ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Development of Nonclassical Photoprecursors for Rh2 Nitrenes
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Article

Development of Nonclassical Photoprecursors for Rh2 Nitrenes
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Inorganic Chemistry

Cite this: Inorg. Chem. 2023, 62, 31, 12557–12564
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c01820
Published July 27, 2023

Copyright © 2023 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Characterization of reactive intermediates in C–H functionalization is challenging due to the fleeting lifetimes of these species. Synthetic photochemistry provides a strategy to generate post-turnover-limiting-step intermediates in catalysis under cryogenic conditions that enable characterization. We have a long-standing interest in the structure and reactivity of Rh2 nitrene intermediates, which are implicated as transient intermediates in Rh2-catalyzed C–H amination. Previously, we demonstrated that Rh2 complexes bearing organic azide ligands can serve as solid-state and in crystallo photoprecursors in the synthesis of transient Rh2 nitrenoids. Complementary solution-phase experiments have not been available due to the weak binding of most organic azides to Rh2 complexes. Furthermore, the volatility of the N2 that is evolved during in crystallo nitrene synthesis from these precursors has prevented the in crystallo observation of C–H functionalization from lattice-confined nitrenes. Motivated by these challenges, here we describe the synthesis and photochemistry of nonclassical nitrene precursors based on sulfilimine ligands. Sulfilimines bind to Rh2 carboxylate complexes more tightly than the corresponding azides, which has enabled the full solid-state and solution-phase characterization of these new complexes. The higher binding affinity of sulfilimine ligands as compared with organic azides has enabled both solution-phase and solid-state nitrene photochemistry. Cryogenic photochemical studies of Rh2 sulfilimine complexes confined within polystyrene thin films demonstrate that sulfilimine photochemistry can be accomplished at low temperature but that C–H amination is rapid at temperatures compatible with N═S photoactivation. The potential of these structures to serve as platforms for multistep in crystallo cascades is discussed.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2023 American Chemical Society

Synopsis

The synthesis of dibenzothiophene-derived sulfilimine ligands and their coordination with Rh2esp2 is described. The coordination of the sulfilimine ligands with Rh2(II,II) complexes is characterized by UV−vis, IR, NMR spectroscopy, and X-ray crystallography. Photochemically promoted nitrogen group transfer (NGT) chemistry is observed in both solution-phase and solid-state photolyses, demonstrating the potential of sulfilimine ligands as nonclassical nitrene photoprecursors.

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Rh2-catalyzed C–H amination reactions have emerged as among the most efficient and functional group-tolerant methods to convert readily available C–H bonds to C–N bonds and have been demonstrated in the context of complex molecule synthesis. (1−10) Motivated both by a fundamental interest in the mechanistic details of C–H amination processes and by a practical interest in extending the scope of Rh2-catalyzed amination to stronger C–H bonds, unique chemoselectivities, and intermolecular bond constructions, a series of experimental and computational investigations have been pursued to elucidate the key mechanistic details of C–H cleavage and nitrogen-group transfer (NGT). (11−17) In general, Rh2-catalyzed NGT reactions proceed through turnover-limiting nitrene transfer from iminoiodinane, organic azide, or hydroxylamine derivatives (i.e., classical nitrene precursors) to the Rh2 catalyst to generate a transient Rh2 nitrene intermediate. (11,12) Subsequent NGT to the C–H bond affords amines and regenerates the Rh2[II,II] catalyst. Because the Rh2 nitrene intermediates that engage in C–H bond cleavage and NGT chemistry is post-turnover limiting step, these structures are not observable in operando but are instead inferred based on kinetics experiments and computational studies. (11,15)
We have been interested in advancing in crystallo photochemistry as a method to prepare and characterize reactive intermediates within single crystal environments (Figure 1a). (18−22) These studies are predicated on the photolysis of single-crystal samples of molecular precursors to unveil the reactive species of interest. (23−30) The combination of lattice confinement and cryogenic temperatures extends the lifetimes of photogenerated intermediates to enable characterization by using diffraction-based methods. In the context of Rh2 nitrenes, we demonstrated that organic azide ligands represent appropriate photoprecursors to the Rh2 nitrenes (via solid-state photoextrusion of N2). (19,21) While these studies enabled observation of Rh2 nitrenes, (1) N2 mobility within the single crystal resulted in loss of crystallinity during thermal annealing experiments designed to promote in crystallo NGT at the lattice-confined Rh2 nitrene, and (2) lability of organic azide ligands in solution prevented complementary spectroscopic experiments. (18)

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) In crystallo photogeneration and characterization of transient Rh2 nitrene from an organic azide photoprecursor. (b) Photoactivation of dibenzosulfilimines affords reactive nitrene fragments with concurrent extrusion of dibenzothiophene. (c) Here, we demonstrate the nitrene photochemistry of Rh2 sulfilimine complexes.

We sought to overcome these challenges by designing new photolabile nitrene precursors (i.e., nonclassical nitrene precursors). (20) We envisioned that access to more strongly binding ligands could facilitate solution-phase photochemical studies and that photoprecursors based on nongaseous leaving groups may enable multistep in crystallo cascades to be accomplished without loss of crystallinity. Motivated by reports of S–N bond photoactivation from dibenzothiophene sulfilimines to unveil reactive nitrene fragments and dibenzothiophene (dbt, Figure 1b), (31−34) here, we describe the synthesis, characterization, and nitrene photochemistry of a family of Rh2 sulfilimine complexes (Figure 1c). Ligand titration experiments confirm that sulfilimine ligands bind Rh2 more tightly than do the corresponding azide ligands, which enables solution-phase characterization of these precursors. Photolysis, in either the solution phase or the solid state, results in NGT chemistry. Immobilization within polystyrene thin films enabled cryogenic photochemical experiments to be carried out, which revealed that NGT is fast relative to N–S photoactivation, even at cryogenic temperatures. The results presented demonstrate a strategy in the design of nitrene photoprecursors that enables solution-phase and solid-state experiments to be pursued.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Synthesis and Characterization of Rh2 Sulfilimine Complexes

A small family of dibenzosulfilimine ligands (6a6e) was prepared by treatment of dibenzo[b,d]thiophene 5-oxide (3a) or 4,6-dimethylated dibenzo[b,d]thiophene-5-oxide (3b) with the appropriate aryl sulfonamide in the presence of trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA, eq 1). (33) This suite of sulfilimines was selected because photochemically promoted dibenzothiophene extrusion from 9a9e would result in differently substituted N-arylsulfonyl nitrenes and N-substitution has been shown to have a marked effect on nitrene transfer reactivity. (31−33) Photochemically promoted dibenzothiophene extrusion from 9d would result in an N-arylsulfonyl nitrene featuring pendant methine C–H bonds, which represent potential sites for intramolecular C–H amination. (35)
Complexation of these sulfilimine ligands with Rh2esp2 was pursued because (1) Rh2esp2 is commonly employed as a catalyst in nitrene transfer chemistry (1,2,5,7,8,13,14,16,17,36,37) and (2) our previous in crystallo studies employed this complex. (18,21) Treatment of Rh2esp2 with 2 equiv of sulfilimine ligands 6a6d resulted in the formation of 2:1 complexes 9a9d, which feature a N-coordinated sulfilimine ligand on both axial sites of the Rh2 core (Figure 2). In contrast, 6e forms an S-coordinated 2:1 complex with the Rh2(II,II) core (9e). 1H NMR analysis of a 2:1 mixture of Rh2esp2 and 6a6e features diamagnetically shifted peaks that are integrated, consistent with the assigned structure. Complexes 9a9e are thermally stable compounds, which based on 1H NMR studies persist in solution for hours to days in the absence of light.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Synthesis of N-coordinated bis-sulfilimine Rh2 complexes (9a9d), and S-coordinated bis-sulfilimine Rh2 complex 9e, which were isolated by crystallization.

UV–vis spectroscopy was utilized to evaluate the donicity of the sulfilimine ligands. (21) A CH2Cl2 solution of Rh2esp2 displays an absorbance at 425 nm, which has been ascribed to the Rh–Rh π* → Rh–O σ* transition, and a lower energy transition at 665 nm, which has been ascribed to the π* → σ* HOMO–LUMO transition. (38) In comparison, while the higher energy feature does not vary significantly as a function of the sulfilimine structure (9a9d), the lower energy feature of these complexes is blue-shifted to 639, 641, 655, and 662 nm, respectively. The lower energy feature is sensitive to the donicity of the axial ligand as this donor perturbs the π* → σ* transition: (39) In general, the higher the donicity of the axial ligand, the larger the HOMO/LUMO gap is, because the σ* parameter would be raised by the stronger donation of the axial ligand and, consequently, the lower energy band will be more blue-shifted. (38) Based on this argument, 6a and 6b are stronger donors than 6c and 6d to the Rh2(II,II) core.
Sulfilimine complexes 9 were further characterized in the solid state by diffuse reflectance and IR spectroscopies. Diffuse reflectance UV–vis spectra were obtained for crystalline samples of compounds 1, 9b, and 9d (see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). Similar to the solution-phase spectra of these compounds, the low-energy feature of Rh2esp2 is blue-shifted upon coordination of sulfilimines. When compared with the solution-state spectra, the solid-state spectra indicate that the Rh–Rh π* → σ* transition is sensitive to solvent polarity: In the solid state, the low energy bands of 9b and 9d are blue-shifted to 582 and 632 nm, respectively, as compared to 641 nm (9b) and 662 nm (9d) in solution. (40) The collected IR spectra indicated that the S═N stretching frequency is significantly red-shifted upon binding to Rh2esp2: For 6a, νN═S = 939 cm–1, while, for 9a, νN═S = 929 cm–1 (see Figure S2 in the Supporting Information for IR spectral comparison of sulfilimines and the corresponding Rh2 complexes).
The solid-state structures of 9a, 9b, 9c, 9d, and 9e were obtained by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis, and displacement ellipsoid plots are collected in Figure 3. Refinement data are collected in Table 1. Consistent with the 1H NMR analysis, X-ray structures show that 9a, 9b, 9c, 9d, and 9e are 2:1 complexes in which the sulfilimine ligands bind in the apical positions of the Rh2(II,II) core. The Rh(1)–N(1) distances in 9a9d are 2.2992(2) Å, 2.297(4) Å, 2.3374(1) Å, and 2.363(3) Å, respectively. The significant elongation of the Rh–N bond for compounds 9c and 9d may arise due to the enhanced steric profile of sulfilimines 6c and 6d. (38) The apparent weaker coordination of the sulfilimine ligands in complexes 9c and 9d is consistent with UV vis analysis described above. (38) In contrast to 9a9d, which feature N-bound sulfilimine ligands, 9e features an S-bound ligand. This may arise due to differences in the spatial orientations of the aryl sulfonyl substituents and the dibenzothiophene fragment of the sulfilimine ligands: For 9a9d, the two rings are almost parallel, making the N-atom accessible to coordinate with the Rh2(II,II); in the case of 9e, the dimethylated dibenzothiophene and the aryl sulfonyl moieties are perpendicular to each other in such a way that the N-atom is unable to access the Rh2 center.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Displacement ellipsoid plots of N-coordinated Rh2 sulfilimine complexes 9a9d and S-coordinated 9e plotted at 50% probability. H atoms and solvents are removed for clarity. The crystalline sample used in this diffraction experiment was obtained from a concentrated CH2Cl2 solution layered with pentane at −20 °C. Selected metrical parameters: for 9a, Rh(1)–N(1) = 2.2992(2) Å and Rh(1)–Rh(2) = 2.3893(3) Å; for 9b. Rh(1)–N(1) = 2.297(4) Å and Rh(1)–Rh(2) = 2.3944(8) Å; for 9c, Rh(1)–N(1) = 2.3374(1) Å and Rh(1)–Rh(2) = 2.3921(3) Å; for 9d, Rh(1)–N(1) = 2.363(3) Å and Rh(1)–Rh(2) = 2.4026(5) Å; for 9e, Rh(1)–S(1) = 2.5438(5) Å and Rh(1)–Rh(2) = 2.4048(3) Å.

Table 1. Crystal Data and Structure Refinement
 9a·2CH2Cl29b·CH2Cl29c·4CH2Cl29d9e
formulaC70H70N2O12Rh2S4·2(CH2Cl2)C68H64N4O16Rh2S4·CH2Cl2C68H62N6O20Rh2S4·4(CH2Cl2)C86H102N2O12Rh2S4C90H110N2O12Rh2S4
temp, K110100110100110
cryst systemorthorhombicmonoclinictriclinictriclinicmonoclinic
space groupPbcaC2/cPPP21/C
colorgreengreengreenlight greengreen
a, Å19.1550(7)25.393(3)10.7438(6)13.044(1)15.610(1)
b, Å17.2810(5)14.204(2)13.7006(8)13.531(2)11.0136(8)
c, Å21.6940(6)22.950(3)14.487(1)14.145(1)26.606(2)
α, deg9090102.721(2)62.503(2)90
β, deg90120.729(2)93.557(2)69.314(2)95.679(2)
γ, deg9090102.459(2)72.954(2)90
V, A37181.1(4)7715.0(1)2017.7(2)2046.2(3)4551.7(5)
Z44112
R1a0.0340.06830.02730.04530.0373
wR2b0.07240.17340.05340.10980.0184
GOF (F2)c1.0621.1771.0581.0521.110
a

R1 = ∑||Fo – |Fc||/∑|Fo|.

b

wR2 = (∑(w(Fo2Fc2)2)/∑(w(Fo2)2))1/2.

c

GOF = (∑w(Fo2Fc2)2/(np))1/2, where n is the number of data and p is the number of parameters refined.

Synthesis and Characterization of Dibenzothiophene Complex 10

The targeted nitrene photochemistry of Rh2 sulfilimine complexes would be accompanied by the evolution of dbt, which represents a potential ligand for Rh2. To evaluate the coordination chemistry of dibenzothiophene, we treated Rh2esp2 with 2 equiv of dibenzothiophene, which resulted in the formation of adduct 10 (Figure 4). Solution-phase UV–vis spectroscopy of 10 in dichloromethane revealed absorbances centered at 636 nm and a shoulder at 434 nm. 1H NMR analysis supported the formulation as a 2:1 adduct. Refinement of single-crystal X-ray diffraction data provided the structure illustrated in Figure 4.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Reaction of dibenzothiophene with 1 affords Rh2esp2(dbt)2 (10). Displacement ellipsoid plots of 10 are plotted at 50% probability. H-atoms and and solvent are removed for the sake of clarity. Selected metrical parameters: for 10, Rh(1)–S(1) = 2.5298(4) Å and Rh(1)–Rh(2) = 2.3993(3) Å.

Ligand Binding Thermodynamics

To assess the binding of the new family of sulfilimines to Rh2, we carried out a series of UV–vis titrations of Rh2esp2 with sulfilimines 6a6d. Here, we discuss the UV–vis titration of sulfilimine 6a with Rh2esp2 (1), which is representative of analogous experiments with 6b6d. The data obtained from the titration of Rh2esp2 with 6a are illustrated in Figure 5 (see Figures S3–S6 in the Supporting Information) for spectral data corresponding to titrations of Rh2esp2 with sulfilimines 6a6d). A dichloromethane solution of 1 displays characteristic peaks centered at 665 and 425 nm (vide supra). (21,38) UV–vis spectra obtained via the addition of increasing amounts of 6a to a solution of Rh2esp2 display a blue shift of the low-energy feature from 665 nm to 639 nm. The spectral evolution ceased after the addition of 2 equiv of 6a, consistent with conversion of Rh2esp2 to 9a and well-anchored isosbestic points at 646 and 434 nm indicate the absence of steady-state intermediates in this conversion.

Figure 5

Figure 5. UV–vis spectra obtained during the titration of 1 with 6a. The well-anchored isosbestic points at 434 and 639 nm indicate the absence of steady-state intermediates in the conversion of 1 (black) to 9a (red).

The observation that spectral evolution ceases at a 1:2 ratio of 1 and 6a indicates tight binding of the sulfilimine ligand to the Rh2 core (Keq > 10). In contrast, similar concentration-dependent UV–vis titration spectra between 1 and TsN3 (8a) continues to evolve until the addition of ∼25 equiv of 8a (Figure S7 in the Supporting Information). Similar UV–vis analysis was also performed with NsN3 (8b) (Figure S8 in the Supporting Information) and TbsN3 (8c) (Figure S9 in the Supporting Information), which also show ∼20 equiv of organic azides are required to saturate the coordination of 1.
While sulfilimine ligand 6a is more tightly binding than the corresponding azide, it can be displaced by other potentially coordinating ligands, such as THF. Titration of complex 9a with tetrahydrofuran (THF) results in conversion to Rh2esp2(THF)2; ∼2.5 equiv of THF was needed to completely displace the sulfilimine ligands from 9a (see Figure S10 in the Supporting Information for similar analysis with 9a). These data indicate that sulfilimine ligands bind more weakly than THF but more strongly than the corresponding sulfonyl azides. Furthermore, while the addition of 6b or 6c to a solution of 9a did not result in a significant spectral change, the addition of 6a or 6b to a solution of 9c did result in a significant blue shift, which suggests that the sulfilimine ligands are exchangeable and that the binding preferences are 6a > 6b > 6c (Figure S11 in the Supporting Information).

Solution-Phase Photochemistry

Because the sulfilimine ligands are tightly bound to Rh2 (vide supra), we are able to explore the photochemistry of the corresponding Rh2 complexes (i.e., 9ad) in the absence of an exogenous sulfilimine ligand. We began our investigations of the nitrene photochemistry of Rh2 sulfilimine complexes with complex 9d, because we hypothesized that potential intramolecular amination would simplify the analysis of the reaction outcomes. Photolysis (λ > 335 nm) of a CH2Cl2 solution of 9d was monitored periodically by UV–vis spectroscopy (Figure 6). The obtained spectra display a blue shift in the lowest energy absorbance, and the spectral evolution is characterized by the presence of a well-anchored isosbestic point at 675 nm, which indicates the lack of steady-state intermediates in the photochemistry of 9d. The ultimate spectrum obtained following photolysis is superimposable with that of dibenzothiophene complex 10 (Figure S12b in the Supporting Information). The identity of the Rh-containing photoproduct (i.e., 10) was further confirmed by crystallization and X-ray diffraction analysis of the photochemical reaction mixture. Preparative-scale photolysis of 9d enabled isolation and characterization of the organic fragment generated to be heterocycle 13d, which is the product expected of intramolecular C–H amination chemistry (57% yield) (for UV–vis and NMR analysis of the photolysis of compound 9d see Figures S12 and S13 in the Supporting Information). Similarly, the photolysis of a CH2Cl2 solution of 9e results in the formation of Rh2esp2(dmdbt)2 (15) (Figure S14 in the Supporting Information). The formation of heterocycle 13d is evidenced by the 1H NMR spectra of the reaction mixture following photolysis (Figure S15 in the Supporting Information). We speculate that the nitrene photochemistry of 9e may result from the initial S- to N-photoisomerization.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Photolysis of Rh2 sulfilimine 9d results in Rh2esp2(dbt)2 (10) and heterocycle 13d, which are the products expected of intramolecular NGT photochemistry. A well-anchored isosbestic point is observed at 675 nm for the UV–vis spectra collected during photolysis of compound 9d in CH2Cl2 (λ > 335 nm), which indicates the lack of a steady-state intermediate in the conversion of 9d to 10 and 13d.

Photolysis of CH2Cl2 solutions of sulfilimine complexes 9a9c in the presence of appropriate nitrene traps, such as tetralin or ethylbenzene, results in the products of intermolecular nitrene transfer: Rh2esp2(dbt)2 (10) and the trap-derived benzylamine derivative (13a13c or 14a14c) were observed by 1H NMR spectroscopy of crude photolysis mixtures (Figure 7). In comparison, photolysis of 6a and 6b under analogous conditions resulted in no amination products; photolysis of 6c resulted in <10% yield of 13c and trace amount of 14c. In addition, no amination from 9a9c was obtained in the absence of light or thermolytic conditions at 40 °C (for UV–vis evolution and NMR analysis of the photolysis of compounds 9a9c with tetralin, see Figures S13–S18 in the Supporting Information).

Figure 7

Figure 7. Photolysis of compounds 9a, 9b, and 9c with tetralin and ethylbenzene in CH2Cl2 results in the respective intermolecular aminated products.

The efficiency of intermolecular C–H amination depends intimately on the substitution of the N-sulfonyl substituents. The addition of electron-withdrawing aryl substituents, which results in progressively lower ligand-centered LUMOs, results in increasingly efficient amination of both tetralin and ethylbenzene. Similar substituent effects have been previously described in Rh2-catalyzed nitrene transfer reactions. (14)

Solid-State Photochemistry

We were interested in studying the solid-state photochemistry of compounds 9 as a platform to both examine chemistry in the absence of potentially reactive solvents and to use this as the basis for in crystallo experiments. To this end, we monitored the solid-state photolysis of 9b and 9d by using IR spectroscopy (Figure 8). The time-dependent IR spectra of 9d display the depletion of the peak at 896 cm–1, which corresponds to the N═S stretching frequency in Rh2-bound sulfilimine ligands. The concurrent disappearance of the peak at 719 cm–1 and slight red shift of the peak at 752 to 744 cm–1 indicate the formation Rh2esp2(dbt)2 (10) during the solid-state photolysis (Figures S22 and S23 in the Supporting Information). Together, these observations suggest that the solid-state photochemistry of 9d is analogous to the solution-phase photochemistry. For detailed IR analysis of the solid-state photochemistry of compound 9b, see Figures S24 and S25 in the Supporting Information. Solid-state photolysis of 9e also proceeds analogously to the solution-phase experiments (i.e., the formation of 13d and 15; see Figures S26 and S27 in the Supporting Information for relevant spectral data).

Figure 8

Figure 8. Solid-state photolysis of compound IR spectra collected during the photolysis (335 nm < λ < 610 nm) of a KBr pellet of 9d at 23 °C from 0 min (black) to 24 h (red). The disappearance of the peaks at 896 cm–1 is for the N═S cleavage. The disappearance of the peak at 719 cm–1 and slight red shift from 752 cm–1 to 744 cm–1 depicts the conversion from 9d to 10 during 24 h of photolysis.

Photocrystallography

We have previously demonstrated in crystallo photosynthesis of transient Rh2 nitrenes using Rh2 complexes featuring Rh2-bound organic azide ligands. (18,21) While these experiments provided evidence for the formation of triplet nitrene adducts of Rh2, the synthesis of the nitrene was accompanied by the extrusion of N2. At cryogenic temperatures, N2 could be localized in electron density maps. Warming the single-crystalline samples in order to promote C–H amination resulted in a rapid loss of crystallinity, presumably due to increased mobility of intracrystalline N2. (18) Based on the fact that dbt is solid at ambient temperature, we hypothesized that dbt photoextrusion could result in a crystalline nitrene that could engage in subsequent single-crystal to single-crystal C–H amination. To this end, we examined the photolysis (λ = 365 nm) of single crystals of complexes 9a9d by X-ray diffraction. Photolysis was carried out at 100 K and diffraction data were collected with 50 keV synchrotron radiation. Unfortunately, in no case was significant single-crystal photochemistry observed. We speculate that in the van der Waals crystals used in these experiments, photogenerated dbt was not sufficiently mobile to migrate from the reactive nitrene, thus preventing productive N═S cleavage.

Polymer Thin-Film Photochemistry

While the sulfilimine ligands utilized to prepare adducts 9a9d are more tightly binding than the corresponding azide ligands, displacement by potentially coordinating solvents (i.e., THF) represents a challenge to cryogenic photochemical experiments aimed at the spectroscopic characterization of the transient nitrene intermediates implicated above. For example, common glassy solvents such as 2-methyltetrahydrofuran displace the sulfilimine ligands of 9. Furthermore, complexes 9 are poorly soluble in potential noncoordinating glassy solvents, such as 2,2-dimethylbutane/tert-butylbenzene mixtures. (41)
To circumvent these challenges, we pursued low-temperature photochemical experiments using polymer thin films impregnated with Rh2 sulfilimine complexes (Figure 9). (41) To this end, we prepared a 4.27 mM solution of 9d in 1,2-dichloroethane containing 2 wt % polystyrene (Mw = 350 000). We dropcast a thin film on a sapphire slide and removed residual 1,2-dichloroethane in vacuo (for comparison between the solution-phase spectrum and thin-film spectrum of compound 9d see Figure S28b in the Supporting Information). Photolysis (λ = 405 nm) of this film at 129 K for 4 h resulted in a blue-shift of the low-energy spectral feature of 9d (Figure 9). Thermal annealing (300 K) followed by recooling to 129 K did not result in further spectral evolution. Furthermore, the spectrum following photolysis and thermal annealing (300 K) overlays with that of complex 10 (recorded as a polystyrene thin film). These observations indicate that C–H amination of the proximal C–H bond takes place even under cryogenic conditions. Photolysis at lower temperatures (i.e., 77 K) did not result in appreciable spectral evolution on experimentally tractable time scales.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Solid-state cryogenic photolysis of compound 9d in a polystyrene film matrix. (a) Solid-state UV–vis spectra periodically collected during the photolysis over 4 h at 129 K where the colors black, red, and green represent UV–vis spectra at t = 0, 4.5 h, and the end of the thaw-freeze cycle, respectively. (b) Overlay of the UV–vis spectrum of independently prepared 10 (blue) and the thermally annealed spectrum (red) indicates the formation of 10 during the cryogenic photolysis of 9d.

The observation of facile intramolecular C–H amination for a thin film of 9d but no in crystallo photoconversion suggests that dibenzothiophene photoextrusion is likely reversible below temperatures that are compatible with C–H amination. Poor solubility in polymer thin films prevented analogous experiments with sulfilimine complexes 9a9c.

Concluding Remarks

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Synthetic nitrene photochemistry requires access to the appropriate photoprecursor molecules. Many of the commonly encountered reagents in nitrene transfer catalysts, such as organic azides and iminoiodinanes, are either weakly binding ligands to many transition metals or kinetically labile toward nitrene transfer. As a result, access to solution-stable metal nitrene photoprecursors is limited, which prevents the general application of time-resolved solution-phase methods or solid-state matrix isolation techniques to the synthesis and characterization of these species.
Here, we have introduced sulfilimine ligands as photoprecursors to reactive metal nitrene intermediates. Specifically, we reported the coordination chemistry of a small family of sulfilimine ligands with Rh2esp2. UV–vis, NMR spectroscopy, and SCXRD data indicate 2:1 coordination of these ligands with Rh2(II,II) core. Concentration-dependent UV–vis titration revealed that that the sulfilimine ligands have higher binding affinity, compared to the corresponding organic azides. Both intermolecular and intramolecular C–H amination was achieved in the solution phase via the photoextrusion of the dibenzothiophene (dbt) moiety from the complexes.
Demonstration of solution-phase nitrene photochemistry presaged examination of the solid-state photolysis of these complexes. In a KBr pellet, dbt photoextrusion and ultimate formation of Rh2 dbt adducts (i.e., 10) was observed. C–H amination products were obtained as well demonstrating the homology of solution-phase and solid-state processes. Cyogenic photolysis of these compounds in polystyrene thin film matrix revealed that C–H amination is fast, relative to dbt photoextrusion, which prevented direct observation of incipient nitrene intermediates.
Together, the results of solution-phase and solid-state photochemical experiments demonstrated the ability to obtain nitrene photochemistry from sulfilimine precursors. These results provide the foundation for the application of sulfilimine ligands, which balance ground-state binding thermodynamics with photolability, in the photosynthesis of metal nitrenes of interest to catalysis.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c01820.

  • Experimental procedures and spectroscopic data (PDF)

Accession Codes

CCDC 2260853, 2261071, 2261073, 2261078, 2261080, and 2264679 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing [email protected], or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Arpan Paikar - Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States
    • Gerard P. Van Trieste III - Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States
    • Anuvab Das - Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9344-4414
    • Chih-Wei Wang - Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3056-0917
    • Tiffany E. Sill - Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3620-123X
    • Nattamai Bhuvanesh - Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States
  • Author Contributions

    The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The authors acknowledge the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Catalysis Program (No. DE-SC0018977), and the Welch Foundation (No. A-1907) for financial support. T.E.S. acknowledges the support of the NSF under a Graduate Research Fellowship (Grant No. DGE 1746932). The authors thank Dong Hee Son for access to cryogenic photochemical equipment and Sarbajit Banerjee for the use of in situ IR spectrometer. X-ray diffraction data of compounds 9b and 9d was collected at NSF’s ChemMatCARS, Sector 15 at the Advanced Photon Source (APS), Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). This facility is supported by the Divisions of Chemistry (CHE) and Materials Research (DMR), National Science Foundation (under Grant No. NSF/CHE-1834750). This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source; a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science user facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory (under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 41 other publications.

  1. 1
    Chiappini, N. D.; Mack, J. B. C.; Du Bois, J. Intermolecular C(sp3)–H Amination of Complex Molecules. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 49564959,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201713225
  2. 2
    Espino, C. G.; Fiori, K. W.; Kim, M.; Du Bois, J. Expanding the Scope of C–H Amination through Catalyst Design. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1537815379,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0446294
  3. 3
    Espino, C. G.; Wehn, P. M.; Chow, J.; Du Bois, J. Synthesis of 1,3-Difunctionalized Amine Derivatives through Selective C–H Bond Oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 69356936,  DOI: 10.1021/ja011033x
  4. 4
    Nägeli, I.; Baud, C.; Bernardinelli, G.; Jacquier, Y.; Moraon, M.; Müllet, P. Rhodium(II)-Catalyzed CH Insertions with {[(4-Nitrophenyl)sulfonyl]imino}phenyl-λ3-iodane. Helv. Chim. Acta 1997, 80, 10871105,  DOI: 10.1002/hlca.19970800407
  5. 5
    Nguyen, Q.; Sun, K.; Driver, T. G. Rh2(II)-Catalyzed Intramolecular Aliphatic C–H Bond Amination Reactions Using Aryl Azides as the N-Atom Source. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 72627265,  DOI: 10.1021/ja301519q
  6. 6
    Park, Y.; Kim, Y.; Chang, S. Transition Metal-Catalyzed C–H Amination: Scope, Mechanism, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 92479301,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00644
  7. 7
    Paudyal, M. P.; Adebesin, A. M.; Burt, S. R.; Ess, D. H.; Ma, Z.; Kürti, L.; Falck, J. R. Dirhodium-catalyzed C–H arene amination using hydroxylamines. Science 2016, 353, 11441147,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf8713
  8. 8
    Roizen, J. L.; Zalatan, D. N.; Du Bois, J. Selective Intermolecular Amination of C–H Bonds at Tertiary Carbon Centers. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1134311346,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201304238
  9. 9
    Trowbridge, A.; Walton, S. M.; Gaunt, M. J. New Strategies for the Transition-Metal Catalyzed Synthesis of Aliphatic Amines. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 26132692,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00462
  10. 10
    van den Heuvel, N.; Mason, S. M.; Mercado, B. Q.; Miller, S. J. Aspartyl β-Turn-Based Dirhodium(II) Metallopeptides for Benzylic C(sp3)–H Amination: Enantioselectivity and X-ray Structural Analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 1237712385,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c03587
  11. 11
    Perry, R. H.; Cahill, T. J.; Roizen, J. L.; Du Bois, J.; Zare, R. N. Capturing fleeting intermediates in a catalytic C–H amination reaction cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 1829518299,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1207600109
  12. 12
    Zalatan, D. N.; Du Bois, J. Understanding the Differential Performance of Rh2(esp)2 as a Catalyst for C–H Amination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 75587559,  DOI: 10.1021/ja902893u
  13. 13
    Fiori, K. W.; Espino, C. G.; Brodsky, B. H.; Du Bois, J. A mechanistic analysis of the Rh-catalyzed intramolecular C–H amination reaction. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 30423051,  DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2008.11.073
  14. 14
    Fiori, K. W.; Du Bois, J. Catalytic Intermolecular Amination of C–H Bonds: Method Development and Mechanistic Insights. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 562568,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0650450
  15. 15
    Varela-Álvarez, A.; Yang, T.; Jennings, H.; Kornecki, K. P.; Macmillan, S. N.; Lancaster, K. M.; Mack, J. B. C.; Du Bois, J.; Berry, J. F.; Musaev, D. G. Rh2(II,III) Catalysts with Chelating Carboxylate and Carboxamidate Supports: Electronic Structure and Nitrene Transfer Reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 23272341,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b12790
  16. 16
    Bess, E. N.; DeLuca, R. J.; Tindall, D. J.; Oderinde, M. S.; Roizen, J. L.; Du Bois, J.; Sigman, M. S. Analyzing Site Selectivity in Rh2(esp)2-Catalyzed Intermolecular C–H Amination Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 57835789,  DOI: 10.1021/ja5015508
  17. 17
    Harrison, J. G.; Gutierrez, O.; Jana, N.; Driver, T. G.; Tantillo, D. J. Mechanism of Rh2(II)-Catalyzed Indole Formation: The Catalyst Does Not Control Product Selectivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 487490,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b11427
  18. 18
    Das, A.; Wang, C.-H.; Van Trieste, G. P.; Sun, C.-J.; Chen, Y.-S.; Reibenspies, J. H.; Powers, D. C. In Crystallo Snapshots of Rh2-Catalyzed C–H Amination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 1986219867,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c09842
  19. 19
    Das, A.; Reibenspies, J. H.; Chen, Y.-S.; Powers, D. C. Direct Characterization of a Reactive Lattice-Confined Ru2 Nitride by Photocrystallography. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 29122915,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b13357
  20. 20
    Das, A.; Maher, A. G.; Telser, J.; Powers, D. C. Observation of a Photogenerated Rh2 Nitrenoid Intermediate in C–H Amination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 1041210415,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b05599
  21. 21
    Das, A.; Chen, Y.-S.; Reibenspies, J. H.; Powers, D. C. Characterization of a Reactive Rh2 Nitrenoid by Crystalline Matrix Isolation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 1623216236,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b09064
  22. 22
    Van Trieste, G. P.; Reibenspies, J. H.; Chen, Y.-S.; Sengupta, D.; Thompson, R. R.; Powers, D. C. Oxygen-atom transfer photochemistry of a molecular copper bromate complex. Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 1260812611,  DOI: 10.1039/D2CC04403J
  23. 23
    Bukvic, A. J.; Burnage, A. L.; Tizzard, G. J.; Martínez-Martínez, A. J.; McKay, A. I.; Rees, N. H.; Tegner, B. E.; Krämer, T.; Fish, H.; Warren, M. R.; Coles, S. J.; Macgregor, S. A.; Weller, A. S. A Series of Crystallographically Characterized Linear and Branched σ-Alkane Complexes of Rhodium: From Propane to 3-Methylpentane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 51065120,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c00738
  24. 24
    Cohen, M. D.; Schmidt, G. M. J. 383. Topochemistry. Part I. A survey. J. Chem. Soc. Resumed 1964, 19962000,  DOI: 10.1039/jr9640001996
  25. 25
    Ohashi, Y. Dynamical structure analysis of crystalline-state racemization. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 268274,  DOI: 10.1021/ar00151a003
  26. 26
    Reid, K. A.; Powers, D. C. In crystallo organometallic chemistry. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 49935003,  DOI: 10.1039/D1CC01684A
  27. 27
    Das, A.; Van Trieste, G. P.; Powers, D. C. Crystallography of Reactive Intermediates. Comments Inorg. Chem. 2020, 40, 116158,  DOI: 10.1080/02603594.2020.1747054
  28. 28
    Zheng, S.-L.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Z.; Lin, Q.; Coppens, P. Direct Observation of a Photoinduced Nonstabilized Nitrile Imine Structure in the Solid State. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1803618037,  DOI: 10.1021/ja9094523
  29. 29
    Kawano, M.; Takayama, T.; Uekusa, H.; Ohashi, Y.; Ozawa, Y.; Matsubara, K.; Imabayashi, H.; Mitsumi, M.; Toriumi, K. Structure Analysis of Photo-induced Triplet Phenylnitrene Using Synchrotron Radiation. Chem. Lett. 2003, 32, 922923,  DOI: 10.1246/cl.2003.922
  30. 30
    Cole, J. M. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies of photo-induced molecular species. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 501513,  DOI: 10.1039/b205339j
  31. 31
    Antoni, P. W.; Mackenroth, A. V.; Mulks, F. F.; Rudolph, M.; Helmchen, G.; Hashmi, A. S. K. Dibenzothiophenesulfilimines: A Convenient Approach to Intermolecular Rhodium-Catalysed C–H Amidation. Chem.─Eur. J. 2020, 26, 82358238,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.202002371
  32. 32
    Desikan, V.; Liu, Y.; Toscano, J. P.; Jenks, W. S. Photochemistry of N-Acetyl-, N-Trifluoroacetyl-, N- Mesyl-, and N-Tosyldibenzothiophene Sulfilimines. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 43984414,  DOI: 10.1021/jo702654q
  33. 33
    Morita, H.; Tatami, A.; Maeda, T.; Ju Kim, B.; Kawashima, W.; Yoshimura, T.; Abe, H.; Akasaka, T. Generation of Nitrene by the Photolysis of N-Substituted Iminodibenzothiophene. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 71597163,  DOI: 10.1021/jo800604t
  34. 34
    Tian, X.; Song, L.; Hashmi, A. S. K. Synthesis of Carbazoles and Related Heterocycles from Sulfilimines by Intramolecular C–H Aminations. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 1234212346,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202000146
  35. 35
    Breslow, R.; Gellman, S. H. Intramolecular nitrene carbon-hydrogen insertions mediated by transition-metal complexes as nitrogen analogs of cytochrome P-450 reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 67286729,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00360a039
  36. 36
    Davies, H. M. L.; Manning, J. R. Catalytic C–H functionalization by metal carbenoid and nitrenoid insertion. Nature 2008, 451, 417424,  DOI: 10.1038/nature06485
  37. 37
    Mack, J. B. C.; Bedell, T. A.; DeLuca, R. J.; Hone, G. A. B.; Roizen, J. L.; Cox, C. T.; Sorensen, E. J.; Du Bois, J. Rhodium-Catalyzed C–H Amination: A Case Study of Selectivity in C–H Functionalization Reactions. J. Chem. Educ. 2018, 95, 22432248,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00697
  38. 38
    Warzecha, E.; Berto, T. C.; Berry, J. F. Axial Ligand Coordination to the C–H Amination Catalyst Rh2(esp)2: A Structural and Spectroscopic Study. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 88178824,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01532
  39. 39
    Berry, J. F. The role of three-center/four-electron bonds in superelectrophilic dirhodium carbene and nitrene catalytic intermediates. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 700713,  DOI: 10.1039/C1DT11434D
  40. 40
    Hush, N. S.; Reimers, J. R. Solvent Effects on the Electronic Spectra of Transition Metal Complexes. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 775786,  DOI: 10.1021/cr980409v
  41. 41
    Suslick, K. S.; Bautista, J. F.; Watson, R. A. Metalloporphyrin photochemistry with matrix isolation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 61116114,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00016a029

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 5 publications.

  1. Brendan Horst, Leopoldo J. Gabella Carena, Michael T. Doppert, Rens Ham, Thomas Hansen, Eelco Ruijter. Computation‐Guided Scope Exploration of a Conjugate Addition/Truce‐Smiles Cascade Reaction for Scaffold Diversification. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2024, 27 (47) https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.202400870
  2. Tobias Heilmann, Juan M. Lopez‐Soria, Johannes Ulbrich, Johannes Kircher, Zhen Li, Brigitte Worbs, Christopher Golz, Ricardo A. Mata, Manuel Alcarazo. N ‐(Sulfonio)Sulfilimine Reagents: Non‐Oxidizing Sources of Electrophilic Nitrogen Atom for Skeletal Editing. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2024, 63 (25) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202403826
  3. Tobias Heilmann, Juan M. Lopez‐Soria, Johannes Ulbrich, Johannes Kircher, Zhen Li, Brigitte Worbs, Christopher Golz, Ricardo A. Mata, Manuel Alcarazo. N ‐(sulfonio)sulfilimin‐Reagenzien: Nicht‐oxidierende Quellen von elektrophilen Stickstoffatomen für Skeletal Editing. Angewandte Chemie 2024, 136 (25) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202403826
  4. Xuemei Zhao, Zhiyuan Tang, Linlin Shi, Yujing Guo, Rene M. Koenigs, Xinqi Hao. Photochemical nitrene transfer reactions of iminoiodinanes with sulfoxides. Green Synthesis and Catalysis 2024, 134 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gresc.2024.05.001
  5. Arpan Paikar, Evan A. Martinez, David C. Powers. Synthesis, characterization, and photochemistry of Ru2(II,III) complexes of chalcogen oxides. Polyhedron 2024, 250 , 116798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2023.116798

Inorganic Chemistry

Cite this: Inorg. Chem. 2023, 62, 31, 12557–12564
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c01820
Published July 27, 2023

Copyright © 2023 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

1877

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (a) In crystallo photogeneration and characterization of transient Rh2 nitrene from an organic azide photoprecursor. (b) Photoactivation of dibenzosulfilimines affords reactive nitrene fragments with concurrent extrusion of dibenzothiophene. (c) Here, we demonstrate the nitrene photochemistry of Rh2 sulfilimine complexes.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Synthesis of N-coordinated bis-sulfilimine Rh2 complexes (9a9d), and S-coordinated bis-sulfilimine Rh2 complex 9e, which were isolated by crystallization.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Displacement ellipsoid plots of N-coordinated Rh2 sulfilimine complexes 9a9d and S-coordinated 9e plotted at 50% probability. H atoms and solvents are removed for clarity. The crystalline sample used in this diffraction experiment was obtained from a concentrated CH2Cl2 solution layered with pentane at −20 °C. Selected metrical parameters: for 9a, Rh(1)–N(1) = 2.2992(2) Å and Rh(1)–Rh(2) = 2.3893(3) Å; for 9b. Rh(1)–N(1) = 2.297(4) Å and Rh(1)–Rh(2) = 2.3944(8) Å; for 9c, Rh(1)–N(1) = 2.3374(1) Å and Rh(1)–Rh(2) = 2.3921(3) Å; for 9d, Rh(1)–N(1) = 2.363(3) Å and Rh(1)–Rh(2) = 2.4026(5) Å; for 9e, Rh(1)–S(1) = 2.5438(5) Å and Rh(1)–Rh(2) = 2.4048(3) Å.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Reaction of dibenzothiophene with 1 affords Rh2esp2(dbt)2 (10). Displacement ellipsoid plots of 10 are plotted at 50% probability. H-atoms and and solvent are removed for the sake of clarity. Selected metrical parameters: for 10, Rh(1)–S(1) = 2.5298(4) Å and Rh(1)–Rh(2) = 2.3993(3) Å.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. UV–vis spectra obtained during the titration of 1 with 6a. The well-anchored isosbestic points at 434 and 639 nm indicate the absence of steady-state intermediates in the conversion of 1 (black) to 9a (red).

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Photolysis of Rh2 sulfilimine 9d results in Rh2esp2(dbt)2 (10) and heterocycle 13d, which are the products expected of intramolecular NGT photochemistry. A well-anchored isosbestic point is observed at 675 nm for the UV–vis spectra collected during photolysis of compound 9d in CH2Cl2 (λ > 335 nm), which indicates the lack of a steady-state intermediate in the conversion of 9d to 10 and 13d.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Photolysis of compounds 9a, 9b, and 9c with tetralin and ethylbenzene in CH2Cl2 results in the respective intermolecular aminated products.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8. Solid-state photolysis of compound IR spectra collected during the photolysis (335 nm < λ < 610 nm) of a KBr pellet of 9d at 23 °C from 0 min (black) to 24 h (red). The disappearance of the peaks at 896 cm–1 is for the N═S cleavage. The disappearance of the peak at 719 cm–1 and slight red shift from 752 cm–1 to 744 cm–1 depicts the conversion from 9d to 10 during 24 h of photolysis.

    Figure 9

    Figure 9. Solid-state cryogenic photolysis of compound 9d in a polystyrene film matrix. (a) Solid-state UV–vis spectra periodically collected during the photolysis over 4 h at 129 K where the colors black, red, and green represent UV–vis spectra at t = 0, 4.5 h, and the end of the thaw-freeze cycle, respectively. (b) Overlay of the UV–vis spectrum of independently prepared 10 (blue) and the thermally annealed spectrum (red) indicates the formation of 10 during the cryogenic photolysis of 9d.

  • References


    This article references 41 other publications.

    1. 1
      Chiappini, N. D.; Mack, J. B. C.; Du Bois, J. Intermolecular C(sp3)–H Amination of Complex Molecules. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 49564959,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201713225
    2. 2
      Espino, C. G.; Fiori, K. W.; Kim, M.; Du Bois, J. Expanding the Scope of C–H Amination through Catalyst Design. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1537815379,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0446294
    3. 3
      Espino, C. G.; Wehn, P. M.; Chow, J.; Du Bois, J. Synthesis of 1,3-Difunctionalized Amine Derivatives through Selective C–H Bond Oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 69356936,  DOI: 10.1021/ja011033x
    4. 4
      Nägeli, I.; Baud, C.; Bernardinelli, G.; Jacquier, Y.; Moraon, M.; Müllet, P. Rhodium(II)-Catalyzed CH Insertions with {[(4-Nitrophenyl)sulfonyl]imino}phenyl-λ3-iodane. Helv. Chim. Acta 1997, 80, 10871105,  DOI: 10.1002/hlca.19970800407
    5. 5
      Nguyen, Q.; Sun, K.; Driver, T. G. Rh2(II)-Catalyzed Intramolecular Aliphatic C–H Bond Amination Reactions Using Aryl Azides as the N-Atom Source. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 72627265,  DOI: 10.1021/ja301519q
    6. 6
      Park, Y.; Kim, Y.; Chang, S. Transition Metal-Catalyzed C–H Amination: Scope, Mechanism, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 92479301,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00644
    7. 7
      Paudyal, M. P.; Adebesin, A. M.; Burt, S. R.; Ess, D. H.; Ma, Z.; Kürti, L.; Falck, J. R. Dirhodium-catalyzed C–H arene amination using hydroxylamines. Science 2016, 353, 11441147,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf8713
    8. 8
      Roizen, J. L.; Zalatan, D. N.; Du Bois, J. Selective Intermolecular Amination of C–H Bonds at Tertiary Carbon Centers. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1134311346,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201304238
    9. 9
      Trowbridge, A.; Walton, S. M.; Gaunt, M. J. New Strategies for the Transition-Metal Catalyzed Synthesis of Aliphatic Amines. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 26132692,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00462
    10. 10
      van den Heuvel, N.; Mason, S. M.; Mercado, B. Q.; Miller, S. J. Aspartyl β-Turn-Based Dirhodium(II) Metallopeptides for Benzylic C(sp3)–H Amination: Enantioselectivity and X-ray Structural Analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 1237712385,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c03587
    11. 11
      Perry, R. H.; Cahill, T. J.; Roizen, J. L.; Du Bois, J.; Zare, R. N. Capturing fleeting intermediates in a catalytic C–H amination reaction cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 1829518299,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1207600109
    12. 12
      Zalatan, D. N.; Du Bois, J. Understanding the Differential Performance of Rh2(esp)2 as a Catalyst for C–H Amination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 75587559,  DOI: 10.1021/ja902893u
    13. 13
      Fiori, K. W.; Espino, C. G.; Brodsky, B. H.; Du Bois, J. A mechanistic analysis of the Rh-catalyzed intramolecular C–H amination reaction. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 30423051,  DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2008.11.073
    14. 14
      Fiori, K. W.; Du Bois, J. Catalytic Intermolecular Amination of C–H Bonds: Method Development and Mechanistic Insights. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 562568,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0650450
    15. 15
      Varela-Álvarez, A.; Yang, T.; Jennings, H.; Kornecki, K. P.; Macmillan, S. N.; Lancaster, K. M.; Mack, J. B. C.; Du Bois, J.; Berry, J. F.; Musaev, D. G. Rh2(II,III) Catalysts with Chelating Carboxylate and Carboxamidate Supports: Electronic Structure and Nitrene Transfer Reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 23272341,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b12790
    16. 16
      Bess, E. N.; DeLuca, R. J.; Tindall, D. J.; Oderinde, M. S.; Roizen, J. L.; Du Bois, J.; Sigman, M. S. Analyzing Site Selectivity in Rh2(esp)2-Catalyzed Intermolecular C–H Amination Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 57835789,  DOI: 10.1021/ja5015508
    17. 17
      Harrison, J. G.; Gutierrez, O.; Jana, N.; Driver, T. G.; Tantillo, D. J. Mechanism of Rh2(II)-Catalyzed Indole Formation: The Catalyst Does Not Control Product Selectivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 487490,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b11427
    18. 18
      Das, A.; Wang, C.-H.; Van Trieste, G. P.; Sun, C.-J.; Chen, Y.-S.; Reibenspies, J. H.; Powers, D. C. In Crystallo Snapshots of Rh2-Catalyzed C–H Amination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 1986219867,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c09842
    19. 19
      Das, A.; Reibenspies, J. H.; Chen, Y.-S.; Powers, D. C. Direct Characterization of a Reactive Lattice-Confined Ru2 Nitride by Photocrystallography. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 29122915,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b13357
    20. 20
      Das, A.; Maher, A. G.; Telser, J.; Powers, D. C. Observation of a Photogenerated Rh2 Nitrenoid Intermediate in C–H Amination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 1041210415,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b05599
    21. 21
      Das, A.; Chen, Y.-S.; Reibenspies, J. H.; Powers, D. C. Characterization of a Reactive Rh2 Nitrenoid by Crystalline Matrix Isolation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 1623216236,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b09064
    22. 22
      Van Trieste, G. P.; Reibenspies, J. H.; Chen, Y.-S.; Sengupta, D.; Thompson, R. R.; Powers, D. C. Oxygen-atom transfer photochemistry of a molecular copper bromate complex. Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 1260812611,  DOI: 10.1039/D2CC04403J
    23. 23
      Bukvic, A. J.; Burnage, A. L.; Tizzard, G. J.; Martínez-Martínez, A. J.; McKay, A. I.; Rees, N. H.; Tegner, B. E.; Krämer, T.; Fish, H.; Warren, M. R.; Coles, S. J.; Macgregor, S. A.; Weller, A. S. A Series of Crystallographically Characterized Linear and Branched σ-Alkane Complexes of Rhodium: From Propane to 3-Methylpentane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 51065120,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c00738
    24. 24
      Cohen, M. D.; Schmidt, G. M. J. 383. Topochemistry. Part I. A survey. J. Chem. Soc. Resumed 1964, 19962000,  DOI: 10.1039/jr9640001996
    25. 25
      Ohashi, Y. Dynamical structure analysis of crystalline-state racemization. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 268274,  DOI: 10.1021/ar00151a003
    26. 26
      Reid, K. A.; Powers, D. C. In crystallo organometallic chemistry. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 49935003,  DOI: 10.1039/D1CC01684A
    27. 27
      Das, A.; Van Trieste, G. P.; Powers, D. C. Crystallography of Reactive Intermediates. Comments Inorg. Chem. 2020, 40, 116158,  DOI: 10.1080/02603594.2020.1747054
    28. 28
      Zheng, S.-L.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Z.; Lin, Q.; Coppens, P. Direct Observation of a Photoinduced Nonstabilized Nitrile Imine Structure in the Solid State. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1803618037,  DOI: 10.1021/ja9094523
    29. 29
      Kawano, M.; Takayama, T.; Uekusa, H.; Ohashi, Y.; Ozawa, Y.; Matsubara, K.; Imabayashi, H.; Mitsumi, M.; Toriumi, K. Structure Analysis of Photo-induced Triplet Phenylnitrene Using Synchrotron Radiation. Chem. Lett. 2003, 32, 922923,  DOI: 10.1246/cl.2003.922
    30. 30
      Cole, J. M. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies of photo-induced molecular species. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 501513,  DOI: 10.1039/b205339j
    31. 31
      Antoni, P. W.; Mackenroth, A. V.; Mulks, F. F.; Rudolph, M.; Helmchen, G.; Hashmi, A. S. K. Dibenzothiophenesulfilimines: A Convenient Approach to Intermolecular Rhodium-Catalysed C–H Amidation. Chem.─Eur. J. 2020, 26, 82358238,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.202002371
    32. 32
      Desikan, V.; Liu, Y.; Toscano, J. P.; Jenks, W. S. Photochemistry of N-Acetyl-, N-Trifluoroacetyl-, N- Mesyl-, and N-Tosyldibenzothiophene Sulfilimines. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 43984414,  DOI: 10.1021/jo702654q
    33. 33
      Morita, H.; Tatami, A.; Maeda, T.; Ju Kim, B.; Kawashima, W.; Yoshimura, T.; Abe, H.; Akasaka, T. Generation of Nitrene by the Photolysis of N-Substituted Iminodibenzothiophene. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 71597163,  DOI: 10.1021/jo800604t
    34. 34
      Tian, X.; Song, L.; Hashmi, A. S. K. Synthesis of Carbazoles and Related Heterocycles from Sulfilimines by Intramolecular C–H Aminations. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 1234212346,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202000146
    35. 35
      Breslow, R.; Gellman, S. H. Intramolecular nitrene carbon-hydrogen insertions mediated by transition-metal complexes as nitrogen analogs of cytochrome P-450 reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 67286729,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00360a039
    36. 36
      Davies, H. M. L.; Manning, J. R. Catalytic C–H functionalization by metal carbenoid and nitrenoid insertion. Nature 2008, 451, 417424,  DOI: 10.1038/nature06485
    37. 37
      Mack, J. B. C.; Bedell, T. A.; DeLuca, R. J.; Hone, G. A. B.; Roizen, J. L.; Cox, C. T.; Sorensen, E. J.; Du Bois, J. Rhodium-Catalyzed C–H Amination: A Case Study of Selectivity in C–H Functionalization Reactions. J. Chem. Educ. 2018, 95, 22432248,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00697
    38. 38
      Warzecha, E.; Berto, T. C.; Berry, J. F. Axial Ligand Coordination to the C–H Amination Catalyst Rh2(esp)2: A Structural and Spectroscopic Study. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 88178824,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01532
    39. 39
      Berry, J. F. The role of three-center/four-electron bonds in superelectrophilic dirhodium carbene and nitrene catalytic intermediates. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 700713,  DOI: 10.1039/C1DT11434D
    40. 40
      Hush, N. S.; Reimers, J. R. Solvent Effects on the Electronic Spectra of Transition Metal Complexes. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 775786,  DOI: 10.1021/cr980409v
    41. 41
      Suslick, K. S.; Bautista, J. F.; Watson, R. A. Metalloporphyrin photochemistry with matrix isolation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 61116114,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00016a029
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c01820.

    • Experimental procedures and spectroscopic data (PDF)

    Accession Codes

    CCDC 2260853, 2261071, 2261073, 2261078, 2261080, and 2264679 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing [email protected], or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.