sergi Astals, Joan Dosta, Rhys Jon Jones, Jaime Massanet-Nicolau, Alan Guwy, Paolo Pavan, David Bolzonella, Mauro Majone. New insights in food waste, sewage sludge and green waste anaerobic fermentation for short-chain volatile fatty acids production: A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2022, 10 (5) , 108319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.108319
  59. Federico Verdini, Silvia Tabasso, Francesco Mariatti, Francesca Bosco, Chiara Mollea, Emanuela Calcio Gaudino, Alessio Cirio, Giancarlo Cravotto. From Agri-Food Wastes to Polyhydroxyalkanoates through a Sustainable Process. Fermentation 2022, 8 (10) , 556. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8100556
  60. Marco Gottardo, David Bolzonella, Giulia Adele Tuci, Francesco Valentino, Mauro Majone, Paolo Pavan, Federico Battista. Producing volatile fatty acids and polyhydroxyalkanoates from foods by-products and waste: A review. Bioresource Technology 2022, 361 , 127716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127716
  61. Niravkumar Mahendrasinh Kosamia, Mahdieh Samavi, Kachuol Piok, Sudip Kumar Rakshit. Perspectives for scale up of biorefineries using biochemical conversion pathways: Technology status, techno-economic, and sustainable approaches. Fuel 2022, 324 , 124532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124532
  62. Mridul Umesh, Sabarathinam Shanmugam, Timo Kikas, Nguyen Thuy Lan Chi, Arivalagan Pugazhendhi. Progress in bio-based biodegradable polymer as the effective replacement for the engineering applicators. Journal of Cleaner Production 2022, 362 , 132267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132267
  63. Paloma Cabecas Segura, Quentin De Meur, Abbas Alloul, Audrey Tanghe, Rob Onderwater, Siegfried E. Vlaeminck, Alain Vande Wouwer, Ruddy Wattiez, Laurent Dewasme, Baptiste Leroy. Preferential photoassimilation of volatile fatty acids by purple non-sulfur bacteria: Experimental kinetics and dynamic modelling. Biochemical Engineering Journal 2022, 186 , 108547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2022.108547
  64. A. Lanfranchi, G. Tassinato, F. Valentino, G.A. Martinez, E. Jones, C. Gioia, L. Bertin, C. Cavinato. Hydrodynamic cavitation pre-treatment of urban waste: Integration with acidogenic fermentation, PHAs synthesis and anaerobic digestion processes. Chemosphere 2022, 301 , 134624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134624
  65. Francesca Crisafi, Francesco Valentino, Federico Micolucci, Renata Denaro. From Organic Wastes and Hydrocarbons Pollutants to Polyhydroxyalkanoates: Bioconversion by Terrestrial and Marine Bacteria. Sustainability 2022, 14 (14) , 8241. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148241
  66. Patrick Sekoai, Obinna Ezeokoli, Kelvin Yoro, Orevaoghene Eterigho-Ikelegbe, Olivier Habimana, Samuel Iwarere, Michael Daramola, Tunde Ojumu. The production of polyhydroxyalkanoates using volatile fatty acids derived from the acidogenic biohydrogen effluents: An overview. Bioresource Technology Reports 2022, 18 , 101111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101111
  67. Laura Lorini, Gianluca Munarin, Gaia Salvatori, Sara Alfano, Paolo Pavan, Mauro Majone, Francesco Valentino. Sewage sludge as carbon source for polyhydroxyalkanoates: a holistic approach at pilot scale level. Journal of Cleaner Production 2022, 354 , 131728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131728
  68. Santo Fabio Corsino, Daniele Di Trapani, Francesco Traina, Ilenia Cruciata, Laura Scirè Calabrisotto, Francesco Lopresti, Vincenzo La Carrubba, Paola Quatrini, Michele Torregrossa, Gaspare Viviani. Integrated production of biopolymers with industrial wastewater treatment: Effects of OLR on process yields, biopolymers characteristics and mixed microbial community enrichment. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2022, 47 , 102772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102772
  69. Crognale Simona, Lorini Laura, Valentino Francesco, Villano Marianna, Marzo Gago Cristina, Tonanzi Barbara, Majone Mauro, Rossetti Simona. Effect of the organic loading rate on the PHA-storing microbiome in sequencing batch reactors operated with uncoupled carbon and nitrogen feeding. Science of The Total Environment 2022, 825 , 153995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153995
  70. Neda Amanat, Bruna Matturro, Marianna Villano, Laura Lorini, Marta Maria Rossi, Marco Zeppilli, Simona Rossetti, Marco Petrangeli Papini. Enhancing the biological reductive dechlorination of trichloroethylene with PHA from mixed microbial cultures (MMC). Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2022, 10 (2) , 107047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.107047
  71. Shikha Guleria, Harpreet Singh, Vamika Sharma, Neha Bhardwaj, Shailendra Kumar Arya, Sanjeev Puri, Madhu Khatri. Polyhydroxyalkanoates production from domestic waste feedstock: A sustainable approach towards bio-economy. Journal of Cleaner Production 2022, 340 , 130661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130661
  72. Simone Bagatella, Riccardo Ciapponi, Elena Ficara, Nicola Frison, Stefano Turri. Production and Characterization of Polyhydroxyalkanoates from Wastewater via Mixed Microbial Cultures and Microalgae. Sustainability 2022, 14 (6) , 3704. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063704
  73. Alan Werker, Laura Lorini, Marianna Villano, Francesco Valentino, Mauro Majone. Modelling Mixed Microbial Culture Polyhydroxyalkanoate Accumulation Bioprocess towards Novel Methods for Polymer Production Using Dilute Volatile Fatty Acid Rich Feedstocks. Bioengineering 2022, 9 (3) , 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9030125
  74. Elena Rossi, Isabella Pecorini, Paola Paoli, Renato Iannelli. Plug-flow reactor for volatile fatty acid production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Influence of organic loading rate. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2022, 10 (1) , 106963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106963
  75. Maximilian T. Schmid, Eva Sykacek, Kevin O'Connor, Markus Omann, Norbert Mundigler, Markus Neureiter. Pilot scale production and evaluation of mechanical and thermal properties of P( 3HB ) from Bacillus megaterium cultivated on desugarized sugar beet molasses. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2022, 139 (3) https://doi.org/10.1002/app.51503
  76. Ilke Pala-Ozkok, Gülsüm Emel Zengin, Didem Okutman Taş, Nevin Yağcı, Didem Güven, H. Güçlü Insel, Emine Çokgör. Polyhydroxyalkanoate production from food industry residual streams using mixed microbial cultures. 2022, 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90178-9.00010-X
  77. Mónica Carvalheira, Bruno C. Marreiros, M.A.M Reis. Acids (VFAs) and bioplastic (PHA) recovery. 2022, 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90178-9.00016-0
  78. Mukesh Kumar, Inderpal Devgon, Ritu Bala, Abhishek Rana, Manpreet Kaur Somal, Rohan Samir Kumar Sachan, Arun Karnwal. Integrated production of polyhydroxyalkonate (bioplastic) with municipal wastewater and sludge treatment for sustainable development. 2022, 283-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91180-1.00011-9
  79. Gabriella Papa, Tommy Pepe Sciarria, Barbara Scaglia, Fabrizio Adani. Diversifying the products from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) by producing polyhydroxyalkanoates from the liquid fraction and biomethane from the residual solid fraction. Bioresource Technology 2022, 344 , 126180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126180
  80. Qi Hao Goh, Amr A. Farouk, IreneMei Leng Chew. Optimizing the bioplastic chemical building block with wastewater sludge as the feedstock using carbon-hydrogen-oxygen framework. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2022, 176 , 105920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105920
  81. Chris M. Vermeer, Maaike Nielsen, Vincent Eckhardt, Matthijs Hortensius, Jelmer Tamis, Stephen J. Picken, Gabrie M. H. Meesters, Robbert Kleerebezem. Systematic Solvent Screening and Selection for Polyhydroxyalkanoates (Phbv) Recovery from Biomass. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 13 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4122159
  82. Fabiano Asunis, Alessandra Carucci, Giorgia De Gioannis, Gianluigi Farru, Aldo Muntoni, Alessandra Polettini, Raffaella Pomi, Andreina Rossi, Daniela Spiga. Combined Biohydrogen and Polyhydroxyalkanoates Production from Sheep Cheese Whey by a Mixed Microbial Culture. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 244 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4170586
  83. Sonam Tripathi, Diane Purchase, Sarah Al-Rashed, Ram Chandra. Microbial community dynamics and their relationships with organic and metal pollutants of sugarcane molasses-based distillery wastewater sludge. Environmental Pollution 2022, 292 , 118267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118267
  84. Mónica Carvalheira, Loic Hilliou, Catarina S.S. Oliveira, Eliana C. Guarda, Maria A.M. Reis. Polyhydroxyalkanoates from industrial cheese whey: Production and characterization of polymers with differing hydroxyvalerate content. Current Research in Biotechnology 2022, 4 , 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2022.03.004
  85. Nausheen Jaffur, Pratima Jeetah, Gopalakrishnan Kumar. A review on enzymes and pathways for manufacturing polyhydroxybutyrate from lignocellulosic materials. 3 Biotech 2021, 11 (11) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-021-03009-x
  86. Jesús E. Rodríguez G., Silvia Brojanigo, Marina Basaglia, Lorenzo Favaro, Sergio Casella. Efficient production of polyhydroxybutyrate from slaughterhouse waste using a recombinant strain of Cupriavidus necator DSM 545. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 794 , 148754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148754
  87. Vasanth Kumar Vaithyanathan, Hubert Cabana. Integrated Biotechnology Management of Biosolids: Sustainable Ways to Produce Value—Added Products. Frontiers in Water 2021, 3 https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.729679
  88. Vineet Kumar, Shaili Srivastava, Indu Shekhar Thakur. Enhanced recovery of polyhydroxyalkanoates from secondary wastewater sludge of sewage treatment plant: Analysis and process parameters optimization. Bioresource Technology Reports 2021, 15 , 100783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100783
  89. Anouk F. Duque, Riccardo Campo, Angeles Val del Rio, Catarina L. Amorim. Wastewater Valorization: Practice around the World at Pilot- and Full-Scale. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, 18 (18) , 9466. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189466
  90. Marta M. Rossi, Edoardo Dell’Armi, Laura Lorini, Neda Amanat, Marco Zeppilli, Marianna Villano, Marco Petrangeli Papini. Combined Strategies to Prompt the Biological Reduction of Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbons: New Sustainable Options for Bioremediation Application. Bioengineering 2021, 8 (8) , 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8080109
  91. Sara Alfano, Laura Lorini, Mauro Majone, Fabio Sciubba, Francesco Valentino, Andrea Martinelli. Ethylic Esters as Green Solvents for the Extraction of Intracellular Polyhydroxyalkanoates Produced by Mixed Microbial Culture. Polymers 2021, 13 (16) , 2789. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162789
  92. Erica Pascale, Elena Franchitti, Chiara Caredda, Stefania Fornasero, Giulia Carletto, Biancamaria Pietrangeli, Francesco Valentino, Paolo Pavan, Giorgio Gilli, Elisa Anedda, Deborah Traversi. Bioaerosol Emissions during Organic Waste Treatment for Biopolymer Production: A Case Study. Atmosphere 2021, 12 (8) , 1069. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12081069
  93. Francisco G. Blanco, Natalia Hernández, Virginia Rivero-Buceta, Beatriz Maestro, Jesús M. Sanz, Aránzazu Mato, Ana M. Hernández-Arriaga, M. Auxiliadora Prieto. From Residues to Added-Value Bacterial Biopolymers as Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications. Nanomaterials 2021, 11 (6) , 1492. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061492
  94. Ángel Estévez-Alonso, Ruizhe Pei, Mark C.M. van Loosdrecht, Robbert Kleerebezem, Alan Werker. Scaling-up microbial community-based polyhydroxyalkanoate production: status and challenges. Bioresource Technology 2021, 327 , 124790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124790
  95. Laura Lorini, Andrea Martinelli, Paolo Pavan, Mauro Majone, Francesco Valentino. Downstream processing and characterization of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) produced by mixed microbial culture (MMC) and organic urban waste as substrate. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2021, 11 (2) , 693-703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00788-w
  96. Shashi Kant Bhatia, Sachin V. Otari, Jong-Min Jeon, Ranjit Gurav, Yong-Keun Choi, Ravi Kant Bhatia, Arivalagan Pugazhendhi, Vinod Kumar, J. Rajesh Banu, Jeong-Jun Yoon, Kwon-Young Choi, Yung-Hun Yang. Biowaste-to-bioplastic (polyhydroxyalkanoates): Conversion technologies, strategies, challenges, and perspective. Bioresource Technology 2021, 326 , 124733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124733
  97. Neda Amanat, Bruna Matturro, Marta Rossi, Francesco Valentino, Marianna Villano, Marco Petrangeli Papini. Assessment of Long-Term Fermentability of PHA-Based Materials from Pure and Mixed Microbial Cultures for Potential Environmental Applications. Water 2021, 13 (7) , 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070897
  98. Laura Lorini, Andrea Martinelli, Giorgio Capuani, Nicola Frison, Maria Reis, Bruno Sommer Ferreira, Marianna Villano, Mauro Majone, Francesco Valentino. Characterization of Polyhydroxyalkanoates Produced at Pilot Scale From Different Organic Wastes. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2021, 9 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.628719
  99. Chiara Cavaliere, Anna Laura Capriotti, Andrea Cerrato, Laura Lorini, Carmela Maria Montone, Francesco Valentino, Aldo Laganà, Mauro Majone. Identification and Quantification of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Polyhydroxyalkanoates Produced from Mixed Microbial Cultures and Municipal Organic Wastes at Pilot Scale. Molecules 2021, 26 (3) , 539. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26030539
  100. Asmita Gupta, Madan Kumar, Shaili Srivastava. Recent Advances in Wastewater Sludge Valorization. 2021, 225-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9696-4_10
Load all citations

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Cite this: Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 27, 12149–12158
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01831
Published June 10, 2019

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

4800

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Process scheme developed at pilot scale for OFMSW and SS valorization toward PHA production.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. VFA, CODSOL, and pH evolution in the fermented feedstock (A); VFA distribution under the three different conditions tested (B).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Main parameters monitored in SBR: VFA, CODSOL, PHA, ammonium, and phosphate in a typical SBR FL-III cycle (A). Feast phase/cycle length ratio (B), maximum and minimum PHA concentration (C), and storage rate and yield (D) in the three different SBR runs.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Fed-batch accumulations conducted with biomass enriched in SBR FL-III run: synthetic acetate (A) and ffFL-III (B) as feeding solutions.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Mass flow diagram of PHA production from OFMSW-SS mixture.

  • References


    This article references 36 other publications.

    1. 1
      Morgan-Sagastume, F. Characterisation of open, mixed microbial cultures for polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2016, 15, 593625,  DOI: 10.1007/s11157-016-9411-0
    2. 2
      Kourmentza, C.; Plácido, J.; Venetsaneas, N.; Burniol-Figols, A.; Varrone, C.; Gavala, H. N.; Reis, M. A. M. Recent advances and challenges towards sustainable polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production. Bioengineering 2017, 4, 55,  DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering4020055
    3. 3
      Rodriguez-Perez, S.; Serrano, A.; Pantión, A. A.; Alonso-Farinas, B. Challenges of scaling-up PHA production from waste streams. A review. J. Environ. Manage. 2018, 205, 215230,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.083
    4. 4
      Valentino, F.; Morgan-Sagastume, F.; Campanari, S.; Villano, M.; Werker, A.; Majone, M. Carbon recovery from wastewater through bioconversion into biodegradable polymers. New Biotechnol. 2017, 37, 923,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2016.05.007
    5. 5
      Gholami, A.; Mohkam, M.; Rasoul-Amini, S.; Ghasemi, Y. Industrial production of polyhydroxyalkanoates by bacteria: opportunities and challenges. Minerva Biotechnol. 2016, 28, 5974
    6. 6
      Morgan-Sagastume, F.; Hjort, M.; Cirne, D.; Gérardin, F.; Lacroix, S.; Gaval, G.; Karabegovic, L.; Alexandersson, T.; Johansson, P.; Karlsson, A.; Bengtsson, S.; Arcos-Hernández, M.; Magnusson, P.; Werker, A. Integrated production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) with municipal wastewater and sludge treatment at pilot scale. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 181, 7889,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.046
    7. 7
      Bengtsson, S.; Karlsson, A.; Alexandersson, T.; Quadri, L.; Hjort, M.; Johansson, P.; Morgan-Sagastume, F.; Anterrieu, S.; Arcos-Hernandez, M.; Karabegovic, L.; Magnusson, P.; Werker, A. A process for polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production from municipal wastewater treatment with biological carbon and nitrogen removal demonstrated at pilot-scale. New Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 4253,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2016.11.005
    8. 8
      Jia, Q.; Xiong, H.; Wang, H.; Shi, H.; Sheng, X.; Sun, R.; Chen, G. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) by bacterial consortium from excess sludge fermentation liquid at laboratory and pilot scales. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 171, 159167,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.059
    9. 9
      Chakravarty, P.; Mhaisalkar, V.; Chakrabarti, T. Study on polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production in pilot scale continuous mode wastewater treatment system. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 28962899,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.097
    10. 10
      Tamis, J.; Luzkova, K.; Jiang, Y.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Kleerebezem, R. Enrichment of Plasticicumulans acidivorans at pilot-scale for PHA production on industrial wastewater. J. Biotechnol. 2014, 192, 161169,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.10.022
    11. 11
      Reis, M. A. M.; Albuquerque, M. G. E.; Villano, M.; Majone, M. Mixed culture processes for polyhydroxyalkanoate production from agroindustrial surplus wastes as feedstocks. Comprehensive Biotechnology 2011, 669683,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-088504-9.00464-5
    12. 12
      Pfaltzgraff, L. A.; De bruyn, M.; Cooper, E. C.; Budarin, V.; Clark, J. H. Food waste biomass: a resource for high-value chemicals. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 307,  DOI: 10.1039/c2gc36978h
    13. 13
      Valentino, F.; Gottardo, M.; Micolucci, F.; Pavan, P.; Bolzonella, D.; Rossetti, S.; Majone, M. Organic fraction of municipal solid waste recovery by conversion into added-value polyhydroxyalkanoates and biogas. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 1637516385,  DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03454
    14. 14
      Korkakaki, E.; Mulders, M.; Veeken, A.; Rozendal, R.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Kleerebezem, R. PHA production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW): Overcoming the inhibitory matrix. Water Res. 2016, 96, 7483,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.033
    15. 15
      Colombo, B.; Favini, F.; Scaglia, B.; Sciarria, T. P.; D’Imporzano, G.; Pognani, M.; Alekseeva, A.; Eisele, G.; Cosentino, C.; Adani, F. Enhanced polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste by using mixed microbial culture. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2017, 10, 201,  DOI: 10.1186/s13068-017-0888-8
    16. 16
      Basset, N.; Katsou, E.; Frison, N.; Malamis, S.; Dosta, J.; Fatone, F. Integrating the selection of PHA storing biomass and nitrogen removal via nitrite in the main wastewater treatment line. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 200, 820829,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.063
    17. 17
      Valentino, F.; Morgan-Sagastume, F.; Fraraccio, S.; Corsi, G.; Zanaroli, G.; Werker, A.; Majone, M. Sludge minimization in municipal wastewater treatment by polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 72817294,  DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3268-y
    18. 18
      Valentino, F.; Beccari, M.; Fraraccio, S.; Zanaroli, G.; Majone, M. Feed frequency in a Sequencing Batch Reactor strongly affects the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) from volatile fatty acids. New Biotechnol. 2014, 31, 264275,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2013.10.006
    19. 19
      Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed.; American Public Health Association, 1998.
    20. 20
      Braunegg, G.; Sonnleitner, B.; Lafferty, R. M. A. Rapid gas chromatographic method for the determination of poly-b-hydroxybutyric acid in microbial biomass. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1978, 6, 2937,  DOI: 10.1007/BF00500854
    21. 21
      Valentino, F.; Brusca, A. A.; Beccari, M.; Nuzzo, A.; Zanaroli, G.; Majone, M. Start up of biological sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and short-term biomass acclimation for polyhydroxyalkanoates production. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2013, 88, 261270,  DOI: 10.1002/jctb.3824
    22. 22
      Hao, J.; Wang, H. Volatile fatty acids productions by mesophilic and thermophilic sludge fermentation: Biological responses to fermentation temperature. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 175, 367373,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.106
    23. 23
      Girotto, F.; Lavagnolo, M. C.; Pivato, A.; Cossu, R. Acidogenic fermentation of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and cheese whey for bio-plastic precursors recovery – Effects of process conditions during batch tests. Waste Manage. 2017, 70, 7180,  DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.09.015
    24. 24
      Bolzonella, D.; Fatone, F.; Pavan, P.; Cecchi, F. Anaerobic fermentation of organic fraction of municipal solid waste for the production of soluble organic compounds. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 34123418,  DOI: 10.1021/ie048937m
    25. 25
      Bengtsson, S.; Pisco, A. R.; Johansson, P.; Lemos, P. C.; Reis, M. A. M. Molecular weight and thermal properties of polyhydroxyalkanoates produced from fermented sugar molasses by open mixed cultures. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 147, 172179,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.03.022
    26. 26
      Pittmann, T.; Steinmetz, H. Polyhydroxyalkanoate production on waste water treatment plants: process scheme, operating conditions and potential analysis for german and european municipal waste water treatment plants. Bioengineering 2017, 4, 54,  DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering4020054
    27. 27
      Campanari, S.; e Silva, F. A.; Bertin, L.; Villano, M.; Majone, M. Effect of the organic loading rate on the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates in a multi-stage process aimed at the valorization of olive oil mill wastewater. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 71, 3441,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.06.006
    28. 28
      Dionisi, D.; Majone, M.; Papa, V.; Beccari, M. Biodegradable polymers from organic acids by using activated sludge enriched by aerobic periodic feeding. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 85, 569579,  DOI: 10.1002/bit.10910
    29. 29
      Albuquerque, M. G. E.; Torres, C. A. V.; Reis, M. A. M. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) production by a mixed microbial culture using sugar molasses: effect of the influent substrate concentration on culture selection. Water Res. 2010, 44, 34193433,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.03.021
    30. 30
      Majone, M.; Massanisso, P.; Carucci, A.; Lindrea, K.; Tandoi, V. Influence of storage on kinetic selection to control aerobic filamentous bulking. Water Sci. Technol. 1996, 34, 223232,  DOI: 10.2166/wst.1996.0554
    31. 31
      Albuquerque, M. G. E.; Eiroa, M.; Torres, C.; Nunes, B. R.; Reis, M. A. M. Strategies for the development of a side stream process for polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production from sugar cane molasses. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 130, 411421,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.05.011
    32. 32
      Valentino, F.; Karabegovic, L.; Majone, M.; Morgan-Sagastume, F.; Werker, A. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) storage within a mixed-culture biomass with simultaneous growth as a function of accumulation substrate nitrogen and phosphorus levels. Water Res. 2015, 77, 4963,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.03.016
    33. 33
      Morgan-Sagastume, F.; Valentino, F.; Hjort, M.; Zanaroli, G.; Majone, M.; Werker, A. Acclimation process for enhancing polyhydroxyalkanoate accumulation in activated-sludge biomass. Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 10, 10651082,  DOI: 10.1007/s12649-017-0122-8
    34. 34
      Amulya, K.; Jukuri, S.; Venkata Mohan, S. Sustainable multistage process for enhanced productivity of bioplastics from waste remediation through aerobic dynamic feeding strategy: Process integration for up-scaling. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 188, 231239,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.070
    35. 35
      Moretto, G., Ardolino, F., Piasentin, A., Girotto, L., Cecchi, F. Integrated anaerobic codigestion system for the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge treatment: an Italian case study. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2019,  DOI: 10.1002/jctb.5993 .
    36. 36
      Valentino, F.; Moretto, G.; Gottardo, M.; Pavan, P.; Bolzonella, D.; Majone, M. Novel routes for urban bio-waste management: A combined acidic fermentation and anaerobic digestion process for platform chemicals and biogas production. J. Cleaner Prod. 2019, 220, 368375,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.102