ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Versatile Diphosphine Chelators for Radiolabeling Peptides with 99mTc and 64Cu
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Article

Versatile Diphosphine Chelators for Radiolabeling Peptides with 99mTc and 64Cu
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Ingebjørg N. Hungnes
    Ingebjørg N. Hungnes
    School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, Fourth Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
  • Truc Thuy Pham
    Truc Thuy Pham
    School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, Fourth Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
  • Charlotte Rivas
    Charlotte Rivas
    School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, Fourth Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
  • James A. Jarvis
    James A. Jarvis
    Randall Centre of Cell and Molecular Biophysics and Centre for Biomolecular Spectroscopy, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
  • Rachel E. Nuttall
    Rachel E. Nuttall
    School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, Fourth Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
    School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock’s Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, United Kingdom
  • Saul M. Cooper
    Saul M. Cooper
    Department of Chemistry, Imperial College London, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, London W12 0BZ, United Kingdom
  • Jennifer D. Young
    Jennifer D. Young
    School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, Fourth Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
  • Philip J. Blower
    Philip J. Blower
    School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, Fourth Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
  • Paul G. Pringle*
    Paul G. Pringle
    School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock’s Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, United Kingdom
    *Email: [email protected]
  • Michelle T. Ma*
    Michelle T. Ma
    School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, Fourth Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
    *Email: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Inorganic Chemistry

Cite this: Inorg. Chem. 2023, 62, 50, 20608–20620
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00426
Published March 27, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We have developed a diphosphine (DP) platform for radiolabeling peptides with 99mTc and 64Cu for molecular SPECT and PET imaging, respectively. Two diphosphines, 2,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)maleic anhydride (DPPh) and 2,3-bis(di-p-tolylphosphino)maleic anhydride (DPTol), were each reacted with a Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-targeted dipeptide (PSMAt) to yield the bioconjugates DPPh-PSMAt and DPTol-PSMAt, as well as an integrin-targeted cyclic peptide, RGD, to yield the bioconjugates DPPh-RGD and DPTol-RGD. Each of these DP-PSMAt conjugates formed geometric cis/trans-[MO2(DPX-PSMAt)2]+ (M = 99mTc, 99gTc, natRe; X = Ph, Tol) complexes when reacted with [MO2]+ motifs. Furthermore, both DPPh-PSMAt and DPTol-PSMAt could be formulated into kits containing reducing agent and buffer components, enabling preparation of the new radiotracers cis/trans-[99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and cis/trans-[99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ from aqueous 99mTcO4 in 81% and 88% radiochemical yield (RCY), respectively, in 5 min at 100 °C. The consistently higher RCYs observed for cis/trans-[99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ are attributed to the increased reactivity of DPTol-PSMAt over DPPh-PSMAt. Both cis/trans-[99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and cis/trans-[99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ exhibited high metabolic stability, and in vivo SPECT imaging in healthy mice revealed that both new radiotracers cleared rapidly from circulation, via a renal pathway. These new diphosphine bioconjugates also furnished [64Cu(DPX-PSMAt)2]+ (X = Ph, Tol) complexes rapidly, in a high RCY (>95%), under mild conditions. In summary, the new DP platform is versatile: it enables straightforward functionalization of targeting peptides with a diphosphine chelator, and the resulting bioconjugates can be simply radiolabeled with both the SPECT and PET radionuclides, 99mTc and 64Cu, in high RCYs. Furthermore, the DP platform is amenable to derivatization to either increase the chelator reactivity with metallic radioisotopes or, alternatively, modify the radiotracer hydrophilicity. Functionalized diphosphine chelators thus have the potential to provide access to new molecular radiotracers for receptor-targeted imaging.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

SPECIAL ISSUE

This article is part of the Inorganic Chemistry of Radiopharmaceuticals special issue.

Synopsis

Derivatives of 2,3-bis(diarylphosphino)maleic anhydride enable synthetic access to diphosphine−peptide bioconjugates for efficient radiolabeling and molecular imaging with the SPECT isotope, 99mTc, or the PET isotope, 64Cu.

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) with radiopharmaceuticals allow whole-body molecular imaging. One class of PET and SPECT radiopharmaceuticals incorporates a radioactive metal bound via a chelator attached to a peptide, which targets cell-surface receptors of diseased cells. (1) The γ-emitting radionuclide technetium-99m (99mTc, t1/2 = 6 h, 90% γ, 140 keV) and the positron-emitting radionuclide copper-64 (64Cu, t1/2 = 12.7 h, β+ Emax = 656 keV, 19%) have both been used to radiolabel and subsequently image peptides for molecular SPECT/γ-scintigraphy and PET imaging, respectively. 99mTc is largely produced by benchtop generators, enabling widespread access, while 64Cu can be produced by both cyclotrons and reactors. Both 99mTc- and 64Cu-labeled receptor-targeted peptides have demonstrated clinical diagnostic value in the management of cancer. (2−4)
Radiopharmaceuticals based on 99mTc are widely used, with approximately 30 million imaging procedures performed worldwide every year. (5) The majority of these radiopharmaceuticals are used for imaging perfusion (as opposed to molecular) processes. These relatively simple 99mTc complexes are prepared using kit-based radiosynthetic protocols in which the precursor 99mTcO4 is simply eluted from a generator in a saline solution and added to commercially available “kit” vials that contain a reducing agent, a chelator, and other reagents. (6) One of the challenges in developing 99mTc or 64Cu radiometalated peptides for molecular imaging is designing chelators that allow simple, quantitative, and rapid radiolabeling in physiologically compatible solutions, using kits. Additionally, in these radiochemical reactions, the concentrations/amounts of both the chelator–peptide bioconjugate and radiometallic ion are very low, so favorable thermodynamics are required to drive formation of the desired complex. Finally, the resulting radiometalated complex needs to be sufficiently stable in vivo to resist transchelation of the radiometal to endogenous species in the biological milieu, such as proteins, minerals, and other biomolecules, which compete for metal binding. (1) In radiolabeling reactions with 99mTc, there are several accessible oxidation states; the selected chelator also needs to yield a well-defined complex that is inert in the presence of biological oxidants and reductants. (5) One of the major challenges in developing chelators for 64Cu and other Cu radioisotopes is ensuring that the resulting complex is highly kinetically stable in biological media. (7) Thus, the majority of these successful chelators are based on macrobicyclic species that complex Cu2+, (7) but for the most part, these chelators have little utility in coordinating other radiometals.
Phosphine ligands form useful complexes with 99mTc. The radiopharmaceutical “Myoview” is routinely used to image cardiac perfusion. In Myoview, two bidentate diphosphines coordinate to a TcV metal center, with two oxido ligands occupying axial positions. (8) Myoview is prepared using a single step kit: 99mTcO4 is added to a kit containing sodium gluconate, stannous chloride, sodium bicarbonate, and a diphosphine ligand, followed by incubation at room temperature for 15 min to produce Myoview in >90% yield, which is administered to patients without further processing. (9) Other multidentate chelator systems designed specifically for the coordination of 99mTc also have incorporated phosphine donors. These include P,S-bidentate and P2,N-tridentate ligands for coordinating the [TcN]2+ motif, (10,11) P2,N- and P,S2-tridentate ligands for coordinating the [Tc(CO)3]+ motif, (12,13) and P2,S2- and P2,N2-tetradentate ligands for coordinating the [TcO2]+ motif. (14,15)
We have recently described the use of 2,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)maleic anhydride (DPPh) as a platform for simple preparation and 99mTc radiolabeling of diphosphine–peptide conjugates. (16) DPPh reacts with the primary amine of the pentapeptide, cyclic Arg-Gly-Asp-dPhe-Lys (RGD), to yield DPPh-RGD. The conjugate DPPh-RGD can be incorporated into “kits” containing DPPh-RGD, reducing agent (stannous chloride), sodium tartrate, and sodium bicarbonate. The addition of 99mTcO4 to these kits, followed by heating, produces a mixture of cis/trans-[99mTcO2(DPPh-RGD)2]+ in high radiochemical yield (RCY >90%). [99mTcO2(DPPh-RGD)2]+ shows high affinity and specificity for the target αvβ3 integrin receptor, which is overexpressed in neovasculature, inflammation, and some cancers. We have also very recently shown that a diphosphine chelator derivatized with glucose units similarly coordinates the [99mTcO2]+ motif and that the resulting radiotracer is highly stable in vivo and exhibits favorable biodistribution properties, including fast renal clearance. (17)
Our work with DPPh builds upon others’ prior research, in which diphosphines (18,19) including both DPPh and its benzylamine conjugate, DPPh-Bn, (20,21) were used to complex Cu+ to yield [Cu(DPPh)2]+ and [Cu(DPPh-Bn)2]+, respectively. Importantly, DPPh-Bn could be radiolabeled with solutions of 64CuCl2 to give [64Cu(DPPh-Bn)2]+ (Scheme 1). In these reactions, the excess of diphosphine acted as both a reducing agent, reducing 64Cu2+ to Cu+, and a bidentate chelator.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Preparation of [Cu(DPPh-Bn)2]+a

a(i) CuCl; (ii) 64CuCl2.

We postulated that bis(phosphino)maleic anhydride compounds could be versatile chemical platforms for radiolabeling with not only 64Cu but also 99mTc. They could potentially (i) provide a flexible platform for appending receptor-targeted peptides/molecules to a diphosphine motif, (ii) enable simple, rapid, efficient, and stable radiolabeling of peptides with either the [99mTcO2]+ motif or 64Cu+, and (iii) allow improvement of the efficiency of radiolabeling protocols by varying phosphine substituents to increase the phosphine reactivity for complexation of [99mTcO2]+ or 64Cu+. To investigate this, we prepared and conjugated two bis(phosphino)maleic anhydride compounds to two different peptides: (a) “RGD” peptide, which targets the αvβ3 integrin receptor overexpressed in neovasculature, inflammation, and many cancers; (b) “PSMAt”, which targets the prostate specific membrane antigen, overexpressed in prostate cancer. The new diphosphine–peptide conjugates were radiolabeled with both 99mTc and 64Cu radionuclides. We also compared the electronic properties of these phosphine derivatives from the IR spectra of their [Mo(CO)4L] (L = bidentate diphosphine) complexes.

Results

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Synthesis of DPPh and DPTol

The diphosphine compound DPPh has been used by us and others for diverse applications, including molecular imaging. (16,20−23) It has been shown previously that DPPh can be prepared from diphenyl(trimethylsilyl)phosphine and dichloromaleic anhydride. (22,24) Here, DPPh was instead prepared directly from diphenylphosphine and dichloromaleic anhydride in the presence of trimethylamine in diethyl ether (Scheme 2, top). Following isolation and removal of phosphine oxide side products, DPPh was obtained in 36% yield.

Scheme 2

Scheme 2. Preparation of DPPh
A second diphosphine derivative, 2,3-bis(di-p-tolylphosphino)maleic anhydride (DPTol), has been prepared by a similar route (Scheme 2, bottom). Phosphine derivatives containing p-tolyl substituents in place of phenyl groups have demonstrated increased σ-donor capacity. (25,26) We postulated that peptide derivatives of DPTol would provide increased RCYs in reactions with 99mTc or 64Cu, relative to DPPh derivatives. DPTol was prepared in two steps from the commercial starting material bis(p-tolyl)chlorophosphine. First, bis(p-tolyl)phosphine was formed in high purity (>95%) by the reduction of bis(p-tolyl)chlorophosphine with lithium aluminum hydride. Bis(p-tolyl)phosphine was then reacted with dichloromaleic anhydride in the presence of triethylamine (TEA) in diethyl ether. Following isolation and removal of phosphine oxide side products, DPTol was obtained in 86% yield.

Evaluating the Donor Properties of DPPh, DPTol, and Derivatives: IR Spectra of Mo Complexes

Complexes of the type cis-[Mo(CO)4L2] (27) are widely used to assess the binding properties of a variety of ligands: IR stretching frequencies of CO ligands are a useful indicator of σ-donor/π-acceptor characteristics of ligand “L”. The diphosphines used in this study are primarily σ-donor ligands, and the stronger the σ donor, the greater the π-back-bonding from Mo to CO, and the lower the CO stretching frequency will be.
[Mo(CO)4(nbd)] (nbd = norbornadiene) was reacted with either DPPh or DPTol at ambient temperature in dichloromethane (Scheme 3). The reactions were monitored by 31P{1H} NMR spectroscopy; [Mo(CO)4(DPTol)] was formed in >95% yield within 1 day, while [Mo(CO)4(DPPh)] required 3 days of reaction to achieve comparable yields. To generate a model for the DP–peptide conjugate species, [Mo(CO)4(DPPh)] and [Mo(CO)4(DPTol)] were each reacted with an excess of (2-methoxyethyl)amine in dichloromethane, yielding [Mo(CO)4(DPPh-NH-MOE] and [Mo(CO)4(DPTol-NH-MOE)], respectively (MOE = methoxyethane; Scheme 3). The 31P{1H} NMR spectra of the reaction mixtures revealed that these species were formed quantitatively and rapidly. These complexes were isolated as (2-methoxyethyl)ammonium salts.

Scheme 3

Scheme 3. Mo Complexes of DPPh and DPTol Derivatives
IR and NMR spectra were acquired for all isolated Mo complexes (see Table 1 and the Supporting Information, SI). There was a decrease in νCO in the order [Mo(CO)4(nbd)] > [Mo(CO)4(DPPh)] > [Mo(CO)4(DPTol)] > [Mo(CO)4(DPPh-NH-MOE)] > [Mo(CO)4(DPTol-NH-MOE)]. Importantly, the νCO values are lower for [Mo(CO)4(DPTol)] relative to [Mo(CO)4(DPPh)], and the νCO values are lower for [Mo(CO)4(DPTol-NH-MOE)] relative to [Mo(CO)4(DPPh-NH-MOE)]. These observed reductions in νCO for DPTol complexes relative to DPPh complexes are consistent with DPTol derivatives possessing increased σ-donor capacities compared to DPPh derivatives. Additionally, νCO values of complexes [Mo(CO)4(DPPh-NH-MOE)] and [Mo(CO)4(DPTol-NH-MOE)] were lower than those of [Mo(CO)4(DPPh)] and [Mo(CO)4(DPTol)], indicating (as expected) that DP-NHR ligands are significantly better σ-donor ligands than the bis(phosphino)maleic anhydride precursors.
Table 1. Spectroscopic Data for Mo Complexes and DPPh and DPTol Ligands
compoundνCO (cm–1)31P{1H} NMR (ppm)
DPPh –20.5 (s)a
DPTol –23.1 (s)a
[Mo(CO)4(nbd)]2041 (s), 1980 (sh), 1951 (s), 1888 (s) 
[Mo(CO)4(DPPh)]2031 (s), ∼1938 (sh), 1920 (s), 1775 (s)49.9 (s)b
[Mo(CO)4(DPTol)]2029 (s), ∼1935 (sh), 1916 (s), 1774 (s)48.4 (s)b
[MOE-NH3][Mo(CO)4(DPPh-NH-MOE]2024 (s), 1931 (s), 1902 (s)72.5 (d, J = 3.3 Hz), 70.2 (d, J = 3.3 Hz)c
[MOE-NH3][Mo(CO)4(DPTol-NH-MOE)]2022 (s), 1928 (s), 1900 (s)70.8 (d, J = 2.4 Hz), 68.5 (d, J = 2.4 Hz)c
a

162 MHz, CDCl3.

b

122 MHz, CD2Cl2.

c

162 MHz, CD2Cl2.

DPPh and DPTol Peptide Conjugates and Their Re and Tc Complexes

We next aimed to prepare diphosphine peptide conjugates by reacting DPPh and DPTol with peptides containing single primary amine groups. We have recently shown that the cyclic pentapeptide, c(RGDfK) (RGD), reacts with DPPh under basic conditions to give DPPh-RGD. (16) The reaction of DPTol under the same conditions yielded the analogous conjugate DPTol-RGD in 57% yield.
The PSMAt peptide, which targets the prostate specific membrane antigen, has been clinically used to target imaging and therapeutic radioisotopes to prostate cancer. Here, a linker consisting of a tetraethylene glycol unit (to increase the water solubility of the resulting conjugates) with a single pendant primary amine was appended to the dipeptide PSMAt pharmacophore. The reaction of this PSMAt peptide with either DPPh or DPTol furnished DPPh-PSMAt or DPTol-PSMAt (Scheme 4), respectively, which were isolated using preparative reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and characterized by 1H and 31P{1H} NMR spectroscopy and high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HR-ESI-MS; vide infra, SI). Both conjugates were obtained in over 60% yield and were freely soluble in water.

Scheme 4

Scheme 4. Preparation and Complexation of DP-PSMAt Conjugatesa

a(i) [ReO2I(PPh3)2] in DMF; (ii) [NtBu4][99gTcOCl4] in DMF; (iii) 99mTcO4, SnCl2, sodium tartrate, in water (pH 8).

In the solid state, all three of these new conjugates─DPTol-RGD, DPPh-PSMAt, and DPTol-PSMAt─were stable to oxidation of tertiary phosphine centers in air, although they slowly oxidized in solution to phosphine oxide derivatives under normal atmospheric conditions. For experimental purposes, the conjugates could be handled in air as dry material, in basic organic solutions, or in aqueous solutions at near-neutral pH. However, in acidic solutions, DP–peptide conjugates reformed the starting peptide and bis(phosphino)maleic anhydride.
DPPh-PSMAt and DPTol-PSMAt were each reacted with [ReO2I(PPh3)2] (Scheme 4), and the resulting [ReO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [ReO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ complexes were isolated and analyzed by HR-ESI-MS, 1H and 31P{1H} NMR spectroscopy, and reverse-phase HPLC. In the HR-ESI-MS spectra, signals consistent with [M + H]2+ ions were detected (m/z 1142.3402 where M = [ReO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and m/z 1198.4039 where M = [ReO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+).
The putative cis and trans isomers that are possible for each rhenium complex of the PSMAt conjugates possessed closely similar chromatographic behavior, and we were unable to isolate one isomer from another (as was previously achieved for cis and trans isomers of the homologous RGD-based complex, (16) [ReO2(DPPh-RGD)2]+).
In the 31P{1H} NMR spectra of each of the free ligands, DPPh-PSMA and DPTol-PSMA, the two inequivalent P atoms produce an AB pattern (Figure 1a). Geometric cis and trans isomers of [ReO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [ReO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ are expected to exhibit 31P{1H} NMR splitting patterns of AA′BB′ spin systems. Acquired 31P{1H} NMR spectra exhibited two distinct pairs of signals typical of the presence of both cis and trans isomers (Figure 1b). In each spectrum, the pair of signals with a pseudo-AB coupling pattern and a large 2J(PAPB) (∼360 Hz) was assigned to the cis isomer (consistent with a large 2J(PAPB) expected for trans-inequivalent P atoms); the remaining pair of signals was assigned to the trans isomer. To support these assignments, 31P{1H} NMR spectra were simulated as AA′BB′ spin systems (Figures S42 and S43). The good agreement between the experimental and simulated spectra supports the assignment of the isomers and is consistent with our prior observations of similar systems. (16,17) In the 1H NMR spectra, aromatic phenyl or tolyl signals shift upon ReV binding (SI, section 3).

Figure 1

Figure 1. 31P{1H} NMR spectra of (a-i) DPPh-PSMAt, (a-ii) DPTol-PSMAt, (b-i) [natReO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+, (b-ii) [natReO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+, (c-i) [natCu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+, and (c-ii) [natCu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+. Signals corresponding to cis-[natReO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and cis-[natReO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ are highlighted in blue.

DPPh-PSMAt and DPTol-PSMAt were each reacted with [NtBu4][99gTcOCl4] (99gTc, t1/2 = 211000 years), and the resulting [TcO2(DPPh/Tol-PSMAt)2]+ complexes were analyzed by reverse-phase C18 HPLC–LR-MS. For each compound, the UV chromatogram (λ = 254 nm) of the LC–MS showed two strongly absorbing signals that corresponded to species with a formula of [TcO2(DPPh/Tol-PSMAt)2]+ (Figure 2). These isomeric pairs eluted within 0.25 min of each other and were attributed to the presence of cis and trans isomers for each complex. This chromatographic behavior is similar to that of cis-[MO2(DPPh-RGD)2]+ and trans-[MO2(DPPh-RGD)2]+ (M = 99gTc, Re).

Figure 2

Figure 2. DP-PSMAt derivatives reacted with [NtBu4][99gTcOCl4] to yield [99gTcO2(DP-PSMAt)2]+), which consists of both cis and trans isomers. (a-i) UV chromatogram of [99gTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+); (a-ii) MS chromatogram of [99gTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+; (b-i) UV chromatogram of [99gTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+; (b-ii) MS chromatogram of [99gTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+. For HPLC method 8, see the SI.

Lastly, the putative cis-[99gTcO2(DPPh/Tol-PSMAt)2]+ and trans-[TcO2(99gDPPh/Tol-PSMAt)2]+ species exhibited near-identical HPLC retention times to analogous Re complexes, indicative of the structural homology between Tc and Re species (Figure S57).

99mTc Radiolabeling

To assess radiolabeling with 99mTc, lyophilized, prefabricated kits were prepared, containing a diphosphine–peptide conjugate, a reducing agent (stannous chloride), a “weak” chelator to stabilize any Tc intermediates (sodium tartrate), and a sodium bicarbonate buffer. Generator-produced 99mTcO4 (200 MBq) in a saline solution (300 μL) was then added to these kits, and the mixtures were heated at 100 °C for 5 min, prior to analysis by radio-iTLC and radio-HPLC. These reactions were also undertaken at ambient temperature for comparison. RCYs were determined by iTLC.
At both ambient temperature (20–25 °C) and 100 °C, both [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ could be prepared from kits in >75% RCY in 5 min (Table 2). For both [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+, RCYs were higher at 100 °C compared to RCYs at ambient temperature. Under both conditions, the concomitant formation of 99mTc-labeled colloidal material was the main factor that decreased RCY. As hypothesized, RCYs for [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ were significantly higher than RCYs for [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ at both ambient temperature and 100 °C. At 100 °C, the RCY for [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ (88.0 ± 0.6%) was higher than that for [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ (81.2 ± 1.8%, mean difference = 6.8%, and p = 0.007); at ambient temperature, the RCY for [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ (83.5 ± 1.5%) was higher than that for [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ (75.3 ± 3.0%, mean difference = 8.2%, and p = 0.026).
Table 2. RCYs (%) of [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ (Determined Using iTLC)a
 22 °C100 °C
[99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+75.3 ± 3.081.2 ± 1.8
[99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+83.5 ± 1.588.0 ± 0.6
a

Radiochemical reactions were performed in triplicate (±standard deviation).

The reaction products were also analyzed by analytical reverse-phase C18 HPLC. When these kit-based reactions were undertaken at 100 °C, aside from small amounts of unreacted 99mTcO4 (eluting at 2.3 min), the only radiolabeled products observed in the radio chromatograms corresponded to putative cis and trans isomers of either [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ or [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ (Figure 3). Importantly, these radioactive signals were near-coincident with the UV signals of characterized [ReO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [ReO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ complexes. When these kit-based reactions were performed at ambient temperature, low amounts of additional 99mTc-labeled products were observed in the radiochromatograms (4–5%), eluting at earlier retention times (Figure S55).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Putative cis and trans isomers of (a) [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and (b) [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+, separated on a shallow analytical C18 HPLC gradient. The radioactive signals were coincident with the UV signals of characterized (c) [natReO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and (d) [natReO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+. For HPLC method 10, see the SI.

Stability and Biodistribution of [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ in Healthy Mice

To evaluate the biological behavior of each radiotracer, kit-based radiolabeling solutions were purified using size-exclusion HPLC, enabling [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ to be isolated from unreacted 99mTcO4, 99mTc colloids, and unreacted DP-PSMAt conjugate.
[99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ were each added to human serum and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Analytical reverse-phase radio-HPLC analysis of serum samples indicated that both [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ exhibited high stability, with over 90% of each radiotracer remaining intact over 24 h. With the exception of a species with a retention time of 2.5 min, which was attributed to dissociated, oxidized 99mTcO4, no other degradation products were observed in radio-HPLC chromatograms (Table 3).
Table 3. Amount of Dissociated 99mTc (%) after Incubation of [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ with Serum
incubation time (h)[99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+[99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+
100.1
40.71.6
244.26.5
The log DOCT/PBS of [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ was −2.45 and the log DOCT/PBS of [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ was −2.08, indicating that both are relatively hydrophilic, despite the multiple phenyl or tolyl groups present.
In preliminary in vivo SPECT imaging studies assessing the biodistribution of these radiotracers, healthy male SCID Beige mice were administered either [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ or [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+. SPECT imaging (Figure 4), undertaken 15 min to 4 h postinjection of each radiotracer, indicated that (i) both [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ cleared from circulation via a renal pathway with increasing amounts of 99mTc radioactivity measured in urine over 4 h and (ii) [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ cleared from the kidneys to the bladder faster than [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+. Urine was also collected (4 h postinjection) and analyzed by analytical reverse-phase radio-HPLC (Figure 5). Both [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ were excreted intact, with no other 99mTc species detectable, indicating that the two radiotracers possess very high metabolic stability.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Maximum intensity projections of healthy male SCID Beige mice injected with (a-i) [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and (b-i) [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ from 15 min to 4 h postinjection. Regions of interest were selected on VivoQuant (inviCRO, LLC, Boston, MA), and percentages of injected dose per milliliter (% ID/mL) were calculated for each of (a-ii) [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ (n = 1) and (b-ii) [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ (n = 1). K = kidneys; B = bladder.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Radio-HPLC analysis of urine from healthy male SCID Beige mice intravenously administered with either (a) [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ or (b) [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+. Radio-HPLC shows that both radiotracers are highly metabolically stable and are excreted intact. For HPLC method 2, see the SI.

Cu Complexes of DP-PSMAt Conjugates

Prior studies (20,21) have shown that DPPh-Bn reacts with solutions of Cu+ to give [Cu(DPPh-Bn)2]+. Here, each DP-PSMAt conjugate (2 equiv) was reacted with [Cu(MeCN)4][PF6] in mixtures of water and acetonitrile (ambient temperature, 30–60 min), with each reaction analyzed by analytical reverse-phase C18 HPLC. Each chromatographic trace (λ = 254 nm) showed a single, strongly-absorbing species. MS analysis of the reaction solutions was consistent with the formation of [Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ (for [M + H]2+, m/z 1065.3402 (obsd) and 1065.3385 (calcd)) and [Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ (for [M + H]2+, m/z 1121.3953 (obsd) and 1121.4012 (calcd); Scheme 5).

Scheme 5

Scheme 5. Reaction of DP-PSMAt Conjugates with Cu+a

a(i) [Cu(MeCN)4][PF6] in mixtures of water and acetonitrile; (ii) solutions of 64Cu2+ with a large excess of DP-PSMAt conjugate in an aqueous solution.

The 31P{1H} NMR spectrum of [Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ exhibits a single broad, asymmetric peak at 11.94 ppm; for [Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+, a similar peak is observed at 10.81 ppm (Figure 1c). The broadness of these resonances obscures distinction of the two chemically inequivalent P atoms in each of these complexes. In the 1H NMR spectra of [Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+, the resonances of the diphenyl/ditolylphosphine protons and PEG linker protons that are in the closest vicinity to the Cu+ center are broad (Figure S8). In contrast, 1H signals for the PSMAt dipeptide motif are significantly sharper. These 1H and 31P{1H} NMR spectral line shapes are typical of tetrakis(phosphine) complexes of Cu+, in which fast quadrupolar relaxation times are associated with 63Cu and 65Cu, which both have nuclear spins of I = 3/2. This becomes particularly apparent in asymmetric complexes: similar spectral features have been described for Cu+ tetrahedral complexes, including those in which two unsymmetrical bidentate diphosphine ligands coordinate Cu+. (28,29)

64Cu Radiolabeling and Serum Stability

DPPh-PSMAt and DPTol-PSMAt (50 μg) were each reacted with solutions of 64Cu2+ (5–10 MBq, in an aqueous solution of 0.1 M ammonium acetate, pH 7) at ambient temperature for 20 min. Analysis by analytical reverse-phase radio-HPLC showed that each reaction yielded only a single radiolabeled product, which was formed in >95% RCY (retention times of 12.0 and 13.7 min for DPPh-PSMAt and DPTol-PSMAt, respectively; Figure 6). Importantly, radioactive signals for these products were coincident with UV signals for characterized nonradioactive [natCu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ or [natCu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ isotopologues. We postulate that when present in a large excess, DP-PSMAt conjugates are capable of reducing 64Cu2+ to 64Cu+, enabling the formation of [64Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ or [64Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ (Scheme 5). This is similar to the radiochemical preparation of [64Cu(DPPh-Bn)2]+ from solutions containing DPPh-Bn and 64Cu2+. (20)

Figure 6

Figure 6. HPLC chromatograms of (a) [Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and (b) [Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+. DP-PSMAt derivatives were reacted with solutions of either [natCu(MeCN)4][PF6] (blue traces) or 64Cu2+ (red traces), with UV signals for [natCu(DP-PSMAt)2]+ derivatives coincident with radioactive signals for [64Cu(DP-PSMAt)2]+ (with slight differences in the retention times a result of the configuration of the UV and scintillation detectors in series). Analytical radio-HPLC analysis revealed that both radiotracers were stable in serum over 24 h (black traces). For HPLC method 2, see the SI.

log DOCT/PBS of [64Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ measured −3.30 and log DOCT/PBS of [64Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ measured −3.01, suggesting that both are relatively hydrophilic.
To assess the stability of [64Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ or [64Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ in the presence of serum proteins, each species was added to human serum and incubated at 37 °C. Radiochromatograms of the serum samples showed that [64Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [64Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ were still present, even after 24 h of incubation in serum, with no other degradation products detectable (Figure 6).

Discussion and Concluding Remarks

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We have shown that the two bis(phosphino)maleic anhydride compounds, DPPh and DPTol, are versatile platforms for the preparation of receptor-targeted radiotracers. Both compounds react readily with primary amine groups of either RGD peptide or PSMAt peptide, and we envisage that other targeted biomolecules could similarly be derivatized with a diphosphine.
Furthermore, these diphosphine–peptide conjugates can be very easily radiolabeled with either the SPECT isotope, 99mTc, or the PET isotope, 64Cu. The new 99mTc radiotracers, [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+, have been prepared in high RCYs (>75%) in 5 min, at either ambient temperature or 100 °C, by the simple addition of a solution of 99mTcO4 to single kits containing all necessary reagents. It is likely that varying the amounts of different kit reagents will lead to even higher RCYs, and we are currently optimizing the formulation of these kits to this end. The new 64Cu radiotracers, [64Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [64Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+, have also been prepared in high RCYs (>95%) at ambient temperature, by the addition of a solution of 64Cu2+ to solutions containing DPPh/Tol-PSMAt bioconjugate. For both 99mTc and 64Cu radiotracers, two copies of a targeting peptide are incorporated into a molecular radiotracer, potentially enhancing the target receptor affinity of this class of radiotracer. Other tracers that incorporate multiple copies of a targeting peptide have demonstrated increased target tissue accumulation relative to their monomeric homologues. (30−32) The ability of these conjugates to complex both 64Cu and 99mTc enables their use in both PET and SPECT molecular imaging.
We postulated that, by modifying the substituents of the (diaryl)phosphine ligands, an increase in the donor capacity of diphosphine–peptide groups could be achieved, which would improve the radiolabeling efficiency. IR spectroscopic measurements of [Mo(CO)4L] (L = bidentate diphosphine) compounds, in which model DPPh-NH-MOE and DPTol-NH-MOE ligands coordinate to Mo, indicated a modest but significant increase in the donor capacity of DPTol-NH-MOE compared with that of DPPh-NH-MOE. In 99mTc radiolabeling kit-based reactions, the increased donor strength of DPTol-MOE indeed resulted in higher RCYs for [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ compared with [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ at both ambient temperature and 100 °C. This observed statistically significant increase in the RCY of 6–8% was modest. For 64Cu radiolabeling reactions, we did not observe differences in the RCYs between DPPh and DPTol derivatives (both >95%).
For clinical adoption in radiopharmacies, radiolabeling reactions of receptor-targeted tracers need to provide near-quantitative RCYs (>95%) at relatively low amounts of ligand. Achieving near-quantitative RCY obviates time-consuming purification steps to remove unreacted radiometal from the desired radiotracer. Additionally, in such clinical formulations, the excess of ligand is typically not removed from the labeled radiotracer and is administered to patients along with the radiotracer. If present in very high amounts, this excess ligand can compete with the radiotracer for binding to target receptors in vivo, compromising the diagnostic imaging scans.
In this context, seemingly incremental increases in the RCY of a tracer can influence whether or not a radiotracer is suitable for routine radiopharmaceutical production and clinical adoption. The increased 99mTc RCY afforded by the DPTol derivative is important in determining the potential clinical utility of this new radiolabeling platform. Here, low amounts of diphosphine–peptide conjugate (110 nmol, 110–120 μg) were used in kit-based reactions, with radiolabeling conditions mimicking the typical radiopharmaceutical formulation protocols.
This is the first report detailing how the modification of phosphine substituents can improve the efficiency of radiolabeling reactions in a pharmaceutical context. Our results suggest that this is a viable strategy for increasing RCYs of 99mTc compounds based on diphosphines. Further derivatization of this platform, for example, the use of alternative aryl substituents or the use of aliphatic substituents, could further improve 99mTc radiolabeling efficiencies.
The new 99mTc and 64Cu diphosphine-PSMAt radiotracers possess favorable properties for use as receptor-targeted imaging agents. All of the radiotracers exhibit requisite high stability when incubated in human serum, with either no or low dissociation of the radiometal from the diphosphine–peptide conjugate over 24 h. The measured partition coefficients indicate that these radiotracers are comparatively hydrophilic, with all log DOCT/PBS values lower than −2.0, despite the presence of eight aromatic groups in each of these radiotracers. The hydrophilicity in receptor-targeted tracers is generally preferred; hydrophobic radiotracers often accumulate and are retained in off-target organs such as the liver and intestines. Indeed, our preliminary SPECT/CT imaging studies show that both [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ clear circulation rapidly, predominantly via a renal pathway (Figure 4). These properties are favorable for receptor-targeted imaging radiotracers because the low concentration of radioactivity in nontarget, healthy tissues contributes to high contrast images, allowing better delineation of diseased tissue. We are currently evaluating these new molecular 99mTc and 64Cu radiotracers in vitro and in vivo in PSMA-expressing prostate cancer models.
The presence of two isomeric radiolabeled products for DP-peptide conjugates, cis-[99mTcO2(DP-peptide)2]+ and trans-[99mTcO2(DP-peptide)2]+, is potentially unfavorable. It is possible that, prior to any clinical application, cis and trans isomers would require separate evaluation to qualify that their target affinities, pharmacokinetics, and stabilities are biologically equivalent to each other. Interestingly, the PSMA-targeted PET imaging radiopharmaceutical, 68Ga-HBED-PSMA, consists of at least two distinguishable (and as yet undefined) chemical species. (33,34) However, the biological profiles of each distinct 68Ga-HBED-PSMA species have not been elucidated, and this has not prevented its clinical adoption in prostate cancer clinical management. We have very recently prepared and isolated cis-[99mTcO2(DP-gly2)2]+ and trans-[99mTcO2(DP-gly2)2]+ isomeric complexes. (17) In this study, the bioconjugate DP-gly2 also consists of an asymmetric bidentate diphosphine, with one phosphine derivatized with two glucose substituents and the other phosphine with two phenyl substituents. Importantly, cis-[99mTcO2(DP-gly2)2]+ and trans-[99mTcO2(DP-gly2)2]+ exhibited near-identical biodistribution and clearance properties in a healthy mouse model. We anticipate that cis-[99mTcO2(DP-peptide)2]+ and trans-[99mTcO2(DP-peptide)2]+ derivatives, which all exhibit very similar chromatographic behavior, are likely to possess near-identical biological properties.
Lastly, we have shown that the new diphosphine–peptide conjugates coordinate to both [TcO2]+ and [ReO2]+ motifs to yield isostructural complexes. The generator-produced, β-emitting isotope, 188Re, has demonstrated efficacy in systemic radiotherapy of liver, skin, and bone cancers. (35,36) The ability to prepare pairs of chemically and biologically analogous 99mTc and 188Re molecular radiopharmaceuticals will allow the clinical development of economical generator-based, dual diagnostic/therapeutic or “theranostic” radiopharmaceuticals for receptor-targeted molecular treatments. In addition to further synthetic in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation of our new diphosphine technology and 99mTc radiotracers in prostate cancer models, we are also undertaking exploratory 188Re radiolabeling experiments.
In summary, this diphosphine chelator platform enables the simple and versatile development of new molecular radiopharmaceuticals: it is facile to derivatize with amine-containing targeting moieties, it allows radiolabeling with SPECT (99mTc), PET (64Cu), and likely radiotherapeutic isotopes (188Re), and phosphine substituents can be tuned to increase the chelator binding and potentially the lipophilicity/hydrophilicity.

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

General experimental considerations are included in the SI.

Synthesis

NMR and HRMS data and spectra are included in the SI.

DPPh

Diphenylphosphine (2.2 equiv, 5.04 mmol, 0.88 mL) was added to a solution of dichloromaleic anhydride (1 equiv, 2.42 mmol, 404 mg) in degassed diethyl ether (15 mL) to give a pale-yellow solution. Triethylamine (TEA; 2.2 equiv, 5.04 mmol, 0.7 mL) was added dropwise and the dark-yellow suspension stirred for 2 h at ambient temperature until a compact sludge had formed. The solids, which contained product, were isolated by filter cannula and washed with ice cold diethyl ether (3 × 10 mL). The crude product was redissolved in dichloromethane and passed through a silica plug, after which the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to yield a yellow solid. This product was recrystallized from chloroform/diethyl ether, furnishing crystalline yellow needles (391 mg, 838 μmol, 35%).

Bis(p-tolyl)phosphine

Bis(p-tolyl)chlorophosphine (1 equiv, 4.02 mmol, 0.9 mL) in degassed diethyl ether (5 mL) was added dropwise to a slurry of lithium aluminum hydride (3.2 equiv, 13.0 mmol, 494 mg) in degassed diethyl ether (20 mL) at 0 °C. The gray suspension was stirred first at 0 °C for 30 min and then at ambient temperature for 22 h. The reaction was quenched by the dropwise addition of degassed water (0.5 mL), then a degassed aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide [0.5 mL, 15% (w/v)], and finally degassed water (1.5 mL), all at 0 °C. The white precipitate was removed from the filtrate (that contained the product) by filter cannula. The precipitate was then washed with diethyl ether (2 × 10 mL), and these washes were combined with the filtrate. The resulting solution was dried on magnesium sulfate and reisolated by filter cannula, washing the magnesium sulfate with diethyl ether (2 × 10 mL) and combining the filtrate and washes. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure to yield the product as a clear liquid (593 mg, 2.77 mmol, 69%), which crystallized below 20 °C. When the reaction scale was doubled, the crude product was purified by distillation at 200 °C and 2.5 × 10–1 mbar.

DPTol

TEA (2.2 equiv, 1.00 mmol, 0.14 mL) was added to a solution of bis(p-tolyl)phosphine (2.05 equiv, 0.996 mmol, 207 mg) in dry, degassed diethyl ether (3.0 mL). A solution of dichloromaleic anhydride (1.0 equiv., 0.471 mmol, 78.7 mg) in dry, degassed diethyl ether (1.6 mL) was added dropwise, which resulted in an immediate color change from a colorless to deep-red solution with an orange precipitate. Once the reaction had reached completion, as monitored by 31P{1H} NMR spectroscopy, the volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was dissolved in ethyl acetate and passed through a silica plug eluting with ethyl acetate and concentrated to dryness. Residual bis(p-tolyl)phosphine was removed by dissolving the crude product in ethyl acetate (1 mL), followed by the addition of hexane (5 mL) to afford an orange precipitate. The supernatant was removed and the precipitate washed with further hexane (2 × 3 mL) to give the product (214 mg, 0.407 mmol, 86%) as an orange solid. Any residual oxidized DPTol could be removed by crystallizing DPTol from chloroform and diethyl ether.

[Mo(CO)4(DPX)] (X = Ph, Tol)

A solution of either DPPh (16 mg, 33 μmol) or DPTol (17 mg, 33 μmol) in dichloromethane (0.3 mL) was added to a suspension of (norbornadiene)tetracarbonylmolybdenum(0) (10 mg, 34 μmol) in dichloromethane (0.25 mL). The reaction was left at room temperature for either 20 h (DPTol) or 3 days (DPPh) until reaction completion, determined by in situ 31P{1H} NMR spectroscopy. The solvent was removed in vacuo to yield a purple solid, which was azeotroped with toluene (1.5 mL) and then washed with hexane (2 mL). Finally, the solid was isolated by cannula filtration and dried to yield the product. [Mo(CO)4(DPPh)]: 19 mg, 0.028 mmol, 84%, pale purple. [Mo(CO)4(DPTol)]: 24 mg, 32.6 μmol, 99%, pale brown.

[MOE-NH3][Mo(CO)4(DPX-NH-MOE)] (X = Ph, Tol)

A solution of (2-methoxyethyl)amine (3 equiv, 6–7 mg) in dichloromethane (0.12 mL) was added to a solution of either [Mo(CO)4(DPPh)] (18 mg, 26.7 μmol) or [Mo(CO)4(DPTol)] (23 mg, 31.1 μmol) in dichloromethane (0.4 mL), leading to the immediate formation of [Mo(CO)4(DPX-NH-MOE)] (X = Ph, Tol), as determined by in situ 31P{1H} NMR spectroscopy and a color change (to pale yellow/orange). The solvent was removed, and the resulting product was washed with hexane (0.6 mL). The solid was isolated by cannula filtration and dried. [MOE-NH3][Mo(CO)4(DPPh-NH-MOE)]: 12 mg, 14.2 μmol, 53%. [MOE-NH3][Mo(CO)4(DPTol-MOE)]: 9 mg, 10.2 μmol, 33%.

DPTol-RGD

Under a stream of N2, DPTol (4.1 mg, ∼8 μmol) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA, 6 μL) were added to a solution of cyclic RGDfK peptide (4.6 mg, ∼8 μmol) in degassed N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF; 200 μL). The resulting dark-orange solution was left to react at ambient temperature for 20 min, resulting in a pale-orange solution. The reaction solution was applied to a reverse-phase C18 semipreparative HPLC column and purified by HPLC (method 5). An aqueous ammonium bicarbonate solution (0.125 M, 15 μL/mL elute) was added to fractions containing the desired product. These solutions were lyophilized to yield DPTol-RGD (4.9 mg, 4.35 μmol, 57%) as a solid.

DPPh-PSMAt and DPTol-PSMAt

Under a stream of N2, DPPh or DPTol (4–5 mg, 1 equiv) in degassed DMF (100 μL) and Lys-((PEG)4-NH2)-uredo-Glu [Lys(PEG4)-CO-Glu; 4–6 mg, 1 equiv] in degassed DMF (100 μL) were combined and DIPEA (6 μL) was added. The solution was agitated at room temperature for 15–20 min. The reaction solution was then applied to a reverse-phase C18 semipreparative HPLC column and purified by HPLC (method 6). An aqueous ammonium bicarbonate solution (0.125 M, 15 μL/mL elute) was added to fractions containing the desired product. These solutions were lyophilized to yield either DPPh-PSMAt or DPTol-PSMAt (>60%).

[ReO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [ReO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+

In initial experiments in which we monitored the reaction of [ReO2I(PPh3)2] with DPX-PSMAt (X = Ph, Tol) species by LC–MS, we observed that an excess of [ReO2I(PPh3)2] complex favored formation of the desired products. Therefore, in subsequent experiments, we elected to use only a single equivalent of the DP-peptide ligands compared to [ReO2I(PPh3)2]. A solution of [ReO2I(PPh3)2] (∼14–17 mg, 16.6–19.6 μmol, 1 equiv) in DMF (200 μL) was combined with a solution of either DPPh-PSMAt (20.2 mg, 19.6 μmol, 1 equiv) or DPTol-PSMAt (18.2 mg, 16.7 μmol, 1 equiv) and DIPEA (9 μL) in DMF (300 μL). The resulting dark-brown solution was left to react at room temperature for 2–3 h. The reaction solution was applied to a reverse-phase C18 semipreparative HPLC column and purified by HPLC (method 6). The highest-purity fractions containing the desired product were lyophilized to yield [ReO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ (7.6 mg, 3.3 μmol, 34%) and [ReO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ (7.5 mg, 3.1 μmol, 38%) as solids.

Radiolabeling and Radiotracer Characterization

Kit Preparation

An aqueous stock solution was prepared containing the required amounts of sodium bicarbonate, tin chloride, and sodium tartrate. The pH was adjusted to 8–8.5 by the dropwise addition of an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide (0.1 M). Aliquots of the stock solution were mixed with the required amount of DPPh-PSMAt or DPTol-PSMAt [dissolved in a mixture of water/ethanol (50%/50%)] to form the kit solutions outlined in Table 4, which were immediately frozen and lyophilized using a freeze-dryer. The lyophilized kits were stored in a freezer prior to use.
Table 4. Lyophilized Kit Formulations for DPPh-PSMAt and DPTol-PSMAt for Radiolabeling
 kit composition
 DPPh-PSMAt kitDPTol-PSMAt kit
componentamount (μmol)mass (mg)amount (μmol)mass (mg)
DPPh-PSMAt0.110.11  
DPTol-PSMAt  0.110.12
SnCl2·2H2O0.110.030.110.03
sodium tartrate1.150.261.150.26
NaHCO310.710.9010.710.90

Radiolabeling of DPPh-PSMAt and DPTol-PSMAt with 99mTcO4

DPPh-PSMAt and DPTol-PSMAt were radiolabeled with generator-produced 99mTcO4 (200 MBq) in a saline solution (500 μL, 0.9% NaCl in water, w/v), using the lyophilized kits described in Table 4. The radiolabeling reaction mixtures were either left to react at ambient temperature (∼22 °C) for 5 min or heated at 100 °C for 5 min. Aliquots were analyzed by iTLC and analytical C18 HPLC to determine the RCYs. The species were attributed as [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ eluted at 11.0–12.5 min and [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ eluted at 12.5–14.0 min.
Two separate iTLC analyses were undertaken, to enable quantification of 99mTc colloids and unreacted 99mTcO4 and [99mTcO2(DP-PSMAt)2]+. To quantify the amounts of unreacted 99mTcO4, acetone was used as a mobile phase. Rf values: 99mTcO4 > 0.9, 99mTc colloids < 0.1, and [99mTcO2(DP-PSMAt)2]+ < 0.1. To quantify 99mTc-colloid formation, a 1:1 mixture of methanol and a 2 M aqueous ammonium acetate solution was used as a mobile phase: 99mTcO4 > 0.9, 99mTc colloids < 0.1, and [99mTcO2(DP-PSMAt)2]+ > 0.9.
For in vitro and in vivo studies, these kit-based reaction solutions were further purified. Solutions of either [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ or [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ prepared from kits were applied to a SE-HPLC column (method 7), using an aqueous mobile phase of phosphate-buffered saline. Fractions containing either [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ or [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ (>95% radiochemical purity) eluted at 10–12 min. Other reaction components, including unreacted starting materials and impurities, also eluted at distinct retention times: unlabeled DPPh-PSMAt ligand eluted at 16–17 min, unlabeled DPTol-PSMAt eluted at 27–28 min, 99mTcO4 eluted at 14–15 min, and 99mTc colloid was trapped on the column.

Preparation of [99gTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [99gTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+

The 99gTc(V) precursor [NtBu4][99gTcOCl4] was prepared following a previously described method. (37) A solution of either DPPh-PSMAt or DPTol-PSMAt (1.0 mg, ∼1 μmol, 2 equiv) dissolved in methanol (300 μL, degassed) was combined with a solution of [NtBu4][99gTcOCl4] (0.25 mg, 0.46 μmol, 1 equiv) in methanol (50 μL). The resulting pale-yellow solution was left to react at ambient temperature for 15 min. An aliquot was then analyzed by LC-MS-ESI+ (method 8) and HR-ESI-MS.

[99gTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+

LR-MS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]2+ 1099.0 (calcd for C102H125N8O32P4Tc 1098.5), [M + Na]2+ 1110.0 (calcd for C102H124N8O32P4TcNa 1109.5), [M + K]2+ 1117.7 (calcd for C102H124N8O32P4TcK 1117.5), [M + 2H]3+ 732.7 (calcd for C102H126N8O32P4Tc 732.7), [M + H + K]3+ 745.2 (calcd for C102H126N8O32P4TcK 745.3).

[99gTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+

LR-MS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]2+ 1155.0 (calcd for C110H141N8O32P4Tc 1154.5), [M + Na]2+ 1165.8 (calcd for C110H140N8O32P4TcNa 1165.5), [M + K]2+ 1173.8 (calcd for C110H140N8O32P4TcK 1173.5), [M + 2H]3+ 770.3 (calcd for C110H142N8O32P4Tc 770.0), [M + H + K]3+ 782.8 (calcd for C110H141N8O32P4TcK 782.7).

log 7.4D of [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+

The following procedure was carried out in triplicate. A solution containing either [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ or [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2] (0.25 MBq in 1 μL) was combined with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4, 500 μL) and octanol (500 μL), and the mixture was agitated for 30 min. The mixture was then centrifuged (10 000 rpm, 10 min), and aliquots of octanol and aqueous phosphate-buffered saline solution were analyzed for radioactivity using a γ counter. log 7.4D of [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ = −2.45 ± 0.20; log 7.4D of [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ = −2.08 ± 0.30.

Serum Stability of [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+

A solution containing either [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ or [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ (100 μL, 80 MBq) was added to filtered human serum (Sigma-Aldrich, 900 μL) and incubated at 37 °C. At 1, 4, and 24 h, aliquots were taken. Each aliquot (300 μL) was treated with ice-cold acetonitrile (300 μL) to precipitate and remove serum proteins. Acetonitrile in the supernatant was then removed by evaporation under a stream of N2 gas (40 °C, 30 min). This final supernatant solution was then analyzed by reverse-phase analytical HPLC (method 2).

In Vivo Imaging of [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ in Healthy Mice

Animal imaging studies were ethically reviewed and carried out in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (ASPA) U.K. Home Office regulations governing animal experimentation. Mice were purchased from Charles River (Margate, U.K.). A male SCID Beige mouse (approximately 3 months old, n = 1) was anaesthetized [2.5% (v/v) isofluorane, 0.8–1.0 L/min O2 flow rate] and injected intravenously via the tail vein with [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ (100 μL, 26 MBq, >99% RCP, 0–5 μg PSMAt peptide in phosphate-buffered saline) or [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ (160 μL, 30 MBq, >99% RCP, 0–5 μg PSMAt peptide in phosphate-buffered saline), followed immediately by CT acquisition and SPECT scanning. Following completion of the scan, mice were culled and urine was collected for HPLC analysis. For the sake of time efficiency during in vivo experimentation, we elected to use a shorter analytical HPLC method (HPLC method 2) to determine the purity of the radiotracers and subsequently to analyze the urine samples.

64Cu Radiolabeling of DPPh-PSMAt and DPTol-PSMAt

64Cu was produced by a 64Ni(p,n)64Cu nuclear reaction on a CTI RDS 112 11 MeV cyclotron and purified to give 64Cu2+ in 0.1 M HCl solutions used for radiolabeling. (38,39) The 64Cu2+ solutions (in 0.1 M HCl) were dried under a flow of N2 with heating at 100 °C, and the residue was redissolved in an ammonium acetate solution (0.1 M, pH 7). An aliquot of an ammonium acetate solution containing 64Cu2+ (10 MBq, 50–100 μL) was added to either DPPh-PSMAt (50 μg) or DPTol-PSMAt (50 μg) dissolved in an aqueous ammonium acetate (0.1 M) to give a final radiolabeling solution of 200 μL volume. The radiolabeling mixtures were left to react at ambient temperature (∼22 °C) for 20 min. Aliquots were analyzed by iTLC and analytical HPLC to determine the RCYs. By C18 analytical HPLC (method 2), the species attributed as [64Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ eluted at 12.0–13.0 min; [64Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ eluted at 13.5–14.5 min; unreacted 64Cu2+ eluted with the solvent front at 2.0–3.5 min.
iTLC analysis was undertaken to enable the quantification of unreacted 64Cu2+ and [64Cu(DP-PSMAt)2]+. Citrate buffer (0.1 M, pH 5) was used as a mobile phase. Rf values: unreacted 64Cu2+ > 0.9, and [64Cu(DP-PSMAt)2]+ < 0.1.

Preparation of [Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+

A solution of either DPPh-PSMAt or DPTol-PSMAt (1.0 mg, ∼1 μmol, 2 equiv) in saline (500 μL) was added to a solution of [Cu(MeCN)4][PF6] (170–180 μg, ∼0.5 μmol, 1 equiv) in acetonitrile (dry, deoxygenated, 500 μL). The reaction mixture was left to react at ambient temperature for 60 min. The product was isolated by semipreparative HPLC (method 6), lyophilizing the product fractions eluting at either ∼46–47 min ([Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+) or 56–57 min ([Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+). Yield = 30–40%. Aliquots of [Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ or [Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ were analyzed by analytical HPLC (method 2).

log 7.4D of [64Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [64Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+

The following procedure was carried out in triplicate. A solution containing either [64Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ or [64Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2] (0.5 MBq in 20 μL) was combined with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4, 480 μL) and octanol (500 μL), and the mixture was agitated for 30 min. The mixture was then centrifuged (10 000 rpm, 10 min), and aliquots of octanol and aqueous phosphate-buffered saline were analyzed for radioactivity using a γ counter. log 7.4D of [Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ = −3.30 ± 0.03; log 7.4D of [Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ = −3.01 ± 0.06.

Serum Stability of [64Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and [64Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+

A sample of [Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ (>99.0% RCP, 1.7 MBq, 5 μg DPPh-PSMAt ligand) or 64Cu-DPTol-PSMAt (>99.0% RCP, 1.7 MBq, 5 μg DPTol-PSMAt ligand) in an aqueous solution of ammonium acetate (20 μL, 0.1 M) was added to filtered human serum from a healthy volunteer (180 μL) and incubated at 37 °C. At 1, 4, and 24 h, aliquots were taken. Each aliquot (300 μL) was treated with ice-cold acetonitrile (300 μL) to precipitate and remove serum proteins. Acetonitrile in the supernatant was then removed by evaporation under a stream of N2 gas (40 °C, 30 min). The final solution was then analyzed by reverse-phase analytical HPLC (method 2).

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00426.

  • General experimental and instrumentation details, NMR and ESI-MS, 31P{1H} NMR spectrum simulations, IR spectroscopy, and HPLC (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
  • Authors
    • Ingebjørg N. Hungnes - School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, Fourth Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
    • Truc Thuy Pham - School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, Fourth Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United KingdomOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5850-4592
    • Charlotte Rivas - School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, Fourth Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United KingdomOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5892-3156
    • James A. Jarvis - Randall Centre of Cell and Molecular Biophysics and Centre for Biomolecular Spectroscopy, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
    • Rachel E. Nuttall - School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, Fourth Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United KingdomSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock’s Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, United KingdomOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3945-3096
    • Saul M. Cooper - Department of Chemistry, Imperial College London, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, London W12 0BZ, United Kingdom
    • Jennifer D. Young - School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, Fourth Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
    • Philip J. Blower - School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, Fourth Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United KingdomOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6290-1590
  • Notes
    The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): A PCT application describing chemical technology included in this manuscript has recently been filed.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This research was supported by a Cancer Research U.K. Career Establishment Award (C63178/A24959), King’s College London and Imperial College London EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Medical Imaging (EP/L015226/1), the Bristol Chemical Synthesis Centre for Doctoral Training funded by EPSRC (EP/L015366/1), the EPSRC programme for Next Generation Molecular Imaging and Therapy with Radionuclides (EP/S032789/1, “MITHRAS”), Rosetrees Trust (M685 and M606), the Cancer Research U.K. National Cancer Imaging Translational Accelerator Award (C4278/A27066), the Wellcome Multiuser Equipment Radioanalytical Facility funded by Wellcome Trust (212885/Z/18/Z), the Centre for Medical Engineering funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (WT088641/Z/09/Z), and the King’s College London Centre for Biomolecular Spectroscopy funded by Wellcome Trust (202762/Z/16/Z) and British Heart Foundation (IG/16/2/32273).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 39 other publications.

  1. 1
    Jackson, J. A.; Hungnes, I. N.; Ma, M. T.; Rivas, C. Bioconjugates of Chelators with Peptides and Proteins in Nuclear Medicine: Historical Importance, Current Innovations, and Future Challenges. Bioconjugate Chem. 2020, 31, 483491,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00015
  2. 2
    Maurer, T.; Robu, S.; Schottelius, M.; Schwamborn, K.; Rauscher, I.; van den Berg, N. S.; van Leeuwen, F. W. B.; Haller, B.; Horn, T.; Heck, M. M.; Gschwend, J. E.; Schwaiger, M.; Wester, H. J.; Eiber, M. 99mTechnetium-Based Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen–Radioguided Surgery in Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Eur. Urol. 2019, 75, 659666,  DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.013
  3. 3
    Schmidkonz, C.; Hollweg, C.; Beck, M.; Reinfelder, J.; Goetz, T. I.; Sanders, J. C.; Schmidt, D.; Prante, O.; Bäuerle, T.; Cavallaro, A.; Uder, M.; Wullich, B.; Goebell, P.; Kuwert, T.; Ritt, P. 99mTc-MIP-1404-SPECT/CT for the Detection of PSMA-Positive Lesions in 225 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer. Prostate 2018, 78, 5463,  DOI: 10.1002/pros.23444
  4. 4
    Hicks, R. J.; Jackson, P.; Kong, G.; Ware, R. E.; Hofman, M. S.; Pattison, D. A.; Akhurst, T.; Drummond, E.; Roselt, P.; Callahan, J.; Price, R.; Jeffery, C. M.; Hong, E.; Noonan, W.; Herschtal, A.; Hicks, L. J.; Hedt, A.; Harris, M.; Paterson, B. M.; Donnelly, P. S. First-in-Human Trial of 64Cu-SARTATE PET Imaging of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumours Demonstrates High Tumor Uptake and Retention, Potentially Allowing Prospective Dosimetry for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy. J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 60, 777785,  DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.217745
  5. 5
    Rivas, C.; Jackson, J. A.; Hungnes, I. N.; Ma, M. T. Radioactive Metals in Imaging and Therapy. Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry III; Elsevier, 2021; Vol. 9, pp 706740.
  6. 6
    Liu, S.; Chakraborty, S. 99mTc-Centered One-Pot Synthesis for Preparation of 99mTc Radiotracers. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 60776086,  DOI: 10.1039/c0dt01462a
  7. 7
    Ma, M. T.; Blower, P. J. Chelators for Diagnostic Molecular Imaging with Radioisotopes of Copper, Gallium and Zirconium. Metal Chelation in Medicine; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, U.K., 2016; Chapter 8, pp 260312.
  8. 8
    Kelly, J. D.; Forster, A. M.; Higley, B.; Archer, C. M.; Booker, F. S.; Canning, L. R.; Wai Chiu, K.; Edwards, B.; Gill, H. K.; McPartlin, M.; Nagle, K. R.; Latham, I. A.; Pickett, R. D.; Storey, A. E.; Webbon, P. M. Technetium-99m-Tetrofosmin as a New Radiopharmaceutical for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 1993, 34, 222227
  9. 9
    Amersham Health. Myoview Kit for the Preparation of Technetium Tc99m Tetrofosmin for Injection. www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2003/20372slr015_myoview_lbl.pdf (accessed Jan 20, 2023).
  10. 10
    Bolzati, C.; Malagò, E.; Boschi, A.; Cagnolini, A.; Porchia, M.; Bandoli, G. Symmetric Bis-Substituted and Asymmetric Mono-Substituted Nitridotechnetium Complexes with Heterofunctionalized Phosphinothiolate Ligands. New J. Chem. 1999, 23, 807809,  DOI: 10.1039/a903679b
  11. 11
    Bolzati, C.; Caporale, A.; Agostini, S.; Carta, D.; Cavazza-Ceccato, M.; Refosco, F.; Tisato, F.; Schievano, E.; Bandoli, G. Avidin-Biotin System: A Small Library of Cysteine Biotinylated Derivatives Designed for the [99mTc(N)(PNP)]2+ Metal Fragment. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2007, 34, 511522,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.04.006
  12. 12
    Kannan, R.; Pillarsetty, N.; Gali, H.; Hoffman, T. J.; Barnes, C. L.; Jurisson, S. S.; Smith, C. J.; Volkert, W. A. Design and Synthesis of a Bombesin Peptide-Conjugated Tripodal Phosphino Dithioether Ligand Topology for the Stabilization of the fac-[M(CO)3]+ Core (M = 99 MTc or Re). Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 62106219,  DOI: 10.1021/ic200491z
  13. 13
    Kothari, K. K.; Raghuraman, K.; Pillarsetty, N. K.; Hoffman, T. J.; Owen, N. K.; Katti, K. V.; Volkert, W. A. Syntheses, in vitro and in vivo Characterization of a 99mTc-(I)-Tricarbonyl-Benzylamino-Dihydroxymethyl Phosphine (NP2) Chelate. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2003, 58, 543549,  DOI: 10.1016/S0969-8043(03)00030-7
  14. 14
    Gali, H.; Hoffman, T. J.; Sieckman, G. L.; Owen, N. K.; Katti, K. V.; Volkert, W. A. Synthesis, Characterization, and Labeling with 99mTc/188Re of Peptide Conjugates Containing a Dithia-Bisphosphine Chelating Agent. Bioconjugate Chem. 2001, 12, 354363,  DOI: 10.1021/bc000077c
  15. 15
    Karra, S. R.; Schibli, R.; Gali, H.; Katti, K. V.; Hoffman, T. J.; Higginbotham, C.; Sieckman, G. L.; Volkert, W. A. 99mTc-Labeling and in vivo Studies of a Bombesin Analogue with a Novel Water-Soluble Dithiadiphosphine-Based Bifunctional Chelating Agent. Bioconjugate Chem. 1999, 10, 254260,  DOI: 10.1021/bc980096a
  16. 16
    Hungnes, I. N.; Al-Salemee, F.; Gawne, P. J.; Eykyn, T.; Atkinson, R. A.; Terry, S. Y. A.; Clarke, F.; Blower, P. J.; Pringle, P. G.; Ma, M. T. One-Step, Kit-Based Radiopharmaceuticals for Molecular SPECT Imaging: A Versatile Diphosphine Chelator for 99mTc Radiolabelling of Peptides. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 1615616165,  DOI: 10.1039/D1DT03177E
  17. 17
    Nuttall, R. E.; Pham, T. T.; Chadwick, A. C.; Hungnes, I. N.; Firth, G.; Heckenast, M. A.; Sparkes, H. A. M.; Galan, C.; Ma, M. T.; Pringle, P. G. Diphosphine Bioconjugates via Pt(0)-Catalyzed Hydrophosphination. A Versatile Chelator Platform for Technetium-99m and Rhenium-188 Radiolabeling of Biomolecules. Inorg. Chem. 2023,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c04008
  18. 18
    Lewis, J. S.; Zweit, J.; Blower, P. J. Effect of Ligand and Solvent on Chloride Ion Coordination in Anti-Tumour Copper(I) Diphosphine Complexes: Synthesis of [Cu(dppe)2]Cl and Analogous Complexes (dppe = 1,2-Bis(Diphenylphosphino)Ethane). Polyhedron 1998, 17, 513517,  DOI: 10.1016/S0277-5387(97)00343-4
  19. 19
    Lewis, J. S.; Dearling, J. L. J.; Sosabowski, J. K.; Zweit, J.; Carnochan, P.; Kelland, L. R.; Coley, H. M.; Blower, P. J. Copper Bis(Diphosphine) Complexes: Radiopharmaceuticals for the Detection of Multi-Drug Resistance in Tumours by PET. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 2000, 27, 638646,  DOI: 10.1007/s002590050557
  20. 20
    Lewis, J. S.; Zweit, J.; Dearling, J. L. J.; Rooney, B. C.; Blower, P. J. Copper(I) Bis(Diphosphine) Complexes as a Basis for Radiopharmaceuticals for Positron Emission Tomography and Targeted Radiotherapy. Chem. Commun. 1996, 10931094,  DOI: 10.1039/cc9960001093
  21. 21
    Lewis, J. S.; Heath, S. L.; Powell, A. K.; Zweit, J.; Blower, P. J. Diphosphine Bifunctional Chelators for Low-Valent Metal Ions. Crystal Structures of the Copper(I) Complexes [CuClL12]and [CuL12][PF6][L1 = 2,3-Bis(diphenylphosphino)maleic anhydride]. J. Chem. Soc. Dalt. Trans. 1997, 855862,  DOI: 10.1039/a607203h
  22. 22
    Fei, M.; Sur, S. K.; Tyler, D. R. Reaction of (η5-C5Ph5)2Mo2(CO)6 with a Chelating Phosphine Ligand: Generation of Stable 17- and 19-Electron Complexes. Dynamic Equilibrium of (η5-C5Ph5)2Mo2(CO)6 and (η5-C5Ph5)Mo(CO)3. Organometallics 1991, 10, 419423,  DOI: 10.1021/om00048a017
  23. 23
    Mao, F.; Tyler, D. R.; Bruce, M. R. M.; Bruce, A. E.; Rieger, A. L.; Rieger, P. H. Solvent Effects on Electron Delocalization in Paramagnetic Organometallic Complexes: Solvent Manipulation of the Amount of 19-Electron Character in Co(CO)3L2 (L2 = a Chelating Phosphine). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 64186424,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00042a019
  24. 24
    Fenske, D.; Becher, H. J. 2,3-Bis(diphenylphosphino)maleinsäureanhydrid und Diphenylphosphinoderivate des Cyclobutendions als Liganden in Metallcarbonylen. Chem. Ber. 1974, 107, 117122,  DOI: 10.1002/cber.19741070114
  25. 25
    Tolman, C. A. Steric Effects of Phosphorus Ligands in Organometallic Chemistry and Homogeneous Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 1977, 77, 313348,  DOI: 10.1021/cr60307a002
  26. 26
    Tolman, C. A. Electron Donor-Acceptor Properties of Phosphorus Ligands. Substituent Additivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 29532956,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00713a006
  27. 27
    Anton, D. R.; Crabtree, R. H. Metalation-Resistant Ligands: Some Properties of Dibenzocyclooctatetraene Complexes of Molybdenum, Rhodium, and Iridium. Organometallics 1983, 2, 621627,  DOI: 10.1021/om00077a009
  28. 28
    Berners-Price, S. J.; Sadler, P. J.; Brevard, C.; Pagelot, A. [Cu(Ph2PCH2CH2PEt2)2]Cl: A Chelated Copper(I) Complex with Tetrahedral Stereochemistry. Rate of Inversion Compared with Those of Isostructural Silver(I) and Gold(I) Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25, 596599,  DOI: 10.1021/ic00225a004
  29. 29
    Berners-Price, S. J.; Johnson, R. K.; Mirabelli, C. K.; Faucette, L. F.; McCabe, F. L.; Sadler, P. J. Copper(I) Complexes with Bidentate Tertiary Phosphine Ligands: Solution Chemistry and Antitumor Activity. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 33833387,  DOI: 10.1021/ic00267a034
  30. 30
    Imberti, C.; Terry, S. Y. A.; Cullinane, C.; Clarke, F.; Cornish, G. H.; Ramakrishnan, N. K.; Roselt, P.; Cope, A. P.; Hicks, R. J.; Blower, P. J.; Ma, M. T. Enhancing PET Signal at Target Tissue in Vivo: Dendritic and Multimeric Tris(Hydroxypyridinone) Conjugates for Molecular Imaging of αvβ3 Integrin Expression with Gallium-68. Bioconjugate Chem. 2017, 28, 481495,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00621
  31. 31
    Frei, A.; Fischer, E.; Childs, B. C.; Holland, J. P.; Alberto, R. Two Is Better than One: Difunctional High-Affinity PSMA Probes Based on a [CpM(CO)3] (M = Re/ 99mTc) Scaffold. Dalt. Trans. 2019, 48, 1460014605,  DOI: 10.1039/C9DT02506E
  32. 32
    Zia, N. A.; Cullinane, C.; Van Zuylekom, J. K.; Waldeck, K.; McInnes, L. E.; Buncic, G.; Haskali, M. B.; Roselt, P. D.; Hicks, R. J.; Donnelly, P. S. A Bivalent Inhibitor of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Radiolabeled with Copper-64 with High Tumor Uptake and Retention. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 1499114994,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201908964
  33. 33
    Tsionou, M. I.; Knapp, C. E.; Foley, C. A.; Munteanu, C. R.; Cakebread, A.; Imberti, C.; Eykyn, T. R.; Young, J. D.; Paterson, B. M.; Blower, P. J.; Ma, M. T. Comparison of Macrocyclic and Acyclic Chelators for Gallium-68 Radiolabelling. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 4958649599,  DOI: 10.1039/C7RA09076E
  34. 34
    Eder, M.; Neels, O.; Müller, M.; Bauder-Wüst, U.; Remde, Y.; Schäfer, M.; Hennrich, U.; Eisenhut, M.; Afshar-Oromieh, A.; Haberkorn, U.; Kopka, K. Novel Preclinical and Radiopharmaceutical Aspects of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC: A New PET Tracer for Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Pharmaceuticals 2014, 7, 779796,  DOI: 10.3390/ph7070779
  35. 35
    Bernal, P.; Raoul, J.-L.; Stare, J.; Sereegotov, E.; Sundram, F. X.; Kumar, A.; Jeong, J.-M.; Pusuwan, P.; Divgi, C.; Zanzonico, P.; Vidmar, G.; Buscombe, J.; Chau, T. T. M.; Saw, M. M.; Chen, S.; Ogbac, R.; Dondi, M.; Padhy, A. K. International Atomic Energy Agency-Sponsored Multination Study of Intra-Arterial Rhenium-188-Labeled Lipiodol in the Treatment of Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results With Special Emphasis on Prognostic Value of Dosimetric Study. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2008, 38, S40S45,  DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2007.10.006
  36. 36
    Shinto, A. Rhenium 188: The Poor Man’s Yttrium. World J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 16, 12,  DOI: 10.4103/1450-1147.198225
  37. 37
    Davison, A.; Orvig, C.; Trop, H. S.; Sohn, M.; DePamphilis, B. V.; Jones, A. G. Preparation of Oxobis(Dithiolato) Complexes of Technetium(V) and Rhenium(V). Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 19881992,  DOI: 10.1021/ic50209a031
  38. 38
    Cooper, M. S.; Ma, M. T.; Sunassee, K.; Shaw, K. P.; Williams, J. D.; Paul, R. L.; Donnelly, P. S.; Blower, P. J. Comparison of 64Cu-Complexing Bifunctional Chelators for Radioimmunoconjugation: Labeling Efficiency, Specific Activity, and in vitro/in vivo Stability. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 10291039,  DOI: 10.1021/bc300037w
  39. 39
    Jauregui-Osoro, M.; De Robertis, S.; Halsted, P.; Gould, S. M.; Yu, Z.; Paul, R. L.; Marsden, P. K.; Gee, A. D.; Fenwick, A.; Blower, P. J. Production of Copper-64 Using a Hospital Cyclotron: Targetry, Purification and Quality Analysis. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2021, 42, 10241038,  DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001422

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 2 publications.

  1. Sourav Chatterjee, Bishwajit Paul, Govindaswamy Shanker. His-Tagging: Exploring Precise Chemical Modification of Histidine-Containing Bioactive Peptide Sequences. Synlett 2025, 36 (06) , 661-673. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1775364
  2. Truc T. Pham, Ingebjørg N. Hungnes, Charlotte Rivas, Julie Cleaver, George Firth, Philip J. Blower, Jane Sosabowski, Gary J.R. Cook, Lefteris Livieratos, Jennifer D. Young, Paul G. Pringle, Michelle T. Ma. Receptor-Targeted Peptide Conjugates Based on Diphosphines Enable Preparation of 99m Tc and 188 Re Theranostic Agents for Prostate Cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2024, 65 (7) , 1087-1094. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267450

Inorganic Chemistry

Cite this: Inorg. Chem. 2023, 62, 50, 20608–20620
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00426
Published March 27, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

2116

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Preparation of [Cu(DPPh-Bn)2]+a

    a(i) CuCl; (ii) 64CuCl2.

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2. Preparation of DPPh

    Scheme 3

    Scheme 3. Mo Complexes of DPPh and DPTol Derivatives

    Scheme 4

    Scheme 4. Preparation and Complexation of DP-PSMAt Conjugatesa

    a(i) [ReO2I(PPh3)2] in DMF; (ii) [NtBu4][99gTcOCl4] in DMF; (iii) 99mTcO4, SnCl2, sodium tartrate, in water (pH 8).

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. 31P{1H} NMR spectra of (a-i) DPPh-PSMAt, (a-ii) DPTol-PSMAt, (b-i) [natReO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+, (b-ii) [natReO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+, (c-i) [natCu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+, and (c-ii) [natCu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+. Signals corresponding to cis-[natReO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and cis-[natReO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ are highlighted in blue.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. DP-PSMAt derivatives reacted with [NtBu4][99gTcOCl4] to yield [99gTcO2(DP-PSMAt)2]+), which consists of both cis and trans isomers. (a-i) UV chromatogram of [99gTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+); (a-ii) MS chromatogram of [99gTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+; (b-i) UV chromatogram of [99gTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+; (b-ii) MS chromatogram of [99gTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+. For HPLC method 8, see the SI.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Putative cis and trans isomers of (a) [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and (b) [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+, separated on a shallow analytical C18 HPLC gradient. The radioactive signals were coincident with the UV signals of characterized (c) [natReO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and (d) [natReO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+. For HPLC method 10, see the SI.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Maximum intensity projections of healthy male SCID Beige mice injected with (a-i) [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and (b-i) [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ from 15 min to 4 h postinjection. Regions of interest were selected on VivoQuant (inviCRO, LLC, Boston, MA), and percentages of injected dose per milliliter (% ID/mL) were calculated for each of (a-ii) [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ (n = 1) and (b-ii) [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+ (n = 1). K = kidneys; B = bladder.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Radio-HPLC analysis of urine from healthy male SCID Beige mice intravenously administered with either (a) [99mTcO2(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ or (b) [99mTcO2(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+. Radio-HPLC shows that both radiotracers are highly metabolically stable and are excreted intact. For HPLC method 2, see the SI.

    Scheme 5

    Scheme 5. Reaction of DP-PSMAt Conjugates with Cu+a

    a(i) [Cu(MeCN)4][PF6] in mixtures of water and acetonitrile; (ii) solutions of 64Cu2+ with a large excess of DP-PSMAt conjugate in an aqueous solution.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. HPLC chromatograms of (a) [Cu(DPPh-PSMAt)2]+ and (b) [Cu(DPTol-PSMAt)2]+. DP-PSMAt derivatives were reacted with solutions of either [natCu(MeCN)4][PF6] (blue traces) or 64Cu2+ (red traces), with UV signals for [natCu(DP-PSMAt)2]+ derivatives coincident with radioactive signals for [64Cu(DP-PSMAt)2]+ (with slight differences in the retention times a result of the configuration of the UV and scintillation detectors in series). Analytical radio-HPLC analysis revealed that both radiotracers were stable in serum over 24 h (black traces). For HPLC method 2, see the SI.

  • References


    This article references 39 other publications.

    1. 1
      Jackson, J. A.; Hungnes, I. N.; Ma, M. T.; Rivas, C. Bioconjugates of Chelators with Peptides and Proteins in Nuclear Medicine: Historical Importance, Current Innovations, and Future Challenges. Bioconjugate Chem. 2020, 31, 483491,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00015
    2. 2
      Maurer, T.; Robu, S.; Schottelius, M.; Schwamborn, K.; Rauscher, I.; van den Berg, N. S.; van Leeuwen, F. W. B.; Haller, B.; Horn, T.; Heck, M. M.; Gschwend, J. E.; Schwaiger, M.; Wester, H. J.; Eiber, M. 99mTechnetium-Based Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen–Radioguided Surgery in Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Eur. Urol. 2019, 75, 659666,  DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.013
    3. 3
      Schmidkonz, C.; Hollweg, C.; Beck, M.; Reinfelder, J.; Goetz, T. I.; Sanders, J. C.; Schmidt, D.; Prante, O.; Bäuerle, T.; Cavallaro, A.; Uder, M.; Wullich, B.; Goebell, P.; Kuwert, T.; Ritt, P. 99mTc-MIP-1404-SPECT/CT for the Detection of PSMA-Positive Lesions in 225 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer. Prostate 2018, 78, 5463,  DOI: 10.1002/pros.23444
    4. 4
      Hicks, R. J.; Jackson, P.; Kong, G.; Ware, R. E.; Hofman, M. S.; Pattison, D. A.; Akhurst, T.; Drummond, E.; Roselt, P.; Callahan, J.; Price, R.; Jeffery, C. M.; Hong, E.; Noonan, W.; Herschtal, A.; Hicks, L. J.; Hedt, A.; Harris, M.; Paterson, B. M.; Donnelly, P. S. First-in-Human Trial of 64Cu-SARTATE PET Imaging of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumours Demonstrates High Tumor Uptake and Retention, Potentially Allowing Prospective Dosimetry for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy. J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 60, 777785,  DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.217745
    5. 5
      Rivas, C.; Jackson, J. A.; Hungnes, I. N.; Ma, M. T. Radioactive Metals in Imaging and Therapy. Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry III; Elsevier, 2021; Vol. 9, pp 706740.
    6. 6
      Liu, S.; Chakraborty, S. 99mTc-Centered One-Pot Synthesis for Preparation of 99mTc Radiotracers. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 60776086,  DOI: 10.1039/c0dt01462a
    7. 7
      Ma, M. T.; Blower, P. J. Chelators for Diagnostic Molecular Imaging with Radioisotopes of Copper, Gallium and Zirconium. Metal Chelation in Medicine; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, U.K., 2016; Chapter 8, pp 260312.
    8. 8
      Kelly, J. D.; Forster, A. M.; Higley, B.; Archer, C. M.; Booker, F. S.; Canning, L. R.; Wai Chiu, K.; Edwards, B.; Gill, H. K.; McPartlin, M.; Nagle, K. R.; Latham, I. A.; Pickett, R. D.; Storey, A. E.; Webbon, P. M. Technetium-99m-Tetrofosmin as a New Radiopharmaceutical for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 1993, 34, 222227
    9. 9
      Amersham Health. Myoview Kit for the Preparation of Technetium Tc99m Tetrofosmin for Injection. www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2003/20372slr015_myoview_lbl.pdf (accessed Jan 20, 2023).
    10. 10
      Bolzati, C.; Malagò, E.; Boschi, A.; Cagnolini, A.; Porchia, M.; Bandoli, G. Symmetric Bis-Substituted and Asymmetric Mono-Substituted Nitridotechnetium Complexes with Heterofunctionalized Phosphinothiolate Ligands. New J. Chem. 1999, 23, 807809,  DOI: 10.1039/a903679b
    11. 11
      Bolzati, C.; Caporale, A.; Agostini, S.; Carta, D.; Cavazza-Ceccato, M.; Refosco, F.; Tisato, F.; Schievano, E.; Bandoli, G. Avidin-Biotin System: A Small Library of Cysteine Biotinylated Derivatives Designed for the [99mTc(N)(PNP)]2+ Metal Fragment. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2007, 34, 511522,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.04.006
    12. 12
      Kannan, R.; Pillarsetty, N.; Gali, H.; Hoffman, T. J.; Barnes, C. L.; Jurisson, S. S.; Smith, C. J.; Volkert, W. A. Design and Synthesis of a Bombesin Peptide-Conjugated Tripodal Phosphino Dithioether Ligand Topology for the Stabilization of the fac-[M(CO)3]+ Core (M = 99 MTc or Re). Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 62106219,  DOI: 10.1021/ic200491z
    13. 13
      Kothari, K. K.; Raghuraman, K.; Pillarsetty, N. K.; Hoffman, T. J.; Owen, N. K.; Katti, K. V.; Volkert, W. A. Syntheses, in vitro and in vivo Characterization of a 99mTc-(I)-Tricarbonyl-Benzylamino-Dihydroxymethyl Phosphine (NP2) Chelate. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2003, 58, 543549,  DOI: 10.1016/S0969-8043(03)00030-7
    14. 14
      Gali, H.; Hoffman, T. J.; Sieckman, G. L.; Owen, N. K.; Katti, K. V.; Volkert, W. A. Synthesis, Characterization, and Labeling with 99mTc/188Re of Peptide Conjugates Containing a Dithia-Bisphosphine Chelating Agent. Bioconjugate Chem. 2001, 12, 354363,  DOI: 10.1021/bc000077c
    15. 15
      Karra, S. R.; Schibli, R.; Gali, H.; Katti, K. V.; Hoffman, T. J.; Higginbotham, C.; Sieckman, G. L.; Volkert, W. A. 99mTc-Labeling and in vivo Studies of a Bombesin Analogue with a Novel Water-Soluble Dithiadiphosphine-Based Bifunctional Chelating Agent. Bioconjugate Chem. 1999, 10, 254260,  DOI: 10.1021/bc980096a
    16. 16
      Hungnes, I. N.; Al-Salemee, F.; Gawne, P. J.; Eykyn, T.; Atkinson, R. A.; Terry, S. Y. A.; Clarke, F.; Blower, P. J.; Pringle, P. G.; Ma, M. T. One-Step, Kit-Based Radiopharmaceuticals for Molecular SPECT Imaging: A Versatile Diphosphine Chelator for 99mTc Radiolabelling of Peptides. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 1615616165,  DOI: 10.1039/D1DT03177E
    17. 17
      Nuttall, R. E.; Pham, T. T.; Chadwick, A. C.; Hungnes, I. N.; Firth, G.; Heckenast, M. A.; Sparkes, H. A. M.; Galan, C.; Ma, M. T.; Pringle, P. G. Diphosphine Bioconjugates via Pt(0)-Catalyzed Hydrophosphination. A Versatile Chelator Platform for Technetium-99m and Rhenium-188 Radiolabeling of Biomolecules. Inorg. Chem. 2023,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c04008
    18. 18
      Lewis, J. S.; Zweit, J.; Blower, P. J. Effect of Ligand and Solvent on Chloride Ion Coordination in Anti-Tumour Copper(I) Diphosphine Complexes: Synthesis of [Cu(dppe)2]Cl and Analogous Complexes (dppe = 1,2-Bis(Diphenylphosphino)Ethane). Polyhedron 1998, 17, 513517,  DOI: 10.1016/S0277-5387(97)00343-4
    19. 19
      Lewis, J. S.; Dearling, J. L. J.; Sosabowski, J. K.; Zweit, J.; Carnochan, P.; Kelland, L. R.; Coley, H. M.; Blower, P. J. Copper Bis(Diphosphine) Complexes: Radiopharmaceuticals for the Detection of Multi-Drug Resistance in Tumours by PET. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 2000, 27, 638646,  DOI: 10.1007/s002590050557
    20. 20
      Lewis, J. S.; Zweit, J.; Dearling, J. L. J.; Rooney, B. C.; Blower, P. J. Copper(I) Bis(Diphosphine) Complexes as a Basis for Radiopharmaceuticals for Positron Emission Tomography and Targeted Radiotherapy. Chem. Commun. 1996, 10931094,  DOI: 10.1039/cc9960001093
    21. 21
      Lewis, J. S.; Heath, S. L.; Powell, A. K.; Zweit, J.; Blower, P. J. Diphosphine Bifunctional Chelators for Low-Valent Metal Ions. Crystal Structures of the Copper(I) Complexes [CuClL12]and [CuL12][PF6][L1 = 2,3-Bis(diphenylphosphino)maleic anhydride]. J. Chem. Soc. Dalt. Trans. 1997, 855862,  DOI: 10.1039/a607203h
    22. 22
      Fei, M.; Sur, S. K.; Tyler, D. R. Reaction of (η5-C5Ph5)2Mo2(CO)6 with a Chelating Phosphine Ligand: Generation of Stable 17- and 19-Electron Complexes. Dynamic Equilibrium of (η5-C5Ph5)2Mo2(CO)6 and (η5-C5Ph5)Mo(CO)3. Organometallics 1991, 10, 419423,  DOI: 10.1021/om00048a017
    23. 23
      Mao, F.; Tyler, D. R.; Bruce, M. R. M.; Bruce, A. E.; Rieger, A. L.; Rieger, P. H. Solvent Effects on Electron Delocalization in Paramagnetic Organometallic Complexes: Solvent Manipulation of the Amount of 19-Electron Character in Co(CO)3L2 (L2 = a Chelating Phosphine). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 64186424,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00042a019
    24. 24
      Fenske, D.; Becher, H. J. 2,3-Bis(diphenylphosphino)maleinsäureanhydrid und Diphenylphosphinoderivate des Cyclobutendions als Liganden in Metallcarbonylen. Chem. Ber. 1974, 107, 117122,  DOI: 10.1002/cber.19741070114
    25. 25
      Tolman, C. A. Steric Effects of Phosphorus Ligands in Organometallic Chemistry and Homogeneous Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 1977, 77, 313348,  DOI: 10.1021/cr60307a002
    26. 26
      Tolman, C. A. Electron Donor-Acceptor Properties of Phosphorus Ligands. Substituent Additivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 29532956,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00713a006
    27. 27
      Anton, D. R.; Crabtree, R. H. Metalation-Resistant Ligands: Some Properties of Dibenzocyclooctatetraene Complexes of Molybdenum, Rhodium, and Iridium. Organometallics 1983, 2, 621627,  DOI: 10.1021/om00077a009
    28. 28
      Berners-Price, S. J.; Sadler, P. J.; Brevard, C.; Pagelot, A. [Cu(Ph2PCH2CH2PEt2)2]Cl: A Chelated Copper(I) Complex with Tetrahedral Stereochemistry. Rate of Inversion Compared with Those of Isostructural Silver(I) and Gold(I) Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25, 596599,  DOI: 10.1021/ic00225a004
    29. 29
      Berners-Price, S. J.; Johnson, R. K.; Mirabelli, C. K.; Faucette, L. F.; McCabe, F. L.; Sadler, P. J. Copper(I) Complexes with Bidentate Tertiary Phosphine Ligands: Solution Chemistry and Antitumor Activity. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 33833387,  DOI: 10.1021/ic00267a034
    30. 30
      Imberti, C.; Terry, S. Y. A.; Cullinane, C.; Clarke, F.; Cornish, G. H.; Ramakrishnan, N. K.; Roselt, P.; Cope, A. P.; Hicks, R. J.; Blower, P. J.; Ma, M. T. Enhancing PET Signal at Target Tissue in Vivo: Dendritic and Multimeric Tris(Hydroxypyridinone) Conjugates for Molecular Imaging of αvβ3 Integrin Expression with Gallium-68. Bioconjugate Chem. 2017, 28, 481495,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00621
    31. 31
      Frei, A.; Fischer, E.; Childs, B. C.; Holland, J. P.; Alberto, R. Two Is Better than One: Difunctional High-Affinity PSMA Probes Based on a [CpM(CO)3] (M = Re/ 99mTc) Scaffold. Dalt. Trans. 2019, 48, 1460014605,  DOI: 10.1039/C9DT02506E
    32. 32
      Zia, N. A.; Cullinane, C.; Van Zuylekom, J. K.; Waldeck, K.; McInnes, L. E.; Buncic, G.; Haskali, M. B.; Roselt, P. D.; Hicks, R. J.; Donnelly, P. S. A Bivalent Inhibitor of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Radiolabeled with Copper-64 with High Tumor Uptake and Retention. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 1499114994,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201908964
    33. 33
      Tsionou, M. I.; Knapp, C. E.; Foley, C. A.; Munteanu, C. R.; Cakebread, A.; Imberti, C.; Eykyn, T. R.; Young, J. D.; Paterson, B. M.; Blower, P. J.; Ma, M. T. Comparison of Macrocyclic and Acyclic Chelators for Gallium-68 Radiolabelling. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 4958649599,  DOI: 10.1039/C7RA09076E
    34. 34
      Eder, M.; Neels, O.; Müller, M.; Bauder-Wüst, U.; Remde, Y.; Schäfer, M.; Hennrich, U.; Eisenhut, M.; Afshar-Oromieh, A.; Haberkorn, U.; Kopka, K. Novel Preclinical and Radiopharmaceutical Aspects of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC: A New PET Tracer for Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Pharmaceuticals 2014, 7, 779796,  DOI: 10.3390/ph7070779
    35. 35
      Bernal, P.; Raoul, J.-L.; Stare, J.; Sereegotov, E.; Sundram, F. X.; Kumar, A.; Jeong, J.-M.; Pusuwan, P.; Divgi, C.; Zanzonico, P.; Vidmar, G.; Buscombe, J.; Chau, T. T. M.; Saw, M. M.; Chen, S.; Ogbac, R.; Dondi, M.; Padhy, A. K. International Atomic Energy Agency-Sponsored Multination Study of Intra-Arterial Rhenium-188-Labeled Lipiodol in the Treatment of Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results With Special Emphasis on Prognostic Value of Dosimetric Study. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2008, 38, S40S45,  DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2007.10.006
    36. 36
      Shinto, A. Rhenium 188: The Poor Man’s Yttrium. World J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 16, 12,  DOI: 10.4103/1450-1147.198225
    37. 37
      Davison, A.; Orvig, C.; Trop, H. S.; Sohn, M.; DePamphilis, B. V.; Jones, A. G. Preparation of Oxobis(Dithiolato) Complexes of Technetium(V) and Rhenium(V). Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 19881992,  DOI: 10.1021/ic50209a031
    38. 38
      Cooper, M. S.; Ma, M. T.; Sunassee, K.; Shaw, K. P.; Williams, J. D.; Paul, R. L.; Donnelly, P. S.; Blower, P. J. Comparison of 64Cu-Complexing Bifunctional Chelators for Radioimmunoconjugation: Labeling Efficiency, Specific Activity, and in vitro/in vivo Stability. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 10291039,  DOI: 10.1021/bc300037w
    39. 39
      Jauregui-Osoro, M.; De Robertis, S.; Halsted, P.; Gould, S. M.; Yu, Z.; Paul, R. L.; Marsden, P. K.; Gee, A. D.; Fenwick, A.; Blower, P. J. Production of Copper-64 Using a Hospital Cyclotron: Targetry, Purification and Quality Analysis. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2021, 42, 10241038,  DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001422
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00426.

    • General experimental and instrumentation details, NMR and ESI-MS, 31P{1H} NMR spectrum simulations, IR spectroscopy, and HPLC (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.