ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Ferroelectric Control of the Spin Texture in GeTe

  • Christian Rinaldi*
    Christian Rinaldi
    Department of Physics, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
    IFN-CNR, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
    *E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: +39-02-2399-9661.
  • Sara Varotto
    Sara Varotto
    Department of Physics, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
    More by Sara Varotto
  • Marco Asa
    Marco Asa
    Department of Physics, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
    More by Marco Asa
  • Jagoda Sławińska
    Jagoda Sławińska
    Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche CNR-SPIN, Sede Temporanea di Chieti, c/o Univ. “G. D’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
  • Jun Fujii
    Jun Fujii
    CNR-IOM, Laboratorio TASC in Area Science Park - Basovizza, 34149 Trieste, Italy
    More by Jun Fujii
  • Giovanni Vinai
    Giovanni Vinai
    CNR-IOM, Laboratorio TASC in Area Science Park - Basovizza, 34149 Trieste, Italy
  • Stefano Cecchi
    Stefano Cecchi
    Paul-Drude-Institut für Festkörperelektronik, Hausvogteiplatz 5-7, 10117 Berlin, Germany
  • Domenico Di Sante
    Domenico Di Sante
    Institut für Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland Campus Süd, Würzburg 97074, Germany
  • Raffaella Calarco
    Raffaella Calarco
    Paul-Drude-Institut für Festkörperelektronik, Hausvogteiplatz 5-7, 10117 Berlin, Germany
  • Ivana Vobornik
    Ivana Vobornik
    CNR-IOM, Laboratorio TASC in Area Science Park - Basovizza, 34149 Trieste, Italy
  • Giancarlo Panaccione
    Giancarlo Panaccione
    CNR-IOM, Laboratorio TASC in Area Science Park - Basovizza, 34149 Trieste, Italy
  • Silvia Picozzi
    Silvia Picozzi
    Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche CNR-SPIN, Sede Temporanea di Chieti, c/o Univ. “G. D’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
  • , and 
  • Riccardo Bertacco*
    Riccardo Bertacco
    Department of Physics, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
    IFN-CNR, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
    *E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: +39-02-2399-9663.
Cite this: Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 5, 2751–2758
Publication Date (Web):January 30, 2018
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04829

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND.

  • Open Access

Article Views

7571

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (6 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

The electric and nonvolatile control of the spin texture in semiconductors would represent a fundamental step toward novel electronic devices combining memory and computing functionalities. Recently, GeTe has been theoretically proposed as the father compound of a new class of materials, namely ferroelectric Rashba semiconductors. They display bulk bands with giant Rashba-like splitting due to the inversion symmetry breaking arising from the ferroelectric polarization, thus allowing for the ferroelectric control of the spin. Here, we provide the experimental demonstration of the correlation between ferroelectricity and spin texture. A surface-engineering strategy is used to set two opposite predefined uniform ferroelectric polarizations, inward and outward, as monitored by piezoresponse force microscopy. Spin and angular resolved photoemission experiments show that these GeTe(111) surfaces display opposite sense of circulation of spin in bulk Rashba bands. Furthermore, we demonstrate the crafting of nonvolatile ferroelectric patterns in GeTe films at the nanoscale by using the conductive tip of an atomic force microscope. Based on the intimate link between ferroelectric polarization and spin in GeTe, ferroelectric patterning paves the way to the investigation of devices with engineered spin configurations.

While Moore’s law seems to approach its limit of validity, the search for new paradigms allowing the further improvement of the computing capabilities of electronic devices is entering a final rush. Spintronics is a promising route in this perspective, but so far, its success stories are limited to the field of memories. To enter the area of computing, devices capable of manipulating the information encoded in the spin are needed. In this sense, a lot of effort is currently carried out in the fields of spin logic, (1) magnon spintronics, (2,3) and semiconductor spintronics. (4−7) Nevertheless, about 20 years after the pioneering idea of “spin transistor” proposed by Datta and Das, (8) many practical limitations still prevent the implementation of effective transistors based on spin properties. (9) The dream remains to manipulate spins within semiconductors devices to exploit the full potential of materials with a gap for charge control, without use of auxiliary ferromagnetic materials and magnetic fields. Beyond magnetic semiconductors, (10) which still suffer from low-temperature operation and the need of external magnetic fields to control the spin texture, new materials and concepts are necessary. In this context, the recently introduced class of ferroelectric Rashba semiconductors (FERSCs), (11) whose father compound is α-GeTe, (12) is highly promising. They are semiconductors and also ferroelectrics, so that the remanent ferroelectric polarization vector breaks the inversion symmetry and determines a giant bulk Rashba k-dependent spin-splitting of the bands. (13) Remarkably, density functional theory (DFT) simulations predict that the spin direction in each sub-band should reverse upon inversion of the ferroelectric polarization, thereby allowing its electrical control. In perspective, these unique features could be exploited in novel devices (14,15) integrating memory and computing functionalities within the very same channel of a spin-transistor. (16) While ferroelectric hysteresis provides the memory functionality, spin-dependent transport phenomena in spin textures defined by ferroelectric domains can implement computing, within the very same devices.

In this paper, we address a fundamental issue on the roadmap toward the exploitation of FERSCs: the nonvolatile, but reversible, electric control of the spin texture in α-GeTe thin films down to the nanoscale, thus paving the way to the definition of unconventional spin configurations in semiconductors. The electric switching of the ferroelectric (FE) polarization has been already demonstrated in GeTe(111) films (13) and more recently in GeTe nanowires. (17) However, an experimental proof of the reversal of the spin texture (the clockwise or counterclockwise sense of circulation of spins in bulk Rashba-like bands) for opposite FE polarization is still missing. So far, only a link between the direction of the FE polarization and the spin orientation in the surface Rashba sub-bands has been reported. (13) More recently, the impact of magnetic fields on the spin texture of Mn-doped GeTe films has been investigated but always for fixed FE polarization. (18)

Here, we experimentally establish the intimate link between the orientation of the remanent ferroelectric polarization and the circulation of spin texture associated with Rashba bands in GeTe(111) thin films. First, we describe a surface engineering strategy to prepare in situ α-GeTe(111) films with uniform pristine ferroelectric polarization, outward or inward. Then, by spin- and angular-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (S-ARPES), we provide evidence for opposite sense of spin circulation of bulk Rashba bands in the two surfaces prepared with opposite FE polarization. Our results suggest the possibility of crafting the spin texture at the nanoscale in GeTe via ferroelectric patterning. In this route, we demonstrate the reversible writing of an array of nanostripes with inward and outward FE polarization, assumed to have opposite spin configurations. This represents a first example of engineered meta-material based on a ferroelectric Rashba semiconductor, suitable to implement the concept of Rashba barriers. In perspective, our results pave the way to the exploitation of GeTe in unconventional spintronic devices with pure electric control of their operation and reconfigurable computing functionalities.

The first step toward the demonstration of the link between FE state and spin texture in GeTe by S-ARPES is the initialization of the whole film, leading to a uniform pristine FE polarization pointing inward or outward. This also corresponds to the “clean blackboard” state preliminary to any patterning. In this scope, we developed a method for preparing α-GeTe(111) surfaces with opposite FE polarization, associated with different terminations. Rhombohedral α-GeTe(111) results from the stacking of Ge and Te planes, which are not equidistant and thus give rise to a net electric dipole, being Te more electronegative than Ge. (19,20)

As the energetically favored termination is generated by the breaking of long (rather than short) bonds, a Te terminated surface is expected to display a dipole pointing outward (Pout), while a Ge-terminated one will have a net dipole inward (Pin), as depicted in panels a and a′ of Figure 1. Even though calculations predict the Te-terminated GeTe(111) to be more stable than the Ge-terminated one by 60 meV Å–2, this surface energy difference is largely reduced by the presence of reconstructions, (21) vacancies, and other kind of defects, thus suggesting the possibility of stabilizing both terminations in real surfaces.

Figure 1

Figure 1. GeTe(111) surfaces with opposite FE polarization. (a, a′) Sketch of the Ge and Te planes for the Te and Ge termination, respectively. The distances given on the left refer to the unrelaxed interlayer distances. Only the topmost surface atoms of the slab are shown. The black rectangle denotes a bulk hexagonal unit cell used in DFT calculations as a building block to construct the (111) surface (rhombohedral setting, corresponding to the (0001) in the hexagonal setting). The net FE polarization Pout (Pin) (white arrows) arises from the interatomic dipoles shown with blue and red arrows. (b, b′) Piezoresponse-phase images recorded on STe (SGe) after poling with the tip at +7 V (−7 V) and −7 V (+7 V) over two concentric squares of 1.5 and 0.5 μm per side. The scale bar corresponds to 0.5 μm. (c, c′) PFM-phase signal showing the pristine polarization state and the ferroelectric hysteresis loop, as measured ex-situ on STe and SGe after the S-ARPES experiment. The controlled thermal desorption of the Te capping layer leads to a virgin-state FE polarization Pout and Pin in the two samples, respectively.

GeTe(111) films, 23 nm thick, were grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) on Si(111) and then capped with 20 nm of Te to prevent contamination due to exposure to atmosphere. A reliable protocol for controlled Te-desorption in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) has been first optimized to obtain Ge- and Te-rich surfaces with opposite polarization, as checked by X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) with Al–Kα radiation and piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) (for details, see sections 1 and 2 of the Supporting Information). An annealing of 1 h at about 240 °C produces a Te-rich surface displaying a pristine polarization Pout, while the same annealing at 260 °C causes a complete desorption of Te (the more volatile species) and produces a Ge-rich surface with Pin. Crucial for this paper, the same method has been applied to samples prepared in situ for S-ARPES, to demonstrate that opposite FE polarization states are associated with inverse spin texture. After insertion in vacuum at the APE beamline, the samples were annealed at about 240 and 260 °C for 1 h, controlling the heater current. According to the recipe previously optimized (for details see section 2 of the Supporting Information), we obtained a first sample (STe) with a Te-rich surface and a second one (SGe) with a Ge-rich surface, as confirmed by the in situ analysis of the XPS spectra taken at 800 eV photon energy (see section 3 of the Supporting Information). In fact, from the relative intensity of the Ge 3d and Te 4d peaks, normalized to the analyzer transmission and tabulated atomic photoemission cross-sections, the average stoichiometries of STe and SGe are Ge0.39Te0.61 and Ge0.46Te0.54, respectively. The uncertainty on the relative stoichiometry is ± 0.02, and it mainly arises from the error on the estimation of the peaks’ area. Within the photoemission probing depth (∼17 Å at 800 eV photon energy), STe is clearly Te-rich, while the Ge concentration in SGe is slightly above that of GeTe films, which typically displays 10% Ge vacancies (Ge0.45Te0.55), (22,23) thus pointing toward a Ge enrichment of SGe. Data taken with Al–Kα radiation (1486.6 eV), after the beamtime, confirm that STe (SGe) is Te (Ge) rich at surface (see section 2 of the Supporting Information). Furthermore, the deconvolution of XPS spectra, using surface and bulk components (section 2 of the Supporting Information), shows that the Te (Ge) enrichment is localized at surface. Based on these considerations, in the following we will compare our ARPES data from STe and SGe with density functional theory simulations of Ge- and Te-terminated surfaces. In fact, these truncated bulk systems represent the simplest models of Te- and Ge-rich surfaces with outward and inward FE polarization.

The virgin ferroelectric state of Te- and Ge-rich samples has been widely investigated by PFM, both during the optimization of the surface strategy for poling (section 1 of the Supporting Information) and after the beamtime, on samples STe and SGe. Here in particular, we report on these two samples, whose pristine FE state is crucial for the establishment of the link between FE polarization and spin texture. In Figure 1b (1b′), we show the phase signal recorded on STe (SGe) after writing a large square with +7 V (−7 V) bias on the AFM tip and then an inner square with opposite bias. FE patterns are stable over more than 24 h (section 1 of the Supporting Information), thus indicating the robustness of ferroelectricity in GeTe films. The inner square displays the same contrast (PFM phase) of the unpoled area, indicating an outward (inward) virgin ferroelectric polarization in STe (SGe). To confirm these findings, we measured the virgin curve and the full ferroelectric hysteresis loops by sweeping the PFM tip voltage. A pair of characteristic loops measured on STe and SGe are reported in panels c and c′ of Figure 1 as representative of the average response of the entire sample area probed by S-ARPES (see section 1 of the Supporting Information for details on the statistical analysis). The virgin curve measured for STe indicates the initial state is close to that obtained for negative saturating voltages, while the opposite holds for the sample SGe. This is a clear indication that STe and SGe present two opposite outward and inward virgin FE polarizations. These samples are ideal candidates for investigating the connection between FE polarization and spin texture.

In Figure 2, we show the bands dispersion and the corresponding spin texture calculated by DFT for Te- and Ge-terminated GeTe(111) surfaces displaying, respectively, Pout and Pin FE polarization that will be compared with S-ARPES from STe (Te-rich surface) and SGe (Ge-rich surface), respectively. For the sake of completeness, the spectral function for the energetically unfavorable configurations (i.e., Te-terminated surface with Pin and Ge-terminated surface with Pout) are reported in section 3 of the Supporting Information. In agreement with previous works, (21,24) we refer to bulk coordinates in terms of the rhombohedral setting (a = b = c = 4.37 Å and α = β = γ = 57.9°), such that the ferroelectric polarization points along the [111] direction of the real space and the Rashba-like dispersion of bulk bands is seen on the {111} planes of the reciprocal space around Z. However, to simulate surface aspects we adopt the more common hexagonal setting to construct the slabs (Figure 1, panels a and a′), with the ferroelectric polarization pointing along the [0001] direction. However, throughout the text, we will refer to the sample surface as GeTe(111) defined with respect to the rhombohedral cell.

Figure 2

Figure 2. DFT calculations of GeTe(111) surfaces with different terminations. (a) Density of states (spectral function) of Te-terminated GeTe(111) surface with outward polarization, projected on bulk (deep pink) and surface (yellow) principal layers calculated via Green’s functions technique for the semi-infinite model of the surface. Brighter tones of pink (yellow) bands indicate higher intensity of bulk (surface) features. High-symmetry directions used for the calculation of band dispersions are defined in panel d. (b) Corresponding k-resolved spin polarization along the high-symmetry directions. Due to its complexity, we show only the in-plane components perpendicular to k. The in-plane component parallel to wave vector is zero within the whole Brillouin zone. (c) Schematic picture of the spin texture in main bulk bands extracted from panels a and b at E = −0.5 eV; the arrows denote the direction of the in-plane projection of the spin for inner and outer bands. (a′–c′) Same as panels a–c for Ge-terminated surface, with polarization inward. The Fermi level here has been shifted to align the bulk bands of Te- and Ge-terminated surfaces. (d) Brillouin zone of hexagonal surface and bulk unit cells; the gray square marks the area displayed in panels c and c′. Dashed vertical lines in a and a′ indicate the k points used for the spin analysis reported in Figure 4.

The bulk high-symmetry directions ZU and ZA, together with the corresponding surface directions ΓM and ΓK, are shown in Figure 2d. The FE polarization is parallel to ΓZ direction of the reciprocal space, i.e., the (111) direction of the crystal. Band dispersions along high-symmetry directions are presented in Figure 2a for STe and Figure 2a′ for SGe, after projection of the spectral function on the surface layers and on the bulk in the semi-infinite model, to single out surface and bulk-like contributions.

The k-resolved spin polarization is reported in panel b for STe and b′ for SGe, in which the non-null spin components perpendicular to the wave vector are shown along the high-symmetry bulk (surface) ZA (ΓK) and ZU (ΓM) directions. While the shape of bulk Rashba sub-bands is not affected by FE polarization reversal, their spin texture is reversed, according to the main concept of FERSCs. This is evident from the comparison of the isoenergy cuts, taken at 0.5 eV below the top of the valence band, reported in panels c and c′, where arrows indicate the local spin direction. However, surface bands with Rashba splitting are very different for the two terminations. In the Te-terminated one (Pout) they display a clear Rashba-like splitting and cross the Fermi energy at higher wave vectors with respect to the bulk bands. In the Ge-terminated one (Pin), instead, the Rashba splitting of the surface bands in the gap is largely suppressed and surface bands shift toward the conduction band, without crossing the Fermi level at high momenta.

The remarkable difference between surface Rashba like bands predicted by DFT for Te- and Ge-termination has an experimental counterpart in ARPES data reported in Figure 3 for STe (panels a–h) and SGe (a′–h′). Panels a and b in Figure 3 present the experimental band dispersions along ZA and ZU for STe. Corresponding isoenergy cuts at 0, 0.25, and 0.5 eV BE in panels c–e of Figure 3 are compared with theoretical ones for a Te-terminated surface. In the following we will use a simplified distinction between “surface” and “bulk” Rashba states. Having in mind that ARPES at 20 eV probes just a few atomic layers underneath the sample surface, we identify as bulk states those displaying a sizable photon energy or kz dispersion. (13) Rigorously, these are not true bulk states but can be viewed as surface-bulk resonances (24) or simply states with sizable projection on bulk states, so they mainly reflect the bulk behavior. (25)

Figure 3

Figure 3. ARPES from Te-rich and Ge-rich samples. Panels a–h refer to the Te-rich sample STe with outward polarization. (a, b) Experimental bands dispersion collected along the principal directions ZA (kx) and ZU (ky) in the Brillouin zone. (c–e) Constant energy maps at 0, 0.25, and 0.5 eV below the Fermi energy. (f–h) Corresponding calculated constant energy maps with yellow and pink indicating the surface and bulk character of states, respectively. Panels labeled by the apex (panels a′–h′) are the same as above but for the Ge-rich sample SGe with inward polarization. The Fermi level in panels f′–h′ is chosen to be consistent with Figure 2.

Both band dispersions and isoenergy cuts from sample STe are very similar to data available in the literature for Te-terminated α-GeTe(111). (13,24,25) In agreement with DFT calculations, prominent surface bands with Rashba splitting (S1, S2) are seen at large momenta, especially along the ZA direction. A pair of outer spin split bands with 6-fold symmetry and “arms” along the equivalent ZU directions are clearly visible in the isoenergy cuts of panels c and d of Figure 3 (marked by green ticks). However, at 0.25 eV BE (Figure 3d), an inner 6-fold star (orange ticks) appears, rotated by 30 degrees with respect to the surface one, i.e., with arms along ZA. This is ascribed to the bulk-like bands (B1 and B2) evident in the band dispersion along ZU of panel b. The isoenergy cut at 0.5 eV (Figure 3e), instead, mainly reflects the symmetry of the bulk inner star because at this BE, the cut of states with surface character occurs at higher momenta.

The scenario for the SGe sample is completely different because surface states are almost absent, in agreement with DFT simulations. Indeed the prominent surface Rashba bands S1 and S2 along ZA in Figure 3a are missing in panel a′, while bulk bands B1 and B2 along ZU12 are similar in panels b and b′. The absence of S1 and S2 surface states is even more evident from the Fermi energy cut of panel 3c′, which does not display the outer 6-fold double star of panel c. Besides, the isoenergy cut at 0.25 eV (panel d′) already reflects the symmetry of bulk states, such as the inner star in Figure 3d,e from sample STe, i.e., with arms along ZA.

To summarize, ARPES data from samples STe and SGe show band dispersions in good agreement with those calculated for a Te-terminated (Pout) and Ge-terminated (Pin) surface, respectively. This represents a self-consistent proof of the reliability of our method for preparing GeTe(111) surfaces with opposite FE polarization.

In the following, we discuss the connection between the spin texture of bulk Rashba bands and the FE polarization, which is the key concept of FERSC materials. Figure 4 reports spin-resolved ARPES data from STe and SGe.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Spin-resolved ARPES from Te-rich and Ge-rich samples. Panels a–g refer to the Te-rich sample STe with outward polarization. (a) Calculated bulk bands (solid line) along ZU (ky) over the 2nd derivative of the measured band dispersion. (b, c) Spin-polarized spectra and spin asymmetry at fixed wave vector k1 indicated in panel a. The two peaks correspond to the intersection of bulk Rashba bands B1 and B2 with the vertical dashed line at k1 (panel a). (d, e) Spin-polarized spectra and spin asymmetry at opposite wave vector –k1. (f, g) Constant energy maps at 0.18 and 0.5 eV BE, corresponding to the energy of bulk bands B1 and B2 at k1, in nice agreement with the peaks of opposite spin polarizations in panels c and e. Blue and red arrows indicate the sense of circulation of spins: clockwise in the outer band and counterclockwise in the inner one. Panels a′–g′ refer to the case of the Ge-rich sample SGe. (b′–e′) Spin analysis for opposite wave vectors k2 and –k2, where the Rashba splitting is maximized. (f′, g′) Constant energy maps at 0 eV (top of B1) and 0.26 eV BE, corresponding to the energy of bulk bands B1 and B2 at k2 (panel a′). The sense of circulation of spins is opposite to that found for STe: counterclockwise in the outer band and clockwise in the inner band (panel g′).

In fact, the Rashba splitting of surface bands can be largely affected, or even suppressed, by proximity with other materials in a multilayer (26) or by the surface electric field due to screening charges. In sample STe, which displays both surface and bulk Rashba bands, we performed spin-polarized scans at fixed momenta (k1, −k1) marked in panels f and g of Figure 4, along the equivalent ZU direction at 30 degrees with respect to kx. Even though these are not the points where the Rashba splitting is maximized, for ± k1, only bulk bands B1,2 are expected to contribute to the photoemission signal at BE greater than 0.2 eV (see Figure 2a,b). The spin polarized spectra and corresponding spin-polarization are reported in panels b and c for k1 and d and e for −k1. With reference to the polarimeter quantization axis set along the negative direction of ky, at k1, we find a positive peak in the spin polarization at about 0.2 eV and a negative one at about 0.5 eV (panel c), corresponding to the crossing of the outer and inner band B1 and B2, respectively. The opposite occurs at −k1, as expected for GeTe Rashba bands. (12,24,25) The sense of circulation of spins resulting from our data is sketched in Figure 4f,g by arrows superimposed to the isoenergy cuts taken at 0.18 and 0.5 eV. In agreement with DFT calculations, for a Te-terminated (Pout) surface the sense of circulation of spins is clockwise for the outer band and counterclockwise for the inner one.

For SGe, the analysis of the spin texture of bulk bands is simpler, due to the lack of surface bands. In this case, we choose opposite k points (k2, −k2), along ky (ZU direction), where the maximum Rashba energy splitting (ER) of bulk bands B1,2 is expected (see Figures 2a′ and 4a′). The quantization axis of the spin polarimeter was set orthogonal to the wave vectors toward the positive kx direction. Spin-polarized spectra in Figure 4b′ display two prominent peaks with opposite spin, arising from the crossing of B1 and B2 bands at k2. Their energy splitting of about 200 meV is in good agreement with the expected value of the Rashba energy ER, according to theoretical predictions (12) and recent experimental findings. (24,25) Noteworthy is the fact that the sign of the spin polarization of the two peaks reverts when moving from k2 to −k2, as it appears from the comparison of panels b′–e′ in Figure 4. To determine the sense of circulation of spins in the outer and inner bands, we simply note that in panel c′, the peak at lower BE (outer band) has a negative polarization with respect to the quantization axis, i.e., the spin is directed along the negative direction of kx (counterclockwise rotation). The opposite holds for the peak at higher BE (inner band), so that the sense of circulation of the spin there is clockwise. The corresponding spin texture is sketched in panels f′ and g′. For a more-detailed vectorial analysis of the spin texture, see section 4 of the Supporting Information.

Crucial for the demonstration of the basic concept of FERSCs, the sense of circulation of spin in the inner and outer bands is opposite in samples STe (Figure 4g) and SGe (Figure 4g’), which display outward and inward FE polarization, respectively. This means that the spin texture is locked to the FE polarization because it reverts when the FE polarization is switched.

Having demonstrated the locking between ferroelectric polarization and spin textures, in the following we focus on the nanopatterning of ferroelectric domains. Figure 5 reports an example of a peculiar ferroelectric pattern written in a GeTe film, i.e., an array of lines with 600 nm spacing, having FE polarization inward (Pin), in a sample with uniform FE polarization outward (Pout). This pattern has been defined starting from a sample with uniform Pout, obtained by applying the surface engineering method outlined above for producing a Te-rich surface, over which a sequence of lines with opposite polarization has been written by sweeping the conductive tip of the AFM with a positive bias of +10 V. For a sweep rate of 3 μm/s, we get an average line width of about 300 nm as a result of the characteristic GeTe FE viscosity.

It is noteworthy that the pattern is stable over more than 24 h, thus pointing to the possibility of using this kind of FE patterns in spintronic devices exploiting the propagation of electrons in structure with engineered in-plane domains with opposite spin texture. Even though the direct observation of the spin in these FE nanodomains is prevented by experimental limitations of spectroscopic techniques, our S-ARPES analysis indicates that patterning of FE domains with inward or outward polarization provides a way to define also spin textures with opposite sense of rotation of spins in the Rashba bands. The FE structure of Figure 5 thus corresponds to the typical Rashba barrier device, where lines with opposite FE polarization are associated with opposite sense of circulation of spins in the Rashba bands. According to the theory of Rashba barriers, (27−29) a modulation of the resistivity for current flowing perpendicularly to the lines is expected with respect to the case of uniform FE polarization. Noteworthy, such a modulation is nonvolatile but reversible, as the uniform polarization state can be restored by electric poling. In perspective, similar structures can be designed and implemented in devices with gate electrodes, suitable for an easy and real-time manipulation of the spin texture and, in turn, of the electric conductivity. This represents the basic building block of a circuit element combining memory and computing, where the information is written in the nonvolatile ferroelectric and spin-texture pattern and computing takes place via the modulation of some spin-dependent transport property.

Figure 5

Figure 5. FE domains and spin texture patterning at the nanoscale. (a) Sketch of the writing procedure to obtain a sequence of Rashba barriers using the conductive tip of an AFM on a sample with pristine polarization outward, prepared as for sample STe above or by sweeping the tip with a negative voltage (Vtip = −10 V). Lines of inward polarization are written with opposite bias (Vtip = 10 V). The distance between lines is 600 nm, and their width about 300 nm. (b) PFM-phase signal measured along the y direction, perpendicular to the lines. (c) PFM-phase image of the ferroelectric domain pattern.

To summarize, in this Letter, we demonstrated the ferroelectric control of the spin-texture in GeTe. We developed a surface engineering strategy to prepare in situ a uniform ferroelectric polarization state, inward or outward. Through S-ARPES, we provided evidence for the intimate correlation between ferroelectric polarization and spin circulation in Rashba bands, i.e., the basis toward the possibility of crafting the spin texture via ferroelectric patterning. In this direction, by using the conductive tip of an atomic force microscope, we wrote a sequence of ferroelectric domains with inward and outward polarization expected to implement the structure of a Rashba barrier device. Noteworthy, FE domains are stable over time but can be electrically manipulated in a reversible way. These achievements pave the way to the realization of devices with gate electrodes for the real time reconfiguration of the spin structure in view of computing applications. Our findings indicate that a full electric control of the spin in a semiconductor is feasible without magnetic fields or adjacent magnetic layers. This represents a fundamental achievement toward the deployment of GeTe in spintronic devices exploiting the rich physics of Rashba effect and the additional degree of freedom arising from the electric reconfigurability of the spin texture.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04829.

  • Additional information about the methods (sample growth, DFT calculations, angular resolved photoemission spectroscopy, and piezoresponse force microscopy), engineering of Te- and Ge-rich GeTe(111) surfaces with opposite polarization, detailed XPS characterization of Te-rich and Ge-rich samples, vectorial analysis of the spin texture of GeTe, and DFT calculations of GeTe(111) surfaces with unstable terminations. (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Christian Rinaldi - Department of Physics, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, ItalyIFN-CNR, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, ItalyOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-6930-211X Email: [email protected]
    • Riccardo Bertacco - Department of Physics, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, ItalyIFN-CNR, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Sara Varotto - Department of Physics, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
    • Marco Asa - Department of Physics, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
    • Jagoda Sławińska - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche CNR-SPIN, Sede Temporanea di Chieti, c/o Univ. “G. D’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
    • Jun Fujii - CNR-IOM, Laboratorio TASC in Area Science Park - Basovizza, 34149 Trieste, Italy
    • Giovanni Vinai - CNR-IOM, Laboratorio TASC in Area Science Park - Basovizza, 34149 Trieste, ItalyOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-4882-663X
    • Stefano Cecchi - Paul-Drude-Institut für Festkörperelektronik, Hausvogteiplatz 5-7, 10117 Berlin, GermanyOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-2243-7268
    • Domenico Di Sante - Institut für Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland Campus Süd, Würzburg 97074, Germany
    • Raffaella Calarco - Paul-Drude-Institut für Festkörperelektronik, Hausvogteiplatz 5-7, 10117 Berlin, GermanyOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5008-1617
    • Ivana Vobornik - CNR-IOM, Laboratorio TASC in Area Science Park - Basovizza, 34149 Trieste, Italy
    • Giancarlo Panaccione - CNR-IOM, Laboratorio TASC in Area Science Park - Basovizza, 34149 Trieste, Italy
    • Silvia Picozzi - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche CNR-SPIN, Sede Temporanea di Chieti, c/o Univ. “G. D’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We are grateful for helpful discussions with G. Rossi and M. Cantoni. C.R., S.V., M.A., and R.B. acknowledge financial support by the Cariplo Foundation grant no. 2013-0726 (MAGISTER) and grant no. 2013-0623 (SEARCH IV). C.R. also acknowledge the financial support by Fondazione Cariplo and Regione Lombardia via the project ECOS (grant no. 2017-1622). This work has been partly performed in the framework of the nanoscience foundry and fine analysis (NFFA-MIUR Italy) project. R.C. and S.C. thank S. Behnke and C. Stemmler for technical support at the MBE and the Leibniz Gemeinschaft within the Leibniz Competition on a project entitled “Epitaxial phase change superlattices designed for investigation of non-thermal switching” for partial funding. D.D.S. acknowledges the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1170 ToCoTronics) and the ERC-StG-336012-Thomale-TOPOLECTRICS. This work was partially performed at Polifab, the micro- and nanofabrication facility of Politecnico di Milano.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 29 other publications.

  1. 1
    Allwood, D. A. Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 2005, 309 (5741), 16881692,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1108813
  2. 2
    Karenowska, A. D.; Chumak, A. V.; Serga, A. A.; Hillebrands, B. Handbook of Spintronics; Springer: Dordrecht Heidelberg2015; Vol. 11, pp 15051549.
  3. 3
    Albisetti, E.; Petti, D.; Pancaldi, M.; Madami, M.; Tacchi, S.; Curtis, J.; King, W. P.; Papp, A.; Csaba, G.; Porod, W.; Vavassori, P.; Riedo, E.; Bertacco, R. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11 (6), 545551,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2016.25
  4. 4
    Jansen, R. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11 (5), 400408,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3293
  5. 5
    Rinaldi, C.; Cantoni, M.; Petti, D.; Sottocorno, A.; Leone, M.; Caffrey, N. M.; Sanvito, S.; Bertacco, R. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24 (22), 30373041,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201104256
  6. 6
    Sanvito, S. Nat. Phys. 2010, 6 (8), 562564,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys1714
  7. 7
    Ciudad, D.; Gobbi, M.; Kinane, C. J.; Eich, M.; Moodera, J. S.; Hueso, L. E. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26 (45), 75617567,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201401283
  8. 8
    Datta, S.; Das, B. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1990, 56 (7), 665667,  DOI: 10.1063/1.102730
  9. 9
    Xu, Y.; Awschalom, D. D.; Nitta, J. Handbook of Spintronics, 1st ed.; Springer Publishing Company: New York, 2015.
  10. 10
    Dietl, T. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9 (12), 965974,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat2898
  11. 11
    Picozzi, S. Front. Phys. 2014, 2, 15,  DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2014.00010
  12. 12
    Di Sante, D.; Barone, P.; Bertacco, R.; Picozzi, S. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25 (4), 509513,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201203199
  13. 13
    Liebmann, M.; Rinaldi, C.; Di Sante, D.; Kellner, J.; Pauly, C.; Wang, R. N.; Boschker, J. E.; Giussani, A.; Bertoli, S.; Cantoni, M.; Baldrati, L.; Asa, M.; Vobornik, I.; Panaccione, G.; Marchenko, D.; Sánchez-Barriga, J.; Rader, O.; Calarco, R.; Picozzi, S.; Bertacco, R.; Morgenstern, M. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28 (3), 560565,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201503459
  14. 14
    Manchon, A.; Koo, H. C.; Nitta, J.; Frolov, S. M.; Duine, R. A. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14 (9), 871882,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat4360
  15. 15
    Hoffmann, A.; Bader, S. D. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2015, 4 (4), 47001,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.4.047001
  16. 16
    Rinaldi, C.; Rojas-Sánchez, J. C.; Wang, R. N.; Fu, Y.; Oyarzun, S.; Vila, L.; Bertoli, S.; Asa, M.; Baldrati, L.; Cantoni, M.; George, J. M.; Calarco, R.; Fert, A.; Bertacco, R. APL Mater. 2016, 4 (3), 32501,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4941276
  17. 17
    Nukala, P.; Ren, M.; Agarwal, R.; Berger, J.; Liu, G.; Johnson, A. T. C.; Agarwal, R. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8 (1), 15033,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15033
  18. 18
    Krempasky, J.; Weber, A. P.; Pilet, N.; Warnicke, P.; Ebert, H.; Muff, S.; Bisti, F.; Fanciulli, M.; Volfova, H.; Springholz, G. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7 (May), 13071,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13071
  19. 19
    Chattopadhyay, T.; Boucherle, J. X.; VonSchnering, H. G. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 1987, 20 (10), 14311440,  DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/20/10/012
  20. 20
    Rabe, K. M.; Joannopoulos, J. D. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1987, 36 (12), 66316639,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.36.6631
  21. 21
    Deringer, V. L.; Lumeij, M.; Dronskowski, R. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116 (29), 1580115811,  DOI: 10.1021/jp304455z
  22. 22
    Wuttig, M.; Lüsebrink, D.; Wamwangi, D.; Wełnic, W.; Gilleßen, M.; Dronskowski, R. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6 (2), 122128,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat1807
  23. 23
    Perumal, K. Epitaxial Growth of Ge-Sb-Te based Phase Change Materials, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin , 2013.
  24. 24
    Krempasky, J.; Muff, S.; Pilet, N.; Landolt, G.; Radovi, M.; Shi, M.; Kriegner, D.; Hol, V.; Braun, J.; Dil, J. H. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2016, 94, 205111,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.205111
  25. 25
    Elmers, H. J.; Wallauer, R.; Liebmann, M.; Kellner, J.; Morgenstern, M.; Wang, R. N.; Boschker, J. E.; Calarco, R.; Sánchez-Barriga, J.; Rader, O.; Kutnyakhov, D.; Chernov, S. V.; Medjanik, K.; Tusche, C.; Ellguth, M.; Volfova, H.; Borek, S.; Braun, J.; Minár, J.; Ebert, H.; Schönhense, G. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2016, 94 (20), 201403,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.201403
  26. 26
    Oyarzún, S.; Nandy, A. K.; Rortais, F.; Rojas-Sánchez, J. C.; Dau, M. T.; Noël, P.; Laczkowski, P.; Pouget, S.; Okuno, H.; Vila, L.; Vergnaud, C.; Beigné, C.; Marty, A.; Attané, J. P.; Gambarelli, S.; George, J. M.; Jaffrès, H.; Blügel, S.; Jamet, M. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13857,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13857
  27. 27
    Gong, S. J.; Yang, Z. Q. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 102 (3). 033706 DOI: 10.1063/1.2767373
  28. 28
    Xiao, X. B.; Li, X. M.; Chen, Y. G. Phys. B 2009, 404 (21), 41594161,  DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2009.07.192
  29. 29
    Zhang, L.; Brusheim, P.; Xu, H. Q. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 72 (4), 45347,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.045347

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 105 publications.

  1. Ravi Kashikar, Abduljelili Popoola, Sergey Lisenkov, A. Stroppa, I. Ponomareva. Persistent and Quasipersistent Spin Textures in Halide Perovskites Induced by Uniaxial Stress. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2023, 14 (38) , 8541-8547. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c02248
  2. Jiajia Chen, Kai Wu, Wei Hu, Jinlong Yang. High-Throughput Inverse Design for 2D Ferroelectric Rashba Semiconductors. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (43) , 20035-20046. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c08827
  3. Doried Ghader, Heng Gao, Paolo G. Radaelli, Alessandra Continenza, Alessandro Stroppa. Theoretical Study of Magnon Spin Currents in Chromium Trihalide Hetero-bilayers: Implications for Magnonic and Spintronic Devices. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2022, 5 (10) , 15150-15161. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c03296
  4. Jiajia Chen, Kai Wu, Wei Hu, Jinlong Yang. Spin–Orbit Coupling in 2D Semiconductors: A Theoretical Perspective. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2021, 12 (51) , 12256-12268. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03662
  5. Preeti Bhumla, Deepika Gill, Sajjan Sheoran, Saswata Bhattacharya. Origin of Rashba Spin Splitting and Strain Tunability in Ferroelectric Bulk CsPbF3. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2021, 12 (39) , 9539-9546. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02596
  6. Ruixiang Fei, Shuaiqin Yu, Yan Lu, Linghan Zhu, Li Yang. Switchable Enhanced Spin Photocurrent in Rashba and Cubic Dresselhaus Ferroelectric Semiconductors. Nano Letters 2021, 21 (5) , 2265-2271. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00116
  7. Xu Yang, Xiao-Mei Li, Yang Li, Yan Li, Rui Sun, Jia-Nan Liu, Xuedong Bai, Na Li, Zong-Kai Xie, Lei Su, Zi-Zhao Gong, Xiang-Qun Zhang, Wei He, Zhaohua Cheng. Three-Dimensional Limit of Bulk Rashba Effect in Ferroelectric Semiconductor GeTe. Nano Letters 2021, 21 (1) , 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03161
  8. Alexander S. Frolov, Jaime Sánchez-Barriga, Carolien Callaert, Joke Hadermann, Alexander V. Fedorov, Dmitry Yu. Usachov, Alexander N. Chaika, Brian C. Walls, Kuanysh Zhussupbekov, Igor V. Shvets, Matthias Muntwiler, Matteo Amati, Luca Gregoratti, Andrei Yu. Varykhalov, Oliver Rader, Lada V. Yashina. Atomic and Electronic Structure of a Multidomain GeTe Crystal. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (12) , 16576-16589. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c05851
  9. Lin Ju, Jing Shang, Xiao Tang, Liangzhi Kou. Tunable Photocatalytic Water Splitting by the Ferroelectric Switch in a 2D AgBiP2Se6 Monolayer. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (3) , 1492-1500. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b11614
  10. In-Hyeok Park, Qiannan Zhang, Ki Chang Kwon, Ziyu Zhu, Wei Yu, Kai Leng, David Giovanni, Hwa Seob Choi, Ibrahim Abdelwahab, Qing-Hua Xu, Tze Chien Sum, Kian Ping Loh. Ferroelectricity and Rashba Effect in a Two-Dimensional Dion-Jacobson Hybrid Organic–Inorganic Perovskite. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141 (40) , 15972-15976. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b07776
  11. Mingjin Dai, Zhiguo Wang, Fakun Wang, Yunfeng Qiu, Jia Zhang, Cheng-Yan Xu, Tianyou Zhai, Wenwu Cao, Yongqing Fu, Dechang Jia, Yu Zhou, Ping-An Hu. Two-Dimensional van der Waals Materials with Aligned In-Plane Polarization and Large Piezoelectric Effect for Self-Powered Piezoelectric Sensors. Nano Letters 2019, 19 (8) , 5410-5416. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01907
  12. Richarj Mondal, Yuki Aihara, Yuta Saito, Paul Fons, Alexander V. Kolobov, Junji Tominaga, Muneaki Hase. Topological Phase Buried in a Chalcogenide Superlattice Monitored by Helicity-Dependent Kerr Measurement. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2018, 10 (31) , 26781-26786. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b07974
  13. A. Khaliq, S. Lewińska, R. Minikaev, M. Arciszewska, A. Avdonin, B. Brodowska, V.E. Slynko, A. Ślawska-Waniewska, L. Kilanski. Magnetic phase diagram of Ge1––(Sn Mn )Te multiferroic semiconductors: Coexistence of ferromagnetic and cluster glass ordering. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2023, 968 , 171893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171893
  14. Boris Croes, Fabien Cheynis, Michaël Texier, Pierre Müller, Stefano Curiotto, Frédéric Leroy. Thermomechanic behavior of epitaxial GeTe ferroelectric films. Journal of Applied Physics 2023, 134 (20) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0173718
  15. V. D. Esin, D. Yu. Kazmin, Yu. S. Barash, A. V. Timonina, N. N. Kolesnikov, E. V. Deviatov. Reentrant Proximity-induced Superconductivity for GeTe Semimetal. JETP Letters 2023, 8 https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364023603329
  16. Stefano Cecchi, Jamo Momand, Daniele Dragoni, Omar Abou El Kheir, Federico Fagiani, Dominik Kriegner, Christian Rinaldi, Fabrizio Arciprete, Vaclav Holý, Bart J. Kooi, Marco Bernasconi, Raffaella Calarco. Thick Does the Trick: Genesis of Ferroelectricity in 2D GeTe‐Rich (GeTe) m (Sb 2 Te 3 ) n Lamellae. Advanced Science 2023, 306 https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202304785
  17. Shuhui Li, Feng Wang, Yanrong Wang, Jia Yang, Xinyuan Wang, Xueying Zhan, Jun He, Zhenxing Wang. Van der Waals Ferroelectrics: Theories, Materials, and Device Applications. Advanced Materials 2023, 304 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202301472
  18. G.E.W. Bauer, P. Tang, R. Iguchi, J. Xiao, K. Shen, Z. Zhong, T. Yu, S.M. Rezende, J.P. Heremans, K. Uchida. Polarization transport in ferroelectrics. Physical Review Applied 2023, 20 (5) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.050501
  19. Seong Won Cho, Young Woong Lee, Sang Heon Kim, Seungwu Han, Inho Kim, Jong-Keuk Park, Joon Young Kwak, Jaewook Kim, YeonJoo Jeong, Gyu Weon Hwang, Kyeong Seok Lee, Seongsik Park, Suyoun Lee. Reduction of carrier density and enhancement of the bulk Rashba spin-orbit coupling strength in Bi2Te3/GeTe superlattices. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2023, 957 , 170444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170444
  20. Shuai Yang, Fengrui Sui, Yucheng Liu, Ruijuan Qi, Xiaoyu Feng, Shangwei Dong, Pingxiong Yang, Fangyu Yue. Anisotropy and thermal properties in GeTe semiconductor by Raman analysis. Nanoscale 2023, 15 (32) , 13297-13303. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NR02678G
  21. Manish Kumar Mohanta, Puru Jena. Symmetry-driven persistent spin texture for the two-dimensional nonsymmorphic CdTe and ZnTe crystal structures. Physical Review B 2023, 108 (8) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.085432
  22. N. N. Orlova, A. V. Timonina, N. N. Kolesnikov, E. V. Deviatov. Gate-Dependent Nonlinear Hall Effect at Room Temperature in Topological Semimetal GeTe. Chinese Physics Letters 2023, 40 (7) , 077302. https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/40/7/077302
  23. Karma Tenzin, Arunesh Roy, Homayoun Jafari, Bruno Banas, Frank T. Cerasoli, Mihir Date, Anooja Jayaraj, Marco Buongiorno Nardelli, Jagoda Sławińska. Analogs of Rashba-Edelstein effect from density functional theory. Physical Review B 2023, 107 (16) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.165140
  24. Tahir Ahmad, Kajal Jindal, Monika Tomar, Pradip K. Jha. Theoretical insight of origin of Rashba–Dresselhaus effect in tetragonal and rhombohedral phases of BiFeO 3. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2023, 25 (7) , 5857-5868. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CP04852C
  25. Boris Croes, Fabien Cheynis, Yannick Fagot-Revurat, Pierre Müller, Stefano Curiotto, Frédéric Leroy. Early-stage growth of GeTe on Si(111)-Sb. Physical Review Materials 2023, 7 (1) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.014409
  26. Alfonso Franciosi, Maya Kiskinova. Elettra-Sincrotrone Trieste: present and future. The European Physical Journal Plus 2023, 138 (1) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03654-6
  27. N.N. Orlova, A.V. Timonina, N.N. Kolesnikov, E.V. Deviatov. Dynamic negative capacitance response in GeTe Rashba ferroelectric. Physica B: Condensed Matter 2022, 647 , 414358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2022.414358
  28. Geoffroy Kremer, Julian Maklar, Laurent Nicolaï, Christopher W. Nicholson, Changming Yue, Caio Silva, Philipp Werner, J. Hugo Dil, Juraj Krempaský, Gunther Springholz, Ralph Ernstorfer, Jan Minár, Laurenz Rettig, Claude Monney. Field-induced ultrafast modulation of Rashba coupling at room temperature in ferroelectric α-GeTe(111). Nature Communications 2022, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33978-3
  29. Moh. Adhib Ulil Absor, Iman Santoso. Reversible canted persistent spin textures in two-dimensional ferroelectric bilayer WTe2. Journal of Applied Physics 2022, 132 (18) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0121520
  30. Zhizhong Chen, Rui Xu, Sijie Ma, Yuan Ma, Yang Hu, Lifu Zhang, Yuwei Guo, Zhenhan Huang, Baiwei Wang, Yi‐Yang Sun, Jie Jiang, Ryan Hawks, Ru Jia, Yu Xiang, Gwo‐Ching Wang, Esther A. Wertz, Jisen Tian, Daniel Gall, Xinchun Chen, Vei Wang, Lei Gao, Hanyu Zhu, Jian Shi. Searching for Circular Photo Galvanic Effect in Oxyhalide Perovskite Bi 4 NbO 8 Cl. Advanced Functional Materials 2022, 32 (47) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202206343
  31. Kun Zhu, Guanglong Ge, Jinfeng Lin, Hairui Bai, Cheng Shi, Guohui Li, Fei Yan, Liuxue Xu, Weiwei Yang, Huarong Zeng, Kunyu Zhao, Zhenyong Man, Feifei Wang, Bo Shen, Jiwei Zhai, Xiujian Chou. Polarization Rotation Control Domain Dynamic Response Modulates Piezoelectric Properties of Lead‐Free Thin Films. Advanced Electronic Materials 2022, 8 (11) https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202200611
  32. Ding-Fu Shao, Shu-Hui Zhang, Rui-Chun Xiao, Zi-An Wang, W. J. Lu, Y. P. Sun, Evgeny Y. Tsymbal. Spin-neutral tunneling anomalous Hall effect. Physical Review B 2022, 106 (18) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.L180404
  33. Xu Li, Hao Tian, Hong Jian Zhao, Changsong Xu, Meng Ye, Lan Chen, Hongjun Xiang, Jun-Ming Liu, L. Bellaiche, Di Wu, Yurong Yang. Simultaneously improving Rashba-type and Zeeman effects in two-dimensional multiferroics. Physical Review B 2022, 106 (20) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.L201105
  34. Po-Hsin Shih, Godfrey Gumbs, Danhong Huang, Andrii Iurov, Yonatan Abranyos. Blocked electron transmission/reflection by coupled Rashba–Zeeman effects for forward and backward spin filtering. Journal of Applied Physics 2022, 132 (15) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0107527
  35. Gustav Bihlmayer, Paul Noël, Denis V. Vyalikh, Evgueni V. Chulkov, Aurélien Manchon. Rashba-like physics in condensed matter. Nature Reviews Physics 2022, 4 (10) , 642-659. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00490-y
  36. Alexander S. Frolov, Carolien Callaert, Maria Batuk, Joke Hadermann, Andrey A. Volykhov, Anna P. Sirotina, Matteo Amati, Luca Gregoratti, Lada V. Yashina. Nanoscale phase separation in the oxide layer at GeTe (111) surfaces. Nanoscale 2022, 14 (35) , 12918-12927. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NR02261C
  37. Ryutaro Yoshimi, Minoru Kawamura, Kenji Yasuda, Atsushi Tsukazaki, Kei S. Takahashi, Masashi Kawasaki, Yoshinori Tokura. Nonreciprocal electrical transport in the multiferroic semiconductor (Ge,Mn)Te. Physical Review B 2022, 106 (11) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.115202
  38. Homayoun Jafari, Arunesh Roy, Jagoda Sławińska. Ferroelectric control of charge-to-spin conversion in WTe 2 . Physical Review Materials 2022, 6 (9) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.L091404
  39. Yuyu Yao, Xueying Zhan, Chuyun Ding, Feng Wang, Yanrong Wang, Jia Yang, Zhenxing Wang, Jun He. One-step method to simultaneously synthesize separable Te and GeTe nanosheets. Nano Research 2022, 15 (7) , 6736-6742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-4330-6
  40. Riccardo Bertacco, Giancarlo Panaccione, Silvia Picozzi. From Quantum Materials to Microsystems. Materials 2022, 15 (13) , 4478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134478
  41. Oliver J. Clark, Indrajit Wadgaonkar, Friedrich Freyse, Gunther Springholz, Marco Battiato, Jaime Sánchez‐Barriga. Ultrafast Thermalization Pathways of Excited Bulk and Surface States in the Ferroelectric Rashba Semiconductor GeTe. Advanced Materials 2022, 34 (24) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202200323
  42. Can Zhu, Feng Luo, Jian Wang, Xiong He, Zhen Yang, Shun Zhang, Jiafu Wang, Hongxia Liu, Zhigang Sun. Synthesis mechanism and magnetoresistance effect of millimeter-sized GeTe faceted crystals. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 2022, 165 , 110671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2022.110671
  43. B. Croes, F. Cheynis, P. Müller, S. Curiotto, F. Leroy. Polar surface of ferroelectric nanodomains in GeTe thin films. Physical Review Materials 2022, 6 (6) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.064407
  44. Felix Trier, Paul Noël, Joo-Von Kim, Jean-Philippe Attané, Laurent Vila, Manuel Bibes. Oxide spin-orbitronics: spin–charge interconversion and topological spin textures. Nature Reviews Materials 2022, 7 (4) , 258-274. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00395-9
  45. Sayantika Bhowal, Stephen P. Collins, Nicola A. Spaldin. Hidden k -Space Magnetoelectric Multipoles in Nonmagnetic Ferroelectrics. Physical Review Letters 2022, 128 (11) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.116402
  46. Abdul Khaliq, Roman Minikayev, Monika Arciszewska, Andrei Avdonin, Beata Brodowska, Abbas Khan, Vasyl E. Slynko, Evgen I. Slynko, Lukasz Kilanski. Spin-glass like magnetic ordering in Ge1--(Sn Mn )Te multiferroics. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 2022, 544 , 168695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168695
  47. Mayank Gupta, B. R. K. Nanda. Spin texture as polarization fingerprint of halide perovskites. Physical Review B 2022, 105 (3) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.035129
  48. Nadezhda Nikolaevna Orlova, Anna Timonina, Nikolaii Kolesnikov, Eduard Deviatov. Dynamic Negative Capacitance Response in Gete Rashba Ferroelectric. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 90 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4132969
  49. Jeehoon Jeon, Seong Won Cho, OukJae Lee, Jinki Hong, Joon Young Kwak, Seungwu Han, Soonho Jung, Yunseok Kim, Hye-Won Ko, Suyoun Lee, Kyung-Jin Lee, Hyun Cheol Koo. Field-like spin–orbit torque induced by bulk Rashba channels in GeTe/NiFe bilayers. NPG Asia Materials 2021, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41427-021-00344-6
  50. Yan Li, Yang Li, Peng Li, Bin Fang, Xu Yang, Yan Wen, Dong-xing Zheng, Chen-hui Zhang, Xin He, Aurélien Manchon, Zhao-Hua Cheng, Xi-xiang Zhang. Nonreciprocal charge transport up to room temperature in bulk Rashba semiconductor α-GeTe. Nature Communications 2021, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20840-7
  51. Lin Ju, Xin Tan, Xin Mao, Yuantong Gu, Sean Smith, Aijun Du, Zhongfang Chen, Changfeng Chen, Liangzhi Kou. Controllable CO2 electrocatalytic reduction via ferroelectric switching on single atom anchored In2Se3 monolayer. Nature Communications 2021, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25426-5
  52. Đorđe Dangić, Olle Hellman, Stephen Fahy, Ivana Savić. The origin of the lattice thermal conductivity enhancement at the ferroelectric phase transition in GeTe. npj Computational Materials 2021, 7 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00523-7
  53. C. A. F. Vaz, Y. J. Shin, M. Bibes, K. M. Rabe, F. J. Walker, C. H. Ahn. Epitaxial ferroelectric interfacial devices. Applied Physics Reviews 2021, 8 (4) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0060218
  54. Ravi Kashikar, P. S. Ghosh, S. Lisenkov, B. R. K. Nanda, I. Ponomareva. Chemically and electrically tunable spin polarization in ferroelectric Cd-based hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites. Physical Review B 2021, 104 (23) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.235132
  55. Boris Croes, Fabien Cheynis, Yide Zhang, Cédric Voulot, Kokou Dodzi Dorkenoo, Salia Cherifi-Hertel, Cristian Mocuta, Michaël Texier, Thomas Cornelius, Olivier Thomas, Marie-Ingrid Richard, Pierre Müller, Stefano Curiotto, Frédéric Leroy. Ferroelectric nanodomains in epitaxial GeTe thin films. Physical Review Materials 2021, 5 (12) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.124415
  56. Jinhao Su, Xiting Wang, Chen Shao, Yuzheng Guo, Lede Xian. Strain-controlled Rashba spin-orbit coupling effect in SnS and SnSe monolayers. Materials & Design 2021, 209 , 110005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110005
  57. Sara Varotto, Luca Nessi, Stefano Cecchi, Jagoda Sławińska, Paul Noël, Simone Petrò, Federico Fagiani, Alessandro Novati, Matteo Cantoni, Daniela Petti, Edoardo Albisetti, Marcio Costa, Raffaella Calarco, Marco Buongiorno Nardelli, Manuel Bibes, Silvia Picozzi, Jean-Philippe Attané, Laurent Vila, Riccardo Bertacco, Christian Rinaldi. Room-temperature ferroelectric switching of spin-to-charge conversion in germanium telluride. Nature Electronics 2021, 4 (10) , 740-747. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-021-00653-2
  58. Ruixiang Fei, Li Yang. Room-temperature ferroelectric switching. Nature Electronics 2021, 4 (10) , 703-704. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-021-00660-3
  59. Qian Ye, Yu-Hao Shen, Chun-Gang Duan. Ferroelectric Controlled Spin Texture in Two-Dimensional NbOI 2 Monolayer. Chinese Physics Letters 2021, 38 (8) , 087702. https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/38/8/087702
  60. Siti Amalia Sasmito, Muhammad Anshory, Ibnu Jihad, Moh. Adhib Ulil Absor. Reversible spin textures with giant spin splitting in two-dimensional Ga X Y ( X = Se , Te; Y = Cl , Br, I) compounds for a persistent spin helix. Physical Review B 2021, 104 (11) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.115145
  61. Kwangsik Jeong, Hyangsook Lee, Changwoo Lee, Lim Hyeon Wook, Hyoungsub Kim, Eunha Lee, Mann-Ho Cho. Ferroelectric switching in GeTe through rotation of lone-pair electrons by Electric field-driven phase transition. Applied Materials Today 2021, 24 , 101122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101122
  62. Kunihiro Yananose, Giovanni Cantele, Procolo Lucignano, Sang-Wook Cheong, Jaejun Yu, Alessandro Stroppa. Chirality-induced spin texture switching in twisted bilayer graphene. Physical Review B 2021, 104 (7) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.075407
  63. Hongda Li, Chenpu Li, Boran Tao, Shaonan Gu, Yuanmiao Xie, Hao Wu, Gaojie Zhang, Guofu Wang, Wenfeng Zhang, Haixin Chang. Two‐Dimensional Metal Telluride Atomic Crystals: Preparation, Physical Properties, and Applications. Advanced Functional Materials 2021, 31 (23) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202010901
  64. Mei Fang, Wenchao Zhang, Xiaoyu Wu, Wang Guo, Huayan Xia, Yutai Wang, Wenbin Wang, Jian Shen. Recent advances in tunable spin–orbit coupling using ferroelectricity. APL Materials 2021, 9 (6) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0052553
  65. Hanyoung Ryu, Jae-Mo Lihm, Joonil Cha, Beomyoung Kim, Beom Seo Kim, Wonshik Kyung, Inkyung Song, Yeongkwan Kim, Garam Han, Jonathan Denlinger, In Chung, Cheol-Hwan Park, Seung Ryong Park, Changyoung Kim. Chemical control of the Rashba spin splitting size of α -GeTe(111) surface states by adjusting the potential at the topmost atomic layer. Physical Review B 2021, 103 (24) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.245113
  66. L L Tao, Evgeny Y Tsymbal. Perspectives of spin-textured ferroelectrics. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 2021, 54 (11) , 113001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/abcc25
  67. Jing Shang, Xiao Tang, Liangzhi Kou. Two dimensional ferroelectrics: Candidate for controllable physical and chemical applications. WIREs Computational Molecular Science 2021, 11 (2) https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1496
  68. Subhadeep Bandyopadhyay, I. Dasgupta. Orbital-dependent spin textures in ferroelectric Rashba systems. Physical Review B 2021, 103 (1) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.014105
  69. J. Gosteau, R. Arras, P. Chen, H. J. Zhao, C. Paillard, L. Bellaiche. Spin-orbit effects in ferroelectric Pb Ti O 3 under tensile strain. Physical Review B 2021, 103 (2) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.024416
  70. Can Zhu, Feng Luo, Jian Wang, Xiong He, Zhen Yang, Shun Zhang, Jiafu Wang, Hongxia Liu, Zhigang Sun. Synthesis Mechanism and Magnetoresistance Effect of Millimeter-Sized GeTe Faceted Crystals. SSRN Electronic Journal 2021, 10 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3985323
  71. Ranganayakulu K. Vankayala, Tian‐Wey Lan, Prakash Parajuli, Fengjiao Liu, Rahul Rao, Shih Hsun Yu, Tsu‐Lien Hung, Chih‐Hao Lee, Shin‐ichiro Yano, Cheng‐Rong Hsing, Duc‐Long Nguyen, Cheng‐Lung Chen, Sriparna Bhattacharya, Kuei‐Hsien Chen, Min‐Nan Ou, Oliver Rancu, Apparao M. Rao, Yang‐Yuan Chen. High zT and Its Origin in Sb‐doped GeTe Single Crystals. Advanced Science 2020, 7 (24) https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202002494
  72. Feng Lou, Teng Gu, Junyi Ji, Junsheng Feng, Hongjun Xiang, Alessandro Stroppa. Tunable spin textures in polar antiferromagnetic hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites by electric and magnetic fields. npj Computational Materials 2020, 6 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-020-00374-8
  73. Fei Wang, Heng Gao, Coen de Graaf, Josep M. Poblet, Branton J. Campbell, Alessandro Stroppa. Switchable Rashba anisotropy in layered hybrid organic–inorganic perovskite by hybrid improper ferroelectricity. npj Computational Materials 2020, 6 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-020-00450-z
  74. Ðorđe Dangić, Stephen Fahy, Ivana Savić. Giant thermoelectric power factor in charged ferroelectric domain walls of GeTe with Van Hove singularities. npj Computational Materials 2020, 6 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-020-00468-3
  75. Haihang Wang, Priya Gopal, Silvia Picozzi, Stefano Curtarolo, Marco Buongiorno Nardelli, Jagoda Sławińska. Spin Hall effect in prototype Rashba ferroelectrics GeTe and SnTe. npj Computational Materials 2020, 6 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-020-0274-0
  76. Yiqun Zhao, Libin Tang, Shengyi Yang, Shu Ping Lau, Kar Seng Teng. Infrared photovoltaic detector based on p-GeTe/n-Si heterojunction. Nanoscale Research Letters 2020, 15 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-020-03336-7
  77. Emanuele Longo, Claudia Wiemer, Raimondo Cecchini, Massimo Longo, Alessio Lamperti, Anton Khanas, Andrei Zenkevich, Matteo Cantoni, Christian Rinaldi, Marco Fanciulli, Roberto Mantovan. Fe/Sb 2 Te 3 Interface Reconstruction through Mild Thermal Annealing. Advanced Materials Interfaces 2020, 7 (19) https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202000905
  78. Muhammad Anshory, Moh. Adhib Ulil Absor. Strain-controlled spin-splitting in the persistent spin helix state of two-dimensional SnSe monolayer. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 2020, 124 , 114372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2020.114372
  79. Carlos Mera Acosta, Adalberto Fazzio, Gustavo M. Dalpian, Alex Zunger. Inverse design of compounds that have simultaneously ferroelectric and Rashba cofunctionality. Physical Review B 2020, 102 (14) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.144106
  80. Wenxu Zhang, Zhao Teng, Huizhong Zeng, Hongbin Zhang, Jakub Železný, Wanli Zhang. Tuning Spin Hall Conductivity in GeTe by Ferroelectric Polarization. physica status solidi (b) 2020, 257 (9) https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.202000143
  81. G. Kremer, T. Jaouen, B. Salzmann, L. Nicolaï, M. Rumo, C. W. Nicholson, B. Hildebrand, J. H. Dil, J. Minár, G. Springholz, J. Krempaský, C. Monney. Unveiling the complete dispersion of the giant Rashba split surface states of ferroelectric α − GeTe ( 111 ) by alkali doping. Physical Review Research 2020, 2 (3) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033115
  82. Đorđe Dangić, Éamonn D. Murray, Stephen Fahy, Ivana Savić. Structural and thermal transport properties of ferroelectric domain walls in GeTe from first principles. Physical Review B 2020, 101 (18) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.184110
  83. Paul Noël, Felix Trier, Luis M. Vicente Arche, Julien Bréhin, Diogo C. Vaz, Vincent Garcia, Stéphane Fusil, Agnès Barthélémy, Laurent Vila, Manuel Bibes, Jean-Philippe Attané. Non-volatile electric control of spin–charge conversion in a SrTiO3 Rashba system. Nature 2020, 580 (7804) , 483-486. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2197-9
  84. Chang Liu, Heng Gao, Yongchang Li, Kangying Wang, Lee A. Burton, Wei Ren. Manipulation of the Rashba effect in layered tellurides MTe (M = Ge, Sn, Pb). Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2020, 8 (15) , 5143-5149. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TC00003E
  85. Xiao Tang, Jing Shang, Yuantong Gu, Aijun Du, Liangzhi Kou. Reversible gas capture using a ferroelectric switch and 2D molecule multiferroics on the In 2 Se 3 monolayer. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2020, 8 (15) , 7331-7338. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA00854K
  86. Jagoda Sławińska, Frank T Cerasoli, Priya Gopal, Marcio Costa, Stefano Curtarolo, Marco Buongiorno Nardelli. Ultrathin SnTe films as a route towards all-in-one spintronics devices. 2D Materials 2020, 7 (2) , 025026. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/ab6f7a
  87. Baozeng Zhou. Ferroelectric Rashba semiconductors, AgBiP 2 X 6 (X = S, Se and Te), with valley polarization: an avenue towards electric and nonvolatile control of spintronic devices. Nanoscale 2020, 12 (9) , 5533-5542. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR10865C
  88. Yiqun Zhao, Libin Tang, Shengyi Yang, Kar Seng Teng, Shu Ping Lau. Infrared photodetector based on GeTe nanofilms with high performance. Optics Letters 2020, 45 (5) , 1108. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.385280
  89. Bin Zhou, Shi-Jing Gong, Kai Jiang, Liping Xu, Liangqing Zhu, Liyan Shang, Yawei Li, Zhigao Hu, Junhao Chu. Ferroelectric and dipole control of band alignment in the two dimensional InTe/In 2 Se 3 heterostructure. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2020, 32 (5) , 055703. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ab4d60
  90. Kai Liu, Wei Luo, Junyi Ji, Paolo Barone, Silvia Picozzi, Hongjun Xiang. Band splitting with vanishing spin polarizations in noncentrosymmetric crystals. Nature Communications 2019, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13197-z
  91. Hania Djani, Andres Camilo Garcia-Castro, Wen-Yi Tong, Paolo Barone, Eric Bousquet, Silvia Picozzi, Philippe Ghosez. Rationalizing and engineering Rashba spin-splitting in ferroelectric oxides. npj Quantum Materials 2019, 4 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-019-0190-z
  92. Kunihiko Yamauchi, Paolo Barone, Silvia Picozzi. Bulk Rashba effect in multiferroics: A theoretical prediction for BiCoO 3 . Physical Review B 2019, 100 (24) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.245115
  93. R. Arras, J. Gosteau, H. J. Zhao, C. Paillard, Y. Yang, L. Bellaiche. Rashba-like spin-orbit and strain effects in tetragonal PbTiO 3 . Physical Review B 2019, 100 (17) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.174415
  94. Xingen Liu, Yali Yang, Tao Hu, Guodong Zhao, Chen Chen, Wei Ren. Vertical ferroelectric switching by in-plane sliding of two-dimensional bilayer WTe 2. Nanoscale 2019, 11 (40) , 18575-18581. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR05404A
  95. Zuzhang Lin, Chen Si, Shaorong Duan, Chong Wang, Wenhui Duan. Rashba splitting in bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides controlled by electronic ferroelectricity. Physical Review B 2019, 100 (15) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.155408
  96. Xing-kai Hu, Zhao-xia Pang, Chang-wen Zhang, Pei-ji Wang, Ping Li, Wei-xiao Ji. A two-dimensional robust topological insulator with coexisting ferroelectric and valley polarization. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2019, 7 (30) , 9406-9412. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TC06252H
  97. Carmine Autieri, Paolo Barone, Jagoda Sławińska, Silvia Picozzi. Persistent spin helix in Rashba-Dresselhaus ferroelectric CsBiNb 2 O 7 . Physical Review Materials 2019, 3 (8) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.084416
  98. Haoqiang Ai, Xikui Ma, Xiaofei Shao, Weifeng Li, Mingwen Zhao. Reversible out-of-plane spin texture in a two-dimensional ferroelectric material for persistent spin helix. Physical Review Materials 2019, 3 (5) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.054407
  99. Jagoda Sławińska, Domenico Di Sante, Sara Varotto, Christian Rinaldi, Riccardo Bertacco, Silvia Picozzi. Fe/GeTe(111) heterostructures as an avenue towards spintronics based on ferroelectric Rashba semiconductors. Physical Review B 2019, 99 (7) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.075306
  100. Wencan Jin, Richard M. Osgood. Spectroscopic photoemission and low-energy electron microscopy studies of the surface and electronic structure of two-dimensional materials. Advances in Physics: X 2019, 4 (1) , 1688187. https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2019.1688187
Load all citations
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. GeTe(111) surfaces with opposite FE polarization. (a, a′) Sketch of the Ge and Te planes for the Te and Ge termination, respectively. The distances given on the left refer to the unrelaxed interlayer distances. Only the topmost surface atoms of the slab are shown. The black rectangle denotes a bulk hexagonal unit cell used in DFT calculations as a building block to construct the (111) surface (rhombohedral setting, corresponding to the (0001) in the hexagonal setting). The net FE polarization Pout (Pin) (white arrows) arises from the interatomic dipoles shown with blue and red arrows. (b, b′) Piezoresponse-phase images recorded on STe (SGe) after poling with the tip at +7 V (−7 V) and −7 V (+7 V) over two concentric squares of 1.5 and 0.5 μm per side. The scale bar corresponds to 0.5 μm. (c, c′) PFM-phase signal showing the pristine polarization state and the ferroelectric hysteresis loop, as measured ex-situ on STe and SGe after the S-ARPES experiment. The controlled thermal desorption of the Te capping layer leads to a virgin-state FE polarization Pout and Pin in the two samples, respectively.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. DFT calculations of GeTe(111) surfaces with different terminations. (a) Density of states (spectral function) of Te-terminated GeTe(111) surface with outward polarization, projected on bulk (deep pink) and surface (yellow) principal layers calculated via Green’s functions technique for the semi-infinite model of the surface. Brighter tones of pink (yellow) bands indicate higher intensity of bulk (surface) features. High-symmetry directions used for the calculation of band dispersions are defined in panel d. (b) Corresponding k-resolved spin polarization along the high-symmetry directions. Due to its complexity, we show only the in-plane components perpendicular to k. The in-plane component parallel to wave vector is zero within the whole Brillouin zone. (c) Schematic picture of the spin texture in main bulk bands extracted from panels a and b at E = −0.5 eV; the arrows denote the direction of the in-plane projection of the spin for inner and outer bands. (a′–c′) Same as panels a–c for Ge-terminated surface, with polarization inward. The Fermi level here has been shifted to align the bulk bands of Te- and Ge-terminated surfaces. (d) Brillouin zone of hexagonal surface and bulk unit cells; the gray square marks the area displayed in panels c and c′. Dashed vertical lines in a and a′ indicate the k points used for the spin analysis reported in Figure 4.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. ARPES from Te-rich and Ge-rich samples. Panels a–h refer to the Te-rich sample STe with outward polarization. (a, b) Experimental bands dispersion collected along the principal directions ZA (kx) and ZU (ky) in the Brillouin zone. (c–e) Constant energy maps at 0, 0.25, and 0.5 eV below the Fermi energy. (f–h) Corresponding calculated constant energy maps with yellow and pink indicating the surface and bulk character of states, respectively. Panels labeled by the apex (panels a′–h′) are the same as above but for the Ge-rich sample SGe with inward polarization. The Fermi level in panels f′–h′ is chosen to be consistent with Figure 2.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Spin-resolved ARPES from Te-rich and Ge-rich samples. Panels a–g refer to the Te-rich sample STe with outward polarization. (a) Calculated bulk bands (solid line) along ZU (ky) over the 2nd derivative of the measured band dispersion. (b, c) Spin-polarized spectra and spin asymmetry at fixed wave vector k1 indicated in panel a. The two peaks correspond to the intersection of bulk Rashba bands B1 and B2 with the vertical dashed line at k1 (panel a). (d, e) Spin-polarized spectra and spin asymmetry at opposite wave vector –k1. (f, g) Constant energy maps at 0.18 and 0.5 eV BE, corresponding to the energy of bulk bands B1 and B2 at k1, in nice agreement with the peaks of opposite spin polarizations in panels c and e. Blue and red arrows indicate the sense of circulation of spins: clockwise in the outer band and counterclockwise in the inner one. Panels a′–g′ refer to the case of the Ge-rich sample SGe. (b′–e′) Spin analysis for opposite wave vectors k2 and –k2, where the Rashba splitting is maximized. (f′, g′) Constant energy maps at 0 eV (top of B1) and 0.26 eV BE, corresponding to the energy of bulk bands B1 and B2 at k2 (panel a′). The sense of circulation of spins is opposite to that found for STe: counterclockwise in the outer band and clockwise in the inner band (panel g′).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. FE domains and spin texture patterning at the nanoscale. (a) Sketch of the writing procedure to obtain a sequence of Rashba barriers using the conductive tip of an AFM on a sample with pristine polarization outward, prepared as for sample STe above or by sweeping the tip with a negative voltage (Vtip = −10 V). Lines of inward polarization are written with opposite bias (Vtip = 10 V). The distance between lines is 600 nm, and their width about 300 nm. (b) PFM-phase signal measured along the y direction, perpendicular to the lines. (c) PFM-phase image of the ferroelectric domain pattern.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 29 other publications.

    1. 1
      Allwood, D. A. Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 2005, 309 (5741), 16881692,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1108813
    2. 2
      Karenowska, A. D.; Chumak, A. V.; Serga, A. A.; Hillebrands, B. Handbook of Spintronics; Springer: Dordrecht Heidelberg2015; Vol. 11, pp 15051549.
    3. 3
      Albisetti, E.; Petti, D.; Pancaldi, M.; Madami, M.; Tacchi, S.; Curtis, J.; King, W. P.; Papp, A.; Csaba, G.; Porod, W.; Vavassori, P.; Riedo, E.; Bertacco, R. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11 (6), 545551,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2016.25
    4. 4
      Jansen, R. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11 (5), 400408,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3293
    5. 5
      Rinaldi, C.; Cantoni, M.; Petti, D.; Sottocorno, A.; Leone, M.; Caffrey, N. M.; Sanvito, S.; Bertacco, R. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24 (22), 30373041,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201104256
    6. 6
      Sanvito, S. Nat. Phys. 2010, 6 (8), 562564,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys1714
    7. 7
      Ciudad, D.; Gobbi, M.; Kinane, C. J.; Eich, M.; Moodera, J. S.; Hueso, L. E. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26 (45), 75617567,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201401283
    8. 8
      Datta, S.; Das, B. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1990, 56 (7), 665667,  DOI: 10.1063/1.102730
    9. 9
      Xu, Y.; Awschalom, D. D.; Nitta, J. Handbook of Spintronics, 1st ed.; Springer Publishing Company: New York, 2015.
    10. 10
      Dietl, T. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9 (12), 965974,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat2898
    11. 11
      Picozzi, S. Front. Phys. 2014, 2, 15,  DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2014.00010
    12. 12
      Di Sante, D.; Barone, P.; Bertacco, R.; Picozzi, S. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25 (4), 509513,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201203199
    13. 13
      Liebmann, M.; Rinaldi, C.; Di Sante, D.; Kellner, J.; Pauly, C.; Wang, R. N.; Boschker, J. E.; Giussani, A.; Bertoli, S.; Cantoni, M.; Baldrati, L.; Asa, M.; Vobornik, I.; Panaccione, G.; Marchenko, D.; Sánchez-Barriga, J.; Rader, O.; Calarco, R.; Picozzi, S.; Bertacco, R.; Morgenstern, M. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28 (3), 560565,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201503459
    14. 14
      Manchon, A.; Koo, H. C.; Nitta, J.; Frolov, S. M.; Duine, R. A. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14 (9), 871882,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat4360
    15. 15
      Hoffmann, A.; Bader, S. D. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2015, 4 (4), 47001,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.4.047001
    16. 16
      Rinaldi, C.; Rojas-Sánchez, J. C.; Wang, R. N.; Fu, Y.; Oyarzun, S.; Vila, L.; Bertoli, S.; Asa, M.; Baldrati, L.; Cantoni, M.; George, J. M.; Calarco, R.; Fert, A.; Bertacco, R. APL Mater. 2016, 4 (3), 32501,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4941276
    17. 17
      Nukala, P.; Ren, M.; Agarwal, R.; Berger, J.; Liu, G.; Johnson, A. T. C.; Agarwal, R. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8 (1), 15033,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15033
    18. 18
      Krempasky, J.; Weber, A. P.; Pilet, N.; Warnicke, P.; Ebert, H.; Muff, S.; Bisti, F.; Fanciulli, M.; Volfova, H.; Springholz, G. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7 (May), 13071,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13071
    19. 19
      Chattopadhyay, T.; Boucherle, J. X.; VonSchnering, H. G. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 1987, 20 (10), 14311440,  DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/20/10/012
    20. 20
      Rabe, K. M.; Joannopoulos, J. D. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1987, 36 (12), 66316639,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.36.6631
    21. 21
      Deringer, V. L.; Lumeij, M.; Dronskowski, R. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116 (29), 1580115811,  DOI: 10.1021/jp304455z
    22. 22
      Wuttig, M.; Lüsebrink, D.; Wamwangi, D.; Wełnic, W.; Gilleßen, M.; Dronskowski, R. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6 (2), 122128,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat1807
    23. 23
      Perumal, K. Epitaxial Growth of Ge-Sb-Te based Phase Change Materials, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin , 2013.
    24. 24
      Krempasky, J.; Muff, S.; Pilet, N.; Landolt, G.; Radovi, M.; Shi, M.; Kriegner, D.; Hol, V.; Braun, J.; Dil, J. H. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2016, 94, 205111,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.205111
    25. 25
      Elmers, H. J.; Wallauer, R.; Liebmann, M.; Kellner, J.; Morgenstern, M.; Wang, R. N.; Boschker, J. E.; Calarco, R.; Sánchez-Barriga, J.; Rader, O.; Kutnyakhov, D.; Chernov, S. V.; Medjanik, K.; Tusche, C.; Ellguth, M.; Volfova, H.; Borek, S.; Braun, J.; Minár, J.; Ebert, H.; Schönhense, G. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2016, 94 (20), 201403,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.201403
    26. 26
      Oyarzún, S.; Nandy, A. K.; Rortais, F.; Rojas-Sánchez, J. C.; Dau, M. T.; Noël, P.; Laczkowski, P.; Pouget, S.; Okuno, H.; Vila, L.; Vergnaud, C.; Beigné, C.; Marty, A.; Attané, J. P.; Gambarelli, S.; George, J. M.; Jaffrès, H.; Blügel, S.; Jamet, M. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13857,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13857
    27. 27
      Gong, S. J.; Yang, Z. Q. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 102 (3). 033706 DOI: 10.1063/1.2767373
    28. 28
      Xiao, X. B.; Li, X. M.; Chen, Y. G. Phys. B 2009, 404 (21), 41594161,  DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2009.07.192
    29. 29
      Zhang, L.; Brusheim, P.; Xu, H. Q. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 72 (4), 45347,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.045347
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04829.

    • Additional information about the methods (sample growth, DFT calculations, angular resolved photoemission spectroscopy, and piezoresponse force microscopy), engineering of Te- and Ge-rich GeTe(111) surfaces with opposite polarization, detailed XPS characterization of Te-rich and Ge-rich samples, vectorial analysis of the spin texture of GeTe, and DFT calculations of GeTe(111) surfaces with unstable terminations. (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect