ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Validating a Density Functional Theory Approach for Predicting the Redox Potentials Associated with Charge Carriers and Excitons in Polymeric Photocatalysts
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Article

Validating a Density Functional Theory Approach for Predicting the Redox Potentials Associated with Charge Carriers and Excitons in Polymeric Photocatalysts
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, U.K.
Open PDFSupporting Information (2)

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 3, 1498–1506
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11133
Published December 22, 2016

Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We compare, for a range of conjugated polymers relevant to water-splitting photocatalysis, the predictions for the redox potentials associated with charge carriers and excitons by a total-energy ΔDFT approach to those measured experimentally. For solid-state potentials, of the different classes of potentials available experimentally for conjugated polymers, the class measured under conditions which are the most similar to those during water splitting, we find a good fit between the ionization potentials predicted using ΔB3LYP and those measured experimentally using photoemission spectroscopy (PES). We also observe a reasonable fit to the more limited data sets of excited-state ionization potentials, obtained from two-photon PES, and electron affinities, measured by inverse PES, respectively. Through a comparison of solid-state potentials with gas phase and solution potentials for a range of oligomers, we demonstrate how the quality of the fit to experimental solid-state data is probably the result of benign error cancellation. We discuss that the good fit for solid-state potentials in vacuum suggests that a similar accuracy can be expected for calculations on solid-state polymers interfaced with water. We also analyze the quality of approximating the ΔB3LYP potentials by orbital energies. Finally, we discuss what a comparison between experimental and predicted potentials teaches us about conjugated polymers as photocatalysts, focusing specifically on the large exciton-binding energy in these systems and the mechanism of free charge carrier generation.

Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Oligomeric and polymeric photocatalysts (1-13) that can drive the redox half-reactions that underlie photocatalytic water splitting, i.e., the reduction of protons to molecular hydrogen and/or oxidation of water to oxygen gas, or CO2 photoreduction, are currently a very active area of research. (14, 15) The attraction of these materials arises from the fact that they are based on earth abundant elements, that their properties can easily be tuned through copolymerization, and that, compared to related carbon nitride (16-27) and graphene oxide (28, 29) photocatalysts, their molecular structure is generally well understood.
One of the crucial requirements for a potential photocatalyst, polymeric or not, to meet is the thermodynamic ability to drive both of the water splitting or CO2 photoreduction solution half-reactions. This prerequisite, at least for colloidal photocatalysts, translates into the constraint that the adiabatic potentials associated with the charge carriers, the ionization potential (IP), and electron affinity (EA) for holes and electrons, respectively, and the excited state, IP* and EA*, in a materials straddle those of the solution half-reactions, as shown in Figure 1. Knowledge of these potentials is hence crucial when trying to understand the activity of known photocatalysts or developing new ones. Reliably measuring such potentials, especially under operating conditions, however, is far from easy. For example, cyclic voltammetry (CV) on solid polymer films on an electrode in contact with an aprotic polar solvent system, the closest measurements in practice come to a solid polymer in contact with water, is generally hard to interpret because the voltammograms tend to be broad, show signs of irreversibility, (30-32) and involve the incorporation of counterions and solvent molecules into the film, (33) something not expected under photocatalysis conditions. A related problem with CV and other electrochemical measurements is that measuring the electron affinity values of polymers is complicated by the fact that these often lie outside the stability window of common solvents and that one thus has to be cautious not to confuse a signal due to solvent oxidation with the signature of electron affinity. The ability to calculate the redox potentials of charge carriers and excitons, therefore, is very useful, especially as it moreover allows one to predict such potentials of hypothetical materials that have not been synthesized as yet and thus to screen computationally for promising photocatalysts. The latter is an especially attractive proposition for polymeric materials, for which the synthesis, purification, and characterization of both the polymer and constituting monomers can be very time-consuming.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Scheme illustrating how, in the case of water splitting, the redox potentials associated with charge carriers (IP and EA) and excitons (EA* and IP*) of a photocatalyst must straddle the proton reduction and water oxidation potentials (blue and red broken lines, respectively) for both processes to be thermodynamically favorable. The vertical axis on the right of the figure shows the different possible alignments with vacuum, the result of the different experimental SHEAP values.

In our group, we developed a density functional theory (DFT) approach specifically aimed at predicting the potentials of polymeric and nanoparticulate photocatalysts (34-38) and applied it, among other things, to linear polymers, (11, 34) including the first ever reported polymer photocatalyst poly(p-phenylene), (1-4) polymer networks, (8) and carbon nitride materials. (35) The main difference between our approach and that developed by others (39-45) for describing photocatalysts is that it revolves around molecular calculations in combination with a continuum dielectric screening model (46) to describe the material and its aqueous environment rather than calculations using periodic boundary conditions (PBC). The focus in the case of polymeric materials on a single polymer strand and the assumption that all intermolecular interaction, be it with other polymer strands or water, can be described in terms of an isotropic dielectric response, is related to the fact that such materials are often amorphous or only poorly crystallized. Hence, we do not have good experimental structural models for polymers to use in PBC calculations and, even if we did construct artificially periodic models, they probably would not necessarily be representative for the solid. Another difference between our approach and that of many others is that we calculate the potentials using a total-energy ΔDFT approach, rather than equate IP and EA with (generalized) Kohn−Sham−(G)KS−orbital energies, which at least conceptually is problematic, especially for EA, (37, 47) as well as, calculate potentials associated with the exciton. Finally, we also take into account the (self-)trapping of charge carriers and excitons, i.e., the formation of polarons and polaronic excitons, by considering adiabatic rather than vertical potentials.
Our approach predicts potentials that are in line with observed activity of polymeric photocatalysts; e.g., many polymers are predicted to have no thermodynamic driving force for water oxidation, their ionization potential is more negative than the potential associated with the water oxidation half-reaction, while sacrificial electron donor oxidation is predicted to be exergonic. However, we never previously compared the explicit predicted polymer and oligomer potentials with those measured experimentally. Here, we correct this omission and compare predicted potentials, in the absence of data for polymeric solids in contact with water, to those measured from three distinctly different alternative data sets, gas phase photoemission spectroscopy (PES) for oligomers of poly(p-phenylene), (48) solution electrochemistry data in aprotic polar solvents for oligomers of poly(p-phenylene) (49) and poly(fluorene) (50) derivatized with solubilizing alkyl chains, and solid-state (inverse) PES data (44, 48, 51-60) for a range of conjugated polymer solids in vacuum. The differences between this and previous work validating the use of hybrid DFT for predicting redox potentials in the literature (61-73) are a combination of (i) our focus on oligomers/polymers rather than small molecules or metal complexes, (ii) our emphasis on potentials in condensed phases, including the solid-state, (iii) the fact that we consider adiabatic rather than vertical potentials, and/or (iv) because we also include excited state potentials in our comparison. We show that, for conjugated oligomers and polymers, (TD-)DFT calculations using the standard B3LYP (74, 75) density functional yield reasonable gas and solution phase potentials and rather consistently good solid-state potentials, the latter in line with previous work for the IP and EA of small molecules. (65-67) We further demonstrate that these good solid-state potentials appear to be the result of rather benign error cancellation. We discuss that the good fit for solid-state potentials in vacuum suggests that a similar accuracy can be expected for calculations on solid-state polymers interfaced with water. We will also briefly touch upon the merits of the orbital approximation mentioned above, as well as discuss the requirements on a density functional to consistently calculate the potentials associated with charge carriers and excitons in polymeric materials. Finally, we will examine what a comparison of experimental and computationally predicted potentials teaches us about conjugated polymers as water-splitting photocatalysts.

Methodology

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We calculate the adiabatic IP, EA, IP*, and EA* potentials of a polymer P in a ΔDFT fashion from the Gibbs free energy difference of the following four redox reactions, written, in line with convention, as reductions(1)(2)(3)(4)where P+, P, and P* are the polymer with a hole, excess electron and exciton, respectively. The Gibbs free energy differences ΔGr are converted to reduction potentials E via(5)where F is the Faraday constant and n the number of electrons involved in the reaction, typically one. In our calculations, we furthermore equate the Gibbs free energy difference to the total energy difference, neglecting the vibrational, translational and rotational contribution to the free energy. In our previous work on poly(para-phenylene) oligomers, (34) this was found to be a generally good approximation because of the relative similarity of the structures of P+, P, P*, and P. Effects of solvation and going to condensed phases in general are described using the COSMO (76) dielectric screening model, where we generally neglect the outlying charge correction. P* energies were obtained by a TD-DFT energy minimization in vacuum, followed, if needs be, by a single point TD-DFT calculation using COSMO, where all TD-DFT calculations make the Tamm–Dancoff approximation. (77) All (TD-)DFT calculations, finally, except where otherwise indicated, were performed using the Turbomole 6.6 code, (78, 79) the B3LYP functional, the double-ζ DZP (80) basis-set, and the m3 medium integration grid.
Potentials, be them computationally predicted or experimentally measured, are always expressed with respect to a reference, typically vacuum in the case of photoelectron spectroscopy and a reference electrode, for example, the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE), for liquid electrochemistry. A key parameter in the conversion from one potential reference to another is the value of the SHE absolute potential (SHEAP), for which a range of experimental values are proposed, something that is partly related to different possible choices for thermodynamic standard states and partly due to extra-thermodynamic assumptions. (81) In this paper, we consider two values of the SHEAP (see Figure 1), 4.44 V, the original IUPAC recommended value (82) we used in our previous work, and, a more recently proposed value of 4.28 V. (81) We will present results where possible for both SHEAP choices. However, if in the text only one value is mentioned for a given system, this will be based on the use of 4.44 V for SHEAP.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

IP

When an oligomer or polymer, or more generally a molecule, is taken from the gas phase into a solution, the solid state or a solid in contact with a solution, the IP of the molecule gets reduced and becomes shallower, through two different mechanisms. (83, 84) First, prior to ionization, in solids, where the molecules are densely packed, hybridization raises the energy of the highest energy occupied orbital, from which an electron will get removed upon ionization. Second, after ionization, the dielectric nature of the environment will screen the generated charge by polarization and stabilize the charged species formed energetically. The difference between the gas and condensed IP values is commonly referred to as the polarization energy, even if only part of this difference is the result of dielectric polarization and, in contrast to what the names suggest, it also contains a contribution due to hybridization.
Table 1 shows experimental and DFT predicted values of the IP of oligomers and polymers of p-phenylene in the gas phase, in a dichloromethane (DCM) solution, and as a solid. We will first concentrate on the experimental values taken from the literature. (48, 49) While one has to be slightly careful with comparing these experimental potentials as they are measured using two fundamentally different methods, ultraviolet PES (UV-PES) and CV, and because of the need to convert between different potential references, vacuum for UV-PES and the standard calomel electrode (SCE)/SHE and the ferrocene/ferrocenium redox couple in the case of CV, such a comparison is very insightful.
Table 1. Experimentally Measured and Computationally Predicted Ionization Potentials of Oligomers and Polymers of p-Phenylene in Different Environments vs the Standard Hydrogen Electrode (All Values in Volts)
 gas phaseDCMbsolid
 UV-PESa, (48)B3LYPaCVc, (49)B3LYPa εr 8.93UV-PESa, (48)B3LYPa εr 2
23.72 (3.88)3.26 (3.42)1.911.42 (1.58)  
33.36 (3.52)2.71 (2.87)1.781.22 (1.38)1.66 (1.82)2.09 (2.25)
4  1.731.13 (1.29)  
5  1.691.09 (1.25)  
62.76 (2.92)2.08 (2.24)1.661.07 (1.23)1.46 (1.62)1.63 (1.79)
7  1.651.05 (1.21)  
8  1.65   
  1.5d0.9d1.21/1.36e (1.37/1.52)1.45 (1.61)f
a

Absolute IP vs vacuum converted to SHE scale by a shift of 4.44 and 4.28 (inside parentheses), respectively.

b

Oligomers with branched iso-alkyl chains at the terminal p-carbon atoms.

c

Measured in DCM in the presence of 0.2 M n-Bu4NPF6 supporting electrolyte against SCE, values converted to SHE scale by application of a shift of +0.244.

d

Obtained through linear extrapolation vs 1/n.

e

Value obtained by two different extrapolation methods in the original experimental paper.

f

Modeled using an oligomer of 12 units.

As expected based on the literature, the gas phase IPs are the deepest, with the solid-state and DCM solution values being 1–2 V smaller than the corresponding gas phase values. More interestingly, the polarization energies for the different oligomers in the solid state and DCM, which can be extracted from the IP values in Table 1, are very similar. As the dielectric permittivity of the solid-state oligomer/polymer phase is likely to be smaller than that of DCM, especially given the fact that the supporting electrolyte is likely to increase the effective dielectric permittivity of the DCM solution through ion-pair formation, (85) this suggests that the smaller dielectric contribution to the permittivity and thus screening of the formed charge in the solid state relative to the solution is more than compensated by the larger contribution due to hybridization in the former. On the basis of the numbers, it is hard to extract an exact value for the effect of hybridization, but it is likely to be at least a few tenths of volts. The experimental polarization energy values measured for the oligomers, finally, are similar in magnitude to those measured for organic crystals (83, 84) and appear to decrease with oligomer length.
Moving on to the computational predictions, where we approximate the alkyl side chain by an isopropyl group (see Figure 2), inspection of Table 1 shows that, for the gas and solution phases, ΔDFT calculations using the B3LYP functional yield IP values that are 0.5–0.6 V shallower, less positive, than those measured experimentally. A similar shift was reported by Baik and Friesner when calculating EA values of small molecules in solution using B3LYP. (61) Calculations, discussed in the Supporting Information (ESI-1), using a slightly higher dielectric permittivity for the DCM solution than that of pure DCM in order to take into account that the supporting electrolyte will likely increase the effective dielectric permittivity, as well as calculations with larger basis-sets (ESI-2), do not sufficiently change this observation. Moreover, a comparison between similar ΔB3LYP calculations and experimental data for the ionization potentials of oligo(fluorene) in solution in the Supporting Information (ESI-1) finds a similar 0.5–0.6 V shift, suggesting this to be a quite general feature. In contrast to for the gas and solution phases, in calculations for the solid state, in which as discussed above we neglect hybridization, the predicted IPs are 0.2–0.4 V more shallow, less positive, than those measured experimentally. For the dissolved oligomers, the calculations reproduce the experimentally obtained polarization energy values rather well, but the solid-state polarization energies are underestimated by ∼1 V. If the isotropic dielectric screening model used in our calculation correctly reproduces the dielectric component of the polarization energy, this would suggest that the effect of hybridization is ∼65% of the polarization energy and far from negligible. The absolute values of the solid-state IPs, most relevant for our work, however, are, as discussed above, reasonably well reproduced. As the inherent density functional related error and the error introduced by neglecting hybridization have similar magnitudes and opposite signs, the solid-state values by benign error cancelation lie close to their experimental counterparts.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Structures of oligomer models studied computationally.

This success in reproducing experimental values of solid-state IP values for polymers appears to be not limited to oligomers and the polymer of p-phenylene. Figure 3 and Table S5 in the Supporting Information show a comparison of IPs of a range of conjugated polymers measured experimentally by UV-PES (48, 51-54, 56, 60) and our B3LYP calculations, again using εr 2, for oligomers of 12 units (see Figure 4 for the structures of different polymers studied). Concentrating on the polymers without side chains, for all materials, except perhaps poly(pyrrole), the match is quite good (maximum deviation of −0.44 V, for poly(pyrrole), and a mean absolute deviation of 0.20 V) and the DFT predictions correctly recover the relative ordering of the IPs of the different polymers. Since poly(pyrrole) is easily oxidizable, (54) the deviation observed for this material can in part find its origin in experiment. Use of a slightly higher dielectric permittivity than 2 for the heteroatom containing polymers, to account for the fact that such polymers probably have a higher dielectric permittivity than pure hydrocarbon polymers (see Table S8 in the Supporting Information), if anything worsens the fit. In this context, it is important to remember that photoemission is likely to mostly involve molecules near the polymer–vacuum interface due to the surface sensitivity of UV-PES and that such molecules as a result will be less screened than in the bulk. (86) These results also suggest that the single oligomer embedded in a dielectric continuum approximation, which ignores details of molecular packing, works very well for these amorphous/quasi-crystalline polymers, even if for fully crystalline materials there are cases known where nonisotropic packing effects are large and one has to go beyond the continuum approach. (87)

Figure 3

Figure 3. Comparison between the potentials predicted using (TD-)B3LYP and εr 2, thick lines, and measured experimentally, thin lines, for a range of conjugated polymers.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Structures of the polymers studied; the n used in the calculations was 12 for all structures except PF, where an n of 6 was used instead.

Overall, on the basis of these results and the fact that the (dielectric) effect of going from an interface with vacuum to water is most likely additive, we feel confident that the computational setup used will also provide decent predictions for the IP of a polymer interfaced with water. Protonation of a polymer might induce an additional shift in the potentials, but this is, even for the nitrogen containing polymers, unlikely to be an issue at (near) neutral pH.

EA

In contrast to the relative multitude of reference data on the IP of oligomers and polymers, there is very little experimental data on the EA of oligomers and polymers, especially in the solid state. Most reported electron affinities are obtained by adding the optical gap, the onset of light absorption, to the value of the IP, but this is a questionable approach. More theoretically justified values can be obtained from either inverse PES or the high kinetic energy edge of two-photon PES (2PPE) spectra. Such data are only available, as far as we are aware, for three of the polymers discussed above. for the alkyl-chain derivatized version of poly(thiophene): poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT), (59, 60) poly(fluorene): poly(9,9-dioctylfluorene) (57) (PF8), and poly(2-methoxy-5-(2-ethyl-hexyloxy)-p-phenylene vinylene) (58) (MEH-PPV). As can be seen from Figure 3 and Table S6 in the Supporting Information, the fit is good for P3HT and PPV, and slightly less good for PF8. This is for calculations neglecting the alkyl side chains. However, calculations that take these side chains into account, included in Table S6 in the Supporting Information, show that these side chains are predicted to only have a small effect on the electron affinity. While these three data points are not sufficient to properly test our approach in terms of its ability to correctly predict electron affinities of polymers in the solid state, it at least give some confidence in our approach. Similarly as for the IP, we expect that the difference in the EA for a polymer in contact with vacuum and water is adequately described by changing the dielectric permittivity from 2 to that of water.

Excited State Potentials: IP* and EA*

Experimental benchmark data for the excited state potentials of relevant polymers are as rare as data for EA, if not rarer. We are aware of 2PPE data, where the process of ionization of the intermediate state by the second photon can be hypothesized to correspond to the ionization of a (self-trapped) exciton and thus IP*, for only two polymers: P3HT, (59) and MEH-PPV. (58) As can be seen from Figure 3 and Table S7 in the Supporting Information, the experimentally measured values appear in line with the values predicted by our computational approach for the polymers without side chains. Moreover, for both P3HT and MEH-PPV, EA and IP* are split by ∼0.7 (e)V, the adiabatic exciton-binding energy, in experiment and by ∼1 (e)V in our calculations. Similarly as for EA, while these two data points for IP* are not sufficient to properly test our approach in terms of its ability to correctly predict electron affinities of polymers in the solid state, it does give confidence in our approach. We are not aware of any experimental data that would allow us to directly validate our EA* predictions; this would require a 2PPE equivalent inverse photoemission spectroscopy. However, as by definition, the splitting between IP and EA* is the same as between EA and IP*, the fit between predicted IP* and 2PPE values in combination with the fit between experimental and computational IP values suggests that EA* might be as well described as IP*. Again, just as for IP and EA, the effect of water is likely to be additive for IP* and EA*.

Orbital Approximation

IP and EA are often approximated in the literature by the negative of the energy of the highest energy occupied (G)KS molecular orbital (HOMO or valence band maximum) and lowest energy unoccupied (G)KS molecular orbital (LUMO or conduction band minimum). This approximation is especially problematic on conceptual grounds for EA as, at least for pure density dependent functionals, the unoccupied orbitals are too strongly bound and lie too deep. (37, 47) The (G)KS gap, the energy difference between LUMO and HOMO, as a result lies often closer to the vertical optical gap than the vertical fundamental gap. A comparison between IP/EA and −HOMO/–LUMO for the polymers in Figure 5, however, shows a surprisingly decent fit between both and by extension with experimental IP/EA values. The difference between the orbital energies and potentials is an approximately constant small shift of a couple of tenths of volts. In line with what was previously observed by Schwenn and co-workers (67) in the case of small molecules, the reason again appears to be benign error cancellation. The underestimation of the vertical fundamental gap by the HOMO–LUMO energy difference is similar in size to a shift in IP and EA due to adiabatic and polarization effects not included in orbital energies, and both effects cancel each other. However, while we observe a decent fit between IP/EA and −HOMO/–LUMO for the solid-state oligomers studied, the accuracy of unshifted orbital energies will be different for different dielectric constants (see the Supporting Information) and hence different environments, as well as, we expect, when using different density functionals or for the case of PBC calculations on solids.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Comparison between IP and −HOMO, red open squares, and EA and −LUMO, open blue triangles, calculated with B3LYP and εr 2.

Perspective

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Methodology

Consistently calculating the set of potentials associated with the charge carriers and exciton is rather a demanding application. Very likely other density functionals than B3LYP, for example optimally tuned range-separated density functionals, (69, 72, 88) might yield more accurate values for the ionization potential or electron affinity of oligomers in the gas phase or in solution. However, to be useful in this context, use of such a functional should simultaneously allow for the calculations of the other potentials, including the excited state potentials, and hence the optical properties of a system, and the potentials of solution reactions, and all to a similar consistent standard. Additionally, while our dependence on error cancelation to predict decent solid-state values is unsatisfying from a theoretical point of view, it saves one from having to do calculations on extended models of the solid. If our estimate of the contribution of hybridization to the polarization energy for PPP is correct and a general feature of conjugated polymers, then calculations with functionals that give better gas phase values might require calculations on explicit stacks to obtain solid-state values or ad-hoc shifts. The latter is probably as conceptually unsatisfying as relying on error cancelation, while the former is, at least for polymers that are amorphous or poorly crystallized, difficult to achieve due to, as discussed in the Introduction, the lack of meaningful structural models. An additional complication with calculations on explicit stacks is the fact that the percentage of Hartree–Fock exchange included the density functional fixes the intermolecular dielectric screening inside the stack. (89) As a result, the effective dielectric constant inside the stack might be different from its desired value and different from that used in the external continuum dielectric screening model.
We see the use of orbital energies to predominantly lie in fast screening of materials before calculating the potentials explicitly with ΔDFT for promising materials. Even if the −HOMO/–LUMO values would be exactly identical to IP/EA, the fact that within the orbital formalism one cannot calculate the excited state potentials or estimate adiabatic or polarization effects makes it, in our opinion, at least for polymers, more of a high throughput screening tool than an in-depth analysis method.

Materials

Besides validating our computational methodology, the comparison between experimentally measured and computationally predicted potentials also gives us additional insight into polymeric materials and their ability to act as water-splitting photocatalysts. Specifically, the good match between the predicted and experimentally measured ionization potentials, as well as the specific experimental values of the ionization potentials and electron affinities for the polymers considered, supports our previous observation (34, 38) that conjugated polymers generally have a large thermodynamic driving force for proton reduction and a small(er) driving force, if at all, for water oxidation, i.e., that the electron affinities and ionization potentials of most polymers are relatively shallow. The experimental data are similarly in line with our prediction (38) that the incorporation of heteroatoms should drive down the ionization potential of a polymer and improve the driving force for water oxidation if it results in a polymer with an electron-poor π-system, e.g., poly(pyridine), and reduce this driving force if the resulting polymer is electron-rich, i.e., poly(pyrrole) and poly(thiophene).
Perhaps even more interestingly, our estimate of the experimental adiabatic exciton-binding energy in substituted poly(thiophene) P3HT and poly(phenylvinylene) PPV of ∼0.7 (e)V, obtained above from the difference in the measured electron affinity (58-60) and 2PPE intermediate state energy (58, 59) discussed above, as well as the fact that it is similar to our theoretical estimate, confirms our previous observation (38) that excitons in conjugated polymers should be so strongly bound that they are unlikely to spontaneously fall apart in the bulk. The generation of free charge carriers, where free signifies that the charge carriers are not bound in the form of an exciton, thus has to be mediated by either a reduction of the adiabatic exciton-binding energy through induced dielectric screening by close contact with water or dissociation of the exciton at the polymer–water (or heteropolymer) interface. Calculations (38) predict that the former indeed takes place but that the resulting adiabatic exciton-binding energies still will be larger than kB*T at room temperature. Free charge carrier generation thus appears mediated by interface dissociation of excitons, similar to exciton dissociation in organic photovoltaics on the donor–acceptor interface. (90)

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We have for a range of polymers relevant to photocatalysis compared the predictions of density functional theory for the redox potentials associated with charge carriers and excitons to those measured experimentally. We find for the ionization potentials of solid-state polymers in contact with vacuum, of the different classes of potentials available experimentally for conjugated polymers, the set measured under conditions which are the most similar to those during water splitting, a good fit between the values predicted using ΔB3LYP and those measured experimentally. Experimental data measured under similar conditions for the electron affinity and excited state ionization potential are much more limited, but we find a good fit to ΔB3LYP in the latter case and a decent fit in the former. Overall, the comparison with experimental data gives good confidence in the use of ΔB3LYP to predict polymer potentials for solids and suggests that, if the effect of replacing the interface with vacuum by an interface with water is largely dielectric in nature, the here used approach should also give accurate predictions under water-splitting conditions.
In contrast to the case of solid-state polymers, the ΔB3LYP predicted ionization potentials for oligomers of p-phenylene in the gas phase and solutions and oligomers of fluorene are off by 0.5–0.6 V with respect to experiment. A combination of this observation and comparison of experimental and theoretical estimates of the polarization energy suggests that the consistently good fit for solid polymers may be the result of benign error cancellation. We lack similar data for the electron affinity and excited state potentials, but it stands to reason that the decent description of these potentials is similarly the result of error cancelation.
Besides validating our computational approach, the comparison between experimental and computational results, among other things, also confirms our previous prediction that generally excitons in conjugated polymers are so strongly bound that they do not spontaneously fall apart in the bulk. The generation of free charge carriers instead thus must be mediated by the dissociation of excitons on the polymer–solution interface or polymer–polymer interface in heterogeneous materials.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11133.

  • Tables of potentials for alternative εr values, tables of solid-state potentials vs vacuum, results with larger basis sets, and orbital approximation data for εr 80.1 (PDF)

  • xyz coordinates of relevant DFT optimized structures (ZIP)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Pierre Guiglion - Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, U.K.
    • Adriano Monti - Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, U.K.
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We kindly acknowledge Prof. Dave Adams, Dr. Enrico Berardo, Prof. Richard Buchner, Dr. Cristina Butchosa, Prof. Andrew Cooper, Dr. Sam Chong, Dr. Warren Duffy, Prof. Furio Cora, Prof. Iain McCulloch, Prof. Chad Risko, Dr. Sebastian Sprick, and Lei Yuang for stimulating discussions. M.A.Z. acknowledges the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) for a Career Acceleration Fellowship (Grant EP/I004424/1), as well as additional funding (EP/N004884/1). Computational time on Archer, the UK’s national high-performance computing service (via our membership of the UK’s HPC Materials Chemistry Consortium, which is funded by EPSRC grant EP/L000202/1), and at the EPSRC National Centre for Computational Chemistry Software (NCCCS) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 90 other publications.

  1. 1
    Yanagida, S.; Kabumoto, A.; Mizumoto, K.; Pac, C.; Yoshino, K. Poly(Para-Phenylene)-Catalyzed Photoreduction of Water to Hydrogen J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985, 474 475 DOI: 10.1039/c39850000474
  2. 2
    Shibata, T.; Kabumoto, A.; Shiragami, T.; Ishitani, O.; Pac, C.; Yanagida, S. Novel Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalyst - Poly(Para-Phenylene)-Catalyzed Photoreductions of Water, Carbonyl-Compounds, and Olefins J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 2068 2076 DOI: 10.1021/j100368a063
  3. 3
    Matsuoka, S.; Fujii, H.; Pac, C.; Yanagida, S. Photocatalysis of Oligo(Para-Phenylene) Leading to Reductive Formation of Hydrogen and Ethanol from Triethylamine in Aqueous Organic-Solvent Chem. Lett. 1990, 19, 1501 1502 DOI: 10.1246/cl.1990.1501
  4. 4
    Matsuoka, S.; Kohzuki, T.; Pac, C.; Ishida, A.; Takamuku, S.; Kusaba, M.; Nakashima, N.; Yanagida, S. Photocatalysis of Oligo(Para-Phenylenes) - Photochemical Reduction of Carbon-Dioxide with Triethylamine J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 4437 4442 DOI: 10.1021/j100190a057
  5. 5
    Schwab, M. G.; Hamburger, M.; Feng, X. L.; Shu, J.; Spiess, H. W.; Wang, X. C.; Antonietti, M.; Mullen, K. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution through Fully Conjugated Poly(Azomethine) Networks Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 8932 8934 DOI: 10.1039/c0cc04057f
  6. 6
    Zhang, Z. Z.; Long, J. L.; Yang, L. F.; Chen, W. K.; Dai, W. X.; Fu, X. Z.; Wang, X. X. Organic Semiconductor for Artificial Photosynthesis: Water Splitting into Hydrogen by a Bioinspired C3N3S3 Polymer under Visible Light Irradiation Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 1826 1830 DOI: 10.1039/C1SC00257K
  7. 7
    Chu, S.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, P.; Yu, H.; Luo, L. L.; Kong, F.; Zou, Z. G. Facile Green Synthesis of Crystalline Polyimide Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Generation from Water J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 15519 15521 DOI: 10.1039/c2jm32595k
  8. 8
    Sprick, R. S.; Jiang, J. X.; Bonillo, B.; Ren, S. J.; Ratvijitvech, T.; Guiglion, P.; Zwijnenburg, M. A.; Adams, D. J.; Cooper, A. I. Tunable Organic Photocatalysts for Visible-Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 3265 3270 DOI: 10.1021/ja511552k
  9. 9
    Bornoz, P.; Prevot, M. S.; Yu, X. Y.; Guijarro, N.; Sivula, K. Direct Light-Driven Water Oxidation by a Ladder-Type Conjugated Polymer Photoanode J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 15338 15341 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b05724
  10. 10
    Schwinghammer, K.; Hug, S.; Mesch, M. B.; Senker, J.; Lotsch, B. V. Phenyl-Triazine Oligomers for Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 3345 3353 DOI: 10.1039/C5EE02574E
  11. 11
    Sprick, R. S.; Bonillo, B.; Clowes, R.; Guiglion, P.; Brownbill, N. J.; Slater, B. J.; Blanc, F.; Zwijnenburg, M. A.; Adams, D. J.; Cooper, A. I. Visible-Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution Using Planarized Conjugated Polymer Photocatalysts Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 1824 1828 DOI: 10.1002/ange.201510542
  12. 12
    Yang, C.; Ma, B. C.; Zhang, L. Z.; Lin, S.; Ghasimi, S.; Landfester, K.; Zhang, K. A. I.; Wang, X. C. Molecular Engineering of Conjugated Polybenzothiadiazoles for Enhanced Hydrogen Production by Photosynthesis Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9202 9206 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201603532
  13. 13
    Li, L. W.; Cai, Z. X.; Wu, Q. H.; Lo, W. Y.; Zhang, N.; Chen, L. X.; Yu, L. P. Rational Design of Porous Conjugated Polymers and Roles of Residual Palladium for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 7681 7686 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b03472
  14. 14
    Vyas, V. S.; Lau, V. W. H.; Lotsch, B. V. Soft Photocatalysis: Organic Polymers for Solar Fuel Productions Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 5191 5204 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01894
  15. 15
    Zhang, G.; Lan, Z.-A.; Wang, X. Organic Conjugated Semiconductors for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution with Visible Light Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 15712 15727 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201607375
  16. 16
    Wang, X. C.; Maeda, K.; Thomas, A.; Takanabe, K.; Xin, G.; Carlsson, J. M.; Domen, K.; Antonietti, M. A Metal-Free Polymeric Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Production from Water under Visible Light Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 76 80 DOI: 10.1038/nmat2317
  17. 17
    Wang, X. C.; Maeda, K.; Chen, X. F.; Takanabe, K.; Domen, K.; Hou, Y. D.; Fu, X. Z.; Antonietti, M. Polymer Semiconductors for Artificial Photosynthesis: Hydrogen Evolution by Mesoporous Graphitic Carbon Nitride with Visible Light J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1680 1681 DOI: 10.1021/ja809307s
  18. 18
    Maeda, K.; Wang, X. C.; Nishihara, Y.; Lu, D. L.; Antonietti, M.; Domen, K. Photocatalytic Activities of Graphitic Carbon Nitride Powder for Water Reduction and Oxidation under Visible Light J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 4940 4947 DOI: 10.1021/jp809119m
  19. 19
    Zhang, J. S.; Chen, X. F.; Takanabe, K.; Maeda, K.; Domen, K.; Epping, J. D.; Fu, X. Z.; Antonietti, M.; Wang, X. C. Synthesis of a Carbon Nitride Structure for Visible-Light Catalysis by Copolymerization Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 441 444 DOI: 10.1002/anie.200903886
  20. 20
    Zhang, G. G.; Lan, Z. A.; Lin, L. H.; Lin, S.; Wang, X. C. Overall Water Splitting by Pt/G-C3N4 Photocatalysts without Using Sacrificial Agents Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 3062 3066 DOI: 10.1039/C5SC04572J
  21. 21
    Sui, Y.; Liu, J. H.; Zhang, Y. W.; Tian, X. K.; Chen, W. Dispersed Conductive Polymer Nanoparticles on Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Enhanced Solar-Driven Hydrogen Evolution from Pure Water Nanoscale 2013, 5, 9150 9155 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr02413j
  22. 22
    Schwinghammer, K.; Tuffy, B.; Mesch, M. B.; Wirnhier, E.; Martineau, C.; Taulelle, F.; Schnick, W.; Senker, J.; Lotsch, B. V. Triazine-Based Carbon Nitrides for Visible-Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2435 2439 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201206817
  23. 23
    Martin, D. J.; Qiu, K. P.; Shevlin, S. A.; Handoko, A. D.; Chen, X. W.; Guo, Z. X.; Tang, J. W. Highly Efficient Photocatalytic H2 Evolution from Water Using Visible Light and Structure-Controlled Graphitic Carbon Nitride Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 9240 9245 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201403375
  24. 24
    Schwinghammer, K.; Mesch, M. B.; Duppel, V.; Ziegler, C.; Senker, J.; Lotsch, B. V. Crystalline Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Improved Visible-Light Hydrogen Evolution J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1730 1733 DOI: 10.1021/ja411321s
  25. 25
    Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, N. Y.; Han, Y. Z.; Zhang, X.; Huang, H.; Lifshitz, Y.; Lee, S. T.; Zhong, J.; Kang, Z. H. Metal-Free Efficient Photocatalyst for Stable Visible Water Splitting Via a Two-Electron Pathway Science 2015, 347, 970 974 DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa3145
  26. 26
    Lau, V. W. H.; Mesch, M. B.; Duppel, V.; Blum, V.; Senker, J.; Lotsch, B. V. Low-Molecular-Weight Carbon Nitrides for Solar Hydrogen Evolution J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1064 1072 DOI: 10.1021/ja511802c
  27. 27
    Lau, V. W. H.; Moudrakovski, I.; Botari, T.; Weinberger, S.; Mesch, M. B.; Duppel, V.; Senker, J.; Blum, V.; Lotsch, B. V. Rational Design of Carbon Nitride Photocatalysts by Identification of Cyanamide Defects as Catalytically Relevant Sites Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12165 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12165
  28. 28
    Yeh, T. F.; Syu, J. M.; Cheng, C.; Chang, T. H.; Teng, H. S. Graphite Oxide as a Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Production from Water Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 2255 2262 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201000274
  29. 29
    Yeh, T. F.; Teng, C. Y.; Chen, S. J.; Teng, H. S. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots as Photocatalysts for Overall Water-Splitting under Visible Light Illumination Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3297 3303 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201305299
  30. 30
    Tsai, E. W.; Basak, S.; Ruiz, J. P.; Reynolds, J. R.; Rajeshwar, K. Electrochemistry of Some Beta-Substituted Polythiophenes - Anodic-Oxidation, Electrochromism, and Electrochemical Deactivation J. Electrochem. Soc. 1989, 136, 3683 3689 DOI: 10.1149/1.2096530
  31. 31
    Novak, P.; Rasch, B.; Vielstich, W. Overoxidation of Polypyrrole in Propylene Carbonate - an Insitu FTIR Study J. Electrochem. Soc. 1991, 138, 3300 3304 DOI: 10.1149/1.2085406
  32. 32
    Zotti, G.; Schiavon, G.; Zecchin, S. Irreversible-Processes in the Electrochemical Reduction of Polythiophenes - Chemical Modifications of the Polymer and Charge-Trapping Phenomena Synth. Met. 1995, 72, 275 281 DOI: 10.1016/0379-6779(95)03280-0
  33. 33
    Vyas, R. N.; Wang, B. Electrochemical Analysis of Conducting Polymer Thin Films Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 1956 1972 DOI: 10.3390/ijms11041956
  34. 34
    Guiglion, P.; Butchosa, C.; Zwijnenburg, M. A. Polymeric Watersplitting Photocatalysts; a Computational Perspective on the Water Oxidation Conundrum J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 11996 12004 DOI: 10.1039/C4TA02044H
  35. 35
    Butchosa, C.; Guiglion, P.; Zwijnenburg, M. A. Carbon Nitride Photocatalysts for Water Splitting: A Computational Perspective J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 24833 24842 DOI: 10.1021/jp507372n
  36. 36
    Berardo, E.; Zwijnenburg, M. A. Modeling the Water Splitting Activity of a Tio2 Rutile Nanoparticle J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 13384 13393 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01512
  37. 37
    Guiglion, P.; Berardo, E.; Butchosa, C.; Wobbe, M. C. C.; Zwijnenburg, M. A. Modelling Materials for Solar Fuel Synthesis by Artificial Photosynthesis; Predicting the Optical, Electronic and Redox Properties of Photocatalysts J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2016, 28, 074001 DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/28/7/074001
  38. 38
    Guiglion, P.; Butchosa, C.; Zwijnenburg, M. A. Polymer Photocatalysts for Water Splitting: Insights from Computational Modeling Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2016, 217, 344 353 DOI: 10.1002/macp.201500432
  39. 39
    Toroker, M. C.; Kanan, D. K.; Alidoust, N.; Isseroff, L. Y.; Liao, P. L.; Carter, E. A. First Principles Scheme to Evaluate Band Edge Positions in Potential Transition Metal Oxide Photocatalysts and Photoelectrodes Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 16644 16654 DOI: 10.1039/c1cp22128k
  40. 40
    Castelli, I. E.; Olsen, T.; Datta, S.; Landis, D. D.; Dahl, S.; Thygesen, K. S.; Jacobsen, K. W. Computational Screening of Perovskite Metal Oxides for Optimal Solar Light Capture Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 5814 5819 DOI: 10.1039/C1EE02717D
  41. 41
    Persson, K. A.; Waldwick, B.; Lazic, P.; Ceder, G. Prediction of Solid-Aqueous Equilibria: Scheme to Combine First-Principles Calculations of Solids with Experimental Aqueous States Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2012, 85, 235438 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.235438
  42. 42
    Zhuang, H. L. L.; Hennig, R. G. Single-Layer Group-Iii Monochalcogenide Photocatalysts for Water Splitting Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 3232 3238 DOI: 10.1021/cm401661x
  43. 43
    Stevanovic, V.; Lany, S.; Ginley, D. S.; Tumas, W.; Zunger, A. Assessing Capability of Semiconductors to Split Water Using Ionization Potentials and Electron Affinities Only Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 3706 3714 DOI: 10.1039/c3cp54589j
  44. 44
    Jiang, X.; Wang, P.; Zhao, J. J. 2d Covalent Triazine Framework: A New Class of Organic Photocatalyst for Water Splitting J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 7750 7758 DOI: 10.1039/C4TA03438D
  45. 45
    Buckeridge, J.; Butler, K. T.; Catlow, C. R. A.; Logsdail, A. J.; Scanlon, D. O.; Shevlin, S. A.; Woodley, S. M.; Sokol, A. A.; Walsh, A. Polymorph Engineering of Tio2: Demonstrating How Absolute Reference Potentials Are Determined by Local Coordination Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 3844 3851 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00230
  46. 46
    Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Quantum Mechanical Continuum Solvation Models Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2999 3093 DOI: 10.1021/cr9904009
  47. 47
    Baerends, E. J.; Gritsenko, O. V.; van Meer, R. The Kohn-Sham Gap, the Fundamental Gap and the Optical Gap: The Physical Meaning of Occupied and Virtual Kohn-Sham Orbital Energies Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 16408 16425 DOI: 10.1039/c3cp52547c
  48. 48
    Seki, K.; Karlsson, U. O.; Engelhardt, R.; Koch, E. E.; Schmidt, W. Intramolecular Band Mapping of Poly(Para-Phenylene) Via Uv Photoelectron-Spectroscopy of Finite Polyphenyls Chem. Phys. 1984, 91, 459 470 DOI: 10.1016/0301-0104(84)80078-6
  49. 49
    Banerjee, M.; Shukla, R.; Rathore, R. Synthesis, Optical, and Electronic Properties of Soluble Poly-P-Phenylene Oligomers as Models for Molecular Wires J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1780 1786 DOI: 10.1021/ja805102d
  50. 50
    Chi, C. Y.; Wegner, G. Chain-Length Dependence of the Electrochemical Properties of Conjugated Oligofluorenes Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2005, 26, 1532 1537 DOI: 10.1002/marc.200500437
  51. 51
    Nagashima, U.; Fujimoto, H.; Inokuchi, H.; Seki, K. Electronic and Geometric Structures of Oligothiophenes J. Mol. Struct. 1989, 197, 265 289 DOI: 10.1016/0022-2860(89)85169-5
  52. 52
    Seki, K.; Asada, S.; Mori, T.; Inokuchi, H.; Murase, I.; Ohnishi, T.; Noguchi, T. Uv Photoemission Spectroscopy of Poly(P-Phenylene Vinylene) (PPV) Solid State Commun. 1990, 74, 677 680 DOI: 10.1016/0038-1098(90)90700-L
  53. 53
    Fujimoto, H.; Nagashima, U.; Inokuchi, H.; Seki, K.; Nakahara, N.; Nakayama, J.; Hoshino, M.; Fukuda, K. Electronic and Geometric Structures of Oligothiophenes Studied by Ups and Mndo - π-Band Evolution and Effect of Disorder Phys. Scr. 1990, 41, 105 109 DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/41/1/026
  54. 54
    Hino, S.; Iwasaki, K.; Tatematsu, H.; Matsumoto, K. Photoelectron-Spectra of Polypyrrole - the Effect of the Ambient Atmosphere to the Spectra Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1990, 63, 2199 2205 DOI: 10.1246/bcsj.63.2199
  55. 55
    Miyamae, T.; Yoshimura, D.; Ishii, H.; Ouchi, Y.; Seki, K.; Miyazaki, T.; Koike, T.; Yamamoto, T. Ultraviolet Photoelectron-Spectroscopy of Poly(Pyridine-2,5-Diyl), Poly(2,2′-Bipyridine-5,5′-Diyl), and Their K-Doped States J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 2738 2744 DOI: 10.1063/1.470508
  56. 56
    Liao, L. S.; Fung, M. K.; Lee, C. S.; Lee, S. T.; Inbasekaran, M.; Woo, E. P.; Wu, W. W. Electronic Structure and Energy Band Gap of Poly (9,9-Dioctylfluorene) Investigated by Photoelectron Spectroscopy Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 76, 3582 3584 DOI: 10.1063/1.126713
  57. 57
    Hwang, J.; Kim, E. G.; Liu, J.; Bredas, J. L.; Duggal, A.; Kahn, A. Photoelectron Spectroscopic Study of the Electronic Band Structure of Polyfluorene and Fluorene-Arylamine Copolymers at Interfaces J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 1378 1384 DOI: 10.1021/jp067004w
  58. 58
    Sohn, Y.; Stuckless, J. T. Bimolecular Recombination Kinetics and Interfacial Electronic Structures of Poly 2-Methoxy-5-(2-Ethyl-Hexyloxy)-P-Phenylene Vinylene on Gold Studied Using Two-Photon Photoemission Spectroscopy J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 174901 DOI: 10.1063/1.2727473
  59. 59
    Sohn, Y.; Stuckless, J. T. Characteristics of Photoexcitations and Interfacial Energy Levels of Regioregular Poly(3-Hexythiophene-2,5-Diyl) on Gold ChemPhysChem 2007, 8, 1937 1942 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200700348
  60. 60
    Kanai, K.; Miyazaki, T.; Suzuki, H.; Inaba, M.; Ouchi, Y.; Seki, K. Effect of Annealing on the Electronic Structure of Poly(3-Hexylthiophene) Thin Film Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 273 282 DOI: 10.1039/B914100F
  61. 61
    Baik, M. H.; Friesner, R. A. Computing Redox Potentials in Solution: Density Functional Theory as a Tool for Rational Design of Redox Agents J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 7407 7412 DOI: 10.1021/jp025853n
  62. 62
    Uudsemaa, M.; Tamm, T. Density-Functional Theory Calculations of Aqueous Redox Potentials of Fourth-Period Transition Metals J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 9997 10003 DOI: 10.1021/jp0362741
  63. 63
    Shimodaira, Y.; Miura, T.; Kudo, A.; Kobayashi, H. Dft Method Estimation of Standard Redox Potential of Metal Ions and Metal Complexes J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2007, 3, 789 795 DOI: 10.1021/ct700015t
  64. 64
    Roy, L. E.; Jakubikova, E.; Guthrie, M. G.; Batista, E. R. Calculation of One-Electron Redox Potentials Revisited. Is It Possible to Calculate Accurate Potentials with Density Functional Methods? J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 6745 6750 DOI: 10.1021/jp811388w
  65. 65
    Nayak, P. K.; Periasamy, N. Calculation of Ionization Potential of Amorphous Organic Thin-Films Using Solvation Model and DFT Org. Electron. 2009, 10, 532 535 DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2009.01.011
  66. 66
    Nayak, P. K.; Periasamy, N. Calculation of Electron Affinity, Ionization Potential, Transport. Gap, Optical Band Gap and Exciton Binding Energy of Organic Solids Using ’Solvation’ Model and DFT Org. Electron. 2009, 10, 1396 1400 DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2009.06.011
  67. 67
    Schwenn, P. E.; Burn, P. L.; Powell, B. J. Calculation of Solid State Molecular Ionisation Energies and Electron Affinities for Organic Semiconductors Org. Electron. 2011, 12, 394 403 DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.11.025
  68. 68
    Hughes, T. F.; Friesner, R. A. Development of Accurate Dft Methods for Computing Redox Potentials of Transition Metal Complexes: Results for Model Complexes and Application to Cytochrome P450 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 442 459 DOI: 10.1021/ct2006693
  69. 69
    Tamblyn, I.; Refaely-Abramson, S.; Neaton, J. B.; Kronik, L. Simultaneous Determination of Structures, Vibrations, and Frontier Orbital Energies from a Self-Consistent Range-Separated Hybrid Functional J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 2734 2741 DOI: 10.1021/jz5010939
  70. 70
    Phillips, H.; Zheng, Z. L.; Geva, E.; Dunietz, B. D. Orbital Gap Predictions for Rational Design of Organic Photovoltaic Materials Org. Electron. 2014, 15, 1509 1520 DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.03.040
  71. 71
    Richard, R. M.; Marshall, M. S.; Dolgounitcheva, O.; Ortiz, J. V.; Bredas, J. L.; Marom, N.; Sherrill, C. D. Accurate Ionization Potentials and Electron Affinities of Acceptor Molecules I. Reference Data at the CCSD(T) Complete Basis Set Limit J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 595 604 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00875
  72. 72
    Gallandi, L.; Marom, N.; Rinke, P.; Korzdorfer, T. Accurate Ionization Potentials and Electron Affinities of Acceptor Molecules II: Non-Empirically Tuned Long-Range Corrected Hybrid Functionals J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 605 614 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00873
  73. 73
    Rangel, T.; Hamed, S. M.; Bruneval, F.; Neaton, J. B. Evaluating the Gw Approximation with CCSD(T) for Charged Excitations across the Oligoacenes J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 2834 2842 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00163
  74. 74
    Becke, A. D. Density-Functional Thermochemistry 0.3. The Role of Exact Exchange J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648 5652 DOI: 10.1063/1.464913
  75. 75
    Stephens, P. J.; Devlin, F. J.; Chabalowski, C. F.; Frisch, M. J. Ab-Initio Calculation of Vibrational Absorption and Circular-Dichroism Spectra Using Density-Functional Force-Fields J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 11623 11627 DOI: 10.1021/j100096a001
  76. 76
    Klamt, A.; Schuurmann, G. Cosmo - a New Approach to Dielectric Screening in Solvents with Explicit Expressions for the Screening Energy and Its Gradient J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1993, 799 805 DOI: 10.1039/P29930000799
  77. 77
    Hirata, S.; Head-Gordon, M. Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory within the Tamm-Dancoff Approximation Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 314, 291 299 DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01149-5
  78. 78
    Furche, F.; Ahlrichs, R.; Hattig, C.; Klopper, W.; Sierka, M.; Weigend, F. Turbomole Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2014, 4, 91 100 DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1162
  79. 79
    Ahlrichs, R.; Bar, M.; Haser, M.; Horn, H.; Kolmel, C. Electronic-Structure Calculations on Workstation Computers - the Program System Turbomole Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989, 162, 165 169 DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(89)85118-8
  80. 80
    Schafer, A.; Horn, H.; Ahlrichs, R. Fully Optimized Contracted Gaussian-Basis Sets for Atoms Li to Kr J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 2571 2577 DOI: 10.1063/1.463096
  81. 81
    Isse, A. A.; Gennaro, A. Absolute Potential of the Standard Hydrogen Electrode and the Problem of Interconversion of Potentials in Different Solvents J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 7894 7899 DOI: 10.1021/jp100402x
  82. 82
    Trasatti, S. The Absolute Electrode Potential - an Explanatory Note (Recommendations 1986) Pure Appl. Chem. 1986, 58, 955 966 DOI: 10.1351/pac198658070955
  83. 83
    Sato, N.; Seki, K.; Inokuchi, H. Polarization Energies of Organic-Solids Determined by Ultraviolet Photoelectron-Spectroscopy J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 1981, 77, 1621 1633 DOI: 10.1039/f29817701621
  84. 84
    Inokuchi, H.; Seki, K.; Sato, N. Uv Photoelectron-Spectroscopy of Organic Molecular Materials Phys. Scr. 1987, T17, 93 103 DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/1987/T17/011
  85. 85
    Gestblom, B.; Songstad, J. Solvent Properties of Dichloromethane 0.6. Dielectric-Properties of Electrolytes in Dichloromethane Acta Chem. Scand. 1987, 41, 396 409 DOI: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.41b-0396
  86. 86
    Tsiper, E. V.; Soos, Z. G.; Gao, W.; Kahn, A. Electronic Polarization at Surfaces and Thin Films of Organic Molecular Crystals: Ptcda Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 360, 47 52 DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)00774-1
  87. 87
    Ryno, S. M.; Risko, C.; Bredas, J. L. Impact of Molecular Packing on Electronic Polarization in Organic Crystals: The Case of Pentacene Vs Tips-Pentacene J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 6421 6427 DOI: 10.1021/ja501725s
  88. 88
    Stein, T.; Eisenberg, H.; Kronik, L.; Baer, R. Fundamental Gaps in Finite Systems from Eigenvalues of a Generalized Kohn-Sham Method Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 266802 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.266802
  89. 89
    Refaely-Abramson, S.; Sharifzadeh, S.; Jain, M.; Baer, R.; Neaton, J. B.; Kronik, L. Gap Renormalization of Molecular Crystals from Density-Functional Theory Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2013, 88, 081204 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.081204
  90. 90
    Few, S.; Frost, J. M.; Nelson, J. Models of Charge Pair Generation in Organic Solar Cells Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 2311 2325 DOI: 10.1039/C4CP03663H

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 41 publications.

  1. Ying Yang, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg, Adrian M. Gardner, Sylwia Adamczyk, Jing Yang, Yaqi Sun, Qiuyao Jiang, Alexander J. Cowan, Reiner Sebastian Sprick, Lu-Ning Liu, Andrew I. Cooper. Conjugated Polymer/Recombinant Escherichia coli Biohybrid Systems for Photobiocatalytic Hydrogen Production. ACS Nano 2024, 18 (21) , 13484-13495. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c10668
  2. Sam A. J. Hillman, Reiner Sebastian Sprick, Drew Pearce, Duncan J. Woods, Wai-Yu Sit, Xingyuan Shi, Andrew I. Cooper, James R. Durrant, Jenny Nelson. Why Do Sulfone-Containing Polymer Photocatalysts Work So Well for Sacrificial Hydrogen Evolution from Water?. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (42) , 19382-19395. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c07103
  3. Christian B. Meier, Rob Clowes, Enrico Berardo, Kim E. Jelfs, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg, Reiner Sebastian Sprick, Andrew I. Cooper. Structurally Diverse Covalent Triazine-Based Framework Materials for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution from Water. Chemistry of Materials 2019, 31 (21) , 8830-8838. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02825
  4. Neil Qiang Su, Xin Xu. Insights into Direct Methods for Predictions of Ionization Potential and Electron Affinity in Density Functional Theory. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2019, 10 (11) , 2692-2699. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01052
  5. Yang Bai, Liam Wilbraham, Benjamin J. Slater, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg, Reiner Sebastian Sprick, Andrew I. Cooper. Accelerated Discovery of Organic Polymer Photocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution from Water through the Integration of Experiment and Theory. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141 (22) , 9063-9071. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b03591
  6. Liam Wilbraham, Enrico Berardo, Lukas Turcani, Kim E. Jelfs, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg. High-Throughput Screening Approach for the Optoelectronic Properties of Conjugated Polymers. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2018, 58 (12) , 2450-2459. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00256
  7. Reiner Sebastian Sprick, Liam Wilbraham, Yang Bai, Pierre Guiglion, Adriano Monti, Rob Clowes, Andrew I. Cooper, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg. Nitrogen Containing Linear Poly(phenylene) Derivatives for Photo-catalytic Hydrogen Evolution from Water. Chemistry of Materials 2018, 30 (16) , 5733-5742. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02501
  8. Ewan McQueen, Noritaka Sakakibara, Kei Kamogawa, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg, Yusuke Tamaki, Osamu Ishitani, Reiner Sebastian Sprick. Visible-light-responsive hybrid photocatalysts for quantitative conversion of CO 2 to highly concentrated formate solutions. Chemical Science 2024, 15 (43) , 18146-18160. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SC05289G
  9. Boon-Junn Ng, Lutfi Kurnianditia Putri, Wei-Kean Chong, Siang-Piao Chai. Breaking boundaries of soft photocatalysis: overcoming limitations of carbon nitride as a single-light absorber for overall water splitting. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2024, 12 (36) , 23971-24004. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4TA03163F
  10. Richard J. Lyons, Ying Yang, Ewan McQueen, Liang Luo, Andrew I. Cooper, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg, Reiner Sebastian Sprick. Polymer Photocatalysts with Side Chain Induced Planarity for Increased Activity for Sacrificial Hydrogen Production from Water. Advanced Energy Materials 2024, 14 (12) https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202303680
  11. Shilpa Palit, Bettina V. Lotsch, Tanmay Banerjee. Understanding solar fuel photocatalysis using covalent organic frameworks. 2022, 403-427. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781839167676-00403
  12. Zhenyuan Teng, Hongbin Yang, Qitao Zhang, Teruhisa Ohno. Carrier Dynamics and Surface Reaction Boosted by Polymer-based Single-atom Photocatalysts. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities 2022, 38 (5) , 1207-1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40242-022-2215-6
  13. Lunjie Liu, Michał A. Kochman, Wei Zhao, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg, Reiner Sebastian Sprick. Linear conjugated polymer photocatalysts with various linker units for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water. Chemical Communications 2022, 58 (76) , 10639-10642. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CC03810B
  14. Yu Jing, Xinyue Zhu, Sabine Maier, Thomas Heine. 2D conjugated polymers: exploiting topological properties for the rational design of metal-free photocatalysts. Trends in Chemistry 2022, 4 (9) , 792-806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2022.06.002
  15. Andrew W. Prentice, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg. Exploration of the photocatalytic cycle for sacrificial hydrogen evolution by conjugated polymers containing heteroatoms. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 2022, 6 (16) , 3756-3767. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SE02032C
  16. Guoqing Li, Ping Fu, Qihong Yue, Fangpei Ma, Xiaolong Zhao, Shu Dong, Xin Han, Yu Zhou, Jun Wang. Boosting exciton dissociation by regulating dielectric constant in covalent organic framework for photocatalysis. Chem Catalysis 2022, 2 (7) , 1734-1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.checat.2022.05.002
  17. Benedict Saunders, Liam Wilbraham, Andrew W. Prentice, Reiner Sebastian Sprick, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg. The potential scarcity, or not, of polymeric overall water splitting photocatalysts. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 2022, 6 (9) , 2233-2242. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SE00027J
  18. N. Samali Weliwatte, Matteo Grattieri, Shelley D. Minteer. Rational design of artificial redox-mediating systems toward upgrading photobioelectrocatalysis. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 2021, 20 (10) , 1333-1356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-021-00099-7
  19. Yang Bai, Liam Wilbraham, Hui Gao, Rob Clowes, Haofan Yang, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg, Andrew I. Cooper, Reiner Sebastian Sprick. Photocatalytic polymers of intrinsic microporosity for hydrogen production from water. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2021, 9 (35) , 19958-19964. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA03098A
  20. Andrew W. Prentice, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg. The Role of Computational Chemistry in Discovering and Understanding Organic Photocatalysts for Renewable Fuel Synthesis. Advanced Energy Materials 2021, 11 (29) https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202100709
  21. Huaxing Lin, Chunping Chen, Tianhua Zhou, Jian Zhang. Two‐Dimensional Covalent‐Organic Frameworks for Photocatalysis: The Critical Roles of Building Block and Linkage. Solar RRL 2021, 5 (6) https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.202000458
  22. Andrew W. Prentice, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg. Hydrogen evolution by polymer photocatalysts; a possible photocatalytic cycle. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 2021, 5 (10) , 2622-2632. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SE00059D
  23. Neil Qiang Su, Xin Xu. Perturbation theory made efficient and effective for predictions of ionization potential and electron affinity. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2021, 154 (17) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0047956
  24. Tanmay Banerjee, Filip Podjaski, Julia Kröger, Bishnu P. Biswal, Bettina V. Lotsch. Polymer photocatalysts for solar-to-chemical energy conversion. Nature Reviews Materials 2021, 6 (2) , 168-190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-00254-z
  25. Rodrigo P. Carvalho, Cleber F. N. Marchiori, C. Moyses Araujo, Daniel Brandell. Atomic-scale Modelling of Redox-active Organic Molecules and Polymers for Energy Applications. 2020, 93-136. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781788019743-00093
  26. Yonghao Gu, Xin Xu. A correlation–relaxation-balanced direct method at the second order perturbation theory for accurate ionization potential predictions. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2020, 22 (39) , 22342-22348. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP03430D
  27. Shyam Badu, Roderick Melnik, Sundeep Singh. Analysis of Photosynthetic Systems and Their Applications with Mathematical and Computational Models. Applied Sciences 2020, 10 (19) , 6821. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196821
  28. Mohammad Rahman, Haining Tian, Tomas Edvinsson. Revisiting the Limiting Factors for Overall Water‐Splitting on Organic Photocatalysts. Angewandte Chemie 2020, 132 (38) , 16418-16433. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202002561
  29. Mohammad Rahman, Haining Tian, Tomas Edvinsson. Revisiting the Limiting Factors for Overall Water‐Splitting on Organic Photocatalysts. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2020, 59 (38) , 16278-16293. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202002561
  30. Catherine M. Aitchison, Michael Sachs, Marc A. Little, Liam Wilbraham, Nick J. Brownbill, Christopher M. Kane, Frédéric Blanc, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg, James R. Durrant, Reiner Sebastian Sprick, Andrew I. Cooper. Structure–activity relationships in well-defined conjugated oligomer photocatalysts for hydrogen production from water. Chemical Science 2020, 11 (33) , 8744-8756. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SC02675A
  31. Chengxiao Zhao, Zupeng Chen, Run Shi, Xiaofei Yang, Tierui Zhang. Recent Advances in Conjugated Polymers for Visible‐Light‐Driven Water Splitting. Advanced Materials 2020, 32 (28) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201907296
  32. Duncan J. Woods, Sam A. J. Hillman, Drew Pearce, Liam Wilbraham, Lucas Q. Flagg, Warren Duffy, Iain McCulloch, James R. Durrant, Anne A. Y. Guilbert, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg, Reiner Sebastian Sprick, Jenny Nelson, Andrew I. Cooper. Side-chain tuning in conjugated polymer photocatalysts for improved hydrogen production from water. Energy & Environmental Science 2020, 13 (6) , 1843-1855. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EE01213K
  33. Yonghao Gu, Xin Xu. Extended Koopmans' theorem at the second‐order perturbation theory. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2020, 41 (12) , 1165-1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.26163
  34. Yang Bai, Duncan J. Woods, Liam Wilbraham, Catherine M. Aitchison, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg, Reiner Sebastian Sprick, Andrew I. Cooper. Hydrogen evolution from water using heteroatom substituted fluorene conjugated co-polymers. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2020, 8 (17) , 8700-8705. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA02599B
  35. Catherine M. Aitchison, Christopher M. Kane, David P. McMahon, Peter R. Spackman, Angeles Pulido, Xiaoyan Wang, Liam Wilbraham, Linjiang Chen, Rob Clowes, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg, Reiner Sebastian Sprick, Marc A. Little, Graeme M. Day, Andrew I. Cooper. Photocatalytic proton reduction by a computationally identified, molecular hydrogen-bonded framework. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2020, 8 (15) , 7158-7170. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA00219D
  36. Mohammad Ziaur Rahman, Md Golam Kibria, Charles Buddie Mullins. Metal-free photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. Chemical Society Reviews 2020, 49 (6) , 1887-1931. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CS00313D
  37. Isabelle Heath-Apostolopoulos, Liam Wilbraham, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg. Computational high-throughput screening of polymeric photocatalysts: exploring the effect of composition, sequence isomerism and conformational degrees of freedom. Faraday Discussions 2019, 215 , 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8FD00171E
  38. Liam Wilbraham, Reiner Sebastian Sprick, Kim E. Jelfs, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg. Mapping binary copolymer property space with neural networks. Chemical Science 2019, 10 (19) , 4973-4984. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8SC05710A
  39. Michael Sachs, Reiner Sebastian Sprick, Drew Pearce, Sam A. J. Hillman, Adriano Monti, Anne A. Y. Guilbert, Nick J. Brownbill, Stoichko Dimitrov, Xingyuan Shi, Frédéric Blanc, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg, Jenny Nelson, James R. Durrant, Andrew I. Cooper. Understanding structure-activity relationships in linear polymer photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. Nature Communications 2018, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07420-6
  40. Xiaoyan Wang, Linjiang Chen, Samantha Y. Chong, Marc A. Little, Yongzhen Wu, Wei-Hong Zhu, Rob Clowes, Yong Yan, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg, Reiner Sebastian Sprick, Andrew I. Cooper. Sulfone-containing covalent organic frameworks for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water. Nature Chemistry 2018, 10 (12) , 1180-1189. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-018-0141-5
  41. Reiner Sebastian Sprick, Catherine M. Aitchison, Enrico Berardo, Lukas Turcani, Liam Wilbraham, Ben M. Alston, Kim E. Jelfs, Martijn A. Zwijnenburg, Andrew I. Cooper. Maximising the hydrogen evolution activity in organic photocatalysts by co-polymerisation. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2018, 6 (25) , 11994-12003. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA04186E

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 3, 1498–1506
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11133
Published December 22, 2016

Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Article Views

2358

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Scheme illustrating how, in the case of water splitting, the redox potentials associated with charge carriers (IP and EA) and excitons (EA* and IP*) of a photocatalyst must straddle the proton reduction and water oxidation potentials (blue and red broken lines, respectively) for both processes to be thermodynamically favorable. The vertical axis on the right of the figure shows the different possible alignments with vacuum, the result of the different experimental SHEAP values.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Structures of oligomer models studied computationally.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Comparison between the potentials predicted using (TD-)B3LYP and εr 2, thick lines, and measured experimentally, thin lines, for a range of conjugated polymers.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Structures of the polymers studied; the n used in the calculations was 12 for all structures except PF, where an n of 6 was used instead.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Comparison between IP and −HOMO, red open squares, and EA and −LUMO, open blue triangles, calculated with B3LYP and εr 2.

  • References


    This article references 90 other publications.

    1. 1
      Yanagida, S.; Kabumoto, A.; Mizumoto, K.; Pac, C.; Yoshino, K. Poly(Para-Phenylene)-Catalyzed Photoreduction of Water to Hydrogen J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985, 474 475 DOI: 10.1039/c39850000474
    2. 2
      Shibata, T.; Kabumoto, A.; Shiragami, T.; Ishitani, O.; Pac, C.; Yanagida, S. Novel Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalyst - Poly(Para-Phenylene)-Catalyzed Photoreductions of Water, Carbonyl-Compounds, and Olefins J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 2068 2076 DOI: 10.1021/j100368a063
    3. 3
      Matsuoka, S.; Fujii, H.; Pac, C.; Yanagida, S. Photocatalysis of Oligo(Para-Phenylene) Leading to Reductive Formation of Hydrogen and Ethanol from Triethylamine in Aqueous Organic-Solvent Chem. Lett. 1990, 19, 1501 1502 DOI: 10.1246/cl.1990.1501
    4. 4
      Matsuoka, S.; Kohzuki, T.; Pac, C.; Ishida, A.; Takamuku, S.; Kusaba, M.; Nakashima, N.; Yanagida, S. Photocatalysis of Oligo(Para-Phenylenes) - Photochemical Reduction of Carbon-Dioxide with Triethylamine J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 4437 4442 DOI: 10.1021/j100190a057
    5. 5
      Schwab, M. G.; Hamburger, M.; Feng, X. L.; Shu, J.; Spiess, H. W.; Wang, X. C.; Antonietti, M.; Mullen, K. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution through Fully Conjugated Poly(Azomethine) Networks Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 8932 8934 DOI: 10.1039/c0cc04057f
    6. 6
      Zhang, Z. Z.; Long, J. L.; Yang, L. F.; Chen, W. K.; Dai, W. X.; Fu, X. Z.; Wang, X. X. Organic Semiconductor for Artificial Photosynthesis: Water Splitting into Hydrogen by a Bioinspired C3N3S3 Polymer under Visible Light Irradiation Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 1826 1830 DOI: 10.1039/C1SC00257K
    7. 7
      Chu, S.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, P.; Yu, H.; Luo, L. L.; Kong, F.; Zou, Z. G. Facile Green Synthesis of Crystalline Polyimide Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Generation from Water J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 15519 15521 DOI: 10.1039/c2jm32595k
    8. 8
      Sprick, R. S.; Jiang, J. X.; Bonillo, B.; Ren, S. J.; Ratvijitvech, T.; Guiglion, P.; Zwijnenburg, M. A.; Adams, D. J.; Cooper, A. I. Tunable Organic Photocatalysts for Visible-Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 3265 3270 DOI: 10.1021/ja511552k
    9. 9
      Bornoz, P.; Prevot, M. S.; Yu, X. Y.; Guijarro, N.; Sivula, K. Direct Light-Driven Water Oxidation by a Ladder-Type Conjugated Polymer Photoanode J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 15338 15341 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b05724
    10. 10
      Schwinghammer, K.; Hug, S.; Mesch, M. B.; Senker, J.; Lotsch, B. V. Phenyl-Triazine Oligomers for Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 3345 3353 DOI: 10.1039/C5EE02574E
    11. 11
      Sprick, R. S.; Bonillo, B.; Clowes, R.; Guiglion, P.; Brownbill, N. J.; Slater, B. J.; Blanc, F.; Zwijnenburg, M. A.; Adams, D. J.; Cooper, A. I. Visible-Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution Using Planarized Conjugated Polymer Photocatalysts Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 1824 1828 DOI: 10.1002/ange.201510542
    12. 12
      Yang, C.; Ma, B. C.; Zhang, L. Z.; Lin, S.; Ghasimi, S.; Landfester, K.; Zhang, K. A. I.; Wang, X. C. Molecular Engineering of Conjugated Polybenzothiadiazoles for Enhanced Hydrogen Production by Photosynthesis Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9202 9206 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201603532
    13. 13
      Li, L. W.; Cai, Z. X.; Wu, Q. H.; Lo, W. Y.; Zhang, N.; Chen, L. X.; Yu, L. P. Rational Design of Porous Conjugated Polymers and Roles of Residual Palladium for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 7681 7686 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b03472
    14. 14
      Vyas, V. S.; Lau, V. W. H.; Lotsch, B. V. Soft Photocatalysis: Organic Polymers for Solar Fuel Productions Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 5191 5204 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01894
    15. 15
      Zhang, G.; Lan, Z.-A.; Wang, X. Organic Conjugated Semiconductors for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution with Visible Light Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 15712 15727 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201607375
    16. 16
      Wang, X. C.; Maeda, K.; Thomas, A.; Takanabe, K.; Xin, G.; Carlsson, J. M.; Domen, K.; Antonietti, M. A Metal-Free Polymeric Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Production from Water under Visible Light Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 76 80 DOI: 10.1038/nmat2317
    17. 17
      Wang, X. C.; Maeda, K.; Chen, X. F.; Takanabe, K.; Domen, K.; Hou, Y. D.; Fu, X. Z.; Antonietti, M. Polymer Semiconductors for Artificial Photosynthesis: Hydrogen Evolution by Mesoporous Graphitic Carbon Nitride with Visible Light J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1680 1681 DOI: 10.1021/ja809307s
    18. 18
      Maeda, K.; Wang, X. C.; Nishihara, Y.; Lu, D. L.; Antonietti, M.; Domen, K. Photocatalytic Activities of Graphitic Carbon Nitride Powder for Water Reduction and Oxidation under Visible Light J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 4940 4947 DOI: 10.1021/jp809119m
    19. 19
      Zhang, J. S.; Chen, X. F.; Takanabe, K.; Maeda, K.; Domen, K.; Epping, J. D.; Fu, X. Z.; Antonietti, M.; Wang, X. C. Synthesis of a Carbon Nitride Structure for Visible-Light Catalysis by Copolymerization Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 441 444 DOI: 10.1002/anie.200903886
    20. 20
      Zhang, G. G.; Lan, Z. A.; Lin, L. H.; Lin, S.; Wang, X. C. Overall Water Splitting by Pt/G-C3N4 Photocatalysts without Using Sacrificial Agents Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 3062 3066 DOI: 10.1039/C5SC04572J
    21. 21
      Sui, Y.; Liu, J. H.; Zhang, Y. W.; Tian, X. K.; Chen, W. Dispersed Conductive Polymer Nanoparticles on Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Enhanced Solar-Driven Hydrogen Evolution from Pure Water Nanoscale 2013, 5, 9150 9155 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr02413j
    22. 22
      Schwinghammer, K.; Tuffy, B.; Mesch, M. B.; Wirnhier, E.; Martineau, C.; Taulelle, F.; Schnick, W.; Senker, J.; Lotsch, B. V. Triazine-Based Carbon Nitrides for Visible-Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2435 2439 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201206817
    23. 23
      Martin, D. J.; Qiu, K. P.; Shevlin, S. A.; Handoko, A. D.; Chen, X. W.; Guo, Z. X.; Tang, J. W. Highly Efficient Photocatalytic H2 Evolution from Water Using Visible Light and Structure-Controlled Graphitic Carbon Nitride Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 9240 9245 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201403375
    24. 24
      Schwinghammer, K.; Mesch, M. B.; Duppel, V.; Ziegler, C.; Senker, J.; Lotsch, B. V. Crystalline Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Improved Visible-Light Hydrogen Evolution J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1730 1733 DOI: 10.1021/ja411321s
    25. 25
      Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, N. Y.; Han, Y. Z.; Zhang, X.; Huang, H.; Lifshitz, Y.; Lee, S. T.; Zhong, J.; Kang, Z. H. Metal-Free Efficient Photocatalyst for Stable Visible Water Splitting Via a Two-Electron Pathway Science 2015, 347, 970 974 DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa3145
    26. 26
      Lau, V. W. H.; Mesch, M. B.; Duppel, V.; Blum, V.; Senker, J.; Lotsch, B. V. Low-Molecular-Weight Carbon Nitrides for Solar Hydrogen Evolution J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1064 1072 DOI: 10.1021/ja511802c
    27. 27
      Lau, V. W. H.; Moudrakovski, I.; Botari, T.; Weinberger, S.; Mesch, M. B.; Duppel, V.; Senker, J.; Blum, V.; Lotsch, B. V. Rational Design of Carbon Nitride Photocatalysts by Identification of Cyanamide Defects as Catalytically Relevant Sites Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12165 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12165
    28. 28
      Yeh, T. F.; Syu, J. M.; Cheng, C.; Chang, T. H.; Teng, H. S. Graphite Oxide as a Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Production from Water Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 2255 2262 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201000274
    29. 29
      Yeh, T. F.; Teng, C. Y.; Chen, S. J.; Teng, H. S. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots as Photocatalysts for Overall Water-Splitting under Visible Light Illumination Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3297 3303 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201305299
    30. 30
      Tsai, E. W.; Basak, S.; Ruiz, J. P.; Reynolds, J. R.; Rajeshwar, K. Electrochemistry of Some Beta-Substituted Polythiophenes - Anodic-Oxidation, Electrochromism, and Electrochemical Deactivation J. Electrochem. Soc. 1989, 136, 3683 3689 DOI: 10.1149/1.2096530
    31. 31
      Novak, P.; Rasch, B.; Vielstich, W. Overoxidation of Polypyrrole in Propylene Carbonate - an Insitu FTIR Study J. Electrochem. Soc. 1991, 138, 3300 3304 DOI: 10.1149/1.2085406
    32. 32
      Zotti, G.; Schiavon, G.; Zecchin, S. Irreversible-Processes in the Electrochemical Reduction of Polythiophenes - Chemical Modifications of the Polymer and Charge-Trapping Phenomena Synth. Met. 1995, 72, 275 281 DOI: 10.1016/0379-6779(95)03280-0
    33. 33
      Vyas, R. N.; Wang, B. Electrochemical Analysis of Conducting Polymer Thin Films Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 1956 1972 DOI: 10.3390/ijms11041956
    34. 34
      Guiglion, P.; Butchosa, C.; Zwijnenburg, M. A. Polymeric Watersplitting Photocatalysts; a Computational Perspective on the Water Oxidation Conundrum J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 11996 12004 DOI: 10.1039/C4TA02044H
    35. 35
      Butchosa, C.; Guiglion, P.; Zwijnenburg, M. A. Carbon Nitride Photocatalysts for Water Splitting: A Computational Perspective J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 24833 24842 DOI: 10.1021/jp507372n
    36. 36
      Berardo, E.; Zwijnenburg, M. A. Modeling the Water Splitting Activity of a Tio2 Rutile Nanoparticle J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 13384 13393 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01512
    37. 37
      Guiglion, P.; Berardo, E.; Butchosa, C.; Wobbe, M. C. C.; Zwijnenburg, M. A. Modelling Materials for Solar Fuel Synthesis by Artificial Photosynthesis; Predicting the Optical, Electronic and Redox Properties of Photocatalysts J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2016, 28, 074001 DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/28/7/074001
    38. 38
      Guiglion, P.; Butchosa, C.; Zwijnenburg, M. A. Polymer Photocatalysts for Water Splitting: Insights from Computational Modeling Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2016, 217, 344 353 DOI: 10.1002/macp.201500432
    39. 39
      Toroker, M. C.; Kanan, D. K.; Alidoust, N.; Isseroff, L. Y.; Liao, P. L.; Carter, E. A. First Principles Scheme to Evaluate Band Edge Positions in Potential Transition Metal Oxide Photocatalysts and Photoelectrodes Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 16644 16654 DOI: 10.1039/c1cp22128k
    40. 40
      Castelli, I. E.; Olsen, T.; Datta, S.; Landis, D. D.; Dahl, S.; Thygesen, K. S.; Jacobsen, K. W. Computational Screening of Perovskite Metal Oxides for Optimal Solar Light Capture Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 5814 5819 DOI: 10.1039/C1EE02717D
    41. 41
      Persson, K. A.; Waldwick, B.; Lazic, P.; Ceder, G. Prediction of Solid-Aqueous Equilibria: Scheme to Combine First-Principles Calculations of Solids with Experimental Aqueous States Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2012, 85, 235438 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.235438
    42. 42
      Zhuang, H. L. L.; Hennig, R. G. Single-Layer Group-Iii Monochalcogenide Photocatalysts for Water Splitting Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 3232 3238 DOI: 10.1021/cm401661x
    43. 43
      Stevanovic, V.; Lany, S.; Ginley, D. S.; Tumas, W.; Zunger, A. Assessing Capability of Semiconductors to Split Water Using Ionization Potentials and Electron Affinities Only Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 3706 3714 DOI: 10.1039/c3cp54589j
    44. 44
      Jiang, X.; Wang, P.; Zhao, J. J. 2d Covalent Triazine Framework: A New Class of Organic Photocatalyst for Water Splitting J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 7750 7758 DOI: 10.1039/C4TA03438D
    45. 45
      Buckeridge, J.; Butler, K. T.; Catlow, C. R. A.; Logsdail, A. J.; Scanlon, D. O.; Shevlin, S. A.; Woodley, S. M.; Sokol, A. A.; Walsh, A. Polymorph Engineering of Tio2: Demonstrating How Absolute Reference Potentials Are Determined by Local Coordination Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 3844 3851 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00230
    46. 46
      Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Quantum Mechanical Continuum Solvation Models Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2999 3093 DOI: 10.1021/cr9904009
    47. 47
      Baerends, E. J.; Gritsenko, O. V.; van Meer, R. The Kohn-Sham Gap, the Fundamental Gap and the Optical Gap: The Physical Meaning of Occupied and Virtual Kohn-Sham Orbital Energies Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 16408 16425 DOI: 10.1039/c3cp52547c
    48. 48
      Seki, K.; Karlsson, U. O.; Engelhardt, R.; Koch, E. E.; Schmidt, W. Intramolecular Band Mapping of Poly(Para-Phenylene) Via Uv Photoelectron-Spectroscopy of Finite Polyphenyls Chem. Phys. 1984, 91, 459 470 DOI: 10.1016/0301-0104(84)80078-6
    49. 49
      Banerjee, M.; Shukla, R.; Rathore, R. Synthesis, Optical, and Electronic Properties of Soluble Poly-P-Phenylene Oligomers as Models for Molecular Wires J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1780 1786 DOI: 10.1021/ja805102d
    50. 50
      Chi, C. Y.; Wegner, G. Chain-Length Dependence of the Electrochemical Properties of Conjugated Oligofluorenes Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2005, 26, 1532 1537 DOI: 10.1002/marc.200500437
    51. 51
      Nagashima, U.; Fujimoto, H.; Inokuchi, H.; Seki, K. Electronic and Geometric Structures of Oligothiophenes J. Mol. Struct. 1989, 197, 265 289 DOI: 10.1016/0022-2860(89)85169-5
    52. 52
      Seki, K.; Asada, S.; Mori, T.; Inokuchi, H.; Murase, I.; Ohnishi, T.; Noguchi, T. Uv Photoemission Spectroscopy of Poly(P-Phenylene Vinylene) (PPV) Solid State Commun. 1990, 74, 677 680 DOI: 10.1016/0038-1098(90)90700-L
    53. 53
      Fujimoto, H.; Nagashima, U.; Inokuchi, H.; Seki, K.; Nakahara, N.; Nakayama, J.; Hoshino, M.; Fukuda, K. Electronic and Geometric Structures of Oligothiophenes Studied by Ups and Mndo - π-Band Evolution and Effect of Disorder Phys. Scr. 1990, 41, 105 109 DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/41/1/026
    54. 54
      Hino, S.; Iwasaki, K.; Tatematsu, H.; Matsumoto, K. Photoelectron-Spectra of Polypyrrole - the Effect of the Ambient Atmosphere to the Spectra Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1990, 63, 2199 2205 DOI: 10.1246/bcsj.63.2199
    55. 55
      Miyamae, T.; Yoshimura, D.; Ishii, H.; Ouchi, Y.; Seki, K.; Miyazaki, T.; Koike, T.; Yamamoto, T. Ultraviolet Photoelectron-Spectroscopy of Poly(Pyridine-2,5-Diyl), Poly(2,2′-Bipyridine-5,5′-Diyl), and Their K-Doped States J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 2738 2744 DOI: 10.1063/1.470508
    56. 56
      Liao, L. S.; Fung, M. K.; Lee, C. S.; Lee, S. T.; Inbasekaran, M.; Woo, E. P.; Wu, W. W. Electronic Structure and Energy Band Gap of Poly (9,9-Dioctylfluorene) Investigated by Photoelectron Spectroscopy Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 76, 3582 3584 DOI: 10.1063/1.126713
    57. 57
      Hwang, J.; Kim, E. G.; Liu, J.; Bredas, J. L.; Duggal, A.; Kahn, A. Photoelectron Spectroscopic Study of the Electronic Band Structure of Polyfluorene and Fluorene-Arylamine Copolymers at Interfaces J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 1378 1384 DOI: 10.1021/jp067004w
    58. 58
      Sohn, Y.; Stuckless, J. T. Bimolecular Recombination Kinetics and Interfacial Electronic Structures of Poly 2-Methoxy-5-(2-Ethyl-Hexyloxy)-P-Phenylene Vinylene on Gold Studied Using Two-Photon Photoemission Spectroscopy J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 174901 DOI: 10.1063/1.2727473
    59. 59
      Sohn, Y.; Stuckless, J. T. Characteristics of Photoexcitations and Interfacial Energy Levels of Regioregular Poly(3-Hexythiophene-2,5-Diyl) on Gold ChemPhysChem 2007, 8, 1937 1942 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200700348
    60. 60
      Kanai, K.; Miyazaki, T.; Suzuki, H.; Inaba, M.; Ouchi, Y.; Seki, K. Effect of Annealing on the Electronic Structure of Poly(3-Hexylthiophene) Thin Film Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 273 282 DOI: 10.1039/B914100F
    61. 61
      Baik, M. H.; Friesner, R. A. Computing Redox Potentials in Solution: Density Functional Theory as a Tool for Rational Design of Redox Agents J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 7407 7412 DOI: 10.1021/jp025853n
    62. 62
      Uudsemaa, M.; Tamm, T. Density-Functional Theory Calculations of Aqueous Redox Potentials of Fourth-Period Transition Metals J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 9997 10003 DOI: 10.1021/jp0362741
    63. 63
      Shimodaira, Y.; Miura, T.; Kudo, A.; Kobayashi, H. Dft Method Estimation of Standard Redox Potential of Metal Ions and Metal Complexes J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2007, 3, 789 795 DOI: 10.1021/ct700015t
    64. 64
      Roy, L. E.; Jakubikova, E.; Guthrie, M. G.; Batista, E. R. Calculation of One-Electron Redox Potentials Revisited. Is It Possible to Calculate Accurate Potentials with Density Functional Methods? J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 6745 6750 DOI: 10.1021/jp811388w
    65. 65
      Nayak, P. K.; Periasamy, N. Calculation of Ionization Potential of Amorphous Organic Thin-Films Using Solvation Model and DFT Org. Electron. 2009, 10, 532 535 DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2009.01.011
    66. 66
      Nayak, P. K.; Periasamy, N. Calculation of Electron Affinity, Ionization Potential, Transport. Gap, Optical Band Gap and Exciton Binding Energy of Organic Solids Using ’Solvation’ Model and DFT Org. Electron. 2009, 10, 1396 1400 DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2009.06.011
    67. 67
      Schwenn, P. E.; Burn, P. L.; Powell, B. J. Calculation of Solid State Molecular Ionisation Energies and Electron Affinities for Organic Semiconductors Org. Electron. 2011, 12, 394 403 DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.11.025
    68. 68
      Hughes, T. F.; Friesner, R. A. Development of Accurate Dft Methods for Computing Redox Potentials of Transition Metal Complexes: Results for Model Complexes and Application to Cytochrome P450 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 442 459 DOI: 10.1021/ct2006693
    69. 69
      Tamblyn, I.; Refaely-Abramson, S.; Neaton, J. B.; Kronik, L. Simultaneous Determination of Structures, Vibrations, and Frontier Orbital Energies from a Self-Consistent Range-Separated Hybrid Functional J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 2734 2741 DOI: 10.1021/jz5010939
    70. 70
      Phillips, H.; Zheng, Z. L.; Geva, E.; Dunietz, B. D. Orbital Gap Predictions for Rational Design of Organic Photovoltaic Materials Org. Electron. 2014, 15, 1509 1520 DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.03.040
    71. 71
      Richard, R. M.; Marshall, M. S.; Dolgounitcheva, O.; Ortiz, J. V.; Bredas, J. L.; Marom, N.; Sherrill, C. D. Accurate Ionization Potentials and Electron Affinities of Acceptor Molecules I. Reference Data at the CCSD(T) Complete Basis Set Limit J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 595 604 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00875
    72. 72
      Gallandi, L.; Marom, N.; Rinke, P.; Korzdorfer, T. Accurate Ionization Potentials and Electron Affinities of Acceptor Molecules II: Non-Empirically Tuned Long-Range Corrected Hybrid Functionals J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 605 614 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00873
    73. 73
      Rangel, T.; Hamed, S. M.; Bruneval, F.; Neaton, J. B. Evaluating the Gw Approximation with CCSD(T) for Charged Excitations across the Oligoacenes J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 2834 2842 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00163
    74. 74
      Becke, A. D. Density-Functional Thermochemistry 0.3. The Role of Exact Exchange J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648 5652 DOI: 10.1063/1.464913
    75. 75
      Stephens, P. J.; Devlin, F. J.; Chabalowski, C. F.; Frisch, M. J. Ab-Initio Calculation of Vibrational Absorption and Circular-Dichroism Spectra Using Density-Functional Force-Fields J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 11623 11627 DOI: 10.1021/j100096a001
    76. 76
      Klamt, A.; Schuurmann, G. Cosmo - a New Approach to Dielectric Screening in Solvents with Explicit Expressions for the Screening Energy and Its Gradient J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1993, 799 805 DOI: 10.1039/P29930000799
    77. 77
      Hirata, S.; Head-Gordon, M. Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory within the Tamm-Dancoff Approximation Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 314, 291 299 DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01149-5
    78. 78
      Furche, F.; Ahlrichs, R.; Hattig, C.; Klopper, W.; Sierka, M.; Weigend, F. Turbomole Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2014, 4, 91 100 DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1162
    79. 79
      Ahlrichs, R.; Bar, M.; Haser, M.; Horn, H.; Kolmel, C. Electronic-Structure Calculations on Workstation Computers - the Program System Turbomole Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989, 162, 165 169 DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(89)85118-8
    80. 80
      Schafer, A.; Horn, H.; Ahlrichs, R. Fully Optimized Contracted Gaussian-Basis Sets for Atoms Li to Kr J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 2571 2577 DOI: 10.1063/1.463096
    81. 81
      Isse, A. A.; Gennaro, A. Absolute Potential of the Standard Hydrogen Electrode and the Problem of Interconversion of Potentials in Different Solvents J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 7894 7899 DOI: 10.1021/jp100402x
    82. 82
      Trasatti, S. The Absolute Electrode Potential - an Explanatory Note (Recommendations 1986) Pure Appl. Chem. 1986, 58, 955 966 DOI: 10.1351/pac198658070955
    83. 83
      Sato, N.; Seki, K.; Inokuchi, H. Polarization Energies of Organic-Solids Determined by Ultraviolet Photoelectron-Spectroscopy J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 1981, 77, 1621 1633 DOI: 10.1039/f29817701621
    84. 84
      Inokuchi, H.; Seki, K.; Sato, N. Uv Photoelectron-Spectroscopy of Organic Molecular Materials Phys. Scr. 1987, T17, 93 103 DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/1987/T17/011
    85. 85
      Gestblom, B.; Songstad, J. Solvent Properties of Dichloromethane 0.6. Dielectric-Properties of Electrolytes in Dichloromethane Acta Chem. Scand. 1987, 41, 396 409 DOI: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.41b-0396
    86. 86
      Tsiper, E. V.; Soos, Z. G.; Gao, W.; Kahn, A. Electronic Polarization at Surfaces and Thin Films of Organic Molecular Crystals: Ptcda Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 360, 47 52 DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)00774-1
    87. 87
      Ryno, S. M.; Risko, C.; Bredas, J. L. Impact of Molecular Packing on Electronic Polarization in Organic Crystals: The Case of Pentacene Vs Tips-Pentacene J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 6421 6427 DOI: 10.1021/ja501725s
    88. 88
      Stein, T.; Eisenberg, H.; Kronik, L.; Baer, R. Fundamental Gaps in Finite Systems from Eigenvalues of a Generalized Kohn-Sham Method Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 266802 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.266802
    89. 89
      Refaely-Abramson, S.; Sharifzadeh, S.; Jain, M.; Baer, R.; Neaton, J. B.; Kronik, L. Gap Renormalization of Molecular Crystals from Density-Functional Theory Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2013, 88, 081204 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.081204
    90. 90
      Few, S.; Frost, J. M.; Nelson, J. Models of Charge Pair Generation in Organic Solar Cells Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 2311 2325 DOI: 10.1039/C4CP03663H
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11133.

    • Tables of potentials for alternative εr values, tables of solid-state potentials vs vacuum, results with larger basis sets, and orbital approximation data for εr 80.1 (PDF)

    • xyz coordinates of relevant DFT optimized structures (ZIP)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.