ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
A Strategy to Conjugate Bioactive Fragments to Cytotoxic Diiron Bis(cyclopentadienyl) Complexes
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Article

A Strategy to Conjugate Bioactive Fragments to Cytotoxic Diiron Bis(cyclopentadienyl) Complexes
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Organometallics

Cite this: Organometallics 2021, 40, 15, 2516–2528
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.organomet.1c00270
Published July 2, 2021

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

A series of bioactive molecules were synthesized from the condensation of aspirin or chlorambucil with terminal alkynes bearing alcohol or amine substituents. Insertion of the resulting alkynes into the iron–carbyne bond of readily accessible diiron bis(cyclopentadienyl) μ-aminocarbyne complexes, [1a,b]CF3SO3, afforded novel diiron complexes with a bridging vinyliminium ligand, [210]CF3SO3, functionalized with a bioactive moiety. All compounds were characterized by elemental analysis and IR and multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and in three cases by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Moreover, the D2O solubility, stability in D2O and cell culture media, and octanol–water partition coefficients of diiron complexes were determined spectroscopically. The cytotoxicity of the complexes was assessed in the tumorigenic A2780 and A2780cisR and the nontumorigenic HEK 293T cell lines. Some complexes exhibit high potency and the ability to overcome resistance in A2780cisR cells (aspirin complexes) or high selectivity relative to HEK 293T cells (chlorambucil complexes). Further studies indicate that the complexes significantly trigger intracellular ROS production, irrespective of the nature of the bioactive fragment. DNA alkylation and protein binding studies were also undertaken.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Platinum anticancer compounds have been extensively employed in the clinic but have important limitations due to the occurrence of severe side effects and both intrinsic and acquired resistance. (1) Therefore, compounds based on other transition metals have been widely investigated for their anticancer potential. (2) In this context, iron has emerged as an attractive element, being bioessential and basically nontoxic in many forms, (3) and especially ferrocifens, resulting from the conjugation of the ferrocene skeleton with the drug tamoxifen, hold much promise. (4) The redox chemistry of the ferrocenyl iron(II) center is the key to the cytotoxicity, with oxidation to FeIII in the tumor environment triggering the production of toxic metabolites, leading to DNA damage and cell death. (5) Additionally, some piano-stool monoiron cyclopentadienyl complexes display potent cytotoxicity against various tumor cell lines. (6) However, the assessment of the anticancer properties of diiron complexes still remains undeveloped, despite opportunities offered by the cooperativity of two metal centers. (7) Indeed, bimetallic systems often enable reactivity patterns not accessible to homologous monometallic compounds, with significant catalytic and biological implications. (8) A useful diiron platform is represented by [Fe2Cp2(CO)4] (Cp = η5-C5H5), where the carbonyl ligands can be progressively replaced by small unsaturated molecules, leading to unusual organic fragments stabilized by coordination to both metal centers. (9) In particular, bridging vinyliminium ligands can be constructed from isocyanide–alkyne coupling reactions (Figure 1). (10) The broad availability of alkynes permits a vast choice of substituents for the vinyliminium ligand, modulating the physicochemical properties of the cationic complexes. Recently, we reported a variety of cationic diiron vinyliminium compounds that are cytotoxic against A2780 and A2780cisR cell lines, with IC50 values spanning from nanomolar concentrations to inactivity, depending on the substituents. (11−13) According to preliminary studies, the mode of action seems multitargeted, involving ROS production. Antiproliferative activity is maintained in neutral derivatives containing a modified vinyliminium chain. (14)

Figure 1

Figure 1. General structure of diiron μ-vinyliminium complexes obtained from the assembly of one isocyanide (fragment in red) and one alkyne (fragment in blue), starting from Fe2Cp2(CO)4 and structures of aspirin (ASP-CO2H) and chlorambucil (CMB-CO2H).

A general and effective strategy to enhance the anticancer activity of metal complexes consists of the incorporation of an organic fragment with known biological activity, including clinically approved drugs, within the metal scaffold. (15) Synthetic methods include direct coordination of the bioactive group to the metal and the use of a suitable ligand as a linker between such two entities. (16) The ligand–-biomolecule connection might consist of either an ester or an amide function, and these two different linkers may significantly affect the mode of action and, hence, the cytotoxicity. (17) The cyclopentadienyl ring(s) in ferrocenes have been extensively derivatized with bioactive molecules, (18) e.g. ferrocifens (see above), (19) whereas examples with non-ferrocene iron species are rare. (20)
Relevant to the present work, the inclusion of acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) and chlorambucil (Figure 1) within PtIV and RuII anticancer complexes has resulted in synergistic effects on cancer cells originating from the two components. (21,22) Aspirin, one of the most widely used medicines in the world, possesses analgesic, antipyretic, and anti-inflammatory properties, which are associated with the inactivation of COX-1 and COX-2 enzymes, and anticancer properties have been recently evidenced. (23) On the other hand, chlorambucil is a DNA alkylating agent approved by the FDA for oral administration in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and some other tumors. (22,24)
Here, we report a straightforward synthetic strategy allowing the attachment of a bioactive molecule, i.e. aspirin or chlorambucil, to a diiron scaffold which itself displays anticancer activity. This method is applicable to both ester and amide linkages. The resulting functionalized complexes have been assessed for their cytotoxicity, and experiments to elucidate mechanistic aspects have been carried out.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Synthesis and Characterization of Compounds

The bioderivatized alkynes ALKA1, ALKA2, ALKA3, and ALKA4 (aspirin-alkynes) and ALKC1, ALKC2 and ALKC3 (chlorambucil-alkynes) were prepared via condensation reactions of propargyl alcohol, 3-hydroxyphenylacetylene, 3-aminophenylacetylene, and 4-aminophenylacetylene with the appropriate carboxylic acid, i.e. ASP-CO2H or CMB-CO2H, using different protocols (Scheme 1). The products were purified by silica chromatography and then isolated as white/light yellow solid/oily materials in 51–95% yield.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Synthesis of Terminal Alkynes Derivatized with Aspirin or Chlorambucila

aReaction conditions: CH2Cl2 solution, room temperature; (i) and (ii) EDCI·HCl/DMAP; (iii) BIO-CO2H + oxalyl chloride/DMF; (iv) +alkyne/NEt3.

The alkyne ALKA1 was previously reported, (25) while the remaining alkynes are unprecedented and were fully characterized by elemental analysis and IR and NMR spectroscopy. In the IR spectra (solid state), the triple carbon–carbon bond manifests itself by a weak absorption around 2100 cm–1, whereas the amide NH group in ALKA3, ALKA4, ALKC2, and ALKC3 absorbs as a medium-intensity stretching band at ca. 3250 cm–1. The infrared band of the carbonyl belonging to the alkyne–BIO linkage falls within the ranges 1721–1757 cm–1 (ester) and 1652–1673 cm–1 (amide). The 1H NMR spectra (CDCl3 solutions) display a resonance due to the alkyne CH proton in the range 2.56–3.56 ppm, with the NH of amide-containing species being observed between 7.35 and 9.30 ppm. In the 13C NMR spectra, the carbonyl groups give rise to a resonance between 162.7 and 171.8 ppm. The NMR signals due to the bioactive cores do not significantly differ from the corresponding signals of aspirin (26) and chlorambucil. (27) The molecular structures of ALKA2 and ALKA3 were confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Molecular structures of (a) ALKA2 and (b) ALKA3 with key atoms labeled. Displacement ellipsoids are at the 30% probability level. Main bond distances (Å) and angles (deg) for ALKA2: C(1)–C(2) 1.4913(16), C(2)–O(1) 1.1947(13), C(2)–O(2) 1.3718(13), O(2)–C(3) 1.3947(13), C(8)–C(9) 1.4905(14), C(9)–O(3) 1.1984(13), C(9)–O(4) 1.3600(13), O(4)–C(10) 1.4050(13), C(14)–C(16) 1.4383(15), C(16)–C(17) 1.1840(17), C(1)–C(2)–O(2) 109.80(9), C(2)–O(2)–C(3) 116.37(8), C(8)–C(9)–O(4) 109.85(9), C(9)–O(4)–C(10) 117.57(8), C(14)–C(16)–C(17) 177.99(12). Main bond distances (Å) and angles (deg) for ALKA3: C(1)–C(2) 1.4827(16, C(2)–O(1) 1.2030(14), C(2)–O(2) 1.3532(13), O(2)–C(3) 1.3965(13), C(8)–C(9) 1.5035(15), C(9)–O(3) 1.2210(13), C(9)–N(1) 1.3577(14), N(1)–C(10) 1.4191(13), C(14)–C(16) 1.4400(16), C(16)–C(17) 1.1873(17), C(1)–C(2)–O(2) 110.18(9), C(2)–O(2)–C(3) 117.30(8), C(8)–C(9)–N(1) 114.60(9), C(9)–N(1)–C(10) 124.23(9), C(14)–C(16)–C(17) 175.31(12) Hydrogen bonds for ALKA3 (Å and deg): N(1)–H(1) 0.883(12), H(1)···O(1)#1 2.006(12), N(1)···O(1)#1 2.8653(12), ∠N(1)H(1)O(1)#1 164.0(12). Symmetry transformation: (#1) x + 1/2, y, −z + 1/2.

In order to obtain the functionalized diiron complexes, the μ-aminocarbyne complexes [Fe2Cp2(CO)2(μ-CO){μ-CNMe(R)}]CF3SO3 (R = Me, [1a]CF3SO3; R = Xyl = 2,6-C6H3Me2, [1b]CF3SO3), readily available from a multigram-scale synthesis, were first converted into the mono(acetonitrile) adducts [Fe2Cp2(CO)(NCMe)(μ-CO){μ-CNMe(R)}]CF3SO3 (R = Me, Xyl). (28) Then, the latter complexes, in dichloromethane solution, were treated with a slight molar excess of the alkyne, thus allowing a highly regio- and stereoselective alkyne insertion into the iron–bridging carbyne bond upon removal of the labile acetonitrile ligand (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2

Scheme 2. Two-Step Synthesis of Diiron Vinyliminium Complexes via Coupling of Bridging Aminocarbyne Ligands with Aspirin- and Chlorambucil-Functionalized Alkynes (CF3SO3 Salts)
Complexes [210]CF3SO3 were isolated in 48–96% yield after workup and fully characterized by elemental analysis and IR and NMR spectroscopy. The IR spectra (CH2Cl2 solutions) share a common pattern with two bands due to terminal (1991–2007 cm–1) and bridging carbonyl ligands (1807–1820 cm–1) and another band related to the {CβCαN} (10a) moiety (1628–1692 cm–1). The ester linkages between the vinyliminium and the bioactive fragment in [24,8]CF3SO3 absorb in the 1727–1758 cm–1 range, whereas the amido carbonyl groups belonging to [57,910]CF3SO3 are observed at 1678–1691 cm–1. The 1H NMR spectra of [2,6]CF3SO3 (acetone-d6 solutions) contain two sets of resonances, due to EZ isomerism arising from the different substituents on the iminium nitrogen, with prevalence of the E form (E/Z ratio = 2 for [2]CF3SO3 and 9 for [6]CF3SO3). The other complexes exist as single isomeric species, including [4]CF3SO3, which is present in solution as the E isomer only. Comparisons with a library of data related to nonfunctionalized diiron vinyliminium complexes indicate that the Cp ligands exclusively adopt a mutual cis geometry in all compounds [210]CF3SO3. (10−12,29) Cβ-H resonates at 4.4–4.8 ppm and is negligibly affected by the adjacent Cγ substituent; the NH amide proton in [57,910]CF3SO3 is slightly deshielded in comparison to the alkyne precursors and is observed at around 9.5 ppm. Salient 13C NMR features are given by the resonances related to the vinyliminium carbon chain, respectively in the intervals 224.3–232.4 ppm (Cα), 48.6–53.8 ppm (Cβ), and 200.7–207.8 ppm (Cγ), thus evidencing the alkylidene character of Cα (amino-alkylidene) and Cγ. The chemical shifts for the ester/amide linkage carbon in [210]CF3SO3 do not differ significantly with respect to the biofunctionalized alkynes.
The structure of [2]CF3SO3 was elucidated by X-ray diffraction (Figure 3). The cation is composed of a [Fe2Cp2(CO)(μ-CO)] skeleton, with the Cp-ligands in a cis geometry, and a {μ-η13-C3(R)C2HC1N(Me)(Xyl)}+ vinyliminium ligand bearing the aspirin moiety (R = CH2OC(O)C6H4OC(O)CH3). The bridging alkylidene C3 carbon is slightly asymmetric with respect to the Fe centers (Fe(1)–C(3) 2.016(6) Å, Fe(2)–C(3) 1.945(6) Å), and a more pronounced asymmetry is observed for the μ-CO ligand (Fe(1)–C(31) 1.971(6) Å, Fe(2)–C(31) 1.876(6) Å). The C(1)–N(1) distance (1.295(8) Å) is indicative of an iminium bond, although the Fe(1)–C(1) distance (1.831(6) Å) possesses some aminoalkylidene nature, in agreement with the 13C NMR spectrum. (10,11) The iminium group adopts an E conformation which corresponds to the prevalent conformation detected in solution by NMR spectroscopy (see above).

Figure 3

Figure 3. View of the cation of [2]CF3SO3 with key atoms labeled. Displacement ellipsoids are at the 30% probability level. Hydrogen atoms, except H(2), have been omitted for clarity. Main bond distances (Å) and angles (deg): Fe(1)–Fe(2) 2.5421(12), Fe(1)–C(31) 1.971(6), Fe(2)–C(31) 1.876(6), Fe(2)–C(32) 1.758(8), Fe(1)–C(3) 2.016(6), Fe(2)–C(3) 1.945(6), Fe(1)–C(2) 2.042(6), Fe(1)–C(1) 1.831(6), C(31)–O(1) 1.172(8), C(32)–O(2) 1.153(9), C(1)–N(1) 1.295(8), C(1)–C(2) 1.411(8), C(2)–C(3) 1.416(9), C(3)–C(13) 1.511(8), C(13)–O(3) 1.446(7), O(3)–C(14) 1.326(7), C(14)–O(4) 1.210(8), Fe(1)–C(31)–Fe(2) 82.7(2), Fe(1)–C(3)–Fe(2) 79.8(2), Fe(2)–C(32)–O(2) 175.5(7), Fe(2)–C(3)–C(2) 122.2(4), C(3)–C(2)–C(1) 116.6(5), C(2)–C(1)–N(1) 134.5(6), C(3)–C(13)–O(3) 105.1(5), C(13)–O(3)–C(14) 116.1(5), O(3)–C(14)–O(4) 123.1(6).

Solubility and Stability in Aqueous Media and Octanol–Water Partition Coefficients

The solubility of the complexes in D2O was assessed using 1H NMR spectroscopy (see Table 1 and the Experimental Section for details). Complexes [3]CF3SO3, [5]CF3SO3, and [7]CF3SO3 possess appreciable water solubility, whereas the solubility values for the remaining compounds are low. Data from the literature for the related nonfunctionalized complexes [2′,3′]CF3SO3 are compiled in Table 1 for comparison. (11) The octanol–water partition coefficients (Log Pow) were measured using a UV–vis method and fall within the −0.2 to +1.2 range (Table 1). The structural variability provided by the synthetic route offers much opportunity for fine-tuning the lipophilicity of the complexes, which is significantly influenced by the iminium substituents, the type of linkage to the bioactive group (i.e., ester or amide), and its location on the aryl ring. For instance, Log Pow values of 1.07 and 0.65 are obtained for the geometric isomers [9]CF3SO3 and [10]CF3SO3, respectively.
Table 1. Solubility in D2O (based on 1H NMR Spectroscopy, Me2SO2 as Internal Standard) and Partition Coefficients (Log Pow) of Diiron Complexes (T = 21 °C) and Residual Percent of cComplex in D2O/DMSO 2/1 v/v Mixture after 24 h at 37 °C
compoundsolubility (mol L–1)Log Powstability (%)
[2]CF3SO3<1 × 10–40.40 ± 0.0185 (69)a
[3]CF3SO37.8 × 10–40.24 ± 0.0181 (57)a
[4]CF3SO3<1 × 10–41.06 ± 0.0459
[5]CF3SO31.1 × 10–3–0.10 ± 0.0169
[6]CF3SO3<1 × 10–40.80 ± 0.0291
[7]CF3SO35.3 × 10–4–0.19 ± 0.0170
[8]CF3SO3<1 × 10–41.2 ± 0.284 (77)a,b
[9]CF3SO3<1 × 10–41.07 ± 0.0588b
[10]CF3SO3<1 × 10–40.65 ± 0.0293 (85)a,b
[2′]CF3SO3c1.0 × 10–3–0.1 
[3′]CF3SO3c1.4 × 10–2–0.34 
a

The residual percentage of the complex after 72 h at 37 °C is given in parentheses.

b

Total percentage of diiron complexes with a chlorambucil-like group in D2O/DMSO 1/1 v/v mixture.

c

Values from ref (11).

Stability studies in deuterated aqueous medium at 37 °C were carried out using 1H NMR spectroscopy and evidenced partial release (approximately 20%) of aspirin (Asp-CO2H) from the {CH2–OCOAsp} linkage within [2]CF3SO3 after 24 h (see Figure S40 in the Supporting Information), to give the hydrolyzed alcohol derivative [2′]+ (Figure 4). Conversely, [37]CF3SO3, containing either {Aryl–OCOAsp} or {Aryl-NHCOAsp} moieties, were stable under the same conditions. The ester bond connecting chlorambucil to the aryl unit in [8]CF3SO3 did not undergo hydrolysis; nevertheless, gradual chloride/hydroxide exchange occurred within the peripheral chlorambucil moiety, affording [8OH]+ and [82OH]+ (Figure 4; their identity was confirmed by HPLC-MS). Complete conversion into the bis-hydroxide [82OH]+ was achieved within 72 h. Similarly, [9,10]CF3SO3 undergo activation of the {C–Cl} bonds to give mixtures of the partially Cl/OH substituted species [9OH]+ and [10OH]+ and the fully substituted species [92OH]+ and [102OH]+.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Structures of diiron complexes discussed in this work in addition to those shown in Scheme 2: [2’]+, [3′]+, [5′]+, [8OH]+, and [82OH]+ formed upon release of the bioactive fragments in aqueous/biological media; 9GMP formed upon interaction of [9]+ with the model nucleotide guanosine 5′-monophosphate (disodium salt, Na2[GMP]); [1114]+ investigated for COX-2 inhibition assays. The structures of [8OH]+ and [82OH]+ are also representative of those of the homologous complexes [9OH]+, [10OH]+, [92OH]+, and [102OH]+ (not shown).

Complexes [3]CF3SO3, [5]CF3SO3, and [8]CF3SO3 were selected for an evaluation of their stability in the culture medium. Compounds were dissolved in DMSO-d6, and these solutions were diluted with the cell culture medium and stored at 37 °C. According to NMR spectroscopy, progressive release of the bioactive fragment occurred over 72 h, affording [3′]+ from [3]CF3SO3 and [5′]+ from [5]CF3SO3 (Figures S41 and S42). The amide linkage between aspirin and the diiron frame in [5]CF3SO3 was found to be weaker than the corresponding ester bond in [3]CF3SO3, and complete dissociation was observed after 72 h for the former complex. The 1H NMR spectrum suggests that chlorambucil release from [8]CF3SO3 is accompanied by the gradual hydrolysis of the two chloroethyl groups, as observed in D2O/DMSO-d6. Overall, these findings indicate that the diiron scaffold decorated with biofunctionalized vinyliminium ligands is robust in aqueous media, with a tendency to progressively release the bioactive moiety in the medium used in cytotoxicity studies.

Cytotoxicity Studies

The antiproliferative activity of the new diiron complexes [210]CF3SO3 and that of cisplatin as a reference was assessed toward cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin-resistant human ovarian cancer cell lines, A2780 and A2780cisR, respectively, and the noncancerous HEK 293T cell line. The results are compiled in Table 2, where they are compared to those previously reported for [2′,3′]CF3SO3, (11) [1a,b]CF3SO3, (7) chlorambucil, (22b) and aspirin. (30) In general, a correlation exists between the IC50 and Log Pow values, the most lipophilic compounds being also the most active. With regard to the aspirin-containing complexes [27]CF3SO3, these exhibit a comparable level of activity against the two cancer cell lines; in particular, [4]+ and [6]+ are strongly cytotoxic with IC50 values falling in the low-micromolar range. The performance of the chlorambucil derivative [9]CF3SO3 is notable, since this complex displays a potent cytotoxicity against the A2780 cell line, a significant selectivity (SI = 5), and an enhanced ability to overcoming cisplatin resistance (IC50 on A2780cisR cell line 7.9 μM for cisplatin, 3.8 μM for [9]CF3SO3). The performance of [9]CF3SO3 against the cancer cell lines is superior to that of chlorambucil. The chlorambucil complex [8]CF3SO3, differing from [9]CF3SO3 in the presence of an ester group instead of an amide, also displays some selectivity, but it is not as effective as the aspirin complexes in the cisplatin-resistant cell line. Overall, the attachment of bioactive fragments to the diiron scaffold leads to a marked effect on the activity of the complexes. Finally, it should be mentioned that the cytotoxicity of the vinyliminium-functionalized complexes [3,5,710]CF3SO3 on the A2780 cell line is strongly improved in comparison to their aminocarbyne precursor [1a]CF3SO3, which is not active; (7) a previous investigation pointed out the absence of activity of the ALKA1 toward cancer cell lines. (25)
Table 2. IC50 Calues (μM) Determined for Compounds [210]CF3SO3, Cisplatin, [2′,3′]CF3SO3, (11) [1a,b]CF3SO3, (7) Aspirin, (30) and Chlorambucil (22b) on Human Ovarian Carcinoma (A2780), Human Ovarian Carcinoma Cisplatin Resistant (A2780cisR), and Human Embryonic Kidney 293T (HEK 293T) Cell Lines after 72 h Exposurea
compoundA2780A2780cisRHEK 293T
[2]CF3SO313 ± 214 ± 19.2 ± 0.5
[3]CF3SO324 ± 521 ± 542 ± 6
[4]CF3SO32.8 ± 0.42.6 ± 0.43.8 ± 0.7
[5]CF3SO343 ± 645 ± 189.9 ± 0.3
[6]CF3SO36.5 ± 0.87 ± 27.2 ± 0.9
[7]CF3SO371 ± 1487 ± 10>100
[8]CF3SO34.7 ± 0.423 ± 320 ± 9
[9]CF3SO31.8 ± 0.33.8 ± 0.39 ± 3
[10]CF3SO36.4 ± 1.415 ± 530 ± 1
[2′]CF3SO311.6 ± 0.621 ± 213.4 ± 1.0
[3′]CF3SO3163 ± 16172 ± 11200 ± 21
[1a]CF3SO3>200  
[1b]CF3SO39.3 ± 0.7  
aspirin>200>200>200
chlorambucil5.2 ± 1.625 ± 4 
cisplatin0.6 ± 0.17.9 ± 0.12.6 ± 0.4
a

Values are given as the mean ± SD.

Mechanistic Studies

In order to shed light on the possible mechanism of action of the biofunctionalized diiron complexes, a series of complementary studies were performed. It was previously shown that the diiron vinyliminium structural motif induces ROS production, possibly associated with more than one mechanism: (1) monoelectron reduction of the complex favored by its net cationic charge; (2) fragmentation into a monoiron derivative and atomic iron; (3) rupture of the organometallic scaffold in aqueous medium releasing the two Fe+I centers which rapidly convert into iron(III) oxides. (11−13,7) The aspirin complex [4]CF3SO3 and chlorambucil complex [9]CF3SO3 were selected as representative, strongly cytotoxic compounds for the evaluation of induced intracellular ROS production. Thus, fluorescence measurements were conducted using the DCFH-DA assay, exposing A2780 cells to [4]CF3SO3, [9]CF3SO3, the reference drug cisplatin, or H2O2 as a positive control. Significant intracellular ROS levels were detected from [4]CF3SO3 and [9]CF3SO3, especially after ca. 20 h, and progressively increasing up to 24 h (Figure 5). Remarkably, both diiron complexes elicited a ROS production higher than that recorded for H2O2. Thus, the incorporation of the bioactive fragments within the diiron structure does not reduce the ability of the complexes to interfere with cellular redox processes via ROS production, a phenomenon which may substantially contribute to the observed antiproliferative activity.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Fluorescence kinetic measurements of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS, p < 0.05). A2780 cells were incubated for 24 h with 10 μM of the iron compounds at 37 °C and 5% CO2.

Next, the possible role of the bioactive fragment in the complexes was studied. COX-2 enzyme inhibition assays were performed on the aspirin compounds [27]CF3SO3 and also on a series of nonfunctionalized vinyliminium complexes as references, [1114]CF3SO3 (Figure 4). In each case, the enzyme was treated with the complex and the residual enzyme activity was measured to determine the IC50 concentrations (Table 3). All diiron–aspirin conjugates exhibit significantly lower IC50 values in comparison to [1114]CF3SO3 and aspirin itself; this outcome indicates that the assembly of aspirin with the diiron framework provides a synergic effect in terms of COX-2 inhibition.
Table 3. IC50 Values (μM) Determined for Diiron Complexes and Aspirin in the Inhibition of COX-2 Enzymea
compoundIC50 value (μM)
[2]CF3SO384 ± 2
[3]CF3SO371 ± 1
[4]CF3SO330 ± 3
[5]CF3SO310 ± 2
[6]CF3SO366 ± 2
[7]CF3SO320 ± 2
[11]CF3SO3541 ± 55
[12]CF3SO3506 ± 15
[13]CF3SO3629 ± 49
[14]CF3SO3288 ± 6
aspirin>1500 (31)
a

Values are given as the mean ± SD.

The ability of [4]CF3SO3 and [9]CF3SO3 to interact with natural DNA was studied using the ethidium bromide (EB) exchange test (Figure 6), with the concentration of the complexes beingin the 1.5–124 μM range for [4]CF3SO3 and 1.4–135 μM for [9]CF3SO3. Blank experiments were carried out with the two bioactive molecules and also with DMSO to check for solvent/dilution effects. The results indicate that both [4]CF3SO3 and [9]CF3SO3 are able to interact weakly with natural DNA, similarly to that previously described for nonfunctionalized diiron vinyliminium complexes. (11) However, EB exchange titrations are suitable to recognize fast noncovalent binding events, but not subsequent slow covalent binding. Therefore, since chlorambucil is a DNA-alkylating agent, we studied the possible reaction of [9]CF3SO3 with the nucleotide guanosine 5′-monophosphate (disodium salt, Na2[GMP]; see Figure 4) as a model for DNA binding. Complex [9]CF3SO3 was incubated with a D2O/CD3OD mixture containing GMP for 24 h at 37 °C. A subsequent mass spectrometric analysis was indicative of almost complete conversion of [9]+ into the neutral adduct 9GMP (Figure 4); the latter is best viewed as the result of the modification of the two ethyl chloride functions of [9]+, one of the two being hydrolyzed and the other one undergoing chloride substitution by one imine function of [GMP]2–.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Ethidium bromide displacement tests for selected diiron vinyliminium complexes. Conditions: CDNA = 1.15 × 10–4 M, CEB = 5.60 × 10–5 M, NaCl 0.1 M, NaCac 0.01 M, λex = 520 nm, λem= 595 nm, T = 25 °C.

The interaction of [4]CF3SO3 and [9]CF3SO3 with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a model protein was also explored. The addition of the metal complex to the protein in pH buffer solution (pH 7.0 buffer; NaCl 0.1 M, NaCac 0.01 M) produced a quenching of the intrinsic fluorescence emission of the latter. A data fit, according to the Stern–Volmer equation, (11) provided quenching constants (KSV) values equal to ca. 3.4 × 104 for both systems, indicative that a binding event occurs (Figure S1). (32) Spectral analysis (33) collected during the titration revealed that a 1:1 stoichiometry model is adequate to describe the binding (Figure S2). The related Log K values are 5.9 ± 0.1 for [4]CF3SO3/BSA and 6.5 ± 0.1 for [9]CF3SO3/BSA and suggest the occurrence of a reversible interaction, similarly to that previously found for nonfunctionalized diiron vinyliminium complexes. (11) More precisely, the binding constant (106) appears to be high enough to ensure adduct formation but also weak enough to release the complex once the biotarget is reached; this is assumed to be the optimal condition for BSA-driven transport and diffusion of a drug. (34)

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Monoiron cyclopentadienyl complexes, and ferrocenes in particular, have aroused great interest due to their anticancer properties, while diiron complexes have been much less investigated despite the advantageous cooperative effects provided by two iron centers. The readily accessible {Fe2Cp2(CO)2} scaffold offers considerable opportunities for the construction of various bridging hydrocarbyl ligands, and here we show that bioactive carboxylic acids can be incorporated through an alkyne-insertion reaction. Aspirin (enzyme inhibitor) and chlorambucil (DNA alkylating agent) were selected as representative compounds to demonstrate the viability of the synthetic approach, but this may be extended to other bioactive molecules given the generality of the insertion reaction. (10−12,29) The new complexes exhibit favorable characteristics in aqueous media, in that they are quite stable with a tendency to progressively release the bioactive fragment. The cytotoxicity ranges from moderate to the low-micromolar range, and complementary experiments reveal a possible multimodal action of the complexes, with the induction of intracellular ROS production playing a major role. The complexes manifest the specificity provided by the bioactive fragment, since experiments reveal the ability of chlorambucil complexes to alkylate DNA and that of aspirin complexes to inhibit COX-2 enzyme. In particular, diiron–chlorambucil conjugates display a cytotoxicity profile more comparable to that of cisplatin. The versatility of the synthetic method and the broad structural variability provided by the diiron core allows fine-tuning of physicochemical properties of the complexes, which is conducive to the future development of optimal iron drug candidates.

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Synthesis and Characterization of Compounds

General Details

Organic reactants were purchased from TCI Europe or Merck and were of the highest purity available, while solvents were purchased from Merck (petroleum ether, bp 40–60 °C). The compounds ALKA1, (25,35) [Fe2Cp2(CO)2(μ-CO){μ-CNMe(R)}]CF3SO3 (R = Me, [1a]CF3SO3; R = Xyl = 2,6-C6H3Me2, [1b]CF3SO3), (28) [11]CF3SO3, (36) [12]CF3SO3, and [14]CF3SO3 (11) and [13]CF3SO3 (37) were prepared according to the literature. The synthesis of alkynes was carried out under an N2 atmosphere using standard Schlenk techniques, and solvents were distilled before use from the appropriate drying agents under N2; all other operations were conducted in air. Once isolated, products were stored in air. Separations were carried out on columns of silica (Merck), deactivated alumina (Merck, 4% w/w water), or Celite (Fluka, 512 Medium). Infrared spectra of solutions were recorded on a PerkinElmer Spectrum 100 FT-IR spectrometer with a CaF2 liquid transmission cell (2300–1500 cm–1 range) or on solid samples at 298 K on a PerkinElmer FT-IR spectrometer, equipped with a UATR sampling accessory. UV–vis spectra were recorded on an Ultraspec 2100 Pro spectrophotometer. IR and UV–vis spectra were processed with Spectragryph software. (38) NMR spectra were recorded at 298 K on a Bruker Avance II DRX400 instrument equipped with a BBFO broad-band probe. Chemical shifts (expressed in parts per million) are referenced to the residual solvent peaks (39) (1H, 13C). NMR spectra were assigned with the assistance of 1H–13C (gs-HSQC and gs-HMBC) correlation experiments. (40) NMR signals due to secondary isomeric forms (where it has been possible to detect them) are italicized. Elemental analyses were performed on a Vario MICRO cube instrument (Elementar). HPLC-MS analyses were performed with a HPLC 1200 Infinity, coupled with a quadrupole time of flight tandem mass spectrometer 6530 Infinity Q-ToF detector by a Jet Stream ESI interface (Agilent Technologies, USA); the data were processed with Mass Hunter Qualitative Analysis software.

Synthesis and Characterization of Diiron Complexes

General Procedure

A solution of [1a,b]CF3SO3 (ca. 0.5 mmol) in MeCN (ca. 10 mL) was treated with Me3NO (1.3 equiv). The resulting mixture was stirred for 1 h, during which time progressive color darkening occurred. The complete conversion of the starting material into the corresponding acetonitrile adduct [Fe2Cp2(CO)(μ-CO)(NCMe){μ-CN(Me)(R)}]CF3SO3 (41) was checked by IR spectroscopy. The volatiles were removed under vacuum to afford a dark brown residue that was dissolved in dichloromethane (ca. 20 mL) and treated with the appropriate alkyne (ca. 1.3 equiv). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 48 h, and then it was filtered through Celite. The volatiles were evaporated from the filtered solution under reduced pressure, and the residue was repeatedly washed with diethyl ether and finally dried under vacuum.
[Fe2Cp2(CO)(μ-CO){μ-η13-Cγ(CH2OC(═O)C6H4OC(═O)Me)CβHCαNMe(Xyl)}]CF3SO3 ([2]CF3SO3) (Chart 1)
This compound was obtained from [1b]CF3SO3 and ALKA1: brown solid, yield 52%. Anal. Calcd for C35H32F3Fe2NO9S: C, 51.81; H, 3.98; N, 1.73; S, 3.95. Found: C, 51.70; H, 3.88; N, 1.83; S, 4.04. IR (CH2Cl2): ν̃/cm–1 2007vs (CO), 1820s (μ-CO), 1766s (MeC═O), 1727s (C6H4C═O), 1634m (CβCαN), 1607m (C–Carom). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ/ppm 8.05–6.90 (m, 7 H, C6H4 + C6H3); 6.81, 6.53 (d, 2J = 15.1 Hz, 2 H, CH2); 5.53, 5.24, 5.03, 4.45 (s, 10 H, Cp); 4.38 (s, 1 H, CβH); 4.20, 2.70 (s, 3 H, NMe); 2.21, 2.20 (s, 3 H, O═CMe); 2.18, 2.14, 2.07, 1.80 (s, 6 H, C6H3Me2). E/Z ratio ca. 2. 13C{1H} NMR (acetone-d6): δ/ppm 252.7 (μ-CO); 232.4 (Cα); 210.0 (CO); 200.7 (Cγ); 169.0 (O═CMe); 163.5 (C6H4C═O); 151.1 (C2); 145.2, 131.8, 131.3 (ipso-C6H3); 134.5, 131.2, 129.6, 129.4, 129.3, 126.3, 124.3 (C6H4 + C6H3); 123.2 (C1); 90.8, 88.1 (Cp); 76.3 (CH2); 48.6 (Cβ); 45.7 (NMe); 20.0 (O═CMe); 17.1, 16.5 (C6H3Me2). Crystals of 2 suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained by slow evaporation of the solvent from a methanol solution.

Chart 1

Chart 1. Structure of [2]+
[Fe2Cp2(CO)(μ-CO){μ-η13-Cγ(3-C6H4OC(═O)C6H4OC(═O)Me)CβHCαNMe2}]CF3SO3 ([3]CF3SO3) (Chart 2)
This compound was obtained from [1a]CF3SO3 and ALKA2: brown solid, yield 48%. Anal. Calcd for C33H28F3Fe2NO9S: C, 50.60; H, 3.60; N, 1.79; S, 4.09. Found: C, 50.45; H, 3.65; N, 1.83; S, 4.03. IR (CH2Cl2): ν̃/cm–1 1993vs (CO), 1809s (μ-CO), 1767m (MeC═O), 1743s (C6H4C═O), 1692m (CβCαN), 1607w (C–Carom), 1577w (C–Carom). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ/ppm 8.28 (dd, 3JH3–H4 = 7.8 Hz, 4JH3–H5 = 1.4 Hz, 1 H, H3); 7.71 (t, 3J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H, H5); 7.58 (t, 3J = 8.1 Hz, 1 H, H4); 7.51, 7.49–7.41, 7.25–7.18 (m, 5 H, H6 + H8 + H10 + H11 + H12); 5.25, 5.02 (s, 10 H, Cp); 4.84 (s, 1 H, CβH); 3.96, 3.43 (s, 6 H, NMe2); 2.30 (s, 3 H, O═CMe). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3): δ/ppm 255.7 (μ-CO); 224.5 (Cα); 209.4 (CO); 201.3 (Cγ); 169.9 (O═CMe); 163.5 (C6H4C═O); 157.0 (C7); 150.9, 150.3 (C2 + C9); 134.9, 132.2, 130.1, 126.4, 124.5, 123.8, 121.0, 120.1 (C6H4); 122.5 (C1); 91.3, 87.8 (Cp); 52.9 (Cβ); 51.7, 44.6 (NMe2); 21.2 (O═CMe).

Chart 2

Chart 2. Structure of [3]+
[Fe2Cp2(CO)(μ-CO){μ-η13-Cγ(3-C6H4OC(═O)C6H4OC(═O)Me)CβHCαNMe(Xyl)}]CF3SO3 ([4]CF3SO3) (Chart 3)
This compound was obtained from [1b]CF3SO3 and ALKA2: brown solid, yield 86%. Anal. Calcd. for C40H34F3Fe2NO9S: C, 55.00; H, 3.924; N, 1.60; S, 3.67. Found: C, 54.87; H, 3.95; N, 1.55; S, 3.52. IR (CH2Cl2): ν̃/cm–1 2004vs (CO), 1819s (μ-CO), 1768m (MeC═O), 1744s (C6H4C═O), 1631m (CβCαN), 1607w (C–Carom), 1578w (C–Carom). 1H NMR (acetone-d6): δ/ppm 8.23, 7.79, 7.65–7.00 (m, 11 H, C6H4 + C6H3); 5.70, 5.47 (s, 10 H, Cp); 4.44 (br s, 4 H, NMe + CβH); 2.37 (s, 3 H, O═CMe); 2.25, 1.89 (s, 6 H, C6H3Me2). 13C{1H} NMR (acetone-d6): δ/ppm 253.1 (μ-CO); 232.1 (Cα); 210.1 (CO); 169.0 (O═CMe); 163.1 (C6H4C═O); 157.2 (C7); 151.1, 150.4 (C2 + C9); 145.4, 132.0, 131.3 (ipso-C6H3); 134.9, 131.8, 129.7, 129.6, 129.3, 129.3, 126.2, 124.1, 124.1, 120.8, 120.1 (C6H4 + C6H3); 122.9 (C1); 92.5, 88.2 (Cp); 53.8 (Cβ); 45.5 (NMe); 20.2 (O═CMe); 17.3, 16.6 (C6H3Me2). Cγ overlapped with solvent signal.

Chart 3

Chart 3. Structure of [4]+
[Fe2Cp2(CO)(μ-CO){μ-η13-Cγ(3-C6H4NHC(═O)C6H4OC(═O)Me)CβHCαNMe2}]CF3SO3 ([5]CF3SO3) (Chart 4)
This compound was obtained from [1a]CF3SO3 and ALKA3: brown solid, yield 96%. Anal. Calcd for C33H29F3Fe2N2O8S: C, 50.66; H, 3.74; N, 3.58; S, 4.10. Found: C, 50.74; H, 3.62; N, 3.68; S, 4.00. IR (CH2Cl2): ν̃/cm–1 1991vs (CO), 1807s (μ-CO), 1770m (MeC═O), 1678s (CβCαN + NC = O), 1604m (C–Carom), 1582m (C–Carom), 1537s. 1H NMR (acetone-d6): δ/ppm 9.75 (s, 1 H, NH); 8.70, 7.90–7.20 (m, 8 H, C6H4); 5.45, 5.31 (s, 10 H, Cp); 4.74 (s, 1 H, CβH); 4.07, 3.48 (s, 6 H, NMe2); 2.23 (s, 3 H, O═CMe). 13C NMR (acetone-d6): δ/ppm 255.8 (μ-CO); 224.9 (Cα); 210.0 (CO); 203.6 (Cγ); 168.7 (O═Me); 164.8 (NC═O); 156.7 (C7); 148.7 (C2); 139.1 (C9); 129.6 (C1); 131.8, 129.1, 128.8, 125.9, 123.4, 122.4, 119.2, 118.2 (C6H4); 91.7, 87.9 (Cp); 53.0 (Cβ); 50.9, 44.2 (NMe2); 20.2 (O═CMe).

Chart 4

Chart 4. Structure of [5]+
[Fe2Cp2(CO)(μ-CO){μ-η13-Cγ(3-C6H4NHC(═O)C6H4OC(═O)Me)CβHCαNMe(Xyl)}]CF3SO3 ([6]CF3SO3) (Chart 5)
This compound was obtained from [1b]CF3SO3 and ALKA3: brown solid, yield 95%. Anal. Calcd. for C40H35F3Fe2N2O8S: C, 55.07; H, 4.04; N, 3.21; S, 3.68. Found: C, 55.25; H, 4.03; N, 3.25; S, 3.62. IR (CH2Cl2): ν̃/cm–1 2003vs (CO), 1816s (μ-CO), 1771w (MeC═O), 1678m (NC═O), 1628m (CβCαN), 1605m (C–Carom), 1583m (C–Carom), 1535s. 1H NMR (acetone-d6): δ/ppm 9.74 (s, 1 H, NH); 8.40 (s, 1 H, H8); 7.68, 7.44, 7.15 (m, 3 H, H10 + H11 + H12); 7.82, 7.59, 7.40, 7.24 (m, 4 H, H3 + H4 + H5 + H6); 7.26, 7.19, 7.10 (m, 3 H, C6H3); 5.69, 5.43, 5.38, 5.09 (s, 10 H, Cp); 4.43, 2.62 (s, 3 H, NMe); 4.36 (s, 1 H, CβH); 2.36, 1.89 (s, 6 H, C6H3Me2); 2.21 (s, 3 H, O═CMe). E/Z ratio 9. 13C NMR (acetone-d6): δ/ppm 253.4 (μ-CO); 232.2 (Cα); 210.3 (CO); 207.8 (Cγ); 168.6 (O═CMe); 164.7 (NC═O); 156.4 (C7); 148.7 (C2); 145.5, 132.0, 131.3 (ipso-C6H3); 139.0 (C9); 129.6, 129.3, 129.1 (C6H3); 129.1 (C1); 131.8, 129.3, 125.9, 123.4 (C3 + C4 + C5 + C6); 128.8, 122.0, 118.2 (C10 + C11 + C12); 118.2 (C8); 92.5, 92.4, 88.2, 88.0 (Cp); 53.8 (Cβ); 45.5 (NMe); 20.2 (O═CMe); 17.3, 16.6 (C6H3Me2).

Chart 5

Chart 5. Structure of [6]+
[Fe2Cp2(CO)(μ-CO){μ-η13-Cγ(4-C6H4NHC(═O)C6H4OC(═O)Me)CβHCαNMe2}]CF3SO3 ([7]CF3SO3) (Chart 6)
This compound was obtained from [1a]CF3SO3 and ALKA4: brown solid, yield 81%. Anal. Calcd for C33H29F3Fe2N2O8S: C, 50.66; H, 3.74; N, 3.58; S, 4.10. Found: C, 50.52; H, 3.78; N, 3.51; S, 4.16. IR (CH2Cl2): ν̃/cm–1 1991vs (CO), 1807s (μ-CO), 1773w (MeC═O), 1681s (CβCαN + NC = O), 1604m (C–Carom), 1589m (C–Carom), 1518s. 1H NMR (acetone-d6): δ/ppm 9.65 (s, 1 H, NH); 7.98, 7.95–7.70, 7.60, 7.42, 7.26 (m, 8 H, C6H4); 5.41, 5.30 (s, 10 H, Cp); 4.66 (s, 1 H, CβH); 4.05, 3.47 (s, 6 H, NMe2); 2.29 (s, 3 H, O═CMe). 13C{1H} NMR (acetone-d6): δ/ppm 256.0 (μ-CO); 225.3 (Cα); 210.1 (CO); 203.3 (Cγ); 168.6 (O═CMe); 152.3 (NC═O); 148.7, 138.4, 131.7, 129.7, 129.1, 128.1, 125.9, 123.5, 119.4, 119.4 (C6H4); 91.6, 87.7 (Cp); 52.7 (Cβ); 50.8, 44.1 (NMe2); 20.1 (O═CMe).

Chart 6

Chart 6. Structure of [7]+
[Fe2Cp2(CO)(μ-CO){μ-η13-Cγ(3-C6H4OC(═O)(CH2)3C6H4N(CH2CH2Cl)2)CβHCαNMe2}]CF3SO3 ([8]CF3SO3) (Chart 7)
This compound was obtained from [1a]CF3SO3 and ALKC1: brown solid, yield 87%. Anal. Calcd for C38H39Cl2F3Fe2N2O7S: C, 50.30; H, 4.33; N, 3.09; S, 3.53. Found: C, 50.21; H, 4.26; N, 3.15; S, 3.58. IR (CH2Cl2): ν̃/cm–1 1992vs (CO), 1809s (μ-CO), 1758m (OC═O), 1690w (CβCαN), 1615w (C–Carom), 1578w (C–Carom), 1519s. 1H NMR (acetone-d6): δ/ppm 7.71 (d, 3JH10–H9 = 7.3 Hz, 1 H, H10); 7.63 (br s, 1 H, H6); 7.59 (t, 3J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H, H9); 7.19 (d, 3JH8–H9 = 7.9 Hz, 1 H, H8); 7.15 (d, 3JH3–H2 = 8.6 Hz, 2 H, H3); 6.78 (d, 3JH2–H3 = 8.7 Hz, 2 H, H2); 5.42, 5.29 (s, 10 H, Cp); 4.72 (s, 1 H, CβH); 4.06, 3.48 (s, 6 H, NMe2); 3.81 (m, 4 H, NCH2); 3.75 (m, 4 H, CH2Cl); 2.67 (m, 4 H, H11 + H13); 2.08 (m, 2 H, H12). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3): δ/ppm 256.3 (μ-CO); 224.2 (Cα); 209.5 (CO); 202.0 (Cγ); 172.3 (C═O); 156.7 (C5); 150.5 (C7); 144.5 (C1); 130.2 (C4); 129.8 (C3 + C10); 123.9, 120.8 (C6 + C9); 120.0 (C8); 112.3 (C2); 91.0, 87.8 (Cp); 53.6 (NCH2); 53.2 (Cβ); 52.0, 44.7 (NMe2); 40.6 (CH2Cl); 34.0 (C13); 33.9 (C11); 26.7 (C12).

Chart 7

Chart 7. Structure of [8]+
[Fe2Cp2(CO)(μ-CO){μ-η13-Cγ(3-C6H4NHC(═O)(CH2)3C6H4N(CH2CH2Cl)2)CβHCαNMe2}]CF3SO3 ([9]CF3SO3) (Chart 8)
This compound was obtained from [1a]CF3SO3 and ALKC2: brown solid, yield 81%. Anal. Calcd for C38H40Cl2F3Fe2N3O6S: C, 50.35; H, 4.45; N, 4.64; S, 3.54. Found: C, 50.24; H, 4.53; N, 4.57; S, 3.61. IR (CH2Cl2): ν̃/cm–1 1991vs (CO), 1808s (μ-CO), 1683br-s (CβCαN + NC═O), 1615m (C–Carom), 1602m, 1584m (C–Carom), 1519vs. 1H NMR (acetone-d6): δ/ppm 9.52 (s, 1 H, NH); 8.53 (s, 1 H, H6); 7.52 (d, 3JH8–H9 = 7.9 Hz, 1 H, H8); 7.45 (t, 3J = 7.7 Hz, 1 H, H9); 7.38 (d, 3JH10–H9 = 7.1 Hz, 1 H, H10); 7.12 (d, 3JH3–H2 = 8.2 Hz, 2 H, H3); 6.74 (d, 3JH2–H3 = 8.2 Hz, 2 H, H2); 5.41, 5.26 (s, 10 H, Cp); 4.68 (s, 1 H, CβH); 4.04, 3.45 (s, 6 H, NMe2); 3.78 (m, 4 H, NCH2); 3.74 (m, 4 H, CH2Cl); 2.61 (t, 3JH13–H12 = 7.4 Hz, 2 H, H13); 2.48 (t, 3JH11–H12 = 7.2 Hz, 2 H, H11); 1.99 (m, 2 H, H12). 13C{1H} NMR (acetone-d6): δ/ppm 255.9 (μ-CO); 225.1 (Cα); 210.0 (CO); 204.1 (Cγ); 171.8 (C═O); 156.6 (C5); 144.7 (C1); 139.5 (C7); 130.6 (C4); 129.5 (C3); 128.6 (C9); 121.6 (C10); 118.5 (C6); 117.4 (C8); 112.3 (C2); 91.7, 87.8 (Cp); 53.1 (NCH2); 52.9 (Cβ); 50.8, 44.2 (NMe2); 40.8 (CH2Cl); 36.4 (C11); 34.0 (C13); 27.4 (C12).

Chart 8

Chart 8. Structure of [9]+
[Fe2Cp2(CO)(μ-CO){μ-η13-Cγ(4-C6H4NHC(═O)(CH2)3C6H4N(CH2CH2Cl)2)CβHCαNMe2}]CF3SO3 ([10]CF3SO3) (Chart 9)
This compound was obtained from [1a]CF3SO3 and ALKC3: brown solid, yield 64%. Anal. Calcd for C38H40Cl2F3Fe2N3O6S: C, 50.35; H, 4.45; N, 4.64; S, 3.54. Found: C, 50.23; H, 4.51; N, 4.69; S, 3.62. IR (CH2Cl2): ν̃/cm–1 = 1992vs (CO), 1808s (μ-CO), 1691br-s (CβCαN + NC═O), 1614m (C–Carom), 1606m, 1586m (C–Carom), 1518vs. 1H NMR (acetone-d6): δ/ppm 9.38 (s, 1 H, NH); 7.87 (d, 3JH7–H6 = 8.5 Hz, 2 H, H7); 7.79 (d, 3JH6–H7 = 8.6 Hz, 2 H, H6); 7.14 (d, 3JH3–H2 = 8.6 Hz, 2 H, H3); 6.78 (d, 3JH2–H3 = 8.6 Hz, 2 H, H2); 5.40, 5.29 (s, 10 H, Cp); 4.63 (s, 1 H, CβH); 4.05, 3.47 (s, 6 H, NMe2); 3.80 (m, 4 H, NCH2); 3.77 (m, 4 H, CH2Cl); 2.64 (t, 3JH11–H10 = 7.3 Hz, 2 H, H11); 2.46 (t, 3JH9–H10 = 7.5 Hz, 2 H, H9); 2.02 (m, 2 H, H10). 13C{1H} NMR (acetone-d6): δ/ppm 256.2 (μ-CO); 225.4 (Cα); 210.1 (CO); 203.7 (Cγ); 171.4 (C═O); 151.6 (C5); 144.8 (C1); 138.8 (C8); 130.7 (C4); 129.5 (C3); 128.0 (C6); 118.7 (C7); 112.3 (C2); 91.6, 87.7 (Cp); 53.1 (NCH2); 52.6 (Cβ); 50.9, 44.2 (NMe2); 40.8 (CH2Cl); 36.3 (C9); 34.0 (C11); 27.5 (C10).

Chart 9

Chart 9. Structure of [10]+

Cell Culture and Cytotoxicity Studies

Human ovarian carcinoma (A2780 and A2780cisR) cell lines were obtained from the European Collection of Cell Cultures. The Human Embryonic Kidney 293T (HEK 293T) cell line was obtained from the ATCC (Sigma, Buchs, Switzerland). Penicillin–streptomycin, RPMI 1640 GlutaMAX (where RPMI = Roswell Park Memorial Institute), and DMEM GlutaMAX media (where DMEM = Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium) were obtained from Life Technologies, and fetal bovine serum (FBS) was obtained from Sigma. The cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 GlutaMAX (A2780 and A2780cisR) and DMEM GlutaMAX (HEK 293T) media containing 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin at 37 °C and CO2 (5%). The A2780cisR cell line was routinely treated with cisplatin (2 μM) in the media to maintain cisplatin resistance. The cytotoxicity was determined using the 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. (42) Cells were seeded in flat-bottomed 96-well plates as a suspension in a prepared medium (100 μL aliquots and approximately 4300 cells/well) and preincubated for 24 h. Stock solutions of compounds were prepared in DMSO and were diluted in the medium. The solutions were sequentially diluted to give a final DMSO concentration of 0.5% and a final compound concentration range of 0–200 μM. Cisplatin was tested as a positive (0–100 μM) control. The compounds were placed in the preincubated 96-well plates in 100 μL aliquots, and the plates were incubated for a further 72 h. MTT (20 μL, 5 mg/mL in Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline) was placed in the cells, and the plates were incubated for a further 4 h. The culture medium was aspirated, and the purple formazan crystals, formed by the mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity of vital cells, were dissolved in DMSO (100 μL/well). The absorbance of the resulting solutions, directly proportional to the number of surviving cells, was quantified at 590 nm using a SpectroMax M5e multimode microplate reader (using SoftMax Pro software, version 6.2.2). The percentage of surviving cells was calculated from the absorbance of wells corresponding to the untreated control cells. The reported IC50 values are based on the means from two independent experiments, each comprising four tests per concentration level.

ROS Determination

The intracellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) upon treatment of the complexes [4]CF3SO3 and [9]CF3SO3 was measured by using the DCFH-DA (2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate, Sigma-Aldrich) assay, based on the cellular uptake of the nonfluorescent diacetate following deacetylation by esterases (2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein, DCFH) and oxidation to the fluorescent dichlorofluorescein (2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein, DCF). (43) A2780 cells were seeded at a concentration of 4 × 104 cells per well in 90 μL of complete growth medium into 96-well plates. After overnight incubation, the cells were treated following the manufacturer’s protocol. A 100 μL portion of a solution containing the fluorogenic probe was added to the culture medium and, after 1 h of incubation with 5% CO2 at 37 °C, cells were exposed with a final concentration of 10 μM of the tested compound; H2O2 100 μM was used as a positive control. Stock solutions of compounds were prepared as described above; cells incubated with equal amounts of DMSO in supplemented RPMI were used as a control. The fluorescence was measured up to 24 h with an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and with a 535 nm emission filter by Multilabel Counter (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The measurements were performed in triplicate, and results were reported as mean ± SD. Statistical differences were examined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and a Tukey test was used for post hoc analysis. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

COX-2 Inhibition Assays

The enzymatic activity of COX-2 (0.25 UN) was fluorimetrically assayed at 576 nm/586 nm at 25 °C by measuring the conversion rate of arachidonic acid (ARA) into resorufin by COX-2 as a function of time (COX-2 assay kit from Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The assay mixture contained 25 μM ADHP, 5 μM hemin, and 37.5 μM ARA in 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8). The inhibitory efficacy of the tested compounds was determined by recording the residual activity of COX-2 in the presence of variable concentrations of the analyzed compound (11–705 μM). The IC50 value was obtained using GraphPad Prism 7 software. All of the inhibitor assays were performed at least in triplicate.

Interaction with Biomolecules

Ethidium bromide (EB, ≥98.0%), bovine serum albumin (BSA, lyophilized powder, crystallized, ≥98.0%), and natural double-stranded DNA from calf thymus (DNA, lyophilized powder, Na+ salt in the form of fibers) were purchased from Merck, while anhydrous guanosine 5′-monophosphate disodium salt (Na2[GMP], >98.0%) was purchased from TCI Chemicals. Prior to use, DNA was sonicated to ca. 500 base pair length (MSE-Sonyprep sonicator, 7 cycles of 10 s sonication + 20 s pause at an amplitude of 14 μm, solution kept in ice bath—the final length was checked by agarose gel electrophoresis tests on the sample using a 100 bp DNA ladder) to produce stock solutions in water (ca. 2 mM). Stock solutions of EB and BSA were prepared by weighing directly in the buffer (NaCl 0.1 M, NaCac 0.01M, pH 7.0—NaCac is sodium cacodylate). A temperature-controlled (±0.1 °C) Shimadzu UV2450 spectrophotometer and PerkinElmer LS55 spectrofluorometer were the instruments used. Molar concentrations of solutions of EB (CEB), BSA (CBSA), and DNA (CDNA) were determined by absorbance measurements (εEB480 nm = 5700 M–1 cm–1; εBSA278 nm = 44000 M–1 cm–1; εDNA260 nm = 13200 M–1 cm–1 for a concentration expressed in base pairs). Solutions of the metal complex were prepared by weighing an appropriate amount of the solid and dissolving it in DMSO (ca. 5 mM). Ultrapure water (Sartorius) was the reaction medium. In EB/DNA exchange experiments, EB was added to DNA until the fluorescence emission at λex = 520 nm/λem = 595 nm (diagnostic wavelengths for the DNA-intercalated EB only) started to reach the plateau (CEB = 5.60 × 10–5 M, CDNA = 1.15 × 10–4 M). The concentrated stock solution of the metal complex was then directly added in small amounts to the EB/DNA mixture with a gastight syringe connected to a Mitutoyo micrometric screw (1 total turn of the screw = 8.2 μL). The total maximum amount of DMSO was checked (<3%) as well as the metal complex absorbance at the set wavelengths (A < 0.05 to ensure negligible inner filter effects). Note that a blank test was carried out by adding DMSO to the EB/DNA mixture, in order to quantify fluorescence changes due only to dilution/solvent effects. For BSA fluorescence titrations, the working solution of the metal complex (4.42 × 10–5 M for [4]CF3SO3, 4.59 × 10–5 M for [9]CF3SO3, both in the buffer) was added to a 3.34 × 10–7 M BSA solution in the buffer (λex = 280 nm, λem = 345 nm, dilution from stock such that the DMSO content is negligible). Each experiment was performed at least in duplicate; the reported values are mean values over the replicates (error <5%).
In order to analyze the interaction with a model nucleotide, a freshly prepared solution of [9]CF3SO3 (2 mg) in D2O/CD3OD (5/3 v/v) was treated with 1 equiv of anhydrous Na2[GMP]. The resulting mixture was maintained at 37 °C for 24 h, and then the final solution was filtered in order to remove some solid and analyzed by mass spectrometry. HPLC-MS(+): m/z found 1087.2451 [9GMP + Na]+, calcd for C47H53Fe2N8NaO12P 1087.2117; m/z found 555.0666 [9GMP + 2Na]2+, calcd for C47H53Fe2N8Na2O12P 555.1008. The isotopic patterns fit well the calculated patterns.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.organomet.1c00270.

  • Synthesis and characterization of alkynes, X-ray crystallography, solubility and stability in aqueous media, determination of partition coefficients, BSA binding studies, and NMR spectra of products (PDF)

Accession Codes

CCDC 20767102076712 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing [email protected], or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Silvia Schoch - University of Pisa, Dipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, 56124 Pisa, Italy
    • Mouna Hadiji - Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
    • Sarah A. P. Pereira - LAQV, REQUIMTE, Laboratório de Química Aplicada, Faculdade de Farmácia, da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    • M. Lúcia M. F. S. Saraiva - LAQV, REQUIMTE, Laboratório de Química Aplicada, Faculdade de Farmácia, da Universidade do Porto, Porto, PortugalOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6539-1741
    • Simona Braccini - University of Pisa, Dipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, 56124 Pisa, Italy
    • #Federica Chiellini - University of Pisa, Dipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, 56124 Pisa, ItalyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4680-9975
    • Tarita Biver - University of Pisa, Dipartimento di Farmacia, 56126 Pisa, ItalyUniversity of Pisa, Dipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, 56124 Pisa, ItalyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8512-8422
    • Stefano Zacchini - University of Bologna, Dipartimento di Chimica Industriale “Toso Montanari”, 40136 Bologna, ItalyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0739-0518
    • Guido Pampaloni - University of Pisa, Dipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, 56124 Pisa, ItalyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6375-4411
    • Paul J. Dyson - Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, SwitzerlandOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3117-3249
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.
    #Deceased in March 2021.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We gratefully thank the University of Pisa (PRA_2020_39: “New horizons in CO2 chemistry: from capture to fine chemicals and metal based drugs”) for financial support, Prof. Ilaria Degano (University of Pisa) for the execution of mass spectrometry analyses and helpful discussions, and the CIRCMSB (Consorzio Inter-Universitario di Ricerca in Chimica dei Metalli nei Sistemi Biologici). This contribution is part of the work from COST Action CA18202, NECTAR-Network for Equilibria and Chemical Thermodynamics Advanced Research, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 43 other publications.

  1. 1
    (a) Oun, R.; Moussa, Y. E.; Wheate, N. J. The side effects of platinum-based chemotherapy drugs: a review for chemists. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 66456653,  DOI: 10.1039/C8DT00838H
    (b) Siddik, Z. H. Cisplatin Mode of Cytotoxic Action and Molecular Basis of Resistance. Oncogene 2003, 22, 72657279,  DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206933
    (c) Apps, M. G.; Choi, E. H. Y.; Wheate, N. J. The state-of-play and future of platinum drugs. Endocr.-Relat. Cancer 2015, 22, R219R233,  DOI: 10.1530/ERC-15-0237
  2. 2

    Selected recent reviews:

    (a) Murray, B. S.; Dyson, P. J. Recent progress in the development of organometallics for the treatment of cancer. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2020, 56, 2834,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2019.11.001
    (b) Zhang, P.; Sadler, P. J. Advances in the design of organometallic anticancer complexes. J. Organomet. Chem. 2017, 839, 514,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2017.03.038
    (c) Lazarevič, T.; Rilak, A.; Bugarčič, Z. D. Platinum, palladium, gold and ruthenium complexes as anticancer agents: Current clinical uses, cytotoxicity studies and future perspectives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 142, 831,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.04.007
    (d) Meier-Menches, S. M.; Gerner, C.; Berger, W.; Hartinger, C. G.; Keppler, B. K. Structure–activity relationships for ruthenium and osmium anticancer agents – towards clinical development. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 909928,  DOI: 10.1039/C7CS00332C
    (e) Mora, M.; Gimeno, M. C.; Visbal, R. Recent advances in gold–NHC complexes with biological properties. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 447462,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CS00570B
  3. 3
    Kaim, W.; Schwederski, B.; Klein, A. iIn Bioinorganic Chemistry: Inorganic Elements in the Chemistry of Life, 2nd ed.; Wiley: 2013.
  4. 4
    (a) Jaouen, G.; Vessieres, A.; Top, S. Ferrocifen type anti cancer drugs. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 88028817,  DOI: 10.1039/C5CS00486A
    (b) Patra, M.; Gasser, G. The medicinal chemistry of ferrocene and its derivatives. Nat. Chem. Rev. 2017, 1, 0066,  DOI: 10.1038/s41570-017-0066
  5. 5
    (a) Wang, Y.; Dansette, P. M.; Pigeon, P.; Top, S.; McGlinchey, M. J.; Mansuy, D.; Jaouen, G. A new generation of ferrociphenols leads to a great diversity of reactive metabolites, and exhibits remarkable antiproliferative properties. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 7078,  DOI: 10.1039/C7SC04213B
    (b) Leonidova, A.; Anstaett, P.; Pierroz, V.; Mari, C.; Spingler, B.; Ferrari, S.; Gasser, G. Induction of Cytotoxicity through Photorelease of Aminoferrocene. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 97409748,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01332
    (c) Ocasio, C. A.; Sansook, S.; Jones, R.; Roberts, J. M.; Scott, T. G.; Tsoureas, N.; Coxhead, P.; Guille, M.; Tizzard, G. J.; Coles, S. J.; Hochegger, H.; Bradner, J. E.; Spencer, J. Pojamide: An HDAC3-Selective Ferrocene Analogue with Remarkably Enhanced Redox-Triggered Ferrocenium Activity in Cells. Organometallics 2017, 36, 32763283,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00437
  6. 6
    (a) Pilon, A.; Gírio, P.; Nogueira, G.; Avecilla, F.; Adams, H.; Lorenzo, J.; Garcia, M. H.; Valente, A. New iron cyclopentadienyl complexes bearing different phosphane co-ligands: Structural factors vs. cytotoxicity. J. Organomet. Chem. 2017, 852, 3442,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2017.10.004
    (b) Florindo, P. R.; Pereira, D. M.; Borralho, P. M.; Rodrigues, C. M. P.; Piedade, M. F. M.; Fernandes, A. C. Cyclopentadienyl–Ruthenium(II) and Iron(II) Organometallic Compounds with Carbohydrate Derivative Ligands as Good Colorectal Anticancer Agents. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 43394347,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00403
    (c) Herry, B.; Batchelor, L. K.; Roufosse, B.; Romano, D.; Baumgartner, J.; Borzova, M.; Reifenstahl, T.; Collins, T.; Benamrane, A.; Weggelaar, J.; Correia, M. C.; Dyson, P. J.; Blom, B. Heterobimetallic Ru(μ-dppm)Fe and homobimetallic Ru(μ-dppm)Ru complexes as potential anti-cancer agents. J. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 901, 120934,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2019.120934
  7. 7
    Agonigi, G.; Biancalana, L.; Lupo, M. G.; Montopoli, M.; Ferri, N.; Zacchini, S.; Binacchi, F.; Biver, T.; Campanella, B.; Pampaloni, G.; Zanotti, V.; Marchetti, F. Exploring the Anticancer Potential of Diiron Bis-cyclopentadienyl Complexes with Bridging Hydrocarbyl Ligands: Behavior in Aqueous Media and In Vitro Cytotoxicity. Organometallics 2020, 39, 645657,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.organomet.9b00681
  8. 8

    See for instance:

    (a) Ritleng, V.; Chetcuti, M. J. Hydrocarbyl Ligand Transformations on Heterobimetallic Complexes. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 797858,  DOI: 10.1021/cr940270y
    (b) Adams, R. D.; Captain, B. Bimetallic cluster complexes: Synthesis, structures and applications to catalysis. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 45214529,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2004.08.001
    (c) Patra, S.; Maity, N. Recent advances in (hetero)dimetallic systems towards tandem catalysis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 434, 213803,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213803
    (d) van Niekerk, A.; Chellan, P.; Mapolie, S. F. Heterometallic Multinuclear Complexes as Anti-Cancer Agents- An Overview of Recent Developments. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 2019, 34323455,  DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201900375
  9. 9

    Selected reviews:

    (a) Mazzoni, R.; Salmi, M.; Zanotti, V. C-C Bond Formation in Diiron Complexes. Chem. - Eur. J. 2012, 18, 1017410194,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201201040
    (b) Marchetti, F. Constructing Organometallic Architectures from Aminoalkylidyne Diiron Complexes. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 2018, 39874003,  DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201800659
    (c) García, M. E.; García-Vivó, D.; Ramos, A.; Ruiz, M. A. Phosphinidene-bridged binuclear complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 330, 136,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.09.008
  10. 10
    (a) Ciancaleoni, G.; Zacchini, S.; Zanotti, V.; Marchetti, F. DFT Mechanistic Insights into the Alkyne Insertion Reaction Affording Diiron μ-Vinyliminium Complexes and New Functionalization Pathways. Organometallics 2018, 37, 37183731,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.organomet.8b00448
    (b) Albano, V. G.; Busetto, L.; Marchetti, F.; Monari, M.; Zacchini, S.; Zanotti, V. Diiron μ-Vinyliminium Complexes from Acetylene Insertion into a Metal–Aminocarbyne Bond. Organometallics 2003, 22, 13261331,  DOI: 10.1021/om020923y
  11. 11
    Rocco, D.; Batchelor, L. K.; Agonigi, G.; Braccini, S.; Chiellini, F.; Schoch, S.; Biver, T.; Funaioli, T.; Zacchini, S.; Biancalana, L.; Ruggeri, M.; Pampaloni, G.; Dyson, P. J.; Marchetti, F. Anticancer Potential of Diiron Vinyliminium Complexes. Chem. - Eur. J. 2019, 25, 1480114816,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201902885
  12. 12
    Rocco, D.; Busto, N.; Pérez-Arnaiz, C.; Biancalana, L.; Zacchini, S.; Pampaloni, G.; Garcia, B.; Marchetti, F. Antiproliferative and bactericidal activity of diiron and monoiron cyclopentadienyl carbonyl complexes comprising a vinyl-aminoalkylidene unit. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2020, 34, e5923  DOI: 10.1002/aoc.5923
  13. 13
    Agonigi, G.; Batchelor, L. K.; Ferretti, E.; Schoch, S.; Bortoluzzi, M.; Braccini, S.; Chiellini, F.; Biancalana, L.; Zacchini, S.; Pampaloni, G.; Sarkar, B.; Dyson, P. J.; Marchetti, F. Mono-, Di- and Tetra-iron Complexes with Selenium or Sulphur Functionalized Vinyliminium Ligands: Synthesis, Structural Characterization and Antiproliferative Activity. Molecules 2020, 25, 1656,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules25071656
  14. 14
    Schoch, S.; Batchelor, L. K.; Funaioli, T.; Ciancaleoni, G.; Zacchini, S.; Braccini, S.; Chiellini, F.; Biver, T.; Pampaloni, G.; Dyson, P. J.; Marchetti, F. Diiron Complexes with a Bridging Functionalized Allylidene Ligand: Synthesis, Structural Aspects, and Cytotoxicity. Organometallics 2020, 39, 361373,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.organomet.9b00813
  15. 15
    (a) Štarha, P.; Trávníček, Z. Non-platinum complexes containing releasable biologically active ligands. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 395, 130145,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.06.001
    (b) Kilpin, K. J.; Dyson, P. J. Enzyme inhibition by metal complexes: concepts, strategies and applications. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 14101419,  DOI: 10.1039/c3sc22349c
  16. 16
    (a) Hanif, M.; Hartinger, C. G. From the hypothesis-driven development of organometallic anticancer drugs to new methods in mode of action studies. Adv. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 75, 339359,  DOI: 10.1016/bs.adioch.2019.10.007
    (b) Steel, T. R.; Walsh, F.; Wieczorek-Błauz, A.; Hanif, M.; Hartinger, C. G. Monodentately-coordinated bioactive moieties in multimodal half-sandwich organoruthenium anticancer agents. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 439, 213890,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213890
    (c) Gibson, D. Platinum(IV) anticancer agents; are we en route to the holy grail or to a dead end?. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2021, 217, 111353,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2020.111353
  17. 17
    (a) Studer, V.; Anghel, N.; Desiatkina, O.; Felder, T.; Boubaker, G.; Amdouni, Y.; Ramseier, J.; Hungerbühler, M.; Kempf, C.; Heverhagen, J. T.; Hemphill, A.; Ruprecht, N.; Furrer, J.; Pǎunescu, E. Conjugates Containing Two and Three Trithiolato-Bridged Dinuclear Ruthenium(II)-Arene Units as In Vitro Antiparasitic and Anticancer Agents. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 471,  DOI: 10.3390/ph13120471
    (b) Reithofer, M. R.; Valiahdi, S. M.; Jakupec, M. A.; Arion, V. B.; Egger, A.; Galanski, M.; Keppler, B. K. Novel Di- and Tetracarboxylatoplatinum(IV) Complexes. Synthesis, Characterization, Cytotoxic Activity, and DNA Platination. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 66926699,  DOI: 10.1021/jm070897b
    (c) Cabrera, S.; Navas, F.; Matesanz, A. I.; Maroto, M.; Riedel, T.; Dyson, P. J.; Quiroga, A. G. Versatile Route to trans-Platinum(II) Complexes via Manipulation of a Coordinated 3-(Pyridin-3-yl)propanoic Acid Ligand. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 72007208,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00126
  18. 18
    Chellan, P.; Sadler, P. J. Enhancing the Activity of Drugs by Conjugation to Organometallic Fragments. Chem. - Eur. J. 2020, 26, 86768688,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201904699
  19. 19
    (a) Singh, A.; Lumb, I.; Mehra, V.; Kumar, V. Ferrocene-appended pharmacophores: an exciting approach for modulating the biological potential of organic scaffolds. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 28402860,  DOI: 10.1039/C8DT03440K
    (b) Sansook, S.; Hassell-Hart, S.; Ocasio, C.; Spencer, J. Ferrocenes in medicinal chemistry; a personal perspective. J. Organomet. Chem. 2020, 905, 121017,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2019.121017
    (c) Wang, R.; Chen, H.; Yan, W.; Zheng, M.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Y. Ferrocene-containing hybrids as potential anticancer agents: Current developments, mechanisms of action and structure-activity relationships. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 190, 112109,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112109
    (d) Błauz, A.; Rychlik, B.; Makal, A.; Szulc, K.; Strzelczyk, P.; Bujacz, G.; Zakrzewski, J.; Woẑniak, K.; Plaẑuk, D. Ferrocene–Biotin Conjugates: Synthesis, Structure, Cytotoxic Activity and Interaction with Avidin. ChemPlusChem 2016, 81, 11911201,  DOI: 10.1002/cplu.201600320
    (e) Gimeno, M. C.; Goitia, H.; Laguna, A.; Luque, M. E.; Villacampa, M. D.; Sepúlveda, C.; Meireles, M. Conjugates of ferrocene with biological compounds. Coordination to gold complexes and antitumoral properties. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2011, 105, 13731382,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2011.07.015
  20. 20
    Prinz, C.; Vasyutina, E.; Lohmann, G.; Schrader, A.; Romanski, S.; Hirschhäuser, C.; Mayer, P.; Frias, C.; Herling, C. D.; Hallek, M.; Schmalz, H.-G.; Prokop, A.; Mougiakakos, D.; Herling, M. Organometallic nucleosides induce non-classical leukemic cell death that is mitochondrial-ROS dependent and facilitated by TCL1-oncogene burden. Mol. Cancer 2015, 14, 114,  DOI: 10.1186/s12943-015-0378-1
  21. 21
    Aspirin:Cheng, Q.; Shi, H.; Wang, H.; Min, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y. The ligation of aspirin to cisplatin demonstrates significant synergistic effects on tumor cells. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 74277430,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CC00419A
  22. 22

    Chlorambucil:

    (a) Qin, X.; Fang, L.; Chen, F.; Gou, S. Conjugation of platinum(IV) complexes with chlorambucil to overcome cisplatin resistance via a “joint action” mode toward DNA. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 137, 167175,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.05.056
    (b) Nazarov, A. A.; Meier, S. M.; Zava, O.; Nosova, Y. N.; Milaeva, E. R.; Hartinger, C. G.; Dyson, P. J. Protein ruthenation and DNA alkylation: chlorambucil-functionalized RAPTA complexes and their anticancer activity. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 36143623,  DOI: 10.1039/C4DT02764G
  23. 23
    Fiala, C.; Pasic, M. D. Aspirin: Bitter pill or miracle drug?. Clin. Biochem. 2020, 85, 14,  DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.07.003
  24. 24
    Goede, V.; Eichhorst, B.; Fischer, K.; Wendtner, C.-M.; Hallek, M. Past, present and future role of chlorambucil in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk. Lymphoma 2015, 56, 15851592,  DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2014.963077
  25. 25
    Rubner, G.; Bensdorf, K.; Wellner, A.; Kircher, B.; Bergemann, S.; Ott, I.; Gust, R. Synthesis and Biological Activities of Transition Metal Complexes Based on Acetylsalicylic Acid as Neo-Anticancer Agents. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 68896898,  DOI: 10.1021/jm101019j
  26. 26
    Biancalana, L.; Batchelor, L. K.; Funaioli, T.; Zacchini, S.; Bortoluzzi, M.; Pampaloni, G.; Dyson, P. J.; Marchetti, F. α-Diimines as Versatile, Derivatizable Ligands in Ruthenium(II) p-Cymene Anticancer Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 66696685,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b00882
  27. 27
    Liu, J.; Huang, W.; Pang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Yan, D. Hyperbranched Polyphosphates for Drug Delivery Application: Design, Synthesis, and In Vitro Evaluation. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 15641570,  DOI: 10.1021/bm100188h
  28. 28
    Agonigi, G.; Bortoluzzi, M.; Marchetti, F.; Pampaloni, G.; Zacchini, S.; Zanotti, V. Regioselective Nucleophilic Additions to Diiron Carbonyl Complexes Containing a Bridging Aminocarbyne Ligand: A Synthetic, Crystallographic and DFT Study. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 2018, 960971,  DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201701115
  29. 29
    Albano, V. G.; Busetto, L.; Marchetti, F.; Monari, M.; Zacchini, S.; Zanotti, V. Stereochemistry of the insertion of disubstituted alkynes into the metal aminocarbyne bond in diiron complexes. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 528538,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2003.11.003
  30. 30
    Biancalana, L.; Batchelor, L. K.; De Palo, A.; Zacchini, S.; Pampaloni, G.; Dyson, P. J.; Marchetti, F. A general strategy to add diversity to ruthenium arene complexes with bioactive organic compounds via a coordinated (4-hydroxyphenyl) diphenylphosphine ligand. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 1200112004,  DOI: 10.1039/C7DT02062G
  31. 31
    The previously reported value was aspirin 1160 mM:Makkar, F.; Chakraborty, K. First report of dual cyclooxygenase-2 and 5-lipoxygenase inhibitory halogen derivatives from the thallus of intertidal seaweed Kappaphycus alvarezii. Med. Chem. Res. 2018, 27, 23312340,  DOI: 10.1007/s00044-018-2239-0
  32. 32
    Macii, F.; Biver, T. Spectrofluorimetric analysis of the binding of a target molecule to serum albumin: tricky aspects and tips. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2021, 216, 111305,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2020.111305
  33. 33
    HypSpec2014 software; http://www.hyperquad.co.uk/.
  34. 34
    (a) Tǒpala, T.; Pascual-Álvarez, A.; Moldes-Tolosa, M. Á.; Bodoki, A.; Castiñeiras, A.; Torres, J.; del Pozo, C.; Borrás, J.; Alzuet-Piña, G. New sulfonamide complexes with essential metal ions [Cu(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II)]. Effect of the geometry and the metal ion on DNA binding and nuclease activity. BSA protein interaction. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2020, 202, 110823,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2019.110823
    (b) Elsadek, B.; Kratz, F. Impact of albumin on drug delivery-New applications on the horizon. J. Controlled Release 2012, 157, 428,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.069
  35. 35
    Schmidt, K.; Jung, M.; Keilitz, R.; Schnurr, B.; Gust, R. Acetylenehexacarbonyldicobalt complexes, a novel class of antitumor drugs. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000, 306, 616,  DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)00139-0
  36. 36
    Provinciali, G.; Bortoluzzi, M.; Funaioli, T.; Zacchini, S.; Campanella, B.; Pampaloni, G.; Marchetti, F. Tetrasubstituted Selenophenes from the Stepwise Assembly of Molecular Fragments on a Diiron Frame and Final Cleavage of a Bridging Alkylidene. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 1749717508,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c02748
  37. 37
    Agonigi, G.; Ciancaleoni, G.; Funaioli, T.; Zacchini, S.; Pineider, F.; Pinzino, C.; Pampaloni, G.; Zanotti, V.; Marchetti, F. Controlled Dissociation of Iron and Cyclopentadienyl from a Diiron Complex with a Bridging C3 Ligand Triggered by One-Electron Reduction. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 1517215186,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b02445
  38. 38
    Menges, F. Spectragryph - optical spectroscopy software, Ver. 1.2.5 , 20162017; http://www.effemm2.de/spectragryph.
  39. 39
    Fulmer, G. R.; Miller, A. J. M.; Sherden, N. H.; Gottlieb, H. E.; Nudelman, A.; Stoltz, B. M.; Bercaw, J. E.; Goldberg, K. I. NMR Chemical Shifts of Trace Impurities: Common Laboratory Solvents, Organics, and Gases in Deuterated Solvents Relevant to the Organometallic Chemist. Organometallics 2010, 29, 21762179,  DOI: 10.1021/om100106e
  40. 40
    Willker, W.; Leibfritz, D.; Kerssebaum, R.; Bermel, W. Gradient selection in inverse heteronuclear correlation spectroscopy. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1993, 31, 287292,  DOI: 10.1002/mrc.1260310315
  41. 41
    Albano, V. G.; Busetto, L.; Monari, M.; Zanotti, V. Reactions of acetonitrile di-iron μ-aminocarbyne complexes; synthesis and structure of [Fe2(μ-CNMe2)(μ-H)(CO)2(Cp)2]. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 606, 163168,  DOI: 10.1016/S0022-328X(00)00337-5
  42. 42
    Mosmann, T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 5563,  DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4
  43. 43
    Rosenkranz, A. R.; Schmaldienst, S.; Stuhlmeier, K. M.; Chen, W.; Knapp, W.; Zlabinger, G. J. A microplate assay for the detection of oxidative products using 2’,7’-dichlorofluorescin-diacetate. J. Immunol. Methods 1992, 156, 3945,  DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(92)90008-H

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 12 publications.

  1. Tong Zhang, Arindam Ghosh, Lisa Behringer-Pließ, Lata Chouhan, Ana V. Cunha, Remco W. A. Havenith, Eugenia Butkevich, Lei Zhang, Olalla Vázquez, Elke Debroye, Jörg Enderlein, Shoubhik Das. Proton Tunneling Allows a Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Process in the Cancer Cell. JACS Au 2024, 4 (12) , 4856-4865. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.4c00815
  2. Giulio Bresciani, Serena Boni, Tiziana Funaioli, Stefano Zacchini, Guido Pampaloni, Natalia Busto, Tarita Biver, Fabio Marchetti. Adding Diversity to a Diruthenium Biscyclopentadienyl Scaffold via Alkyne Incorporation: Synthesis and Biological Studies. Inorganic Chemistry 2023, 62 (31) , 12453-12467. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c01644
  3. Silvia Schoch, Dalila Iacopini, Maria Dalla Pozza, Sebastiano Di Pietro, Ilaria Degano, Gilles Gasser, Valeria Di Bussolo, Fabio Marchetti. Tethering Carbohydrates to the Vinyliminium Ligand of Antiproliferative Organometallic Diiron Complexes. Organometallics 2022, 41 (5) , 514-526. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.organomet.1c00519
  4. Ahmed Said Mohamed, Isabelle Jourdain, Michael Knorr, Stephanie Beffy, Abdirahman Elmi, Farhan Siddique, Samir Chtita, Carsten Strohmann, Annika Schmidt, Mostafa A. Hussien. Synthesis and crystallographic investigation of dicobalt tetrahedrane complexes ligated by 2-butyne-1,4-diol. In silico evaluation of their efficiency as anticancer metallodrugs. Journal of Molecular Structure 2025, 1321 , 140108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.140108
  5. Alberto Gobbo, Feihong Chen, Stefano Zacchini, Shaohua Gou, Fabio Marchetti. Enhanced DNA damage and anti-proliferative activity of a novel ruthenium complex with a chlorambucil-decorated ligand. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 2024, 260 , 112703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2024.112703
  6. Giulio Bresciani, Gianluca Ciancaleoni, Stefano Zacchini, Lorenzo Biancalana, Guido Pampaloni, Tiziana Funaioli, Fabio Marchetti. Mixed valence triiron complexes from the conjugation of [Fe I Fe I ] and [Fe II ] complexes via intermolecular carbyne/alkyne coupling. Dalton Transactions 2024, 53 (9) , 4299-4313. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4DT00079J
  7. Giulio Bresciani, Jakub Cervinka, Hana Kostrhunova, Lorenzo Biancalana, Marco Bortoluzzi, Guido Pampaloni, Vojtech Novohradsky, Viktor Brabec, Fabio Marchetti, Jana Kasparkova. N-Indolyl diiron vinyliminium complexes exhibit antiproliferative effects in cancer cells associated with disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis, ROS scavenging, and antioxidant activity. Chemico-Biological Interactions 2023, 385 , 110742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2023.110742
  8. Silvia Schoch, Simona Braccini, Lorenzo Biancalana, Alessandro Pratesi, Tiziana Funaioli, Stefano Zacchini, Guido Pampaloni, Federica Chiellini, Fabio Marchetti. When ferrocene and diiron organometallics meet: triiron vinyliminium complexes exhibit strong cytotoxicity and cancer cell selectivity. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers 2022, 9 (20) , 5118-5139. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2QI00534D
  9. Yong Wang, Pascal Pigeon, Wei Li, Jiangkun Yan, Patrick M. Dansette, Mohamed Othman, Michael J. McGlinchey, Gérard Jaouen. Diversity-oriented synthesis and bioactivity evaluation of N-substituted ferrocifen compounds as novel antiproliferative agents against TNBC cancer cells. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 234 , 114202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114202
  10. Fabio Marchetti. Alkylidyne and Alkylidene Complexes of Iron. 2022, 210-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820206-7.00105-0
  11. Lorenzo Biancalana, Fabio Marchetti. Aminocarbyne ligands in organometallic chemistry. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2021, 449 , 214203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214203
  12. Simona Braccini, Giorgia Rizzi, Lorenzo Biancalana, Alessandro Pratesi, Stefano Zacchini, Guido Pampaloni, Federica Chiellini, Fabio Marchetti. Anticancer Diiron Vinyliminium Complexes: A Structure–Activity Relationship Study. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13 (8) , 1158. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13081158

Organometallics

Cite this: Organometallics 2021, 40, 15, 2516–2528
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.organomet.1c00270
Published July 2, 2021

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

1761

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. General structure of diiron μ-vinyliminium complexes obtained from the assembly of one isocyanide (fragment in red) and one alkyne (fragment in blue), starting from Fe2Cp2(CO)4 and structures of aspirin (ASP-CO2H) and chlorambucil (CMB-CO2H).

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Synthesis of Terminal Alkynes Derivatized with Aspirin or Chlorambucila

    aReaction conditions: CH2Cl2 solution, room temperature; (i) and (ii) EDCI·HCl/DMAP; (iii) BIO-CO2H + oxalyl chloride/DMF; (iv) +alkyne/NEt3.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Molecular structures of (a) ALKA2 and (b) ALKA3 with key atoms labeled. Displacement ellipsoids are at the 30% probability level. Main bond distances (Å) and angles (deg) for ALKA2: C(1)–C(2) 1.4913(16), C(2)–O(1) 1.1947(13), C(2)–O(2) 1.3718(13), O(2)–C(3) 1.3947(13), C(8)–C(9) 1.4905(14), C(9)–O(3) 1.1984(13), C(9)–O(4) 1.3600(13), O(4)–C(10) 1.4050(13), C(14)–C(16) 1.4383(15), C(16)–C(17) 1.1840(17), C(1)–C(2)–O(2) 109.80(9), C(2)–O(2)–C(3) 116.37(8), C(8)–C(9)–O(4) 109.85(9), C(9)–O(4)–C(10) 117.57(8), C(14)–C(16)–C(17) 177.99(12). Main bond distances (Å) and angles (deg) for ALKA3: C(1)–C(2) 1.4827(16, C(2)–O(1) 1.2030(14), C(2)–O(2) 1.3532(13), O(2)–C(3) 1.3965(13), C(8)–C(9) 1.5035(15), C(9)–O(3) 1.2210(13), C(9)–N(1) 1.3577(14), N(1)–C(10) 1.4191(13), C(14)–C(16) 1.4400(16), C(16)–C(17) 1.1873(17), C(1)–C(2)–O(2) 110.18(9), C(2)–O(2)–C(3) 117.30(8), C(8)–C(9)–N(1) 114.60(9), C(9)–N(1)–C(10) 124.23(9), C(14)–C(16)–C(17) 175.31(12) Hydrogen bonds for ALKA3 (Å and deg): N(1)–H(1) 0.883(12), H(1)···O(1)#1 2.006(12), N(1)···O(1)#1 2.8653(12), ∠N(1)H(1)O(1)#1 164.0(12). Symmetry transformation: (#1) x + 1/2, y, −z + 1/2.

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2. Two-Step Synthesis of Diiron Vinyliminium Complexes via Coupling of Bridging Aminocarbyne Ligands with Aspirin- and Chlorambucil-Functionalized Alkynes (CF3SO3 Salts)

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. View of the cation of [2]CF3SO3 with key atoms labeled. Displacement ellipsoids are at the 30% probability level. Hydrogen atoms, except H(2), have been omitted for clarity. Main bond distances (Å) and angles (deg): Fe(1)–Fe(2) 2.5421(12), Fe(1)–C(31) 1.971(6), Fe(2)–C(31) 1.876(6), Fe(2)–C(32) 1.758(8), Fe(1)–C(3) 2.016(6), Fe(2)–C(3) 1.945(6), Fe(1)–C(2) 2.042(6), Fe(1)–C(1) 1.831(6), C(31)–O(1) 1.172(8), C(32)–O(2) 1.153(9), C(1)–N(1) 1.295(8), C(1)–C(2) 1.411(8), C(2)–C(3) 1.416(9), C(3)–C(13) 1.511(8), C(13)–O(3) 1.446(7), O(3)–C(14) 1.326(7), C(14)–O(4) 1.210(8), Fe(1)–C(31)–Fe(2) 82.7(2), Fe(1)–C(3)–Fe(2) 79.8(2), Fe(2)–C(32)–O(2) 175.5(7), Fe(2)–C(3)–C(2) 122.2(4), C(3)–C(2)–C(1) 116.6(5), C(2)–C(1)–N(1) 134.5(6), C(3)–C(13)–O(3) 105.1(5), C(13)–O(3)–C(14) 116.1(5), O(3)–C(14)–O(4) 123.1(6).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Structures of diiron complexes discussed in this work in addition to those shown in Scheme 2: [2’]+, [3′]+, [5′]+, [8OH]+, and [82OH]+ formed upon release of the bioactive fragments in aqueous/biological media; 9GMP formed upon interaction of [9]+ with the model nucleotide guanosine 5′-monophosphate (disodium salt, Na2[GMP]); [1114]+ investigated for COX-2 inhibition assays. The structures of [8OH]+ and [82OH]+ are also representative of those of the homologous complexes [9OH]+, [10OH]+, [92OH]+, and [102OH]+ (not shown).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Fluorescence kinetic measurements of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS, p < 0.05). A2780 cells were incubated for 24 h with 10 μM of the iron compounds at 37 °C and 5% CO2.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Ethidium bromide displacement tests for selected diiron vinyliminium complexes. Conditions: CDNA = 1.15 × 10–4 M, CEB = 5.60 × 10–5 M, NaCl 0.1 M, NaCac 0.01 M, λex = 520 nm, λem= 595 nm, T = 25 °C.

    Chart 1

    Chart 1. Structure of [2]+

    Chart 2

    Chart 2. Structure of [3]+

    Chart 3

    Chart 3. Structure of [4]+

    Chart 4

    Chart 4. Structure of [5]+

    Chart 5

    Chart 5. Structure of [6]+

    Chart 6

    Chart 6. Structure of [7]+

    Chart 7

    Chart 7. Structure of [8]+

    Chart 8

    Chart 8. Structure of [9]+

    Chart 9

    Chart 9. Structure of [10]+
  • References


    This article references 43 other publications.

    1. 1
      (a) Oun, R.; Moussa, Y. E.; Wheate, N. J. The side effects of platinum-based chemotherapy drugs: a review for chemists. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 66456653,  DOI: 10.1039/C8DT00838H
      (b) Siddik, Z. H. Cisplatin Mode of Cytotoxic Action and Molecular Basis of Resistance. Oncogene 2003, 22, 72657279,  DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206933
      (c) Apps, M. G.; Choi, E. H. Y.; Wheate, N. J. The state-of-play and future of platinum drugs. Endocr.-Relat. Cancer 2015, 22, R219R233,  DOI: 10.1530/ERC-15-0237
    2. 2

      Selected recent reviews:

      (a) Murray, B. S.; Dyson, P. J. Recent progress in the development of organometallics for the treatment of cancer. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2020, 56, 2834,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2019.11.001
      (b) Zhang, P.; Sadler, P. J. Advances in the design of organometallic anticancer complexes. J. Organomet. Chem. 2017, 839, 514,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2017.03.038
      (c) Lazarevič, T.; Rilak, A.; Bugarčič, Z. D. Platinum, palladium, gold and ruthenium complexes as anticancer agents: Current clinical uses, cytotoxicity studies and future perspectives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 142, 831,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.04.007
      (d) Meier-Menches, S. M.; Gerner, C.; Berger, W.; Hartinger, C. G.; Keppler, B. K. Structure–activity relationships for ruthenium and osmium anticancer agents – towards clinical development. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 909928,  DOI: 10.1039/C7CS00332C
      (e) Mora, M.; Gimeno, M. C.; Visbal, R. Recent advances in gold–NHC complexes with biological properties. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 447462,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CS00570B
    3. 3
      Kaim, W.; Schwederski, B.; Klein, A. iIn Bioinorganic Chemistry: Inorganic Elements in the Chemistry of Life, 2nd ed.; Wiley: 2013.
    4. 4
      (a) Jaouen, G.; Vessieres, A.; Top, S. Ferrocifen type anti cancer drugs. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 88028817,  DOI: 10.1039/C5CS00486A
      (b) Patra, M.; Gasser, G. The medicinal chemistry of ferrocene and its derivatives. Nat. Chem. Rev. 2017, 1, 0066,  DOI: 10.1038/s41570-017-0066
    5. 5
      (a) Wang, Y.; Dansette, P. M.; Pigeon, P.; Top, S.; McGlinchey, M. J.; Mansuy, D.; Jaouen, G. A new generation of ferrociphenols leads to a great diversity of reactive metabolites, and exhibits remarkable antiproliferative properties. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 7078,  DOI: 10.1039/C7SC04213B
      (b) Leonidova, A.; Anstaett, P.; Pierroz, V.; Mari, C.; Spingler, B.; Ferrari, S.; Gasser, G. Induction of Cytotoxicity through Photorelease of Aminoferrocene. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 97409748,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01332
      (c) Ocasio, C. A.; Sansook, S.; Jones, R.; Roberts, J. M.; Scott, T. G.; Tsoureas, N.; Coxhead, P.; Guille, M.; Tizzard, G. J.; Coles, S. J.; Hochegger, H.; Bradner, J. E.; Spencer, J. Pojamide: An HDAC3-Selective Ferrocene Analogue with Remarkably Enhanced Redox-Triggered Ferrocenium Activity in Cells. Organometallics 2017, 36, 32763283,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00437
    6. 6
      (a) Pilon, A.; Gírio, P.; Nogueira, G.; Avecilla, F.; Adams, H.; Lorenzo, J.; Garcia, M. H.; Valente, A. New iron cyclopentadienyl complexes bearing different phosphane co-ligands: Structural factors vs. cytotoxicity. J. Organomet. Chem. 2017, 852, 3442,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2017.10.004
      (b) Florindo, P. R.; Pereira, D. M.; Borralho, P. M.; Rodrigues, C. M. P.; Piedade, M. F. M.; Fernandes, A. C. Cyclopentadienyl–Ruthenium(II) and Iron(II) Organometallic Compounds with Carbohydrate Derivative Ligands as Good Colorectal Anticancer Agents. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 43394347,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00403
      (c) Herry, B.; Batchelor, L. K.; Roufosse, B.; Romano, D.; Baumgartner, J.; Borzova, M.; Reifenstahl, T.; Collins, T.; Benamrane, A.; Weggelaar, J.; Correia, M. C.; Dyson, P. J.; Blom, B. Heterobimetallic Ru(μ-dppm)Fe and homobimetallic Ru(μ-dppm)Ru complexes as potential anti-cancer agents. J. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 901, 120934,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2019.120934
    7. 7
      Agonigi, G.; Biancalana, L.; Lupo, M. G.; Montopoli, M.; Ferri, N.; Zacchini, S.; Binacchi, F.; Biver, T.; Campanella, B.; Pampaloni, G.; Zanotti, V.; Marchetti, F. Exploring the Anticancer Potential of Diiron Bis-cyclopentadienyl Complexes with Bridging Hydrocarbyl Ligands: Behavior in Aqueous Media and In Vitro Cytotoxicity. Organometallics 2020, 39, 645657,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.organomet.9b00681
    8. 8

      See for instance:

      (a) Ritleng, V.; Chetcuti, M. J. Hydrocarbyl Ligand Transformations on Heterobimetallic Complexes. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 797858,  DOI: 10.1021/cr940270y
      (b) Adams, R. D.; Captain, B. Bimetallic cluster complexes: Synthesis, structures and applications to catalysis. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 45214529,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2004.08.001
      (c) Patra, S.; Maity, N. Recent advances in (hetero)dimetallic systems towards tandem catalysis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 434, 213803,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213803
      (d) van Niekerk, A.; Chellan, P.; Mapolie, S. F. Heterometallic Multinuclear Complexes as Anti-Cancer Agents- An Overview of Recent Developments. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 2019, 34323455,  DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201900375
    9. 9

      Selected reviews:

      (a) Mazzoni, R.; Salmi, M.; Zanotti, V. C-C Bond Formation in Diiron Complexes. Chem. - Eur. J. 2012, 18, 1017410194,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201201040
      (b) Marchetti, F. Constructing Organometallic Architectures from Aminoalkylidyne Diiron Complexes. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 2018, 39874003,  DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201800659
      (c) García, M. E.; García-Vivó, D.; Ramos, A.; Ruiz, M. A. Phosphinidene-bridged binuclear complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 330, 136,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.09.008
    10. 10
      (a) Ciancaleoni, G.; Zacchini, S.; Zanotti, V.; Marchetti, F. DFT Mechanistic Insights into the Alkyne Insertion Reaction Affording Diiron μ-Vinyliminium Complexes and New Functionalization Pathways. Organometallics 2018, 37, 37183731,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.organomet.8b00448
      (b) Albano, V. G.; Busetto, L.; Marchetti, F.; Monari, M.; Zacchini, S.; Zanotti, V. Diiron μ-Vinyliminium Complexes from Acetylene Insertion into a Metal–Aminocarbyne Bond. Organometallics 2003, 22, 13261331,  DOI: 10.1021/om020923y
    11. 11
      Rocco, D.; Batchelor, L. K.; Agonigi, G.; Braccini, S.; Chiellini, F.; Schoch, S.; Biver, T.; Funaioli, T.; Zacchini, S.; Biancalana, L.; Ruggeri, M.; Pampaloni, G.; Dyson, P. J.; Marchetti, F. Anticancer Potential of Diiron Vinyliminium Complexes. Chem. - Eur. J. 2019, 25, 1480114816,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201902885
    12. 12
      Rocco, D.; Busto, N.; Pérez-Arnaiz, C.; Biancalana, L.; Zacchini, S.; Pampaloni, G.; Garcia, B.; Marchetti, F. Antiproliferative and bactericidal activity of diiron and monoiron cyclopentadienyl carbonyl complexes comprising a vinyl-aminoalkylidene unit. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2020, 34, e5923  DOI: 10.1002/aoc.5923
    13. 13
      Agonigi, G.; Batchelor, L. K.; Ferretti, E.; Schoch, S.; Bortoluzzi, M.; Braccini, S.; Chiellini, F.; Biancalana, L.; Zacchini, S.; Pampaloni, G.; Sarkar, B.; Dyson, P. J.; Marchetti, F. Mono-, Di- and Tetra-iron Complexes with Selenium or Sulphur Functionalized Vinyliminium Ligands: Synthesis, Structural Characterization and Antiproliferative Activity. Molecules 2020, 25, 1656,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules25071656
    14. 14
      Schoch, S.; Batchelor, L. K.; Funaioli, T.; Ciancaleoni, G.; Zacchini, S.; Braccini, S.; Chiellini, F.; Biver, T.; Pampaloni, G.; Dyson, P. J.; Marchetti, F. Diiron Complexes with a Bridging Functionalized Allylidene Ligand: Synthesis, Structural Aspects, and Cytotoxicity. Organometallics 2020, 39, 361373,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.organomet.9b00813
    15. 15
      (a) Štarha, P.; Trávníček, Z. Non-platinum complexes containing releasable biologically active ligands. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 395, 130145,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.06.001
      (b) Kilpin, K. J.; Dyson, P. J. Enzyme inhibition by metal complexes: concepts, strategies and applications. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 14101419,  DOI: 10.1039/c3sc22349c
    16. 16
      (a) Hanif, M.; Hartinger, C. G. From the hypothesis-driven development of organometallic anticancer drugs to new methods in mode of action studies. Adv. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 75, 339359,  DOI: 10.1016/bs.adioch.2019.10.007
      (b) Steel, T. R.; Walsh, F.; Wieczorek-Błauz, A.; Hanif, M.; Hartinger, C. G. Monodentately-coordinated bioactive moieties in multimodal half-sandwich organoruthenium anticancer agents. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 439, 213890,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213890
      (c) Gibson, D. Platinum(IV) anticancer agents; are we en route to the holy grail or to a dead end?. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2021, 217, 111353,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2020.111353
    17. 17
      (a) Studer, V.; Anghel, N.; Desiatkina, O.; Felder, T.; Boubaker, G.; Amdouni, Y.; Ramseier, J.; Hungerbühler, M.; Kempf, C.; Heverhagen, J. T.; Hemphill, A.; Ruprecht, N.; Furrer, J.; Pǎunescu, E. Conjugates Containing Two and Three Trithiolato-Bridged Dinuclear Ruthenium(II)-Arene Units as In Vitro Antiparasitic and Anticancer Agents. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 471,  DOI: 10.3390/ph13120471
      (b) Reithofer, M. R.; Valiahdi, S. M.; Jakupec, M. A.; Arion, V. B.; Egger, A.; Galanski, M.; Keppler, B. K. Novel Di- and Tetracarboxylatoplatinum(IV) Complexes. Synthesis, Characterization, Cytotoxic Activity, and DNA Platination. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 66926699,  DOI: 10.1021/jm070897b
      (c) Cabrera, S.; Navas, F.; Matesanz, A. I.; Maroto, M.; Riedel, T.; Dyson, P. J.; Quiroga, A. G. Versatile Route to trans-Platinum(II) Complexes via Manipulation of a Coordinated 3-(Pyridin-3-yl)propanoic Acid Ligand. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 72007208,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00126
    18. 18
      Chellan, P.; Sadler, P. J. Enhancing the Activity of Drugs by Conjugation to Organometallic Fragments. Chem. - Eur. J. 2020, 26, 86768688,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201904699
    19. 19
      (a) Singh, A.; Lumb, I.; Mehra, V.; Kumar, V. Ferrocene-appended pharmacophores: an exciting approach for modulating the biological potential of organic scaffolds. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 28402860,  DOI: 10.1039/C8DT03440K
      (b) Sansook, S.; Hassell-Hart, S.; Ocasio, C.; Spencer, J. Ferrocenes in medicinal chemistry; a personal perspective. J. Organomet. Chem. 2020, 905, 121017,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2019.121017
      (c) Wang, R.; Chen, H.; Yan, W.; Zheng, M.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Y. Ferrocene-containing hybrids as potential anticancer agents: Current developments, mechanisms of action and structure-activity relationships. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 190, 112109,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112109
      (d) Błauz, A.; Rychlik, B.; Makal, A.; Szulc, K.; Strzelczyk, P.; Bujacz, G.; Zakrzewski, J.; Woẑniak, K.; Plaẑuk, D. Ferrocene–Biotin Conjugates: Synthesis, Structure, Cytotoxic Activity and Interaction with Avidin. ChemPlusChem 2016, 81, 11911201,  DOI: 10.1002/cplu.201600320
      (e) Gimeno, M. C.; Goitia, H.; Laguna, A.; Luque, M. E.; Villacampa, M. D.; Sepúlveda, C.; Meireles, M. Conjugates of ferrocene with biological compounds. Coordination to gold complexes and antitumoral properties. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2011, 105, 13731382,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2011.07.015
    20. 20
      Prinz, C.; Vasyutina, E.; Lohmann, G.; Schrader, A.; Romanski, S.; Hirschhäuser, C.; Mayer, P.; Frias, C.; Herling, C. D.; Hallek, M.; Schmalz, H.-G.; Prokop, A.; Mougiakakos, D.; Herling, M. Organometallic nucleosides induce non-classical leukemic cell death that is mitochondrial-ROS dependent and facilitated by TCL1-oncogene burden. Mol. Cancer 2015, 14, 114,  DOI: 10.1186/s12943-015-0378-1
    21. 21
      Aspirin:Cheng, Q.; Shi, H.; Wang, H.; Min, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y. The ligation of aspirin to cisplatin demonstrates significant synergistic effects on tumor cells. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 74277430,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CC00419A
    22. 22

      Chlorambucil:

      (a) Qin, X.; Fang, L.; Chen, F.; Gou, S. Conjugation of platinum(IV) complexes with chlorambucil to overcome cisplatin resistance via a “joint action” mode toward DNA. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 137, 167175,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.05.056
      (b) Nazarov, A. A.; Meier, S. M.; Zava, O.; Nosova, Y. N.; Milaeva, E. R.; Hartinger, C. G.; Dyson, P. J. Protein ruthenation and DNA alkylation: chlorambucil-functionalized RAPTA complexes and their anticancer activity. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 36143623,  DOI: 10.1039/C4DT02764G
    23. 23
      Fiala, C.; Pasic, M. D. Aspirin: Bitter pill or miracle drug?. Clin. Biochem. 2020, 85, 14,  DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.07.003
    24. 24
      Goede, V.; Eichhorst, B.; Fischer, K.; Wendtner, C.-M.; Hallek, M. Past, present and future role of chlorambucil in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk. Lymphoma 2015, 56, 15851592,  DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2014.963077
    25. 25
      Rubner, G.; Bensdorf, K.; Wellner, A.; Kircher, B.; Bergemann, S.; Ott, I.; Gust, R. Synthesis and Biological Activities of Transition Metal Complexes Based on Acetylsalicylic Acid as Neo-Anticancer Agents. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 68896898,  DOI: 10.1021/jm101019j
    26. 26
      Biancalana, L.; Batchelor, L. K.; Funaioli, T.; Zacchini, S.; Bortoluzzi, M.; Pampaloni, G.; Dyson, P. J.; Marchetti, F. α-Diimines as Versatile, Derivatizable Ligands in Ruthenium(II) p-Cymene Anticancer Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 66696685,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b00882
    27. 27
      Liu, J.; Huang, W.; Pang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Yan, D. Hyperbranched Polyphosphates for Drug Delivery Application: Design, Synthesis, and In Vitro Evaluation. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 15641570,  DOI: 10.1021/bm100188h
    28. 28
      Agonigi, G.; Bortoluzzi, M.; Marchetti, F.; Pampaloni, G.; Zacchini, S.; Zanotti, V. Regioselective Nucleophilic Additions to Diiron Carbonyl Complexes Containing a Bridging Aminocarbyne Ligand: A Synthetic, Crystallographic and DFT Study. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 2018, 960971,  DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201701115
    29. 29
      Albano, V. G.; Busetto, L.; Marchetti, F.; Monari, M.; Zacchini, S.; Zanotti, V. Stereochemistry of the insertion of disubstituted alkynes into the metal aminocarbyne bond in diiron complexes. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 528538,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2003.11.003
    30. 30
      Biancalana, L.; Batchelor, L. K.; De Palo, A.; Zacchini, S.; Pampaloni, G.; Dyson, P. J.; Marchetti, F. A general strategy to add diversity to ruthenium arene complexes with bioactive organic compounds via a coordinated (4-hydroxyphenyl) diphenylphosphine ligand. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 1200112004,  DOI: 10.1039/C7DT02062G
    31. 31
      The previously reported value was aspirin 1160 mM:Makkar, F.; Chakraborty, K. First report of dual cyclooxygenase-2 and 5-lipoxygenase inhibitory halogen derivatives from the thallus of intertidal seaweed Kappaphycus alvarezii. Med. Chem. Res. 2018, 27, 23312340,  DOI: 10.1007/s00044-018-2239-0
    32. 32
      Macii, F.; Biver, T. Spectrofluorimetric analysis of the binding of a target molecule to serum albumin: tricky aspects and tips. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2021, 216, 111305,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2020.111305
    33. 33
      HypSpec2014 software; http://www.hyperquad.co.uk/.
    34. 34
      (a) Tǒpala, T.; Pascual-Álvarez, A.; Moldes-Tolosa, M. Á.; Bodoki, A.; Castiñeiras, A.; Torres, J.; del Pozo, C.; Borrás, J.; Alzuet-Piña, G. New sulfonamide complexes with essential metal ions [Cu(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II)]. Effect of the geometry and the metal ion on DNA binding and nuclease activity. BSA protein interaction. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2020, 202, 110823,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2019.110823
      (b) Elsadek, B.; Kratz, F. Impact of albumin on drug delivery-New applications on the horizon. J. Controlled Release 2012, 157, 428,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.069
    35. 35
      Schmidt, K.; Jung, M.; Keilitz, R.; Schnurr, B.; Gust, R. Acetylenehexacarbonyldicobalt complexes, a novel class of antitumor drugs. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000, 306, 616,  DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)00139-0
    36. 36
      Provinciali, G.; Bortoluzzi, M.; Funaioli, T.; Zacchini, S.; Campanella, B.; Pampaloni, G.; Marchetti, F. Tetrasubstituted Selenophenes from the Stepwise Assembly of Molecular Fragments on a Diiron Frame and Final Cleavage of a Bridging Alkylidene. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 1749717508,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c02748
    37. 37
      Agonigi, G.; Ciancaleoni, G.; Funaioli, T.; Zacchini, S.; Pineider, F.; Pinzino, C.; Pampaloni, G.; Zanotti, V.; Marchetti, F. Controlled Dissociation of Iron and Cyclopentadienyl from a Diiron Complex with a Bridging C3 Ligand Triggered by One-Electron Reduction. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 1517215186,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b02445
    38. 38
      Menges, F. Spectragryph - optical spectroscopy software, Ver. 1.2.5 , 20162017; http://www.effemm2.de/spectragryph.
    39. 39
      Fulmer, G. R.; Miller, A. J. M.; Sherden, N. H.; Gottlieb, H. E.; Nudelman, A.; Stoltz, B. M.; Bercaw, J. E.; Goldberg, K. I. NMR Chemical Shifts of Trace Impurities: Common Laboratory Solvents, Organics, and Gases in Deuterated Solvents Relevant to the Organometallic Chemist. Organometallics 2010, 29, 21762179,  DOI: 10.1021/om100106e
    40. 40
      Willker, W.; Leibfritz, D.; Kerssebaum, R.; Bermel, W. Gradient selection in inverse heteronuclear correlation spectroscopy. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1993, 31, 287292,  DOI: 10.1002/mrc.1260310315
    41. 41
      Albano, V. G.; Busetto, L.; Monari, M.; Zanotti, V. Reactions of acetonitrile di-iron μ-aminocarbyne complexes; synthesis and structure of [Fe2(μ-CNMe2)(μ-H)(CO)2(Cp)2]. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 606, 163168,  DOI: 10.1016/S0022-328X(00)00337-5
    42. 42
      Mosmann, T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 5563,  DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4
    43. 43
      Rosenkranz, A. R.; Schmaldienst, S.; Stuhlmeier, K. M.; Chen, W.; Knapp, W.; Zlabinger, G. J. A microplate assay for the detection of oxidative products using 2’,7’-dichlorofluorescin-diacetate. J. Immunol. Methods 1992, 156, 3945,  DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(92)90008-H
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.organomet.1c00270.

    • Synthesis and characterization of alkynes, X-ray crystallography, solubility and stability in aqueous media, determination of partition coefficients, BSA binding studies, and NMR spectra of products (PDF)

    Accession Codes

    CCDC 20767102076712 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing [email protected], or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.