logo
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Mg- and Mn-MOFs Boost the Antibiotic Activity of Nalidixic Acid

  • Vânia André*
    Vânia André
    Centro de Química Estrutural, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, Lisbon 1049-001, Portugal
    *E-mail: [email protected]
  • André Ramires Ferreira da Silva
    André Ramires Ferreira da Silva
    Centro de Química Estrutural, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, Lisbon 1049-001, Portugal
  • Auguste Fernandes
    Auguste Fernandes
    Centro de Química Estrutural, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, Lisbon 1049-001, Portugal
  • Raquel Frade
    Raquel Frade
    Instituto de Investigação do Medicamento (iMed.ULisboa), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon 1649-003, Portugal
    More by Raquel Frade
  • Catarina Garcia
    Catarina Garcia
    Centre Research for Biosciences & Health Technologies (CBIOS), Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Lisbon 1749-024, Portugal
  • Patrícia Rijo
    Patrícia Rijo
    Instituto de Investigação do Medicamento (iMed.ULisboa), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon 1649-003, Portugal
    Centre Research for Biosciences & Health Technologies (CBIOS), Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Lisbon 1749-024, Portugal
  • Alexandra M. M. Antunes
    Alexandra M. M. Antunes
    Centro de Química Estrutural, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, Lisbon 1049-001, Portugal
  • João Rocha
    João Rocha
    University of Aveiro, Department of Chemistry, CICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials, Aveiro 3810-193, Portugal
    More by João Rocha
  • , and 
  • M. Teresa Duarte
    M. Teresa Duarte
    Centro de Química Estrutural, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, Lisbon 1049-001, Portugal
Cite this: ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2019, 2, 6, 2347–2354
Publication Date (Web):May 8, 2019
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.9b00046
Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society
Authors ChoiceACS AuthorChoice
Article Views
832
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

PDF (3 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

The development of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) enclosing active pharmaceutical ingredients is of considerable interest, as their use in controlled drug release and delivery is very promising. Although nalidixic acid is an antibiotic with a broad spectrum of biological applications, effective mainly against Gram-negative infections, its oral bioavailability is low due to a poor solubility and slow dissolution. Herein, we report new metal–organic frameworks (BioMOFs) comprising nalidixic acid and divalent magnesium and manganese ions. These compounds showed an adequate cytotoxicity and improved antimicrobial activity, especially against Gram-negative bacteria. These BioMOFS are among the first examples containing active pharmaceutical ingredients as linkers. Importantly, it is shown that a remarkable increase of the antimicrobial activity of certain antibiotics may be achieved by delivering them in the form of BioMOFs.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Infections and infectious diseases are among the major causes of worldwide morbidity and mortality, and therefore, it is essential to develop effective antimicrobial agents. Bactericidal agents, including antibiotics, have drastically reduced the number of deaths caused by infections over the last 70 years. However, due to their misuse and abuse, many microorganisms have developed resistance mechanisms to most available antibiotics. The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that highly antibiotic-resistant bacteria are responsible for 2 million illnesses, resulting in 23 000 deaths every year in the United States. In Europe, such infections are responsible for some 25 000 deaths per year and represent an economic burden of over 1.5 billion euros. Many of these infections are caused by Gram-negative bacteria, which are responsible for a wide spectrum of diseases, including pneumonia, bloodstream infections, wound or surgical site infections, meningitis, urinary tract, bloodstream, airway, venereal, and other health care-associated infections. Although the fast and global dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant organisms in recent years has been unprecedented, only a few new antibiotics targeting Gram-negative bacteria are in development.(1)
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) display fascinating architectures and may be used in many different applications, such as gas storage, luminescence, separation, catalysis, drug delivery,(2−8) and cancer therapy.(9,10) As shown here, they can also be advantageous in the quest for more efficient antibiotic forms.
We disclose here one example in which nalidixic acid MOFs present benefits. Nalidixic acid (NALD) is a first generation drug of the quinolone family with a broad spectrum of biological activity, such as antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antitumor.(11−16) It is bacteriostatic at low concentrations and bactericidal at higher doses. However, nalidixic acid has a low oral bioavailability due to its poor solubility and slow dissolution rate.(17) Moreover, microorganisms developed resistance mechanisms against quinolone antibiotics.(18) To overcome these drawbacks, new quinazolone derivatives of nalidixic acid have been prepared(19) and nanotechnological approaches have been explored.(20,21) For example, nanoformulations of nalidixic acid-based diacyl and sulfonyl acyl hydrazide derivatives were reported has having promising antimicrobial activity.(20) Also the formation of peptide–nalidixic acid conjugates led to an improved antibacterial activity.(22)
Several metal-based nalidixic acid complexes have been synthesized in the past few years as binary or ternary complexes with one or more O- (water, methanol) or N-bearing donor ligands or coligands (pyridine, 2,2′-bipyridine, 1R,2R-diaminocyclo-hexane, etc.). This activity was prompted by the synergetic effect of a metal ion to quinolone drugs with an improved pharmacological activity, including potential as anticancer agents.(13−16,23−27) Very recently, André et al. reported a coordination network with Zn2+ showing a higher water solubility.(28) Herein, we report two new BioMOFs with divalent magnesium and manganese ions.
Magnesium is the fourth most abundant metal in the human body, and it is partially responsible for countless aspects of good health, being essential, for example, in the regulation of over 300 biological reactions due to the role of its ions as anzyme cofactores, and in the reactions that generate and use adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Magnesium further contributes for healthy muscle and nerve functions, a steady heart rhythm, normal blood pressure, regulated blood sugar levels, strong bones, and hormonal activity.(29−34) R. Blower et al.(35) and Wohlkonig, A. et al.(36) have shown that a magnesium ion bridges the enzymes (topoisomerase IV or gyrase) and fluoroquinolones, being essential for the activity of these antibiotics. This is owed to its stabilizing effect on DNA topology and its ability to chelate with quinolones keto and carboxylate groups.
Manganese plays a role, for example, in keeping bones healthy, alleviating the premenstrual syndrome, and assisting in the vitamin absorption in the digestive tract.(37−39)
Mechanochemistry is a solvent-free synthetic technique increasingly used for the synthesis of organic solids of pharmaceutical interest, luminescent and photo- or termoactive materials, coordination polymers, and MOFs and in studies of biomolecular recognition, asymmetric catalysis, interlocked systems, and racemic resolution.(40−56) Several variations of the technique may be employed: in neat grinding, no liquid is added; liquid-assisted grinding uses catalytic amounts of solvent; in ion- and liquid-assisted grinding, catalytic amounts of solvent and an ionic salt are added; polymer-assisted grinding was recently reported.(49,50,55,57−59) Ball milling is one of the techniques in the portfolio of pharmaceutical particle technologies used to improve the poor solubility of drugs by reducing the particle size.(60)
Herein, we report the preparation of novel BioMOFs comprising nalidixic acid and divalent manganese or magnesium ions by mechanochemistry, exhibiting a water solubility increase over nalidixic acid. Moreover, the material with Mg2+ showed a remarkable increase in the antibacterial activity mostly against the Escherichia coli strain. We, thus, demonstrate that BioMOFs may be used to change the properties of currently used antibiotics, such as solubility, and most importantly to enhance their bactericidal activity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of a BioMOF built from an active pharmaceutical ingredient showing such an increase in the bactericidal properties.

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Two metal coordination frameworks of nalidixic acid were obtained by reacting with Mg(NO3)2·6H2O and MnCl2·4H2O and were characterized by single-crystal and powder X-ray diffraction, infrared spectroscopy, elemental analyses, and (Mg-form) solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance. The thermal stability of these compounds was evaluated by thermal analyses. The solubility of the materials and their toxicity and bactericidal effect were also assessed.
Liquid-assisted grinding was used in the synthesis of both compounds reported herein. Different synthetic approaches, such as solution and solvothermal, were unsuccessfully explored, leading to mixtures that were not possible to separate and characterize.

Structural Characterization

Due to their similarity, the crystal structures of both BioMOFs will be discussed in parallel and only the differences highlighted. The asymmetric unit of these compounds consists of a metal center coordinated to one deprotonated nalidixic acid moiety and three water molecules, and the charge balance is ensured by a counterion, nitrate for Mg-MOF and chloride for Mn-MOF. The metal centers display an octahedral geometry, coordinating to three water molecules and two nalidixic acid moieties. One nalidixic acid molecule acts as a bidentate ligand coordinating via the carbonyl group and one of the carboxylate oxygen atoms, while the other nalidixic acid molecule coordinates to the metal through the remaining carboxylate’s oxygen (Figure 1). These structures are similar to the previously reported network with Zn.(28)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Nalidixic acid coordination modes scheme (a) and details on the octahedral geometry in the coordination sphere of the metal centers (b).

Metal complexes of quinolones have been extensively studied by many authors.(61) The coordination is established via the carbonyl and carboxylic/carboxylate groups and the metal center. Focusing on examples with magnesium, the most common is the bidentate coordination mode involving the carbonyl and one of the carboxylate oxygen atoms, originating complexes.(62−64) The extended frameworks presented here are due to the coordination of the second oxygen of the carboxylate moiety, besides the common bidentate mode.
At a supramolecular level, zigzag chains are formed in the bc plane (Figure 2a). These chains stack along the b axis in a parallel fashion, and the counterions (nitrate in Mg-MOF and chloride in Mn-MOF) reside in the voids between the chains (Figure 2b).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Crystal structure details of Mg- and Mn-MOFs viewed along the a (a) and b (b) axes.

Concerning crystal packing, the same description applies to both MOFs, even if the counterions are different and the networks are not isostructural, showing some conformational differences (Figure 3).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Overlap of Mg-MOF (yellow) and Mn-MOF (blue), showing conformational differences in the 2D network.

Water molecules are involved in hydrogen bonding, stabilizing the crystal packing (Table 1). The water coordinated in one of the equatorial positions is involved in hydrogen bonds within the chains (O2w–H2w···O1 2.721(2) Å for Mg-MOF and 2.765(4) Å for Mn-MOF). One of the axial water molecules establishes the interaction between parallel chains (O3w–H4w···N2 2.910(2) Å for Mg-MOF and 2.939(4) Å for Mn-MOF). All of the other interactions involving water molecules are established with the counterions.
Table 1. Hydrogen Bond Parameters for the Most Relevant Interactions in Mg- and Mn-MOFs
Mg-MOF
sym opD–H···Ad(H···A) (Å)d(D···A) (Å)(DHA) (deg)
x, 1/2 – y, 1/2 + zO1w–H6w···O62.58(2)3.282(2)135(2)
2 – x, 1 – y, 1 – zO2w–H1w···O61.917(16)2.833(2)173(2)
1 – x, 1/2 + y, 3/2 – zO2w–H2w···O11.854(16)2.721(2)158(2)
1 – x, 1 – y, 1 – zO3w–H3w···O41.866(15)2.770(2)170(2)
1 −x, 1 −y, 1 – zO3w–H3w···O52.47(2)3.146(2)131(2)
1 – x, 1 – y, 1 – zO3w–H4w···N22.015(15)2.910(2)170(2)
2 – x, 1 −y, 1 – zO1w–H5w···O52.002(16)2.817(2)148(2)
x, 1/2 – y, 1/2 + zO1w–H6w···O41.867(15)2.765(2)170(2)
Mn-MOF
x, –1/2 + y, 1/2 – zO2w–H1w···Cl12.189(19)3.115(3)178(4)
1 – x, –1/2 + y, 1/2 – zO2w–H2w···O11.88(2)2.765(4)159(4)
1 – x, –1/2 + y, 1/2 – zO3w–H3w···Cl12.17(2)3.120(3)174(3)
1 – x, 1 – y, 1 – zO3w–H4w···N22.06(2)2.939(4)155(3)
x, −1/2 + y, 1/2 – zO1w–H5w···Cl12.33(2)3.174(3)152(3)
x, y, zO1w–H6w···Cl12.188(18)3.114(3)170(3)
The intermolecular interactions of the compounds were also explored by Hirshfeld surface analysis. This is a graphical tool for visualization and further understanding of intermolecular interactions. The red spots over the surface (Figure 4) depict the strong hydrogen bonds between the water molecules and the nalidixic acid moieties and counterions. Lighter spots correspond to weaker interactions among the molecules and H···H contacts.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Hirshfeld surfaces for the Mg-MOF.

The contribution of the different intermolecular contacts for the Hishfeld surfaces is represented in two-dimensional fingerprint plots (see the Supporting Information). Only in the Mn-MOF, the interaction to the metal (O–M) has some contribution to these surfaces, even if minimal (2.4%). The H–H intercontacts show large surfaces in both structures, whereas the O···H/H···O contacts show the two characteristic wings of hydrogen bonds. N···H/H···N interactions are represented by two sharp spikes pointing toward the upper and lower left of the plots corresponding to the hydrogen bonds. The relative contributions of the different interactions to the Hirshfeld surfaces are summarized in Figure 5.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Hirshfeld surface: percentage of various intermolecular contacts contributing to the Hirshfeld surfaces for Mg- and Mn-MOFs.

Powder X-ray diffraction shows that both MOFs are obtained as pure phases (see the Supporting Information).
Infrared spectroscopy supports the crystal structure determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Indeed, the characteristic nalidixic acid bands at 1715 and 1620 cm–1 (C═O stretching ascribed to, respectively, carboxylic and carbonyl groups) are absent in the Mg-MOF spectrum, while new bands appear at 1640 and 1390 cm–1, characteristic of carboxylate groups (see the Supporting Information). The Mn-MOF shows similar results.
Concerning Mg-MOF, 13C solid-state NMR confirmed the presence of nalidixic acid (see the Supporting Information).
Concerning Mg-MOF, 13C solid-state NMR confirmed the presence of nalidixic acid (see the Supporting Information) and 1H NMR solution NMR data suggest that the Mg coordination to carbonyl groups was maintained in solution (see the Supporting Information).

Thermal Stability

The Mg-MOF is stable until ca. 100 °C. Above this temperature and up to 207 °C, two endothermic peaks are observed corresponding to a total mass loss of 14.9%, i.e., the release of the three water molecules (Figure 6a).

Figure 6

Figure 6. Differential scanning calorimetry (black line) and thermogravimetry (blue line) curves of Mg-MOF (a) and Mn-MOF (b).

The Mn-MOF is stable up to 80 °C, followed by a 9.5% mass loss until 175 °C, associated with two endothermic peaks. These events correspond to the loss of two water molecules, with the third water molecule being released above 230 °C (Figure 6b).
These data show that both Mg- and Mn-MOFs are stable up to temperatures well above 37 °C, with the Mg material being more stable than the Mn one.

Stability under Ambient Conditions and at 77% Room Humidity

As witnessed by powder X-ray diffraction, both BioMOFs are stable for, at least, five months on the shelf under ambient conditions (20–25 °C, 35–40% room humidity) and at 77% room humidity (20–25 °C) (see the Supporting Information).

Solubility Tests

The solubility of Mg- and Mn-MOFs was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography at 25 °C in water, in a phosphate buffered saline solution (PBS) (pH 7.40) and in an HCl solution (pH 1.52). The MOFs solubility is higher than the solubility of nalidixic acid (3.76 × 10–4 M): 6.78 × 10–4 M for Mg-MOF and 6.15 × 10–4 M for Mn-MOF. In phosphate buffered saline solution, nalidixic acid is more soluble (1.52 × 10–3 M) than the BioMOFs (5.78 × 10–4 M for Mg-MOF, 4.68 × 10–4 M for Mn-MOF), while in acidic media all solubility values are similar (7.97 × 10–5 M for nalidixic acid, 7.81 × 10–5 M for Mg-MOF, and 8.71 × 10–5 M for Mn-MOF). The increased solubility of MOFs when compared with the free ligand might be explained on the basis of the carboxylate character of MOFs.

Cytotoxicity

BioMOF cytotoxicity was assessed using human colorectal adenocarcinoma CaCo-2 cells, a model common in this type of studies because in a differentiated state it resembles the human intestinal epithelium. As the cells were grown in an aqueous culture medium, the compounds tested must be water-soluble. Unfortunately, only Mg-MOF could be dissolved in the aqueous cell culture medium attaining the concentration required for these tests.
A stock solution of NALD-Mg MOF was prepared in ethanol and then diluted with the cell culture medium in order to attain ≤1% organic solvent in contact with the CaCo-2 cell monolayer. Concentrations up to 45 μM were tested. Cytotoxicity was determined by the MTT assay after 24 h exposure. (Figure 7). Mg-MOF does not affect significantly the cell viability, and thus, it is probably not cytotoxic to the human epithelium. However, other in vitro models should be tested to assess its impact on humans.

Figure 7

Figure 7. MTT cytotoxicity and cell viability study (where error bars represent the standard deviation).

Antimicrobial Activity

Antimicrobial tests (Table 2) were carried out against Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis), Gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli), and yeasts strains (Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Notable growth inhibitory activity is observed against the Gram-negative bacteria E. coli. Mg-MOF has shown significant bactericidal effect against the Gram-negative bacteria, whereas Mn-MOF induces a bacteriostatic effect. The antimicrobial activity of both BioMOFs is higher than the nalidixic acid activity. Lower, or similar, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values are observed for Mg- and Mn-MOFs on yeasts, when compared to nalidixic acid. The latter exhibits an overall bactericidal effect, in contrast with the BioMOFs, showing a tendency for bacteriostatic behavior. In short, Mg- and Mn-MOFs have a greater inhibitory activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and yeasts than nalidixic acid.
Table 2. Minimum Inhibitory and Bactericidal Concentrations, MIC and MBC (or Minimum Fungicidal Concentration, MFC) Values, of the Compounds Obtained by the Microdilution Method against Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria and Yeasts Strains in μg/mLa
 S. aureusE. faecalisP. aeruginosaE. coliC. albicansS. cerevisiae
compoundMICMBCMICMBCMICMBCMICMBCMICMBCMICMBC
NA1255001255001255003.9131.262.562.5125125
Mg-MOF31.350031.32501255000.981.9562.525031.3250
Mn-MOF31.325031.32502505000.987.8131.312531.3125
positive controlb7.82ntc1.95ntc<0.48ntc0.98ntc0.98ntc0.98ntc
a

Results represent a median of at least three independent experiments.

b

Vancomycin for S. aureus and E. faecalis. Norfloxacin for P. aeruginosa and E. coli. Nystatin for C. albicans and S. cerevisiae.

c

Not tested (nt).

Experimental Section

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Synthesis

All reagents were purchased from Sigma and used without further purification.

Mg-MOF

An equimolar (0.6 mmol) mixture of nalidixic acid and Mg(NO3)2·6H2O was milled with 50 μL of water and 100 μL of ammonium hydroxide to turn the media basic and facilitate the reaction, making use of a Retsch MM400 ball mill with two stainless steel balls (7 mm diameter), at 29.5 rpm for 5 min. Ethanol was used to wash the powder and eliminate the ammonium nitrate (secondary product). The resulting powder was then dissolved in a water/ethanol (1:1) solution with droplets of ammonium hydroxide, and colorless single crystals of Mg-MOF were grown by slow evaporation of the solvent after 3 days at room temperature.

Mn-MOF

An equimolar (0.5 mmol) mixture of nalidixic acid and MgCl2·4H2O was manually ground for 2 min with 50 μL of water and 100 μL of ammonium hydroxide using an agate mortar and pestle. Ethanol was used to wash the powder and eliminate the ammonium chloride (secondary product). The resulting powder was then dissolved in a water/ethanol (1:1) solution with droplets of ammonium hydroxide, and colorless single crystals of Mn-MOF were grown by slow evaporation of the solvent after 5 days at room temperature.

Single-Crystal X-ray Diffraction

Data were acquired on Bruker AXS-KAPPA APEX II and Bruker AXS-KAPPA D8 QUEST diffractometers at 293 K, with graphite-monochromated radiation (Mo K, = 0.71069 Å). Further details are given in the Supporting Information. Table 3 summarizes data collection and refinement details. Crystallographic data of Mg- and Mn-MOF were deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC nos. 1885221 and 1885222).
Table 3. Crystallographic Data and Experimental Details for Mg- and Mn-MOFs
 Mg-MOFMn-MOF
chemical formulaC12H17N3O9MgC12H17N2O6MnCl
formula weight371.59375.67
temperature (K)293(2)293(2)
wavelength (Å)0.710 690.710 69
crystal form, colorblock, colorlessplate, colorless
crystal size (mm)0.20 × 0.12 × 0.100.20 × 0.10 × 0.04
crystal systemmonoclinicmonoclinic
space groupP21/cP21/c
a (Å)8.4071(7)7.7602(6)
b (Å)9.3706(9)9.4603(7)
c (Å)20.5857(18)21.1818(18)
α (deg)90.0090.00
β (deg)93.473(3)91.906(3)
γ (deg)90.0090.00
V3)1618.8(2)1554.2(2)
Z44
d (mg cm–3)1.5251.605
μ (mm–1)0.1641.050
θ range (deg)1.982–29.4962.626–28.490
reflections collected/unique17 528/449921 829/3188
Rint0.06910.0880
GoF1.0181.120
final R indicesa,b [I > 2(I)]R1 = 0.0462, wR2 = 0.1106R1 = 0.0510, wR2 = 0.1298
a

R1 = ||F0| – |Fc||/|F0|.

b

wR2 = [[w(F02Fc2)2]/[w(F02)2]]1/2.

Powder X-ray Diffraction

Patterns were collected on a D8 Advance Bruker AXS θ-2θ diffractometer, with a copper radiation source (Cu Kα, λ = 1.5406 Å) and a secondary monochromator, operated at 40 kV and 30 mA. The program Mercury 3.10.3(65) was used to obtain the diffraction patterns calculated from single-crystal data. The purity of the bulk was always verified by comparing the calculated and observed powder X-ray diffraction patterns.

Solid-State NMR

1H–13C cross-polarization magic angle spinning NMR spectra were recorded at 100.6 MHz on a 9.4 T widebore (400 MHz, 1 H Larmor frequency) Bruker Avance III 400 spectrometer, on a 4 mm double-resonance MAS probe. Samples were spun at 14 kHz on ZrO2 rotors. Spectra were recorded using a ramp step (varying from 100% to 50% in amplitude using 100 points), 3.0 ms contact time, 1H 90° 2.5 μ s excitation pulse, 5 s recycle delay. 1H and 13C radio frequency field strengths for cross-polarization were set to 87 and 68 kHz, respectively. TPPM-15 decoupling was employed during the signal acquisition, using a 4.75 μ s pulse length for the basic TPPM pulse unit on the 1H channel (field strength = 100 kHz).

Solution NMR

1H NMR spectra were recorded at 37 °C on a Bruker Avance III 500, operating at 500 MHz, using a 5 mm BBO probe. Samples were dissolved in D2O and analyzed by 1H NMR with and without water resonance presaturation, performed with standard pulse programs.

Infrared Spectroscopy

Data for samples diluted in KBr (1:100 w/w) were acquired on a Nexus-Thermo Nicolet spectrometer (64 scans; resolution of 4 cm–1) from 4000 to 400 cm–1.

Elemental Analysis

Data were obtained at the elemental analysis service of Instituto Superior Técnico (IST) on a Fisons Instrument Mod EA-1108. Anal. Calcd for C12H17N3O9Mg: C, 38.79%; H, 4.61%; N, 11.31%. Found: C, 38.035%; H, 4.55%; N, 11.23%. Anal. Calcd for C12H17N2O6MnCl: C, 38.37%; H, 4.56%; N, 7.46%. Found: C, 37.94%; H, 4.53%; N, 7.58%.

Differential Scanning Calorimetry and Thermogravimetry

Combined measurements were carried out on a SETARAM TG-DTA 92 thermobalance under a nitrogen flow with a heating rate of 10 °C min–1. The sample masses were in the range from 5 to 10 mg.

Stability Tests

Shelf Stability

Samples were kept under ambient conditions (20–25 °C, 35–40% room humidity) over 5 months and analyzed weekly by powder X-ray diffraction to confirm the shelf stability.

Stability under 77% Room Humidity

Samples were kept inside a desiccator with a saturated solution of NaCl to maintain 77% room humidity (20–25 °C). Samples were analyzed on a weekly basis for five months to confirm their stability.

Solubility Tests

Slurry suspensions of nalidixic acid and Mg- and Mn-MOFs were left stirring for 24 h in water, in a phosphate buffered saline solution (PBS) (pH 7.40) and in a HCl solution (pH 1.52). The filtered solutions were used to calculate the solubility of the novel BioMOFs and nalidixic acid using HPLC.

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

Data were acquired at room temperature using Dionex equipment with an Ultimate 3000 pump, a photodiode detector (DAD, Ultimate 3000), and a RP-18e reverse phase column (Luna C18(2) from Phenomenex, 250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) with a flow of 1 mL min–1. An isocratic elution was used, with acetonitrile and 1% aqueous formic acid solution (30%:70% v/v) as a mobile phase, with a flow of 1 mL min–1 (sample volume = 20 μL, run time = 30 min). Nalidixic acid was identified at 256.7 nm, with a 20.5 min retention time. Standard solutions of the drug were prepared in order to determine the calibration curve and the compound solubility. For solubility studies, the calibration curve method was used.

Cell Culture

Colorectal adenocarcinoma CaCo-2 cells (ATCC) were grown in RPMI- 1640 medium (R8758, Sigma), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and an antibiotic antimycotic solution at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.

Cytotoxic Assay

CaCo-2 cells were seeded on 96-well plates and cultured until reaching confluence. Stock solutions of the compounds were diluted with the cell culture medium and added to the cells for 24 h (percentage of the organic solvent ≤ 1%). The medium was removed from the plate, and cells were washed with phosphate buffer saline solution (PBS). Then, fresh medium with the colorimetric reagent MTT (0.1 g/L) was added to the plate and left for 4 h. The medium was removed; the plate was washed with PBS, and DMSO was added to dissolve the purple formazam crystals. The plate was gently shaken and read in a plate reader at 570 nm. Each experimental condition was done in triplicate. Presented error bars are the standard deviation of the 3 replicates.

Antimicrobial Activity

The minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations (MIC and MBC) were determined by the microdilution method.(66) Briefly, a volume of 100 μL was added to all of the wells containing the appropriate culture medium (Mueller-Hinton for bacteria and Sabouraud for yeasts), and 100 μL of the samples at a concentration of 1 mg/mL were added to the first well. Serial dilutions were made in a proportion of 1:2, and 10 μL of the bacterial (Gram-negative and -positive) or yeast suspension was added to each well. The plates were then incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. MBC determination followed MIC assignment, by swabbing a solution of each well within the range concentrations lower than its MIC, onto a Petri plate with the adequate solid culture medium. These microplates were then incubated using the conditions already stated. MBC corresponds to the lowest concentration with no visible bacterial or fungal growth.

Conclusions

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Mg- and Mn-MOFs were mechanochemically obtained, as this was the most efficient synthetic technique leading to the isolation of the pure compounds. Compared with other approaches, previously explored, concerning the improvement of the antimicrobial activity of nalidixic acid, our procedure is much simpler and faster. BioMOFs were structurally characterized, and their properties were assessed, namely, the shelf stability, solubility, bioavailability, cytotoxicity, and bactericidal activity. The results witness a clear potential of these materials for pharmaceutical applications. Importantly, both compounds have proven to increase the nalidixic acid antimicrobial activity in the assays using S. aureus, E. faecalis, E. coli, C. albicans, and S. cerevisiae, with the effect against E. coli being the most relevant. The emergence of Gram-negative E. coli multidrug resistance is of global concern, and BioMOFs may provide a viable alternative to the present antibiotics, due to their increased bactericidal activity.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.9b00046.

  • Single-crystal X-ray diffraction experimental details, bulk purity, infrared spectroscopy, solid-state NMR, and shelf stability at 77% room humidity (PDF)

Author Contributions

The authors contributed equally.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Terms & Conditions

Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The authors acknowledge Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) (PEst-OE/QUI/UI0100/2013) and FEDER to the project PTDC/QUI-OUT/30988/2017 for funding. We also wish to thank the European Union, QREN, FEDER through Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade (COMPETE), and CICECO–Aveiro Institute of Materials, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007679 (FCT ref no. UID/CTM/50011/2013), financed by national funds through the FCT/MEC and when appropriate cofinanced by FEDER under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement. The authors further acknowledge Ms. C. Iolanda Santos for the use of the HPLC.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 66 other publications.

  1. 1
    Vasoo, S.; Barreto, J. N.; Tosh, P. K. Emerging Issues in Gram-Negative Bacterial Resistance: An Update for the Practicing Clinician. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2015, 90 (3), 395403,  DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.12.002
  2. 2
    Eddaoudi, M.; Moler, D. B.; Li, H. L.; Chen, B. L.; Reineke, T. M.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Modular chemistry: Secondary building units as a basis for the design of highly porous and robust metal-organic carboxylate frameworks. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34 (4), 319330,  DOI: 10.1021/ar000034b
  3. 3
    Eddaoudi, M.; Sava, D. F.; Eubank, J. F.; Adil, K.; Guillerm, V. Zeolite-like metal-organic frameworks (ZMOFs): design, synthesis, and properties. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44 (1), 22849,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CS00230J
  4. 4
    Miller, S. R.; Heurtaux, D.; Baati, T.; Horcajada, P.; Greneche, J. M.; Serre, C. Biodegradable therapeutic MOFs for the delivery of bioactive molecules. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46 (25), 45264528,  DOI: 10.1039/c001181a
  5. 5
    Li, S.; Huo, F. Metal-organic framework composites: from fundamentals to applications. Nanoscale 2015, 7 (17), 74827501,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR00518C
  6. 6
    Lee, J.; Farha, O. K.; Roberts, J.; Scheidt, K. A.; Nguyen, S. T.; Hupp, J. T. Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38 (5), 14501459,  DOI: 10.1039/b807080f
  7. 7
    Sun, C.-Y.; Qin, C.; Wang, X.-L.; Su, Z.-M. Metal-organic frameworks as potential drug delivery systems. Expert Opin. Drug Delivery 2013, 10 (1), 89101,  DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2013.741583
  8. 8
    Wang, S.; Wang, X. Multifunctional Metal-Organic Frameworks for Photocatalysis. Small 2015, 11 (26), 30973112,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201500084
  9. 9
    Wuttke, S.; Braig, S.; Preiss, T.; Zimpel, A.; Sicklinger, J.; Bellomo, C.; Raedler, J. O.; Vollmar, A. M.; Bein, T. MOF nanoparticles coated by lipid bilayers and their uptake by cancer cells. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51 (87), 1575215755,  DOI: 10.1039/C5CC06767G
  10. 10
    Wang, X. G.; Dong, Z. Y.; Cheng, H.; Wan, S. S.; Chen, W. H.; Zou, M. Z.; Huo, J. W.; Deng, H. X.; Zhang, X. Z. A multifunctional metal-organic framework based tumor targeting drug delivery system for cancer therapy. Nanoscale 2015, 7 (38), 1606116070,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR04045K
  11. 11
    Barry, A. L.; Jones, R. N.; Thornsberry, C.; Ayers, L. W.; Gerlach, E. H.; Sommers, H. M. Antibacterial activities of ciprofloxacin, oxolinic acid, cinoxacin, and nalidixic acid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1984, 25 (5), 633637,  DOI: 10.1128/AAC.25.5.633
  12. 12
    Akahane, K.; Sekiguchi, M.; Une, T.; Osada, Y. Structure-epileptogenicity relationships of quinolones with special reference to their interaction with gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor sites. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1989, 33 (10), 17041708,  DOI: 10.1128/AAC.33.10.1704
  13. 13
    Kljun, J.; Bratsos, I.; Alessio, E.; Psomas, G.; Repnik, U.; Butinar, M.; Turk, B.; Turel, I. New Uses for Old Drugs: Attempts to Convert Quinolone Antibacterials into Potential Anticancer Agents Containing Ruthenium. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52 (15), 90399052,  DOI: 10.1021/ic401220x
  14. 14
    Hudej, R.; Kljun, J.; Kandioller, W.; Repnik, U.; Turk, B.; Hartinger, C. G.; Keppler, B. K.; Miklavcic, D.; Turel, I. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of the Thionated Antibacterial Agent Nalidixic Acid and Its Organoruthenium(II) Complex. Organometallics 2012, 31 (16), 58675874,  DOI: 10.1021/om300424w
  15. 15
    Lee, S. S.; Jung, O. S.; Lee, C. O.; Choi, S. U.; Jun, M. J.; Sohn, Y. S. Cationic diamineplatinum(II) complexes of nalidixic acid. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1995, 239 (1–2), 133138,  DOI: 10.1016/0020-1693(95)04734-4
  16. 16
    Kljun, J.; Bytzek, A. K.; Kandioller, W.; Bartel, C.; Jakupec, M. A.; Hartinger, C. G.; Keppler, B. K.; Turel, I. Physicochemical Studies and Anticancer Potency of Ruthenium eta(6)-p-Cymene Complexes Containing Antibacterial Quinolones. Organometallics 2011, 30 (9), 25062512,  DOI: 10.1021/om101180c
  17. 17
    Mallick, S.; Sahu A Fau - Pal, K.; Pal, K. Dissolution behaviour of nalidixic acid solid dispersions using water soluble dispersion carriers. Acta Polym. Pharm. 2004, 61, 2130
  18. 18
    Drlica, K.; Hiasa, H.; Kerns, R.; Malik, M.; Mustaev, A.; Zhao, X. L. Quinolones: Action and Resistance Updated. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2009, 9 (11), 981998,  DOI: 10.2174/156802609789630947
  19. 19
    Grover, G.; Kini, S. G. Synthesis and evaluation of new quinazolone derivatives of nalidixic acid as potential antibacterial and antifungal agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 41 (2), 256262,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2005.09.002
  20. 20
    Pandey, A.; Aggarwal, N.; Adholeya, A.; Kochar, M. Resurrection of Nalidixic Acid: Evaluation of Water-Based Nanoformulations as Potential Nanomedicine. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 298,  DOI: 10.1186/s11671-018-2718-8
  21. 21
    Zhu, X.; Radovic-Moreno, A. F.; Wu, J.; Langer, R.; Shi, J. J. Nanomedicine in the management of microbial infection - Overview and perspectives. Nano Today 2014, 9 (4), 478498,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2014.06.003
  22. 22
    Ahmed, M.; Kelley, S. O. Enhancing the Potency of Nalidixic Acid toward a Bacterial DNA Gyrase with Conjugated Peptides. ACS Chem. Biol. 2017, 12 (10), 25632569,  DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00540
  23. 23
    Behrens, N. B.; Diaz, G. M.; Goodgame, D. M. L. etal-complexes of the antibiotic nalidixic acid. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1986, 125 (1), 2126,  DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)85478-X
  24. 24
    Mendozadiaz, G.; Martinezaguilera, L. M. R.; Perezalonso, R.; Solans, X.; Moreno-Esparza, R. Synthesis and characterization of mixed-ligand complexes of copper with nalidixic acid and (N-N) donors - crystal-structure of Cu(PHEN)(NAL)-(H2O)NO3.3H2O. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1987, 138 (1), 4147,  DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)81179-2
  25. 25
    Arjmand, F.; Yousuf, I.; Afzal, M.; Toupet, L. Design and synthesis of new Zn(II) nalidixic acid-DACH based Topo-II inhibiting molecular entity: Chemotherapeutic potential validated by its in vitro binding profile, pBR322 cleavage activity and molecular docking studies with DNA and RNA molecular targets. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2014, 421, 2637,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2014.05.015
  26. 26
    Arjmand, F.; Yousuf, I.; ben Hadda, T.; Toupet, L. Synthesis, crystal structure and antiproliferative activity of Cu(II) nalidixic acid-DACH conjugate: Comparative in vitro DNA/RNA binding profile, cleavage activity and molecular docking studies. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 81, 7688,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.04.080
  27. 27
    Yousuf, I.; Usman, M.; Ahmad, M.; Tabassum, S.; Arjmand, F. Single X-ray crystal structure, DFT studies and topoisomerase I inhibition activity of a tailored ionic Ag(I) nalidixic acid-piperazinium drug entity specific for pancreatic cancer cells. New J. Chem. 2018, 42 (1), 506519,  DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ03602G
  28. 28
    Andre, V.; Galego, F.; Martins, M. Mechanochemical Assembly of Nalidixic Acid Bioinspired Metal-Organic Compounds and Complexes toward Improved Solubility. Cryst. Growth Des. 2018, 18 (4), 20672081,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01523
  29. 29
    Rios, F. J.; Montezano, A. C.; Touyz, R. M.; Collins, J. F. Magnesium, Vascular Function, and Hypertension. Molecular, genetic, and nutritional aspects of major and trace minerals 2017, 353364,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802168-2.00029-4
  30. 30
    Schmitz, C.; Perraud, A.-L.; Collins, J. F. Magnesium and the Immune Response. Molecular, Genetic, and Nutritional Aspects of Major and Trace Minerals 2017, 319331,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802168-2.00026-9
  31. 31
    Pleshchitser, A. L. BIOLOGICAL ROLE OF MAGNESIUM. Clinical Chemistry 1958, 4 (6), 429450
  32. 32
    Nielsen, F. H.; Collins, J. F. Magnesium: Basic Nutritional Aspects. Molecular, Genetic, and Nutritional Aspects of Major and Trace Minerals 2017, 307317,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802168-2.00025-7
  33. 33
    Komiya, Y.; Runnels, L. W.; Collins, J. F. Magnesium and Embryonic Development. Molecular, Genetic, and Nutritional Aspects of Major and Trace Minerals 2017, 343351,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802168-2.00028-2
  34. 34
    He, K.; Tsinovoi, C. L.; Collins, J. F. Magnesium Intake and Chronic Disease in Humans. Molecular, Genetic, and Nutritional Aspects of Major and Trace Minerals 2017, 333,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802168-2.00027-0
  35. 35
    Blower, T. R.; Williamson, B. H.; Kerns, R. J.; Berger, J. M. Crystal structure and stability of gyrase-fluoroquinolone cleaved complexes from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016, 113 (7), 17061713,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1525047113
  36. 36
    Wohlkonig, A.; Chan, P. F.; Fosberry, A. P.; Homes, P.; Huang, J.; Kranz, M.; Leydon, V. R.; Miles, T. J.; Pearson, N. D.; Perera, R. L.; Shillings, A. J.; Gwynn, M. N.; Bax, B. D. Structural basis of quinolone inhibition of type IIA topoisomerases and target-mediated resistance. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17, 1152,  DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1892
  37. 37
    Peres, T. V.; Aschner, M.; Collins, J. F. Nutritional, Genetic, and Molecular Aspects of Manganese Intoxication. Molecular, Genetic, and Nutritional Aspects of Major and Trace Minerals 2017, 367376,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802168-2.00030-0
  38. 38
    Juttukonda, L. J.; Skaar, E. P.; Collins, J. F. Manganese and Nutritional Immunity. Molecular, Genetic, and Nutritional Aspects of Major and Trace Minerals 2017, 377387,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802168-2.00031-2
  39. 39
    Gunter, T. E.; Collins, J. F. Manganese and Mitochondrial Function. Molecular, Genetic, and Nutritional Aspects of Major and Trace Minerals 2017, 389396,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802168-2.00032-4
  40. 40
    Strukil, V.; Igrc, M. D.; Eckert-Maksic, M.; Friscic, T. Click Mechanochemistry: Quantitative Synthesis of ″Ready to Use″ Chiral Organocatalysts by Efficient Two-Fold Thiourea Coupling to Vicinal Diamines. Chem. - Eur. J. 2012, 18 (27), 84648473,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201200632
  41. 41
    Nichols, P. J.; Raston, C. L.; Steed, J. W. Engineering of porous pi-stacked solids using mechanochemistry. Chem. Commun. 2001, (12), 10621063,  DOI: 10.1039/b103411c
  42. 42
    Martins, I.; Martins, M.; Fernandes, A.; Andre, V.; Duarte, M. T. An insight into dapsone co-crystals: sulfones as participants in supramolecular interactions. CrystEngComm 2013, 15 (40), 81738179,  DOI: 10.1039/c3ce41323c
  43. 43
    Braga, D.; Maini, L.; Grepioni, F. Mechanochemical preparation of co-crystals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (18), 76387648,  DOI: 10.1039/c3cs60014a
  44. 44
    André, V.; Quaresma, S. Bio-inspired metalorganic frameworks in the pharmaceutical world: a brief review. Metal-Organic Frameworks 2016, 135156,  DOI: 10.5772/64027
  45. 45
    Andini, S.; Bolognese, A.; Formisano, D.; Manfra, M.; Montagnaro, F.; Santoro, L. Mechanochemistry of ibuprofen pharmaceutical. Chemosphere 2012, 88 (5), 548553,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.025
  46. 46
    Chow, E. H. H.; Strobridge, F. C.; Friscic, T. Mechanochemistry of magnesium oxide revisited: facile derivatisation of pharmaceuticals using coordination and supramolecular chemistry. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46 (34), 63686370,  DOI: 10.1039/c0cc01337d
  47. 47
    Andre, V.; Quaresma, S.; Silva, J. L. F.; Duarte, M. T. Exploring mechanochemistry to turn organic bio-relevant molecules into metal-organic frameworks: a short review. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017, 13, 24162427,  DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.13.239
  48. 48
    Craig, S. L. Mechanochemistry: A tour of force. Nature 2012, 487 (7406), 176177,  DOI: 10.1038/487176a
  49. 49
    James, S. L.; Adams, C. J.; Bolm, C.; Braga, D.; Collier, P.; Friscic, T.; Grepioni, F.; Harris, K. D. M.; Hyett, G.; Jones, W.; Krebs, A.; Mack, J.; Maini, L.; Orpen, A. G.; Parkin, I. P.; Shearouse, W. C.; Steed, J. W.; Waddell, D. C. Mechanochemistry: opportunities for new and cleaner synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41 (1), 413447,  DOI: 10.1039/C1CS15171A
  50. 50
    Friscic, T. New opportunities for materials synthesis using mechanochemistry. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20 (36), 75997605,  DOI: 10.1039/c0jm00872a
  51. 51
    Beldon, P. J.; Fabian, L.; Stein, R. S.; Thirumurugan, A.; Cheetham, A. K.; Friscic, T. Rapid Room-Temperature Synthesis of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks by Using Mechanochemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49 (50), 96409643,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201005547
  52. 52
    Delori, A.; Friscic, T.; Jones, W. The role of mechanochemistry and supramolecular design in the development of pharmaceutical materials. CrystEngComm 2012, 14 (7), 23502362,  DOI: 10.1039/c2ce06582g
  53. 53
    Zhang, P.; Li, H.; Veith, G. M.; Dai, S. Soluble Porous Coordination Polymers by Mechanochemistry: From Metal-Containing Films/Membranes to Active Catalysts for Aerobic Oxidation. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27 (2), 234239,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201403299
  54. 54
    Garay, A. L.; Pichon, A.; James, S. L. Solvent-free synthesis of metal complexes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36 (6), 846855,  DOI: 10.1039/b600363j
  55. 55
    Friscic, T. Supramolecular concepts and new techniques in mechanochemistry: cocrystals, cages, rotaxanes, open metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41 (9), 34933510,  DOI: 10.1039/c2cs15332g
  56. 56
    Andre, V.; Hardeman, A.; Halasz, I.; Stein, R. S.; Jackson, G. J.; Reid, D. G.; Duer, M. J.; Curfs, C.; Duarte, M. T.; Friscic, T. Mechanosynthesis of the Metallodrug Bismuth Subsalicylate from Bi2O3 and Structure of Bismuth Salicylate without Auxiliary Organic Ligands. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50 (34), 78587861,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201103171
  57. 57
    Quaresma, S.; Andre, V.; Fernandes, A.; Duarte, M. T. Mechanochemistry - a green methodology leading to metallodrugs, metallopharmaceuticals and bio-inspired metal-organic frameworks. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2017, 455, 309318,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2016.09.033
  58. 58
    Hasa, D.; Carlino, E.; Jones, W. Polymer-Assisted Grinding, a Versatile Method for Polymorph Control of Cocrystallization. Cryst. Growth Des. 2016, 16 (3), 17721779,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00084
  59. 59
    Hasa, D.; Rauber, G. S.; Voinovich, D.; Jones, W. Cocrystal Formation through Mechanochemistry: from Neat and Liquid-Assisted Grinding to Polymer-Assisted Grinding. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54 (25), 73717375,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201501638
  60. 60
    Khadka, P.; Ro, J.; Kim, H.; Kim, I.; Kim, J. T.; Kim, H.; Cho, J. M.; Yun, G.; Lee, J. Pharmaceutical particle technologies: An approach to improve drug solubility, dissolution and bioavailability. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 9 (6), 304316,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ajps.2014.05.005
  61. 61
    Turel, I. The interactions of metal ions with quinolone antibacterial agents. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2002, 232 (1–2), 2747,  DOI: 10.1016/S0010-8545(02)00027-9
  62. 62
    Chen, Z. F.; Xiong, R. G.; Zuo, J. L.; Guo, Z. J.; You, X. Z.; Fun, H. K. X-Ray crystal structures of Mg2+ and Ca2+ dimers of the antibacterial drug norfloxacin. Journal of the Chemical Society-Dalton Transactions 2000, (22), 40134014,  DOI: 10.1039/b006806n
  63. 63
    Xiao, D. R.; Wang, E. B.; An, H. Y.; Su, Z. M.; Li, Y. G.; Gao, L.; Sun, C. Y.; Xu, L. Rationally designed, polymeric, extended metal-ciprofloxacin complexes. Chem. - Eur. J. 2005, 11 (22), 66736686,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.200500548
  64. 64
    Turel, I.; Zivec, P.; Pevec, A.; Tempelaar, S.; Psomas, G. Compounds of antibacterial agent ciprofloxacin and magnesium - Crystal structures and molecular modeling calculations. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 2008 (23), 37183727,  DOI: 10.1002/ejic.200800338
  65. 65
    Macrae, C. F.; Bruno, I. J.; Chisholm, J. A.; Edgington, P. R.; McCabe, P.; Pidcock, E.; Rodriguez-Monge, L.; Taylor, R.; van de Streek, J.; Wood, P. A. Mercury CSD 2.0 - new features for the visualization and investigation of crystal structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2008, 41, 466470,  DOI: 10.1107/S0021889807067908
  66. 66
    Siopa, F.; Figueiredo, T.; Frade, R. F. M.; Neto, I.; Meirinhos, A.; Reis, C. P.; Sobral, R. G.; Afonso, C. A. M.; Rijo, P. Choline-Based Ionic Liquids: Improvement of Antimicrobial Activity. Chemistryselect 2016, 1 (18), 59095916,  DOI: 10.1002/slct.201600864

Cited By


This article is cited by 3 publications.

  1. Paula C. Alves, Patrícia Rijo, Catarina Bravo, Alexandra M. M. Antunes, Vânia André. Bioactivity of Isostructural Hydrogen Bonding Frameworks Built from Pipemidic Acid Metal Complexes. Molecules 2020, 25 (10) , 2374. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25102374
  2. Isobel Tibbetts, George Kostakis. Recent Bio-Advances in Metal-Organic Frameworks. Molecules 2020, 25 (6) , 1291. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25061291
  3. Dan Luo, Cuijuan Wang, Yan Tong, Cheng Liu, Yumei Xiao, Zixin Zhu, DongNing Liu, Yaoyu Wang. An NIF-doped ZIF-8 hybrid membrane for continuous antimicrobial treatment. RSC Advances 2020, 10 (13) , 7360-7367. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA00108B
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Nalidixic acid coordination modes scheme (a) and details on the octahedral geometry in the coordination sphere of the metal centers (b).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Crystal structure details of Mg- and Mn-MOFs viewed along the a (a) and b (b) axes.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Overlap of Mg-MOF (yellow) and Mn-MOF (blue), showing conformational differences in the 2D network.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Hirshfeld surfaces for the Mg-MOF.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Hirshfeld surface: percentage of various intermolecular contacts contributing to the Hirshfeld surfaces for Mg- and Mn-MOFs.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Differential scanning calorimetry (black line) and thermogravimetry (blue line) curves of Mg-MOF (a) and Mn-MOF (b).

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. MTT cytotoxicity and cell viability study (where error bars represent the standard deviation).

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 66 other publications.

    1. 1
      Vasoo, S.; Barreto, J. N.; Tosh, P. K. Emerging Issues in Gram-Negative Bacterial Resistance: An Update for the Practicing Clinician. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2015, 90 (3), 395403,  DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.12.002
    2. 2
      Eddaoudi, M.; Moler, D. B.; Li, H. L.; Chen, B. L.; Reineke, T. M.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Modular chemistry: Secondary building units as a basis for the design of highly porous and robust metal-organic carboxylate frameworks. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34 (4), 319330,  DOI: 10.1021/ar000034b
    3. 3
      Eddaoudi, M.; Sava, D. F.; Eubank, J. F.; Adil, K.; Guillerm, V. Zeolite-like metal-organic frameworks (ZMOFs): design, synthesis, and properties. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44 (1), 22849,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CS00230J
    4. 4
      Miller, S. R.; Heurtaux, D.; Baati, T.; Horcajada, P.; Greneche, J. M.; Serre, C. Biodegradable therapeutic MOFs for the delivery of bioactive molecules. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46 (25), 45264528,  DOI: 10.1039/c001181a
    5. 5
      Li, S.; Huo, F. Metal-organic framework composites: from fundamentals to applications. Nanoscale 2015, 7 (17), 74827501,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR00518C
    6. 6
      Lee, J.; Farha, O. K.; Roberts, J.; Scheidt, K. A.; Nguyen, S. T.; Hupp, J. T. Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38 (5), 14501459,  DOI: 10.1039/b807080f
    7. 7
      Sun, C.-Y.; Qin, C.; Wang, X.-L.; Su, Z.-M. Metal-organic frameworks as potential drug delivery systems. Expert Opin. Drug Delivery 2013, 10 (1), 89101,  DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2013.741583
    8. 8
      Wang, S.; Wang, X. Multifunctional Metal-Organic Frameworks for Photocatalysis. Small 2015, 11 (26), 30973112,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201500084
    9. 9
      Wuttke, S.; Braig, S.; Preiss, T.; Zimpel, A.; Sicklinger, J.; Bellomo, C.; Raedler, J. O.; Vollmar, A. M.; Bein, T. MOF nanoparticles coated by lipid bilayers and their uptake by cancer cells. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51 (87), 1575215755,  DOI: 10.1039/C5CC06767G
    10. 10
      Wang, X. G.; Dong, Z. Y.; Cheng, H.; Wan, S. S.; Chen, W. H.; Zou, M. Z.; Huo, J. W.; Deng, H. X.; Zhang, X. Z. A multifunctional metal-organic framework based tumor targeting drug delivery system for cancer therapy. Nanoscale 2015, 7 (38), 1606116070,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR04045K
    11. 11
      Barry, A. L.; Jones, R. N.; Thornsberry, C.; Ayers, L. W.; Gerlach, E. H.; Sommers, H. M. Antibacterial activities of ciprofloxacin, oxolinic acid, cinoxacin, and nalidixic acid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1984, 25 (5), 633637,  DOI: 10.1128/AAC.25.5.633
    12. 12
      Akahane, K.; Sekiguchi, M.; Une, T.; Osada, Y. Structure-epileptogenicity relationships of quinolones with special reference to their interaction with gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor sites. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1989, 33 (10), 17041708,  DOI: 10.1128/AAC.33.10.1704
    13. 13
      Kljun, J.; Bratsos, I.; Alessio, E.; Psomas, G.; Repnik, U.; Butinar, M.; Turk, B.; Turel, I. New Uses for Old Drugs: Attempts to Convert Quinolone Antibacterials into Potential Anticancer Agents Containing Ruthenium. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52 (15), 90399052,  DOI: 10.1021/ic401220x
    14. 14
      Hudej, R.; Kljun, J.; Kandioller, W.; Repnik, U.; Turk, B.; Hartinger, C. G.; Keppler, B. K.; Miklavcic, D.; Turel, I. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of the Thionated Antibacterial Agent Nalidixic Acid and Its Organoruthenium(II) Complex. Organometallics 2012, 31 (16), 58675874,  DOI: 10.1021/om300424w
    15. 15
      Lee, S. S.; Jung, O. S.; Lee, C. O.; Choi, S. U.; Jun, M. J.; Sohn, Y. S. Cationic diamineplatinum(II) complexes of nalidixic acid. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1995, 239 (1–2), 133138,  DOI: 10.1016/0020-1693(95)04734-4
    16. 16
      Kljun, J.; Bytzek, A. K.; Kandioller, W.; Bartel, C.; Jakupec, M. A.; Hartinger, C. G.; Keppler, B. K.; Turel, I. Physicochemical Studies and Anticancer Potency of Ruthenium eta(6)-p-Cymene Complexes Containing Antibacterial Quinolones. Organometallics 2011, 30 (9), 25062512,  DOI: 10.1021/om101180c
    17. 17
      Mallick, S.; Sahu A Fau - Pal, K.; Pal, K. Dissolution behaviour of nalidixic acid solid dispersions using water soluble dispersion carriers. Acta Polym. Pharm. 2004, 61, 2130
    18. 18
      Drlica, K.; Hiasa, H.; Kerns, R.; Malik, M.; Mustaev, A.; Zhao, X. L. Quinolones: Action and Resistance Updated. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2009, 9 (11), 981998,  DOI: 10.2174/156802609789630947
    19. 19
      Grover, G.; Kini, S. G. Synthesis and evaluation of new quinazolone derivatives of nalidixic acid as potential antibacterial and antifungal agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 41 (2), 256262,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2005.09.002
    20. 20
      Pandey, A.; Aggarwal, N.; Adholeya, A.; Kochar, M. Resurrection of Nalidixic Acid: Evaluation of Water-Based Nanoformulations as Potential Nanomedicine. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 298,  DOI: 10.1186/s11671-018-2718-8
    21. 21
      Zhu, X.; Radovic-Moreno, A. F.; Wu, J.; Langer, R.; Shi, J. J. Nanomedicine in the management of microbial infection - Overview and perspectives. Nano Today 2014, 9 (4), 478498,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2014.06.003
    22. 22
      Ahmed, M.; Kelley, S. O. Enhancing the Potency of Nalidixic Acid toward a Bacterial DNA Gyrase with Conjugated Peptides. ACS Chem. Biol. 2017, 12 (10), 25632569,  DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00540
    23. 23
      Behrens, N. B.; Diaz, G. M.; Goodgame, D. M. L. etal-complexes of the antibiotic nalidixic acid. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1986, 125 (1), 2126,  DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)85478-X
    24. 24
      Mendozadiaz, G.; Martinezaguilera, L. M. R.; Perezalonso, R.; Solans, X.; Moreno-Esparza, R. Synthesis and characterization of mixed-ligand complexes of copper with nalidixic acid and (N-N) donors - crystal-structure of Cu(PHEN)(NAL)-(H2O)NO3.3H2O. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1987, 138 (1), 4147,  DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)81179-2
    25. 25
      Arjmand, F.; Yousuf, I.; Afzal, M.; Toupet, L. Design and synthesis of new Zn(II) nalidixic acid-DACH based Topo-II inhibiting molecular entity: Chemotherapeutic potential validated by its in vitro binding profile, pBR322 cleavage activity and molecular docking studies with DNA and RNA molecular targets. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2014, 421, 2637,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2014.05.015
    26. 26
      Arjmand, F.; Yousuf, I.; ben Hadda, T.; Toupet, L. Synthesis, crystal structure and antiproliferative activity of Cu(II) nalidixic acid-DACH conjugate: Comparative in vitro DNA/RNA binding profile, cleavage activity and molecular docking studies. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 81, 7688,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.04.080
    27. 27
      Yousuf, I.; Usman, M.; Ahmad, M.; Tabassum, S.; Arjmand, F. Single X-ray crystal structure, DFT studies and topoisomerase I inhibition activity of a tailored ionic Ag(I) nalidixic acid-piperazinium drug entity specific for pancreatic cancer cells. New J. Chem. 2018, 42 (1), 506519,  DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ03602G
    28. 28
      Andre, V.; Galego, F.; Martins, M. Mechanochemical Assembly of Nalidixic Acid Bioinspired Metal-Organic Compounds and Complexes toward Improved Solubility. Cryst. Growth Des. 2018, 18 (4), 20672081,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01523
    29. 29
      Rios, F. J.; Montezano, A. C.; Touyz, R. M.; Collins, J. F. Magnesium, Vascular Function, and Hypertension. Molecular, genetic, and nutritional aspects of major and trace minerals 2017, 353364,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802168-2.00029-4
    30. 30
      Schmitz, C.; Perraud, A.-L.; Collins, J. F. Magnesium and the Immune Response. Molecular, Genetic, and Nutritional Aspects of Major and Trace Minerals 2017, 319331,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802168-2.00026-9
    31. 31
      Pleshchitser, A. L. BIOLOGICAL ROLE OF MAGNESIUM. Clinical Chemistry 1958, 4 (6), 429450
    32. 32
      Nielsen, F. H.; Collins, J. F. Magnesium: Basic Nutritional Aspects. Molecular, Genetic, and Nutritional Aspects of Major and Trace Minerals 2017, 307317,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802168-2.00025-7
    33. 33
      Komiya, Y.; Runnels, L. W.; Collins, J. F. Magnesium and Embryonic Development. Molecular, Genetic, and Nutritional Aspects of Major and Trace Minerals 2017, 343351,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802168-2.00028-2
    34. 34
      He, K.; Tsinovoi, C. L.; Collins, J. F. Magnesium Intake and Chronic Disease in Humans. Molecular, Genetic, and Nutritional Aspects of Major and Trace Minerals 2017, 333,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802168-2.00027-0
    35. 35
      Blower, T. R.; Williamson, B. H.; Kerns, R. J.; Berger, J. M. Crystal structure and stability of gyrase-fluoroquinolone cleaved complexes from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016, 113 (7), 17061713,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1525047113
    36. 36
      Wohlkonig, A.; Chan, P. F.; Fosberry, A. P.; Homes, P.; Huang, J.; Kranz, M.; Leydon, V. R.; Miles, T. J.; Pearson, N. D.; Perera, R. L.; Shillings, A. J.; Gwynn, M. N.; Bax, B. D. Structural basis of quinolone inhibition of type IIA topoisomerases and target-mediated resistance. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17, 1152,  DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1892
    37. 37
      Peres, T. V.; Aschner, M.; Collins, J. F. Nutritional, Genetic, and Molecular Aspects of Manganese Intoxication. Molecular, Genetic, and Nutritional Aspects of Major and Trace Minerals 2017, 367376,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802168-2.00030-0
    38. 38
      Juttukonda, L. J.; Skaar, E. P.; Collins, J. F. Manganese and Nutritional Immunity. Molecular, Genetic, and Nutritional Aspects of Major and Trace Minerals 2017, 377387,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802168-2.00031-2
    39. 39
      Gunter, T. E.; Collins, J. F. Manganese and Mitochondrial Function. Molecular, Genetic, and Nutritional Aspects of Major and Trace Minerals 2017, 389396,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802168-2.00032-4
    40. 40
      Strukil, V.; Igrc, M. D.; Eckert-Maksic, M.; Friscic, T. Click Mechanochemistry: Quantitative Synthesis of ″Ready to Use″ Chiral Organocatalysts by Efficient Two-Fold Thiourea Coupling to Vicinal Diamines. Chem. - Eur. J. 2012, 18 (27), 84648473,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201200632
    41. 41
      Nichols, P. J.; Raston, C. L.; Steed, J. W. Engineering of porous pi-stacked solids using mechanochemistry. Chem. Commun. 2001, (12), 10621063,  DOI: 10.1039/b103411c
    42. 42
      Martins, I.; Martins, M.; Fernandes, A.; Andre, V.; Duarte, M. T. An insight into dapsone co-crystals: sulfones as participants in supramolecular interactions. CrystEngComm 2013, 15 (40), 81738179,  DOI: 10.1039/c3ce41323c
    43. 43
      Braga, D.; Maini, L.; Grepioni, F. Mechanochemical preparation of co-crystals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (18), 76387648,  DOI: 10.1039/c3cs60014a
    44. 44
      André, V.; Quaresma, S. Bio-inspired metalorganic frameworks in the pharmaceutical world: a brief review. Metal-Organic Frameworks 2016, 135156,  DOI: 10.5772/64027
    45. 45
      Andini, S.; Bolognese, A.; Formisano, D.; Manfra, M.; Montagnaro, F.; Santoro, L. Mechanochemistry of ibuprofen pharmaceutical. Chemosphere 2012, 88 (5), 548553,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.025
    46. 46
      Chow, E. H. H.; Strobridge, F. C.; Friscic, T. Mechanochemistry of magnesium oxide revisited: facile derivatisation of pharmaceuticals using coordination and supramolecular chemistry. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46 (34), 63686370,  DOI: 10.1039/c0cc01337d
    47. 47
      Andre, V.; Quaresma, S.; Silva, J. L. F.; Duarte, M. T. Exploring mechanochemistry to turn organic bio-relevant molecules into metal-organic frameworks: a short review. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017, 13, 24162427,  DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.13.239
    48. 48
      Craig, S. L. Mechanochemistry: A tour of force. Nature 2012, 487 (7406), 176177,  DOI: 10.1038/487176a
    49. 49
      James, S. L.; Adams, C. J.; Bolm, C.; Braga, D.; Collier, P.; Friscic, T.; Grepioni, F.; Harris, K. D. M.; Hyett, G.; Jones, W.; Krebs, A.; Mack, J.; Maini, L.; Orpen, A. G.; Parkin, I. P.; Shearouse, W. C.; Steed, J. W.; Waddell, D. C. Mechanochemistry: opportunities for new and cleaner synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41 (1), 413447,  DOI: 10.1039/C1CS15171A
    50. 50
      Friscic, T. New opportunities for materials synthesis using mechanochemistry. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20 (36), 75997605,  DOI: 10.1039/c0jm00872a
    51. 51
      Beldon, P. J.; Fabian, L.; Stein, R. S.; Thirumurugan, A.; Cheetham, A. K.; Friscic, T. Rapid Room-Temperature Synthesis of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks by Using Mechanochemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49 (50), 96409643,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201005547
    52. 52
      Delori, A.; Friscic, T.; Jones, W. The role of mechanochemistry and supramolecular design in the development of pharmaceutical materials. CrystEngComm 2012, 14 (7), 23502362,  DOI: 10.1039/c2ce06582g
    53. 53
      Zhang, P.; Li, H.; Veith, G. M.; Dai, S. Soluble Porous Coordination Polymers by Mechanochemistry: From Metal-Containing Films/Membranes to Active Catalysts for Aerobic Oxidation. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27 (2), 234239,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201403299
    54. 54
      Garay, A. L.; Pichon, A.; James, S. L. Solvent-free synthesis of metal complexes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36 (6), 846855,  DOI: 10.1039/b600363j
    55. 55
      Friscic, T. Supramolecular concepts and new techniques in mechanochemistry: cocrystals, cages, rotaxanes, open metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41 (9), 34933510,  DOI: 10.1039/c2cs15332g
    56. 56
      Andre, V.; Hardeman, A.; Halasz, I.; Stein, R. S.; Jackson, G. J.; Reid, D. G.; Duer, M. J.; Curfs, C.; Duarte, M. T.; Friscic, T. Mechanosynthesis of the Metallodrug Bismuth Subsalicylate from Bi2O3 and Structure of Bismuth Salicylate without Auxiliary Organic Ligands. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50 (34), 78587861,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201103171
    57. 57
      Quaresma, S.; Andre, V.; Fernandes, A.; Duarte, M. T. Mechanochemistry - a green methodology leading to metallodrugs, metallopharmaceuticals and bio-inspired metal-organic frameworks. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2017, 455, 309318,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2016.09.033
    58. 58
      Hasa, D.; Carlino, E.; Jones, W. Polymer-Assisted Grinding, a Versatile Method for Polymorph Control of Cocrystallization. Cryst. Growth Des. 2016, 16 (3), 17721779,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00084
    59. 59
      Hasa, D.; Rauber, G. S.; Voinovich, D.; Jones, W. Cocrystal Formation through Mechanochemistry: from Neat and Liquid-Assisted Grinding to Polymer-Assisted Grinding. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54 (25), 73717375,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201501638
    60. 60
      Khadka, P.; Ro, J.; Kim, H.; Kim, I.; Kim, J. T.; Kim, H.; Cho, J. M.; Yun, G.; Lee, J. Pharmaceutical particle technologies: An approach to improve drug solubility, dissolution and bioavailability. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 9 (6), 304316,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ajps.2014.05.005
    61. 61
      Turel, I. The interactions of metal ions with quinolone antibacterial agents. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2002, 232 (1–2), 2747,  DOI: 10.1016/S0010-8545(02)00027-9
    62. 62
      Chen, Z. F.; Xiong, R. G.; Zuo, J. L.; Guo, Z. J.; You, X. Z.; Fun, H. K. X-Ray crystal structures of Mg2+ and Ca2+ dimers of the antibacterial drug norfloxacin. Journal of the Chemical Society-Dalton Transactions 2000, (22), 40134014,  DOI: 10.1039/b006806n
    63. 63
      Xiao, D. R.; Wang, E. B.; An, H. Y.; Su, Z. M.; Li, Y. G.; Gao, L.; Sun, C. Y.; Xu, L. Rationally designed, polymeric, extended metal-ciprofloxacin complexes. Chem. - Eur. J. 2005, 11 (22), 66736686,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.200500548
    64. 64
      Turel, I.; Zivec, P.; Pevec, A.; Tempelaar, S.; Psomas, G. Compounds of antibacterial agent ciprofloxacin and magnesium - Crystal structures and molecular modeling calculations. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 2008 (23), 37183727,  DOI: 10.1002/ejic.200800338
    65. 65
      Macrae, C. F.; Bruno, I. J.; Chisholm, J. A.; Edgington, P. R.; McCabe, P.; Pidcock, E.; Rodriguez-Monge, L.; Taylor, R.; van de Streek, J.; Wood, P. A. Mercury CSD 2.0 - new features for the visualization and investigation of crystal structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2008, 41, 466470,  DOI: 10.1107/S0021889807067908
    66. 66
      Siopa, F.; Figueiredo, T.; Frade, R. F. M.; Neto, I.; Meirinhos, A.; Reis, C. P.; Sobral, R. G.; Afonso, C. A. M.; Rijo, P. Choline-Based Ionic Liquids: Improvement of Antimicrobial Activity. Chemistryselect 2016, 1 (18), 59095916,  DOI: 10.1002/slct.201600864
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.9b00046.

    • Single-crystal X-ray diffraction experimental details, bulk purity, infrared spectroscopy, solid-state NMR, and shelf stability at 77% room humidity (PDF)

    Terms & Conditions

    Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

OOPS

You have to login with your ACS ID befor you can login with your Mendeley account.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE