ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Explosion Hazards of Sodium Hydride in Dimethyl Sulfoxide, N,N-Dimethylformamide, and N,N-Dimethylacetamide
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
  • Editors Choice
Article

Explosion Hazards of Sodium Hydride in Dimethyl Sulfoxide, N,N-Dimethylformamide, and N,N-Dimethylacetamide
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Qiang Yang*
    Qiang Yang
    Product Design & Process R&D, Corteva Agriscience, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46268, United States
    *E-mail: [email protected]
    More by Qiang Yang
  • Min Sheng
    Min Sheng
    Reactive Chemicals, Corteva Agriscience, Midland, Michigan 48667, United States
    More by Min Sheng
  • James J. Henkelis
    James J. Henkelis
    Product Design & Process R&D, Corteva Agriscience, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46268, United States
  • Siyu Tu
    Siyu Tu
    Product Design & Process R&D, Corteva Agriscience, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46268, United States
    More by Siyu Tu
  • Eric Wiensch
    Eric Wiensch
    Product Design & Process R&D, Corteva Agriscience, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46268, United States
    More by Eric Wiensch
  • Honglu Zhang
    Honglu Zhang
    Product Design & Process R&D, Corteva Agriscience, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46268, United States
    More by Honglu Zhang
  • Yiqun Zhang
    Yiqun Zhang
    Analytical Sciences, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan 48667, United States
    More by Yiqun Zhang
  • Craig Tucker
    Craig Tucker
    Reactive Chemicals, Corteva Agriscience, Midland, Michigan 48667, United States
    More by Craig Tucker
  • David E. Ejeh
    David E. Ejeh
    Reactive Chemicals, Corteva Agriscience, Midland, Michigan 48667, United States
Open PDF

Organic Process Research & Development

Cite this: Org. Process Res. Dev. 2019, 23, 10, 2210–2217
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00276
Published August 10, 2019

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The hazards associated with the thermal decomposition of chemically incompatible sodium hydride solvent matrices are known, with reports from the 1960s detailing the inherent instability of NaH/dimethyl sulfoxide, NaH/N,N-dimethylformamide, and NaH/N,N-dimethylacetamide mixtures. However, these hazards remain underappreciated and undercommunicated, likely as a consequence of the widespread use of these NaH/solvent matrices in synthetic chemistry. We report herein detailed investigations into the thermal stability of these mixtures and studies of the formation of gaseous products from their thermal decomposition. We expect this contribution to promote awareness of these hazards within the wider scientific community, encourage scientists to identify and pursue safer alternatives, and most importantly, help to prevent incidents associated with these reactive mixtures.

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society

SPECIAL ISSUE

This article is part of the Corteva Agriscience special issue.

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The use of NaH as a strong base is commonplace in synthetic organic chemistry. (1) Generally speaking, NaH is easy to handle and store and often offers predictable reactivity and high atom efficiency. As a result, it has been used to facilitate a wide range of chemical transformations. (2) The most commonly used solvents for reactions that use NaH are dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), and N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc) because of their complementary physical properties and their ability to solubilize both organic and inorganic compounds.
The hazards associated with the thermal instability of NaH/DMSO, NaH/DMF, and NaH/DMAc mixtures have been a growing concern within the chemistry community. (3) In addition to the desirable physical properties of DMSO to solubilize both organic and inorganic compounds, dimsyl ion (also known as sodium dimsylate or methyl sulfinyl carbanion), prepared via the reaction of NaH with DMSO under nitrogen at 70–75 °C, has found wide applications in a variety of chemical transformations since the seminal publication by Corey and Chaykovsky in the early 1960s. (4) The thermal instability of dimsyl ion was first highlighted by Corey and Chaykovsky in 1965 (4b) and further studied by many research groups. (5) The first reported explosion resulting from a NaH/DMSO mixture was in 1966, (6) when scientists at the Cancer Chemotherapy Research Department of Mount Zion Hospital and Medical Center (Palo Alto, CA) were scaling up a methylation reaction that employed NaH in DMSO, following a method reported by Russell and Weiner. (7) The scientists noted incomplete conversion when the reaction was carried out using a NaH/DMSO molar ratio of 0.19:1 and thus increased the ratio to 0.24:1. The reaction mixture was maintained at 70 °C for 1 h and then cooled, during which time they observed a sharp temperature spike followed by an explosion that was accompanied by a noxious gas. Immediately after the disclosure of this incident, an analogous explosion from a NaH/DMSO mixture was reported, (8) albeit at a lower temperature (50 °C) and concentration (0.17:1 NaH/DMSO on a molar basis) compared with the conditions employed in the earlier incident. (6)
The thermal decomposition of a NaH/DMF mixture was first observed in the early 1960s, first by Powers et al., who noted energetic decomposition during a NaH-mediated cleavage of a formyl group, (9) and Brimacombe et al. during the alkylation of a carbohydrate using NaH as the base. (10) Nasipuri et al. later reported the aromatization of various cyclohexenones using NaH in DMF, in which the authors acknowledged the decomposition of DMF in the presence of NaH but still carried out their reactions at 100 °C. (11) The researchers proposed that the active base in these reactions was sodium dimethylamine, resulting from the reaction of DMF with NaH.
The hazards associated with the thermal instability of NaH/DMF pose an even greater risk as the reaction scale increases. Reports of large-scale incidents associated with the thermal instability of NaH/DMF were noted in the early 1980s. In the first reported example, conducted on a pilot-plant scale at SmithKline Beckman, a condensation reaction employing NaH in DMF experienced uncontrolled self-heating on 2500 L scale that resulted in the failure of a reactor’s rupture disk. (12) Through a series of calorimetric studies, the research team observed that mixtures of NaH with either DMF or DMAc would begin to self-heat at temperatures as low as 26 °C and that the temperature would rapidly increase to 80 °C, at which point the cooling capacity of the pilot-plant reactor would be exceeded. They further commented that the onset temperature of decomposition was between 40 and 50 °C with carefully dried DMF; however, the detailed thermal stability data resulting from the study were not reported. A second account was reported by Burdick and Jackson Laboratories in the same year, stating that uncontrolled heating of a NaH/DMF reaction mixture began at 40 °C and that the reaction temperature quickly rose to more than 100 °C in less than 10 min. (13) Although full cooling was applied to the reaction vessel, the temperature could not be controlled, and the majority of the DMF solvent evaporated before the reaction subsided. They commented that the reaction had been conducted many times without an incident, which highlights the unpredictable nature of this chemistry. While they suspected the reactor’s material of construction (stainless steel) to be the likely cause of the decomposition, this hypothesis was proven invalid by later studies and data presented in this contribution.
The safety concerns regarding the thermal instability of NaH mixtures were reiterated in two editorials by the previous Organic Process Research & Development Editor-in-Chief, Trevor Laird, (14) who commented that multiple runaway reactions with NaH/DMF mixtures had occurred before the first report was published in 1982. These editorials drew much-needed attention to NaH-containing reactive mixtures and highlighted the importance of scientific communication to raise awareness of these hazards and alert others to such dangers.
Despite the numerous reports intended to caution scientists, the hazards associated with NaH/DMSO, NaH/DMF, and NaH/DMAc reactive mixtures remain underappreciated and inadequately discussed, overshadowed by the sheer number of publications that utilize these hazardous conditions, further diminishing their impact upon the chemistry community. As shown in Figures 13, the number of publications reporting the use of these hazardous conditions each year remains consistently high. Between 2014 and 2018, Organic Letters published 38–62 examples/year (Figure 1), whereas The Journal of Organic Chemistry (Figure 2) and the Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (Figure 3) published 28–46 and 67–94 examples/year, respectively.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Numbers of publications using NaH/DMSO, NaH/DMF, and NaH/DMAc in Organic Letters in 2014–2018.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Numbers of publications using NaH/DMSO, NaH/DMF, and NaH/DMAc in The Journal of Organic Chemistry in 2014–2018.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Numbers of publications using NaH/DMSO, NaH/DMF, and NaH/DMAc in the Journal of Medicinal Chemistry in 2014–2018.

It should be noted that most of the papers published in Organic Process Research & Development employing NaH/DMSO, NaH/DMF, and NaH/DMAc only reported these hazardous conditions in their original discovery-phase routes (Figure 4). In most instances, the authors acknowledged the inherent safety hazards associated with these reactive mixtures and designed their processes away from these mixtures in the final routes. For example, Dahl et al. (15) employed sodium dimsylate as the base in their process for the synthesis of (S)-2-({3-[(S)-5-chloro-1-(4-chlorophenyl)indan-1-yl]propyl}methylamino)propionic acid. The researchers performed a detailed reaction calorimetry evaluation, which indicated that the sodium dimsylate decomposed at temperatures as low as ∼50 °C with an adiabatic temperature rise (ΔTad) of 500 °C in pure DMSO. In contrast, when the DMSO solution of sodium dimsylate was diluted with THF, the lowest observed decomposition temperature was ∼100 °C with a ΔTad of 230 °C. On the basis of these results, the researchers developed a safer process in which the reaction was performed using 4 equiv of DMSO (relative to NaH) in 7 volumes of THF (relative to DMSO) and successfully scaled up this process to 4.1 kg of 60 wt % NaH in mineral oil. Nonetheless, there are examples where these hazardous mixtures were employed in the final reaction conditions, one of which includes a large-scale production that operated using 880 mol of NaH (35.2 kg of 60 wt % NaH in mineral oil). (16) In these cases the authors restated that alternative reaction conditions were not appropriate and that all of the reactions were conducted within safe operating ranges and in a reactor made of compatible materials of construction. (8) It is worth noting that calorimetry studies have proven that these hazards are independent of the reactor material of construction (stainless steel). Furthermore, critical reaction parameters, such as residual water, reaction temperature, and relative concentration of NaH, might help mitigate some of the hazards associated with their use, but they do not completely address the dangers of spontaneous thermal decomposition.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Numbers of publications using NaH/DMSO, NaH/DMF, and NaH/DMAc in Organic Process Research & Development in 1997–2018.

This literature survey shows that reactions with these matrices continue to appear in publications, indicating their relatively common use and suggesting that the safety hazards associated with the thermal instability of NaH/DMSO, NaH/DMF, and NaH/DMAc mixtures remain underappreciated. In this contribution, we communicate the results of detailed thermal stability evaluations of these hazardous combinations in order to promote awareness of these hazards within the chemistry community and encourage scientists to employ safer reaction conditions, with the ultimate goal of preventing incidents relating to these hazards.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

An exothermic reaction is typically maintained at the optimal temperature by applying external cooling until reaction completion and then cooled for workup and isolation of the product. However, in cases of insufficient cooling or cooling failure, unreacted components will further react to release energy, leading to a higher reaction temperature. In a worst-case scenario (e.g., all reactants are accumulated and the reaction continues under adiabatic conditions), the reaction temperature would reach the maximum temperature of a synthesis reaction (MTSR), which is equal to the desired reaction temperature plus ΔTad. (17) In cases when the MTSR exceeds the onset temperature of reaction mixture decomposition, a secondary reaction would be initiated, potentially leading to runaway scenarios. It is thus crucial to evaluate reaction calorimetry and thermal stability hazards of chemical reactions and to design control strategies accordingly in order to ensure that thermal decomposition of the reaction mixture is not triggered. Measurements of the heat of the desired reaction and ΔTad are generally performed using an instrument such as an RC1 reaction calorimeter, a micro reaction calorimeter (μRC), or an EasyMax HF Cal heat flow calorimeter. The thermal stability of reaction mixtures is generally characterized with a differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), a thermal screening unit (Tsu), an accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC), and/or a vent-sizing package (VSP).

1. Thermal Stability Evaluation of NaH/DMSO

ARC analysis of 4.55 g of a mixture of 9.7% NaH, 6.4% mineral oil, and 83.9% DMSO (18) recorded two small exothermic events followed by a significant exothermic event with an onset temperature of 56.8 °C (Figure 5 and Table 1). This exotherm caused the rupture of an ARC cell designed with an average burst pressure of 14 500 psi (Figure 6, left). The force generated from this explosion was strong enough to displace the reactor housing, which sat on top of the ARC reactor (Figure 6, right). The full heat and pressure information on these exothermic events could not be recorded because of this rupture.

Figure 5

Figure 5. ARC heat rate and pressure vs temperature profiles of a NaH/DMSO mixture.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Pictures of (left) a ruptured Hastelloy C ARC cell and (right) the displaced ARC reactor housing resulting from the cell explosion.

Table 1. ARC Analysis of a NaH/DMSO Mixture
sample description9.7% NaH + 6.4% mineral oil + 83.9% DMSO
total sample mass (g)4.5471
Cp of sample (J g–1 °C–1)1.923
ARC cell mass (g)21.9702
set end temperature (°C)350
phi2.06
onset temperature (°C)56.8
peak temperature (°C)
end temperature (°C)
max self-heating rate (°C/min)
total heat (J/g)ruptured
A mixture of 10.3% NaH, 6.9% mineral oil, and 82.8% DMSO was then studied by DSC to better understand the total heat output that could result from an exothermic event strong enough to rupture an ARC cell. As shown in Figure 7, DSC analysis recorded an endothermic event (14 to 39 °C), a minor exothermic event (39 to 120 °C), and two consecutive major exothermic events (120 to 285 °C). The first major exothermic event had a peak temperature of 146 °C and a total heat of −413.5 J/g, while the second major exothermic event had a peak at 255 °C and a total heat of −810.2 J/g. With the combined heat of these two events (−1123.7 J/g), this mixture was considered to be explosive according to the Yoshida correlation. (19) As a direct comparison, pure DMSO decomposes at around 278 °C with a heat output of −911.59 J/g by DSC analysis.

Figure 7

Figure 7. DSC analysis of a NaH/DMSO mixture.

While the first of the two small exothermic events recorded by ARC (21.3 to 26.4 °C, EXO1 in Figure 8) was attributed to the heat of mixing, the second one (36.9 to 43.5 °C, EXO2 in Figure 8), with a total heat of only −93.2 J/g, was most likely caused by the reaction between NaH and DMSO. Surprisingly, this minor exotherm generated a significant amount of noncondensable gases that raised the cell pressure from 129 to 1289 psi between the end of the first exothermic event (109 min) and the start of the major exothermic event (635 min, EXO3 in Figure 8).

Figure 8

Figure 8. ARC temperature and pressure vs time profiles of a NaH/DMSO mixture.

Analysis of the gaseous products from EXO2 was performed using headspace GC/MS. The total ion chromatograms (TIC), overlaid in red (air blank) and black (sample of interest), are compared in Figure 9. The gases detected in the sample referenced against the NIST chemical library supported the presence of ethylene and dimethyl sulfide as the decomposition products, (20) along with DMSO. (21) Undoubtedly, the generation of large volumes of gases poses a significant safety concern and contributed to the explosion during the dominant exothermic event.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Headspace GC/MS analysis of the gaseous products from the thermal decomposition of a NaH/DMSO mixture.

2. Thermal Stability Evaluation of NaH/DMF

The thermal stability of NaH/DMF mixtures was evaluated by ARC analysis. As shown in Figure 10, a significant exothermic decomposition with an onset temperature of 76.1 °C was detected with a mixture of 9.5% NaH, 6.3% mineral oil, and 84.2% DMF. This decomposition produced an exotherm of −528.4 J/g with a maximum self-heating rate of 7.23 °C/min. Increasing the weight ratio of NaH to 24.6% (in 16.4% mineral oil and 59% DMF) significantly lowered the decomposition onset temperature to 39.8 °C and increased the peak self-heating rate to 634.7 °C/min, affording a total exotherm of greater than −601.8 J/g (Table 2). Both tests had substantial cool-down pressures, confirming that the decomposition of DMF resulted in the formation of significant amounts of gaseous products.

Figure 10

Figure 10. ARC heat rate and pressure vs temperature profiles of NaH/DMF mixtures.

Table 2. ARC Analysis of NaH/DMF Mixtures
sample description9.5% NaH + 6.3% mineral oil + 84.2% DMF24.6% NaH + 16.4% mineral oil + 59% DMF
total sample mass (g)4.12343.3896
Cp of sample (J g–1 °C–1)2.0101.930
ARC cell mass (g)21.892614.8079
set end temperature (°C)350200
phi2.111.95
onset temperature (°C)76.139.8
peak temperature (°C)133.8126.2
end temperature (°C)200.7>199.7
max self-heating rate (°C/min)7.23634.7
total heat output (J/g)–528.4>−601.8
Identification of the gaseous products resulting from the thermal decomposition of NaH/DMF was performed using evolved gas analysis (EGA) Micro-GC analysis. In a control experiment with NaH in mineral oil, only the residual water in the EGA Micro-GC system, transfer lines, and sample cup was detected at <100 °C. Release of H2 gas was detected when the temperature reached ∼165 °C and ended at ∼360 °C, indicating that the formation of H2 was caused by the thermal decomposition of NaH rather than hydrolysis by residual water (Figure 11).

Figure 11

Figure 11. Thermogram of NaH in mineral oil by EGA Micro-GC.

The profiles of the gaseous products resulting from the thermal decomposition of the NaH/DMF mixture are shown in Figure 12. Water was detected when the temperature was below 140 °C and was likely the result of residual water in the EGA Micro-GC system, transfer lines, and sample cup. Two separate peaks were detected for H2, the first at 140–270 °C and the second at 270–360 °C. In addition to H2, carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH4), and ethylene or acetylene were also observed within the same temperature range as the first H2 peak. A trace amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) was also found at >300 °C. (22) The formation of these gaseous products suggests that a more complicated, potentially radical decomposition mechanism occurs during the thermal decomposition of NaH/DMF.

Figure 12

Figure 12. Gaseous products (EGA Micro-GC) from the thermal decomposition of NaH/DMF.

3. Thermal Stability Evaluation of NaH/DMAc

Similar to the thermal decomposition of NaH/DMF, ARC analysis of a mixture of 9% NaH, 6% mineral oil, and 85% DMAc evidenced a decomposition onset temperature of 56.4 °C with a peak self-heating rate of 5.78 °C/min and a total heat release of −422.6 J/g. Increasing the content of NaH to 16.2% significantly lowered the decomposition onset temperature to 30.1 °C and substantially increased the maximum self-heating rate to 479.1 °C/min with a total heat output of −528.2 J/g (Figure 13 and Table 3). Again, both experiments resulted in significantly high cool-down pressures, confirming the formation of noncondensable gaseous products from the thermal decomposition. These results confirm that the thermal decomposition of the NaH/DMAc combination could also result in runway scenarios.

Figure 13

Figure 13. ARC heat rate and pressure vs temperature profiles of NaH/DMAc mixtures.

Table 3. ARC Analysis of NaH/DMAc Mixtures
sample description9% NaH + 6% mineral oil + 85% DMAc16.2% NaH + 10.8% mineral oil + 73.1% DMAc
total sample mass (g)4.22405.3631
Cp of sample (J g–1 °C–1)1.9751.943
ARC cell mass (g)22.001014.7578
set end temperature (°C)350200
phi2.111.60
onset temperature (°C)56.430.1
peak temperature (°C)123.0122.7
end temperature (°C)157.8200
max self-heating rate (°C/min)5.78479.1
total heat (J/g)–422.6–528.2
EGA Micro-GC analysis of the NaH/DMAc reaction mixture showed that the release of H2 occurred at a lower temperature (<110 °C) than with the NaH/DMF sample, with the majority of H2 generation occurring in the temperature range of 104–305 °C. Other noncondensable gaseous products, such as CH4, ethane, ethylene or acetylene, and CO, were also observed in this temperature range as well as above 300 °C (Figure 14). (22)

Figure 14

Figure 14. Gaseous products (EGA Micro-GC) from the thermal decomposition of NaH/DMAc.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The inherent thermal instability hazards of NaH/DMSO, NaH/DMF, and NaH/DMAc mixtures have been well-documented in the literature over the past few decades, yet the dangers remain underappreciated and poorly communicated, as evidenced by their continued appearance in hundreds of publications. The data outlined in this contribution confirm that these reactive mixtures undergo exothermic decomposition at relatively low temperatures, occurring concurrently with the generation of noncondensable gases. The dangers associated with NaH/DMSO mixtures were evidenced by an explosion during the ARC analysis that was forceful enough to displace the ARC housing. We expect this report to promote awareness of these hazards in the chemistry community, encouraging scientists to employ safer alternative conditions (e.g., alternative bases, NaH with stable solvents, etc.) (23) and avoid incidents related to these hazards.

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

General

All reagents were commercially available and used as purchased without further purification.

Procedure for ARC Analysis

An accelerating rate calorimeter manufactured by Thermal Hazard Technology was used in this study. A preweighted NaH/mineral oil sample was loaded into a Hastelloy C ARC cell. The ARC sphere was connected to the calorimeter lid and purged with N2. The ARC test was started and put in EXO mode, and then the reaction solvent was manually injected with a syringe. The ARC experiment was performed in heat–wait–search (HWS) mode. A heat step of 5 °C, waiting time of 30 min, and detection threshold of 0.02 °C/min were utilized for each sample.

Procedure for DSC Analysis

A Q2500 differential scanning calorimeter from TA Instruments was used for the constant-heating-rate tests (at 10 °C/min) in this study. A 3.2515 mg sample (a mixture of 10.3% NaH, 6.9% mineral oil, and 82.8% DMSO) was sealed within a gold-plated high-pressure crucible with N2 in the headspace. The sealed crucible had a total internal volume of ∼20 μL and was able to withstand pressures of up to 3000 psi at 400 °C, preventing the release of any reaction materials, products, or byproducts. The DSC analysis of pure DMSO was performed following the same method in a sealed glass capillary tube under N2. (24)

Procedure for EGA Micro-GC Analysis

A Varian model CP-490 Micro-GC system was used for EGA of the NaH/solvent mixtures using a Frontier Py2020iD pyrolysis unit (Figure 15). Approximately 2 mg of NaH (60% dispersion in mineral oil) was added with 15 μL of solvent (DMF or DMAc). The sample was analyzed by EGA Micro-GC using helium as the purge gas through the pyrolysis oven. The ramp rate of the pyrolysis oven was 5 °C/min, and the samples were heated from 40 to 400 °C. The Micro-GC system was used to analyze the gases evolved after the sample was inserted into the pyrolysis oven and the programmed heating cycle was started. An aliquot of the pyrolysis effluent was injected into the Micro GC system every 150 s. The helium flow rate was approximately 13 mL/min.

Figure 15

Figure 15. Flow diagram of the EGA Micro-GC system.

A Molsieve 5A (MS5A) module with argon as the carrier gas was used to separate H2. An MS5A module with helium as the carrier gas was used to separate CO and CH4. A PoraPLOT Q (PPQ) module with helium as the carrier gas was used to separate CO2, CH4, water, ethane, and ethylene/acetylene. A 19CB module with helium as the carrier gas was used to separate DMF and DMAc. Quantitation was performed using a microthermal conductivity detector (TCD). H2, N2, CO, CO2, CH4, ethane, propane, and butane responses were calibrated against certified gas standard mixtures (Matheson Tri-Gas). H2O responses were identified and estimated on the basis of literature references. (25)

Varian CP-490 Quad-Channel Micro-GC Specifications

Serial no. (SN): GC0912B639. Channel 1: 20 m MS5A module with backflush, SN 61685, part no. (PN) 494001370. Channel 2: 10 m MS5A module with backflush, SN 61162, PN 494001360. Channel 3: 10 m PPQ module with backflush, SN 61222, PN 494001430. Channel 4: 6 m 19CB module, SN 61607, PN 492004810. Dell Latitude Laptop PC with Agilent EZChrom Elite software, version 3.2.2 SP2.

Method Settings

Sample time: 40 s. Sample line temperature: 100 °C. Stabilizing time: 5 s. Continuous flow: disabled. Number of flush cycles: 1. Peak simulation: disabled. The channel settings are shown in Table 4.
Table 4. Micro-GC Channel Settings
 channel 1channel 2channel 3channel 4
module20 m MS5A10 m MS5A10 m PPQ6 m 19CB
carrier gasargonheliumheliumhelium
column temp. (°C)146907380
injection temp. (°C)100100100100
injection time (ms)50505050
backflush time (s)101020NA
detectoronononon
TCD temp. limit checkonononon
sensitivityautoautoautoauto
pressure modestaticstaticstaticstatic
initial pressure (psi)30301618
sampling frequency (Hz)100100100100
run time (s)150150150150
acquisition delay (s)0000

Procedure for Headspace GC/MS Analysis

The sample was preheated at 40 °C for 1 h in a headspace vial and analyzed along with an empty headspace vial, which served as the blank. An Agilent 5975C inert XL GC/MSD system with triple-axis detector was used. The instrument was equipped with both direct liquid, SPME, and headspace capabilities. A Supelco Q-PLOT capillary column with dimensions of 30 m × 0.32 mm (cat. no. 24242) was used for the analysis. The agitation temperature of the sample compartment was set at 40 °C. The NIST chemical library was used for the identification of gaseous products.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Min Sheng - Reactive Chemicals, Corteva Agriscience, Midland, Michigan 48667, United States
    • James J. Henkelis - Product Design & Process R&D, Corteva Agriscience, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46268, United States
    • Siyu Tu - Product Design & Process R&D, Corteva Agriscience, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46268, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-6126-5729
    • Eric Wiensch - Product Design & Process R&D, Corteva Agriscience, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46268, United States
    • Honglu Zhang - Product Design & Process R&D, Corteva Agriscience, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46268, United States
    • Yiqun Zhang - Analytical Sciences, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan 48667, United States
    • Craig Tucker - Reactive Chemicals, Corteva Agriscience, Midland, Michigan 48667, United States
    • David E. Ejeh - Reactive Chemicals, Corteva Agriscience, Midland, Michigan 48667, United States
  • Author Contributions

    The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All of the authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The authors thank Dr. Gregory T. Whiteker for his constructive suggestions during the preparation of this manuscript.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 25 other publications.

  1. 1
    Hansley, V. L.; Carlisle, P. J. The Production of Sodium Hydride and Some of its Reactions. Chem. Eng. News 1945, 23 (15), 13321380,  DOI: 10.1021/cen-v023n015.p1332
  2. 2
    Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons, 1995; Vol. 7, pp 45684571.
  3. 3
    (a) Bretherick, L. Dimethyl sulfoxide: Sodium hydride. In Bretherick’s Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, 3rd ed.; Butterworths: London, 1985; p 294.
    (b) Bretherick, L. Sodium hydride: Dimethylformamide. In Bretherick’s Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, 3rd ed.; Butterworths: London, 1985; p 1133.
  4. 4
    (a) Corey, E. J.; Chaykovsky, M. Methylsulfinylcarbanion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 866867,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00864a039
    (b) Corey, E. J.; Chaykovsky, M. Methylsulfinyl Carbanion (CH3-SO-CH2). Formation and Applications to Organic Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 13451353,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01084a033
  5. 5
    (a) Price, G. G.; Whiting, M. C. The sodium derivative of dimethyl sulfoxide, Dimsylsodium. Chem. Ind. (London) 1963, 775776
    (b) Sjoberg, K. Stable solutions of methylsulfinyl carbanion. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 7, 63836384,  DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)70182-1
    (c) Lyness, W. I.; O’Connor, D. E.; Berry, J. S. Sulfinyl carbanions for preparing surface-active detergents. U.S. Patent 3,288,860, Nov 29, 1966.
  6. 6
    French, F. A. Sodium Hydride–DMSO Mixture Explodes. Chem. Eng. News 1966, 44 (15), 48
  7. 7
    Russell, G. A.; Weiner, S. A. Methylation of Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Dimethyl Sulfoxide in the Presence of Base. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 248,  DOI: 10.1021/jo01339a056
  8. 8
    Olson, G. L. Lab explosions. Chem. Eng. News 1966, 44 (24), 7
  9. 9
    Powers, J. C.; Seidner, R.; Parsons, T. G. The cleavage of formyl groups by sodium hydride. Tetrahedron Lett. 1965, 6, 17131716,  DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)90114-X
  10. 10
    Brimacombe, J. S.; Jones, B. D.; Stacey, M.; Willard, J. J. Alkylation of carbohydrates using sodium hydride. Carbohydr. Res. 1966, 2, 167,  DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)81480-9
  11. 11
    Nasipuri, D.; Bhattacharyya, A.; Hazra, B. G. Novel Aromatisation Reaction of Cyclohexenone Derivatives with Sodium Hydride. J. Chem. Soc. D 1971, 13, 660,  DOI: 10.1039/c29710000660
  12. 12
    Buckley, J.; Webb, R. L.; Laird, T.; Ward, R. J. Report on thermal reaction. Chem. Eng. News 1982, 60 (28), 5
  13. 13
    DeWall, G. Sodium hydride and DMF. Chem. Eng. News 1982, 60 (37), 5
  14. 14
    (a) Laird, T. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2002, 6, 876,  DOI: 10.1021/op025601k
    (b) Laird, T. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2005, 9, 951,  DOI: 10.1021/op050197l
  15. 15
    Dahl, A. C.; Mealy, M. J.; Nielsen, M. A.; Lyngsø, L. O.; Suteu, C. Route Scouting and Process Development of Lu AA26778. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2008, 12, 429,  DOI: 10.1021/op7002584
  16. 16
    Ishii, Y.; Fujimoto, R.; Mikami, M.; Murakami, S.; Miki, Y.; Furukawa, Y. Practical syntheses of Chiral α-Amino Acids and Chiral Half-Esters by Kinetic Resolution of Urethane-Protected α-Amino Acid N-Carboxyanhydrides and Desymmetrization of Cyclic meso-Anhydrides with New Modified Cinchona Alkaloid Catalysts. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2007, 11, 609,  DOI: 10.1021/op700023h
  17. 17
    Stoessel, F. Thermal Safety of Chemical Processes: Risk Assessment and Process Design; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2008.
  18. 18

    This combination is a result of using 60% NaH in mineral oil for the evaluations.

  19. 19
    Yoshida, T.; Yoshizawa, F.; Itoh, M.; Matsunaga, T.; Watanabe, M.; Tamura, M. Prediction of Fire and Explosion Hazards of Reactive Chemicals (I). Estimation of Explosive Properties of Self-Reactive Chemicals from SC-DSC Data. Kogyo Kayaku 1987, 48, 311316
  20. 20
    Brandes, B. T.; Smith, D. K. Calorimetric study of the exothermic decomposition of dimethyl sulfoxide. Process Saf. Prog. 2016, 35, 374391,  DOI: 10.1002/prs.11802
  21. 21

    This method was not designed for the detection of hydrogen gas. It would have coeluted with the carrier gas helium if it was present as part of the decomposition products.

  22. 22

    The presence of dimethylamine (Me2NH) in the decomposition products has been reported previously. (12) Detection of Me2NH was not attempted during this analysis.

  23. 23
    (a) Prashad, M.; Har, D.; Hu, B.; Kim, H.-Y.; Girgis, M. J.; Chaudhary, A.; Repič, O.; Blacklock, T. J.; Marterer, W. Process Development of a Large-Scale Synthesis of TKA731: A Tachykinin Receptor Antagonist. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2004, 8, 330340,  DOI: 10.1021/op0341824
    (b) McCabe Dunn, J. M.; Duran-Capece, A.; Meehan, B.; Ulis, J.; Iwama, T.; Gloor, G.; Wong, G.; Bekos, E. The Safe Use of Sodium Hydride on Scale: The Process Development of a Chloropyrimidine Displacement. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2011, 15, 1442,  DOI: 10.1021/op200114t
    (c) Yang, Q.; Li, X.; Lorsbach, B. A.; Muhuhi, J. M.; Roth, G. A.; Gray, K.; Podhorez, D. E. Development of a Scalable Process for the Insecticidal Candidate Tyclopyrazoflor. Part 2. Fit-for-Purpose Optimization of the Route to Tyclopyrazoflor Featuring [3 + 2] Cyclization of 3-Hydrazinopyridine·2HCl and Methyl Acrylate. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2019,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00128
  24. 24
    (a) Tou, J. C.; Whiting, L. F. A cradle-glass ampoule sample container for differential scanning calorimetric analysis. Thermochim. Acta 1980, 42, 21,  DOI: 10.1016/0040-6031(80)87111-5
    (b) Yang, Q.; Canturk, B.; Gray, K.; McCusker, E.; Sheng, M.; Li, F. Evaluation of Potential Safety Hazards Associated with the Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling of Aryl Bromides with Vinylboron Species. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2018, 22, 351359,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00001
    (c) Yang, Q.; Cabrera, P. J.; Li, X.; Sheng, M.; Wang, N. X. Safety Evaluation of the Copper-Mediated Cross-Coupling of 2-Bromopyridines with Ethyl Bromodifluoroacetate. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2018, 22, 14411447,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00261
    (d) Yang, Q.; Sane, N.; Klosowski, D.; Lee, M.; Rosenthal, T.; Wang, N. X.; Wiensch, E. Mizoroki–Heck Cross-Coupling of Bromobenzenes with Styrenes: Another Example of Pd-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling with Potential Safety Hazards. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2019,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00126
    (e) Sheng, M.; Valco, D.; Tucker, C.; Cayo, E. Practical Use of Differential Scanning Calorimetry for Thermal Stability Hazard Evaluation. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2019,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00266
  25. 25
    Dietz, W. A. Response factors for gas chromatographic analyses. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1967, 5, 6871,  DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/5.2.68

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 107 publications.

  1. Russell F. Algera, Sergei Tcyrulnikov, Giselle P. Reyes. Mechanism-Based Regiocontrol in SNAr: A Case Study of Ortho-Selective Etherification with Chloromagnesium Alkoxides. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2024, 146 (41) , 28095-28109. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c07427
  2. Jeonguk Kweon, Minjeong Lee, Dongwook Kim, Sukbok Chang. Enhancing the Sustainability and Scalability of Transition-Metal-Free Stereoretentive Decarboxylative Amidation with Dioxazolones. Organic Process Research & Development 2024, 28 (9) , 3691-3697. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00247
  3. Daniel P. Walker, Ronald J. VanderRoest, Tapan Maji, Shankar Ramanathan, Matthew J. Birchmeier, Michelle Y. Johnson, Calin D. Sferdean, Randall L. DeJong, Thomas Geurden. A New Process To Prepare 1-(4-Chlorobenzyl)-1H-imidazole-4,5-dicarboxamide, a Potential Anticoccidial Agent. Organic Process Research & Development 2024, 28 (9) , 3724-3734. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00278
  4. Ali Afshar, Masoud Rahimi, Peyman Salehi. Synthesis and Impurity Profiling of a Vital Intermediate in Gabapentin and Bispidine Derivative Pathways by Response Surface Methodology. Organic Process Research & Development 2024, 28 (8) , 3171-3181. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00086
  5. Patrick B. Brady, Kaid C. Harper, Bryan K. Sorensen, Stephen N. Greszler, Chunqiu Lai, Alan S. Florjancic, Gang Zhao, Bhadra H. Shelat, Gregory E. Storer, Rodger F. Henry, T. Matthew Hansen. Stereoselective Synthesis of ABBV-992 Enabled by a Flow Diazotization and a Partial Reduction of a Pyridone. Organic Process Research & Development 2024, 28 (8) , 3152-3160. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00077
  6. Carmela Molinaro, Nicholas Wong, Nicholas A. White, Lauren E. Sirois, Raphael Bigler, Quentin P. Bindschaedler, Steven Do, Sushant Malhotra, Francis Gosselin. Fit-for-Purpose Synthesis of a KRASG12C Covalent Inhibitor, via a Diastereoselective Hayashi Arylation. Organic Process Research & Development 2024, 28 (8) , 3313-3325. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00211
  7. U Bin Kim, Srinivas Samala, Jaehun Jung, Juyoung Song, Kee-Young Lee, Chang-Young Oh, Hyunik Shin. Proprietary Synthesis of the C27–C35 Fragment of Eribulin and Its Elaboration toward the C14–C35 Subunit. Organic Process Research & Development 2024, 28 (7) , 2832-2843. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00150
  8. Kazuya Okamoto, Tatsuhiko Ueno, Yoshio Hato, Yasunori Kawaguchi, Toshikazu Hakogi, Shohei Majima, Takafumi Ohara, Motoyuki Hagihara, Norihiko Tanimoto, Takayuki Tsuritani. Stereoselective Synthesis of Baloxavir Marboxil Using Diastereoselective Cyclization and Photoredox Decarboxylation of l-Serine. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2024, 89 (14) , 9937-9948. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.4c00799
  9. Elsa J. Koninckx, Paul M. Braswell, Jérôme Ferreira, Brandon Nutter, Jun J. Qi, Martin Schiller. Thermal Decomposition of Dimethylacetamide (DMAc). Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2024, 63 (28) , 12452-12458. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c01601
  10. Stefan Reber, Nicole Blumer, Daniel Leuenberger, Tony Fleischer, Dorte Renneberg, Stefan Abele, Gabriel Schäfer. Scalable Synthesis of C5aR1 Antagonist ACT-1014-6470 via N7-Selective Reductive Amination of an Unprotected Pyrazole Starting Material and Intramolecular Urea Formation with 1,1′-Carbonyl-di(1,2,4-triazol) (CDT). Organic Process Research & Development 2024, 28 (6) , 2269-2283. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00492
  11. Maksim Vasilev, Aravind S. Gangu, Praveen Gajula, Nathaniel D. Kaetzel, Vasudevan Natarajan, Bimbisar Desai, Gopal Sirasani, Bo Qu, Chris H. Senanayake. Development of Continuous Flow Processes to Access Pyrrolo[2,1-f][1,2,4]triazin-4-amine: An RSM for the Synthesis of Antiviral Drugs. Organic Process Research & Development 2024, 28 (5) , 1556-1566. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00184
  12. Jae-Hong Kweon, Hyungjin Shin, Min Kyoung Lee, Sung Ah Lee, Pargat Singh, Kyeongwon Moon, In Su Kim. Manufacturing Process Development of Tegoprazan as a Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker (P-CAB). Organic Process Research & Development 2024, 28 (4) , 1159-1169. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00005
  13. Thomas Carr, Sam Beddoe, Stephen Johns, Jonathan Hull, Tom Stowe, Jonathan Moore, James Brown, Adrian Maddaford, Etienne Rochette, Michel Bernatchez, Martin Jean, Jean Francois Parent, Connor Barrett, Jeffrey B. Sperry, Daniel Richter. Development of a Safe and Scalable Method to Prepare 3-Bromo-N-alkyl-1,6-naphthyridones via Enamine Cyclization. Organic Process Research & Development 2024, 28 (4) , 1083-1088. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00479
  14. Angelo Martinelli, Andrea Nitti, Riccardo Po, Dario Pasini. C2-Symmetrical 3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene Monomers through a Divergent Approach. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2024, 89 (6) , 4237-4243. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c02972
  15. Kenny Delacroix, Baptiste Fours, Solenne Kowalkowski, Vincent Revil-Baudard, Marc Perez, Laurent Petit. Process Development of a Novel Route to Rilpivirine Hydrochloride. Organic Process Research & Development 2024, 28 (2) , 524-531. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00326
  16. Praveen Bollini, Moiz Diwan, Pankaj Gautam, Ryan L. Hartman, Daniel A. Hickman, Martin Johnson, Motoaki Kawase, Matthew Neurock, Gregory S. Patience, Alan Stottlemyer, Dionisios G. Vlachos, Benjamin Wilhite. Vision 2050: Reaction Engineering Roadmap. ACS Engineering Au 2023, 3 (6) , 364-390. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsengineeringau.3c00023
  17. Kristýna Jelínková, Aneta Závodná, Jiří Kaleta, Petr Janovský, Filip Zatloukal, Marek Nečas, Zdeňka Prucková, Lenka Dastychová, Michal Rouchal, Robert Vícha. Two Squares in a Barrel: An Axially Disubstituted Conformationally Rigid Aliphatic Binding Motif for Cucurbit[6]uril. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2023, 88 (22) , 15615-15625. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01556
  18. Biyue Lin, Shuming Wu, Qingbo Xiao, Jingping Kou, Ji’an Hu, Zhu Zhu, Xinglin Zhou, Jiang Weng, Zhongqing Wang. Development of Scalable Processes for the Preparation of 4-(chloromethyl)-1-cyclohexyl-2-(trifluoromethyl)benzene: A Key Intermediate for Siponimod. Organic Process Research & Development 2023, 27 (8) , 1474-1484. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00170
  19. Flavio S.P. Cardoso, Appasaheb L. Kadam, Ryan C. Nelson, John W. Tomlin, Dipendra Dahal, Christopher S. Kuehner, Gard Gudvangen, Anthony J. Arduengo, III, Justina M. Burns, Sarah L. Aleshire, David R. Snead, Fengrui Qu, Ken Belmore, Saeed Ahmad, Toolika Agrawal, Joshua D. Sieber, Kai Oliver Donsbach. Practical and Scalable Two-Step Process for 6-(2-Fluoro-4-nitrophenyl)-2-oxa-6-azaspiro[3.3]heptane: A Key Intermediate of the Potent Antibiotic Drug Candidate TBI-223. Organic Process Research & Development 2023, 27 (7) , 1390-1399. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00148
  20. Dattatray L. Tarange, Nagaraj Nayak, Anil Kumar. Continuous Flow Synthesis of Substituted 3,4-Propylenedioxythiophene Derivatives. Organic Process Research & Development 2023, 27 (2) , 358-366. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00356
  21. Deeksha, Elagandhula Sathish, Kiran, Ritesh Singh. Access to Sterically Hindered Thioethers (α-Thioamides) Under Mild Conditions Using α-Halohydroxamates: Application toward 1,4-Benzothiazinones and 4,1-Benzothiazepinones. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2023, 88 (2) , 901-908. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.2c02274
  22. Gregory L. Beutner, David T. George. Opportunities for the Application and Advancement of the Corey–Chaykovsky Cyclopropanation. Organic Process Research & Development 2023, 27 (1) , 10-41. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00315
  23. Stephen N. Greszler, Gang Zhao, Bhadra Shelat, Eric A. Voight. Enabling Asymmetric Synthesis of ABBV-3748, a Corrector Compound for the Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis. Organic Letters 2022, 24 (40) , 7305-7308. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.2c02729
  24. Daniel S. Lippe, Omar Elghawy, Adam M. Zucker, Evan S. K. Yanagawa, Erin Mathews, Yusef G. Ahmed, Paige N. D’Elia, Sabrina Bimson, Ryan R. Walvoord. Synthesis of 7-Aminocoumarins from 7-Hydroxycoumarins via Amide Smiles Rearrangement. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (39) , 35269-35279. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c04653
  25. Thomas Keenan, Alexandre Jean, Stellios Arseniyadis. Phase-Transfer-Catalyzed Alkylation of Hydantoins. ACS Organic & Inorganic Au 2022, 2 (4) , 312-317. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsorginorgau.1c00058
  26. Qiang Yang, Yinsong Zhao, Dawei Ma. Cu-Mediated Ullmann-Type Cross-Coupling and Industrial Applications in Route Design, Process Development, and Scale-up of Pharmaceutical and Agrochemical Processes. Organic Process Research & Development 2022, 26 (6) , 1690-1750. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00050
  27. Qiang Yang, (Guest Editor, Organic Process Research & Development)S. Camille Peres, (Guest Editor, ACS Chemical Health & Safety)Qingsheng Wang, (Guest Editor, ACS Chemical Health & Safety)Ashok G. Dastidar (Guest Editor, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries). Process Safety from Bench to Pilot to Plant. ACS Chemical Health & Safety 2022, 29 (2) , 110-113. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chas.2c00001
  28. Masahiro Abe, Sayasa Nitta, Erina Miura, Tetsutaro Kimachi, Kiyofumi Inamoto. Nitrile Synthesis via Desulfonylative–Smiles Rearrangement. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2022, 87 (6) , 4460-4467. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.1c03011
  29. Feng Peng, Lushi Tan, Lu Chen, Stephen M. Dalby, Daniel A. DiRocco, Jianjun Duan, Minyi Feng, Guan Gong, Haiheng Guo, J. Caleb Hethcox, Lu Jin, Heather C. Johnson, Jungchul Kim, Diane Le, Yipeng Lin, Wenjun Liu, Jun Shen, Yimei Wan, Chengqian Xiao, Bangping Xiang, Qun Xiang, Jing Xu, Luliang Yan, Weiyi Yang, Honglin Ye, Yanpei Yu, Jun Zhang. Manufacturing Process Development for Belzutifan, Part 1: A Concise Synthesis of the Indanone Starting Material. Organic Process Research & Development 2022, 26 (3) , 508-515. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.1c00236
  30. Alexander D. Huters, James Stambuli, Russell C. Klix, Mark A. Matulenko, Vincent S. Chan, Justin Simanis, David R. Hill, Rajarathnam E. Reddy, Timothy B. Towne, John R. Bellettini, Brian J. Kotecki, Benoit Cardinal-David, Jianguo Ji, Eric A. Voight, Minshan Shou, Selvakumar Balaraman, Abhishek Ashok, Soma Ghosh. Scalable Asymmetric Syntheses of Foslevodopa and Foscarbidopa Drug Substances for the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2022, 87 (4) , 1986-1995. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.1c00905
  31. Qiang Yang, (Guest Editor, Organic Process Research & Development)S. Camille Peres, (Guest Editor, ACS Chemical Health & Safety)Qingsheng Wang, (Guest Editor, ACS Chemical Health & Safety)Ashok G. Dastidar (Guest Editor, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries). Process Safety from Bench to Pilot to Plant. Organic Process Research & Development 2022, 26 (2) , 235-238. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00008
  32. Marina Tsuzaki, Shin Ando, Tadao Ishizuka. Etherification via Aromatic Substitution on 1,3-Disubstituted Benzene Derivatives. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2022, 87 (2) , 1357-1365. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.1c02670
  33. Sarabindu Roy, Ajay Yadaw, Subho Roy, Gopal Sirasani, Aravind Gangu, Jack D. Brown, Joseph D. Armstrong, III, Rodger W. Stringham, B. Frank Gupton, Chris H. Senanayake, David R. Snead. Facile and Scalable Methodology for the Pyrrolo[2,1-f][1,2,4]triazine of Remdesivir. Organic Process Research & Development 2022, 26 (1) , 82-90. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.1c00071
  34. Longrui Chen, Lisa M. Barton, Julien C. Vantourout, Yinghua Xu, Chengpu Chu, Eric C. Johnson, Jesse J. Sabatini, Phil S. Baran. Electrochemical Cyclobutane Synthesis in Flow: Scale-Up of a Promising Melt-Castable Energetic Intermediate. Organic Process Research & Development 2021, 25 (12) , 2639-2645. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00270
  35. Julakanti Satyanarayana Reddy, Chih-Ming Chen, Mohane Selvaraj Coumar, Hsu-Yi Sun, Na Sun, Hsing-Pang Hsieh. Development of a Robust Scale-Up Synthetic Route for BPR1K871: A Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Solid Tumors. Organic Process Research & Development 2021, 25 (4) , 817-830. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00515
  36. Ming Sheng, Qiang Yang, Darren Huff, Andrew G. Schafer, Craig Tucker, Daniel Valco. Thermal Instability and Associated Potential Safety Hazards of Rhodium(I) Precatalyst Complexes with Weakly Coordinated Ligands. Organic Process Research & Development 2021, 25 (4) , 1054-1064. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.1c00061
  37. Kallol Basu, Dan Lehnherr, Gary E. Martin, Richard A. Desmond, Yu-hong Lam, Feng Peng, John Y. L. Chung, Rebecca A. Arvary, Michael A. Zompa, Si-Wei Zhang, Jinchu Liu, Zachary E. X. Dance, Patrick Larpent, Ryan D. Cohen, Francisco J. Guzman, Nicholas J. Rogus, Michael J. Di Maso, Hong Ren, Kevin M. Maloney. Development of a Green and Sustainable Manufacturing Process for Gefapixant Citrate (MK-7264) Part 3: Development of a One-Pot Formylation–Cyclization Sequence to the Diaminopyrimidine Core. Organic Process Research & Development 2020, 24 (11) , 2462-2477. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00246
  38. Dinesh J. Paymode, Flavio S. P. Cardoso, Toolika Agrawal, John W. Tomlin, Daniel W. Cook, Justina M. Burns, Rodger W. Stringham, Joshua D. Sieber, B. Frank Gupton, David R. Snead. Expanding Access to Remdesivir via an Improved Pyrrolotriazine Synthesis: Supply Centered Synthesis. Organic Letters 2020, 22 (19) , 7656-7661. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.0c02848
  39. Yoshikuni Deguchi, Masafumi Kono, Yuto Koizumi, Yu-ichiro Izato, Atsumi Miyake. Study on Autocatalytic Decomposition of Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO). Organic Process Research & Development 2020, 24 (9) , 1614-1620. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00113
  40. Qiang Yang, Min Sheng, Yongliang Huang. Potential Safety Hazards Associated with Using N,N-Dimethylformamide in Chemical Reactions. Organic Process Research & Development 2020, 24 (9) , 1586-1601. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00330
  41. Shin Ando, Marina Tsuzaki, Tadao Ishizuka. Aryl Ether Syntheses via Aromatic Substitution Proceeding under Mild Conditions. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2020, 85 (17) , 11181-11189. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.0c01250
  42. Markus Baenziger, Marcel Baierl, Krishnaswamy Devanathan, Sumesh Eswaran, Peng Fu, Bjoern Gschwend, Michael Haller, Gopu Kasinathan, Nikola Kovacic, Audrey Langlois, Yongfeng Li, Friedrich Schuerch, Xiaodong Shen, Yinbo Wan, Regina Wickendick, Siwei Xie, Kai Zhang. Synthesis Development of the Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD) LSZ102 from a Suzuki Coupling to a C–H Activation Strategy. Organic Process Research & Development 2020, 24 (8) , 1405-1419. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00076
  43. Jianhua Jia, Huiqiang Wei, Yuqing Duan, Hongxin Ning, Jiang Yu, Yuan Zhu, Wenbin Hou, Yiliang Li. An Improved Synthesis of the Triethylene Glycol-Substituted 4-(N-Methyl-N-Boc-Amino)Styrylpyridine. ACS Omega 2020, 5 (31) , 19446-19452. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01244
  44. Qiang Yang, Min Sheng, Xiaoyong Li, Craig Tucker, Suhelen Vásquez Céspedes, Nicola J. Webb, Gregory T. Whiteker, Jing Yu. Potential Explosion Hazards Associated with the Autocatalytic Thermal Decomposition of Dimethyl Sulfoxide and Its Mixtures. Organic Process Research & Development 2020, 24 (6) , 916-939. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00159
  45. Lauren E. Sirois, David Lao, Jie Xu, Rémy Angelaud, Jerry Tso, Brandon Scott, Paroma Chakravarty, Sushant Malhotra, Francis Gosselin. Process Development Overcomes a Challenging Pd-Catalyzed C–N Coupling for the Synthesis of RORc Inhibitor GDC-0022. Organic Process Research & Development 2020, 24 (4) , 567-578. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00012
  46. Ivan A. Bidusenko, Elena Yu. Schmidt, Nadezhda I. Protsuk, Igor A. Ushakov, Alexander V. Vashchenko, Andrei V. Afonin, Boris A. Trofimov. KOBut/DMSO-Mediated α-C–H Vinylation of N-Benzyl Ketimines with Acetylene Gas: Stereoselective Synthesis of (E,Z)-2-Azadienes. Organic Letters 2020, 22 (7) , 2611-2614. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00564
  47. Allison Devitt, Darren Hsu, Jos van den Eijnde, Michael B. Blayney, Rachel D. Dicken. Literature Highlights. ACS Chemical Health & Safety 2020, 27 (2) , 83-85. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chas.0c00023
  48. David L. Hughes. Review of Synthetic Routes and Crystalline Forms of the Antiandrogen Oncology Drugs Enzalutamide, Apalutamide, and Darolutamide. Organic Process Research & Development 2020, 24 (3) , 347-362. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00005
  49. Yu Zhang, Shilin Chen, Yuxiu Liu, Qingmin Wang. Route Evaluation and Ritter Reaction Based Synthesis of Oxazoline Acaricide Candidates FET-II-L and NK-12. Organic Process Research & Development 2020, 24 (2) , 216-227. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00494
  50. Qiang Yang, Nicholas R. Babij, Steffen Good. Potential Safety Hazards Associated with Pd-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions. Organic Process Research & Development 2019, 23 (12) , 2608-2626. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00377
  51. Chunming Zhang, Ron Leng, Chris Hamilton, Min Sheng, Siyu Tu, Binghe Gu, Bruce Bell. Process Development for the Crop Safener Cloquintocet Acid. Organic Process Research & Development 2019, 23 (10) , 2218-2224. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00279
  52. Gregory T. Whiteker. Applications of the 12 Principles of Green Chemistry in the Crop Protection Industry. Organic Process Research & Development 2019, 23 (10) , 2109-2121. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00305
  53. Xiuying Wu, Junxia He, Rongrong Hu, Ben Zhong Tang. NaOH‐Assisted Multicomponent Reaction and Polymerizations of Elemental Sulfur, Diisocyanides, and Diols to Access Functional Poly( O ‐thiocarbamate)s. Chemistry – An Asian Journal 2024, 142 https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.202401022
  54. Calin D. Sferdean, Tuba Jaherun, Denis M. Sobieray, Rajendran Vairagoundar, Ronald J. VanderRoest, Valerie S. Westrick, Samir Ghosh, Kent A. Mills, Dominic Millheim, Jason D. Koch, Darryl Hester, Kamran Falahatpisheh, Daniel P. Walker. Development of scalable processes to prepare a key chiral, nonracemic intermediate en route to LpxC inhibitors for Gram-negative infections. Tetrahedron Letters 2024, 152 , 155336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2024.155336
  55. Leonan Augusto Massete Perá, Guilherme Barbosa Stella, José Renato Campos, Josimar Fernando da Silva. Limits of the harmonic approach for the Morse potential. Physica Scripta 2024, 99 (8) , 085403. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad5ac2
  56. Stephen J. Sujansky, Garrett A. Hoteling, Jeffrey S. Bandar. A strategy for the controllable generation of organic superbases from benchtop-stable salts. Chemical Science 2024, 15 (26) , 10018-10026. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SC02524E
  57. Rosaria Schettini, Maria Rosaria Acocella. State Of The Art Of Supported Phase Transfer‐Catalysts Onium Salt‐Based. ChemCatChem 2024, 16 (11) https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202301425
  58. Delio Santalucia, Mattia Bondanza, Filippo Lipparini, Matyas Ripszam, Nicolò Rossi, Alessandro Mandoli.. Breaking the Rules: On the Relative Stability of Some Methylencyclopropane and Methylcyclopropene Derivatives. Chemistry – A European Journal 2024, 30 (29) https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202400431
  59. Aggie Lawer, Finlay P. Player, Vicky M. Avery, Daniel J. Foley. Synthesis of Quinine‐Inspired Antimalarials by Ni‐Catalysed Cross Electrophile Coupling. Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis 2024, 366 (9) , 2090-2100. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsc.202301458
  60. Jenna N. Humke, Roman G. Belli, Erin E. Plasek, Sallu S. Kargbo, Annabel Q. Ansel, Courtney C. Roberts. Nickel binding enables isolation and reactivity of previously inaccessible 7-aza-2,3-indolynes. Science 2024, 384 (6694) , 408-414. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi1606
  61. Cesar A. D. Zaragoza, Gabriel S. G. Peagno, Ana J. A. Minguine, Airton G. Salles. Metal-free synthesis of propargylamines via light-mediated persulfate activation and phase-transfer catalysis. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry 2024, 22 (12) , 2359-2364. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4OB00218K
  62. Daniela Imperio, Filippo Valloni, Luigi Panza. Alternative Routes to 4,6‐ O ‐Benzylidene β‐Thioglycosides. Helvetica Chimica Acta 2024, 107 (2) https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.202300193
  63. Stefan Diethelm, Gunther Schmidt, Thierry Sifferlen, Amandine Boller, Laurent Cornu, Christine Schmitt. Scalable Preparation of 1‐Aminoethyl Substituted Chromanes. Helvetica Chimica Acta 2024, 107 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.202300187
  64. Marlon Millard, Jonas Kilian, Marius Ozenil, Mariella Mogeritsch, Verena Schwingenschlögl-Maisetschläger, Wolfgang Holzer, Marcus Hacker, Thierry Langer, Verena Pichler. Design, synthesis and preclinical evaluation of muscarine receptor antagonists via a scaffold-hopping approach. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 262 , 115891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115891
  65. Dominique M. S. Buyens, Lynne A. Pilcher. Migrating 1 H NMR peaks in the benzylation of adenine reveal the disruptive Kornblum oxidation in DMSO. Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry 2023, 60 (10) , 1760-1767. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhet.4718
  66. Rajan Kumar, Neha Kumari, Harpreet Kaur, Chandralata Bal, Ashoke Sharon. Amidate ion‐mediated intramolecular ring transformation of 2‐pyrones to 2‐pyridones. Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry 2023, 60 (9) , 1641-1646. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhet.4671
  67. Hans-Jürgen Federsel. What enables and blocks synthetic chemistry methods in becoming industrially significant?. Cell Reports Physical Science 2023, 4 (7) , 101493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101493
  68. Jordan P. Liles, Caroline Rouget-Virbel, Julie L.H. Wahlman, René Rahimoff, Jennifer M. Crawford, Abby Medlin, Veronica S. O’Connor, Junqi Li, Vladislav A. Roytman, F. Dean Toste, Matthew S. Sigman. Data science enables the development of a new class of chiral phosphoric acid catalysts. Chem 2023, 9 (6) , 1518-1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2023.02.020
  69. Domenico C. M. Albanese, Michele Penso. New Trends in Asymmetric Phase Transfer Catalysis. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2023, 26 (19) https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.202300224
  70. Omar Mohammad, Jude A. Onwudili, Qingchun Yuan. A critical review of the production of hydroxyaromatic carboxylic acids as a sustainable method for chemical utilisation and fixation of CO 2. RSC Sustainability 2023, 1 (3) , 404-417. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SU00105E
  71. Feng Gao, Honggang Chang, Jinjin Li, Ruifeng Wang, Yanlong Gu. Replacing polar aprotic solvents with water in organic synthesis. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 2023, 40 , 100774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100774
  72. . Specific Methods for the Destruction of Hazardous Chemicals in the Laboratory. 2023, 25-159. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119848851.ch1
  73. Michael V. Tarasca, Cassidy J. Tomlinson, Pavel Gris, Graham K. Murphy. One-Step, Gram-Scale Synthesis of Caffeine-d 9 from Xanthine and CD3I. Synthesis 2023, 55 (05) , 821-825. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1972-3819
  74. Ingrid Santos Miguez, Fernanda Thimoteo Azevedo Jorge, Roberta Pereira Espinheira, Ronaldo Rodrigues de Sousa, Viridiana Santana Ferreira Leitão, Ricardo Sposina Sobral Teixeira, Carmen Lucia de Oliveira Petkowicz, Ayla Sant’Ana da Silva. Plant cell wall polysaccharides: Methodologies for compositional, structural, and physicochemical characterization. 2023, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99986-1.00002-8
  75. Lei Huang, Yi Zhang, Xiao-Hui Shan, Yu Liu, Jian-Qi Li. Industrial-Scale Preparation of a Key Intermediate for the Manufacture of Therapeutic SGLT2 Inhibitors. Pharmaceutical Fronts 2022, 04 (04) , e237-e243. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750423
  76. William Connors, Ryan DeKorte, Simon C. C. Lucas, Ariamala Gopalsamy, Robert E. Ziegler. Synthesis of Benzothiazinones from Benzoyl Thiocarbamates: Application to Clinical Candidates for Tuberculosis Treatment. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2022, 2022 (34) https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.202200684
  77. Lavleen Mader, John J. Hayward, Lisa A. Porter, John F. Trant. A revised synthesis of 6-alkoxy-2-aminopurines with late-stage convergence allowing for increased molecular complexity. New Journal of Chemistry 2022, 46 (35) , 17040-17048. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NJ02204D
  78. Sathyendran Swetha, Gopal Chandru Senadi. An Umpolung Route to Amides from α‐Aminonitriles under Metal‐Free Conditions. Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis 2022, 364 (16) , 2872-2882. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsc.202200607
  79. Qiang Yang, S. Camille Peres, Qingsheng Wang, Ashok Dastidar. Process safety from bench to pilot to plant. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2022, 77 , 104758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2022.104758
  80. Alec Passarelli, Timothy Rice, M. Chowdhury, Megan Powers, Muhammad Mansha, Ingrid Wilke, Mona Hella, Matthew Oehlschlaeger. Terahertz-Wave Absorption Gas Sensing for Dimethyl Sulfoxide. Applied Sciences 2022, 12 (11) , 5729. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12115729
  81. Arminas Urbonavičius, Graziana Fortunato, Emilija Ambrazaitytė, Elena Plytninkienė, Aurimas Bieliauskas, Vaida Milišiūnaitė, Renzo Luisi, Eglė Arbačiauskienė, Sonata Krikštolaitytė, Algirdas Šačkus. Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Heterocyclic Chalcones from 1-Phenyl-1H-pyrazol-3-ol. Molecules 2022, 27 (12) , 3752. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27123752
  82. Piyali Dutta, Andrea McGranaghan, Isabelle Keller, Yogesh Patil, Nicholas Mulholland, Vikrant Murudi, Horst Prescher, Alex Smith, Nessa Carson, Chris Martin, Paul Cox, Daniel Stierli, Mohamed Boussemghoune, Fabien Barreteau, Jérôme Cassayre, Edouard Godineau. A case study in green chemistry: the reduction of hazardous solvents in an industrial R&D environment. Green Chemistry 2022, 24 (10) , 3943-3956. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2GC00698G
  83. Dariya Getya, Ivan Gitsov. Reactive Cellu-mers—A Novel Approach to Improved Cellulose/Polymer Composites. Polymers 2022, 14 (9) , 1670. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14091670
  84. Mayuri K. Porwal, Yernaidu Reddi, Derek J. Saxon, Christopher J. Cramer, Christopher J. Ellison, Theresa M. Reineke. Stereoregular functionalized polysaccharides via cationic ring-opening polymerization of biomass-derived levoglucosan. Chemical Science 2022, 13 (16) , 4512-4522. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SC00146B
  85. Dylan Dagoneau, Pierre Quinodoz, Amandine Kolleth, Mert Bozoflu, Beyza Horoz, Saron Catak, Philippe‐Alexandre Poisson, Alexandre Lumbroso, Sarah Sulzer‐Mossé, Alain De Mesmaeker. A Short and Versatile Approach for the Synthesis of Pyrrolizidinones. Helvetica Chimica Acta 2022, 105 (3) https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.202100226
  86. Joy Karmakar, Apurba Pramanik, Vincent Joseph, Vered Marks, Flavio Grynszpan, Mindy Levine. A dipodal bimane–ditriazole–diCu( ii ) complex serves as an ultrasensitive water sensor. Chemical Communications 2022, 58 (16) , 2690-2693. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CC07138F
  87. Vladimir Iashin, Tom Wirtanen, Jesus E. Perea-Buceta. Tetramethylammonium Fluoride: Fundamental Properties and Applications in C-F Bond-Forming Reactions and as a Base. Catalysts 2022, 12 (2) , 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12020233
  88. Apurba Pramanik, Joy Karmakar, Flavio Grynszpan, Mindy Levine. Highly Sensitive Water Detection Through Reversible Fluorescence Changes in a syn-Bimane Based Boronic Acid Derivative. Frontiers in Chemistry 2022, 9 https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.782481
  89. Anton El Khoury, Paul M. Seidler, David S. Eisenberg, Patrick G. Harran. Catalytic Synthesis of PEGylated EGCG Conjugates that Disaggregate Alzheimer’s Tau. Synthesis 2021, 53 (22) , 4263-4271. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1509-5904
  90. Jacques Muzart. A Journey from June 2018 to October 2021 with N,N-Dimethylformamide and N,N-Dimethylacetamide as Reactants. Molecules 2021, 26 (21) , 6374. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216374
  91. Feng Gao, Rongxian Bai, Minghao Li, Yanlong Gu. Dipolar HCP materials as alternatives to DMF solvent for azide-based synthesis. Green Chemistry 2021, 23 (19) , 7499-7505. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1GC02002A
  92. Mathieu Madau, Gaëlle Morandi, Christophe Rihouey, Vincent Lapinte, Hassan Oulyadi, Didier LE Cerf, Virginie Dulong, Luc Picton. A mild and straightforward one-pot hyaluronic acid functionalization through termination of poly-(2-alkyl-2-oxazoline). Polymer 2021, 230 , 124059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2021.124059
  93. Jingjing Gui, Xin Cai, Lingyun Chen, Yuxin Zhou, Wenjing Zhu, Yuanrui Jiang, Min Hu, Xiaobei Chen, Yanwei Hu, Shilei Zhang. Facile and practical hydrodehalogenations of organic halides enabled by calcium hydride and palladium chloride. Organic Chemistry Frontiers 2021, 8 (17) , 4685-4692. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1QO00758K
  94. Maikel Wijtmans, Ewald Edink, Oscar PJ van Linden, Yang Zheng, Antoni R Blaazer, Marco Siderius, Jacqueline E van Muijlwijk-Koezen. From recipe to research: introducing undergraduate students to the nature of science using a hybrid practical course centred on drug discovery for neglected diseases. Drug Discovery Today 2021, 26 (6) , 1359-1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2021.02.012
  95. Brij Mohan, Sandeep Kumar, Shixuan Ma, Hengzhi You, Peng Ren. Mechanistic Insight into Charge and Energy Transfers of Luminescent Metal–Organic Frameworks Based Sensors for Toxic Chemicals. Advanced Sustainable Systems 2021, 5 (5) https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202000293
  96. Rosario Vidal, Jaume‐Adrià Alberola‐Borràs, Núria Sánchez‐Pantoja, Iván Mora‐Seró. Comparison of Perovskite Solar Cells with other Photovoltaics Technologies from the Point of View of Life Cycle Assessment. Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research 2021, 2 (5) https://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.202000088
  97. Christopher A. Hughes-Whiffing, Alexis Perry. One-pot, three-component Fischer indolisation– N -alkylation for rapid synthesis of 1,2,3-trisubstituted indoles. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry 2021, 19 (3) , 627-634. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0OB02185G
  98. Stefan G. Koenig, Keena L. Green, Barbara Müller, C. Gregory Sowell, David Askin, Francis Gosselin. Development of a practical synthesis to PI3K α-selective inhibitor GDC-0326. Tetrahedron 2021, 79 , 131840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2020.131840
  99. Albanese Domenico, Penso Michele. Phase Transfer Catalysis. 2020, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471238961.0301200104050813.a01.pub3
  100. Hau Sun Sam Chan, Amber L. Thompson, Kirsten E. Christensen, Jonathan W. Burton. Forwards and backwards – synthesis of Laurencia natural products using a biomimetic and retrobiomimetic strategy incorporating structural reassignment of laurefurenynes C–F. Chemical Science 2020, 11 (42) , 11592-11600. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SC04120C
Load all citations

Organic Process Research & Development

Cite this: Org. Process Res. Dev. 2019, 23, 10, 2210–2217
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00276
Published August 10, 2019

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

78k

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Numbers of publications using NaH/DMSO, NaH/DMF, and NaH/DMAc in Organic Letters in 2014–2018.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Numbers of publications using NaH/DMSO, NaH/DMF, and NaH/DMAc in The Journal of Organic Chemistry in 2014–2018.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Numbers of publications using NaH/DMSO, NaH/DMF, and NaH/DMAc in the Journal of Medicinal Chemistry in 2014–2018.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Numbers of publications using NaH/DMSO, NaH/DMF, and NaH/DMAc in Organic Process Research & Development in 1997–2018.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. ARC heat rate and pressure vs temperature profiles of a NaH/DMSO mixture.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Pictures of (left) a ruptured Hastelloy C ARC cell and (right) the displaced ARC reactor housing resulting from the cell explosion.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. DSC analysis of a NaH/DMSO mixture.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8. ARC temperature and pressure vs time profiles of a NaH/DMSO mixture.

    Figure 9

    Figure 9. Headspace GC/MS analysis of the gaseous products from the thermal decomposition of a NaH/DMSO mixture.

    Figure 10

    Figure 10. ARC heat rate and pressure vs temperature profiles of NaH/DMF mixtures.

    Figure 11

    Figure 11. Thermogram of NaH in mineral oil by EGA Micro-GC.

    Figure 12

    Figure 12. Gaseous products (EGA Micro-GC) from the thermal decomposition of NaH/DMF.

    Figure 13

    Figure 13. ARC heat rate and pressure vs temperature profiles of NaH/DMAc mixtures.

    Figure 14

    Figure 14. Gaseous products (EGA Micro-GC) from the thermal decomposition of NaH/DMAc.

    Figure 15

    Figure 15. Flow diagram of the EGA Micro-GC system.

  • References


    This article references 25 other publications.

    1. 1
      Hansley, V. L.; Carlisle, P. J. The Production of Sodium Hydride and Some of its Reactions. Chem. Eng. News 1945, 23 (15), 13321380,  DOI: 10.1021/cen-v023n015.p1332
    2. 2
      Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons, 1995; Vol. 7, pp 45684571.
    3. 3
      (a) Bretherick, L. Dimethyl sulfoxide: Sodium hydride. In Bretherick’s Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, 3rd ed.; Butterworths: London, 1985; p 294.
      (b) Bretherick, L. Sodium hydride: Dimethylformamide. In Bretherick’s Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, 3rd ed.; Butterworths: London, 1985; p 1133.
    4. 4
      (a) Corey, E. J.; Chaykovsky, M. Methylsulfinylcarbanion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 866867,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00864a039
      (b) Corey, E. J.; Chaykovsky, M. Methylsulfinyl Carbanion (CH3-SO-CH2). Formation and Applications to Organic Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 13451353,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01084a033
    5. 5
      (a) Price, G. G.; Whiting, M. C. The sodium derivative of dimethyl sulfoxide, Dimsylsodium. Chem. Ind. (London) 1963, 775776
      (b) Sjoberg, K. Stable solutions of methylsulfinyl carbanion. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 7, 63836384,  DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)70182-1
      (c) Lyness, W. I.; O’Connor, D. E.; Berry, J. S. Sulfinyl carbanions for preparing surface-active detergents. U.S. Patent 3,288,860, Nov 29, 1966.
    6. 6
      French, F. A. Sodium Hydride–DMSO Mixture Explodes. Chem. Eng. News 1966, 44 (15), 48
    7. 7
      Russell, G. A.; Weiner, S. A. Methylation of Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Dimethyl Sulfoxide in the Presence of Base. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 248,  DOI: 10.1021/jo01339a056
    8. 8
      Olson, G. L. Lab explosions. Chem. Eng. News 1966, 44 (24), 7
    9. 9
      Powers, J. C.; Seidner, R.; Parsons, T. G. The cleavage of formyl groups by sodium hydride. Tetrahedron Lett. 1965, 6, 17131716,  DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)90114-X
    10. 10
      Brimacombe, J. S.; Jones, B. D.; Stacey, M.; Willard, J. J. Alkylation of carbohydrates using sodium hydride. Carbohydr. Res. 1966, 2, 167,  DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)81480-9
    11. 11
      Nasipuri, D.; Bhattacharyya, A.; Hazra, B. G. Novel Aromatisation Reaction of Cyclohexenone Derivatives with Sodium Hydride. J. Chem. Soc. D 1971, 13, 660,  DOI: 10.1039/c29710000660
    12. 12
      Buckley, J.; Webb, R. L.; Laird, T.; Ward, R. J. Report on thermal reaction. Chem. Eng. News 1982, 60 (28), 5
    13. 13
      DeWall, G. Sodium hydride and DMF. Chem. Eng. News 1982, 60 (37), 5
    14. 14
      (a) Laird, T. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2002, 6, 876,  DOI: 10.1021/op025601k
      (b) Laird, T. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2005, 9, 951,  DOI: 10.1021/op050197l
    15. 15
      Dahl, A. C.; Mealy, M. J.; Nielsen, M. A.; Lyngsø, L. O.; Suteu, C. Route Scouting and Process Development of Lu AA26778. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2008, 12, 429,  DOI: 10.1021/op7002584
    16. 16
      Ishii, Y.; Fujimoto, R.; Mikami, M.; Murakami, S.; Miki, Y.; Furukawa, Y. Practical syntheses of Chiral α-Amino Acids and Chiral Half-Esters by Kinetic Resolution of Urethane-Protected α-Amino Acid N-Carboxyanhydrides and Desymmetrization of Cyclic meso-Anhydrides with New Modified Cinchona Alkaloid Catalysts. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2007, 11, 609,  DOI: 10.1021/op700023h
    17. 17
      Stoessel, F. Thermal Safety of Chemical Processes: Risk Assessment and Process Design; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2008.
    18. 18

      This combination is a result of using 60% NaH in mineral oil for the evaluations.

    19. 19
      Yoshida, T.; Yoshizawa, F.; Itoh, M.; Matsunaga, T.; Watanabe, M.; Tamura, M. Prediction of Fire and Explosion Hazards of Reactive Chemicals (I). Estimation of Explosive Properties of Self-Reactive Chemicals from SC-DSC Data. Kogyo Kayaku 1987, 48, 311316
    20. 20
      Brandes, B. T.; Smith, D. K. Calorimetric study of the exothermic decomposition of dimethyl sulfoxide. Process Saf. Prog. 2016, 35, 374391,  DOI: 10.1002/prs.11802
    21. 21

      This method was not designed for the detection of hydrogen gas. It would have coeluted with the carrier gas helium if it was present as part of the decomposition products.

    22. 22

      The presence of dimethylamine (Me2NH) in the decomposition products has been reported previously. (12) Detection of Me2NH was not attempted during this analysis.

    23. 23
      (a) Prashad, M.; Har, D.; Hu, B.; Kim, H.-Y.; Girgis, M. J.; Chaudhary, A.; Repič, O.; Blacklock, T. J.; Marterer, W. Process Development of a Large-Scale Synthesis of TKA731: A Tachykinin Receptor Antagonist. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2004, 8, 330340,  DOI: 10.1021/op0341824
      (b) McCabe Dunn, J. M.; Duran-Capece, A.; Meehan, B.; Ulis, J.; Iwama, T.; Gloor, G.; Wong, G.; Bekos, E. The Safe Use of Sodium Hydride on Scale: The Process Development of a Chloropyrimidine Displacement. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2011, 15, 1442,  DOI: 10.1021/op200114t
      (c) Yang, Q.; Li, X.; Lorsbach, B. A.; Muhuhi, J. M.; Roth, G. A.; Gray, K.; Podhorez, D. E. Development of a Scalable Process for the Insecticidal Candidate Tyclopyrazoflor. Part 2. Fit-for-Purpose Optimization of the Route to Tyclopyrazoflor Featuring [3 + 2] Cyclization of 3-Hydrazinopyridine·2HCl and Methyl Acrylate. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2019,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00128
    24. 24
      (a) Tou, J. C.; Whiting, L. F. A cradle-glass ampoule sample container for differential scanning calorimetric analysis. Thermochim. Acta 1980, 42, 21,  DOI: 10.1016/0040-6031(80)87111-5
      (b) Yang, Q.; Canturk, B.; Gray, K.; McCusker, E.; Sheng, M.; Li, F. Evaluation of Potential Safety Hazards Associated with the Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling of Aryl Bromides with Vinylboron Species. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2018, 22, 351359,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00001
      (c) Yang, Q.; Cabrera, P. J.; Li, X.; Sheng, M.; Wang, N. X. Safety Evaluation of the Copper-Mediated Cross-Coupling of 2-Bromopyridines with Ethyl Bromodifluoroacetate. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2018, 22, 14411447,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00261
      (d) Yang, Q.; Sane, N.; Klosowski, D.; Lee, M.; Rosenthal, T.; Wang, N. X.; Wiensch, E. Mizoroki–Heck Cross-Coupling of Bromobenzenes with Styrenes: Another Example of Pd-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling with Potential Safety Hazards. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2019,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00126
      (e) Sheng, M.; Valco, D.; Tucker, C.; Cayo, E. Practical Use of Differential Scanning Calorimetry for Thermal Stability Hazard Evaluation. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2019,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00266
    25. 25
      Dietz, W. A. Response factors for gas chromatographic analyses. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1967, 5, 6871,  DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/5.2.68