ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Biexciton Binding Energy and Line width of Single Quantum Dots at Room Temperature
My Activity
  • Open Access
Letter

Biexciton Binding Energy and Line width of Single Quantum Dots at Room Temperature
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Nano Letters

Cite this: Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 13, 5760–5766
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01556
Published June 16, 2021

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Broadening of multiexciton emission from colloidal quantum dots (QDs) at room temperature is important for their use in high-power applications, but an in-depth characterization has not been possible until now. We present and apply a novel spectroscopic method to quantify the biexciton line width and biexciton binding energy of single CdSe/CdS/ZnS colloidal QDs at room temperature. In our method, which we term “cascade spectroscopy”, we select emission events from the biexciton cascade and reconstruct their spectrum. The biexciton has an average emission line width of 86 meV on the single-QD scale, similar to that of the exciton. Variations in the biexciton repulsion (Eb = 4.0 ± 3.1 meV; mean ± standard deviation of 15 QDs) are correlated with but are more narrowly distributed than variations in the exciton energy (10.0 meV standard deviation). Using a simple quantum-mechanical model, we conclude that inhomogeneous broadening in our sample is primarily due to variations in the CdS shell thickness.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
  • nc licence
  • nd licence
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Since the first report of colloidal quantum-dot (QD) synthesis 30 years ago, (1) significant research effort has been devoted to reaching high emission efficiencies and pure emission colors tunable over the entire visible range. However, variations in particle size, which reduce the color purity because of inhomogeneous broadening, cannot be entirely avoided. Inhomogeneous and homogeneous broadening (2−6) of QD emission at room temperature, directly relevant for applications in displays and lamps, has been studied extensively on the ensemble and single-QD level. Previous studies have focused on QD emission in the regime of weak optical excitation, where QD fluorescence originates from the single-exciton excited state. Prospective new applications—such as lasing and high-power lighting—inherently demand stronger excitation, which creates multiexciton states with optical properties different from those of single excitons, (7,8) most notably a lower emission efficiency because of Auger recombination. (9,10)

The spectral characteristics of multiexcitons have remained largely unexplored. Studying multiexciton states is difficult because, under strong excitation, the simultaneous presence of trions, biexcitons, and higher multiexcitons obscures the investigation of any particular multiexciton state. Only at cryogenic temperatures can multi- and single-exciton emission be separated on the basis of polarization (11,12) or by spectral selection. (13) At room temperature, such selections are difficult because the energy splitting between fine-structure states and the spectral shifts between single excitons and multiexcitons are small (a few meV) in comparison to the emission line widths (tens of meV). Photon-correlation investigations of multiexciton (14−22) emission efficiencies at room temperature have revealed enormous heterogeneities with no apparent link to the single-exciton properties. (20,23−26) A detailed characterization of multiexciton emission energies and the variations thereof at the single-QD level is important for high-power applications (27−29) but has not yet been achieved.

In this Letter, we measure the biexciton spectrum of single QDs at room temperature. We employ a novel spectroscopic technique, which we call “cascade spectroscopy”. In this technique, we identify biexciton cascades from the emission of a single QD by cross-correlating the signal recorded by two time-resolved single-photon detectors. On one of the two detectors we achieve energy resolution, which allows us to reconstruct the biexciton emission spectra. We observe a repulsive biexciton of single CdSe/CdS/ZnS core–shell–shell QDs, commonly used for lasing, (27) consistent with power-dependent measurements on the ensemble scale and with previous studies of thick-shelled core–shell QDs. (30) The single-QD biexciton emission line width is 86 meV on average (full width at half-maximum; fwhm). This matches the line width of the single-QD exciton emission of our QDs and those of other groups. (3,28) We find single-QD biexciton shifts of Eb = 4.0 ± 3.1 meV, which are slightly negatively correlated with but more narrowly distributed than the single-QD exciton energies (variation of 10.0 meV). Comparing these correlations and variations to simple quantum-mechanical calculations of multicarrier states in QDs, we conclude that both are predominantly due to variations in the thickness of the CdS shell. We thus present the first method to characterize single-QD biexciton spectra at room temperature, which will guide the development of synthesis strategies aimed at minimizing inhomogeneous broadening of biexciton emission for high-power applications.

We first characterize the biexciton emission of our CdSe/CdS/ZnS core–shell–shell sample (section S1 in the Supporting Information) on the ensemble scale, as a micrometer-thick layer on a cover slip, using energy-resolved time-correlated single-photon counting. Figure 1a shows the setup, which we term the “galvo-APD” setup. A galvo mirror periodically varies the incidence angle of the QD emission onto a transmissive diffraction grating (300 lines/mm). Fourier imaging of the grating plane projects part of the QD spectrum onto an avalanche photodiode (APD) with a resolution Δλ ≈ aL/f, where a is the detector size (20 μm), L is the groove spacing (3.3 μm), and f is the focal distance (20 mm). These optical elements give a resolution of approximately Δλ = 3 nm (section S2.1 in the Supporting Information). Periodic scanning (Figure 1b, 0.5 Hz) measures the emission spectrum twice every 2 s. We perform a pulsed-excitation experiment (repetition rate 2.5 MHz), where we deduce the energy of each detected photon from the detection time T since the beginning of the experiment (see inset of Figure 1b). For each photon, we simultaneously measure the delay time t with respect to the previous laser pulse.

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the galvo-APD setup. The QD emission is directed to a periodically rotating galvo mirror, which changes the angle of incidence on a transmission grating. Fourier imaging of the grating plane projects part of the QD emission spectrum onto an avalanche photodiode (APD). (b) Periodically rotating the galvo mirror with 0.5 Hz scans the emission spectrum of the QDs (pulsed excitation 2.5 MHz) over the APD twice every 2 s. We can convert the experimental time T to a photon energy (see inset). (c, d) Time-resolved emission spectra of a micrometer-thick layer of QDs on glass at increasing excitation-pulse energy. The white lines indicate the emission maximum as a function of delay time. At the highest power, the spectrum is slightly blue shifted at delay times of 0–2 ns because of the contribution of repulsive biexcitons. (e) Emission spectrum integrated between 0 and 0.6 ns delay times for n = 0.005 (red, panel c) and n = 0.23 (blue, panel d) excitons per pulse. By globally fitting a series of spectra for different fluences, we obtain an ensemble biexciton shift of b = +14 meV.

Figure 1c,d shows time-resolved emission maps, i.e. emission spectrum versus delay time, at different excitation powers, measured with our galvo-APD setup. At the lowest power (estimated number of excitons per QD per pulse n = 0.005, Figure 1c) the emission peaks at 2.002 eV on the interval t = 0–0.6 ns. It then slowly shifts to lower energies over the next 15 ns, likely due to inhomogeneous broadening of the emission (31) and exciton diffusion. (32) At higher powers (n = 0.23, Figure 1d) an additional slightly bluer contribution to the emission appears; the emission peaks at 2.007 eV on the interval t = 0–0.6 ns. Figure 1e shows the integrated emission spectra for t = 0–0.6 ns for the low fluence (red) and the high fluence (blue). This indicates a repulsive biexciton; i.e., the ensemble-scale biexciton shift is positive, b = BXX > 0, where BX and X are the ensemble-scale biexciton and exciton emission energies, respectively. We expect negligible contribution of triexcitons at the excitation fluences used. Nevertheless, extracting a quantitative value for b remains difficult, because the majority of the signal originates from the exciton and the shift between exciton and biexciton emission is much smaller than the line width due to inhomogeneous and homogeneous broadening. A global-fit procedure (section S3 in the Supporting Information) yields a best estimate for the ensemble-scale biexciton shift of b = 14 meV.

Experiments on single QDs allow us to unambiguously distinguish between biexciton and exciton photons and to directly extract the biexciton shift and the biexciton emission spectrum. We split the emission of a single QD using a Hanbury-Brown–Twiss (HBT) setup (Figure 2a), in which one of the detection channels uses a regular APD while the other uses the galvo-APD setup (70 lines/mm, Δλ = 13 nm), introduced in Figure 1a.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Schematic of the cascade spectroscopy setup. The emission of a single QD is split equally over the energy-resolved “galvo APD” (Figure 1a) and a regular APD. (b) Photon correlation function g(2) of a single QD (repetition rate 2.5 MHz, estimated average number of excitons per pulse μ = 0.1) integrated over the entire experiment, showing a biexciton efficiency of ηBX = 10.5%. The highlights mark the delay time ranges where events of types 1, 0, 0+, and 1+ contribute. (c) Overview of possible ordered-emission events. The laser pulses are the vertical blue lines. Events wherein two photons (dots) are detected following two consecutive laser pulses are highlighted 1+ and 1, depending on the order of the detector clicks. Two photons detected after a single laser pulse, indicating biexciton cascade emission, are highlighted 0+ and 0. The first photon of a cascade is a biexciton photon (blue dots); all other photons most likely originate from the single-exciton state (red dots). (d, e) Energy-resolved g(2) (log y-scale) for low (d) and high (e) galvo-APD detection energies. Lower galvo-APD detection energies Edet = 1.95–1.99 eV yield a ratio N0+/N0 < 1, while for blue-shifted detection energies Edet = 2.08–2.16 eV, N0+/N0 > 1. This indicates a repulsive biexciton. The insets (linear y scale) are enlarged views to show N0+/N0 more clearly. We discarded afterglow events from panels b, d, and e (Figure S3 in the Supporting Information). (f) N0+/N1 as a function of galvo-APD detection energy Edet. The gray spectrum shows the exciton emission of this single QD. The error bars are calculated assuming shot noise. By fitting eq 2 to the data, we extract a single-QD biexciton shift of Eb = 6.8 ± 1.0 meV.

From the energy-resolved measurement, we can reconstruct the same photon-correlation function g(2) as obtained with a conventional HBT setup, by simply integrating g(2) over the total experimental time of 30–60 min (section S4.2 in the Supporting Information). Figure 2b shows the result for a typical single QD from our batch. We performed a blind-time analysis to confirm that the zero-delay peak is due to biexciton-cascade events, while the side peaks are due to exciton–exciton pairs following consecutive laser pulses (Figure S4 in the Supporting Information). (33) The correlation function measured in the limit of weak excitation reveals the biexciton-to-exciton efficiency ratio ηBXX from the number of photon-pair events in the zero-delay peak N0 and the number of photon-pair pairs in a side peak N1: (14)

(1)

We find a biexciton efficiency of ηBX = 10.5% (assuming ηX = 1 (14)), which is a typical value for thick-shell CdSe/CdS/ZnS core–shell–shell QDs. (14,26)

In our correlation analysis, the galvo APD acts as the “start” channel and the regular APD as the “stop” channel. In our definition of g(2), the biexciton cascade emission wherein the first photon arrived at the galvo APD thus appears in the zero-delay peak at positive delay times (highlighted with 0+ in Figure 2b,c); cascade emission wherein the first photon arrived at the regular APD appears in the zero-delay peak at negative delay times (highlighted with 0 in Figure 2b,c). Similarly, for the side peaks, the order of the detector clicks determines whether an exciton–exciton emission pair appears at positive or negative delay times (compare 1 and 1+ in Figure 2b,c).

The relative areas of the peaks in the correlation function g(2) for a specific galvo-APD detection energy Edet contain information about the biexciton emission spectrum. Indeed, the number of recorded photon pairs of types 1, 0, 0+, and 1+ depend on Edet and on the emission spectra of biexcitons and excitons. Successful detection of photon pairs of type 1, 0, and 1+ require the galvo APD to record an exciton photon (section S4.3 in the Supporting Information); thus, the number of detection events is proportional to the brightness of the exciton at Edet. In contrast, for events of type 0+ the galvo APD must record a biexciton photon; thus, the number of such events is proportional to the biexciton brightness at Edet. A comparison of g(2) for Edet = 1.95–1.99 eV (Figure 2d) and for Edet = 2.08–2.16 eV (Figure 2e) shows the consequence: the total number of events of types 0 and 0+, which we denote N0 and N0+, are unequal and dependent on Edet. More precisely, we observe that N0 > N0+ in Figure 2d and N0 < N0+ in Figure 2e (highlighted in the insets). Hence, a low Edet favors the recording of exciton photons on the galvo APD, while a high Edet favors the recording of biexciton photons. This proves that this single QD has a repulsive biexciton: i.e., the biexciton emission energy EBX is higher than the exciton emission energy EX. With a quantitative analysis, we can determine the biexciton shift Eb = EBXEX on the single-QD level. We compare the number of events recorded of type 0+ (positive-time area of the zero-delay peak N0+) to the number of events recorded of types 1 and 1+ (side-peak areas N1 and N1+). To improve the signal-to-noise ratio, we take the average N1 = N1 + N1+. Realizing that N0+ scales with the biexciton emission spectrum IBX(E) peaking at EBX = EX + Eb and N1 with the exciton emission spectrum IX(E) peaking at EX, we can derive (section S4.1 in the Supporting Information)

(2)

We observe that N0+/N1 increases as the galvo-APD detection energy increases for Edet = 1.97–2.07 eV (Figure 2e). Outside this range of Edet, the detection efficiency of both biexciton and exciton emission is low and dark counts affect the measurement. We fit N0+/N1 as a function of detection energy Edet using eq 2 (dashed blue line), fixing the previously determined biexciton efficiency, assuming Gaussian exciton and biexciton spectra with equal line width (fwhm = 85 meV, gray exciton spectrum inset) and using the biexciton shift Eb as the only fit parameter. The solid blue line is calculated including the contribution of dark counts (section S4.3 in the Supporting Information), which yields a match with the data over the full range of Edet. We obtain a biexciton shift Eb = 6.8 ± 1.0 meV for this single QD.

Understanding the different cascade events that occur in our experiment, we can now reconstruct the single-QD biexciton spectrum directly from the positive-time area N0+ of the zero-delay peak. The absolute value of N0+ as a function of Edet is proportional to the biexciton emission spectrum IBX. Similarly, we obtain the exciton emission spectrum IX from N1 as a function of Edet. The contribution of photon pairs to N0+ and N1 originating from a transient low-efficiency gray state due to blinking is negligible (Figure S6 in the Supporting Information), since the count rate of photon pairs scales quadratically with emission efficiency. Figure 3a shows the biexciton and exciton emission spectra obtained with this analysis procedure of the same QD as described in Figure 2. The exciton spectrum (red dots) has a maximum at EX = 2.025 eV and a fwhm of 92 meV. The emission is broadened by spectral diffusion and slightly by the finite resolution of the setup (Figure S2 in the Supporting Information). Interestingly, we measure a biexciton spectrum (blue dots) with an equal fwhm of 89 meV, which confirms the assumption of equal exciton and biexciton line widths that we used in fitting eq 2 to the data in Figure 2e. From the difference in fitted exciton and biexciton emission maxima we obtain a biexciton shift of Eb = 7.2 ± 2.1 meV, very similar to the value found from the fit in Figure 2e.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) Biexciton (blue) and exciton (red) emission spectra of the single QD analyzed in Figure 2. The biexciton spectrum was extracted from the positive-time area N0+ of the zero-delay peak in the energy-resolved photon-correlation function. We measure a biexciton shift of Eb = 7.2 ± 2.1 meV. (b) A different QD with exciton with a larger biexciton shift of Eb = 12.7 ± 1.9 meV. (c) Biexciton and exciton line widths (fwhm) of 22 single QDs measured. Error bars are standard errors of the Gaussian fit.

Figure 3b shows the emission spectra of a different QD from the synthesis batch. The exciton emission peaks at EX = 1.958 eV, and interestingly, the biexciton is significantly more repulsive: Eb = 12.7 ± 1.9 meV. Again, we observe equal line widths of the exciton and biexciton emission of 85 meV. Figure 3c shows the biexciton and exciton emission line widths obtained from 22 single-QD measurements (Figures S7–S9 in the Supporting Information). The single-QD line widths of biexciton and exciton emission are distributed between 70 and 100 meV fwhm, with a mean of 86 and 87 meV, respectively, and are strongly correlated; the biexciton and emission line widths of a single QD typically differ by no more than 10 meV fwhm. Equal line widths for the biexciton and exciton were reported before for epitaxially grown QDs over a wide temperature range from cryogenic temperatures up to room temperature. (34) Our experimental finding shows that the homogeneous emission broadening (determined by a combination of spectral diffusion, phonon coupling, and fine structure (3,34−36)) of different single QDs varies, but it affects the exciton and biexciton emission line widths by the same amount.

Figure 4a shows an overview of the biexciton shifts and exciton energies found. Of the 22 single-QD measurements, 15 were randomly selected QDs (blue dots in Figure 4a) and 7 QDs were specially selected for their low-energy emission (red dots in Figure 4a). We find that the variations in the exciton emission maximum (10.0 meV standard deviation) exceed the variations in the biexciton shift (3.1 meV) by almost a factor of 4. Additionally, we observe on average a slightly more repulsive biexciton Eb = +9.4 meV for the selected QDs in comparison to a weakly repulsive biexciton Eb = +4.0 meV for randomly selected QDs.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Biexciton shift Eb versus exciton energy EX for randomly selected QDs (blue) and for QDs selected for their low-energy exciton emission (red). Error bars denote one standard error of the fit. We observe a slight negative correlation between biexciton shift and exciton energy. (b) Dependence of Eb and EX on CdSe core radius a and CdSe/CdS core–inner-shell radius b, calculated with an effective-mass model that includes Coulomb interactions between carriers as a perturbation to second order (section S5 in the Supporting Information). The QD geometry is given as grid lines for a (core radius, solid lines) and b (core–inner-shell radius, dashed lines). The gray-shaded area highlights the range of exciton energies and biexciton shifts found experimentally. The red point and arrows are the calculated exciton energy and biexciton shift for the independently determined values of a = 1.84 nm (from the absorption spectrum of the cores) and b = 4.1 ± 0.4 nm (from electron microscopy).

To understand the variations in exciton energy and biexciton shift, we set up a simple quantum-mechanical effective-mass model of multicarrier states in a spherical core–shell–shell QD. Coulomb interactions between carriers are included as a perturbation to the particle-in-a-box confinement energies (section S5 in the Supporting Information). We compute the biexciton shift Eb and exciton energy EX of core–shell geometries with different CdSe core radii a and CdSe/CdS core–shell radii b. Figure 4b shows the results of the calculations in a way that facilitates comparison to the experimental data of Figure 4a: a grid of contour lines lays out which QD geometry (a, b) produces which values of Eb and EX.

We can determine the dominant geometrical contribution to inhomogeneous emission broadening in our QD sample by comparing the calculations (grid lines in Figure 4b) to the experimental distribution of QD properties (highlighted by the gray area). The experimental variation in EX exceeds the variation in Eb by almost a factor of 4, and they are slightly negatively correlated. This is consistent with energy variations due to a distribution of core–shell radii b, while a distribution of core radii a appears to be of lesser importance. Indeed, the solid contour lines in Figure 4b, running along directions of constant a, slope in approximately the same direction as the experimental distribution of single-QD emission energies. The calculations would predict that our experimental finding of the biexciton and exciton energies are due to a distribution of QD geometries with a = 1.82 ± 0.05 nm and b = 4.3 ± 0.3 nm. These calculated values match well with the values of a = 1.84 nm determined from the absorption spectrum of the cores and b = 4.1 ± 0.4 nm (mean ± standard deviation) from electron microscopy (red arrows in Figure 4b). A dominant contribution of variations in the CdSe/CdS core–shell size b to inhomogeneous broadening could be expected on the basis of our synthesis procedure and those of many others. (28,37,38) For the core synthesis, growth is fast and is stopped before size defocusing of a sets in. (39) Shells, on the other hand, are grown at a low growth rate to avoid secondary nucleation, which may lead to Ostwald ripening effects that widen the distribution of shell thicknesses. (40)

Using our effective-mass model, we can intuitively understand why variations in core–shell size b produce the observed distribution of biexciton and exciton energies. When Coulomb interactions are included as a first-order perturbation, the exciton energy is

(3)
where Econf, e and Econf, h are the particle-in-a-box confinement energies of the single-electron (e) and single-hole (h) 1S states, respectively, and Jij is the Coulomb interaction between carriers i and j. Similarly, the biexciton shift including Coulomb interactions to first order is
(4)

This description yields analytical expressions for the dependence of EX(1) and Eb(1) on a and b in the limit that ba (section S5.1 in the Supporting Information). As inhomogeneous broadening in our QD batch appears mostly due to variations in b, we can understand it from the derivatives of eqs 3 and 4 with respect to b

(5)
(6)
where is the reduced Planck’s constant, me the effective mass of the electron, e the elementary charge, ε0 the permittivity of the vacuum, and ε the relative permittivity of the QD material. Evaluating eqs 5 and 6 at a core–shell radius of b = 4.1 nm yields the prediction that a distribution of b produces variations in exciton energy of ∂EX(1)/∂b = −88 meV nm–1 (decrease with increasing shell thickness) and variations in biexciton binding of ∂Eb(1)/∂b = 26 meV nm–1 (increase with increasing shell thickness). The variations in the exciton energy ∂EX(1)/∂b are mainly caused by variations in the confinement energy of the electron. Hence, our simple model explains the wider variations in single-QD exciton energy than in biexciton binding as well as the slightly negative correlations between the two parameters. The negative correlation can also explain the less repulsive biexciton on the single-QD level (on average Eb = +4.0 meV) in comparison to the ensemble level (Figure 1c–e, b = +14 meV). Since both the biexciton efficiency (26) and the biexciton shift (eq 6) increase with increasing shell thickness, we expect a biexciton-efficiency-weighted biexciton shift in ensemble measurements. This highlights the necessity of single-QD measurements to successfully characterize biexciton emission. Equations 36 can be used to predict and understand the inhomogeneous broadening of exciton and biexciton energies for other QD geometries.

To summarize, we have measured the biexciton shift and biexciton line width of single CdSe/CdS/ZnS QDs using cascade spectroscopy. We found that the line widths of biexciton and exciton emission are similar, although they vary between different single QDs. Variations in the biexciton shift are small in comparison to variations of the exciton energy, and the two parameters are slightly negatively correlated. We can rationalize these variations with simple quantum-mechanical calculations, which point to a distribution of CdS shell thicknesses as the dominant contributor to inhomogeneous broadening. Our method and findings are relevant for a fundamental understanding of multicarrier interactions in colloidal QDs. Moreover, they can serve as a guide for synthesis procedures of core–shell nanocrystals, which will particularly benefit their use in high-power applications.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01556.

  • Experimental methods, details of data processing and calibration procedures, details of quantum-mechanical calculations, a derivation of the energy-resolved g(2), and an overview of all single-QD experiments (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Sander J. W. Vonk - Debye Institute, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC Utrecht, The NetherlandsOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4650-9473
    • Bart A. J. Heemskerk - Debye Institute, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
    • Robert C. Keitel - Optical Materials Engineering Laboratory, ETH Zurich, Leonhardstrasse 21, 8092 Zurich, SwitzerlandOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9412-8034
    • Stijn O. M. Hinterding - Debye Institute, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
    • Jaco J. Geuchies - Optoelectronic Materials Section, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ Delft, The NetherlandsOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0758-9140
    • Arjan J. Houtepen - Optoelectronic Materials Section, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ Delft, The NetherlandsOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8328-443X
  • Author Contributions

    The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This work was supported by the Dutch Research Council NWO (OCENW.KLEIN.008). F.T.R. acknowledges financial support from The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research NWO (VENI grant number 722.017.002) and The Netherlands Center for Multiscale Catalytic Energy Conversion (MCEC). J.J.G. and A.J.H. acknowledge support from European Research Council Horizon 2020 ERC Grant Agreement 678004 (Doping on Demand). R.C.K. acknowledges support from the European Research Council (ERC; FP/2007-2013), ERC Grant Agreement No. 339905 (QuaDoPS Advanced Grant). Peter Helfferich is thanked for technical support setting up the galvo-APD setup.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 40 other publications.

  1. 1
    Murray, C. B.; Norris, D. J.; Bawendi, M. G. Synthesis and Characterization of Nearly Monodisperse CdE (E = S, Se, Te) Semiconductor Nanocrystallites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115 (19), 87068715,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00072a025
  2. 2
    Cui, J.; Beyler, A. P.; Marshall, L. F.; Chen, O.; Harris, D. K.; Wanger, D. D.; Brokmann, X.; Bawendi, M. G. Direct Probe of Spectral Inhomogeneity Reveals Synthetic Tunability of Single-Nanocrystal Spectral Linewidths. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5 (7), 602606,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1654
  3. 3
    Cui, J.; Beyler, A. P.; Coropceanu, I.; Cleary, L.; Avila, T. R.; Chen, Y.; Cordero, J. M.; Heathcote, S. L.; Harris, D. K.; Chen, O. Evolution of the Single-Nanocrystal Photoluminescence Linewidth with Size and Shell: Implications for Exciton-Phonon Coupling and the Optimization of Spectral Linewidths. Nano Lett. 2016, 16 (1), 289296,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03790
  4. 4
    Utzat, H.; Shulenberger, K. E.; Achorn, O. B.; Nasilowski, M.; Sinclair, T. S.; Bawendi, M. G. Probing Linewidths and Biexciton Quantum Yields of Single Cesium Lead Halide Nanocrystals in Solution. Nano Lett. 2017, 17 (11), 68386846,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03120
  5. 5
    Gellen, T. A.; Lem, J.; Turner, D. B. Probing Homogeneous Line Broadening in CdSe Nanocrystals Using Multidimensional Electronic Spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 2017, 17 (5), 28092815,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05068
  6. 6
    Van Der Bok, J. C.; Dekker, D. M.; Peerlings, M. L. J.; Salzmann, B. B. V.; Meijerink, A. Luminescence Line Broadening of CdSe Nanoplatelets and Quantum Dots for Application in W-LEDs. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124 (22), 1215312160,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c03048
  7. 7
    Bae, W. K.; Park, Y. S.; Lim, J.; Lee, D.; Padilha, L. A.; McDaniel, H.; Robel, I.; Lee, C.; Pietryga, J. M.; Klimov, V. I. Controlling the Influence of Auger Recombination on the Performance of Quantum-Dot Light-Emitting Diodes. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 3661,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3661
  8. 8
    Grim, J. Q.; Christodoulou, S.; Di Stasio, F.; Krahne, R.; Cingolani, R.; Manna, L.; Moreels, I. Continuous-Wave Biexciton Lasing at Room Temperature Using Solution-Processed Quantum Wells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9 (11), 891895,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2014.213
  9. 9
    Hollingsworth, J. A. Heterostructuring Nanocrystal Quantum Dots toward Intentional Suppression of Blinking and Auger Recombination. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25 (8), 13181331,  DOI: 10.1021/cm304161d
  10. 10
    Pandey, A.; Guyot-Sionnest, P. Multicarrier Recombination in Colloidal Quantum Dots. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127 (11), 111104,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2786068
  11. 11
    He, Y. M.; Iff, O.; Lundt, N.; Baumann, V.; Davanco, M.; Srinivasan, K.; Höfling, S.; Schneider, C. Cascaded Emission of Single Photons from the Biexciton in Monolayered WSe2. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13409,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13409
  12. 12
    Huang, X.; Chen, L.; Zhang, C.; Qin, Z.; Yu, B.; Wang, X.; Xiao, M. Inhomogeneous Biexciton Binding in Perovskite Semiconductor Nanocrystals Measured with Two-Dimensional Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11 (23), 1017310181,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03153
  13. 13
    Fernée, M. J.; Tamarat, P.; Lounis, B. Cryogenic Single-Nanocrystal Spectroscopy: Reading the Spectral Fingerprint of Individual CdSe Quantum Dots. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4 (4), 609618,  DOI: 10.1021/jz302142d
  14. 14
    Nair, G.; Zhao, J.; Bawendi, M. G. Biexciton Quantum Yield of Single Semiconductor Nanocrystals from Photon Statistics. Nano Lett. 2011, 11 (3), 11361140,  DOI: 10.1021/nl104054t
  15. 15
    Beyler, A. P.; Bischof, T. S.; Cui, J.; Coropceanu, I.; Harris, D. K.; Bawendi, M. G. Sample-Averaged Biexciton Quantum Yield Measured by Solution-Phase Photon Correlation. Nano Lett. 2014, 14 (12), 67926798,  DOI: 10.1021/nl5027953
  16. 16
    Amgar, D.; Yang, G.; Tenne, R.; Oron, D. Higher-Order Photon Correlation as a Tool to Study Exciton Dynamics in Quasi-2D Nanoplatelets. Nano Lett. 2019, 19 (12), 87418748,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03442
  17. 17
    Fisher, B.; Caruge, J. M.; Zehnder, D.; Bawendi, M. Room-Temperature Ordered Photon Emission from Multiexciton States in Single CdSe Core-Shell Nanocrystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94 (8), 087403  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.087403
  18. 18
    Nasilowski, M.; Spinicelli, P.; Patriarche, G.; Dubertret, B. Gradient CdSe/CdS Quantum Dots with Room Temperature Biexciton Unity Quantum Yield. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (6), 39533958,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00838
  19. 19
    Bischof, T. S.; Correa, R. E.; Rosenberg, D.; Dauler, E. A.; Bawendi, M. G. Measurement of Emission Lifetime Dynamics and Biexciton Emission Quantum Yield of Individual InAs Colloidal Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2014, 14 (12), 67876791,  DOI: 10.1021/nl502180w
  20. 20
    Zhao, J.; Nair, G.; Fisher, B. R.; Bawendi, M. G. Challenge to the Charging Model of Semiconductor-Nanocrystal Fluorescence Intermittency from off-State Quantum Yields and Multiexciton Blinking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104 (15), 157403,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.157403
  21. 21
    Shulenberger, K. E.; Bischof, T. S.; Caram, J. R.; Utzat, H.; Coropceanu, I.; Nienhaus, L.; Bawendi, M. G. Multiexciton Lifetimes Reveal Triexciton Emission Pathway in CdSe Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2018, 18 (8), 51535158,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02080
  22. 22
    Park, Y. S.; Malko, A. V.; Vela, J.; Chen, Y.; Ghosh, Y.; García-Santamaría, F.; Hollingsworth, J. A.; Klimov, V. I.; Htoon, H. Near-Unity Quantum Yields of Biexciton Emission from CdSe/CdS Nanocrystals Measured Using Single-Particle Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106 (18), 187401,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.187401
  23. 23
    Park, Y. S.; Bae, W. K.; Pietryga, J. M.; Klimov, V. I. Auger Recombination of Biexcitons and Negative and Positive Trions in Individual Quantum Dots. ACS Nano 2014, 8 (7), 72887296,  DOI: 10.1021/nn5023473
  24. 24
    Rabouw, F. T.; Lunnemann, P.; Van Dijk-Moes, R. J. A.; Frimmer, M.; Pietra, F.; Koenderink, A. F.; Vanmaekelbergh, D. Reduced Auger Recombination in Single CdSe/CdS Nanorods by One-Dimensional Electron Delocalization. Nano Lett. 2013, 13 (10), 48844892,  DOI: 10.1021/nl4027567
  25. 25
    Zhao, J.; Chen, O.; Strasfeld, D. B.; Bawendi, M. G. Biexciton Quantum Yield Heterogeneities in Single CdSe (CdS) Core (Shell) Nanocrystals and Its Correlation to Exciton Blinking. Nano Lett. 2012, 12 (9), 44774483,  DOI: 10.1021/nl3013727
  26. 26
    Rabouw, F. T.; Vaxenburg, R.; Bakulin, A. A.; van Dijk-Moes, R. J. A.; Bakker, H. J.; Rodina, A.; Lifshitz, E.; Efros, A. L.; Koenderink, A. F.; Vanmaekelbergh, D. Dynamics of Intraband and Interband Auger Processes in Colloidal Core-Shell Quantum Dots. ACS Nano 2015, 9 (10), 1036610376,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b04491
  27. 27
    Klimov, V. I.; Ivanov, S. A.; Nanda, J.; Achermann, M.; Bezel, I.; McGuire, J. A.; Piryatinski, A. Single-Exciton Optical Gain in Semiconductor Nanocrystals. Nature 2007, 447 (7143), 441446,  DOI: 10.1038/nature05839
  28. 28
    Chen, O.; Zhao, J.; Chauhan, V. P.; Cui, J.; Wong, C.; Harris, D. K.; Wei, H.; Han, H. S.; Fukumura, D.; Jain, R. K. Compact High-Quality CdSe-CdS Core-Shell Nanocrystals with Narrow Emission Linewidths and Suppressed Blinking. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12 (5), 445451,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3539
  29. 29
    Xing, G.; Mathews, N.; Lim, S. S.; Yantara, N.; Liu, X.; Sabba, D.; Grätzel, M.; Mhaisalkar, S.; Sum, T. C. Low-Temperature Solution-Processed Wavelength-Tunable Perovskites for Lasing. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13 (5), 476480,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3911
  30. 30
    Bisschop, S.; Geiregat, P.; Aubert, T.; Hens, Z. The Impact of Core/Shell Sizes on the Optical Gain Characteristics of CdSe/CdS Quantum Dots. ACS Nano 2018, 12 (9), 90119021,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b02493
  31. 31
    Rabouw, F. T.; Kamp, M.; Van Dijk-Moes, R. J. A.; Gamelin, D. R.; Koenderink, A. F.; Meijerink, A.; Vanmaekelbergh, D. Delayed Exciton Emission and Its Relation to Blinking in CdSe Quantum Dots. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (11), 77187725,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03818
  32. 32
    Akselrod, G. M.; Prins, F.; Poulikakos, L. V.; Lee, E. M. Y.; Weidman, M. C.; Mork, A. J.; Willard, A. P.; Bulović, V.; Tisdale, W. A. Subdiffusive Exciton Transport in Quantum Dot Solids. Nano Lett. 2014, 14 (6), 35563562,  DOI: 10.1021/nl501190s
  33. 33
    Deutsch, Z.; Schwartz, O.; Tenne, R.; Popovitz-Biro, R.; Oron, D. Two-Color Antibunching from Band-Gap Engineered Colloidal Semiconductor Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2012, 12 (6), 29482952,  DOI: 10.1021/nl300638t
  34. 34
    Gindele, F.; Hild, K.; Langbein, W.; Woggon, U. Temperature-Dependent Line Widths of Single Excitons and Biexcitons. J. Lumin. 2000, 87, 381383,  DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2313(99)00409-3
  35. 35
    Gindele, F.; Hild, K.; Langbein, W.; Woggon, U. Phonon Interaction of Single Excitons and Biexcitons. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60 (4), R2157R2160,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.R2157
  36. 36
    Korkusinski, M.; Voznyy, O.; Hawrylak, P. Fine Structure and Size Dependence of Exciton and Biexciton Optical Spectra in CdSe Nanocrystals. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 82 (24), 245304,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.245304
  37. 37
    Hanifi, D. A.; Bronstein, N. D.; Koscher, B. A.; Nett, Z.; Swabeck, J. K.; Takano, K.; Schwartzberg, A. M.; Maserati, L. Redefining near-unity luminescence in quantum dots with photothermal quantum yield. Science 2019, 363 (6432), 11991202,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aat3803
  38. 38
    Boldt, K.; Kirkwood, N.; Beane, G. A.; Mulvaney, P. Synthesis of Highly Luminescent and Photo-Stable, Graded Shell CdSe/CdxZn1–xS Nanoparticles by in Situ Alloying. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25 (23), 47314738,  DOI: 10.1021/cm402645r
  39. 39
    Prins, P. T.; Montanarella, F.; Dümbgen, K.; Justo, Y.; Van der Bok, J. C.; Hinterding, S. O. M.; Geuchies, J. J.; Maes, J.; De Nolf, K.; Deelen, S. Extended Nucleation and Superfocusing in Colloidal Semiconductor Nanocrystal Synthesis. Nano Lett. 2021, 21 (6), 24872496,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04813
  40. 40
    Sung, Y.; Park, K.; Lee, Y.; Kim, T. Ripening Kinetics of CdSe/ZnSe Core/Shell Nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111 (3), 12391242,  DOI: 10.1021/jp066203c

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 21 publications.

  1. Jie Chen, Rena C. Kramer, Thomas R. Howell, Richard A. Loomis. Quantum-State Renormalization in Semiconductor Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2024, 18 (52) , 35104-35118. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c09833
  2. Mark J. J. Mangnus, Jur W. de Wit, Sander J. W. Vonk, Jaco J. Geuchies, Wiebke Albrecht, Sara Bals, Arjan J. Houtepen, Freddy T. Rabouw. High-Throughput Characterization of Single-Quantum-Dot Emission Spectra and Spectral Diffusion by Multiparticle Spectroscopy. ACS Photonics 2023, 10 (8) , 2688-2698. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.3c00420
  3. Nadav Frenkel, Einav Scharf, Gur Lubin, Adar Levi, Yossef E. Panfil, Yonatan Ossia, Josep Planelles, Juan I. Climente, Uri Banin, Dan Oron. Two Biexciton Types Coexisting in Coupled Quantum Dot Molecules. ACS Nano 2023, 17 (15) , 14990-15000. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c03921
  4. Sander J. W. Vonk, Freddy T. Rabouw. Biexciton Blinking in CdSe-Based Quantum Dots. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2023, 14 (23) , 5353-5361. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c00437
  5. Chenjia Mi, Matthew L. Atteberry, Varun Mapara, Lamia Hidayatova, Gavin C. Gee, Madalina Furis, Wai Tak Yip, Binbin Weng, Yitong Dong. Biexciton-like Auger Blinking in Strongly Confined CsPbBr3 Perovskite Quantum Dots. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2023, 14 (23) , 5466-5474. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c01145
  6. Gur Lubin, Dan Oron, Uri Rossman, Ron Tenne, Venkata Jayasurya Yallapragada. Photon Correlations in Spectroscopy and Microscopy. ACS Photonics 2022, 9 (9) , 2891-2904. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00817
  7. Gur Lubin, Gili Yaniv, Miri Kazes, Arin Can Ulku, Ivan Michel Antolovic, Samuel Burri, Claudio Bruschini, Edoardo Charbon, Venkata Jayasurya Yallapragada, Dan Oron. Resolving the Controversy in Biexciton Binding Energy of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals through Heralded Single-Particle Spectroscopy. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (12) , 19581-19587. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c06624
  8. Katherine E. Shulenberger, Sophie C. Coppieters ‘t Wallant, Megan D. Klein, Alexandra R. McIsaac, Tamar Goldzak, David B. Berkinsky, Hendrik Utzat, Ulugbek Barotov, Troy Van Voorhis, Moungi G. Bawendi. Resolving the Triexciton Recombination Pathway in CdSe/CdS Nanocrystals through State-Specific Correlation Measurements. Nano Letters 2021, 21 (18) , 7457-7464. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c05109
  9. Vladimir V. Poborchii, Alexander A. Shklyaev, Alexander V. Fokin. Phononic, photonic and excitonic properties of ∼5 nm diameter aligned CdSe nanowires. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 2025, 197 , 112424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2024.112424
  10. Bin Li, Guofeng Zhang, Yuke Gao, Xiaopeng Chen, Ruiyun Chen, Chengbing Qin, Jianyong Hu, Ruixiang Wu, Liantuan Xiao, Suotang Jia. Single quantum dot spectroscopy for exciton dynamics. Nano Research 2024, 17 (12) , 10332-10345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-024-6504-x
  11. Y.Y. Bleyan, D.B. Hayrapetyan. Biexciton in Prolate Ellipsoidal Quantum Dot: Optical-Magnetic Properties. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 2024, 1241 , 114874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2024.114874
  12. Edoardo Amarotti, Zhengjun Wang, Albin Hedse, Nils Lenngren, Karel Žídek, Kaibo Zheng, Donatas Zigmantas, Tõnu Pullerits. Direct Visualization of Confinement and Many‐Body Correlation Effects in 2D Spectroscopy of Quantum Dots. Advanced Optical Materials 2024, 12 (15) https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202302968
  13. Katherine E. Shulenberger, Skylar J. Sherman, Madison R. Jilek, Helena R. Keller, Lauren M. Pellows, Gordana Dukovic. Exciton and biexciton transient absorption spectra of CdSe quantum dots with varying diameters. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2024, 160 (1) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0179129
  14. Patrick J. Brosseau, Jaco J. Geuchies, Dipti Jasrasaria, Arjan J. Houtepen, Eran Rabani, Patanjali Kambhampati. Ultrafast hole relaxation dynamics in quantum dots revealed by two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy. Communications Physics 2023, 6 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-023-01169-1
  15. Somnath Koley, Jiabin Cui, Yossef.E. Panfil, Yonatan Ossia, Adar Levi, Einav Scharf, Lior Verbitsky, Uri Banin. Photon correlations in colloidal quantum dot molecules controlled by the neck barrier. Matter 2022, 5 (11) , 3997-4014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2022.07.032
  16. David F. Macias-Pinilla, Josep Planelles, Juan I. Climente. Biexcitons in CdSe nanoplatelets: geometry, binding energy and radiative rate. Nanoscale 2022, 14 (23) , 8493-8500. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NR01354A
  17. Ying Tang, Qilin Qin, Hongyu Yang, Shengnan Feng, Chunfeng Zhang, Jiayu Zhang, Min Xiao, Xiaoyong Wang. Electrical control of biexciton Auger recombination in single CdSe/CdS nanocrystals. Nanoscale 2022, 14 (20) , 7674-7681. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NR00305H
  18. Taehee Kim, Youngsik Kim, Seongmin Park, Kyoungwon Park, Zhen Wang, Sang Ho Oh, Sohee Jeong, Dongho Kim. Shape‐Tuned Multiphoton‐Emitting InP Nanotetrapods. Advanced Materials 2022, 34 (19) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202110665
  19. Somnath Koley, Jiabin Cui, Yossef. E. Panfil, Yonatan Ossia, Adar Levi, Einav Scharf, Lior Verbitsky, Uri Banin. Photon Correlations in Colloidal Quantum Dot Molecules Controlled by the Neck Barrier. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 353 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4077244
  20. Bin Li, Guo-Feng Zhang, Rui-Yun Chen, Cheng-Bing Qin, Jian-Yong Hu, Lian-Tuan Xiao, Suo-Tang Jia, , . Research progress of single quantum-dot spectroscopy and exciton dynamics. Acta Physica Sinica 2022, 71 (6) , 067802. https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.71.20212050
  21. Adam Olejniczak, Ryan Rich, Zygmunt Gryczynski, Bartłomiej Cichy. Non-excitonic defect-assisted radiative transitions are responsible for new D-type blinking in ternary quantum dots. Nanoscale Horizons 2021, 7 (1) , 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NH00424G

Nano Letters

Cite this: Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 13, 5760–5766
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01556
Published June 16, 2021

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Article Views

5840

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the galvo-APD setup. The QD emission is directed to a periodically rotating galvo mirror, which changes the angle of incidence on a transmission grating. Fourier imaging of the grating plane projects part of the QD emission spectrum onto an avalanche photodiode (APD). (b) Periodically rotating the galvo mirror with 0.5 Hz scans the emission spectrum of the QDs (pulsed excitation 2.5 MHz) over the APD twice every 2 s. We can convert the experimental time T to a photon energy (see inset). (c, d) Time-resolved emission spectra of a micrometer-thick layer of QDs on glass at increasing excitation-pulse energy. The white lines indicate the emission maximum as a function of delay time. At the highest power, the spectrum is slightly blue shifted at delay times of 0–2 ns because of the contribution of repulsive biexcitons. (e) Emission spectrum integrated between 0 and 0.6 ns delay times for n = 0.005 (red, panel c) and n = 0.23 (blue, panel d) excitons per pulse. By globally fitting a series of spectra for different fluences, we obtain an ensemble biexciton shift of b = +14 meV.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) Schematic of the cascade spectroscopy setup. The emission of a single QD is split equally over the energy-resolved “galvo APD” (Figure 1a) and a regular APD. (b) Photon correlation function g(2) of a single QD (repetition rate 2.5 MHz, estimated average number of excitons per pulse μ = 0.1) integrated over the entire experiment, showing a biexciton efficiency of ηBX = 10.5%. The highlights mark the delay time ranges where events of types 1, 0, 0+, and 1+ contribute. (c) Overview of possible ordered-emission events. The laser pulses are the vertical blue lines. Events wherein two photons (dots) are detected following two consecutive laser pulses are highlighted 1+ and 1, depending on the order of the detector clicks. Two photons detected after a single laser pulse, indicating biexciton cascade emission, are highlighted 0+ and 0. The first photon of a cascade is a biexciton photon (blue dots); all other photons most likely originate from the single-exciton state (red dots). (d, e) Energy-resolved g(2) (log y-scale) for low (d) and high (e) galvo-APD detection energies. Lower galvo-APD detection energies Edet = 1.95–1.99 eV yield a ratio N0+/N0 < 1, while for blue-shifted detection energies Edet = 2.08–2.16 eV, N0+/N0 > 1. This indicates a repulsive biexciton. The insets (linear y scale) are enlarged views to show N0+/N0 more clearly. We discarded afterglow events from panels b, d, and e (Figure S3 in the Supporting Information). (f) N0+/N1 as a function of galvo-APD detection energy Edet. The gray spectrum shows the exciton emission of this single QD. The error bars are calculated assuming shot noise. By fitting eq 2 to the data, we extract a single-QD biexciton shift of Eb = 6.8 ± 1.0 meV.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a) Biexciton (blue) and exciton (red) emission spectra of the single QD analyzed in Figure 2. The biexciton spectrum was extracted from the positive-time area N0+ of the zero-delay peak in the energy-resolved photon-correlation function. We measure a biexciton shift of Eb = 7.2 ± 2.1 meV. (b) A different QD with exciton with a larger biexciton shift of Eb = 12.7 ± 1.9 meV. (c) Biexciton and exciton line widths (fwhm) of 22 single QDs measured. Error bars are standard errors of the Gaussian fit.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) Biexciton shift Eb versus exciton energy EX for randomly selected QDs (blue) and for QDs selected for their low-energy exciton emission (red). Error bars denote one standard error of the fit. We observe a slight negative correlation between biexciton shift and exciton energy. (b) Dependence of Eb and EX on CdSe core radius a and CdSe/CdS core–inner-shell radius b, calculated with an effective-mass model that includes Coulomb interactions between carriers as a perturbation to second order (section S5 in the Supporting Information). The QD geometry is given as grid lines for a (core radius, solid lines) and b (core–inner-shell radius, dashed lines). The gray-shaded area highlights the range of exciton energies and biexciton shifts found experimentally. The red point and arrows are the calculated exciton energy and biexciton shift for the independently determined values of a = 1.84 nm (from the absorption spectrum of the cores) and b = 4.1 ± 0.4 nm (from electron microscopy).

  • References


    This article references 40 other publications.

    1. 1
      Murray, C. B.; Norris, D. J.; Bawendi, M. G. Synthesis and Characterization of Nearly Monodisperse CdE (E = S, Se, Te) Semiconductor Nanocrystallites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115 (19), 87068715,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00072a025
    2. 2
      Cui, J.; Beyler, A. P.; Marshall, L. F.; Chen, O.; Harris, D. K.; Wanger, D. D.; Brokmann, X.; Bawendi, M. G. Direct Probe of Spectral Inhomogeneity Reveals Synthetic Tunability of Single-Nanocrystal Spectral Linewidths. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5 (7), 602606,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1654
    3. 3
      Cui, J.; Beyler, A. P.; Coropceanu, I.; Cleary, L.; Avila, T. R.; Chen, Y.; Cordero, J. M.; Heathcote, S. L.; Harris, D. K.; Chen, O. Evolution of the Single-Nanocrystal Photoluminescence Linewidth with Size and Shell: Implications for Exciton-Phonon Coupling and the Optimization of Spectral Linewidths. Nano Lett. 2016, 16 (1), 289296,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03790
    4. 4
      Utzat, H.; Shulenberger, K. E.; Achorn, O. B.; Nasilowski, M.; Sinclair, T. S.; Bawendi, M. G. Probing Linewidths and Biexciton Quantum Yields of Single Cesium Lead Halide Nanocrystals in Solution. Nano Lett. 2017, 17 (11), 68386846,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03120
    5. 5
      Gellen, T. A.; Lem, J.; Turner, D. B. Probing Homogeneous Line Broadening in CdSe Nanocrystals Using Multidimensional Electronic Spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 2017, 17 (5), 28092815,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05068
    6. 6
      Van Der Bok, J. C.; Dekker, D. M.; Peerlings, M. L. J.; Salzmann, B. B. V.; Meijerink, A. Luminescence Line Broadening of CdSe Nanoplatelets and Quantum Dots for Application in W-LEDs. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124 (22), 1215312160,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c03048
    7. 7
      Bae, W. K.; Park, Y. S.; Lim, J.; Lee, D.; Padilha, L. A.; McDaniel, H.; Robel, I.; Lee, C.; Pietryga, J. M.; Klimov, V. I. Controlling the Influence of Auger Recombination on the Performance of Quantum-Dot Light-Emitting Diodes. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 3661,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3661
    8. 8
      Grim, J. Q.; Christodoulou, S.; Di Stasio, F.; Krahne, R.; Cingolani, R.; Manna, L.; Moreels, I. Continuous-Wave Biexciton Lasing at Room Temperature Using Solution-Processed Quantum Wells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9 (11), 891895,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2014.213
    9. 9
      Hollingsworth, J. A. Heterostructuring Nanocrystal Quantum Dots toward Intentional Suppression of Blinking and Auger Recombination. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25 (8), 13181331,  DOI: 10.1021/cm304161d
    10. 10
      Pandey, A.; Guyot-Sionnest, P. Multicarrier Recombination in Colloidal Quantum Dots. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127 (11), 111104,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2786068
    11. 11
      He, Y. M.; Iff, O.; Lundt, N.; Baumann, V.; Davanco, M.; Srinivasan, K.; Höfling, S.; Schneider, C. Cascaded Emission of Single Photons from the Biexciton in Monolayered WSe2. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13409,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13409
    12. 12
      Huang, X.; Chen, L.; Zhang, C.; Qin, Z.; Yu, B.; Wang, X.; Xiao, M. Inhomogeneous Biexciton Binding in Perovskite Semiconductor Nanocrystals Measured with Two-Dimensional Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11 (23), 1017310181,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03153
    13. 13
      Fernée, M. J.; Tamarat, P.; Lounis, B. Cryogenic Single-Nanocrystal Spectroscopy: Reading the Spectral Fingerprint of Individual CdSe Quantum Dots. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4 (4), 609618,  DOI: 10.1021/jz302142d
    14. 14
      Nair, G.; Zhao, J.; Bawendi, M. G. Biexciton Quantum Yield of Single Semiconductor Nanocrystals from Photon Statistics. Nano Lett. 2011, 11 (3), 11361140,  DOI: 10.1021/nl104054t
    15. 15
      Beyler, A. P.; Bischof, T. S.; Cui, J.; Coropceanu, I.; Harris, D. K.; Bawendi, M. G. Sample-Averaged Biexciton Quantum Yield Measured by Solution-Phase Photon Correlation. Nano Lett. 2014, 14 (12), 67926798,  DOI: 10.1021/nl5027953
    16. 16
      Amgar, D.; Yang, G.; Tenne, R.; Oron, D. Higher-Order Photon Correlation as a Tool to Study Exciton Dynamics in Quasi-2D Nanoplatelets. Nano Lett. 2019, 19 (12), 87418748,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03442
    17. 17
      Fisher, B.; Caruge, J. M.; Zehnder, D.; Bawendi, M. Room-Temperature Ordered Photon Emission from Multiexciton States in Single CdSe Core-Shell Nanocrystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94 (8), 087403  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.087403
    18. 18
      Nasilowski, M.; Spinicelli, P.; Patriarche, G.; Dubertret, B. Gradient CdSe/CdS Quantum Dots with Room Temperature Biexciton Unity Quantum Yield. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (6), 39533958,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00838
    19. 19
      Bischof, T. S.; Correa, R. E.; Rosenberg, D.; Dauler, E. A.; Bawendi, M. G. Measurement of Emission Lifetime Dynamics and Biexciton Emission Quantum Yield of Individual InAs Colloidal Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2014, 14 (12), 67876791,  DOI: 10.1021/nl502180w
    20. 20
      Zhao, J.; Nair, G.; Fisher, B. R.; Bawendi, M. G. Challenge to the Charging Model of Semiconductor-Nanocrystal Fluorescence Intermittency from off-State Quantum Yields and Multiexciton Blinking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104 (15), 157403,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.157403
    21. 21
      Shulenberger, K. E.; Bischof, T. S.; Caram, J. R.; Utzat, H.; Coropceanu, I.; Nienhaus, L.; Bawendi, M. G. Multiexciton Lifetimes Reveal Triexciton Emission Pathway in CdSe Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2018, 18 (8), 51535158,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02080
    22. 22
      Park, Y. S.; Malko, A. V.; Vela, J.; Chen, Y.; Ghosh, Y.; García-Santamaría, F.; Hollingsworth, J. A.; Klimov, V. I.; Htoon, H. Near-Unity Quantum Yields of Biexciton Emission from CdSe/CdS Nanocrystals Measured Using Single-Particle Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106 (18), 187401,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.187401
    23. 23
      Park, Y. S.; Bae, W. K.; Pietryga, J. M.; Klimov, V. I. Auger Recombination of Biexcitons and Negative and Positive Trions in Individual Quantum Dots. ACS Nano 2014, 8 (7), 72887296,  DOI: 10.1021/nn5023473
    24. 24
      Rabouw, F. T.; Lunnemann, P.; Van Dijk-Moes, R. J. A.; Frimmer, M.; Pietra, F.; Koenderink, A. F.; Vanmaekelbergh, D. Reduced Auger Recombination in Single CdSe/CdS Nanorods by One-Dimensional Electron Delocalization. Nano Lett. 2013, 13 (10), 48844892,  DOI: 10.1021/nl4027567
    25. 25
      Zhao, J.; Chen, O.; Strasfeld, D. B.; Bawendi, M. G. Biexciton Quantum Yield Heterogeneities in Single CdSe (CdS) Core (Shell) Nanocrystals and Its Correlation to Exciton Blinking. Nano Lett. 2012, 12 (9), 44774483,  DOI: 10.1021/nl3013727
    26. 26
      Rabouw, F. T.; Vaxenburg, R.; Bakulin, A. A.; van Dijk-Moes, R. J. A.; Bakker, H. J.; Rodina, A.; Lifshitz, E.; Efros, A. L.; Koenderink, A. F.; Vanmaekelbergh, D. Dynamics of Intraband and Interband Auger Processes in Colloidal Core-Shell Quantum Dots. ACS Nano 2015, 9 (10), 1036610376,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b04491
    27. 27
      Klimov, V. I.; Ivanov, S. A.; Nanda, J.; Achermann, M.; Bezel, I.; McGuire, J. A.; Piryatinski, A. Single-Exciton Optical Gain in Semiconductor Nanocrystals. Nature 2007, 447 (7143), 441446,  DOI: 10.1038/nature05839
    28. 28
      Chen, O.; Zhao, J.; Chauhan, V. P.; Cui, J.; Wong, C.; Harris, D. K.; Wei, H.; Han, H. S.; Fukumura, D.; Jain, R. K. Compact High-Quality CdSe-CdS Core-Shell Nanocrystals with Narrow Emission Linewidths and Suppressed Blinking. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12 (5), 445451,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3539
    29. 29
      Xing, G.; Mathews, N.; Lim, S. S.; Yantara, N.; Liu, X.; Sabba, D.; Grätzel, M.; Mhaisalkar, S.; Sum, T. C. Low-Temperature Solution-Processed Wavelength-Tunable Perovskites for Lasing. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13 (5), 476480,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3911
    30. 30
      Bisschop, S.; Geiregat, P.; Aubert, T.; Hens, Z. The Impact of Core/Shell Sizes on the Optical Gain Characteristics of CdSe/CdS Quantum Dots. ACS Nano 2018, 12 (9), 90119021,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b02493
    31. 31
      Rabouw, F. T.; Kamp, M.; Van Dijk-Moes, R. J. A.; Gamelin, D. R.; Koenderink, A. F.; Meijerink, A.; Vanmaekelbergh, D. Delayed Exciton Emission and Its Relation to Blinking in CdSe Quantum Dots. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (11), 77187725,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03818
    32. 32
      Akselrod, G. M.; Prins, F.; Poulikakos, L. V.; Lee, E. M. Y.; Weidman, M. C.; Mork, A. J.; Willard, A. P.; Bulović, V.; Tisdale, W. A. Subdiffusive Exciton Transport in Quantum Dot Solids. Nano Lett. 2014, 14 (6), 35563562,  DOI: 10.1021/nl501190s
    33. 33
      Deutsch, Z.; Schwartz, O.; Tenne, R.; Popovitz-Biro, R.; Oron, D. Two-Color Antibunching from Band-Gap Engineered Colloidal Semiconductor Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2012, 12 (6), 29482952,  DOI: 10.1021/nl300638t
    34. 34
      Gindele, F.; Hild, K.; Langbein, W.; Woggon, U. Temperature-Dependent Line Widths of Single Excitons and Biexcitons. J. Lumin. 2000, 87, 381383,  DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2313(99)00409-3
    35. 35
      Gindele, F.; Hild, K.; Langbein, W.; Woggon, U. Phonon Interaction of Single Excitons and Biexcitons. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60 (4), R2157R2160,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.R2157
    36. 36
      Korkusinski, M.; Voznyy, O.; Hawrylak, P. Fine Structure and Size Dependence of Exciton and Biexciton Optical Spectra in CdSe Nanocrystals. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 82 (24), 245304,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.245304
    37. 37
      Hanifi, D. A.; Bronstein, N. D.; Koscher, B. A.; Nett, Z.; Swabeck, J. K.; Takano, K.; Schwartzberg, A. M.; Maserati, L. Redefining near-unity luminescence in quantum dots with photothermal quantum yield. Science 2019, 363 (6432), 11991202,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aat3803
    38. 38
      Boldt, K.; Kirkwood, N.; Beane, G. A.; Mulvaney, P. Synthesis of Highly Luminescent and Photo-Stable, Graded Shell CdSe/CdxZn1–xS Nanoparticles by in Situ Alloying. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25 (23), 47314738,  DOI: 10.1021/cm402645r
    39. 39
      Prins, P. T.; Montanarella, F.; Dümbgen, K.; Justo, Y.; Van der Bok, J. C.; Hinterding, S. O. M.; Geuchies, J. J.; Maes, J.; De Nolf, K.; Deelen, S. Extended Nucleation and Superfocusing in Colloidal Semiconductor Nanocrystal Synthesis. Nano Lett. 2021, 21 (6), 24872496,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04813
    40. 40
      Sung, Y.; Park, K.; Lee, Y.; Kim, T. Ripening Kinetics of CdSe/ZnSe Core/Shell Nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111 (3), 12391242,  DOI: 10.1021/jp066203c
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01556.

    • Experimental methods, details of data processing and calibration procedures, details of quantum-mechanical calculations, a derivation of the energy-resolved g(2), and an overview of all single-QD experiments (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.