ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
The First Dive into the Mechanism and Kinetics of ATRP
My Activity
  • Free to Read
Editorial

The First Dive into the Mechanism and Kinetics of ATRP
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDF

Macromolecules

Cite this: Macromolecules 2020, 53, 4, 1115–1118
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.9b02460
Published February 25, 2020

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use.

This publication is licensed for personal use by The American Chemical Society.

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society

I have the distinct honor and challenge of writing on the impacts of the work reported in “Controlled/“Living” Radical Polymerization. Halogen Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization Promoted by a Cu(I)/Cu(II) Redox Process”, by Jin-Shan Wang and Krzysztof Matyjaszewski, published in the 28th volume of Macromolecules in 1995. (1,2) On the 75th anniversary of Staudinger’s seminal work whose centennial we are celebrating this year, our understanding of polymer chemistry was taking a leap forward. This paper was a critical milestone in that journey.

By the 1980s, polymer science and the fundamental set of organic chemistries used to make polymer chains for academic interest or industrial use had been well-established and studied for decades. Textbooks described in detail the principal mechanisms and kinetic models of polymer chain growth. Some chemists were exploring new possibilities to control polymerization, but translation of those methods into scalable technologies would require significant effort. Everyone “knew” that while carbon-centered radical-based methods were extremely versatile and provided a rich diversity of copolymers, easily scaled to produce commercial products, they were inherently unstable and uncontrollable species which yielded highly disperse molecular masses (Đ > 2). And yet, in the early 1980s, one of the most exciting races that would turn all of that knowledge on its head saw the first spark of an idea.

At that time, living cationic polymerization was a research topic of interest. One of the seminal discoveries in this field was that highly reactive carbocations could be “tamed” as propagating centers via their reversible activation from covalent species by Lewis acids. Because of this chemical interaction, the lifetime of a propagating chain, before chain transfer or termination, could be extended to permit many propagation cycles and lead to controlled growth of a polymer chain. Such success for controlling the chemistry of carbocation propagating species led researchers in the field to ask whether a similar mechanism could be developed for the yet untamed carbon radical propagating centers.

Carbon-centered radical propagation presented some uniquely appealing features as well as unique challenges. (5) The propagating chain end is inherently less stable and more promiscuous than ionic chain ends. If it could be controlled, however, many more monomers become available for polymerization. A multitude of copolymerizations would become possible—either to form the segments of block copolymers or to be statistically distributed along the chain. The conditions for the reactions also become much less stringent: extreme low temperatures are no longer necessary, and water would not poison the reactions. Only removal of oxygen and other radical inhibitors would become necessary, perhaps mild heating, which is comparatively easy when considering the necessary requirements for ionic polymerizations. These advantages would significantly lower the barriers to researchers using this chemistry in their lab as long as the starting materials were available or not onerous to prepare. They would also open the door to seemingly infinite permutations of copolymers which could target advanced functionality in ways not possible before because the reaction is unaffected by hydroxyls, acids, amides, and many other functional groups.

There were some early efforts to tame carbon radicals for this purpose, (6) though the first fine control as it became used in modern methods came from David Solomon and the outstanding team of scientists at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) polymer group in Australia including Ezio Rizzardo and Graeme Moad, who patented their findings on nitroxide mediated radical polymerization. (7−9) By the mid-1990s, at least half a dozen groups were exploring the versatility of this method for reversibly deactivating carbon-centered radical chain ends to prevent the common irreversible side reactions in polymerization. (10) The subtle steric and electronic effects of the nitroxide substituents required organic synthesis skills to tailor the deactivator to the propagating chain end. What was missing to turn this spark into the fire that revolutionized polymer chemistry was a generally accessible method using “off the shelf” ingredients to achieve the same results. This event happened in 1995.

Several communications that year from preeminent polymer chemists, beginning with Sawamoto et al. (12) and quickly followed by Wang and Matyjazewski (13,14) and Percec and Barboiu, (15) had reported the ability of transition metal salts combined with “off the shelf” ligands to control what was hypothesized to be radical polymerization (Figure 1). Each reported system showed a constant concentration of growing radicals, molecular masses determined by the extent of monomer conversion and the initial ratio of monomer to initiator, and consistently low mass dispersities that became lower with higher conversion. The follow-on full paper, submitted on May 2, 1995, delved into the details of the reaction and characterization of the chains produced to focus on the propagation mechanism and eliminate alternatives. It established without a doubt that atom transfer between the chain end and a copper/bipyridyl complex was indeed controlling a radical polymerization process, making the name atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) appropriate rather than just catchy.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Participants at a 1995 Symposium at the Romanian Academy in Iasi. Professor Matyjaszewski is fourth from the right, Professor Percec is fifth, and Professor Sawamoto is sixth. All three would publish communications reporting controlled radical polymerization based on transition metal mediated halogen exchange in 1995, leading up to the full paper discussed in this editorial. Reproduced with permission from ref (11). Copyright 2018 Royal Society of Chemistry.

There were a lot of firsts in this paper. The manuscript was the first appearance of the scheme detailing the catalytic cycling of metal oxidation states with halogen transfer and propagation that would be reproduced in countless forms over the next 25 years. The paper described the first demonstration that polymerizations of four different monomers (styrene, methyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and methyl methacrylate (MMA)) were all controlled with the same metal–ligand combination and similar conditions. Finally, the manuscript included 13C NMR spectral data matching PMMA tacticity for polymers synthesized by ATRP and conventional radical polymerization (Figure 2). The authors also demonstrated that the ratio of propagation to termination rates (kp/kt) improved with temperature as expected from a radical propagation mechanism.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Reproduction of Figure 6 from ref (1) comparing 13C NMR of PMMA prepared via conventional radical polymerization (A) and ATRP (B). Reproduced with permission from ref (1).

This paper made it clear that the polymerization did not occur via a coordination–insertion reaction, nor was it a redox initiated conventional radical polymerization or a degenerative transfer process. Coordination–insertion was eliminated by the similarities in stereochemistry mentioned above as well as the effectiveness of radical inhibitors (galvinoxyl) in stopping the reaction. The reaction could not proceed via conventional radical polymerization because molecular mass increased with conversion, indicating fast initiation and controlled propagation of chains. Telomerization via degenerative chain transfer was discredited by the linear dependence of molecular mass on conversion.

There were early experiments in this paper that alluded to contributing factors that would be studied in much more depth later: for example, the effect of the alkyl halide initiator structure and the observable difference between working with chlorine and bromine as the leaving group. There were indications of the effects of solvation and ligand effects on the halogen exchange equilibrium and radical concentration. Despite the simplicity of the basic mechanistic scheme, decades of more research, up to the present day, into mechanism and polymerization control have led to new polymerization systems and expanded the range of monomers that can be polymerized by atom transfer radical systems. During this time, controlled radical polymerization (CRP) emerged as its own field of study and would later become known as reversible deactivation radical polymerization (RDRP).

In fact, some controversy over the mechanism of ATRP would consume the field for years after 1995. It was in part the great success of strategies based on the findings of this paper which solidified its results as the correct reaction mechanism. The choice of initiator structure and halogen, and the use of strategic design to control both solubility and exchange equilibria of the catalyst, remove competing inhibitors, and reduce the amount of catalyst in the system, have been the dominant strategies for chemical innovation in ATRP. (16)

By demonstrating in one paper that one simple catalyst was controlling chain growth via radical propagation in a range of monomers, this report achieved two big shifts in polymer science. The first was that a broad palette of radically polymerizable monomers and their copolymers could be polymerized by ATRP to yield well-defined polymers. The second was that perhaps anyone could conduct a living polymerization in their own laboratory using commercially available chemicals and (maybe) without much experience in synthetic chemistry. A great democratization of polymer chemistry was started. ATRP would be complemented by major progress in nitroxide mediated polymerization (NMP) and later reversible addition–fragmentation chain-transfer polymerization (RAFT). These methods in combination with the adoption of “click” chemistry provided an easy-to-use tool kit to an enormous range of disciplines, whose researchers could deliberately prepare and study tailored, functional macromolecules and structured soft materials. Another great advantage of these chemistries, which was clear very early with ATRP, was the presence of easily transformable end groups. Conversion of the alkyl halide end group, and the ability to use a wide range of functional initiators and monomers due to the high tolerance of radical reactions, meant that all kinds of architecture variants (stars, branches, telechelics, and even cyclics) could be produced as well. Today, any physicist, medical researcher, or engineer can use RDRP, often ATRP, in their own laboratory and access seemingly endless variations of copolymer chemistries and molecular architectures. (17)

I do not think that one can overstate how important the development of ATRP, and RDRP more generally, has been to the broader fields of science. Alvin Weinberg, once Director of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, wrote in an editorial on priority investments in research “that field has the most scientific merit which contributes most heavily to and illuminates most brightly its neighboring scientific disciplines.” (18) Certainly, the RDRP tool kit has been a powerful enabler of our fundamental understanding of condensed matter physics. Beyond that, polymers produced from RDRP are used in fields ranging from medicine to agriculture: anywhere that precision control of chain structure and amphiphilic properties improves performance, such as adhesives, drug delivery, biocompatibilization, composites, pigment dispersion, and manufacturing processes for memory devices, among others. These research fields have all been advanced by the accessibility and flexibility of RDRP methods. In all of these fields it is the ability to dramatically reduce and fine-tune the distributions of molecular properties including molecular mass, chemical functionality, and architecture that has imparted precise control of higher-order structure and the resulting thermodynamics and transport properties in polymer thin films, solutions, and solids.

After those exciting communications reporting the discovery of ATRP, it was this full paper that solidified 1995 as the year that spark of an idea became a flame.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    • Author
    • Notes
      Views expressed in this editorial are those of the author and not necessarily the views of the ACS.
      The author declares no competing financial interest.

    Acknowledgments

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    Drs. Beers is writing in her personal capacity and the views expressed in the article/editorial do not necessarily represent the views of NIST or the United States. Conversations and suggestions from Dr. Timothy E. Patten are gratefully acknowledged.

    References

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article references 18 other publications.

    1. 1
      Wang, J. S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Controlled/“Living” Radical Polymerization. Halogen Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization Promoted by a Cu(I)/Cu(II) Redox Process. Macromolecules 1995, 28 (23), 79017910,  DOI: 10.1021/ma00127a042
    2. 2
      Matyjaszewski, K.; Wang, J. S. Novel (Co)Polymers and a Novel Polymerization Process Based on Atom (or Group) Transfer Radical Polymerization. US 5763548, 1995.
    3. 3
      Cationic Polymerizations: Mechanism, Synthesis, and Applications; Matyjaszewski, K., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1996.
    4. 4
      Aoshima, S.; Kanaoka, S. A Renaissance in Living Cationic Polymerization. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109 (11), 52455287,  DOI: 10.1021/cr900225g
    5. 5
      Webster, O. W. Living Polymerization Methods. Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 1991, 251 (4996), 887893,  DOI: 10.1126/science.251.4996.887
    6. 6
      Otsu, T.; Yoshida, M.; Kuriyama, A. Living Radical Polymerizations in Homogeneous Solution by Using Organic Sulfides as Photoiniferters. Polym. Bull. 1982, 7 (1), 4550,  DOI: 10.1007/BF00264156
    7. 7
      Solomon, D. H.; Rizzardo, E.; Cacioli, P. Free Radical Polymerization and the Produced Polymers. EP135280A2, 1985.
    8. 8
      Solomon, D. H.; Rizzardo, E.; Cacioli, P. Polymerization Process and Polymers Produced Thereby. US 4581429, 1986.
    9. 9
      Johnson, C. H. J.; Moad, G.; Solomon, D. H.; Spurling, T. H.; Vearing, D. J. The Application of Supercomputers in Modeling Chemical Reaction Kinetics: Kinetic Simulation of ‘Quasi-Living’ Radical Polymerization. Aust. J. Chem. 1990, 43 (7), 12151230,  DOI: 10.1071/CH9901215
    10. 10
      Georges, M. K.; Veregin, R. P. N.; Kazmaier, P. M.; Hamer, G. K. Narrow Molecular Weight Resins by a Free-Radical Polymerization Process. Macromolecules 1993, 26 (11), 29872988,  DOI: 10.1021/ma00063a054
    11. 11
      Klein, M. L.; Percec, V. Frontiers of Macromolecular and Supramolecular Science Symposia. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9 (18), 23552358,  DOI: 10.1039/C8PY90063A
    12. 12
      Kato, M.; Kamigaito, M.; Sawamoto, M.; Higashimura, T. Polymerization of Methyl Methacrylate with the Carbon Tetrachloride/Dichlorotris-(Triphenylphosphine)Ruthenium(II)/ Methylaluminum Bis(2,6-Di-Tert-Butylphenoxide) Initiating System: Possibility of Living Radical Polymerization. Macromolecules 1995, 28 (5), 17211723,  DOI: 10.1021/ma00109a056
    13. 13
      Wang, J. S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Controlled/“Living” Radical Polymerization. Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization in the Presence of Transition-Metal Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117 (20), 56145615,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00125a035
    14. 14
      Wang, J. S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Living”/Controlled Radical Polymerization. Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization in the Presence of a Conventional Radical Initiator. Macromolecules 1995, 28 (22), 75727573,  DOI: 10.1021/ma00126a041
    15. 15
      Percec, V.; Barboiu, B. Living” Radical Polymerization of Styrene Initiated by Arenesulfonyl Chlorides and CuI(Bpy)NCl. Macromolecules 1995, 28 (23), 79707972,  DOI: 10.1021/ma00127a057
    16. 16
      Matyjaszewski, K. Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP): Current Status and Future Perspectives. Macromolecules 2012, 45 (10), 40154039,  DOI: 10.1021/ma3001719
    17. 17
      Matyjaszewski, K. Advanced Materials by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30 (23), 122,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201706441
    18. 18
      Weinberg, A. M. Criteria for Scientific Choice. Phys. Today 1964, 17 (3), 42,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3051468

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Citation Statements
    Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

    This article is cited by 9 publications.

    1. Glenn K. K. Clothier, Thiago R. Guimarães, Graeme Moad, Per B. Zetterlund. Expanding the Scope of RAFT Multiblock Copolymer Synthesis Using the Nanoreactor Concept: The Critical Importance of Initiator Hydrophobicity. Macromolecules 2022, 55 (6) , 1981-1991. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.2c00181
    2. Glenn K. K. Clothier, Thiago R. Guimarães, Graeme Moad, Per B. Zetterlund. Multiblock Copolymer Synthesis via Reversible Addition–Fragmentation Chain Transfer Emulsion Polymerization: Effects of Chain Mobility within Particles on Control over Molecular Weight Distribution. Macromolecules 2021, 54 (8) , 3647-3658. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.1c00345
    3. Masami Kamigaito, Mitsuo Sawamoto. Synergistic Advances in Living Cationic and Radical Polymerizations. Macromolecules 2020, 53 (16) , 6749-6753. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.0c01392
    4. Mingsan Miao, Liang Guo, Jinyan Xue, Yuzhen Jia, Zhenzhen Cui, Huaixia Yang. A controllable Y-shaped DNA structure assisted aptasensor for the simultaneous detection of AFB 1 and OTA based on ARGET ATRP. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 2024, 12 (24) , 5861-5868. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4TB00383G
    5. Tejasvi Pandey, Aditi Sharma, Anuradha Sandhu, Vivek Pandey. Controlled polymerization in microfluidics: Advancement in nanogel synthesis. SPE Polymers 2024, 5 (2) , 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/pls2.10116
    6. Matylda Szewczyk-Łagodzińska, Andrzej Plichta, Maciej Dębowski, Sebastian Kowalczyk, Anna Iuliano, Zbigniew Florjańczyk. Recent Advances in the Application of ATRP in the Synthesis of Drug Delivery Systems. Polymers 2023, 15 (5) , 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15051234
    7. Izabela Zaborniak, Małgorzata Sroka, Paweł Chmielarz. Lemonade as a rich source of antioxidants: Polymerization of 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate in lemon extract. Polymer 2022, 254 , 125099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2022.125099
    8. Izabela Zaborniak, Angelika Macior, Paweł Chmielarz. Smart, Naturally-Derived Macromolecules for Controlled Drug Release. Molecules 2021, 26 (7) , 1918. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26071918
    9. Ryan Duty, Christopher E. Hobbs. Post-Polymerization Modification of Ring Opening Metathesis Polymerization (ROMP)-Derived Materials Using Wittig Reactions. Polymers 2020, 12 (6) , 1247. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12061247

    Macromolecules

    Cite this: Macromolecules 2020, 53, 4, 1115–1118
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.9b02460
    Published February 25, 2020

    Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use.

    Article Views

    3248

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

    • Figure 1

      Figure 1. Participants at a 1995 Symposium at the Romanian Academy in Iasi. Professor Matyjaszewski is fourth from the right, Professor Percec is fifth, and Professor Sawamoto is sixth. All three would publish communications reporting controlled radical polymerization based on transition metal mediated halogen exchange in 1995, leading up to the full paper discussed in this editorial. Reproduced with permission from ref (11). Copyright 2018 Royal Society of Chemistry.

      Figure 2

      Figure 2. Reproduction of Figure 6 from ref (1) comparing 13C NMR of PMMA prepared via conventional radical polymerization (A) and ATRP (B). Reproduced with permission from ref (1).

    • References


      This article references 18 other publications.

      1. 1
        Wang, J. S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Controlled/“Living” Radical Polymerization. Halogen Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization Promoted by a Cu(I)/Cu(II) Redox Process. Macromolecules 1995, 28 (23), 79017910,  DOI: 10.1021/ma00127a042
      2. 2
        Matyjaszewski, K.; Wang, J. S. Novel (Co)Polymers and a Novel Polymerization Process Based on Atom (or Group) Transfer Radical Polymerization. US 5763548, 1995.
      3. 3
        Cationic Polymerizations: Mechanism, Synthesis, and Applications; Matyjaszewski, K., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1996.
      4. 4
        Aoshima, S.; Kanaoka, S. A Renaissance in Living Cationic Polymerization. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109 (11), 52455287,  DOI: 10.1021/cr900225g
      5. 5
        Webster, O. W. Living Polymerization Methods. Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 1991, 251 (4996), 887893,  DOI: 10.1126/science.251.4996.887
      6. 6
        Otsu, T.; Yoshida, M.; Kuriyama, A. Living Radical Polymerizations in Homogeneous Solution by Using Organic Sulfides as Photoiniferters. Polym. Bull. 1982, 7 (1), 4550,  DOI: 10.1007/BF00264156
      7. 7
        Solomon, D. H.; Rizzardo, E.; Cacioli, P. Free Radical Polymerization and the Produced Polymers. EP135280A2, 1985.
      8. 8
        Solomon, D. H.; Rizzardo, E.; Cacioli, P. Polymerization Process and Polymers Produced Thereby. US 4581429, 1986.
      9. 9
        Johnson, C. H. J.; Moad, G.; Solomon, D. H.; Spurling, T. H.; Vearing, D. J. The Application of Supercomputers in Modeling Chemical Reaction Kinetics: Kinetic Simulation of ‘Quasi-Living’ Radical Polymerization. Aust. J. Chem. 1990, 43 (7), 12151230,  DOI: 10.1071/CH9901215
      10. 10
        Georges, M. K.; Veregin, R. P. N.; Kazmaier, P. M.; Hamer, G. K. Narrow Molecular Weight Resins by a Free-Radical Polymerization Process. Macromolecules 1993, 26 (11), 29872988,  DOI: 10.1021/ma00063a054
      11. 11
        Klein, M. L.; Percec, V. Frontiers of Macromolecular and Supramolecular Science Symposia. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9 (18), 23552358,  DOI: 10.1039/C8PY90063A
      12. 12
        Kato, M.; Kamigaito, M.; Sawamoto, M.; Higashimura, T. Polymerization of Methyl Methacrylate with the Carbon Tetrachloride/Dichlorotris-(Triphenylphosphine)Ruthenium(II)/ Methylaluminum Bis(2,6-Di-Tert-Butylphenoxide) Initiating System: Possibility of Living Radical Polymerization. Macromolecules 1995, 28 (5), 17211723,  DOI: 10.1021/ma00109a056
      13. 13
        Wang, J. S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Controlled/“Living” Radical Polymerization. Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization in the Presence of Transition-Metal Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117 (20), 56145615,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00125a035
      14. 14
        Wang, J. S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Living”/Controlled Radical Polymerization. Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization in the Presence of a Conventional Radical Initiator. Macromolecules 1995, 28 (22), 75727573,  DOI: 10.1021/ma00126a041
      15. 15
        Percec, V.; Barboiu, B. Living” Radical Polymerization of Styrene Initiated by Arenesulfonyl Chlorides and CuI(Bpy)NCl. Macromolecules 1995, 28 (23), 79707972,  DOI: 10.1021/ma00127a057
      16. 16
        Matyjaszewski, K. Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP): Current Status and Future Perspectives. Macromolecules 2012, 45 (10), 40154039,  DOI: 10.1021/ma3001719
      17. 17
        Matyjaszewski, K. Advanced Materials by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30 (23), 122,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201706441
      18. 18
        Weinberg, A. M. Criteria for Scientific Choice. Phys. Today 1964, 17 (3), 42,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3051468