ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Charge Transfer from Photoexcited Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes to Wide-Bandgap Wrapping Polymer
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
C: Chemical and Catalytic Reactivity at Interfaces

Charge Transfer from Photoexcited Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes to Wide-Bandgap Wrapping Polymer
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Zhuoran Kuang
    Zhuoran Kuang
    Physikalisch Chemisches Institut  and  Centre for Advanced Materials, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229/253, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
  • Felix J. Berger
    Felix J. Berger
    Physikalisch Chemisches Institut  and  Centre for Advanced Materials, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229/253, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
  • Jose Luis Pérez Lustres
    Jose Luis Pérez Lustres
    Physikalisch Chemisches Institut  and  Centre for Advanced Materials, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229/253, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
  • Nikolaus Wollscheid
    Nikolaus Wollscheid
    Physikalisch Chemisches Institut  and  Centre for Advanced Materials, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229/253, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
  • Han Li
    Han Li
    Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen 76344, Germany
    More by Han Li
  • Jan Lüttgens
    Jan Lüttgens
    Physikalisch Chemisches Institut  and  Centre for Advanced Materials, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229/253, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
  • Merve Balcı Leinen
    Merve Balcı Leinen
    Physikalisch Chemisches Institut  and  Centre for Advanced Materials, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229/253, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
  • Benjamin S. Flavel
    Benjamin S. Flavel
    Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen 76344, Germany
  • Jana Zaumseil
    Jana Zaumseil
    Physikalisch Chemisches Institut  and  Centre for Advanced Materials, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229/253, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
  • Tiago Buckup*
    Tiago Buckup
    Physikalisch Chemisches Institut  and  Centre for Advanced Materials, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229/253, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
    *Email: [email protected]. Phone: +49 6221 548723. Fax: +49 6221 548730.
    More by Tiago Buckup
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 15, 8125–8136
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c10171
Published April 14, 2021

Copyright © 2021 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

As narrow optical bandgap materials, semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) are rarely regarded as charge donors in photoinduced charge-transfer (PCT) reactions. However, the unique band structure and unusual exciton dynamics of SWCNTs add more possibilities to the classical PCT mechanism. In this work, we demonstrate PCT from photoexcited semiconducting (6,5) SWCNTs to a wide-bandgap wrapping poly-[(9,9-dioctylfluorenyl-2,7-diyl)-alt-(6,6′)-(2,2′-bipyridine)] (PFO–BPy) via femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. By monitoring the spectral dynamics of the SWCNT polaron, we show that charge transfer from photoexcited SWCNTs to PFO–BPy can be driven not only by the energetically favorable E33 transition but also by the energetically unfavorable E22 excitation under high pump fluence. This unusual PCT from narrow-bandgap SWCNTs toward a wide-bandgap polymer originates from the up-converted high-energy excitonic state (E33 or higher) that is promoted by the Auger recombination of excitons and charge carriers in SWCNTs. These insights provide new pathways for charge separation in SWCNT-based photodetectors and photovoltaic cells.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
  • nc licence
  • nd licence
Copyright © 2021 American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The highly selective wrapping of semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) with conjugated polymers, e.g., polyfluorenes and polythiophenes, has enabled monochiral samples with high purity (1−3) to be available for a wide range of optoelectronic applications from field-effect transistors, (4) light-emitting diodes, (5) and electrochromic cells (6) to photovoltaic cells (7,8) and photodiodes. (9) The interaction of nanotubes with their immediate environment, i.e., the wrapping polymer or matrix, with regard to energy and charge transfer depending on the energy level alignment (10,11) is crucial for their functionality and not yet fully understood. The unique electronic structure and complex photophysics of SWCNTs (12) make this interaction highly interesting from a fundamental and application point of view. For photovoltaic cells based on carbon nanotubes, SWCNTs assume the role of donor in photoinduced charge transfer (PCT) only when a semiconductor with high electron affinity (e.g., fullerene derivatives) acts as an acceptor. (13−15) When wrapped by typical semiconducting polymers, the narrow-bandgap nanotubes usually behave as acceptors for both charges and excitation. (16−21)
Various spectroscopic methods, including pump–probe transient absorption (TA) and transient fluorescence spectroscopy, have been applied to explore the excited-state interactions between SWCNTs and the conjugated wrapping polymer. (11,16,22−25) Strong electronic interaction in SWCNT/polymer hybrids has been concluded by studying the modulation effect of the polymer frontier orbital levels on nanotube valence and conduction band energies, as well as newly formed hybridized electronic states between the two components. (22,23,25) The energy transfer observed in SWCNT/polymer composites also points to an electron-exchange mechanism. (11,16) However, only the first optical bandgap in semiconductors is usually taken into account in studies of the classical PCT mechanism. The electronic interplay between the complex band structure of SWCNTs and the wrapping polymer has not been clarified yet. (26,27)
(6,5) SWCNTs are chosen for this study due to their availability as nearly monochiral samples in large amounts after selective dispersion with a polyfluorene–bipyridine copolymer (PFO–BPy). (2) The energy level alignment of (6,5) SWCNTs and PFO–BPy (Figure 1) indicates that the PFO–BPy-wrapped (6,5) SWCNT hybrid system (hereafter referred to as Hybrid) constitutes a Type-I heterojunction. When regarding the narrow-bandgap (6,5) SWCNT as a charge donor, the PCT from excited (6,5) SWCNT toward wide-bandgap acceptor PFO–BPy is energetically unfavorable, at least for the E11 and E22 transitions. However, the established exciton photophysics of SWCNTs suggests that low-energy photon excitation is able to promote populations of high-energy excitonic states via, e.g., Auger recombination of excitons. (30−36) Under this mechanism, even in the presence of ultrafast intersubband relaxation, high-energy excitonic states still have a considerable decay time as that of the E11 state, which may favor the PCT from excited SWCNTs to a wide-bandgap acceptor. (35) Here, we analyze this SWCNT-based Type-I heterojunction by femtosecond TA spectroscopy. A comparison with surfactant-dispersed (6,5) SWCNTs in water (hereafter referred to as SWCNT), which allows for observations of exciton dynamics without energy or charge transfer, (37−40) is conducted throughout this work. The exciton dynamics of the Hybrid in tetrahydrofuran and SWCNT in water are investigated upon the E11, E22, and E33 excitation with variable excitation fluences, and PCT products in the Hybrid are analyzed. We demonstrate that the PCT from photoexcited (6,5) SWCNT to PFO–BPy is driven by the energetically favorable E33 excitation and may be also driven by the energetically unfavorable E22 excitation. The latter process occurs via Auger recombination of excitons and charge carriers at high excitation fluences.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Schematic energy level alignment of (6,5) SWCNT and PFO–BPy. The density of states of (6,5) SWCNT with characteristic van Hove singularities of the valence (v1, v2, v3) and conduction (c1, c2, c3) band was based on ref (28) and shifted by the reported ionization potential. (16) The HOMO and LUMO energies of PFO–BPy indicated by red horizontal lines were reported by Jang et al. (29) The gray arrows are simplified representations for observed excitonic absorption bands E11, E22, and E33. The inset shows the molecular structure of PFO–BPy.

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Surfactant-Based Carbon Nanotube Dispersion and Chirality Enrichment

The preparation of aqueous (6,5) suspension is based on the pH-modulated aqueous two-phase extraction (ATPE) method. (41) Simply, a 20 mg portion of CoMoCAT SG65i SWCNTs powder (SouthWest Nanotechnologies, lot no. SG65i-L58) was suspended in 20 mL of aqueous 1% (m/v) DOC (BioChemica) by tip sonication (Weber Ultrasonics, 35 kHz, 16 W in continuous mode) for 1 h while immersed in an ice bath. The resulting dispersion was centrifuged at 45 560g (Beckman Optima L-80 XP, SW 40 Ti rotor) for 1 h, and the supernatant collected for ATPE. ATPE then was performed at a concentration of 4% (m/m) dextran (Mw 70 000 Da, TCI), 8% (m/m) PEG (Mw 6000 Da, Alfa Aesar) with 0.5% m/v SDS (Sigma-Aldrich), and 0.05% m/v DOC (Sigma-Aldrich). First, 16 μL of HCl (0.5 M) was added to a 16 mL ATPE system (with 0.8 mL of SWCNT suspension) to remove the nanotubes with a diameter larger than the (6,5). Next, a fresh mimic top phase was added along with some new HCl (20 μL) to obtain (6,5) on the top phase. Finally, the (6,5) enriched top phase was added to a fresh mimic bottom phase with 40 μL of sodium hypochlorite (NaClO, Honeywell) and 20 μL of compensated HCl to separate the metallic tubes with similar diameters. After centrifugation, the purified single chirality (6,5) remained in the bottom phase while the metallic tubes (7,4) partitioned to the top phase.

Carbon Nanotube Dispersion by Polymer Wrapping

As described previously, (2) nearly monochiral polymer-wrapped (6,5) SWCNTs were obtained by shear force mixing (Silverson L2/Air, 10 230 rpm, 72 h) of CoMoCAT raw material (Chasm Advanced Materials, SG65i-L58, 0.38 g L–1) and poly-[(9,9-dioctylfluorenyl-2,7-diyl)-alt-(6,6′)-(2,2′-bipyridine)] (PFO–BPy, American Dye Source, Mw 40 000 Da, 0.5 g L–1) in toluene. Aggregates were removed by centrifugation at 60 000g (Beckman Coulter Avanti J26XP centrifuge) for 2 × 45 min with intermediate supernatant extraction and final filtration through a poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) syringe filter (5 μm pore size). To remove unbound PFO–BPy, the dispersion was passed through a PTFE membrane filter (Merck Millipore, JVWP, 0.1 μm pore size) to collect the SWCNTs and separate the unbound polymer. The SWCNT-coated membrane was further washed by immersion in toluene at 80 °C for 10 min. Finally, the washed, PFO–BPy-wrapped (6,5) SWCNTs (Hybrid) were redispersed from the membrane by bath sonication in a small volume of tetrahydrofuran (THF) for 30 min.

Stationary and Transient Absorption Spectral Measurements

Stationary UV–visible–NIR absorption spectra were measured on a V-770 (JASCO) spectrophotometer. Femtosecond transient absorption (TA) spectral measurements were performed on a commercial TA spectrograph (Helios Fire, Ultrafast Systems). The pump spectra centered at 1000, 576, or 350 nm were generated with a commercial optical parametric amplifier (TOPAS-Prime, Light Conversion), which was pumped by a regeneratively amplified femtosecond Ti:sapphire laser (Astrella, Coherent) centered at 800 nm, with a 4 kHz repetition rate, 78 fs pulse durations, and 1.6 mJ pulse energy. The spectra of pump pulses are shown in Figure S1 in the Supporting Information (SI). The spot size of the focused pump beam was about 250 μm. Typically, pump fluences were 200 μJ·cm–2 for pulse energies of 100 nJ. The supercontinuum probe beam was generated in a sapphire substrate for the NIR detection (800–1350 nm) or in a calcium fluoride substrate for the UV–vis detection (330–650 nm). The pump beam was linearly polarized at the magic angle (54.7°) relative to the probe beam. TA spectra were corrected for the group velocity dispersion of the broad-band probe beam before analysis. All measurements were performed under ambient conditions.

Spectroelectrochemical Measurement

The spectroelectrochemical measurement was carried out on a Lambda 750 (PerkinElmer) UV–visible spectrophotometer combined with a CHI 660D (CH Instruments) potentiostat. The working electrode was an ITO glass (<10 Ω/square). The counter electrode was a platinum coil. The reference electrode was Ag/AgCl. The electrolyte is 0.1 M nBu4NPF6. Experiments were carried out at ambient temperature under the protection of nitrogen.

Results

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Stationary Spectral Characterizations

The stationary absorption spectra (Figure 2) of SWCNT/PFO–BPy Hybrid and surfactant-dispersed SWCNT show the typical excitonic transitions, i.e., E00 → E11, E00 → E22, and E00 → E33 (E00 denotes the ground state in the exciton picture, as shown in Figure S1 in the Supporting Information), peaking around 1000, 576, and 350 nm, respectively. The absorption of PFO–BPy in the Hybrid system is observed as a shoulder on the red side of the E00 → E33 absorption band (see Supporting Information, Figure S2 for details). The visibility of the E00 → E33 absorption is due to the carefully reduced PFO–BPy concentration. Moreover, the chirality distributions of the SWCNT and Hybrid samples have been characterized by absorption spectroscopy (see Supporting Information, section B). (42)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Stationary absorption spectra of surfactant-dispersed (6,5) SWCNT in water, PFO–BPy-wrapped (6,5) SWCNT Hybrid in THF, and PFO–BPy in THF. The positions of absorption peaks are marked with corresponding colors.

Transient Absorption Spectra of the SWCNT

Figure 3 displays selected near-infrared (NIR) TA spectra of SWCNT upon the E11, E22, and E33 resonant excitations. Due to the purity of the sorted (6,5) SWCNT, several known absorption features are clearly observed in the TA spectra. Upon E11 excitation (Figure 3a) the dominant negative signal centered at ∼1000 nm arises from the E00 → E11 bleach, as reported previously. (43) The photoinduced absorption (PA) band centered at ∼1110 nm (∼1.12 eV) on the red side of the E00 → E11 bleach builds up within the instrumental response time and decays subsequently. This PA band has been assigned to the transition from exciton to biexciton (E11 → E11,BX). (39,44) Another PA band peaking at ∼1143 nm (∼1.08 eV) is evident after ∼10 ps and dominating the long-time scale spectra up to the limit of the measurement time window. Previous studies attributed this band to the triplet exciton absorption (3E113Enn). (45) Additionally, a broad PA band over 1200–1350 nm decays rapidly within the initial ∼1 ps. This spectral feature is commonly observed for the optical excitation into the E11 excitonic band at high pump fluence and has been discussed to be related to multiple E11 exciton interactions. (38,39,46,47) The PA band on the blue side of the E00 → E11 bleach is attributed to a transition from a dark E11 state to the unbound two-exciton manifold. (48)

Figure 3

Figure 3. Selected TA spectra of SWCNT in water upon the (a) E11, (b) E22, and (c) E33 excitations. Experimental conditions: (a) λex = 1000 nm, (b) λex = 576 nm, and (c) λex = 350 nm; pump energy: 100 nJ·pulse–1. Dotted lines highlight major transition manifolds.

Resonant excitation into the E22 or E33 excitonic band of SWCNT results basically in the same spectral features (Figure 3b, c): the E11 → E11,BX and 3E113Enn transitions are still evident and show spectral line shapes and positions in agreement with those upon the E11 excitation (vide supra). For excitons created by higher band transitions, such as E22, the intersubband relaxation to the E11 state has been shown to take place within 100 fs. (30,40,48,49) Upon E22 or E33 excitation, the E00 → E11 bleach with a large negative amplitude becomes broader and slightly blue-shifted, which results in larger overlap with the blue-side PA band. Similar spectral dynamics of SWCNT are observed in our results upon the excitation of either the E11, E22, or E33 excitonic band. (44)

Transient Absorption Spectra of the SWCNT/PFO–BPy Hybrid

In the previous section, the intrinsic exciton dynamics of (6,5) SWCNTs upon different excitonic–transition excitations have been shown. Our focus now turns to the excited-state dynamics of the (6,5) SWCNT/PFO–BPy formed heterojunction to find evidence for PCT. Selected NIR TA spectra of the Hybrid upon the E11, E22, and E33 excitations are shown in Figure 4. Besides the known E11 → E11,BX (∼1100 nm, ∼1.13 eV) and 3E113Enn (∼1160 nm, ∼1.07 eV) transitions, an additional broad PA band emerges on the red side of the E00 → E11 bleach in the Hybrid upon E22 and E33 excitation (highlighted by shaded areas in Figure 4b, c). It covers the spectral range of ∼1050–1200 nm that overlaps with the absorption of E11 → E11,BX and 3E113Enn transitions and lasts for tens of picoseconds. Furthermore, on this time scale, we note that the E00 → E11 bleach in the TA spectra of the Hybrid upon the E33 excitation manifests a dynamic blue-shift of up to ∼5 nm. We summarize the peak dynamics in Figure 5. The time-dependent peak-shifting of the E00 → E11 bleach was extracted from the TA spectra by Gaussian-peak fitting in the energy domain within the spectral region of the dominant bleach band centered at ∼1000 nm. Considering that the exciton density is strongly dependent on the excitation fluence (section I), we investigated this peak shift for the SWCNT and Hybrid with various excitation fluences (see Supporting Information, section C for fluence-dependent TA spectra).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Selected TA spectra for the Hybrid in THF upon the (a) E11, (b) E22, and (c) E33 excitations. Experimental conditions: (a) λex = 1000 nm, (b) λex = 576 nm, and (c) λex = 350 nm; pump energy: 100 nJ·pulse–1. Dotted lines highlight major transition manifolds. The shaded shapes indicate the absorption signature of the suspected SWCNT polaron. The asterisks (*) denote the wavelength of 1050 nm.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Pump-energy-dependent peak-shifting dynamics of the E00 → E11 bleaching in TA spectra of the SWCNT (a, b, c) and the Hybrid (d, e, f) in the time window of 0.1–500 ps. Excitation wavelength and corresponding pump energy per pulse are given in legends. Due to dispersion instability under high pump fluences, TA spectra of SWCNT are unavailable at higher fluences in b and c.

As shown in Figure 5a, the peak position of the E00 → E11 bleach for the SWCNT upon the E11 excitation remains stable across the investigated time window. For the SWCNT upon E22 or E33 excitation (Figure 5b and 5c, respectively), the bleach peak shows a slight and smooth red-shift through the entire time window. This trend is widely observed when tracking the dynamics of excitonic band bleach recovery in SWCNTs, and it can be explained by intersubband and intrasubband relaxation. (39,50) Upon exciting the Hybrid with different pump wavelengths, the initial peak position at ∼0.1 ps shifts slightly, which matches well with the trend observed in the SWCNT. However, the peak-shifting dynamics are significantly different for the Hybrid. Besides the smooth red-shift through the entire time window, a dynamic blue-shift of the E00 → E11 bleach is particularly evident within the time delay from 1 to 50 ps when the Hybrid is pumped at E33 (Figure 5f). Notably, the extent of the dynamic blue-shift progressively becomes larger with increasing excitation fluence. When the peak-shifting curves of the Hybrid upon E22 excitation (Figure 5e) are examined, although these curves do not show an obvious blue-shift as E33 excitation, the peak position plateaus on the same time scale at the highest excitation energy. For the Hybrid upon E11 excitation, we hardly observe this trend (Figure 5d), and it behaves almost the same as the SWCNT upon E11 excitation. The additional peak dynamics of the E00 → E11 bleach in the Hybrid upon E33 (and less pronounced upon E22) excitation indicate an additional quasiparticle with a blue-shifted E00 → E11 bleach and an observable buildup time, which may be the PCT product. One point to note is that the dynamic blue-shift in tens of picoseconds does not directly reflect real population dynamics. It only suggests that the share of this new species is increasing among all quasiparticles, and the population of each transient species may be decaying individually on that time scale.

Absorption Features of Charge Transfer Products

To identify the PCT in the Hybrid, we examine the spectroscopic features of potential PCT transient products. (22,51) Charged transient products in SWCNTs have been demonstrated to be two kinds of quasiparticles: (a) the polaron, which describes a conduction electron (or hole) strongly coupled with the lattice ions, (52) or (b) the trion, which is a three-body charge-exciton bound state. (38,47,53,54)
The (6,5) SWCNT polaron can be created in steady state by two methods, namely redox-chemical doping (22,25,55−57) and electrochemical doping. (6,58,59) We carried out the redox-chemical hole-doping of the Hybrid dispersion with NOBF4 (+1.00 V vs Fc/Fc+ in CH2Cl2) (60) as a one-electron oxidant. (61) As shown in Figure 6a, along with the increasing doping level, the stationary absorption of the E00 → E11 transition (∼1000 nm) decreases dramatically and exhibits a blue-shift in wavelength. On the red side of the dominant E00 → E11 transition, stationary spectra of the doped Hybrid feature a broad absorptive band extending from 1030 to 1200 nm, including a peak around ∼1150 nm. The weak absorption at 1150 nm before the oxidative titration ([NOBF4] = 0 μM) results from the slight p-doping of SWCNTs in the air. (62) We expect that the polymer in the Hybrid remains unoxidized during the titration, since the HOMO energy of PFO–BPy is stabilized by 1.4 eV with respect to the first valence band of (6,5) SWCNT. The previously reported electrochemical doping for the Hybrid in films shows a very similar trend to the redox doping. (6) Note that for very high doping levels, the entire NIR absorption of the Hybrid is strongly bleached. We conclude that the above spectral features describe the (6,5) SWCNT hole-polaron absorption transition, denoted as E+00 → E+11.

Figure 6

Figure 6. (a) NIR stationary absorption spectra monitor the oxidative titration of the Hybrid with NOBF4 in toluene:CH2Cl2 (ratio 1:1) mixed solution. Experimental conditions: [(6,5) SWCNT] ∼ 2.74 nM; SWCNT length ∼1000 nm; optical path length = 10 mm. (b) Selected TA spectra for a heavily hole-doped ([NOBF4] ∼ 128 μM) Hybrid in toluene:CH2Cl2 (ratio 1:1) mixed solution. Experimental conditions: λex = 1000 nm, i.e., in resonance with E11; pump energy = 50 nJ·pulse–1. Scaled steady-state absorption spectrum (inverted shaded shape) is shown for comparison.

In order to examine the spectral signature of trions, we conducted the TA measurement on the heavily hole-doped ([NOBF4] ∼ 128 μM) Hybrid under E11 excitation. (47) As shown in Figure 6b, the initial TA spectra show the E00 → E11 bleach at ∼1000 nm and E+00 → E+11 bleach at ∼1150 nm. The E+00 → E+11 bleach decreases within ∼1 ps, and meanwhile a new absorptive species centered at ∼1190 nm (∼1.04 eV) is formed. This band has been assigned to a positive trion (Tr+11 → Tr+nn) absorption of (6,5) SWCNTs. (38,47) The spectral signature of trions in the Hybrid is consistent with that observed in (6,5) SWCNT superstructures reported by Therien et al. (38,47)

Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Observation of Charge Transfer in SWCNT/PFO–BPy Hybrid

Combining the results of redox-chemical and electrochemical doping (vide supra), we can summarize the spectroscopic features of the (6,5) SWCNT hole-polaron (E+00 → E+11) in comparison with the excitonic absorption spectrum of neutral (6,5) SWCNTs. The (6,5) SWCNTs hole-polaron features a bleached and blue-shifted E00 → E11 transition and an additional absorption band covering 1030–1200 nm, the line shape of which strongly depends on the charge carrier level. (25,55,57−59,63) The electronic absorption transitions of oxidized nanotubes are explained by the electron depletion of the top of the valence band, which results in an increase in the E00 → E11 transition energy and leads to additional electronic transitions. (25,59) It is noteworthy that studies by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy reveal that the unpaired electrons in lightly reduced SWCNTs are relatively free and fast-relaxing. (20) This is certainly valid for metallic SWCNTs but has been corroborated as well for semiconducting SWCNTs. (64) Thus, the “polaron” in SWCNTs is relatively delocalized, which may prolong the lifetime of the charge-separation state.
As shown in Figure 5, TA spectra of the Hybrid feature a dynamic blue-shift of the E00 → E11 bleach in picoseconds following the E22 and E33 excitations, which strongly suggests the formation of the SWCNT polaron (E±00 → E±11). Although the triplet absorption also contributes to the absorption around 1160 nm where an absorption peak of E±00 → E±11 is located, the TA spectra of SWCNT indicate that the formation of triplet excitons is independent of the excitation energy and fluence. According to the reported time constant of intersystem crossing of ∼20 ps in (6,5) SWCNTs, (45) the broad absorption band at 1030–1200 nm and the peak around 1160 nm formed in the first few picoseconds in the Hybrid upon high-energy excitation should be attributed to the E±00 → E±11 transition. However, the spectral overlap between E±00 → E±11, E11 → E11,BX, and 3E113Enn transitions (compare Figure 4 with Figure 6a) impedes a spectral disentanglement of the SWCNT polaron dynamics via global analysis of the TA dynamics of the Hybrid. Thus, we select the TA kinetics at 1050 nm, where an isosbestic point with almost zero ΔA is located in the TA spectra of the SWCNT, to further investigate the formation of the SWCNT polaron in the Hybrid. As shown in Figure 7a–c, the normalized kinetic traces for the Hybrid pumped at very low pump energy (5 or 20 nJ·pulse–1) show a smooth decay which is generally the same for the E11, E22, and E33 excitations. This decay component arises from the absorption edge of E11 → E11,BX (centered at 1100 nm) transition. When the pump energy is increased from 50 to 400 nJ·pulse–1, the dynamics of the SWCNT polaron emerge. It becomes progressively evident in the Hybrid upon E22 and E33 excitation (Figure 7b, c) and overlaps with the E11 → E11,BX absorption. The absorption amplitude reaches its maximum at ∼3 ps and slowly decays over a few hundred picoseconds. The spectroscopic features of SWCNT polaron absorption over 1050–1200 nm can be observed in the normalized TA spectra of the Hybrid at the probe delay of 3 ps (Figure 7e, f), matching well with the absorptive feature of the SWCNT hole-polaron (E+00 → E+11, shown in blue lines) obtained by chemical doping (vide supra). In the TA spectra of the Hybrid upon E11 excitation, the signature of the SWCNT polaron is hardly observed in the respective kinetics and spectra (Figure 7a, d). In addition, using the spectroelectrochemical method, the PFO–BPy polaron was prepared and observed in the steady-state spectrum. As one would expect, the formation of the PFO–BPy polaron is also observed in the UV region of the Hybrid TA spectra around 380 nm (see Supporting Information, sections E and F). Hence, we conclude that a PCT reaction takes place in the SWCNT/PFO–BPy Hybrid system, forming an interfacial charge-separated state. (22)

Figure 7

Figure 7. Normalized pump-energy-dependent TA traces at 1050 nm for the Hybrid in THF upon (a) E11, (b) E22, and (c) E33 excitation. Note that traces were normalized by the ΔA amplitude at 0.1–0.2 ps considering the instrumental response. Normalized pump-energy-dependent TA spectra for the Hybrid in THF at a time delay of ∼3 ps upon the (d) E11, (e) E22, and (f) E33 excitations. Note that spectra were normalized at the E00 → E11 bleaching maximum. The blue lines represent the stationary absorption feature of the (6,5) SWCNT hole-polaron obtained by redox-chemical doping ([NOBF4] ∼ 128.4 μM, shown in Figure 6a).

It is worth adding that we have not observed any spectral evidence of trion formation, as previously identified from the hole-doped Hybrid solution (Figure 6b), in the TA spectra of undoped SWCNT or Hybrid.
In the Hybrid, the direction of PCT can be deduced by analyzing the excitation distribution between the two components. In the case of E11 or E22 excitation of the Hybrid, the pump pulse centered at 1000 or 576 nm is far away from the UV resonant absorption of PFO–BPy. Thus, the PCT in both cases purely originates from the excited (6,5) SWCNT to the PFO–BPy. In the case of E33 excitation, the pump spectrum centered at 350 nm is resonant with (6,5) SWCNT as well as with PFO–BPy. Since PCT from excited PFO–BPy to the (6,5) SWCNTs is also energetically favorable in this case, one needs to evaluate the excitation contribution from (6,5) SWCNT and PFO–BPy in the Hybrid by comparing the initial UV–vis TA spectra of the Hybrid, SWCNT, and PFO–BPy excited at 350 nm. As shown in Figure 8, the TA spectrum of PFO–BPy at 0.2 ps clearly manifests a negative bleach peak (∼365 nm) and a negative stimulated emission peak (∼390 nm) (see Supporting Information, section D for the TA spectral analysis of PFO–BPy). However, the above TA spectral features from excited PFO–BPy are hardly observed in the TA spectrum of the Hybrid at the same time delay (see Supporting Information, section E for a comparison of the full dynamics). The Hybrid TA spectrum only retains the excitation features of the SWCNT, especially for the region of 350–450 nm, and the excitation contribution of PFO–BPy is minimal in comparison to the excitation of (6,5) SWCNTs in the Hybrid. Thus, we conclude that although the PCT from excited PFO–BPy to (6,5) SWCNT cannot be completely ruled out, the current analysis shows that, in the case of E33 (350 nm) excitation of the Hybrid, the PCT from excited (6,5) SWCNT to PFO–BPy is absolutely dominant.

Figure 8

Figure 8. UV–vis TA spectra for the Hybrid in THF, SWCNT in water, and PFO–BPy in THF at a time delay of 0.2 ps. Excitation wavelength: 350 nm. Pump energy: 100 nJ·pulse–1.

An additional point to address is whether an electron or hole transfer takes place. Since the electron and hole in SWCNT have a similar effective mass, electron- and hole-polaron will show very similar absorptive signatures at the same doping level. (65) However, the energy level alignment in the Hybrid (Figure 1) implies that the electron transfer from the third conduction subband (c3) of (6,5) SWCNT to the LUMO of PFO–BPy has a larger driving force than the hole transfer from the third valence subband (v3) to the HOMO. Therefore, photoinduced electron transfer from (6,5) SWCNT to PFO–BPy is more likely to take place than hole transfer.

Charge Transfer Assisted by Auger Recombination

As discussed above, when the wide-bandgap PFO–BPy acts as a charge acceptor in the Hybrid, the PCT from the E11/E22-excited (6,5) SWCNT to PFO–BPy is energetically unfavorable (Figure 1). However, when multiple excitons are present on a SWCNT in a high-excitation-density regime, strong exciton–exciton interactions lead to Auger recombination of excitons, also known as exciton–exciton annihilation (EEA), in which one exciton recombines to the ground state and the other is promoted to a higher excitonic state or dissociates into free charge carriers. (34,35,39,66) Hence, Auger recombination of excitons can be regarded as a potential energy up-conversion process that forms one high-energy exciton through absorbing two low-energy photons. Under this assumption, the occurrence of PCT driven by E22 (576 nm, 2.15 eV) excitation in the Hybrid indicates that E33 (350 nm, 3.54 eV) or higher-energy excitons are generated via Auger recombination of excitons, thus making the reaction energetically favorable. For the Hybrid upon E11 (1000 nm, 1.24 eV) excitation, however, the annihilation of two E11 excitons is energetically insufficient to directly promote an E33 exciton (350 nm, 3.54 eV). Consequently, the PCT from the E11-excited (6,5) SWCNT to PFO–BPy is quite inefficient as observed in Figure 7. According to previous reports on fluence-dependent dynamics in SWCNTs, (67) we conclude from the estimated exciton density (see Supporting Information, section I) that the exciton–exciton Auger process is unlikely to occur under E22 excitation with less than 20 nJ·pulse–1. As shown in Figure 7, the PCT characteristics are hardly observable under these conditions.
Due to the effect of exciton dissociation in SWCNTs, the elementary excitation specifically involved in the Auger recombination may not be limited to excitons but can also involve unbound charge carriers, i.e., electrons and holes (e, h). The up-converted product in the Auger recombination of charge carriers is a high-energy carrier (electron or hole), while the product in the Auger recombination of excitons is a high-energy exciton (schematically shown in Figure 9a). It has been shown that these two mechanisms can be distinguished by their distinct population kinetics. (34) Auger recombination of charge carriers, as a three-particle process, can be described by a rate equation as
(1)
where ne,h(t) is the population of charge carriers, and γA is the rate constant of the Auger recombination of charge carriers. The solution of eq 1, [ne,h(0)/ne,h(t)]2 – 1 = 2/3γAne,h2(0)t, where ne,h(0) denotes the initial population of charge carriers, predicts a linear dependence between the reciprocal of the charge carrier population squared and the delay time. Auger recombination of excitons, as a two-particle process, can be described as
(2)
where nex(t) is the population of excitons, and γEEA is the rate constant of the Auger recombination of excitons. The solution of eq 2, [nex(0)/nex(t)] – 1 = 1/2γEEAnex(0)t, where nex(0) denotes the initial population of excitons, predicts a linear dependence between the reciprocal of the exciton population and the delay time.

Figure 9

Figure 9. (a) Schematic description of the Auger recombination of charge carriers (left) and excitons (right). ET denotes energy transfer. (b) Kinetics of the integral E00 → E11 bleaching in the TA spectra of the Hybrid in THF upon the E11, E22, and E33 excitations, plotted as {[ΔA(0)/ΔA(t)]2 – 1} (red dots, left axis) and {[ΔA(0)/ΔA(t)] – 1} (blue squares, right axis). Traces are shifted by different offset on the vertical axis for a better comparison. Solid black lines represent the results of the linear fitting. Adjusted R-squared (Adj. R2) and fitting residuals are shown with corresponding colors. Note that the fitting of the E11-excited TA trace started from 1 ps to exclude the nondiffusion-controlled rapid annihilation. (35) Pump energy: 100 nJ·pulse–1.

To analyze the time dependence of the bleach signal in the initial 10 ps of Hybrid upon E11, E22, and E33 excitations, the E00 → E11 bleaching band in the TA signal is integrated, and its kinetics are plotted as shown in Figure 9b (pump energies of 100 nJ·pulse–1) and section G (pump energies of 2–400 nJ·pulse–1) in the Supporting Information. The linear fitting of [ΔA(0)/ΔA(t)] and [ΔA(0)/ΔA(t)]2 shows, however, comparable adjusted R-squared and fitting residuals for all excitation photon energies and excitation fluences. This result suggests that Auger recombination in the Hybrid in the initial 10 ps is not purely excitonic, but the Auger recombination of charge carriers coexists as well.
It is worth noting that when the pump photon energy increases from 1.24 eV (1000 nm, E11 excitation) to 2.15 eV (576 nm, E22 excitation) and 3.54 eV (350 nm, E33 excitation), the charge carrier nature does not obviously replace the excitonic nature as dominant in the elementary excitations of the Hybrid in THF. Besides, the trion, as an indication of efficient free carrier generation (FCG), is absent as well in the TA spectra of the undoped Hybrid as discussed above. All these results indicate that the FCG of the Hybrid in THF is relatively inefficient. The exciton binding energy in carbon nanotubes increases with decreasing solvent dielectric permittivity, (68) which entails that FCG is highly sensitive to the electrostatic environment. Efficient FCG in pristine SWCNTs is usually observed in high dielectric permittivity microenvironments, such as polar solvents, ionic surfactants, or ionic semiconducting polymers. (33,38,69,70) Therien et al. pointed out the adverse effect of the low dielectric environment on FCG in SWCNTs by quantitatively analyzing the FCG efficiency in mixtures of D2O (ε = 78.5) and MeOH (ε = 32.6). (38) Therefore, we deduce that the FCG in the Hybrid may be suppressed by the low dielectric solvent, THF (ε = 7.5). The wrapping PFO–BPy, as a weakly polar polymer, also provides a low dielectric microenvironment for SWCNTs, which is unfavorable to efficient FCG as well. The influence of environmental effects on all-optical FCG in polymer-wrapped SWCNTs still needs further study.
Beside Auger recombination, high-energy and high-fluence excitations may also lead to other nonlinear effects in SWCNTs. The multiple-exciton generation (MEG), as the opposite process of the Auger recombination, forms two excitons by absorbing one photon with energy higher than twice the bandgap. (36) MEG is, however, an intrinsic feature of SWCNTs and should thus be observable in both surfactant-dispersed and polymer-wrapped SWCNTs. The lack of any obvious changes in the line shape of the spectra caused by MEG upon E33 excitation at high pump fluence for pure SWCNTs shows that MEG is not present. Furthermore, MEG as an energy down-conversion process should not contribute to the PCT from excited SWCNTs to wide-bandgap PFO–BPy. Finally, while two-photon absorption (TPA) is an energy up-conversion process which may favor the PCT, TPA coefficients in pristine semiconducting SWCNTs have been reported to be very low. (71)

Charge Separation and Recombination Dynamics

Finally, reaction time constants for photoexcited interfacial charge separation (τCS) and thermal charge recombination (τCR) in the SWCNT/PFO–BPy Hybrid were estimated by fitting the fluence-dependent kinetic traces (see Supporting Informaton, section H). The buildup of the SWCNT polaron signature takes place in τCS ≈ 0.9 ps, which is consistent with the time scale of reported electron transfer in perylenediimide-based polymer-wrapped carbon nanotube superstructures (τCS ≈ 0.4 ps). (22) The decay of the SWCNT polaron manifests in a multiphase process, which was reproduced by three-exponential kinetics (τCR ≈ 3, 50, and 1000 ps). However, the UV–vis TA spectra of the Hybrid corroborate that the decay of the PFO–BPy polaron is on a time scale of a few picoseconds and does not feature a nanosecond-lived component (see Supporting Information, section E). The charge recombination path should not be limited to the direct recombination between the SWCNT hole polaron and PFO–BPy electron polaron. The Type-I heterojunction can efficiently funnel the electron on the LUMO of PFO–BPy into the conduction band of the SWCNT, which is independent of whether the SWCNT is charged or neutral. Consequently, the PFO–BPy polaron features a significantly shorter decay time compared with that of the SWCNT polaron. When electrons back-transfer to neutral SWCNTs, SWCNT electron polarons will be formed and coexist with the hole polarons because of the high migration rate and large delocalization length of the SWCNT polaron. (25,72) Therefore, we deduce that the fast decay of the SWCNT polaron on a time scale of ∼3 ps might originate from the direct charge recombination between the closely associated SWCNT electron polaron and PFO–BPy hole polaron. The delocalized SWCNT electron and hole polarons, which migrate along the nanotubes backbone, prolong the final charge recombination to the subnanosecond time scale. (22,73−75)
Through comparison of the spectra of the SWCNT polaron produced by chemical oxidation and the maximal E00 → E11 blue-shift in the TA spectra (see Supporting Information, section J), we estimate that PCT induces a doping level higher than the equivalent of ∼8 μM NOBF4 in the SWCNTs. However, because of the spectral overlap in the TA spectra, especially at the delay time when the population of the SWCNT polaron reaches its maximum at around 1–3 ps, we could not extract the pure E00 → E11 bleach of the SWCNT polaron. Thus, the degree of charge transfer in the PCT reaction cannot be quantified precisely in this work. The question could be addressed in the future through TA spectroscopy on polymer-SWCNTs in thin-film electrochromic devices. (6)

Conclusion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In summary, we have investigated the charge transfer from photoexcited semiconducting (6,5) SWCNTs to a wide-bandgap wrapping polymer PFO–BPy via femtosecond TA spectroscopy. By spectral and dynamic analysis of the PCT products, we show that the PCT from excited SWCNTs to PFO–BPy can be driven not only by the energetically favorable E33 excitation but also by the energetically unfavorable E22 excitation under high excitation fluences. The energetically unfavorable PCT originates from the Auger recombination of excitons and charge carriers in the SWCNT, which promotes higher energy excitonic states (E33 or higher) and thus makes the charge transfer from the photoexcited narrow-bandgap SWCNT toward the wide-bandgap polymer possible. The spectral dynamics of the SWCNT polaron indicate a time constant of ∼0.9 ps for the interfacial charge separation reaction between the SWCNT and PFO–BPy. The charge recombination may manifest in multiple paths. It includes the direct recombination between the closely associated SWCNT electron polaron and PFO–BPy hole polaron on a time scale of ∼3 ps, while the delocalized SWCNT electron and hole polarons prolong the final charge recombination to the subnanosecond time scale. These findings expand our understanding of the PCT mechanism in Type-I heterojunctions with SWCNTs. When an energy up-conversion process, such as Auger recombination of excitons, takes place in a hybrid system, the energetically unfavorable PCT from a narrow-bandgap nanotube donor to a wide-bandgap polymer acceptor can be driven as well. Such processes might need to be considered for optoelectronic devices that rely on charge separation between nanotubes and semiconducting polymers (e.g., solar cells or photodiodes), in particular in systems where the polymer bandgap is much smaller than that of PFO–BPy.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c10171.

  • Excitonic transitions in the exciton picture, stationary absorption spectra, pump pulse spectra, fluence-dependent NIR transient absorption spectra of SWCNT and SWCNT/PFO–BPy hybrid, transient absorption spectra of PFO–BPy, PFO–BPy polaron in UV–vis transient absorption spectra of the SWCNT/PFO–BPy hybrid and spectroelectrochemistry, elementary excitation analysis of the Auger process, analysis of charge-transfer dynamics, exciton density estimate, and comparison between all-optical doping and chemical doping (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Zhuoran Kuang - Physikalisch Chemisches Institut  and  Centre for Advanced Materials and , Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229/253, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
    • Felix J. Berger - Physikalisch Chemisches Institut  and  Centre for Advanced Materials and , Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229/253, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
    • Jose Luis Pérez Lustres - Physikalisch Chemisches Institut  and  Centre for Advanced Materials and , Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229/253, Heidelberg 69120, GermanyPresent Address: Institut für Experimentelle Physik, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 14, Berlin 14195, Germany
    • Nikolaus Wollscheid - Physikalisch Chemisches Institut  and  Centre for Advanced Materials and , Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229/253, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
    • Han Li - Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen 76344, Germany
    • Jan Lüttgens - Physikalisch Chemisches Institut  and  Centre for Advanced Materials and , Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229/253, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
    • Merve Balcı Leinen - Physikalisch Chemisches Institut  and  Centre for Advanced Materials and , Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229/253, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
    • Benjamin S. Flavel - Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen 76344, GermanyOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8213-8673
    • Jana Zaumseil - Physikalisch Chemisches Institut  and  Centre for Advanced Materials and , Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229/253, Heidelberg 69120, GermanyOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-2048-217X
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This project received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant No. 817494). J.L. acknowledges support by the Volkswagenstiftung (Grant No. 93404). M.B.L. received funding from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, Grant No. ZA 638/7). B.S.F. gratefully acknowledges support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, Grant No. FL 834/2-2, FL 834/5-1, and FL 834/7-1).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 75 other publications.

  1. 1
    Nish, A.; Hwang, J.-Y.; Doig, J.; Nicholas, R. J. Highly selective dispersion of single-walled carbon nanotubes using aromatic polymers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2 (10), 640646,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2007.290
  2. 2
    Graf, A.; Zakharko, Y.; Schießl, S. P.; Backes, C.; Pfohl, M.; Flavel, B. S.; Zaumseil, J. Large scale, selective dispersion of long single-walled carbon nanotubes with high photoluminescence quantum yield by shear force mixing. Carbon 2016, 105, 593599,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.05.002
  3. 3
    Samanta, S. K.; Fritsch, M.; Scherf, U.; Gomulya, W.; Bisri, S. Z.; Loi, M. A. Conjugated Polymer-Assisted Dispersion of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes: The Power of Polymer Wrapping. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47 (8), 24462456,  DOI: 10.1021/ar500141j
  4. 4
    Rother, M.; Brohmann, M.; Yang, S.; Grimm, S. B.; Schiessl, S. P.; Graf, A.; Zaumseil, J. Aerosol-Jet Printing of Polymer-Sorted (6,5) Carbon Nanotubes for Field-Effect Transistors with High Reproducibility. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2017, 3 (8), 1700080,  DOI: 10.1002/aelm.201700080
  5. 5
    Graf, A.; Murawski, C.; Zakharko, Y.; Zaumseil, J.; Gather, M. C. Infrared Organic Light-Emitting Diodes with Carbon Nanotube Emitters. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30 (12), 1706711,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201706711
  6. 6
    Berger, F. J.; Higgins, T. M.; Rother, M.; Graf, A.; Zakharko, Y.; Allard, S.; Matthiesen, M.; Gotthardt, J. M.; Scherf, U.; Zaumseil, J. From Broadband to Electrochromic Notch Filters with Printed Monochiral Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10 (13), 1113511142,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b00643
  7. 7
    Ye, Y.; Bindl, D. J.; Jacobberger, R. M.; Wu, M.-Y.; Roy, S. S.; Arnold, M. S. Semiconducting Carbon Nanotube Aerogel Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells. Small 2014, 10 (16), 32993306,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201400696
  8. 8
    Pfohl, M.; Glaser, K.; Graf, A.; Mertens, A.; Tune, D. D.; Puerckhauer, T.; Alam, A.; Wei, L.; Chen, Y.; Zaumseil, J. Probing the Diameter Limit of Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes in SWCNT: Fullerene Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6 (21), 1600890,  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201600890
  9. 9
    Li, G.; Suja, M.; Chen, M.; Bekyarova, E.; Haddon, R. C.; Liu, J.; Itkis, M. E. Visible-Blind UV Photodetector Based on Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Thin Film/ZnO Vertical Heterostructures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9 (42), 3709437104,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b07765
  10. 10
    Schuettfort, T.; Nish, A.; Nicholas, R. J. Observation of a type II heterojunction in a highly ordered polymer-carbon nanotube nanohybrid structure. Nano Lett. 2009, 9 (11), 38716,  DOI: 10.1021/nl902081t
  11. 11
    Eckstein, A.; Karpicz, R.; Augulis, R.; Redeckas, K.; Vengris, M.; Namal, I.; Hertel, T.; Gulbinas, V. Excitation quenching in polyfluorene polymers bound to (6,5) single-wall carbon nanotubes. Chem. Phys. 2016, 467, 15,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2015.12.006
  12. 12
    Amori, A. R.; Hou, Z.; Krauss, T. D. Excitons in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Their Dynamics. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2018, 69, 8199,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-050317-014241
  13. 13
    Bindl, D. J.; Arnold, M. S. Efficient Exciton Relaxation and Charge Generation in Nearly Monochiral (7,5) Carbon Nanotube/C60 Thin-Film Photovoltaics. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117 (5), 23902395,  DOI: 10.1021/jp310983y
  14. 14
    Wang, J.; Peurifoy, S. R.; Bender, M. T.; Ng, F.; Choi, K.-S.; Nuckolls, C.; Arnold, M. S. Non-fullerene Acceptors for Harvesting Excitons from Semiconducting Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123 (35), 2139521402,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b06381
  15. 15
    Mollahosseini, M.; Karunaratne, E.; Gibson, G. N.; Gascon, J. A.; Papadimitrakopoulos, F. Fullerene-Assisted Photoinduced Charge Transfer of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes through a Flavin Helix. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (18), 590415,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b13496
  16. 16
    Balcı Leinen, M.; Berger, F. J.; Klein, P.; Mühlinghaus, M.; Zorn, N. F.; Settele, S.; Allard, S.; Scherf, U.; Zaumseil, J. Doping-Dependent Energy Transfer from Conjugated Polyelectrolytes to (6,5) Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123 (36), 2268022689,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b07291
  17. 17
    Stranks, S. D.; Yong, C.-K.; Alexander-Webber, J. A.; Weisspfennig, C.; Johnston, M. B.; Herz, L. M.; Nicholas, R. J. Nanoengineering Coaxial Carbon Nanotube–Dual-Polymer Heterostructures. ACS Nano 2012, 6 (7), 60586066,  DOI: 10.1021/nn301133v
  18. 18
    Kang, H. S.; Sisto, T. J.; Peurifoy, S.; Arias, D. H.; Zhang, B.; Nuckolls, C.; Blackburn, J. L. Long-Lived Charge Separation at Heterojunctions between Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Perylene Diimide Electron Acceptors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122 (25), 1415014161,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01400
  19. 19
    Stranks, S. D.; Weisspfennig, C.; Parkinson, P.; Johnston, M. B.; Herz, L. M.; Nicholas, R. J. Ultrafast charge separation at a polymer-single-walled carbon nanotube molecular junction. Nano Lett. 2011, 11 (1), 6672,  DOI: 10.1021/nl1036484
  20. 20
    Niklas, J.; Holt, J. M.; Mistry, K.; Rumbles, G.; Blackburn, J. L.; Poluektov, O. G. Charge Separation in P3HT:SWCNT Blends Studied by EPR: Spin Signature of the Photoinduced Charged State in SWCNT. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5 (3), 601606,  DOI: 10.1021/jz402668h
  21. 21
    Ferguson, A. J.; Blackburn, J. L.; Holt, J. M.; Kopidakis, N.; Tenent, R. C.; Barnes, T. M.; Heben, M. J.; Rumbles, G. Photoinduced Energy and Charge Transfer in P3HT:SWNT Composites. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1 (15), 24062411,  DOI: 10.1021/jz100768f
  22. 22
    Olivier, J. H.; Park, J.; Deria, P.; Rawson, J.; Bai, Y.; Kumbhar, A. S.; Therien, M. J. Unambiguous Diagnosis of Photoinduced Charge Carrier Signatures in a Stoichiometrically Controlled Semiconducting Polymer-Wrapped Carbon Nanotube Assembly. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54 (28), 81338138,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201501364
  23. 23
    Kahmann, S.; Salazar Rios, J. M.; Zink, M.; Allard, S.; Scherf, U.; Dos Santos, M. C.; Brabec, C. J.; Loi, M. A. Excited-State Interaction of Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes with Their Wrapping Polymers. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8 (22), 56665672,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02553
  24. 24
    Dabera, G. D.; Jayawardena, K. D.; Prabhath, M. R.; Yahya, I.; Tan, Y. Y.; Nismy, N. A.; Shiozawa, H.; Sauer, M.; Ruiz-Soria, G.; Ayala, P. Hybrid carbon nanotube networks as efficient hole extraction layers for organic photovoltaics. ACS Nano 2013, 7 (1), 55665,  DOI: 10.1021/nn304705t
  25. 25
    Deria, P.; Olivier, J. H.; Park, J.; Therien, M. J. Potentiometric, electronic, and transient absorptive spectroscopic properties of oxidized single-walled carbon nanotubes helically wrapped by ionic, semiconducting polymers in aqueous and organic media. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (40), 141939,  DOI: 10.1021/ja507457z
  26. 26
    Wu, J.; Zhang, S.; Lin, D.; Ma, B.; Yang, L.; Zhang, S.; Kang, L.; Mao, N.; Zhang, N.; Tong, L. Anisotropic Raman-Enhancement Effect on Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Arrays. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5 (3), 1700941,  DOI: 10.1002/admi.201700941
  27. 27
    Erck, A.; Sapp, W.; Kilina, S.; Kilin, D. Photoinduced Charge Transfer at Interfaces of Carbon Nanotube and Lead Selenide Nanowire. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120 (40), 2319723206,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05571
  28. 28
    Maruyama, S. 1D DOS (van Hove singularity). http://www.photon.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~maruyama/kataura/1D_DOS.htmlhttp://www.photon.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~maruyama/kataura/1D_DOS.html (accessed March 26, 2020).
  29. 29
    Park, K. H.; Lee, S.-H.; Toshimitsu, F.; Lee, J.; Park, S. H.; Tsuyohiko, F.; Jang, J.-W. Gate-enhanced photocurrent of (6,5) single-walled carbon nanotube based field effect transistor. Carbon 2018, 139, 709715,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.07.002
  30. 30
    Manzoni, C.; Gambetta, A.; Menna, E.; Meneghetti, M.; Lanzani, G.; Cerullo, G. Intersubband exciton relaxation dynamics in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94 (20), 207401,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.207401
  31. 31
    Crochet, J. J.; Hoseinkhani, S.; Luer, L.; Hertel, T.; Doorn, S. K.; Lanzani, G. Free-carrier generation in aggregates of single-wall carbon nanotubes by photoexcitation in the ultraviolet regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107 (25), 257402,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.257402
  32. 32
    Park, J.; Reid, O. G.; Blackburn, J. L.; Rumbles, G. Photoinduced spontaneous free-carrier generation in semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8809,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9809
  33. 33
    Soavi, G.; Scotognella, F.; Brida, D.; Hefner, T.; Späth, F.; Antognazza, M. R.; Hertel, T.; Lanzani, G.; Cerullo, G. Ultrafast Charge Photogeneration in Semiconducting Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117 (20), 1084910855,  DOI: 10.1021/jp404009z
  34. 34
    Valkunas, L.; Ma, Y.-Z.; Fleming, G. R. Exciton-exciton annihilation in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2006, 73 (11), 115432,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.115432
  35. 35
    Ma, Y. Z.; Valkunas, L.; Dexheimer, S. L.; Bachilo, S. M.; Fleming, G. R. Femtosecond spectroscopy of optical excitations in single-walled carbon nanotubes: evidence for exciton-exciton annihilation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94 (15), 157402,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.157402
  36. 36
    Wang, S.; Khafizov, M.; Tu, X.; Zheng, M.; Krauss, T. D. Multiple exciton generation in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2010, 10 (7), 23816,  DOI: 10.1021/nl100343j
  37. 37
    O’Connell, M. J.; Bachilo, S. M.; Huffman, C. B.; Moore, V. C.; Strano, M. S.; Haroz, E. H.; Rialon, K. L.; Boul, P. J.; Noon, W. H.; Kittrell, C. Band Gap Fluorescence from Individual Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Science 2002, 297 (5581), 593596,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1072631
  38. 38
    Bai, Y.; Bullard, G.; Olivier, J. H.; Therien, M. J. Quantitative Evaluation of Optical Free Carrier Generation in Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (44), 1461914626,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b05598
  39. 39
    Park, J.; Deria, P.; Olivier, J. H.; Therien, M. J. Fluence-dependent singlet exciton dynamics in length-sorted chirality-enriched single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2014, 14 (2), 50411,  DOI: 10.1021/nl403511s
  40. 40
    Huang, L.; Krauss, T. D. Quantized Bimolecular Auger Recombination of Excitons in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96 (5), 057407,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.057407
  41. 41
    Li, H.; Gordeev, G.; Garrity, O.; Reich, S.; Flavel, B. S. Separation of Small-Diameter Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in One to Three Steps with Aqueous Two-Phase Extraction. ACS Nano 2019, 13 (2), 25672578,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b09579
  42. 42
    Pfohl, M.; Tune, D. D.; Graf, A.; Zaumseil, J.; Krupke, R.; Flavel, B. S. Fitting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Optical Spectra. ACS Omega 2017, 2 (3), 11631171,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.6b00468
  43. 43
    Lüer, L.; Hoseinkhani, S.; Polli, D.; Crochet, J.; Hertel, T.; Lanzani, G. Size and mobility of excitons in (6, 5) carbon nanotubes. Nat. Phys. 2009, 5 (1), 5458,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys1149
  44. 44
    Styers-Barnett, D. J.; Ellison, S. P.; Mehl, B. P.; Westlake, B. C.; House, R. L.; Park, C.; Wise, K. E.; Papanikolas, J. M. Exciton dynamics and biexciton formation in single-walled carbon nanotubes studied with femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112 (12), 45074516,  DOI: 10.1021/jp7099256
  45. 45
    Park, J.; Deria, P.; Therien, M. J. Dynamics and transient absorption spectral signatures of the single-wall carbon nanotube electronically excited triplet state. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (43), 171569,  DOI: 10.1021/ja2079477
  46. 46
    Korovyanko, O. J.; Sheng, C. X.; Vardeny, Z. V.; Dalton, A. B.; Baughman, R. H. Ultrafast spectroscopy of excitons in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92 (1), 017403,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.017403
  47. 47
    Bai, Y.; Olivier, J. H.; Bullard, G.; Liu, C.; Therien, M. J. Dynamics of charged excitons in electronically and morphologically homogeneous single-walled carbon nanotubes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2018, 115 (4), 674679,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712971115
  48. 48
    Zhu, Z.; Crochet, J.; Arnold, M. S.; Hersam, M. C.; Ulbricht, H.; Resasco, D.; Hertel, T. Pump-Probe Spectroscopy of Exciton Dynamics in (6,5) Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111 (10), 38313835,  DOI: 10.1021/jp0669411
  49. 49
    Ma, Y.-Z.; Stenger, J.; Zimmermann, J.; Bachilo, S. M.; Smalley, R. E.; Weisman, R. B.; Fleming, G. R. Ultrafast carrier dynamics in single-walled carbon nanotubes probed by femtosecond spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120 (7), 33683373,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1640339
  50. 50
    Arias, D. H.; Sulas-Kern, D. B.; Hart, S. M.; Kang, H. S.; Hao, J.; Ihly, R.; Johnson, J. C.; Blackburn, J. L.; Ferguson, A. J. Effect of nanotube coupling on exciton transport in polymer-free monochiral semiconducting carbon nanotube networks. Nanoscale 2019, 11 (44), 2119621206,  DOI: 10.1039/C9NR07821E
  51. 51
    Figueroa Del Valle, D. G.; Moretti, L.; Maqueira-Albo, I.; Aluicio-Sarduy, E.; Kriegel, I.; Lanzani, G.; Scotognella, F. Ultrafast Hole Transfer from (6,5) SWCNT to P3HT:PCBM Blend by Resonant Excitation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7 (17), 33538,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01377
  52. 52
    Verissimo-Alves, M.; Capaz, R. B.; Koiller, B.; Artacho, E.; Chacham, H. Polarons in Carbon Nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86 (15), 33723375,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3372
  53. 53
    Jakubka, F.; Grimm, S. B.; Zakharko, Y.; Gannott, F.; Zaumseil, J. Trion Electroluminescence from Semiconducting Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Nano 2014, 8 (8), 84778486,  DOI: 10.1021/nn503046y
  54. 54
    Matsunaga, R.; Matsuda, K.; Kanemitsu, Y. Observation of charged excitons in hole-doped carbon nanotubes using photoluminescence and absorption spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106 (3), 037404,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.037404
  55. 55
    Eckstein, K. H.; Oberndorfer, F.; Achsnich, M. M.; Schöppler, F.; Hertel, T. Quantifying Doping Levels in Carbon Nanotubes by Optical Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123 (49), 3000130006,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b08663
  56. 56
    Heller, I.; Kong, J.; Williams, K. A.; Dekker, C.; Lemay, S. G. Electrochemistry at Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: The Role of Band Structure and Quantum Capacitance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (22), 73537359,  DOI: 10.1021/ja061212k
  57. 57
    Zheng, M.; Diner, B. A. Solution Redox Chemistry of Carbon Nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (47), 1549015494,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0457967
  58. 58
    Eckstein, K. H.; Hartleb, H.; Achsnich, M. M.; Schoppler, F.; Hertel, T. Localized Charges Control Exciton Energetics and Energy Dissipation in Doped Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Nano 2017, 11 (10), 1040110408,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b05543
  59. 59
    Hartleb, H.; Späth, F.; Hertel, T. Evidence for Strong Electronic Correlations in the Spectra of Gate-Doped Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Nano 2015, 9 (10), 1046110470,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b04707
  60. 60
    Kochi, J. K. Inner-sphere electron transfer in organic chemistry. Relevance to electrophilic aromatic nitration. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25 (1), 3947,  DOI: 10.1021/ar00013a006
  61. 61
    Connelly, N. G.; Geiger, W. E. Chemical Redox Agents for Organometallic Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96 (2), 877910,  DOI: 10.1021/cr940053x
  62. 62
    Aguirre, C. M.; Levesque, P. L.; Paillet, M.; Lapointe, F.; St-Antoine, B. C.; Desjardins, P.; Martel, R. The Role of the Oxygen/Water Redox Couple in Suppressing Electron Conduction in Field-Effect Transistors. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21 (30), 30873091,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.200900550
  63. 63
    Avery, A. D.; Zhou, B. H.; Lee, J.; Lee, E.-S.; Miller, E. M.; Ihly, R.; Wesenberg, D.; Mistry, K. S.; Guillot, S. L.; Zink, B. L. Tailored semiconducting carbon nanotube networks with enhanced thermoelectric properties. Nat. Energy 2016, 1 (4), 16033,  DOI: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.33
  64. 64
    Holt, J. M.; Ferguson, A. J.; Kopidakis, N.; Larsen, B. A.; Bult, J.; Rumbles, G.; Blackburn, J. L. Prolonging Charge Separation in P3HT–SWNT Composites Using Highly Enriched Semiconducting Nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2010, 10 (11), 46274633,  DOI: 10.1021/nl102753z
  65. 65
    Sato, K.; Saito, R.; Jiang, J.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M. S. Discontinuity in the family pattern of single-wall carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2007, 76 (19), 195446,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.195446
  66. 66
    Chmeliov, J.; Narkeliunas, J.; Graham, M. W.; Fleming, G. R.; Valkunas, L. Exciton–exciton annihilation and relaxation pathways in semiconducting carbon nanotubes. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (3), 16181626,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR06853C
  67. 67
    Harrah, D. M.; Schneck, J. R.; Green, A. A.; Hersam, M. C.; Ziegler, L. D.; Swan, A. K. Intensity-Dependent Exciton Dynamics of (6,5) Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: Momentum Selection Rules, Diffusion, and Nonlinear Interactions. ACS Nano 2011, 5 (12), 98989906,  DOI: 10.1021/nn203604v
  68. 68
    Perebeinos, V.; Tersoff, J.; Avouris, P. Scaling of Excitons in Carbon Nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92 (25), 257402,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.257402
  69. 69
    Santos, S. M.; Yuma, B.; Berciaud, S.; Shaver, J.; Gallart, M.; Gilliot, P.; Cognet, L.; Lounis, B. All-Optical Trion Generation in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107 (18), 187401,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.187401
  70. 70
    Soavi, G.; Scotognella, F.; Viola, D.; Hefner, T.; Hertel, T.; Cerullo, G.; Lanzani, G. High energetic excitons in carbon nanotubes directly probe charge-carriers. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9681,  DOI: 10.1038/srep09681
  71. 71
    Shi, J.; Chu, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Pan, H.; Li, D. Synthesis and nonlinear optical properties of semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes at 1 μm. Nanoscale 2019, 11 (15), 72877292,  DOI: 10.1039/C8NR10174D
  72. 72
    Brady, G. J.; Joo, Y.; Singha Roy, S.; Gopalan, P.; Arnold, M. S. High performance transistors via aligned polyfluorene-sorted carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104 (8), 083107,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4866577
  73. 73
    Ehli, C.; Oelsner, C.; Guldi, D. M.; Mateo-Alonso, A.; Prato, M.; Schmidt, C.; Backes, C.; Hauke, F.; Hirsch, A. Manipulating single-wall carbon nanotubes by chemical doping and charge transfer with perylene dyes. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1 (3), 2439,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.214
  74. 74
    Dowgiallo, A.-M.; Mistry, K. S.; Johnson, J. C.; Blackburn, J. L. Ultrafast Spectroscopic Signature of Charge Transfer between Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and C60. ACS Nano 2014, 8 (8), 85738581,  DOI: 10.1021/nn503271k
  75. 75
    Howard, I. A.; Mauer, R.; Meister, M.; Laquai, F. Effect of Morphology on Ultrafast Free Carrier Generation in Polythiophene:Fullerene Organic Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (42), 1486614876,  DOI: 10.1021/ja105260d

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 14 publications.

  1. Daria D. Blach, Dana B. Sulas-Kern, Bipeng Wang, Run Long, Qiushi Ma, Oleg V. Prezhdo, Jeffrey L. Blackburn, Libai Huang. Long-Range Charge Transport Facilitated by Electron Delocalization in MoS2 and Carbon Nanotube Heterostructures. ACS Nano 2025, 19 (3) , 3439-3447. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c12858
  2. Zachary X. W. Widel, James A. Alatis, Riley H. Stephenson, Francesco Mastrocinque, Alexander C. Wilcox, George Bullard, Jean-Hubert Olivier, Yusong Bai, Peng Zhang, David N. Beratan, Michael J. Therien. Fluence-Dependent Photoinduced Charge Transfer Dynamics in Polymer-Wrapped Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2024, 146 (45) , 31169-31176. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c11118
  3. Nigar Sultana, Hannah M. Dewey, Ariel Gomez Arellano, Januka Budhathoki-Uprety. Understanding the Molecular Assemblies of Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Tailoring their Photoluminescence for the Next-Generation Optical Nanosensors. Chemistry of Materials 2024, 36 (9) , 4034-4053. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c00232
  4. Jan M. Lüttgens, Zhuoran Kuang, Nicolas F. Zorn, Tiago Buckup, Jana Zaumseil. Evidence for a Polariton-Mediated Biexciton Transition in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Photonics 2022, 9 (5) , 1567-1576. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01590
  5. Jing Tao, Linfeng Wang, Minhao Hu, Zhendong Dai. First-Principles Study on Tuning of Contact Electrification and Adhesion of Bio-inspired Adhesive Carbon-Based Materials via an External Electric Field. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2022, 126 (11) , 5354-5361. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c00497
  6. Verena Wulf, Gadi Slor, Parul Rathee, Roey J. Amir, Gili Bisker. Dendron–Polymer Hybrids as Tailorable Responsive Coronae of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (12) , 20539-20549. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c09125
  7. Paul Finnie, Jianying Ouyang, Jeffrey A. Fagan. Static and dynamic Raman excitation mapping of chirality-pure carbon nanotube films. Communications Materials 2025, 6 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-024-00727-6
  8. Yuki Usami, Shuho Murazoe, Deep Banerjee, Takumi Kotooka, Hirofumi Tanaka. Effect of electronic state for in-materio physical reservoir computing performance with a porphyrin-polyoxometalate/single-walled carbon nanotube network. Applied Physics Letters 2025, 126 (8) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0245122
  9. Kuljeet Kaur, Ben Johns, Pooja Bhatt, Jino George. Controlling Electron Mobility of Strongly Coupled Organic Semiconductors in Mirrorless Cavities. Advanced Functional Materials 2023, 33 (47) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202306058
  10. Nicholas J. Dallaire, Brendan Mirka, Joseph G. Manion, William J. Bodnaryk, Darryl Fong, Alex Adronov, Karin Hinzer, Benoît H. Lessard. Conjugated wrapping polymer influences on photoexcitation of single-walled carbon nanotube-based thin film transistors. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2023, 11 (27) , 9161-9171. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3TC01484C
  11. Andrzej Dzienia, Dominik Just, Dawid Janas. Solvatochromism in SWCNTs suspended by conjugated polymers in organic solvents. Nanoscale 2023, 15 (21) , 9510-9524. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NR00392B
  12. Debika Devi Thongam, Harsh Chaturvedi. Heterostructure charge transfer dynamics on self-assembled ZnO on electronically different single-walled carbon nanotubes. Chemosphere 2023, 323 , 138239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138239
  13. Abdurrahman Ali El Yumin, Nicolas F. Zorn, Felix J. Berger, Daniel Heimfarth, Jana Zaumseil. Trion emission from frozen p-n junctions in networks of electrolyte-gated (6,5) single-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2023, 202 , 547-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.11.025
  14. Nicolas F. Zorn, Jana Zaumseil. Charge transport in semiconducting carbon nanotube networks. Applied Physics Reviews 2021, 8 (4) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0065730

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 15, 8125–8136
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c10171
Published April 14, 2021

Copyright © 2021 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Article Views

2605

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Schematic energy level alignment of (6,5) SWCNT and PFO–BPy. The density of states of (6,5) SWCNT with characteristic van Hove singularities of the valence (v1, v2, v3) and conduction (c1, c2, c3) band was based on ref (28) and shifted by the reported ionization potential. (16) The HOMO and LUMO energies of PFO–BPy indicated by red horizontal lines were reported by Jang et al. (29) The gray arrows are simplified representations for observed excitonic absorption bands E11, E22, and E33. The inset shows the molecular structure of PFO–BPy.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Stationary absorption spectra of surfactant-dispersed (6,5) SWCNT in water, PFO–BPy-wrapped (6,5) SWCNT Hybrid in THF, and PFO–BPy in THF. The positions of absorption peaks are marked with corresponding colors.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Selected TA spectra of SWCNT in water upon the (a) E11, (b) E22, and (c) E33 excitations. Experimental conditions: (a) λex = 1000 nm, (b) λex = 576 nm, and (c) λex = 350 nm; pump energy: 100 nJ·pulse–1. Dotted lines highlight major transition manifolds.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Selected TA spectra for the Hybrid in THF upon the (a) E11, (b) E22, and (c) E33 excitations. Experimental conditions: (a) λex = 1000 nm, (b) λex = 576 nm, and (c) λex = 350 nm; pump energy: 100 nJ·pulse–1. Dotted lines highlight major transition manifolds. The shaded shapes indicate the absorption signature of the suspected SWCNT polaron. The asterisks (*) denote the wavelength of 1050 nm.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Pump-energy-dependent peak-shifting dynamics of the E00 → E11 bleaching in TA spectra of the SWCNT (a, b, c) and the Hybrid (d, e, f) in the time window of 0.1–500 ps. Excitation wavelength and corresponding pump energy per pulse are given in legends. Due to dispersion instability under high pump fluences, TA spectra of SWCNT are unavailable at higher fluences in b and c.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. (a) NIR stationary absorption spectra monitor the oxidative titration of the Hybrid with NOBF4 in toluene:CH2Cl2 (ratio 1:1) mixed solution. Experimental conditions: [(6,5) SWCNT] ∼ 2.74 nM; SWCNT length ∼1000 nm; optical path length = 10 mm. (b) Selected TA spectra for a heavily hole-doped ([NOBF4] ∼ 128 μM) Hybrid in toluene:CH2Cl2 (ratio 1:1) mixed solution. Experimental conditions: λex = 1000 nm, i.e., in resonance with E11; pump energy = 50 nJ·pulse–1. Scaled steady-state absorption spectrum (inverted shaded shape) is shown for comparison.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Normalized pump-energy-dependent TA traces at 1050 nm for the Hybrid in THF upon (a) E11, (b) E22, and (c) E33 excitation. Note that traces were normalized by the ΔA amplitude at 0.1–0.2 ps considering the instrumental response. Normalized pump-energy-dependent TA spectra for the Hybrid in THF at a time delay of ∼3 ps upon the (d) E11, (e) E22, and (f) E33 excitations. Note that spectra were normalized at the E00 → E11 bleaching maximum. The blue lines represent the stationary absorption feature of the (6,5) SWCNT hole-polaron obtained by redox-chemical doping ([NOBF4] ∼ 128.4 μM, shown in Figure 6a).

    Figure 8

    Figure 8. UV–vis TA spectra for the Hybrid in THF, SWCNT in water, and PFO–BPy in THF at a time delay of 0.2 ps. Excitation wavelength: 350 nm. Pump energy: 100 nJ·pulse–1.

    Figure 9

    Figure 9. (a) Schematic description of the Auger recombination of charge carriers (left) and excitons (right). ET denotes energy transfer. (b) Kinetics of the integral E00 → E11 bleaching in the TA spectra of the Hybrid in THF upon the E11, E22, and E33 excitations, plotted as {[ΔA(0)/ΔA(t)]2 – 1} (red dots, left axis) and {[ΔA(0)/ΔA(t)] – 1} (blue squares, right axis). Traces are shifted by different offset on the vertical axis for a better comparison. Solid black lines represent the results of the linear fitting. Adjusted R-squared (Adj. R2) and fitting residuals are shown with corresponding colors. Note that the fitting of the E11-excited TA trace started from 1 ps to exclude the nondiffusion-controlled rapid annihilation. (35) Pump energy: 100 nJ·pulse–1.

  • References


    This article references 75 other publications.

    1. 1
      Nish, A.; Hwang, J.-Y.; Doig, J.; Nicholas, R. J. Highly selective dispersion of single-walled carbon nanotubes using aromatic polymers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2 (10), 640646,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2007.290
    2. 2
      Graf, A.; Zakharko, Y.; Schießl, S. P.; Backes, C.; Pfohl, M.; Flavel, B. S.; Zaumseil, J. Large scale, selective dispersion of long single-walled carbon nanotubes with high photoluminescence quantum yield by shear force mixing. Carbon 2016, 105, 593599,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.05.002
    3. 3
      Samanta, S. K.; Fritsch, M.; Scherf, U.; Gomulya, W.; Bisri, S. Z.; Loi, M. A. Conjugated Polymer-Assisted Dispersion of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes: The Power of Polymer Wrapping. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47 (8), 24462456,  DOI: 10.1021/ar500141j
    4. 4
      Rother, M.; Brohmann, M.; Yang, S.; Grimm, S. B.; Schiessl, S. P.; Graf, A.; Zaumseil, J. Aerosol-Jet Printing of Polymer-Sorted (6,5) Carbon Nanotubes for Field-Effect Transistors with High Reproducibility. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2017, 3 (8), 1700080,  DOI: 10.1002/aelm.201700080
    5. 5
      Graf, A.; Murawski, C.; Zakharko, Y.; Zaumseil, J.; Gather, M. C. Infrared Organic Light-Emitting Diodes with Carbon Nanotube Emitters. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30 (12), 1706711,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201706711
    6. 6
      Berger, F. J.; Higgins, T. M.; Rother, M.; Graf, A.; Zakharko, Y.; Allard, S.; Matthiesen, M.; Gotthardt, J. M.; Scherf, U.; Zaumseil, J. From Broadband to Electrochromic Notch Filters with Printed Monochiral Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10 (13), 1113511142,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b00643
    7. 7
      Ye, Y.; Bindl, D. J.; Jacobberger, R. M.; Wu, M.-Y.; Roy, S. S.; Arnold, M. S. Semiconducting Carbon Nanotube Aerogel Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells. Small 2014, 10 (16), 32993306,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201400696
    8. 8
      Pfohl, M.; Glaser, K.; Graf, A.; Mertens, A.; Tune, D. D.; Puerckhauer, T.; Alam, A.; Wei, L.; Chen, Y.; Zaumseil, J. Probing the Diameter Limit of Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes in SWCNT: Fullerene Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6 (21), 1600890,  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201600890
    9. 9
      Li, G.; Suja, M.; Chen, M.; Bekyarova, E.; Haddon, R. C.; Liu, J.; Itkis, M. E. Visible-Blind UV Photodetector Based on Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Thin Film/ZnO Vertical Heterostructures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9 (42), 3709437104,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b07765
    10. 10
      Schuettfort, T.; Nish, A.; Nicholas, R. J. Observation of a type II heterojunction in a highly ordered polymer-carbon nanotube nanohybrid structure. Nano Lett. 2009, 9 (11), 38716,  DOI: 10.1021/nl902081t
    11. 11
      Eckstein, A.; Karpicz, R.; Augulis, R.; Redeckas, K.; Vengris, M.; Namal, I.; Hertel, T.; Gulbinas, V. Excitation quenching in polyfluorene polymers bound to (6,5) single-wall carbon nanotubes. Chem. Phys. 2016, 467, 15,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2015.12.006
    12. 12
      Amori, A. R.; Hou, Z.; Krauss, T. D. Excitons in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Their Dynamics. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2018, 69, 8199,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-050317-014241
    13. 13
      Bindl, D. J.; Arnold, M. S. Efficient Exciton Relaxation and Charge Generation in Nearly Monochiral (7,5) Carbon Nanotube/C60 Thin-Film Photovoltaics. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117 (5), 23902395,  DOI: 10.1021/jp310983y
    14. 14
      Wang, J.; Peurifoy, S. R.; Bender, M. T.; Ng, F.; Choi, K.-S.; Nuckolls, C.; Arnold, M. S. Non-fullerene Acceptors for Harvesting Excitons from Semiconducting Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123 (35), 2139521402,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b06381
    15. 15
      Mollahosseini, M.; Karunaratne, E.; Gibson, G. N.; Gascon, J. A.; Papadimitrakopoulos, F. Fullerene-Assisted Photoinduced Charge Transfer of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes through a Flavin Helix. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (18), 590415,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b13496
    16. 16
      Balcı Leinen, M.; Berger, F. J.; Klein, P.; Mühlinghaus, M.; Zorn, N. F.; Settele, S.; Allard, S.; Scherf, U.; Zaumseil, J. Doping-Dependent Energy Transfer from Conjugated Polyelectrolytes to (6,5) Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123 (36), 2268022689,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b07291
    17. 17
      Stranks, S. D.; Yong, C.-K.; Alexander-Webber, J. A.; Weisspfennig, C.; Johnston, M. B.; Herz, L. M.; Nicholas, R. J. Nanoengineering Coaxial Carbon Nanotube–Dual-Polymer Heterostructures. ACS Nano 2012, 6 (7), 60586066,  DOI: 10.1021/nn301133v
    18. 18
      Kang, H. S.; Sisto, T. J.; Peurifoy, S.; Arias, D. H.; Zhang, B.; Nuckolls, C.; Blackburn, J. L. Long-Lived Charge Separation at Heterojunctions between Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Perylene Diimide Electron Acceptors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122 (25), 1415014161,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01400
    19. 19
      Stranks, S. D.; Weisspfennig, C.; Parkinson, P.; Johnston, M. B.; Herz, L. M.; Nicholas, R. J. Ultrafast charge separation at a polymer-single-walled carbon nanotube molecular junction. Nano Lett. 2011, 11 (1), 6672,  DOI: 10.1021/nl1036484
    20. 20
      Niklas, J.; Holt, J. M.; Mistry, K.; Rumbles, G.; Blackburn, J. L.; Poluektov, O. G. Charge Separation in P3HT:SWCNT Blends Studied by EPR: Spin Signature of the Photoinduced Charged State in SWCNT. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5 (3), 601606,  DOI: 10.1021/jz402668h
    21. 21
      Ferguson, A. J.; Blackburn, J. L.; Holt, J. M.; Kopidakis, N.; Tenent, R. C.; Barnes, T. M.; Heben, M. J.; Rumbles, G. Photoinduced Energy and Charge Transfer in P3HT:SWNT Composites. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1 (15), 24062411,  DOI: 10.1021/jz100768f
    22. 22
      Olivier, J. H.; Park, J.; Deria, P.; Rawson, J.; Bai, Y.; Kumbhar, A. S.; Therien, M. J. Unambiguous Diagnosis of Photoinduced Charge Carrier Signatures in a Stoichiometrically Controlled Semiconducting Polymer-Wrapped Carbon Nanotube Assembly. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54 (28), 81338138,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201501364
    23. 23
      Kahmann, S.; Salazar Rios, J. M.; Zink, M.; Allard, S.; Scherf, U.; Dos Santos, M. C.; Brabec, C. J.; Loi, M. A. Excited-State Interaction of Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes with Their Wrapping Polymers. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8 (22), 56665672,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02553
    24. 24
      Dabera, G. D.; Jayawardena, K. D.; Prabhath, M. R.; Yahya, I.; Tan, Y. Y.; Nismy, N. A.; Shiozawa, H.; Sauer, M.; Ruiz-Soria, G.; Ayala, P. Hybrid carbon nanotube networks as efficient hole extraction layers for organic photovoltaics. ACS Nano 2013, 7 (1), 55665,  DOI: 10.1021/nn304705t
    25. 25
      Deria, P.; Olivier, J. H.; Park, J.; Therien, M. J. Potentiometric, electronic, and transient absorptive spectroscopic properties of oxidized single-walled carbon nanotubes helically wrapped by ionic, semiconducting polymers in aqueous and organic media. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (40), 141939,  DOI: 10.1021/ja507457z
    26. 26
      Wu, J.; Zhang, S.; Lin, D.; Ma, B.; Yang, L.; Zhang, S.; Kang, L.; Mao, N.; Zhang, N.; Tong, L. Anisotropic Raman-Enhancement Effect on Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Arrays. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5 (3), 1700941,  DOI: 10.1002/admi.201700941
    27. 27
      Erck, A.; Sapp, W.; Kilina, S.; Kilin, D. Photoinduced Charge Transfer at Interfaces of Carbon Nanotube and Lead Selenide Nanowire. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120 (40), 2319723206,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05571
    28. 28
      Maruyama, S. 1D DOS (van Hove singularity). http://www.photon.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~maruyama/kataura/1D_DOS.htmlhttp://www.photon.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~maruyama/kataura/1D_DOS.html (accessed March 26, 2020).
    29. 29
      Park, K. H.; Lee, S.-H.; Toshimitsu, F.; Lee, J.; Park, S. H.; Tsuyohiko, F.; Jang, J.-W. Gate-enhanced photocurrent of (6,5) single-walled carbon nanotube based field effect transistor. Carbon 2018, 139, 709715,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.07.002
    30. 30
      Manzoni, C.; Gambetta, A.; Menna, E.; Meneghetti, M.; Lanzani, G.; Cerullo, G. Intersubband exciton relaxation dynamics in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94 (20), 207401,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.207401
    31. 31
      Crochet, J. J.; Hoseinkhani, S.; Luer, L.; Hertel, T.; Doorn, S. K.; Lanzani, G. Free-carrier generation in aggregates of single-wall carbon nanotubes by photoexcitation in the ultraviolet regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107 (25), 257402,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.257402
    32. 32
      Park, J.; Reid, O. G.; Blackburn, J. L.; Rumbles, G. Photoinduced spontaneous free-carrier generation in semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8809,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9809
    33. 33
      Soavi, G.; Scotognella, F.; Brida, D.; Hefner, T.; Späth, F.; Antognazza, M. R.; Hertel, T.; Lanzani, G.; Cerullo, G. Ultrafast Charge Photogeneration in Semiconducting Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117 (20), 1084910855,  DOI: 10.1021/jp404009z
    34. 34
      Valkunas, L.; Ma, Y.-Z.; Fleming, G. R. Exciton-exciton annihilation in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2006, 73 (11), 115432,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.115432
    35. 35
      Ma, Y. Z.; Valkunas, L.; Dexheimer, S. L.; Bachilo, S. M.; Fleming, G. R. Femtosecond spectroscopy of optical excitations in single-walled carbon nanotubes: evidence for exciton-exciton annihilation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94 (15), 157402,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.157402
    36. 36
      Wang, S.; Khafizov, M.; Tu, X.; Zheng, M.; Krauss, T. D. Multiple exciton generation in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2010, 10 (7), 23816,  DOI: 10.1021/nl100343j
    37. 37
      O’Connell, M. J.; Bachilo, S. M.; Huffman, C. B.; Moore, V. C.; Strano, M. S.; Haroz, E. H.; Rialon, K. L.; Boul, P. J.; Noon, W. H.; Kittrell, C. Band Gap Fluorescence from Individual Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Science 2002, 297 (5581), 593596,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1072631
    38. 38
      Bai, Y.; Bullard, G.; Olivier, J. H.; Therien, M. J. Quantitative Evaluation of Optical Free Carrier Generation in Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (44), 1461914626,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b05598
    39. 39
      Park, J.; Deria, P.; Olivier, J. H.; Therien, M. J. Fluence-dependent singlet exciton dynamics in length-sorted chirality-enriched single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2014, 14 (2), 50411,  DOI: 10.1021/nl403511s
    40. 40
      Huang, L.; Krauss, T. D. Quantized Bimolecular Auger Recombination of Excitons in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96 (5), 057407,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.057407
    41. 41
      Li, H.; Gordeev, G.; Garrity, O.; Reich, S.; Flavel, B. S. Separation of Small-Diameter Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in One to Three Steps with Aqueous Two-Phase Extraction. ACS Nano 2019, 13 (2), 25672578,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b09579
    42. 42
      Pfohl, M.; Tune, D. D.; Graf, A.; Zaumseil, J.; Krupke, R.; Flavel, B. S. Fitting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Optical Spectra. ACS Omega 2017, 2 (3), 11631171,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.6b00468
    43. 43
      Lüer, L.; Hoseinkhani, S.; Polli, D.; Crochet, J.; Hertel, T.; Lanzani, G. Size and mobility of excitons in (6, 5) carbon nanotubes. Nat. Phys. 2009, 5 (1), 5458,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys1149
    44. 44
      Styers-Barnett, D. J.; Ellison, S. P.; Mehl, B. P.; Westlake, B. C.; House, R. L.; Park, C.; Wise, K. E.; Papanikolas, J. M. Exciton dynamics and biexciton formation in single-walled carbon nanotubes studied with femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112 (12), 45074516,  DOI: 10.1021/jp7099256
    45. 45
      Park, J.; Deria, P.; Therien, M. J. Dynamics and transient absorption spectral signatures of the single-wall carbon nanotube electronically excited triplet state. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (43), 171569,  DOI: 10.1021/ja2079477
    46. 46
      Korovyanko, O. J.; Sheng, C. X.; Vardeny, Z. V.; Dalton, A. B.; Baughman, R. H. Ultrafast spectroscopy of excitons in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92 (1), 017403,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.017403
    47. 47
      Bai, Y.; Olivier, J. H.; Bullard, G.; Liu, C.; Therien, M. J. Dynamics of charged excitons in electronically and morphologically homogeneous single-walled carbon nanotubes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2018, 115 (4), 674679,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712971115
    48. 48
      Zhu, Z.; Crochet, J.; Arnold, M. S.; Hersam, M. C.; Ulbricht, H.; Resasco, D.; Hertel, T. Pump-Probe Spectroscopy of Exciton Dynamics in (6,5) Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111 (10), 38313835,  DOI: 10.1021/jp0669411
    49. 49
      Ma, Y.-Z.; Stenger, J.; Zimmermann, J.; Bachilo, S. M.; Smalley, R. E.; Weisman, R. B.; Fleming, G. R. Ultrafast carrier dynamics in single-walled carbon nanotubes probed by femtosecond spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120 (7), 33683373,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1640339
    50. 50
      Arias, D. H.; Sulas-Kern, D. B.; Hart, S. M.; Kang, H. S.; Hao, J.; Ihly, R.; Johnson, J. C.; Blackburn, J. L.; Ferguson, A. J. Effect of nanotube coupling on exciton transport in polymer-free monochiral semiconducting carbon nanotube networks. Nanoscale 2019, 11 (44), 2119621206,  DOI: 10.1039/C9NR07821E
    51. 51
      Figueroa Del Valle, D. G.; Moretti, L.; Maqueira-Albo, I.; Aluicio-Sarduy, E.; Kriegel, I.; Lanzani, G.; Scotognella, F. Ultrafast Hole Transfer from (6,5) SWCNT to P3HT:PCBM Blend by Resonant Excitation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7 (17), 33538,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01377
    52. 52
      Verissimo-Alves, M.; Capaz, R. B.; Koiller, B.; Artacho, E.; Chacham, H. Polarons in Carbon Nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86 (15), 33723375,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3372
    53. 53
      Jakubka, F.; Grimm, S. B.; Zakharko, Y.; Gannott, F.; Zaumseil, J. Trion Electroluminescence from Semiconducting Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Nano 2014, 8 (8), 84778486,  DOI: 10.1021/nn503046y
    54. 54
      Matsunaga, R.; Matsuda, K.; Kanemitsu, Y. Observation of charged excitons in hole-doped carbon nanotubes using photoluminescence and absorption spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106 (3), 037404,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.037404
    55. 55
      Eckstein, K. H.; Oberndorfer, F.; Achsnich, M. M.; Schöppler, F.; Hertel, T. Quantifying Doping Levels in Carbon Nanotubes by Optical Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123 (49), 3000130006,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b08663
    56. 56
      Heller, I.; Kong, J.; Williams, K. A.; Dekker, C.; Lemay, S. G. Electrochemistry at Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: The Role of Band Structure and Quantum Capacitance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (22), 73537359,  DOI: 10.1021/ja061212k
    57. 57
      Zheng, M.; Diner, B. A. Solution Redox Chemistry of Carbon Nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (47), 1549015494,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0457967
    58. 58
      Eckstein, K. H.; Hartleb, H.; Achsnich, M. M.; Schoppler, F.; Hertel, T. Localized Charges Control Exciton Energetics and Energy Dissipation in Doped Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Nano 2017, 11 (10), 1040110408,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b05543
    59. 59
      Hartleb, H.; Späth, F.; Hertel, T. Evidence for Strong Electronic Correlations in the Spectra of Gate-Doped Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Nano 2015, 9 (10), 1046110470,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b04707
    60. 60
      Kochi, J. K. Inner-sphere electron transfer in organic chemistry. Relevance to electrophilic aromatic nitration. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25 (1), 3947,  DOI: 10.1021/ar00013a006
    61. 61
      Connelly, N. G.; Geiger, W. E. Chemical Redox Agents for Organometallic Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96 (2), 877910,  DOI: 10.1021/cr940053x
    62. 62
      Aguirre, C. M.; Levesque, P. L.; Paillet, M.; Lapointe, F.; St-Antoine, B. C.; Desjardins, P.; Martel, R. The Role of the Oxygen/Water Redox Couple in Suppressing Electron Conduction in Field-Effect Transistors. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21 (30), 30873091,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.200900550
    63. 63
      Avery, A. D.; Zhou, B. H.; Lee, J.; Lee, E.-S.; Miller, E. M.; Ihly, R.; Wesenberg, D.; Mistry, K. S.; Guillot, S. L.; Zink, B. L. Tailored semiconducting carbon nanotube networks with enhanced thermoelectric properties. Nat. Energy 2016, 1 (4), 16033,  DOI: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.33
    64. 64
      Holt, J. M.; Ferguson, A. J.; Kopidakis, N.; Larsen, B. A.; Bult, J.; Rumbles, G.; Blackburn, J. L. Prolonging Charge Separation in P3HT–SWNT Composites Using Highly Enriched Semiconducting Nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2010, 10 (11), 46274633,  DOI: 10.1021/nl102753z
    65. 65
      Sato, K.; Saito, R.; Jiang, J.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M. S. Discontinuity in the family pattern of single-wall carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2007, 76 (19), 195446,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.195446
    66. 66
      Chmeliov, J.; Narkeliunas, J.; Graham, M. W.; Fleming, G. R.; Valkunas, L. Exciton–exciton annihilation and relaxation pathways in semiconducting carbon nanotubes. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (3), 16181626,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR06853C
    67. 67
      Harrah, D. M.; Schneck, J. R.; Green, A. A.; Hersam, M. C.; Ziegler, L. D.; Swan, A. K. Intensity-Dependent Exciton Dynamics of (6,5) Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: Momentum Selection Rules, Diffusion, and Nonlinear Interactions. ACS Nano 2011, 5 (12), 98989906,  DOI: 10.1021/nn203604v
    68. 68
      Perebeinos, V.; Tersoff, J.; Avouris, P. Scaling of Excitons in Carbon Nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92 (25), 257402,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.257402
    69. 69
      Santos, S. M.; Yuma, B.; Berciaud, S.; Shaver, J.; Gallart, M.; Gilliot, P.; Cognet, L.; Lounis, B. All-Optical Trion Generation in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107 (18), 187401,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.187401
    70. 70
      Soavi, G.; Scotognella, F.; Viola, D.; Hefner, T.; Hertel, T.; Cerullo, G.; Lanzani, G. High energetic excitons in carbon nanotubes directly probe charge-carriers. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9681,  DOI: 10.1038/srep09681
    71. 71
      Shi, J.; Chu, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Pan, H.; Li, D. Synthesis and nonlinear optical properties of semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes at 1 μm. Nanoscale 2019, 11 (15), 72877292,  DOI: 10.1039/C8NR10174D
    72. 72
      Brady, G. J.; Joo, Y.; Singha Roy, S.; Gopalan, P.; Arnold, M. S. High performance transistors via aligned polyfluorene-sorted carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104 (8), 083107,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4866577
    73. 73
      Ehli, C.; Oelsner, C.; Guldi, D. M.; Mateo-Alonso, A.; Prato, M.; Schmidt, C.; Backes, C.; Hauke, F.; Hirsch, A. Manipulating single-wall carbon nanotubes by chemical doping and charge transfer with perylene dyes. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1 (3), 2439,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.214
    74. 74
      Dowgiallo, A.-M.; Mistry, K. S.; Johnson, J. C.; Blackburn, J. L. Ultrafast Spectroscopic Signature of Charge Transfer between Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and C60. ACS Nano 2014, 8 (8), 85738581,  DOI: 10.1021/nn503271k
    75. 75
      Howard, I. A.; Mauer, R.; Meister, M.; Laquai, F. Effect of Morphology on Ultrafast Free Carrier Generation in Polythiophene:Fullerene Organic Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (42), 1486614876,  DOI: 10.1021/ja105260d
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c10171.

    • Excitonic transitions in the exciton picture, stationary absorption spectra, pump pulse spectra, fluence-dependent NIR transient absorption spectra of SWCNT and SWCNT/PFO–BPy hybrid, transient absorption spectra of PFO–BPy, PFO–BPy polaron in UV–vis transient absorption spectra of the SWCNT/PFO–BPy hybrid and spectroelectrochemistry, elementary excitation analysis of the Auger process, analysis of charge-transfer dynamics, exciton density estimate, and comparison between all-optical doping and chemical doping (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.