ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Accurate Time-Dependent Wave Packet Calculations for the O+ + H2 → OH+ + H Ion–Molecule Reaction

View Author Information
Department of Physics, Firat University, 23169 Elazig̃, Turkey
Departamento de Química Física I, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Unidad Asociada I+D+i CSIC), 28040 Madrid, Spain
§ Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742-2021, United States
Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y de Agregados, Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC, C/Serrano, 123, 28006 Madrid, Spain
Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. A 2015, 119, 50, 11951–11962
Publication Date (Web):March 30, 2015
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b00815
Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    641

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
    Read OnlinePDF (3 MB)
    Supporting Info (1)»

    Abstract

    Abstract Image

    Accurate quantum reactive scattering time-dependent wave packet close-coupling calculations have been carried out to determine total reaction probabilities and integral cross sections for the O+ + H2 → OH+ + H reaction in a range of collision energies from 10–3 eV up to 1.0 eV for the H2 rovibrational states (v = 0; j = 0, 1, 2) and (v = 1; j = 0) using the potential energy surface (PES) by Martı́nez et al. As expected for a barrierless reaction, the reaction cross section decays rapidly with collision energy, Ec, following a behavior that nearly corresponds to that predicted by the Langevin model. Rotational excitation of H2 into j = 1, 2 has a very moderate effect on reactivity, similarly to what happens with vibrational excitation below Ec ≈ 0.3 eV. However, at higher collision energies the cross section increases notably when H2 is promoted to v = 1. This effect is explained by resorting to the effective potentials in the entrance channel. The integral cross sections have been used to calculate rate constants in the temperature range 200–1000 K. A good overall agreement has been found with the available experimental data on integral cross sections and rate constants. In addition, time-independent quantum mechanical and quasi-classical trajectory (QCT) calculations have been performed on the same PES aimed to compare the various methodologies and to discern the detailed mechanism of the title reaction. In particular, the analysis of individual trajectories has made it possible to explain, in terms of the coupling between reagent relative velocity and the topography of the PES, the presence of a series of alternating maxima and minima in the collision energy dependence of the QCT reaction probabilities for the reactions with H2(v=0,1,j=0), which are absent in the quantum mechanical calculations.

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    (a) TDWP cross sections and thermal rate coefficients, (b) contour plots of the potential in R, γ Jacobi coordinates. On top of each plot, a typical trajectory has been represented at various collision energies. For each of them, a movie is included. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    This article is cited by 21 publications.

    1. Ezman Karabulut. Oxygen Molecule Formation and the Puzzle of Nitrogen Dioxide and Nitrogen Oxide during Lightning Flash. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2022, 126 (32) , 5363-5374. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.2c02378
    2. Ezman Karabulut, Fatih Ahmet Celik, Ebru Tanboğa Korkmaz. The long-lived reactive nitrogen species in the troposphere: DFTB model for atmospheric applications. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2023, 25 (7) , 5569-5581. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CP05344F
    3. Yuliang Wang, Hui Li, Jilei Zhang, Cunhai Liu. Dynamics of the proton transfer reaction O + H 2 + ( v  = 0, j  = 0) → OH +  + H on the ground 1 2 A ″ potential energy surface. Molecular Physics 2022, 120 (21) https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2022.2122889
    4. Kaisheng Song, Hongwei Song, Jun Li. Validating experiments for the reaction H 2 + NH 2 − by dynamical calculations on an accurate full-dimensional potential energy surface. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2022, 24 (17) , 10160-10167. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CP00870J
    5. Pierre-Michel Hillenbrand, Nathalie de Ruette, Xavier Urbain, Daniel W. Savin. Branching Ratio for O + H 3 + Forming OH + + H 2 and H 2 O + + H. The Astrophysical Journal 2022, 927 (1) , 47. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac41ce
    6. Ye Mao, Zijiang Yang, Bayaer Buren, Maodu Chen. Non-adiabatic quantum dynamics studies of the Mg+(3p) + D2 → MgD+ + D reaction. Chemical Physics 2021, 550 , 111311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2021.111311
    7. P. G. Jambrina, L. González-Sánchez, M. Lara, M. Menéndez, F. J. Aoiz. Unveiling shape resonances in H + HF collisions at cold energies. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2020, 22 (43) , 24943-24950. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP04885B
    8. Jin-Yu Zhang, Ting Xu, Zhi-Wei Ge, Juan Zhao, Shou-Bao Gao, Qing-Tian Meng. Mechanism analysis of reaction S+(2D)+H2(X1Σg+)→SH+(X3Σ−)+H(2S) based on the quantum state-to-state dynamics*. Chinese Physics B 2020, 29 (6) , 063101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ab889c
    9. L. Bonnet, P. Larregaray. Statistical properties of quantum probability fluctuations in complex-forming chemical reactions. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2020, 152 (8) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139207
    10. Ziliang Zhu, Li Li, Qiju Li, Bing Teng. Dynamics studies of O +  + D 2 reaction using the time-dependent wave packet method. Molecular Physics 2020, 118 (4) , 1619855. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2019.1619855
    11. Feng Gao, Lulu Zhang, Wenli Zhao, Qingtian Meng, Yuzhi Song. Accurate global potential energy surface for SiH2+(X2A1) and quantum dynamics of related reaction H(2S) + SiH+(X1Σ+). The Journal of Chemical Physics 2019, 150 (22) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5088637
    12. Ting Xu, Jinyu Zhang, Juan Zhao, Yuzhi Song, Qingtian Meng. Quantum state-to-state dynamics of O + + H 2 ( ν = 0, j = 0) → OH + ( ν ′ , j ′ ) + H reaction on a global potential energy surface. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 2019, 126 (5) , 53001. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/126/53001
    13. Mei-Ling Yuan, Wen-Tao Li, , , . Dynamics studies of O<sup>+</sup> + H<sub>2</sub>→ OH<sup>+</sup> + H reaction. Acta Physica Sinica 2019, 68 (8) , 083401. https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.68.20182141
    14. Xian-Long Wang, Feng Gao, Shou-Bao Gao, Lu-Lu Zhang, Yu-Zhi Song, Qing-Tian Meng. Novel potential energy surface-based quantum dynamics of ion–molecule reaction ${{\rm{O}}}^{+}+{{\rm{D}}}_{2}\to {\mathrm{OD}}^{+}+{\rm{D}}$. Chinese Physics B 2018, 27 (4) , 043104. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/27/4/043104
    15. Artem Kovalenko, Thuy Dung Tran, Serhiy Rednyk, Štěpán Roučka, Petr Dohnal, Radek Plašil, Dieter Gerlich, Juraj Glosík. OH + Formation in the Low-temperature O + ( 4 S) + H 2 Reaction. The Astrophysical Journal 2018, 856 (2) , 100. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aab106
    16. Thuy Dung Tran, Serhiy Rednyk, Artem Kovalenko, Štěpán Roučka, Petr Dohnal, Radek Plašil, Dieter Gerlich, Juraj Glosík. Formation of H 2 O + and H 3 O + Cations in Reactions of OH + and H 2 O + with H 2 : Experimental Studies of the Reaction Rate Coefficients from T = 15 to 300 K. The Astrophysical Journal 2018, 854 (1) , 25. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaa0d8
    17. Wentao Li, Jiuchuang Yuan, Meiling Yuan, Yong Zhang, Minghai Yao, Zhigang Sun. A new potential energy surface of the OH 2 + system and state-to-state quantum dynamics studies of the O + + H 2 reaction. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2018, 20 (2) , 1039-1050. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP03676K
    18. Ai-jie Zhang, Kai-lu Zang, Jian-feng Jia, Hai-shun Wu, Yi-Wang, Guang-jiu Zhao. A time-dependent quantum dynamical study of the O( 3 P) + D 2 + → OD + + D reaction. Chemical Physics Letters 2017, 676 , 77-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2017.03.026
    19. Dan Li, Yuliang Wang, Tuerdi Wumaier. Quantum and quasi-classical dynamics of reaction H + DN (v = 0,1; j = 0) → HD + N and its isotopic variants. The European Physical Journal D 2016, 70 (8) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2016-70048-2
    20. Samuel M. Greene, Xiao Shan, David C. Clary. An investigation of one- versus two-dimensional semiclassical transition state theory for H atom abstraction and exchange reactions. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2016, 144 (8) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4942161
    21. Ghofran Werfelli, Philippe Halvick, Pascal Honvault, Boutheïna Kerkeni, Thierry Stoecklin. Low temperature rate coefficients of the H + CH+ → C+ + H2 reaction: New potential energy surface and time-independent quantum scattering. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2015, 143 (11) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4931103

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

    STEP 1:
    Click to create an ACS ID

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
    Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect