ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery: Into the Great Wide Open
My Activity
  • Free to Read
Editorial

Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery: Into the Great Wide Open
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDF

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Cite this: J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 16, 8651–8652
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01077
Published July 8, 2020

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use.

This publication is licensed for personal use by The American Chemical Society.

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society

SPECIAL ISSUE

This article is part of the Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery special issue.

We are pleased to introduce the Special Issue “Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery” highlighting the emerging role of artificial intelligence (AI) in pharmaceutical research. A focal point of this issue is illuminating how AI approaches are beginning to impact the practice of drug discovery. The Special Issue contains articles and perspectives that view AI in drug discovery from different angles.

First, we thank our authors for their high-quality and thematically diverse contributions. In addition, we thank many reviewers of submissions to this Special Issue who often have carefully evaluated manuscripts at short notice. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge the editorial office staff for their continuous support.

Of note, a significant number of the many submissions to this Special Issue could not be further considered because they did not meet the Author Guidelines and general acceptance criteria for publication of computational studies in the Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

The papers in this issue cover a variety of method development efforts and practical applications that provide us with a flavor of how AI is entering the drug discovery arena. Of course, machine learning methods have already been applied for more than two decades in cheminformatics and computational medicinal chemistry, but deep learning has more recently become a hot topic in many areas of science including chemistry. The Special Issue pays tribute to these developments. In addition to providing a number of applications of AI in drug discovery, the Special Issue contains papers that address several key features in the field, as highlighted below.

Molecular Representation. A machine learning method creates a model that is used to establish relationships between input data and an observable end point. In medicinal chemistry, we typically model the relationship between chemical structure and physical properties or biological activity. A key component in this process is the representation that is used to map a molecular structure into a form that can be processed by a machine learning algorithm. Until recently, molecules were often represented as vectors encoding the presence or absence of substructures of structural patterns in a molecule. In recent years, a number of groups have developed methods that use deep learning to create new “learned representations”. While the predictive power of these learned representations is still an open question, they have shown promising initial results. One of the perspectives in this issue provides an excellent introduction to the motivations behind and applications of learned representations (Chuang et al.; DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00385). In addition, this issue features two articles on the topic of learned representations. One paper describes the application of a technique known as graph attention networks, which enable a neural network to focus on the most important features (Xiong et al.; DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00959). The other paper reports the benchmarking of a novel molecular representation on a large set of pharmaceutical ADME data (Feinberg et al.; DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b02187).

Model Interpretation. One drawback to many machine learning approaches is that they mostly are “black box predictors”. Accordingly, in a drug discovery setting, one inputs a chemical structure and receives a result without any explanation of how or why the prediction was generated. Ideally, we would like to have machine learning models that could be interpreted by human users. The explanations produced by these models would serve two purposes. First, a user could examine the explanation, confirm that it agrees with theoretical and experimental foundations, and establish some degree of confidence in the prediction. Second, the explanation of the model could provide clues into the mechanistic drivers behind the biological activity being modeled and provide inspiration for the design of new molecules. The Special Issue contains a paper describing new methods that enable machine learning models to provide interpretable results for chemical data sets, regardless of the algorithms that are used (Rodríguez-Pérez et al.; DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01101).

Recommendation Systems. Computer systems that provide recommendations have become part of our everyday lives. For example, e-commerce sites provide recommendations based on our purchasing history. Online streaming sites recommend music and videos that we may enjoy. A paper in this issue extends this concept to the medicinal chemistry laboratory. The authors describe how the concept of “people who bought this also bought this” can be extended to recommending routes for organic synthesis, three-dimensional structures of similar compounds, and assays that may provide additional insights (Rohall et al.; DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b02130).

Reaction Design. One of the areas in chemistry where AI is currently making headway is predicting and modeling new chemical reactions and synthetic routes. A perspective in this issue highlights recent developments in this emerging area of research and provides an outlook (Struble et al.; DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b02120).

Generative Models. Despite more than 30 years of advances in computational chemistry, many, if not most, of the ideas for new molecules in a drug discovery program originate from the imagination and ingenuity of a medicinal chemist. Beginning in the 1990s, a number of groups produced computer programs for performing de novo molecular design. These programs often (but not always) operated by “growing” an existing molecule in the context of a protein binding site. However, while there were some stories of success from de novo design, the technique failed to achieve mainstream adoption. Over the past few years, we have seen the rise of a related technique known as generative modeling. This field, which has its origins in language models and image generation, takes as input a set of molecular structures, which are encoded as a continuous low-dimensional representation. This representation can then be decoded to generate new, often novel, molecules. However, chemists may question the ability of such a system to learn the actual chemistry necessary to generate drug-like molecules. One of the papers in this issue provides an investigation of this potential caveat by evaluating the scope of the actual chemistry learned by a generative model (Grebner et al.; DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b02044).

Perspectives. The Special Issue includes a number of important perspectives on the role of AI in drug discovery. One of these papers explores the broader theme of interactions between chemists and AI in depth (Griffen et al.; DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00163), while another focuses on the impact of AI in synthesis (Struble et al.; DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b02120; vide supra). Many applications of AI in our field are still constrained by the limited availability of data, which is also addressed in a perspective discussing transfer learning methods that can be used to leverage knowledge gained in related projects to accelerate new efforts.

Practical Impact. We also note that only very few of the papers appearing in this Special Issue showcase real-world applications of AI that currently impact drug discovery. We are certainly encouraged by in-house evaluation of these methods by those on the front lines in pharma, as highlighted in one of the contributions (Rohall et al.; DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b02130; vide supra), and we emphasize the need for these methods to be put to the test in more “risky” scenarios. In particular, this means that AI applications, and especially predictive models, need to have “skin in the game” and directly influence the selection and prioritization of compounds in high-profile drug discovery programs. However, demonstrating the impact of AI at that level is still a rare event. Importantly, as long as “prospective” evaluations only consider the choices made by chemists (rather than the choices made by the algorithms), the real impact of these methods will be difficult to assess and, importantly, nearly impossible to improve. From this point of view, the field is still wide open to advance AI in drug discovery beyond the conceptual level and demonstrate the ability of smart algorithms to consistently design novel chemical matter going beyond a chemist’s imagination. To these ends, the contributions contained in this Special Issue are also considered as an encouragement to move forward “into the great wide open” (Tom Petty & the Heartbreakers, 1991). The papers certainly provide a realistic impression of the current state-of-the-art.

It is sincerely hoped that the readers of the Journal of Medicinal Chemistry will enjoy this Special Issue covering a hot topic in science from a drug discovery perspective.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 41 publications.

  1. Filip Miljković, Raquel Rodríguez-Pérez, Jürgen Bajorath. Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Compound Discovery, Design, and Synthesis. ACS Omega 2021, 6 (49) , 33293-33299. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c05512
  2. Zhixiong Lin, Junjie Zou, Shuai Liu, Chunwang Peng, Zhipeng Li, Xiao Wan, Dong Fang, Jian Yin, Gianpaolo Gobbo, Yongpan Chen, Jian Ma, Shuhao Wen, Peiyu Zhang, Mingjun Yang. A Cloud Computing Platform for Scalable Relative and Absolute Binding Free Energy Predictions: New Opportunities and Challenges for Drug Discovery. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2021, 61 (6) , 2720-2732. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01329
  3. Shruti Bharadwaj, Kumari Deepika, Asim Kumar, Shivani Jaiswal, Shaweta Miglani, Damini Singh, Prachi Fartyal, Roshan Kumar, Shareen Singh, Mahendra Pratap Singh, Abhay M. Gaidhane, Bhupinder Kumar, Vibhu Jha. Exploring the Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact in Pharmaceutical Sciences: Insights Toward the Horizons Where Technology Meets Tradition. Chemical Biology & Drug Design 2024, 104 (4) https://doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.14639
  4. Alhumaidi Alabbas. Targeting XGHPRT enzyme to manage Helicobacter pylori induced gastric cancer: A multi-pronged machine learning, artificial intelligence and biophysics-based study. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 2024, 77 , 103960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2024.103960
  5. Neelanjan Chowdhury, Satheesh Kumar Nanjappan. Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) in Drug Purposing. 2024, 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5016-0_4
  6. Jürgen Bajorath. Specific contributions of artificial intelligence to interdisciplinary life science research – exploring and communicating new opportunities. Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences 2023, 3 , 100052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ailsci.2022.100052
  7. Arijit Bhattacharya, Sk Abdul Amin, Prabhat Kumar, Tarun Jha, Shovanlal Gayen. Exploring structural requirements of HDAC10 inhibitors through comparative machine learning approaches. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling 2023, 123 , 108510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2023.108510
  8. Aditya Kate, Ekkita Seth, Ananya Singh, Chandrashekhar Mahadeo Chakole, Meenakshi Kanwar Chauhan, Ravi Kant Singh, Shrirang Maddalwar, Mohit Mishra. Artificial Intelligence for Computer-Aided Drug Discovery. Drug Research 2023, 73 (07) , 369-377. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2076-3359
  9. Yichen Pan, Haotian Ren, Liang Lan, Yixue Li, Tao Huang. Review of Predicting Synergistic Drug Combinations. Life 2023, 13 (9) , 1878. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13091878
  10. Peng Yu, Spencer Ericksen, Anthony Gitter, Michael A. Newton. Bayes Optimal Informer Sets for Early-Stage Drug Discovery. Biometrics 2023, 79 (2) , 642-654. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13637
  11. Anushree Tripathi, Krishna Misra, Richa Dhanuka, Jyoti Prakash Singh. Artificial Intelligence in Accelerating Drug Discovery and Development. Recent Patents on Biotechnology 2023, 17 (1) , 9-23. https://doi.org/10.2174/1872208316666220802151129
  12. Douglas McNair. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Lead-to-Candidate Decision-Making and Beyond. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 2023, 63 (1) , 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-051921-023255
  13. Susan Miller, Walter Moos, Barbara Munk, Stephen Munk, Charles Hart, David Spellmeyer. Drug discovery: Standing on the shoulders of giants. 2023, 207-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824304-6.00001-8
  14. Hatice KELEŞ. TIPTA YAPAY ZEKA UYGULAMALARI. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2022, 24 (3) , 604-613. https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.1214512
  15. Rafal Madaj, Ben Geoffrey, Akhil Sanker, Pavan Preetham Valluri. Target2DeNovoDrug: a novel programmatic tool for in silico -deep learning based de novo drug design for any target of interest. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 2022, 40 (16) , 7511-7516. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2021.1898474
  16. Muhammad Faisal. Recent Advances in Drug Design With Machine Learning. 2022, 165-194. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394167258.ch6
  17. Sudipta Roy, Tanushree Meena, Se-Jung Lim. Demystifying Supervised Learning in Healthcare 4.0: A New Reality of Transforming Diagnostic Medicine. Diagnostics 2022, 12 (10) , 2549. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102549
  18. Ryo Kunimoto, Jürgen Bajorath, Kazumasa Aoki. From traditional to data-driven medicinal chemistry: A case study. Drug Discovery Today 2022, 27 (8) , 2065-2070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2022.04.017
  19. Sonal Priya, Garima Tripathi, Dev Bukhsh Singh, Priyanka Jain, Abhijeet Kumar. Machine learning approaches and their applications in drug discovery and design. Chemical Biology & Drug Design 2022, 100 (1) , 136-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.14057
  20. NISHA V KALAYIL, SHONA S D’SOUZA, SHOWKHIYA Y KHAN, PALLAVI PAUL. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN PHARMACY DRUG DESIGN. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 2022, , 21-27. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2022.v15i4.43890
  21. Jürgen Bajorath. Artificial intelligence in interdisciplinary life science and drug discovery research. Future Science OA 2022, 8 (4) https://doi.org/10.2144/fsoa-2022-0010
  22. Md Moinul, Sk Abdul Amin, Prabhat Kumar, Umesh Kumar Patil, Asmita Gajbhiye, Tarun Jha, Shovanlal Gayen. Exploring sodium glucose cotransporter (SGLT2) inhibitors with machine learning approach: A novel hope in anti-diabetes drug discovery. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling 2022, 111 , 108106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2021.108106
  23. Jürgen Bajorath. Deep Machine Learning for Computer-Aided Drug Design. Frontiers in Drug Discovery 2022, 2 https://doi.org/10.3389/fddsv.2022.829043
  24. Pengfei Jia, Junping Pei, Guan Wang, Xiaoli Pan, Yumeng Zhu, Yong Wu, Liang Ouyang. The roles of computer-aided drug synthesis in drug development. Green Synthesis and Catalysis 2022, 3 (1) , 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gresc.2021.11.007
  25. Sethu Arun Kumar, Thirumoorthy Durai Ananda Kumar, Narasimha M Beeraka, Gurubasavaraj Veeranna Pujar, Manisha Singh, Handattu Sankara Narayana Akshatha, Meduri Bhagyalalitha. Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Data-Driven Decision Making of Drug Discovery and Challenges in High-Quality Data Acquisition in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Future Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 14 (4) , 245-270. https://doi.org/10.4155/fmc-2021-0243
  26. Xin An, Xi Chen, Daiyao Yi, Hongyang Li, Yuanfang Guan. Representation of molecules for drug response prediction. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2022, 23 (1) https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbab393
  27. Rishi R. Gupta. Application of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Drug Discovery. 2022, 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1787-8_4
  28. Mario A. Gutiérrez-Mondragón, Caroline König, Alfredo Vellido. A Deep Learning-Based Method for Uncovering GPCR Ligand-Induced Conformational States Using Interpretability Techniques. 2022, 275-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07802-6_23
  29. Avradip Chatterjee, Sayan Paul, Bharti Bisht, Shelley Bhattacharya, Sudhakar Sivasubramaniam, Manash K. Paul. Advances in targeting the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway in cancer. Drug Discovery Today 2022, 27 (1) , 82-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2021.07.007
  30. Atsushi Yoshimori, Filip Miljković, Jürgen Bajorath. Approach for the Design of Covalent Protein Kinase Inhibitors via Focused Deep Generative Modeling. Molecules 2022, 27 (2) , 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27020570
  31. Peng-ran Liu, Lin Lu, Jia-yao Zhang, Tong-tong Huo, Song-xiang Liu, Zhe-wei Ye. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: An Overview. Current Medical Science 2021, 41 (6) , 1105-1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-021-2474-3
  32. Raquel Rodríguez-Pérez, Jürgen Bajorath. Chemistry-centric explanation of machine learning models. Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences 2021, 1 , 100009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ailsci.2021.100009
  33. Raquel Rodríguez-Pérez, Jürgen Bajorath. Feature importance correlation from machine learning indicates functional relationships between proteins and similar compound binding characteristics. Scientific Reports 2021, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93771-y
  34. S. Nandi, P. Kumar, S.A. Amin, T. Jha, S. Gayen. First molecular modelling report on tri-substituted pyrazolines as phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors through classical and machine learning based multi-QSAR analysis. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research 2021, 32 (11) , 917-939. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2021.1989721
  35. Ajit Vikram, Ken Brudnak, Arwa Zahid, Moonsub Shim, Paul J. A. Kenis. Accelerated screening of colloidal nanocrystals using artificial neural network-assisted autonomous flow reactor technology. Nanoscale 2021, 13 (40) , 17028-17039. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NR05497J
  36. Mateus Sá Magalhães Serafim, Valtair Severino dos Santos Júnior, Jadson Castro Gertrudes, Vinícius Gonçalves Maltarollo, Kathia Maria Honorio. Machine learning techniques applied to the drug design and discovery of new antivirals: a brief look over the past decade. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 2021, 16 (9) , 961-975. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2021.1918098
  37. Jürgen Bajorath. State-of-the-art of Artificial Intelligence in Medicinal Chemistry. Future Science OA 2021, 7 (6) https://doi.org/10.2144/fsoa-2021-0030
  38. José T. Moreira-Filho, Arthur C. Silva, Rafael F. Dantas, Barbara F. Gomes, Lauro R. Souza Neto, Jose Brandao-Neto, Raymond J. Owens, Nicholas Furnham, Bruno J. Neves, Floriano P. Silva-Junior, Carolina H. Andrade. Schistosomiasis Drug Discovery in the Era of Automation and Artificial Intelligence. Frontiers in Immunology 2021, 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.642383
  39. Min Huang, Jin-Jian Lu, Jian Ding. Natural Products in Cancer Therapy: Past, Present and Future. Natural Products and Bioprospecting 2021, 11 (1) , 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13659-020-00293-7
  40. Steven Kearnes. Pursuing a Prospective Perspective. Trends in Chemistry 2021, 3 (2) , 77-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2020.10.012
  41. José L. Medina-Franco. Expanding the Chemical Information Science gateway. F1000Research 2021, 10 , 294. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.52192.1

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Cite this: J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 16, 8651–8652
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01077
Published July 8, 2020

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

17k

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • This publication has no figures.
  • This publication has no References.