ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Periodic Giant Polarization Gradients in Doped BiFeO3 Thin Films
My Activity
  • Open Access
Letter

Periodic Giant Polarization Gradients in Doped BiFeO3 Thin Films
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Electron Microscopy Center, Empa, Überlandstrasse 129, Dübendorf 8600, Switzerland
Department of Physics, KAIST, Daejeon 305-701, Republic of Korea
§ Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Nano Letters

Cite this: Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 2, 717–724
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03817
Published January 9, 2018

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The ultimate challenge for the development of new multiferroics with enhanced properties lies in achieving nanoscale control of the coupling between different ordering parameters. In oxide-based multiferroics, substitutional cation dopants offer the unparalleled possibility to modify both the electric and magnetic properties at a local scale. Herein it is demonstrated the formation of a dopant-controlled polar pattern in BiFeO3 leading to the spontaneous instauration of periodic polarization waves. In particular, nonpolar Ca-doped rich regions act as spacers between consecutive dopant-depleted regions displaying coupled ferroelectric states. This alternation of layers with different ferroelectric state creates a novel vertical polar structure exhibiting giant polarization gradients as large as 70 μC cm–2 across 30 Å thick domains. The drastic change in the polar state of the film is visualized using high-resolution differential phase-contrast imaging able to map changes in ferroelectric polarization at atomic scale. Furthermore, a periodic distortion in the Fe—O—Fe bonding angle suggests a local variation in the magnetic ordering. The findings provide a new insight into the role of doping and reveal hitherto unexplored means to tailor the functional properties of multiferroics by doping engineering.

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society

Multiferroics are intriguing materials with coupled order parameters that permit the control of material properties by different applied stimuli. For instance, in magnetoelectric multiferroics an electrical stimulus results in a magnetic response. (1-5) Such multiferroics rarely occur in nature and thus need to be engineered by, for example, inducing a defined strain state which leads to the desired ferroic coupling essential for technological applications. (6) Local structural instabilities represent degrees of freedom exploitable for the introduction of a specific ferroic ordering or modification of the ones naturally existing, opening unrivaled possibilities to tailor the materials’ properties for a wide range of applications that span from spintronics to magnetoelectronics. (7-9) Additionally, the high versatility of the perovskite structure in ferroelectric oxides is a unique playground for the introduction of substitutional species that can alter the electronic properties and magnetism. (10-12) Although the effect of structural distortions on the materials’ properties has been widely investigated, (13-17) an atomic scale correlation between substitutional doping and local structural instabilities has not yet been fully addressed. In this framework, achieving a complete understanding of doping effects is of crucial importance for tailoring new materials with enhanced properties.
Bismuth ferrite (BFO) has been widely investigated for being one among the few multiferroic materials that exhibits ferroelectricity and antiferromagnetism at room temperature (RT). (18) In the rhombohedral phase (space group R3c) BFO is ferroelectric with a large polarization (80–100 μC cm–2) along the [111] direction of the perovskite cell. (19-21) Ferroelectricity of BFO arises from the localized character of the 6s2 electrons of the Bi ions that are spatially confined forming a localized lobe (lone-pair) on the A-sites of the perovskite structure. (22) This lone-pair is responsible for the cooperative displacement of the Fe cations and the surrounding O cages along the [111] direction.
Among the different possible dopants, Ca as an A-site dopant is very promising not only for enhancing the magnetoelectric coupling (23) but also for making accessible in BFO thin films novel conducting states and properties, for example, field-controlled conductivity modulation, (24) and electrochromism. (25) In Bi1–xCaxFeO3-δ (δ = x/2) the hole-doping resulting from replacing Bi3+ with Ca2+ leads to the formation of O vacancies that are organized in self-assembled superstructures, (24-30) which are responsible for the aforementioned effects.
Here we report an atomic resolution investigation of a Bi0.8Ca0.2FeO3−δ thin film exhibiting periodic dopant fluctuations. We perform a complete analysis of the structural distortions related to the polar instability, discussing the local effect of the substitutional dopants on both ferroelectric and magnetic properties. Our results demonstrate that controlled doping represents an effective tool that can be employed, eventually in combination with strain or other structural distortions, to tailor the material properties at the nanoscale.
The atomic scale properties of a 85 nm Bi0.8Ca0.2FeO3−δ film epitaxially grown on SrTiO3 (STO) were investigated by high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) by means of high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF), annular bright-field (ABF), and differential phase-contrast (DPC). While HAADF-STEM imaging provides a Z-contrast signal, particularly sensitive to columns of high atomic number (Z), ABF-STEM provides a mean to locate light atomic columns, like oxygen columns. On the other hand, and as explained later in the text, DPC-STEM is a novel technique able to map the local electrostatic field (31) with a great potential impact on ferroelectric materials investigation.
Figure 1a shows an unprocessed HAADF-STEM image of the film in the [010] projection. Herein all the indices are given within the pseudocubic setting of the perovskite structure. The growth direction is from bottom to top (along [001]) and the area corresponds to about one-ninth of the original micrograph rotated by 45° (Figure S1, Supporting Information).

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) Color-coded HAADF micrograph in the [010] zone axis. The growth direction is from bottom to top. The horizontal white lines indicate the position of the dark-layers at each side of the image, appearing every 7 or 8 perovskite blocks. (b) Corresponding FFT indexed within the pseudocubic reference system. (c) Line profiles along the [001] and [100] directions of the FFT. The satellite spots (SL) due to the superstructure are visible along the [001] direction at a spacing of ∼0.35 nm–1, while an additional spot at ∼1.28 nm–1 (marked by the black arrow) corresponding to a doubling of the perovskite periodicity is observed in the profile taken along the [100] direction.

The film is characterized by the repetition of single planar dark-layers appearing periodically every 7 or 8 perovskite blocks along the growth direction. The lateral extension of these dark-layers is frequently interrupted and a 7-layer perovskite-block band may be transformed into an 8-layer perovskite-block band, and vice versa. The transformation between 7- to 8-layer blocks occurs over steps ∼2–3 unit cells wide. These dark-layers have been described in literature as self-assembled structures due to the local accumulation of O vacancies. (29) The fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the full high-resolution image is given in Figure 1b. The line profile in Figure 1c (top) reveals the occurrence of an incommensurate modulation along [001]. In fact, the dark-layers recurring with two different periodicities along the c-axis generate incommensurate superlattice reflections (labeled SL in Figure 1c) at a reciprocal distance of ∼0.35 nm–1. In real space, the average thickness of the bands separated by the dark-layers is ∼7.3 perovskite blocks, in good agreement with the HAADF micrograph shown in Figure 1a. Besides, the line profile along the [010] direction in Figure 1c (bottom) displays a peak (marked by the black arrow) at a reciprocal distance of ∼1.28 nm–1 corresponding to a real space distance of ∼0.78 nm. The periodicity of the perovskite structure (∼0.39 nm) along [100] is thus broken resulting in a doubling in this direction. In the following, the origin of the structural features along the a and c directions will be elucidated.
Geometrical phase analysis (32) (GPA) carried out on the full thickness of the film demonstrates that the film is adapted to the STO substrate, whereas a significant out-of-plane dilation (εyy ∼ 4%) is observed only for the dark perovskite layers (Figure S2, Supporting Information). A more detailed quantitative analysis of the lattice distortions was performed by means of peak-pair analysis (33) (PPA), fitting the peaks corresponding to the atomic columns in high-resolution HAADF/ABF-STEM images (see Material and Methods for details). In Figure 2, the PPA analysis on the simultaneously acquired HAADF and ABF-STEM signals along the [010] zone axis is presented. Two dark-layers (marked by the black arrows) are visible in the field of view of the HAADF image (Figure 2a). Following the nomenclature given in the scheme, we analyze the structural distortions by measuring the distance between the peaks corresponding to the atomic columns of the A and B sublattices. In particular, we call aA-A and cA-A the interatomic distances of the A-sublattice parallel respectively to [100] and [001], whereas aB–B and cB–B are the analogous distances for the B-sublattice. In Figure 2b, the maps of the interatomic distances are reported. Because of the off-centering of the A and B sublattices, the maps of aB–B and cB–B correspond to the regions marked by the white dashed boxes in the aA–A and cA–A maps. The positions of the dark-layers are marked in each map by the black arrows. No evident in-plane strain is visible for the A-sublattice, while an out-of-plane elongation of the A–A interatomic distances is detected in proximity of the defective layers, in agreement with the GPA analysis. Remarkably, this distortion is not uniform along the entire layer but has a precise pattern in which one A–A pair undergoing a stronger out-of-plane elongation is immediately followed by one A–A pair in which a less pronounced distortion is observed. An opposite trend is instead observed for the B-sublattice. In fact, while no distortion of the B–B interatomic distances is found along the out-of-plane direction, alternated compressive/tensile distortions of the in-plane interatomic distances are detected along the dark-layers. A strong tetragonal distortion (cA-A/aA-A ∼ 1.07) is observed just at the dark-layers, as proven by the line-profile along [001] shown in Figure 2c. The large standard deviation of the value measured in the dark layers is due to the alternation of A–A pairs with different out-of-plane dilation, previously described. Taking into account the sublattices offset, in the dark-layers the overall distortion occurs in such a way that the stronger out-of-plane elongation of the A–A pair corresponds to the in-plane compression of the B–B distance, followed by a less pronounced out-of-plane A–A elongation in proximity of the in-plane dilated B–B pair. A sketch of the distorted structure is shown in Figure 2d. The doubling of the periodicity along [100] generated by this structural distortion is responsible for the diffraction peak at ∼1.28 nm–1 mentioned above.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) High-resolution HAADF image showing two dark-layers separated by 7-perovskite layers. (b) Maps of the interatomic distances for the A and B sublattices as obtained by PPA. The scheme defines the nomenclature for the two sublattices. (c) Profile along [001] of the tetragonal distortion. (d) Schematic representation (not in scale) of the structural distortions occurring in the dark-layers. (e) Corresponding inverted-ABF image. (f) Fit of the intensities of the O atomic columns plotted at their fitted coordinates. A chessboard-like pattern of O intensities is visible, because the effect is stronger in the region immediately following the dark-layers along the [001] direction. (g) Schematic representation of the O vacancies ordering into the distorted cations lattice. The portion of the model in the gray dashed box corresponds to a dark-layer, where O vacancies are preferentially organized. The partial O vacancies ordering in the other layers is depicted by semitransparent white boxes.

The simultaneously acquired ABF-STEM signal is shown in Figure 2e, after inverting the contrast (see Materials and Methods for details). The two layers that appeared as dark-layers in HAADF-STEM exhibit here a lower total intensity in the inverted signal. In Figure 2f, the intensity of all the O atomic columns is plotted at the fitted atomic positions. Taking the profiles along the directions indicated by the arrows, we observe an ordering of O vacancies appearing as an alternation of more intense O atomic columns (labeled as O) and less intense O columns (labeled by a white square), in which the O vacancies are preferentially localized. The atomic columns displaying a higher O content are located between the more spaced A–A pairs and the closer B–B pairs, as sketched in Figure 2g. In the defective layers, the Fe cations are thus shifted toward the less deficient O columns resulting in a local reduction of the Fe–O bond length. It is worth noting that (i) beside the preferential ordering in the defective layers a chessboard-like pattern, which can be attributed to a partial ordering of O vacancies, is observed throughout the perovskite blocks at both sides of the dark-layers; (ii) in the defective layers, the O nearest-neighbors of the O vacancy (labeled as 1–4 in Figure 2f ,g) are shifted toward the O vacancy, inducing a tetragonal coordination around the Fe cations. These results are in agreement with the average reduction of the Fe—O bond length recently proposed for polycrystalline Bi0.9Ca0.1FeO3−δ samples. (34) Our results demonstrate that the ordering of O vacancies and the cations sublattices distortions are strongly coupled and the contraction of the Fe—O bond length is a localized effect.
In order to investigate the distribution of the Ca dopants, we did an analysis of the HAADF/ABF signal intensities taking line profiles along the [001] direction over an area of about 25 nm2. The profile reported in Figure 3a shows a fluctuation of the HAADF intensity which is periodic and is repeated for each block composing the superstructure. In particular after each dark-layer, whose position is marked by a black arrow and is characterized by a lower integrated intensity (area colored in gray), we observe a linear increase of the HAADF intensity until the next dark-layer. This intensity variation can be attributed to a decrease of the Ca doping within the intermediate perovskite blocks along [001]. These spontaneously generated dopant fluctuations are effective in producing a layering within the structure with Ca-rich and Ca-poor regions. On the contrary, a correlation of the HAADF signal and Ca concentration in the dark-layers is not possible due to strain effects that locally affect the channeling of the electron beam. Though a quantitative interpretation of the ABF-STEM signal is less straightforward, taking the intensity profile of the fitted O columns located at the FeO2 layers perpendicular to the growth direction, we observe a similar tendency. The O content increases from the Ca-rich toward the Ca-poor areas (Figure 3b). A deviation from this general trend is observed for the O layers respectively above and below the defective layers which exhibit a local higher O content. This self-induced effect shall compensate for the oxygen (and electron) deficient state in the defective layers, thus preserving the charge neutrality.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) HAADF and (b) inverted-ABF intensity profiles along the [001] direction. Periodic fluctuations of the HAADF intensity are observed for each block composing the superstructure between consecutive dark-layers (marked in gray). A similar trend is visible in the inverted-ABF profile, which can be related to a variation of O concentration. (c) Profiles along [001] of the perovskite cell angle (φ) and O-octahedron tilting amplitude (|ω|). (d) Scheme of the doping-induced distortion of the O-octahedron tilting pattern, showing a structural phase transformation from Pnma to R3c space group as the doping concentration decreases.

In Figure 3c, we report the profiles of structural distortions of the perovskite cells, that is, the angle of the perovskite cell (ϕ) and the O octahedron tilting amplitude (|ω|). Remarkably, a periodic pattern following the dopant profile is observed and an angle ϕ = 89.3 ± 0.5° is observed except for the layers close to the dark-layers, which are affected by the structural distortions. On the other hand, the average O octahedron tilting amplitude decreases along the perovskite block from ∼2° toward zero, consistent with a transition between an in-phase toward an out-of-phase tilting scheme from the Ca-rich toward the Ca-deficient area. This trend in the structural distortions highlights a progressive variation from a higher toward a lower symmetry space group moving from Ca-rich toward Ca-poor areas (Figure 3d), revealing a structure that is doping-controlled at the nanoscale.
The ferroelectric state of the film was studied by analyzing the geometrical displacements of the cations sublattices in high-resolution HAADF-STEM. In BFO, the modulus of the atomic-scale polarization is proportional to the displacement of Fe cation with respect to the center of mass of the Bi cell and its direction is opposite to such displacement. (35) In Figure 4a, a polarization map (see Materials and Methods for details) is plotted superimposed to an HAADF-STEM image taken in the [010] zone axis where six dark-layers are visible. The map shows a periodic alternation of ferroelectric domains and layers in which the ferroelectric instability is quenched, corresponding to Ca-poor and Ca-rich regions, respectively. With respect to different systems characterized by a lateral juxtaposition of polar and nonpolar regions, for example, columnar systems containing a ferroelectric perovskite and a ferromagnetic spinel, (36, 37) in the present system the dopant ordering along the growing direction produces alternated ferroelectric/nonferroelectric regions that are stacked along the direction normal to the film surface, giving rise to a vertical polar superstructure. It is worth noting that the polarization of the ferroelectric domains appears in this projection to be parallel either to the [101̅] or [1̅01̅] directions, in agreement with a global polarization vector along [111] as typically observed for undoped BFO. A further confirmation regarding the displacements geometry is obtained analyzing the film polarization along a different projection, for example, [110] zone axis (see Figure S3, Supporting Information). Ferroelectric domains arising due to an inversion in the doping ordering, that is, with Ca-content increasing in the intermediate perovskite blocks along the film growth direction, were also observed in different portions of the TEM sample, in agreement with the macroscopic characterizations of similar films previously reported in refs 24 and 25.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Polarization map superimposed to the HAADF image. The black arrows on the left indicate the position of the dark-layers. (b) Profiles along the [001] direction of the in-plane (Δx) and out-of-plane (Δy) components of the atomic displacements. Scheme of the relationship between atomic displacements and the projected ferroelectric polarization is given in the inset. (c) Sketch of the complex polar structure of the film, showing a periodic polarization wave. Coupled ferroelectric domains exist in the periodic superstructure (dashed circles). (d) Profile along [001] of the Fe—O—Fe bonding angle that highlights a straightening of the superexchange path in the Ca-rich areas with respect to the ferroelectric regions.

In Figure 4b, the profiles of the atomic displacements at the origin of the ferroelectric properties are shown. The displacements of Fe along the [100] and [001] directions, named respectively Δx and Δy, display different periodicities, being the periodicity of Δx the double of the one of Δyx = 2λy). The different periodicities in the atomic displacements are correlated to the establishment of symmetric coupled ferroelectric domains in consecutive Ca-depleted regions. A schematic representation of the film polar structure is given in Figure 4c, where the coupled ferroelectric domains are marked by dashed circles. Despite some asymmetries due to small residual mistilt, in the ferroelectric Bi-rich areas an average total displacement of the Fe cations of ∼31 pm was measured. Additionally, the Δx value obtained in the dark-layers confirms that the atomic displacements are affected by the local structural strain: in particular, a small value with a large standard deviation is originated by the alternated positive and negative horizontal displacements of Fe cations, arising from the B–B pairs distortions previously shown in Figure 2g. The Ca-doping fluctuations induce therefore a periodic ferroelectric polarization wave with a polarization vector modulus that goes from a nearly zero value of Pmin ≈ 8 μC cm–2 in the Ca-rich areas toward a maximum value Pmax ≈ 80 μC cm–2 in the Ca-poor regions, calculated under the Born effective charge (38) approximation. Such an abrupt change in polarization, effectively about 70 μC cm–2 across only 30 Å, results in an unprecedented giant polarization gradient 2 orders of magnitude larger than the one recently reported for compositionally graded Ba1–xSrxTiO3 thin films. (39)
Furthermore, the geometrical distortion at the origin of the polar instability has an additional relevant effect. In fact, despite the previously discussed doping-dependent pattern in the tilting scheme of the O octahedrons, the different Fe displacements in the Ca-poor and Ca-rich areas are effective in producing a local variation in the Fe—O—Fe angle, which has a notable relevance for the magnetic properties of the system. The profile of the Fe—O—Fe angle shown in Figure 4d highlights a distortion scheme that resembles the trend of the Ca-doping. In particular, an angle close to 180° that favors an AFM interaction (GKA exchange) is observed in the Ca-rich part, while a severe bond buckling occurs in the Ca-poor areas. In agreement with the results of Chou et al., (34) a local and periodic modification in the superexchange interaction represents an effective way to break the undesired cycloidal spin modulation, (40) which prevents the instauration of a net magnetic moment in undoped BFO.
An analysis of the lone-pair ordering at the base of the observed ferroelectric structure was carried out by combining HAADF/ABF-STEM imaging and DPC-STEM (Figure 5). In Figure 5a, the statistical averages (see Materials and Methods for details) of a region containing two defective layers are presented for both HAADF and inverted ABF-STEM signals, together with a schematic representation of the corresponding dopant and polarization profiles. The two areas marked by white rectangles belonging to two consecutive Ca-poor regions are reported at a magnified scale in Figure 5b. In these zoomed images, the A-site cations present nonsymmetric coordination geometry. In particular, the vertical off-centering with respect to the surrounding O columns occurs for both regions with an upward displacement of the anions surrounding the cation. On the contrary, displacements with opposite sign are observed along the horizontal direction in consecutive Ca-poor regions, as highlighted by the two line-profiles taken along the white dashed rectangles. This coordination geometry in the Ca-poor regions agrees well with the one of undoped BFO (R3c space group), as visible by the comparison with the structural models reported as reference in Figure 5b for both analyzed regions. Such asymmetric coordination around the A-site is attributed to a different preferential localization of the lone pair, as depicted in the scheme.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a) HAADF and ABF motifs (lateral width: 1.1 nm) obtained averaging a template over the field of view of Figure 2a,e, respectively. The corresponding polarization and dopant fluctuations are given in the schemes. The dark-layers are marked by gray boxes. (b) Magnified views of two consecutive Ca-poor regions, corresponding to the areas marked by the white boxes in (a). The atomic configurations of these two regions are horizontally flipped, thus explaining the change of sign of the in-plane component of polarization in two consecutive layers. (c) Schematic representation of the basic principle of the DPC technique. (d) Sketch of the sample orientation with respect to the segmented detector. (e) Differential signals between opposite segments (A–C, B–D) of the detector on an area showing the same structure as in panel a. The line profiles of the two signals are obtained along the directions of the arrows. (f) Vector plot of the atomic electric fields, where the hue gives the field direction and the saturation is proportional to the vector modulus.

Electric field imaging of single atoms by means of DPC has recently been demonstrated, opening new perspectives in materials investigation at the atomic scale. (41) Here we present an analysis of the atomic electrostatic fields as an experimental proof of the complex polar state occurring in the Ca-doped BFO film. Figure 5c shows a schematic representation of the principle of DPC. In this technique, the origin of the differential signal between opposite pairs of quadrants (A,C and B,D) in the segmented annular dark-field detector is due to the deflection of the beam by local electric fields in the specimen. (31, 41) In our investigation, we oriented the sample with the [100] and [001] directions parallel to the A–C and B–D segments of the detector, respectively (Figure 5d).
In Figure 5e, the DPC(A–C) and DPC(B–D) differential signals are shown. Taking a profile over the entire field of view of DPC(A–C) along the direction of the white arrow, an antisymmetric profile is obtained at each zero-crossing corresponding either to A or B sites. On the contrary, taking a similar profile of the DPC(B–D) along the perpendicular direction, some peculiar features emerge. In particular, (i) a strong asymmetry is observed at the zero crossing for the A-sites in the defective layers (indicated by the red lines), (ii) a transition from an antisymmetric toward an asymmetric profile is observed at the zero crossing for the B-site (indicated by the orange lines) moving from the Ca-rich toward the Ca-poor areas, (iii) the position of the zero crossing for the B-site undergoes a vertical shift that resemble the cationic displacements responsible for the establishment of a ferroelectric polarization in the Ca-poor layers of the sample. In Figure 5f, an atomic resolution color map of the atomic fields is reported showing an increase of polarization from the Ca-rich toward the Ca-poor regions visible as an asymmetry in the color pattern. These results prove that DPC is hence a suitable technique to detect atomic electric field fluctuations, paving the way for new insights into ferroelectric materials.
In conclusion, the presented atomic-scale analysis demonstrates that the spontaneous formation of a layered structure of substitutional dopants is effective in creating a complex ferroelectric structure constituted by the alternation of polar and nonpolar domains. This polar pattern showing giant polarization gradients has been investigated combining several advanced scanning transmission electron microscopy techniques at the atomic level, that is, HAADF/ABF and DPC. In particular, periodic fluctuations in the Ca dopant concentration are at the origin of the breaking of the lone-pair ordering scheme, producing a local quenching of the ferroelectricity and a local straightening of the Fe—O—Fe bond angle which is expected to be advantageous for the magnetic properties. These findings provide a new insight into the role of doping in complex ferroelectric structures in which anisotropic dopants/vacancies distribution can occur and represent a proof of concept that controlled substitutional doping is a powerful tool exploitable to create artificial structures with complex polar patterns and giant polarization gradients, such as polarization waves.

Materials and Methods

Sample Preparation

Ca-doped (20%) BiFeO3 films with a thickness of 85 nm were grown on SrTiO3(001) substrate using pulsed laser deposition at 873–923 K in 50–100 mTorr O2 pressure. Typical deposition rates were about 2 nm min–1 with a laser repetition rate of 10 Hz. The pulsed KrF excimer laser (wavelength: 248 nm) was focused to reach a laser fluency of ∼2 J cm–2 on the target surface. The films were cooled down at a rate of 5 K min–1 with ∼1 atm O2 pressure.

High-Resolution Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy

Electron transparent cross-sectioned samples for transmission electron microcopy were prepared by means of a FEI Helios NanoLab 600i and a FEI Helios NanoLab 450S focused ion beam operated at accelerating voltages of 30 and 5 kV. The specimens’ thicknesses were in the range 30–60 nm. Plasma-cleaning (25% O2, 75% Ar) was performed for 60 s on the specimens before STEM experiments. HAADF and simultaneous ABF STEM were performed on an aberration-corrected JEOL ARM200F, operated at 200 kV. The experiments were carried out setting a probe semiconvergence angle of 18 mrad and collecting semiangles of 90–170 mrad for HAADF and 9–18 for ABF. All the ABF images are here presented after inverting the signal, that is, peaks corresponding to atomic columns appear as local intensity maxima in the images.

Differential-Phase Contrast

In DPC techniques, a deflection of the center of mass of the transmitted disk is observed due to the electric fields in the specimen plane. DPC investigation was carried out on an aberration-corrected Titan Themis 80-300 operated at 300 kV with a probe-forming aperture semiangle of 18 mrad and a collection angular range for the segmented DF4 detector set to 9–57 mrad. The orientation of the samples with respect to the detector segments was set as described in the text.

Data Processing and Analysis

HAADF and ABF images of Figures 2 and 3 were obtained as averages of time series of 10 frames, after nonrigid registration using the Smart Align (42) software. HAADF whose signal is proportional to Zn (n ≈ 1.6–2.0) was employed to map the Ca doping, thanks to its strong sensitivity to atomic number. On the contrary, ABF signal is proportional to Zm (m ≈ 1/3) and can be successfully employed to visualize light elements, like oxygen. (43) Making use of ABF, we investigated the ordering of O vacancies and the structural distortions related to the anionic sublattice.
The picometer-precision fitting of the peaks corresponding to the atomic columns was computed on both HAADF and ABF signals by means of 7 parameters Gaussians, using a custom-developed Matlab code based on the method proposed by Yankovich et al. (44)
Following Bals et al., (45) in an ideal crystal (i.e., a crystal with constant interatomic distances) the precision of the atomic columns fitting can be defined as the standard deviation (σ) of the lattice separations. We carried out an analogous statistical analysis, calculating the σ of the interatomic distances for Bi, Fe, and O species. Such calculation was performed excluding the layers mostly affected by the strain, that is, the dark-layers and their nearest-neighbors (see Figure 2b,c). The following values were obtained for the different species: σBi = 5.8 pm, σFe = 3.6 pm, and σO = 4.3 pm. Because of the complexity of our system displaying a doping gradient along the entire perovskite block, these values represent an overestimation of the precision of the fitting algorithm. Nevertheless, the reduced precision in the fitting of the Bi columns positions with respect to Fe and O species can be remarkably attributed to an increase of their local static displacements, induced by the substitution of Ca dopant on the A-site of the perovskite structure.
The precise fitting of the peaks in the HAADF/ABF images permits to directly access the projected crystallographic structure and make quantitative analysis, by, for example, PPA. In this way, the structural distortions are immediately accessible by direct imaging of the crystal structure along the selected crystallographic orientation. Distortion analysis and polarization mapping were performed using custom-developed Matlab codes. The atomic column positions were fitted over the entire field-of-view of the time-averaged ABF/HAADF signals; afterward, the profiles along the [001] direction were calculated averaging along the [010] direction the corresponding distortion/displacement maps. The averages represent the estimated values while the standard deviations give the error bars. Atomic-scale polarization maps were calculated by measuring the off-centering between the B-site position and the center of the A-site cell, following the method proposed by Nelson et al. (35)
In order to compare HAADF/ABF signals to DPC we used the approach of template-matching. By means of template-matching, a statistical average of a representative portion of the sample (motif) can be obtained. In particular, the statistically equivalent averaged motifs for both HAADF and ABF signals were determined by cross-correlation and averaging using the MacTempas (46) software package.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03817.

  • Large-scale morphology of the film superstructure (Figure S1). Description of the strain state of the film by GPA analysis (Figure S2). Polarization analysis along the complementary [110] pseudocubic direction (Figure S3) (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Rolf Erni - Electron Microscopy Center, Empa, Überlandstrasse 129, Dübendorf 8600, Switzerland
    • Chan−Ho Yang - Department of Physics, KAIST, Daejeon 305-701, Republic of Korea
    • Ramamoorthy Ramesh - Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
    • Marta D. Rossell - Electron Microscopy Center, Empa, Überlandstrasse 129, Dübendorf 8600, Switzerland
  • Author Contributions

    C.-H.Y. and R.R. carried out the thin films growth. M.D.R. prepared the electron transparent TEM specimens. M.C. and M.D.R. conducted the HAADF/ABF-STEM experiments. M.C. performed DPC-STEM experiments and the data analysis. M.C. wrote the manuscript supervised by R.E. and M.D.R. M.D.R. coordinated the project. All the authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

M.C. thanks NCCR-MARVEL project funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) for the financial support. Access to the TEM facility at the IBM Research-Zürich (Switzerland) under the IBM/Empa Master Joint Development Agreement is gratefully acknowledged. The work at KAIST was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (NRF-2017R1A3B1023686).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 46 other publications.

  1. 1
    Spaldin, N. A.; Fiebig, M. Science 2005, 309, 391 DOI: 10.1126/science.1113357
  2. 2
    Eerenstein, W.; Mathur, N. D.; Scott, J. F. Nature 2006, 442, 759 DOI: 10.1038/nature05023
  3. 3
    Cheong, S.-W.; Mostovoy, M. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 13 DOI: 10.1038/nmat1804
  4. 4
    Ramesh, R.; Spaldin, N. A. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 21 DOI: 10.1038/nmat1805
  5. 5
    Fiebig, M.; Lottermoser, T.; Meier, D.; Trassin, M. Nat. Rev. Mats. 2016, 1, 16046 DOI: 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.46
  6. 6
    Hill, N. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 6694 DOI: 10.1021/jp000114x
  7. 7
    Scott, J. F. Science 2007, 315, 954 DOI: 10.1126/science.1129564
  8. 8
    Béa, H.; Gajek, M.; Bibes, M.; Barthélémy, A. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2008, 20, 434221 DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/20/43/434221
  9. 9
    Bibes, M.; Barthelemy, A. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 425 DOI: 10.1038/nmat2189
  10. 10
    Ahn, C. H.; Triscone, J.-M.; Mannhart, J. Nature 2003, 424, 1015 DOI: 10.1038/nature01878
  11. 11
    Yang, C.-H.; Kan, D.; Takeuchi, I.; Nagarajan, V.; Seidel, J. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 15953 DOI: 10.1039/c2cp43082g
  12. 12
    Park, J.; Kang, M.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.; Jang, K.-H.; Pirogov, A.; Park, J.-G.; Lee, C.; Park, S.-H.; Kim, H. C. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2009, 79, 064417 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.064417
  13. 13
    Choi, K. J.; Biegalski, M.; Li, Y. L.; Sharan, A.; Schubert, J.; Uecker, R.; Reiche, P.; Chen, Y. B.; Pan, X. Q.; Gopalan, V.; Chen, L.-Q.; Schlom, D. G.; Eom, C.-B. Science 2004, 306, 1005 DOI: 10.1126/science.1103218
  14. 14
    Haeni, J. H.; Irvin, P.; Chang, W.; Uecker, R.; Reiche, P.; Li, Y. L.; Choudhury, S.; Tian, W.; Hawley, M. E.; Craigo, B.; Tagantsev, A. K.; Pan, X. Q.; Streiffer, S. K.; Chen, L. Q.; Kirchoefer, S. W.; Levy, J.; Schlom, D. G. Nature 2004, 430, 758 DOI: 10.1038/nature02773
  15. 15
    Jang, H. W.; Ortiz, D.; Baek, S.-H.; Folkman, C. M.; Das, R. R.; Shafer, P.; Chen, Y.; Nelson, C. T.; Pan, X.; Ramesh, R.; Eom, C.-B. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 817 DOI: 10.1002/adma.200800823
  16. 16
    Rossell, M. D.; Erni, R.; Prange, M. P.; Idrobo, J.-C.; Luo, W.; Zeches, R. J.; Pantelides, S. T.; Ramesh, R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 047601 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.047601
  17. 17
    Guzmán, R.; Maurel, L.; Langenberg, E.; Lupini, A. R.; Algarabel, P. A.; Pardo, J. A.; Magén, C. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 2221 DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04455
  18. 18
    Catalan, G.; Scott, F. J. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2463 DOI: 10.1002/adma.200802849
  19. 19
    Wang, J.; Neaton, J. B.; Zheng, H.; Nagarajan, V.; Ogale, S. B.; Liu, B.; Viehland, D.; Vaithyanathan, V.; Schlom, D. G.; Waghmare, U. V.; Spaldin, N. A.; Rabe, K. M.; Wuttig, M.; Ramesh, R. Science 2003, 299, 1719 DOI: 10.1126/science.1080615
  20. 20
    Yun, K. Y.; Noda, M.; Okuyama, M.; Saeki, H.; Tabata, H.; Saito, K. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 96, 3399 DOI: 10.1063/1.1775045
  21. 21
    Das, R. R.; Kim, D. M.; Baek, S. H.; Eom, C. B.; Zavaliche, F.; Yang, S. Y.; Ramesh, R.; Chen, Y. B.; Pan, X. Q.; Ke, X.; Rzchowski, M. S.; Streiffer, S. K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 242904 DOI: 10.1063/1.2213347
  22. 22
    Ravindran, P.; Vidya, R.; Kjekshus, A.; Fjellvåg, H.; Eriksson, O. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2006, 74, 224412 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.224412
  23. 23
    Catalan, G.; Sardar, K.; Church, N. S.; Scott, J. F.; Harrison, R. J.; Redfern, S. A. T. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2009, 79, 212415 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.212415
  24. 24
    Yang, C.-H.; Seidel, J.; Kim, S. Y.; Rossen, P. B.; Yu, P.; Gajek, M.; Chu, Y. H.; Martin, L. W.; Holcomb, M. B.; He, Q.; Maksymovych, P.; Balke, N.; Kalinin, S. V.; Baddorf, A. P.; Basu, S. R.; Scullin, M. L.; Ramesh, R. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 485 DOI: 10.1038/nmat2432
  25. 25
    Seidel, J.; Luo, W.; Suresha, S. J.; Nguyen, P.-K.; Lee, A. S.; Kim, S.-Y.; Yang, C.-H.; Pennycook, S. J.; Pantelides, S. T.; Scott, J. F.; Ramesh, R. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 799 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1799
  26. 26
    Chen, W.-T.; Williams, A. J.; Ortega-San-Martin, L.; Li, M.; Sinclair, D. C.; Zhou, W.; Attfield, J. P. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 2085 DOI: 10.1021/cm8031048
  27. 27
    Lepoittevin, C.; Malo, S.; Barrier, N.; Nguyen, N.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Hervieu, M. J. Solid State Chem. 2008, 181, 2601 DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2008.04.047
  28. 28
    Schiemer, J.; Withers, R.; Norén, L.; Liu, Y.; Bourgeois, L.; Stewart, G. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 4223 DOI: 10.1021/cm901757h
  29. 29
    Jang, H.; Kerr, G.; Lim, J. S.; Yang, C.-H.; Kao, C.-C.; Lee, J.-S. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12402 DOI: 10.1038/srep12402
  30. 30
    Schiemer, J. A.; Withers, R. L.; Liu, Y.; Carpenter, M. A. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 4436 DOI: 10.1021/cm402962q
  31. 31
    Shibata, N.; Findlay, S. D.; Kohno, Y.; Sawada, H.; Kondo, Y.; Ikuhara, Y. Nat. Phys. 2012, 8, 611 DOI: 10.1038/nphys2337
  32. 32
    Hÿtch, M. J.; Snoeck, E.; Kilaas, R. Ultramicroscopy 1998, 74, 131 DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3991(98)00035-7
  33. 33
    Galindo, P. L.; Kret, S.; Sanchez, A. M.; Laval, J.-Y.; Yáñez, A.; Pizarro, J.; Guerrero, E.; Ben, T.; Molina, S. I. Ultramicroscopy 2007, 107, 1186 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2007.01.019
  34. 34
    Chou, H.; Yen, C.-W.; Yang, C.-C.; Dwivedi, G.D.; Yang, K. S.; Wu, C. P.; Liu, K. C.; Li, W.-H. Acta Mater. 2016, 111, 297 DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.071
  35. 35
    Nelson, C. T.; Winchester, B.; Zhang, Y.; Kim, S.-J.; Melville, A.; Adamo, C.; Folkman, C. M.; Baek, S.-H.; Eom, C.-B.; Schlom, D. G.; Chen, L.-Q.; Pan, X. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 828 DOI: 10.1021/nl1041808
  36. 36
    Zhan, Q.; Yu, R.; Crane, S. P.; Zheng, H.; Kisielowski, C.; Ramesh, R. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 172902 DOI: 10.1063/1.2364692
  37. 37
    Liu, H.; Liang, W.; Chu, Y.; Zheng, H.; Ramesh, R. MRS Commun. 2014, 4, 31 DOI: 10.1557/mrc.2014.13
  38. 38
    Neaton, J. B.; Ederer, C.; Waghmare, U. V.; Spaldin, N. A.; Rabe, K. M. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 71, 014113 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.014113
  39. 39
    Damodaran, A. R.; Pandya, S.; Qi, Y.; Hsu, S.-L.; Liu, S.; Nelson, C.; Dasgupta, A.; Ercius, P.; Ophus, C.; Dedon, L. R.; Agar, J. C.; Lu, H.; Zhang, J.; Minor, A. M.; Rappe, A. M.; Martin, L. W. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14961 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14961
  40. 40
    Ederer, C.; Spaldin, N. A. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 71, 060401 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.060401
  41. 41
    Shibata, N.; Seki, T.; Sánchez-Santolino, G.; Findlay, S. D.; Kohno, Y.; Matsumoto, T.; Ishikawa, R.; Ikuhara, Y. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15631 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15631
  42. 42
    Jones, L.; Yang, H.; Pennycook, T. J.; Marshall, M. S. J.; Van Aert, S.; Browning, N. D.; Castell, M. R.; Nellist, P. D. Adv. Struct. Chem. Imag. 2015, 1, 8 DOI: 10.1186/s40679-015-0008-4
  43. 43
    Findlay, S. D.; Shibata, N.; Sawada, H.; Okunishi, E.; Kondo, Y.; Ikuhara, Y. Ultramicroscopy 2010, 110, 903 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.04.004
  44. 44
    Yankovich, A. B.; Berkels, B.; Dahmen, W.; Binev, P.; Sanchez, S. I.; Bradley, S. A.; Li, A.; Szlufarska, I.; Voyles, P. M. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4155 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5155
  45. 45
    Bals, S.; Aert, S. V.; Tendeloo, G. V.; Ávila-Brande, D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 096106 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.096106
  46. 46
    Kilaas, R. MacTempas: a program for Simulating high resolution TEM images and diffraction pattern. Total Resolution LLC, http://www.totalresolution (accessed on 06/09/2017).

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 59 publications.

  1. Yuji Masubuchi, Kyohei Koyama, Akira Hosono, Mikio Higuchi, Masaki Takesada, Kazuki Shitara, Hiroki Moriwake, Shinichi Kikkawa. Average Cubic BaTaO2N Crystal Structure Formed by 50 nm Size Domains with Polar Nanoregions Consisting of cis-TaO4N2 Octahedral Chains. Chemistry of Materials 2024, 36 (15) , 7504-7513. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01474
  2. Chiara Ricca, Elizabeth Skoropata, Marta D. Rossell, Rolf Erni, Urs Staub, Ulrich Aschauer. Combined Theoretical and Experimental Study of the Moiré Dislocation Network at the SrTiO3-(La,Sr)(Al,Ta)O3 Interface. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2023, 15 (46) , 53678-53687. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c10958
  3. Ke Ran, Juri Barthel, Lei Jin, Daesung Park, Annika Buchheit, Kerstin Neuhaus, Stefan Baumann, Wilhelm A. Meulenberg, Joachim Mayer. Direct Visualization of Distorted Twin Boundaries in Ce-Doped GdFeO3. Nano Letters 2023, 23 (7) , 2945-2951. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00318
  4. Alexander Vogel, Alicia Ruiz Caridad, Johanna Nordlander, Martin F. Sarott, Quintin N. Meier, Rolf Erni, Nicola A. Spaldin, Morgan Trassin, Marta D. Rossell. Origin of the Critical Thickness in Improper Ferroelectric Thin Films. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2023, 15 (14) , 18482-18492. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c00412
  5. Ulrich Haselmann, Thomas Radlinger, Weijie Pei, Maxim N. Popov, Tobias Spitaler, Lorenz Romaner, Yurii P. Ivanov, Jian Chen, Yunbin He, Gerald Kothleitner, Zaoli Zhang. Ca Solubility in a BiFeO3-Based System with a Secondary Bi2O3 Phase on a Nanoscale. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2022, 126 (17) , 7696-7703. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c00674
  6. Gopalakrishnan Dayal, Kochupurackal B. Jinesh. Linear Weight Update and Large Synaptic Responses in Neuromorphic Devices Comprising Pulsed-Laser-Deposited BiFeO3. ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2022, 4 (2) , 592-597. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.1c00958
  7. Ulrich Haselmann, Y. Eren Suyolcu, Ping-Chun Wu, Yurii P. Ivanov, Daniel Knez, Peter A. van Aken, Ying-Hao Chu, Zaoli Zhang. Negatively Charged In-Plane and Out-Of-Plane Domain Walls with Oxygen-Vacancy Agglomerations in a Ca-Doped Bismuth-Ferrite Thin Film. ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2021, 3 (10) , 4498-4508. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.1c00638
  8. Farah Benyettou, Gobinda Das, Anjana Ramdas Nair, Thirumurugan Prakasam, Digambar B. Shinde, Sudhir Kumar Sharma, Jamie Whelan, Yoann Lalatonne, Hassan Traboulsi, Renu Pasricha, Osama Abdullah, Ramesh Jagannathan, Zhiping Lai, Laurence Motte, Felipe Gándara, Kirsten C. Sadler, Ali Trabolsi. Covalent Organic Framework Embedded with Magnetic Nanoparticles for MRI and Chemo-Thermotherapy. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (44) , 18782-18794. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c05381
  9. Yu Feng, Jiagang Wu, Qingguo Chi, Weili Li, Yang Yu, Weidong Fei. Defects and Aliovalent Doping Engineering in Electroceramics. Chemical Reviews 2020, 120 (3) , 1710-1787. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00507
  10. Marco Campanini, Morgan Trassin, Claude Ederer, Rolf Erni, Marta D. Rossell. Buried In-Plane Ferroelectric Domains in Fe-Doped Single-Crystalline Aurivillius Thin Films. ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2019, 1 (6) , 1019-1028. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.9b00180
  11. Heung-Sik Park, Jinhyuk Jang, Ji Soo Lim, Jeonghun Suh, Si-Young Choi, Chan-Ho Yang. Oxygen vacancy order–disorder transition process during topotactic filament formation in a perovskite oxide tracked by Raman microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. Applied Physics Reviews 2024, 11 (4) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0212526
  12. Satoko Toyama, Takehito Seki, Yuji Kohno, Yoshiki O. Murakami, Yuichi Ikuhara, Naoya Shibata. Nanoscale electromagnetic field imaging by advanced differential phase-contrast STEM. Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering 2024, 67 https://doi.org/10.1038/s44287-024-00117-7
  13. Johanna Nordlander, Bastien F. Grosso, Marta D. Rossell, Aline Maillard, Bixin Yan, Elzbieta Gradauskaite, Nicola A. Spaldin, Manfred Fiebig, Morgan Trassin. Combined Electrostatic and Strain Engineering of BiFeO 3 Thin Films at the Morphotropic Phase Boundary. Advanced Electronic Materials 2024, 10 (11) https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202400185
  14. Lei Liao, Qing Yang, Chen Cai, Yong Zhou, Huacong Sun, Xudan Huang, Pan Chen, Jianlin Wang, Xiaomei Li, Xuezeng Tian, Sheng Meng, Xuedong Bai, Lifen Wang. The atomic configuration and metallic state of extrinsic defects in Nb-doped BiFeO3 thin films. Acta Materialia 2024, 273 , 119986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2024.119986
  15. Le DAI, Yang LIU, Xuan GAO, Shuhao WANG, Yating SONG, Mingmeng TANG, V Karpinsky DMITRY, Lisha LIU, Yaojin WANG. Self-polarization Achieved by Compositionally Gradient Doping in BiFeO 3 Thin Films. Journal of Inorganic Materials 2024, 39 (1) , 99. https://doi.org/10.15541/jim20230278
  16. P. Zambon, J. Vávra, G. Montemurro, S. Bottinelli, A. Dudina, R. Schnyder, C. Hörmann, M. Meffert, C. Schulze-Briese, D. Stroppa, N. Lehmann, L. Piazza. High-frame rate and high-count rate hybrid pixel detector for 4D STEM applications. Frontiers in Physics 2023, 11 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1308321
  17. Elzbieta Gradauskaite, Quintin N. Meier, Natascha Gray, Martin F. Sarott, Tizian Scharsach, Marco Campanini, Thomas Moran, Alexander Vogel, Karla Del Cid-Ledezma, Bryan D. Huey, Marta D. Rossell, Manfred Fiebig, Morgan Trassin. Defeating depolarizing fields with artificial flux closure in ultrathin ferroelectrics. Nature Materials 2023, 22 (12) , 1492-1498. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-023-01674-2
  18. Heung-Sik Park, Ji Soo Lim, Jeonghun Suh, Chan-Ho Yang. Morphological instability and mobility of the color front during the electrocoloration of perovskite oxide thin films. Physical Review Materials 2023, 7 (12) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.123401
  19. Asmaa A Abdelrahman, Heba M Salem, Mostafa R Abukhadra, Ahmed M El-Sherbeeny, Wail Al Zoubi, Abdelrahman M Rabie. Synthesis of BiFeO 3 /ZnMgAl-LDH nanocomposite for instantaneous decolorization of methylene blue by ultrasonic induced adsorption system: characterization and equilibrium studies. Materials Research Express 2023, 10 (12) , 125008. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ad15c2
  20. Matthew J. Cabral, Zibin Chen, Xiaozhou Liao. Scanning transmission electron microscopy for advanced characterization of ferroic materials. Microstructures 2023, 3 (4) https://doi.org/10.20517/microstructures.2023.39
  21. Christopher Addiego, Jacob A. Zorn, Wenpei Gao, Sujit Das, Jiaqi Guo, Chengqing Qu, Liming Zhao, Lane W. Martin, Ramamoorthy Ramesh, Long-Qing Chen, Xiaoqing Pan. Multiscale electric-field imaging of polarization vortex structures in PbTiO3/SrTiO3 superlattices. APL Materials 2023, 11 (5) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0146713
  22. P. Zambon, S. Bottinelli, R. Schnyder, D. Musarra, D. Boye, A. Dudina, N. Lehmann, S. De Carlo, M. Rissi, C. Schulze-Briese, M. Meffert, M. Campanini, R. Erni, L. Piazza. KITE: High frame rate, high count rate pixelated electron counting ASIC for 4D STEM applications featuring high-Z sensor. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 2023, 1048 , 167888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2022.167888
  23. Christopher Addiego, Wenpei Gao, Huaixun Huyan, Xiaoqing Pan. Probing charge density in materials with atomic resolution in real space. Nature Reviews Physics 2023, 5 (2) , 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00541-4
  24. Martin F. Sarott, Marta D. Rossell, Manfred Fiebig, Morgan Trassin. Multilevel polarization switching in ferroelectric thin films. Nature Communications 2022, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30823-5
  25. Ji Soo Lim, Ho-Hyun Nahm, Marco Campanini, Jounghee Lee, Yong-Jin Kim, Heung-Sik Park, Jeonghun Suh, Jun Jung, Yongsoo Yang, Tae Yeong Koo, Marta D. Rossell, Yong-Hyun Kim, Chan-Ho Yang. Critical ionic transport across an oxygen-vacancy ordering transition. Nature Communications 2022, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32826-8
  26. Sergei V. Kalinin, Colin Ophus, Paul M. Voyles, Rolf Erni, Demie Kepaptsoglou, Vincenzo Grillo, Andrew R. Lupini, Mark P. Oxley, Eric Schwenker, Maria K. Y. Chan, Joanne Etheridge, Xiang Li, Grace G. D. Han, Maxim Ziatdinov, Naoya Shibata, Stephen J. Pennycook. Machine learning in scanning transmission electron microscopy. Nature Reviews Methods Primers 2022, 2 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00095-w
  27. Jin Luo, Hao Qian, Tianyang Zheng, Jing‐Feng Li, Yunfei Liu, Yinong Lyu. Local Ionic Displacements and Polarization at the Paraelectric‐Ferroelectric Heterointerface: Effect of Octahedral Distortion. Advanced Materials Interfaces 2022, 9 (25) https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202200897
  28. R.W. Yang, Y.P. Liang, J. Xu, X.Y. Meng, J.T. Zhu, S.Y. Cao, M.Y. Wei, R.X. Zhang, J.L. Yang, F. Gao. Rare-earth-niobate high-entropy ceramic foams with enhanced thermal insulation performance. Journal of Materials Science & Technology 2022, 116 , 94-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.10.050
  29. Jin Luo, Hao Zhu, Tianyang Zheng, Hao Qian, Yunfei Liu, Yinong Lyu. A slush-like polar structure for high energy storage performance in a Sr 0.7 Bi 0.2 TiO 3 lead-free relaxor ferroelectric thin film. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2022, 10 (13) , 7357-7365. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA10524H
  30. Heung-Sik Park, Ji Soo Lim, Jeonghun Suh, Chan-Ho Yang. Electric-field-induced epitaxial breakdown and emergent magnetoresistance due to strong oxygen reduction in Ca-doped BiFeO 3 . Physical Review Materials 2022, 6 (2) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.024404
  31. María de la Mata, Sergio I. Molina. STEM Tools for Semiconductor Characterization: Beyond High-Resolution Imaging. Nanomaterials 2022, 12 (3) , 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12030337
  32. Tri N. M. Nguyen, Yichen Guo, Shuyu Qin, Kylie S. Frew, Ruijuan Xu, Joshua C. Agar. Symmetry-aware recursive image similarity exploration for materials microscopy. npj Computational Materials 2021, 7 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00637-y
  33. Huaixun Huyan, Christopher Addiego, Xingxu Yan, Chaitanya A. Gadre, Alexander Melville, Darrell G. Schlom, Xiaoqing Pan. Direct observation of polarization-induced two-dimensional electron/hole gases at ferroelectric-insulator interface. npj Quantum Materials 2021, 6 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-021-00389-4
  34. Jinyu Ruan, Chao Yin, Tiandong Zhang, Hao Pan. Effects of LaNiO3 Seed Layer on the Microstructure and Electrical Properties of Ferroelectric BZT/PZT/BZT Thin Films. Frontiers in Materials 2021, 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.732186
  35. Anastasia Chouprik, Dmitrii Negrov, Evgeny Y. Tsymbal, Andrei Zenkevich. Defects in ferroelectric HfO 2. Nanoscale 2021, 13 (27) , 11635-11678. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NR01260F
  36. Jeonghun Suh, Ji Soo Lim, Heung-Sik Park, Chan-Ho Yang. Complementary study of anisotropic ion conduction in (110)-oriented Ca-doped BiFeO3 films using electrochromism and impedance spectroscopy. Applied Physics Letters 2021, 119 (2) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0054895
  37. Nicola A. Spaldin, Ipek Efe, Marta D. Rossell, Chiara Gattinoni. Layer and spontaneous polarizations in perovskite oxides and their interplay in multiferroic bismuth ferrite. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2021, 154 (15) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0046061
  38. Xiaofeng Zhou, Bo Shen, Jiwei Zhai, Niklas Hedin. Reactive Oxygenated Species Generated on Iodide‐Doped BiVO 4 /BaTiO 3 Heterostructures with Ag/Cu Nanoparticles by Coupled Piezophototronic Effect and Plasmonic Excitation. Advanced Functional Materials 2021, 31 (13) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202009594
  39. Takehito Seki, Yuichi Ikuhara, Naoya Shibata. Toward quantitative electromagnetic field imaging by differential-phase-contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy. Microscopy 2021, 70 (1) , 148-160. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmicro/dfaa065
  40. Hafiz Abdul Ali Khan, Saif Ullah, Gul Rehman, Sajid Khan, Iftikhar Ahmad. First principle study of band gap nature, spontaneous polarization, hyperfine field and electric field gradient of desirable multiferroic bismuth ferrite (BiFeO3). Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 2021, 148 , 109737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2020.109737
  41. M. Campanini, L. Nasi, F. Albertini, R. Erni. Disentangling nanoscale electric and magnetic fields by time-reversal operation in differential phase-contrast STEM. Applied Physics Letters 2020, 117 (15) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0026121
  42. Ji Soo Lim, Jounghee Lee, Byeoung Ju Lee, Yong-Jin Kim, Heung-Sik Park, Jeonghun Suh, Ho-Hyun Nahm, Sang-Woo Kim, Byeong-Gwan Cho, Tae Yeong Koo, Eunjip Choi, Yong-Hyun Kim, Chan-Ho Yang. Harnessing the topotactic transition in oxide heterostructures for fast and high-efficiency electrochromic applications. Science Advances 2020, 6 (41) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb8553
  43. Min Shi, Zheng Zhao, Zhuolin Si, Ruzhong Zuo, Yudong Xu, Li Guo, Enyang Men, Kunzhuang Hu. Ferroelectric, ferromagnetic, and magnetoelectric properties of Bi3.15Nd0.85Ti2.9Zr0.1O12–CoFe2O4 composite films with large magnetoelectric coupling effect. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 2020, 31 (13) , 10865-10872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-03638-7
  44. M. Chakraborty, M. Ziatdinov, O. Dyck, S. Jesse, A. D. White, Sergei V. Kalinin. Reconstruction of the interatomic forces from dynamic scanning transmission electron microscopy data. Journal of Applied Physics 2020, 127 (22) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0009413
  45. M. Campanini, K. Eimre, M. Bon, C. A. Pignedoli, M. D. Rossell, R. Erni. Atomic-resolution differential phase contrast STEM on ferroelectric materials: A mean-field approach. Physical Review B 2020, 101 (18) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.184116
  46. Marco Campanini, Elzbieta Gradauskaite, Morgan Trassin, Di Yi, Pu Yu, Ramamoorthy Ramesh, Rolf Erni, Marta D. Rossell. Imaging and quantification of charged domain walls in BiFeO 3. Nanoscale 2020, 12 (16) , 9186-9193. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NR01258K
  47. Yee Wen Teh, Michell K. T. Chee, Xin Ying Kong, Siek-Ting Yong, Siang-Piao Chai. An insight into perovskite-based photocatalysts for artificial photosynthesis. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 2020, 4 (3) , 973-984. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SE00526A
  48. Marco Campanini, Rolf Erni, Marta D. Rossell. Probing local order in multiferroics by transmission electron microscopy. Physical Sciences Reviews 2020, 5 (2) https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2019-0068
  49. Li Yin, Wenbo Mi. Progress in BiFeO 3 -based heterostructures: materials, properties and applications. Nanoscale 2020, 12 (2) , 477-523. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR08800H
  50. Qinggong Song, Peidong Wu, Samrat Sarkar, Yufeng Zhao, Zhifeng Liu. Bi 3 TaO 7 film: a promising photoelectrode for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Dalton Transactions 2020, 49 (1) , 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9DT03953H
  51. Xiaoxi Cai, Jiang Li, Yunguo Liu, Xinjiang Hu, Xiaofei Tan, Shaobo Liu, Hui Wang, Yanling Gu, Lerong Luo. Design and Preparation of Chitosan-Crosslinked Bismuth Ferrite/Biochar Coupled Magnetic Material for Methylene Blue Removal. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020, 17 (1) , 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010006
  52. Heung-Sik Park, Ji Soo Lim, Jeonghun Suh, Chan-Ho Yang. Real-time observation of filamentary conduction pathways in Ca-doped BiFeO3. Applied Physics Letters 2019, 115 (18) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5124892
  53. Mintao Xue, Guoqiang Tan, Ao Xia, Zhengjun Chai, Long Lv, Huijun Ren, Xixi Ren, Jincheng Li. Regulation of defect complexes at the interface for improving multiferroicity of Bi0.79La0.18Sr0.03Fe0.94Mn0.04Co0.02O3/CoFe2-xLaxO4 bilayer thin films. Ceramics International 2019, 45 (15) , 19504-19512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.038
  54. Qing-Yan Rong, Wen-Zhi Xiao, Chuan-Pin Cheng, Ling-Ling Wang. Magnetism and ferroelectricity in BiFeO3 doped with Ga at Fe sites. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2019, 797 , 117-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.082
  55. Mintao Xue, Guoqiang Tan, Ao Xia, Zhengjun Chai, Long Lv, Huijun Ren, Xixi Ren, Jincheng Li. Multi-doped bismuth ferrite thin films with enhanced multiferroic properties. Ceramics International 2019, 45 (10) , 12806-12813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.03.200
  56. Xueyou Yuan, Lei Shi, Jiyin Zhao, Shiming Zhou, Jianhui Guo, Shiyou Pan, Xianbing Miao, Liang Wu. Tuning Ferroelectric, Dielectric, and Magnetic Properties of BiFeO 3 Ceramics by Ca and Pb Co‐Doping. physica status solidi (b) 2019, 256 (3) https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.201800499
  57. H.C. Wu, J.K. Yuan, K.D. Chandrasekhar, C.H. Lee, W.H. Li, C.W. Wang, J.M. Chen, J.-Y. Lin, H. Berger, T.W. Yen, S.M. Huang, C.W. Chu, H.D. Yang. Observation of charge–transfer–driven antiferroelectricity in 3d-pyrochlore multiferroic Cu2OCl2. Materials Today Physics 2019, 8 , 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2018.12.003
  58. Piyush Agrawal, Marco Campanini, Andrew Rappe, Shi Liu, Vincenzo Grillo, Cécile Hébert, Rolf Erni, Daniele Passerone, Marta D. Rossell. Structure and properties of edge dislocations in BiFe O 3 . Physical Review Materials 2019, 3 (3) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.034410
  59. Jordan A. Hachtel, Juan Carlos Idrobo, Miaofang Chi. Sub-Ångstrom electric field measurements on a universal detector in a scanning transmission electron microscope. Advanced Structural and Chemical Imaging 2018, 4 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40679-018-0059-4

Nano Letters

Cite this: Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 2, 717–724
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03817
Published January 9, 2018

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

5007

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (a) Color-coded HAADF micrograph in the [010] zone axis. The growth direction is from bottom to top. The horizontal white lines indicate the position of the dark-layers at each side of the image, appearing every 7 or 8 perovskite blocks. (b) Corresponding FFT indexed within the pseudocubic reference system. (c) Line profiles along the [001] and [100] directions of the FFT. The satellite spots (SL) due to the superstructure are visible along the [001] direction at a spacing of ∼0.35 nm–1, while an additional spot at ∼1.28 nm–1 (marked by the black arrow) corresponding to a doubling of the perovskite periodicity is observed in the profile taken along the [100] direction.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) High-resolution HAADF image showing two dark-layers separated by 7-perovskite layers. (b) Maps of the interatomic distances for the A and B sublattices as obtained by PPA. The scheme defines the nomenclature for the two sublattices. (c) Profile along [001] of the tetragonal distortion. (d) Schematic representation (not in scale) of the structural distortions occurring in the dark-layers. (e) Corresponding inverted-ABF image. (f) Fit of the intensities of the O atomic columns plotted at their fitted coordinates. A chessboard-like pattern of O intensities is visible, because the effect is stronger in the region immediately following the dark-layers along the [001] direction. (g) Schematic representation of the O vacancies ordering into the distorted cations lattice. The portion of the model in the gray dashed box corresponds to a dark-layer, where O vacancies are preferentially organized. The partial O vacancies ordering in the other layers is depicted by semitransparent white boxes.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a) HAADF and (b) inverted-ABF intensity profiles along the [001] direction. Periodic fluctuations of the HAADF intensity are observed for each block composing the superstructure between consecutive dark-layers (marked in gray). A similar trend is visible in the inverted-ABF profile, which can be related to a variation of O concentration. (c) Profiles along [001] of the perovskite cell angle (φ) and O-octahedron tilting amplitude (|ω|). (d) Scheme of the doping-induced distortion of the O-octahedron tilting pattern, showing a structural phase transformation from Pnma to R3c space group as the doping concentration decreases.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) Polarization map superimposed to the HAADF image. The black arrows on the left indicate the position of the dark-layers. (b) Profiles along the [001] direction of the in-plane (Δx) and out-of-plane (Δy) components of the atomic displacements. Scheme of the relationship between atomic displacements and the projected ferroelectric polarization is given in the inset. (c) Sketch of the complex polar structure of the film, showing a periodic polarization wave. Coupled ferroelectric domains exist in the periodic superstructure (dashed circles). (d) Profile along [001] of the Fe—O—Fe bonding angle that highlights a straightening of the superexchange path in the Ca-rich areas with respect to the ferroelectric regions.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (a) HAADF and ABF motifs (lateral width: 1.1 nm) obtained averaging a template over the field of view of Figure 2a,e, respectively. The corresponding polarization and dopant fluctuations are given in the schemes. The dark-layers are marked by gray boxes. (b) Magnified views of two consecutive Ca-poor regions, corresponding to the areas marked by the white boxes in (a). The atomic configurations of these two regions are horizontally flipped, thus explaining the change of sign of the in-plane component of polarization in two consecutive layers. (c) Schematic representation of the basic principle of the DPC technique. (d) Sketch of the sample orientation with respect to the segmented detector. (e) Differential signals between opposite segments (A–C, B–D) of the detector on an area showing the same structure as in panel a. The line profiles of the two signals are obtained along the directions of the arrows. (f) Vector plot of the atomic electric fields, where the hue gives the field direction and the saturation is proportional to the vector modulus.

  • References


    This article references 46 other publications.

    1. 1
      Spaldin, N. A.; Fiebig, M. Science 2005, 309, 391 DOI: 10.1126/science.1113357
    2. 2
      Eerenstein, W.; Mathur, N. D.; Scott, J. F. Nature 2006, 442, 759 DOI: 10.1038/nature05023
    3. 3
      Cheong, S.-W.; Mostovoy, M. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 13 DOI: 10.1038/nmat1804
    4. 4
      Ramesh, R.; Spaldin, N. A. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 21 DOI: 10.1038/nmat1805
    5. 5
      Fiebig, M.; Lottermoser, T.; Meier, D.; Trassin, M. Nat. Rev. Mats. 2016, 1, 16046 DOI: 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.46
    6. 6
      Hill, N. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 6694 DOI: 10.1021/jp000114x
    7. 7
      Scott, J. F. Science 2007, 315, 954 DOI: 10.1126/science.1129564
    8. 8
      Béa, H.; Gajek, M.; Bibes, M.; Barthélémy, A. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2008, 20, 434221 DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/20/43/434221
    9. 9
      Bibes, M.; Barthelemy, A. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 425 DOI: 10.1038/nmat2189
    10. 10
      Ahn, C. H.; Triscone, J.-M.; Mannhart, J. Nature 2003, 424, 1015 DOI: 10.1038/nature01878
    11. 11
      Yang, C.-H.; Kan, D.; Takeuchi, I.; Nagarajan, V.; Seidel, J. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 15953 DOI: 10.1039/c2cp43082g
    12. 12
      Park, J.; Kang, M.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.; Jang, K.-H.; Pirogov, A.; Park, J.-G.; Lee, C.; Park, S.-H.; Kim, H. C. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2009, 79, 064417 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.064417
    13. 13
      Choi, K. J.; Biegalski, M.; Li, Y. L.; Sharan, A.; Schubert, J.; Uecker, R.; Reiche, P.; Chen, Y. B.; Pan, X. Q.; Gopalan, V.; Chen, L.-Q.; Schlom, D. G.; Eom, C.-B. Science 2004, 306, 1005 DOI: 10.1126/science.1103218
    14. 14
      Haeni, J. H.; Irvin, P.; Chang, W.; Uecker, R.; Reiche, P.; Li, Y. L.; Choudhury, S.; Tian, W.; Hawley, M. E.; Craigo, B.; Tagantsev, A. K.; Pan, X. Q.; Streiffer, S. K.; Chen, L. Q.; Kirchoefer, S. W.; Levy, J.; Schlom, D. G. Nature 2004, 430, 758 DOI: 10.1038/nature02773
    15. 15
      Jang, H. W.; Ortiz, D.; Baek, S.-H.; Folkman, C. M.; Das, R. R.; Shafer, P.; Chen, Y.; Nelson, C. T.; Pan, X.; Ramesh, R.; Eom, C.-B. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 817 DOI: 10.1002/adma.200800823
    16. 16
      Rossell, M. D.; Erni, R.; Prange, M. P.; Idrobo, J.-C.; Luo, W.; Zeches, R. J.; Pantelides, S. T.; Ramesh, R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 047601 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.047601
    17. 17
      Guzmán, R.; Maurel, L.; Langenberg, E.; Lupini, A. R.; Algarabel, P. A.; Pardo, J. A.; Magén, C. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 2221 DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04455
    18. 18
      Catalan, G.; Scott, F. J. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2463 DOI: 10.1002/adma.200802849
    19. 19
      Wang, J.; Neaton, J. B.; Zheng, H.; Nagarajan, V.; Ogale, S. B.; Liu, B.; Viehland, D.; Vaithyanathan, V.; Schlom, D. G.; Waghmare, U. V.; Spaldin, N. A.; Rabe, K. M.; Wuttig, M.; Ramesh, R. Science 2003, 299, 1719 DOI: 10.1126/science.1080615
    20. 20
      Yun, K. Y.; Noda, M.; Okuyama, M.; Saeki, H.; Tabata, H.; Saito, K. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 96, 3399 DOI: 10.1063/1.1775045
    21. 21
      Das, R. R.; Kim, D. M.; Baek, S. H.; Eom, C. B.; Zavaliche, F.; Yang, S. Y.; Ramesh, R.; Chen, Y. B.; Pan, X. Q.; Ke, X.; Rzchowski, M. S.; Streiffer, S. K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 242904 DOI: 10.1063/1.2213347
    22. 22
      Ravindran, P.; Vidya, R.; Kjekshus, A.; Fjellvåg, H.; Eriksson, O. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2006, 74, 224412 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.224412
    23. 23
      Catalan, G.; Sardar, K.; Church, N. S.; Scott, J. F.; Harrison, R. J.; Redfern, S. A. T. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2009, 79, 212415 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.212415
    24. 24
      Yang, C.-H.; Seidel, J.; Kim, S. Y.; Rossen, P. B.; Yu, P.; Gajek, M.; Chu, Y. H.; Martin, L. W.; Holcomb, M. B.; He, Q.; Maksymovych, P.; Balke, N.; Kalinin, S. V.; Baddorf, A. P.; Basu, S. R.; Scullin, M. L.; Ramesh, R. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 485 DOI: 10.1038/nmat2432
    25. 25
      Seidel, J.; Luo, W.; Suresha, S. J.; Nguyen, P.-K.; Lee, A. S.; Kim, S.-Y.; Yang, C.-H.; Pennycook, S. J.; Pantelides, S. T.; Scott, J. F.; Ramesh, R. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 799 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1799
    26. 26
      Chen, W.-T.; Williams, A. J.; Ortega-San-Martin, L.; Li, M.; Sinclair, D. C.; Zhou, W.; Attfield, J. P. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 2085 DOI: 10.1021/cm8031048
    27. 27
      Lepoittevin, C.; Malo, S.; Barrier, N.; Nguyen, N.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Hervieu, M. J. Solid State Chem. 2008, 181, 2601 DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2008.04.047
    28. 28
      Schiemer, J.; Withers, R.; Norén, L.; Liu, Y.; Bourgeois, L.; Stewart, G. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 4223 DOI: 10.1021/cm901757h
    29. 29
      Jang, H.; Kerr, G.; Lim, J. S.; Yang, C.-H.; Kao, C.-C.; Lee, J.-S. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12402 DOI: 10.1038/srep12402
    30. 30
      Schiemer, J. A.; Withers, R. L.; Liu, Y.; Carpenter, M. A. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 4436 DOI: 10.1021/cm402962q
    31. 31
      Shibata, N.; Findlay, S. D.; Kohno, Y.; Sawada, H.; Kondo, Y.; Ikuhara, Y. Nat. Phys. 2012, 8, 611 DOI: 10.1038/nphys2337
    32. 32
      Hÿtch, M. J.; Snoeck, E.; Kilaas, R. Ultramicroscopy 1998, 74, 131 DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3991(98)00035-7
    33. 33
      Galindo, P. L.; Kret, S.; Sanchez, A. M.; Laval, J.-Y.; Yáñez, A.; Pizarro, J.; Guerrero, E.; Ben, T.; Molina, S. I. Ultramicroscopy 2007, 107, 1186 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2007.01.019
    34. 34
      Chou, H.; Yen, C.-W.; Yang, C.-C.; Dwivedi, G.D.; Yang, K. S.; Wu, C. P.; Liu, K. C.; Li, W.-H. Acta Mater. 2016, 111, 297 DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.071
    35. 35
      Nelson, C. T.; Winchester, B.; Zhang, Y.; Kim, S.-J.; Melville, A.; Adamo, C.; Folkman, C. M.; Baek, S.-H.; Eom, C.-B.; Schlom, D. G.; Chen, L.-Q.; Pan, X. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 828 DOI: 10.1021/nl1041808
    36. 36
      Zhan, Q.; Yu, R.; Crane, S. P.; Zheng, H.; Kisielowski, C.; Ramesh, R. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 172902 DOI: 10.1063/1.2364692
    37. 37
      Liu, H.; Liang, W.; Chu, Y.; Zheng, H.; Ramesh, R. MRS Commun. 2014, 4, 31 DOI: 10.1557/mrc.2014.13
    38. 38
      Neaton, J. B.; Ederer, C.; Waghmare, U. V.; Spaldin, N. A.; Rabe, K. M. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 71, 014113 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.014113
    39. 39
      Damodaran, A. R.; Pandya, S.; Qi, Y.; Hsu, S.-L.; Liu, S.; Nelson, C.; Dasgupta, A.; Ercius, P.; Ophus, C.; Dedon, L. R.; Agar, J. C.; Lu, H.; Zhang, J.; Minor, A. M.; Rappe, A. M.; Martin, L. W. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14961 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14961
    40. 40
      Ederer, C.; Spaldin, N. A. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 71, 060401 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.060401
    41. 41
      Shibata, N.; Seki, T.; Sánchez-Santolino, G.; Findlay, S. D.; Kohno, Y.; Matsumoto, T.; Ishikawa, R.; Ikuhara, Y. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15631 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15631
    42. 42
      Jones, L.; Yang, H.; Pennycook, T. J.; Marshall, M. S. J.; Van Aert, S.; Browning, N. D.; Castell, M. R.; Nellist, P. D. Adv. Struct. Chem. Imag. 2015, 1, 8 DOI: 10.1186/s40679-015-0008-4
    43. 43
      Findlay, S. D.; Shibata, N.; Sawada, H.; Okunishi, E.; Kondo, Y.; Ikuhara, Y. Ultramicroscopy 2010, 110, 903 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.04.004
    44. 44
      Yankovich, A. B.; Berkels, B.; Dahmen, W.; Binev, P.; Sanchez, S. I.; Bradley, S. A.; Li, A.; Szlufarska, I.; Voyles, P. M. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4155 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5155
    45. 45
      Bals, S.; Aert, S. V.; Tendeloo, G. V.; Ávila-Brande, D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 096106 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.096106
    46. 46
      Kilaas, R. MacTempas: a program for Simulating high resolution TEM images and diffraction pattern. Total Resolution LLC, http://www.totalresolution (accessed on 06/09/2017).
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03817.

    • Large-scale morphology of the film superstructure (Figure S1). Description of the strain state of the film by GPA analysis (Figure S2). Polarization analysis along the complementary [110] pseudocubic direction (Figure S3) (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.