ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Long-Term Stability of n-Alkane-in-Water Pickering Nanoemulsions: Effect of Aqueous Solubility of Droplet Phase on Ostwald Ripening
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Long-Term Stability of n-Alkane-in-Water Pickering Nanoemulsions: Effect of Aqueous Solubility of Droplet Phase on Ostwald Ripening
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Langmuir

Cite this: Langmuir 2018, 34, 31, 9289–9297
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01835
Published July 12, 2018

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

High-pressure microfluidization is used to prepare a series of oil-in-water Pickering nanoemulsions using sterically-stabilized diblock copolymer nanoparticles as the Pickering emulsifier. The droplet phase comprised either n-octane, n-decane, n-dodecane, or n-tetradecane. This series of oils enabled the effect of aqueous solubility on Ostwald ripening to be studied, which is the primary instability mechanism for such nanoemulsions. Analytical centrifugation (LUMiSizer instrument) was used to evaluate the long-term stability of these Pickering nanoemulsions over time scales of weeks/months. This technique enables convenient quantification of the fraction of growing oil droplets and confirmed that using n-octane (aqueous solubility = 0.66 mg dm–3 at 20 °C) leads to instability even over relatively short time periods. However, using n-tetradecane (aqueous solubility = 0.386 μg dm–3 at 20 °C) leads to significantly improved long-term stability with respect to Ostwald ripening, with all droplets remaining below 1 μm diameter after 6 weeks storage at 20 °C. In the case of n-dodecane, the long-term stability of these new copolymer-stabilized Pickering nanoemulsions is significantly better than the silica-stabilized Pickering nanoemulsions reported in the literature by Persson et al. (Colloids Surf., A,2014,459, 48–57). This is attributed to a much greater interfacial yield stress for the former system, as recently described in the literature (see P. J. Betramo et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.,2017,114, 10373–10378).

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Pickering emulsions can be defined as emulsion droplets that are stabilized by solid particles and have been recognized since the beginning of the last century. (1,2) Both water-in-oil (w/o) (3−5) or oil-in-water (o/w) (6−8) Pickering emulsions are widely reported in the literature, with additional recent examples including water-in-water (w/w) (9,10) and oil-in-oil (o/o) Pickering emulsions. (11,12) Examples of suitable Pickering emulsifiers include silica, (6,13) titania, (14) clays, (15−18) carbon black, (19) and latex particles; (5,7,20) in this context, emulsifier efficacy is governed primarily by surface wettability rather than by bulk chemical composition.
Recently, there have been a few literature reports of the preparation of Pickering nanoemulsions. (21−23) A nanoemulsion comprises very fine droplets that are less than approximately 200 nm in diameter. (24) Compared to macroemulsions, nanoemulsions are significantly less susceptible to gravitational creaming or sedimentation. In addition, their much higher surface area is expected to lead to more active formulations for cosmetics, (25) drug delivery, (26) food manufacturing, (27) and agrochemical applications. (28)
To date, most nanoemulsion studies have utilized various surfactants as the emulsifier. (29−32) Significantly, fewer literature examples involve Pickering nanoemulsions, perhaps because their stabilization requires relatively small nanoparticles (typically at least 5–10 times smaller than the mean droplet diameter) which may not be readily available. (21−23,33) Nevertheless, Persson et al. (21) used a high-pressure microfluidizer to prepare o/w Pickering nanoemulsions of between 100 and 200 nm diameter stabilized using a commercial 7 nm silica sol. Unfortunately, Ostwald ripening was observed over time periods of hours (for n-octane) to weeks (for n-tetradecane) when using various n-alkanes, even for relatively water-insoluble n-alkanes such as n-hexadecane. However, this instability mechanism, which is well-known for nanoemulsions owing to their relatively high surface area, (30) could be suppressed by employing a highly water-insoluble oil such as squalene.
Using a similar high-pressure microfluidizer setup as that utilized by Persson et al., we recently reported (34) the preparation of relatively stable n-dodecane-in-water Pickering nanoemulsions stabilized by poly(glycerol monomethacrylate-block-2,2,2-trifluoroethyl methacrylate) (PGMA–PTFEMA) diblock copolymer nanoparticles of 25 nm diameter. Nanoemulsions with mean hydrodynamic droplet diameters as small as 220 nm (35) could be prepared that remained stable for up to 4 months, as judged by dynamic light scattering (DLS) studies. Herein, we extend this preliminary study by comparing the relative long-term stabilities of o/w Pickering nanoemulsions prepared using n-octane, n-decane, n-dodecane, or n-tetradecane. This series of four oils was chosen to examine the extent of Ostwald ripening. These nanoemulsions were characterized using three well-established particle-sizing techniques, namely DLS (Malvern Nanosizer), laser diffraction (Malvern Mastersizer), and analytical centrifugation (LUMiSizer instrument).

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Materials

Glycerol monomethacrylate (GMA, 99.8% purity) was obtained from GEO Specialty Chemicals (Hythe, UK) and was used as received. 2-Cyano-2-propyl benzodithioate, 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl methacrylate (TFEMA), 4,4′-azobis(4-cyanopentanoic acid) (ACVA), fluorescein O-methacrylate (FluMA), n-dodecane, n-octane, n-tetradecane, dichloromethane, and deuterium oxide were purchased from Aldrich (UK) and were used as received, unless otherwise stated. Ethanol and dimethylformamide (DMF) were purchased from VWR chemicals (UK), while n-decane was purchased from Alfa Aesar (UK).

Synthesis of PGMA48 Macro-CTA via RAFT Solution Polymerization in Ethanol

A PGMA48 macro-CTA (hereafter described as PGMA48) was synthesized via RAFT polymerization of glycerol monomethacrylate in ethanol at 70 °C, as described previously. (21,30)1H NMR studies indicated a mean DP of 48 via end-group analysis (integrated aromatic RAFT end-group signals at 7.1–7.4 ppm were compared to those of the two oxymethylene protons at 3.5–4.4 ppm). DMF gel permeation chromatography (GPC) studies (refractive index detector) indicated an Mn of 12 700 g mol–1 and an Mw/Mn of 1.17, with a series of near-monodisperse poly(methyl methacrylate) standards being used for calibration.

Synthesis of PGMA48–PTFEMA50 Diblock Copolymer Nanoparticles via RAFT Aqueous Emulsion Polymerization

PGMA48–PTFEMA50 diblock copolymer nanoparticles were synthesized as follows: PGMA48 macro-CTA (2.830 g), ACVA (0.020 g, 71.4 μmol; macro-CTA/ACVA molar ratio = 5.0), and water (52.65 g, 10 w/w %) were weighed into a 100 mL round-bottomed flask, sealed with a rubber septum and degassed with nitrogen for 30 min. TFEMA (2.54 mL, 17.8 mmol, target DP = 50), which had been deoxygenated separately with nitrogen for 15 min, was then added to the solution under nitrogen and immersed in an oil bath set at 70 °C. The reaction solution was stirred for 20 h to ensure complete TFEMA monomer conversion, and the polymerization was quenched by exposure to air. 19F NMR spectroscopy analysis of the copolymer dissolved in d6-acetone indicated less than 1% residual TFEMA monomer. DMF GPC studies indicated an Mn of 19 100 g mol–1 and a Mw/Mn of 1.14, with a series of near-monodisperse poly(methyl methacrylate) standards being used for calibration.

Preparation of PGMA48–PTFEMA50-Stabilized Pickering Macroemulsions Using High-Shear Homogenization

A PGMA48–PTFEMA50 aqueous dispersion (8.0 mL; 7.0 w/w % solids) was added to a 14 mL glass vial and homogenized with 2.0 mL of n-dodecane for 2.0 min at 20 °C using an IKA Ultra-Turrax T-18 homogenizer with a 10 mm dispersing tool operating at 15 500 rpm. The resulting milky oil-in-water emulsion was then analyzed by optical microscopy and laser diffraction. The same protocol was used for the other three n-alkanes used in this work.

Preparation of PGMA48–PTFEMA50-Stabilized Pickering Nanoemulsions Using High-Pressure Microfluidization

A Pickering macroemulsion (6.0 mL) was further processed using an LV1 Low Volume Microfluidizer Processor (Microfluidics, USA). The pressure was adjusted to 20 000 psi, and the number of passes through the LV1 was fixed at 10.

Characterization

NMR Spectroscopy

1H and 19F NMR spectra were recorded in d6-acetone, D2O, or CD3OD using a Bruker AVANCE 400 spectrometer operating at 400 MHz.

Gel Permeation Chromatography

Molecular weights and dispersities were assessed using a GPC instrument equipped with a Varian 290-LC pump injection module, a Varian 390-LC refractive index detector, and two Polymer Laboratories PL gel 5 μm mixed-C columns with a DMF mobile phase containing 0.01 M LiBr operating at 60 °C with a constant flow rate of 1.0 mL min–1. Dimethyl sulfoxide was used as a flow-rate marker, and calibration was achieved using a series of near-monodisperse poly(methyl methacrylate) standards.

Dynamic Light Scattering

Z-average hydrodynamic diameters were determined by DLS at 25 °C using a Malvern Zetasizer NanoZS instrument at a fixed scattering angle of 173°. Dilute aqueous dispersions (0.01 w/w %) of PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles were analyzed using disposable cuvettes, and the results were averaged over three consecutive runs. The deionized water used to dilute each sample was ultrafiltered through a 0.20 μm membrane to remove extraneous dust.

Laser Diffraction

Each macroemulsion was sized using a Malvern Mastersizer 3000 instrument equipped with a hydro EV wet sample dispersion unit, a red HeNe laser operating at 633 nm and a light-emitting diode blue-light source operating at 470 nm. The stirring rate was adjusted to 1500 rpm to avoid creaming of the emulsion during analysis. After each measurement, the cell was rinsed three times with deionized water; the glass walls of the cell were carefully wiped with a lens cleaning tissue to avoid cross-contamination, and the laser was aligned centrally to the detector prior to data acquisition.

Analytical Centrifugation (LUMiSizer)

Droplet size distributions were assessed using a LUMiSizer analytical photocentrifuge (LUM GmbH, Berlin, Germany) at 20 °C. Measurements were conducted on diluted Pickering nanoemulsions (1.0 v/v % n-alkane) in 2 mm path length polyamide cells at 200 rpm for 200 profiles (allowing 20 s between profiles), and then the rate of centrifugation was increased up to 4000 rpm for a further 800 profiles. The slow initial rate of centrifugation enabled detection of any larger oil droplets that might be present within the nanoemulsion. The LUMiSizer instrument employs space- and time-resolved extinction profiles technology to measure the intensity of transmitted near-infrared light as a function of time and position over the entire cell length simultaneously. The gradual progression of these transmission profiles contains information on the rate of creaming and, in principle, enables assessment of the droplet size distribution. The nanoemulsion droplet density is an essential input parameter for such analytical centrifugation studies. In the present case, the effective droplet density is somewhat higher than that of the pure n-alkane owing to the presence of the adsorbed monolayer of relatively dense PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles. Nevertheless, the true droplet density must lie between that of the pure n-alkane and water because visual inspection confirmed that droplet creaming always occurred during the LUMiSizer analysis. The effective density of the nanoparticle-coated n-alkane droplets can be estimated by using eqs 13 (see below). One caveat here is that a density distribution is superimposed on the droplet size distribution for each Pickering nanoemulsion. On the basis of our earlier studies, (36,37) this is expected to lead to an artefactual broadening (38) of the LUMiSizer droplet size distribution. Moreover, the superimposed density distribution is expected to change over time as the droplet size distribution broadens as a result of Ostwald ripening. Thus, correcting for this secondary effect is rather complex and is considered to be beyond the scope of the present study, which instead focuses on assessing the relative long-term stabilities of Pickering nanoemulsions prepared using four different n-alkanes. In view of this, we chose to estimate the effective droplet density from the initial z-average DLS diameter recorded for each fresh nanoemulsion, and this value was utilized for all subsequent time-dependent LUMiSizer studies.

Small-Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS)

SAXS data were acquired using a laboratory-based SAXS instrument (Xeuss 2.0, Xenocs, France) equipped with a liquid gallium MetalJet X-ray source (Excillum, Sweden, wavelength λ = 0.134 nm), with motorized scatterless slits for beam collimation and a Dectris PILATUS 1M pixel detector. The sample-to-detector distance (or camera length) was 2.493 m. SAXS patterns were recorded over a q range of 0.04 nm–1 < q < 3.0 nm–1, where q (=4π sin θ/λ) is the scattering vector and θ is one-half of the scattering angle. Glass capillaries of approximately 2.0 mm diameter were used for all samples. Data were reduced using the Foxtrot software package developed by SOLEIL and further analyzed using Irena SAS macros (39) for Igor Pro.

Calculation of Nanoparticle and Droplet Densities

The PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticle density (ρparticle) was calculated using eq 1, as described in our earlier study. (36)
(1)
Here, ρPTFEMA and Rs denote the density and radius of the PTFEMA50 core-forming block, and ρPGMA and Rg are the density and radius of gyration of the shell component (PGMA48). 2Rg is equal to the PGMA stabilizer shell thickness. The numerical value of ρPTFEMA was taken to be 1.47 g cm–3, which is the density of nonsolvated PTFEMA, whereas the highly hydrated PGMA shell was estimated to have a density ρPGMA of approximately 1.00 g cm–3. Rs = 6.81 nm and Rg = 1.59 nm were calculated by fitting the SAXS pattern recorded for the PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles to a spherical micelle model; (36) this approach afforded a ρparticle of 1.15 g cm–3. The volume-average particle diameter, DSAXS, was calculated to be 20.0 nm using DSAXS = (2Rs + 4Rg).
The effective density of the n-alkane droplets was estimated by first calculating the number of nanoparticles packed around a single droplet (N).
(2)
Here, mparticle is the mass of particles used to prepare the nanoemulsion, NA is Avogadro’s constant, and Ns is the number of PGMA48–PTFEMA50 chains per particle, determined by SAXS to be 139 using , Mn is the number–average molecular mass of the PGMA48–PTFEMA50 chains, Voil is the total volume of oil used to prepare each nanoemulsion, and roil is the radius of the minimum possible droplet diameter. We calculate roil to be the mean DLS droplet radius (rDLS) minus the adsorbed nanoparticle diameter to give the minimum bare oil droplet radius (roil = rDLS – 2rparticle).
The PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticle diameter d was determined to be 20.0 nm by SAXS (where d = 2Rs + 4Rg). However, we consider the effective adsorbed diameter (2rparticle) at the oil/water interface to be given by 2Rcore + 2Rg (or 16.8 nm). This is because the PGMA48 stabilizer chains that are in direct contact with the oil phase are expected to be fully collapsed and hence should occupy negligible volume at the oil/water interface (Scheme 1). For example, a nanoemulsion droplet with an overall diameter of 220 nm should have a core droplet diameter of 220 – (2 × 16.8) ≈ 186 nm. Several assumptions are made in these calculations: (i) the z-average droplet diameter reported by DLS includes both the oil droplet and the nanoparticle shell and (ii) the nanoparticles adsorb at the o/w interface with an effective contact angle of 0° with respect to the nanoparticle core (see Scheme 1). Clearly, this is not the true nanoparticle contact angle; therefore, the droplet diameter will be slightly overestimated. However, this is likely to be a relatively small systematic error and therefore is not expected to affect the main findings of this study.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Schematic Representation of the Adsorption of PGMA48–PTFEMA50 Nanoparticles at the n-Alkane/Water Interfacea

aIt is assumed that (i) the nanoparticles are adsorbed with an effective contact angle of 0° and (ii) PGMA48 stabilizer chains in direct contact with the n-alkane/water interface are fully collapsed and hence do not contribute to the adsorbed nanoparticle radius. Thus, given that the effective thickness of the adsorbed sterically stabilized nanoparticles is given by 2Rs + 2Rg (rather than 2Rs + 4Rg), the approximate effective sphere radius, rparticle, of the adsorbed nanoparticles is given by rparticle = Rs + Rg or 8.4 nm. Experimental values for Rs and Rg were obtained from SAXS analysis of the PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles prior to emulsification, see the main text.

The effective density of each nanoemulsion droplet, ρnanoemulsion, was then calculated using a core–shell model where the core is composed of the n-alkane (whose density is denoted by ρoil) and the particulate shell comprises a monolayer of adsorbed PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles with an effective adsorbed particle radius (rparticle) of 8.4 nm (37) comprising the particulate shell. (37)
(3)

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles used in this study were prepared as a 10% aqueous dispersion by RAFT aqueous emulsion polymerization using a technique known as polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA), as reported previously (see Figure 1A). (36) The z-average nanoparticle diameter was determined to be 24 nm by DLS, whereas fitting SAXS data to a spherical micelle model indicated a volume-average diameter of 20 nm; TEM studies confirmed that the nanoparticles possessed a near-monodisperse spherical morphology (see Figure 1B–D). Preliminary scoping experiments suggested that an excess of relatively small nanoparticles were required to maximize the total surface area available during the high-pressure microfluidization processing step and hence ensure the formation of stable Pickering nanoemulsions. For example, utilizing somewhat larger PGMA48–PTFEMA150 nanoparticles (51 nm diameter by DLS) merely produced highly flocculated nanoemulsions. (34)

Figure 1

Figure 1. (A) Synthesis of PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles via RAFT aqueous emulsion polymerization of TFEMA at 70 °C using a PGMA48 macro-CTA; (B) TEM image of the resulting sterically stabilized PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles; (C) particle size distribution determined by DLS; (D) SAXS pattern recorded for a 1.0 w/w % aqueous dispersion of the PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles (solid red line represents the data fit obtained using a spherical micelle model, which reports a volume-average diameter of 20 ± 1 nm).

Initially, a 7.0 w/v % aqueous dispersion of PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles was used to prepare a relatively coarse Pickering macroemulsion with a mean droplet diameter of 40 μm via conventional high-shear homogenization. Figure 2 illustrates how this precursor macroemulsion was then processed using the LV1 microfluidizer to produce a Pickering nanoemulsion. It is essential to have a substantial excess of PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles present after formation of the initial macroemulsion, as these non-adsorbed nanoparticles are required to stabilize the new oil/water interface generated during high-pressure microfluidization. In a recent related study, (34) it was found empirically that an applied pressure of 20 000 psi was optimal for the preparation of stable Pickering nanoemulsions. Lower pressures let to larger, more polydisperse droplets, whereas higher pressures lead to the breakup of PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles into individual diblock copolymer chains, which can then act as an amphiphilic copolymer surfactant to form (non-Pickering) nanoemulsions. Our previous studies focused on n-dodecane: for this oil, it was shown that at least eight passes through the microfluidizer were required to achieve a stable nanoemulsion with a unimodal droplet size distribution. (34) Essentially the same observations were made for the other three n-alkanes selected for this study (n-octane, n-decane, and n-tetradecane). These four oils were selected for their differing aqueous solubilities (40,41) because this parameter is known to be important in determining the extent of Ostwald ripening for nanoemulsions. (42−44) After 10 passes through the LV1, a mean DLS droplet diameter of around 180 nm was obtained when using n-octane, n-decane, or n-tetradecane. In contrast, using n-dodecane produced a somewhat larger mean droplet diameter of 257 nm under the same conditions. The reason for this minor discrepancy is not known, but such experiments proved to be reproducible. It does not appear to be related to the mean diameter of the precursor Pickering macroemulsions, which was around 40 μm for each of the four oils.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Schematic representation of the two-step preparation of Pickering nanoemulsions. First, a 7.0 w/v % aqueous dispersion of PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles were homogenized with one of four n-alkanes to form an oil-in-water Pickering macroemulsion of around 40–50 μm diameter using conventional high-shear homogenization at 15 500 rpm for 2 min at 20 °C. This relatively coarse precursor emulsion was then refined via 10 passes through the LV1 microfluidizer at 20 000 psi to obtain the final Pickering nanoemulsion.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained for dried fresh Pickering nanoemulsions, as shown in Figure 3. Although the volatile droplet phase is no longer present under the ultrahigh vacuum conditions required for TEM, some of the original superstructure of the adsorbed PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles is preserved. Such post-mortem studies provide convincing evidence that spherical droplets corresponding to nanoemulsion length scales were achieved when using each of the four oils, albeit with a significant degree of polydispersity. It is perhaps worth mentioning that the relatively high electron density of the PTFEMA cores provides relatively good contrast for such TEM studies, which is one advantage of using these particular amphiphilic PGMA48–PTFEMA50 diblock copolymers.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Representative TEM images obtained for freshly prepared Pickering nanoemulsions prepared via high-pressure microfluidization using 7.0 w/w % PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles and 20 v/v % n-alkane. Conditions: applied pressure = 20 000 psi for 10 passes using an LV1 microfluidizer.

Table 1 summarizes the initial droplet size distributions determined for Pickering nanoemulsions prepared using the four different n-alkanes. DLS and laser diffraction studies were conducted on fresh nanoemulsions within 30 min of their preparation. For three of the oils, the volume-average nanoemulsion diameters reported by laser diffraction are lower than the z-average diameters obtained from DLS, as expected. However, the DLS droplet diameter is actually lower than that reported by laser diffraction for the n-octane-based nanoemulsion. A possible explanation for this unexpected finding is that the latter nanoemulsion already exhibits signs of Ostwald ripening even at this rather early stage and that the DLS technique is surprisingly insensitive to the coarsening droplet size distribution (see the following discussion). The remarkably poor stability of this n-octane nanoemulsion is consistent with findings by Persson et al., (21) who observed the appearance of significantly larger droplet diameters for the same oil after ageing a silica-stabilized nanoemulsion for just 30 min.
Table 1. Summary of the Pickering Nanoemulsions Prepared Using Four n-Alkanes (n-Octane, n-Decane, n-Dodecane, and n-Tetradecane)a
oil typeinitial DLS diameter, DDLS (nm)binitial laser diffraction diameter, Dv (nm)bare droplet diameter, Doil (nm)cnumber of spheres per droplet, Npacking efficiency (%)ρn-alkane (g cm–3)ρnanoemulsion (g cm–3)
n-octane179 ± 59233 ± 245145120440.700.77
n-decane182 ± 56117 ± 92148128450.730.80
n-dodecane257 ± 93167 ± 159223438740.750.81
n-tetradecane180 ± 37120 ± 95146123450.760.82
a

Droplet size distributions were recorded within 30 min of the preparation of each nanoemulsion. The SAXS-derived PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticle diameter, DSAXS, was determined to be 20.0 nm (where DSAXS = 2Rcore + 4Rg), whereas the effective adsorbed diameter at the oil/water interface was taken to be 2Rcore + 2Rg (16.8 nm) because the collapsed stabilizer chains that are in direct contact with the oil/water interface occupying a negligible volume. The effective nanoparticle density was estimated to be 1.15 g cm–3 using previously reported data. (36)

b

Z-average diameter.

c

Calculated using Doil = DDLS – 4rparticle.

Analytical centrifugation was used to further characterize both the initial and ageing nanoemulsions. This particular technique (LUMiSizer instrument) has a much higher resolution compared to DLS or laser diffraction because droplet fractionation occurs during the measurement (prior to detection). Thus, better insight into how the nanoemulsion size distributions change over time for each oil type was anticipated. One drawback of this technique is that the effective particle density is required to obtain an accurate particle size. (36) This critical input parameter was estimated using eqs 13 from the initial DLS droplet diameter using the additional data derived from the SAXS analysis of the PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles (see the Experimental Section and the Supporting Information for details). The calculated nanoemulsion densities (ρnanoemulsion) are shown in Table 1 for each n-alkane.
Another important consideration when using analytical centrifugation is the appropriate concentration at which the samples are analyzed. These Pickering nanoemulsions were prepared at a relatively high oil volume fraction (20 v/v % n-alkane). However, analyzing droplets at such high concentrations is known to undersize substantially owing to the phenomenon of hindered sedimentation. (45) In the present case, the rate of creaming of droplets within a relatively concentrated nanoemulsion when subjected to a centrifugal field is significantly retarded as a result of the close proximity of neighboring droplets; thus, the slower creaming rate leads to a smaller apparent droplet diameter. This artefact was indeed observed in the case of these Pickering nanoemulsions. Figure 4A shows that, as the droplet concentration used for analytical centrifugation studies is systematically reduced, the apparent nanoemulsion droplet diameter increases and approaches a constant plateau value at approximately 1.0 v/v %. Thus, all further studies were conducted at this oil droplet concentration, with the 20 v/v % stock nanoemulsion being diluted immediately prior to analysis. Using droplet concentrations lower than 1.0 v/v % becomes problematic: such dilute emulsions scatter light only rather weakly and hence fall outside of the optimum transmission range required for the LUMiSizer instrument (i.e., below 30% transmission). Figure 4B illustrates the effect that varying the oil droplet concentration has on the apparent droplet size distributions reported by the instrument. Analyzing relatively concentrated nanoemulsions (diluted to only 10 v/v %) leads to a significantly smaller apparent droplet diameter (and an apparently narrower droplet size distribution).

Figure 4

Figure 4. (A) Effect of droplet concentration on apparent droplet diameter for an n-dodecane-in-water Pickering nanoemulsion as determined by analytical centrifugation (LUMiSizer instrument). This hindrance function indicates that the optimum droplet concentration for such analyses is approximately 1.0 v/v %, with higher concentrations leading to hindered creaming and hence artefactual undersizing. (B) Droplet size distributions determined by analytical centrifugation using an effective nanoemulsion droplet density of 0.81 g cm–3 at either 10 or 1.0 v/v % n-dodecane. As a result of these initial studies, all further LUMiSizer analyses were conducted at a droplet concentration of 1.0 v/v % n-alkane.

Figure 5 summarizes the data obtained for various droplet characterization techniques for a freshly-made and 1-week-old n-octane-in-water Pickering nanoemulsion. A significant increase in the mean droplet diameter is discernible by laser diffraction (Figure 5A), analytical centrifugation (Figure 5B), and optical microscopy (Figure 5D) after ageing the 20 v/v % nanoemulsion for 1 week at ambient temperature. Given the relatively high solubility of n-octane in water (0.66 mg dm–3 at 20 °C), (40) such droplet growth is attributed to Ostwald ripening. (42−44) Perhaps surprisingly, DLS analysis indicated only a minimal change in particle size: the z-average diameter actually decreased slightly from 179 ± 59 to 168 ± 72 nm, although a rather small population of micrometer-sized coarser droplets was also detected. However, the latter feature was only observed initially (see Figure 5C); it disappeared in subsequent runs (each measurement comprising an average of three runs). DLS is normally highly biased toward larger populations because the scattered light intensity scales according to the sixth power of the particle radius. This unexpected lack of sensitivity is puzzling, but one possible explanation could be the rapid creaming of the relatively large oil droplets (which were clearly detectable by laser diffraction and analytical centrifugation). This is consistent with the detection of large droplets during the first run but not during the two subsequent runs. Laser diffraction and analytical centrifugation studies indicated that a significant fraction of n-octane droplets (>60% according to analytical centrifugation) became micrometer-sized within 1 week of ageing at 20 °C. This was confirmed by optical microscopy studies performed after 1 week (Figure 5D). According to the analytical centrifugation data, approximately 20% of the droplets had already grown to at least 1–2 μm diameter by the time the fresh nanoemulsion was analyzed. This illustrates the high resolution of this technique: laser diffraction and DLS simply do not have the sensitivity to readily discriminate between a large population of submicrometer-sized droplets and a minor fraction of the micrometer-sized droplets. The former population cannot be observed by optical microscopy because such fine droplets are beyond the optical resolution limit. In the literature, nanoemulsions are typically sized using either DLS or laser diffraction, as such instruments are widely available in many research laboratories. In contrast, there are relatively few reports of sizing nanoemulsions via analytical centrifugation, yet this high-resolution technique appears to offer an important advantage when considering the effect of Ostwald ripening. For this reason, the rest of this article focuses on the characterization of Pickering nanoemulsions via analytical centrifugation. The caveat with this sizing technique is the uncertainty in calculating the effective droplet density for this particular nanoemulsion system and the technical problems associated with the superimposed density distribution on the droplet size distribution (see above).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Various particle sizing techniques used to characterize a freshly-made and 1-week-old 20 v/v % n-octane-in-water Pickering nanoemulsion prepared using 7.0 w/w % PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles at 20 000 psi with 10 passes. (A) Laser diffraction, (B) DLS, (C) analytical centrifugation (LUMiSizer, ρnanoemulsion = 0.77 g cm–3), and (D) optical microscopy (no oil droplets were observed by optical microscopy for any of the freshly-made Pickering nanoemulsions reported in this study, but micrometer-sized oil droplets were clearly discernible within 1 week of ageing the n-octane-based Pickering nanoemulsion). Perhaps surprisingly, DLS seemed to be relatively insensitive to the larger oil droplets present within the 1-week-old Pickering nanoemulsion, whereas this coarse fraction was readily detected by laser diffraction and analytical centrifugation.

Table 2 reports the mean volume-average diameter determined by analytical centrifugation for Pickering nanoemulsions prepared using each of the four n-alkanes on ageing at 20 °C for up to 6 weeks. Unfortunately, the relatively high volatilities of n-octane and n-decane meant that significant evaporation of the oil droplet phase occurred within 1 week, even if these nanoemulsions were well-sealed. Hence, it was not possible to accurately size these two nanoemulsions after ageing for 1 week. However, it is nevertheless evident that significant droplet coalescence occurred for these two nanoemulsions over this time frame compared to those prepared under the same conditions using n-dodecane or n-tetradecane. In particular, the width of the droplet size distributions observed for the fresh nanoemulsions became significantly broader from n-tetradecane to n-octane. For the two more volatile oils, these distributions become highly asymmetric, with pronounced tailing toward larger droplet diameters. This suggests that Ostwald ripening commences immediately after preparation of each nanoemulsion, with n-octane droplets coarsening significantly faster than n-decane droplets. After ageing for 1 week, only the n-tetradecane-based nanoemulsion retains its (approximate) original mean droplet diameter. The n-octane and n-decane nanoemulsions exhibited the largest increases in mean diameter, which correlate with the significantly higher aqueous solubilities of these two oils. All four droplet size distributions became broader, with the most pronounced change being observed for n-octane and only a minimal change being detected for n-tetradecane. Figure 6A shows the volume-average cumulative distributions obtained for each of the four Pickering nanoemulsions recorded after ageing for 1 week. The extent of Ostwald ripening is clearly greatest for n-octane: around 60% of the droplets now exceed 500 nm, with approximately 10% being larger than 4 μm. In comparison, the proportion of droplets exceeding 500 nm for the other three oils is 45% for n-decane, 9% for n-dodecane, but less than 0.1% for n-tetradecane. Although substantial Ostwald ripening had occurred within 1 week, significant proportions of the original n-octane (>35%) and n-decane (>50%) formulations can still be classified as nanoemulsions. This represents much better stability compared to the silica-stabilized nanoemulsions reported by Persson and co-workers. (21) In principle, this difference may be simply related to the relatively large 20 nm PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles being more strongly adsorbed at the oil/water interface than the 7 nm charge-stabilized “hard sphere” silica nanoparticles utilized by the Swedish group. (4) However, Vermant and co-workers have just reported that using sterically stabilized “soft spheres” leads to a much greater interfacial yield stress, which is believed to account for the enhanced long-term stability observed for many emulsions (and foams). (46)

Figure 6

Figure 6. Volume-weighted cumulative distributions determined by analytical centrifugation (LUMiSizer instrument) for the n-alkane-in-water nanoemulsions: (A) after ageing for 1 week at 20 °C and (B) after ageing for 6 weeks. Note that significant evaporation of the more volatile n-octane and n-decane oils occurred within 1 week; so, no further analysis was possible in these two cases.

Table 2. Change in Mean Droplet Diameter with Ageing Time as Determined by Analytical Centrifugation (LUMiSizer) for the Four n-Alkane Pickering Nanoemulsions Reported in This Studya
   mean nanoemulsion diameter by analytical centrifugation (nm)
oil typeaqueous solubility of oil at 20 °C (mg dm–3)ρnanoemulsion (g cm–3)fresh1 week4 weeks6 weeks
n-octane0.660.77132 ± 637234 ± 1850  
n-decane0.03960.80115 ± 219258 ± 1108  
n-dodecane0.00340.81160 ± 92182 ± 156186 ± 227175 ± 335
n-tetradecane0.0003860.82145 ± 67141 ± 87146 ± 146156 ± 180
a

All nanoemulsions were prepared with 20 v/v % n-alkane using 7.0 w/w % PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles at 20 000 psi after 10 passes through a LV1 high-pressure microfluidizer. Analytical centrifugation studies of the “fresh” nanoemulsions were conducted within 24 h of microfluidization in all cases. (N.B. significant evaporation of the n-octane- and n-decane-based nanoemulsions occurred within 1 week, which meant that no further analysis could be undertaken in these two cases).

After ageing for 4–6 weeks, the n-dodecane- and n-tetradecane-based nanoemulsions gradually undergo further Ostwald ripening, albeit to a much smaller extent than that observed for the n-octane and n-decane nanoemulsions. Analytical centrifugation studies indicate that the mean droplet diameter remains almost unchanged (Table 2), but the droplet distributions become significantly broader over time, with the n-dodecane-based nanoemulsion being prone to greater coarsening (with 6% of droplets exceeding 1 μm diameter after 6 weeks) than that produced using the less water-soluble n-tetradecane. After 6 weeks ageing at 20 °C, all of the latter oil droplets remained below 1 μm diameter, with around 65% still being classified as a nanoemulsion. In principle, at least some of this droplet coarsening could be attributed to a superimposed density distribution, as discussed earlier. (36−38) However, in practice, this is likely to be a secondary effect. Overall, the Ostwald ripening observed for these Pickering nanoemulsions strongly correlate with the aqueous solubilities of the four n-alkanes used in this study. Given the bimodal size distributions observed for these Pickering nanoemulsions on ageing, it was not possible to examine whether the cube of the mean diameter for the ripening droplets depended linearly on the ageing time, as reported previously by Solans and co-workers. (47)

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In summary, a series of oil-in-water Pickering nanoemulsions have been prepared using four different n-alkanes stabilized by PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles. The Pickering nature of these nanoemulsions was confirmed by TEM studies because drying led to close-packed spherical superstructures comprising the original nanoparticles. Mean droplet diameters for the fresh nanoemulsions were determined by DLS, laser diffraction, and analytical centrifugation. Perhaps surprisingly, DLS proved to be inadequate for monitoring the Ostwald ripening of these Pickering nanoemulsions over time. This lack of sensitivity may be the result of rapid creaming of micrometer-sized droplets or it could simply reflect the relatively low upper size limit for this instrument. In contrast, laser diffraction was able to detect the growing population of larger oil droplets, but this technique suffered from relatively low resolution. Analytical centrifugation proved to be the most sensitive technique for studying droplet growth because the oil droplets are fractionated according to their size prior to detection. Time-dependent studies using the latter technique indicated that the n-octane nanoemulsions were rather unstable as expected, given the relatively high aqueous solubility of this oil (0.66 mg dm–3). These droplets coarsened significantly on ageing for 1 week at 20 °C, with larger mean droplet diameters and a much broader droplet size distribution being obtained, as confirmed by optical microscopy studies. Nanoemulsions prepared using n-decane (aqueous solubility = 0.0396 mg dm–3) also proved to be relatively unstable on ageing. In contrast, nanoemulsions prepared using either n-dodecane or n-tetradecane were significantly more stable, as expected given their much lower aqueous solubilities (0.0034 and 0.000386 mg dm–3, respectively). After ageing for 6 weeks at 20 °C, only minimal change in the mean droplet diameter was observed for these latter two oils, but significant broadening of their respective droplet size distributions was discernible. Nevertheless, 94% of n-dodecane droplets and 100% of n-tetradecane droplets remained below 1 μm diameter after this ageing period.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01835.

  • Details of the spherical micelle models used for the SAXS analysis (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Kate L. Thompson - Department of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, Dainton Building, Brook Hill, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S3 7HF, U.K. Email: [email protected]
    • Steven P. Armes - Department of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, Dainton Building, Brook Hill, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S3 7HF, U.K.Orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8289-6351 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

S.P.A. thanks the financial support from EPSRC (Fellowship grant EP/R003009/1) and also acknowledges a five-year Advanced Investigator ERC grant (PISA 320372).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 47 other publications.

  1. 1
    Pickering, S. U. CXCVI.—Emulsions. J. Chem. Soc. 1907, 91, 20012021,  DOI: 10.1039/ct9079102001
  2. 2
    Ramsden, W. Separation of solids in the surface-layers of solutions and “suspensions” (observations on surface-membranes, bubbles, emulsions, and mechanical coagulation)—Preliminary account. Proc. R. Soc. London 1903, 72, 156164,  DOI: 10.1098/rspl.1903.0034
  3. 3
    Thompson, K. L.; Fielding, L. A.; Mykhaylyk, O. O.; Lane, J. A.; Derry, M. J.; Armes, S. P. Vermicious thermo-responsive Pickering emulsifiers. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 42074214,  DOI: 10.1039/c5sc00598a
  4. 4
    Binks, B. P. Particles as surfactants - similarities and differences. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 7, 2141,  DOI: 10.1016/s1359-0294(02)00008-0
  5. 5
    Binks, B. P.; Lumsdon, S. O. Pickering emulsions stabilized by monodisperse latex particles: Effects of particle size. Langmuir 2001, 17, 45404547,  DOI: 10.1021/la0103822
  6. 6
    Binks, B. P.; Lumsdon, S. O. Stability of oil-in-water emulsions stabilised by silica particles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1999, 1, 30073016,  DOI: 10.1039/a902209k
  7. 7
    Fujii, S.; Randall, D. P.; Armes, S. P. Synthesis of polystyrene/poly2-(dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate-stat-ethylene glycol dimethacrylatel core-shell latex particles by seeded emulsion polymerization and their application as stimulus-responsive particulate emulsifiers for oil-in-water emulsions. Langmuir 2004, 20, 1132911335,  DOI: 10.1021/la048473x
  8. 8
    Kalashnikova, I.; Bizot, H.; Cathala, B.; Capron, I. New Pickering emulsions stabilized by bacterial cellulose nanocrystals. Langmuir 2011, 27, 74717479,  DOI: 10.1021/la200971f
  9. 9
    Nguyen, B. T.; Wang, W.; Saunders, B. R.; Benyahia, L.; Nicolai, T. pH-Responsive water-in-water Pickering emulsions. Langmuir 2015, 31, 36053611,  DOI: 10.1021/la5049024
  10. 10
    Nicolai, T.; Murray, B. Particle stabilized water in water emulsions. Food Hydrocolloids 2017, 68, 157163,  DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.08.036
  11. 11
    Rizzelli, S. L.; Jones, E. R.; Thompson, K. L.; Armes, S. P. Preparation of non-aqueous Pickering emulsions using anisotropic block copolymer nanoparticles. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2016, 294, 112,  DOI: 10.1007/s00396-015-3785-3
  12. 12
    Thompson, K. L.; Lane, J. A.; Derry, M. J.; Armes, S. P. Non-aqueous Isorefractive Pickering Emulsions. Langmuir 2015, 31, 43734376,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00630
  13. 13
    Fielding, L. A.; Armes, S. P. Preparation of Pickering emulsions and colloidosomes using either a glycerol-functionalised silica sol or core-shell polymer/silica nanocomposite particles. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 1123511244,  DOI: 10.1039/c2jm31433a
  14. 14
    Ikem, V. O.; Menner, A.; Bismarck, A. High-porosity macroporous polymers sythesized from titania-particle-stabilized medium and high internal phase emulsions. Langmuir 2010, 26, 88368841,  DOI: 10.1021/la9046066
  15. 15
    Cui, Y.; Threlfall, M.; van Duijneveldt, J. S. Optimizing organoclay stabilized Pickering emulsions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 356, 665671,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.046
  16. 16
    Cui, Y.; van Duijneveldt, J. S. Adsorption of polyetheramines on montmorillonite at high pH. Langmuir 2010, 26, 1721017217,  DOI: 10.1021/la103278v
  17. 17
    Cui, Y.; van Duijneveldt, J. S. Microcapsules composed of cross-linked organoclay. Langmuir 2012, 28, 17531757,  DOI: 10.1021/la2040856
  18. 18
    Williams, M.; Armes, S. P.; York, D. W. Clay-based colloidosomes. Langmuir 2012, 28, 11421148,  DOI: 10.1021/la2046405
  19. 19
    Katepalli, H.; John, V. T.; Bose, A. The response of carbon black stabilized oil-in-water emulsions to the addition of surfactant solutions. Langmuir 2013, 29, 67906797,  DOI: 10.1021/la400037c
  20. 20
    Gautier, F.; Destribats, M.; Perrier-Cornet, R.; Dechézelles, J.-F.; Giermanska, J.; Héroguez, V.; Ravaine, S.; Leal-Calderon, F.; Schmitt, V. Pickering emulsions with stimulable particles: from highly- to weakly-covered interfaces. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 64556462,  DOI: 10.1039/b710226g
  21. 21
    Persson, K. H.; Blute, I. A.; Mira, I. C.; Gustafsson, J. Creation of well-defined particle stabilized oil-in-water nanoemulsions. Colloids Surf., A 2014, 459, 4857,  DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.06.034
  22. 22
    Sihler, S.; Schrade, A.; Cao, Z.; Ziener, U. Inverse Pickering emulsions with droplet sizes below 500 nm. Langmuir 2015, 31, 1039210401,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02735
  23. 23
    Sacanna, S.; Kegel, W. K.; Philipse, A. P. Thermodynamically stable Pickering emulsions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98, 158301,  DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.98.158301
  24. 24
    Solans, C.; Izquierdo, P.; Nolla, J.; Azemar, N.; Garcia-Celma, M. J. Nano-emulsions. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 10, 102110,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cocis.2005.06.004
  25. 25
    Sonneville-Aubrun, O.; Simonnet, J.-T.; L’Alloret, F. Nanoemulsions: a new vehicle for skincare products. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 108, 145149,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2003.10.026
  26. 26
    Rapoport, N. Y.; Kennedy, A. M.; Shea, J. E.; Scaife, C. L.; Nam, K.-H. Controlled and targeted tumor chemotherapy by ultrasound-activated nanoemulsions/microbubbles. J. Controlled Release 2009, 138, 268276,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.05.026
  27. 27
    McClements, D. J.; Rao, J. Food-grade nanoemulsions: Formulation, fabrication, properties, performance, biological fate, and potential toxicity. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 51, 285330,  DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2011.559558
  28. 28
    Du, Z.; Wang, C.; Tai, X.; Wang, G.; Liu, X. Optimization and characterization of biocompatible oil-in-water nanoemulsion for pesticide delivery. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 983991,  DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01058
  29. 29
    Teo, A.; Goh, K. K. T.; Wen, J.; Oey, I.; Ko, S.; Kwak, H.-S.; Lee, S. J. Physicochemical properties of whey protein, lactoferrin and Tween 20 stabilised nanoemulsions: Effect of temperature, pH and salt. Food Chem. 2016, 197, 297306,  DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.086
  30. 30
    Wooster, T. J.; Golding, M.; Sanguansri, P. Impact of oil type on nanoemulsion formation and ostwald ripening stability. Langmuir 2008, 24, 1275812765,  DOI: 10.1021/la801685v
  31. 31
    Gutiérrez, J. M.; González, C.; Maestro, A.; Solé, I.; Pey, C. M.; Nolla, J. Nano-emulsions: New applications and optimization of their preparation. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 13, 245251,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cocis.2008.01.005
  32. 32
    Kentish, S.; Wooster, T. J.; Ashokkumar, A.; Balachandran, S.; Mawson, R.; Simons, L. The use of ultrasonics for nanoemulsion preparation. Innovat. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2008, 9, 170175,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2007.07.005
  33. 33
    Jiménez Saelices, C.; Capron, I. Design of Pickering micro and nanoemulsions based on the structural characteristics of nanocelluloses. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19, 460,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b01564
  34. 34
    Thompson, K. L.; Cinotti, N.; Jones, E. R.; Mable, C. J.; Fowler, P. W.; Armes, S. P. Bespoke diblock copolymer nanoparticles enable the production of relatively stable oil-in-water Pickering nanoemulsions. Langmuir 2017, 33, 1261612623,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02267
  35. 35

    This overall diameter of 220 nm necessarily includes the thickness of the adsorbed PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticle layer. If this contribution is subtracted from the overall droplet diameter, the mean diameter for the underlying “naked” oil droplet is less than 200 nm, which meets the criterion for a nanoemulsion according to the literature (see ref (24)).

  36. 36
    Akpinar, B.; Fielding, L. A.; Cunningham, V. J.; Ning, Y.; Mykhaylyk, O. O.; Fowler, P. W.; Armes, S. P. Determining the effective density and stabilizer layer thickness of sterically stabilized nanoparticles. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 51605171,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b00987
  37. 37
    Fielding, L. A.; Mykhaylyk, O. O.; Armes, S. P.; Fowler, P. W.; Mittal, V.; Fitzpatrick, S. Correcting for a density distribution: Particle size analysis of core–shell nanocomposite particles using disk centrifuge photosedimentometry. Langmuir 2012, 28, 25362544,  DOI: 10.1021/la204841n
  38. 38

    For the present nanoemulsion system, the core comprises a low-density oil and the shell is composed of high-density nanoparticles. However, in this particular case the overall droplet density is less than that of the continuous phase, so centrifugation leads to creaming rather than sedimentation. Thus artefactual broadening of the droplet size distribution is anticipated, rather than artefactual narrowing.

  39. 39
    Ilavsky, J.; Jemian, P. R. Irena: tool suite for modeling and analysis of small-angle scattering. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 347353,  DOI: 10.1107/s0021889809002222
  40. 40
    McAuliffe, C. Solubility in water of C1-C9 hydrocarbons. Nature 1963, 200, 1092,  DOI: 10.1038/2001092a0
  41. 41
    Taylor, P. Ostwald ripening in emulsions: estimation of solution thermodynamics of the disperse phase. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 106, 261285,  DOI: 10.1016/s0001-8686(03)00113-1
  42. 42
    Binks, B. P.; Cho, W.-G.; Fletcher, P. D. I.; Petsev, D. N. Stability of oil-in-water emulsions in a low interfacial tension system. Langmuir 2000, 16, 10251034,  DOI: 10.1021/la990952m
  43. 43
    Binks, B. P.; Clint, J. H.; Fletcher, P. D. I.; Rippon, S.; Lubetkin, S. D.; Mulqueen, P. J. Kinetics of swelling of oil-in-water emulsions. Langmuir 1998, 14, 54025411,  DOI: 10.1021/la980522g
  44. 44
    Binks, B. P.; Clint, J. H.; Fletcher, P. D. I.; Rippon, S.; Lubetkin, S. D.; Mulqueen, P. J. Kinetics of swelling of oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by different surfactants. Langmuir 1999, 15, 44954501,  DOI: 10.1021/la990054q
  45. 45
    Walter, J.; Thajudeen, T.; Süβ, S.; Segets, D.; Peukert, W. New possibilities of accurate particle characterisation by applying direct boundary models to analytical centrifugation. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 65746587,  DOI: 10.1039/c5nr00995b
  46. 46
    Beltramo, P. J.; Gupta, M.; Alicke, A.; Liascukiene, I.; Gunes, D. Z.; Baroud, C. N.; Vermant, J. Arresting dissolution by interfacial rheology design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2017, 114, 10373,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1705181114
  47. 47
    Izquierdo, P.; Esquena, J.; Tadros, T. F.; Dederen, C.; Garcia, M. J.; Azemar, N.; Solans, C. Formation and stability of nano-emulsions prepared using the phase inversion temperature method. Langmuir 2002, 18, 2630,  DOI: 10.1021/la010808c

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 59 publications.

  1. Saul J. Hunter, Priyanka Chohan, Spyridon Varlas, Steven P. Armes. Effect of Temperature, Oil Type, and Copolymer Concentration on the Long-Term Stability of Oil-in-Water Pickering Nanoemulsions Prepared Using Diblock Copolymer Nanoparticles. Langmuir 2024, 40 (7) , 3702-3714. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c03423
  2. Yanlin Guo, Xinpeng Zhang, Xiaohan Wang, Li Zhang, Zhenghe Xu, Dejun Sun. Nanoemulsions Stable against Ostwald Ripening. Langmuir 2024, 40 (2) , 1364-1372. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c03019
  3. Shuaib A. Mubarak, Yunsang Kim, Islam Elsayed, El Barbary Hassan. Cellulose Nanofibril Stabilized Pickering Emulsion Templated Aerogel with High Oil Absorption Capacity. ACS Omega 2023, 8 (40) , 36856-36867. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03871
  4. Saul J. Hunter, Steven P. Armes. Sterically Stabilized Diblock Copolymer Nanoparticles Enable Efficient Preparation of Non-Aqueous Pickering Nanoemulsions. Langmuir 2023, 39 (21) , 7361-7370. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00464
  5. Boxin Ding, Seyedeh Hannaneh Ahmadi, Petro Babak, Steven L. Bryant, Apostolos Kantzas. On the Stability of Pickering and Classical Nanoemulsions: Theory and Experiments. Langmuir 2023, 39 (20) , 6975-6991. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00133
  6. Ahmed Wasel Alsmaeil, Antonios Kouloumpis, Georgia Potsi, Mohamed Amen Hammami, Mazen Yousef Kanj, Emmanuel P. Giannelis. Probing the Interfacial Properties of Oil–Water Interfaces Decorated with Ionizable, pH Responsive Silica Nanoparticles. Langmuir 2023, 39 (8) , 3118-3130. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c03286
  7. Saul J. Hunter, Steven P. Armes. Long-Term Stability of Pickering Nanoemulsions Prepared Using Diblock Copolymer Nanoparticles: Effect of Nanoparticle Core Crosslinking, Oil Type, and the Role Played by Excess Copolymers. Langmuir 2022, 38 (26) , 8021-8029. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c00821
  8. Csilla György, Chloe Verity, Thomas J. Neal, Matthew J. Rymaruk, Erik J. Cornel, Timothy Smith, David J. Growney, Steven P. Armes. RAFT Dispersion Polymerization of Methyl Methacrylate in Mineral Oil: High Glass Transition Temperature of the Core-Forming Block Constrains the Evolution of Copolymer Morphology. Macromolecules 2021, 54 (20) , 9496-9509. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01528
  9. Yong Gao, Zhe Xiang, Xi Zhao, Guoxiang Wang, Chenze Qi. Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Diblock Copolymer Worms Prepared via Reversible Addition–Fragmentation Chain Transfer Aqueous Dispersion Polymerization: How Does the Stimulus Sensitivity Affect the Rate of Demulsification?. Langmuir 2021, 37 (40) , 11695-11706. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c01609
  10. Tahir Mehmood, Anwaar Ahmed, Zaheer Ahmed. Food-Grade Nanoemulsions for the Effective Delivery of β-Carotene. Langmuir 2021, 37 (10) , 3086-3092. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03399
  11. Csilla György, Matthew J. Derry, Erik J. Cornel, Steven P. Armes. Synthesis of Highly Transparent Diblock Copolymer Vesicles via RAFT Dispersion Polymerization of 2,2,2-Trifluoroethyl Methacrylate in n-Alkanes. Macromolecules 2021, 54 (3) , 1159-1169. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.0c02646
  12. Saul J. Hunter, Steven P. Armes. Pickering Emulsifiers Based on Block Copolymer Nanoparticles Prepared by Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly. Langmuir 2020, 36 (51) , 15463-15484. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02595
  13. Saul J. Hunter, Erik J. Cornel, Oleksandr O. Mykhaylyk, Steven P. Armes. Effect of Salt on the Formation and Stability of Water-in-Oil Pickering Nanoemulsions Stabilized by Diblock Copolymer Nanoparticles. Langmuir 2020, 36 (51) , 15523-15535. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02742
  14. Bryony R. Parker, Matthew J. Derry, Yin Ning, Steven P. Armes. Exploring the Upper Size Limit for Sterically Stabilized Diblock Copolymer Nanoparticles Prepared by Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly in Non-Polar Media. Langmuir 2020, 36 (14) , 3730-3736. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00211
  15. Tahir Mehmood, Anwaar Ahmed. Tween 80 and Soya-Lecithin-Based Food-Grade Nanoemulsions for the Effective Delivery of Vitamin D. Langmuir 2020, 36 (11) , 2886-2892. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b03944
  16. Saul J. Hunter, Nicholas J. W. Penfold, Derek H. Chan, Oleksandr O. Mykhaylyk, Steven P. Armes. How Do Charged End-Groups on the Steric Stabilizer Block Influence the Formation and Long-Term Stability of Pickering Nanoemulsions Prepared Using Sterically Stabilized Diblock Copolymer Nanoparticles?. Langmuir 2020, 36 (3) , 769-780. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b03389
  17. Zhenya Du, Qing Li, Junguang Li, Enyi Su, Xiao Liu, Zhili Wan, Xiaoquan Yang. Self-Assembled Egg Yolk Peptide Micellar Nanoparticles as a Versatile Emulsifier for Food-Grade Oil-in-Water Pickering Nanoemulsions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2019, 67 (42) , 11728-11740. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b04595
  18. Gieberth Rodriguez-Lopez, Yhan O’Neil Williams, Jhoan Toro-Mendoza. Individual and Collective Behavior of Emulsion Droplets Undergoing Ostwald Ripening. Langmuir 2019, 35 (15) , 5316-5323. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03959
  19. Saul J. Hunter, Csilla György. Sub-micron colloidosomes with tuneable cargo release prepared using epoxy-functional diblock copolymer nanoparticles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2024, 675 , 999-1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2024.07.084
  20. Karin Schroën, Xuefeng Shen, Fathinah Islami Hasyyati, Siddharth Deshpande, Jasper van der Gucht. From theoretical aspects to practical food Pickering emulsions: Formation, stabilization, and complexities linked to the use of colloidal food particles. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 2024, 334 , 103321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2024.103321
  21. Yao Wang, Peng Zhang, Haowen Lin, Xiaoyun Fei, Guowen Zhang, Xing Hu. Pickering emulsions stabilized by β-Lactoglobulin-Rosmarinic acid-Pectin nanoparticles: Influence of interfacial behavior and rheology performance. Food Hydrocolloids 2024, 154 , 110084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.110084
  22. Boxin Ding, Apostolos Kantzas, Abbas Firoozabadi. Spatiotemporal X-Ray Imaging of Neat and Viscosified CO2 in Displacement of Brine-Saturated Porous Media. SPE Journal 2024, 29 (08) , 4426-4441. https://doi.org/10.2118/214842-PA
  23. Anna P. Constantinou, Birsen Somuncuoğlu, Theoni K. Georgiou. An environmentally friendly synergistic stabilization of emulsions using an ABC macrosurfactant and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. Journal of Polymer Science 2024, 62 (12) , 2728-2743. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.20240063
  24. Noriko Kanai, Scott A. Willis, Izuru Kawamura, William S. Price. Droplet size distribution of oil-in-water Pickering emulsions stabilized by cellulose nanofibers using restricted diffusion NMR. Journal of Molecular Liquids 2024, 403 , 124793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2024.124793
  25. Seunghan Yun, Geon Woong Kim, Jihui Jang, Jun Bae Lee, So Youn Kim. Ensuring long-term stability and size control of nanoemulsion via post-microfluidization dilution toward energy saving scale-up process. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2024, 691 , 133845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.133845
  26. Ansar Abbas, Sameer Hussain, Muhammad Asad, Asma Khatoon, Ali Raza, Silong Xu. Pickering emulsion-derived nano/microreactors for unconventional interfacial catalysis: state-of-the-art advances and perspectives in green reactions. Green Chemistry 2024, 26 (6) , 3039-3057. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3GC02512H
  27. Marco Rehosek, Michaela Laupheimer, Frank Marlow. Demixing behavior of Pickering emulsions stabilized by Janus particles and uniform Pickering particles at different pH values. Colloid and Polymer Science 2024, 302 (2) , 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-023-05196-w
  28. Saul J. Hunter, Mahmoud H. Abu Elella, Edwin C. Johnson, Laura Taramova, Emma E. Brotherton, Steven P. Armes, Vitaliy V. Khutoryanskiy, Mark J. Smallridge. Mucoadhesive pickering nanoemulsions via dynamic covalent chemistry. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2023, 651 , 334-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.07.162
  29. Csilla György, Steven P. Armes. Recent Advances in Polymerization‐Induced Self‐Assembly (PISA) Syntheses in Non‐Polar Media. Angewandte Chemie 2023, 135 (42) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202308372
  30. Csilla György, Steven P. Armes. Recent Advances in Polymerization‐Induced Self‐Assembly (PISA) Syntheses in Non‐Polar Media. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2023, 62 (42) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202308372
  31. Tamara Carvalho, Marcela Guimarães Landim, Maria Letícia Duarte Lima, Cíntia Bittar, Beatriz Carvalho de Araújo Oliveira Faria, Paula Rahal, Milena Campelo Freitas de Lima, Valdir Florêncio da Veiga Junior, Graziella Anselmo Joanitti, Marilia Freitas Calmon, . Synthesis of copaiba (Copaifera officinalis) oil nanoemulsion and the potential against Zika virus: An in vitro study. PLOS ONE 2023, 18 (9) , e0283817. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283817
  32. Jatin Rathee, Sakshi Malhotra, Manisha Pandey, Neha Jain, Shreya Kaul, Gaurav Gupta, Upendra Nagaich. Recent Update on Nanoemulsion Impregnated Hydrogel: a Gleam into the Revolutionary Strategy for Diffusion-Controlled Delivery of Therapeutics. AAPS PharmSciTech 2023, 24 (6) https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-023-02611-x
  33. Jianwei Zhou, Meimei Guo, Yu Qin, Wenjun Wang, Ruiling Lv, Enbo Xu, Tian Ding, Donghong Liu, Zhengzong Wu. Advances in Starch Nanoparticle for Emulsion Stabilization. Foods 2023, 12 (12) , 2425. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12122425
  34. Seyedeh Hannaneh Ahmadi, Boxin Ding, Steven L. Bryant, Apostolos Kantzas. Synthesis and Characterization of Magnetic Nanodroplets for Flowback Analysis in Fractured Reservoirs. 2023https://doi.org/10.2118/212722-MS
  35. Zhixiang Cai, Yue Wei, Aimin Shi, Jian Zhong, Pingfan Rao, Qiang Wang, Hongbin Zhang. Correlation between interfacial layer properties and physical stability of food emulsions: current trends, challenges, strategies, and further perspectives. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 2023, 313 , 102863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2023.102863
  36. Sitong Ge, Rui Jia, Wei Liu, Jiahan Xie, Meihong Liu, Dan Cai, Mingzhu Zheng, Huimin Liu, Jingsheng Liu. Lipid oxidation and in vitro digestion of pickering emulsion based on zein-adzuki bean seed coat polyphenol covalent crosslinking nanoparticles. Food Chemistry 2022, 386 , 132513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132513
  37. Alexander B. Cook, Michele Schlich, Purnima N. Manghnani, Thomas L. Moore, Paolo Decuzzi, Anna Lisa Palange. Size effects of discoidal PLGA nanoconstructs in Pickering emulsion stabilization. Journal of Polymer Science 2022, 60 (9) , 1480-1491. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.20210748
  38. Marina Yurievna Koroleva, Evgeny Vasil'evich Yurtov. Pickering emulsions: structure, properties and the use as colloidosomes and stimuli-sensitive emulsions. Russian Chemical Reviews 2022, 91 (5) https://doi.org/10.1070/RCR5024
  39. Chao Lin, Pengju Pan, Guorong Shan, Miao Du. Microstructurally tunable pickering emulsions stabilized by poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(ε-caprolactone) diblock biodegradable copolymer micelles with predesigned polymer architecture. Food Chemistry 2022, 374 , 131827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131827
  40. Fanny Coumes, François Stoffelbach, Jutta Rieger. Polymerization‐Induced Self‐Assembly: From Macromolecular Engineering Toward Applications. 2022, 1-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527815562.mme0037
  41. Manali Nandy, B.B. Lahiri, John Philip. Inter-droplet force between magnetically polarizable Pickering oil-in-water nanoemulsions stabilized with γ-Al2O3 nanoparticles: Role of electrostatic and electric dipolar interactions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2022, 607 , 1671-1686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2021.09.025
  42. P. Karthik, A. Saravana Raj, J. Pavithra. Natural compound-based interfacial stabilization of nanoemulsions. 2022, 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-89846-1.00014-0
  43. Gaëlle Gauthier, Isabelle Capron. Pickering nanoemulsions: An overview of manufacturing processes, formulations, and applications. JCIS Open 2021, 4 , 100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jciso.2021.100036
  44. Yuri Reyes, Shaghayegh Hamzehlou, Jose Ramon Leiza. Ostwald ripening in nano/miniemulsions in the presence of two costabilizers as revealed by molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Molecular Liquids 2021, 335 , 116152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116152
  45. Heba S. Elsewedy, Bandar E. Al-Dhubiab, Mahmoud A. Mahdy, Hanan M. Elnahas. Basic Concepts of Nanoemulsion and its Potential application in Pharmaceutical, Cosmeceutical and Nutraceutical fields. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2021, , 3938-3946. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00684
  46. Nozomi Higashide, Nobuyuki Matsuda, Kazumitsu Naoe, Masanao Imai. Application of food-grade magnesium stearate microparticles as stabilizer in preparation of biocompatible Pickering emulsions. Chemical Papers 2021, 75 (4) , 1639-1648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-020-01428-3
  47. Marina Yu. Koroleva, Evgeny V. Yurtov. Ostwald ripening in macro- and nanoemulsions. Russian Chemical Reviews 2021, 90 (3) , 293-323. https://doi.org/10.1070/RCR4962
  48. Kunal Kadiya, Supratim Ghosh. Analytical photo-centrifuge-based prediction of shelf-life and droplet packing behaviour of nanoemulsions upon removal of excess micelles. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2021, 612 , 125869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125869
  49. Francesca Ravera, Katarzyna Dziza, Eva Santini, Luigi Cristofolini, Libero Liggieri. Emulsification and emulsion stability: The role of the interfacial properties. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 2021, 288 , 102344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2020.102344
  50. Xianghui Li, Zhiqiang Zhang, Zhenhuan Guo, Li Zhao, Yonglu Liu, Xia Ma, Qigai He. Macrophage immunomodulatory activity of Acanthopanax senticousus polysaccharide nanoemulsion via activation of P65/JNK/ikkαsignaling pathway and regulation of Th1/Th2 Cytokines. PeerJ 2021, 9 , e12575. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12575
  51. Hongjie Dai, Yuan Li, Liang Ma, Yong Yu, Hankun Zhu, Hongxia Wang, Tingwei Liu, Xin Feng, Mi Tang, Weijie Hu, Yuhao Zhang. Fabrication of cross-linked β-lactoglobulin nanoparticles as effective stabilizers for Pickering high internal phase emulsions. Food Hydrocolloids 2020, 109 , 106151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106151
  52. Omar Sarheed, Douha Shouqair, KVRNS Ramesh, Muhammad Amin, Joshua Boateng, Markus Drechsler. Physicochemical Characteristics and In Vitro Permeation of Loratadine Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Transdermal Delivery. Therapeutic Delivery 2020, 11 (11) , 685-700. https://doi.org/10.4155/tde-2020-0075
  53. Mahammad Anas, Somdeb Jana, Tarun K. Mandal. Vesicular assemblies of thermoresponsive amphiphilic polypeptide copolymers for guest encapsulation and release. Polymer Chemistry 2020, 11 (16) , 2889-2903. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0PY00135J
  54. Danae Gonzalez Ortiz, Celine Pochat-Bohatier, Julien Cambedouzou, Mikhael Bechelany, Philippe Miele. Current Trends in Pickering Emulsions: Particle Morphology and Applications. Engineering 2020, 6 (4) , 468-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.08.017
  55. Liang Ee Low, Sangeetaprivya P. Siva, Yong Kuen Ho, Eng Seng Chan, Beng Ti Tey. Recent advances of characterization techniques for the formation, physical properties and stability of Pickering emulsion. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 2020, 277 , 102117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2020.102117
  56. Nurudeen Yekeen, Eswaran Padmanabhan, Asad Hassan Syed, Thenesh Sevoo, Kamalarasan Kanesen. Synergistic influence of nanoparticles and surfactants on interfacial tension reduction, wettability alteration and stabilization of oil-in-water emulsion. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 2020, 186 , 106779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106779
  57. Qingqing Liu, He Huang, Honghong Chen, Junfan Lin, Qin Wang. Food-Grade Nanoemulsions: Preparation, Stability and Application in Encapsulation of Bioactive Compounds. Molecules 2019, 24 (23) , 4242. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234242
  58. Katharina Nieswandt, Prokopios Georgopanos, Clarissa Abetz, Volkan Filiz, Volker Abetz. Synthesis of Poly(3-vinylpyridine)-Block-Polystyrene Diblock Copolymers via Surfactant-Free RAFT Emulsion Polymerization. Materials 2019, 12 (19) , 3145. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12193145
  59. D. Knoth, R. W. Eckert, S. F. Hartmann, C. M. Keck. Characterization of Nanoparticles in Dermal Formulations. 2019, 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16573-4_10

Langmuir

Cite this: Langmuir 2018, 34, 31, 9289–9297
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01835
Published July 12, 2018

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Article Views

2941

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Schematic Representation of the Adsorption of PGMA48–PTFEMA50 Nanoparticles at the n-Alkane/Water Interfacea

    aIt is assumed that (i) the nanoparticles are adsorbed with an effective contact angle of 0° and (ii) PGMA48 stabilizer chains in direct contact with the n-alkane/water interface are fully collapsed and hence do not contribute to the adsorbed nanoparticle radius. Thus, given that the effective thickness of the adsorbed sterically stabilized nanoparticles is given by 2Rs + 2Rg (rather than 2Rs + 4Rg), the approximate effective sphere radius, rparticle, of the adsorbed nanoparticles is given by rparticle = Rs + Rg or 8.4 nm. Experimental values for Rs and Rg were obtained from SAXS analysis of the PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles prior to emulsification, see the main text.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (A) Synthesis of PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles via RAFT aqueous emulsion polymerization of TFEMA at 70 °C using a PGMA48 macro-CTA; (B) TEM image of the resulting sterically stabilized PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles; (C) particle size distribution determined by DLS; (D) SAXS pattern recorded for a 1.0 w/w % aqueous dispersion of the PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles (solid red line represents the data fit obtained using a spherical micelle model, which reports a volume-average diameter of 20 ± 1 nm).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Schematic representation of the two-step preparation of Pickering nanoemulsions. First, a 7.0 w/v % aqueous dispersion of PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles were homogenized with one of four n-alkanes to form an oil-in-water Pickering macroemulsion of around 40–50 μm diameter using conventional high-shear homogenization at 15 500 rpm for 2 min at 20 °C. This relatively coarse precursor emulsion was then refined via 10 passes through the LV1 microfluidizer at 20 000 psi to obtain the final Pickering nanoemulsion.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Representative TEM images obtained for freshly prepared Pickering nanoemulsions prepared via high-pressure microfluidization using 7.0 w/w % PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles and 20 v/v % n-alkane. Conditions: applied pressure = 20 000 psi for 10 passes using an LV1 microfluidizer.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (A) Effect of droplet concentration on apparent droplet diameter for an n-dodecane-in-water Pickering nanoemulsion as determined by analytical centrifugation (LUMiSizer instrument). This hindrance function indicates that the optimum droplet concentration for such analyses is approximately 1.0 v/v %, with higher concentrations leading to hindered creaming and hence artefactual undersizing. (B) Droplet size distributions determined by analytical centrifugation using an effective nanoemulsion droplet density of 0.81 g cm–3 at either 10 or 1.0 v/v % n-dodecane. As a result of these initial studies, all further LUMiSizer analyses were conducted at a droplet concentration of 1.0 v/v % n-alkane.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Various particle sizing techniques used to characterize a freshly-made and 1-week-old 20 v/v % n-octane-in-water Pickering nanoemulsion prepared using 7.0 w/w % PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticles at 20 000 psi with 10 passes. (A) Laser diffraction, (B) DLS, (C) analytical centrifugation (LUMiSizer, ρnanoemulsion = 0.77 g cm–3), and (D) optical microscopy (no oil droplets were observed by optical microscopy for any of the freshly-made Pickering nanoemulsions reported in this study, but micrometer-sized oil droplets were clearly discernible within 1 week of ageing the n-octane-based Pickering nanoemulsion). Perhaps surprisingly, DLS seemed to be relatively insensitive to the larger oil droplets present within the 1-week-old Pickering nanoemulsion, whereas this coarse fraction was readily detected by laser diffraction and analytical centrifugation.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Volume-weighted cumulative distributions determined by analytical centrifugation (LUMiSizer instrument) for the n-alkane-in-water nanoemulsions: (A) after ageing for 1 week at 20 °C and (B) after ageing for 6 weeks. Note that significant evaporation of the more volatile n-octane and n-decane oils occurred within 1 week; so, no further analysis was possible in these two cases.

  • References


    This article references 47 other publications.

    1. 1
      Pickering, S. U. CXCVI.—Emulsions. J. Chem. Soc. 1907, 91, 20012021,  DOI: 10.1039/ct9079102001
    2. 2
      Ramsden, W. Separation of solids in the surface-layers of solutions and “suspensions” (observations on surface-membranes, bubbles, emulsions, and mechanical coagulation)—Preliminary account. Proc. R. Soc. London 1903, 72, 156164,  DOI: 10.1098/rspl.1903.0034
    3. 3
      Thompson, K. L.; Fielding, L. A.; Mykhaylyk, O. O.; Lane, J. A.; Derry, M. J.; Armes, S. P. Vermicious thermo-responsive Pickering emulsifiers. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 42074214,  DOI: 10.1039/c5sc00598a
    4. 4
      Binks, B. P. Particles as surfactants - similarities and differences. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 7, 2141,  DOI: 10.1016/s1359-0294(02)00008-0
    5. 5
      Binks, B. P.; Lumsdon, S. O. Pickering emulsions stabilized by monodisperse latex particles: Effects of particle size. Langmuir 2001, 17, 45404547,  DOI: 10.1021/la0103822
    6. 6
      Binks, B. P.; Lumsdon, S. O. Stability of oil-in-water emulsions stabilised by silica particles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1999, 1, 30073016,  DOI: 10.1039/a902209k
    7. 7
      Fujii, S.; Randall, D. P.; Armes, S. P. Synthesis of polystyrene/poly2-(dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate-stat-ethylene glycol dimethacrylatel core-shell latex particles by seeded emulsion polymerization and their application as stimulus-responsive particulate emulsifiers for oil-in-water emulsions. Langmuir 2004, 20, 1132911335,  DOI: 10.1021/la048473x
    8. 8
      Kalashnikova, I.; Bizot, H.; Cathala, B.; Capron, I. New Pickering emulsions stabilized by bacterial cellulose nanocrystals. Langmuir 2011, 27, 74717479,  DOI: 10.1021/la200971f
    9. 9
      Nguyen, B. T.; Wang, W.; Saunders, B. R.; Benyahia, L.; Nicolai, T. pH-Responsive water-in-water Pickering emulsions. Langmuir 2015, 31, 36053611,  DOI: 10.1021/la5049024
    10. 10
      Nicolai, T.; Murray, B. Particle stabilized water in water emulsions. Food Hydrocolloids 2017, 68, 157163,  DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.08.036
    11. 11
      Rizzelli, S. L.; Jones, E. R.; Thompson, K. L.; Armes, S. P. Preparation of non-aqueous Pickering emulsions using anisotropic block copolymer nanoparticles. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2016, 294, 112,  DOI: 10.1007/s00396-015-3785-3
    12. 12
      Thompson, K. L.; Lane, J. A.; Derry, M. J.; Armes, S. P. Non-aqueous Isorefractive Pickering Emulsions. Langmuir 2015, 31, 43734376,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00630
    13. 13
      Fielding, L. A.; Armes, S. P. Preparation of Pickering emulsions and colloidosomes using either a glycerol-functionalised silica sol or core-shell polymer/silica nanocomposite particles. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 1123511244,  DOI: 10.1039/c2jm31433a
    14. 14
      Ikem, V. O.; Menner, A.; Bismarck, A. High-porosity macroporous polymers sythesized from titania-particle-stabilized medium and high internal phase emulsions. Langmuir 2010, 26, 88368841,  DOI: 10.1021/la9046066
    15. 15
      Cui, Y.; Threlfall, M.; van Duijneveldt, J. S. Optimizing organoclay stabilized Pickering emulsions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 356, 665671,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.046
    16. 16
      Cui, Y.; van Duijneveldt, J. S. Adsorption of polyetheramines on montmorillonite at high pH. Langmuir 2010, 26, 1721017217,  DOI: 10.1021/la103278v
    17. 17
      Cui, Y.; van Duijneveldt, J. S. Microcapsules composed of cross-linked organoclay. Langmuir 2012, 28, 17531757,  DOI: 10.1021/la2040856
    18. 18
      Williams, M.; Armes, S. P.; York, D. W. Clay-based colloidosomes. Langmuir 2012, 28, 11421148,  DOI: 10.1021/la2046405
    19. 19
      Katepalli, H.; John, V. T.; Bose, A. The response of carbon black stabilized oil-in-water emulsions to the addition of surfactant solutions. Langmuir 2013, 29, 67906797,  DOI: 10.1021/la400037c
    20. 20
      Gautier, F.; Destribats, M.; Perrier-Cornet, R.; Dechézelles, J.-F.; Giermanska, J.; Héroguez, V.; Ravaine, S.; Leal-Calderon, F.; Schmitt, V. Pickering emulsions with stimulable particles: from highly- to weakly-covered interfaces. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 64556462,  DOI: 10.1039/b710226g
    21. 21
      Persson, K. H.; Blute, I. A.; Mira, I. C.; Gustafsson, J. Creation of well-defined particle stabilized oil-in-water nanoemulsions. Colloids Surf., A 2014, 459, 4857,  DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.06.034
    22. 22
      Sihler, S.; Schrade, A.; Cao, Z.; Ziener, U. Inverse Pickering emulsions with droplet sizes below 500 nm. Langmuir 2015, 31, 1039210401,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02735
    23. 23
      Sacanna, S.; Kegel, W. K.; Philipse, A. P. Thermodynamically stable Pickering emulsions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98, 158301,  DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.98.158301
    24. 24
      Solans, C.; Izquierdo, P.; Nolla, J.; Azemar, N.; Garcia-Celma, M. J. Nano-emulsions. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 10, 102110,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cocis.2005.06.004
    25. 25
      Sonneville-Aubrun, O.; Simonnet, J.-T.; L’Alloret, F. Nanoemulsions: a new vehicle for skincare products. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 108, 145149,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2003.10.026
    26. 26
      Rapoport, N. Y.; Kennedy, A. M.; Shea, J. E.; Scaife, C. L.; Nam, K.-H. Controlled and targeted tumor chemotherapy by ultrasound-activated nanoemulsions/microbubbles. J. Controlled Release 2009, 138, 268276,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.05.026
    27. 27
      McClements, D. J.; Rao, J. Food-grade nanoemulsions: Formulation, fabrication, properties, performance, biological fate, and potential toxicity. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 51, 285330,  DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2011.559558
    28. 28
      Du, Z.; Wang, C.; Tai, X.; Wang, G.; Liu, X. Optimization and characterization of biocompatible oil-in-water nanoemulsion for pesticide delivery. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 983991,  DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01058
    29. 29
      Teo, A.; Goh, K. K. T.; Wen, J.; Oey, I.; Ko, S.; Kwak, H.-S.; Lee, S. J. Physicochemical properties of whey protein, lactoferrin and Tween 20 stabilised nanoemulsions: Effect of temperature, pH and salt. Food Chem. 2016, 197, 297306,  DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.086
    30. 30
      Wooster, T. J.; Golding, M.; Sanguansri, P. Impact of oil type on nanoemulsion formation and ostwald ripening stability. Langmuir 2008, 24, 1275812765,  DOI: 10.1021/la801685v
    31. 31
      Gutiérrez, J. M.; González, C.; Maestro, A.; Solé, I.; Pey, C. M.; Nolla, J. Nano-emulsions: New applications and optimization of their preparation. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 13, 245251,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cocis.2008.01.005
    32. 32
      Kentish, S.; Wooster, T. J.; Ashokkumar, A.; Balachandran, S.; Mawson, R.; Simons, L. The use of ultrasonics for nanoemulsion preparation. Innovat. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2008, 9, 170175,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2007.07.005
    33. 33
      Jiménez Saelices, C.; Capron, I. Design of Pickering micro and nanoemulsions based on the structural characteristics of nanocelluloses. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19, 460,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b01564
    34. 34
      Thompson, K. L.; Cinotti, N.; Jones, E. R.; Mable, C. J.; Fowler, P. W.; Armes, S. P. Bespoke diblock copolymer nanoparticles enable the production of relatively stable oil-in-water Pickering nanoemulsions. Langmuir 2017, 33, 1261612623,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02267
    35. 35

      This overall diameter of 220 nm necessarily includes the thickness of the adsorbed PGMA48–PTFEMA50 nanoparticle layer. If this contribution is subtracted from the overall droplet diameter, the mean diameter for the underlying “naked” oil droplet is less than 200 nm, which meets the criterion for a nanoemulsion according to the literature (see ref (24)).

    36. 36
      Akpinar, B.; Fielding, L. A.; Cunningham, V. J.; Ning, Y.; Mykhaylyk, O. O.; Fowler, P. W.; Armes, S. P. Determining the effective density and stabilizer layer thickness of sterically stabilized nanoparticles. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 51605171,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b00987
    37. 37
      Fielding, L. A.; Mykhaylyk, O. O.; Armes, S. P.; Fowler, P. W.; Mittal, V.; Fitzpatrick, S. Correcting for a density distribution: Particle size analysis of core–shell nanocomposite particles using disk centrifuge photosedimentometry. Langmuir 2012, 28, 25362544,  DOI: 10.1021/la204841n
    38. 38

      For the present nanoemulsion system, the core comprises a low-density oil and the shell is composed of high-density nanoparticles. However, in this particular case the overall droplet density is less than that of the continuous phase, so centrifugation leads to creaming rather than sedimentation. Thus artefactual broadening of the droplet size distribution is anticipated, rather than artefactual narrowing.

    39. 39
      Ilavsky, J.; Jemian, P. R. Irena: tool suite for modeling and analysis of small-angle scattering. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 347353,  DOI: 10.1107/s0021889809002222
    40. 40
      McAuliffe, C. Solubility in water of C1-C9 hydrocarbons. Nature 1963, 200, 1092,  DOI: 10.1038/2001092a0
    41. 41
      Taylor, P. Ostwald ripening in emulsions: estimation of solution thermodynamics of the disperse phase. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 106, 261285,  DOI: 10.1016/s0001-8686(03)00113-1
    42. 42
      Binks, B. P.; Cho, W.-G.; Fletcher, P. D. I.; Petsev, D. N. Stability of oil-in-water emulsions in a low interfacial tension system. Langmuir 2000, 16, 10251034,  DOI: 10.1021/la990952m
    43. 43
      Binks, B. P.; Clint, J. H.; Fletcher, P. D. I.; Rippon, S.; Lubetkin, S. D.; Mulqueen, P. J. Kinetics of swelling of oil-in-water emulsions. Langmuir 1998, 14, 54025411,  DOI: 10.1021/la980522g
    44. 44
      Binks, B. P.; Clint, J. H.; Fletcher, P. D. I.; Rippon, S.; Lubetkin, S. D.; Mulqueen, P. J. Kinetics of swelling of oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by different surfactants. Langmuir 1999, 15, 44954501,  DOI: 10.1021/la990054q
    45. 45
      Walter, J.; Thajudeen, T.; Süβ, S.; Segets, D.; Peukert, W. New possibilities of accurate particle characterisation by applying direct boundary models to analytical centrifugation. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 65746587,  DOI: 10.1039/c5nr00995b
    46. 46
      Beltramo, P. J.; Gupta, M.; Alicke, A.; Liascukiene, I.; Gunes, D. Z.; Baroud, C. N.; Vermant, J. Arresting dissolution by interfacial rheology design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2017, 114, 10373,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1705181114
    47. 47
      Izquierdo, P.; Esquena, J.; Tadros, T. F.; Dederen, C.; Garcia, M. J.; Azemar, N.; Solans, C. Formation and stability of nano-emulsions prepared using the phase inversion temperature method. Langmuir 2002, 18, 2630,  DOI: 10.1021/la010808c
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01835.

    • Details of the spherical micelle models used for the SAXS analysis (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.