ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

A Conformational Restriction Strategy for the Identification of a Highly Selective Pyrimido-pyrrolo-oxazine mTOR Inhibitor

  • Chiara Borsari
    Chiara Borsari
    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 28, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
  • Denise Rageot
    Denise Rageot
    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 28, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
  • Alix Dall’Asen
    Alix Dall’Asen
    PIQUR Therapeutics AG, Hochbergerstrasse 60, 4057 Basel, Switzerland
  • Thomas Bohnacker
    Thomas Bohnacker
    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 28, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
  • Anna Melone
    Anna Melone
    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 28, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
    More by Anna Melone
  • Alexander M. Sele
    Alexander M. Sele
    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 28, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
  • Eileen Jackson
    Eileen Jackson
    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 28, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
  • Jean-Baptiste Langlois
    Jean-Baptiste Langlois
    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 28, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
  • Florent Beaufils
    Florent Beaufils
    PIQUR Therapeutics AG, Hochbergerstrasse 60, 4057 Basel, Switzerland
  • Paul Hebeisen
    Paul Hebeisen
    PIQUR Therapeutics AG, Hochbergerstrasse 60, 4057 Basel, Switzerland
  • Doriano Fabbro
    Doriano Fabbro
    PIQUR Therapeutics AG, Hochbergerstrasse 60, 4057 Basel, Switzerland
  • Petra Hillmann
    Petra Hillmann
    PIQUR Therapeutics AG, Hochbergerstrasse 60, 4057 Basel, Switzerland
  • , and 
  • Matthias P. Wymann*
    Matthias P. Wymann
    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 28, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
    *E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: +41 61 207 5046. Fax: +41 61 207 3566.
Cite this: J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 18, 8609–8630
Publication Date (Web):August 29, 2019
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00972

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND.

  • Open Access

Article Views

7076

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (2 MB)
Supporting Info (7)»

Abstract

The mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) plays a pivotal role in growth and tumor progression and is an attractive target for cancer treatment. ATP-competitive mTOR kinase inhibitors (TORKi) have the potential to overcome limitations of rapamycin derivatives in a wide range of malignancies. Herein, we exploit a conformational restriction approach to explore a novel chemical space for the generation of TORKi. Structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies led to the identification of compound 12b with a ∼450-fold selectivity for mTOR over class I PI3K isoforms. Pharmacokinetic studies in male Sprague Dawley rats highlighted a good exposure after oral dosing and a minimum brain penetration. CYP450 reactive phenotyping pointed out the high metabolic stability of 12b. These results identify the tricyclic pyrimido-pyrrolo-oxazine moiety as a novel scaffold for the development of highly selective mTOR inhibitors for cancer treatment.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR, also mammalian TOR) is a key signaling node in the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/mTOR signaling pathway and operates downstream of PI3K. mTOR is a serine/threonine protein kinase and is part of two functionally distinct multiprotein complexes, mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) and mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2). (1,2) TORC1 integrates inputs from cell surface receptors, cellular energy, stress levels, availability of oxygen and amino acids. Cell surface receptors activate PI3K to produce PtdIns(3,4,5)P3, which serves as a docking site for protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) and phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDK1). This results in phosphorylation of PKB/Akt at two regulatory sites, Thr308 by PDK1 and Ser473 by mTORC2, and other hydrophobic motif kinases. (3−6)
Through the activation of S6 kinase (S6K), TORC1 promotes phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6, which is a key regulator of protein and lipid synthesis. (7) TORC1 also regulates lysosome function and autophagy, while TORC2 promotes cytoskeletal rearrangement, cell survival, and cell cycle entry. (8) The PI3K/mTOR axis is involved in many cellular processes including cell growth, proliferation, and metabolism, and it has been found to be dysregulated in fatal diseases, such as cancer, metabolic, cardiovascular, and neurological disorders. (5,9−12)
The pivotal role of mTOR in numerous human cancers has made this Ser/Thr-kinase a therapeutic target for cancer treatment.
Rapamycin and its analogs (rapalogs) are allosteric inhibitors of TORC1 (Figure 1) and form a TORC1/rapalog/FK506 binding protein 12 (FKBP12) complex. (13) Rapalogs have been extensively investigated in clinical trials in oncology (14−17) and have been approved for a number of cancer treatments such as lung, gastrointestinal neuroendocrine, noncancerous kidney, and advanced pancreatic tumors, advanced ER+/HER2-negative breast and endometrial cancer, mantle cell lymphoma, tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), and pediatric subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA). (16,18,19)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Chemical structures of rapamycin and rapalogs and a selection of ATP-competitive mTOR kinase inhibitor (TORKi) compounds.

Their efficacy as single agents in major solid tumors, however, has turned out to be limited. (20) This might be explained by the selective allosteric inhibition of TORC1, which (i) leaves mTORC2 intact and (ii) suppresses TORC1-dependent feedback loops. (21−24) Small molecule ATP-competitive TORKi compounds target both mTORC1 and mTORC2. Hence, these inhibitors efficiently block two branches of PI3K downstream signaling: (i) one via PKB/Akt to tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and Ras homolog enriched in brain (Rheb1) controlling TORC1 and (ii) the PtdIns(3,4,5)P3-medited Sin1-dependent TORC2 activation, (25) explaining their robust antitumor efficacy. (26) However, by targeting the ATP-binding site of mTOR, TORKi compounds potentially inhibit other protein and lipid kinases at elevated doses, especially the structurally related PI3Ks. Thus, the development of highly selective TORKi is an ongoing challenge. Structurally distinct mTOR-selective inhibitors have been reported and evaluated in a wide range of malignancies. Among the most noteworthy examples, CC-223 (55), (27) sapanisertib (INK128, MLN0128, 56), (28) and vistusertib (AZD2014, 57) (29) have been explored in clinical trials and were found superior to rapalogs in terms of cytostatic and cytotoxic potential (see Figure 1 for chemical structures). (30)
Very recently, we have reported on PQR620 (58) (Figure 1), a highly selective and potent ATP-competitive mTOR inhibitor, targeting both mTORC1 and mTORC2 kinase activities. (31) PQR620 (58) had been discovered through chemical modification of PQR309 (1), a pan-PI3K and moderate mTOR inhibitor currently in clinical trials for the treatment of lymphoma and solid tumors. (32−35)
Here, we report the discovery of conformationally restricted compounds as a novel scaffold for the development of highly selective TORKi compounds. The design of conformationally constrained analogs is often used to minimize the entropic loss associated with target binding, to enhance the potency for the target, and to increase the selectivity. (36) This conformational restriction approach explores a novel chemical space and secured intellectual property. (37) An extensive structure–activity relationship (SAR) study led us to the identification of a highly selective and potent ATP-competitive inhibitor 12b. Compound 12b is orally bioavailable, metabolically stable and has a minimal brain permeability, an advantage in the treatment of systemic tumors. Our results disclose the tricyclic pyrimido-pyrrolo-oxazine moiety as an innovative scaffold for selectively targeting mTOR kinase.

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Rigidification Strategy

In our rigidification strategy, we started from PQR309 (1) and introduced a methylene bridge between one of the morpholines and the aromatic core (Figure 2). This led to the conversion of the triazine ring into a pyrimidine core. Moreover, we have removed the trifluoromethyl group from the 2-aminopyridine moiety (Figure 2) to alter lipophilicity, increase solubility, and change electronic and steric parameters. (38)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Strategy for the development of mTOR selective inhibitors starting from PQR309 (1): rigidification strategy (red dotted lines) and removal of trifluoromethyl group from the 2-aminopyridine moiety (blue).

For the designed compounds, two different regioisomers exist, each with two enantiomers (Table 1, 2a /2b and 2c/2d). To evaluate the rigidification effect on compounds activity, compounds 2ad were evaluated for in vitro binding [Ki for mTOR and PI3Kα (p110α)] and for PI3K/mTOR signaling in A2058 cells (IC50 for phosphorylated S6 to detect mTORC1 activity, and protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) phosphorylation on Ser473 to detect mTORC2 activity). One regioisomer is more potent both in cells and in vitro, as highlighted by comparing 2a with 2c and 2b with 2d. Compound 2a was >9-fold more potent in cells and >11-fold more potent in vitro than 2c (Table 1).
Table 1. Conformationally Restricted Regioisomers 2a/2b and 2c/2d
 cellular assay, IC50 [nM]ain vitro binding assay, Ki [nM]b  
compdpPKB S473pS6 S235/236p110αmTORselectivity Ki(p110α)/Ki(mTOR)clogPc
PQR309 (1)13920517620.273.11
2a19416476691.12.65
2b118964322418.32.65
2c187117908678121.12.65
2d1560185754112790.42.65
a

PKB phosphorylation on Ser473 and ribosomal S6 phosphorylation on Ser235/236 were analyzed in A2058 cells exposed to the indicated inhibitors and subsequent detection of phosphoproteins in an in-cell Western assay. Each experiment was performed with n = 2. The log IC50 values and standard errors are reported in Table S7 in the Supporting Information.

b

Compounds were tested for the in vitro binding to the ATP-binding site of p110α and mTOR using a commercially available time-resolved FRET (TR-FRET) displacement assay (LanthaScreen). Each experiment was performed with n = 2. IC50 values and log IC50 values and standard errors are reported in Table S7 in the Supporting Information.

c

Marvin/JChem 16.10.17 was used for calculation of log P (partition coefficient) values.

Elucidation of Binding Modes to PI3K and mTOR

To explain activity differences of the regioisomers, we considered the possible interactions of the inhibitors within the ATP-binding site of the kinases. As previously reported for PQR309 (1) (33) and other morpholino-substituted PI3K inhibitors, (32,39) a crucial interaction for PI3K binding is the hydrogen bond formation in the hinge region between the backbone amide of Val882 residue in PI3Kγ (Val851 in PI3Kα) and the morpholine oxygen atom. Herein, we started from the conformationally restricted PQR309 (1) analogs (3a and 3b, Table 2) and replaced the morpholine with a piperidine (4a,b and 5a,b, Table 2) to investigate whether the methylene-bridged morpholine or the unrestricted morpholine points toward and interacts with the hinge region Val of the ATP-binding pocket. The obtained Ki values for PI3Kα suggested that the methylene-bridged morpholine is located in the solvent exposed region, since only the compounds with a methylene-bridged piperidine (4a and 4b) displayed a strong affinity for PI3Kα (Ki = 22 and 48 nM, respectively). The in vitro potency of 4a and 4b is comparable to that of the dimorpholine-substituted parental compounds (3a and 3b). On the contrary, replacement of the unrestricted morpholine with a piperidine (5a and 5b) led to a drop in PI3K binding affinity.
Table 2. Binding Mode: Morpholine vs Piperidine in Unrestricted and Restricted Positions
a

PKB phosphorylation on Ser473 and ribosomal S6 phosphorylation on Ser235/236 were analyzed in A2058 cells exposed to the indicated inhibitors and subsequent detection of phosphoproteins in an in-cell Western assay. Each experiment was performed with n = 2. The log IC50 values and standard errors are reported in Table S8.

b

Compounds were tested for the in vitro binding to the ATP-binding site of p110α and mTOR using a commercially available time-resolved FRET (TR-FRET) displacement assay (LanthaScreen). Each experiment was performed with n = 2. IC50 values, logIC50 values, and standard errors are reported in Table S8.

We thus concluded that the unrestricted morpholine binds to the hinge region and establishes a H-bond with the Val backbone amide. We exploited the 2.48 Å resolution X-ray structure of PIKiN3 in PI3Kγ (see ref (32); PDB code 5JHB), and substituted PIKiN3 for compound 3a to confirm its binding mode. Energy minimization calculations of the resulting PI3Kγ-3a complex maintained important interactions such as H-bonds between the aminopyridine and Asp836/964 as well as the interaction of the oxygen atom of the unrestricted morpholine and the backbone amide of Val882 (as present in the parental structure with PIKiN3; Figure 3A). Moreover, the interaction of the core nitrogen of compound 3a with the structured water molecule allows stabilization of the inhibitor binding through a H-bond network. In PI3Kγ, this interaction had been proved to play a pivotal role in inhibitor binding (see ref (32); PDB code 5JHB).

Figure 3

Figure 3. (A) Docking of compound 3a (plum) into PI3Kγ (gray) starting from PDB code 5JHB (see ref (32)). Structural water molecules are shown in red, and water-mediated H-bonds are depicted as dashed black lines. (B) Docking of compound 2a (gold) and (C) compound 2b (green) into mTOR (turquoise) starting from PDB code 4JT6. The important features for mTOR selectivity are depicted in a ball and stick representation. (D) Docking of compound 2a (gold) and (E) compound 2b (green) into PI3Kα (gray) starting from PDB code 3ZIM. The exit vector from the restricted morpholine oxygen is shown as a black arrow.

Given the high homology of the ATP-binding pocket of class I PI3Ks and mTOR, a similar binding mode and orientation in mTOR and all PI3K isoforms can be assumed. Computational modeling studies were performed to elucidate the binding mode of the conformationally restricted compounds 2a and 2b in mTOR starting from the PI103-mTOR complex (PDB code 4JT6). In analogy to PI3K, the higher mTOR potency of the compounds bearing the unrestricted morpholine in the 4-position of the pyrimidine core (2a and 2b, Scheme 1B) could be derived from the interaction of a pyrimidine core nitrogen with a putative structured water molecule, even though the 3.6 Å structural resolution of mTOR did not reveal such structured water molecules. Thus, the position of N-1 of the pyrimidine core (see Scheme 1 for numbering) in the ATP-binding pocket is an essential parameter for mTOR affinity. The binding affinity data of compounds 2ad suggest a similar structured water network in mTOR, which is only maintained by binding of regioisomer 2a and 2b but not with 2c and 2d (Ki2a, 2b = 69, 24 nM vs Ki2c, 2d = 812, 1279 nM). An additional stabilization of 2a/2b-mTOR complex is provided by hydrophobic interactions between the methylene bridge and Met2345 (Figure 3B and Figure 3C). The important features for mTOR selectivity are depicted in Figure 3B and Figure 3C in a ball and stick representation.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. c

aPrepared according to ref (32).

bPrepared according to procedure vii. After the reaction, the two regioisomers (26 and 32) were separated by column chromatography.

c(A) Reagents and conditions: (i) (1) benzaldehyde, 2 M NaOH, rt, 30 min; (2) NaBH4, 5 °C → rt, 1 h; (ii) (1) chloroacetyl chloride, K2CO3, THF/H2O, 0 °C, 1 h; (2) NaOH, 5 °C, 2 h; (iii) borane–dimethyl sulfide complex, Et3N, THF, 0 °C → 65 °C, 5 h; (iv) Pd/C, H2, 2.8 bar, 48 h; (v) thionyl chloride, imidazole, DCM, −5 °C → rt → 0 °C, 2 h; (vi) ruthenium(IV) oxide hydrate, NaIO4, rt, o/n. (B) Reagents and conditions: (vii) morpholine derivative (Mn–H), DIPEA, DCM, 0 °C → rt, o/n; (viii) (1) n-BuLi, CuI, −78 °C → rt, o/n; (2) HCl conc, MeOH, 45 °C, 4–6 h; (3) NaOH, H2O, rt, 1–16 h; (ix) (1) boronic ester 38 or 41, XPhosPdG2 (cat.), K3PO4, dioxane/H2O, 95 °C, 2–16 h; (2) HCl, dioxane/H2O, 60 °C, 3–16 h (for 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 6a, 6b, 7a, 7b, 8a, 8b, 9a, 9b, 10a, 10b, and 14b); (x) 2-aminopyridine-5-boronic acid pinacol ester, XPhosPdG2 (cat.), K3PO4, dioxane/H2O, 95 °C (for 11b), o/n; (xi) boronic ester 39, Pd(dppf)Cl2 (cat.), CsCO3, THF, Δ, o/n (for 12b); (xii) (1) boronic ester generated in situ, XPhosPdG2 (cat.), K3PO4, dioxane/H2O, 95 °C, 3–3.5 h; (2) HCl, 80 °C, o/n (for 13b and 15b); (xiii) (1) boronic ester generated in situ, XPhosPdG2 (cat.), K3PO4, dioxane/H2O, 95 °C, 2–16 h (isolated intermediates 18b and 19b); (2) 18b or 19b, TFA, DCM, 0 °C → rt, 1–3 h (for 16b and 17b).

Within one regioisomer pair (2a and 2b), the (R)-enantiomer 2b displayed a stronger affinity for mTOR, together with an 18-fold selectivity for mTOR kinase over PI3Kα (Ki for mTOR = 24 nM and Ki for PI3Kα = 432 nM). In contrast, the (S)-enantiomer 2a is a dual mTOR/PI3Kα inhibitor (Table 1). The 6-fold difference in PI3K inhibitory activity between compound 2a and 2b (Ki for PI3Kα = 76 and 432 nM, respectively) might be related to the different orientation of the morpholine due to scaffold rigidification. In the (S)-configured compound 2a, the oxygen of the restricted morpholine points toward the amide side chain of Gln859 (4 Å) and a weak H-bond could stabilize the binding of 2a in PI3Kα (see exit vector in Figure 3D). In the (R)-tricyclic pyrimido-pyrrolo-oxazine 2b the morpholine oxygen is rotated by 1 Å with respect to the oxygen atom of 2a and the exit vector does not point toward Gln859 (see Figure 3E). Therefore, no H-bond can be established.

Chemistry

Procedures for library synthesis are depicted in Scheme 1. First, sulfamidates 33a and 33b were prepared (Scheme 1A). Typically, sulfamidates are made from chiral amino alcohols in several steps. (40) The 3-hydroxymethyl morpholines (34a and 34b) were synthesized by a chiral synthesis starting from serine enantiomers. As for 34a, the amino group of (R)-serine was protected with a benzyl group (compound 37b) since the ring closure has been described to proceed in higher yields when a protecting group is present. (41)N-Benzyl-(R)-serine (37b) underwent ring closure in the presence of chloroacetyl chloride to give (R)-4-benzyl-5-oxomorpholine-3-carboxylic acid (36b) in 71% yield. Reduction of 36b using borane–dimethyl sulfide complex in tetrahydrofuran (THF) gave intermediate 35a with an 82% yield. Hydrogenolysis of N-benzyl derivative (35a) over palladium on charcoal (Pd/C, H2) yielded (S)-morpholin-3-ylmethanol (34a). Subsequent two-step cyclic sulfamidate formation was performed by treating the amino alcohol (34a) with thionyl chloride to give the corresponding cyclic sulfamidite, followed by oxidation using NaIO4 and catalytic amounts of ruthenium(IV) oxide hydrate to give sulfamidate 33b in 52% yield. The (S)-enantiomer (33a) was synthesized from (S)-serine following the procedure described for 33b (Scheme 1A). The dichloropyrimidines (2631) were prepared according to Scheme 1B starting from the commercially available 2,4,6-trichloropyrimidine. Morpholines M0–M5 were introduced as Mn substituents by nucleophilic aromatic substitution reaction. Following this procedure, both regioisomers were generated and separated by column chromatography. The desired regioisomers (2731) were isolated in moderate to high yields (46–86%). The (S)-tricyclic intermediates (20a25a) were synthesized by sequential alkylation and nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions of dichloropyrimidines (2631) with (R)-sulfamidate 33b using n-BuLi in THF at −78 °C and a catalytic amount of copper(I) iodide followed by acidic hydrolysis of the intermediary sulfaminic acid and ring closure mediated by base treatment. (42) The same procedure was followed for the preparation of (R)-tricyclic intermediates (20b25b), starting from (S)-sulfamidate 33a. A subsequent palladium catalyzed Suzuki coupling between choloropyrimidine intermediates (20a25a and 20b25b) and protected 2-aminopyridine-5-boronic acid pinacol ester (38, see Supporting Information) afforded compounds 2a, 6a10a, and 2b, 6b10b in moderate to high yields (49–88%; Scheme 1B). In addition, the chlorine of intermediate 22b was displaced by heteroaryl moieties using Suzuki cross-coupling reaction with boronic acid pinacol esters to give compounds 11b17b (Scheme 1B). For not commercially available boronic acid pinacol esters or corresponding bromo derivatives, the synthesis is reported in Schemes S1 and S2 in Supporting Information. The regioisomer bearing the unrestricted morpholine in the 2-position of the pyrimidine core (enantiomers 2c and 2d) was synthesized starting from dichloropyrimidine 32 (Scheme 1C) following the procedure described for 2a and 2b. The synthesis of the conformationally restricted PQR309 (1) analogs 3a and 3b (Table 2) is depicted in Scheme S3A in Supporting Information, and the synthetic procedure is analogous to that described for 2a and 2b. The procedure for the preparation of the compounds bearing a piperidine instead of a morpholine (4a,b and 5a,b, Table 2) is reported in Scheme S3B and Scheme S3C in Supporting Information.

Determination of Cellular Potency and PI3K vs mTOR Kinase Activities

In the search for novel mTOR inhibitors, we selected the regioisomer bearing the unrestricted morpholine in the 4-position of the pyrimidine core (Scheme 1B) and built up a structure–activity relationship (SAR) study to investigate (i) the influence of the stereogenic center on mTOR selectivity and (ii) the effect of substitution on the unrestricted morpholine. We prepared a series of compounds introducing different morpholine derivatives (Mn substituents, Scheme 1B), such as 3-methylmorpholine [M1, (S); M2, (R)], 8-oxa-3-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane (M3), 3-oxa-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane (M4), and 3,3-dimethylmorpholine (M5). Morpholines with increased steric demand had already been shown to increase selectivity for mTOR over PI3K. (31,43) For each conformationally restricted compound both (S)- (2a, 6a10a) and (R)-enantiomers (2b, 6b10b) were synthesized and tested in kinase binding and cellular assays. For all the regioisomer pairs, the (R)-enantiomer had higher affinity for mTOR than the (S)-configured compound (Table 3), confirming the results of compounds 2a and 2b. Also the cellular potency of the (R)-configured compounds was 2- to 7-fold higher than that of their corresponding enantiomers (see Table 3). The introduction of sterically hindered morpholines in the hinge region of (R)-configured tricyclic pyrimido-pyrrolo-oxazines (6b10b) did not affect the potency for mTOR but led to a significant improvement in mTOR selectivity. With the exception of compound 10b, the selectivity of (R)-configured tricyclic compounds for mTOR versus PI3Kα was higher than 35-fold [Ki(p110α)/Ki(mTOR) 6b = 43; 7b = 165; 8b = 53; 9b = 36]. The (S)-3-methylmorpholine (M1) only slightly increased the compound potency and selectivity for mTOR if compared with the morpholine (M0) [Ki for mTOR 2b = 24 nM; 6b = 9.1 nM; selectivity Ki(p110α)/Ki(mTOR) for 2b was 18-fold and for 6b 43-fold]. On the contrary, the presence of a (R)-3-methylmorpholine (M2) on the (R)-configured tricyclic pyrimido-pyrrolo-oxazine scaffold yielded the highest selectivity of the series [Ki(p110α)/Ki(mTOR) for 7b was 165-fold]. In cells, compound 7b displayed good activity (IC50 for phosphorylated PKB/Akt = 133 nM and for phosphorylated S6 = 61 nM) and was therefore selected for further optimization.
Table 3. SAR Study on the Unrestricted Morpholine of Tricyclic Pyrimido-pyrrolo-oxazinesd
a

PKB phosphorylation on Ser473 and ribosomal S6 phosphorylation on Ser235/236 were analyzed in A2058 cells exposed to the indicated inhibitors and subsequent detection of phosphoproteins in an in-cell Western assay. Each experiment was performed with n = 2. The log IC50 values and standard errors are reported in Table S7 in the Supporting Information.

b

Compounds were tested for the in vitro binding to the ATP-binding site of p110α and mTOR using a commercially available time-resolved FRET (TR-FRET) displacement assay (LanthaScreen). Each experiment was performed with n = 2. IC50 values, log IC50 values, and standard errors are reported in Table S7 in the Supporting Information.

c

Marvin/JChem 16.10.17 was used for calculation of log P (partition coefficient) values.

d

Chemical structures of M0–M5 are depicted in Scheme 1.

To further improve the potency and selectivity for mTOR and to modulate the physicochemical properties of compound 7b, we investigated the role of the aryl moiety (Table 4). First, we replaced the pyridine ring with a pyrimidine (11b) and a pyrazine (12b) to assess the effect of the polarity of the heteroaromatic ring. Afterward, we introduced a methyl (13b and 14b), a methoxy (15b), or a dimethoxymethyl substituent (16b and 17b) on the 2-amino-substituted aryl group. The presence of a pyrimidine or a pyrazine ring slightly increased mTOR potency, selectivity, and cellular activity (see comparison between 11b/12b and 7b, Table 4). Compound 13b, bearing a methyl substituent in position 4 of the 2-aminopyridine ring, had a moderate activity toward mTOR (Ki = 85 nM), and was poorly active in cells (IC50 for phosphorylated PKB/Akt and for phosphorylated S6 was >800 nM, Table 4). In contrast, compound 14b, with a 3-methyl-substituted aminopyridine, maintained a moderate activity in cells (IC50 for phosphorylated PKB/Akt was 488 nM and 289 nM for phosphorylated S6). The introduction of a methoxy (15b) and a dimethoxymethyl substituent (16b) on the pyridine ring reduced cellular potency and binding to both PI3Kα and mTOR. Compound 17b, bearing a dimethoxymethyl substituent on the pyrimidine ring, is a dual PI3Kα/mTOR inhibitor (Ki for p110α = 66 nM; Ki for mTOR = 34 nM) but showed a limited potency in cells (IC50(pPKB) > 500 nM and IC50(pS6) > 300 nM, Table 4). With respect to compound 7b, the introduction of an additional nitrogen on the heteroaromatic ring decreased the clogP value (compound 11b = 2.22 and 12b = 2.15), leading to compounds with predicted optimal physicochemical and ADME properties for oral drugs. (44) Moreover, the polar surface area (PSA) of > 90 Å of compounds 11b and 12b is indicative that they might not cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Limited brain uptake of mTOR inhibitors, normally used to treat systemic tumors, is an advantage because inhibition of the mTOR pathway in the brain could lead to neurological side effects.
Table 4. SAR Study on the Aryl Moiety of Tricyclic Pyrimido-pyrrolo-oxazinesd
a

PKB phosphorylation on Ser473 and ribosomal S6 phosphorylation on Ser235/236 were analyzed in A2058 cells exposed to the indicated inhibitors and subsequent detection of phosphoproteins in an in-cell Western assay. Each experiment was performed with n = 2. The log IC50 values and standard errors are reported in Table S7 in the Supporting Information. *PQR620 data are from ref (31) for comparison.

b

Compounds were tested for the in vitro binding to the ATP-binding site of p110α and mTOR using a commercially available time-resolved FRET (TR-FRET) displacement assay (LanthaScreen). Each experiment was performed with n = 2. IC50 values, log IC50 values, and standard errors are reported in Table S7 in the Supporting Information.

c

Marvin/JChem 16.10.17 was used for calculation of log P (partition coefficient) values.

d

Chemical structures of Ar0–Ar7 are depicted in Scheme 1.

Pharmacological Parameters

To assess the oral availability and to determine BBB permeability, pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were carried out for compounds 7b and 12b. Compounds 7b and 12b were administered orally (5 mg/kg po) in male Sprague Dawley rats, and compound concentrations in plasma and brain were determined after a single dose (Figure 4A and Figure 4B, respectively; see also Tables S1–S4 in Supporting Information). Both compounds showed plasma exposure sufficient to efficiently inhibit mTOR kinase, and brain levels remined minimal. After 8 h, the total exposure AUC0–8 was 5730 ng·h/mL in plasma and 104 ng·h/g in brain for compound 12b.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Plasma and brain concentration of (A) compound 7b and (B) compound 12b after po dosing at 5 mg/kg in male Sprague Dawley rats. Stability of compound 11b (5 μM) with primary hepatocytes from (C) mice (green) and rats (turquoise) and (D) dogs (red) and humans (black) (n = 2). All values are the mean ± SEM. Error bars are not shown when smaller than the symbols.

To predict the metabolic stability of our restricted scaffold, in vitro assays were performed for compound 11b, using hepatocyte cultures of different origin (CD-1 mice, Sprague Dawley rats, beagle dogs, and humans). Compound 11b was only minimally metabolized when incubated with mouse, rat, dog, and human hepatocytes, as indicated by 81.2%, 93.6%, 93.0%, and 93.2% remaining compound after 3 h of incubation (Figure 3C, Figure 3D, and Table S5 in Supporting Information). As compound 11b was highly stable across species, neither half-lives nor intrinsic clearance could be determined under the experimental conditions.

CYP450 Reactive Phenotyping for Compounds 7b, 11b, and 12b

CYP450 reactive phenotyping was performed to evaluate the involvement of different human hepatic CYP isoenzymes (CYP1A1 and CYP1A2) in the metabolism of compounds 7b, 11b, and 12b. All three compounds turned out to be moderate CYP1A1 substrates, as indicated by <77% parental compound remaining after 60 min of incubation (Table 5). Compounds 7b and 11b were partially stable toward CYP1A1 (44% and 51% compound remaining, respectively), while the lowest turnover was observed with compound 12b (77% remaining). A low metabolization by CYP1A2 was observed with 11b (73% remaining). On the other hand, compounds 7b and 12b remained stable (Table 5), indicating that they are not substrates of CYP1A2.
Table 5. CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 Reactive Phenotyping of 7b, 11b, and 12b (1 μM)a
 remaining test item with cofactors% remaining in corresponding negative control without cofactors 
test itemmean %SDmeanSDmean (%)corrb
CYP1A1
7b442.01093.735
11b510.3932.958
12b770.08964.581
CYP1A2
7b980.6940.1104
11b730.4912.483
12b920.2910.8101
a

Compounds remaining after 60 min of incubation with Supersomes at 25 pmol/mL (n = 2), calculation based on absolute amounts (nM).

b

mean (%)corr = (100 – % remaining negative control) + % remaining sample.

On the basis of these results, compound 11b was further investigated to identify metabolites formed in vitro by CYP1A1 (Figure 5A) and CYP1A2 (Figure 5B). Upon incubation of 11b with human recombinant CYP1A1, the highest peak areas were observed for metabolite M2 (9.3% of total peak areas, hydrolysis of the 3R-methylmorpholinyl residue and oxidation to corresponding aldehyde) and its secondary products M5 (7.5%, introduction of a C–C double bond (desaturation) at the tricyclic backbone of M2; Figure 5C). Other minor metabolites were observed, highlighting that the preferred site of oxidative metabolism of compound 11b was the 3R-methyl-substituted morpholinyl moiety (Table S6 and Figures S1–S5 in Supporting Information). In CYP1A2 incubates, M2 was the only metabolite (0.3%) suggesting that compound 11b is not a substrate of CYP1A2.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Pie chart showing the percentage of compound 11b and its metabolites after 60 min of incubation with human recombinant (A) CYP1A1 and (B) CYP1A2. (C) Major metabolites observed upon incubation of 11b with CYP1A1.

Enzymatic Profiling and Determination of Selectivity

According to our SAR studies, compounds 7b, 11b, and 12b were the most potent and selective mTOR inhibitors showing high potency in cellular assays and good pharmacokinetic profile. Therefore, 7b, 11b, and 12b were chosen for further characterization using the KINOMEScan platform of DiscoverX (Table 6). DiscoverX KdELECT assays confirmed the excellent mTOR selectivity of compound 12b over class I and class III PI3K and PI4K: 12b was ∼450-fold more potent for mTOR than for class I PI3K isoforms. The selectivity of 12b for mTOR over PI3K exceeds competitor compounds such as CC223 (55) (45) (∼80×), INK128 (56) (∼40×), and AZD2104 (57) (∼230×) (Table 6). Moreover, compound 12b showed negligible off-target effects when screened against a DiscoverX scanMAX kinase assay panel containing a set of 468 protein and lipid kinases (Supporting Information, Figure S6 and Table S10). At a concentration of 10 μM, compound 12b and PQR620 (58) reached outstanding selectivity scores [S(10) was 0.005 for both compounds; see Supporting Information, Table S9], while the same value for INK128 (56) reached 0.14 (corresponding to 55 hits, Table S9).
Table 6. mTOR and Lipid Kinase Binding Constants of 7b, 11b, 12b, and Reference Compounds
 inhibitor binding constant,aKd [nM] 
compdmTORPI3KαPI3KβPI3KδPI3KγPI4KβVPS34most sensitive PI3K/mTOR,c fold selectivity
7b34610410062008700>30000210017.9
11b14120140019001800>300009808.6
12b3.5160075001200011000>300003200457
CC223 (55)b2823001800062007100392500>80×
INK128 (56)b0.0921581303.7nd8200>40×
AZD2014 (57)b0.1433330015008400>3000023000>230×
PQR620 (58)0.271000220002300018000>300002750>3700×
a

Dissociation constants (Kd) were determined using ScanMax technology (DiscoveRx) with 11-point 3-fold serial dilutions of the indicated compounds. Kd is the mean value from experiments performed in duplicate and was calculated from standard dose–response curves using the Hill equation. nd = not determined.

b

Dissociation constants (Kd) of CC223 (55), INK128 (56), AZD2014 (57), and PQR620 (58) are from ref (31).

c

Fold selectivity: ratio of Kd of the most sensitive class I PI3K isoform (displayed in bold type) over Kd for mTOR.

Conclusion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

In summary, we have exploited a conformational restriction strategy to enlarge the chemical space around PQR309 (1), a pan-PI3K and moderate mTOR inhibitor. Our rigidification strategy allowed us to enhance potency and selectivity for mTOR. Molecular modeling elucidated interactions of the tricyclic pyrimido-pyrrolo-oxazine scaffold in the ATP-binding pocket of PI3Ks and mTOR and explained the difference in potency between the regioisomers. An extensive SAR study led to the discovery of compound 12b, with a selectivity for mTOR higher than competitor compounds such as CC223 (55), INK128 (56), and AZD2014 (57). The selectivity of PQR620 (58) for mTOR over PI3Ks exceeds that of 12b; however 12b explores a novel chemical space and paves the way for additional chemical modifications. A lead optimization process of the tricyclic pyrimido-pyrrolo-oxazine scaffold could lead to further improvement of the mTOR potency and selectivity of 12b. Compound 12b efficiently inhibited mTOR signaling in cells and showed plasma drug exposure after oral dosing that is expected to fully inhibit mTOR in vivo. The minimal brain permeability of compounds 7b and 12b suggests the tricyclic pyrimido-pyrrolo-oxazine as a novel scaffold for the development of highly selective and potent ATP-competitive mTOR inhibitors to be exploited for the treatment of systemic tumors. PQR620 (58) and the tricyclic pyrimido-pyrrolo-oxazine derivatives span along the different therapeutic applications of mTOR inhibitors. PQR620 (58) showed an excellent brain penetration and could be exploited in the treatment of neurological disorders. On the contrary, the conformationally restricted compounds have a limited brain uptake and could find an optimal application in the treatment of systemic cancers, with the advantage of avoiding neurological side effects. Our novel scaffold was also characterized for CYP450 related metabolism to assess the substrate specificity toward CYP1A1 and CYP1A2. The tricyclic pyrimido-pyrrolo-oxazines 7b, 11b, and 12b were metabolically stable, with compound 12b showing the lowest turnover in CYP450 reactive phenotyping. On the basis of its remarkable mTOR potency/selectivity and favorable pharmacokinetic profile, compound 12b represents a promising starting point for the development of a novel mTOR candidate in oncology.

Experimental Section

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

General Information

Reagents were purchased at the highest commercial quality from Acros, Sigma-Aldrich, or Fluorochem and used without further purification. Solvents were purchased from Acros Organics in AcroSeal bottles over molecular sieves. Cross-coupling reactions were carried out under nitrogen atmosphere in anhydrous solvents, and glassware was oven-dried prior to use. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) plates were purchased from Merck KGaA (Polygram SIL/UV254, 0.2 mm silica with fluorescence indicator), and UV light (254 nm) was used to visualize the compounds. Column chromatographic purifications were performed on Merck KGaA silica gel (pore size 60 Å, 230–400 mesh particle size). Alternatively, flash chromatography was performed with Isco CombiFlash Companion systems using prepacked silica gel columns (40–60 μm particle size RediSep). 1H, 19F, and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer. NMR spectra were obtained in deuterated solvents, such as CDCl3, (CD3)2SO, or CD3OD. The chemical shifts (δ values) are reported in ppm and corrected to the signal of the deuterated solvents (7.26 ppm (1H NMR) and 77.16 ppm (13C NMR) for CDCl3; 2.50 ppm (1H NMR) and 39.52 ppm (13C NMR) for (CD3)2SO; and 3.31 ppm (1H NMR) and 49.00 ppm (13C NMR) for CD3OD). 19F NMR spectra are calibrated relative to CFCl3 (δ = 0 ppm) as external standard. When peak multiplicities are reported, the following abbreviations are used: s (singlet), d (doublet), dd (doublet of doublets), t (triplet), td (triplet of doublets), q (quartet), m (multiplet), br (broadened). Coupling constants, when given, are reported in hertz (Hz). High resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were recorded on a Bruker maxis 4G, high resolution ESI-QTOF. All analyses were carried out in positive ion mode and in MeOH + 0.1% formic acid as solvent. Sodium formate was used as calibration standard. MALDI-ToF mass spectra were obtained on a Voyager-De Pro measured in m/z. The chromatographic purity of final compounds was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analyses on an Ultimate 3000SD system from ThermoFisher with LPG-3400SD pump system, ACC-3000 autosampler and column oven, and DAD-3000 diode array detector. An Acclaim-120 C18 reversed-phase column from ThermoFisher was used as stationary phase. Gradient elution (5:95 for 0.2 min, 5:95 → 100:0 over 10 min, 100:0 for 3 min) of the mobile phase consisting of CH3CN/MeOH:H2O(10:90) was used at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min at 40 °C. The purity of all final compounds was >95%. Optical rotations ([α]D23) were measured on a PerkinElmer polarimeter 341 (in a cuvette (l = 1 dm)) at 23 °C at 589 nm.

General Procedure 1

A flask was charged with the corresponding boronic acid pinacol ester (1 equiv), N,N-dimethylformamide–dimethyl acetal (DMF–DMA, 1.3–1.5 equiv), and THF (5 mL). The mixture was stirred at 70 °C overnight. After completion of the reaction monitored by NMR, the solvents were evaporated and the compound was dried under vacuum.

General Procedure 2

To a solution of the desired morpholine (1.05 equiv) in DCM (approximately 1 mL/0.6 mmol) at 0 °C, N,N-diisopropylethylamine (2.1 equiv) was added, followed by 2,4,6-trichloropyrimidine (1.0 equiv). The reaction mixture was allowed to warm up to rt and was stirred overnight. The reaction mixture was washed with aqueous saturated NaHSO4 solution (2×). The aqueous layer was extracted with DCM, and the combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude was purified by column chromatography on silica gel.
Using this procedure, both regioisomers were generated and separated by column chromatography. Only the characterization of the desired regioisomer is reported.

General Procedure 3

Under nitrogen atmosphere, a 1.6 M n-BuLi solution (1.0 mL, 1.52 mmol, 1.2 equiv) in THF (approximately 1 mL/1.5 mmol) was cooled down to −78 °C and a solution of the corresponding morpholine (1 equiv) in THF (approximately 1 mL/0.4 mmol) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 35 min. CuI (0.05 equiv) and a solution of the corresponding sulfamidate (1–1.2 equiv) in THF (approximately 1 mL/0.5 mmol) were added. The mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 15 min, then allowed to warm to rt and stirred overnight. The reaction was quenched by addition of water. Conc HCl and methanol were added, and the mixture was heated at 45 °C for 4–6 h. The reaction mixture was cooled down to 0 °C, and a 6 M NaOH solution was added until pH 10 was obtained. The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 1–16 h, then transferred to a separatory funnel. The layers were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (2×). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel.

General Procedure 4

Chloropyrimidine derivative (1.0 equiv) and boronic acid pinacol ester (1.0 equiv) were charged in a flask. Under nitrogen atmosphere, 1,4-dioxane (approximately 1 mL/0.2 mmol) was added, followed by an aqueous K3PO4 solution (2 equiv) and chloro(2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropyl-1,1′-biphenyl)[2-(2′-amino-1,1′-biphenyl)]palladium(II) (XPhos Pd G2, 0.05 equiv). The resulting mixture was stirred at 95 °C for 2–16 h. After completion of the reaction monitored by TLC, a 3 M aqueous HCl solution (10 equiv) was added and the mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 3–16 h. A 2 M aqueous NaOH solution was added until pH 9–10 was obtained. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3×). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel.

General Procedure 5

Step 1

The corresponding di-Boc protected bromo derivative 44 or 49 (1.0 equiv), bis(pinacolato)diboron (1.5 equiv), and KOAc (3.0 equiv) were charged into a flask. Under nitrogen atmosphere, 1,4-dioxane (approximately 1 mL/0.2 mmol) was added, followed by [1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene]dichloropalladium(II) (Pd(dppf)Cl2, 0.1 equiv). The reaction mixture was stirred at 100 °C for 2 h.

Step 2

After completion of the reaction monitored by TLC, the chloropyrimidine derivative 22b (200 mg, 0.65 mmol, 1 equiv) and K3PO4 (3.0 equiv) in water (approximately 1 mL/0.3 mmol) and chloro(2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropyl-1,1′-biphenyl)[2-(2′-amino-1,1′-biphenyl)]palladium(II) (XPhos Pd G2, 0.05 equiv) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 95 °C for 2–16 h. A 15% NH4Cl solution was added, and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3×). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel.

General Procedure 6

To a cold solution (0 °C) of the corresponding Boc-protected compound (1 equiv) in DCM (approximately 1 mL/0.1 mmol), trifluoroacetic acid (TFA, 40 equiv) was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm up to room temperature and was stirred for 1–3 h. After completion of the reaction monitored by TLC, a saturated NaHCO3 solution was slowly added. The aqueous layer was extracted with DCM (3×). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel.

(S)-5-(4-Morpholino-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)pyridin-2-amine (2a)

2a was prepared according to general procedure 4 from (S)-2-chloro-4-morpholino-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine 20a (131 mg, 0.44 mmol, 1 equiv) and (E)-N,N-dimethyl-N′-(5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)pyridin-2-yl)formimidamide 38 (121 mg, 0.44 mmol, 1 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 0:1) gave compound 2a as a colorless solid (102 mg, 0.29 mmol, 65%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.83 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 8.18 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 6.45 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.27 (br s, 2 H), 4.04 (dd, J = 13.5, 2.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.87 (ddt, J = 10.5, 8.8, 4.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.79–3.71 (m, 3 H), 3.68–3.54 (m, 7 H), 3.35–3.28 (m, 1 H), 3.22–3.10 (m, 3 H), 2.63 (dd, J = 15.3, 4.7 Hz, 1 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 167.71 (s, 1 C), 161.20 (s, 1 C), 160.90 (s, 1 C), 158.28 (s, 1 C), 148.91 (s, 1 C), 136.73 (s, 1 C), 122.60 (s, 1 C), 107.34 (s, 1 C), 93.55 (s, 1 C), 70.07 (s, 1 C), 66.64 (s, 2 C), 66.17 (s, 1 C), 56.91 (s, 1 C), 45.90 (s, 2 C), 42.07 (s, 1 C), 29.14 (s, 1 C). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C18H23N6O2 355.1877; found, 355.1880. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 4.98 min (98.7% purity).

(R)-5-(4-Morpholino-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)pyridin-2-amine (2b)

2b was prepared as described for its (S)-enantiomer 2a starting from (R)-2-chloro-4-morpholino-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine 20b (150 mg, 0.51 mmol, 1 equiv) and boronic acid pinacol ester 38 in a 76% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (S)-enantiomer. HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C18H23N6O2 355.1877; found, 355.1883. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 4.95 min (97.4% purity).

(S)-5-(2-Morpholino-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-4-yl)pyridin-2-amine (2c)

2c was prepared according to general procedure 4 from (S)-4-chloro-2-morpholino-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine 20c (80 mg, 0.27 mmol, 1 equiv) and (E)-N,N-dimethyl-N′-(5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)pyridin-2-yl)formimidamide 38 (81.5 mg, 0.30 mmol, 1.1 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 0:1) gave compound 2c as a colorless solid (45 mg, 0.13 mmol, 47%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.46 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.93 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 6.50 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1 H), 6.31 (br s, 2 H), 3.96–3.89 (m, 2 H), 3.81–3.75 (m, 2 H), 3.69–3.61 (m, 8 H), 3.34–3.27 (m, 1 H), 3.24–3.11 (m, 3 H), 2.62 (dd, J = 15.9, 4.5 Hz, 1 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 166.88 (s, 1 C), 161.13 (s, 1 C), 160.00 (s, 1 C), 152.84 (s, 1 C), 147.95 (s, 1 C), 136.12 (s, 1 C), 122.01 (s, 1 C), 107.22 (s, 1 C), 102.42 (s, 1 C), 70.07 (s, 1 C), 66.11 (s, 2 C), 65.54 (s, 1 C), 56.92 (s, 1 C), 44.23 (s, 2 C), 41.31 (s, 1 C), 27.75 (s, 1 C). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C18H23N6O2 355.1877; found, 355.1881. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 3.57 min (99.8% purity).

(R)-5-(2-Morpholino-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-4-yl)pyridin-2-amine (2d)

2d was prepared as described for its (S)-enantiomer 2c starting from (R)-4-chloro-2-morpholino-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine 20d (100 mg, 0.34 mmol, 1 equiv) and boronic acid pinacol ester 38 in a 57% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (S)-enantiomer. HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C18H23N6O2 355.1877; found, 355.1880. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 3.61 min (99.2% purity).

(S)-5-(4-Morpholino-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)-4-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine (3a)

3a was prepared according to general procedure 4 from (S)-2-chloro-4-morpholino-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine 20a (544 mg, 1.83 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and boronic acid pinacol ester 50 (818 mg, 2.38 mmol, 1.3 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (CH2Cl2/methanol 1:0 → 20:1) gave compound 3a as a colorless solid (503 mg, 1.19 mmol, 65%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.62 (s, 1 H), 6.77 (s, 1 H), 4.75 (br s, 2 H), 4.10 (dd, J = 14.0, 2.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.01–3.93 (m, 1 H), 3.86–3.70 (m, 6 H), 3.70–3.58 (m, 4 H), 3.47 (td, J = 12.0, 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.35 (t, J = 11 Hz, 1 H), 3.27–3.17 (m, 2 H), 2.62 (dd, J = 15.0, 4.8 Hz, 1 H). 19F{1H} NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −60.2 (s, 3 F). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 167.70 (s, 1 C), 161.65 (s, 1 C), 158.91 (s, 1 C), 158.33 (s, 1 C), 152.29 (s, 1 C), 138.0 (q, J = 32 Hz, 1 C), 123.91–123.81 (m, 1 C), 123.1 (q, J = 274 Hz, 1 C), 105.2 (q, J = 5.6 Hz, 1 C), 93.59 (s, 1 C), 70.44 (s, 1 C), 66.96 (s, 2 C), 66.59 (s, 1 C), 56.97 (s, 1 C), 45.94 (s, 2 C), 42.05 (s, 1 C), 29.66 (s, 1 C). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C19H22F3N6O2 423.1751; found, 423.1743. HPLC: tR = 6.74 min (97.5% purity). (S)-enantiomer: [α]: [α]D20 = −13.2 (c = 2.0, CHCl3).

(R)-5-(4-Morpholino-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)-4-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine (3b)

3b was prepared as described for its (S)-enantiomer 50a starting from (R)-2-chloro-4-morpholino-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine 20b (552 mg, 1.86 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and boronic acid pinacol ester 50 (83 mg, 2.42 mmol, 1.3 equiv) in a 62% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (S)-enantiomer. HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C19H22F3N6O2 423.1751; found, 423.1744. HPLC: tR = 6.73 min (98.9% purity). (R)-enantiomer: [α]D20 = +13.5 (c = 1.6, CHCl3).

(S)-5-(4-Morpholino-5,5a,6,7,8,9-hexahydropyrimido[5,4-b]indolizin-2-yl)-4-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine (4a)

4a was prepared according to general procedure 4 from intermediate 51a (150 mg, 0.51 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and boronic acid pinacol ester 50 (175 mg, 0.51 mmol, 1.0 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 3:2) gave compound 4a as a yellowish solid (90 mg, 0.21 mmol, 42%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 8.42 (s, 1 H), 6.76 (s, 1 H), 6.67 (br s, 2 H), 4.05 (dd, J = 13, 4.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.67–3.49 (m, 9 H), 3.25 (dd, J = 15.0, 9.1 Hz, 1 H), 2.78–2.64 (m, 2 H), 1.83–1.67 (m, 2 H), 1.63–1.55 (m, 1 H), 1.51–1.37 (m, 1 H), 1.37–1.20 (m, 2 H). 19F{1H} NMR (376 MHz, DMSO): δ −59.1 (s, 3 F). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO): δ 167.2 (s, 1 C), 160.7 (s, 1 C), 160.2 (s, 1 C), 157.5 (s, 1 C), 151.8 (s, 1 C), 135.7 (q, J = 31 Hz, 1 C), 123.3 (q, J = 274 Hz, 1 C), 121.2–121.1 (m, 1 C), 104.1 (q, J = 5.9 Hz, 1 C), 99.3 (s, 1 C), 66.1 (s, 2 C), 58.9 (s, 1 C), 45.5 (s, 2 C), 41.3 (s, 1 C), 33.6 (s, 1 C), 31.5 (s, 1 C), 24.4 (s, 1 C), 23.6 (s, 1 C). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C20H24F3N6O 421.1958; found, 421.1962. HPLC: tR = 8.44 min (97.8% purity).

(R)-5-(4-Morpholino-5,5a,6,7,8,9-hexahydropyrimido[5,4-b]indolizin-2-yl)-4-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine (4b)

4b was prepared as described for its (S)-enantiomer 4a starting from 51b (150 mg, 0.51 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and boronic acid pinacol ester 50 (175 mg, 0.51 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in a 47% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (S)-enantiomer. HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C20H24F3N6O 421.1958; found, 421.1966. HPLC: tR = 8.45 min (98.7% purity).

(S)-5-(4-(Piperidin-1-yl)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)-4-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine (5a)

5a was prepared as described for its (R)-enantiomer 5b starting from 52a (100 mg, 0.34 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and boronic acid pinacol ester 50 (128 mg, 0.37 mmol, 1.1 equiv) in a 75% yield. The spectroscopic data agree with those reported for the (R)-enantiomer. HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C20H24F3N6O 421.1958; found, 421.1966. HPLC: tR = 8.55 min (98.3% purity).

(R)-5-(4-(Piperidin-1-yl)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)-4-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine (5b)

5b was prepared according to general procedure 4 from intermediate 52b (100 mg, 0.34 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and boronic acid pinacol ester 50 (128 mg, 0.38 mmol, 1.1 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 3:2) gave compound 5b as a colorless solid (114 mg, 0.27 mmol, 80%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ 8.43 (s, 1 H), 6.76 (s, 1 H), 6.69 (br s, 2 H), 3.95–3.80 (m, 2 H), 3.77–3.67 (m, 2 H), 3.63–3.50 (m, 4 H), 3.29 (td, J = 12.0, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.23–3.14 (m, 2 H), 3.08 (td, J = 13.0, 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 2.61 (dd, J = 15.0, 4.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.64–1.57 (m,. Two H), 1.53–1.44 (m, 4 H). 19F{1H} NMR (376 MHz, DMSO): δ −58.9 (s, 3 F). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO): δ 167.10 (s, 1 C), 160.88 (s, 1 C), 160.18 (s, 1 C), 157.47 (s, 1 C), 151.81 (s, 1 C), 135.70 (q, J = 31 Hz, 1 C), 123.30 (q, J = 274 Hz, 1 C), 121.16 (s, 1 C), 104.12 (q, J = 5.7 Hz, 1 C), 92.47 (s, 1 C), 69.51 (s, 1 C), 65.62 (s, 1 C), 56.31 (s, 1 C), 45.88 (s, 2 C), 41.61 (s, 1 C), 29.11 (s, 1 C), 25.57 (s, 2 C), 24.43 (s, 1 C). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C20H24F3N6O 421.1958; found, 421.1963. HPLC: tR = 8.55 min (98.9% purity).

5-((S)-4-((S)-3-Methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)pyridin-2-amine (6a)

6a was prepared according to general procedure 4 from (S)-2-chloro-4-((S)-3-methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine 21a (84 mg, 0.27 mmol, 1 equiv) and (E)-N,N-dimethyl-N′-(5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)pyridin-2-yl)formimidamide 38 (275 mg, 0.27 mmol, 1 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 0:1) gave compound 6a as a colorless solid (76 mg, 0.21 mmol, 76%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.82 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 8.17 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 6.45 (dd, J = 8.7, 0.8 Hz, 1 H), 6.28 (br s, 2 H), 4.36–4.30 (m, 1 H), 4.09–4.02 (m, 2 H), 3.93–3.84 (m, 2 H), 3.79–3.63 (m, 4 H), 3.48 (td, J = 11.7, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.35–3.29 (m, 1 H), 3.26–3.10 (m, 4 H), 2.65 (dd, J = 15.3, 4.7 Hz, 1 H), 1.18 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 167.63 (s, 1 C), 161.19 (s, 1 C), 160.88 (s, 1 C), 157.80 (s, 1 C), 148.91 (s, 1 C), 136.70 (s, 1 C), 122.69 (s, 1 C), 107.33 (s, 1 C), 93.14 (s, 1 C), 70.86 (s, 1 C), 70.10 (s, 1 C), 66.98 (s, 1 C), 66.17 (s, 1 C), 56.77 (s, 1 C), 47.58 (s, 1 C), 42.02 (s, 1 C), 40.11 (s, 1 C), 29.18 (s, 1 C), 14.23 (s, 1 C). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C19H25N6O2 369.2034; found, 369.2033. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 5.39 min (99.2% purity).

5-((R)-4-((S)-3-Methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)pyridin-2-amine (6b)

6b was prepared as described for its (S,R)-enantiomer 7a starting from (R)-2-chloro-4-((S)-3-methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine 21b (120 mg, 0.39 mmol, 1 equiv) and boronic acid pinacol ester 38 in a 64% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (S,R)-enantiomer. HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C19H25N6O2 369.2034; found, 369.2033. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 5.37 min (98.9% purity).

5-((S)-4-((R)-3-Methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)pyridin-2-amine (7a)

7a was prepared according to general procedure 4 from (S)-2-chloro-4-((R)-3-methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine 22a (84 mg, 0.27 mmol, 1 equiv) and (E)-N,N-dimethyl-N′-(5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)pyridin-2-yl)formimidamide 38 (75 mg, 0.27 mmol, 1 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 0:1) gave compound 7a as a colorless solid (72 mg, 0.20 mmol, 74%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.82 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 8.17 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 6.45 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1 H), 6.27 (br s, 2 H), 4.35–4.30 (m, 1 H), 4.13–4.02 (m, 2 H), 3.92–3.81 (m, 2 H), 3.79–3.72 (m, 2 H), 3.69–3.61 (m, 2 H), 3.48 (td, J = 11.8, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.36–3.29 (m, 1 H), 3.25–3.09 (m, 4 H), 2.57 (dd, J = 15.3, 4.7 Hz, 1 H), 1.21 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 167.25 (s, 1 C), 160.73 (s, 1 C), 160.40 (s, 1 C), 157.20 (s, 1 C), 148.43 (s, 1 C), 136.23 (s, 1 C), 122.22 (s, 1 C), 106.87 (s, 1 C), 92.50 (s, 1 C), 70.41 (s, 1 C), 69.53 (s, 1 C), 66.53 (s, 1 C), 65.68 (s, 1 C), 56.38 (s, 1 C), 47.12 (s, 1 C), 41.64 (s, 1 C), 28.84 (s, 1 C), 13.88 (s, 1 C). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C19H25N6O2 369.2034; found, 369.2034. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 5.42 min (99.3% purity).

5-((R)-4-((R)-3-Methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)pyridin-2-amine (7b)

7b was prepared as described for its (S,S)-enantiomer 6a starting from (R)-2-chloro-4-((R)-3-methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine 22b (150 mg, 0.48 mmol, 1 equiv) and boronic acid pinacol ester 38 in a 49% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (S,S)-enantiomer. HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C19H25N6O2 369.2034; found, 369.2035. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 5.35 min (99.6% purity).

5-[(9S)-6-{8-Oxa-3-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-3-yl}-11-oxa-1,3,5-triazatricyclo[7.4.0.02,7]trideca-2(7),3,5-trien-4-yl]pyridin-2-amine (8a)

8a was prepared according to general procedure 4 from (9S)-4-chloro-6-{8-oxa-3-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-3-yl}-11-oxa-1,3,5-triazatricyclo[7.4.0.02,7]trideca-2(7),3,5-triene 23a (150 mg, 0.46 mmol, 1 equiv) and (E)-N,N-dimethyl-N′-(5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)pyridin-2-yl)formimidamide 38 (128 mg, 0.46 mmol, 1 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 0:1) gave compound 8a as a colorless solid (118 mg, 0.31 mmol, 67%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.81 (dd, J = 2.3, 0.8 Hz, 1 H), 8.15 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 6.44 (dd, J = 8.7, 0.8 Hz, 1 H), 6.26 (br s, 2 H), 4.38–4.34 (m, 2 H), 4.09–3.95 (m, 3 H), 3.87–3.80 (m, 1 H), 3.77–3.69 (m, 2 H), 3.34–3.27 (m, 1 H), 3.22–3.05 (m, 5 H), 2.63 (dd, J = 15.3, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 1.84–1.74 (m, 4 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 167.09 (s, 1 C), 160.72 (s, 1 C), 160.25 (s, 1 C), 158.61 (s, 1 C), 148.43 (s, 1 C), 136.26 (s, 1 C), 122.22 (s, 1 C), 106.86 (s, 1 C), 92.56 (s, 1 C), 73.16 (s, 1 C), 73.15 (s, 1 C), 69.60 (s, 1 C), 65.70 (s, 1 C), 56.38 (s, 1 C), 50.70 (s, 1 C), 50.48 (s, 1 C), 41.59 (s, 1 C), 28.84 (s, 1 C), 27.56 (s, 1 C), 27.52 (s, 1 C). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C20H25N6O2 381.2034; found, 381.2033. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 5.34 min (98.2% purity).

5-[(9R)-6-{8-Oxa-3-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-3-yl}-11-oxa-1,3,5-triazatricyclo[7.4.0.02,7]trideca-2(7),3,5-trien-4-yl]pyridin-2-amine (8b)

8b was prepared as described for its (S)-enantiomer 8a starting from (9R)-4-chloro-6-{8-oxa-3-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-3-yl}-11-oxa-1,3,5-triazatricyclo[7.4.0.02,7]trideca-2(7),3,5-triene 23b (200 mg, 0.62 mmol, 1 equiv) and boronic acid pinacol ester 38 in a 86% yield. The spectroscopic data agree with those reported for the (S)-enantiomer. HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C20H25N6O2 381.2034; found, 381.2036. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 5.17 min (96.4% purity).

5-[(9S)-6-{3-Oxa-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-8-yl}-11-oxa-1,3,5-triazatricyclo[7.4.0.02,7]trideca-2(7),3,5-trien-4-yl]pyridin-2-amine (9a)

9a was prepared according to general procedure 4 from (9S)-4-chloro-6-{3-oxa-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-8-yl}-11-oxa-1,3,5-triazatricyclo[7.4.0.02,7]trideca-2(7),3,5-triene 24a (150 mg, 0.46 mmol, 1 equiv) and (E)-N,N-dimethyl-N′-(5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)pyridin-2-yl)formimidamide 38 (128 mg, 0.46 mmol, 1 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 0:1) gave compound 9a as a colorless solid (122 mg, 0.32 mmol, 69%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.04 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 8.35 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 6.50 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.61–4.51 (m, 4 H), 4.20 (dd, J = 13.4, 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.01–3.93 (m, 1 H), 3.88–3.77 (m, 4 H), 3.58 (d, J = 10.7 Hz, 2 H), 3.50 (td, J = 11.7, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.36–3.23 (m, 2 H), 3.09 (dd, J = 14.9, 9.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.48 (dd, J = 14.9, 4.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.12–1.97 (m, 4 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 166.92 (s, 1 C), 160.96 (s, 1 C), 160.72 (s, 1 C), 155.76 (s, 1 C), 148.43 (s, 1 C), 136.26 (s, 1 C), 122.23 (s, 1 C), 106.86 (s, 1 C), 93.44 (s, 1 C), 70.42 (s, 1 C), 70.38 (s, 1 C), 69.71 (s, 1 C), 65.74 (s, 1 C), 56.46 (s, 1 C), 55.11 (s, 1 C), 55.04 (s, 1 C), 41.51 (s, 1 C), 28.03 (s, 1 C), 26.52 (s, 1 C), 26.45 (s, 1 C). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C20H25N6O2 381.2034; found, 381.2036. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 5.39 min (97.2% purity).

5-[(9R)-6-{3-Oxa-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-8-yl}-11-oxa-1,3,5-triazatricyclo[7.4.0.02,7]trideca-2(7),3,5-trien-4-yl]pyridin-2-amine (9b)

9b was prepared as described for its (S)-enantiomer 9a starting from (9S)-4-chloro-6-{3-oxa-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-8-yl}-11-oxa-1,3,5-triazatricyclo[7.4.0.02,7]trideca-2(7),3,5-triene 24b (200 mg, 0.62 mmol, 1 equiv) and boronic acid pinacol ester 38 in a 88% yield. The spectroscopic data agree with those reported for the (S)-enantiomer. HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C20H25N6O2 381.2034; found, 381.2040. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 5.35 min (96.7% purity).

(S)-5-(4-(3,3-Dimethylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)pyridin-2-amine (10a)

10a was prepared according to general procedure 4 from (S)-2-chloro-4-(3,3-dimethylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine 25a (150 mg, 0.46 mmol, 1 equiv) and (E)-N,N-dimethyl-N′-(5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)pyridin-2-yl)formimidamide 38 (127 mg, 0.46 mmol, 1 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 3:7) gave compound 10a as a colorless solid (124 mg, 0.32 mmol, 70%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.83 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 8.16 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 6.47 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1 H), 6.29 (br s, 2 H), 4.01 (dd, J = 13.4, 2.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.90–3.83 (m, 1 H), 3.79–3.65 (m, 4 H), 3.36–3.29 (m, 3 H), 3.20–3.04 (m, 4 H), 2.97 (dd, J = 16.0, 9.1 Hz, 1 H), 2.40 (dd, J = 15.9, 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.47 (s, 3 H), 1.43 (s, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 167.29 (s, 1 C), 160.72 (s, 1 C), 160.67 (s, 1 C), 159.98 (s, 1 C), 148.38 (s, 1 C), 136.03 (s, 1 C), 122.33 (s, 1 C), 107.05 (s, 1 C), 101.51 (s, 1 C), 77.82 (s, 1 C), 69.73 (s, 1 C), 67.12 (s, 1 C), 65.57 (s, 1 C), 56.91 (s, 1 C), 53.80 (s, 1 C), 43.68 (s, 1 C), 41.57 (s, 1 C), 27.77 (s, 1 C), 21.74 (s, 1 C), 20.72 (s, 1 C). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C20H27N6O2 383.2190; found, 383.2192. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 5.58 min (98.1% purity).

(R)-5-(4-(3,3-Dimethylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)pyridin-2-amine (10b)

10b was prepared as described for its (S)-enantiomer 10a starting from (S)-2-chloro-4-(3,3-dimethylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine 25b (150 mg, 0.46 mmol, 1 equiv) and boronic acid pinacol ester 38 in a 88% yield. The spectroscopic data agree with those reported for the (S)-enantiomer. HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C20H27N6O2 383.2190; found, 383.2193. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 5.61 min (99.5% purity).

5-((R)-4-((R)-3-Methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine (11b)

Chloropyrimidine derivative 22b (100 mg, 0.32 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2-aminopyridine-5-boronic acid pinacol ester (71.2 mg, 0.32 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were charged in a flask. Under nitrogen atmosphere, 1,4-dioxane (2 mL) was added, followed by K3PO4 (137 mg, 0.65 mmol, 2 equiv) aqueous solution (1 mL) and chloro(2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropyl-1,1′-biphenyl)[2-(2′-amino-1,1′-biphenyl)]palladium(II) (XPhos Pd G2, 12.7 mg, 0.016 mmol, 0.05 equiv). The resulting mixture was stirred at 95 °C overnight. After completion of the reaction monitored by TLC, a 15% NH4Cl solution (15 mL) was added and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3×). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 0:1) gave compound 11b as a colorless solid (100 mg, 0.27 mmol, 84%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.98 (s, 2 H), 7.00 (br s, 2 H), 4.35–4.29 (m, 1 H), 4.07–4.02 (m, 2 H), 3.92–3.85 (m, 2 H), 3.79–3.61 (m, 4 H), 3.46 (td, J = 11.7, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.35–3.29 (m, 1 H), 3.26–3.09 (m, 4 H), 2.66 (dd, J = 15.4, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 1.17 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 167.01 (s, 1 C), 164.01 (s, 1 C), 158.80 (s, 1 C), 157.70 (s, 2 C), 157.24 (s, 1 C), 120.30 (s, 1 C), 93.09 (s, 1 C), 70.37 (s, 1 C), 69.66 (s, 1 C), 66.50 (s, 1 C), 65.73 (s, 1 C), 56.28 (s, 1 C), 47.12 (s, 1 C), 41.54 (s, 1 C), 39.63 (s, 1 C), 28.71 (s, 1 C), 13.82 (s, 1 C). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C18H24N7O2 370.1986; found, 370.1991. HPLC: tR = 6.09 min (98.7% purity).

5-((R)-4-((R)-3-Methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)pyrazin-2-amine (12b)

Chloropyrimidine derivative 22b (200 mg, 0.65 mmol, 1.0 equiv), 39 (428 mg, 1.94 mmol, 3.0 equiv), and Cs2CO3 (421 mg, 1.29 mmol, 2.0 equiv) were charged in a flask. Under nitrogen atmosphere, THF (2 mL) was added, followed by [1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene]dichloropalladium(II) (Pd(dppf)Cl2, 47.2 mg, 0.065 mmol, 0.1 equiv). The resulting mixture was stirred at reflux for 6 h. After completion of the reaction monitored by TLC, a 15% NH4Cl solution (15 mL) was added and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3×). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 0:1) gave compound 12b as a colorless solid (163 mg, 0.44 mmol, 68%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.78 (s, 1 H), 7.91 (s, 1 H), 6.73 (br s, 2 H), 4.36–4.30 (m, 1 H), 4.09–4.00 (m, 2 H), 3.92–3.85 (m, 2 H), 3.78–3.61 (m, 4 H), 3.46 (td, J = 11.7, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.29–3.09 (m, 5 H), 2.67 (dd, J = 15.4, 4.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.17 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 167.44 (s, 1 C), 160.37 (s, 1 C), 157.39 (s, 1 C), 155.84 (s, 1 C), 142.83 (s, 1 C), 138.67 (s, 1 C), 130.87 (s, 1 C), 93.51 (s, 1 C), 70.37 (s, 1 C), 69.64 (s, 1 C), 66.52 (s, 1 C), 65.73 (s, 1 C), 56.27 (s, 1 C), 47.11 (s, 1 C), 41.60 (s, 1 C), 39.65 (s, 1 C), 28.71 (s, 1 C), 13.84 (s, 1 C). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C18H24N7O2 370.1986; found, 370.1986. HPLC: tR = 5.53 min (98.1% purity).

4-Methyl-5-((R)-4-((R)-3-methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)pyridin-2-amine (13b)

Step 1. (E)-N′-(5-Bromo-4-methylpyridin-2-yl)-N,N-dimethylformimidamide 40 (281 mg, 1.16 mmol, 3.0 equiv), 2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropylbiphenyl (XPhos, 55.4 mg, 0.12 mmol, 0.3 equiv), KOAc (342 mg, 3.48 mmol, 9.0 equiv), and bis(pinacolato)diboron (312 mg, 3.48 mmol, 9.0 equiv) were charged into a flask. Under nitrogen atmosphere, EtOH (11.6 mL) was added and the reaction mixture was heated at 80 °C. Chloro(2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropyl-1,1′-biphenyl)[2-(2′-amino-1,1′-biphenyl)]palladium(II) (XPhos Pd G2, 45.7 mg, 0.058 mmol, 0.15 equiv) was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 2 h.
Step 2. Then the mixture was allowed to cool down to room temperature. The chloropyrimidine derivative 22b (120 mg, 0.39 mmol, 1.0 equiv), 1,4-dioxane (2 mL), and a 1.8 M aqueous K2CO3 solution (650 μL, 1,16 mmol, 3.0 equiv) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 95 °C for 3 h.
Step 3. After completion of the reaction, the mixture was allowed to cool down to room temperature, a 3 M HCl solution (1.3 mL, 3.87 mmol, 10.0 equiv) was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred at 80 °C overnight. A 2 M aqueous NaOH solution (15 mL) was added until pH 9–10 was obtained. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3×). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 0:1) gave compound 13b as a colorless solid (46 mg, 0.12 mmol, 31%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.64 (s, 1 H), 6.35 (s, 1 H), 4.57 (br s, 2 H), 4.34–4.27 (m, 1 H), 4.13 (dd, J = 13.4, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.04–3.93 (m, 3 H), 3.85–3.71 (m, 4 H), 3.59 (td, J = 11.8, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.47 (td, J = 11.7, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.39–3.30 (m, 2 H), 3.28–3.17 (m, 2 H), 2.62 (dd, J = 14.9, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.54 (s, 3 H), 1.28 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 167.57 (s, 1 C), 163.28 (s, 1 C), 158.42 (s, 1 C), 158.08 (s, 1 C), 150.47 (s, 1 C), 148.84 (s, 1 C), 126.18 (s, 1 C), 109.96 (s, 1 C), 92.79 (s, 1 C), 71.23 (s, 1 C), 70.57 (s, 1 C), 67.42 (s, 1 C), 66.68 (s, 1 C), 56.89 (s, 1 C), 48.07 (s, 1 C), 42.08 (s, 1 C), 40.43 (s, 1 C), 29.78 (s, 1 C), 22.04 (s, 1 C), 14.26 (s, 1 C). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C18H23N6O2 383.2190; found, 383.2191. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 5.18 min (96.7% purity).

3-Methyl-5-((R)-4-((R)-3-methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)pyridin-2-amine (14b)

14b was prepared according to general procedure 4 from (R)-2-chloro-4-((R)-3-methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine 22b (120 mg, 0.39 mmol, 1 equiv) and (E)-N,N-dimethyl-N′-(3-methyl-5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)pyridin-2-yl)formimidamide 41 (112 mg, 0.39 mmol, 1 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 0:1) gave compound 14b as a colorless solid (98 mg, 0.26 mmol, 66%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.70 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1 H), 8.01 (s, 1 H), 6.05 (br s, 2 H), 4.34–4.28 (m, 1 H), 4.09–4.02 (m, 2 H), 3.92–3.83 (m, 2 H), 3.78–3.62 (m, 4 H), 3.47 (td, J = 11.8, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.30–3.28 (m, 1 H), 3.26–3.09 (m, 4 H), 2.64 (dd, J = 15.3, 4.7 Hz, 1 H), 2.08 (s, 3 H), 1.17 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 167.15 (s, 1 C), 160.53 (s, 1 C), 159.35 (s, 1 C), 157.36 (s, 1 C), 145.97 (s, 1 C), 135.92 (s, 1 C), 122.83 (s, 1 C), 114.54 (s, 1 C), 92.65 (s, 1 C), 70.41 (s, 1 C), 69.67 (s, 1 C), 66.54 (s, 1 C), 65.74 (s, 1 C), 56.29 (s, 1 C), 47.14 (s, 1 C), 41.57 (s, 1 C), 39.63 (s, 1 C), 28.74 (s, 1 C), 17.20 (s, 1 C), 13.77 (s, 1 C). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C18H23N6O2 383.2190; found, 383.2191. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 5.67 min (99.2% purity).

4-Methoxy-5-((R)-4-((R)-3-methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)pyridin-2-amine (15b)

Step 1. (tert-Butyl (5-bromo-4-methoxypyridin-2-yl)carbamate 42 (200 mg, 0.66 mmol, 1.0 equiv), 2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropylbiphenyl (XPhos, 31.5 mg, 0.066 mmol, 0.1 equiv), KOAc (194 mg, 1.98 mmol, 3.0 equiv), and bis(pinacolato)diboron (178 mg, 1.98 mmol, 3.0 equiv) were charged into a flask. Under nitrogen atmosphere, EtOH (6.6 mL) was added and the reaction mixture was heated at 60 °C. Chloro(2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropyl-1,1′-biphenyl)[2-(2′-amino-1,1′-biphenyl)]palladium(II) (XPhos Pd G2, 26 mg, 0.033 mmol, 0.05 equiv) was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 3 h.
Step 2. Then the mixture was allowed to cool down to room temperature. The chloropyrimidine derivative 22b (102 mg, 0.33 mmol, 0.5 equiv) and K3PO4 (210 mg, 0.99 mmol, 1.5 equiv) in water (1.7 mL) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 3.5 h.
Step 3. After completion of the reaction monitored by TLC, a 15% NH4Cl solution (10 mL) was added and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3×). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude was dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (1.6 mL), a 3 M HCl solution (0.7 mL, 1.98 mmol, 3.0 equiv) was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 3 h. A 2 M aqueous NaOH solution was added until pH 9–10 was obtained. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3×). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 0:1) gave compound 15b as a colorless solid (58 mg, 0.15 mmol, 44%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.18 (s, 1 H), 6.04 (br s, 2 H), 6.02 (s, 1 H), 4.32–4.26 (m, 1 H), 4.00–3.90 (m, 2 H), 3.89–3.81 (m, 1 H), 3.75–3.69 (m, 2 H), 3.71 (s, 3 H), 3.67–3.58 (m, 2 H), 3.44 (td, J = 11.7, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.30–3.25 (m, 2 H), 3.21–3.05 (m, 4 H), 2.64 (dd, J = 15.3, 4.7 Hz, 1 H), 1.16 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 167.05 (s, 1 C), 164.76 (s, 1 C), 161.73 (s, 1 C), 160.96 (s,1 C), 157.24 (s, 1 C), 150.54 (s, 1 C), 115.28 (s, 1 C), 92.45 (s, 1 C), 89.20 (s, 1 C), 70.45 (s, 1 C), 69.60 (s, 1 C), 66.51 (s, 1 C), 65.66 (s, 1 C), 56.24 (s, 1 C), 54.84 (s, 1 C), 47.03 (s, 1 C), 41.59 (s, 1 C), 39.70 (s, 1 C), 28.69 (s, 1 C), 13.76 (s, 1 C). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C20H27N6O3 399.2139; found, 399.2145. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 4.28 min (95.3% purity).

4-(Dimethoxymethyl)-5-((R)-4-((R)-3-methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)pyridin-2-amine (16b)

16b was prepared according to general procedure 6 from 18b (169 mg, 0.26 mmol, 1 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 0:1) gave compound 16b as a colorless solid (88 mg, 0.20 mmol, 76%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.41 (s, 1 H), 6.66 (s, 1 H), 6.45 (s, 1 H), 6.24 (br s, 2 H), 4.33–4.26 (m, 1 H), 3.99–3.94 (m, 2 H), 3.92–3.84 (m, 2 H), 3.79–3.72 (m, 2 H), 3.69–3.61 (m, 2 H), 3.46 (td, J = 11.7, 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.35–3.26 (m, 2 H), 3.24–3.10 (m, 3 H), 3.22 (s, 3 H), 3.16 (s, 3 H), 2.68 (dd, J = 15.3, 4.9 Hz, 1 H), 1.19 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 166.97 (s, 1 C), 162.33 (s, 1 C), 159.98 (s, 1 C), 157.32 (s, 1 C), 150.47 (s, 1 C), 145.81 (s, 1 C), 122.14 (s, 1 C), 104.47 (s, 1 C), 99.62 (s, 1 C), 92.62 (s, 1 C), 70.39 (s, 1 C), 69.65 (s, 1 C), 66.49 (s, 1 C), 65.68 (s, 1 C), 56.33 (s, 1 C), 53.71 (s, 1 C), 53.26 (s, 1 C), 47.11 (s, 1 C), 41.68 (s, 1 C), 39.79 (s, 1 C), 28.74 (s, 1 C), 13.88 (s, 1 C). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C22H31N6O4 443.2401; found, 443.2405. HPLC (ACN with 0.1% TFA): tR = 5.19 min (99.5% purity).

4-(Dimethoxymethyl)-5-((R)-4-((R)-3-methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazin-2-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine (17b)

17b was prepared according to general procedure 6 from 19b (234 mg, 0.36 mmol, 1 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 0:1) gave compound 17b as a colorless solid (122 mg, 0.28 mmol, 76%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.72 (s, 1 H), 6.97 (br s, 2 H), 6.36 (s, 1 H), 4.33–4.27 (m, 1 H), 4.01–3.85 (m, 4 H), 3.79–3.72 (m, 2 H), 3.68–3.60 (m, 2 H), 3.46 (td, J = 11.7, 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.36–3.29 (m, 1 H), 3.27 (s, 3 H), 3.25 (s, 3 H), 3.26–3.10 (m, 4 H), 2.68 (dd, J = 15.4, 4.9 Hz, 1 H), 1.18 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 166.95 (s, 1 C), 162.97 (s, 1 C), 162.76 (s, 1 C), 160.70 (s, 1 C), 160.57 (s, 1 C), 157.25 (s, 1 C), 120.35 (s, 1 C), 99.37 (s, 1 C), 92.84 (s, 1 C), 70.35 (s, 1 C), 69.66 (s, 1 C), 66.48 (s, 1 C), 65.69 (s, 1 C), 56.33 (s, 1 C), 53.94 (s, 1 C), 53.71 (s, 1 C), 47.13 (s, 1 C), 41.65 (s, 1 C), 39.68 (s, 1 C), 28.70 (s, 1 C), 13.96 (s, 1 C). HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C21H30N7O4 444.2354; found, 444.2358. HPLC: tR = 5.88 min (98.3% purity).

tert-Butyl N-[(tert-Butoxy)carbonyl]-N-[4-(dimethoxymethyl)-5-[(9R)-6-[(3R)-3-methylmorpholin-4-yl]-11-oxa-1,3,5-triazatricyclo[7.4.0.02,7]trideca-2(7),3,5-trien-4-yl]pyridin-2-yl]carbamate (18b)

18b was prepared according to general procedure 5 from 44 (289 mg, 0.65 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 22b (200 mg, 0.65 mmol, 1 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 1:1) gave compound 18b as a colorless solid (174 mg, 0.27 mmol, 42%). The product is a mixture of mono- and di-Boc protected derivative and was used for the next step without further purification. MALDI-MS: m/z = 643.813 ([M + H]+); 543.329 ([M – Boc + H]+).

tert-Butyl N-[(tert-Butoxy)carbonyl]-N-[4-(dimethoxymethyl)-5-[(9R)-6-[(3R)-3-methylmorpholin-4-yl]-11-oxa-1,3,5-triazatricyclo[7.4.0.02,7]trideca-2(7),3,5-trien-4-yl]pyrimidin-2-yl]carbamate (19b)

19b was prepared according to general procedure 5 from 49 (289 mg, 0.65 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 22b (200 mg, 0.65 mmol, 1 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 1:1) gave compound 19b as a yellowish solid (240 mg, 0.37 mmol, 57%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 9.20 (s, 1 H), 6.36 (s, 1 H), 4.36–4.30 (m, 1 H), 4.05–3.08 (m, 4 H), 3.81–3.76 (m, 2 H), 3.70–3.62 (m, 2 H), 3.47 (td, J = 11.7, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.33 (s, 3 H), 3.28 (s, 3 H), 3.39–3.14 (m, 5 H), 2.76 (dd, J = 15.6, 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.42 (s, 18 H), 1.21 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H). MALDI-MS: m/z = 644.445 ([M + H]+).

(S)-2-Chloro-4-morpholino-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine (20a)

20a was prepared according to general procedure 3 from 4-(2,6-dichloropyrimidin-4-yl)morpholine 26 (653 mg, 2.79 mmol, 1 equiv) and (R)-tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-dioxide 33b (500 mg, 2.79 mmol, 1 equiv). Purification by column chromatography (cyclohexane/EtOAc 2:1 → 1:1) gave compound 20a as a colorless solid (550 mg, 1.85 mmol, 66%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.01 (dd, J = 13.5, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.95–3.87 (m, 1 H), 3.79–3.72 (m, 2 H), 3.68–3.65 (m, 4 H), 3.59–3.49 (m, 4 H), 3.38 (td, J = 11.7, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.23 (t, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 3.18–3.09 (m, 2 H), 2.50 (dd, J = 15.0, 5.1 Hz, 1 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 167.84 (s, 1 C), 158.32 (s, 1 C), 158.24 (s, 1 C), 93.08 (s, 1 C), 70.49 (s, 1 C), 66.73 (s, 2 C), 66.58 (s, 1 C), 57.32 (s, 1 C), 45.81 (s, 2 C), 42.15 (s, 1 C), 29.06 (s, 1 C). MALDI-MS: m/z = 297.301 ([M + H]+). HPLC: tR = 6.36 min (97.7% purity). (S)-enantiomer: [αD] = +4.0 (CHCl3, c = 1.2).

(R)-2-Chloro-4-morpholino-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine (20b)

20b was prepared as described for its (S)-enantiomer 20a starting from (S)-tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-dioxide 33a (506 mg, 2.16 mmol, 1 equiv) in 73% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (S)-enantiomer. HPLC: tR = 6.35 min (98.0% purity). (R)-enantiomer: [αD] = −3.3 (CHCl3, c = 1.5).

(S)-4-Chloro-2-morpholino-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine (20c)

20c was prepared according to general procedure 3 from 4-(4,6-dichloropyrimidin-2-yl)morpholine 32 (298 mg, 1.27 mmol, 1 equiv) and (R)-tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-dioxide 33b (228 mg, 1.27 mmol, 1 equiv). Purification by column chromatography (cyclohexane/EtOAc 2:1 → 1:1) gave compound 20c as a colorless solid (286 mg, 0.96 mmol, 76%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.02–3.94 (m, 2 H), 3.89–3.87 (m, 1 H), 3.86–3.84 (m, 1 H), 3.75–3.70 (m, 8 H), 3.44 (td, J = 11.7, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.26 (t, J = 11.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.25–3.19 (m, 1 H), 2.99 (dd, J = 16.1, 9.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.42 (dd, J = 16.1, 5.0 Hz, 1 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 166.64 (s, 1 C), 161.92 (s, 1 C), 151.94 (s, 1 C), 104.19 (s, 1 C), 71.07 (s, 1 C), 66.83 (s, 2 C), 66.40 (s, 1 C), 57.11 (s, 1 C), 44.54 (s, 2 C), 41.79 (s, 1 C), 26.35 (s, 1 C). MALDI-MS: m/z = 297.030 ([M + H]+). (S)-enantiomer: [αD] = −61.0 (CHCl3, c = 1.1).

(R)-4-Chloro-2-morpholino-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine (20d)

20d was prepared as described for its (S)-enantiomer 20c starting from (R)-tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-dioxide 33a (281 mg, 1.57 mmol, 1 equiv) in 24% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (S)-enantiomer. (R)-enantiomer: [αD] = +56.2 (CHCl3, c = 1.4).

(S)-2-Chloro-4-((S)-3-methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine (21a)

21a was prepared according to general procedure 3 from (S)-4-(2,6-dichloropyrimidin-4-yl)-3-methylmorpholine 27 (3.68 g, 14.92 mmol, 1 equiv) and (R)-tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-dioxide 33b (2.67 g, 14.92 mmol, 1 equiv). Purification by column chromatography (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 3:2) gave compound 21a as a yellowish solid (853 mg, 2.75 mmol, 18%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 4.23–4.18 (m, 1 H), 3.97–3.73 (m, 6 H), 3.66–3.57 (m, 2 H), 3.42 (td, J = 11.8, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.34–3.29 (m, 1 H), 3.24–3.08 (m, 4 H), 2.68 (dd, J = 15.4, 5.1 Hz, 1 H), 1.17 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 167.87 (s, 1 C), 157.71 (s, 1 C), 157.48 (s, 1 C), 93.25 (s, 1 C), 70.13 (s, 1 C), 69.64 (s, 1 C), 66.27 (s, 1 C), 65.69 (s, 1 C), 56.71 (s, 1 C), 47.18 (s, 1 C), 41.55 (s, 1 C), 39.67 (s, 1 C), 28.07 (s, 1 C), 14.10 (s, 1 C). MALDI-MS: m/z = 311.109 ([M + H]+). HPLC: tR = 7.03 min (96.5% purity).

(R)-2-Chloro-4-((S)-3-methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine (21b)

21b was prepared as described for its (S,R)-enantiomer 22a starting from (S)-tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-dioxide 33a (1.0 g, 5.58 mmol, 1 equiv) in 24% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (S,R)-enantiomer.

(S)-2-Chloro-4-((R)-3-methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine (22a)

22a was prepared according to general procedure 3 from (R)-4-(2,6-dichloropyrimidin-4-yl)-3-methylmorpholine 28 (1.15 g, 4.65 mmol, 1 equiv) and (R)-tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-dioxide 33b (833 mg, 4.65 mmol, 1 equiv). Purification by column chromatography (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 4:1) gave compound 22a as a yellowish solid (1.05 g, 3.39 mmol, 73%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 4.20–4.14 (m, 1 H), 3.93–3.72 (m, 6 H), 3.63 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.56 (dd, J = 11.5, 3.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.41 (td, J = 11.8, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.34–3.27 (m, 1 H), 3.25–3.06 (m, 4 H), 2.57 (dd, J = 15.4, 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.18 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 167.96 (s, 1 C), 157.72 (s, 1 C), 157.40 (s, 1 C), 93.14 (s, 1 C), 70.15 (s, 1 C), 69.55 (s, 1 C), 66.29 (s, 1 C), 65.66 (s, 1 C), 56.76 (s, 1 C), 47.23 (s, 1 C), 41.62 (s, 1 C), 39.56 (s, 1 C), 28.18 (s, 1 C), 14.21 (s, 1 C). MALDI-MS: m/z = 311.085 ([M + H]+). HPLC: tR = 7.15 min (98.9% purity).

(R)-2-Chloro-4-((R)-3-methylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine (22b)

22b was prepared as described for its (S,S)-enantiomer 21a starting from (S)-tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-dioxide 33a (1.0 g, 5.58 mmol, 1 equiv) in 55% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (S,S)-enantiomer. HPLC: tR = 7.24 min (99.6% purity).

(9S)-4-Chloro-6-{8-oxa-3-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-3-yl}-11-oxa-1,3,5-triazatricyclo[7.4.0.02,7]trideca-2(7),3,5-triene (23a)

23a was prepared according to general procedure 3 from 3-(2,6-dichloropyrimidin-4-yl)-8-oxa-3-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane 29 (1.21 g, 4.65 mmol, 1 equiv) and (R)-tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-dioxide 33b (1 g, 5.58 mmol, 1.2 equiv). Purification by column chromatography (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 3:2) gave compound 23a as a yellowish solid (1.06 g, 3.28 mmol, 71%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 4.36–4.31 (m, 2 H), 3.92–3.71 (m, 6 H), 3.32–3.27 (m, 1 H), 3.24–3.19 (m, 2 H), 3.16–3.03 (m, 3 H), 2.65 (dd, J = 15.4, 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.83–1.69 (m, 4 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 167.75 (s, 1 C), 158.86 (s, 1 C), 157.52 (s, 1 C), 93.27 (s, 1 C), 72.89 (s, 1 C), 72.88 (s, 1 C), 69.59 (s, 1 C), 65.67 (s, 1 C), 56.75 (s, 1 C), 50.61 (s, 1 C), 50.42 (s, 1 C), 41.55 (s, 1 C), 28.20 (s, 1 C), 27.37 (s, 1 C), 27.34 (s, 1 C). MALDI-MS: m/z = 323.162 ([M + H]+). HPLC: tR = 6.98 min (99.8% purity).

(9R)-4-Chloro-6-{8-oxa-3-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-3-yl}-11-oxa-1,3,5-triazatricyclo[7.4.0.02,7]trideca-2(7),3,5-triene (23b)

23b was prepared as described for its (S)-enantiomer 23a starting from (S)-tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-dioxide 33a (2.0 g, 11.17 mmol, 1 equiv) in 40% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (S)-enantiomer.

(9S)-4-Chloro-6-{3-oxa-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-8-yl}-11-oxa-1,3,5-triazatricyclo[7.4.0.02,7]trideca-2(7),3,5-triene (24a)

24a was prepared according to general procedure 3 from 8-(2,6-dichloropyrimidin-4-yl)-3-oxa-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane 30 (1.21 g, 4.65 mmol, 1 equiv) and (R)-tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-dioxide 33b (1 g, 5.58 mmol, 1.2 equiv). Purification by column chromatography (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 3:2) gave compound 24a as a colorless solid (893 mg, 2.77 mmol, 59%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 4.38–4.33 (m, 2 H), 3.94–3.89 (m, 1 H), 3.80–3.71 (m, 3 H), 3.59 (dd, J = 10.8, 5.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.50 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.36–3.29 (m, 1 H), 3.23 (t, J = 11.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.14–3.03 (m, 2 H), 2.54–2.48 (m, 1 H), 1.93–1.85 (m, 4 H). MALDI-MS: m/z = 323.111 ([M + H]+). HPLC: tR = 7.04 min (95.5% purity). 13C NMR spectroscopic data are not available due to insufficient solubility in standard deuterated solvents.

(9S)-4-Chloro-6-{3-oxa-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-8-yl}-11-oxa-1,3,5-triazatricyclo[7.4.0.02,7]trideca-2(7),3,5-triene (24b)

24b was prepared as described for its (S)-enantiomer 24a starting from (S)-tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-dioxide 33a (2.0 g, 11.17 mmol, 1 equiv) in 26% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (S)-enantiomer.

(S)-2-Chloro-4-(3,3-dimethylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine (25a)

25a was prepared according to general procedure 3 from 4-(2,6-dichloropyrimidin-4-yl)-3,3-dimethylmorpholine 31 (1.21 g, 4.65 mmol, 1 equiv) and (R)-tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-dioxide 33b (1 g, 5.58 mmol, 1.2 equiv). Purification by column chromatography (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 4:1) gave compound 25a as a colorless solid (922 mg, 2.84 mmol, 61%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 3.95–3.88 (m, 1 H), 3.81–3.73 (m, 3 H), 3.72–3.62 (m, 2 H), 3.35–3.27 (m, 4 H), 3.22–3.07 (m, 4 H), 2.99 (dd, J = 16.1, 9.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.42 (dd, J = 16.1, 5.3 Hz, 1 H), 1.36 (s, 3 H), 1.33 (s, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 168.01 (s, 1 C), 160.49 (s, 1 C), 156.25 (s, 1 C), 102.21 (s, 1 C), 77.30 (s, 1 C), 69.71 (s, 1 C), 66.75 (s, 1 C), 65.51 (s, 1 C), 57.21 (s, 1 C), 54.29 (s, 1 C), 43.33 (s, 1 C), 41.56 (s, 1 C), 27.39 (s, 1 C), 21.71 (s, 1 C), 20.86 (s, 1 C). MALDI-MS: m/z = 325.036 ([M + H]+). HPLC: tR = 8.19 min (99.1% purity).

(R)-2-Chloro-4-(3,3-dimethylmorpholino)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine (25b)

25b was prepared as described for its (S)-enantiomer 25a starting from (S)-tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-dioxide 33a (1.64 g, 9.16 mmol, 1.2 equiv) in 66% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (S)-enantiomer.

4-(2,6-Dichloropyrimidin-4-yl)morpholine (26)

26 was prepared according to the literature. (32)

(S)-4-(2,6-Dichloropyrimidin-4-yl)-3-methylmorpholine (27)

27 was prepared according to general procedure 2 from (S)-3-methylmorpholine (1.3 mL, 11.46 mmol, 1.05 equiv) and 2,4,6-trichloropyrimidine (1.25 mL, 10.92 mmol, 1.0 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 3:1) gave compound 27 as a colorless solid (1.96 g, 7.90 mmol, 72%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 6.95 (s, 1 H), 4.49 (qd, J = 6.8, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 4.13 (dd, J = 13.7, 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.90 (dd, J = 11.5, 3.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.69 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.56 (dd, J = 11.6, 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.44–3.37 (m, 1 H), 3.25–3.18 (m, 1 H), 1.21 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H). The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (R)-enantiomer.

(R)-4-(2,6-Dichloropyrimidin-4-yl)-3-methylmorpholine (28)

28 was prepared according to general procedure 2 from (R)-3-methylmorpholine (4 g, 39.54 mmol, 1.05 equiv) and 2,4,6-trichloropyrimidine (4.55 mL, 39.54 mmol, 1.0 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 3:2) gave compound 28 as a colorless solid (6.94 g, 28.10 mmol, 71%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.00 (s, 1 H), 4.46–4.32 (m, 1 H), 4.10–3.97 (m, 1 H), 3.91 (ddt, J = 11.5, 4.0, 1.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.70 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.57 (dd, J = 11.7, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.43 (td, J = 11.9, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.21 (td, J = 13.0, 3.8 Hz, 1 H), 1.21 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.06 (s, 1 C), 160.71 (s, 1 C), 160.06 (s, 1 C), 99.90 (s, 1 C), 70.70 (s, 1 C), 66.56 (s, 1 C), 47.94 (s, 1 C), 39.72 (s, 1 C), 14.09 (s, 1 C). The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (S)-enantiomer.

3-(2,6-Dichloropyrimidin-4-yl)-8-oxa-3-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane (29)

29 was prepared according to general procedure 2 from 8-oxa-3-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane·HCl (2.5 g, 16.70 mmol, 1.05 equiv) and 2,4,6-trichloropyrimidine (1.83 mL, 15.90 mmol, 1.0 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 4:1) gave compound 29 as a colorless solid (3.57 g, 13.73 mmol, 86%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 6.94 (s, 1 H), 4.47–4.36 (m, 2 H), 4.25–4.04 (m, 1 H), 3.82–3.60 (m, 1 H), 3.26–2.95 (m, 2 H), 1.90–1.74 (m, 2 H), 1.73–1.55 (m, 2 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 164.65 (s, 1 C), 160.53 (s, 1 C), 159.83 (s, 1 C), 99.79 (s, 1 C), 73.33 (s, 2 C), 50.30 (s, 2 C), 27.79 (s, 2 C).

8-(2,6-Dichloropyrimidin-4-yl)-3-oxa-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane (30)

30 was prepared according to general procedure 2 from 3-oxa-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane.HCl (2.5 g, 16.70 mmol, 1.05 equiv) and 2,4,6-trichloropyrimidine (1.83 mL, 15.90 mmol, 1.0 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 4:1) gave compound 30 as a colorless solid (3.33 g, 12.81 mmol, 80%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 6.98 (s, 1 H), 4.68–4.62 (m, 1 H), 4.52–4.45 (m, 1 H), 3.61–3.53 (m, 4 H), 2.02–1.87 (m, 4 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 160.52 (s, 1 C), 159.36 (s, 1 C), 159.22 (s, 1 C), 102.25 (s, 1 C), 71.21 (s, 2 C), 55.97 (s, 1 C), 55.71 (s, 1 C), 26.95 (s, 1 C), 26.17 (s, 1 C).

4-(2,6-Dichloropyrimidin-4-yl)-3,3-dimethylmorpholine (31)

31 was prepared according to general procedure 2 from 3,3-dimethylmorpholine (4.0 g, 34.73 mmol, 1.05 equiv) and 2,4,6-trichloropyrimidine (3.8 mL, 33.08 mmol, 1.0 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 9:1) gave compound 31 as a colorless solid (4.19 g, 15.99 mmol, 46%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.04 (s, 1 H), 3.81 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 2 H), 3.59 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 2 H), 3.46 (s, 2 H), 1.44 (s, 6 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 165.40 (s, 1 C), 159.38 (s, 1 C), 157.59 (s, 1 C), 104.26 (s, 1 C), 75.62 (s, 1 C), 65.76 (s, 1 C), 57.14 (s, 1 C), 42.65 (s, 1 C), 22.57 (s, 2 C).

4-(4,6-Dichloropyrimidin-2-yl)morpholine (32)

32 was prepared according to the literature. (32)

(S)-Tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-Dioxide (33a)

33a was prepared as described for its (R)-enantiomer 33b starting from (R)-morpholin-3-ylmethanol 34b (0.685 g, 5.85 mmol, 1 equiv) in 64% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (R)-enantiomer. (S)-enantiomer: [αD] = +53.8 (CHCl3, c = 0.75).

(R)-Tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-Dioxide (33b)

A solution of thionyl chloride (2.8 g, 1.7 mL, 23.3 mmol, 1.95 equiv) in DCM (1.7 mL) was added dropwise to a cooled (−5 °C) solution of imidazole (4.9 g, 71.7 mmol, 6 equiv) in DCM (30 mL), and the temperature was kept at −5 °C. The cooling bath was removed, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 45 min while allowing it to warm to rt. The mixture was cooled down to −10 °C, and a solution of 34a (1.4 g, 11.9 mmol, 1 equiv) in DCM (12 mL) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 2 h. Water (30 mL) was added, and the layers were separated. The organic layer was washed with half-concentrated brine (30 mL) and cooled to 5 °C. A NaIO4 solution (7.7 g, 35.9 mmol) in water (75 mL) was added, followed by RuO2–H2O (16 mg). The mixture was allowed to warm up to rt and stirred at rt overnight. The layers were separated, and the organic layer was filtered through a silica gel column eluting with DCM. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure to give compound 33b (1.1 g, 61.4 mmol, 52%) as a colorless solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.59 (dd, J = 8.1, 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.31 (dd, J = 9.3, 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.02 (dd, J = 11.6, 3.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.88 (dt, J = 11.9, 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.85–3.79 (m, 1 H), 3.74 (ddd, J = 11.9, 8.9, 3.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.61 (dd, J = 11.6, 7.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.39–3.33 (m, 1 H), 3.15 (ddd, J = 12.2, 8.9, 3.4 Hz, 1 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 69.85 (s, 1 C), 66.52 (s, 1 C), 64.65 (s, 1 C), 54.21 (s, 1 C), 43.43 (s, 1 C). MALDI-MS: m/z = 180.032 ([M + H]+). (R)-enantiomer: [αD] = −42.8 (CHCl3, c = 0.65).

(S)-Morpholin-3-ylmethanol (34a)

A solution of 35a (14 g, 67.4 mmol) in methanol (200 mL) was placed in a Parr apparatus and degassed with argon. Palladium on carbon (10 wt %, 1.5 g) was added, and the mixture was stirred under H2 at 2.8 bar for 48 h. The resulting mixture was filtered through Celite, washed with MeOH, and concentrated under reduced pressure to give compound 34a (8.0 g, 68.3 mmol, 99%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.81–3.80 (m, 1 H), 3.79–3.76 (m, 1 H), 3.60–3.47 (m, 4 H), 3.38–3.32 (m, 1 H), 3.00–2.91 (m, 4 H). The spectroscopic data are consistent with previous literature reports. (41)

(R)-Morpholin-3-ylmethanol (34b)

34b was prepared as described for its (S)-enantiomer 34a starting from (R)-(4-benzylmorpholin-3-yl)methanol 35b (5.2 g, 25.1 mmol, 1 equiv) in 96% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (S)-enantiomer.

(S)-(4-Benzylmorpholin-3-yl)methanol (35a)

To a stirred solution of 36b (20.6 g, 87.5 mmol, 1 equiv) in THF (320 mL), triethylamine (10.6 g, 14.7 mL, 105.1 mmol) was added. The solution was cooled to 0 °C, and borane–dimethyl sulfide complex (10 M in THF, 50 mL, 524.0 mmol) was slowly added. The reaction mixture was heated up to 65 °C for 5 h. After cooling to rt, the reaction was quenched by addition of water (60 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at rt overnight. The organic solvents were removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was diluted with aqueous NaOH solution (20% v/v, 2×). The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (2×), and the organic layer was washed with an aqueous 1 M HCl solution (2×). The combined aqueous fractions were then basified to pH 14 by addition of solid NaOH and re-extracted with EtOAc (3×). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduce pressure to give compound 35a (15.0 g, 72.4 mmol, 82%) as a clear oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.53–7.26 (m, 5 H), 4.13 (d, J = 13.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.96 (dd, J = 11.5, 4.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.84 (ddd, J = 11.5, 3.8, 1.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.75 (td, J = 3.3, 1.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.73 (td, J = 3.3, 1.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.67 (dd, J = 11.6, 9.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.56–3.49 (m, 2 H), 2.73 (dt, J = 12.0, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.59–2.54 (m, 1 H), 2.52 (br s, 1 H), 2.34 (ddd, J = 12.0, 10.0, 3.3 Hz, 1 H). The spectroscopic data are consistent with previous literature reports. (41)

(R)-(4-Benzylmorpholin-3-yl)methanol (35b)

35b was prepared as described for its (S)-enantiomer 35a starting from (S)-4-benzyl-5-oxomorpholine-3-carboxylic acid 36a (7.4 g, 31.5 mmol, 1 equiv) in 81% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (S)-enantiomer.

(S)-4-Benzyl-5-oxomorpholine-3-carboxylic Acid (36a)

36a was prepared as described for its (R)-enantiomer 36b starting from N-benzyl-S-serine 37a (12.2 g, 62.5 mmol, 1 equiv) in 51% yield. The spectroscopic data agree with those reported for the (R)-enantiomer.

(R)-4-Benzyl-5-oxomorpholine-3-carboxylic Acid (36b)

To a solution of N-benzyl-R-serine 37b (25.6 g, 131.1 mmol, 1 equiv) and K2CO3 (36.2 g, 262.2 mmol, 2 equiv) in THF/water (150 mL/150 mL) at 0 °C, a chloroacetyl chloride (17.8 g, 12.5 mL, 157.4 mmol, 1.2 equiv) solution in THF (13 mL) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 1 h. Solid NaOH (15.72 g, 393 mmol, 3 equiv) was added, and the mixture was stirred at 5 °C for 2 h. After completion of the reaction, cyclohexane was added and vigorously stirred. The layers were separated and the basic aqueous layer was acidified to pH 1 with conc HCl. The mixture was kept in the fridge overnight and the solid was filtered off, washed with cold water, and dried under vacuum to give compound 36b (21.8 g, 92.7 mmol, 71%) as a colorless solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.37–7.26 (m, 5 H), 5.26 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.19–4.12 (m, 3 H), 3.96–3.90 (m, 2 H), 3.83 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1 H). The spectroscopic data are consistent with previous literature reports. (41)

N-Benzyl-(S)-serine (37a)

37a was prepared as described for its (R) enantiomer 37b starting from (S)-serine (29.5 g, 280.7 mmol, 1 equiv) in 63% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (R) enantiomer.

N-Benzyl-(R)-serine (37b)

To a stirred solution of (R)-serine (25 g, 237.9 mmol, 1 equiv) in aqueous 2 M NaOH (120 mL), benzaldehyde (24.7 g, 24.5 mL, 233.1 mmol, 1 equiv) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 30 min before cooling to 5 °C. NaBH4 (2.7 g, 71.4 mmol, 0.3 equiv) was added portionwise while keeping the temperature below 10 °C. After addition, the reaction mixture was allowed to warm up to rt and stirred 1 h. Additional benzaldehyde (24.7 g, 24.5 mL, 233.1 mmol, 1 equiv) was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 30 min. The reaction mixture was cooled to 5 °C, and further NaBH4 (2.7 g, 71.4 mmol, 0.3 equiv) was added portionwise while a temperature of 5–10 °C was maintained. After completion of the addition, the reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 2 h. The reaction mixture was then extracted with ether (3×), and the aqueous phase was cooled down to 0 °C and acidified to pH 5 with conc HCl. The resulting white precipitate was filtered off, washed with water, and dried under reduced pressure to give compound 37b (25.8 g, 132.2 mmol, 55%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.45–7.30 (m, 5 H), 4.04–3.92 (m, 2 H), 3.70–3.61 (m, 3 H), 3.17 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 1 H). The spectroscopic data are consistent with previous literature reports. (41)

(E)-N,N-Dimethyl-N′-(5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)pyridin-2-yl)formimidamide (38)

38 was prepared according to general procedure 1 from 2-aminopyridine-5-boronic acid pinacol ester (500 mg, 2.27 mmol, 1 equiv) and N,N-dimethylformamide–dimethyl acetal (DMF–DMA, 395 μL, 2.95 mmol, 1.3 equiv). Compound 38 was obtained as a beige solid (538 mg, 1.96 mmol, 86%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.57 (s, 1 H), 8.41 (dd, J = 2.0, 0.9 Hz, 1 H), 7.75 (dd, J = 8.1, 2.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.78 (dd, J = 8.0, 0.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.11 (s, 3 H), 3.00 (s, 3 H), 1.29 (s, 12 H).

5-(4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)pyrazin-2-amine (39)

2-Amino-5-bromopyrazine (1.50 g, 8.77 mmol, 1 equiv), bis(pinacolato)diboron (3.29 g, 12.95 mmol, 1.5 equiv), and KOAc (2.53 g, 25.82 mmol, 3.0 equiv) were charged in a flask. Under nitrogen atmosphere, 1,4-dioxane (20 mL) and [1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene]dichloropalladium(II) (Pd(dppf)Cl2, 605 mg, 0.86 mmol, 0.1 equiv) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 105 °C for 3.5 h. After completion of the reaction monitored by TLC, the mixture was filtered through Celite and the solvents were evaporated under reduced pressure. Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) was added, and the solid was filtered off. Compound 39 was obtained as a light brownish solid (1.23 g, 5.57 mmol, 64%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.11 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.99 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1 H), 6.81 (br s, 2 H), 1.27 (s, 12 H).

(E)-N′-(5-Bromo-4-methylpyridin-2-yl)-N,N-dimethylformimidamide (40)

40 was prepared according to general procedure 1 from 5-bromo-4-methylpyridin-2-amine (8.06 g, 43.10 mmol, 1 equiv) and DMF–DMA (6.92 mL, 51.70 mmol, 1.2 equiv). Compound 40 was obtained as a beige solid (7.6 g, 31.52 mmol, 73%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.69 (s, 1 H), 8.54 (s, 1 H), 7.14 (s, 1 H), 3.38 (s, 3 H), 3.37 (s, 3 H), 2.62 (s, 3 H).

(E)-N,N-Dimethyl-N′-(3-methyl-5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)pyridin-2-yl)formimidamide (41)

41 was prepared according to general procedure 1 from 3-methyl-5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)pyridin-2-amine (500 mg, 2.13 mmol, 1 equiv) and DMF–DMA (430 μL, 3.20 mmol, 1.5 equiv). Compound 41 was obtained as a brownish solid (407 mg, 1.41 mmol, 66%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.51 (s, 1 H), 8.26 (s, 1 H), 7.62 (s, 1 H), 3.11 (s, 3 H), 3.03 (s, 3 H), 2.19 (s, 3 H), 1.28 (s, 12 H).

tert-Butyl (5-Bromo-4-methoxypyridin-2-yl)carbamate (42)

To a solution of Boc anhydride (Boc2O, 4.73 g, 21.67 mmol, 2.2 equiv) in THF (20 mL) at 0 °C, 5-bromo-4-methoxypyridin-2-amine (2.0 g, 9.85 mmol, 1 equiv) was added. Then, 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP, 241 mg, 1.97 mmol, 0.2 equiv) was added portionwise. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight while it was allowed to warm up to room temperature. After completion of the reaction monitored by TLC, the solvent was evaporated and DCM (200 mL) was added. The organic layer was washed with NH4Cl 15% solution (2×), and the combined aqueous layers were extracted with DCM (1×). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification by column chromatography (cyclohexane/EtOAc 1:0 → 1:4) gave compound 42 as a colorless solid (767 mg, 2.53 mmol, 26%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 9.97 (s, 1 H), 8.22 (s, 1 H), 7.61 (s, 1 H), 3.92 (s, 3 H), 1.48 (s, 9 H).

5-Bromo-4-(dimethoxymethyl)pyridin-2-amine (43)

To a solution of 4-(dimethoxymethyl)pyridin-2-amine (2.0 g, 11.89 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (24 mL) at 0 °C, N-bromosuccinimide (NBS, 2.23 g, 12.48 mmol, 1.05 equiv) was added portionwise. The reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 1 h and then at rt overnight. After completion of the reaction monitored by TLC, the reaction mixture was washed with a Na2CO3 8% solution (3×). The combined aqueous layers were extracted with 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (1×). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification by column chromatography (cyclohexane/EtOAc 1:0 → 4:1) gave compound 43 as a beige solid (2.585 g, 10.46 mmol, 88%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.98 (s, 1 H), 6.65 (s, 1 H), 6.24 (br s, 2 H), 5.28 (s, 1 H), 3.29 (s, 6 H).

tert-Butyl N-[5-Bromo-4-(dimethoxymethyl)pyridin-2-yl]-N-[(tert-butoxy)carbonyl]carbamate (44) and tert-Butyl N-[5-Bromo-4-(dimethoxymethyl)pyridin-2-yl]carbamate (45)

To a solution of Boc anhydride (Boc2O, 5.02 g, 22.98 mmol, 2.2 equiv) in THF (26 mL) at 0 °C, 5-bromo-4-(dimethoxymethyl)pyridin-2-amine 43 (2.58 g, 10.44 mmol, 1 equiv) was added. Then, 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP, 256 mg, 2.09 mmol, 0.2 equiv) was added portionwise. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight while it was allowed to warm up to room temperature. After completion of the reaction monitored by TLC, the reaction mixture was washed with NH4Cl 15% solution (2×) and the organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification by column chromatography (cyclohexane/EtOAc 1:0 → 0:1) gave compound 44 as a yellowish oil (1.286 g, 2.87 mmol, 27%) and 45 as a white solid (2.154 g, 6.21 mmol, 59%). 44: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.66 (s, 1 H), 7.45 (s, 1 H), 5.51 (s, 1 H), 3.33 (s, 6 H), 1.40 (s, 18 H). 45: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.70 (s, 1 H), 7.51 (s, 1 H), 5.51 (s, 1 H), 3.33 (s, 6 H), 1.38 (s, 9 H).

(E)-4-(Dimethylamino)-1,1-dimethoxybut-3-en-2-one (46)

46 was prepared as previously reported in the literature. (46) A solution of methylglyoxal dimethyl acetal (26 mL, 211.6 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and DMF–DMA (37 mL, 275.1 mmol, 1.3 equiv) was stirred at 100 °C overnight. The reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure. Compound 46 was obtained as a brown oil (35.7 g, 206.1 mmol, 75%) and used for the next step without further purification.

4-(Dimethoxymethyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (47)

Compound 46 (35.7 g, 206.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was dissolved in ethanol (780 mL). Potassium carbonate (71.2 g, 512.3 mmol, 2.5 equiv) and guanidine hydrochloride (23.6 g, 247.3 mmol, 1.2 equiv) were added, and the resulting suspension was heated to reflux overnight. After completion of the reaction monitored by TLC, ethanol was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was stirred with water for 6 h, filtered, and dried under vacuum to afford compound 47. The filtrate was extracted with dichloromethane (3×) and the combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure to give compound 47 as a brown solid (24.8 g, 146.6 mmol, 71%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.34 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.84 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 5.28 (br s, 1 H), 5.14 (s, 1 H), 4.76 (br s, 1 H), 3.39 (s, 6 H).

5-Bromo-4-(dimethoxymethyl)pyrimidin-2-amine (48)

To a solution of 4-(dimethoxymethyl)pyrimidin-2-amine 47 (5.0 g, 29.58 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in ACN (150 mL), NBS (5.53 g, 31.06 mmol, 1.05 equiv) was added portionwise. The reaction mixture was stirred at 70 °C overnight. After completion of the reaction monitored by TLC, ACN was evaporated. The solid was dissolved in DCM (250 mL), and the organic layer was washed with a Na2CO3 8% solution (3×). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The product was recrystallized from dichloromethane/heptanes to obtain compound 48 as a beige solid (6.50 g, 26.20 mmol, 89%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.34 (s, 1 H), 7.02 (br s, 2 H), 5.27 (s, 1 H), 3.35 (s, 6 H).

tert-Butyl N-[5-Bromo-4-(dimethoxymethyl)pyrimidin-2-yl]-N-[(tert-butoxy)carbonyl]carbamate (49)

To a solution of Boc anhydride (Boc2O, 12.59 g, 57.66 mmol, 2.2 equiv) in THF (65 mL) at 0 °C, 5-bromo-4-(dimethoxymethyl)pyrimidin-2-amine 48 (6.50 g, 26.21 mmol, 1 equiv) was added. Then, DMAP (640 mg, 5.24 mmol, 0.2 equiv) was added portionwise. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight while it was allowed to warm up to room temperature. After completion of the reaction monitored by TLC, the reaction mixture was washed with a 0.1 M HCl solution (2×) and the organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. Recrystallization from heptanes gave compound 49 as a beige solid (10.71 g, 23.91 mmol, 91%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 9.12 (s, 1 H), 5.54 (s, 1 H), 3.39 (s, 6 H), 1.40 (s, 18 H).

(E)-N,N-Dimethyl-N′-(5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)-4-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-yl)formimidamide (50)

50 was prepared according to the literature. (33)

(S)-4-(2-Chloro-5,5a,6,7,8,9-hexahydropyrimido[5,4-b]indolizin-4-yl)morpholine (51a)

51a was prepared as described for its (R)-enantiomer 51b starting from (S)-hexahydro[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[3,4-a]pyridine 1,1-dioxide 53a (507 mg, 2.86 mmol, 1.2 equiv) in 43% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (R)-enantiomer.

(R)-4-(2-Chloro-5,5a,6,7,8,9-hexahydropyrimido[5,4-b]indolizin-4-yl)morpholine (51b)

51b was prepared according to general procedure 3 from 4-(2,6-dichloropyrimidin-4-yl)morpholine (702 mg, 3.00 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and (R)-hexahydro-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[3,4-a]pyridine 1,1-dioxide 53b (638 mg, 3.60 mmol, 1.2 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 9:1) gave compound 51b as a colorless solid (324 mg, 1.10 mmol, 36%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.91 (dd, J = 13.0, 4.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.68–3.57 (m, 5 H), 3.52–3.44 (m, 4 H), 3.24 (dd, J = 15.0, 9.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.75 (td, J = 13.0, 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.66 (dd, J = 15.0, 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 1.82–1.67 (m, 2 H), 1.63–1.55 (m, 1 H), 1.50–1.36 (m, 1 H), 1.35–1.20 (m, 2 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, DMSO): δ 167.84 (s, 1 C), 157.66–157.53 (m, 2 C), 93.32 (s, 1 C), 65.99 (s, 2 C), 59.15 (s, 1 C), 45.34 (s, 2 C), 41.29 (s, 1 C), 32.60 (s, 1 C), 31.62 (s, 1 C), 24.43 (s, 1 C), 23.35 (s, 1 C). MALDI-MS: m/z = 295.267 ([M + H]+).

(S)-2-Chloro-4-(piperidin-1-yl)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine (52a)

52a was prepared as described for its (R)-enantiomer 52b starting from (R)-tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-dioxide 33b in 70% yield. The spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported for the (R)-enantiomer.

(R)-2-Chloro-4-(piperidin-1-yl)-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-pyrimido[5′,4′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine (52b)

52b was prepared according to general procedure 3 from dichloropyrimidine 54 (200 mg, 0.86 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and (S)-tetrahydro-3H-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[4,3-c][1,4]oxazine 1,1-dioxide 33a (185 mg, 1.03 mmol, 1.2 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 9:1) gave compound 52b as a colorless solid (168 mg, 0.57 mmol, 66%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.03–3.88 (m, 2 H), 3.79 (ddd, J = 16.0, 11.0, 3.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.60–3.53 (m, 4 H), 3.44 (td, J = 12.0, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.29 (t, J = 11.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.22–3.12 (m, 2 H), 2.54 (dd, J = 15.0, 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.69–1.61 (m, 2 H), 1.61–1.53 (m, 4 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 168.44 (s, 1 C), 158.98 (s, 1 C), 158.49 (s, 1 C), 92.49 (s, 1 C), 70.55 (s, 1 C), 66.72 (s, 1 C), 57.32 (s, 1 C), 46.69 (s, 2 C), 42.11 (s, 1 C), 29.55 (s, 1 C), 26.16 (s, 2 C), 24.84 (s, 1 C). MALDI-MS: m/z = 295.082 ([M + H]+).

(S)-Hexahydro-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[3,4-a]pyridine 1,1-Dioxide (53a)

53a was prepared as described for its (R)-enantiomer 53b in a 74% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.57 (dd, J = 7.7, 5.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.18 (dd, J = 9.9, 7.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.59–3.51 (m, 1 H), 3.50–3.40 (m, 1 H), 2.76 (ddd, J = 12.0, 11.0, 3.1 Hz, 1 H), 1.96–1.86 (m, 2 H), 1.86–1.78 (m, 1 H), 1.69–1.57 (m, 1 H), 1.50–1.27 (m, 2 H). The spectroscopic data are consistent with those reported in literature. (47)

(R)-Hexahydro-[1,2,3]oxathiazolo[3,4-a]pyridine 1,1-Dioxide (53b)

To a solution of imidazole (1.77 g, 26.0 mmol, 6.0 equiv) in DCM (18 mL), a solution of SOCl2 (610 μL, 8.36 mmol, 1.9 equiv) in DCM (6 mL) was added dropwise. The resulting colorless suspension was stirred at rt for 1 h. Then, a solution of (R)-piperidin-2-ylmethanol (500 mg, 4.34 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in DCM (800 μL) was added dropwise at −10 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm up to rt and stirred at rt for 1.5 h. After completion of the reaction monitored by TLC, deionized H2O (35 mL) was added and the layers were separated. The organic layer was washed with brine (15 mL) and used in the next step. Under vigorous stirring, a solution of RuO2–H2O (5.80 mg, 43.6 μmol, 0.01 equiv) and NaIO4 (2.38 g, 11.1 mmol, 2.6 equiv) in deionized H2O (24 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 30 min. After completion of the reaction, the layers were separated and the organic layer was filtered through a pad of silica gel (12 g) (eluent: DCM). The solvent was evaporated to give compound 53b as a colorless liquid (638 mg, 3.60 mmol, 83%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.57 (dd, J = 7.8, 5.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.18 (dd, J = 9.9, 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.59–3.52 (m, 1 H), 3.50–3.40 (m, 1 H), 2.76 (ddd, J = 12.0, 11.0, 3.1 Hz, 1 H), 1.96–1.86 (m, 2 H), 1.86–1.78 (m, 1 H), 1.69–1.56 (m, 1 H), 1.51–1.27 (m, 2 H).

2,4-Dichloro-6-(piperidin-1-yl)pyrimidine (54)

54 was prepared according to general procedure 2 from 2,4,6-trichloropyrimidine (627 μL, 5.45 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and piperidine (566 μL, 5.72 mmol, 1.0 equiv). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 1:0 → 4:1) gave compound 54 as a colorless solid (849 mg, 3.66 mmol, 67%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.39 (s, 1 H), 3.79–3.36 (m, 4 H), 1.74–1.66 (m, 2 H), 1.66–1.57 (m, 4 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 162.82 (s, 1 C), 160.31 (s, 1 C), 160.02 (s, 1 C), 99.66 (s, 1 C), 45.81 (br s, 2 C), 25.61 (s, 2 C), 24.41 (s, 1 C).

Structure Modeling of PI3K and mTOR Kinase Complexes

The coordinates of PIKiN3 in PI3Kγ complex (PDB code 5JHB, resolution of 2.48 Å), CNX-1351 in PI3Kα (PDB code 3ZIM, resolution of 2.85 Å), and mTOR kinase bound to PI103 (PDB code 4JT6; 3.6 Å) were used as starting points to dock molecules into the ATP-binding sites. Ligands in crystal structures were manually replaced using Maestro 11.1, and energy minimization was carried out. Further measurements and figures were generated in Maestro 11.1 and Chimera UCSF.

Determination of Inhibitor Dissociation Constants

Dissociation constants of compounds (Ki) for p110α and mTOR were determined by commercial LanthaScreen (Life Technologies) and evaluated as described in ref (33). Briefly, AlexaFluor647-labeled kinase tracer 314 (no. PV6087) with a Kd of 2.2 nM was used at 20 nM for p110α and at a final concentration of 10 nM for mTOR (Kd of 19 nM). Recombinant N-terminally (His)6-tagged p110α was detected with biotinylated anti-(His)6-tag antibody (2 nM, no. PV6089) and LanthaScreen Eu-Steptavidin (2 nM, no. PV5899); N-terminal GST fused to truncated mTOR (amino acids 1360–2549; no. PR8683B) was detected with a LanthaScreen Eu-labeled anti-GST antibody (2 nM, no. PV5594). The p110α assay buffer was composed of 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, and 0.01% (v/v) Brij-35, and the mTOR assay buffer contained 50 mM HEPES; 5 mM MgCl2; 1 mM EGTA; 0.01% Pluronic F-127. Further details and calculations are explained in ref (32).

Kinome Profiling

The inhibitory capacity and selectivity of compound were determined using the ScanMax platform provided by DiscoverX. (48) In short binding of immobilized ligand to DNA-tagged kinases competed with 10 μM compound. The amount of kinase bound to the immobilized ligand was measured by quantitative PCR of the respective DNA tags and is given as percentage of control. Binding constants of compounds for kinases of interest were determined by competing the immobilized ligand kinase interactions with an 11-point 3-fold serial dilution of compound starting from 30 μM and subsequent quantitative PCR of DNA tags. Binding constants were calculated by a standard dose–response curve using the Hill equation (with Hill slope set to −1):
Selectivity cores (49) were calculated as S = number of hits/number of tested kinases (excluding mutant variants), where S35, S10, S1 were calculated using %Ctrl as a potency threshold (35, 10, 1%); for example S(35) = (number of nonmutant kinases with %Ctrl < 35)/(number of nonmutant kinases tested).

Cellular PI3K and mTOR Signaling

Downstream signals emerging from mTORC2 (phosphorylation of Ser473 of PKB/Akt; rabbit polyclonal antibody from Cell Signaling Technology (CST), no. 4058) and mTORC1 (phosphorylation of Ser235/236 on the ribosomal protein S6; rabbit monoclonal antibody from CST, no. 4856) were measured in in-cell Western assays plating 2 × 104 A2058 cells/well in 96-well plates (Cell Carrier, PerkinElmer) for 24 h (37 °C, 5% CO2) before exposing cells for 1 h to inhibitors or DMSO. Then, cells were fixed (4% PFA in PBS for 30 min at rt), blocked (1% BSA/0.1% Triton X-100/5% goat serum in PBS for 30 min, RT), and stained with CST primary antibodies (1:500). Tubulin staining (mouse anti-α-tubulin, 1:2000, Sigma no. T9026) was assessed as internal standard. Secondary antibody [IRDye680-conjugated goat anti-mouse, and IRDye800-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibodies (LICOR no. 926-68070 and no. 926-32211), both 1:500] fluorescence was detected on an Odyssey CLx infrared imaging scanner (LICOR). Remaining phospho-protein signals were normalized to cellular tubulin and related to DMSO controls. ICW anaylsis and determination of IC50 were done as described in ref (33).

Pharmacokinetic Studies

Male Sprague Dawley rats (8 weeks old at delivery) were purchased from Janvier Labs (France). The animals were housed in a temperature-controlled room (20–24 °C) and maintained in a 12h light/12h dark cycle. Food and water were available ad libitum throughout the duration of the study. Formulations of compounds 7b and 12b were prepared by weighing the test items into glass vials and dissolving them by addition of Captisol (40% w/w in water) and water for injection in a proportion of 50% and 35% of the final desired volume. The pH was adjusted to 3 with 0.2 M HCl, and finally, the volume was completed with water for injection. The formulations were stirred continuously until application to the animals. At each time point (30 min, 2 h, 4 h, and 8 h), three rats were anesthetized with isoflurane and 1 mL blood was collected, via heart puncture, in tubes containing lithium-heparin. After blood sampling, the rats were euthanized and brain, liver, and skin were collected. Blood samples were stored on dry ice until centrifugation at 6000 rpm (10 min, 4 °C). Plasma supernatants and tissue samples were kept at −80 °C until being assayed. The calibration standards and quality controls were prepared in duplicates. A volume of 50 μL of unknown samples, zero samples, and blanks was spiked with 6 μL of DMSO. After 10 min of equilibration, a volume of 100 μL of acetonitrile containing the internal standard (diazepam, 300 ng/mL) was added to each calibration standard, QC, zero sample, and unknown sample, while a volume of 100 μL of plain acetonitrile was added to all blanks. Samples were vigorously shaken and centrifuged for 10 min at 6000g and 20 °C. The particle free supernatant was diluted 1 + 1 with water. An aliquot was transferred to 200 μL sampler vials and subsequently subjected to LC–MS. The HPLC system consisted of an Accela U-HPLC pump and an Accela autosampler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Mass spectrometry was performed on an Exactive mass spectrometer (Orbitrap technology with accurate mass) equipped with a heated electrospray (H-ESI 2) interface (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) connected to a PC running the standard software Xcalibur 2.1.
Ethics Statement. All experimental procedures were approved by and conducted in accordance with the regulations of the local animal welfare authorities (Landesamt für Gesundheit and Verbraucherschutz, Abteilung Lebensmittel- and Veterinärwesen, Saarbrücken).

Hepatocyte Stability Assay

Primary hepatocytes from mouse (CD-1), rat (Sprague Dawley, SD), dog (Beagle), and human were used. Assays were performed using cryopreserved hepatocytes in suspension. Hepatocytes were thawed according to the instructions of the supplier before seeding in 48-well cell culture plates at a density of 200 000 cells/well in 225 μL of incubation medium consisting of WME (Williams medium E) supplemented with 2 mM l-glutamine and 25 mM HEPES. Stock solution of compound 11b was prepared with 10 mM in DMSO. A working solution was obtained by dilution of the stock solution in DMSO (first step) and in incubation medium (second step) resulting in a concentration of 10-fold higher strength (50 μM) than the final intended test concentration (5 μM) and a solvent content of 5% DMSO.
Positive control incubations were performed using 7-ethoxycoumarin as substrate. A 10 mM stock solution in acetonitrile (ACN) was further diluted in ACN (first step) and in incubation medium (second step) to give a working solution in 10% ACN and of 10-fold higher strength than the final intended incubation concentration (5 μM). To 225 μL of cell suspension, 25 μL of the 10-fold concentrated working solution of test or reference item was added, resulting in a final test concentration of 5 μM for compound 11b or 7-ethoxycoumarin, respectively, with final solvent concentrations of 0.5% DMSO (11b) or 1% ACN (7-ethoxycoumarin). For analysis, samples were taken after 0, 15, 60, 90, and 180 min of incubation for 11b and after 0, 60, and 180 min for reference item. The sample preparation was performed afterward by protein precipitation using ACN (200 μL of cell suspension plus 200 μL of ACN/ISTD3). After centrifugation (5 min, 4800g), the particle-free supernatants were diluted with one volume of water and were analyzed by LC–MS. Negative controls were performed to exclude nonmetabolic degradation processes; i.e., the finding that the concentrations remained stable over the investigated time suggests that the decrease of the parent compound was mainly due to metabolism. Negative control incubations were performed in line with all experiments using incubation medium in absence of hepatocytes.
For quantitative analysis of compound 11b in samples from primary human hepatocytes, the HPLC system consisted of a LC pump Surveyor Plus and an autosampler Surveyor Plus (Thermo-Fisher, USA). Mass spectrometry was performed on a TSQ Quantum Discovery Max triple quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ion source (ESI) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) connected to a PC running the standard software Xcalibur 2.0.7.

CYP Reactive Phenotyping with Human Recombinant CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 Isoenzymes

Human recombinant isoenzymes from insect cells infected by baculovirus and containing cDNA of a single human CYP isoenzyme (Supersomes, Corning) were used. The test item stock solutions were diluted in DMSO/H2O (1:8, v/v) to obtain 50-fold concentrated working solutions (solvent content 12.5% DMSO/87.5% H2O) for CYP1A1 and CYP1A2. The test compound concentration applied in the CYP reactive phenotyping assay was 1 μM in the presence of 0.25% DMSO. The assays were performed in duplicate using human recombinant enzymes systems from Corning (BD Gentest P450 high throughput inhibitor screening kits). The cofactor mix, containing the NADP+-regenerating system, was prepared according to the instructions of the manufacturer. For CYP1A1 and CYP1A2, 4 μL of the 50-fold concentrated working solution was added to 96 μL of cofactor mix. Cofactor mix and test item were pipetted into the respective wells of a prewarmed 96-well plate and prewarmed for 10 min on a shaker with fitted heating block. The reactions were initiated by addition of 100 μL of prewarmed enzyme mix. By default, the final protein concentration of all CYP isoenzymes was 25 pmol/mL. Incubations with a final volume of 200 μL were performed at 37 °C. After 0 and 60 min (30 min for positive control substrates), the reactions were stopped by the addition of 200 μL of stop solution, i.e., ACN containing the internal standard. Two control groups were run in parallel for every assay: positive controls (PC, n = 2) using specific probe substrates for each CYP isoform as reference compounds (CYP1A1 = melatonin and CYP1A2 = phenacetin) to prove the quality of the enzyme activity of the used batches and a negative control (NC, n = 2), which were performed without cofactors and glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase to ensure that the potential loss of parent compound is due to CYP-mediated metabolism.
For quantitative analysis of compounds 7b, 11b, and 12b, LC–MS systems were used. (i) LC–MS: Accela U-HPLC pump and an Accela autosampler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) connected to an Exactive mass spectrometer (Orbitrap with accurate mass (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA)); data handling with the standard software Xcalibur 2.1. (ii) LC–HRMS: Accela U-HPLC pump and an Accela Open autosampler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) connected to an Q-Exactive mass spectrometer (Orbitrap); data handling with the standard software Xcalibur 2.2. (iii) LC–MS: Surveyor MS Plus HPLC (Thermo Electron) HPLC system connected to a TSQ Quantum Discovery Max (Thermo Electron) triple quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray (ESI) or APCI interface (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA); connected to a PC running the standard software Xcalibur 2.0.7.
The pump flow rate was set to 600 μL/min, and the analytes were separated on a Kinetex phenylhexyl analytical column 2.6 μm, 50 mm × 2.1 mm (Phenomenex, Germany).

Metabolite Identification of Compound 11b

CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 incubates were screened for the presence of potential metabolites using LC–HRMS Q-Exactive (Thermo Scientific) instrument, combining high-performance quadrupole precursor selection with high resolution (up to 140 000) and accurate mass detection (Orbitrap). The full scan accurate mass analysis of suspected metabolites was confirmed or refused using three primary tools: (i) screening for prototypical phase I metabolites, (ii) predictive chemical formula and corresponding mass error analysis, and (iii) confirmation by product ion scan. The putative metabolites were identified based on the test item fragmentation pattern of compound 11b and its corresponding characteristic fragments.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00972.

  • Syntheses of bromo derivative 44 (Scheme S1), bromo derivative 49 (Scheme S2), and compounds 3a5a and 3b5b (Scheme S3); plasma concentration of 7b after a single po dose of 5 mg/kg in rats (Table S1); brain concentration of 7b after a single po dose of 5 mg/kg in rats (Table S2); plasma concentration of 12b after a single po dose of 5 mg/kg in rats (Table S3); brain concentration of 12b after a single po dose of 5 mg/kg in rats (Table S4); stability of compound 11b (5 μM) in primary mouse, rat, dog, and human hepatocytes (Table S5); CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 metabolites identification of 11b (Table S6); proposed metabolic pathway for CYP-dependent metabolism of 11b (Figure S1); chromatogram of compound 11b incubated with CYP1A1 (60 min) (Figure S2); chromatogram of compound 11b incubated with CYP1A1 (0 min) (Figure S3); chromatogram of compound 11b incubated with CYP1A2 (60 min) (Figure S4); chromatogram of compound 11b incubated with CYP1A2 (0 min) (Figure S5); activity data and standard errors of final compounds (Table S7); activity data and standard errors of compounds for modeling (Table S8); TREEspot data visualization of KINOMEScan interactions of compound 12b, PQR620, and INK128 (Figure S6); selectivity profile calculated from KinomeScan data (Table S9); kinase interactions (KINOMEscan data) (Table S10); 1H NMR, 13C{1H} NMR, and NSI-HRMS spectra; HPLC chromatograms; chemical structures of final compounds and intermediates (PDF)

  • Compound 3a-PI3Kγ (PDB)

  • Compound 2a-mTOR (PDB)

  • Compound 2b-mTOR (PDB)

  • Compound 2a-PI3Kα (PDB)

  • Compound 2b-PI3Kα (PDB)

  • Molecular formula strings and some data (CSV)

Accession Codes

PDB code 5JHB was used for docking of compound 3a into PI3Kγ. PDB code 4JT6 was used for docking of compounds 2a and 2b into mTOR kinase. PDB code 3ZIM was used for docking of compounds 2a and 2b into PI3Kα.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Chiara Borsari - Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 28, 4058 Basel, SwitzerlandOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-4688-8362
    • Denise Rageot - Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 28, 4058 Basel, SwitzerlandOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-2833-5481
    • Alix Dall’Asen - PIQUR Therapeutics AG, Hochbergerstrasse 60, 4057 Basel, Switzerland
    • Thomas Bohnacker - Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 28, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
    • Anna Melone - Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 28, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
    • Alexander M. Sele - Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 28, 4058 Basel, SwitzerlandOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-4903-7934
    • Eileen Jackson - Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 28, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
    • Jean-Baptiste Langlois - Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 28, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
    • Florent Beaufils - PIQUR Therapeutics AG, Hochbergerstrasse 60, 4057 Basel, Switzerland
    • Paul Hebeisen - PIQUR Therapeutics AG, Hochbergerstrasse 60, 4057 Basel, Switzerland
    • Doriano Fabbro - PIQUR Therapeutics AG, Hochbergerstrasse 60, 4057 Basel, Switzerland
    • Petra Hillmann - PIQUR Therapeutics AG, Hochbergerstrasse 60, 4057 Basel, Switzerland
  • Notes
    The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): A.D.A., F.B., P.He., P.Hi., and D.F. are current or past employees of PIQUR Therapeutics AG, Basel; and P.He., D.F., and M.P.W. are shareholders of PIQUR Therapeutics AG.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We thank A. Pfaltz, J. Füglistaler, C. Meyer, J. Schwarte, and E. Teillet for advice, discussions, and contributions to synthetic efforts, and we thank S. Bünger for technical assistance. This work was supported by the Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI) by PFLS-LS Grants 14032.1, 15811.2, and 17241.1; the Stiftung für Krebsbekämpfung Grant 341; and Swiss National Science Foundation Grants 310030_153211 and 316030_133860 (to M.P.W.).

Abbreviations Used

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

mTOR

mechanistical (or mammalian) target of rapamycin

TORC1

mTOR complex 1

TORC2

mTOR complex 2

PI3K

phosphoinositide 3-kinase

PKB

protein kinase B/Akt

S6RP

ribosomal protein S6

S6K

p70 S6 kinase

VPS34

vacuolar protein sorting 34 (the class III PI3K)

TORKi

mTOR kinase inhibitor

PK

pharmacokinetic

TR-FRET

time-resolved Förster resonance energy transfer

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 49 other publications.

  1. 1
    Wymann, M. P.; Schneiter, R. Lipid signalling in disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9 (2), 162176,  DOI: 10.1038/nrm2335
  2. 2
    Yang, H.; Rudge, D. G.; Koos, J. D.; Vaidialingam, B.; Yang, H. J.; Pavletich, N. P. mTOR kinase structure, mechanism and regulation. Nature 2013, 497 (7448), 217223,  DOI: 10.1038/nature12122
  3. 3
    Sarbassov, D. D.; Guertin, D. A.; Ali, S. M.; Sabatini, D. M. Phosphorylation and regulation of Akt/PKB by the rictor-mTOR complex. Science 2005, 307 (5712), 10981101,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1106148
  4. 4
    Feng, J.; Park, J.; Cron, P.; Hess, D.; Hemmings, B. A. Identification of a PKB/Akt hydrophobic motif Ser-473 kinase as DNA-dependent protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279 (39), 4118941196,  DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M406731200
  5. 5
    Wymann, M. P.; Marone, R. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase in disease: timing, location, and scaffolding. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2005, 17 (2), 141149,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.02.011
  6. 6
    Bozulic, L.; Hemmings, B. A. PIKKing on PKB: regulation of PKB activity by phosphorylation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009, 21 (2), 256261,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.02.002
  7. 7
    Magnuson, B.; Ekim, B.; Fingar, D. C. Regulation and function of ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K) within mTOR signalling networks. Biochem. J. 2012, 441 (1), 121,  DOI: 10.1042/BJ20110892
  8. 8
    Laplante, M.; Sabatini, D. M. mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell 2012, 149 (2), 274293,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.017
  9. 9
    Saxton, R. A.; Sabatini, D. M. mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell 2017, 168 (6), 960976,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.004
  10. 10
    Vivanco, I.; Sawyers, C. L. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase AKT pathway in human cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2 (7), 489501,  DOI: 10.1038/nrc839
  11. 11
    Marone, R.; Cmiljanovic, V.; Giese, B.; Wymann, M. P. Targeting phosphoinositide 3-kinase: moving towards therapy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Proteins Proteomics 2008, 1784 (1), 159185,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2007.10.003
  12. 12
    Wymann, M. PI3Ks—Drug Targets in Inflammation and Cancer. In Phosphoinositides I: Enzymes of Synthesis and Degradation; Balla, T., Wymann, M., York, J. D., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp 111181.
  13. 13
    Choi, J.; Chen, J.; Schreiber, S. L.; Clardy, J. Structure of the FKBP1 2-rapamycin complex interacting with the binding domain of human FRAP. Science 1996, 273 (5272), 239242,  DOI: 10.1126/science.273.5272.239
  14. 14
    Hudes, G.; Carducci, M.; Tomczak, P.; Dutcher, J.; Figlin, R.; Kapoor, A.; Staroslawska, E.; Sosman, J.; McDermott, D.; Bodrogi, I.; Kovacevic, Z.; Lesovoy, V.; Schmidt-Wolf, I. G. H.; Barbarash, O.; Gokmen, E.; O’Toole, T.; Lustgarten, S.; Moore, L.; Motzer, R. J. Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356 (22), 22712281,  DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa066838
  15. 15
    Motzer, R. J.; Escudier, B.; Oudard, S.; Hutson, T. E.; Porta, C.; Bracarda, S.; Grünwald, V.; Thompson, J. A.; Figlin, R. A.; Hollaender, N.; Urbanowitz, G.; Berg, W. J.; Kay, A.; Lebwohl, D.; Ravaud, A. Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Lancet 2008, 372 (9637), 449456,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61039-9
  16. 16
    Jerusalem, G.; Rorive, A.; Collignon, J. Use of mTOR inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer: an evaluation of factors that influence patient outcomes. Breast Cancer: Targets Ther. 2014, 6, 4357,  DOI: 10.2147/BCTT.S38679
  17. 17
    André, F.; O’Regan, R.; Ozguroglu, M.; Toi, M.; Xu, B.; Jerusalem, G.; Masuda, N.; Wilks, S.; Arena, F.; Isaacs, C.; Yap, Y.-S.; Papai, Z.; Lang, I.; Armstrong, A.; Lerzo, G.; White, M.; Shen, K.; Litton, J.; Chen, D.; Zhang, Y.; Ali, S.; Taran, T.; Gianni, L. Everolimus for women with trastuzumab-resistant, HER2-positive, advanced breast cancer (BOLERO-3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15 (6), 580591,  DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70138-X
  18. 18
    Peterson, M. E. Management of adverse events in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer treated with everolimus: observations from a phase III clinical trial. Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 2013, 21 (8), 23412349,  DOI: 10.1007/s00520-013-1826-3
  19. 19
    Santulli, G.; Totary-Jain, H. Tailoring mTOR-based therapy: molecular evidence and clinical challenges. Pharmacogenomics 2013, 14 (12), 15171526,  DOI: 10.2217/pgs.13.143
  20. 20
    Meng, L. H.; Zheng, X. F. Toward rapamycin analog (rapalog)-based precision cancer therapy. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2015, 36 (10), 11631169,  DOI: 10.1038/aps.2015.68
  21. 21
    Feldman, M. E.; Apsel, B.; Uotila, A.; Loewith, R.; Knight, Z. A.; Ruggero, D.; Shokat, K. M. Active-site inhibitors of mTOR target rapamycin-resistant outputs of mTORC1 and mTORC2. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7 (2), e1000038,  DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000038
  22. 22
    Kang, S. A.; Pacold, M. E.; Cervantes, C. L.; Lim, D.; Lou, H. J.; Ottina, K.; Gray, N. S.; Turk, B. E.; Yaffe, M. B.; Sabatini, D. M. mTORC1 phosphorylation sites encode their sensitivity to starvation and rapamycin. Science 2013, 341 (6144), 1236566,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1236566
  23. 23
    Jacinto, E.; Loewith, R.; Schmidt, A.; Lin, S.; Ruegg, M. A.; Hall, A.; Hall, M. N. Mammalian TOR complex 2 controls the actin cytoskeleton and is rapamycin insensitive. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004, 6 (11), 11228,  DOI: 10.1038/ncb1183
  24. 24
    O’Reilly, K. E.; Rojo, F.; She, Q. B.; Solit, D.; Mills, G. B.; Smith, D.; Lane, H.; Hofmann, F.; Hicklin, D. J.; Ludwig, D. L.; Baselga, J.; Rosen, N. mTOR inhibition induces upstream receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and activates Akt. Cancer Res. 2006, 66 (3), 15001508,  DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2925
  25. 25
    Liu, P.; Gan, W.; Chin, Y. R.; Ogura, K.; Guo, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, B.; Blenis, J.; Cantley, L. C.; Toker, A.; Su, B.; Wei, W. PtdIns(3,4,5)P3-dependent activation of the mTORC2 kinase complex. Cancer Discovery 2015, 5 (11), 11941209,  DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0460
  26. 26
    Nowak, P.; Cole, D. C.; Brooijmans, N.; Bursavich, M. G.; Curran, K. J.; Ellingboe, J. W.; Gibbons, J. J.; Hollander, I.; Hu, Y.; Kaplan, J.; Malwitz, D. J.; Toral-Barza, L.; Verheijen, J. C.; Zask, A.; Zhang, W. G.; Yu, K. Discovery of potent and selective inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52 (22), 70817089,  DOI: 10.1021/jm9012642
  27. 27
    Jin, Z.; Niu, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Q.; Yang, A. Preclinical study of CC223 as a potential anti-ovarian cancer agent. Oncotarget 2017, 8 (35), 5846958479,  DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17753
  28. 28
    Slotkin, E. K.; Patwardhan, P. P.; Vasudeva, S. D.; de Stanchina, E.; Tap, W. D.; Schwartz, G. K. MLN0128, an ATP-competitive mTOR kinase inhibitor with potent in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity, as potential therapy for bone and soft-tissue sarcoma. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015, 14 (2), 395406,  DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0711
  29. 29
    Pike, K. G.; Malagu, K.; Hummersone, M. G.; Menear, K. A.; Duggan, H. M.; Gomez, S.; Martin, N. M.; Ruston, L.; Pass, S. L.; Pass, M. Optimization of potent and selective dual mTORC1 and mTORC2 inhibitors: the discovery of AZD8055 and AZD2014. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23 (5), 12121216,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.01.019
  30. 30
    Lee, J. S.; Vo, T. T.; Fruman, D. A. Targeting mTOR for the treatment of B cell malignancies. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2016, 82 (5), 12131228,  DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12888
  31. 31
    Rageot, D.; Bohnacker, T.; Melone, A.; Langlois, J. B.; Borsari, C.; Hillmann, P.; Sele, A. M.; Beaufils, F.; Zvelebil, M.; Hebeisen, P.; Loscher, W.; Burke, J.; Fabbro, D.; Wymann, M. P. Discovery and preclinical characterization of 5-[4,6-Bis({3-oxa-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-8-yl})-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]-4-(difluoro methyl)pyridin-2-amine (PQR620), a highly potent and selective mTORC1/2 inhibitor for cancer and neurological disorders. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61 (22), 1008410105,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01262
  32. 32
    Bohnacker, T.; Prota, A. E.; Beaufils, F.; Burke, J. E.; Melone, A.; Inglis, A. J.; Rageot, D.; Sele, A. M.; Cmiljanovic, V.; Cmiljanovic, N.; Bargsten, K.; Aher, A.; Akhmanova, A.; Diaz, J. F.; Fabbro, D.; Zvelebil, M.; Williams, R. L.; Steinmetz, M. O.; Wymann, M. P. Deconvolution of Buparlisib’s mechanism of action defines specific PI3K and tubulin inhibitors for therapeutic intervention. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14683,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14683
  33. 33
    Beaufils, F.; Cmiljanovic, N.; Cmiljanovic, V.; Bohnacker, T.; Melone, A.; Marone, R.; Jackson, E.; Zhang, X.; Sele, A.; Borsari, C.; Mestan, J.; Hebeisen, P.; Hillmann, P.; Giese, B.; Zvelebil, M.; Fabbro, D.; Williams, R. L.; Rageot, D.; Wymann, M. P. 5-(4,6-Dimorpholino-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine (PQR309), a potent, brain-penetrant, orally bioavailable, pan-class I PI3K/mTOR inhibitor as clinical candidate in oncology. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60 (17), 75247538,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00930
  34. 34
    Tarantelli, C.; Gaudio, E.; Arribas, A. J.; Kwee, I.; Hillmann, P.; Rinaldi, A.; Cascione, L.; Spriano, F.; Bernasconi, E.; Guidetti, F.; Carrassa, L.; Pittau, R. B.; Beaufils, F.; Ritschard, R.; Rageot, D.; Sele, A.; Dossena, B.; Rossi, F. M.; Zucchetto, A.; Taborelli, M.; Gattei, V.; Rossi, D.; Stathis, A.; Stussi, G.; Broggini, M.; Wymann, M. P.; Wicki, A.; Zucca, E.; Cmiljanovic, V.; Fabbro, D.; Bertoni, F. PQR309 is a novel dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor with preclinical antitumor activity in lymphomas as a single agent and in combination therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24 (1), 120129,  DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1041
  35. 35
    Wicki, A.; Brown, N.; Xyrafas, A.; Bize, V.; Hawle, H.; Berardi, S.; Cmiljanovic, N.; Cmiljanovic, V.; Stumm, M.; Dimitrijevic, S.; Herrmann, R.; Pretre, V.; Ritschard, R.; Tzankov, A.; Hess, V.; Childs, A.; Hierro, C.; Rodon, J.; Hess, D.; Joerger, M.; von Moos, R.; Sessa, C.; Kristeleit, R. First-in human, phase 1, dose-escalation pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the oral dual PI3K and mTORC1/2 inhibitor PQR309 in patients with advanced solid tumors (SAKK 67/13). Eur. J. Cancer 2018, 96, 616,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.03.012
  36. 36
    Fang, Z.; Song, Y.; Zhan, P.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, X. Conformational restriction: an effective tactic in “follow-on”-based drug discovery. Future Med. Chem. 2014, 6 (8), 885901,  DOI: 10.4155/fmc.14.50
  37. 37
    Cmiljanovic, V.; Hebeisen, P.; Jackson, E.; Beaufils, F.; Bohnacker, T.; Wymann, M. P. Conformationally Restricted PI3K and mTOR Inhibitors. Patent WO2015049369, 2015.
  38. 38
    Leroux, F. R.; Manteau, B.; Vors, J. P.; Pazenok, S. Trifluoromethyl ethers--synthesis and properties of an unusual substituent. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2008, 4 (13),  DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.4.13 .
  39. 39
    Burger, M. T.; Pecchi, S.; Wagman, A.; Ni, Z. J.; Knapp, M.; Hendrickson, T.; Atallah, G.; Pfister, K.; Zhang, Y.; Bartulis, S.; Frazier, K.; Ng, S.; Smith, A.; Verhagen, J.; Haznedar, J.; Huh, K.; Iwanowicz, E.; Xin, X.; Menezes, D.; Merritt, H.; Lee, I.; Wiesmann, M.; Kaufman, S.; Crawford, K.; Chin, M.; Bussiere, D.; Shoemaker, K.; Zaror, I.; Maira, S. M.; Voliva, C. F. Identification of NVP-BKM120 as a potent, selective, orally bioavailable class I PI3 Kinase inhibitor for treating cancer. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2 (10), 774779,  DOI: 10.1021/ml200156t
  40. 40
    Rousseau, J. F.; Chekroun, I.; Ferey, V.; Labrosse, J. R. Concise preparation of a stable cyclic sulfamidate intermediate in the synthesis of a enantiopure chiral active diamine derivative. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2015, 19 (4), 506513,  DOI: 10.1021/op500264v
  41. 41
    Brown, G. R.; Foubister, A. J.; Wright, B. Chiral synthesis of 3-substituted morpholines via serine enantiomers and reductions of 5-oxomorpholine-3-carboxylates. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1985, 1, 25772580,  DOI: 10.1039/p19850002577
  42. 42
    Hebeisen, P.; Alker, A.; Buerkler, M. Iterative one pot reactions of a chiral sulfamidate with 2,4,6-trichloropyridine: regiocontrolled synthesis of linear and angular chiral dipyrrolidino pyridines. Heterocycles 2012, 85 (1), 6572,  DOI: 10.3987/COM-11-12360
  43. 43
    Zask, A.; Kaplan, J.; Verheijen, J. C.; Richard, D. J.; Curran, K.; Brooijmans, N.; Bennett, E. M.; Toral-Barza, L.; Hollander, I.; Ayral-Kaloustian, S.; Yu, K. Morpholine derivatives greatly enhance the selectivity of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52 (24), 79427945,  DOI: 10.1021/jm901415x
  44. 44
    Thomas, V. H.; Bhattachar, S.; Hitchingham, L.; Zocharski, P.; Naath, M.; Surendran, N.; Stoner, C. L.; El-Kattan, A. The road map to oral bioavailability: an industrial perspective. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2006, 2 (4), 591608,  DOI: 10.1517/17425255.2.4.591
  45. 45
    Mortensen, D. S.; Fultz, K. E.; Xu, S.; Xu, W.; Packard, G.; Khambatta, G.; Gamez, J. C.; Leisten, J.; Zhao, J.; Apuy, J.; Ghoreishi, K.; Hickman, M.; Narla, R. K.; Bissonette, R.; Richardson, S.; Peng, S. X.; Perrin-Ninkovic, S.; Tran, T.; Shi, T.; Yang, W. Q.; Tong, Z.; Cathers, B. E.; Moghaddam, M. F.; Canan, S. S.; Worland, P.; Sankar, S.; Raymon, H. K. CC-223, a potent and selective inhibitor of mTOR kinase: in vitro and in vivo characterization. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015, 14 (6), 12951305,  DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-1052
  46. 46
    Nosik, P. S.; Ryabukhin, S. V.; Artamonov, O. S.; Grygorenko, O. O. Synthesis of trans-disubstituted pyrazolylcyclopropane building blocks. Monatsh. Chem. 2016, 147 (9), 16291636,  DOI: 10.1007/s00706-016-1726-6
  47. 47
    Zhang, L.; Luo, S.; Mi, X.; Liu, S.; Qiao, Y.; Xu, H.; Cheng, J. P. Combinatorial synthesis of functionalized chiral and doubly chiral ionic liquids and their applications as asymmetric covalent/non-covalent bifunctional organocatalysts. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6 (3), 567576,  DOI: 10.1039/B713843A
  48. 48
    Fabian, M. A.; Biggs, W. H.; Treiber, D. K.; Atteridge, C. E.; Azimioara, M. D.; Benedetti, M. G.; Carter, T. A.; Ciceri, P.; Edeen, P. T.; Floyd, M.; Ford, J. M.; Galvin, M.; Gerlach, J. L.; Grotzfeld, R. M.; Herrgard, S.; Insko, D. E.; Insko, M. A.; Lai, A. G.; Lélias, J. M.; Mehta, S. A.; Milanov, Z. V.; Velasco, A. M.; Wodicka, L. M.; Patel, H. K.; Zarrinkar, P. P.; Lockhart, D. J. A small molecule-kinase interaction map for clinical kinase inhibitors. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 329336,  DOI: 10.1038/nbt1068
  49. 49
    Karaman, M. W.; Herrgard, S.; Treiber, D. K.; Gallant, P.; Atteridge, C. E.; Campbell, B. T.; Chan, K. W.; Ciceri, P.; Davis, M. I.; Edeen, P. T.; Faraoni, R.; Floyd, M.; Hunt, J. P.; Lockhart, D. J.; Milanov, Z. V.; Morrison, M. J.; Pallares, G.; Patel, H. K.; Pritchard, S.; Wodicka, L. M.; Zarrinkar, P. P. A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 127132,  DOI: 10.1038/nbt1358

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 22 publications.

  1. Jindi Huang, Liye Chen, Jiangxia Wu, Daiqiao Ai, Ji-Quan Zhang, Tie-Gen Chen, Ling Wang. Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway in the Treatment of Human Diseases: Current Status, Trends, and Solutions. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 65 (24) , 16033-16061. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01070
  2. Chiara Borsari, Erhan Keles, Denise Rageot, Andrea Treyer, Thomas Bohnacker, Lukas Bissegger, Martina De Pascale, Anna Melone, Rohitha Sriramaratnam, Florent Beaufils, Matthias Hamburger, Paul Hebeisen, Wolfgang Löscher, Doriano Fabbro, Petra Hillmann, Matthias P. Wymann. 4-(Difluoromethyl)-5-(4-((3R,5S)-3,5-dimethylmorpholino)-6-((R)-3-methylmorpholino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)pyridin-2-amine (PQR626), a Potent, Orally Available, and Brain-Penetrant mTOR Inhibitor for the Treatment of Neurological Disorders. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 63 (22) , 13595-13617. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00620
  3. Simone Bonazzi, Carleton P. Goold, Audrey Gray, Noel M. Thomsen, Jill Nunez, Rajeshri G. Karki, Aakruti Gorde, Jonathan D. Biag, Hasnain A. Malik, Yingchuan Sun, Guiqing Liang, Danuta Lubicka, Sarah Salas, Nancy Labbe-Giguere, Erin P. Keaney, Stephanie McTighe, Shanming Liu, Lin Deng, Grazia Piizzi, Franco Lombardo, Doug Burdette, Jean-Cosme Dodart, Christopher J. Wilson, Stefan Peukert, Daniel Curtis, Lawrence G. Hamann, Leon O. Murphy. Discovery of a Brain-Penetrant ATP-Competitive Inhibitor of the Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) for CNS Disorders. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 63 (3) , 1068-1083. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01398
  4. Denise Rageot, Florent Beaufils, Chiara Borsari, Alix Dall’Asen, Markus Neuburger, Paul Hebeisen, Matthias P. Wymann. Scalable, Economical, and Practical Synthesis of 4-(Difluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine, a Key Intermediate for Lipid Kinase Inhibitors. Organic Process Research & Development 2019, 23 (11) , 2416-2424. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00312
  5. Chiara Borsari, Denise Rageot, Florent Beaufils, Thomas Bohnacker, Erhan Keles, Ivan Buslov, Anna Melone, Alexander M. Sele, Paul Hebeisen, Doriano Fabbro, Petra Hillmann, Matthias P. Wymann. Preclinical Development of PQR514, a Highly Potent PI3K Inhibitor Bearing a Difluoromethyl–Pyrimidine Moiety. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2019, 10 (10) , 1473-1479. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.9b00333
  6. Ahmed H.E. Hassan, Mohammad Maqusood Alam, Trong-Nhat Phan, Kyung-Hwa Baek, Hyeryon Lee, Soo Bin Cho, Chae Hyeon Lee, Yeon Ju Kim, Joo Hwan No, Yong Sup Lee. Repurposing of conformationally-restricted cyclopentane-based AKT–inhibitors leads to discovery of potential and more selective antileishmanial agents than miltefosine. Bioorganic Chemistry 2023, 141 , 106890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2023.106890
  7. Shashwati Paul, Daniel Adelfinsky, Christophe Salome, Thomas Fessard, M. Kevin Brown. 2,5-disubstituted bicyclo[2.1.1]hexanes as rigidified cyclopentane variants. Chemical Science 2023, 14 (30) , 8070-8075. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SC02695G
  8. Sara Asadi, Hossein Mehrabi. Efficient synthesis of some novel pyrimido[4,5‐ e ][1,3]oxazine dione derivatives via one‐pot three‐component reaction under thermal and thermal microwave‐assisted conditions. Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry 2023, 60 (3) , 497-503. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhet.4605
  9. Martina De Pascale, Lukas Bissegger, Chiara Tarantelli, Florent Beaufils, Alessandro Prescimone, Hayget Mohamed Seid Hedad, Omar Kayali, Clara Orbegozo, Luka Raguž, Thorsten Schaefer, Paul Hebeisen, Francesco Bertoni, Matthias P. Wymann, Chiara Borsari. Investigation of morpholine isosters for the development of a potent, selective and metabolically stable mTOR kinase inhibitor. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 248 , 115038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.115038
  10. Uros Stojiljkovic, Claudio Meyer, Pierre Boulay, Paul Hebeisen, Denise Rageot, Matthias P. Wymann, Chiara Borsari. Stereospecific Synthesis of Substituted Sulfamidates as Privileged Morpholine Building Blocks. Synthesis 2023, 55 (03) , 499-509. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1915-7794
  11. Patrik Oleksak, Eugenie Nepovimova, Zofia Chrienova, Kamil Musilek, Jiri Patocka, Kamil Kuca. Contemporary mTOR inhibitor scaffolds to diseases breakdown: A patent review (2015–2021). European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 238 , 114498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114498
  12. Beibei Mao, Qi Zhang, Li Ma, Dong-Sheng Zhao, Pan Zhao, Peizheng Yan. Overview of Research into mTOR Inhibitors. Molecules 2022, 27 (16) , 5295. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165295
  13. Bohdan Vashchenko, Oleksandr Grygorenko, Oleksandr Stepaniuk. Heterocyclizations of β-alkoxy, β-diaminoalkyl, and related β-functionalized enones (enals) with NCN-binucleophiles. Ukrainica Bioorganica Acta 2022, 17 (1) , 56-71. https://doi.org/10.15407/bioorganica2022.01.056
  14. Chiara Borsari, Matthias P. Wymann. Targeting Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase – Five Decades of Chemical Space Exploration. CHIMIA 2021, 75 (12) , 1037. https://doi.org/10.2533/chimia.2021.1037
  15. Chiara Borsari, Martina De Pascale, Matthias P. Wymann. Chemical and Structural Strategies to Selectively Target mTOR Kinase. ChemMedChem 2021, 16 (18) , 2744-2759. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.202100332
  16. Li Chen, Rong Huang, Xing-Han Yun, Tian-Hui Hao, Sheng-Jiao Yan. Multi-component cascade reaction of 3-formylchromones: highly selective synthesis of 4,5-dihydro-[4,5′-bipyrimidin]-6(1 H )-one derivatives. Chemical Communications 2021, 57 (62) , 7657-7660. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CC02437J
  17. Chiara Borsari, Erhan Keles, Andrea Treyer, Martina De Pascale, Paul Hebeisen, Matthias Hamburger, Matthias P. Wymann. Second-generation tricyclic pyrimido-pyrrolo-oxazine mTOR inhibitor with predicted blood–brain barrier permeability. RSC Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 12 (4) , 579-583. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0MD00408A
  18. Ruoyu He, Bingyong Xu, Li Ping, Xiaoqing Lv. Structural optimization towards promising β-methyl-4-acrylamido quinoline derivatives as PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitors for anti-cancer therapy: The in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 214 , 113249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113249
  19. S. V. Fedoseev, O. E. Ershov. Reaction of 4-Halo-3-hydroxyfuro[3,4-c]pyridin-1(3H)-ones with Morpholine and Thiomorpholine. Russian Journal of Organic Chemistry 2021, 57 (3) , 483-485. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070428021030234
  20. Rajkumar Lalji Sahani, Raquel Diana-Rivero, Sanjeev Kumar V. Vernekar, Lei Wang, Haijuan Du, Huanchun Zhang, Andres Emanuelli Castaner, Mary C. Casey, Karen A. Kirby, Philip R. Tedbury, Jiashu Xie, Stefan G. Sarafianos, Zhengqiang Wang. Design, Synthesis and Characterization of HIV-1 CA-Targeting Small Molecules: Conformational Restriction of PF74. Viruses 2021, 13 (3) , 479. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13030479
  21. Ting-Ting Wu, Qing-Qing Guo, Zi-Li Chen, Li-Li Wang, Yao Du, Rui Chen, Yuan-Hu Mao, Sheng-Gang Yang, Jing Huang, Jian-Ta Wang, Ling Wang, Lei Tang, Ji-Quan Zhang. Design, synthesis and bioevaluation of novel substituted triazines as potential dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitors. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 204 , 112637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112637
  22. Cedric Magaway, Eugene Kim, Estela Jacinto. Targeting mTOR and Metabolism in Cancer: Lessons and Innovations. Cells 2019, 8 (12) , 1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8121584
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Chemical structures of rapamycin and rapalogs and a selection of ATP-competitive mTOR kinase inhibitor (TORKi) compounds.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Strategy for the development of mTOR selective inhibitors starting from PQR309 (1): rigidification strategy (red dotted lines) and removal of trifluoromethyl group from the 2-aminopyridine moiety (blue).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (A) Docking of compound 3a (plum) into PI3Kγ (gray) starting from PDB code 5JHB (see ref (32)). Structural water molecules are shown in red, and water-mediated H-bonds are depicted as dashed black lines. (B) Docking of compound 2a (gold) and (C) compound 2b (green) into mTOR (turquoise) starting from PDB code 4JT6. The important features for mTOR selectivity are depicted in a ball and stick representation. (D) Docking of compound 2a (gold) and (E) compound 2b (green) into PI3Kα (gray) starting from PDB code 3ZIM. The exit vector from the restricted morpholine oxygen is shown as a black arrow.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. c

    aPrepared according to ref (32).

    bPrepared according to procedure vii. After the reaction, the two regioisomers (26 and 32) were separated by column chromatography.

    c(A) Reagents and conditions: (i) (1) benzaldehyde, 2 M NaOH, rt, 30 min; (2) NaBH4, 5 °C → rt, 1 h; (ii) (1) chloroacetyl chloride, K2CO3, THF/H2O, 0 °C, 1 h; (2) NaOH, 5 °C, 2 h; (iii) borane–dimethyl sulfide complex, Et3N, THF, 0 °C → 65 °C, 5 h; (iv) Pd/C, H2, 2.8 bar, 48 h; (v) thionyl chloride, imidazole, DCM, −5 °C → rt → 0 °C, 2 h; (vi) ruthenium(IV) oxide hydrate, NaIO4, rt, o/n. (B) Reagents and conditions: (vii) morpholine derivative (Mn–H), DIPEA, DCM, 0 °C → rt, o/n; (viii) (1) n-BuLi, CuI, −78 °C → rt, o/n; (2) HCl conc, MeOH, 45 °C, 4–6 h; (3) NaOH, H2O, rt, 1–16 h; (ix) (1) boronic ester 38 or 41, XPhosPdG2 (cat.), K3PO4, dioxane/H2O, 95 °C, 2–16 h; (2) HCl, dioxane/H2O, 60 °C, 3–16 h (for 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 6a, 6b, 7a, 7b, 8a, 8b, 9a, 9b, 10a, 10b, and 14b); (x) 2-aminopyridine-5-boronic acid pinacol ester, XPhosPdG2 (cat.), K3PO4, dioxane/H2O, 95 °C (for 11b), o/n; (xi) boronic ester 39, Pd(dppf)Cl2 (cat.), CsCO3, THF, Δ, o/n (for 12b); (xii) (1) boronic ester generated in situ, XPhosPdG2 (cat.), K3PO4, dioxane/H2O, 95 °C, 3–3.5 h; (2) HCl, 80 °C, o/n (for 13b and 15b); (xiii) (1) boronic ester generated in situ, XPhosPdG2 (cat.), K3PO4, dioxane/H2O, 95 °C, 2–16 h (isolated intermediates 18b and 19b); (2) 18b or 19b, TFA, DCM, 0 °C → rt, 1–3 h (for 16b and 17b).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Plasma and brain concentration of (A) compound 7b and (B) compound 12b after po dosing at 5 mg/kg in male Sprague Dawley rats. Stability of compound 11b (5 μM) with primary hepatocytes from (C) mice (green) and rats (turquoise) and (D) dogs (red) and humans (black) (n = 2). All values are the mean ± SEM. Error bars are not shown when smaller than the symbols.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Pie chart showing the percentage of compound 11b and its metabolites after 60 min of incubation with human recombinant (A) CYP1A1 and (B) CYP1A2. (C) Major metabolites observed upon incubation of 11b with CYP1A1.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 49 other publications.

    1. 1
      Wymann, M. P.; Schneiter, R. Lipid signalling in disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9 (2), 162176,  DOI: 10.1038/nrm2335
    2. 2
      Yang, H.; Rudge, D. G.; Koos, J. D.; Vaidialingam, B.; Yang, H. J.; Pavletich, N. P. mTOR kinase structure, mechanism and regulation. Nature 2013, 497 (7448), 217223,  DOI: 10.1038/nature12122
    3. 3
      Sarbassov, D. D.; Guertin, D. A.; Ali, S. M.; Sabatini, D. M. Phosphorylation and regulation of Akt/PKB by the rictor-mTOR complex. Science 2005, 307 (5712), 10981101,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1106148
    4. 4
      Feng, J.; Park, J.; Cron, P.; Hess, D.; Hemmings, B. A. Identification of a PKB/Akt hydrophobic motif Ser-473 kinase as DNA-dependent protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279 (39), 4118941196,  DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M406731200
    5. 5
      Wymann, M. P.; Marone, R. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase in disease: timing, location, and scaffolding. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2005, 17 (2), 141149,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.02.011
    6. 6
      Bozulic, L.; Hemmings, B. A. PIKKing on PKB: regulation of PKB activity by phosphorylation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009, 21 (2), 256261,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.02.002
    7. 7
      Magnuson, B.; Ekim, B.; Fingar, D. C. Regulation and function of ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K) within mTOR signalling networks. Biochem. J. 2012, 441 (1), 121,  DOI: 10.1042/BJ20110892
    8. 8
      Laplante, M.; Sabatini, D. M. mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell 2012, 149 (2), 274293,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.017
    9. 9
      Saxton, R. A.; Sabatini, D. M. mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell 2017, 168 (6), 960976,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.004
    10. 10
      Vivanco, I.; Sawyers, C. L. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase AKT pathway in human cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2 (7), 489501,  DOI: 10.1038/nrc839
    11. 11
      Marone, R.; Cmiljanovic, V.; Giese, B.; Wymann, M. P. Targeting phosphoinositide 3-kinase: moving towards therapy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Proteins Proteomics 2008, 1784 (1), 159185,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2007.10.003
    12. 12
      Wymann, M. PI3Ks—Drug Targets in Inflammation and Cancer. In Phosphoinositides I: Enzymes of Synthesis and Degradation; Balla, T., Wymann, M., York, J. D., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp 111181.
    13. 13
      Choi, J.; Chen, J.; Schreiber, S. L.; Clardy, J. Structure of the FKBP1 2-rapamycin complex interacting with the binding domain of human FRAP. Science 1996, 273 (5272), 239242,  DOI: 10.1126/science.273.5272.239
    14. 14
      Hudes, G.; Carducci, M.; Tomczak, P.; Dutcher, J.; Figlin, R.; Kapoor, A.; Staroslawska, E.; Sosman, J.; McDermott, D.; Bodrogi, I.; Kovacevic, Z.; Lesovoy, V.; Schmidt-Wolf, I. G. H.; Barbarash, O.; Gokmen, E.; O’Toole, T.; Lustgarten, S.; Moore, L.; Motzer, R. J. Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356 (22), 22712281,  DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa066838
    15. 15
      Motzer, R. J.; Escudier, B.; Oudard, S.; Hutson, T. E.; Porta, C.; Bracarda, S.; Grünwald, V.; Thompson, J. A.; Figlin, R. A.; Hollaender, N.; Urbanowitz, G.; Berg, W. J.; Kay, A.; Lebwohl, D.; Ravaud, A. Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Lancet 2008, 372 (9637), 449456,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61039-9
    16. 16
      Jerusalem, G.; Rorive, A.; Collignon, J. Use of mTOR inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer: an evaluation of factors that influence patient outcomes. Breast Cancer: Targets Ther. 2014, 6, 4357,  DOI: 10.2147/BCTT.S38679
    17. 17
      André, F.; O’Regan, R.; Ozguroglu, M.; Toi, M.; Xu, B.; Jerusalem, G.; Masuda, N.; Wilks, S.; Arena, F.; Isaacs, C.; Yap, Y.-S.; Papai, Z.; Lang, I.; Armstrong, A.; Lerzo, G.; White, M.; Shen, K.; Litton, J.; Chen, D.; Zhang, Y.; Ali, S.; Taran, T.; Gianni, L. Everolimus for women with trastuzumab-resistant, HER2-positive, advanced breast cancer (BOLERO-3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15 (6), 580591,  DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70138-X
    18. 18
      Peterson, M. E. Management of adverse events in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer treated with everolimus: observations from a phase III clinical trial. Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 2013, 21 (8), 23412349,  DOI: 10.1007/s00520-013-1826-3
    19. 19
      Santulli, G.; Totary-Jain, H. Tailoring mTOR-based therapy: molecular evidence and clinical challenges. Pharmacogenomics 2013, 14 (12), 15171526,  DOI: 10.2217/pgs.13.143
    20. 20
      Meng, L. H.; Zheng, X. F. Toward rapamycin analog (rapalog)-based precision cancer therapy. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2015, 36 (10), 11631169,  DOI: 10.1038/aps.2015.68
    21. 21
      Feldman, M. E.; Apsel, B.; Uotila, A.; Loewith, R.; Knight, Z. A.; Ruggero, D.; Shokat, K. M. Active-site inhibitors of mTOR target rapamycin-resistant outputs of mTORC1 and mTORC2. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7 (2), e1000038,  DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000038
    22. 22
      Kang, S. A.; Pacold, M. E.; Cervantes, C. L.; Lim, D.; Lou, H. J.; Ottina, K.; Gray, N. S.; Turk, B. E.; Yaffe, M. B.; Sabatini, D. M. mTORC1 phosphorylation sites encode their sensitivity to starvation and rapamycin. Science 2013, 341 (6144), 1236566,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1236566
    23. 23
      Jacinto, E.; Loewith, R.; Schmidt, A.; Lin, S.; Ruegg, M. A.; Hall, A.; Hall, M. N. Mammalian TOR complex 2 controls the actin cytoskeleton and is rapamycin insensitive. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004, 6 (11), 11228,  DOI: 10.1038/ncb1183
    24. 24
      O’Reilly, K. E.; Rojo, F.; She, Q. B.; Solit, D.; Mills, G. B.; Smith, D.; Lane, H.; Hofmann, F.; Hicklin, D. J.; Ludwig, D. L.; Baselga, J.; Rosen, N. mTOR inhibition induces upstream receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and activates Akt. Cancer Res. 2006, 66 (3), 15001508,  DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2925
    25. 25
      Liu, P.; Gan, W.; Chin, Y. R.; Ogura, K.; Guo, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, B.; Blenis, J.; Cantley, L. C.; Toker, A.; Su, B.; Wei, W. PtdIns(3,4,5)P3-dependent activation of the mTORC2 kinase complex. Cancer Discovery 2015, 5 (11), 11941209,  DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0460
    26. 26
      Nowak, P.; Cole, D. C.; Brooijmans, N.; Bursavich, M. G.; Curran, K. J.; Ellingboe, J. W.; Gibbons, J. J.; Hollander, I.; Hu, Y.; Kaplan, J.; Malwitz, D. J.; Toral-Barza, L.; Verheijen, J. C.; Zask, A.; Zhang, W. G.; Yu, K. Discovery of potent and selective inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52 (22), 70817089,  DOI: 10.1021/jm9012642
    27. 27
      Jin, Z.; Niu, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Q.; Yang, A. Preclinical study of CC223 as a potential anti-ovarian cancer agent. Oncotarget 2017, 8 (35), 5846958479,  DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17753
    28. 28
      Slotkin, E. K.; Patwardhan, P. P.; Vasudeva, S. D.; de Stanchina, E.; Tap, W. D.; Schwartz, G. K. MLN0128, an ATP-competitive mTOR kinase inhibitor with potent in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity, as potential therapy for bone and soft-tissue sarcoma. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015, 14 (2), 395406,  DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0711
    29. 29
      Pike, K. G.; Malagu, K.; Hummersone, M. G.; Menear, K. A.; Duggan, H. M.; Gomez, S.; Martin, N. M.; Ruston, L.; Pass, S. L.; Pass, M. Optimization of potent and selective dual mTORC1 and mTORC2 inhibitors: the discovery of AZD8055 and AZD2014. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23 (5), 12121216,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.01.019
    30. 30
      Lee, J. S.; Vo, T. T.; Fruman, D. A. Targeting mTOR for the treatment of B cell malignancies. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2016, 82 (5), 12131228,  DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12888
    31. 31
      Rageot, D.; Bohnacker, T.; Melone, A.; Langlois, J. B.; Borsari, C.; Hillmann, P.; Sele, A. M.; Beaufils, F.; Zvelebil, M.; Hebeisen, P.; Loscher, W.; Burke, J.; Fabbro, D.; Wymann, M. P. Discovery and preclinical characterization of 5-[4,6-Bis({3-oxa-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-8-yl})-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]-4-(difluoro methyl)pyridin-2-amine (PQR620), a highly potent and selective mTORC1/2 inhibitor for cancer and neurological disorders. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61 (22), 1008410105,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01262
    32. 32
      Bohnacker, T.; Prota, A. E.; Beaufils, F.; Burke, J. E.; Melone, A.; Inglis, A. J.; Rageot, D.; Sele, A. M.; Cmiljanovic, V.; Cmiljanovic, N.; Bargsten, K.; Aher, A.; Akhmanova, A.; Diaz, J. F.; Fabbro, D.; Zvelebil, M.; Williams, R. L.; Steinmetz, M. O.; Wymann, M. P. Deconvolution of Buparlisib’s mechanism of action defines specific PI3K and tubulin inhibitors for therapeutic intervention. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14683,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14683
    33. 33
      Beaufils, F.; Cmiljanovic, N.; Cmiljanovic, V.; Bohnacker, T.; Melone, A.; Marone, R.; Jackson, E.; Zhang, X.; Sele, A.; Borsari, C.; Mestan, J.; Hebeisen, P.; Hillmann, P.; Giese, B.; Zvelebil, M.; Fabbro, D.; Williams, R. L.; Rageot, D.; Wymann, M. P. 5-(4,6-Dimorpholino-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine (PQR309), a potent, brain-penetrant, orally bioavailable, pan-class I PI3K/mTOR inhibitor as clinical candidate in oncology. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60 (17), 75247538,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00930
    34. 34
      Tarantelli, C.; Gaudio, E.; Arribas, A. J.; Kwee, I.; Hillmann, P.; Rinaldi, A.; Cascione, L.; Spriano, F.; Bernasconi, E.; Guidetti, F.; Carrassa, L.; Pittau, R. B.; Beaufils, F.; Ritschard, R.; Rageot, D.; Sele, A.; Dossena, B.; Rossi, F. M.; Zucchetto, A.; Taborelli, M.; Gattei, V.; Rossi, D.; Stathis, A.; Stussi, G.; Broggini, M.; Wymann, M. P.; Wicki, A.; Zucca, E.; Cmiljanovic, V.; Fabbro, D.; Bertoni, F. PQR309 is a novel dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor with preclinical antitumor activity in lymphomas as a single agent and in combination therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24 (1), 120129,  DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1041
    35. 35
      Wicki, A.; Brown, N.; Xyrafas, A.; Bize, V.; Hawle, H.; Berardi, S.; Cmiljanovic, N.; Cmiljanovic, V.; Stumm, M.; Dimitrijevic, S.; Herrmann, R.; Pretre, V.; Ritschard, R.; Tzankov, A.; Hess, V.; Childs, A.; Hierro, C.; Rodon, J.; Hess, D.; Joerger, M.; von Moos, R.; Sessa, C.; Kristeleit, R. First-in human, phase 1, dose-escalation pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the oral dual PI3K and mTORC1/2 inhibitor PQR309 in patients with advanced solid tumors (SAKK 67/13). Eur. J. Cancer 2018, 96, 616,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.03.012
    36. 36
      Fang, Z.; Song, Y.; Zhan, P.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, X. Conformational restriction: an effective tactic in “follow-on”-based drug discovery. Future Med. Chem. 2014, 6 (8), 885901,  DOI: 10.4155/fmc.14.50
    37. 37
      Cmiljanovic, V.; Hebeisen, P.; Jackson, E.; Beaufils, F.; Bohnacker, T.; Wymann, M. P. Conformationally Restricted PI3K and mTOR Inhibitors. Patent WO2015049369, 2015.
    38. 38
      Leroux, F. R.; Manteau, B.; Vors, J. P.; Pazenok, S. Trifluoromethyl ethers--synthesis and properties of an unusual substituent. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2008, 4 (13),  DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.4.13 .
    39. 39
      Burger, M. T.; Pecchi, S.; Wagman, A.; Ni, Z. J.; Knapp, M.; Hendrickson, T.; Atallah, G.; Pfister, K.; Zhang, Y.; Bartulis, S.; Frazier, K.; Ng, S.; Smith, A.; Verhagen, J.; Haznedar, J.; Huh, K.; Iwanowicz, E.; Xin, X.; Menezes, D.; Merritt, H.; Lee, I.; Wiesmann, M.; Kaufman, S.; Crawford, K.; Chin, M.; Bussiere, D.; Shoemaker, K.; Zaror, I.; Maira, S. M.; Voliva, C. F. Identification of NVP-BKM120 as a potent, selective, orally bioavailable class I PI3 Kinase inhibitor for treating cancer. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2 (10), 774779,  DOI: 10.1021/ml200156t
    40. 40
      Rousseau, J. F.; Chekroun, I.; Ferey, V.; Labrosse, J. R. Concise preparation of a stable cyclic sulfamidate intermediate in the synthesis of a enantiopure chiral active diamine derivative. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2015, 19 (4), 506513,  DOI: 10.1021/op500264v
    41. 41
      Brown, G. R.; Foubister, A. J.; Wright, B. Chiral synthesis of 3-substituted morpholines via serine enantiomers and reductions of 5-oxomorpholine-3-carboxylates. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1985, 1, 25772580,  DOI: 10.1039/p19850002577
    42. 42
      Hebeisen, P.; Alker, A.; Buerkler, M. Iterative one pot reactions of a chiral sulfamidate with 2,4,6-trichloropyridine: regiocontrolled synthesis of linear and angular chiral dipyrrolidino pyridines. Heterocycles 2012, 85 (1), 6572,  DOI: 10.3987/COM-11-12360
    43. 43
      Zask, A.; Kaplan, J.; Verheijen, J. C.; Richard, D. J.; Curran, K.; Brooijmans, N.; Bennett, E. M.; Toral-Barza, L.; Hollander, I.; Ayral-Kaloustian, S.; Yu, K. Morpholine derivatives greatly enhance the selectivity of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52 (24), 79427945,  DOI: 10.1021/jm901415x
    44. 44
      Thomas, V. H.; Bhattachar, S.; Hitchingham, L.; Zocharski, P.; Naath, M.; Surendran, N.; Stoner, C. L.; El-Kattan, A. The road map to oral bioavailability: an industrial perspective. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2006, 2 (4), 591608,  DOI: 10.1517/17425255.2.4.591
    45. 45
      Mortensen, D. S.; Fultz, K. E.; Xu, S.; Xu, W.; Packard, G.; Khambatta, G.; Gamez, J. C.; Leisten, J.; Zhao, J.; Apuy, J.; Ghoreishi, K.; Hickman, M.; Narla, R. K.; Bissonette, R.; Richardson, S.; Peng, S. X.; Perrin-Ninkovic, S.; Tran, T.; Shi, T.; Yang, W. Q.; Tong, Z.; Cathers, B. E.; Moghaddam, M. F.; Canan, S. S.; Worland, P.; Sankar, S.; Raymon, H. K. CC-223, a potent and selective inhibitor of mTOR kinase: in vitro and in vivo characterization. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015, 14 (6), 12951305,  DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-1052
    46. 46
      Nosik, P. S.; Ryabukhin, S. V.; Artamonov, O. S.; Grygorenko, O. O. Synthesis of trans-disubstituted pyrazolylcyclopropane building blocks. Monatsh. Chem. 2016, 147 (9), 16291636,  DOI: 10.1007/s00706-016-1726-6
    47. 47
      Zhang, L.; Luo, S.; Mi, X.; Liu, S.; Qiao, Y.; Xu, H.; Cheng, J. P. Combinatorial synthesis of functionalized chiral and doubly chiral ionic liquids and their applications as asymmetric covalent/non-covalent bifunctional organocatalysts. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6 (3), 567576,  DOI: 10.1039/B713843A
    48. 48
      Fabian, M. A.; Biggs, W. H.; Treiber, D. K.; Atteridge, C. E.; Azimioara, M. D.; Benedetti, M. G.; Carter, T. A.; Ciceri, P.; Edeen, P. T.; Floyd, M.; Ford, J. M.; Galvin, M.; Gerlach, J. L.; Grotzfeld, R. M.; Herrgard, S.; Insko, D. E.; Insko, M. A.; Lai, A. G.; Lélias, J. M.; Mehta, S. A.; Milanov, Z. V.; Velasco, A. M.; Wodicka, L. M.; Patel, H. K.; Zarrinkar, P. P.; Lockhart, D. J. A small molecule-kinase interaction map for clinical kinase inhibitors. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 329336,  DOI: 10.1038/nbt1068
    49. 49
      Karaman, M. W.; Herrgard, S.; Treiber, D. K.; Gallant, P.; Atteridge, C. E.; Campbell, B. T.; Chan, K. W.; Ciceri, P.; Davis, M. I.; Edeen, P. T.; Faraoni, R.; Floyd, M.; Hunt, J. P.; Lockhart, D. J.; Milanov, Z. V.; Morrison, M. J.; Pallares, G.; Patel, H. K.; Pritchard, S.; Wodicka, L. M.; Zarrinkar, P. P. A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 127132,  DOI: 10.1038/nbt1358
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00972.

    • Syntheses of bromo derivative 44 (Scheme S1), bromo derivative 49 (Scheme S2), and compounds 3a5a and 3b5b (Scheme S3); plasma concentration of 7b after a single po dose of 5 mg/kg in rats (Table S1); brain concentration of 7b after a single po dose of 5 mg/kg in rats (Table S2); plasma concentration of 12b after a single po dose of 5 mg/kg in rats (Table S3); brain concentration of 12b after a single po dose of 5 mg/kg in rats (Table S4); stability of compound 11b (5 μM) in primary mouse, rat, dog, and human hepatocytes (Table S5); CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 metabolites identification of 11b (Table S6); proposed metabolic pathway for CYP-dependent metabolism of 11b (Figure S1); chromatogram of compound 11b incubated with CYP1A1 (60 min) (Figure S2); chromatogram of compound 11b incubated with CYP1A1 (0 min) (Figure S3); chromatogram of compound 11b incubated with CYP1A2 (60 min) (Figure S4); chromatogram of compound 11b incubated with CYP1A2 (0 min) (Figure S5); activity data and standard errors of final compounds (Table S7); activity data and standard errors of compounds for modeling (Table S8); TREEspot data visualization of KINOMEScan interactions of compound 12b, PQR620, and INK128 (Figure S6); selectivity profile calculated from KinomeScan data (Table S9); kinase interactions (KINOMEscan data) (Table S10); 1H NMR, 13C{1H} NMR, and NSI-HRMS spectra; HPLC chromatograms; chemical structures of final compounds and intermediates (PDF)

    • Compound 3a-PI3Kγ (PDB)

    • Compound 2a-mTOR (PDB)

    • Compound 2b-mTOR (PDB)

    • Compound 2a-PI3Kα (PDB)

    • Compound 2b-PI3Kα (PDB)

    • Molecular formula strings and some data (CSV)

    Accession Codes

    PDB code 5JHB was used for docking of compound 3a into PI3Kγ. PDB code 4JT6 was used for docking of compounds 2a and 2b into mTOR kinase. PDB code 3ZIM was used for docking of compounds 2a and 2b into PI3Kα.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect