ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
Recently Viewed
You have not visited any articles yet, Please visit some articles to see contents here.
CONTENT TYPES

Curvilinear One-Dimensional Antiferromagnets

Cite this: Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 11, 8157–8162
Publication Date (Web):September 28, 2020
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03246
Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society
Subscribed Access
Article Views
917
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (3 MB) OpenURL ROCHESTER INST OF TECHNOLOGY
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Antiferromagnets host exotic quasiparticles, support high frequency excitations and are key enablers of the prospective spintronic and spin–orbitronic technologies. Here, we propose a concept of a curvilinear antiferromagnetism where material responses can be tailored by a geometrical curvature without the need to adjust material parameters. We show that an intrinsically achiral one-dimensional (1D) curvilinear antiferromagnet behaves as a chiral helimagnet with geometrically tunable Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction (DMI) and orientation of the Néel vector. The curvature-induced DMI results in the hybridization of spin wave modes and enables a geometrically driven local minimum of the low-frequency branch. This positions curvilinear 1D antiferromagnets as a novel platform for the realization of geometrically tunable chiral antiferromagnets for antiferromagnetic spin–orbitronics and fundamental discoveries in the formation of coherent magnon condensates in the momentum space.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Antiferromagnets (AFMs) have emerged as a versatile material science platform that enabled numerous fundamental discoveries including observation of monopole quasiparticles in frustrated systems (1−3) and collective quantum effects, such as spin superfluidity (4−6) and Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) of magnetic excitations. (5,7,8) This trend is even further facilitated by the advent of antiferromagnetic spintronics (6,9−11) and related novel physical concepts of staggered spin–orbit torques. (11−13) These effects are specific to AFMs possessing broken inversion symmetry in a local environment, which is also a source of DMI. (14−16) The presence of DMI can cause noncollinear AFM states, characterized by weak ferromagnetism and (or) chiral helimagnetism. (17,18) DMI significantly affects dynamics of solitary excitations in AFMs including much higher domain wall velocities (19) and absence of the gyroforce (Magnus force) for skyrmions. (20,21) The portfolio of material systems available for these studies is very limited due to the stringent requirement on symmetry, as DMI-induced chiral textures in an AFM can exist only in magnetic materials belonging to gyrotropic crystal classes. (15,17) In addition, the efficient manipulation of arbitrary textures of any kind by spin–orbit torques also requires broken inversion symmetry of the crystal lattice or staggered spin current polarization. (22) This requirement renders the progress in AFM-related fundamental and technological research to depend on time-consuming material screening and optimization of intrinsic chiral properties of AFMs.
For ferromagnets (FMs) chiral responses in nanowires and thin films can be tailored by using curvilinear geometries. (23−26) This framework, known as curvilinear magnetism, (27−30) allows induction of magnetochiral effects in otherwise conventional achiral FMs. (25,31,32) In contrast to FMs, no theory of curvilinear antiferromagnetism is available to date. Therefore, the appealing approaches to use geometrical curvatures to enable chiral properties in AFMs have not been explored. If available, it would be possible to decouple the design of chiral responses of AFMs and their intrinsic magnetic properties. We emphasize that the case of curvilinear AFMs is fundamentally different from curvilinear FMs primarily due to the necessity to self-consistently account for the mutual interplay of several (at least two for AFM vs one for FM) fields of magnetization with the geometrical curvature. This is directly related to the physical nature of the order parameter in AFMs. In contrast to FMs, where the opposite directions of the magnetization correspond to different magnetic states, the AFM order parameter is represented only by the axis of orientation, similarly to nematic directors. (33) The latter leads to specific types of domains, absent in FMs. (34,35) The staggered magnetic ordering also allows the magnetostatic interaction between neighboring AFM systems to be neglected and enhances the resonance frequencies. (36)
In this Letter, we put forth a fundamental foundation of curvilinear 1D AFMs. We explore curvature effects in a prototypical AFM system, namely, spin chain where spins are coupled via local exchange and long-range dipolar interactions. The nearest-neighbor exchange interaction brings about two geometry-induced responses: the intrinsically achiral curvilinear AFM spin chain behaves as a chiral helimagnet with a geometrically tunable DMI and a biaxial anisotropy. We show that generic curvilinear 1D AFMs exhibit the full set of Lifshitz invariants, whose strength is determined by the local torsion and curvature. We apply our theory to analyze static and dynamic responses of helical AFM spin chains to demonstrate consequences of the coupling between the geometry and the AFM order parameter. Spin chains arranged along space curves with nonzero torsion exhibit a magnetic phase transition from homogeneous to periodic states, which is tunable by controlling geometrical parameters. The appearance of the curvature-induced DMI results in the hybridization of spin wave modes in linear dynamics and opens a possibility to investigate a coherent and long-living magnon state in the DMI-induced minimum of the dispersion curve.

Model of a Curvilinear AFM

We start with a classical spin chain taking into account the AFM nearest-neighbor exchange and dipolar interaction. Its static and dynamic properties are determined by the Landau–Lifshitz equation with the Hamiltonian specific to the collinear intrinsically achiral AFM(1)Here, mi is the unit magnetic moment of ith site, ℏ is the Planck constant, S is the spin length, J < 0 is the exchange integral, μ = BS is the total magnetic moment of one site with g being Landé factor, and μB is Bohr magneton. The dipolar field at the ith site reads Hid = −μ∑j = l+i[mjrij2–3rij(mj·rij)]/rij5 with rij being the radius-vector between the ith and jth sites and the distance between neighboring sites equal a. We assume that the positions of all magnetic sites are described by a space curve γ(s) with s being the arc-length characterized by the curvature κ(s) and torsion τ(s). The local reference frame can be chosen as the Frenet–Serret frame with tangential, normal, and binormal vectors eT,N,B, see Figure 1a.

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) Schematics of the antiferromagnetic spin chain γ. Magnetic sublattices with magnetization mI and mII are shown by magenta and light-blue arrows. The Dzyaloshinskii vector d (dark-blue) lies in the TB plane given by the TNB basis eT,N,B. Hard and easy anisotropy axes are labeled by e1 and e3, respectively. (b) Helix spin chain with radius R and pitch P. The AFM order parameter (Néel vector) n parametrized by angles θ and ϕ is shown by the green arrow. (c) Diagram of equilibrium states for a helix spin chain. Open symbols and triangles correspond to periodic and homogeneous states, respectively, obtained in spin–lattice simulations. The solid red curve shows the boundary between the states. The dashed green line shows the asymptotic of the boundary τb ≈ 0.85κ for κ ≪ 1. Schematics of the (d, e) homogeneous and (f, g) periodic states in the TNB reference frame. (d, f) Bloch spheres illustrate the trajectories of n. The tilt angle .

The continuum counterpart of the spin–lattice model is formulated on the basis of two vector fields, namely, the total magnetization m(s) = (mI + mII)/2 and Néel vector n(s) = (mImII)/2. The fields mI,II = mI,II(s) correspond to the two sublattices of the AFM. In the long-wave approximation, the density of Lagrangian , corresponding to the curvilinear AFM reads(2a)with the overdot corresponding to the derivative with respect to time. The effective energy density is written as(2b)where Ms = μ/(2a) is the magnetization of one sublattice, γ0 is the gyromagnetic ratio, Λ = 2|J|S2/a is the constant of the uniform exchange, A = |J|S2a/2 is the exchange stiffness, and K ≈ 2.7 μ2/a4 is the hard axis anisotropy constant induced by the dipolar interaction, see the Supporting Information. Model (2) is valid for K ≪Λ and the space curve γ possessing consequent turns separated by a distance significantly larger than the lattice constant a. In this approximation, |m| ≪ |n| and n can be considered as a unit director. In model (2b), the Einstein summation rule is applied and prime means derivative with respect to s. The Frenet tensor has four nonzero components and . The characteristic length and time scales are given by the magnetic length and the frequency of the AFM resonance with being the characteristic magnon speed. The exchange energy density expands into three terms, with only one, , possessing the form of a regular inhomogeneous exchange in straight spin chains.
The term can be written as the functional form of a DMI, . This term is allowed in crystals with magnetic symmetry groups Cn and S4 acting on 1D magnetic textures. (15) However, its origin is not the spin–orbit interaction as for the case of intrinsic DMI but the exchange interaction. The vector d = dTeT + dBeB acts as the Dzyaloshinskii vector with components dT = 2 and dB = 2. This DMI corresponds to the full set of Lifshitz invariants, allowed in a 1D magnet. The DMI vector d is linear with respect to τ and κ, which allows strong chiral effects in curvilinear 1D AFMs. The strength of the curvature-induced DMI can be estimated as the relation to the exchange stiffness. For instance, in the case of a Mn-DNA chain (A-DNA form) bent to the radius of 15 nm, the adT,B/A is about 0.05. (Magnetic parameters of Mn-DNA S = 5/2, a = 0.344 nm, and |J| = 9.6 × 10–25 J are taken from ref (37).) This value is comparable with the intrinsic chiral properties of KMnF3 used for the discussion of dynamics of 1D solitons (19,38) (aD/A = 0.036 with D being the constant of the nonuniform DMI), where ultrafast motion of AFM domain walls was predicted. (19)
In addition to the linear in τ and κ DMI terms, the expression for energy density contains weaker bilinear terms, representing a curvature-induced anisotropy whose coefficients are given by the tensor , κτ. It contains nondiagonal terms, causing the tilt of n within the rectifying surface formed by eT and eB. The presence of the two anisotropies (hard axis stemming from the dipolar interaction and easy axis stemming from the exchange interaction) renders a curvilinear AFM spin chain to behave as a biaxial AFM. The directions of the primary hard axis e1 and secondary easy axis e3 are determined by the diagonalization of the tensor of the total anisotropy with δαβ being Kronecker delta, see Figure 1a. The axis e1 lies within the rectifying surface. The anisotropy induced by the dipolar interaction is the strongest one and defines the plane, where the Néel vector rotates. The direction of the vector n within the easy plane is given by the curvature-induced anisotropy . The system has no competing easy axis anisotropy terms. This means that independent of the strength of it govern the orientation of the Néel vector even for 2, 2K.
As a result, a generic curvilinear achiral 1D AFM will behave as a chiral helimagnet with the DMI strength and the orientation of the Néel vector determined by the geometrical parameters, i.e., curvature and torsion.

Ground State of AFM Helix Chains

To illustrate the behavior of curvilinear AFM spin chains, described by (2), we analyzed a helix chain as the prototypical curvilinear systems possessing a constant curvature and torsion. The geometry of a helix is characterized by the radius R = κ/(κ2 + τ2) and pitch P = 2πτ/(κ2 + τ2), see Figure 1b. It is convenient to introduce the angular parametrization of the Néel vector n = eTcos θ + eNsin θcos ϕ + eB sin θ sin ϕ with θ = θ(s, t) and ϕ = ϕ(s, t) being polar and azimuthal angles, respectively. Taking into account the Néel vector is a director, states with (θ, ϕ) and (π – θ, ϕ ± π) are equivalent. The linear energy density then reads(3)As a biaxial chiral helimagnet, helix spin chains support homogeneous and periodic equilibrium states dependent on the strength of the DMI, see Figure 1c. For the case of the homogeneous state, which is realized for τ < τb(κ) ≈ 0.85κ at , see Figure 1d, e and the Supporting Information, the orientation of the Néel vector is given by θhom = π/2 – ψ and ϕhom = π/2, where and , .
The periodic state can be stabilized in systems possessing torsion τ > τb(κ). In the periodic state, the Néel vector is almost uniform in the plane perpendicular to the helix axis and modulated in the local reference frame, see Figure 1f, g. The emergence of the periodic state is a consequence of the exchange-induced DMI, , with the main contribution given by the torsion-related term dT. When the curvature is much smaller than the torsion, the state can be described as the Dzyaloshinskii spiral (39) with θper = π/2 and ϕper = −τs. The boundary between the homogeneous and periodic states τb(κ) is plotted by the solid red line in Figure 1c.
It is instructive to compare the results above with FM spin chains, where dipolar interactions induce easy axis anisotropy. In contrast to a FM helices, (24) the phase transition between the periodic and homogeneous states in AFMs has no threshold in curvature. Hence, the transition to the periodic state in the case of AFM helical chains can be observed for very small curvatures. This is a consequence of the specificity of the curvilinear AFM systems where the stability of the state is given by the weak easy axis anisotropy stemming from the exchange interaction. Therefore, effects of curvilinearity in AFMs are much stronger than in FMs.

Linear Dynamics

To describe linear excitations in a curved AFM helix chain, we consider the homogeneous magnetic state. The Euler–Lagrange equations for the Lagrangian (2a) are linearized by θ(s, t) = θhom + ϑ(s, t) and ϕ(s, t) = ϕhom + φ(s, t)/ sin θhom. Here, ϑ(s, t) and φ(s, t) are small deviations from the equilibrium state. The corresponding equations read(4)where K0,3 and D3 are functions of curvature, acting as the effective anisotropy and DMI coefficients, respectively, see the Supporting Information. For a large curvature radius and small torsion, , K32 and D3 ≈ 2. The dispersion law can be written using the substitution of plane waves ϑ(s, t) = ϑk  cos(ks – Ωt) and φ(s, t) = φk  sin(ks – Ωt), where ϑk and φk are small amplitudes, k is the wavenumber, and Ω is frequency. The dispersion reads(5)We note that the dispersion curve is similar to flat biaxial AFMs with DMI (19) and remains symmetric with respect to the sign of the momentum k. Yet, the geometrical tunability of the anisotropy and DMI allows to unveil new physics of collective excitations in curvilinear 1D AFMs.
The spin-wave spectrum (5) superimposed with spin–lattice simulations (see the Supporting Information) is shown in Figure 2a for two helix geometries (Figure 2b). The high-frequency optical branch with q = 1 is always gapped and the change of the geometry affects only the gap due to the curvature-induced anisotropy, . In contrast, there is a strong qualitative impact of the curvature on the low frequency branch. While it is gapless for a straight spin chain, (40) the gap Ωq=–1gap appears for any finite curvature as a results of the spin-wave hybridization, forming a low-frequency optical branch with q = −1, see Figure 2a. The curvature-induced DMI results in the emergence of a region with a negative group velocity followed by a local minimum at k = kmin on the dispersion curve with the depth δ, see Figure 2a, c. The presence of a negative group velocity is also observed for multiferroics (41) and exchange-dipolar modes in AFM thin films. (42,43) The depth of the minimum increases with κ and τ, see Figure 2d. The possibility to realize magnon ground states not in equilibrium (k ≠ 0 at minimum energy) (44) renders curvilinear 1D AFMs a flexible platform to study coherent excitations for spin superfluidity (45−47) and BEC of magnons (48−51) with taking into account a proper pumping and magnon thermodynamics.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Spin-wave dispersion (5) for helical AFM spin chains with and two curvatures (black) and (red). The result of spin–lattice simulations is shown by the background color for a helical spin chain with the geometry with and . (b) Helix geometries calculated in a. (c) Spin-wave dispersion (5) and simulations for and . The depth of the minimum in the acoustic branch is shown by δ. (d) The depth δ for different curvatures and torsions within the homogeneous ground state (below red line, same as in Figure 1c). Dashed line corresponds to the absence of minimum.

Conclusions

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We develop a theory of curvilinear one-dimensional antiferromagnets. We demonstrate that the intrinsically achiral curvilinear AFM spin chain behaves as a biaxial chiral helimagnet with geometrically tunable DMI and anisotropy. The curvature-induced DMI results in the hybridization of magnon modes in the chain. The low-frequency branch possesses a local minimum supporting a long-living magnon state, which allows consideration of 1D curvilinear AFMs as the platform for the realization of BEC of magnons in k-space. Furthermore, the symmetry and strength of the geometry-induced DMI opens perspectives for applications in antiferromagnetic spin–orbitronics, e.g. for ultrafast dynamics of chiral domain walls. (19,38) We consider copper-based (52) and DNA-based metal–organic frameworks (53−56) as a promising materials for experimental validation of our predictions. For instance, one can expect the strength of curvature-induced DMI as adT, B/A ≈ 0.05, which is comparable with AFMs supporting chiral domain walls.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03246.

  • Details on analytical calculations and numerical simulations, including (i) the geometry, (ii) the model of curvilinear antiferromagnet, (iii) dipolar interaction in spin chains as an effective anisotropy (both ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic ordering, and curvilinear antiferromagnetic spin chains), (iv) the homogeneous state of antiferromagnetic helix chains, (v) the periodic state of antiferromagnetic helix chains, (vi) the boundary between states, (vii) The ground state of antiferromagnetic flat chains, (viii) spin waves in antiferromagnetic flat chains, (ix) spin waves in antiferromagnetic helices and stability of the homogeneous state, and (x) simulations (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Authors
  • Authors
    • Oleksandr V. Pylypovskyi - Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf e.V., Institute of Ion Beam Physics and Materials Research, Dresden 01328, GermanyTaras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv 01601, UkraineOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5947-9760
    • Denys Y. Kononenko - Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv 01601, UkraineInstitute for Theoretical Solid State Physics, IFW Dresden, Dresden 01069, GermanyOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-4467-730X
    • Kostiantyn V. Yershov - Institute for Theoretical Solid State Physics, IFW Dresden, Dresden 01069, GermanyBogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv 03143, UkraineOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2731-2808
    • Ulrich K. Rößler - Institute for Theoretical Solid State Physics, IFW Dresden, Dresden 01069, Germany
    • Artem V. Tomilo - Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv 01601, UkraineOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5390-2767
    • Jürgen Fassbender - Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf e.V., Institute of Ion Beam Physics and Materials Research, Dresden 01328, Germany
    • Jeroen van den Brink - Institute for Theoretical Solid State Physics, IFW Dresden, Dresden 01069, GermanyInstitute for Theoretical Physics, TU Dresden, Dresden 01069, Germany
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We thank U. Nitzsche for technical support. D.Y.K. and K.V.Y. acknowledge financial support from UKRATOP-project (funded by BMBF under reference 01DK18002). In part, this work was supported by the Program of Fundamental Research of the Department of Physics and Astronomy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Project 0120U100855), by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Research Group Linkage Programme), DFG MA 5144/22-1, DFG MA 5144/24-1, DFG MC 9/22-1, and by Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Project 19BF052-01).

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 56 other publications.

  1. 1
    Castelnovo, C.; Moessner, R.; Sondhi, S. L. Magnetic monopoles in spin ice. Nature 2008, 451, 4245,  DOI: 10.1038/nature06433
  2. 2
    Nagaosa, N.; Tokura, Y. Emergent electromagnetism in solids. Phys. Scr. 2012, T146, 014020,  DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/2012/T146/014020
  3. 3
    Zvyagin, A. A. New physics in frustrated magnets: Spin ices, monopoles, etc. (Review Article). Low Temp. Phys. 2013, 39, 901922,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4826079
  4. 4
    Takei, S.; Halperin, B. I.; Yacoby, A.; Tserkovnyak, Y. Superfluid spin transport through antiferromagnetic insulators. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2014, 90, 094408,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.094408
  5. 5
    Proukakis, N., Snoke, D., Littlewood, P., Eds.; Universal Themes of Bose–Einstein Condensation; Cambridge University Press, 2017; pp 387388.
  6. 6
    Baltz, V.; Manchon, A.; Tsoi, M.; Moriyama, T.; Ono, T.; Tserkovnyak, Y. Antiferromagnetic spintronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018, 90, 015005,  DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015005
  7. 7
    Rice, T. M. QUANTUM MECHANICS: To Condense or Not to Condense. Science 2002, 298, 760761,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1078819
  8. 8
    Giamarchi, T.; Rüegg, C.; Tchernyshyov, O. Bose–Einstein condensation in magnetic insulators. Nat. Phys. 2008, 4, 198204,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys893
  9. 9
    Gomonay, O.; Jungwirth, T.; Sinova, J. Concepts of antiferromagnetic spintronics. Phys. Status Solidi RRL 2017, 11, 1700022,  DOI: 10.1002/pssr.201700022
  10. 10
    Šmejkal, L.; Mokrousov, Y.; Yan, B.; MacDonald, A. H. Topological antiferromagnetic spintronics. Nat. Phys. 2018, 14, 242251,  DOI: 10.1038/s41567-018-0064-5
  11. 11
    Manchon, A.; Železný, J.; Miron, I. M.; Jungwirth, T.; Sinova, J.; Thiaville, A.; Garello, K.; Gambardella, P. Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2019, 91, 035004,  DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.035004
  12. 12
    Zhang, X.; Liu, Q.; Luo, J.-W.; Freeman, A. J.; Zunger, A. Hidden spin polarization in inversion-symmetric bulk crystals. Nat. Phys. 2014, 10, 387393,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys2933
  13. 13
    Železný, J.; Gao, H.; Výborný, K.; Zemen, J.; Mašek, J.; Manchon, A.; Wunderlich, J.; Sinova, J.; Jungwirth, T. Relativistic Néel-Order Fields Induced by Electrical Current in Antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 157201,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.157201
  14. 14
    Dzialoshinskii, I. E. Thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism in antiferromagnetic substances. Sov. Phys. JETP 1957, 5, 12591272
  15. 15
    Bogdanov, A. N.; Yablonskiĭ, D. A. Thermodynamically stable “vortices” in magnetically ordered crystals. The mixed state of magnets. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 1989, 95, 178182
  16. 16
    Qaiumzadeh, A.; Ado, I. A.; Duine, R. A.; Titov, M.; Brataas, A. Theory of the Interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction in Rashba Antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 197202,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.197202
  17. 17
    Dzyaloshinskii, I. E. Theory of Helicoidal Structures in Antiferromagnets. I. Nonmetals. Sov. Phys. JETP 1964, 19, 960971
  18. 18
    Bogdanov, A. N.; Rößler, U. K.; Wolf, M.; Müller, K.-H. Magnetic structures and reorientation transitions in noncentrosymmetric uniaxial antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2002, 66, 214410,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.214410
  19. 19
    Qaiumzadeh, A.; Kristiansen, L. A.; Brataas, A. Controlling chiral domain walls in antiferromagnets using spin-wave helicity. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2018, 97, 020402(R)  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.020402
  20. 20
    Barker, J.; Tretiakov, O. A. Static and Dynamical Properties of Antiferromagnetic Skyrmions in the Presence of Applied Current and Temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 147203,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.147203
  21. 21
    Shen, L.; Li, X.; Zhao, Y.; Xia, J.; Zhao, G.; Zhou, Y. Current-Induced Dynamics of the Antiferromagnetic Skyrmion and Skyrmionium. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 12, 064033,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.064033
  22. 22
    Železný, J.; Wadley, P.; Olejník, K.; Hoffmann, A.; Ohno, H. Spin transport and spin torque in antiferromagnetic devices. Nat. Phys. 2018, 14, 220228,  DOI: 10.1038/s41567-018-0062-7
  23. 23
    Gaididei, Y.; Kravchuk, V. P.; Sheka, D. D. Curvature Effects in Thin Magnetic Shells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112, 257203,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.257203
  24. 24
    Sheka, D. D.; Kravchuk, V. P.; Yershov, K. V.; Gaididei, Y. Torsion-induced effects in magnetic nanowires. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2015, 92, 054417,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.054417
  25. 25
    Pylypovskyi, O. V.; Sheka, D. D.; Kravchuk, V. P.; Yershov, K. V.; Makarov, D.; Gaididei, Y. Rashba Torque Driven Domain Wall Motion in Magnetic Helices. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23316,  DOI: 10.1038/srep23316
  26. 26
    Sheka, D. D.; Pylypovskyi, O. V.; Landeros, P.; Gaididei, Y.; Kákay, A.; Makarov, D. Nonlocal chiral symmetry breaking in curvilinear magnetic shells. Communications Physics 2020, 3, 128,  DOI: 10.1038/s42005-020-0387-2
  27. 27
    Streubel, R.; Fischer, P.; Kronast, F.; Kravchuk, V. P.; Sheka, D. D.; Gaididei, Y.; Schmidt, O. G.; Makarov, D. Magnetism in curved geometries (Topical Review). J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2016, 49, 363001,  DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/36/363001
  28. 28
    Fernández-Pacheco, A.; Streubel, R.; Fruchart, O.; Hertel, R.; Fischer, P.; Cowburn, R. P. Three-dimensional nanomagnetism. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15756,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15756
  29. 29
    Fischer, P.; Sanz-Hernández, D.; Streubel, R.; Fernández-Pacheco, A. Launching a new dimension with 3D magnetic nanostructures. APL Mater. 2020, 8, 010701,  DOI: 10.1063/1.5134474
  30. 30
    Vedmedenko, E. Y.; Kawakami, R. K.; Sheka, D.; Gambardella, P.; Kirilyuk, A.; Hirohata, A.; Binek, C.; Chubykalo-Fesenko, O. A.; Sanvito, S.; Kirby, B.; Grollier, J.; Everschor-Sitte, K.; Kampfrath, T.; You, C.-Y.; Berger, A. The 2020 Magnetism Roadmap. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 453001,  DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab9d98
  31. 31
    Otálora, J. A.; Yan, M.; Schultheiss, H.; Hertel, R.; Kákay, A. Curvature-Induced Asymmetric Spin-Wave Dispersion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 117, 227203,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.227203
  32. 32
    Vojkovic, S.; Carvalho-Santos, V. L.; Fonseca, J. M.; Nunez, A. S. Vortex-antivortex pairs induced by curvature in toroidal nanomagnets. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 121, 113906,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4977983
  33. 33
    Yang, D.-K.; Wu, S.-T. Fundamentals of Liquid Crystal Devices; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, U.K., 2014.
  34. 34
    Cheong, S.-W.; Fiebig, M.; Wu, W.; Chapon, L.; Kiryukhin, V. Seeing is believing: visualization of antiferromagnetic domains. npj Quantum Materials 2020, 5, 3,  DOI: 10.1038/s41535-019-0204-x
  35. 35
    Castillo-Sepúlveda, S.; Escobar, R. A.; Altbir, D.; Krizanac, M.; Vedmedenko, E. Y. Magnetic Möbius stripe without frustration: Noncollinear metastable states. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2017, 96, 024426,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.024426
  36. 36
    Gurevich, A. G.; Melkov, G. A. Magnetization Oscillations and Waves; CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1996.
  37. 37
    Mizoguchi, K.; Tanaka, S.; Ogawa, T.; Shiobara, N.; Sakamoto, H. Magnetic study of the electronic states of B-DNA and M-DNA doped with metal ions. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 72, 033106,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.033106
  38. 38
    Pan, K.; Xing, L.; Yuan, H. Y.; Wang, W. Driving chiral domain walls in antiferromagnets using rotating magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2018, 97, 184418,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.184418
  39. 39
    Dzyaloshinskii, I. E. The Theory of Helicoidal Structures in Antiferromagnets. II. Metals. Sov. Phys. JETP 1965, 20, 223
  40. 40
    Ivanov, B. A.; Kolezhuk, A. K. Solitons in Low-Dimensional Antiferromagnets. Low Temp. Phys. 1995, 21, 275301
  41. 41
    de Sousa, R.; Moore, J. E. Optical coupling to spin waves in the cycloidal multiferroic BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2008, 77, 012406,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.012406
  42. 42
    Stamps, R. L.; Camley, R. E. Bulk and surface spin waves in thin-film antiferromagnets. J. Appl. Phys. 1984, 56, 34973502,  DOI: 10.1063/1.333915
  43. 43
    Stamps, R. L.; Camley, R. E. Dipole-exchange spin-wave modes in very-thin-film antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1987, 35, 19191931,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.1919
  44. 44
    Demokritov, S. O., Slavin, A. N., Eds.; Magnonics: From Fundamentals to Applications; Topics in Applied Physics; Springer: Berlin, 2013.
  45. 45
    Yuan, W.; Zhu, Q.; Su, T.; Yao, Y.; Xing, W.; Chen, Y.; Ma, Y.; Lin, X.; Shi, J.; Shindou, R.; Xie, X. C.; Han, W. Experimental signatures of spin superfluid ground state in canted antiferromagnet Cr2O3 via nonlocal spin transport. Science Advances 2018, 4, eaat1098  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aat1098
  46. 46
    Sonin, E. B. Superfluid spin transport in ferro- and antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2019, 99, 104423,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.104423
  47. 47
    Evers, M.; Nowak, U. Transport properties of spin superfluids: Comparing easy-plane ferromagnets and antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2020, 101, 184415,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.184415
  48. 48
    Demokritov, S. O.; Demidov, V. E.; Dzyapko, O.; Melkov, G. A.; Serga, A. A.; Hillebrands, B.; Slavin, A. N. Bose–Einstein condensation of quasi-equilibrium magnons at room temperature under pumping. Nature 2006, 443, 430433,  DOI: 10.1038/nature05117
  49. 49
    Serga, A. A.; Tiberkevich, V. S.; Sandweg, C. W.; Vasyuchka, V. I.; Bozhko, D. A.; Chumak, A. V.; Neumann, T.; Obry, B.; Melkov, G. A.; Slavin, A. N.; Hillebrands, B. Bose–Einstein condensation in an ultra-hot gas of pumped magnons. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3452,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4452
  50. 50
    Clausen, P.; Bozhko, D. A.; Vasyuchka, V. I.; Hillebrands, B.; Melkov, G. A.; Serga, A. A. Stimulated thermalization of a parametrically driven magnon gas as a prerequisite for Bose–Einstein magnon condensation. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2015, 91, 220402(R)  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.220402
  51. 51
    Bozhko, D. A.; Serga, A. A.; Clausen, P.; Vasyuchka, V. I.; Heussner, F.; Melkov, G. A.; Pomyalov, A.; L’vov, V. S.; Hillebrands, B. Supercurrent in a room-temperature Bose–Einstein magnon condensate. Nat. Phys. 2016, 12, 10571062,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys3838
  52. 52
    Zhang, X.; Li, B.; Zhang, J. An Efficient Strategy for Self-Assembly of DNA-Mimic Homochiral 1D Helical Cu(II) Chain from Achiral Flexible Ligand by Spontaneous Resolution. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 33783383,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b02785
  53. 53
    Zhang, H. Y.; Calzolari, A.; Di Felice, R. On the Magnetic Alignment of Metal Ions in a DNA-Mimic Double Helix. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 1534515348,  DOI: 10.1021/jp052202t
  54. 54
    Yamaguchi, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Kawakami, T.; Hamamoto, T.; Okumura, M. Possibilities of magnetic modifications of DNA wires, sheets and related materials. Polyhedron 2005, 24, 27582766,  DOI: 10.1016/j.poly.2005.03.132
  55. 55
    Mizoguchi, K.; Tanaka, S.; Ojima, M.; Sano, S.; Nagatori, M.; Sakamoto, H.; Yonezawa, Y.; Aoki, Y.; Sato, H.; Furukawa, K.; Nakamura, T. AF-like Ground State of Mn-DNA and Charge Transfer from Fe to Base-π-Band in Fe-DNA. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2007, 76, 043801,  DOI: 10.1143/JPSJ.76.043801
  56. 56
    Samanta, P. K.; Pati, S. K. Structural and Magnetic Properties of a Variety of Transition Metal Incorporated DNA Double Helices. Chem. - Eur. J. 2014, 20, 17601764,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201302628

Cited By


This article is cited by 10 publications.

  1. E. Saavedra, S. Castillo-Sepúlveda, R.M. Corona, D. Altbir, J. Escrig, V.L. Carvalho-Santos. Influence of curvature on the dynamical susceptibility of bent nanotubes. Results in Physics 2022, 35 , 105290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105290OpenURL ROCHESTER INST OF TECHNOLOGY
  2. Kostiantyn V. Yershov. Dynamics of domain walls in curved antiferromagnetic wires. Physical Review B 2022, 105 (6) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.064407OpenURL ROCHESTER INST OF TECHNOLOGY
  3. Denis D. Sheka, Oleksandr V. Pylypovskyi, Oleksii M. Volkov, Kostiantyn V. Yershov, Volodymyr P. Kravchuk, Denys Makarov. Fundamentals of Curvilinear Ferromagnetism: Statics and Dynamics of Geometrically Curved Wires and Narrow Ribbons. Small 2022, 84 , 2105219. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202105219OpenURL ROCHESTER INST OF TECHNOLOGY
  4. Denys Makarov, Oleksii M. Volkov, Attila Kákay, Oleksandr V. Pylypovskyi, Barbora Budinská, Oleksandr V. Dobrovolskiy. New Dimension in Magnetism and Superconductivity: 3D and Curvilinear Nanoarchitectures. Advanced Materials 2022, 34 (3) , 2101758. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202101758OpenURL ROCHESTER INST OF TECHNOLOGY
  5. Gaetano Napoli, Oleksandr V. Pylypovskyi, Denis D. Sheka, Luigi Vergori. Nematic shells: new insights in topology- and curvature-induced effects. Soft Matter 2021, 17 (45) , 10322-10333. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SM00719JOpenURL ROCHESTER INST OF TECHNOLOGY
  6. Nabil Challab, Damien Faurie, Mohamed Haboussi, Fatih Zighem. Effects of Heterogeneous Strain on the Magnetization Processes in Magnetic Nanomembranes. physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters 2021, 15 (8) , 2100149. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssr.202100149OpenURL ROCHESTER INST OF TECHNOLOGY
  7. Denis D. Sheka. A perspective on curvilinear magnetism. Applied Physics Letters 2021, 118 (23) , 230502. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0048891OpenURL ROCHESTER INST OF TECHNOLOGY
  8. Robert Streubel, Evgeny Y. Tsymbal, Peter Fischer. Magnetism in curved geometries. Journal of Applied Physics 2021, 129 (21) , 210902. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0054025OpenURL ROCHESTER INST OF TECHNOLOGY
  9. Oleksandr V. Pylypovskyi, Yelyzaveta A. Borysenko, Jürgen Fassbender, Denis D. Sheka, Denys Makarov. Curvature-driven homogeneous Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction and emergent weak ferromagnetism in anisotropic antiferromagnetic spin chains. Applied Physics Letters 2021, 118 (18) , 182405. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0048823OpenURL ROCHESTER INST OF TECHNOLOGY
  10. Oleksandr V. Pylypovskyi, Artem V. Tomilo, Denis D. Sheka, Jürgen Fassbender, Denys Makarov. Boundary conditions for the Néel order parameter in a chiral antiferromagnetic slab. Physical Review B 2021, 103 (13) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.134413OpenURL ROCHESTER INST OF TECHNOLOGY
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (a) Schematics of the antiferromagnetic spin chain γ. Magnetic sublattices with magnetization mI and mII are shown by magenta and light-blue arrows. The Dzyaloshinskii vector d (dark-blue) lies in the TB plane given by the TNB basis eT,N,B. Hard and easy anisotropy axes are labeled by e1 and e3, respectively. (b) Helix spin chain with radius R and pitch P. The AFM order parameter (Néel vector) n parametrized by angles θ and ϕ is shown by the green arrow. (c) Diagram of equilibrium states for a helix spin chain. Open symbols and triangles correspond to periodic and homogeneous states, respectively, obtained in spin–lattice simulations. The solid red curve shows the boundary between the states. The dashed green line shows the asymptotic of the boundary τb ≈ 0.85κ for κ ≪ 1. Schematics of the (d, e) homogeneous and (f, g) periodic states in the TNB reference frame. (d, f) Bloch spheres illustrate the trajectories of n. The tilt angle .

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) Spin-wave dispersion (5) for helical AFM spin chains with and two curvatures (black) and (red). The result of spin–lattice simulations is shown by the background color for a helical spin chain with the geometry with and . (b) Helix geometries calculated in a. (c) Spin-wave dispersion (5) and simulations for and . The depth of the minimum in the acoustic branch is shown by δ. (d) The depth δ for different curvatures and torsions within the homogeneous ground state (below red line, same as in Figure 1c). Dashed line corresponds to the absence of minimum.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 56 other publications.

    1. 1
      Castelnovo, C.; Moessner, R.; Sondhi, S. L. Magnetic monopoles in spin ice. Nature 2008, 451, 4245,  DOI: 10.1038/nature06433
    2. 2
      Nagaosa, N.; Tokura, Y. Emergent electromagnetism in solids. Phys. Scr. 2012, T146, 014020,  DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/2012/T146/014020
    3. 3
      Zvyagin, A. A. New physics in frustrated magnets: Spin ices, monopoles, etc. (Review Article). Low Temp. Phys. 2013, 39, 901922,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4826079
    4. 4
      Takei, S.; Halperin, B. I.; Yacoby, A.; Tserkovnyak, Y. Superfluid spin transport through antiferromagnetic insulators. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2014, 90, 094408,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.094408
    5. 5
      Proukakis, N., Snoke, D., Littlewood, P., Eds.; Universal Themes of Bose–Einstein Condensation; Cambridge University Press, 2017; pp 387388.
    6. 6
      Baltz, V.; Manchon, A.; Tsoi, M.; Moriyama, T.; Ono, T.; Tserkovnyak, Y. Antiferromagnetic spintronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018, 90, 015005,  DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015005
    7. 7
      Rice, T. M. QUANTUM MECHANICS: To Condense or Not to Condense. Science 2002, 298, 760761,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1078819
    8. 8
      Giamarchi, T.; Rüegg, C.; Tchernyshyov, O. Bose–Einstein condensation in magnetic insulators. Nat. Phys. 2008, 4, 198204,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys893
    9. 9
      Gomonay, O.; Jungwirth, T.; Sinova, J. Concepts of antiferromagnetic spintronics. Phys. Status Solidi RRL 2017, 11, 1700022,  DOI: 10.1002/pssr.201700022
    10. 10
      Šmejkal, L.; Mokrousov, Y.; Yan, B.; MacDonald, A. H. Topological antiferromagnetic spintronics. Nat. Phys. 2018, 14, 242251,  DOI: 10.1038/s41567-018-0064-5
    11. 11
      Manchon, A.; Železný, J.; Miron, I. M.; Jungwirth, T.; Sinova, J.; Thiaville, A.; Garello, K.; Gambardella, P. Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2019, 91, 035004,  DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.035004
    12. 12
      Zhang, X.; Liu, Q.; Luo, J.-W.; Freeman, A. J.; Zunger, A. Hidden spin polarization in inversion-symmetric bulk crystals. Nat. Phys. 2014, 10, 387393,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys2933
    13. 13
      Železný, J.; Gao, H.; Výborný, K.; Zemen, J.; Mašek, J.; Manchon, A.; Wunderlich, J.; Sinova, J.; Jungwirth, T. Relativistic Néel-Order Fields Induced by Electrical Current in Antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 157201,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.157201
    14. 14
      Dzialoshinskii, I. E. Thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism in antiferromagnetic substances. Sov. Phys. JETP 1957, 5, 12591272
    15. 15
      Bogdanov, A. N.; Yablonskiĭ, D. A. Thermodynamically stable “vortices” in magnetically ordered crystals. The mixed state of magnets. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 1989, 95, 178182
    16. 16
      Qaiumzadeh, A.; Ado, I. A.; Duine, R. A.; Titov, M.; Brataas, A. Theory of the Interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction in Rashba Antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 197202,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.197202
    17. 17
      Dzyaloshinskii, I. E. Theory of Helicoidal Structures in Antiferromagnets. I. Nonmetals. Sov. Phys. JETP 1964, 19, 960971
    18. 18
      Bogdanov, A. N.; Rößler, U. K.; Wolf, M.; Müller, K.-H. Magnetic structures and reorientation transitions in noncentrosymmetric uniaxial antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2002, 66, 214410,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.214410
    19. 19
      Qaiumzadeh, A.; Kristiansen, L. A.; Brataas, A. Controlling chiral domain walls in antiferromagnets using spin-wave helicity. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2018, 97, 020402(R)  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.020402
    20. 20
      Barker, J.; Tretiakov, O. A. Static and Dynamical Properties of Antiferromagnetic Skyrmions in the Presence of Applied Current and Temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 147203,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.147203
    21. 21
      Shen, L.; Li, X.; Zhao, Y.; Xia, J.; Zhao, G.; Zhou, Y. Current-Induced Dynamics of the Antiferromagnetic Skyrmion and Skyrmionium. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 12, 064033,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.064033
    22. 22
      Železný, J.; Wadley, P.; Olejník, K.; Hoffmann, A.; Ohno, H. Spin transport and spin torque in antiferromagnetic devices. Nat. Phys. 2018, 14, 220228,  DOI: 10.1038/s41567-018-0062-7
    23. 23
      Gaididei, Y.; Kravchuk, V. P.; Sheka, D. D. Curvature Effects in Thin Magnetic Shells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112, 257203,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.257203
    24. 24
      Sheka, D. D.; Kravchuk, V. P.; Yershov, K. V.; Gaididei, Y. Torsion-induced effects in magnetic nanowires. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2015, 92, 054417,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.054417
    25. 25
      Pylypovskyi, O. V.; Sheka, D. D.; Kravchuk, V. P.; Yershov, K. V.; Makarov, D.; Gaididei, Y. Rashba Torque Driven Domain Wall Motion in Magnetic Helices. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23316,  DOI: 10.1038/srep23316
    26. 26
      Sheka, D. D.; Pylypovskyi, O. V.; Landeros, P.; Gaididei, Y.; Kákay, A.; Makarov, D. Nonlocal chiral symmetry breaking in curvilinear magnetic shells. Communications Physics 2020, 3, 128,  DOI: 10.1038/s42005-020-0387-2
    27. 27
      Streubel, R.; Fischer, P.; Kronast, F.; Kravchuk, V. P.; Sheka, D. D.; Gaididei, Y.; Schmidt, O. G.; Makarov, D. Magnetism in curved geometries (Topical Review). J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2016, 49, 363001,  DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/36/363001
    28. 28
      Fernández-Pacheco, A.; Streubel, R.; Fruchart, O.; Hertel, R.; Fischer, P.; Cowburn, R. P. Three-dimensional nanomagnetism. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15756,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15756
    29. 29
      Fischer, P.; Sanz-Hernández, D.; Streubel, R.; Fernández-Pacheco, A. Launching a new dimension with 3D magnetic nanostructures. APL Mater. 2020, 8, 010701,  DOI: 10.1063/1.5134474
    30. 30
      Vedmedenko, E. Y.; Kawakami, R. K.; Sheka, D.; Gambardella, P.; Kirilyuk, A.; Hirohata, A.; Binek, C.; Chubykalo-Fesenko, O. A.; Sanvito, S.; Kirby, B.; Grollier, J.; Everschor-Sitte, K.; Kampfrath, T.; You, C.-Y.; Berger, A. The 2020 Magnetism Roadmap. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 453001,  DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab9d98
    31. 31
      Otálora, J. A.; Yan, M.; Schultheiss, H.; Hertel, R.; Kákay, A. Curvature-Induced Asymmetric Spin-Wave Dispersion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 117, 227203,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.227203
    32. 32
      Vojkovic, S.; Carvalho-Santos, V. L.; Fonseca, J. M.; Nunez, A. S. Vortex-antivortex pairs induced by curvature in toroidal nanomagnets. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 121, 113906,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4977983
    33. 33
      Yang, D.-K.; Wu, S.-T. Fundamentals of Liquid Crystal Devices; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, U.K., 2014.
    34. 34
      Cheong, S.-W.; Fiebig, M.; Wu, W.; Chapon, L.; Kiryukhin, V. Seeing is believing: visualization of antiferromagnetic domains. npj Quantum Materials 2020, 5, 3,  DOI: 10.1038/s41535-019-0204-x
    35. 35
      Castillo-Sepúlveda, S.; Escobar, R. A.; Altbir, D.; Krizanac, M.; Vedmedenko, E. Y. Magnetic Möbius stripe without frustration: Noncollinear metastable states. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2017, 96, 024426,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.024426
    36. 36
      Gurevich, A. G.; Melkov, G. A. Magnetization Oscillations and Waves; CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1996.
    37. 37
      Mizoguchi, K.; Tanaka, S.; Ogawa, T.; Shiobara, N.; Sakamoto, H. Magnetic study of the electronic states of B-DNA and M-DNA doped with metal ions. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 72, 033106,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.033106
    38. 38
      Pan, K.; Xing, L.; Yuan, H. Y.; Wang, W. Driving chiral domain walls in antiferromagnets using rotating magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2018, 97, 184418,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.184418
    39. 39
      Dzyaloshinskii, I. E. The Theory of Helicoidal Structures in Antiferromagnets. II. Metals. Sov. Phys. JETP 1965, 20, 223
    40. 40
      Ivanov, B. A.; Kolezhuk, A. K. Solitons in Low-Dimensional Antiferromagnets. Low Temp. Phys. 1995, 21, 275301
    41. 41
      de Sousa, R.; Moore, J. E. Optical coupling to spin waves in the cycloidal multiferroic BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2008, 77, 012406,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.012406
    42. 42
      Stamps, R. L.; Camley, R. E. Bulk and surface spin waves in thin-film antiferromagnets. J. Appl. Phys. 1984, 56, 34973502,  DOI: 10.1063/1.333915
    43. 43
      Stamps, R. L.; Camley, R. E. Dipole-exchange spin-wave modes in very-thin-film antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1987, 35, 19191931,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.1919
    44. 44
      Demokritov, S. O., Slavin, A. N., Eds.; Magnonics: From Fundamentals to Applications; Topics in Applied Physics; Springer: Berlin, 2013.
    45. 45
      Yuan, W.; Zhu, Q.; Su, T.; Yao, Y.; Xing, W.; Chen, Y.; Ma, Y.; Lin, X.; Shi, J.; Shindou, R.; Xie, X. C.; Han, W. Experimental signatures of spin superfluid ground state in canted antiferromagnet Cr2O3 via nonlocal spin transport. Science Advances 2018, 4, eaat1098  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aat1098
    46. 46
      Sonin, E. B. Superfluid spin transport in ferro- and antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2019, 99, 104423,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.104423
    47. 47
      Evers, M.; Nowak, U. Transport properties of spin superfluids: Comparing easy-plane ferromagnets and antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2020, 101, 184415,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.184415
    48. 48
      Demokritov, S. O.; Demidov, V. E.; Dzyapko, O.; Melkov, G. A.; Serga, A. A.; Hillebrands, B.; Slavin, A. N. Bose–Einstein condensation of quasi-equilibrium magnons at room temperature under pumping. Nature 2006, 443, 430433,  DOI: 10.1038/nature05117
    49. 49
      Serga, A. A.; Tiberkevich, V. S.; Sandweg, C. W.; Vasyuchka, V. I.; Bozhko, D. A.; Chumak, A. V.; Neumann, T.; Obry, B.; Melkov, G. A.; Slavin, A. N.; Hillebrands, B. Bose–Einstein condensation in an ultra-hot gas of pumped magnons. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3452,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4452
    50. 50
      Clausen, P.; Bozhko, D. A.; Vasyuchka, V. I.; Hillebrands, B.; Melkov, G. A.; Serga, A. A. Stimulated thermalization of a parametrically driven magnon gas as a prerequisite for Bose–Einstein magnon condensation. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2015, 91, 220402(R)  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.220402
    51. 51
      Bozhko, D. A.; Serga, A. A.; Clausen, P.; Vasyuchka, V. I.; Heussner, F.; Melkov, G. A.; Pomyalov, A.; L’vov, V. S.; Hillebrands, B. Supercurrent in a room-temperature Bose–Einstein magnon condensate. Nat. Phys. 2016, 12, 10571062,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys3838
    52. 52
      Zhang, X.; Li, B.; Zhang, J. An Efficient Strategy for Self-Assembly of DNA-Mimic Homochiral 1D Helical Cu(II) Chain from Achiral Flexible Ligand by Spontaneous Resolution. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 33783383,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b02785
    53. 53
      Zhang, H. Y.; Calzolari, A.; Di Felice, R. On the Magnetic Alignment of Metal Ions in a DNA-Mimic Double Helix. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 1534515348,  DOI: 10.1021/jp052202t
    54. 54
      Yamaguchi, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Kawakami, T.; Hamamoto, T.; Okumura, M. Possibilities of magnetic modifications of DNA wires, sheets and related materials. Polyhedron 2005, 24, 27582766,  DOI: 10.1016/j.poly.2005.03.132
    55. 55
      Mizoguchi, K.; Tanaka, S.; Ojima, M.; Sano, S.; Nagatori, M.; Sakamoto, H.; Yonezawa, Y.; Aoki, Y.; Sato, H.; Furukawa, K.; Nakamura, T. AF-like Ground State of Mn-DNA and Charge Transfer from Fe to Base-π-Band in Fe-DNA. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2007, 76, 043801,  DOI: 10.1143/JPSJ.76.043801
    56. 56
      Samanta, P. K.; Pati, S. K. Structural and Magnetic Properties of a Variety of Transition Metal Incorporated DNA Double Helices. Chem. - Eur. J. 2014, 20, 17601764,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201302628
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03246.

    • Details on analytical calculations and numerical simulations, including (i) the geometry, (ii) the model of curvilinear antiferromagnet, (iii) dipolar interaction in spin chains as an effective anisotropy (both ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic ordering, and curvilinear antiferromagnetic spin chains), (iv) the homogeneous state of antiferromagnetic helix chains, (v) the periodic state of antiferromagnetic helix chains, (vi) the boundary between states, (vii) The ground state of antiferromagnetic flat chains, (viii) spin waves in antiferromagnetic flat chains, (ix) spin waves in antiferromagnetic helices and stability of the homogeneous state, and (x) simulations (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE