ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Flow Chemistry and Continuous Processing: More Mainstream than Ever!
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Free to Read
Editorial

Flow Chemistry and Continuous Processing: More Mainstream than Ever!
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDF

Organic Process Research & Development

Cite this: Org. Process Res. Dev. 2024, 28, 5, 1269–1271
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00483
Published May 17, 2024

Copyright © Published 2024 by American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use.

This publication is licensed for personal use by The American Chemical Society.

Copyright © Published 2024 by American Chemical Society

SPECIAL ISSUE

This article is part of the Flow Chemistry Enabling Efficient Synthesis 2024 special issue.

We are pleased to present the fifth OPR&D special issue focused on continuous processing and hope that it pays homage to the previous editions by inspiring further momentum in this exciting field! It is safe to say that continuous manufacturing (CM) can now be viewed as a mainstream technology that is widely implemented across fine chemicals, agrochemicals, and pharmaceuticals. It is now commonplace to meet (under)graduate students or postdocs who have experience performing reactions in flow, and the importance of academic research in flow chemistry has never been greater. This is key to supplying the workforce with fresh talent trained in CM, but companies must continue to invest in the training and education of their existing staff to keep a critical mass of CM know-how. While there is no arguing that industrial chemists have often provided leadership regarding a multitude of continuous flow concepts, they frequently rely on academia to pioneer new reaction or equipment types and to “lure” them into applying the new methods to industrial problems. With that can come important academic–industrial collaborations, which in addition to training students in CM has served to expedite much of the cutting-edge research coming out of universities. Of the pharmaceutical companies that possess their own manufacturing capabilities, many if not most have recently implemented divisions or personnel that specialize in flow processes. While this fact is encouraging, it may hide missed opportunities to push the limitations of CM. Many agrochemical and pharmaceutical manufacturers outsource the preparation of advanced intermediates and conduct only the final key steps, which are often less chemically complex, in-house. There are tremendous opportunities for CM upstream from the final sequence, where many of the most difficult chemical transformations are conducted, often by contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs).

It is obvious that CM capabilities are now increasing among CMOs in our industries. Many contract manufacturers in fine chemicals or pharmaceuticals offer various continuous processing capabilities. These range from simple plug-flow reactors (PFRs) or continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTRs) to more sophisticated equipment modalities such as photochemical or packed bed hydrogenation reactors and even the ability to conduct separations such as extraction or crystallization in continuous flow. What is perhaps most encouraging is that some CMOs now possess true competence in these areas and can develop and implement certain CM processes with minimal input from the customer. While this is not true for every case, none of it was true a decade ago when most CMOs had either not begun to implement CM or were only beginning to move in this direction; an IQ survey from ca. 2018 discusses this topic. (1) What caused such a rapid change in the level of adoption of CM technologies among CMOs? The answer is undoubtedly complex, but it certainly includes the manufacturers realizing the benefits of these technologies and increasing CM demand from their clients. The most important benefits of flow have not changed, but CMOs appear to have realized that they must offer CM capabilities or lose clients to competitors. We would be remiss as well to ignore the changes that have occurred in the regulatory space concerning the growing adaptation of CM. With the finalization of ICH Q13, (2) a framework for how CM processes can be developed and communicated to regulators is in place, and the fear of “how will regulators treat my CM submission?” is reduced.

Looking to the future, the merits of conducting so-called “end-to-end continuous manufacturing” can be argued (and are!). End-to-end processes, and even merely linked and simultaneously operating CM processes (e.g., a PFR and a linked separation unit operation) are still relatively uncommon in our industries. We often select a batch–flow hybrid model, where a standalone flow unit operation (normally a reaction) is conducted and the subsequent workup is performed in batch mode. When adjacent flow unit operations are linked, the complexity and challenge of conducting these operations greatly increases, especially if the processes are conducted under rigorous quality constraints such as current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMPs). It is important to note, however, that there is tremendous unrealized potential in continuous separation unit operations. Separations that are run continuously such as countercurrent extraction, thin-film evaporation, or kinetically controlled crystallization can offer miraculous benefits over the batch analog in terms of yield, safety, impurity rejection, resource usage, etc. While many chemists and engineers are now trained to look for opportunities to implement flow reactions, we should also search for what beneficial flow separations might exist when designing and commercializing new syntheses. It is our belief that the next CM special issue will possess articles highlighting increased numbers of separations performed in flow. These capabilities will become as widespread as flow reaction unit operations.

We sincerely thank all the authors who have contributed to this issue with their time and talent. There are many noteworthy articles in the 2024 special issue, but three particularly caught our attention. Many teams have described their development approaches toward covalent KRAS G12C inhibitors, (3) and this previously undruggable target has become popular throughout oncology drug development. (4) Many small-molecule inhibitors feature a densely functionalized biaryl ring system, some of which are atropisomeric. A team from Genentech and Roche (DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00164) describe an excellent application of continuous flow technology in the Grignard exchange and subsequent transmetalation to the arylzinc reagent needed to forge the biaryl bond (Scheme 1). The continuous process enabled operation at higher temperature (−20 vs −70 °C), which was cited by the authors as being an important factor in the ability to scale the process to commercial volumes in available equipment. The continuous process was demonstrated at kilogram scale and gave a 72% isolated yield after the subsequent Negishi coupling.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Grignard Exchange and Transmetalation Steps Developed in Flow En Route to KRAS G12C Inhibitor Divarasib

The formation of N–N bonds can be a powerful method for the synthesis of aromatic heterocycles. A team from TCG GreenChem Inc. (DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00184) demonstrated the use of multistep continuous processing to form 2-cyanopyrrole from pyrrole (Scheme 2). In the next step, pyrrole N-amination is achieved in flow using in situ-generated chloramine. The previously reported base for the amination, sodium hydride, was replaced with safer t-BuOK in the flow process. Finally, the 1-aminopyrrole intermediate is treated with formamidine acetate in batch mode to afford desired pyrrolotriazine target. Several process safety improvements were noted as driving factors in this work, and the yield of the three-step sequence was 52% with high purity and assay. This work is impressive from the perspective that multiple simultaneous unit operations were connected, including separations, to enable multiple challenging chemical transformation to be achieved at once.

Scheme 2

Scheme 2. Synthesis of Triazine 9 Using Multiple Flow Unit Operations with Enabled Hazardous Chemistry

Finally, an interesting example of continuous reactor design has been disclosed by Jiang and co-workers (DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00328). A series of eight mini-CSTRs capable of vertical or horizontal flow was constructed with a built-in LED array, stirring, and cooling capabilities (Figure 1). This reactor design was demonstrated to tolerate use of a solid-supported catalyst, uranyl-doped glass wool, in addition to more standard catalysts. In the case of the glass-wool-supported catalyst, catalyst recycling of at least 12 cycles was demonstrated without loss of activity. The reactor was tested with a handful of photochemical applications, including oxidations and ketone carboxylation. This stands as an example of how improved reactor design can further enable specialized conditions for applications in CM.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Eight CSTRs in series reactor for heterogeneous photocatalytic processes. Reproduced from 10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00328. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society.

We hope that you will enjoy this issue and take the time to read many of the articles in-depth. It was certainly a fun challenge to pull all these articles together for this issue, and we hope that the passion, dedication, and engagement of the authors is evident and infectious. Happy reading!

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Jonathan N. JaworskiProcess Chemistry Development, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., 35 Landsdowne Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9509-3769
    • C. Oliver KappeInstitute of Chemistry, University of Graz, Heinrichstrasse 28, A-8010 Graz, AustriaOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2983-6007
    • Shu KobayashiDepartment of Chemistry, School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8235-4368
    • Anita R. MaguireSchool of Chemistry and School of Pharmacy, Analytical and Biological Chemistry Research Facility, SSPC, the SFI Research Centre for Pharmaceuticals, University College Cork, Cork T12 K8AF, IrelandOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8306-1893
    • Anne O’Kearney-McMullanChemical Development, Pharmaceutical Technology & Development, Operations, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield SK10 2NA, United Kingdom
    • Jaan A. PestiPharma Resource Group Inc., 880 Enterprise Drive, Royersford, Pennsylvania 19468, United States
  • Notes
    Views expressed in this editorial are those of the authors and not necessarily the views of the ACS.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 4 other publications.

  1. 1
    McWilliams, J. C.; Allian, A. D.; Opalka, S. M.; May, S. A.; Journet, M.; Braden, T. M. The Evolving State of Continuous Processing in Pharmaceutical API Manufacturing: A Survey of Pharmaceutical Companies and Contract Manufacturing Organizations. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2018, 22, 11431166,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00160
  2. 2
    Q13 Continuous Manufacturing of Drug Substances and Drug Products: Guidance for Industry. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, March 2023. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/q13-continuous-manufacturing-drug-substances-and-drug-products (accessed 2023-11-18).
  3. 3

    For recent selected references related to KRAS inhibitor synthesis, see:

    (a) Feng, W.-D. Process Research for ZG1077, a KRAS G12C Inhibitor. Org. Process Res. Dev 2022, 26, 29862996,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00284
    (b) Allison, B. D.; Deng, X.; Li, L.-S.; Liang, J.; Mani, N. S.; Ren, P.; Sales, Z. S. Selective Metalation of Functionalized Quinazolines to Enable Discovery and Advancement of Covalent KRAS Inhibitors. Org. Process Res. Dev 2022, 26, 29262936,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00242
    (c) Zhang, L. Development of a Commercial Manufacturing Process for Sotorasib, a First-in-Class KRASG12C Inhibitor. Org. Process Res. Dev 2022, 26, 31153125,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00249
    (d) Yang, X. Hindered Biaryl Bond Construction and Subsequent Diastereomeric Crystallization to Produce an Atropisomeric Covalent KRASG12C Inhibitor ARS-2102. Org. Process Res. Dev 2023, 27, 206216,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00335
    (e) Nikitidis, G. Synthetic and Chromatographic Challenges and Strategies for Multigram Manufacture of KRASG12C Inhibitors. Org. Process Res. Dev 2022, 26, 710729,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.1c00179
  4. 4
    Gabizon, R.; London, N. Hitting KRAS When It’s Down. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 66776678,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00785

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 2 publications.

  1. Hirotsugu Usutani. Lessons Learned in Developing a Manufacturing Facility for Flow Chemistry. Organic Process Research & Development 2025, 29 (6) , 1486-1494. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.5c00082
  2. Rosaria Ciriminna, Rafael Luque, Mario Pagliaro. Reproducible Green Syntheses Using Hybrid Sol‐Gel Catalysts. Chemistry – A European Journal 2024, 30 (50) https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202402071

Organic Process Research & Development

Cite this: Org. Process Res. Dev. 2024, 28, 5, 1269–1271
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00483
Published May 17, 2024

Copyright © Published 2024 by American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

5000

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Grignard Exchange and Transmetalation Steps Developed in Flow En Route to KRAS G12C Inhibitor Divarasib

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2. Synthesis of Triazine 9 Using Multiple Flow Unit Operations with Enabled Hazardous Chemistry

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Eight CSTRs in series reactor for heterogeneous photocatalytic processes. Reproduced from 10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00328. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society.

  • References


    This article references 4 other publications.

    1. 1
      McWilliams, J. C.; Allian, A. D.; Opalka, S. M.; May, S. A.; Journet, M.; Braden, T. M. The Evolving State of Continuous Processing in Pharmaceutical API Manufacturing: A Survey of Pharmaceutical Companies and Contract Manufacturing Organizations. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2018, 22, 11431166,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00160
    2. 2
      Q13 Continuous Manufacturing of Drug Substances and Drug Products: Guidance for Industry. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, March 2023. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/q13-continuous-manufacturing-drug-substances-and-drug-products (accessed 2023-11-18).
    3. 3

      For recent selected references related to KRAS inhibitor synthesis, see:

      (a) Feng, W.-D. Process Research for ZG1077, a KRAS G12C Inhibitor. Org. Process Res. Dev 2022, 26, 29862996,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00284
      (b) Allison, B. D.; Deng, X.; Li, L.-S.; Liang, J.; Mani, N. S.; Ren, P.; Sales, Z. S. Selective Metalation of Functionalized Quinazolines to Enable Discovery and Advancement of Covalent KRAS Inhibitors. Org. Process Res. Dev 2022, 26, 29262936,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00242
      (c) Zhang, L. Development of a Commercial Manufacturing Process for Sotorasib, a First-in-Class KRASG12C Inhibitor. Org. Process Res. Dev 2022, 26, 31153125,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00249
      (d) Yang, X. Hindered Biaryl Bond Construction and Subsequent Diastereomeric Crystallization to Produce an Atropisomeric Covalent KRASG12C Inhibitor ARS-2102. Org. Process Res. Dev 2023, 27, 206216,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00335
      (e) Nikitidis, G. Synthetic and Chromatographic Challenges and Strategies for Multigram Manufacture of KRASG12C Inhibitors. Org. Process Res. Dev 2022, 26, 710729,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.1c00179
    4. 4
      Gabizon, R.; London, N. Hitting KRAS When It’s Down. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 66776678,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00785