ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Hybrid Silver(I)-Doped Soybean Oil and Potato Starch Biopolymer Films to Combat Bacterial Biofilms
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Biological and Medical Applications of Materials and Interfaces

Hybrid Silver(I)-Doped Soybean Oil and Potato Starch Biopolymer Films to Combat Bacterial Biofilms
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Tiago A. Fernandes
    Tiago A. Fernandes
    Centro de Química Estrutural, Institute of Molecular Sciences, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
  • Inês F.M. Costa
    Inês F.M. Costa
    Centro de Química Estrutural, Institute of Molecular Sciences, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
  • Paula Jorge
    Paula Jorge
    Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
    More by Paula Jorge
  • Ana Catarina Sousa
    Ana Catarina Sousa
    Centro de Química Estrutural, Institute of Molecular Sciences, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
    Área Departamental de Engenharia Química, ISEL─Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, R. Conselheiro Emídio Navarro, 1, 1959-007 Lisbon, Portugal
  • Vânia André
    Vânia André
    Centro de Química Estrutural, Institute of Molecular Sciences, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
  • Rafaela G. Cabral
    Rafaela G. Cabral
    Centro de Química Estrutural, Institute of Molecular Sciences, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
    Área Departamental de Engenharia Química, ISEL─Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, R. Conselheiro Emídio Navarro, 1, 1959-007 Lisbon, Portugal
  • Nuno Cerca*
    Nuno Cerca
    Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
    *Email: [email protected]
    More by Nuno Cerca
  • Alexander M. Kirillov*
    Alexander M. Kirillov
    Centro de Química Estrutural, Institute of Molecular Sciences, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
    *Email: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Cite this: ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 22, 25104–25114
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c03010
Published May 27, 2022

Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This study describes the preparation, characterization, and antimicrobial properties of novel hybrid biopolymer materials doped with bioactive silver(I) coordination polymers (bioCPs). Two new bioCPs, [Ag26-hfa)]n (1) and [Ag24-nda)(H2O)2]n (2), were assembled from Ag2O and homophthalic (H2hfa) or 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic (H2nda) acids as unexplored building blocks. Their structures feature 2D metal–organic and supramolecular networks with 3,6L64 or sql topology. Both compounds act as active antimicrobial agents for producing bioCP-doped biopolymer films based on epoxidized soybean oil acrylate (SBO) or potato starch (PS) as model biopolymer materials with a different rate of degradability and silver release. BioCPs and their hybrid biopolymer films (1@[SBO]n, 2@[SBO]n, 1@[PS]n, and 2@[PS]n) with a very low loading of coordination polymer (0.05–0.5 wt %) show remarkable antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis (Gram-positive) and Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Gram-negative) bacteria. Biopolymer films also effectively impair the formation of bacterial biofilms, allowing total biofilm inhibition in several cases. By reporting on new bioCPs and biopolymer films obtained from renewable biofeedstocks (soybean oil and PS), this study blends highly important research directions and widens a limited antimicrobial application of bioCPs and derived functional materials. This research thus opens up the perspectives for designing hybrid biopolymer films with outstanding bioactivity against bacterial biofilms.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Bacterial biofilms represent a community of bacteria usually associated with a surface and encased within an extracellular matrix. Biofilms correspond to a very typical form for the growth of bacteria, which are naturally assembled on diverse interface types of materials and environments, including living organisms. (1) During the formation of biofilms, the adhesion of bacterial cells to the surface occurs with a simultaneous synthesis of a protective matrix. (2,3) This process enables bacteria to survive under aggressive environments (i.e., heat and treatment with antiseptics and antibiotics) and develop increased resistance, which nowadays constitutes a critical issue in human healthcare. (4−6) In fact, biofilms are largely responsible for persistent and chronic infection diseases in humans, which are often related with the use of biomaterials (e.g., implants, catheters, and valves). (7,8) Hence, the prevention of bacterial attachment to surfaces represents one of the most promising strategies to tackle biofilm formation and growth, namely, by investigating alternative functional materials, (9−11) capable of reducing bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation.
In this regard, bioCPs (bioactive coordination polymers) and bioMOFs (bioactive metal–organic frameworks) attracted a great deal of attention as promising antibacterial agents (12−21) composed of biocidal metal centers as well as linkers and/or guest species with antimicrobial activity. Among various metals with a potential antibacterial activity, silver is particularly appealing with the most significant bioactivity in addition to a relatively low intrinsic toxicity to human cells. (22−32)
Silver ions, nanoparticles, and coordination compounds are thus well recognized for their bactericidal activity with many partially implicit types of action mechanisms. (27,33−35) The examples include intrusion of Ag+ species into intracellular protein moieties and membranes of bacteria, particularly sulfur-containing proteins and phosphorus-containing deoxyribonucleic acid. Such interactions involving thiol functionalities in essential enzymes contribute to their deactivation, inhibit division of cells, and cause death of cells. (36−38) Prior results indicate that in bacteria subjected to treatment by Ag+ species, DNA can lose the ability to replicate, causing changes in the structures of cell membranes and in the development of minor electron-rich granules incorporating Ag and S elements. (36,38,39)
In pursuit of this discussion and high current perspectives of bioactive coordination polymers and derived materials, the principal aim of this work focused on the synthesis of new silver(I) bioCPs and assessment of their antimicrobial activity after incorporation as antimicrobial dopants into biopolymer films. This research direction tracks a trend for the design of renewable and biodegradable biopolymer materials with diverse applications. (40−43) As an example, the search for alternative biodegradable packaging products has seen a great development in response to the biological incompatibility of non-biodegradable packaging materials. Biopolymer films that simultaneously comprise an antimicrobial component and derive from the natural bio-based precursors [e.g., soybean oil and potato starch (PS)] may find a high significance in this field.
Specifically, epoxidized soybean oil acrylate (SBO) and PS are considered very promising candidates as organic polymer matrices for the production of antimicrobial biomaterials. Soy protein isolate (SPI) is a promising packaging material derived from the edible oil industry and possesses advantages such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, and film-forming capacity. The limited practical applications of SPI-based films have led to an increased research on epoxide compounds that are able to enhance their mechanical properties. In this regard, SBO represents a particularly interesting substrate for the preparation of biopolymers. (44−46)
Apart from SBO, PS can also act as a low-cost biodegradable polymer matrix to immobilize antimicrobial bioCPs. As a polysaccharide widely used to produce green biomaterials, starch constitutes a renewable and sustainable polymer and represents one of the most commercially available biofeedstocks. (47) The non-biodegradability of petrochemical-based materials generated a strong demand for “green alternatives”, such as starch-based biodegradable bioplastics. Thus, PS is considered as a highly attractive resource for the production of biopolymer films in the packaging industry. (48−51)
Aiming at fabricating novel functional materials and merging both the synthetic and antimicrobial approaches, the current work reports on the synthesis of new silver(I) bioactive coordination polymers as well as their application as dopants for the preparation of hybrid bioCP-doped biopolymer films based on [SBO]n or [PS]n. Hence, two new bioCPs, [Ag26-hfa)]n (1) and [Ag24-nda)(H2O)2]n (2), were assembled from homophthalic (H2hfa) or 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic (H2nda) acids as linkers and applied in the production of hybrid biopolymer film materials. These were then screened for their potential to prevent the growth of bacteria and biofilms. By reporting on new bioCPs along with hybrid biopolymer films and their antibacterial and biofilm inhibition properties, this multidisciplinary study not only blends different highly important research directions but also widens a still limited antimicrobial application of coordination polymers and derived biomaterials.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Preparation of bioCPs

New silver(I) bioCPs formulated as [Ag26-hfa)]n (1) and [Ag24-nda)(H2O)2]n (2) were self-assembled from an acetonitrile–methanol reaction mixture composed of silver(I) oxide, homophthalic (H2hfa) or 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic (H2nda) acid, 2-dimethylaminoethanol (template), and aqueous ammonium hydroxide (Figure S1, Supporting Information). Both products 1 and 2 were isolated as air-stable crystalline compounds having a mean size of particles of 66 and 51 μm, respectively (Figures S2 and S6). The formulation and structures of the obtained compounds were confirmed by C/H/N analyses, IR (Figures S7 and S8) and NMR spectroscopies, and X-ray diffraction methods (SCXD and PXRD, Figures S20 and S21).

Preparation of Hybrid BioCP-Doped Biopolymer Films

Two types of hybrid biopolymer films were fabricated by dispersing very low amounts of bioCPs in the biopolymer precursors based on the epoxidized SBO, or PS with glycerol, followed by polymerization in Petri dishes (Figures 1 and S4). The examples of sample coupons for [SBO]n and [PS]n biopolymer films that were cut and used for antimicrobial studies are shown in Figure 2. Low loadings (0.05, 0.01, and 0.5 wt %) of bioCPs were explored, giving origin to the biopolymer thin films (∼1 mm thickness) abbreviated as 1-0.5%@[SBO]n, 1-0.1%@[SBO]n, and 1-0.05%@[SBO]n; 2-0.5%@[SBO]n, 2-0.1%@[SBO]n, and 2-0.05%@[SBO]n (SBO series); as well as 1-0.5%@[PS]n and 2-0.5%@[PS]n (PS series) (Figure S5). For comparison, the negative control ([SBO]n and [PS]n) as well as the positive control (Ag2O-0.05%@[SBO]n, Ag2O-0.1%@[SBO]n, Ag2O-0.5%@[SBO]n, and Ag2O-0.5%@[PS]n) biopolymer films were also fabricated. The obtained materials were characterized by ATR-FTIR (Figures S9–S14) and SEM–EDX (Figures 5, S15, and S16). The latter revealed a generally uniform distribution of bioCPs, although these may occasionally be concentrated in areas containing larger crystalline particles. Water absorption and stability of films in PBS medium were also evaluated in addition to silver ion release experiments (Table S1 and Figures S17 and S18). In fact, both types of biopolymer films show a gradual disaggregation (limited stability) along time in PBS medium (Figure S17, Supporting Information) and feature a minor release of Ag+ ions after 24 h, namely, 10–20 and 49–57 μg/L, for [SBO]n and [PS]n films doped by 0.5% bioCPs, respectively. We would like to emphasize that the materials should not be intact to show antimicrobial performance.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Preparation of bioCP-doped [SBO]n and [PS]n biopolymer films.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Sample coupons for (a) [SBO]n and (b) [PS]n biopolymer films.

Similar to a majority of related CPs or MOFs, both the obtained bioCPs are marginally soluble in H2O and in reaction medium during the film formation. This makes more difficult the homogeneous distribution of coordination polymers within the biopolymer films. However, in contrast to discrete soluble complexes or silver salts, the release of silver ions from bioCP-based films is significantly slower, which represents an advantage of these materials in terms of relative stability and possible long-term use. Both carboxylic acid ligands in 1 and 2 were chosen given their unexplored use as building blocks for assembling bioCPs and due to their different hydrolipophilic properties, for example, log P = 1.18 for homophthalic acid and log P = 2.80 for 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid. However, when these ligands are coordinated to silver, they form almost insoluble bioCPs, with a different rate of silver ion release.

Structural Description of bioCPs 1 and 2

The structure of [Ag26-hfa)]n (1) discloses an intricate 2D metal–organic double layer (Figure 3), which is constructed from two structurally distinct Ag1/Ag2 centers and a μ6-homophthalate2– linker (Figure 3a,b). This linker simultaneously binds to three Ag1 and three Ag2 atoms by carboxylate groups that act in the μ3-bridging tridentate and μ4-bridging tetradentate modes. The Ag1 center is 3-coordinate featuring a distorted trigonal planar arrangement of three carboxylate O donor atoms with the Ag1–O distances in the 2.1677(1)–2.4711(1) Å range. The Ag2 center is 4-coordinate by four oxygen atoms coming from three μ6-hfa2– blocks with the Ag2–O bonds varying in the 2.2193(1)–2.6405(1) Å interval. In addition, both the Ag1 and Ag2 centers participate in several weak argentophilic interactions, wherein the Ag···Ag distances are in the 2.8204(6)–3.1861(5) Å interval (Figure 3b). These interactions reinforce the 2D metal–organic network (Figure 3c,d) that is driven by the μ6-hfa2– linkers and features a 3,6L64 topology (Figure S3a,b). Despite being rather simple and commercially available, homophthalic acid has not yet been applied for designing silver complexes and CPs as evidenced by CSD search. Hence, bioCP 1 represents a unique example of Ag(I) coordination polymer derived from H2hfa.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Structural fragments of [Ag26-hfa)]n (1). (a) Coordination mode of μ6-hfa2– ligand. (b) Coordination environment of silver atoms including argentophilic interactions (dotted cyan lines). (c,d) Front (c) and side (d) view of 2D double layer. Further details: (a–d) Ag (cyan), C (gray), and O (red); views along the c (c) and a (d) axes.

The structure of [Ag24-nda)(H2O)2]n (2) is assembled from the symmetry equivalent Ag1 atoms, μ4-nda2– spacers, and terminal water ligands (Figure 4). Note that the discussion is based on the major occupancy Ag atom (Ag1), but similar conclusions can be drawn for the Ag2 center. The Ag1 atoms are surrounded by three oxygen atoms, two coming from the μ4-nda2– blocks and one from the H2O ligand with the Ag1–O bonds ranging from 2.1203(3)(3) to 2.7146(4) Å (Figure 4a,b). There are also weaker Ag···Ag [3.01–3.25 Å] and Ag···O [3.26 Å] interactions which, along with the μ4-nda2– linkers, result in the assembly of a two-dimensional supramolecular net (Figure 4b) with an sql topology (Figure S3c). The compound 2 widens the types of CPs constructed from the nda2– linkers. (52,53)

Figure 4

Figure 4. Structural fragments of [Ag24-nda)(H2O)2]n (2). (a) Coordination mode of μ4-nda2– ligand and environment of Ag1 centers; weaker argentophilic Ag···Ag and Ag···O interactions are shown as dotted lines. (b) 2D supramolecular layer. Further details: Ag (cyan), C (gray), and O (red); (b) view along the c axis.

Morphological Characterization of bioCP-Doped Biopolymer Films

The bioCP-doped [SBO]n and [PS]n biopolymer films were examined by SEM–EDX (Figure 5) to further evaluate their morphology and incorporation of bioCPs 1 or 2 into the films. As observed in Figure 5b,e, coordination polymers 1 and 2 were directly embedded within the [SBO]n matrix, also being present at the surface of the films (Figure 5b). The material was then evaluated by SEM–EDX using a silver analysis probe for determining Ag distribution (Figure 5c,e). From the Ag overlay on the SEM image of the 2-0.5%@[SBO]n film (Figure 5e), it can be seen that silver is well distributed and only occasionally concentrated in areas containing larger crystalline particles of bioCP 2. The oxygen distribution does not provide additional details because O element is present in both the polymer matrix and bioCPs (Figure 5f). Figure 5g shows a morphological characterization of the [PS]n film. Figure 5h,i shows the same region of 1-0.5%@[PS]n, where bioCP particles can be seen throughout the material, which is evidenced by EDX analysis of Ag distribution. In general, the films are quite uniform (Figure 5c,e,i), although it is possible to occasionally observe areas containing increased bioCP concentrations (Figures S15 and S16, Supporting Information). However, taking into account the sample coupon as a whole, any eventual deviation in the distribution of bioCPs is irrelevant, as confirmed by the reproducibility of biological assays that were made in triplicate.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Morphological characterization of [SBO]n and [PS]n films by SEM–EDX. SEM images: (a) SBO film; (b) 1-0.5%@[SBO]n; (c) 1-0.5%@[SBO]n [the same region as (b)] with EDX analysis of Ag distribution; (d) 2-0.5%@[SBO]n, where bioCP particles can be seen throughout the material; (e) 2-0.5%@[SBO]n with EDX analysis of Ag distribution; (f) 2-0.5%@[SBO]n (the same region as e) with EDX analysis of O distribution; (g) [PS]n film; (h) 1-0.5%@[PS]n, where bioCP particles can be seen throughout the material; (i) 1-0.5%@[PS]n (the same region as h) with EDX analysis of Ag distribution. Images (a), (d), (i), and (h) were obtained at 1000× magnification and (b,c,e,f,i) at 500× magnification.

Thermogravimetric Analysis

The thermal stability of bioCP-doped and undoped [SBO]n and [PS]n biopolymer films was investigated by TGA under nitrogen flow (Figure S19, Supporting Information). All [SBO]n-based samples display similar patterns with one major degradation stage between 300 and 470 °C, corresponding to a 90% weight loss. For [PS]n-based samples, there are several thermal effects with major mass losses in the 50–250 and 250–350 °C intervals, eventually corresponding to a release of absorbed H2O/glycerol and the decomposition of biopolymers, respectively. (54,55) The third step of weight loss (350–700 °C) can be assigned to final carbonization. Other difference in the TGA patterns observed between the bioCP-doped samples and sole [PS]n might be regarded to a different content of absorbed water and glycerol present in these samples.

Antibacterial Activity

The obtained bioCPs exhibited antibacterial behavior against all tested species (Figure 6). In terms of susceptibility, the following rough trend was observed: Escherichia coli < Staphylococcus aureus < Pseudomonas aeruginosa < Staphylococcus epidermidis. No link of antibacterial efficiency with Gram classification was observed. Compound 1 had higher antibacterial action against P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis in comparison with 2, which can be evidenced by larger radii of inhibition. For S. aureus, the antibacterial activities of 1 and 2 were comparable (Figure 6). In turn, compound 2 was more effective against E. coli.

Figure 6

Figure 6. (a) Minimum inhibition radius (mean ± SD) showing the normalized activity of 1 and 2 against P. aeruginosa and E. coli (Gram-negative) and S. aureus and S. epidermidis (Gram-positive) bacteria. (b) Examples of the obtained halos representing bacterial growth inhibition.

Concerning the antibacterial activity of the Ag-doped [SBO]n films, 2@[SBO]n stood out as the most effective against all four bacterial strains, with a concentration-dependent efficacy (Figure 7). This is different from the above-discussed data for free compounds, wherein bioCP 1 revealed a superior efficiency (except for E. coli). This difference might be regarded to distinct diffusion patterns of silver compounds in the [SBO]n film. In fact, a higher Ag+ release rate of 20 μg·L–1 was observed for 2@[SBO]n versus 1@[SBO]n after 24 h in PBS (Figure S18).

Figure 7

Figure 7. Normalized activity of [SBO]n biopolymer films containing varying concentrations of Ag2O (Ag2O@[SBO]n) and compounds 1 (1@[SBO]n) and 2 (2@[SBO]n) against P. aeruginosa and E. coli (Gram-negative) and S. aureus and S. epidermidis (Gram-positive) bacteria.

Both 1@[SBO]n and Ag2O@[SBO]n had little activity in comparison with 2@[SBO]n. All the three films had similar ineffectiveness at 0.05 wt % loading. The least susceptible bacteria to 2@[SBO]n was E. coli, while S. epidermidis was the most susceptible.
To compare an antimicrobial efficiency of silver(I) compounds in [SBO]n versus [PS]n films, an antibacterial assay was performed for both biopolymers encompassing the most effective concentration of bioCPs (0.5%). The antimicrobial activity of compound 1 was substantially higher when loaded into [PS]n rather than [SBO]n films. Similarly, Ag2O also showed some increased activity in [PS]n films. In turn, compound 2 had a resembling antimicrobial activity in both films (Figure 8). The differences encountered between the two films are related with their composition, namely, a higher water content in [PS]n versus residual water in [SBO]n, as observed by FTIR (Figures S9 and S12), which may lead to a quicker solubilization and/or migration of bioCPs from [PS]n. In fact, this was further confirmed by a faster Ag+ release to the media from both 1-0.5%@[PS]n and 2-0.5%@[PS]n samples if compared with Ag-doped [SBO]n samples (Figure S18).

Figure 8

Figure 8. Normalized activity of [SBO]nvs [PS]n biopolymer films containing 0.5% of Ag2O and compounds 1 and 2 against P. aeruginosa and E. coli (Gram-negative) and S. aureus and S. epidermidis (Gram-positive) bacteria. Significant statistical differences were found using the two-way ANOVA and subsequent Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test with 95% confidence interval, represented as *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; and ***P ≤ 0.001.

The increase in mass as a percentage of dry mass for both types of biopolymer films was studied to determine water absorption. All samples were kept in water solution for 24 h. Based on the results (Table S1), it is clear that water absorption of 60% is higher for [PS]n films in comparison to a residual 1% absorption of [SBO]n films. As expected, higher water absorption well correlates with an affinity of [PS]n films to water as discussed above. All these findings well rationalize an observed bioactivity of different biopolymer films.
The amount of silver ions released, from both materials (with 0.5% concentration of bioCP, 1-0.5%@[SBO]n, and 1-0.5%@[PS]n), to PBS solution was determined by ICP-OES. In addition to proving a stability of materials, it revealed that only 0.06% of all silver present in the sample was released after 24 h from 1@[SBO]n, in contrast to 0.36% for 1@[PS]n, which corresponds to 10 and 57 μg·L–1, respectively. Similar results were obtained for 2@[SBO]n and 2@[PS]n, showing that [PS]n films release 6 times more silver ions to the aqueous medium within 24 h (Figures S17 and S18). The different Ag+ release rates observed for bioCP-doped [SBO]n and [PS]n biopolymer films are associated with the intrinsic properties (permeability, stability, degradability, and water absorption) of the biopolymer films. An effect of eventual interaction of compounds 1 and 2 with [SBO]n and [PS]n on release rate of Ag+ is negligible, given also a very low content (only 0.05–0.5%) of these bioCPs used as dopants.
A number of Ag(I) coordination polymers or metal–organic frameworks with various Ag–O, Ag–N, and/or Ag–P coordination environment types have been documented as antimicrobial compounds, with significant activity against the types of bacteria tested in the present study (Table S2, Supporting Information). (18,19,21,56−58) Given the difference in the content of antimicrobial components and the use of distinct assays for evaluation of bioactivity, a quantitative comparison of the observed activities is not feasible. Besides, the normalized antimicrobial activity of biopolymer films doped with bioCPs is generally comparable or even superior than that shown by the reference films doped with Ag2O and AgNO3 (Table S3, Supporting Information). Especially, the 2-0.1%@[SBO]n films exhibit a higher activity for all the tested types of bacteria if compared to the respective AgNO3-0.1%@[SBO]n films. Hence, important advantages of the bioCPs and materials reported in the present work concern (1) a usage of inexpensive soybean oil and PS as precursors for biopolymers, (2) a pronounced antimicrobial activity of the obtained films despite a very low loading of bioCPs (0.05–0.5%), (3) a simple generation of compounds 1 and 2 from commercially available reagents, and (4) a possibility of applying the biopolymer films to inhibit the growth of bacterial biofilms.

Biofilm Inhibition Activity

The Ag-doped [SBO]n films were also tested for their ability to prevent biofilm formation. Similar to its antibacterial activity, 2@[SBO]n was overall the most effective in partially preventing all the four bacterial species from forming biofilms on its surface (Figure 9). The Gram-positive bacteria, S. epidermidis and S. aureus, seem to be the most susceptible to 2@[SBO]n, with reductions above 3 log (99.9% bacterial growth reduction). The effect of 1@[SBO]n was much lower, with some effect (although lower than 1 log reduction, i.e., <90%) at the highest concentration against P. aeruginosa and E. coli (Gram-negative) bacteria, while the activity of Ag2O@[SBO]n as a positive control was virtually non-existent.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Normalized biofilm inhibition activity of [SBO]n biopolymer films containing varying concentration of Ag2O (Ag2O@[SBO]n) and compounds 1 (1@[SBO]n) and 2 (2@[SBO]n), against P. aeruginosa and E. coli (Gram-negative) and S. aureus and S. epidermidis (Gram-positive) bacteria. Significant statistical differences were found using the two-way ANOVA and subsequent Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test with 95% confidence interval, represented as *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; and ***P ≤ 0.001.

In parallel with what was observed for the antibacterial activity, the efficacy of the bioCP-doped [SBO]n films in preventing biofilm formation was compared with that of the respective [PS]n films. Overall, the efficacy of Ag2O and compound 2 was similar for both films, while the efficacy of compound 1 was much higher in [PS]n films (Figure 10). This correlates with what was observed for the antibacterial activity (Figure 8) and silver release tests (Figure S18).

Figure 10

Figure 10. Normalized biofilm inhibition activity of [SBO]nvs [PS]n biopolymer films doped with 0.5% of Ag2O and compounds 1 and 2 against P. aeruginosa and E. coli (Gram-negative) and S. aureus and S. epidermidis (Gram-positive) bacteria. Significant statistical differences were found using the two-way ANOVA and subsequent Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test with 95% confidence interval, represented as *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; and ***P ≤ 0.001.

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Self-Assembly Synthesis and Characterization of 1 and 2

[Ag26-hfa)]n (1)

Acetonitrile (7 mL) and methanol (3 mL) were added to Ag2O (0.232 g, 1 mmol). Then, homophthalic acid (H2hfa, 0.180 g, 1 mmol), 2-dimethylaminoethanol (Hdmea, 1.0 mmol, 0.1 mL), and 8.0 mL of aq NH4OH (33%) were added, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min at room temperature, followed by filtration (filter paper). An obtained filtrate was slowly evaporated in a vial in air. Colorless microcrystals (including suitable for X-ray diffraction) appeared in 1–2 weeks, which were separated and air-dried to afford bioCP 1 in 59% yield relatively to silver(I) oxide. BioCP 1 is barely soluble in water (0.065 mg·mL–1). Analysis calculated (%) for 1, C9H6Ag2O4 + 0.5CH3OH + 0.25CH3CN (1 + 0.5CH3OH + 0.25CH3CN): C, 28.59; H, 2.10; N, 0.83. Found: C, 29.04; H, 1.63; N, 0.47. FTIR-ATR (cm–1): 3207 m ν(H2O), 3065 m ν(H2O), 1606 m, 1583 m, 1539 m νas(COO), 1423 s, 1309 s νs(COO), 1145 w, 1041 w, 920 w, 827 w, 747 m, 716 s, 668 s cm–1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): δ ppm 7.59 (1H, d, J = 7.1 Hz), 7.27 (1H, t, JAB = 7.2, JBA = 7.4 Hz), 7.21 (2H, t, JAB = 7.4, JBA = 7.8 Hz), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz), 3.52 (2H, s, CH2). The crystal structure of 1 was determined by X-ray diffraction (Table 1); for details, see the Supporting Information. CCDC 2055525.
Table 1. Crystal Data and Structure Refinement Details for 1 and 2
 12
formulaC9H6Ag2O4C6H5AgO3
fw393.88232.97
crystal form, colorblock, colorlessneedle, colorless
crystal size (mm)0.3 × 0.04 × 0.020.2 × 0.06 × 0.04
crystal systemorthorhombicmonoclinic
space groupPbcaC2/c
a, Å6.2548(2)27.973(3)
b, Å10.4480(3)3.8045(5)
c, Å28.3300(8)13.0369(16)
α, deg9090
β, deg90107.283(4)
γ, deg9090
Z88
V, Å31851.37(10)1324.8(3)
T, K293293
Dc, g cm–32.8262.336
μ(Mo Kα), mm–14.2162.977
θ range (deg)3.261–32.5743.051–26.352
refl. collected26,14815,269
independent refl.33401352
Rint0.03420.0275
R1a, wR2b [I ≥ 2σ(I)]0.0387, 0.07240.0211, 0.0605
GOF on F21.1841.095
a

R1 = Σ||Fo| – |Fc||/Σ|Fo|.

b

wR2 = [Σ[w(Fo2Fc2)2]/Σ[w(Fo2)2]]1/2.

[Ag24-nda)(H2O)2]n (2)

Compound 2 was synthesized by a method similar to 1 but utilizing 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid (H2nda, 0.216 g, 1 mmol) in place of H2hfa. Pale yellow microcrystals (including suitable for X-ray diffraction) appeared in 1–2 weeks, which were separated and air-dried to afford bioCP 2 in 47% yield relatively to silver(I) oxide. BioCP 1 is barely soluble in water (0.089 mg·mL–1). Analysis calculated (%) for 2, C12H6O4Ag2(H2O)2 + CH3CN (2 + CH3CN): C, 33.17; H, 2.58; N, 2.76. Found: C, 33.44; H, 1.95; N, 2.86. FTIR-ATR (cm–1): 3322 m ν(H2O), 3209 m ν(H2O), 1602 w, 1539 s νas(COO), 1490 m, 1383 s, 1348 s νs(COO), 1199 m, 1138 w, 1098 w, 910 w, 831 w, 777 s cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ ppm 8.45 (2H, s), 8.00 (2H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.93 (2H, d, J = 7.4 Hz). The crystal structure of 2 was determined by X-ray diffraction (Table 1); for details, see the Supporting Information. CCDC 2055526.

Synthesis of bioCP-Doped [SBO]n Films

Prior to incorporation into the [SBO]n, coordination polymers 1 or 2 were ground into fine-powder solids. Then, bioCPs were introduced in different quantities to SBO (6.5 g) at loadings of 0.05–0.5 wt %, namely, SBO/bioCP 1000:0.5, 1000:1, 1000:5, and 1000:0 (control SBO sample). The mixtures obtained were stirred for 5 min at 40 °C for uniform dispersion of bioCPs in SBO; then, tert-butyl peroxybenzoate (TBPB, 2 wt % relatively to SBO) was added. After additional homogenization during 2 min, the mixtures were placed to 9 cm Petri dishes for the preparation of thin films of biopolymers. Polymerization of SBO was carried out by heating Petri dish samples in an oven for 2 h at 120 °C, in addition to subsequent treatment at 160 °C for 4 h. After cooling, the biopolymers were detached from Petri dishes to produce thin bioCP-doped biopolymer films that were abbreviated as follows: 1-0.5%@[SBO]n, 1-0.1%@[SBO]n, and 1-0.05%@[SBO]n and 2-0.5%@[SBO]n, 2-0.1%@[SBO]n, 2-0.05%@[SBO]n, and [SBO]n (control sample). For comparative purposes, the related types of the Ag2O-doped (i.e., Ag2O-0.05%@[SBO]n, Ag2O-0.1%@[SBO]n, and Ag2O-0.5%@[SBO]n) and AgNO3-doped biopolymer films were also prepared following the above-described procedure. FTIR-ATR (cm–1): 2019 vs, 2850 s, 1730 vs, 1175 vs, 1097 s, 1051 s, 809 w, 722 m cm–1.

Preparation of bioCP-Doped [PS]n Films

Prior to incorporation into the [PS]n-based biopolymers, bioCPs 1 and 2 were ground into fine-powder solids. A mixture of PS (1 g), distilled water (10 mL), and glycerol (0.8 mL) (1:10:0.8 mass ratio) was prepared by mixing PS with water for 3 min at 80 °C, followed by adding glycerol. Then, compounds 1 or 2 were added, and the mixtures obtained were stirred for 15 min at 70 °C until reaching a complete homogenization. Then, the mixtures were poured into Petri dishes (0.09 m of diameter) and kept at 50 °C in an oven for polymerization for 24 h. The malleable biopolymer films were detached from Petri dishes to furnish the bioCP-doped [PS]n biopolymer films 1-0.5%@[PS]n and 2-0.5%@[PS]n. In parallel experiments, the control [PS]n and Ag2O-0.5%@[PS]n films were prepared for comparative purposes. FTIR-ATR (cm–1): 3300 br, 2936 m, 2886 m, 1645 w, 1456 w, 1417 w, 1335 w, 1151 m, 1105, m, 1078 m, 1020 vs, 999 vs, 923 m, 852 m cm–1.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Two new silver(I) bioCPs, [Ag26-hfa)]n (1) and [Ag24-nda)(H2O)2]n (2), were easily self-assembled and fully characterized. Both compounds represent the unique examples of silver(I) bioCPs driven by homophthalate2– or 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylate2– linkers, thus widening a limited application of these dicarboxylate ligands for designing new metal–organic architectures.
The products 1 and 2 were applied as potent antimicrobial agents for the production of a new series of hybrid bioCP-loaded biopolymer films. Two types of biopolymer films, based on the epoxidized SBO or PS, were fabricated, and their antibacterial and biofilm inhibition properties were investigated in detail against four typical types of bacteria. In fact, the Ag-doped biopolymer films were able to prevent biofilm growth, especially those composed by [PS]n for which a total biofilm inhibition was achieved in several cases. Interestingly, the efficacy of bioCPs was dependent on the biopolymer matrix, with 1 being more effective in [PS]n, while for 2, this trend was less evident, exhibiting inhibition responses of the same magnitude. However, 2@[PS]n exhibited slightly better results against P. aeruginosa and E. coli, while 2@[SBO]n was more successful against S. aureus and S. epidermidis. The usage of two model biopolymers with different permeabilities and stabilities was one of the ideas explored in the present study to obtain materials with higher or lower Ag+ release, while applying the same type of dopant.
In summary, this work contributes to an underexplored biofilm inhibition application of bioCPs and derived functional materials, also showing that highly efficient antimicrobial biopolymer films can be easily fabricated from inexpensive biobased raw materials such as soybean oil, PS, and glycerol. We believe that this study can open up new perspectives for the design and application of biopolymer materials with antimicrobial activity.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.2c03010.

  • Description of methods and experimental procedures and synthesis of bioCPs 1 and 2, detailed photographs of powders and crystals of 1 and 2, topological representations, photographs of [SBO]n and [PS]n biopolymer films, photographs of doped biopolymer films, particle size distribution analysis, ATR-FT-IR spectra, SEM-EDS data, images of biopolymer coupons in PBS solution, ICP-OES data, water absorption data, antibacterial properties of relevant Ag-based coordination polymers/MOFs, nonnormalized minimum inhibitory radius for different Ag-doped biopolymer films, TGA curves, PXRD patterns, additional antimicrobial data, and crystallographic data in CIF format (CCDC 2055525 and 2055526) (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Nuno Cerca - Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, PortugalPresent Address: LABBELS–Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal Email: [email protected]
    • Alexander M. Kirillov - Centro de Química Estrutural, Institute of Molecular Sciences, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, PortugalOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2052-5280 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Tiago A. Fernandes - Centro de Química Estrutural, Institute of Molecular Sciences, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
    • Inês F.M. Costa - Centro de Química Estrutural, Institute of Molecular Sciences, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
    • Paula Jorge - Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, PortugalPresent Address: LABBELS–Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
    • Ana Catarina Sousa - Centro de Química Estrutural, Institute of Molecular Sciences, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, PortugalÁrea Departamental de Engenharia Química, ISEL─Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, R. Conselheiro Emídio Navarro, 1, 1959-007 Lisbon, Portugal
    • Vânia André - Centro de Química Estrutural, Institute of Molecular Sciences, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, PortugalOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5599-8355
    • Rafaela G. Cabral - Centro de Química Estrutural, Institute of Molecular Sciences, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, PortugalÁrea Departamental de Engenharia Química, ISEL─Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, R. Conselheiro Emídio Navarro, 1, 1959-007 Lisbon, Portugal
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This study was supported by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) (projects LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-029697, PTDC/QUI-QIN/29697/2017, UIDP/00100/2020, UIDB/00100/2020, LA/P/0056/2020, and REM2013; contracts under DL no. 57/2016, CEECIND/02725/2018, and CEECIND/00194/2020) as well as ISEL (IPL/2021/Naf4Med3D_ISEL).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 58 other publications.

  1. 1
    Flemming, H.-C.; Wuertz, S. Bacteria and Archaea on Earth and Their Abundance in Biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 247260,  DOI: 10.1038/s41579-019-0158-9
  2. 2
    Garrett, T. R.; Bhakoo, M.; Zhang, Z. Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilms on Surfaces. Prog. Nat. Sci. 2008, 18, 10491056,  DOI: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.04.001
  3. 3
    Achinas, S.; Charalampogiannis, N.; Euverink, G. J. W. A Brief Recap of Microbial Adhesion and Biofilms. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2801,  DOI: 10.3390/app9142801
  4. 4
    Chadha, T. Bacterial Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms and Antibiotic Resistance. J. Bacteriol. Parasitol. 2014, 05, 1000190,  DOI: 10.4172/2155-9597.1000190
  5. 5
    Wu, S.; Xu, C.; Zhu, Y.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, L.; Hu, Y.; Yu, B.; Wang, Y.; Xu, F. J. Biofilm-Sensitive Photodynamic Nanoparticles for Enhanced Penetration and Antibacterial Efficiency. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2103591,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202103591
  6. 6
    Sharma, D.; Misba, L.; Khan, A. U. Antibiotics Versus Biofilm: an Emerging Battleground in Microbial Communities. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2019, 8, 76,  DOI: 10.1186/s13756-019-0533-3
  7. 7
    Jorge, P.; Magalhães, A. P.; Grainha, T.; Alves, D.; Sousa, A. M.; Lopes, S. P.; Pereira, M. O. Antimicrobial Resistance Three Ways: Healthcare Crisis, Major Concepts and the Relevance of Biofilms. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2019, 95, fiz115,  DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiz115
  8. 8
    Şen Karaman, D.; Ercan, U. K.; Bakay, E.; Topaloğlu, N.; Rosenholm, J. M. Evolving Technologies and Strategies for Combating Antibacterial Resistance in the Advent of the Postantibiotic Era. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1908783,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201908783
  9. 9
    Friedlander, A.; Nir, S.; Reches, M.; Shemesh, M. Preventing Biofilm Formation by Dairy-Associated Bacteria Using Peptide-Coated Surfaces. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1405,  DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01405
  10. 10
    Li, X.; Wu, B.; Chen, H.; Nan, K.; Jin, Y.; Sun, L.; Wang, B. Recent Developments in Smart Antibacterial Surfaces to Inhibit Biofilm Formation And Bacterial Infections. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 42744292,  DOI: 10.1039/c8tb01245h
  11. 11
    Ivanova, A.; Ivanova, K.; Tied, A.; Heinze, T.; Tzanov, T. Layer-By-Layer Coating of Aminocellulose and Quorum Quenching Acylase on Silver Nanoparticles Synergistically Eradicate Bacteria and Their Biofilms. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2001284,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202001284
  12. 12
    Neufeld, B. H.; Neufeld, M. J.; Lutzke, A.; Schweickart, S. M.; Reynolds, M. M. Metal-Organic Framework Material Inhibits Biofilm Formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1702255,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201702255
  13. 13
    Zhuang, W.; Yuan, D.; Li, J.-R.; Luo, Z.; Zhou, H.-C.; Bashir, S.; Liu, J. Highly Potent Bactericidal Activity of Porous Metal-Organic Frameworks. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2012, 1, 225238,  DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201100043
  14. 14
    Wang, P.-L.; Xie, L.-H.; Joseph, E. A.; Li, J.-R.; Su, X.-O.; Zhou, H.-C. Metal-Organic Frameworks for Food Safety. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 1063810690,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00257
  15. 15
    Wyszogrodzka, G.; Marszałek, B.; Gil, B.; Dorożyński, P. Metal-Organic Frameworks: Mechanisms of Antibacterial Action and Potential Applications. Drug Discovery Today 2016, 21, 10091018,  DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.04.009
  16. 16
    Cheung, Y. H.; Ma, K.; van Leeuwen, H. C.; Wasson, M. C.; Wang, X.; Idrees, K. B.; Gong, W.; Cao, R.; Mahle, J. J.; Islamoglu, T.; Peterson, G. W.; de Koning, M. C.; Farha, O. K.; Farha, O. K. Immobilized Regenerable Active Chlorine within a Zirconium-Based MOF Textile Composite to Eliminate Biological and Chemical Threats. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 1677716785,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c08576
  17. 17
    Giliopoulos, D.; Zamboulis, A.; Giannakoudakis, D.; Bikiaris, D.; Triantafyllidis, K. Polymer/Metal Organic Framework (MOF) Nanocomposites for Biomedical Applications. Molecules 2020, 25, 185,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules25010185
  18. 18
    Jaros, S. W.; Guedes da Silva, M. F. C.; Florek, M.; Smoleński, P.; Pombeiro, A. J. L.; Kirillov, A. M. Silver(I) 1,3,5-Triaza-7-Phosphaadamantane Coordination Polymers Driven by Substituted Glutarate and Malonate Building Blocks: Self-Assembly Synthesis, Structural Features, and Antimicrobial Properties. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 58865894,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b00186
  19. 19
    Jaros, S. W.; Guedes da Silva, M. F. C.; Król, J.; Conceição Oliveira, M.; Smoleński, P.; Pombeiro, A. J. L.; Kirillov, A. M. Bioactive Silver–Organic Networks Assembled from 1,3,5-Triaza-7-Phosphaadamantane and Flexible Cyclohexanecarboxylate Blocks. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 14861496,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b02235
  20. 20
    Smoleński, P.; Jaros, S. W.; Pettinari, C.; Lupidi, G.; Quassinti, L.; Bramucci, M.; Vitali, L. A.; Petrelli, D.; Kochel, A.; Kirillov, A. M. New Water-Soluble Polypyridine Silver(I) Derivatives of 1,3,5-Triaza-7-Phosphaadamantane (PTA) with Significant Antimicrobial and Antiproliferative Activities. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 65726581,  DOI: 10.1039/c3dt33026e
  21. 21
    Fernandes, T. A.; Costa, I. F. M.; Jorge, P.; Sousa, A. C.; André, V.; Cerca, N.; Kirillov, A. M. Silver(I) Coordination Polymers Immobilized into Biopolymer Films for Antimicrobial Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 1283612844,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c19446
  22. 22
    Abram, S. L.; Fromm, K. M. Handling (Nano)Silver as Antimicrobial Agent: Therapeutic Window, Dissolution Dynamics, Detection Methods and Molecular Interactions. Chem.─Eur. J. 2020, 26, 1094810971,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.202002143
  23. 23
    Eckhardt, S.; Brunetto, P. S.; Gagnon, J.; Priebe, M.; Giese, B.; Fromm, K. M. Nanobio Silver: Its Interactions with Peptides and Bacteria, and Its Uses in Medicine. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 47084754,  DOI: 10.1021/cr300288v
  24. 24
    Horcajada, P.; Gref, R.; Baati, T.; Allan, P. K.; Maurin, G.; Couvreur, P.; Férey, G.; Morris, R. E.; Serre, C. Metal-Organic Frameworks in Biomedicine. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 12321268,  DOI: 10.1021/cr200256v
  25. 25
    Zheng, K.; Setyawati, M. I.; Leong, D. T.; Xie, J. Embedding Ultrasmall Ag Nanoclusters in Luria-Bertani Extract via Light Irradiation for Enhanced Antibacterial Activity. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 357, 117,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.11.019
  26. 26
    Davoudi, Z. M.; Kandjani, A. E.; Bhatt, A. I.; Kyratzis, I. L.; O’Mullane, A. P.; Bansal, V. Hybrid Antibacterial Fabrics with Extremely High Aspect Ratio Ag/AgTCNQ Nanowires. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 10471053,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201302368
  27. 27
    Chen, J.; Wang, F.; Liu, Q.; Du, J. Antibacterial Polymeric Nanostructures for Biomedical Applications. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 1448214493,  DOI: 10.1039/c4cc03001j
  28. 28
    Arenas-Vivo, A.; Amariei, G.; Aguado, S.; Rosal, R.; Horcajada, P. An Ag-loaded Photoactive Nano-metal Organic Framework as a Promising Biofilm Treatment. Acta Biomater. 2019, 97, 490500,  DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.011
  29. 29
    Nishanthi, S. T.; Yadav, K. K.; Baruah, A.; Vaghasiya, K.; Verma, R. K.; Ganguli, A. K.; Jha, M. Nanostructured Silver Decorated Hollow Silica and their Application in the Treatment of Microbial Contaminated Water at Room Temperature. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 89939001,  DOI: 10.1039/c9nj01049a
  30. 30
    Zhang, Y.; Sun, P.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, F.; Dong, K.; Liu, Z.; Ren, J.; Qu, X. Silver-Infused Porphyrinic Metal–Organic Framework: Surface-Adaptive, On-Demand Nanoplatform for Synergistic Bacteria Killing and Wound Disinfection. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1808594,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201808594
  31. 31
    Marchetti, F.; Palmucci, J.; Pettinari, C.; Pettinari, R.; Marangoni, M.; Ferraro, S.; Giovannetti, R.; Scuri, S.; Grappasonni, I.; Cocchioni, M.; Maldonado Hodar, F. J.; Gunnella, R. Preparation of Polyethylene Composites Containing Silver(I) Acylpyrazolonato Additives and SAR Investigation of Their Antibacterial Activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 2967629687,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b09742
  32. 32
    Bhargava, A.; Pareek, V.; Roy Choudhury, S.; Panwar, J.; Karmakar, S. Superior Bactericidal Efficacy of Fucose-Functionalized Silver Nanoparticles against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Prevention of Its Colonization on Urinary Catheters. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 2932529337,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b09475
  33. 33
    Rai, M. K.; Deshmukh, S. D.; Ingle, A. P.; Gade, A. K. Silver Nanoparticles: the Powerful Nanoweapon Against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 112, 841852,  DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05253.x
  34. 34
    Xie, X.; Sun, T.; Xue, J.; Miao, Z.; Yan, X.; Fang, W.; Li, Q.; Tang, R.; Lu, Y.; Tang, L.; Zha, Z.; He, T. Ag Nanoparticles Cluster with pH-Triggered Reassembly in Targeting Antimicrobial Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2000511,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202000511
  35. 35
    Tran, H. A.; Tran, P. A. In Situ Coatings of Silver Nanoparticles for Biofilm Treatment in Implant-Retention Surgeries: Antimicrobial Activities in Monoculture and Coculture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 4143541444,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c08239
  36. 36
    Morones, J. R.; Elechiguerra, J. L.; Camacho, A.; Holt, K.; Kouri, J. B.; Ramírez, J. T.; Yacaman, M. J. The Bactericidal Effect of Silver Nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2005, 16, 23462353,  DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/16/10/059
  37. 37
    Matsumura, Y.; Yoshikata, K.; Kunisaki, S.-i.; Tsuchido, T. Mode of Bactericidal Action of Silver Zeolite and its Comparison with that of Silver Nitrate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 42784281,  DOI: 10.1128/aem.69.7.4278-4281.2003
  38. 38
    Gupta, A.; Maynes, M.; Silver, S. Effects of Halides on Plasmid-mediated Silver Resistance in Escherichia Coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 50425045,  DOI: 10.1128/aem.64.12.5042-5045.1998
  39. 39
    Feng, Q. L.; Wu, J.; Chen, G. Q.; Cui, F. Z.; Kim, T. N.; Kim, J. O. A mechanistic Study of the Antibacterial Effect of Silver Ions on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000, 52, 662668,  DOI: 10.1002/1097-4636(20001215)52:4<662::aid-jbm10>3.0.co;2-3
  40. 40
    Krochta, J. M.; De Mulder-Johnston, C. Edible and Biodegradable Polymer Films: Challenges and Opportunities. Food Technol. 1997, 51, 6174
  41. 41
    Cruz-Romero, M.; Kerry, J. Crop-Based Biodegradable Packaging and its Environmental Implications. CAB Rev. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 2008, 3, 125,  DOI: 10.1079/pavsnnr20083074
  42. 42
    Prakash Maran, J.; Sivakumar, V.; Sridhar, R.; Prince Immanuel, V. Development of Model for Mechanical Properties of Tapioca Starch Based Edible Films. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 42, 159168,  DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.05.011
  43. 43
    Siddiqui, J.; Taheri, M.; Alam, A. U.; Deen, M. J. Nanomaterials in Smart Packaging Applications: A Review. Small 2021, 18, 2101171,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.202101171
  44. 44
    Zhang, Y.; Ma, Q.; Critzer, F.; Davidson, P. M.; Zhong, Q. Physical and Antibacterial Properties of Alginate Films Containing Cinnamon Bark Oil and Soybean Oil. LWT--Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 64, 423430,  DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.05.008
  45. 45
    Xia, C.; Wang, L.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, S.; Shi, S. Q.; Cai, L.; Li, J. Soy Protein Isolate-Based Films Cross-Linked by Epoxidized Soybean Oil. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 8276582771,  DOI: 10.1039/c5ra15590h
  46. 46
    Liang, S.; Wang, L. A Natural Antibacterial-Antioxidant Film from Soy Protein Isolate Incorporated with Cortex Phellodendron Extract. Polymers 2018, 10, 71,  DOI: 10.3390/polym10010071
  47. 47
    Pilla, S. Engineering Applications of Bioplastics and Biocomposites─An Overview. In Handbook of Bioplastics and Biocomposites Engineering Applications; Scrivener Publishing LLC., 2011; pp 115.
  48. 48
    Podshivalov, A.; Zakharova, M.; Glazacheva, E.; Uspenskaya, M. Gelatin/Potato Starch Edible Biocomposite Films: Correlation Between Morphology and Physical Properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 157, 11621172,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.079
  49. 49
    Mukhopadhyay, R.; Sree, K. D.; Saneeha, R.; Kale, P.; Iram, U. Preparation and Characterization of Biodegradable Plastics out of Food Wastes as Prospective and Eco-Friendly Medical Devices. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2017, 5, 134142
  50. 50
    Gonzalez-Gutierrez, J.; Partal, P.; Garcia-Morales, M.; Gallegos, C. Development of Highly-Transparent Protein/Starch-Based Bioplastics. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 20072013,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.025
  51. 51
    Abdullah, A. H. D.; Pudjiraharti, S.; Karina, M.; Putri, O. D.; Fauziyyah, R. H. Fabrication and Characterization of Sweet Potato Starch-Based Bioplastics Plasticized with Glycerol. J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 19, 5764,  DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2019.57.64
  52. 52
    Gong, H.-Y.; Rambo, B. M.; Karnas, E.; Lynch, V. M.; Keller, K. M.; Sessler, J. L. Environmentally Responsive Threading, Dethreading, and Fixation of Anion-Induced Pseudorotaxanes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15261533,  DOI: 10.1021/ja109102k
  53. 53
    Wang, H.; Wan, C.-Q.; Yang, J.; Mak, T. C. W. Ligation Behavior of an Oligo-α-sulfanylpyrazinyl Ligand in Silver(I) Complexes Containing Carboxylates. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 14, 35303540,  DOI: 10.1021/cg500474j
  54. 54
    Fangfang, Z.; Xinpeng, B.; Wei, G.; Wang, G.; Shi, Z.; Jun, C. Effects of Virgin Coconut Oil on the Physicochemical, Morphological and Antibacterial Properties of Potato Starch-Based Biodegradable Films. Int. J. Food Sci. 2020, 55, 192200,  DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.14262
  55. 55
    Altayan, M. M.; Al Darouich, T.; Karabet, F. On the Plasticization Process of Potato Starch: Preparation and Characterization. Food Biophys. 2017, 12, 397403,  DOI: 10.1007/s11483-017-9495-2
  56. 56
    Gordon, O.; Vig Slenters, T.; Brunetto, P. S.; Villaruz, A. E.; Sturdevant, D. E.; Otto, M.; Landmann, R.; Fromm, K. M. Silver Coordination Polymers for Prevention of Implant Infection: Thiol Interaction, Impact on Respiratory Chain Enzymes, and Hydroxyl Radical Induction. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 42084218,  DOI: 10.1128/aac.01830-09
  57. 57
    Berchel, M.; Gall, T. L.; Denis, C.; Hir, S. L.; Quentel, F.; Elléouet, C.; Montier, T.; Rueff, J.-M.; Salaün, J.-Y.; Haelters, J.-P.; Hix, G. B.; Lehn, P.; Jaffrès, P.-A. A Silver-Based Metal-Organic Framework Material as a ‘Reservoir’ of Bactericidal Metal Ions. New J. Chem. 2011, 35, 10001003,  DOI: 10.1039/c1nj20202b
  58. 58
    Wu, F.; He, D.; Chen, L.; Liu, F.; Huang, H.; Dai, J.; Zhang, S.; You, J. Antibacterial Coordination Polymer Hydrogels Composed of Silver(I)-PEGylated Bisimidazolylbenzyl Alcohol. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 2082920835,  DOI: 10.1039/c8ra00682b

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 9 publications.

  1. Bingbing Chen, Xuemin Li, Xing Gao, Yuhang Li, Xiaojiao Hou, Yuanlin Fu, Fuqiang Fan, Tieqiang Wang, Jun Zhou, Fanbao Meng, Yu Fu. Fabrication of Self-Standing Inorganic–Organic Composite Films at a Miscible Interface by “Soft Spray” Technique. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2025, 17 (4) , 6878-6886. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c16448
  2. Sabina W. Jaros, Magdalena Florek, Barbara Bażanów, Jarosław Panek, Agnieszka Krogul-Sobczak, M. Conceição Oliveira, Jarosław Król, Urszula Śliwińska-Hill, Dmytro S. Nesterov, Alexander M. Kirillov, Piotr Smoleński. Silver Coordination Polymers Driven by Adamantoid Blocks for Advanced Antiviral and Antibacterial Biomaterials. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024, 16 (11) , 13411-13421. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c15606
  3. Viviana Barra, Elena Piacenza, Sara Amata, Salvatore Martino, Filippo Vitale, Delia Francesca Chillura Martino, Silvestre Buscemi, Carla Rizzo, Antonio Palumbo Piccionello. Easily synthesized soybean oil bio-based material for wastewater treatment. Sustainable Materials and Technologies 2025, 43 , e01216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2024.e01216
  4. Alessandra Crispini, Iolinda Aiello, Nicolas Godbert, Massimo La Deda, Giuseppe di Maio, Antonio Tagarelli, Rosangela Elliani, Renata De Rose, Francesca Scarpelli. Hybrid Ethylcellulose Polymeric Films: Ag(I)‐Based Components and Curcumin as Reinforcing Ingredients for Enhanced Food Packaging Properties. Chemistry – A European Journal 2024, 30 (44) https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202400452
  5. Tiago A. Fernandes, Filipa Macedo, Rafaela G. Cabral, Telma Guiu, Chris H. J. Franco, Paula Jorge, Ana Catarina Sousa, Vânia André, Nuno Cerca, Alexander M. Kirillov. Sulfonyldibenzoate coordination polymers as bioactive dopants for polysaccharide films with antibacterial and antibiofilm properties. RSC Applied Interfaces 2024, 1 (1) , 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3LF00123G
  6. Diego Sibilia, Martina Amendolea, Roberta Sangiovanni, Mario Bragaglia, Fabrizio Nicoletti, Pierfrancesco Filetici, Antonio D’Addona, Francesca Nanni, Leonardo Dassatti, Giuseppina Nocca, . Biodegradation Study of Biomaterials Composed of Acrylated Epoxidized Soybean Oil: An In Vitro Study. BioMed Research International 2024, 2024 (1) https://doi.org/10.1155/bmri/7100988
  7. Kiryl I. Trusau, Paula Jorge, Ana Catarina Sousa, Tiago A. Fernandes, Vânia André, Marina V. Kirillova, Andrew I. Usevich, Nuno Cerca, Alexander M. Kirillov. Degradable copper( ii )-doped starch-based biopolymeric films with antibacterial activity. RSC Sustainability 2023, 1 (4) , 866-875. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SU00150K
  8. Xiurong Hou, Huashan Wang, Yuting Shi, Zhouyao Yue. Recent advances of antibacterial starch-based materials. Carbohydrate Polymers 2023, 302 , 120392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120392
  9. Arnab Banerjee, Pampa Chowdhury, Kamal Bauri, Biswajit Saha, Priyadarsi De. Inhibition and eradication of bacterial biofilm using polymeric materials. Biomaterials Science 2022, 11 (1) , 11-36. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2BM01276F

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Cite this: ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 22, 25104–25114
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c03010
Published May 27, 2022

Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

1475

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Preparation of bioCP-doped [SBO]n and [PS]n biopolymer films.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Sample coupons for (a) [SBO]n and (b) [PS]n biopolymer films.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Structural fragments of [Ag26-hfa)]n (1). (a) Coordination mode of μ6-hfa2– ligand. (b) Coordination environment of silver atoms including argentophilic interactions (dotted cyan lines). (c,d) Front (c) and side (d) view of 2D double layer. Further details: (a–d) Ag (cyan), C (gray), and O (red); views along the c (c) and a (d) axes.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Structural fragments of [Ag24-nda)(H2O)2]n (2). (a) Coordination mode of μ4-nda2– ligand and environment of Ag1 centers; weaker argentophilic Ag···Ag and Ag···O interactions are shown as dotted lines. (b) 2D supramolecular layer. Further details: Ag (cyan), C (gray), and O (red); (b) view along the c axis.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Morphological characterization of [SBO]n and [PS]n films by SEM–EDX. SEM images: (a) SBO film; (b) 1-0.5%@[SBO]n; (c) 1-0.5%@[SBO]n [the same region as (b)] with EDX analysis of Ag distribution; (d) 2-0.5%@[SBO]n, where bioCP particles can be seen throughout the material; (e) 2-0.5%@[SBO]n with EDX analysis of Ag distribution; (f) 2-0.5%@[SBO]n (the same region as e) with EDX analysis of O distribution; (g) [PS]n film; (h) 1-0.5%@[PS]n, where bioCP particles can be seen throughout the material; (i) 1-0.5%@[PS]n (the same region as h) with EDX analysis of Ag distribution. Images (a), (d), (i), and (h) were obtained at 1000× magnification and (b,c,e,f,i) at 500× magnification.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. (a) Minimum inhibition radius (mean ± SD) showing the normalized activity of 1 and 2 against P. aeruginosa and E. coli (Gram-negative) and S. aureus and S. epidermidis (Gram-positive) bacteria. (b) Examples of the obtained halos representing bacterial growth inhibition.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Normalized activity of [SBO]n biopolymer films containing varying concentrations of Ag2O (Ag2O@[SBO]n) and compounds 1 (1@[SBO]n) and 2 (2@[SBO]n) against P. aeruginosa and E. coli (Gram-negative) and S. aureus and S. epidermidis (Gram-positive) bacteria.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8. Normalized activity of [SBO]nvs [PS]n biopolymer films containing 0.5% of Ag2O and compounds 1 and 2 against P. aeruginosa and E. coli (Gram-negative) and S. aureus and S. epidermidis (Gram-positive) bacteria. Significant statistical differences were found using the two-way ANOVA and subsequent Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test with 95% confidence interval, represented as *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; and ***P ≤ 0.001.

    Figure 9

    Figure 9. Normalized biofilm inhibition activity of [SBO]n biopolymer films containing varying concentration of Ag2O (Ag2O@[SBO]n) and compounds 1 (1@[SBO]n) and 2 (2@[SBO]n), against P. aeruginosa and E. coli (Gram-negative) and S. aureus and S. epidermidis (Gram-positive) bacteria. Significant statistical differences were found using the two-way ANOVA and subsequent Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test with 95% confidence interval, represented as *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; and ***P ≤ 0.001.

    Figure 10

    Figure 10. Normalized biofilm inhibition activity of [SBO]nvs [PS]n biopolymer films doped with 0.5% of Ag2O and compounds 1 and 2 against P. aeruginosa and E. coli (Gram-negative) and S. aureus and S. epidermidis (Gram-positive) bacteria. Significant statistical differences were found using the two-way ANOVA and subsequent Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test with 95% confidence interval, represented as *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; and ***P ≤ 0.001.

  • References


    This article references 58 other publications.

    1. 1
      Flemming, H.-C.; Wuertz, S. Bacteria and Archaea on Earth and Their Abundance in Biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 247260,  DOI: 10.1038/s41579-019-0158-9
    2. 2
      Garrett, T. R.; Bhakoo, M.; Zhang, Z. Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilms on Surfaces. Prog. Nat. Sci. 2008, 18, 10491056,  DOI: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.04.001
    3. 3
      Achinas, S.; Charalampogiannis, N.; Euverink, G. J. W. A Brief Recap of Microbial Adhesion and Biofilms. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2801,  DOI: 10.3390/app9142801
    4. 4
      Chadha, T. Bacterial Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms and Antibiotic Resistance. J. Bacteriol. Parasitol. 2014, 05, 1000190,  DOI: 10.4172/2155-9597.1000190
    5. 5
      Wu, S.; Xu, C.; Zhu, Y.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, L.; Hu, Y.; Yu, B.; Wang, Y.; Xu, F. J. Biofilm-Sensitive Photodynamic Nanoparticles for Enhanced Penetration and Antibacterial Efficiency. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2103591,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202103591
    6. 6
      Sharma, D.; Misba, L.; Khan, A. U. Antibiotics Versus Biofilm: an Emerging Battleground in Microbial Communities. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2019, 8, 76,  DOI: 10.1186/s13756-019-0533-3
    7. 7
      Jorge, P.; Magalhães, A. P.; Grainha, T.; Alves, D.; Sousa, A. M.; Lopes, S. P.; Pereira, M. O. Antimicrobial Resistance Three Ways: Healthcare Crisis, Major Concepts and the Relevance of Biofilms. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2019, 95, fiz115,  DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiz115
    8. 8
      Şen Karaman, D.; Ercan, U. K.; Bakay, E.; Topaloğlu, N.; Rosenholm, J. M. Evolving Technologies and Strategies for Combating Antibacterial Resistance in the Advent of the Postantibiotic Era. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1908783,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201908783
    9. 9
      Friedlander, A.; Nir, S.; Reches, M.; Shemesh, M. Preventing Biofilm Formation by Dairy-Associated Bacteria Using Peptide-Coated Surfaces. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1405,  DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01405
    10. 10
      Li, X.; Wu, B.; Chen, H.; Nan, K.; Jin, Y.; Sun, L.; Wang, B. Recent Developments in Smart Antibacterial Surfaces to Inhibit Biofilm Formation And Bacterial Infections. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 42744292,  DOI: 10.1039/c8tb01245h
    11. 11
      Ivanova, A.; Ivanova, K.; Tied, A.; Heinze, T.; Tzanov, T. Layer-By-Layer Coating of Aminocellulose and Quorum Quenching Acylase on Silver Nanoparticles Synergistically Eradicate Bacteria and Their Biofilms. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2001284,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202001284
    12. 12
      Neufeld, B. H.; Neufeld, M. J.; Lutzke, A.; Schweickart, S. M.; Reynolds, M. M. Metal-Organic Framework Material Inhibits Biofilm Formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1702255,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201702255
    13. 13
      Zhuang, W.; Yuan, D.; Li, J.-R.; Luo, Z.; Zhou, H.-C.; Bashir, S.; Liu, J. Highly Potent Bactericidal Activity of Porous Metal-Organic Frameworks. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2012, 1, 225238,  DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201100043
    14. 14
      Wang, P.-L.; Xie, L.-H.; Joseph, E. A.; Li, J.-R.; Su, X.-O.; Zhou, H.-C. Metal-Organic Frameworks for Food Safety. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 1063810690,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00257
    15. 15
      Wyszogrodzka, G.; Marszałek, B.; Gil, B.; Dorożyński, P. Metal-Organic Frameworks: Mechanisms of Antibacterial Action and Potential Applications. Drug Discovery Today 2016, 21, 10091018,  DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.04.009
    16. 16
      Cheung, Y. H.; Ma, K.; van Leeuwen, H. C.; Wasson, M. C.; Wang, X.; Idrees, K. B.; Gong, W.; Cao, R.; Mahle, J. J.; Islamoglu, T.; Peterson, G. W.; de Koning, M. C.; Farha, O. K.; Farha, O. K. Immobilized Regenerable Active Chlorine within a Zirconium-Based MOF Textile Composite to Eliminate Biological and Chemical Threats. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 1677716785,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c08576
    17. 17
      Giliopoulos, D.; Zamboulis, A.; Giannakoudakis, D.; Bikiaris, D.; Triantafyllidis, K. Polymer/Metal Organic Framework (MOF) Nanocomposites for Biomedical Applications. Molecules 2020, 25, 185,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules25010185
    18. 18
      Jaros, S. W.; Guedes da Silva, M. F. C.; Florek, M.; Smoleński, P.; Pombeiro, A. J. L.; Kirillov, A. M. Silver(I) 1,3,5-Triaza-7-Phosphaadamantane Coordination Polymers Driven by Substituted Glutarate and Malonate Building Blocks: Self-Assembly Synthesis, Structural Features, and Antimicrobial Properties. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 58865894,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b00186
    19. 19
      Jaros, S. W.; Guedes da Silva, M. F. C.; Król, J.; Conceição Oliveira, M.; Smoleński, P.; Pombeiro, A. J. L.; Kirillov, A. M. Bioactive Silver–Organic Networks Assembled from 1,3,5-Triaza-7-Phosphaadamantane and Flexible Cyclohexanecarboxylate Blocks. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 14861496,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b02235
    20. 20
      Smoleński, P.; Jaros, S. W.; Pettinari, C.; Lupidi, G.; Quassinti, L.; Bramucci, M.; Vitali, L. A.; Petrelli, D.; Kochel, A.; Kirillov, A. M. New Water-Soluble Polypyridine Silver(I) Derivatives of 1,3,5-Triaza-7-Phosphaadamantane (PTA) with Significant Antimicrobial and Antiproliferative Activities. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 65726581,  DOI: 10.1039/c3dt33026e
    21. 21
      Fernandes, T. A.; Costa, I. F. M.; Jorge, P.; Sousa, A. C.; André, V.; Cerca, N.; Kirillov, A. M. Silver(I) Coordination Polymers Immobilized into Biopolymer Films for Antimicrobial Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 1283612844,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c19446
    22. 22
      Abram, S. L.; Fromm, K. M. Handling (Nano)Silver as Antimicrobial Agent: Therapeutic Window, Dissolution Dynamics, Detection Methods and Molecular Interactions. Chem.─Eur. J. 2020, 26, 1094810971,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.202002143
    23. 23
      Eckhardt, S.; Brunetto, P. S.; Gagnon, J.; Priebe, M.; Giese, B.; Fromm, K. M. Nanobio Silver: Its Interactions with Peptides and Bacteria, and Its Uses in Medicine. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 47084754,  DOI: 10.1021/cr300288v
    24. 24
      Horcajada, P.; Gref, R.; Baati, T.; Allan, P. K.; Maurin, G.; Couvreur, P.; Férey, G.; Morris, R. E.; Serre, C. Metal-Organic Frameworks in Biomedicine. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 12321268,  DOI: 10.1021/cr200256v
    25. 25
      Zheng, K.; Setyawati, M. I.; Leong, D. T.; Xie, J. Embedding Ultrasmall Ag Nanoclusters in Luria-Bertani Extract via Light Irradiation for Enhanced Antibacterial Activity. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 357, 117,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.11.019
    26. 26
      Davoudi, Z. M.; Kandjani, A. E.; Bhatt, A. I.; Kyratzis, I. L.; O’Mullane, A. P.; Bansal, V. Hybrid Antibacterial Fabrics with Extremely High Aspect Ratio Ag/AgTCNQ Nanowires. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 10471053,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201302368
    27. 27
      Chen, J.; Wang, F.; Liu, Q.; Du, J. Antibacterial Polymeric Nanostructures for Biomedical Applications. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 1448214493,  DOI: 10.1039/c4cc03001j
    28. 28
      Arenas-Vivo, A.; Amariei, G.; Aguado, S.; Rosal, R.; Horcajada, P. An Ag-loaded Photoactive Nano-metal Organic Framework as a Promising Biofilm Treatment. Acta Biomater. 2019, 97, 490500,  DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.011
    29. 29
      Nishanthi, S. T.; Yadav, K. K.; Baruah, A.; Vaghasiya, K.; Verma, R. K.; Ganguli, A. K.; Jha, M. Nanostructured Silver Decorated Hollow Silica and their Application in the Treatment of Microbial Contaminated Water at Room Temperature. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 89939001,  DOI: 10.1039/c9nj01049a
    30. 30
      Zhang, Y.; Sun, P.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, F.; Dong, K.; Liu, Z.; Ren, J.; Qu, X. Silver-Infused Porphyrinic Metal–Organic Framework: Surface-Adaptive, On-Demand Nanoplatform for Synergistic Bacteria Killing and Wound Disinfection. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1808594,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201808594
    31. 31
      Marchetti, F.; Palmucci, J.; Pettinari, C.; Pettinari, R.; Marangoni, M.; Ferraro, S.; Giovannetti, R.; Scuri, S.; Grappasonni, I.; Cocchioni, M.; Maldonado Hodar, F. J.; Gunnella, R. Preparation of Polyethylene Composites Containing Silver(I) Acylpyrazolonato Additives and SAR Investigation of Their Antibacterial Activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 2967629687,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b09742
    32. 32
      Bhargava, A.; Pareek, V.; Roy Choudhury, S.; Panwar, J.; Karmakar, S. Superior Bactericidal Efficacy of Fucose-Functionalized Silver Nanoparticles against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Prevention of Its Colonization on Urinary Catheters. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 2932529337,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b09475
    33. 33
      Rai, M. K.; Deshmukh, S. D.; Ingle, A. P.; Gade, A. K. Silver Nanoparticles: the Powerful Nanoweapon Against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 112, 841852,  DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05253.x
    34. 34
      Xie, X.; Sun, T.; Xue, J.; Miao, Z.; Yan, X.; Fang, W.; Li, Q.; Tang, R.; Lu, Y.; Tang, L.; Zha, Z.; He, T. Ag Nanoparticles Cluster with pH-Triggered Reassembly in Targeting Antimicrobial Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2000511,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202000511
    35. 35
      Tran, H. A.; Tran, P. A. In Situ Coatings of Silver Nanoparticles for Biofilm Treatment in Implant-Retention Surgeries: Antimicrobial Activities in Monoculture and Coculture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 4143541444,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c08239
    36. 36
      Morones, J. R.; Elechiguerra, J. L.; Camacho, A.; Holt, K.; Kouri, J. B.; Ramírez, J. T.; Yacaman, M. J. The Bactericidal Effect of Silver Nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2005, 16, 23462353,  DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/16/10/059
    37. 37
      Matsumura, Y.; Yoshikata, K.; Kunisaki, S.-i.; Tsuchido, T. Mode of Bactericidal Action of Silver Zeolite and its Comparison with that of Silver Nitrate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 42784281,  DOI: 10.1128/aem.69.7.4278-4281.2003
    38. 38
      Gupta, A.; Maynes, M.; Silver, S. Effects of Halides on Plasmid-mediated Silver Resistance in Escherichia Coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 50425045,  DOI: 10.1128/aem.64.12.5042-5045.1998
    39. 39
      Feng, Q. L.; Wu, J.; Chen, G. Q.; Cui, F. Z.; Kim, T. N.; Kim, J. O. A mechanistic Study of the Antibacterial Effect of Silver Ions on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000, 52, 662668,  DOI: 10.1002/1097-4636(20001215)52:4<662::aid-jbm10>3.0.co;2-3
    40. 40
      Krochta, J. M.; De Mulder-Johnston, C. Edible and Biodegradable Polymer Films: Challenges and Opportunities. Food Technol. 1997, 51, 6174
    41. 41
      Cruz-Romero, M.; Kerry, J. Crop-Based Biodegradable Packaging and its Environmental Implications. CAB Rev. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 2008, 3, 125,  DOI: 10.1079/pavsnnr20083074
    42. 42
      Prakash Maran, J.; Sivakumar, V.; Sridhar, R.; Prince Immanuel, V. Development of Model for Mechanical Properties of Tapioca Starch Based Edible Films. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 42, 159168,  DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.05.011
    43. 43
      Siddiqui, J.; Taheri, M.; Alam, A. U.; Deen, M. J. Nanomaterials in Smart Packaging Applications: A Review. Small 2021, 18, 2101171,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.202101171
    44. 44
      Zhang, Y.; Ma, Q.; Critzer, F.; Davidson, P. M.; Zhong, Q. Physical and Antibacterial Properties of Alginate Films Containing Cinnamon Bark Oil and Soybean Oil. LWT--Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 64, 423430,  DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.05.008
    45. 45
      Xia, C.; Wang, L.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, S.; Shi, S. Q.; Cai, L.; Li, J. Soy Protein Isolate-Based Films Cross-Linked by Epoxidized Soybean Oil. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 8276582771,  DOI: 10.1039/c5ra15590h
    46. 46
      Liang, S.; Wang, L. A Natural Antibacterial-Antioxidant Film from Soy Protein Isolate Incorporated with Cortex Phellodendron Extract. Polymers 2018, 10, 71,  DOI: 10.3390/polym10010071
    47. 47
      Pilla, S. Engineering Applications of Bioplastics and Biocomposites─An Overview. In Handbook of Bioplastics and Biocomposites Engineering Applications; Scrivener Publishing LLC., 2011; pp 115.
    48. 48
      Podshivalov, A.; Zakharova, M.; Glazacheva, E.; Uspenskaya, M. Gelatin/Potato Starch Edible Biocomposite Films: Correlation Between Morphology and Physical Properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 157, 11621172,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.079
    49. 49
      Mukhopadhyay, R.; Sree, K. D.; Saneeha, R.; Kale, P.; Iram, U. Preparation and Characterization of Biodegradable Plastics out of Food Wastes as Prospective and Eco-Friendly Medical Devices. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2017, 5, 134142
    50. 50
      Gonzalez-Gutierrez, J.; Partal, P.; Garcia-Morales, M.; Gallegos, C. Development of Highly-Transparent Protein/Starch-Based Bioplastics. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 20072013,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.025
    51. 51
      Abdullah, A. H. D.; Pudjiraharti, S.; Karina, M.; Putri, O. D.; Fauziyyah, R. H. Fabrication and Characterization of Sweet Potato Starch-Based Bioplastics Plasticized with Glycerol. J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 19, 5764,  DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2019.57.64
    52. 52
      Gong, H.-Y.; Rambo, B. M.; Karnas, E.; Lynch, V. M.; Keller, K. M.; Sessler, J. L. Environmentally Responsive Threading, Dethreading, and Fixation of Anion-Induced Pseudorotaxanes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15261533,  DOI: 10.1021/ja109102k
    53. 53
      Wang, H.; Wan, C.-Q.; Yang, J.; Mak, T. C. W. Ligation Behavior of an Oligo-α-sulfanylpyrazinyl Ligand in Silver(I) Complexes Containing Carboxylates. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 14, 35303540,  DOI: 10.1021/cg500474j
    54. 54
      Fangfang, Z.; Xinpeng, B.; Wei, G.; Wang, G.; Shi, Z.; Jun, C. Effects of Virgin Coconut Oil on the Physicochemical, Morphological and Antibacterial Properties of Potato Starch-Based Biodegradable Films. Int. J. Food Sci. 2020, 55, 192200,  DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.14262
    55. 55
      Altayan, M. M.; Al Darouich, T.; Karabet, F. On the Plasticization Process of Potato Starch: Preparation and Characterization. Food Biophys. 2017, 12, 397403,  DOI: 10.1007/s11483-017-9495-2
    56. 56
      Gordon, O.; Vig Slenters, T.; Brunetto, P. S.; Villaruz, A. E.; Sturdevant, D. E.; Otto, M.; Landmann, R.; Fromm, K. M. Silver Coordination Polymers for Prevention of Implant Infection: Thiol Interaction, Impact on Respiratory Chain Enzymes, and Hydroxyl Radical Induction. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 42084218,  DOI: 10.1128/aac.01830-09
    57. 57
      Berchel, M.; Gall, T. L.; Denis, C.; Hir, S. L.; Quentel, F.; Elléouet, C.; Montier, T.; Rueff, J.-M.; Salaün, J.-Y.; Haelters, J.-P.; Hix, G. B.; Lehn, P.; Jaffrès, P.-A. A Silver-Based Metal-Organic Framework Material as a ‘Reservoir’ of Bactericidal Metal Ions. New J. Chem. 2011, 35, 10001003,  DOI: 10.1039/c1nj20202b
    58. 58
      Wu, F.; He, D.; Chen, L.; Liu, F.; Huang, H.; Dai, J.; Zhang, S.; You, J. Antibacterial Coordination Polymer Hydrogels Composed of Silver(I)-PEGylated Bisimidazolylbenzyl Alcohol. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 2082920835,  DOI: 10.1039/c8ra00682b
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.2c03010.

    • Description of methods and experimental procedures and synthesis of bioCPs 1 and 2, detailed photographs of powders and crystals of 1 and 2, topological representations, photographs of [SBO]n and [PS]n biopolymer films, photographs of doped biopolymer films, particle size distribution analysis, ATR-FT-IR spectra, SEM-EDS data, images of biopolymer coupons in PBS solution, ICP-OES data, water absorption data, antibacterial properties of relevant Ag-based coordination polymers/MOFs, nonnormalized minimum inhibitory radius for different Ag-doped biopolymer films, TGA curves, PXRD patterns, additional antimicrobial data, and crystallographic data in CIF format (CCDC 2055525 and 2055526) (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.