ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Quantification of Membrane Protein-Detergent Complex Interactions

OR SEARCH CITATIONS

My Activity
Publications

Figure 1Loading Img
Download Hi-Res ImageDownload to MS-PowerPointCite This:J. Phys. Chem. B 2017, 121, 44, 10228-10241
    Article

    Quantification of Membrane Protein-Detergent Complex Interactions
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    † Department of Physics, Syracuse University, 201 Physics Building, Syracuse, New York 13244-1130, United States
    ‡ Structural Biology, Biochemistry, and Biophysics Program, Syracuse University, 111 College Place, Syracuse, New York 13244-4100, United States
    § Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Design and Manufacture of Micro-Nano Biomedical Instruments and School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
    ∥ Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana−Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
    ⊥ Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware, 136 Brown Laboratory, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States
    # Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, 4249 Weiskotten Hall, 766 Irving Av., Syracuse, New York 13210, United States
    ∇ Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts, 820 LGRT, 710 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003-9336, United States
    ■ Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, Syracuse University, 329 Link Hall, Syracuse, New York 13244, United States
    *E-mail: [email protected]
    *Phone: 315-443-8078; Fax: 315-443-9103; E-mail: [email protected]
    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (1)

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

    Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. B 2017, 121, 44, 10228–10241
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b08045
    Published October 16, 2017
    Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society
    Request reuse permissions

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    Although fundamentally significant in structural, chemical, and membrane biology, the interfacial protein-detergent complex (PDC) interactions have been modestly examined because of the complicated behavior of both detergents and membrane proteins in aqueous phase. Membrane proteins are prone to unproductive aggregation resulting from poor detergent solvation, but the participating forces in this phenomenon remain ambiguous. Here, we show that using rational membrane protein design, targeted chemical modification, and steady-state fluorescence polarization spectroscopy, the detergent desolvation of membrane proteins can be quantitatively evaluated. We demonstrate that depleting the detergent in the sample well produced a two-state transition of membrane proteins between a fully detergent-solvated state and a detergent-desolvated state, the nature of which depended on the interfacial PDC interactions. Using a panel of six membrane proteins of varying hydrophobic topography, structural fingerprint, and charge distribution on the solvent-accessible surface, we provide direct experimental evidence for the contributions of the electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions to the protein solvation properties. Moreover, all-atom molecular dynamics simulations report the major contribution of the hydrophobic forces exerted at the PDC interface. This semiquantitative approach might be extended in the future to include studies of the interfacial PDC interactions of other challenging membrane protein systems of unknown structure. This would have practical importance in protein extraction, solubilization, stabilization, and crystallization.

    Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society

    Subjects

    what are subjects

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b08045.

    • Characterization of selenoproteins prior to and following labeling with Texas Red; example of steady-state FP traces illustrating no time-dependent alterations in the anisotropy readout at detergent concentrations much greater than the CMC; example of steady-state FP traces showing no time-dependent alterations in the anisotropy readout after 24 h; hydrodynamic changes of the proteomicelles during the transition of detergent desolvation; table that summarizes the recorded minima and maxima of the anisotropy with maltoside-containing detergents; summary of the fitting results of the two-state, concentration-dependent anisotropy curves acquired with maltoside-containing detergents; time-dependent changes in the FP anisotropy acquired with CHAPS; time-dependent FP anisotropy acquired with LD; table that summarizes the recorded minima and maxima of the anisotropy readout with DM at various pH values; summary of the fitting results of the two-state desolvation curves acquired with DM at various pH values; MD simulations of DDM molecules binding to β-barrel proteins; differential affinity of DDM molecules to residues of β-barrels; DDM binding versus residue type; biophysical properties of the selenoproteins; table that summarizes the recorded minima and maxima of the anisotropy readout with the α-helical membrane proteins solubilized in DDM; and summary of the fitting results of the two-state, concentration-dependent anisotropy curves acquired with α-helical transmembrane proteins (PDF)

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Citation Statements
    Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai
    powered by  Scite

    This article is cited by 22 publications.

    1. Jiaxin Sun, Antun Skanata, Liviu Movileanu. Single-Molecule Observation of Competitive Protein–Protein Interactions Utilizing a Nanopore. ACS Nano 2025, 19 (1) , 1103-1115. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c13072
    2. Chaewon Park, Soohyun Chung, Hansol Kim, Nayoung Kim, Hye Young Son, Ryunhyung Kim, Sojeong Lee, Geunseon Park, Hyun Wook Rho, Mirae Park, Jueun Han, Yejin Song, Jihee Lee, Sung-Hoon Jun, Yong-Min Huh, Hyoung Hwa Jeong, Eun-Kyung Lim, Eunjung Kim, Seungjoo Haam. All-in-One Fusogenic Nanoreactor for the Rapid Detection of Exosomal MicroRNAs for Breast Cancer Diagnosis. ACS Nano 2024, 18 (38) , 26297-26314. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c08339
    3. Lauren A. Mayse, Yazheng Wang, Mohammad Ahmad, Liviu Movileanu. Real-Time Measurement of a Weak Interaction of a Transcription Factor Motif with a Protein Hub at Single-Molecule Precision. ACS Nano 2024, 18 (31) , 20468-20481. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c04857
    4. Ali Imran, Brandon S. Moyer, Dan Kalina, Thomas M. Duncan, Kelsey J. Moody, Aaron J. Wolfe, Michael S. Cosgrove, Liviu Movileanu. Convergent Alterations of a Protein Hub Produce Divergent Effects within a Binding Site. ACS Chemical Biology 2022, 17 (6) , 1586-1597. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.2c00273
    5. Jiaxin Sun, Avinash Kumar Thakur, Liviu Movileanu. Protein Ligand-Induced Amplification in the 1/f Noise of a Protein-Selective Nanopore. Langmuir 2020, 36 (50) , 15247-15257. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02498
    6. Avinash Kumar Thakur, Liviu Movileanu. Single-Molecule Protein Detection in a Biofluid Using a Quantitative Nanopore Sensor. ACS Sensors 2019, 4 (9) , 2320-2326. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.9b00848
    7. Dongxiang Xue, Jingjing Wang, Xiyong Song, Wei Wang, Tao Hu, Lintao Ye, Yang Liu, Qingtong Zhou, Fang Zhou, Zhong-Xing Jiang, Zhi-Jie Liu, Houchao Tao. A Chemical Strategy for Amphiphile Replacement in Membrane Protein Research. Langmuir 2019, 35 (12) , 4319-4327. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b04072
    8. James Wilson, Kumar Sarthak, Wei Si, Luyu Gao, Aleksei Aksimentiev. Rapid and Accurate Determination of Nanopore Ionic Current Using a Steric Exclusion Model. ACS Sensors 2019, 4 (3) , 634-644. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.8b01375
    9. Aaron J. Wolfe, Jack F. Gugel, Min Chen, Liviu Movileanu. Kinetics of Membrane Protein–Detergent Interactions Depend on Protein Electrostatics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2018, 122 (41) , 9471-9481. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b07889
    10. Aaron J. Wolfe, Jack F. Gugel, Min Chen, Liviu Movileanu. Detergent Desorption of Membrane Proteins Exhibits Two Kinetic Phases. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2018, 9 (8) , 1913-1919. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00549
    11. Florian De Pol, Maciej Baranowski, Caroline Neumann, Sofia Trampari, Poul Nissen, Javier Pérez. Simulation and modelling of the detergent corona around the membrane protein MhsT based on SAXS data. Journal of Applied Crystallography 2024, 57 (5) , 1415-1425. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576724006721
    12. Jiaxin Sun, Avinash Kumar Thakur, Liviu Movileanu. Current noise of a protein‐selective biological nanopore. PROTEOMICS 2022, 22 (5-6) https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.202100077
    13. Veronica Zampieri, Alexia Gobet, Xavier Robert, Pierre Falson, Vincent Chaptal. CryoEM reconstructions of membrane proteins solved in several amphipathic solvents, nanodisc, amphipol and detergents, yield amphipathic belts of similar sizes corresponding to a common ordered solvent layer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes 2021, 1863 (11) , 183693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2021.183693
    14. Veronica Zampieri, Cécile Hilpert, Mélanie Garnier, Yannick Gestin, Sébastien Delolme, Juliette Martin, Pierre Falson, Guillaume Launay, Vincent Chaptal. The Det.Belt Server: A Tool to Visualize and Estimate Amphipathic Solvent Belts around Membrane Proteins. Membranes 2021, 11 (7) , 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11070459
    15. Ali Imran, Brandon S. Moyer, Ashley J. Canning, Dan Kalina, Thomas M. Duncan, Kelsey J. Moody, Aaron J. Wolfe, Michael S. Cosgrove, Liviu Movileanu. Kinetics of the multitasking high-affinity Win binding site of WDR5 in restricted and unrestricted conditions. Biochemical Journal 2021, 478 (11) , 2145-2161. https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20210253
    16. Wei Si, Qianyi Sun, Chang Chen, Meng Yu, Jingjie Sha, Yin Zhang, Yajing Kan, Yunfei Chen. Detergent‐Assisted Braking of Peptide Translocation through a Single‐Layer Molybdenum Disulfide Nanopore. Small Methods 2020, 4 (11) https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201900822
    17. Rani Moons, Renate van der Wekken-de Bruijne, Stuart Maudsley, Filip Lemière, Anne-Marie Lambeir, Frank Sobott. Effects of Detergent on α-Synuclein Structure: A Native MS-Ion Mobility Study. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020, 21 (21) , 7884. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21217884
    18. David Winogradoff, Shalini John, Aleksei Aksimentiev. Protein unfolding by SDS: the microscopic mechanisms and the properties of the SDS-protein assembly. Nanoscale 2020, 12 (9) , 5422-5434. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR09135A
    19. Aaron J. Wolfe, Kyle J. Parella, Liviu Movileanu. High‐Throughput Screening of Protein‐Detergent Complexes Using Fluorescence Polarization Spectroscopy. Current Protocols in Protein Science 2019, 97 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/cpps.96
    20. Jonathan R. Burns, Stefan Howorka. Structural and Functional Stability of DNA Nanopores in Biological Media. Nanomaterials 2019, 9 (4) , 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9040490
    21. Joscha Breibeck, Annette Rompel. Successful amphiphiles as the key to crystallization of membrane proteins: Bridging theory and practice. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects 2019, 1863 (2) , 437-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2018.11.004
    22. Nathan G. Brady, Shuo Qian, Barry D. Bruce. Analysis of styrene maleic acid alternating copolymer supramolecular assemblies in solution by small angle X-ray scattering. European Polymer Journal 2019, 111 , 178-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.11.034
    Download PDF
    Go to The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
    Get e-Alerts
    Get e-Alerts

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

    Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. B 2017, 121, 44, 10228–10241
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b08045
    Published October 16, 2017
    Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society
    Request reuse permissions

    Article Views

    1201

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    22
    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.