ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Ion Complexation Explains Orders of Magnitude Changes in the Equilibrium Constant of Biochemical Reactions in Buffers Crowded by Nonionic Compounds
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Physical Insights into Materials and Molecular Properties

Ion Complexation Explains Orders of Magnitude Changes in the Equilibrium Constant of Biochemical Reactions in Buffers Crowded by Nonionic Compounds
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 1, 112–117
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03596
Published December 28, 2021

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The equilibrium constant (K) of biochemical complex formation in aqueous buffers with high concentration (>20 wt %) of nonionic compounds can vary by orders of magnitude in comparison with the K in a pure buffer. The precise molecular mechanisms of these profound changes are not known. Herein, we show up to a 1000-fold decrease of the K value of DNA hybridization (at nM concentration) in standard molecular crowder systems such as PEG, dextrans, Ficoll, and glycerol. The effect responsible for the decrease of K is the complexation of positively charged ions from a buffer by nonionic polymers/small molecules. We determined the average equilibrium constant for the complexation of ions per monomer (∼0.49 M–1). We retrieve K’s original value for a pure buffer if we properly increase the ionic strength of the buffer crowded by the polymers, compensating for the loss of complexed ions.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Biochemical reactions occur in the cytoplasm of living cells crowded by biomolecules. They occupy up to 40 wt % of the cell interior. (1,2) The solutions of nonionic compounds at large concentrations (∼40–50 wt %) are in vitro models of the cell’s cytoplasm. In these solutions, the equilibrium constant of biochemical reactions often decreases by orders of magnitude compared to pure buffers. (3−6) The mechanism of this phenomenon is not known. Herein, we show up to a 1000-fold decrease of the K value of DNA hybridization (at nanomolar concentration) in standard molecular crowder systems, such as PEG, dextrans, Ficoll, and glycerol. We prove that the general mechanism responsible for decreasing K is the complexation of positively charged ions from a buffer by nonionic polymers/small molecules. We confirm the mechanism by restoring K’s original value for a pure buffer by adding a calculated amount of ions to the solution to compensate for the loss of complexed ions. Typically, the buffer’s ionic strength is ∼100 mM, and nonionic compounds often reach ∼1 M concentration. Therefore, even a very weak complexation of ions, say at ∼1 M–1, removes half of all ions from the solution and decrease the equilibrium constant.

The molecular crowding phenomenon is also studied because a high concentration of cosolutes can alter molecules’ structures, diffusion coefficients, and binding rates. (7−11) The crowded environment is frequently recreated artificially to understand biochemical reactions occurring inside living cells. (12,13) Cosolutes used in solutions mimicking cells’ interior have to be chemically inactive. It was shown that cosolutes can increase the K at modest crowder concentrations (∼10 wt %) through one of the crowding mechanisms─depletion forces. (3,14) The origin of those forces is caused by a decrease of the local volume around the biomolecule by crowders, increasing the effective concentration of reactants. Such a mechanism was shown in the example of the formation of DNA hairpins and the reactive structure of proteins/enzymes. (15−17)

The majority of biochemical reactions (e.g., DNA hybridization or protein folding) require well-defined thermodynamic conditions, including pH and ionic strength (IS). Thus, the experiments in crowded systems are frequently performed in fixed buffers at the physiological IS of around 100 mM. However, the living cell’s interior is an active, self-regulating system that can control ion concentration (e.g., through the ionophoric transfer of cations). The most popular crowding polymer, PEG, complexes divalent cations in nonaqueous solutions with the equilibrium association constant below 1 M–1. (20−23) This raises a question: Can crowders being in high concentration (i.e., 10–50 wt %) affect the IS of the standard buffers (e.g., phosphate buffer) and, in consequence, change K of the complex formations? In aqueous solutions, the formation of complexes between nonionic polymers and cations is difficult to observe directly by experiments because of the strong hydration of metal cations. (24) However, some studies explained interactions of PEG moieties with nonionic and anionic surfactants in water-based system as mediated by alkali metal cations, therefore revealing PEG–cation complexation. (25,26) Moreover, Ohki et al. by cooperative application of ion-transfer voltammetry at a liquid/liquid interface together with X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) measurements strongly suggested that alkali cations form a complex with PEG in water even in relatively low PEG concentrations (5–16 wt %). (24) In addition, Breton et al. confirmed complexation of (Na+, K+, Rb+, and Cs+) indirectly in the electrophysiology experiments by analyzing partitioning of neutral, flexible PEG 2000 molecules into the α-HL nanopore. In the presence of the mentioned cations, the neutral polymer behaved as if it was charged. Interestingly, for lithium cations (Li+) that effect was not observed. (27) The formation of PEG–sodium complexes was also used in cation template-assisted cyclopolymerization. (28)

In this Letter, we revise molecular crowding’s effect on biochemical reactions at the nanomolar concentration range using a previously validated brightness-based method. (18,19)Figure 1 presents the schematic concept workflow. We studied DNA hybridization in standard molecular crowder systems (i.e., PEG, EG, glycerol, Ficoll, and dextrans) as a noncovalent complex formation model. The DNA hybridization is ionic strength-sensitive and is discouraged in a low ion concentration environment. (29) Thus, it is a good indicator of ions’ potential binding by crowders. We also determined the relationship between K and IS to support our hypothesis. In addition, we confirm binding of sodium by dextran in aqueous solution by independent potentiometric measurements using an ion-selective electrode. Finally, we combined both approaches to show that not the mere physical abundance of crowders, which changes the volume available to reactants, but the complexation of ions by them is responsible for changing the K of reaction. (20−23)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Hybridization of complementary DNA oligonucleotides was used as a model biochemical reaction. (a) The change of the fluorescent properties as a result of the complex formation makes it possible to use the brightness analysis method. (18,19) We investigated two biophysical factors that affect the formation of the noncovalent complex: ionic strength and crowded environment. (b) Ionic strength. The formation of the complex was observed at different ionic strengths. (c) Crowded environment. We used the most common biorelated crowders of different sizes and chemical structures. The influence of cosolute is negligible even at 109 excess over the concentration of substrates (region I). There is no correlation between sizes and structures of different agents (region II). (d) The comparison of the interactions in a crowded environment with respect to different ionic strengths allowed the determination of the sodium cation complexation by crowder molecules.

First, we checked the influence of crowders on the DNA hybridization equilibrium constant. The formation of a double-stranded DNA backbone is an electrostatic interaction between two complementary, negatively charged strands. We monitor the effect of the crowded environment on the hybridization of complementary strands in the biochemical concentration regime (5 nM). All crowders we were using are known to be chemically inert. Dextrans and ficolls are “similar” in chemical structure as they possess sugar moieties rich in hydroxyl groups, whereas EG and PEGs are alkoxyl-rich. Using the brightness analysis method (described in the Supporting Information, section S3), the effect of crowders was observed by the determination of the equilibrium constant (K) of DNA hybridization.

The crowding effect on the thermodynamic stability of DNA duplexes formation was previously determined in the presence of various crowders. (5,30) Here, at low crowders concentrations (<10 wt %), the change of K is nearly negligible (see Figure 2). The influence of the crowded environment changes the K by 2–3 orders of magnitude for the high concentration of crowders (40 wt %<). In terms of the molar concentration, this value corresponds to values even above 10 M. This means that the crowders are in over 109 times excess over the concentration of substrates in this reaction (∼1 nM). Hence, if the crowding effect were significant, it would be observable at much lower concentrations. Therefore, the effect responsible for changes of K is not secondary interaction with crowder molecule nor effect caused by depletion with it, but rather some weak effect or interaction.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Hybridization reaction was measured at constant ionic strength in the presence of various crowder agents. The effect of crowder molecules on reaction components (presented in nanomolar concentration) is negligible below a few wt % of crowder concentration (∼200 mM). However, when the molar concentration of the crowder is approximately a few molar, the reaction is affected.

It was reported that crowder molecules, such as polyethers or carbohydrates, form complexes with cations suspended in the nonaqueous solvent. (20−22,24,31−33) The reported values for complexation of the cations by different PEG molecules range from 1 to 102 M–1. These values depend on the charge (e.g., Na+ or Ca2+) and the type of conjugated acidic residual (strong or weak, e.g., phosphate or acetate). (34,35) If we consider a system crowded by 40 wt % PEG 400 (2.68 M) in 0.1 M PB buffer (only sodium cations) and assume no interactions due to depletion forces, then based on reported sodium complexation, κ = 1 M–1, the initial concentration of sodium ions drops by ∼73%.

The concentration of salts regulates the physiological processes of the cell. The changes of IS shift the equilibrium of ions of those biochemical noncovalent complexes, such as complex-forming polypeptides (antibodies), stabilization of membrane-building anionic phospholipids, protein–DNA, DNA–drug, metabolic-substrates with carboxyl or phosphate group, etc. Also, the activity of enzymes or receptors is controlled by the formation of ion-based complexes with specific cations to obtain proper active conformation. (36−39)

Taking all this into consideration, the decrease of the equilibrium constant in a crowded environment (shown in Figure 2) is observed because of ion deficiency caused by complexation of cations in the solution. The decrease of ion concentration in the Debye double layer reduces the screening of negative charges on oligonucleotide backbones. This results in electrostatic repulsion between DNA strands and thus the lower bound fraction. The few nanometer-sized ion-crowder complexes are too large to stabilize DNA hybridization as the average hydrogen bond between complementary nucleotides is 0.2–0.3 nm. (40) DNA duplex formation would require such an object to detach and diffuse. In contrast, angstrom-sized ions can fill the spaces between nucleotides and their proximity without interrupting hybridization. (41)

Following that, we checked the influence of ionic strength on DNA hybridization. The effective ion concentration in the solution is described by IS, and it determines the effective electrostatic repulsion distance (Debye length). During the DNA hybridization, the base pair repulsion (caused by phosphodiester groups) is partially neutralized by cations (e.g., Na+, K+, or Mg2+). We investigated the hybridization of 13 bp complementary DNA strands at different ionic strengths (in a range of ∼100 times lower than physiological concentrations and at a highly saline environment) (see Figure 3). We used PB buffer of various concentrations, where only sodium ions were introduced as positively charged species. At each IS, using the brightness analysis method, we determined the equilibrium constant K. The results were also validated by FRET (see the Supporting Information, section S4).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Influence of ionic strength on the hybridization of complementary DNA oligonucleotide strands (violet points). The data were compared with the observed change of Debye length recorded by Smith et al. (42) The scatters represent data points, and the line (both marked in green) shows dependence of Debye length as a function of ionic strength according to Debye–Hückel theory.

The increase in salt concentration changes the binding energy between complementary DNA fragments to a significant extent. The presence of sodium cations and phosphate anions with a total IS of 10 mM generates an increase in the constant K by 106 M–1 in relation to pure water, where the reaction does not take place.

The ions in the solution screen the negative charges found on the phosphate groups of DNA backbones. Accordingly, the Debye length and the effective negative charge of the oligonucleotides are reduced. Dispersive interactions start to dominate over the repulsive electrostatic forces between DNA strands. As a result, the probability of forming a DNA complex increases. For IS greater than 700 mM, the K constant decreases. At 2 M ionic strength, the value of K is 10 times lower than the maximum value observed. In this regime, the charge on the oligonucleotides is strongly screened and deviation from Debye–Hückel theory occurs.

We suggest that repulsion due to the densely packed Debye layer prevents effective collisions (interactions between DNA molecules) and hinders formation of the double-stranded DNA. A mutual effect was previously observed on the surface covered by charged nanoparticles at different ionic strengths. (43) Moreover, Smith et al. using a surface force apparatus measured similar anomalous changes in Debye’s screening length at high salt (i.e., NaCl) concentrations. (42) In Figure 3, we show their data and the classical Debye screening length overlaying the K constant determined in our research as a function of IS. The changes in Debye length follow the inverted function of changes in K for DNA hybridization caused by varying IS. Following the surface-oriented Smith et al. experiments, we observed analogous results in bulk solution of reagents, by linking directly the influence of ions on the Debye length, and finally with the K of DNA hybridization.

Finally, we determined the complexation of sodium ions by crowders. The interaction scheme of ion complexation by different crowders is presented schematically in eq 1. The binding site for cation within the crowder structure may differ even between crowders of the same binding moiety (functional group). Therefore, we calculated the interaction with crowder per molecule or monomer (in the case of polymers). This model simplifies the interactions between ions and crowder molecules. Hence, the obtained values of the ion complexation equilibrium constant, κ, can be corrected by a factor dependent on the number of monomers/molecules participating in the binding site.

Na++CWκNa·CW
(1)
The equilibrium constant for this interaction can be written as
κ=[Na·CW]eq[Na+]eq·[CW]eq=[Na·CW]eq([Na+]0[Na·CW]eq)·([CW]0[Na·CW]eq)
(2)
where [Na+]0 and [CW]0 are initial molar concentration of sodium ions and crowder molecules, respectively.

The method of buffer preparation enables keeping the pH constant even at different ionic strengths.

To determine the ion complexation, κ, we designed an experiment with the following methodology: we always controlled the total number of sodium ions by preparing a given buffer concentration; with the series of prepared buffers we estimated K of DNA hybridization at each [Na+]0 (see violet points in Figure 4a). Taking into consideration that DNA strands are at 5 nM concentration, great excess of ions in environment (millimolar concentration scale, 6 orders of magnitude difference; thus, [Na+]0 ≫ [DNA]0), we can assume that the initial concentration of sodium ions is almost equal to the concentration at equilibrium [Na+]0 ≈ [Na+]eq. Therefore, we could estimate the relation K = X·[Na+]Y, where X = 9.62 × 1012 and Y = 2.51 (violet dashed line). Next, in a separate series of experiments, we prepared constant concentration of crowders at different concentrations of Na+ and again measured K (see green points in Figure 4a). The obtained K values were transformed to the sodium concentration using the previous relation (K = X·[Na+]Y). At a given concentration of buffer, the difference between calculated concentration of sodium ions without and with the presence of crowders allows us to calculate how many sodium ions got complexed by crowder molecule, [Na·CW]eq. Knowing this value, [Na+]0, and [CW]0 using eq 2 we could estimate κ. This methodology was repeated for a series of multiple buffer concentrations and various crowders at 40 wt %.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Hybridization constant depending on the concentration of sodium ions without the addition of cosolute (violet dots) and in the presence of 40 wt % PEG 400 (green dots). The arrows in the plot correspond to the difference between the K values and thus the number of complexed sodium cations. (b) The sodium ion complexation by PEG 400 at various concentrations of sodium cations in the solution. The violet line represents the average value of the constant κ determined per one PEG 400 monomer (nmer ≈ 8.5). Considering those results, we infer that the complexation of sodium ions by crowders, but not its direct interactions, is in fact mostly responsible for the changes in equilibrium constants. (c) Comparison of determining sodium complexation equilibrium constant by different crowders, excluding depletion force interaction. (d) (left panel) In an ionic solution, the partially charged compound is surrounded by an electrical double layer. Sodium cations screen negative charge of the DNA backbone, which facilities the complex formation. (right panel) After the addition of crowders, sodium cations are getting complexed by weak interaction with crowder molecules. In high concentration of crowders, repulsion of the DNA strands became more pronounced because of reduction of screening charges on the DNA backbone.

In the example experiment with PEG 400, using the presented methodology we determined ion complexation equilibrium constant, κ (see Figure 4b), and averaged it over a series of data points. The calculated complexation constant estimated with brightness analysis is 0.41 ± 0.10 M–1. We measured cosolutes differentiated in molecular sizes and chemical structure (only oxygen was used as a heteroatom in functional groups). The difference in size is not pronounced, especially in the case of crowders similar in structure (sugar moiety), e.g., big dextran of average molecular weight 70 kDa and ficoll, ∼400 kDa. The determined κ values calculated per crowder molecule or monomer (in the case of polymers) are summarized in Figure 4c. In section S6 of the Supporting Information we discuss how addition of crowders can change other properties of the solution, such as dielectric constant, viscosity, pH, or activity.

All the collected data and calculations together with the proof that adding a certain amount of ions reverse the K constant to the higher value suggest complexation of sodium ions by crowders. We also tried to prove it directly by potentiometric measurements using ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) in the crowded solutions as well as with the crowders separated by the dialysis membrane. However, we met experimental difficulties, which are described in detail in the Supporting Information, section S7.

The influence of crowders is related not only to the effect on IS but also to the direct impact on the substrates of the reaction. For instance, depending on the type (e.g., ionic or nonionic) and concentration of crowders, the enzymatic activity can decrease or increase, and protein stability is altered. (44) It was shown that the presence of the crowder molecule near the local neighborhood of the protein substrate may affect its dielectric properties and its hydration structure. (45) Crowders bind water molecules, which can influence the effective amount of available solvent. (46) In section S8 of the Supporting Information, we show the estimated effect of water-binding by crowder molecules and how it may affect concentrations of ions and thus the κ constant. Additionally, the effect of depletion forces that occurs when crowders exclude the effective reactive volume should also be considered and included in the calculation (see Figure 5).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Contribution of interactions in a crowder system. The bar plots (violet) represent experimentally measured K values of 13 bp oligonucleotide hybridization in 100 mM buffer: without crowders, with presence of 40 wt % PEG 400, and in theoretical system where 73 mM of sodium ions were complexed by 40 wt % PEG 400 (κ = 1 M–1) without secondary interactions. The future quantitative analysis forces separation of the contributions of ion complexation and the depletion forces.

To conclude this study, we applied the brightness analysis method to investigate two factors that affect noncovalent complex formation: crowded environment and ionic strength. We showed that an increase in interactions between substrates is increased by ionic strength. However, after exceeding a certain value, it augmented the reducing effect on the bound fraction, which is unintuitive at first sight. This observation may be especially important for further analysis of biochemical reactions of organisms in a highly saline environment or with less access to water. In further analysis, we showed the applicability of the hybridization of DNA reaction as an indicator of sodium ion concentration. The experiments performed in the crowded environment showed that ion complexation, but not molecular crowding, may be responsible for the most changes in K values of biochemical interactions. In addition, we confirmed the results obtained by measurements using an ion-selective electrode. On the basis of this observation, we determined the complexation of sodium cations (on average, κ ≈ 0.49 M–1) by the most popular crowders differentiated in size and chemical structure. Our results will help to plan precise in vitro experiments to mimic conditions in living cells.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03596.

  • Detailed description of materials and experimental methods, microscope setup, the full description with equations of brightness-based method to determine the equilibrium K constant of biochemical reactions, validation of K constant of DNA hybridization by FRET method, changes of solution properties (e.g., viscosity and pH) after addition of crowders, results of measurements of sodium cation complexation by nonionic crowders with the use of ion-selective electrode, and the discussion and results of water complexation by nonionic crowders (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Krzysztof Bielec - Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-224 Warsaw, PolandInstitute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, EPFL CH C2 425, Bâtiment CH, Station 6, Lausanne CH-1015, SwitzerlandOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6023-5499
    • Adam Kowalski - Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-224 Warsaw, PolandOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0172-2622
    • Grzegorz Bubak - Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-224 Warsaw, PolandOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7938-4016
    • Emilia Witkowska Nery - Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-224 Warsaw, Poland
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This work was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland, within the grant Preludium Bis 2020/39/O/ST4/00877.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 46 other publications.

  1. 1
    Zimmerman, S. B.; Trach, S. O. Estimation of macromolecule concentrations and excluded volume effects for the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli. Journal of molecular biology 1991, 222, 599620,  DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90499-V
  2. 2
    Ellis, R. J.; Minton, A. P. Join the crowd. Nature 2003, 425, 2728,  DOI: 10.1038/425027a
  3. 3
    Zosel, F.; Soranno, A.; Buholzer, K. J.; Nettels, D.; Schuler, B. Depletion interactions modulate the binding between disordered proteins in crowded environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2020, 117, 1348013489,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1921617117
  4. 4
    Kuznetsova, I. M.; Turoverov, K. K.; Uversky, V. N. What macromolecular crowding can do to a protein. International journal of molecular sciences 2014, 15, 2309023140,  DOI: 10.3390/ijms151223090
  5. 5
    Nakano, S.-i.; Karimata, H.; Ohmichi, T.; Kawakami, J.; Sugimoto, N. The effect of molecular crowding with nucleotide length and cosolute structure on DNA duplex stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1433014331,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0463029
  6. 6
    Nakano, S.-i.; Miyoshi, D.; Sugimoto, N. Effects of molecular crowding on the structures, interactions, and functions of nucleic acids. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 27332758,  DOI: 10.1021/cr400113m
  7. 7
    Israelachvili, J. N.; McGuiggan, P. M. Forces between surfaces in liquids. Science 1988, 241, 795800,  DOI: 10.1126/science.241.4867.795
  8. 8
    Minton, A. P. The influence of macromolecular crowding and macromolecular confinement on biochemical reactions in physiological media. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 1057710580,  DOI: 10.1074/jbc.R100005200
  9. 9
    Knowles, D.; Shkel, I. A.; Phan, N. M.; Sternke, M.; Lingeman, E.; Cheng, X.; Cheng, L.; O’Connor, K.; Record, M. T. Chemical interactions of polyethylene glycols (PEGs) and glycerol with protein functional groups: applications to effects of PEG and glycerol on protein processes. Biochemistry 2015, 54, 35283542,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00246
  10. 10
    Knowles, D.; LaCroix, A. S.; Deines, N. F.; Shkel, I.; Record, M. T. Separation of preferential interaction and excluded volume effects on DNA duplex and hairpin stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108, 1269912704,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1103382108
  11. 11
    Bubak, G.; Kwapiszewska, K.; Kalwarczyk, T.; Bielec, K.; Andryszewski, T.; Iwan, M.; Bubak, S.; Hołyst, R. Quantifying Nanoscale Viscosity and Structures of Living Cells Nucleus from Mobility Measurements. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 294301,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03052
  12. 12
    Sozański, K.; Ruhnow, F.; Wiśniewska, A.; Tabaka, M.; Diez, S.; Hołyst, R. Small crowders slow down kinesin-1 stepping by hindering motor domain diffusion. Physical review letters 2015, 115, 218102,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.218102
  13. 13
    Hou, S.; Ziebacz, N.; Kalwarczyk, T.; Kaminski, T. S.; Wieczorek, S. A.; Holyst, R. Influence of nano-viscosity and depletion interactions on cleavage of DNA by enzymes in glycerol and poly (ethylene glycol) solutions: qualitative analysis. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 30923099,  DOI: 10.1039/C0SM00899K
  14. 14
    Baltierra-Jasso, L. E.; Morten, M. J.; Laflor, L.; Quinn, S. D.; Magennis, S. W. Crowding-induced hybridization of single DNA hairpins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1602016023,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b11829
  15. 15
    Mitchison, T. Colloid osmotic parameterization and measurement of subcellular crowding. Molecular biology of the cell 2019, 30, 173180,  DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E18-09-0549
  16. 16
    Balcells, C.; Pastor, I.; Pitulice, L.; Hernández, C.; Via, M.; Garcés, J. L.; Madurga, S.; Vilaseca, E.; Isvoran, A.; Cascante, M. Macromolecular crowding upon in-vivo-like enzyme-kinetics: effect of enzyme-obstacle size ratio. New Frontiers in Chemistry 2015, 24, 3
  17. 17
    Hou, S.; Trochimczyk, P.; Sun, L.; Wisniewska, A.; Kalwarczyk, T.; Zhang, X.; Wielgus-Kutrowska, B.; Bzowska, A.; Holyst, R. How can macromolecular crowding inhibit biological reactions? The enhanced formation of DNA nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22033,  DOI: 10.1038/srep22033
  18. 18
    Bielec, K.; Bubak, G.; Kalwarczyk, T.; Holyst, R. Analysis of Brightness of a Single Fluorophore for Quantitative Characterization of Biochemical Reactions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2020, 124, 19411948,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c00770
  19. 19
    Zhou, Y.; Bielec, K.; Pasitsuparoad, P.; Hołyst, R. Single-molecule brightness analysis for the determination of anticancer drug interactions with DNA. Analyst 2020, 145, 66006606,  DOI: 10.1039/D0AN01108H
  20. 20
    Belder, D.; Warnke, J. Electrokinetic effects in poly (ethylene glycol)-coated capillaries induced by specific adsorption of cations. Langmuir 2001, 17, 49624966,  DOI: 10.1021/la010115w
  21. 21
    Lüsse, S.; Arnold, K. The interaction of poly (ethylene glycol) with water studied by 1H and 2H NMR relaxation time measurements. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 42514257,  DOI: 10.1021/ma9508616
  22. 22
    Banka, P.; Selser, J.; Wang, B.; Shenoy, D.; Martin, R. Nonionic Polymer- Salt Interactions in Dilute Solution: The Poly (ethylene oxide)/LiClO4/Methanol System. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 39563959,  DOI: 10.1021/ma9518159
  23. 23
    Lu, J. E.; Chen, S. Organized assembling of poly (ethylene glycol)-functionalized Janus nanoparticles induced by select alkali metal ions. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2019, 110, 107586,  DOI: 10.1016/j.inoche.2019.107586
  24. 24
    Ohki, T.; Harada, M.; Okada, T. Structural and thermodynamic aspects of ionic solvation in concentrated aqueous poly (ethylene glycol). J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 72457252,  DOI: 10.1021/jp071666j
  25. 25
    Murari, G. F.; Penido, J. A.; da Silva, H. M.; Baêta, B. E. L.; de Aquino, S. F.; de Lemos, L. R.; Rodrigues, G. D.; Mageste, A. B. Use of aqueous two-phase PEG-salt systems for the removal of anionic surfactant from effluents. Journal of environmental management 2017, 198, 4349,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.046
  26. 26
    Morini, M. A.; Messina, P. V.; Schulz, P. C. The interaction of electrolytes with non-ionic surfactant micelles. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2005, 283, 12061218,  DOI: 10.1007/s00396-005-1312-7
  27. 27
    Breton, M. F.; Discala, F.; Bacri, L.; Foster, D.; Pelta, J.; Oukhaled, A. Exploration of neutral versus polyelectrolyte behavior of poly (ethylene glycol) s in alkali ion solutions using single-nanopore recording. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 22022208,  DOI: 10.1021/jz400938q
  28. 28
    Terashima, T.; Kawabe, M.; Miyabara, Y.; Yoda, H.; Sawamoto, M. Polymeric pseudo-crown ether for cation recognition via cation template-assisted cyclopolymerization. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2321,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3321
  29. 29
    Nakano, S.-i.; Fujimoto, M.; Hara, H.; Sugimoto, N. Nucleic acid duplex stability: influence of base composition on cation effects. Nucleic acids research 1999, 27, 29572965,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/27.14.2957
  30. 30
    Miyoshi, D.; Sugimoto, N. Molecular crowding effects on structure and stability of DNA. Biochimie 2008, 90, 10401051,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2008.02.009
  31. 31
    Kulshrestha, N.; Chatterjee, B.; Gupta, P. Structural, thermal, electrical, and dielectric properties of synthesized nanocomposite solid polymer electrolytes. High Perform. Polym. 2014, 26, 677688,  DOI: 10.1177/0954008314541820
  32. 32
    Alekseev, Y. E.; Garnovskii, A. D.; Zhdanov, Y. A. Complexes of natural carbohydrates with metal cations. Russian chemical reviews 1998, 67, 649669,  DOI: 10.1070/RC1998v067n08ABEH000343
  33. 33
    Yang, L.; Su, Y.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Guo, Z.; Weng, S.; Yan, C.; Zhang, S.; Wu, J. Interactions between metal ions and carbohydrates. Coordination behavior of neutral erythritol to Ca (II) and lanthanide ions. Inorganic chemistry 2003, 42, 58445856,  DOI: 10.1021/ic0300464
  34. 34
    Fang, Y.; Giesecke, M.; Furo, I. Complexing cations by poly (ethylene oxide): Binding site and binding mode. J. Phys. Chem. B 2017, 121, 21792188,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b12381
  35. 35
    Okada, T. Polyethers in inorganic capillary electrophoresis. Journal of Chromatography A 1999, 834, 7387,  DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00738-9
  36. 36
    Czyrko, J.; Sliwiak, J.; Imiolczyk, B.; Gdaniec, Z.; Jaskolski, M.; Brzezinski, K. Metal-cation regulation of enzyme dynamics is a key factor influencing the activity of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11334,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29535-y
  37. 37
    Hu, Y.; Komoto, J.; Huang, Y.; Gomi, T.; Ogawa, H.; Takata, Y.; Fujioka, M.; Takusagawa, F. Crystal structure of S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase from rat liver. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 83238333,  DOI: 10.1021/bi990332k
  38. 38
    Riordan, J. F. The role of metals in enzyme activity. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 1977, 7, 119129
  39. 39
    Kilpin, K. J.; Dyson, P. J. Enzyme inhibition by metal complexes: concepts, strategies and applications. Chemical Science 2013, 4, 14101419,  DOI: 10.1039/c3sc22349c
  40. 40
    Fonseca Guerra, C.; Bickelhaupt, F. M.; Snijders, J. G.; Baerends, E. J. Hydrogen bonding in DNA base pairs: reconciliation of theory and experiment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 41174128,  DOI: 10.1021/ja993262d
  41. 41
    Auffinger, P.; Westhof, E. Water and ion binding around RNA and DNA (C, G) oligomers. Journal of molecular biology 2000, 300, 11131131,  DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3894
  42. 42
    Smith, A. M.; Lee, A. A.; Perkin, S. The electrostatic screening length in concentrated electrolytes increases with concentration. journal of physical chemistry letters 2016, 7, 21572163,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00867
  43. 43
    Winkler, K.; Paszewski, M.; Kalwarczyk, T.; Kalwarczyk, E.; Wojciechowski, T.; Gorecka, E.; Pociecha, D.; Holyst, R.; Fialkowski, M. Ionic strength-controlled deposition of charged nanoparticles on a solid substrate. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 1909619103,  DOI: 10.1021/jp206704s
  44. 44
    Zhou, H.-X.; Rivas, G.; Minton, A. P. Macromolecular crowding and confinement: biochemical, biophysical, and potential physiological consequences. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2008, 37, 375397,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125817
  45. 45
    Harada, R.; Sugita, Y.; Feig, M. Protein crowding affects hydration structure and dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 48424849,  DOI: 10.1021/ja211115q
  46. 46
    Branca, C.; Magazu, S.; Maisano, G.; Migliardo, F.; Migliardo, P.; Romeo, G. Hydration study of PEG/water mixtures by quasi elastic light scattering, acoustic and rheological measurements. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 1027210276,  DOI: 10.1021/jp014345v

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 5 publications.

  1. Karina Kwapiszewska. Physicochemical Perspective of Biological Heterogeneity. ACS Physical Chemistry Au 2024, 4 (4) , 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphyschemau.3c00079
  2. Xiaole Bai, Fanliang Meng, Xuejiao Wang, Linyun He, Chao Fan, Liangjie Tian, Yangning Zhang, Jiahao Pan, Qun Wu, Xiangrong Hao, Ying Wang, Bo-Feng Zhu, Jun-Bing Fan, Bin Cong. Photodynamic gel-bombs enhance tumor penetration and downstream synergistic therapies. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 2025, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-025-02186-y
  3. Sylwia Karoń, Marcin Drozd, Elżbieta Malinowska. A Careful Insight into DDI-Type Receptor Layers on the Way to Improvement of Click-Biology-Based Immunosensors. Biosensors 2024, 14 (3) , 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14030136
  4. Aneta Karpińska, Alicja Zgorzelska, Karina Kwapiszewska, Robert Hołyst. Entanglement of polymer chains in hypertonic medium enhances the delivery of DNA and other biomacromolecules into cells. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2022, 627 , 270-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.07.040
  5. Adam Kowalski, Krzysztof Bielec, Grzegorz Bubak, Pawel J. Żuk, Maciej Czajkowski, Volodymyr Sashuk, Wilhelm T. S. Huck, Jan M. Antosiewicz, Robert Holyst. Effective screening of Coulomb repulsions in water accelerates reactions of like-charged compounds by orders of magnitude. Nature Communications 2022, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34182-z

The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 1, 112–117
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03596
Published December 28, 2021

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

2861

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Hybridization of complementary DNA oligonucleotides was used as a model biochemical reaction. (a) The change of the fluorescent properties as a result of the complex formation makes it possible to use the brightness analysis method. (18,19) We investigated two biophysical factors that affect the formation of the noncovalent complex: ionic strength and crowded environment. (b) Ionic strength. The formation of the complex was observed at different ionic strengths. (c) Crowded environment. We used the most common biorelated crowders of different sizes and chemical structures. The influence of cosolute is negligible even at 109 excess over the concentration of substrates (region I). There is no correlation between sizes and structures of different agents (region II). (d) The comparison of the interactions in a crowded environment with respect to different ionic strengths allowed the determination of the sodium cation complexation by crowder molecules.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Hybridization reaction was measured at constant ionic strength in the presence of various crowder agents. The effect of crowder molecules on reaction components (presented in nanomolar concentration) is negligible below a few wt % of crowder concentration (∼200 mM). However, when the molar concentration of the crowder is approximately a few molar, the reaction is affected.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Influence of ionic strength on the hybridization of complementary DNA oligonucleotide strands (violet points). The data were compared with the observed change of Debye length recorded by Smith et al. (42) The scatters represent data points, and the line (both marked in green) shows dependence of Debye length as a function of ionic strength according to Debye–Hückel theory.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) Hybridization constant depending on the concentration of sodium ions without the addition of cosolute (violet dots) and in the presence of 40 wt % PEG 400 (green dots). The arrows in the plot correspond to the difference between the K values and thus the number of complexed sodium cations. (b) The sodium ion complexation by PEG 400 at various concentrations of sodium cations in the solution. The violet line represents the average value of the constant κ determined per one PEG 400 monomer (nmer ≈ 8.5). Considering those results, we infer that the complexation of sodium ions by crowders, but not its direct interactions, is in fact mostly responsible for the changes in equilibrium constants. (c) Comparison of determining sodium complexation equilibrium constant by different crowders, excluding depletion force interaction. (d) (left panel) In an ionic solution, the partially charged compound is surrounded by an electrical double layer. Sodium cations screen negative charge of the DNA backbone, which facilities the complex formation. (right panel) After the addition of crowders, sodium cations are getting complexed by weak interaction with crowder molecules. In high concentration of crowders, repulsion of the DNA strands became more pronounced because of reduction of screening charges on the DNA backbone.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Contribution of interactions in a crowder system. The bar plots (violet) represent experimentally measured K values of 13 bp oligonucleotide hybridization in 100 mM buffer: without crowders, with presence of 40 wt % PEG 400, and in theoretical system where 73 mM of sodium ions were complexed by 40 wt % PEG 400 (κ = 1 M–1) without secondary interactions. The future quantitative analysis forces separation of the contributions of ion complexation and the depletion forces.

  • References


    This article references 46 other publications.

    1. 1
      Zimmerman, S. B.; Trach, S. O. Estimation of macromolecule concentrations and excluded volume effects for the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli. Journal of molecular biology 1991, 222, 599620,  DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90499-V
    2. 2
      Ellis, R. J.; Minton, A. P. Join the crowd. Nature 2003, 425, 2728,  DOI: 10.1038/425027a
    3. 3
      Zosel, F.; Soranno, A.; Buholzer, K. J.; Nettels, D.; Schuler, B. Depletion interactions modulate the binding between disordered proteins in crowded environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2020, 117, 1348013489,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1921617117
    4. 4
      Kuznetsova, I. M.; Turoverov, K. K.; Uversky, V. N. What macromolecular crowding can do to a protein. International journal of molecular sciences 2014, 15, 2309023140,  DOI: 10.3390/ijms151223090
    5. 5
      Nakano, S.-i.; Karimata, H.; Ohmichi, T.; Kawakami, J.; Sugimoto, N. The effect of molecular crowding with nucleotide length and cosolute structure on DNA duplex stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1433014331,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0463029
    6. 6
      Nakano, S.-i.; Miyoshi, D.; Sugimoto, N. Effects of molecular crowding on the structures, interactions, and functions of nucleic acids. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 27332758,  DOI: 10.1021/cr400113m
    7. 7
      Israelachvili, J. N.; McGuiggan, P. M. Forces between surfaces in liquids. Science 1988, 241, 795800,  DOI: 10.1126/science.241.4867.795
    8. 8
      Minton, A. P. The influence of macromolecular crowding and macromolecular confinement on biochemical reactions in physiological media. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 1057710580,  DOI: 10.1074/jbc.R100005200
    9. 9
      Knowles, D.; Shkel, I. A.; Phan, N. M.; Sternke, M.; Lingeman, E.; Cheng, X.; Cheng, L.; O’Connor, K.; Record, M. T. Chemical interactions of polyethylene glycols (PEGs) and glycerol with protein functional groups: applications to effects of PEG and glycerol on protein processes. Biochemistry 2015, 54, 35283542,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00246
    10. 10
      Knowles, D.; LaCroix, A. S.; Deines, N. F.; Shkel, I.; Record, M. T. Separation of preferential interaction and excluded volume effects on DNA duplex and hairpin stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108, 1269912704,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1103382108
    11. 11
      Bubak, G.; Kwapiszewska, K.; Kalwarczyk, T.; Bielec, K.; Andryszewski, T.; Iwan, M.; Bubak, S.; Hołyst, R. Quantifying Nanoscale Viscosity and Structures of Living Cells Nucleus from Mobility Measurements. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 294301,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03052
    12. 12
      Sozański, K.; Ruhnow, F.; Wiśniewska, A.; Tabaka, M.; Diez, S.; Hołyst, R. Small crowders slow down kinesin-1 stepping by hindering motor domain diffusion. Physical review letters 2015, 115, 218102,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.218102
    13. 13
      Hou, S.; Ziebacz, N.; Kalwarczyk, T.; Kaminski, T. S.; Wieczorek, S. A.; Holyst, R. Influence of nano-viscosity and depletion interactions on cleavage of DNA by enzymes in glycerol and poly (ethylene glycol) solutions: qualitative analysis. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 30923099,  DOI: 10.1039/C0SM00899K
    14. 14
      Baltierra-Jasso, L. E.; Morten, M. J.; Laflor, L.; Quinn, S. D.; Magennis, S. W. Crowding-induced hybridization of single DNA hairpins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1602016023,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b11829
    15. 15
      Mitchison, T. Colloid osmotic parameterization and measurement of subcellular crowding. Molecular biology of the cell 2019, 30, 173180,  DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E18-09-0549
    16. 16
      Balcells, C.; Pastor, I.; Pitulice, L.; Hernández, C.; Via, M.; Garcés, J. L.; Madurga, S.; Vilaseca, E.; Isvoran, A.; Cascante, M. Macromolecular crowding upon in-vivo-like enzyme-kinetics: effect of enzyme-obstacle size ratio. New Frontiers in Chemistry 2015, 24, 3
    17. 17
      Hou, S.; Trochimczyk, P.; Sun, L.; Wisniewska, A.; Kalwarczyk, T.; Zhang, X.; Wielgus-Kutrowska, B.; Bzowska, A.; Holyst, R. How can macromolecular crowding inhibit biological reactions? The enhanced formation of DNA nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22033,  DOI: 10.1038/srep22033
    18. 18
      Bielec, K.; Bubak, G.; Kalwarczyk, T.; Holyst, R. Analysis of Brightness of a Single Fluorophore for Quantitative Characterization of Biochemical Reactions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2020, 124, 19411948,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c00770
    19. 19
      Zhou, Y.; Bielec, K.; Pasitsuparoad, P.; Hołyst, R. Single-molecule brightness analysis for the determination of anticancer drug interactions with DNA. Analyst 2020, 145, 66006606,  DOI: 10.1039/D0AN01108H
    20. 20
      Belder, D.; Warnke, J. Electrokinetic effects in poly (ethylene glycol)-coated capillaries induced by specific adsorption of cations. Langmuir 2001, 17, 49624966,  DOI: 10.1021/la010115w
    21. 21
      Lüsse, S.; Arnold, K. The interaction of poly (ethylene glycol) with water studied by 1H and 2H NMR relaxation time measurements. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 42514257,  DOI: 10.1021/ma9508616
    22. 22
      Banka, P.; Selser, J.; Wang, B.; Shenoy, D.; Martin, R. Nonionic Polymer- Salt Interactions in Dilute Solution: The Poly (ethylene oxide)/LiClO4/Methanol System. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 39563959,  DOI: 10.1021/ma9518159
    23. 23
      Lu, J. E.; Chen, S. Organized assembling of poly (ethylene glycol)-functionalized Janus nanoparticles induced by select alkali metal ions. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2019, 110, 107586,  DOI: 10.1016/j.inoche.2019.107586
    24. 24
      Ohki, T.; Harada, M.; Okada, T. Structural and thermodynamic aspects of ionic solvation in concentrated aqueous poly (ethylene glycol). J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 72457252,  DOI: 10.1021/jp071666j
    25. 25
      Murari, G. F.; Penido, J. A.; da Silva, H. M.; Baêta, B. E. L.; de Aquino, S. F.; de Lemos, L. R.; Rodrigues, G. D.; Mageste, A. B. Use of aqueous two-phase PEG-salt systems for the removal of anionic surfactant from effluents. Journal of environmental management 2017, 198, 4349,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.046
    26. 26
      Morini, M. A.; Messina, P. V.; Schulz, P. C. The interaction of electrolytes with non-ionic surfactant micelles. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2005, 283, 12061218,  DOI: 10.1007/s00396-005-1312-7
    27. 27
      Breton, M. F.; Discala, F.; Bacri, L.; Foster, D.; Pelta, J.; Oukhaled, A. Exploration of neutral versus polyelectrolyte behavior of poly (ethylene glycol) s in alkali ion solutions using single-nanopore recording. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 22022208,  DOI: 10.1021/jz400938q
    28. 28
      Terashima, T.; Kawabe, M.; Miyabara, Y.; Yoda, H.; Sawamoto, M. Polymeric pseudo-crown ether for cation recognition via cation template-assisted cyclopolymerization. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2321,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3321
    29. 29
      Nakano, S.-i.; Fujimoto, M.; Hara, H.; Sugimoto, N. Nucleic acid duplex stability: influence of base composition on cation effects. Nucleic acids research 1999, 27, 29572965,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/27.14.2957
    30. 30
      Miyoshi, D.; Sugimoto, N. Molecular crowding effects on structure and stability of DNA. Biochimie 2008, 90, 10401051,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2008.02.009
    31. 31
      Kulshrestha, N.; Chatterjee, B.; Gupta, P. Structural, thermal, electrical, and dielectric properties of synthesized nanocomposite solid polymer electrolytes. High Perform. Polym. 2014, 26, 677688,  DOI: 10.1177/0954008314541820
    32. 32
      Alekseev, Y. E.; Garnovskii, A. D.; Zhdanov, Y. A. Complexes of natural carbohydrates with metal cations. Russian chemical reviews 1998, 67, 649669,  DOI: 10.1070/RC1998v067n08ABEH000343
    33. 33
      Yang, L.; Su, Y.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Guo, Z.; Weng, S.; Yan, C.; Zhang, S.; Wu, J. Interactions between metal ions and carbohydrates. Coordination behavior of neutral erythritol to Ca (II) and lanthanide ions. Inorganic chemistry 2003, 42, 58445856,  DOI: 10.1021/ic0300464
    34. 34
      Fang, Y.; Giesecke, M.; Furo, I. Complexing cations by poly (ethylene oxide): Binding site and binding mode. J. Phys. Chem. B 2017, 121, 21792188,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b12381
    35. 35
      Okada, T. Polyethers in inorganic capillary electrophoresis. Journal of Chromatography A 1999, 834, 7387,  DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00738-9
    36. 36
      Czyrko, J.; Sliwiak, J.; Imiolczyk, B.; Gdaniec, Z.; Jaskolski, M.; Brzezinski, K. Metal-cation regulation of enzyme dynamics is a key factor influencing the activity of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11334,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29535-y
    37. 37
      Hu, Y.; Komoto, J.; Huang, Y.; Gomi, T.; Ogawa, H.; Takata, Y.; Fujioka, M.; Takusagawa, F. Crystal structure of S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase from rat liver. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 83238333,  DOI: 10.1021/bi990332k
    38. 38
      Riordan, J. F. The role of metals in enzyme activity. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 1977, 7, 119129
    39. 39
      Kilpin, K. J.; Dyson, P. J. Enzyme inhibition by metal complexes: concepts, strategies and applications. Chemical Science 2013, 4, 14101419,  DOI: 10.1039/c3sc22349c
    40. 40
      Fonseca Guerra, C.; Bickelhaupt, F. M.; Snijders, J. G.; Baerends, E. J. Hydrogen bonding in DNA base pairs: reconciliation of theory and experiment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 41174128,  DOI: 10.1021/ja993262d
    41. 41
      Auffinger, P.; Westhof, E. Water and ion binding around RNA and DNA (C, G) oligomers. Journal of molecular biology 2000, 300, 11131131,  DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3894
    42. 42
      Smith, A. M.; Lee, A. A.; Perkin, S. The electrostatic screening length in concentrated electrolytes increases with concentration. journal of physical chemistry letters 2016, 7, 21572163,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00867
    43. 43
      Winkler, K.; Paszewski, M.; Kalwarczyk, T.; Kalwarczyk, E.; Wojciechowski, T.; Gorecka, E.; Pociecha, D.; Holyst, R.; Fialkowski, M. Ionic strength-controlled deposition of charged nanoparticles on a solid substrate. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 1909619103,  DOI: 10.1021/jp206704s
    44. 44
      Zhou, H.-X.; Rivas, G.; Minton, A. P. Macromolecular crowding and confinement: biochemical, biophysical, and potential physiological consequences. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2008, 37, 375397,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125817
    45. 45
      Harada, R.; Sugita, Y.; Feig, M. Protein crowding affects hydration structure and dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 48424849,  DOI: 10.1021/ja211115q
    46. 46
      Branca, C.; Magazu, S.; Maisano, G.; Migliardo, F.; Migliardo, P.; Romeo, G. Hydration study of PEG/water mixtures by quasi elastic light scattering, acoustic and rheological measurements. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 1027210276,  DOI: 10.1021/jp014345v
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03596.

    • Detailed description of materials and experimental methods, microscope setup, the full description with equations of brightness-based method to determine the equilibrium K constant of biochemical reactions, validation of K constant of DNA hybridization by FRET method, changes of solution properties (e.g., viscosity and pH) after addition of crowders, results of measurements of sodium cation complexation by nonionic crowders with the use of ion-selective electrode, and the discussion and results of water complexation by nonionic crowders (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.