ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Atomic Structure and Electronic Properties of Janus SeMoS Monolayers on Au(111)
My Activity
  • Open Access
Letter

Atomic Structure and Electronic Properties of Janus SeMoS Monolayers on Au(111)
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Nano Letters

Cite this: Nano Lett. 2025, 25, 8, 3330–3336
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c06543
Published February 18, 2025

Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Janus SeMoS monolayers (MLs) are synthetic 2D materials with unique electronic properties, as theory predicts, but their experimental exploration has been hindered by the low quality of the samples. Here we report a synthesis of high-quality Janus MLs on gold substrates by thermal exchange reaction taking place at the ML/Au(111) interface. The synthesized Janus SeMoS MLs were characterized by complementary techniques, and insights into the topography and electronic properties of the system were obtained. Specifically, due to the lattice mismatch with the Au(111), a moiré pattern with a periodicity of 2.9 nm was observed. A precise experimental determination of the lattice constant of Janus SeMoS of 3.22 ± 0.01 Å was obtained, and the measured spin–orbit splitting at the K point of the valence band was found to be 170 ± 15 meV, matching well the results of the density functional theory calculations.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) monolayers (MLs) including 1H MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, WSe2, etc. are two-dimensional (2D) materials with unique electronic and photonic properties continuously attracting a significant research interest. (1,2) Recently, a new class of TMD MLs, the so-called Janus TMDs, came into the focus of research. (3−6) In contrast to the conventional TMD MLs, in which transition metal atoms are sandwiched between chemically similar chalcogens, in Janus TMD MLs the chalcogen atoms differ between the different faces of a ML. This asymmetry results in the broken out-of-plane mirror symmetry and leads to an intrinsic dipole which may cause new physical properties. (7) Numerous theoretical studies of Janus TMDs predict strong Rashba splitting, (8,9) piezoelectric, (10,11) catalytic, (12) novel excitonic, (13) valleytronic (14) and spintronic phenomena, (15) which have to be proven experimentally yet. Experimental studies of Janus TMD MLs are still limited (see, e.g., refs (16−26)). Unlike conventional TMD MLs, which can be exfoliated from bulk crystals, these nanomaterials can only be obtained by bottom-up synthetic approaches, which limit their availability to the experimentalists. The reported synthesis methods are often based on complex methodologies including stripping of the topmost chalcogen layer of TMD ML by laser pulses, (18,26) H2 plasma (19) and refilling of the formed vacancies with chalcogen atoms of the second type. Such approaches typically result in a high defect density in the formed Janus TMD MLs, which complicates the revealing of the theoretically predicted properties. Beyond Janus TMD monolayers several other Janus materials with distinct electronic properties have been studied so far including Janus IV–VI structures, (27,28) Janus transition metal trichalcogenide monolayers, (29) Janus transition metal dichalcogenide oxides, (30) or Janus transition metal oxyhalides. (31)

Recently, a method for the large-area synthesis of high-quality Janus SeMoS MLs was introduced, which is based on the exchange of the chalcogen atoms of the parent TMD ML at the ML/substrate interface via intercalation of chalcogen atoms of the second type. (16) In this method, a MoSe2 ML is first grown on gold foils by chemical vapor deposition (CVD). Next, this monolayer is exposed to sulfur vapor at elevated temperatures. Due to the high affinity of sulfur to gold, sulfur atoms can intercalate between the MoSe2 ML/gold interface leading to an exchange of the bottom Se layer by S and the formation of a SeMoS ML, as schematically depicted in Figure 1a. The quality of the formed Janus SeMoS MLs is characterized at low temperatures by a narrow photoluminescence line width of only 18 meV, high circular polarization of the excitonic emission as well as by the valley Zeeman splitting. (16)

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) Cross section of Janus SeMoS ML on Au(111) based on DFT calculations. Selenium, molybdenum, and sulfur atoms are highlighted in orange, blue, and yellow, respectively. The gold substrate atoms are represented as larger balls and colored according to their depth. (b) Raman spectrum (excitation wavelength, 532 nm) and (c) Mo 3d/S 2s/Se 3s (left), S 2p/Se 3p (middle), and Se 3d/Mo 4s/Au 5p (right) XP spectral regions of Janus SeMoS on Au(111) recorded at an emission angle of 0° (top) and 70° (bottom). Mo, S, Se, and Au peaks are highlighted in blue, green, orange, and yellow, respectively.

Here we present the structural and electronic characterization down to the nanoscale of the grown Janus SeMoS MLs on Au(111). Due to the lattice mismatch between the Janus SeMoS and Au(111), we observe a moiré superstructure by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and low-energy electron diffraction (LEED) and precisely determine the lattice parameters of the Janus SeMoS from the LEED pattern. Further, we measure the band structure by angle-resolved ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (ARUPS) and extract the value of the spin–orbit splitting of the valence band at the K point. To the best of our knowledge, such structural and electronic properties of the Janus TMD MLs are obtained experimentally for the first time. Our findings are backed by density functional theory (DFT) calculations on the SeMoS/Au(111) system.

The synthesis of Janus SeMoS MLs on Au(111) starts with the growth of MoSe2 MLs on Au(111) by ambient pressure CVD. Afterward, the as-grown MoSe2 MLs were sulfurized at 700 °C to exchange the Se layer at the Au(111) interface with S atoms. Details regarding the preparation of Janus SeMoS are given in the Experimental Section. To prove the formation of Janus SeMoS on Au(111) we carried out Raman spectroscopy measurements at ambient conditions. The spectrum shown in Figure 1b reveals a characteristic peak at ∼290 cm–1 corresponding to the A11 mode of the Janus SeMoS. (16,32)

Next, we introduced the sample into a UHV chamber and studied it by angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements. The relevant XP spectra measured with an emission angle of 0° (top) and 70° (bottom) are shown in Figure 1c. A detailed peak analysis is presented in Table S1. First, we focus on the XP spectra measured at normal emission. In the Mo 3d region we observe a sharp, high intensity doublet at binding energies (BEs) of 228.9 ± 0.1 eV (Mo 3d5/2) and 232.0 ± 0.1 eV (Mo 3d3/2), which is due to the formed Janus SeMoS ML (see Figure 1c, left). The other low intensity Mo doublets, at BEs of 229.3 ± 0.1 eV/232.5 ± 0.1 eV and 231.0 ± 0.2 eV/234.2 ± 0.2 eV, originate from remaining nonconverted MoSe2 and MoO3, respectively. Since the intensity of the Janus SeMoS features is about 4 times higher than that of the MoSe2 features, we conclude that about 80% of the as-grown MoSe2 is converted into Janus SeMoS. In the BE region of 171–156 eV (see Figure 1c, middle), dominated by the Se 3p peaks, a high intensity S 2p doublet at the BEs of 162.2 ± 0.1 eV (S 2p3/2) and 163.4 ± 0.1 eV (S 2p1/2), corresponding to the formed Janus SeMoS ML, is clearly recognized, which is accompanied by an additional low intensity S 2p doublet at a higher BE resulting most probably from excess unreacted sulfur clusters. (16,33) In comparison to the S 2p peaks, the Se 3p peaks have a larger spin–orbit splitting and a broader full width at half-maximum. The Se species result also in the 3d doublet at BEs of 54.5 ± 0.1 eV (Se 3d5/2) and 55.4 ± 0.1 eV (Se 3d3/2) (see Figure 1c, right). In comparison to the Mo 3d spectrum, one cannot discriminate Se in the Janus SeMoS and MoSe2 MLs in this spectrum. However, if we consider the SeMoS to MoSe2 ratio obtained from the Mo 3d spectrum, we can estimate the amount of Se related to the SeMoS ML to be ∼70%. This estimation results in an elemental ratio for Se/Mo/S of (1.4 ± 0.3):1.0:(1.2 ± 0.2), which is in good agreement with the expected one of 1:1:1. The presence of the Se atoms on top and of the S atoms on the bottom of the SeMoS ML is further confirmed by the angular dependence XP intensities. Due to the surface sensitivity of XPS, as seen in Figure 1c and Table S1, the intensity ratio of Se/S is higher for an emission angle of 70° compared to normal emission (0°). These results conclusively confirm the formation of the SeMoS ML with its S face oriented toward the Au(111) substrate.

Next, we characterize the structural properties of the Janus SeMoS ML on Au(111) by LEED measurements. The distortion-corrected LEED pattern presented in Figure 2a shows a 6-fold symmetry. The reciprocal unit cells and the LEED spots of the Janus SeMoS and Au(111) are marked in cyan and red, respectively. The first-order spots of the Janus SeMoS reveal the highest intensity. Around each of these spots, six further spots are visible. As we demonstrate below, such a LEED pattern arises from a moiré structure, due to the lattice mismatch between the Janus SeMoS ML and the Au(111) substrate. Note that the formation of moiré structures is also observed for MoS2 and MoSe2 on Au(111). (34) From the distortion-corrected LEED pattern, we precisely determined the lattice parameters of Janus SeMoS MLs on Au(111). For this quantitative analysis, we fitted all visible spots considering multiple scattering with the hexagonal structure of Au(111) with a lattice constant of 2.884 Å (35) as a reference. The obtained lattice constant, aSeMoS, and the enclosing angle between both lattice vectors ∠(a⃗1,a⃗2) are 3.22 ± 0.01 Å and 120.00 ± 0.02°, respectively. Interestingly, the value of aSeMoS is between the experimental values for MoS2 (3.15 ± 0.01 Å) and MoSe2 (3.28 ± 0.01 Å) MLs on Au(111) which were determined in the same way previously. (36) The optimized freestanding SeMoS ML structure (without Au(111) substrate) calculated by DFT results in the lattice parameters of |a⃗1| = |a⃗2| = 3.22 Å = aSeMoS and ∠(a⃗1,a⃗2) = 120° which are in a perfect agreement with our experimental results and previous theoretical reports. (37) We further compared the values of the Janus SeMoS ML with the DFT-calculated values of freestanding MoS2 and MoSe2 MLs (see Table S2). Therewith, the optimized lattice constant of SeMoS (3.22 Å) lies between the values of MoS2 (3.15 Å) and MoSe2 (3.28 Å) and matches the experimental values obtained from LEED analysis very well. In the Janus ML, the Mo–S bond distances become longer by 0.01 Å than the corresponding bonds in a MoS2 ML, whereas the Mo–Se bond gets shorter by 0.01 Å than the corresponding bonds in MoSe2 monolayers. At the same time, the angle of Se–Mo–S bonds falls between those values obtained for the pristine materials. We calculated atomic Bader charges and averaged the electrostatic profile perpendicular to the Janus monolayer and compared it with that in the MoS2 and MoSe2 monolayer (Figures S1, S2 and Table S3). The Mo atoms became more positive in the SeMoS ML compared with MoS2, while the S atoms became more negative. On the other hand, the Se atoms have less negative charge than those in a MoSe2 ML. This leads to a higher charge density around the S atoms than the Se atoms as shown in Figure S1b. The electrostatic potential variation at different chalcogen layers is consistent with the charge transfer from the Mo to S or Se atoms. These results suggest a higher polarization in the Janus material in comparison with the pristine MoS2 and MoSe2 MLs.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) LEED pattern of a Janus SeMoS ML on Au(111) (118 eV, 293 K). The unit cell and the corresponding LEED spots of the Janus SeMoS and Au(111) are highlighted in light blue and red, respectively. (b) Top view of an atomic ball model of the Janus SeMoS ML on Au(111). Due to the different adsorption sites of the sulfur layer with respect to the topmost Au layer, a moiré contrast appears. We distinguish three different regions which are discussed in the text. (c) STM (−1.1 V, 0.5 nA, 4.2 K) and (d) simulated STM images of a Janus SeMoS ML on Au(111). A fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the STM image in panel c is shown in the inset (scale bar ≈ 1 Å–1).

In Figure 3, we compare the structural models of MoS2, Janus SeMoS, and MoSe2 on Au(111). We simulated the lattices of MoS2 (blue), Janus SeMoS (cyan) and MoSe2 (green) and presented them with respect to the lattice of Au(111) (red). For the simulation, we used the following lattice constants obtained from LEED analysis: 3.15 Å (36) (MoS2), 3.22 Å (Janus SeMoS), and 3.28 Å (36) (MoSe2). These values lie within the uncertainties of the LEED analyses. The lattice constant of Au(111) is 2.884 Å. (35) Due to the lattice mismatches between TMDs and Au(111) we observe different moiré structures. Although the lattice constants of the TMDs differ only slightly from each other, we observe more distinct differences in the corresponding moiré patterns, which allows for a more precise determination of the lattice constants. The moiré lattice constants are 34.6 Å for MoS2/Au(111), 28.9 Å for Janus SeMoS/Au(111), and 23.1 Å for MoSe2/Au(111). Thereby, an (11 × 11) MoS2 supercell matches very well a (12 × 12) Au(111) supercell. (38) A (9 × 9) Janus SeMoS supercell matches very well a (10 × 10) Au(111) supercell. The same is true for a (7 × 7) MoSe2 and an (8 × 8) Au(111) supercell. In addition, we optimized the structure of the Janus SeMoS ML on Au(111) using DFT and extracted a moiré periodicity of 28.99 Å. This result is in excellent agreement with our estimated moiré periodicity based on LEED data.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Representation of the lattices of (a) MoS2 (3.15 Å, (36) blue), (b) Janus SeMoS (3.22 Å, light blue), and (c) MoSe2 (3.28 Å, (36) green) on Au(111) (2.884 Å, (35) red). Due to the lattice mismatch between the TMD and Au(111) a moiré contrast appears. The small differences in the lattice constant of the different TMDs results in large differences in the moiré lattice constant periodicities which are 34.6 Å for MoS2/Au(111), 28.9 Å for Janus SeMoS/Au(111), and 23.1 Å for MoSe2/Au(111).

To probe the Janus SeMoS structure on Au(111) in real space, we carried out low-temperature STM measurements. An atomically resolved STM image with the moiré contrast is shown in Figure 2c. The fast Fourier transform of the STM image confirms the hexagonal structure (FFT, inset of Figure 2b). We estimated the moiré periodicity from STM line scans to be ∼2.9 nm in agreement with the DFT calculations. Note that we analyzed the original STM data without any drift correction. Furthermore, an STM image was simulated by integrating occupied states within a narrow energy window (−0.1 eV) below the valence band edge which is shown in Figure 2d. The energy range of the simulated STM images can only be roughly compared to the bias voltages in the experiment due to the differences in the simulated and experimental bandgaps and the different zero energy levels, which corresponds to the Fermi level in the experiments and the highest occupied energy level in the calculations. Nevertheless, the simulated STM image displays good agreement with the experimental one. In the moiré unit cell, we can distinguish three different regions with slightly different electronic properties. These regions differ in the adsorption sites of the bottom S layer to the Au(111) atoms: (i) S atoms on top sites of Au(111), (ii) S atoms on fcc hollow sites, (iii) S atoms on hcp hollow sites. Region (i) has the largest STM height and appears brightest in the STM image. Regions (ii) and (iii) exhibit a significantly darker contrast whereby the STM height of region (iii) is slightly higher than for region (ii). The topography of the optimized Janus ML was carefully analyzed. The structure of SeMoS exhibits a slight buckling on Au(111) in different moiré regions of the interface. As a result, the equilibrium distance between SeMoS and substrate in region (i), i.e., 2.51 Å, is smaller compared to region (ii) (2.61 Å) and region (iii) (2.66 Å), suggesting stronger interaction between the lower S layer and Au atoms in region (i) than other regions. These results are consistent with the experimental STM image indicating high tunneling contrast in region (i).

Furthermore, we also observed point defects as shown in the STM image in Figure S3. These are likely Se vacancies in the top layer. We carefully evaluated the defect density, which proved to be about 1012 vacancies/cm2 confirming the high quality of our Janus SeMoS samples. To help identify the defects, STM images are simulated for Se vacancies in a SeMoS ML (Figure S4). The electronic structure characterization shows that Se vacancies lead to the formation of several in-gap states, including those being close to the conduction and valence band edges of the pristine SeMoS ML. The simulated image shows a single depression at the Se-vacancy site, which agrees well with the experimental STM data.

The electronic structure of Janus SeMoS MLs was characterized using DFT and ARUPS. The calculated band structure of a freestanding Janus SeMoS (without the Au(111) substrate) is shown in Figure 4a. We observe the valence band maximum (VBM) and the conduction band minimum (CBM) at the K point. This finding identifies the Janus SeMoS ML as a direct band semiconductor with a calculated band gap of 1.57 eV, which aligns closely with the previously reported theoretical value of 1.56 eV. (37) The spin–orbit coupling (SOC) leads to a split of the valence and conduction band at the K point (Figure 4a). The energetic distance of the split valence bands is about 168 meV. Our calculated SOC splitting for MoS2 and MoSe2 was found to be 147 and 184 meV, respectively. The projected densities of states suggest that the VBM and CBM mainly result from Mo 4d and chalcogen p orbitals, whereas the sulfur orbitals have a larger contribution than the selenium states at the VBM (Figure S5). Specifically, the valence band splitting at the K point is primarily attributed to the in-plane Mo 4dxy and Mo 4dx2y2 orbitals. (39,40) We also analyzed the effect of the substrate on the electronic structure of the Janus monolayer. The calculated interlayer binding energy of SeMoS on Au (111) is 1.1 J/m2, similar to those for MoS2 on metal substrates. (41) A comparison between the projected DOS of freestanding and Au-supported SeMoS indicates that the interaction with the Au surface perturbs the electronic states of SeMoS close to the Fermi level as shown in Figure S4. It is also evident that the presence of the substrate shifts the Fermi level toward the conduction band minimum, suggesting a charge transfer at the interface. The calculated charge transfer from the substrate to SeMoS is presented in the charge density difference plots and is analyzed for each moiré region using Bader analyses (Figure 5a). The variation of the charge transfer at different moiré regions is caused by the different interactions between S atoms and Au atoms underneath (Figure 5b). Overall, the results indicate an electron transfer from gold to the Janus ML which is consistent with the observed n-type behavior of SeMoS in our electronic structure calculation (Figure S6).

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Electronic band structure and the corresponding density of states of Janus SeMoS MLs calculated by DFT. (b) ARUPS data along the Γ–K direction and around the K point of Janus SeMoS MLs on Au(111).

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a) Average Bader charges for all atoms at each moiré region in the SeMoS/Au(111) interface, as compared to the free-standing SeMoS monolayer. (b) Charge transfer between SeMoS and Au(111) calculated as the difference between the charges in the interface and the isolated Au(111) and SeMoS monolayer. Blue (red) colors indicate charge accumulation (depletion).

In Figures 4b and S7, the band structure of Janus SeMoS MLs on Au(111) measured by ARUPS is shown. From energy distribution curves (EDCs) at Γ and K points, we estimate the valence band maxima to be at BEs of 1.20 ± 0.10 eV and 1.06 ± 0.10 eV, respectively. These results mean that the valence band maximum has a slightly lower BE at the K point than at the Γ point which agrees with the DFT calculations. By zooming in the band structure (right part of Figure 4b), the spin–orbit split valence band at the K point can be recognized even more clearly. The splitting is 170 ± 15 meV in agreement with the DFT calculations of freestanding Janus SeMoS. From the maxima plot of each EDC as a function of their k value (Figure S8), we estimate the effective mass m* of the electron in the valence band to be 0.99 ± 0.10 me. Using the calculated electronic band structure, the effective masses of the electron and the hole are calculated to be 0.60 me and 0.54 me, respectively. Due to substrate interaction and hybridization, the measured effective mass of electrons in the valence band of Janus SeMoS MLs on Au(111) is larger than the calculated effective mass for freestanding Janus SeMoS.

The electronic structure of Janus SeMoS monolayers was characterized for the first time using ARUPS, enabling experimental determination of spin–orbit splitting and valence band effective mass, which are critical for understanding its electronic properties. DFT calculations further reveal that different regions of the Janus SeMoS monolayer interact distinctly with the Au(111) substrate, highlighting the complexity of substrate effects on its electronic structure.

In summary, we grew Janus SeMoS MLs with a high structural quality on Au(111) by CVD, which enabled a detailed investigation of their structural and electronic properties by various complementary experimental techniques. The experimental findings were supported by the results of DFT calculations. The formation of Janus SeMoS MLs was unambiguously confirmed by Raman spectroscopy and XPS, whereas the LEED measurements allowed us to precisely determine their lattice constant of 3.22 ± 0.01 Å. This value lies between the values of MoS2 and MoSe2 MLs and coincides with the theoretically predicted value. The observed moiré pattern of the Janus SeMoS ML on Au(111) with a moiré lattice constant of ∼2.9 nm is in line with the locally different charge transfer. The spin–orbit splitting of the valence band measured at the K point by ARUPS is 170 ± 15 meV and is in good agreement with the DFT predictions as well. To summarize, our experimental and theoretical results demonstrate that the Janus SeMoS ML is a direct band gap semiconductor, exhibiting structural and electronic properties that are intermediate between those of MoS2 and MoSe2 MLs. This study represents a significant step toward advancing the understanding of the structural and electronic characteristics of these novel 2D quantum materials.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c06543.

  • Details of the growth and methods used for characterization, XPS fit details, DFT calculations, STM data, ARUPS data and analyses, and LEED data (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through a research infrastructure grant INST 275/257-1 FUGG (313713174), CRC 1375 NOA (Project B2, 398816777), SPP2244 (Project TU149/21-1, 535253440), and DFG individual grant TU149/16-1 (464283495). The authors thank Stephanie Höppener and Ulrich S. Schubert for enabling Raman spectroscopy studies at the Jena Center for Soft Matter (JCSM). A.V.K. thanks the German Research Foundation (DFG) for support through Project KR 4866/9-1 and the collaborative research center “Chemistry of Synthetic 2D Materials” SFB-1415-417590517. The authors further thank the HZDR Computing Center, HLRS, Stuttgart, Germany, and TU Dresden Cluster “Taurus” for generous grants of CPU time. M.S. acknowledges financial support from the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes through a PhD scholarship.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 41 other publications.

  1. 1
    Manzeli, S.; Ovchinnikov, D.; Pasquier, D.; Yazyev, O. V.; Kis, A. 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2 (8), 17033,  DOI: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.33
  2. 2
    Joseph, S.; Mohan, J.; Lakshmy, S.; Thomas, S.; Chakraborty, B.; Thomas, S.; Kalarikkal, N. A review of the synthesis, properties, and applications of 2D transition metal dichalcogenides and their heterostructures. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 297, 127332  DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.127332
  3. 3
    Cheng, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Tahir, M.; Schwingenschlögl, U. Spin-orbit–induced spin splittings in polar transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. EPL 2013, 102 (5), 57001,  DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/102/57001
  4. 4
    Yin, W.-J.; Tan, H.-J.; Ding, P.-J.; Wen, B.; Li, X.-B.; Teobaldi, G.; Liu, L.-M. Recent advances in low-dimensional Janus materials: theoretical and simulation perspectives. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2 (23), 75437558,  DOI: 10.1039/D1MA00660F
  5. 5
    Tang, X.; Kou, L. 2D Janus transition metal dichalcogenides: Properties and applications. Phys. Status Solidi B 2022, 259 (4), 2100562  DOI: 10.1002/pssb.202100562
  6. 6
    Ahmad, W.; Wang, Y.; Kazmi, J.; Younis, U.; Mubarak, N. M.; Aleithan, S. H.; Channa, A. I.; Lei, W.; Wang, Z. Janus 2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenides: Research Progress, Optical Mechanism and Future Prospects for Optoelectronic Devices. Laser Photonics Rev. 2024, 2400341  DOI: 10.1002/lpor.202400341
  7. 7
    Tao, S.; Xu, B.; Shi, J.; Zhong, S.; Lei, X.; Liu, G.; Wu, M. Tunable Dipole Moment in Janus Single-Layer MoSSe via Transition-Metal Atom Adsorption. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123 (14), 90599065,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b00421
  8. 8
    Hu, T.; Jia, F.; Zhao, G.; Wu, J.; Stroppa, A.; Ren, W. Intrinsic and anisotropic Rashba spin splitting in Janus transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97 (23), 235404  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.235404
  9. 9
    Chen, J.; Wu, K.; Ma, H.; Hu, W.; Yang, J. Tunable Rashba spin splitting in Janus transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers via charge doping. RSC Adv. 2020, 10 (11), 63886394,  DOI: 10.1039/D0RA00674B
  10. 10
    Dong, L.; Lou, J.; Shenoy, V. B. Large in-plane and vertical piezoelectricity in Janus transition metal dichalchogenides. ACS Nano 2017, 11 (8), 82428248,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b03313
  11. 11
    Mohanta, M. K.; De Sarkar, A. Interfacial hybridization of Janus MoSSe and BX (X= P, As) monolayers for ultrathin excitonic solar cells, nanopiezotronics and low-power memory devices. Nanoscale 2020, 12 (44), 2264522657,  DOI: 10.1039/D0NR07000A
  12. 12
    Ma, X.; Wu, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y. A Janus MoSSe monolayer: a potential wide solar-spectrum water-splitting photocatalyst with a low carrier recombination rate. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6 (5), 22952301,  DOI: 10.1039/C7TA10015A
  13. 13
    Zheng, T.; Lin, Y.-C.; Yu, Y.; Valencia-Acuna, P.; Puretzky, A. A.; Torsi, R.; Liu, C.; Ivanov, I. N.; Duscher, G.; Geohegan, D. B. Excitonic dynamics in Janus MoSSe and WSSe monolayers. Nano Lett. 2021, 21 (2), 931937,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03412
  14. 14
    Peng, R.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, S.; Huang, B.; Dai, Y. Valley Polarization in Janus Single-Layer MoSSe via Magnetic Doping. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9 (13), 36123617,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01625
  15. 15
    Vojáček, L.; Medina Dueñas, J. n.; Li, J.; Ibrahim, F.; Manchon, A.; Roche, S.; Chshiev, M.; García, J. H. Field-Free Spin–Orbit Torque Switching in Janus Chromium Dichalcogenides. Nano Lett. 2024, 24 (38), 1188911894,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03029
  16. 16
    Gan, Z.; Paradisanos, I.; Estrada-Real, A.; Picker, J.; Najafidehaghani, E.; Davies, F.; Neumann, C.; Robert, C.; Wiecha, P.; Watanabe, K. Chemical Vapor Deposition of High-Optical-Quality Large-Area Monolayer Janus Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34 (38), 2205226  DOI: 10.1002/adma.202205226
  17. 17
    Kim, S. W.; Choi, S. Y.; Lim, S. H.; Ko, E. B.; Kim, S.; Park, Y. C.; Lee, S.; Kim, H. H. Understanding Solvent-Induced Delamination and Intense Water Adsorption in Janus Transition Metal Dichalcogenides for Enhanced Device Performance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2308709  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202308709
  18. 18
    Lin, Y.-C.; Liu, C.; Yu, Y.; Zarkadoula, E.; Yoon, M.; Puretzky, A. A.; Liang, L.; Kong, X.; Gu, Y.; Strasser, A. Low energy implantation into transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers to form Janus structures. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (4), 38963906,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b10196
  19. 19
    Lu, A.-Y.; Zhu, H.; Xiao, J.; Chuu, C.-P.; Han, Y.; Chiu, M.-H.; Cheng, C.-C.; Yang, C.-W.; Wei, K.-H.; Yang, Y. Janus monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12 (8), 744749,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2017.100
  20. 20
    Schmeink, J.; Musytschuk, V.; Pollmann, E.; Sleziona, S.; Maas, A.; Kratzer, P.; Schleberger, M. Evaluating strain and doping of Janus MoSSe from phonon mode shifts supported by ab initio DFT calculations. Nanoscale 2023, 15 (25), 1083410841,  DOI: 10.1039/D3NR01978K
  21. 21
    Zhang, J.; Jia, S.; Kholmanov, I.; Dong, L.; Er, D.; Chen, W.; Guo, H.; Jin, Z.; Shenoy, V. B.; Shi, L.; Lou, J. Janus Monolayer Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 2017, 11 (8), 81928198,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b03186
  22. 22
    Trivedi, D. B.; Turgut, G.; Qin, Y.; Sayyad, M. Y.; Hajra, D.; Howell, M.; Liu, L.; Yang, S.; Patoary, N. H.; Li, H. Room-temperature synthesis of 2D Janus crystals and their heterostructures. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32 (50), 2006320  DOI: 10.1002/adma.202006320
  23. 23
    Sayyad, M.; Kopaczek, J.; Gilardoni, C. M.; Chen, W.; Xiong, Y.; Yang, S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Kudrawiec, R.; Hautier, G. The Defects Genome of Janus Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2403583  DOI: 10.1002/adma.202403583
  24. 24
    Lakshmy, S.; Mondal, B.; Kalarikkal, N.; Rout, C. S.; Chakraborty, B. Recent developments in synthesis, properties, and applications of 2D Janus MoSSe and MoSexS(1-x) alloys. Adv. Powder Mater. 2024, 3, 100204  DOI: 10.1016/j.apmate.2024.100204
  25. 25
    Bian, C.; Shi, J.; Liu, X.; Yang, Y.; Yang, H.; Gao, H. Optical second-harmonic generation of Janus MoSSe monolayer. Chin. Phys. B 2022, 31 (9), 097304  DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/ac6db4
  26. 26
    Harris, S. B.; Lin, Y.-C.; Puretzky, A. A.; Liang, L.; Dyck, O.; Berlijn, T.; Eres, G.; Rouleau, C. M.; Xiao, K.; Geohegan, D. B. Real-Time diagnostics of 2D crystal transformations by pulsed laser deposition: Controlled synthesis of Janus WSSe monolayers and alloys. ACS Nano 2023, 17 (3), 24722486,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c09952
  27. 27
    Zheng, K.; Vegge, T.; Castelli, I. E. Giant In-Plane Flexoelectricity and Radial Polarization in Janus IV–VI Monolayers and Nanotubes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16 (15), 1936919378,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.4c01527
  28. 28
    Liu, M.-Y.; Gong, L.; He, Y.; Cao, C. Tuning Rashba effect, band inversion, and spin-charge conversion of Janus XSn2Y monolayers via an external field. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103 (7), 075421  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.075421
  29. 29
    Ahammed, R.; Jena, N.; Rawat, A.; Mohanta, M. K.; Dimple; De Sarkar, A. Ultrahigh out-of-plane piezoelectricity meets giant Rashba effect in 2D Janus monolayers and bilayers of group IV transition-metal trichalcogenides. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124 (39), 2125021260,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c05134
  30. 30
    Varjovi, M. J.; Yagmurcukardes, M.; Peeters, F. M.; Durgun, E. Janus two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide oxides: First-principles investigation of WXO monolayers with X = S, Se, and Te. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103 (19), 195438  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.195438
  31. 31
    Yang, Q.; Wang, D.; Zeng, Z.-Y.; Geng, H.-Y.; Chen, X.-R. High-performance photocatalytic and piezoelectric properties of two-dimensional transition metal oxyhalide ZrO X 2 (X= Br, I) and their Janus structures. Phys. Rev. B 2024, 109 (3), 035411  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.035411
  32. 32
    Petrić, M. M.; Kremser, M.; Barbone, M.; Qin, Y.; Sayyad, Y.; Shen, Y.; Tongay, S.; Finley, J. J.; Botello-Méndez, A. R.; Müller, K. Raman spectrum of Janus transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers WSSe and MoSSe. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103 (3), 035414  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.035414
  33. 33
    Yu, M.; Ascolani, H.; Zampieri, G.; Woodruff, D. P.; Satterley, C. J.; Jones, R. G.; Dhanak, V. R. The Structure of Atomic Sulfur Phases on Au(111). J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111 (29), 1090410914,  DOI: 10.1021/jp072088+
  34. 34
    Yasuda, S.; Takahashi, R.; Osaka, R.; Kumagai, R.; Miyata, Y.; Okada, S.; Hayamizu, Y.; Murakoshi, K. Out-of-Plane Strain Induced in a Moiré Superstructure of Monolayer MoS2 and MoSe2 on Au(111). Small 2017, 13 (31), 1700748  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201700748
  35. 35
    Dutta, B.; Dayal, B. Lattice Constants and Thermal Expansion of Gold up to 878° C by X-Ray Method. Phys. Status Solidi B 1963, 3 (3), 473477,  DOI: 10.1002/pssb.19630030312
  36. 36
    Picker, J.; Schaal, M.; Gan, Z.; Gruenewald, M.; Neumann, C.; George, A.; Otto, F.; Forker, R.; Fritz, T.; Turchanin, A. Structural and electronic properties of MoS2 and MoSe2 monolayers grown by chemical vapor deposition on Au(111). Nanoscale Adv. 2023, 6 (1), 92101,  DOI: 10.1039/D3NA00475A
  37. 37
    Wen, Y.-N.; Xia, M.-G.; Zhang, S.-L. Bandgap engineering of Janus MoSSe monolayer implemented by Se vacancy. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2018, 152, 2027,  DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.023
  38. 38
    Silva, C. C.; Dombrowski, D.; Atodiresei, N.; Jolie, W.; Farwick zum Hagen, F.; Cai, J.; Ryan, P. T.; Thakur, P. K.; Caciuc, V.; Blügel, S. Spatial variation of geometry, binding, and electronic properties in the moiré superstructure of MoS2 on Au(111). 2D Mater. 2022, 9 (2), 025003  DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/ac4958
  39. 39
    Xiao, D.; Liu, G.-B.; Feng, W.; Xu, X.; Yao, W. Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108 (19), 196802  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.196802
  40. 40
    Yu, S.-B.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, D.; Chang, K. Spin Hall effect in the monolayer Janus compound MoSSe enhanced by Rashba spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 104 (7), 075435  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.075435
  41. 41
    Calis, M.; Lloyd, D.; Boddeti, N.; Bunch, J. S. Adhesion of 2D MoS2 to Graphite and Metal Substrates Measured by a Blister Test. Nano Lett. 2023, 23 (7), 26072614,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c04886

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 2 publications.

  1. Haomai Yang, Changhao Ding, Zhifu Duan, Jiang Zeng, Li-Ming Tang, Nannan Luo, Ke-Qiu Chen. High thermoelectric performance of monolayer Janus Zn AX Te (A = Ge, Sn; X = S, Se) induced by large band degeneracy and low lattice thermal conductivity. Applied Physics Letters 2025, 126 (20) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0264169
  2. D. Szczęśniak, J.T. Gnyp, M. Kielak. Semiconducting and Superconducting Properties of 2D Hexagonal Materials. Acta Physica Polonica A 2025, 147 (3) , 191-195. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.147.191

Nano Letters

Cite this: Nano Lett. 2025, 25, 8, 3330–3336
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c06543
Published February 18, 2025

Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

1690

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (a) Cross section of Janus SeMoS ML on Au(111) based on DFT calculations. Selenium, molybdenum, and sulfur atoms are highlighted in orange, blue, and yellow, respectively. The gold substrate atoms are represented as larger balls and colored according to their depth. (b) Raman spectrum (excitation wavelength, 532 nm) and (c) Mo 3d/S 2s/Se 3s (left), S 2p/Se 3p (middle), and Se 3d/Mo 4s/Au 5p (right) XP spectral regions of Janus SeMoS on Au(111) recorded at an emission angle of 0° (top) and 70° (bottom). Mo, S, Se, and Au peaks are highlighted in blue, green, orange, and yellow, respectively.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) LEED pattern of a Janus SeMoS ML on Au(111) (118 eV, 293 K). The unit cell and the corresponding LEED spots of the Janus SeMoS and Au(111) are highlighted in light blue and red, respectively. (b) Top view of an atomic ball model of the Janus SeMoS ML on Au(111). Due to the different adsorption sites of the sulfur layer with respect to the topmost Au layer, a moiré contrast appears. We distinguish three different regions which are discussed in the text. (c) STM (−1.1 V, 0.5 nA, 4.2 K) and (d) simulated STM images of a Janus SeMoS ML on Au(111). A fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the STM image in panel c is shown in the inset (scale bar ≈ 1 Å–1).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Representation of the lattices of (a) MoS2 (3.15 Å, (36) blue), (b) Janus SeMoS (3.22 Å, light blue), and (c) MoSe2 (3.28 Å, (36) green) on Au(111) (2.884 Å, (35) red). Due to the lattice mismatch between the TMD and Au(111) a moiré contrast appears. The small differences in the lattice constant of the different TMDs results in large differences in the moiré lattice constant periodicities which are 34.6 Å for MoS2/Au(111), 28.9 Å for Janus SeMoS/Au(111), and 23.1 Å for MoSe2/Au(111).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) Electronic band structure and the corresponding density of states of Janus SeMoS MLs calculated by DFT. (b) ARUPS data along the Γ–K direction and around the K point of Janus SeMoS MLs on Au(111).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (a) Average Bader charges for all atoms at each moiré region in the SeMoS/Au(111) interface, as compared to the free-standing SeMoS monolayer. (b) Charge transfer between SeMoS and Au(111) calculated as the difference between the charges in the interface and the isolated Au(111) and SeMoS monolayer. Blue (red) colors indicate charge accumulation (depletion).

  • References


    This article references 41 other publications.

    1. 1
      Manzeli, S.; Ovchinnikov, D.; Pasquier, D.; Yazyev, O. V.; Kis, A. 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2 (8), 17033,  DOI: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.33
    2. 2
      Joseph, S.; Mohan, J.; Lakshmy, S.; Thomas, S.; Chakraborty, B.; Thomas, S.; Kalarikkal, N. A review of the synthesis, properties, and applications of 2D transition metal dichalcogenides and their heterostructures. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 297, 127332  DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.127332
    3. 3
      Cheng, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Tahir, M.; Schwingenschlögl, U. Spin-orbit–induced spin splittings in polar transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. EPL 2013, 102 (5), 57001,  DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/102/57001
    4. 4
      Yin, W.-J.; Tan, H.-J.; Ding, P.-J.; Wen, B.; Li, X.-B.; Teobaldi, G.; Liu, L.-M. Recent advances in low-dimensional Janus materials: theoretical and simulation perspectives. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2 (23), 75437558,  DOI: 10.1039/D1MA00660F
    5. 5
      Tang, X.; Kou, L. 2D Janus transition metal dichalcogenides: Properties and applications. Phys. Status Solidi B 2022, 259 (4), 2100562  DOI: 10.1002/pssb.202100562
    6. 6
      Ahmad, W.; Wang, Y.; Kazmi, J.; Younis, U.; Mubarak, N. M.; Aleithan, S. H.; Channa, A. I.; Lei, W.; Wang, Z. Janus 2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenides: Research Progress, Optical Mechanism and Future Prospects for Optoelectronic Devices. Laser Photonics Rev. 2024, 2400341  DOI: 10.1002/lpor.202400341
    7. 7
      Tao, S.; Xu, B.; Shi, J.; Zhong, S.; Lei, X.; Liu, G.; Wu, M. Tunable Dipole Moment in Janus Single-Layer MoSSe via Transition-Metal Atom Adsorption. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123 (14), 90599065,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b00421
    8. 8
      Hu, T.; Jia, F.; Zhao, G.; Wu, J.; Stroppa, A.; Ren, W. Intrinsic and anisotropic Rashba spin splitting in Janus transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97 (23), 235404  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.235404
    9. 9
      Chen, J.; Wu, K.; Ma, H.; Hu, W.; Yang, J. Tunable Rashba spin splitting in Janus transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers via charge doping. RSC Adv. 2020, 10 (11), 63886394,  DOI: 10.1039/D0RA00674B
    10. 10
      Dong, L.; Lou, J.; Shenoy, V. B. Large in-plane and vertical piezoelectricity in Janus transition metal dichalchogenides. ACS Nano 2017, 11 (8), 82428248,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b03313
    11. 11
      Mohanta, M. K.; De Sarkar, A. Interfacial hybridization of Janus MoSSe and BX (X= P, As) monolayers for ultrathin excitonic solar cells, nanopiezotronics and low-power memory devices. Nanoscale 2020, 12 (44), 2264522657,  DOI: 10.1039/D0NR07000A
    12. 12
      Ma, X.; Wu, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y. A Janus MoSSe monolayer: a potential wide solar-spectrum water-splitting photocatalyst with a low carrier recombination rate. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6 (5), 22952301,  DOI: 10.1039/C7TA10015A
    13. 13
      Zheng, T.; Lin, Y.-C.; Yu, Y.; Valencia-Acuna, P.; Puretzky, A. A.; Torsi, R.; Liu, C.; Ivanov, I. N.; Duscher, G.; Geohegan, D. B. Excitonic dynamics in Janus MoSSe and WSSe monolayers. Nano Lett. 2021, 21 (2), 931937,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03412
    14. 14
      Peng, R.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, S.; Huang, B.; Dai, Y. Valley Polarization in Janus Single-Layer MoSSe via Magnetic Doping. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9 (13), 36123617,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01625
    15. 15
      Vojáček, L.; Medina Dueñas, J. n.; Li, J.; Ibrahim, F.; Manchon, A.; Roche, S.; Chshiev, M.; García, J. H. Field-Free Spin–Orbit Torque Switching in Janus Chromium Dichalcogenides. Nano Lett. 2024, 24 (38), 1188911894,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03029
    16. 16
      Gan, Z.; Paradisanos, I.; Estrada-Real, A.; Picker, J.; Najafidehaghani, E.; Davies, F.; Neumann, C.; Robert, C.; Wiecha, P.; Watanabe, K. Chemical Vapor Deposition of High-Optical-Quality Large-Area Monolayer Janus Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34 (38), 2205226  DOI: 10.1002/adma.202205226
    17. 17
      Kim, S. W.; Choi, S. Y.; Lim, S. H.; Ko, E. B.; Kim, S.; Park, Y. C.; Lee, S.; Kim, H. H. Understanding Solvent-Induced Delamination and Intense Water Adsorption in Janus Transition Metal Dichalcogenides for Enhanced Device Performance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2308709  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202308709
    18. 18
      Lin, Y.-C.; Liu, C.; Yu, Y.; Zarkadoula, E.; Yoon, M.; Puretzky, A. A.; Liang, L.; Kong, X.; Gu, Y.; Strasser, A. Low energy implantation into transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers to form Janus structures. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (4), 38963906,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b10196
    19. 19
      Lu, A.-Y.; Zhu, H.; Xiao, J.; Chuu, C.-P.; Han, Y.; Chiu, M.-H.; Cheng, C.-C.; Yang, C.-W.; Wei, K.-H.; Yang, Y. Janus monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12 (8), 744749,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2017.100
    20. 20
      Schmeink, J.; Musytschuk, V.; Pollmann, E.; Sleziona, S.; Maas, A.; Kratzer, P.; Schleberger, M. Evaluating strain and doping of Janus MoSSe from phonon mode shifts supported by ab initio DFT calculations. Nanoscale 2023, 15 (25), 1083410841,  DOI: 10.1039/D3NR01978K
    21. 21
      Zhang, J.; Jia, S.; Kholmanov, I.; Dong, L.; Er, D.; Chen, W.; Guo, H.; Jin, Z.; Shenoy, V. B.; Shi, L.; Lou, J. Janus Monolayer Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 2017, 11 (8), 81928198,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b03186
    22. 22
      Trivedi, D. B.; Turgut, G.; Qin, Y.; Sayyad, M. Y.; Hajra, D.; Howell, M.; Liu, L.; Yang, S.; Patoary, N. H.; Li, H. Room-temperature synthesis of 2D Janus crystals and their heterostructures. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32 (50), 2006320  DOI: 10.1002/adma.202006320
    23. 23
      Sayyad, M.; Kopaczek, J.; Gilardoni, C. M.; Chen, W.; Xiong, Y.; Yang, S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Kudrawiec, R.; Hautier, G. The Defects Genome of Janus Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2403583  DOI: 10.1002/adma.202403583
    24. 24
      Lakshmy, S.; Mondal, B.; Kalarikkal, N.; Rout, C. S.; Chakraborty, B. Recent developments in synthesis, properties, and applications of 2D Janus MoSSe and MoSexS(1-x) alloys. Adv. Powder Mater. 2024, 3, 100204  DOI: 10.1016/j.apmate.2024.100204
    25. 25
      Bian, C.; Shi, J.; Liu, X.; Yang, Y.; Yang, H.; Gao, H. Optical second-harmonic generation of Janus MoSSe monolayer. Chin. Phys. B 2022, 31 (9), 097304  DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/ac6db4
    26. 26
      Harris, S. B.; Lin, Y.-C.; Puretzky, A. A.; Liang, L.; Dyck, O.; Berlijn, T.; Eres, G.; Rouleau, C. M.; Xiao, K.; Geohegan, D. B. Real-Time diagnostics of 2D crystal transformations by pulsed laser deposition: Controlled synthesis of Janus WSSe monolayers and alloys. ACS Nano 2023, 17 (3), 24722486,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c09952
    27. 27
      Zheng, K.; Vegge, T.; Castelli, I. E. Giant In-Plane Flexoelectricity and Radial Polarization in Janus IV–VI Monolayers and Nanotubes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16 (15), 1936919378,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.4c01527
    28. 28
      Liu, M.-Y.; Gong, L.; He, Y.; Cao, C. Tuning Rashba effect, band inversion, and spin-charge conversion of Janus XSn2Y monolayers via an external field. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103 (7), 075421  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.075421
    29. 29
      Ahammed, R.; Jena, N.; Rawat, A.; Mohanta, M. K.; Dimple; De Sarkar, A. Ultrahigh out-of-plane piezoelectricity meets giant Rashba effect in 2D Janus monolayers and bilayers of group IV transition-metal trichalcogenides. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124 (39), 2125021260,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c05134
    30. 30
      Varjovi, M. J.; Yagmurcukardes, M.; Peeters, F. M.; Durgun, E. Janus two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide oxides: First-principles investigation of WXO monolayers with X = S, Se, and Te. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103 (19), 195438  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.195438
    31. 31
      Yang, Q.; Wang, D.; Zeng, Z.-Y.; Geng, H.-Y.; Chen, X.-R. High-performance photocatalytic and piezoelectric properties of two-dimensional transition metal oxyhalide ZrO X 2 (X= Br, I) and their Janus structures. Phys. Rev. B 2024, 109 (3), 035411  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.035411
    32. 32
      Petrić, M. M.; Kremser, M.; Barbone, M.; Qin, Y.; Sayyad, Y.; Shen, Y.; Tongay, S.; Finley, J. J.; Botello-Méndez, A. R.; Müller, K. Raman spectrum of Janus transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers WSSe and MoSSe. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103 (3), 035414  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.035414
    33. 33
      Yu, M.; Ascolani, H.; Zampieri, G.; Woodruff, D. P.; Satterley, C. J.; Jones, R. G.; Dhanak, V. R. The Structure of Atomic Sulfur Phases on Au(111). J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111 (29), 1090410914,  DOI: 10.1021/jp072088+
    34. 34
      Yasuda, S.; Takahashi, R.; Osaka, R.; Kumagai, R.; Miyata, Y.; Okada, S.; Hayamizu, Y.; Murakoshi, K. Out-of-Plane Strain Induced in a Moiré Superstructure of Monolayer MoS2 and MoSe2 on Au(111). Small 2017, 13 (31), 1700748  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201700748
    35. 35
      Dutta, B.; Dayal, B. Lattice Constants and Thermal Expansion of Gold up to 878° C by X-Ray Method. Phys. Status Solidi B 1963, 3 (3), 473477,  DOI: 10.1002/pssb.19630030312
    36. 36
      Picker, J.; Schaal, M.; Gan, Z.; Gruenewald, M.; Neumann, C.; George, A.; Otto, F.; Forker, R.; Fritz, T.; Turchanin, A. Structural and electronic properties of MoS2 and MoSe2 monolayers grown by chemical vapor deposition on Au(111). Nanoscale Adv. 2023, 6 (1), 92101,  DOI: 10.1039/D3NA00475A
    37. 37
      Wen, Y.-N.; Xia, M.-G.; Zhang, S.-L. Bandgap engineering of Janus MoSSe monolayer implemented by Se vacancy. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2018, 152, 2027,  DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.023
    38. 38
      Silva, C. C.; Dombrowski, D.; Atodiresei, N.; Jolie, W.; Farwick zum Hagen, F.; Cai, J.; Ryan, P. T.; Thakur, P. K.; Caciuc, V.; Blügel, S. Spatial variation of geometry, binding, and electronic properties in the moiré superstructure of MoS2 on Au(111). 2D Mater. 2022, 9 (2), 025003  DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/ac4958
    39. 39
      Xiao, D.; Liu, G.-B.; Feng, W.; Xu, X.; Yao, W. Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108 (19), 196802  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.196802
    40. 40
      Yu, S.-B.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, D.; Chang, K. Spin Hall effect in the monolayer Janus compound MoSSe enhanced by Rashba spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 104 (7), 075435  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.075435
    41. 41
      Calis, M.; Lloyd, D.; Boddeti, N.; Bunch, J. S. Adhesion of 2D MoS2 to Graphite and Metal Substrates Measured by a Blister Test. Nano Lett. 2023, 23 (7), 26072614,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c04886
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c06543.

    • Details of the growth and methods used for characterization, XPS fit details, DFT calculations, STM data, ARUPS data and analyses, and LEED data (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.