ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

In Situ Nanoscale Investigation of Catalytic Reactions in the Liquid Phase Using Zirconia-Protected Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Probes

  • Naresh Kumar
    Naresh Kumar
    Inorganic Chemistry and Catalysis Group, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
    National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, TW11 0LW, United Kingdom
    More by Naresh Kumar
  • Caterina S. Wondergem
    Caterina S. Wondergem
    Inorganic Chemistry and Catalysis Group, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Andrew J. Wain
    Andrew J. Wain
    National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, TW11 0LW, United Kingdom
  • , and 
  • Bert M. Weckhuysen*
    Bert M. Weckhuysen
    Inorganic Chemistry and Catalysis Group, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
    *E-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 8, 1669–1675
Publication Date (Web):March 27, 2019
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02496

Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND.

  • Open Access

Article Views

2529

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (4 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS) is a promising technique that enables nondestructive and label-free topographical and chemical imaging at the nanoscale. However, its scope for in situ characterization of catalytic reactions in the liquid phase has remained limited due to the lack of durable and chemically inert plasmonically active TERS probes. Herein, we present novel zirconia-protected TERS probes with 3 orders of magnitude increase in lifetime under ambient conditions compared to unprotected silver-coated probes, together with high stability in liquid media. Employing the plasmon-assisted oxidation of p-aminothiophenol as a model reaction, we demonstrate that the highly robust, durable, and chemically inert zirconia-protected TERS probes can be successfully used for nanoscale spatially resolved characterization of a photocatalytic reaction within an aqueous environment. The reported improved lifetime and stability of probes in a liquid environment extend the potential scope of TERS as a nanoanalytical tool not only to heterogeneous catalysis but also to a range of scientific disciplines in which dynamic solid–liquid interfaces play a defining role.

The rational design of novel, chemically functional nanomaterials with tailored properties relies on a deep understanding of structure–behavior relationships. This is especially poignant in the case of heterogeneous catalysis, in which the identification of active sites at spatially nonuniform solid–liquid and solid–gas interfaces under dynamic reaction conditions is key to materials and process optimization. (1,2) However, conventional analytical techniques, such as Raman, infrared (IR), ultraviolet–visible, and fluorescence spectroscopies, often lack the required sensitivity and spatial resolution to achieve this ambitious goal. (3,4) In recent years, tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS) (Figure 1) has emerged as a potential solution to this challenge, enabling nondestructive topographical and molecular imaging of surfaces at the nanoscale. (5,6)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental TERS setup used in this work for spatially resolved mapping of plasmon-assisted oxidation of p-aminothiophenol (pATP) to p,p′-dimercaptoazobenzene (DMAB) over a heterogeneous Ag substrate in an aqueous environment.

In TERS, a metallic scanning probe microscopy (SPM) probe, positioned within the excitation laser spot of a Raman microscope (Figure 1), enhances the incident electric field by several orders of magnitude via a combination of localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) and lightening rod effects, confining the field enhancement to a region similar in size to the probe apex. This near-field approach significantly improves the sensitivity of Raman microscopy and pushes its spatial resolution far beyond the diffraction limit. This technique has been successfully used in a wide range of research areas including biology, (7) polymer blends, (8) semiconductors, (9) crystalline materials, (10) solar energy conversion, (11) nanomaterials research, (12−16) and single-molecule imaging. (17,18)

Despite the advantages of high spatial resolution and rich chemical information offered by TERS, (1,19,20) only a handful of TERS studies of catalytic reactions have been reported so far. (21−28) Furthermore, the majority of such studies have been carried out in ambient air or ultrahigh vacuum, with only a few in liquid environments, mostly limited to point spectroscopy measurements. (29−34) 2D nanoscale chemical imaging of catalytic reactions in liquids represents a key challenge but has not been achieved using TERS, primarily due to the chemical reactivity, (22,35) short lifetime, (36−39) and/or instability of TERS probes in liquids. (29,34) The chemical reactivity of metallic TERS probes is a particularly important consideration when studying catalysis in situ due to the potential for interference in the reaction under investigation. To address this issue, as well as extend the lifetime of metallic TERS probes, the use of an ultrathin coating of dielectric material such as Al2O3 (23,40) or SiO2 (41) as a protective layer has been reported. However, Al2O3 and SiO2 are not stable over the entire pH range, (42) limiting the conditions in which the TERS probes could be used. Furthermore, both Al2O3 and SiO2 coatings only increased the lifetime of TERS probes for approximately 1 month, and although some increased stability in liquids was observed for the Al2O3-protected probes, (30) no TERS mapping was performed. Recently, a more effective method of protecting TERS probes using atomic layer deposition (ALD) has been reported by Huang et al., where the authors presented three different coatings, SiO2, Al2O3, and TiO2, and successfully showed that the SiO2-coated STM-TERS probes could enhance the Raman signal from a self-assembled monolayer of thiol molecules while suppressing the signal from pyridine molecules present in solution. (43) However, TERS data was presented only for the SiO2-coated probes, and the mechanical stability, long-term stability of plasmonic signal enhancement, and capability of 2D chemical imaging in a liquid environment was not demonstrated. Furthermore, the use of ALD to produce ultrathin dielectric coatings requires expensive experimental apparatus and time-consuming optimization of deposition conditions.

Herein, we present novel atomic force microscopy (AFM)-TERS probes with a multilayer metal coating protected using an ultrathin layer of zirconia (ZrO2) that successfully overcome the key limitations of short lifetime, chemical inertness, and instability in a liquid environment. ZrO2 offers excellent catalytic support properties for several reactions (44,45) and stability over the entire pH range, (42) making it especially suitable for investigating heterogeneous catalytic reactions under a wide range of conditions. Compared to ALD, the simple wet-chemical method of ZrO2 coating developed in this work is far cheaper and could be easily implemented in any laboratory fume cupboard. Furthermore, using the novel TERS probes, we demonstrate the feasibility of mapping of a catalytic reaction over a heterogeneous metal surface in water with nanoscale spatial resolution, employing the photocatalytic oxidation of p-aminothiophenol (pATP) to p,p′-dimercaptoazobenzene (DMAB) as a model reaction (Figure 1). (23,46)

Extending the Plasmonic Lifetime of TERS Probes. Experimental details are presented in Supporting Information (SI) section S1, including development of the ZrO2 coating procedure (Figures S1–S4). TEM measurements confirmed that the procedure was successful in coating a layer of ZrO2 on Ag-coated TERS probes with a thickness of 1–5 nm (Figure S5). Note that the TEM measurement was conducted after using the probe for continuous TERS measurements in water for ∼2 h, which demonstrates the stability of the ZrO2 coating. The ZrO2 coating was also found to be stable in an aqueous environment for a long period of time and over the entire pH range (see Figure S3 and S4).

The lifetime of ZrO2-protected TERS probes was compared with that of the unprotected (Ag-coated) TERS probes using a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) thin film as a test sample. Plasmonic enhancement of a TERS probe can be monitored using the ratio of the Raman signal intensity in the near-field (plasmonically enhanced electric field at a TERS probe apex) and far-field (electric field in the entire excitation laser spot), which is known as “contrast” and defined as follows

Contrast=ITERSIFF1
(1)
where ITERS and IFF are the intensities of a Raman band with the TERS probe in contact with and retracted from the sample, respectively. Time series TERS spectra recorded using unprotected and ZrO2-protected TERS probes stored in ambient air are shown in Figure 2a,b, respectively. Additional time series spectra recorded using the unprotected and ZrO2-protected TERS probes are presented in Figures S6 and S7. Contrast was determined using the intensity of the 1454 cm–1 PEDOT:PSS band (νsym,Cα═Cβ) and is plotted in Figure 2c,d for the unprotected and protected probes, respectively. The near-field signal intensity of a fresh unprotected TERS probe is found to be almost 3× higher than the far-field signal, indicating a strong plasmonic enhancement of the electric field at the probe apex. However, the TERS contrast decreases rapidly by 50% of its initial value (half-life) within 4.5 h due to surface oxidation of the Ag coating in air. (36) After a rapid initial decline, the contrast decreases rather gradually by 75% in 10 h, eventually reaching 0 after 170 h of exposure to air, indicating a complete loss of plasmonic enhancement. On the other hand, although the ZrO2-protected TERS probes exhibit a decrease in contrast of almost 50% compared to the unprotected probes (after 2 days of preparation), they show a much higher plasmonic stability; even after 140 days of exposure to the ambient environment, the TERS contrast decreased by only 43%, indicating that the plasmonic sensitivity for TERS measurements is largely preserved. The pinhole-free ZrO2 layer likely blocks contact of the Ag coating with oxygen and moisture present in the surroundings, thereby preventing plasmonic degradation. (36) From extrapolation of the time series plot in Figure 2d, the half-life of the ZrO2-protected TERS probes is estimated to be over 160 days. This corresponds to more than an 850× increase in lifetime compared to unprotected probes and to the best of our knowledge is the longest lifetime of any TERS probe stored under ambient conditions reported to date. Furthermore, unlike STM-based TERS, these novel ZrO2-protected probes could be employed for nanoscale chemical mapping of a wide range of conducting and nonconducting sample surfaces using an AFM-TERS setup.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Time series TERS (red) and far-field Raman (blue) spectra measured from a PEDOT:PSS thin film on glass after exposing (a) unprotected TERS probes for 0, 10, and 170 h and (b) ZrO2-protected TERS probes for 2, 33, and 140 days to the ambient environment. Integration time: 30 s. Laser power: 50 μW. Plots of TERS contrast versus exposure time of representative TERS probes to the ambient environment for measurements presented in (c) Figures 2a and S6 and (d) Figures 2b and S7. In this study, a thin film of PEDOT:PSS was chosen to measure the lifetime of the zirconia-coated TERS tips because of its high chemical stability, low surface roughness, and strong Raman signal. (30,36,40,47,48) For example, the root-mean-square surface roughness of a spin-coated PEDOT:PSS film has been shown to be 1.2 ± 0.1 nm using tapping mode AFM, confirming a smooth topography. (49) In order to further minimize the effect of surface roughness, the time series contrast plotted in Figure 2c,d was measured from an average of three TERS and far-field measurements conducted at different areas on the PEDOT:PSS thin film.

Nanoscale Mapping of a Photocatalytic Reaction in a Liquid Environment. We next used ZrO2-protected TERS probes to demonstrate spatially resolved nanoscale characterization of a catalytic reaction within an aqueous environment. We selected the photocatalytic oxidation of pATP → DMAB as a model reaction due to the ease of monitoring using the distinct Raman bands of the azo group of DMAB, appearing in the 1140–1500 cm–1 spectral region. (46,50) pATP → DMAB is a well-understood and well-characterized plasmon-assisted reaction wherein hot electrons generated via LSPR of metal nanoparticles cause dissociation of adsorbed oxygen under ambient conditions, facilitating oxidative dimerization. (51) On a plasmonic metal substrate, sites exhibiting a stronger LSPR are expected to act as more active catalysts. Therefore, we used a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) of pATP molecules on a heterogeneous Ag substrate containing nanostructures varying from 1 to 9 nm in height (Figure S8) as the test sample to map pATP → DMAB within a liquid environment using TERS. The Ag substrate was surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS)-active with the 532 nm excitation laser. Characteristic ag Raman bands of DMAB at 1142 cm–1C–H), 1390 cm–1N═N), and 1437 cm–1N═N) could be clearly observed in the SERS spectrum of pATP adsorbed on the Ag substrate, indicating conversion to DMAB. See Figure S9 for a comparison of the SERS and Raman spectra of pATP.

We first tested the sensitivity of ZrO2-protected TERS probes for monitoring pATP → DMAB in air and aqueous environments. For measurements in air, we placed the TERS probe in contact with the Ag substrate and carried out Raman mapping the probe apex around. Figure 3a shows the map of the 1437 cm–1 DMAB Raman band intensity, in which a much stronger intensity is observed at the probe apex position. Comparison of average spectra measured at the TERS probe apex in Figure 3a and away from it (Figure S10) showed that the DMAB bands are visible only in the TERS spectra measured at the probe apex, indicating a strong LSPR. Furthermore, the TERS signal measured at the position of maximum intensity in Figure 3a was found to be ∼12× stronger than the SERS signal measured at the same position with the probe retracted from the sample, as shown in Figure 3c. To rule out the possibility of the zirconia-protected TERS probe interfering in the reaction at the sample, we conducted similar TERS measurements on a thin film of pATP mixed with PMMA spin-coated on a glass substrate (Figure S11). TERS spectra measured at the TERS probe apex on this sample did not show signal from any DMAB ag Raman bands, whereas the a1 Raman bands of pATP at 1086 and 1591 cm–1 were enhanced by a contrast of 5.3 in the TERS near-field. This demonstrates the chemical inertness of ZrO2-protected TERS probes for investigation of this catalytic reaction.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Maps of pATP → DMAB at the TERS probe apex obtained using the intensity of the 1437 cm–1N═N) DMAB Raman band measured from the pATP SAM on the Ag substrate in (a) air and (b) water. Integration time: 1 s. Laser power: 117 μW. Pixel size: 50 nm. TERS (red) and SERS (blue) spectra measured at the position of maximum DMAB signal in (c) Figure 3a and (d) Figure 3b, with the TERS probe in contact and retracted from the sample, respectively. Integration time: 60 s (Figure 3c) and 1 s (Figure 3d). The asymmetric shape of the reaction areas at the TERS probe apex shown in Figure 3 most likely arises from the combination of the random distribution of Ag grains at the TERS probe apex resulting from the thermal deposition of the Ag layer and the inhomogeneous and asymmetric distribution of the electromagnetic (EM) field intensity in the laser focal spot.

Next, we examined the sensitivity of the ZrO2-protected TERS probes for monitoring pATP → DMAB in an aqueous environment. In this case, TERS measurements were performed inside of a water droplet placed on the sample surface. Interestingly, compared to the SERS measurements in air, a 210× stronger signal was observed in water, as shown in Figure S12. This is in contrast to previous reports where the far-field Raman signal of molecular SAMs on Au was found to decrease by a factor of >3 in a liquid environment compared to air due to laser focus aberrations. (25,34)

A similar loss of optical coupling in water was also observed in our TERS system during far-field Raman measurements (Figure S13). However, for the pATP SAM on the heterogeneous Ag substrate, we speculate that this effect could arise due to the red shift of the surface plasmon resonance of the SERS substrate in an aqueous environment, (52) which can lead to better matching of the surface plasmon resonance wavelength with the excitation laser, resulting in higher DMAB formation as well as a much stronger SERS signal. (53−56) However, we cannot rule out other phenomena such as surface molecular diffusion (57,58) and molecular reorientation, (59) which may be affected by the presence of an aqueous environment. A detailed understanding of this effect is beyond the scope of the present study and warrants a separate investigation, to be pursued as part of our future work. A map of the 1437 cm–1 DMAB band intensity measured around the TERS probe apex is shown in Figure 3b. Once again, a significantly higher DMAB signal intensity is observed at the probe apex, indicating a strong LSPR. See Figure S14 for a comparison of average spectra measured at the probe apex in Figure 3b and away from it. The intensity of the TERS signal in water is found to be ∼12× stronger compared to the SERS signal measured at the same location (Figure 3d), clearly showing that the ZrO2-protected TERS probes retain their plasmonic sensitivity in water.

Furthermore, comparison of average spectra measured at the probe apex and away from it in Figure S14 also confirms the chemical inertness rendered by ZrO2 protection. In the Raman spectra, the νC–S vibrational mode at ∼1071 cm–1 is assigned to both pATP and DMAB, whereas the νN═N modes at 1390 and 1437 cm–1 and the βC–H mode at 1142 cm–1 are assigned exclusively to DMAB. (46) Therefore, the relative conversion of pATP to DMAB can be assessed using the ratio of the average intensity of DMAB bands (IDMAB) to I1071, (50) removing the effect of fluctuations in the absolute TERS signal. (60) Calculations of IDMAB/I1071 at locations P1–P4 in Figure S14 are presented in Table S1. At all four locations, IDMAB/I1071 is found to be ∼1.9, indicating that the conversion of pATP to DMAB is unaffected by the presence of the ZrO2-protected TERS probe, and it can therefore be considered as chemically noninterfering.

Finally, we performed nanoscale chemical imaging of this reaction on a Ag substrate in water. Figure 4a shows an AFM topography image of the surface, and Figure 4b shows a TERS map of the pATP → DMAB conversion, obtained using the IDMAB/I1071 ratio in an area of 500 × 500 nm2. The conversion exhibits a high degree of spatial heterogeneity across the Ag substrate employed, and a histogram analysis of the IDMAB/I1071 ratio across this map is consistent with a broad range of catalytic activities (Figure 4c). Furthermore, the TERS map in Figure 4b exhibits a number of highly localized regions of notably high pATP → DMAB conversion. Some of these “reaction hotspots” are labeled in Figure 4b (marked as 1–3), and corresponding spectra are shown in Figure 4d. For comparison, example spectra from regions of low conversion are also shown in Figure 4d and labeled as 4–6 in Figure 4b. The locations of the most active spots can be seen in the map presented in Figure S15a, in which the contrast has been adjusted to improve visualization, and additional example spectra are shown in Figure S15b. We propose that these extremely confined regions of high conversion reflect the plasmon-assisted nature of the pATP → DMAB reaction, (51) in which LSPR at or in between individual Ag nanoparticles can confine light to a <1 nm3 volume. (61) We note that a high conversion of pATP to DMAB at a particular position on the Ag substrate could be caused by two factors: (1) strong LSPR coupling between the ZrO2-protected TERS probe apex and the Ag substrate or (2) LSPR within the SERS hotspots present on the Ag substrate. In the current study, it is not possible to distinguish between these two contributing factors as deconvoluting the influence of the TERS probe LSPR on the surface reaction remains a challenging problem beyond the scope of this work. Line profile analysis of the high activity regions (Figure S16 and Table S2) indicates that they are typically confined to one or two pixels (100–200 nm2), consistent with nanoscale spatial resolution. The stability of the ZrO2-protected TERS probe during TERS mapping was also assessed by comparing the first and last spectra recorded in the TERS map (see Figure S17), in which a similar signal intensity was observed.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) AFM topography image of a heterogeneous Ag substrate functionalized with pATP. (b) TERS map of the IDMAB/I1071 intensity ratio for the area marked in (a). Integration time: 1 s. Laser power: 117 μW. Pixel size: 10 nm. (c) Histogram showing the % frequency of the IDMAB/I1071 ratio in the pATP → DMAB TERS map in (b). (d) TERS spectra from the locations marked as 1–6 in (b) showing different degrees of conversion across the TERS map. Spectra have been normalized to the intensity of the 1071 cm–1 band for comparison.

In summary, in this work, we have addressed the key challenges of plasmonic degradation, chemical inertness, and instability within a liquid environment of Ag-coated TERS probes by developing a novel method of protecting them with an ultrathin dielectric layer of zirconia. This successfully extends the lifetime of the probes over 850×, from a few hours to >4.5 months, while rendering them chemically inert for the investigation of catalytic reactions in liquids at the nanoscale. Finally, using these robust and durable probes, we have demonstrated mapping of a model catalytic reaction on a heterogeneous substrate within a liquid environment with nanoscale spatial resolution. This work opens up the possibility of using TERS as a nanoanalytical tool to map molecular heterogeneities and interfacial dynamics in situ in diverse areas of scientific research such as heterogeneous catalyst systems, (3) biology, (62) and electrochemistry, (63) in which nanoscale features at solid–liquid interfaces play a primary role in governing chemical behavior. Furthermore, this clear improvement in the probe lifetime and structural and chemical stability paves the way for using AFM-TERS for nondestructive, label-free, and nanoscale chemical characterization on a wide range of samples and environments.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02496.

  • Experimental details of the TERS system, sample preparation, and preparation of TERS probes including ZrO2 coating; time series TERS measurements of unprotected Ag-coated TERS probes in air; time series TERS measurements of ZrO2-protected Ag-coated TERS probes in air; AFM topography of the Ag substrate; comparison of the Raman spectrum of bulk pATP and SERS spectrum of pATP adsorbed on a heterogeneous Ag substrate; analysis of pATP → DMAB at the apex of the Ag-coated TERS probe in air; chemical inertness test of the ZrO2-protected TERS probe; comparison of pATP → DMAB SERS spectra measured in air and water environments; comparison of far-field Raman spectra measured from a polystyrene thin film on glass in air and water; analysis of pATP → DMAB at the apex of the Ag-coated TERS probe in water; further analysis of the pATP → DMAB TERS map; and comparison of the first and last spectra measured in the TERS map (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Naresh Kumar - Inorganic Chemistry and Catalysis Group, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, The NetherlandsNational Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, TW11 0LW, United KingdomOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-8953-5420
    • Caterina S. Wondergem - Inorganic Chemistry and Catalysis Group, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
    • Andrew J. Wain - National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, TW11 0LW, United KingdomOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8666-6158
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

B.M.W. acknowledges The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) for a Top research grant and the European Research Council (ERC) for an Advanced Grant (No. 321140). N.K. and A.J.W. acknowledge support from the National Measurement System of the UK Department of Business, Energy & Industry Strategy.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 63 other publications.

  1. 1
    Buurmans, I. L. C.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Heterogeneities of individual catalyst particles in space and time as monitored by spectroscopy. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4 (11), 873886,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1478
  2. 2
    Rothenberg, G. Catalysis: Concepts and Green Applications, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2017.
  3. 3
    Weckhuysen, B. M. In situ Spectroscopy of Catalysts; American Scientific Publishers: Stevenson Ranch, 2004.
  4. 4
    Mestl, G. In situ Raman spectroscopy - a valuable tool to understand operating catalysts. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2000, 158 (1), 4565,  DOI: 10.1016/S1381-1169(00)00042-X
  5. 5
    Verma, P. Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: Technique and recent advances. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117 (9), 64476466,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00821
  6. 6
    Deckert-Gaudig, T.; Taguchi, A.; Kawata, S.; Deckert, V. Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy–from early developments to recent advances. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46 (13), 40774110,  DOI: 10.1039/C7CS00209B
  7. 7
    Kumar, N.; Drozdz, M. M.; Jiang, H.; Santos, D. M.; Vaux, D. J. Nanoscale mapping of newly-synthesised phospholipid molecules in a biological cell using tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53 (16), 24512454,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CC10226C
  8. 8
    Yeo, B. S.; Amstad, E.; Schmid, T.; Stadler, J.; Zenobi, R. Nanoscale probing of a polymer-blend thin film with tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Small 2009, 5 (8), 952960,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.200801101
  9. 9
    Lucia, A.; Cacioppo, O. A.; Iulianella, E.; Latessa, L.; Moccia, G.; Passeri, D.; Rossi, M. Capability of tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy about nanoscale analysis of strained silicon for semiconductor devices production. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110 (10), 103105,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4978261
  10. 10
    Berweger, S.; Neacsu, C. C.; Mao, Y.; Zhou, H.; Wong, S. S.; Raschke, M. B. Optical nanocrystallography with tip-enhanced phonon Raman spectroscopy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4 (8), 496499,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2009.190
  11. 11
    Kumar, N.; Zoladek-Lemanczyk, A.; Guilbert, A. A.; Su, W.; Tuladhar, S. M.; Kirchartz, T.; Schroeder, B. C.; McCulloch, I.; Nelson, J.; Roy, D. Simultaneous topographical, electrical and optical microscopy of optoelectronic devices at the nanoscale. Nanoscale 2017, 9 (8), 27232731,  DOI: 10.1039/C6NR09057E
  12. 12
    Yano, T.-a.; Ichimura, T.; Kuwahara, S.; H’Dhili, F.; Uetsuki, K.; Okuno, Y.; Verma, P.; Kawata, S. Tip-enhanced nano-Raman analytical imaging of locally induced strain distribution in carbon nanotubes. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2592,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3592
  13. 13
    Su, W.; Kumar, N.; Dai, N.; Roy, D. Nanoscale mapping of intrinsic defects in single-layer graphene using tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52 (53), 82278230,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CC01990K
  14. 14
    Su, W.; Kumar, N.; Mignuzzi, S.; Crain, J.; Roy, D. Nanoscale mapping of excitonic processes in single-layer MoS2 using tip-enhanced photoluminescence microscopy. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (20), 1056410569,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR07378B
  15. 15
    Su, W.; Kumar, N.; Krayev, A.; Chaigneau, M. In situ topographical chemical and electrical imaging of carboxyl graphene oxide at the nanoscale. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 (1), 2891,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05307-0
  16. 16
    Kumar, N.; Su, W.; Castro, F. A.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy applications: From graphene to heterogeneous catalysis. Proc. SPIE Nanoscience & Engineering VI 2018, 10726, 1072608,  DOI: 10.1117/12.2322188
  17. 17
    Zhang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, Z. C.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, C.; Chen, L. G.; Zhang, L.; Liao, Y.; Aizpurua, J.; Luo, Y.; Yang, J. L.; Hou, J. G. Chemical mapping of a single molecule by plasmon-enhanced Raman scattering. Nature 2013, 498 (7452), 8286,  DOI: 10.1038/nature12151
  18. 18
    Zrimsek, A. B.; Chiang, N.; Mattei, M.; Zaleski, S.; McAnally, M. O.; Chapman, C. T.; Henry, A.-I.; Schatz, G. C.; Van Duyne, R. P. Single-molecule chemistry with surface-and tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117 (11), 75837613,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00552
  19. 19
    Kim, H.; Kosuda, K. M.; Van Duyne, R. P.; Stair, P. C. Resonance Raman and surface- and tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy methods to study solid catalysts and heterogeneous catalytic reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39 (12), 48204844,  DOI: 10.1039/c0cs00044b
  20. 20
    Hartman, T.; Wondergem, C. S.; Kumar, N.; van den Berg, A.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Surface-and tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy in catalysis. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7 (8), 15701584,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00147
  21. 21
    Domke, K. F.; Pettinger, B. In situ discrimination between axially complexed and ligand-free Co porphyrin on Au(111) with tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. ChemPhysChem 2009, 10 (11), 17941798,  DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200900182
  22. 22
    van Schrojenstein Lantman, E. M.; Deckert-Gaudig, T.; Mank, A. J. G.; Deckert, V.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Catalytic processes monitored at the nanoscale with tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7 (9), 583586,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2012.131
  23. 23
    Kumar, N.; Stephanidis, B.; Zenobi, R.; Wain, A.; Roy, D. Nanoscale mapping of catalytic activity using tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nanoscale 2015, 7 (16), 71337137,  DOI: 10.1039/C4NR07441F
  24. 24
    Zhong, J.-H.; Jin, X.; Meng, L.; Wang, X.; Su, H.-S.; Yang, Z.-L.; Williams, C. T.; Ren, B. Probing the electronic and catalytic properties of a bimetallic surface with 3 nm resolution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 12 (2), 132136,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2016.241
  25. 25
    Martín Sabanés, N.; Driessen, L. M.; Domke, K. F. Versatile side-illumination geometry for tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy at solid/liquid interfaces. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88 (14), 71087114,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01080
  26. 26
    Martín Sabanés, N.; Ohto, T.; Andrienko, D.; Nagata, Y.; Domke, K. F. Electrochemical TERS elucidates potential-induced molecular reorientation of adenine/Au(111). Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56 (33), 97969801,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201704460
  27. 27
    Mattei, M.; Kang, G.; Goubert, G.; Chulhai, D. V.; Schatz, G. C.; Jensen, L.; Van Duyne, R. P. Tip-enhanced Raman voltammetry: Coverage dependence and quantitative modeling. Nano Lett. 2017, 17 (1), 590596,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04868
  28. 28
    Kumar, N.; Kalirai, S.; Wain, A. J.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Nanoscale chemical imaging of a single catalyst particle with tip-enhanced fluorescence microscopy. ChemCatChem 2019, 11 (1), 417423,  DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201801023
  29. 29
    Schmid, T.; Yeo, B. S.; Leong, G.; Stadler, J.; Zenobi, R. Performing tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy in liquids. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2009, 40 (10), 13921399,  DOI: 10.1002/jrs.2387
  30. 30
    Scherger, J. D.; Foster, M. D. Tunable, liquid resistant tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy probes: Toward label-free nano-resolved imaging of biological systems. Langmuir 2017, 33 (31), 78187825,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b01338
  31. 31
    Touzalin, T.; Dauphin, A. L.; Joiret, S.; Lucas, I. T.; Maisonhaute, E. Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy imaging of opaque samples in organic liquid. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18 (23), 1551015513,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CP02596J
  32. 32
    Zeng, Z.-C.; Huang, S.-C.; Wu, D.-Y.; Meng, L.-Y.; Li, M.-H.; Huang, T.-X.; Zhong, J.-H.; Wang, X.; Yang, Z.-L.; Ren, B. Electrochemical tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (37), 1192811931,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b08143
  33. 33
    Kurouski, D.; Mattei, M.; Van Duyne, R. P. Probing redox reactions at the nanoscale with electrochemical tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (12), 79567962,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04177
  34. 34
    Kumar, N.; Su, W.; Vesely, M.; Weckhuysen, B. M.; Pollard, A. J.; Wain, A. J. Nanoscale chemical imaging of solid-liquid interfaces using tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nanoscale 2018, 10 (4), 18151824,  DOI: 10.1039/C7NR08257F
  35. 35
    Su, W.; Kumar, N.; Mignuzzi, S.; Crain, J.; Roy, D. Nanoscale mapping of excitonic processes in single-layer MoS 2 using tip-enhanced photoluminescence microscopy. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (20), 1056410569,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR07378B
  36. 36
    Kumar, N.; Spencer, S. J.; Imbraguglio, D.; Rossi, A. M.; Wain, A. J.; Weckhuysen, B. M.; Roy, D. Extending the plasmonic lifetime of tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy probes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18 (19), 1371013716,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CP01641C
  37. 37
    Kalbacova, J.; Rodriguez, R. D.; Desale, V.; Schneider, M.; Amin, I.; Jordan, R.; Zahn, D. R. Chemical stability of plasmon-active silver tips for tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nanospectroscopy 2015, 1, 1218,  DOI: 10.2478/nansp-2014-0002
  38. 38
    Opilik, L.; Dogan, Ü.; Szczerbiński, J.; Zenobi, R. Degradation of silver near-field optical probes and its electrochemical reversal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107 (9), 091109,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4929880
  39. 39
    Yeo, B. S.; Stadler, J.; Schmid, T.; Zenobi, R.; Zhang, W. H. Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy - Its status, challenges and future directions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2009, 472 (1–3), 113,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.02.023
  40. 40
    Barrios, C. A.; Malkovskiy, A. V.; Kisliuk, A. M.; Sokolov, A. P.; Foster, M. D. Highly stable, protected plasmonic nanostructures for tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113 (19), 81588161,  DOI: 10.1021/jp8098126
  41. 41
    Opilik, L.; Dogan, U. z.; Li, C.-Y.; Stephanidis, B.; Li, J.-F.; Zenobi, R. Chemical production of thin protective coatings on optical nanotips for tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120 (37), 2082820832,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02147
  42. 42
    Pourbaix, M. Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions; National Association of Corrosion Engineers: Houston, TX, 1974.
  43. 43
    Huang, Y.-P. Shell-isolated tip-enhanced Raman and fluorescence spectroscopy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57 (25), 75237527,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201802892
  44. 44
    Vaidya, P. D.; Lopez-Sanchez, J. A. Review of hydrogen production by catalytic aqueous-phase reforming. ChemistrySelect 2017, 2 (22), 65636576,  DOI: 10.1002/slct.201700905
  45. 45
    Navarro, R. M.; Pena, M.; Fierro, J. Hydrogen production reactions from carbon feedstocks: fossil fuels and biomass. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107 (10), 39523991,  DOI: 10.1021/cr0501994
  46. 46
    Huang, Y.-F.; Zhu, H.-P.; Liu, G.-K.; Wu, D.-Y.; Ren, B.; Tian, Z.-Q. When the signal is not from the original molecule to be detected: chemical transformation of para-aminothiophenol on Ag during the SERS measurement. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (27), 92449246,  DOI: 10.1021/ja101107z
  47. 47
    Mehtani, D.; Lee, N.; Hartschuh, R.; Kisliuk, A.; Foster, M.; Sokolov, A.; Čajko, F.; Tsukerman, I. Optical properties and enhancement factors of the tips for apertureless near-field optics. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 2006, 8 (4), S183S190,  DOI: 10.1088/1464-4258/8/4/S19
  48. 48
    Agapov, R. L.; Malkovskiy, A. V.; Sokolov, A. P.; Foster, M. D. Prolonged blinking with TERS probes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115 (18), 89008905,  DOI: 10.1021/jp111762u
  49. 49
    Kumar, N.; Rae, A.; Roy, D. Accurate measurement of enhancement factor in tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy through elimination of far-field artefacts. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104 (12), 123106,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4869184
  50. 50
    Zhang, Z.; Merk, V.; Hermanns, A.; Unger, W. E. S.; Kneipp, J. Role of metal cations in plasmon-catalyzed oxidation: A case study of p-aminothiophenol dimerization. ACS Catal. 2017, 7 (11), 78037809,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b02700
  51. 51
    Zhao, L. B.; Zhang, M.; Huang, Y. F.; Williams, C. T.; Wu, D. Y.; Ren, B.; Tian, Z. Q. Theoretical study of plasmon-enhanced surface catalytic coupling reactions of aromatic amines and nitro compounds. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5 (7), 12591266,  DOI: 10.1021/jz5003346
  52. 52
    Mock, J. J.; Smith, D. R.; Schultz, S. Local refractive index dependence of plasmon resonance spectra from individual nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2003, 3 (4), 485491,  DOI: 10.1021/nl0340475
  53. 53
    Xu, P.; Kang, L.; Mack, N. H.; Schanze, K. S.; Han, X.; Wang, H.-L. Mechanistic understanding of surface plasmon assisted catalysis on a single particle: cyclic redox of 4-aminothiophenol. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2997,  DOI: 10.1038/srep02997
  54. 54
    Sun, M.; Xu, H. A novel application of plasmonics: Plasmon-driven surface-catalyzed reactions. Small 2012, 8 (18), 27772786,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201200572
  55. 55
    Kang, L.; Xu, P.; Zhang, B.; Tsai, H.; Han, X.; Wang, H.-L. Laser wavelength- and power-dependent plasmon-driven chemical reactions monitored using single particle surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49 (33), 33893391,  DOI: 10.1039/c3cc40732b
  56. 56
    Dai, Z. G.; Xiao, X. H.; Zhang, Y. P.; Ren, F.; Wu, W.; Zhang, S. F.; Zhou, J.; Mei, F.; Jiang, C. Z. In situ Raman scattering study on a controllable plasmon-driven surface catalysis reaction on Ag nanoparticle arrays. Nanotechnology 2012, 23 (33), 335701,  DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/33/335701
  57. 57
    Walder, R.; Nelson, N.; Schwartz, D. K. Single molecule observations of desorption-mediated diffusion at the solid-liquid interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107 (15), 156102,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.156102
  58. 58
    Nelson, N.; Walder, R.; Schwartz, D. K. Single molecule dynamics on hydrophobic self-assembled monolayers. Langmuir 2012, 28 (33), 1210812113,  DOI: 10.1021/la302369v
  59. 59
    Pardo, L.; Boland, T. A quantitative approach to studying structures and orientation at self-assembled monolayer/fluid interfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 257 (1), 116120,  DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9797(02)00022-X
  60. 60
    Bishnoi, S. W.; Rozell, C. J.; Levin, C. S.; Gheith, M. K.; Johnson, B. R.; Johnson, D. H.; Halas, N. J. All-optical nanoscale pH meter. Nano Lett. 2006, 6 (8), 16871692,  DOI: 10.1021/nl060865w
  61. 61
    Benz, F.; Schmidt, M. K.; Dreismann, A.; Chikkaraddy, R.; Zhang, Y.; Demetriadou, A.; Carnegie, C.; Ohadi, H.; de Nijs, B.; Esteban, R.; Aizpurua, J.; Baumberg, J. J. Single-molecule optomechanics in “picocavities. Science 2016, 354 (6313), 726729,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aah5243
  62. 62
    Dufrêne, Y. F. Using nanotechniques to explore microbial surfaces. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2 (6), 451460,  DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro905
  63. 63
    Weaver, M. J.; Gao, X. In situ electrochemical surface science. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1993, 44 (1), 459494,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pc.44.100193.002331

Cited By

This article is cited by 49 publications.

  1. Dušan Mrđenović, Zi-Xi Tang, Yashashwa Pandey, Weitao Su, Yao Zhang, Naresh Kumar, Renato Zenobi. Regioselective Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy of Lipid Membranes with Sub-Nanometer Axial Resolution. Nano Letters 2023, 23 (9) , 3939-3946. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00689
  2. Tamitake Itoh, Marek Procházka, Zhen-Chao Dong, Wei Ji, Yuko S. Yamamoto, Yao Zhang, Yukihiro Ozaki. Toward a New Era of SERS and TERS at the Nanometer Scale: From Fundamentals to Innovative Applications. Chemical Reviews 2023, 123 (4) , 1552-1634. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00316
  3. Dušan Mrđenović, Daniel Abbott, Victor Mougel, Weitao Su, Naresh Kumar, Renato Zenobi. Visualizing Surface Phase Separation in PS-PMMA Polymer Blends at the Nanoscale. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14 (21) , 24938-24945. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c03857
  4. Zhen-Feng Cai, Juan Pedro Merino, Wei Fang, Naresh Kumar, Jeremy O. Richardson, Steven De Feyter, Renato Zenobi. Molecular-Level Insights on Reactive Arrangement in On-Surface Photocatalytic Coupling Reactions Using Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (1) , 538-546. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c11263
  5. Shahar Dery Elad Gross . IR Nanospectroscopy in Catalysis Research. , 147-173. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2021-1396.ch007
  6. Anette Beata Britz-Grell, Monika Saumer, Alexey Tarasov. Challenges and Opportunities of Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy in Liquids. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (39) , 21321-21340. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c05353
  7. Ryo Kato, Takayuki Umakoshi, Prabhat Verma. Raman Spectroscopic Nanoimaging of Optical Fields of Metal Nanostructures with a Chemically Modified Metallic Tip. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (37) , 20397-20404. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c04823
  8. Zhen-Feng Cai, Li-Qing Zheng, Yao Zhang, Renato Zenobi. Molecular-Scale Chemical Imaging of the Orientation of an On-Surface Coordination Complex by Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (31) , 12380-12386. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c06366
  9. Zhandong Li, Dmitry Kurouski. Probing the Redox Selectivity on Au@Pd and Au@Pt Bimetallic Nanoplates by Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. ACS Photonics 2021, 8 (7) , 2112-2119. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.1c00561
  10. Tian Zhang, Haohan Song, Liyun Deng, Chaoqing Dong, Jicun Ren. Single-Particle Catalytic Analysis by a Photon Burst Counting Technique Combined with a Microfluidic Chip. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (28) , 9752-9759. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01199
  11. Rui-Pu Wang, Ben Yang, Qiang Fu, Yao Zhang, Rui Zhu, Xiao-Ru Dong, Yang Zhang, Bing Wang, Jin-Long Yang, Yi Luo, Zhen-Chao Dong, J. G. Hou. Raman Detection of Bond Breaking and Making of a Chemisorbed Up-Standing Single Molecule at Single-Bond Level. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2021, 12 (7) , 1961-1968. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00074
  12. Yi-Fan Bao, Mao-Feng Cao, Si-Si Wu, Teng-Xiang Huang, Zhi-Cong Zeng, Mao-Hua Li, Xiang Wang, Bin Ren. Atomic Force Microscopy Based Top-Illumination Electrochemical Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Analytical Chemistry 2020, 92 (18) , 12548-12555. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02466
  13. Brian T. O’Callahan, Ashish Bhattarai, Zachary D. Schultz, Patrick Z. El-Khoury. Power-Dependent Dual Analyte Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectral Imaging. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2020, 124 (28) , 15454-15459. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c05396
  14. Thomas Hartman, Robin G. Geitenbeek, Caterina S. Wondergem, Ward van der Stam, Bert M. Weckhuysen. Operando Nanoscale Sensors in Catalysis: All Eyes on Catalyst Particles. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (4) , 3725-3735. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b09834
  15. Hai-Sheng Su, Hui-Shu Feng, Qing-Qing Zhao, Xia-Guang Zhang, Juan-Juan Sun, Yuhan He, Sheng-Chao Huang, Teng-Xiang Huang, Jin-Hui Zhong, De-Yin Wu, Bin Ren. Probing the Local Generation and Diffusion of Active Oxygen Species on a Pd/Au Bimetallic Surface by Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (3) , 1341-1347. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b10512
  16. Caterina S. Wondergem, Thomas Hartman, Bert M. Weckhuysen. In Situ Shell-Isolated Nanoparticle-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy to Unravel Sequential Hydrogenation of Phenylacetylene over Platinum Nanoparticles. ACS Catalysis 2019, 9 (12) , 10794-10802. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b03010
  17. Ashish Bhattarai, Patrick Z. El-Khoury. Nanoscale Chemical Reaction Imaging at the Solid–Liquid Interface via TERS. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2019, 10 (11) , 2817-2822. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00935
  18. Dušan Mrđenović, Zhen-Feng Cai, Yashashwa Pandey, Giovanni Luca Bartolomeo, Renato Zenobi, Naresh Kumar. Nanoscale chemical analysis of 2D molecular materials using tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nanoscale 2023, 15 (3) , 963-974. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NR05127C
  19. Takayuki Umakoshi. Near-field optical microscopy toward its applications for biological studies. Biophysics and Physicobiology 2023, 20 (1) , n/a. https://doi.org/10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v20.0011
  20. Tanja Deckert-Gaudig, Marie Richard-Lacroix, Volker Deckert. Nanoscale Raman Spectroscopy. 2023, 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07125-6_8
  21. Chunxia Mu, Chongyang Lv, Xiangchao Meng, Jianhua Sun, Zhangfa Tong, Kelei Huang. In Situ Characterization Techniques Applied in Photocatalysis: A Review. Advanced Materials Interfaces 2023, 10 (3) https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202201842
  22. Yasuyuki Yokota, Misun Hong, Norihiko Hayazawa, Yousoo Kim. Electrochemical tip-enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for microscopic studies of electrochemical interfaces. Surface Science Reports 2022, 77 (4) , 100576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfrep.2022.100576
  23. Siiri Bienz, Sophie H. van Vreeswijk, Yashashwa Pandey, Giovanni Luca Bartolomeo, Bert M. Weckhuysen, Renato Zenobi, Naresh Kumar. Probing coke formation during the methanol-to-hydrocarbon reaction on zeolite ZSM-5 catalyst at the nanoscale using tip-enhanced fluorescence microscopy. Catalysis Science & Technology 2022, 12 (19) , 5795-5801. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CY01348G
  24. Ghulam Hassnain Jaffari, Tanvir Hussain, Asad Muhammad Iqbal, Yawar Abbas. Formation and crystallization of TiO 2 nanostructures on various surfaces. Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials 2022, 78 (4) , 593-605. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520622005042
  25. Ryo Kato, Toki Moriyama, Takayuki Umakoshi, Taka-aki Yano, Prabhat Verma. Ultrastable tip-enhanced hyperspectral optical nanoimaging for defect analysis of large-sized WS 2 layers. Science Advances 2022, 8 (28) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo4021
  26. Tawfik A. Saleh. Characterization and description of adsorbents and nanomaterials. 2022, 199-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-849876-7.00008-7
  27. Zuolong Chen, Xiyang Wang, Joel P. Mills, Cheng Du, Jintae Kim, John Wen, Yimin A. Wu. Two-dimensional materials for electrochemical CO 2 reduction: materials, in situ / operando characterizations, and perspective. Nanoscale 2021, 13 (47) , 19712-19739. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NR06196H
  28. Maeva Chaupard, Marta de Frutos, Ruxandra Gref. Deciphering the Structure and Chemical Composition of Drug Nanocarriers: From Bulk Approaches to Individual Nanoparticle Characterization. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization 2021, 38 (9) https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.202100022
  29. Hai-Sheng Su, Hui-Shu Feng, Xiang Wu, Juan-Juan Sun, Bin Ren. Recent advances in plasmon-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for catalytic reactions on bifunctional metallic nanostructures. Nanoscale 2021, 13 (33) , 13962-13975. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NR04009J
  30. Sheng-Chao Huang, Yi-Fan Bao, Si-Si Wu, Teng-Xiang Huang, Matthew M. Sartin, Xiang Wang, Bin Ren. Electrochemical Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: An In Situ Nanospectroscopy for Electrochemistry. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 2021, 72 (1) , 213-234. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-061020-053442
  31. Atsushi Urakawa. Toward Precise Understanding of Catalytic Events and Materials Under Working Conditions. 2021, 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527813599.ch12
  32. Christian Hess. New advances in using Raman spectroscopy for the characterization of catalysts and catalytic reactions. Chemical Society Reviews 2021, 50 (5) , 3519-3564. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS01059F
  33. G. Hassnain Jaffari, Tanvir Hussain, Asad M. Iqbal, Yawar Abbas. Formation and Crystallization of TiO 2 Nanostructures on Various Surfaces. SSRN Electronic Journal 2021, 7 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3972623
  34. Manoj Silva, Jonas Baltrusaitis. A review of phosphate adsorption on Mg-containing materials: kinetics, equilibrium, and mechanistic insights. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2020, 6 (12) , 3178-3194. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EW00679C
  35. Naresh Kumar, Sofia Marchesini, Thomas Howe, Lee Edwards, Barry Brennan, Andrew J. Pollard. Nanoscale characterization of plasma functionalized graphitic flakes using tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2020, 153 (18) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0024370
  36. Matthew M. Sartin, Hai-Sheng Su, Xiang Wang, Bin Ren. Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for nanoscale probing of dynamic chemical systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2020, 153 (17) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0027917
  37. Gianfranco Ulian, Daniele Moro, Giovanni Valdrè. Infrared and Raman spectroscopic features of clinochlore Mg6Si4O10(OH)8: A density functional theory contribution. Applied Clay Science 2020, 197 , 105779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2020.105779
  38. Yuan Fan, Dan Jin, Xiuju Wu, Hui Fang, Xiaocong Yuan. Facilitating Hotspot Alignment in Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy via the Silver Photoluminescence of the Probe. Sensors 2020, 20 (22) , 6687. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226687
  39. Shahar Dery, Suhong Kim, Daniel Feferman, Hillel Mehlman, F. Dean Toste, Elad Gross. Site-dependent selectivity in oxidation reactions on single Pt nanoparticles. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2020, 22 (34) , 18765-18769. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP00642D
  40. Jing-Liang Yang, Hong-Jia Wang, Hua Zhang, Zhong-Qun Tian, Jian-Feng Li. Probing Hot Electron Behaviors by Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Cell Reports Physical Science 2020, 1 (9) , 100184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100184
  41. Leila Negahdar, Christopher M. A. Parlett, Mark A. Isaacs, Andrew M. Beale, Karen Wilson, Adam F. Lee. Shining light on the solid–liquid interface: in situ / operando monitoring of surface catalysis. Catalysis Science & Technology 2020, 10 (16) , 5362-5385. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CY00555J
  42. Andrew J. Wilson, Dinumol Devasia, Prashant K. Jain. Nanoscale optical imaging in chemistry. Chemical Society Reviews 2020, 49 (16) , 6087-6112. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS00338G
  43. Ryo Kato, Koki Taguchi, Ravi Yadav, Takayuki Umakoshi, Prabhat Verma. One-side metal-coated pyramidal cantilever tips for highly reproducible tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nanotechnology 2020, 31 (33) , 335207. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab90b6
  44. Dmitry Kurouski, Alexandre Dazzi, Renato Zenobi, Andrea Centrone. Infrared and Raman chemical imaging and spectroscopy at the nanoscale. Chemical Society Reviews 2020, 49 (11) , 3315-3347. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00916C
  45. Xiang Wang, Sheng-Chao Huang, Shu Hu, Sen Yan, Bin Ren. Fundamental understanding and applications of plasmon-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nature Reviews Physics 2020, 2 (5) , 253-271. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-0171-y
  46. Hua Zhang, Jie Wei, Xia-Guang Zhang, Yue-Jiao Zhang, Petar M. Radjenovica, De-Yin Wu, Feng Pan, Zhong-Qun Tian, Jian-Feng Li. Plasmon-Induced Interfacial Hot-Electron Transfer Directly Probed by Raman Spectroscopy. Chem 2020, 6 (3) , 689-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2019.12.015
  47. Caterina S. Wondergem, Thomas P. van Swieten, Robin G. Geitenbeek, Ben H. Erné, Bert M. Weckhuysen. Extending Surface‐Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy to Liquids Using Shell‐Isolated Plasmonic Superstructures. Chemistry – A European Journal 2019, 25 (69) , 15772-15778. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201903204
  48. Jonas H. K. Pfisterer, Masoud Baghernejad, Giovanni Giuzio, Katrin F. Domke. Reactivity mapping of nanoscale defect chemistry under electrochemical reaction conditions. Nature Communications 2019, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13692-3
  49. Yukun Gao, Nan Yang, Sichen Lu, Tingting You, Penggang Yin. In situ monitoring of plasmon-driven photocatalytic reactions at gas–liquid–solid three-phase interfaces by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2019, 7 (32) , 9926-9932. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TC02924A
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental TERS setup used in this work for spatially resolved mapping of plasmon-assisted oxidation of p-aminothiophenol (pATP) to p,p′-dimercaptoazobenzene (DMAB) over a heterogeneous Ag substrate in an aqueous environment.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Time series TERS (red) and far-field Raman (blue) spectra measured from a PEDOT:PSS thin film on glass after exposing (a) unprotected TERS probes for 0, 10, and 170 h and (b) ZrO2-protected TERS probes for 2, 33, and 140 days to the ambient environment. Integration time: 30 s. Laser power: 50 μW. Plots of TERS contrast versus exposure time of representative TERS probes to the ambient environment for measurements presented in (c) Figures 2a and S6 and (d) Figures 2b and S7. In this study, a thin film of PEDOT:PSS was chosen to measure the lifetime of the zirconia-coated TERS tips because of its high chemical stability, low surface roughness, and strong Raman signal. (30,36,40,47,48) For example, the root-mean-square surface roughness of a spin-coated PEDOT:PSS film has been shown to be 1.2 ± 0.1 nm using tapping mode AFM, confirming a smooth topography. (49) In order to further minimize the effect of surface roughness, the time series contrast plotted in Figure 2c,d was measured from an average of three TERS and far-field measurements conducted at different areas on the PEDOT:PSS thin film.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Maps of pATP → DMAB at the TERS probe apex obtained using the intensity of the 1437 cm–1N═N) DMAB Raman band measured from the pATP SAM on the Ag substrate in (a) air and (b) water. Integration time: 1 s. Laser power: 117 μW. Pixel size: 50 nm. TERS (red) and SERS (blue) spectra measured at the position of maximum DMAB signal in (c) Figure 3a and (d) Figure 3b, with the TERS probe in contact and retracted from the sample, respectively. Integration time: 60 s (Figure 3c) and 1 s (Figure 3d). The asymmetric shape of the reaction areas at the TERS probe apex shown in Figure 3 most likely arises from the combination of the random distribution of Ag grains at the TERS probe apex resulting from the thermal deposition of the Ag layer and the inhomogeneous and asymmetric distribution of the electromagnetic (EM) field intensity in the laser focal spot.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) AFM topography image of a heterogeneous Ag substrate functionalized with pATP. (b) TERS map of the IDMAB/I1071 intensity ratio for the area marked in (a). Integration time: 1 s. Laser power: 117 μW. Pixel size: 10 nm. (c) Histogram showing the % frequency of the IDMAB/I1071 ratio in the pATP → DMAB TERS map in (b). (d) TERS spectra from the locations marked as 1–6 in (b) showing different degrees of conversion across the TERS map. Spectra have been normalized to the intensity of the 1071 cm–1 band for comparison.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 63 other publications.

    1. 1
      Buurmans, I. L. C.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Heterogeneities of individual catalyst particles in space and time as monitored by spectroscopy. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4 (11), 873886,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1478
    2. 2
      Rothenberg, G. Catalysis: Concepts and Green Applications, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2017.
    3. 3
      Weckhuysen, B. M. In situ Spectroscopy of Catalysts; American Scientific Publishers: Stevenson Ranch, 2004.
    4. 4
      Mestl, G. In situ Raman spectroscopy - a valuable tool to understand operating catalysts. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2000, 158 (1), 4565,  DOI: 10.1016/S1381-1169(00)00042-X
    5. 5
      Verma, P. Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: Technique and recent advances. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117 (9), 64476466,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00821
    6. 6
      Deckert-Gaudig, T.; Taguchi, A.; Kawata, S.; Deckert, V. Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy–from early developments to recent advances. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46 (13), 40774110,  DOI: 10.1039/C7CS00209B
    7. 7
      Kumar, N.; Drozdz, M. M.; Jiang, H.; Santos, D. M.; Vaux, D. J. Nanoscale mapping of newly-synthesised phospholipid molecules in a biological cell using tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53 (16), 24512454,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CC10226C
    8. 8
      Yeo, B. S.; Amstad, E.; Schmid, T.; Stadler, J.; Zenobi, R. Nanoscale probing of a polymer-blend thin film with tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Small 2009, 5 (8), 952960,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.200801101
    9. 9
      Lucia, A.; Cacioppo, O. A.; Iulianella, E.; Latessa, L.; Moccia, G.; Passeri, D.; Rossi, M. Capability of tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy about nanoscale analysis of strained silicon for semiconductor devices production. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110 (10), 103105,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4978261
    10. 10
      Berweger, S.; Neacsu, C. C.; Mao, Y.; Zhou, H.; Wong, S. S.; Raschke, M. B. Optical nanocrystallography with tip-enhanced phonon Raman spectroscopy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4 (8), 496499,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2009.190
    11. 11
      Kumar, N.; Zoladek-Lemanczyk, A.; Guilbert, A. A.; Su, W.; Tuladhar, S. M.; Kirchartz, T.; Schroeder, B. C.; McCulloch, I.; Nelson, J.; Roy, D. Simultaneous topographical, electrical and optical microscopy of optoelectronic devices at the nanoscale. Nanoscale 2017, 9 (8), 27232731,  DOI: 10.1039/C6NR09057E
    12. 12
      Yano, T.-a.; Ichimura, T.; Kuwahara, S.; H’Dhili, F.; Uetsuki, K.; Okuno, Y.; Verma, P.; Kawata, S. Tip-enhanced nano-Raman analytical imaging of locally induced strain distribution in carbon nanotubes. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2592,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3592
    13. 13
      Su, W.; Kumar, N.; Dai, N.; Roy, D. Nanoscale mapping of intrinsic defects in single-layer graphene using tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52 (53), 82278230,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CC01990K
    14. 14
      Su, W.; Kumar, N.; Mignuzzi, S.; Crain, J.; Roy, D. Nanoscale mapping of excitonic processes in single-layer MoS2 using tip-enhanced photoluminescence microscopy. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (20), 1056410569,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR07378B
    15. 15
      Su, W.; Kumar, N.; Krayev, A.; Chaigneau, M. In situ topographical chemical and electrical imaging of carboxyl graphene oxide at the nanoscale. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 (1), 2891,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05307-0
    16. 16
      Kumar, N.; Su, W.; Castro, F. A.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy applications: From graphene to heterogeneous catalysis. Proc. SPIE Nanoscience & Engineering VI 2018, 10726, 1072608,  DOI: 10.1117/12.2322188
    17. 17
      Zhang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, Z. C.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, C.; Chen, L. G.; Zhang, L.; Liao, Y.; Aizpurua, J.; Luo, Y.; Yang, J. L.; Hou, J. G. Chemical mapping of a single molecule by plasmon-enhanced Raman scattering. Nature 2013, 498 (7452), 8286,  DOI: 10.1038/nature12151
    18. 18
      Zrimsek, A. B.; Chiang, N.; Mattei, M.; Zaleski, S.; McAnally, M. O.; Chapman, C. T.; Henry, A.-I.; Schatz, G. C.; Van Duyne, R. P. Single-molecule chemistry with surface-and tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117 (11), 75837613,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00552
    19. 19
      Kim, H.; Kosuda, K. M.; Van Duyne, R. P.; Stair, P. C. Resonance Raman and surface- and tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy methods to study solid catalysts and heterogeneous catalytic reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39 (12), 48204844,  DOI: 10.1039/c0cs00044b
    20. 20
      Hartman, T.; Wondergem, C. S.; Kumar, N.; van den Berg, A.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Surface-and tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy in catalysis. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7 (8), 15701584,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00147
    21. 21
      Domke, K. F.; Pettinger, B. In situ discrimination between axially complexed and ligand-free Co porphyrin on Au(111) with tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. ChemPhysChem 2009, 10 (11), 17941798,  DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200900182
    22. 22
      van Schrojenstein Lantman, E. M.; Deckert-Gaudig, T.; Mank, A. J. G.; Deckert, V.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Catalytic processes monitored at the nanoscale with tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7 (9), 583586,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2012.131
    23. 23
      Kumar, N.; Stephanidis, B.; Zenobi, R.; Wain, A.; Roy, D. Nanoscale mapping of catalytic activity using tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nanoscale 2015, 7 (16), 71337137,  DOI: 10.1039/C4NR07441F
    24. 24
      Zhong, J.-H.; Jin, X.; Meng, L.; Wang, X.; Su, H.-S.; Yang, Z.-L.; Williams, C. T.; Ren, B. Probing the electronic and catalytic properties of a bimetallic surface with 3 nm resolution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 12 (2), 132136,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2016.241
    25. 25
      Martín Sabanés, N.; Driessen, L. M.; Domke, K. F. Versatile side-illumination geometry for tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy at solid/liquid interfaces. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88 (14), 71087114,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01080
    26. 26
      Martín Sabanés, N.; Ohto, T.; Andrienko, D.; Nagata, Y.; Domke, K. F. Electrochemical TERS elucidates potential-induced molecular reorientation of adenine/Au(111). Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56 (33), 97969801,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201704460
    27. 27
      Mattei, M.; Kang, G.; Goubert, G.; Chulhai, D. V.; Schatz, G. C.; Jensen, L.; Van Duyne, R. P. Tip-enhanced Raman voltammetry: Coverage dependence and quantitative modeling. Nano Lett. 2017, 17 (1), 590596,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04868
    28. 28
      Kumar, N.; Kalirai, S.; Wain, A. J.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Nanoscale chemical imaging of a single catalyst particle with tip-enhanced fluorescence microscopy. ChemCatChem 2019, 11 (1), 417423,  DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201801023
    29. 29
      Schmid, T.; Yeo, B. S.; Leong, G.; Stadler, J.; Zenobi, R. Performing tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy in liquids. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2009, 40 (10), 13921399,  DOI: 10.1002/jrs.2387
    30. 30
      Scherger, J. D.; Foster, M. D. Tunable, liquid resistant tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy probes: Toward label-free nano-resolved imaging of biological systems. Langmuir 2017, 33 (31), 78187825,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b01338
    31. 31
      Touzalin, T.; Dauphin, A. L.; Joiret, S.; Lucas, I. T.; Maisonhaute, E. Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy imaging of opaque samples in organic liquid. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18 (23), 1551015513,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CP02596J
    32. 32
      Zeng, Z.-C.; Huang, S.-C.; Wu, D.-Y.; Meng, L.-Y.; Li, M.-H.; Huang, T.-X.; Zhong, J.-H.; Wang, X.; Yang, Z.-L.; Ren, B. Electrochemical tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (37), 1192811931,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b08143
    33. 33
      Kurouski, D.; Mattei, M.; Van Duyne, R. P. Probing redox reactions at the nanoscale with electrochemical tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (12), 79567962,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04177
    34. 34
      Kumar, N.; Su, W.; Vesely, M.; Weckhuysen, B. M.; Pollard, A. J.; Wain, A. J. Nanoscale chemical imaging of solid-liquid interfaces using tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nanoscale 2018, 10 (4), 18151824,  DOI: 10.1039/C7NR08257F
    35. 35
      Su, W.; Kumar, N.; Mignuzzi, S.; Crain, J.; Roy, D. Nanoscale mapping of excitonic processes in single-layer MoS 2 using tip-enhanced photoluminescence microscopy. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (20), 1056410569,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR07378B
    36. 36
      Kumar, N.; Spencer, S. J.; Imbraguglio, D.; Rossi, A. M.; Wain, A. J.; Weckhuysen, B. M.; Roy, D. Extending the plasmonic lifetime of tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy probes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18 (19), 1371013716,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CP01641C
    37. 37
      Kalbacova, J.; Rodriguez, R. D.; Desale, V.; Schneider, M.; Amin, I.; Jordan, R.; Zahn, D. R. Chemical stability of plasmon-active silver tips for tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nanospectroscopy 2015, 1, 1218,  DOI: 10.2478/nansp-2014-0002
    38. 38
      Opilik, L.; Dogan, Ü.; Szczerbiński, J.; Zenobi, R. Degradation of silver near-field optical probes and its electrochemical reversal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107 (9), 091109,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4929880
    39. 39
      Yeo, B. S.; Stadler, J.; Schmid, T.; Zenobi, R.; Zhang, W. H. Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy - Its status, challenges and future directions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2009, 472 (1–3), 113,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.02.023
    40. 40
      Barrios, C. A.; Malkovskiy, A. V.; Kisliuk, A. M.; Sokolov, A. P.; Foster, M. D. Highly stable, protected plasmonic nanostructures for tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113 (19), 81588161,  DOI: 10.1021/jp8098126
    41. 41
      Opilik, L.; Dogan, U. z.; Li, C.-Y.; Stephanidis, B.; Li, J.-F.; Zenobi, R. Chemical production of thin protective coatings on optical nanotips for tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120 (37), 2082820832,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02147
    42. 42
      Pourbaix, M. Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions; National Association of Corrosion Engineers: Houston, TX, 1974.
    43. 43
      Huang, Y.-P. Shell-isolated tip-enhanced Raman and fluorescence spectroscopy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57 (25), 75237527,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201802892
    44. 44
      Vaidya, P. D.; Lopez-Sanchez, J. A. Review of hydrogen production by catalytic aqueous-phase reforming. ChemistrySelect 2017, 2 (22), 65636576,  DOI: 10.1002/slct.201700905
    45. 45
      Navarro, R. M.; Pena, M.; Fierro, J. Hydrogen production reactions from carbon feedstocks: fossil fuels and biomass. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107 (10), 39523991,  DOI: 10.1021/cr0501994
    46. 46
      Huang, Y.-F.; Zhu, H.-P.; Liu, G.-K.; Wu, D.-Y.; Ren, B.; Tian, Z.-Q. When the signal is not from the original molecule to be detected: chemical transformation of para-aminothiophenol on Ag during the SERS measurement. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (27), 92449246,  DOI: 10.1021/ja101107z
    47. 47
      Mehtani, D.; Lee, N.; Hartschuh, R.; Kisliuk, A.; Foster, M.; Sokolov, A.; Čajko, F.; Tsukerman, I. Optical properties and enhancement factors of the tips for apertureless near-field optics. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 2006, 8 (4), S183S190,  DOI: 10.1088/1464-4258/8/4/S19
    48. 48
      Agapov, R. L.; Malkovskiy, A. V.; Sokolov, A. P.; Foster, M. D. Prolonged blinking with TERS probes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115 (18), 89008905,  DOI: 10.1021/jp111762u
    49. 49
      Kumar, N.; Rae, A.; Roy, D. Accurate measurement of enhancement factor in tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy through elimination of far-field artefacts. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104 (12), 123106,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4869184
    50. 50
      Zhang, Z.; Merk, V.; Hermanns, A.; Unger, W. E. S.; Kneipp, J. Role of metal cations in plasmon-catalyzed oxidation: A case study of p-aminothiophenol dimerization. ACS Catal. 2017, 7 (11), 78037809,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b02700
    51. 51
      Zhao, L. B.; Zhang, M.; Huang, Y. F.; Williams, C. T.; Wu, D. Y.; Ren, B.; Tian, Z. Q. Theoretical study of plasmon-enhanced surface catalytic coupling reactions of aromatic amines and nitro compounds. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5 (7), 12591266,  DOI: 10.1021/jz5003346
    52. 52
      Mock, J. J.; Smith, D. R.; Schultz, S. Local refractive index dependence of plasmon resonance spectra from individual nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2003, 3 (4), 485491,  DOI: 10.1021/nl0340475
    53. 53
      Xu, P.; Kang, L.; Mack, N. H.; Schanze, K. S.; Han, X.; Wang, H.-L. Mechanistic understanding of surface plasmon assisted catalysis on a single particle: cyclic redox of 4-aminothiophenol. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2997,  DOI: 10.1038/srep02997
    54. 54
      Sun, M.; Xu, H. A novel application of plasmonics: Plasmon-driven surface-catalyzed reactions. Small 2012, 8 (18), 27772786,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201200572
    55. 55
      Kang, L.; Xu, P.; Zhang, B.; Tsai, H.; Han, X.; Wang, H.-L. Laser wavelength- and power-dependent plasmon-driven chemical reactions monitored using single particle surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49 (33), 33893391,  DOI: 10.1039/c3cc40732b
    56. 56
      Dai, Z. G.; Xiao, X. H.; Zhang, Y. P.; Ren, F.; Wu, W.; Zhang, S. F.; Zhou, J.; Mei, F.; Jiang, C. Z. In situ Raman scattering study on a controllable plasmon-driven surface catalysis reaction on Ag nanoparticle arrays. Nanotechnology 2012, 23 (33), 335701,  DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/33/335701
    57. 57
      Walder, R.; Nelson, N.; Schwartz, D. K. Single molecule observations of desorption-mediated diffusion at the solid-liquid interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107 (15), 156102,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.156102
    58. 58
      Nelson, N.; Walder, R.; Schwartz, D. K. Single molecule dynamics on hydrophobic self-assembled monolayers. Langmuir 2012, 28 (33), 1210812113,  DOI: 10.1021/la302369v
    59. 59
      Pardo, L.; Boland, T. A quantitative approach to studying structures and orientation at self-assembled monolayer/fluid interfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 257 (1), 116120,  DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9797(02)00022-X
    60. 60
      Bishnoi, S. W.; Rozell, C. J.; Levin, C. S.; Gheith, M. K.; Johnson, B. R.; Johnson, D. H.; Halas, N. J. All-optical nanoscale pH meter. Nano Lett. 2006, 6 (8), 16871692,  DOI: 10.1021/nl060865w
    61. 61
      Benz, F.; Schmidt, M. K.; Dreismann, A.; Chikkaraddy, R.; Zhang, Y.; Demetriadou, A.; Carnegie, C.; Ohadi, H.; de Nijs, B.; Esteban, R.; Aizpurua, J.; Baumberg, J. J. Single-molecule optomechanics in “picocavities. Science 2016, 354 (6313), 726729,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aah5243
    62. 62
      Dufrêne, Y. F. Using nanotechniques to explore microbial surfaces. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2 (6), 451460,  DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro905
    63. 63
      Weaver, M. J.; Gao, X. In situ electrochemical surface science. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1993, 44 (1), 459494,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pc.44.100193.002331
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02496.

    • Experimental details of the TERS system, sample preparation, and preparation of TERS probes including ZrO2 coating; time series TERS measurements of unprotected Ag-coated TERS probes in air; time series TERS measurements of ZrO2-protected Ag-coated TERS probes in air; AFM topography of the Ag substrate; comparison of the Raman spectrum of bulk pATP and SERS spectrum of pATP adsorbed on a heterogeneous Ag substrate; analysis of pATP → DMAB at the apex of the Ag-coated TERS probe in air; chemical inertness test of the ZrO2-protected TERS probe; comparison of pATP → DMAB SERS spectra measured in air and water environments; comparison of far-field Raman spectra measured from a polystyrene thin film on glass in air and water; analysis of pATP → DMAB at the apex of the Ag-coated TERS probe in water; further analysis of the pATP → DMAB TERS map; and comparison of the first and last spectra measured in the TERS map (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect