ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Synthesis, Crystal Structure, and Hydrogen Storage Properties of an AB3-Based Alloy Synthesized by Disproportionation Reactions of AB2-Based Alloys
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
C: Energy Conversion and Storage

Synthesis, Crystal Structure, and Hydrogen Storage Properties of an AB3-Based Alloy Synthesized by Disproportionation Reactions of AB2-Based Alloys
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Toyoto Sato*
    Toyoto Sato
    Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8577, Japan
    *Email: [email protected]
    More by Toyoto Sato
  • Hiroyuki Saitoh
    Hiroyuki Saitoh
    National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan
  • Reina Utsumi
    Reina Utsumi
    National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan
    More by Reina Utsumi
  • Jyunya Ito
    Jyunya Ito
    Shibaura Institute of Technology, 3-7-5 Toyosu, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan
    More by Jyunya Ito
  • Kazuki Obana
    Kazuki Obana
    Shibaura Institute of Technology, 3-7-5 Toyosu, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan
    More by Kazuki Obana
  • Yuki Nakahira
    Yuki Nakahira
    National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan
  • Denis Sheptyakov
    Denis Sheptyakov
    Laboratory for Neutron Scattering and Imaging, PSI Center for Neutron and Muon Sciences, Forschungsstrasse 111, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
  • Takashi Honda
    Takashi Honda
    Institute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan
  • Hajime Sagayama
    Hajime Sagayama
    Institute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan
  • Shigeyuki Takagi
    Shigeyuki Takagi
    National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan
  • Tatsuoki Kono
    Tatsuoki Kono
    Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan
  • Heena Yang
    Heena Yang
    Water Energy Research Center, Korea Water Resources Corporation, 125 Yuseong-daero 1689beon-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34045, Republic of Korea
    More by Heena Yang
  • Wen Luo
    Wen Luo
    School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shangda Road 99, 200444 Shanghai, China
    More by Wen Luo
  • Loris Lombardo
    Loris Lombardo
    Laboratory of Materials for Renewable Energy (LMER), Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering (ISIC), Basic Science Faculty (SB), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Valais/Wallis, Energypolis, Rue de l’Industrie 17, CH-1951 Sion, Switzerland
    Empa Materials Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 129, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
  • Andreas Züttel
    Andreas Züttel
    Laboratory of Materials for Renewable Energy (LMER), Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering (ISIC), Basic Science Faculty (SB), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Valais/Wallis, Energypolis, Rue de l’Industrie 17, CH-1951 Sion, Switzerland
    Empa Materials Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 129, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
  • Shin-ichi Orimo
    Shin-ichi Orimo
    Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8577, Japan
    Advanced Institute for Materials Research (WPI-AIMR), Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8577, Japan
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. C 2025, 129, 6, 2865–2873
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c06759
Published February 2, 2025

Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Hydrogen storage materials store hydrogen in their atomic states, enabling more compact and safer storage methods compared to those for gaseous and liquid hydrogen. Although various types of hydrogen storage materials have been reported, new materials with higher hydrogen storage capacities and enhanced durability are required. Herein, we report the synthesis, crystal structure, and hydrogen storage properties of an AB3-based alloy, Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00, which exhibited reversible hydrogen absorption and desorption with a hydrogen storage capacity of 1.68 mass % and minimal degradation over 100 cycles at 303 K. The hydrogen storage capacity of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 exceeds that of LaNi5, a reported hydrogen storage material with 1.38 mass %. It further increased to 2.88 mass % at room temperature under 10 GPa. This finding suggests that Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 has the potential for even greater hydrogen storage capacity. This could lead to more compact and lightweight storage solutions for hydrogen energy devices.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Hydrogen storage is essential for the development of hydrogen-based societies. Currently, gaseous hydrogen, liquid hydrogen, and material-based methods are promising candidates for hydrogen storage. Although various material-based methods have been reported, storing hydrogen atoms in the interstitial sites of intermetallic compounds, commonly referred to as hydrogen storage materials or alloys, is considered a more compact and safer approach compared to other candidates. In the design of hydrogen storage materials, elements from Groups 1–5 of the periodic table, designated as component A, are typically selected and alloyed with elements from Groups 6–12, designated as component B. (1−3) For instance, AB2, AB3, and AB5 are typical hydrogen storage materials. (3) Alloys AB2 are called Laves phase alloys. As hydrogen atoms are stored in the interstitial sites of hydrogen storage materials, understanding their atomic arrangements has been crucial for elucidating the mechanisms of hydrogen absorption and desorption reactions. Focusing on the typical crystal structures of AB2, AB3, and AB5 (Figure 1 (4,5)), the stacking of two different polyhedra, a Laves polyhedron and a capped hexagonal prism, has been investigated. The crystal structures of AB2 and AB5 are composed of a Laves polyhedron and capped hexagonal prism, respectively. Therefore, in this study, we refer to the Laves polyhedron and capped hexagonal prism as AB2 and AB5 units, respectively. The crystal structure of AB3 comprises AB2 and AB5 units, indicating that AB3 has the characteristic features of AB2 and AB5 as hydrogen storage materials. (6−11)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Crystal structures of AB2, AB3, and AB5. In the crystal structure, A and B atoms are represented as gray and green spheres, respectively. Capped hexagonal prism and Laves polyhedra are represented as orange and green polyhedra, respectively.

In our previous studies focusing on AB2-based alloys, we reported reversible hydrogen storage materials based on YMgNi4 synthesized from the binary alloys, YNi2 and MgNi2. (12,13) YMgNi4 exhibits a similar atomic arrangement to AB2 with a cubic crystal structure (C15). (14) The key difference lies in the atomic arrangement of Y and Mg in YMgNi4. In this structure, Y and Mg atoms are predominantly ordered, whereas if YMgNi4 had the cubic crystal structure (C15) of AB2, the Y and Mg atoms would be completely disordered. (13) This finding suggests that the hydrogen storage properties (equilibrium hydrogen pressures and hydrogen storage capacities) can be controlled by the site occupancies of the Y and Mg atomic positions. Materials related to YMgNi4 as hydrogen storage materials have been previously reported. (14−30) In addition, substituting a part of Ni with Co could potentially lead to a lower equilibrium hydrogen pressure and higher hydrogen storage capacities. Neutron diffraction and inelastic neutron scattering experiments on YMgNi4-based alloys with and without Co suggested that Co in the YMgNi4-based alloy led to more disordered hydrogen atoms compared with YMgNi4 without Co. (30) The disordering of hydrogen atoms could be associated with a lower equilibrium hydrogen pressure, leading to higher hydrogen storage capacities. Co substitution effects have also been reported by Shtender et al. (24−26,28) In their studies, YMgCo4 and related intermetallic compounds exhibited the highest hydrogen storage capacities in the YMg(Ni, Co)4 system. (24) Hence, Co is hypothesized to improve the hydrogen storage properties of AB2 and related materials.
Using AB2 alloys with Co, YCo2, and MgCo2, as starting materials in our study, AB3-based alloys were obtained at higher temperatures than those used in the syntheses of YMgNi4-based alloys. In this study, we refer to the AB3-based alloys as (Y, Mg)Co3. Evaporation of Mg at higher temperatures and similarities in the crystal structures, as mentioned earlier, could lead to disproportionation reactions. Notably, the AB3-based alloys exhibited narrower hysteresis of hydrogen absorption and desorption pressures and superior cycling performance and durability to the YMgNi4-based alloys. Therefore, we report the synthesis, crystal structures before and after the hydrogen absorption reactions, and hydrogen storage properties. Furthermore, we investigated the hydrogen absorption reactions above 1 GPa, where the chemical potential of hydrogen increases substantially, and reactions between hydrogen and the materials occur. (31,32) We used a high-pressure apparatus to understand the potential hydrogen storage capacity of (Y, Mg)Co3.

Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Syntheses

YCo2 and MgCo2 were used as starting materials for (Y, Mg)Co3. YCo2 was synthesized from Y chips (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.9) and Co shots (Rare Metallic Co., Ltd., 99.999%) in an arc-melting furnace (Nissin Gigen Corporation, NEV-AD03) at a molar ratio of 1:2. MgCo2 was synthesized from a mixture of Mg (Rare Metallic Co., Ltd., 99.9%) and Co powders (Rare Metallic Co., Ltd., 99.9%) in an induction melting furnace (Sekisui, MU-1700) at a molar ratio of 1.1:2. X-ray diffraction patterns of YCo2 and MgCo2 are shown in Figure S1 in the Supporting Information. Mixtures of YCo2 and MgCo2 at a molar ratio of 2–x and x (x = 0.8 and 1.0) were pressed into pellets of diameter 6 mm and heated at 1173 K for 24 h in an Ar atmosphere. In this study, we refer to the synthesized samples as (Y, Mg)Co3. YCo3 was synthesized from Y chips (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.9) and Co shots (Rare Metallic Co., Ltd., 99.999%) using an arc-melting furnace (Nissin Gigen Corporation, NEV-AD03) at a molar ratio of 1:3.

X-ray Diffraction

All samples were characterized by a conventional X-ray diffractometer (PANalytical X’PERT) using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å for Kα1 and 1.5444 Å for Kα2).
The crystal structures of (Y, Mg)Co3 synthesized from (2–x)YCo2 and xMgCo2 (x = 0.8 and 1.0) were investigated using synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction performed on BL-8A at the Photon Factory, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Japan. For the synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction, (Y, Mg)Co3 are placed in a Lindemann glass capillary with an outer diameter of 0.3 mm and a thickness of 0.01 mm.

Neutron Diffraction

The crystal structures of (Y, Mg)Co3 synthesized from 1.2YCo2 and 0.8MgCo2 were investigated by neutron diffraction under vacuum and D2 and H2 pressures of 5 MPa using a high-resolution powder diffractometer for thermal neutrons (HRPT) (33) at the Swiss Spallation Neutron Source (SINQ), Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Switzerland. For neutron diffraction, approximately 4 g of (Y, Mg)Co3 powder was placed in a steel container with an outer diameter of 10 mm. Neutron diffraction data were collected using a neutron wavelength of 1.494 Å in the high-intensity mode of the instrument. A custom gas handling system was used to create the dynamic pressures of 5 MPa of H2 and D2 gases over the powder intermetallic sample.

Crystal Structure Investigations

The indexing program TREOR97, (34) least-squares refinement of the unit cell parameter program PIRUM, (35) and the Rietveld refinement program GSAS with the graphical interface EXPGUI (version 1.80) (36) were used to investigate the crystal structure using synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction and neutron diffraction data. In the Rietveld refinement, the pseudo-Voigt peak shape function with the Finger–Cox–Jephcoat asymmetry correction was used for the synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction data, and the standard Gaussian function modified for peak asymmetry was used for neutron diffraction data. The background was modeled using the Chebyshev polynomial function in the GSAS. Isotropic temperature–displacement parameters were used for all elements.

Hydrogen Storage Properties

The hydrogen storage properties of samples were investigated using a pressure–composition isotherm apparatus (PCT apparatus) (Suzuki Shokan Co. Ltd., PCT-3SPWIN) at 303 and 323 K up to 9 MPa of H2 gas pressure. Before the PCT measurements, the sample was heated at 473 K under vacuum for 3 h.
During the cycling between the hydrogen absorption and desorption reactions, the hydrogen absorption reactions were performed at a hydrogen gas pressure of 5 MPa at 303 K for 2 h. The hydrogen desorption reactions were performed under vacuum at 303 K for 2 h. After 2 and 99 cycles, the hydrogen storage properties were investigated using a PCT apparatus.

High Pressure Experiments above 1 GPa

Hydrogen absorption reactions of (Y, Mg)Co3 synthesized from 1.2YCo2 + 0.8MgCo2 at room temperature (above 1 GPa) were observed using a multianvil apparatus combined with synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction at the BL14B1, SPring-8 in Japan. Before the high-pressure experiment, (Y, Mg)Co3 was heated to 473 K under vacuum for 3 h. (Y, Mg)Co3 was placed in a BN capsule enclosed with a hydrogen source, BH3NH3 (Sigma-Aldrich, 97%), in an NaCl capsule. The details of the sample cell assembling, (32) and hydrogen release reactions of BH3NH3 under high pressure are described in previous studies. (37,38) The energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction method was utilized for X-ray diffraction data collection during the high-pressure experiments. The obtained data were analyzed using PDindexer. (39)

Handling of Samples

All samples, which were starting materials for YCo2, MgCo2, as-synthesized (Y, Mg)Co3, and hydrided (Y, Mg)Co3, were handled in Ar-gas filled glove boxes with dew points of <183 K and <1 ppm of O2 to prevent (hydro-)oxidation.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Syntheses

Figure 2 shows X-ray diffraction patterns of the (Y, Mg)Co3 synthesized from (2–x)YCo2 + xMgCo2 (x = 0.8 and 1.0) and YCo3. Most of the Bragg peaks in all samples were indexed by trigonal unit cells. The unit cell parameters are listed in Table 1. Although the X-ray diffraction patterns of (Y, Mg)Co3 are similar to those of YCo3, the Bragg peak positions and unit cell parameters of (Y, Mg)Co3 and YCo3 are slightly different. The chemical composition of the product synthesized from (2–x)YCo2 + xMgCo2 (x = 0.8 and 1.0) was determined by Rietveld refinement using synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction (see the next section). This finding indicates that a disproportionation reaction between YCo2 and MgCo2 occurred during the heat treatment of the mixture of (2–x)YCo2 + xMgCo2. The reaction could have originated from the evaporation of Mg during heat treatment, and it yields Y2O3. The similarities in the crystal structures of AB2 and AB3 may also be related. Despite the disproportionation reactions, the unit cell parameters depend on the amount of MgCo2. Notably, the amount of Mg could be controlled by varying the ratios of starting material, as reported in our previous studies. (12,30) In the following sections, we will discuss the effect of Mg on the crystal structures and hydrogen storage properties.

Figure 2

Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of (Y, Mg)Co3 synthesized from (2–x)YCo2 + xMgCo2 (x = 0.8 and 1.0), and YCo3. In the figure, allow indicates Y2O3. Si was added as an internal standard.

Table 1. Trigonal Unit Cell Parameters of (Y, Mg)Co3 Synthesized from (2–x)YCo2 + xMgCo2 (x = 0.8 and 1.0), and YCo3
 a (Å)c (Å)V3)
1.2YCo2 + 0.8MgCo24.9990(08)24.197(17)523.67(54)
1.0YCo2 + 1.0MgCo24.9823(09)24.032(14)516.63(49)
YCo35.0141(12)24.341(25)529.97(80)

Crystal Structures

Synchrotron Radiation X-ray Diffraction

The crystal structures before and after hydrogen absorption reactions were investigated using conventional and synchrotron radiation X-ray and neutron diffraction. First, we discuss the crystal structures, including the chemical composition, before the hydrogen absorption reactions, which were determined using synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction. The Rietveld refinement fits of (Y, Mg)Co3 using synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction are shown in Figures S2 and S3 in the Supporting Information. Using the same atomic arrangements with YCo3 as an initial structure model (40) for Rietveld refinements, in which Mg atoms are placed at two crystallographically different Y atomic positions, the experimentally observed X-ray diffraction patterns up to a higher Q range are reasonably reproduced. The crystallographic parameters of (Y, Mg)Co3 are listed in Tables S1 and S2 in the Supporting Information. The chemical compositions of (Y, Mg)Co3 synthesized from (2–x)YCo2 + xMgCo2 (x = 0.8 and 1.0) were Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 (x = 0.8) and Y0.58Mg0.42Co3.00 (x = 1.0). The crystal structure of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 is only shown in Figure 3 because the differences between Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 and Y0.58Mg0.42Co3.00 are the unit cell parameters and occupancies at Y1/Mg1 and Y2/Mg2. The crystal structure was composed of stacked AB5 units (capped hexagonal prisms) and AB2 units (Laves polyhedrons). The AB5 unit is formed by Y1/Mg1 atoms surrounded by 18 Co atoms, and the AB2 unit is formed by Y2/Mg2 atoms surrounded by 12 Co atoms. By increasing the amount of Mg in (Y, Mg)Co3, the occupancy of Mg2 at 6c increased. Excess Mg was located on the AB2 unit side because the occupancies of Mg1 were maintained even with an increase in Mg. This finding is related to the hydrogen storage properties, which are discussed in the following section.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Crystal structures of (a) Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00, and (b) Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00D3.76. Y, Mg, Co, and D atoms are represented as gray, orange, green, and blue spheres, respectively. Y1/Mg1 surrounded by 18 Co atoms, and Y2/Mg2 surrounded by 12 Co atoms, are represented by orange and green polyhedra, respectively.

Next, we discuss the crystal structure after the hydrogen (deuterium) absorption reaction, investigated by neutron diffraction under a D2 pressure of 5 MPa at 323 K. The hydrogen storage capacities of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 were higher than those of Y0.58Mg0.42Co3.00 (see the next section); hence, the hydrogen (deuterium) atomic positions were investigated using Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00. The Rietveld refinement fits of the Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 deuteride under a D2 pressure of 5 MPa at 323 K are shown in Figure S4 in the Supporting Information. Its chemical composition was found to be Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00D3.76(11), with a gravimetric hydrogen density of 1.52 mass %. This value was close to the gravimetric hydrogen density observed by the PCT measurements at 323 K (details are available in the next section). Although the Bragg peaks of the stainless-steel sample container were removed because of their strong intensities, the experimentally observed neutron diffraction was reasonably reproduced. The crystallographic parameters are listed in Table S3 in the Supporting Information. We observed the neutron diffraction pattern of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 under an H2 pressure of 5 MPa at 323 K to confirm the D atomic positions. The experimentally observed neutron diffraction pattern under H2 pressure was also reasonably reproduced using the same atomic positions as those of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00D3.76, in which the D atoms were replaced by H atoms. The Rietveld refinement fit is shown in Figure S5.
Based on the Rietveld refinement fits done on neutron diffraction data, we discuss the D atomic positions and the relationship between the hydrogen absorption reactions and crystal structure. In Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00D3.76, the D atoms are located at five crystallographically different atomic sites in which D atoms are referred to as D1, D2, D3, D4, and D5 (Figure 3). Selected interatomic distances are listed in Table 2. They have reasonable interatomic distances compared to our previous work on Y–Mg–Ni–Co. (30) D1 was located inside the tetrahedra coordinated by four Co atoms (1 × Co1 and 3 × Co3). D2 was located inside the tetrahedra coordinated by four Co atoms (1 × Co2 and 3 × Co3). D3 was located inside an octahedron coordinated by four Co atoms (2 × Co2 and 2 × Co3) and two Y1/Mg1 atoms. D4 was located inside a tetrahedron coordinated by two Co atoms (2 × Co3), Y1/Mg1 and Y2/Mg2. D5 was located inside a triangular dipyramid (3 × 2/Mg2, 1 × Co1, and 1 × Co3). Focusing on the AB2 and AB5 units, the local atomic arrangements around hydrogen in Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00D3.76 are shown in Figure 3. The D atomic positions as viewed from the AB5 and AB2 units are shown in Figure 3. The D atomic positions are primarily classified into inside the AB5 and AB2 units (intra-AB5 and intra-AB2 units) and between the AB5 and AB2 units (interunits). The D3 and D4 atoms are inside the AB5 unit, the D5 atoms are inside the AB2 unit, and D1 and D2 locate interunits. According to the D atomic positions in YCo3, (40) the D atoms in YCo3 are locate intraunits. Note that the Mg in the Y atoms may induce the placement of hydrogen atoms in interunits positions. In addition, the AB5 unit (55.9%) with less Mg contained more D atoms than the AB2 unit (32.4%). Considering the occupancies of Mg2 on Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 and Y0.58Mg0.42Co3.00, Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 possessed less Mg atoms in the Y2/Mg2 site and higher hydrogen storage capacities than Y0.58Mg0.42Co3.00 (see the next section). Consequently, the hydrogen storage capacities were related to the AB2 units rather than to the AB5 units (as discussed in the next section). Therefore, the hydrogen storage capacity could increase if more hydrogen atoms were located inside the AB2 unit. Such consideration of the units can provide insights into the dependence of hydrogen storage capacities on Mg. In the next section, we discuss the relationship between the crystal structure (atomic arrangement) and hydrogen storage properties.
Table 2. Selected Interatomic Distances between D and Metal Atomsa
D atom–metal atominteratomic distances (Å)
D1-Co11.644(4)
D1-Co3 (×3)1.634(5)
D2-Co21.77(6)
D2-Co3 (×3)1.598(18)
D3-Y1/Mg1 (×2)2.63685(32)
D3-Co2 (×2)1.538(5)
D3-Co3 (×2)2.055(10)
D4-Y1/Mg12.248(6)
D4-Y2/Mg22.275(10)
D4-Co3 (×2)1.639(4)
D5-Y2/Mg2 (×2)2.6379(5)
D5-Y2/Mg21.909(4)
D5-Co11.671(5)
D5-Co31.652(6)
a

The too short D–D interatomic distances, which are D1–D5 (1.899(6) Å), D2–D4 (1.724(10) Å), and D5–D5 (1.946(11) Å), can perhaps be explained by a by-far non-perfect fits because of the too weak intensities at higher Q range in the neutron diffraction pattern.

Hydrogen Storage Properties

Figure 4 shows the PCT curves of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 and Y0.58Mg0.42Co3.00 at 323 K. Both samples exhibited reversible hydrogen absorption and desorption reactions. The maximum hydrogen storage capacities at 323 K reached 1.56 mass % (of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00) and 1.21 mass % (Y0.58Mg0.42Co3.00), which decreased with increasing amounts of Mg. In addition, the equilibrium pressure increased with increasing amounts of Mg. The trends of hydrogen storage capacities and equilibrium hydrogen pressures were the same as those of YMgNi4-based alloys. (12,24,30) Focusing on the crystal structures of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 and Y0.58Mg0.42Co3.00, the occupancies of Mg2, which were located inside the AB2 unit, increased with increasing amounts of Mg2, although those of Mg1, which were located inside the AB5 unit, were almost the same. This finding indicates that the hydrogen storage properties of (Y, Mg)Co3 depend on hydrogen atoms in the AB2 units. Therefore, the hydrogen storage properties could exhibit the same trend as the YMgNi4-based alloys and be controlled by the spaces and affinities to hydrogen on the AB2 unit sides in (Y, Mg)Co3.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Pressure–composition isotherm (PCT) curves of (black) Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 and (gray) Y0.58Mg0.42Co3.00 at 323 K. Closed and open circles indicate hydrogen absorption and desorption, respectively. The PCT curves in the figure are obtained in the third run.

Next, we discuss the cycling of the hydrogen absorption and desorption reactions on Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 at 323 K. Figure 5 shows the PCT curves on the third and 100th cycles and the X-ray patterns before and after cycling. The PCT measurement at 303 K demonstrated that Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 stored 1.68 mass % hydrogen, which was higher than that of LaNi5 (1.38 mass %), a typical hydrogen storage material. In addition, it exhibited minimal degradation for up to 100 cycles and maintained its crystallinity before and after cycling. This finding could be related to the negligible hysteresis of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00. In contrast, the hysteresis mechanisms of the hydrogen absorption and desorption pressures were observed to be complicated. Elastic and plastic deformations, unit cell expansion, composition, components, crystallinities, and deformations have been reported as factors in the mechanism of hysteresis. (41−46) In this study, Mg may be attributed to negligible hysteresis because YCo3 without Mg exhibits hysteresis between the hydrogen absorption and desorption reactions (Figure S6 in the Supporting Information).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Cycling between hydrogen absorption and desorption reactions on Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 at 303 K. (Top) The PCT curves of (blue) 3 cycles and (green) 100 cycles. (Bottom) X-ray diffraction patterns of before and after the cycling up to 100 cycles.

From the crystal structure investigations of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 during the hydrogen absorption reactions, the hydrogen storage capacities were related to the spaces and affinities between the metal element and hydrogen in the AB2 units. To understand the amount of hydrogen that can be stored in Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00, hydrogen absorption reactions were observed above 1 GPa, where the hydrogen chemical potential could be dramatically increased. (31,32) This finding indicates the potential hydrogen storage capacity of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00. Figure 6 shows X-ray diffraction patterns obtained above 1 GPa at 473 K. In these experiments, the hydrogen source, BH3NH3, must first release hydrogen before the pressure is increased. At 473 K and 1 GPa, the Bragg peaks shift to larger d-spacings. This result indicated the release of hydrogen from the hydrogen source, hydrogen absorption reactions on Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00, and the formation of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 hydride. After confirming hydrogen release from the hydrogen sources and formation of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 hydride, the temperature was decreased to room temperature, and hydrogen absorption reactions were observed at room temperature with increasing pressures for up to 10 GPa. Notably, the Bragg peak positions are mostly maintained in the X-ray diffraction patterns at room temperature and above 1 GPa, even though the pressure increases to 10 GPa (Figure 6), signifying that more hydrogen is stored in Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00. The phenomenon, which shows higher hydrogen storage capacities above 1 GPa, was also reported in AB5-based alloys. (47,48) To estimate the amount of absorbed hydrogen in Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00, the unit cell volumes per formula unit as a function of pressure (Figure 7) are considered, as reported for hydrogen absorption reactions on LaNi5 above 1 GPa. (47) In Figure 7, the unit cell volumes (V) per formula unit (Z) are obtained from high-pressure experiments with and without the hydrogen source. High-pressure experiments without a hydrogen source indicated the V/Z ratio of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 under high pressure. From neutron diffraction experiments, the V/Z values of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 and Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00H3.76 were 522.51/9 = 58.06 Å3/f.u., and 618.72/9 = 68.75 Å3/f.u., respectively. Therefore, the volume of hydrogen atoms in Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00H3.76 was estimated to be 10.69 Å3/f.u., where 2.84 Å3 was estimated to be the volume of one hydrogen atom. Although the unit cell volume per formula unit of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00H3.76 at 1–10 GPa cannot be experimentally observed, it is estimated from the volume of hydrogen atoms in Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00H3.76 (10.69 Å3/f.u.) added to the volume per formula unit of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 at 1–10 GPa (blue circles in Figure 7). In Figure 7, the gap between the V/Z of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 with the hydrogen source and Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00H3.76 can be the volume of hydrogen atoms stored under high pressure. As mentioned above, the volume of one hydrogen atom was 2.84 Å3, highlighting that the chemical formula at 10 GPa could be Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00H7.19, for which the gravimetric hydrogen density reached 2.88 mass %. Figure 8 shows the relationship between hydrogen content and pressure combined with the PCT measurement at 303 K and the high-pressure experiment at room temperature. As mentioned in the section on the crystal structure, the AB5 unit (55.9%) with less Mg contained more D atoms than the AB2 unit (32.4%). This finding that more spaces in the AB2 units could be found in Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00D3.76. We speculate that the spaces in the AB2 units would be related to increasing of hydrogen storage capacities in the higher-pressure region. This finding suggests that Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 has the potential to increase hydrogen storage capacity if the spaces and components of affinities to hydrogen can be optimized.

Figure 6

Figure 6. X-ray diffraction patterns of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 at (bottom) 474 K at 1.6 GPa, and (top) room temperature from 1 to 10 GPa.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Unit cell volume of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 above 1 GPa at room temperature. In the figure, black and red circles are obtained from high-pressure experiments on Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 without and with hydrogen source, respectively. Blue circles are estimated unit cell volume of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00H3.67.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Hydrogen contents in (Y, Mg)Co3 from 10–2 to 104 MPa.

Data points from 10–2 to 101 MPa are obtained by PCT measurements (absorption) at 303 K. Data points from 103 to 104 MPa are estimated by high-pressure experiments at room temperature. Top axis indicates hydrogen and metal atomic ratio.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The AB3-based alloy Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 was obtained from AB2 alloys, YCo2 and MgCo2, at 1172 K in an Ar atmosphere. The crystal structure and hydrogen absorption reactions of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00, before and after hydrogen absorption reactions, were investigated. Before hydrogen absorption reactions, the crystal structure of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 with a = 4.99894(6) Å and c = 24.18914(45) Å in the space group Rm (No. 166) was found to be composed of a Laves polyhedra (AB2 units) and capped hexagonal prisms (AB5 units). In the crystal structure, Mg atoms were located at two crystallographically different atomic positions at the centers of the AB2 and AB5 units. In addition, the atomic positions of the Mg were the same as those of the Y atoms with different occupancies. Only the occupancies of the Mg atoms in the AB2 units increased, although the amount of Mg increased. This finding indicates that the excess Mg atoms are likely to be located on the AB2 unit side. In the hydrogen absorption reactions, the crystal structure motif of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 was maintained. The atomic positions of hydrogen were identified, and their occupations were refined using neutron diffraction under a D2 pressure of 5 MPa at 323 K. In the crystal structure, the D atoms were located at five crystallographically different atomic positions. Two D atoms were located at the interunit positions (between the AB2 and AB5 units), two D atoms were located at the intra-AB2 unit positions (inside the AB2 unit), and one D atom was located at the intra-AB5 unit positions (inside the AB5 unit).
Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 exhibited reversible hydrogen absorption and desorption reactions with a hydrogen storage capacity of 1.68 mass % at 303 K below 10 MPa and minimal degradation for up to 100 cycles of hydrogen absorption and desorption reactions. The hydrogen storage capacity of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 was higher than that of LaNi5 (1.38 mass %), an industrially used hydrogen storage base material. The hydrogen storage capacity and equilibrium hydrogen absorption and desorption reaction pressures depend on the amount of Mg. In particular, excess Mg atoms were located in the AB2 units of the crystal structure. As the hydrogen storage capacities and equilibrium hydrogen absorption and desorption reaction pressures depend on the amount of Mg preferred by the AB2 units, the hydrogen storage properties were controlled by the spaces and affinities of the AB2 units. Considering the fraction of D atoms in the inter-, intra-AB2, and intra-AB5 units, spaces existed in the AB2 units.
To investigate the maximum hydrogen storage capacity of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00, hydrogen absorption reactions were investigated at pressures above 1 GPa, at which the chemical potential of hydrogen dramatically increased. The hydrogen storage capacity finally increased to 2.88 mass % at 10 GPa at room temperature. This finding shows the potential of further site occupation by hydrogen in Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 to increase hydrogen storage capacity.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c06759.

  • X-ray diffraction patterns of the starting materials YCo2 and MgNi2; Rietveld refinement fits of synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction and neutron diffraction; and crystallographic parameters (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Hiroyuki Saitoh - National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan
    • Reina Utsumi - National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan
    • Jyunya Ito - Shibaura Institute of Technology, 3-7-5 Toyosu, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan
    • Kazuki Obana - Shibaura Institute of Technology, 3-7-5 Toyosu, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan
    • Yuki Nakahira - National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5148, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0241-0786
    • Denis Sheptyakov - Laboratory for Neutron Scattering and Imaging, PSI Center for Neutron and Muon Sciences, Forschungsstrasse 111, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
    • Takashi Honda - Institute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4121-8957
    • Hajime Sagayama - Institute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan
    • Shigeyuki Takagi - National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan
    • Tatsuoki Kono - Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan
    • Heena Yang - Water Energy Research Center, Korea Water Resources Corporation, 125 Yuseong-daero 1689beon-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34045, Republic of Korea
    • Wen Luo - School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shangda Road 99, 200444 Shanghai, ChinaOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4250-6168
    • Loris Lombardo - Laboratory of Materials for Renewable Energy (LMER), Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering (ISIC), Basic Science Faculty (SB), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Valais/Wallis, Energypolis, Rue de l’Industrie 17, CH-1951 Sion, SwitzerlandEmpa Materials Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 129, CH-8600 Dübendorf, SwitzerlandOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2968-6686
    • Andreas Züttel - Laboratory of Materials for Renewable Energy (LMER), Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering (ISIC), Basic Science Faculty (SB), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Valais/Wallis, Energypolis, Rue de l’Industrie 17, CH-1951 Sion, SwitzerlandEmpa Materials Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 129, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
    • Shin-ichi Orimo - Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8577, JapanAdvanced Institute for Materials Research (WPI-AIMR), Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8577, Japan
  • Author Contributions

    T.S. conceived this study, prepared and evaluated the samples, performed synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction, and hydrogen storage properties, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. H.S., R.U., J.I., K.O., and Y.N. performed high-pressure experiments above 1 GPa. D.S. performed neutron diffraction. W.L. prepared the sample for neutron diffraction. T.H. and H.S. performed synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction. S.T., T.K., H.Y., W.L., L.L., A.Z., and S.O. participated and discussed the results.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This research was supported by JST SICORP (JPMJSC 1802), MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI (23K23085, 22H01817, JP18H05513 (“Hydrogenomics”), 19K05051), GteX Program Japan Grant Number JPMJGX23H1, and the GIMRT Program of the Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University (Proposal No. 202106-RDKGE-0102, 202112-RDKGE-0012, 202212-RDKGE-0039). Synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction was approved by the Photon Factory Program Advisory Committee (Proposal No. 2019G572). Synchrotron X-ray radiation experiments at SPring-8 were supported by the QST Advanced Characterization Nanotechnology Platform under the remit of the Nanotechnology Platform of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology MEXT, Japan (Proposal Nos. JPMXP09A21QS0031, JPMXP1222QS0007, and JPMXP1222QS0117). The synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction experiments were performed using a QST experimental station at the QST beamline BL14B1 and SPring-8, with the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute JASRI (Proposal Nos. 2021B3694, 2022A3694, and 2022B3694). This work is partly based on experiments performed at the Swiss spallation neutron source SINQ, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland (Proposal No.: 20202035)

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 48 other publications.

  1. 1
    Züttel, A. Materials for Hydrogen Storage. Mater. Today 2003, 6, 2433,  DOI: 10.1016/S1369-7021(03)00922-2
  2. 2
    Hirscher, M.; Yartys, V. A.; Baricco, M.; Bellosta von Colbe, J.; Blanchard, D.; Bowman, R. C.; Broom, D. P.; Buckley, C. E.; Chang, F.; Chen, P. Materials for Hydrogen-Based Energy Storage Past, Recent Progress and Future Outlook. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 827, 153548  DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153548
  3. 3
    Pasquini, L.; Sakaki, S.; Akiba, E.; Allendorf, M. D.; Cho, Y. W.; Alvares, E.; Ares, J. D.; Badai, D.; Bricco, M.; von Colbe, J. B. Magnesium- and Intermetallic Alloys-Based Hydrides for Energy Storage: Modelling, Synthesis and Properties. Prog. Energy 2022, 4, 032007  DOI: 10.1088/2516-1083/ac7190
  4. 4
    Buschow, K. H. J.; van Mal, H. H. Phase Relations and Hydrogen Absorption in the Lanthanum-Nickel System. J. Less-Common Met. 1972, 29, 203210,  DOI: 10.1016/0022-5088(72)90191-9
  5. 5
    Kisi, E. H.; Buckley, C. E.; Gray, E. M. A. The Hydrogen Activation of LaNi5. J. Alloys Compd. 1992, 185, 369384,  DOI: 10.1016/0925-8388(92)90484-Q
  6. 6
    Kadir, K.; Sakai, T.; Uehara, I. Structural Investigation and Hydrogen Capacity of YMg2 Ni9 and (Y0.5Ca0.5)(MgCa)Ni9: New Phases in the AB2C9 System Isostructural with LaMg2Ni9. J. Alloys Compd. 1999, 287, 264270,  DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8388(99)00041-9
  7. 7
    Kadir, K.; Sakai, T.; Uehara, I. Structural Investigation and Hydrogen Storage Capacity of LaMg2Ni9 and (La0.65Ca0.35)(Mg1.32Ca0.68)Ni9 of the AB2C9 type structure. J. Alloys Compd. 2000, 302, 112117,  DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8388(00)00581-8
  8. 8
    Kohno, T.; Yoshida, H.; Kawashima, F.; Inaba, T.; Sakai, I.; Yamamoto, M.; Kanda, M. Hydrogen Storage Properties of New Ternary System Alloys: La2MgNi9, La5Mg2Ni23, La3MgNi14. J. Alloys Compd. 2000, 311, L5L7,  DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8388(00)01119-1
  9. 9
    Denys, R. V.; Yartys, V. A.; Webb, C. J. Hydrogen in La2MgNi9D13: The Role of Magnesium. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 42314238,  DOI: 10.1021/ic202705u
  10. 10
    Liu, W.; Webb, C. J.; Gray, E. MacA. Review of hydrogen storage in AB3 alloys targeting stationary fuel cell applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 34853507,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.054
  11. 11
    Shtender, V. V.; Denys, R. V.; Paul-Boncour, V.; Zavaliy, I. Yu.; Verbovytskyy, Yu. V.; Taylor, D. D. Crystal structure, hydrogen absorption-desorption behavior and magnetic properties of the Nd3-xMgxCo9 alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 695, 14261435,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.268
  12. 12
    Sato, T.; Mochizuki, T.; Ikeda, K.; Honda, T.; Otomo, T.; Sagayama, H.; Yang, H.; Luo, W.; Lombardo, L.; Züttel, A. Crystal Structural Investigations for Understanding the Hydrogen Storage Properties of YMgNi4–Based Alloys. ASC Omega 2020, 5, 3119231198,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c04535
  13. 13
    Sato, T.; Orimo, S. The Crystal Structures in Hydrogen Absorption Reactions of REMgNi4-Based Alloys (RE: rare-earth metals). Energies 2021, 14, 8163,  DOI: 10.3390/en14238163
  14. 14
    Stein, F.; Palm, M.; Sauhoff, G. Structure and Stability of Laves Phases. Part I. Critical Assessment of Factors Controlling Laves Phase Stability. Intermetallics 2004, 12, 713720,  DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2004.02.010
  15. 15
    Kadir, K.; Noréus, D.; Yamashita, I. Structural Determination of AMgNi4 (Where A = Ca, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, and Y) in the AuBe5 Type Structure. J. Alloys Compd. 2002, 345, 140143,  DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8388(02)00323-7
  16. 16
    Aono, K.; Orimo, S.; Fujii, H. Structural and Hydriding Properties of MgYNi4: A New Intermetallic Compound with C15b-type Laves Phase Structure. J. Alloys Compd. 2000, 309, L1L4,  DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8388(00)01065-3
  17. 17
    Guénée, L.; Favre-Nicolin, V.; Yvon, K. Synthesis, Crystal Structure and Hydrogenation Properties of the Ternary Compounds LaNi4Mg and NdNi4Mg. J. Alloys Compd. 2003, 348, 129137,  DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8388(02)00797-1
  18. 18
    Terashita, N.; Akiba, E. Hydriding Properties of (Mg1–xMx)Ni2 C15-Type Laves Phase Alloys. Mater. Trans. 2006, 47, 18901893,  DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.47.1890
  19. 19
    Chotard, J.-N.; Sheptyakov, D.; Yvon, K. Hydrogen Induced Site Depopulation in the LaMgNi4–Hydrogen System. Z. Kristallogr. 2008, 223, 690696,  DOI: 10.1524/zkri.2008.1124
  20. 20
    Denys, R. V.; Riabov, A. B.; Černý, R.; Koval’chuk, I. V.; Zavaliy, I. Yu. New CeMgCo4 and Ce2MgCo9 Compounds: Hydrogenation Properties and Crystal Structure of Hydrides. J. Solid State Chem. 2012, 187, 16,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2011.10.040
  21. 21
    Sakaki, K.; Terashita, N.; Tsunokake, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Akiba, E. In Situ X–ray Diffraction Study of Phase Transformation of Mg2–xPrxNi4 during Hydrogenation and Dehydrogenation (x = 0.6 and 1.0). J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 14011407,  DOI: 10.1021/jp206446c
  22. 22
    Sakaki, K.; Terashita, N.; Tsunokake, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Akiba, E. Effect of Rare Earth Elements and Alloy Composition on Hydrogenation Properties and Crystal Structures of Hydrides in Mg2–xRExNi4. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 1915619163,  DOI: 10.1021/jp3052856
  23. 23
    Sakaki, K.; Terashita, N.; Kim, H.; Proffen, T.; Majzoub, E. H.; Tsunokake, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Akiba, E. Crystal Structure and Local Structure of Mg2-xPrxNi4 (x = 0.6 and 1.0) Deuteride Using in Situ Neutron Total Scattering. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 70107019,  DOI: 10.1021/ic400528u
  24. 24
    Shtender, V. V.; Denys, R. V.; Paul-Boncour, V.; Riabov, A. B.; Zavaliy, I. Yu. Hydrogenation Properties and Crystal Structure of YMgT4 (T = Co, Ni, Cu) Compounds. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 603, 713,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.03.030
  25. 25
    Shtender, V. V.; Denys, R. V.; Paul-Boncour, V.; Verbovytskyy, Yu. V; Zavaliy, I. Yu. Effect of Co Substitution on Hydrogenation and Magnetic Properties of NdMgNi4 Alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 639, 526532,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.03.187
  26. 26
    Shtender, V. V.; Denys, R. V.; Zavaliy, I.Yu.; Zelinska, O. Ya.; Paul-Boncour, V.; Pavlyuk, V. V. Phase Equilibria in the Tb-Mg-Co System at 500 °C, Crystal Structure and Hydrogenation Properties of Selected Compounds. J. Solid State Chem. 2015, 232, 228235,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2015.09.031
  27. 27
    Yang, T.; Yuan, Z.; Bu, W.; Jia, Z.; Qi, Y.; Zhang, Y. Effect of Elemental Substitution on the Structure and Hydrogen Storage Properties of LaMgNi4 Alloy. Mater. Des. 2016, 93, 4652,  DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.150
  28. 28
    Shtender, V. V.; Paul-Boncour, V.; Denys, R. V.; Crivello, J.-C.; Zavaliy, I. Yu. TbMgNi4-xCox-(H,D)2 System. I: Synthesis, Hydrogenation Properties, and Crystal and Electronic Structures. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 196204,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b10252
  29. 29
    Verbovytskyy, Y.; Oprysk, V.; Paul-Boncour, V.; Zavaliy, I.; Berezovets, V.; Lyutyy, P.; Kosarchyn, Y. Solid Gas and Electrochemical Hydrogenation of the Selected Alloys (R’,R”)2-xMgxNi4-yCoy (R’, R” = Pr, Nd; x = 0.8–1.2; y = 0–2). J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 876, 160155  DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160155
  30. 30
    Sato, T.; Ikeda, K.; Honda, T.; Daemen, L. L.; Cheng, Y.; Otomo, T.; Sagayama, H.; Ramirez-Cuesta, A. J.; Takagi, S.; Kono, T. Effect of Co Substitution on Hydrogen Absorption and Desorption Reactions of YMgNi4-based Alloys. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126, 1694316951,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c03265
  31. 31
    Sugimoto, H.; Fukai, Y. Solubility of Hydrogen in Metals under High Hydrogen Pressures: Thermodynamical Calculations. Acta Metall. Mater. 1992, 40, 23272336,  DOI: 10.1016/0956-7151(92)90151-4
  32. 32
    Saitoh, H.; Sato, T.; Tanikami, M.; Ikeda, K.; Machida, A.; Watanuki, T.; Taguchi, T.; Yamamoto, S.; Yamaki, T.; Takagi, S. Hydrogen Storage by Earth-Abundant Metals, Synthesis and Characterization of Al3FeH3.9. Mater. Des. 2021, 208, 109953  DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109953
  33. 33
    Fischer, P.; Frey, G.; Koch, M.; Könnecke, M.; Pomjakushin, V.; Schefer, J.; Thut, R.; Schlumpf, N.; Bürge, R.; Greuter, U. High-Resolution Powder Diffractometer HRPT for Thermal Neutrons at SINQ. Physica B 2000, 146–147, 276278,  DOI: 10.1016/S0921-4526(99)01399-X
  34. 34
    Werner, P.-E.; Eriksson, L.; Westdahl, M. TREOR, A Semi-Exhaustive Trial–and–Error Powder Indexing Program for All Symmetries. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1985, 18, 367370,  DOI: 10.1107/S0021889885010512
  35. 35
    Werner, P.-E. A Fortran Program for Least-Squares Refinement of Crystal-Structure Cell Dimensions. Ark. Kemi 1969, 31, 513516
  36. 36
    Toby, B. H. EXPGUI, A Graphical User Interface for GSAS. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2001, 34, 210213,  DOI: 10.1107/S0021889801002242
  37. 37
    Nylén, J.; Sato, T.; Soignard, E.; Yarger, J. L.; Stoyanov, E.; Häussermann, U. Thermal Decomposition of Ammonia Borane at High Pressures. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 104506,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3230973
  38. 38
    Nylén, J.; Eriksson, L.; Benson, D.; Häussermann, U. Characterization of a High pressure, High Temperature Modification of Ammonia Borane (BH3NH3). J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 054507  DOI: 10.1063/1.4817188
  39. 39
    Seto, Y.; Haname, D.; Nagai, T.; Sata, N. Development of a Software Suite on X-ray Diffraction Experiments. Rev. High Pressure Sci. Technol. 2010, 20, 269276,  DOI: 10.4131/jshpreview.20.269
  40. 40
    Liu, J.; Cui, X.-Y.; Georgiev, P. A.; Morrison, I.; Ross, D. K.; Roberts, M. A.; Andersen, K. A.; Telling, M.; Fort, D. Effect of H on the Crystalline and Magnetic Structures of the (YCo3)-H(D) system. II. YCo3-H(D)x from X-ray and Neutron Powder Diffraction. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 76, 184444  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.184444
  41. 41
    Dayan, D.; Mintz, M. H.; Dariel, M. P. Hysteresis effects in Cerium-ontaining LaNi5-type Compounds. J. Less-Common Met. 1980, 73, 1524,  DOI: 10.1016/0022-5088(80)90338-0
  42. 42
    Qian, S.; Northwood, D. O. Hysteresis in metal-hydrogen systems: a critical review of the experimental observations and theoretical models. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 1988, 13, 2535,  DOI: 10.1016/0360-3199(88)90006-7
  43. 43
    Esayed, A. Y.; Northwood, D. O. Hysteresis in metallic solid solution and intermetallic compound-hydrogen systems. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 1997, 22, 7782,  DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3199(96)00076-6
  44. 44
    Klyamkin, S. N.; Zakharkina, N. S.; Tsikhotskaya, A. A. Hysteresis and related irreversible phenomena in CeNi5-based intermetallic hydrides: Effect of substitution of Co for Ni. J. Alloys Compd. 2005, 398, 145151,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2005.02.038
  45. 45
    Marques, F.; Balcerzak, M.; Winkelmann, F.; Zepon, G.; Felderhoff, M. Review and outlook on high-entropy alloys for hydrogen storage. Energy Enveron. Sci. 2021, 4, 5115227,  DOI: 10.1039/D1EE01543E
  46. 46
    He, X.; Hu, H.; Tang, R.; Zhou, W.; Xiao, H.; Zhang, X.; Ma, C.; Chen, Q. Effect of cobalt substitution for nickel on microstructural evolution and hydrogen storage properties of La0.66Mg0.34Ni3.5-xCox alloys. J. Rare Earth 2024, 42, 930939,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jre.2024.02.003
  47. 47
    Sato, T.; Saitoh, H.; Utsumi, R.; Ito, J.; Nakahira, Y.; Obana, K.; Takagi, S.; Orimo, S. Hydrogen absorption reactions of a hydrogen storage alloy LaNi5 under high pressure. Molecules 2023, 28, 1256,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules28031256
  48. 48
    Ishimatsu, N.; Ishimoto, K.; Sakaki, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Kawamura, N.; Kawaguchi, S. I.; Hirao, N.; Nakano, S. Ferrimagnetic Coupling between Cobalt and Light Rare-Earth Samarium Induced by Dense Hydrogenation of SmCo5 Permanent Magnet under High Pressures. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2023, 7, 024401  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.024401

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. C 2025, 129, 6, 2865–2873
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c06759
Published February 2, 2025

Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

703

Altmetric

-

Citations

-
Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Crystal structures of AB2, AB3, and AB5. In the crystal structure, A and B atoms are represented as gray and green spheres, respectively. Capped hexagonal prism and Laves polyhedra are represented as orange and green polyhedra, respectively.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of (Y, Mg)Co3 synthesized from (2–x)YCo2 + xMgCo2 (x = 0.8 and 1.0), and YCo3. In the figure, allow indicates Y2O3. Si was added as an internal standard.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Crystal structures of (a) Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00, and (b) Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00D3.76. Y, Mg, Co, and D atoms are represented as gray, orange, green, and blue spheres, respectively. Y1/Mg1 surrounded by 18 Co atoms, and Y2/Mg2 surrounded by 12 Co atoms, are represented by orange and green polyhedra, respectively.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Pressure–composition isotherm (PCT) curves of (black) Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 and (gray) Y0.58Mg0.42Co3.00 at 323 K. Closed and open circles indicate hydrogen absorption and desorption, respectively. The PCT curves in the figure are obtained in the third run.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Cycling between hydrogen absorption and desorption reactions on Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 at 303 K. (Top) The PCT curves of (blue) 3 cycles and (green) 100 cycles. (Bottom) X-ray diffraction patterns of before and after the cycling up to 100 cycles.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. X-ray diffraction patterns of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 at (bottom) 474 K at 1.6 GPa, and (top) room temperature from 1 to 10 GPa.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Unit cell volume of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 above 1 GPa at room temperature. In the figure, black and red circles are obtained from high-pressure experiments on Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00 without and with hydrogen source, respectively. Blue circles are estimated unit cell volume of Y0.68Mg0.32Co3.00H3.67.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8. Hydrogen contents in (Y, Mg)Co3 from 10–2 to 104 MPa.

  • References


    This article references 48 other publications.

    1. 1
      Züttel, A. Materials for Hydrogen Storage. Mater. Today 2003, 6, 2433,  DOI: 10.1016/S1369-7021(03)00922-2
    2. 2
      Hirscher, M.; Yartys, V. A.; Baricco, M.; Bellosta von Colbe, J.; Blanchard, D.; Bowman, R. C.; Broom, D. P.; Buckley, C. E.; Chang, F.; Chen, P. Materials for Hydrogen-Based Energy Storage Past, Recent Progress and Future Outlook. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 827, 153548  DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153548
    3. 3
      Pasquini, L.; Sakaki, S.; Akiba, E.; Allendorf, M. D.; Cho, Y. W.; Alvares, E.; Ares, J. D.; Badai, D.; Bricco, M.; von Colbe, J. B. Magnesium- and Intermetallic Alloys-Based Hydrides for Energy Storage: Modelling, Synthesis and Properties. Prog. Energy 2022, 4, 032007  DOI: 10.1088/2516-1083/ac7190
    4. 4
      Buschow, K. H. J.; van Mal, H. H. Phase Relations and Hydrogen Absorption in the Lanthanum-Nickel System. J. Less-Common Met. 1972, 29, 203210,  DOI: 10.1016/0022-5088(72)90191-9
    5. 5
      Kisi, E. H.; Buckley, C. E.; Gray, E. M. A. The Hydrogen Activation of LaNi5. J. Alloys Compd. 1992, 185, 369384,  DOI: 10.1016/0925-8388(92)90484-Q
    6. 6
      Kadir, K.; Sakai, T.; Uehara, I. Structural Investigation and Hydrogen Capacity of YMg2 Ni9 and (Y0.5Ca0.5)(MgCa)Ni9: New Phases in the AB2C9 System Isostructural with LaMg2Ni9. J. Alloys Compd. 1999, 287, 264270,  DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8388(99)00041-9
    7. 7
      Kadir, K.; Sakai, T.; Uehara, I. Structural Investigation and Hydrogen Storage Capacity of LaMg2Ni9 and (La0.65Ca0.35)(Mg1.32Ca0.68)Ni9 of the AB2C9 type structure. J. Alloys Compd. 2000, 302, 112117,  DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8388(00)00581-8
    8. 8
      Kohno, T.; Yoshida, H.; Kawashima, F.; Inaba, T.; Sakai, I.; Yamamoto, M.; Kanda, M. Hydrogen Storage Properties of New Ternary System Alloys: La2MgNi9, La5Mg2Ni23, La3MgNi14. J. Alloys Compd. 2000, 311, L5L7,  DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8388(00)01119-1
    9. 9
      Denys, R. V.; Yartys, V. A.; Webb, C. J. Hydrogen in La2MgNi9D13: The Role of Magnesium. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 42314238,  DOI: 10.1021/ic202705u
    10. 10
      Liu, W.; Webb, C. J.; Gray, E. MacA. Review of hydrogen storage in AB3 alloys targeting stationary fuel cell applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 34853507,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.054
    11. 11
      Shtender, V. V.; Denys, R. V.; Paul-Boncour, V.; Zavaliy, I. Yu.; Verbovytskyy, Yu. V.; Taylor, D. D. Crystal structure, hydrogen absorption-desorption behavior and magnetic properties of the Nd3-xMgxCo9 alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 695, 14261435,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.268
    12. 12
      Sato, T.; Mochizuki, T.; Ikeda, K.; Honda, T.; Otomo, T.; Sagayama, H.; Yang, H.; Luo, W.; Lombardo, L.; Züttel, A. Crystal Structural Investigations for Understanding the Hydrogen Storage Properties of YMgNi4–Based Alloys. ASC Omega 2020, 5, 3119231198,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c04535
    13. 13
      Sato, T.; Orimo, S. The Crystal Structures in Hydrogen Absorption Reactions of REMgNi4-Based Alloys (RE: rare-earth metals). Energies 2021, 14, 8163,  DOI: 10.3390/en14238163
    14. 14
      Stein, F.; Palm, M.; Sauhoff, G. Structure and Stability of Laves Phases. Part I. Critical Assessment of Factors Controlling Laves Phase Stability. Intermetallics 2004, 12, 713720,  DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2004.02.010
    15. 15
      Kadir, K.; Noréus, D.; Yamashita, I. Structural Determination of AMgNi4 (Where A = Ca, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, and Y) in the AuBe5 Type Structure. J. Alloys Compd. 2002, 345, 140143,  DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8388(02)00323-7
    16. 16
      Aono, K.; Orimo, S.; Fujii, H. Structural and Hydriding Properties of MgYNi4: A New Intermetallic Compound with C15b-type Laves Phase Structure. J. Alloys Compd. 2000, 309, L1L4,  DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8388(00)01065-3
    17. 17
      Guénée, L.; Favre-Nicolin, V.; Yvon, K. Synthesis, Crystal Structure and Hydrogenation Properties of the Ternary Compounds LaNi4Mg and NdNi4Mg. J. Alloys Compd. 2003, 348, 129137,  DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8388(02)00797-1
    18. 18
      Terashita, N.; Akiba, E. Hydriding Properties of (Mg1–xMx)Ni2 C15-Type Laves Phase Alloys. Mater. Trans. 2006, 47, 18901893,  DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.47.1890
    19. 19
      Chotard, J.-N.; Sheptyakov, D.; Yvon, K. Hydrogen Induced Site Depopulation in the LaMgNi4–Hydrogen System. Z. Kristallogr. 2008, 223, 690696,  DOI: 10.1524/zkri.2008.1124
    20. 20
      Denys, R. V.; Riabov, A. B.; Černý, R.; Koval’chuk, I. V.; Zavaliy, I. Yu. New CeMgCo4 and Ce2MgCo9 Compounds: Hydrogenation Properties and Crystal Structure of Hydrides. J. Solid State Chem. 2012, 187, 16,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2011.10.040
    21. 21
      Sakaki, K.; Terashita, N.; Tsunokake, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Akiba, E. In Situ X–ray Diffraction Study of Phase Transformation of Mg2–xPrxNi4 during Hydrogenation and Dehydrogenation (x = 0.6 and 1.0). J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 14011407,  DOI: 10.1021/jp206446c
    22. 22
      Sakaki, K.; Terashita, N.; Tsunokake, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Akiba, E. Effect of Rare Earth Elements and Alloy Composition on Hydrogenation Properties and Crystal Structures of Hydrides in Mg2–xRExNi4. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 1915619163,  DOI: 10.1021/jp3052856
    23. 23
      Sakaki, K.; Terashita, N.; Kim, H.; Proffen, T.; Majzoub, E. H.; Tsunokake, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Akiba, E. Crystal Structure and Local Structure of Mg2-xPrxNi4 (x = 0.6 and 1.0) Deuteride Using in Situ Neutron Total Scattering. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 70107019,  DOI: 10.1021/ic400528u
    24. 24
      Shtender, V. V.; Denys, R. V.; Paul-Boncour, V.; Riabov, A. B.; Zavaliy, I. Yu. Hydrogenation Properties and Crystal Structure of YMgT4 (T = Co, Ni, Cu) Compounds. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 603, 713,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.03.030
    25. 25
      Shtender, V. V.; Denys, R. V.; Paul-Boncour, V.; Verbovytskyy, Yu. V; Zavaliy, I. Yu. Effect of Co Substitution on Hydrogenation and Magnetic Properties of NdMgNi4 Alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 639, 526532,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.03.187
    26. 26
      Shtender, V. V.; Denys, R. V.; Zavaliy, I.Yu.; Zelinska, O. Ya.; Paul-Boncour, V.; Pavlyuk, V. V. Phase Equilibria in the Tb-Mg-Co System at 500 °C, Crystal Structure and Hydrogenation Properties of Selected Compounds. J. Solid State Chem. 2015, 232, 228235,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2015.09.031
    27. 27
      Yang, T.; Yuan, Z.; Bu, W.; Jia, Z.; Qi, Y.; Zhang, Y. Effect of Elemental Substitution on the Structure and Hydrogen Storage Properties of LaMgNi4 Alloy. Mater. Des. 2016, 93, 4652,  DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.150
    28. 28
      Shtender, V. V.; Paul-Boncour, V.; Denys, R. V.; Crivello, J.-C.; Zavaliy, I. Yu. TbMgNi4-xCox-(H,D)2 System. I: Synthesis, Hydrogenation Properties, and Crystal and Electronic Structures. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 196204,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b10252
    29. 29
      Verbovytskyy, Y.; Oprysk, V.; Paul-Boncour, V.; Zavaliy, I.; Berezovets, V.; Lyutyy, P.; Kosarchyn, Y. Solid Gas and Electrochemical Hydrogenation of the Selected Alloys (R’,R”)2-xMgxNi4-yCoy (R’, R” = Pr, Nd; x = 0.8–1.2; y = 0–2). J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 876, 160155  DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160155
    30. 30
      Sato, T.; Ikeda, K.; Honda, T.; Daemen, L. L.; Cheng, Y.; Otomo, T.; Sagayama, H.; Ramirez-Cuesta, A. J.; Takagi, S.; Kono, T. Effect of Co Substitution on Hydrogen Absorption and Desorption Reactions of YMgNi4-based Alloys. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126, 1694316951,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c03265
    31. 31
      Sugimoto, H.; Fukai, Y. Solubility of Hydrogen in Metals under High Hydrogen Pressures: Thermodynamical Calculations. Acta Metall. Mater. 1992, 40, 23272336,  DOI: 10.1016/0956-7151(92)90151-4
    32. 32
      Saitoh, H.; Sato, T.; Tanikami, M.; Ikeda, K.; Machida, A.; Watanuki, T.; Taguchi, T.; Yamamoto, S.; Yamaki, T.; Takagi, S. Hydrogen Storage by Earth-Abundant Metals, Synthesis and Characterization of Al3FeH3.9. Mater. Des. 2021, 208, 109953  DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109953
    33. 33
      Fischer, P.; Frey, G.; Koch, M.; Könnecke, M.; Pomjakushin, V.; Schefer, J.; Thut, R.; Schlumpf, N.; Bürge, R.; Greuter, U. High-Resolution Powder Diffractometer HRPT for Thermal Neutrons at SINQ. Physica B 2000, 146–147, 276278,  DOI: 10.1016/S0921-4526(99)01399-X
    34. 34
      Werner, P.-E.; Eriksson, L.; Westdahl, M. TREOR, A Semi-Exhaustive Trial–and–Error Powder Indexing Program for All Symmetries. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1985, 18, 367370,  DOI: 10.1107/S0021889885010512
    35. 35
      Werner, P.-E. A Fortran Program for Least-Squares Refinement of Crystal-Structure Cell Dimensions. Ark. Kemi 1969, 31, 513516
    36. 36
      Toby, B. H. EXPGUI, A Graphical User Interface for GSAS. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2001, 34, 210213,  DOI: 10.1107/S0021889801002242
    37. 37
      Nylén, J.; Sato, T.; Soignard, E.; Yarger, J. L.; Stoyanov, E.; Häussermann, U. Thermal Decomposition of Ammonia Borane at High Pressures. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 104506,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3230973
    38. 38
      Nylén, J.; Eriksson, L.; Benson, D.; Häussermann, U. Characterization of a High pressure, High Temperature Modification of Ammonia Borane (BH3NH3). J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 054507  DOI: 10.1063/1.4817188
    39. 39
      Seto, Y.; Haname, D.; Nagai, T.; Sata, N. Development of a Software Suite on X-ray Diffraction Experiments. Rev. High Pressure Sci. Technol. 2010, 20, 269276,  DOI: 10.4131/jshpreview.20.269
    40. 40
      Liu, J.; Cui, X.-Y.; Georgiev, P. A.; Morrison, I.; Ross, D. K.; Roberts, M. A.; Andersen, K. A.; Telling, M.; Fort, D. Effect of H on the Crystalline and Magnetic Structures of the (YCo3)-H(D) system. II. YCo3-H(D)x from X-ray and Neutron Powder Diffraction. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 76, 184444  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.184444
    41. 41
      Dayan, D.; Mintz, M. H.; Dariel, M. P. Hysteresis effects in Cerium-ontaining LaNi5-type Compounds. J. Less-Common Met. 1980, 73, 1524,  DOI: 10.1016/0022-5088(80)90338-0
    42. 42
      Qian, S.; Northwood, D. O. Hysteresis in metal-hydrogen systems: a critical review of the experimental observations and theoretical models. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 1988, 13, 2535,  DOI: 10.1016/0360-3199(88)90006-7
    43. 43
      Esayed, A. Y.; Northwood, D. O. Hysteresis in metallic solid solution and intermetallic compound-hydrogen systems. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 1997, 22, 7782,  DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3199(96)00076-6
    44. 44
      Klyamkin, S. N.; Zakharkina, N. S.; Tsikhotskaya, A. A. Hysteresis and related irreversible phenomena in CeNi5-based intermetallic hydrides: Effect of substitution of Co for Ni. J. Alloys Compd. 2005, 398, 145151,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2005.02.038
    45. 45
      Marques, F.; Balcerzak, M.; Winkelmann, F.; Zepon, G.; Felderhoff, M. Review and outlook on high-entropy alloys for hydrogen storage. Energy Enveron. Sci. 2021, 4, 5115227,  DOI: 10.1039/D1EE01543E
    46. 46
      He, X.; Hu, H.; Tang, R.; Zhou, W.; Xiao, H.; Zhang, X.; Ma, C.; Chen, Q. Effect of cobalt substitution for nickel on microstructural evolution and hydrogen storage properties of La0.66Mg0.34Ni3.5-xCox alloys. J. Rare Earth 2024, 42, 930939,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jre.2024.02.003
    47. 47
      Sato, T.; Saitoh, H.; Utsumi, R.; Ito, J.; Nakahira, Y.; Obana, K.; Takagi, S.; Orimo, S. Hydrogen absorption reactions of a hydrogen storage alloy LaNi5 under high pressure. Molecules 2023, 28, 1256,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules28031256
    48. 48
      Ishimatsu, N.; Ishimoto, K.; Sakaki, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Kawamura, N.; Kawaguchi, S. I.; Hirao, N.; Nakano, S. Ferrimagnetic Coupling between Cobalt and Light Rare-Earth Samarium Induced by Dense Hydrogenation of SmCo5 Permanent Magnet under High Pressures. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2023, 7, 024401  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.024401
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c06759.

    • X-ray diffraction patterns of the starting materials YCo2 and MgNi2; Rietveld refinement fits of synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction and neutron diffraction; and crystallographic parameters (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.