ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES
RETURN TO ISSUEPREVTechnology ReportNEXT

MolPrint3D: Enhanced 3D Printing of Ball-and-Stick Molecular Models

View Author Information
Center for Biomolecular Structure and Organization, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States
Cite this: J. Chem. Educ. 2018, 95, 1, 169–172
Publication Date (Web):November 17, 2017
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00549
Copyright © 2017 The American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.
  • Free to Read

Article Views

5914

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (2 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

The increased availability of noncommercial 3D printers has provided instructors and students improved access to printing technology. However, printing complex ball-and-stick molecular structures faces distinct challenges, including the need for support structures that increase with molecular complexity. MolPrint3D is a software add-on for the Blender 3D modeling package that enhances the printability of ball-and-stick molecular models by allowing the user to selectively split molecules into fragments. MolPrint3D adds pins to the bond and holes in the atom at selected junction points to allow the fragments to be printed independently and assembled. This approach significantly minimizes the number of support structures needed and enables the construction of large macromolecular structures as ball-and-stick models. The MolPrint3D pipeline is described, and several examples demonstrate how improved printability can provide new tools for enhancing student interaction with 3D models.

This publication is licensed for personal use by The American Chemical Society.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Chemistry, in nearly all of its disciplines, is based fundamentally on the spatial arrangement of atoms in three-dimensional (3D) space. For the chemistry student, appreciating these 3D arrangements is a vital step in understanding core concepts, including molecular symmetry in inorganic complexes, stereochemistry and chirality in organic compounds, and the relationship of polymerized monomers in biomacromolecular structures. Interacting directly with physical 3D models has been shown to provide significant educational enhancements. (1) However, most chemistry classrooms are still largely dependent on 2D images or graphical representations of 3D structures.
3D printing has begun to find its way into chemistry education for a wide range of topics. (2-16) One of the significant barriers to more widespread adoption resides in the ease of printing 3D models on readily available technology at a scale that can reach whole classrooms. Several workflows for creating 3D-printable ball-and-stick molecular models have been described, (17-21) but in most instances these are geared toward higher-end commercial printers that are generally found only in designated manufacturing facilities. The reduction in cost and subsequent increased availability of “hobbyist” fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printers have led to a significant expansion in the capability of individuals—including students and instructors—to create and interact with 3D objects. A significant challenge of printing ball-and-stick molecular structures with FFF printers is that layer-based addition requires the use of support structures. The number of supports correlates with the complexity of the molecular structure in 3D space, leading to increased material consumption and significant postprinting processing that in some cases can make the entire process intractable. (2)
MolPrint3D is a software tool for splitting ball-and-stick molecular models into smaller fragments to enhance their 3D printability. MolPrint3D is a free, open-source (22) add-on for the freely available 3D modeling program Blender. (23) Using the standard Blender interface, MolPrint3D allows the user to select junction points between individual bonds (cylinders) and atoms (spheres) to establish independent object groups for 3D printing. The software adds a “pin” to the bond and “hole” in the atom at the junction to allow the objects to be connected after they have been printed. This allows the parts to be positioned and oriented independently on the printer build plate, which can significantly minimize the number of support structures needed to effectively print the entire structure. MolPrint3D also provides automated and interactive tools to help orient models on the printer build plate, support for multicolor ball-and-stick models, strut generation, and tools for manipulating space-filling CPK models for multicolor printing. By enhancing the printability of molecular structures, large numbers of models can be printed in parallel, ultimately allowing wider distribution of physical models to aid in chemistry education.

MolPrint3D Workflow

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The following steps describe the basic workflow of MolPrint3D. Figure 1 provides an overview of these main steps using an example molecule. Installation instructions and links to example videos are provided in the Supporting Information. Figure S1 shows the MolPrint Toolbar, where the user initiates each of these steps.

Figure 1

Figure 1. MolPrint3D workflow. An idealized model of adenosine triphosphate is shown at the various steps in the MolPrint3D workflow. The imported VRML model (first panel) is grouped into three separate objects corresponding to the nucleobase, ribose, and triphosphate by selecting the appropriate adjacent atoms and bonds (black arrows, second panel). Each group is automatically uniquely colored. The pinned and joined model is separated to see the pins (red arrows, third panel). Finally, the models are floored (last panel) to provide an optimal orientation for sitting on the printer build plate that minimizes the need for support structures.

Import/Cleanup

MolPrint3D uses Virtual Reality Modeling Language (VRML) scene files. These files can be generated by a variety of molecular visualization software packages, including freely available programs such as PyMol, (24) UCSF Chimera, (25) and Jmol. (26) VRML scenes are imported through the MolPrint Toolbar and allow the user to set the number of vertices each primitive object in the scene will have. High primitive divisions enhance the final models’ appearance at the expense of operation speed and final file size (Figure S3). Following import, the scene is “cleaned” to remove any unnecessary objects associated with VRML scenes.

Group Selection

MolPrint3D generates an interaction list between atom and bond objects in the cleaning step to allow group selections. Selecting an interacting atom and bond pair denotes a junction. When a junction interrupts interactions between contiguous atom/bond objects, a new group is defined. By default, each group is colored differently in the Blender 3D view screen to provide immediate visual feedback during the grouping process.
Automated tools for group selection are geared toward macromolecular structures. Cylinder objects below a user-defined threshold can be recognized as coordination/hydrogen bonds. These bonds and the associated atoms may be selected with the Select H-bonds button. For nucleic acid models, selection of glycosidic (C1′–N1/N9) and phosphate–O3′ linkages are predefined. For proteins, linkages between backbone α-carbons and carbonyls can be automatically selected. These automated selections are dependent on the defined sphere radius for each atom type. Because scaling of van der Waals radii varies slightly among software visualization packages, radii for different atom types can be defined in the Atom/Bond Preferences subtab.

Pinning/Joining

Following group selection, pinning creates the pin and hole structures in the defined junctions and simultaneously unionizes the objects in each group to create a fully manifold (“watertight”) mesh object. Cylindrical pins are used by default, but this can be adjusted using the Pin Sides integer parameter. Cylindrical pins allow rotation around the junction point, while triangular or rectangular pins can be used to limit the number of possible assembly orientations. The pin-to-bond size ratio can be set independently for covalent junctions and hydrogen-bond junctions when thinner or thicker pins are desired.

Flooring and Export

Flooring rotates the final pinned models to find an optimal orientation to sit on the printer build plate (orthogonal to the z axis in the Blender 3D view). In many instances this can be automated for all of the objects in the scene using the Floor All button. Selective Floor allows user interaction to pick one or more faces of the convex hull object in Blender Edit Mode to direct the face normal (or average normal if multiple faces are selected) onto the printer build plate. Finally, models can be exported as stereolithography (*.stl) files that are ready for scaling and printing.

Examples

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Disubstituted Cyclohexanes

As part of a planned lesson introducing chair flipping of dimethylcyclohexanes, atomic models of equatorial and axial conformers of trans-1,2-dimethylcyclohexane were rendered as ball-and-stick models in PyMol and exported as VRML scenes. To demonstrate the different ways these models could be split, the axial conformer was pinned at the methyl carbon substituents, while the equatorial conformer was pinned at the carbon 1 and carbon 2 positions (Figure 2A). The resulting models were scaled and printed on a typical FFF printer (Hictop Prusa i3) using polylactide (PLA) filament at 0.2 mm layer height with three exterior shell layers and 50% infill (Figure 2B).

Figure 2

Figure 2. 1,2-Dimethylcyclohexanes. (a) The axial (blue, yellow, violet) and equatorial (green, gray, pink) conformers were split at the substituent groups. The left panel shows the processed models before the floor operation, and the right panel shows the models after flooring. The z axis is orthogonal to the printer build plate. (b) Complete printed models. The left panel shows the six independent objects that were printed, and the right panel shows the final assembled models, which have dimensions of ∼50 mm × 48 mm × 31 mm. The approximate total build time for both models at 60 mm/s and 0.2 mm layer height was 65 min.

These models parallel the use of molecular model kits that have been used extensively in organic chemistry teaching but offer several advantages. First, the students do not need to obtain their own model kits, which can be a burden in some cases. Further, they do not need to bring multipiece model kits to the classroom in order to follow along. Finally, the students’ attention can be focused on particular details of the molecular model that coincide with the lesson plan. In this simple example, students can easily manipulate the model to view it as a Newman projection, visualize the dihedral angles at the substituted positions, and determine the number of gauche butane interactions in the different conformers that contribute to the relative stability of the two conformers. Different substituent groups can easily be exchanged if desired, and the cylindrical pins and holes allow rotation around the bonds, enabling the students to find positions of higher or lower steric strain.
Importantly, the ability to print many models in a single build run at a reasonable price expands the options for using such models in a classroom setting. The cost of each model is estimated at ∼$0.22 on the basis of consumed filament (assuming a cost of $25.00 per kilogram). This affordability makes it feasible to print several different disubstituted cyclohexanes (e.g., cis- and trans-1,2- and -1,3-dimethylcyclohexane in the axial and equatorial conformations) for each student as physical models that they can interact with and compare during the lecture. When feasible, students could also keep the models to assist as study aids.

Biomacromolecules

Previous examples of 3D printing of biomolecules for educational purposes have been largely restricted to space-filling and surface representations. (7, 20) Space-filling models or molecular surfaces can provide important insights into some macromolecular features but can lose other important details available in ball-and-stick models. The utility of MolPrint3D for printing macromolecular structures is illustrated with an idealized B-form DNA of 10 base pairs created in Coot, (27) represented in Chimera, and processed through the MolPrint3D pipeline. Though it may be possible to print this model as a single object, the final object size would be limited by the printer build plate size, and the number of support structures needed would make postprocessing extremely arduous if not impossible (Figure S4). The MolPrint3D pipeline was used with automated group selection features to split each base pair of the model into independent nucleobase pairs (connected by hydrogen bonds) by selecting all glycosidic bonds and to split sugar–phosphate backbone segments by selecting all phosphates (Figure S5). Because the starting model is idealized, the processed model contains only six unique segments: the backbones of each nucleotide type are subtly different, leading to four models and the two base pairs. However, these automated tools can be used to split even complex models that contain many unique segments, including the ∼27 kDa structure of yeast tRNAPhe (Figure S6).
To recreate a segment of the B-DNA duplex, 20 backbone segments and 10 base pairs (five of each type) were printed on FFF printers (Hictop Prusa i3 and FlashForge Creator Pro) in several PLA colors at 0.2 mm layer height with three external shell layers and 50% infill (Figure 3A). These base pair units were assembled into a B-DNA model (Figure 3B). This model provides a number of features that would not be as readily observable in surface or space-filling representations, including the atoms presented in the major and minor grooves, the pseudodyad symmetry, and nucleobase stacking interactions (Figure 3C).

Figure 3

Figure 3. DNA duplex. (a) The six unique models processed from an idealized B-DNA 10-mer duplex. Backbone models are printed in gray; the G–C nucleobase pair is printed in green and the A–T nucleobase pair in blue. The assembled DNA duplex of 10 base pairs is shown (b) perpendicular and (c) parallel to the helical axis. The final assembled model dimensions are 26 cm × 15 cm × 15 cm. The approximate total build time per base pair at 60 mm/s print speed and 0.2 mm layer height was 94 min.

As part of an existing course focused on nucleic acids, these models, along with equivalent A-form DNA models, were used as part of an examination. For a class of 50 students, 25 A-DNA and 25 B-DNA base pairs were distributed to the students with their exams. Using the models, the students had to answer questions on the exam that asked them to identify the sugar pucker, base pair identity, and backbone conformation. After the exam, the students were encouraged to put their models together into larger duplexes to help understand how local conformation differences lead to different macromolecular conformations. The MolPrint3D pipeline can be used in a similar manner to create models that help students explore amino acids. (28)

Conclusions

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The MolPrint3D pipeline provides a rapid and intuitive way to simplify molecular ball-and-stick models for 3D printing. Splitting models into smaller segments that can be readily assembled after printing allows for cost reduction by eliminating the need for extensive support structures and improves the ability to print many models in a single printer run. These enhancements will dramatically improve the ability of instructors to print molecular models for whole classrooms and ultimately provide new tools for students to understand important chemistry concepts.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00549.

  • Installation and usage instructions and Figures S1–S6 (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
    • Notes
      The author declares no competing financial interest.

    Acknowledgment

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    P.J.P. acknowledges funding support from NSF (DMR1149665).

    References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 28 other publications.

    1. 1
      Dori, Y. J.; Barak, M. Virtual and Physical Molecular Modeling: Fostering Model Perception and Spatial Understanding J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2001, 4 (1) 61 74
    2. 2
      Scalfani, V. F.; Vaid, T. P. 3D Printed Molecules and Extended Solid Models for Teaching Symmetry and Point Groups J. Chem. Educ. 2014, 91 (8) 1174 1180 DOI: 10.1021/ed400887t
    3. 3
      Lolur, P.; Dawes, R. 3D Printing of Molecular Potential Energy Surface Models J. Chem. Educ. 2014, 91 (8) 1181 1184 DOI: 10.1021/ed500199m
    4. 4
      Robertson, M. J.; Jorgensen, W. L. Illustrating Concepts in Physical Organic Chemistry with 3D Printed Orbitals J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92 (12) 2113 2116 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00682
    5. 5
      Casas, L.; Estop, E. Virtual and Printed 3D Models for Teaching Crystal Symmetry and Point Groups J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92 (8) 1338 1343 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00147
    6. 6
      Kaliakin, D. S.; Zaari, R. R.; Varganov, S. A. 3D Printed Potential and Free Energy Surfaces for Teaching Fundamental Concepts in Physical Chemistry J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92 (12) 2106 2112 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00409
    7. 7
      Meyer, S. C. 3D Printing of Protein Models in an Undergraduate Laboratory: Leucine Zippers J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92 (12) 2120 2125 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00207
    8. 8
      Rodenbough, P. P.; Vanti, W. B.; Chan, S.-W. 3D-Printing Crystallographic Unit Cells for Learning Materials Science and Engineering J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92 (11) 1960 1962 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00597
    9. 9
      Smiar, K.; Mendez, J. D. Creating and Using Interactive, 3D-Printed Models to Improve Student Comprehension of the Bohr Model of the Atom, Bond Polarity, and Hybridization J. Chem. Educ. 2016, 93 (9) 1591 1594 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00297
    10. 10
      Dean, N. L.; Ewan, C.; McIndoe, J. S. Applying Hand-Held 3D Printing Technology to the Teaching of VSEPR Theory J. Chem. Educ. 2016, 93 (9) 1660 1662 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00186
    11. 11
      Griffith, K. M.; Cataldo, R. de; Fogarty, K. H. Do-It-Yourself: 3D Models of Hydrogenic Orbitals through 3D Printing J. Chem. Educ. 2016, 93 (9) 1586 1590 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00293
    12. 12
      Porter, L. A.; Washer, B. M.; Hakim, M. H.; Dallinger, R. F. User-Friendly 3D Printed Colorimeter Models for Student Exploration of Instrument Design and Performance J. Chem. Educ. 2016, 93 (7) 1305 1309 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00041
    13. 13
      Grasse, E. K.; Torcasio, M. H.; Smith, A. W. Teaching UV–Vis Spectroscopy with a 3D-Printable Smartphone Spectrophotometer J. Chem. Educ. 2016, 93 (1) 146 151 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00654
    14. 14
      Porter, L. A. Active Learning and Student Engagement via 3D Printing and Design: Integrating Undergraduate Research, Service Learning, and Cross-Disciplinary Collaborations MRS Adv. 2016, 1 (56) 3703 3708 DOI: 10.1557/adv.2016.82
    15. 15
      Carroll, F. A.; Blauch, D. N. 3D Printing of Molecular Models with Calculated Geometries and p Orbital Isosurfaces J. Chem. Educ. 2017, 94 (7) 886 891 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00933
    16. 16
      Piunno, P. A. E. Teaching the Operating Principles of a Diffraction Grating Using a 3D-Printable Demonstration Kit J. Chem. Educ. 2017, 94 (5) 615 620 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00906
    17. 17
      Chen, T.-H.; Lee, S.; Flood, A. H.; Miljanić, O. Š. How to print a crystal structure model in 3D CrystEngComm 2014, 16 (25) 5488 5493 DOI: 10.1039/C4CE00371C
    18. 18
      Kaminsky, W.; Snyder, T.; Stone-Sundberg, J.; Moeck, P. One-click preparation of 3D print files (*.stl, *.wrl) from *.cif (crystallographic information framework) data using Cif2VRML Powder Diffr. 2014, 29 (S2) S42 S47 DOI: 10.1017/S0885715614001092
    19. 19
      Rossi, S.; Benaglia, M.; Brenna, D.; Porta, R.; Orlandi, M. Three Dimensional (3D) Printing: A Straightforward, User-Friendly Protocol To Convert Virtual Chemical Models to Real-Life Objects J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92 (8) 1398 1401 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00168
    20. 20
      Van Wieren, K.; Tailor, H. N.; Scalfani, V. F.; Merbouh, N. Rapid Access to Multicolor Three-Dimensional Printed Chemistry and Biochemistry Models Using Visualization and Three-Dimensional Printing Software Programs J. Chem. Educ. 2017, 94, 964 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00602
    21. 21
      Wood, P. A.; Sarjeant, A. A.; Bruno, I. J.; Macrae, C. F.; Maynard-Casely, H. E.; Towler, M. The next dimension of structural science communication: simple 3D printing directly from a crystal structure CrystEngComm 2017, 19 (4) 690 698 DOI: 10.1039/C6CE02412B
    22. 22
      MolPrint. https://github.com/paukstelis/MolPrint (accessed October 2017).
    23. 23
      Blender Foundation. https://www.blender.org (accessed October 2017).
    24. 24
      The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, version 1.8; Schrödinger, LLC: New York, 2016.
    25. 25
      Pettersen, E. F.; Goddard, T. D.; Huang, C. C.; Couch, G. S.; Greenblatt, D. M.; Meng, E. C.; Ferrin, T. E. UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25 (13) 1605 1612 DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20084
    26. 26
      Willighagen, E.; Howard, M. Fast and Scriptable Molecular Graphics in Web Browsers without Java3D Nat. Precedings 2007,  DOI: 10.1038/npre.2007.50.1
    27. 27
      Emsley, P.; Lohkamp, B.; Scott, W. G.; Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66, 486 501 DOI: 10.1107/S0907444910007493
    28. 28
      MolPrint3D was used to create a model kit of all 20 standard amino acids that allows assembly and backbone torsional rotations. See: The 20 Standard Amino Acids. https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2175399 (accessed October 2017).

    Cited By

    This article is cited by 27 publications.

    1. Michelle Garcia, Frances A. O’Leary, Daniel J. O’Leary. Do-It-Yourself 5-Color 3D Printing of Molecular Orbitals and Electron Density Surfaces. Journal of Chemical Education 2023, 100 (4) , 1648-1658. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00907
    2. Charlotte E. Dickenson, Richard A. R. Blackburn, Robert G. Britton. 3D Printing Workshop Activity That Aids Representation of Molecules and Student Comprehension of Shape and Chirality. Journal of Chemical Education 2020, 97 (10) , 3714-3719. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00457
    3. Eric J. Davis, Kraig Wheeler. Use of 3D Printing to Manufacture Document Camera Mounts in Support of Online Education Shifts during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Chemical Education 2020, 97 (9) , 2691-2695. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00629
    4. Anton V. Savchenkov. Designing Three-Dimensional Models That Can Be Printed on Demand and Used with Students to Facilitate Teaching Molecular Structure, Symmetry, and Related Topics. Journal of Chemical Education 2020, 97 (6) , 1682-1687. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00192
    5. Sergio Rossi, Claudia Rossi, Nicoletta Accorigi. Quasiperiodic Crystals: Teaching Aperiodicity of a Crystal Lattice with 3D-Printed Penrose Tiles. Journal of Chemical Education 2020, 97 (5) , 1391-1395. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00702
    6. Paweł Bernard, James D. Mendez. Low-Cost 3D-Printed Polarimeter. Journal of Chemical Education 2020, 97 (4) , 1162-1166. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01083
    7. Cody W. Pinger, Morgan K. Geiger, Dana M. Spence. Applications of 3D-Printing for Improving Chemistry Education. Journal of Chemical Education 2020, 97 (1) , 112-117. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00588
    8. Brian K. Niece. Custom-Printed 3D Models for Teaching Molecular Symmetry. Journal of Chemical Education 2019, 96 (9) , 2059-2062. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00053
    9. Anna S. Grumman, Felix A. Carroll. 3D-Printing Electron Density Isosurface Models and High-Resolution Molecular Models Based on van der Waals Radii. Journal of Chemical Education 2019, 96 (6) , 1157-1164. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00597
    10. Natalie L. Dean, Corrina Ewan, Douglas Braden, J. Scott McIndoe. Open-Source Laser-Cut-Model Kits for the Teaching of Molecular Geometry. Journal of Chemical Education 2019, 96 (3) , 495-499. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00553
    11. Denis Fourches, Jeremiah Feducia. Student-Guided Three-Dimensional Printing Activity in Large Lecture Courses: A Practical Guideline. Journal of Chemical Education 2019, 96 (2) , 291-295. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00346
    12. Felix A. Carroll, David N. Blauch. Using the Force: Three-Dimensional Printing a π-Bonding Model with Embedded Magnets. Journal of Chemical Education 2018, 95 (9) , 1607-1611. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00987
    13. Memet Üçgül, Serhat Altıok. The perceptions of prospective ICT teachers towards the integration of 3D printing into education and their views on the 3D modeling and printing course. Education and Information Technologies 2023, 28 (8) , 10151-10181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11593-z
    14. Vittorio Saggiomo. A 3D Printer in the Lab: Not Only a Toy. Advanced Science 2022, 9 (27) https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202202610
    15. Youngkyun Jung, Young Gun Ko, In Wook Nah, Ung Su Choi. Designing large-sized and spherical CO2 adsorbents for highly reversible CO2 capture and low pressure drop. Chemical Engineering Journal 2022, 427 , 131781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.131781
    16. Ryo Horikoshi, Hiroyuki Higashino, Yoji Kobayashi, Hiroshi Kageyama. Design of a structure model set for inorganic compounds based on ping-pong balls linked with snap buttons. Chemistry Teacher International 2021, 3 (3) , 295-301. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2021-0001
    17. Nazan ŞİMŞİR, Ahmet ÜNAL, Halil İbrahim AKYÜZ, Zekeriya YERLİKAYA. 3D Printing Technology in Education and Some Examples of 3D Printer Technology Materials Applied in Chemistry Education. Uluslararası Alan Eğitimi Dergisi 2021, 7 (1) , 156-184. https://doi.org/10.32570/ijofe.851257
    18. , N.V. Zolotareva, A.S. Resnyanskaya, Yu.A. Ocheredko, , . Implementation of modeling elements and 3D printing technology for chemical objects in the educational process within the framework of the “University – School” interaction system. SHS Web of Conferences 2021, 113 , 00043. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111300043
    19. Johannes Pernaa, Susanne Wiedmer. A systematic review of 3D printing in chemistry education – analysis of earlier research and educational use through technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. Chemistry Teacher International 2020, 2 (2) https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2019-0005
    20. Felix Lederle, Eike G. Hübner. Organic chemistry lecture course and exercises based on true scale models. Chemistry Teacher International 2020, 2 (2) https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2019-0006
    21. Evgeniy G. Gordeev, Valentine P. Ananikov. Widely accessible 3D printing technologies in chemistry, biochemistry and pharmaceutics: applications, materials and prospects. Russian Chemical Reviews 2020, 89 (12) , 1507-1561. https://doi.org/10.1070/RCR4980
    22. Paweł Bernard, James D. Mendez. Drawing in 3D: Using 3D printer pens to draw chemical models. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 2020, 48 (3) , 253-258. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21334
    23. Parsa Asachi, Uyen N. T. Nguyen, Jacqueline Dang, Ryan K. Spencer, Hannah S. Martin, Ronald N. Zuckermann. Skeletides: A Modular, Simplified Physical Model of Protein Secondary Structure. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing 2020, 7 (2) , 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2019.0121
    24. Matthew L. Brown, David Hartling, Hamel N. Tailor, Ken Van Wieren, Gary B. Houghton, Ian G. McGregor, Callum D. Hansen, Nabyl Merbouh. Piecewise 3D printing of crystallographic data for post-printing construction. CrystEngComm 2019, 21 (38) , 5757-5766. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CE00986H
    25. Sean M. Kerwin. Flexible and modular 3D‐printed peptide models. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 2019, 47 (4) , 432-437. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21250
    26. Zibo Zuo, Jian Gong, Yulin Huang, Yijian Zhan, Ming Gong, Lulu Zhang. Experimental research on transition from scale 3D printing to full-size printing in construction. Construction and Building Materials 2019, 208 , 350-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.171
    27. Lluís Casas. Three-dimensional-printing aids in visualizing the optical properties of crystals. Journal of Applied Crystallography 2018, 51 (3) , 901-908. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576718003709
    • Abstract

      Figure 1

      Figure 1. MolPrint3D workflow. An idealized model of adenosine triphosphate is shown at the various steps in the MolPrint3D workflow. The imported VRML model (first panel) is grouped into three separate objects corresponding to the nucleobase, ribose, and triphosphate by selecting the appropriate adjacent atoms and bonds (black arrows, second panel). Each group is automatically uniquely colored. The pinned and joined model is separated to see the pins (red arrows, third panel). Finally, the models are floored (last panel) to provide an optimal orientation for sitting on the printer build plate that minimizes the need for support structures.

      Figure 2

      Figure 2. 1,2-Dimethylcyclohexanes. (a) The axial (blue, yellow, violet) and equatorial (green, gray, pink) conformers were split at the substituent groups. The left panel shows the processed models before the floor operation, and the right panel shows the models after flooring. The z axis is orthogonal to the printer build plate. (b) Complete printed models. The left panel shows the six independent objects that were printed, and the right panel shows the final assembled models, which have dimensions of ∼50 mm × 48 mm × 31 mm. The approximate total build time for both models at 60 mm/s and 0.2 mm layer height was 65 min.

      Figure 3

      Figure 3. DNA duplex. (a) The six unique models processed from an idealized B-DNA 10-mer duplex. Backbone models are printed in gray; the G–C nucleobase pair is printed in green and the A–T nucleobase pair in blue. The assembled DNA duplex of 10 base pairs is shown (b) perpendicular and (c) parallel to the helical axis. The final assembled model dimensions are 26 cm × 15 cm × 15 cm. The approximate total build time per base pair at 60 mm/s print speed and 0.2 mm layer height was 94 min.

    • References

      ARTICLE SECTIONS
      Jump To

      This article references 28 other publications.

      1. 1
        Dori, Y. J.; Barak, M. Virtual and Physical Molecular Modeling: Fostering Model Perception and Spatial Understanding J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2001, 4 (1) 61 74
      2. 2
        Scalfani, V. F.; Vaid, T. P. 3D Printed Molecules and Extended Solid Models for Teaching Symmetry and Point Groups J. Chem. Educ. 2014, 91 (8) 1174 1180 DOI: 10.1021/ed400887t
      3. 3
        Lolur, P.; Dawes, R. 3D Printing of Molecular Potential Energy Surface Models J. Chem. Educ. 2014, 91 (8) 1181 1184 DOI: 10.1021/ed500199m
      4. 4
        Robertson, M. J.; Jorgensen, W. L. Illustrating Concepts in Physical Organic Chemistry with 3D Printed Orbitals J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92 (12) 2113 2116 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00682
      5. 5
        Casas, L.; Estop, E. Virtual and Printed 3D Models for Teaching Crystal Symmetry and Point Groups J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92 (8) 1338 1343 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00147
      6. 6
        Kaliakin, D. S.; Zaari, R. R.; Varganov, S. A. 3D Printed Potential and Free Energy Surfaces for Teaching Fundamental Concepts in Physical Chemistry J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92 (12) 2106 2112 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00409
      7. 7
        Meyer, S. C. 3D Printing of Protein Models in an Undergraduate Laboratory: Leucine Zippers J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92 (12) 2120 2125 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00207
      8. 8
        Rodenbough, P. P.; Vanti, W. B.; Chan, S.-W. 3D-Printing Crystallographic Unit Cells for Learning Materials Science and Engineering J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92 (11) 1960 1962 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00597
      9. 9
        Smiar, K.; Mendez, J. D. Creating and Using Interactive, 3D-Printed Models to Improve Student Comprehension of the Bohr Model of the Atom, Bond Polarity, and Hybridization J. Chem. Educ. 2016, 93 (9) 1591 1594 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00297
      10. 10
        Dean, N. L.; Ewan, C.; McIndoe, J. S. Applying Hand-Held 3D Printing Technology to the Teaching of VSEPR Theory J. Chem. Educ. 2016, 93 (9) 1660 1662 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00186
      11. 11
        Griffith, K. M.; Cataldo, R. de; Fogarty, K. H. Do-It-Yourself: 3D Models of Hydrogenic Orbitals through 3D Printing J. Chem. Educ. 2016, 93 (9) 1586 1590 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00293
      12. 12
        Porter, L. A.; Washer, B. M.; Hakim, M. H.; Dallinger, R. F. User-Friendly 3D Printed Colorimeter Models for Student Exploration of Instrument Design and Performance J. Chem. Educ. 2016, 93 (7) 1305 1309 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00041
      13. 13
        Grasse, E. K.; Torcasio, M. H.; Smith, A. W. Teaching UV–Vis Spectroscopy with a 3D-Printable Smartphone Spectrophotometer J. Chem. Educ. 2016, 93 (1) 146 151 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00654
      14. 14
        Porter, L. A. Active Learning and Student Engagement via 3D Printing and Design: Integrating Undergraduate Research, Service Learning, and Cross-Disciplinary Collaborations MRS Adv. 2016, 1 (56) 3703 3708 DOI: 10.1557/adv.2016.82
      15. 15
        Carroll, F. A.; Blauch, D. N. 3D Printing of Molecular Models with Calculated Geometries and p Orbital Isosurfaces J. Chem. Educ. 2017, 94 (7) 886 891 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00933
      16. 16
        Piunno, P. A. E. Teaching the Operating Principles of a Diffraction Grating Using a 3D-Printable Demonstration Kit J. Chem. Educ. 2017, 94 (5) 615 620 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00906
      17. 17
        Chen, T.-H.; Lee, S.; Flood, A. H.; Miljanić, O. Š. How to print a crystal structure model in 3D CrystEngComm 2014, 16 (25) 5488 5493 DOI: 10.1039/C4CE00371C
      18. 18
        Kaminsky, W.; Snyder, T.; Stone-Sundberg, J.; Moeck, P. One-click preparation of 3D print files (*.stl, *.wrl) from *.cif (crystallographic information framework) data using Cif2VRML Powder Diffr. 2014, 29 (S2) S42 S47 DOI: 10.1017/S0885715614001092
      19. 19
        Rossi, S.; Benaglia, M.; Brenna, D.; Porta, R.; Orlandi, M. Three Dimensional (3D) Printing: A Straightforward, User-Friendly Protocol To Convert Virtual Chemical Models to Real-Life Objects J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92 (8) 1398 1401 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00168
      20. 20
        Van Wieren, K.; Tailor, H. N.; Scalfani, V. F.; Merbouh, N. Rapid Access to Multicolor Three-Dimensional Printed Chemistry and Biochemistry Models Using Visualization and Three-Dimensional Printing Software Programs J. Chem. Educ. 2017, 94, 964 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00602
      21. 21
        Wood, P. A.; Sarjeant, A. A.; Bruno, I. J.; Macrae, C. F.; Maynard-Casely, H. E.; Towler, M. The next dimension of structural science communication: simple 3D printing directly from a crystal structure CrystEngComm 2017, 19 (4) 690 698 DOI: 10.1039/C6CE02412B
      22. 22
        MolPrint. https://github.com/paukstelis/MolPrint (accessed October 2017).
      23. 23
        Blender Foundation. https://www.blender.org (accessed October 2017).
      24. 24
        The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, version 1.8; Schrödinger, LLC: New York, 2016.
      25. 25
        Pettersen, E. F.; Goddard, T. D.; Huang, C. C.; Couch, G. S.; Greenblatt, D. M.; Meng, E. C.; Ferrin, T. E. UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25 (13) 1605 1612 DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20084
      26. 26
        Willighagen, E.; Howard, M. Fast and Scriptable Molecular Graphics in Web Browsers without Java3D Nat. Precedings 2007,  DOI: 10.1038/npre.2007.50.1
      27. 27
        Emsley, P.; Lohkamp, B.; Scott, W. G.; Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66, 486 501 DOI: 10.1107/S0907444910007493
      28. 28
        MolPrint3D was used to create a model kit of all 20 standard amino acids that allows assembly and backbone torsional rotations. See: The 20 Standard Amino Acids. https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2175399 (accessed October 2017).
    • Supporting Information

      Supporting Information

      ARTICLE SECTIONS
      Jump To

      The Supporting Information is available on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00549.

      • Installation and usage instructions and Figures S1–S6 (PDF)


      Terms & Conditions

      Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

    STEP 1:
    Click to create an ACS ID

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
    Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect