ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Synergistically Stabilizing Zinc Anodes by Molybdenum Dioxide Coating and Tween 80 Electrolyte Additive for High-Performance Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Energy, Environmental, and Catalysis Applications

Synergistically Stabilizing Zinc Anodes by Molybdenum Dioxide Coating and Tween 80 Electrolyte Additive for High-Performance Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Nhat Anh Thieu
    Nhat Anh Thieu
    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
  • Wei Li*
    Wei Li
    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
    *Email: [email protected]
    More by Wei Li
  • Xiujuan Chen
    Xiujuan Chen
    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
    More by Xiujuan Chen
  • Qingyuan Li
    Qingyuan Li
    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
    More by Qingyuan Li
  • Qingsong Wang
    Qingsong Wang
    Bavarian Center for Battery Technology (BayBatt), Department of Chemistry, University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstrasse 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany
  • Murugesan Velayutham
    Murugesan Velayutham
    In Vivo Multifunctional Magnetic Resonance Center, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
  • Zane M. Grady
    Zane M. Grady
    Energy and Environmental Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States
  • Xuemei Li
    Xuemei Li
    Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
    More by Xuemei Li
  • Wenyuan Li
    Wenyuan Li
    Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
    More by Wenyuan Li
  • Valery V. Khramtsov
    Valery V. Khramtsov
    In Vivo Multifunctional Magnetic Resonance Center, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
  • David M. Reed
    David M. Reed
    Energy and Environmental Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States
  • Xiaolin Li*
    Xiaolin Li
    Energy and Environmental Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States
    *Email: [email protected]
    More by Xiaolin Li
  • Xingbo Liu*
    Xingbo Liu
    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
    *Email: [email protected]
    More by Xingbo Liu
Open PDFSupporting Information (5)

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Cite this: ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 48, 55570–55586
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c08474
Published November 21, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Recently, aqueous zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) have become increasingly attractive as grid-scale energy storage solutions due to their safety, low cost, and environmental friendliness. However, severe dendrite growth, self-corrosion, hydrogen evolution, and irreversible side reactions occurring at Zn anodes often cause poor cyclability of ZIBs. This work develops a synergistic strategy to stabilize the Zn anode by introducing a molybdenum dioxide coating layer on Zn (MoO2@Zn) and Tween 80 as an electrolyte additive. Due to the redox capability and high electrical conductivity of MoO2, the coating layer can not only homogenize the surface electric field but also accommodate the Zn2+ concentration field in the vicinity of the Zn anode, thereby regulating Zn2+ ion distribution and inhibiting side reactions. MoO2 coating can also significantly enhance surface hydrophilicity to improve the wetting of electrolyte on the Zn electrode. Meanwhile, Tween 80, a surfactant additive, acts as a corrosion inhibitor, preventing Zn corrosion and regulating Zn2+ ion migration. Their combination can synergistically work to reduce the desolvation energy of hydrated Zn ions and stabilize the Zn anodes. Therefore, the symmetric cells of MoO2@Zn∥MoO2@Zn with optimal 1 mM Tween 80 additive in 1 M ZnSO4 achieve exceptional cyclability over 6000 h at 1 mA cm–2 and stability (>700 h) even at a high current density (5 mA cm–2). When coupling with the VO2 cathode, the full cell of MoO2@Zn∥VO2 shows a higher capacity retention (82.4%) compared to Zn∥VO2 (57.3%) after 1000 cycles at 5 A g–1. This study suggests a synergistic strategy of combining surface modification and electrolyte engineering to design high-performance ZIBs.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

1. Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Aqueous metal-ion batteries have many advantages, including higher ionic conductivity, cost-effectiveness, easier processing, and higher safety with aqueous electrolytes, which makes them a promising candidate for energy storage systems. (1) In this regard, aqueous zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) have attracted intense interest due to the merits of Zn anodes with a high theoretical capacity (820 mAh g–1), low redox potential (−0.76 V vs. standard hydrogen electrode), low cost, inherent safety, low toxicity, and mature recyclability. (2,3) However, Zn metal anodes undergo dendritic issues due to inhomogeneous Zn2+ ion deposition and dissolution on the electrode surfaces. (3) Moreover, the Zn anode surface and electrolyte interaction can cause electrode corrosion. Corrosion of Zn anodes creates an irregular surface, causing uneven nucleation sites for Zn2+ ions and facilitating the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) on such corroded Zn surfaces. (4) Then, some passivated byproducts, such as zinc sulfate hydroxide hydrate (Zn4SO4(OH)6·xH2O), can be formed during the electrochemical process. (3) Thus, Zn anodes suffer from poor electrochemical stability, low Coulombic efficiency (CE), short circuits, and limited cycle life, restricting the practical development of ZIBs. (5) Various strategies have been proposed to address these issues of Zn anodes, including modifying the anode surface, (6,7) optimizing the electrolyte composition, (8,9) constructing 3D-structured or alloyed anodes, (10,11) and fabricating functional separators. (12,13) Among them, the coating and electrolyte engineering strategies offer great potential for the practical application of Zn-ion batteries.
Constructing an artificial interface coating layer on the Zn anode surface effectively inhibits Zn dendrite formation and the electrochemical corrosion of Zn anodes. Two types of surface coating materials are commonly reported, including insulating and conductive materials. The use of nonconductive coating layers on the Zn anode surface, such as metal oxides, polymers, and inorganic compounds, can ensure uniform Zn deposition by guiding Zn2+ flux, and prevent corrosion by blocking free water with dissolved oxygen. (6,14,15) However, the high impedance of interfaces between these nonconductive artificial layers and Zn anodes may restrain the performance of ZIBs at high rates. (7) On the other hand, many conductive coating materials such as Cu, (7) Au, (16) MXene, (17) and porous carbon network, (18) can effectively homogenize the surface electric field and Zn2+ concentration field, inducing uniform Zn deposition. Although protective layers have effectively improved the electrochemical performance of ZIBs, some unavoidable limitations still restrict their practical applications. For example, surface modifications are usually produced using complex manufacturing processes, which may increase electron/ion transfer resistance. The coating may hinder the transport of ions to the Zn anode surface during Zn deposition. The exfoliation of the coating layer could occur during cycling due to the poor affinity between protective materials and Zn substrates. Furthermore, electrolyte optimization can suppress Zn anode issues, especially by adding various additives to the electrolyte. (8,9,19) In view of practical applications, the use of an electrolyte additive is a facile method to regulate the Zn anode-electrolyte interface. Adding additives can also stabilize Zn ions in electrolytes, and a homogeneous nucleation process can be achieved by the control of electrode–electrolyte interfaces due to the additives. (20) Nevertheless, these additives cannot completely hinder Zn anodes from contacting aqueous electrolytes, and some may even consume electrons from Zn anodes and be deteriorated (electrocatalytically oxidized/reduced), thereby decreasing the Coulombic efficiency and reversibility. (19) To avoid these issues, a protective layer is typically introduced to protect Zn anodes from reacting with electrolyte components.
As a result, an integrated strategy based on the synergistic effect of electrode surface engineering and electrolyte modification is a promising approach for stabilizing the Zn anode. Nevertheless, there is a need for more research on these synergistic effects and mechanisms of modification. This work introduces the integration of a molybdenum oxide coated Zn anode with the addition of Tween 80 additive to ZnSO4 electrolyte, giving rise to the synergistic protection for stabilizing the Zn anode. Molybdenum oxide has high chemical stability in acidic electrolytes, multiple metal center valences, and tunable oxygen nonstoichiometry leading to tailored oxygen vacancies, (21,22) which may be used as an artificial interface coating to engineer the electrochemistry of Zn. Particularly, molybdenum dioxide (MoO2) with a metallic nature possesses a high theoretical capacity (838 mAh g–1), narrow band gap (≈0.9 eV), outstanding conductivity (1.1 × 106 S·m–1 at 300 K in the form of thin film), high chemical and thermal stability, low toxicity, and cost-effectiveness. (23,24) Due to its one-dimensional (1D) tunnels for fast ion diffusion, MoO2 exhibits not only high electronic conductivity but also considerable ionic conductivity. (24) Although MoO2 has a less prominent presence in technology than MoO3, it has recently been identified as a promising anode material for lithium ion batteries (LIBs). (24−26) Since molybdenum (Mo) is a transition metal element with a unique flexibility in valences, nanostructured molybdenum dioxide (MoO2) exhibits high Li+ storage capacities because of its large redox capability of the multivalent Mo atoms. (25,26)
In this study, MoO2 nanoplates were used as the protective coating layer for stabilizing metallic Zn anodes in ZIBs with mildly acidic aqueous electrolytes. Due to the relatively high electrical conductivity of MoO2, the coating layer can homogenize the surface electric field and the Zn2+ concentration field in the vicinity of the Zn anode, thereby regulating Zn2+ ion distribution and inhibiting side reactions. On the other hand, Tween 80 (Tw80), a nonionic surfactant, has been used as a promising corrosion inhibitor for Zn in acidic solution in the corrosion field due to its hydrophobic main chain and abundant hydrophilic groups. (27−29) Therefore, the adsorption of Tw80 on the Zn surface may alter the corrosion-resistance property and interfacial chemical environment of Zn. Consequently, the MoO2 coating layer and Tw80 as an electrolyte additive could synergistically protect the Zn metal anodes for developing stable aqueous ZIBs. This work provides a new method combining the MoO2-based coating layer and nonionic surfactant additive for stabilizing Zn anodes for ZIBs.

2. Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

2.1. Synthesis of MoO2

MoO2 was synthesized by thermal reduction from the MoO3 nanobelts. The details of the hydrothermal synthesis of MoO3 nanobelts are described in the Supporting Information. The as-prepared MoO3 was then placed inside a tube furnace (MTI Corporation) at 650 °C for 4 h in a mixture of N2 and H2 gas flow (95% N2 + 5% H2). After heating, the system was cooled to room temperature under a gas flow, and the obtained powder was MoO2. The other MoO2 control samples were prepared by similar thermal reduction for different durations (1, 8, and 12 h).

2.2. Preparation of MoO2-Coated Zn Anodes

Initially, a coating slurry was prepared by mixing MoO2 powder and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) with a weight ratio of 8:2 in DI water under magnetic stirring at room temperature overnight to obtain a homogeneous slurry. Next, abrasive papers were used to remove the oxidation layer from the bare Zn foils followed by ultrasonic cleaning with ethanol. Polished Zn foils were further used as either control samples or substrates for MoO2 coated Zn. In the following steps, the obtained slurry was cast onto clean Zn foils using a doctor blade method, then vacuum-dried overnight at 60 °C. The obtained MoO2-coated Zn foil was denoted as MoO2@Zn.

2.3. Synthesis of VO2 Nanorods and Preparation of Cathodes

A reported hydrothermal method was used to fabricate VO2 nanorods. (30) Typically, 1 g of V2O5 was added to 30 mL of deionized water and ethylene glycol mixture solution in a 3:2 volume ratio. The suspension mixture was vigorously stirred for 2 h and then was transferred into a Teflon-line autoclave for a hydrothermal reaction at 180 °C for 5 h. The obtained products were centrifuged, washed with deionized water and ethanol several times, and then dried in a vacuum oven at 80 °C overnight.
The cathode was fabricated by mixing VO2, super P conductive carbon, and CMC in a weight ratio of 7:2:1 with DI water as a solvent. The slurry was then cast on carbon paper and dried at 80 °C for 24 h in a vacuum oven. After drying, a 12 mm circular disk was punched from the sheet as a VO2 cathode.

2.4. Electrochemical Measurements

Bare Zn foil and MoO2@Zn were cut into 15 mm circular disks as electrodes. Glass microfiber sheets were cut into 16 mm circular disks as separators. The electrolytes used in this work are 1 M ZnSO4 and 1 M ZnSO4+1 mM Tw80 aqueous solutions, abbreviated as the ZnSO4 electrolyte and ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte. For comparison, different concentrations (0.5, 5, and 10 mM) of Tw80 in a 1 M ZnSO4 aqueous solution were prepared and denoted as ZnSO4+0.5Tw80, ZnSO4+5Tw80, and ZnSO4+10Tw80 electrolytes, respectively. Coin cells (CR2032) were assembled with separators for symmetrical, half, and full cells. The electrochemical performances of these cells were evaluated using multichannel battery testing equipment (LAND CT2001). Symmetrical cells were assembled by using bare Zn or MoO2@Zn as working and counter electrodes. Different current densities of 1–10 mA cm–2 and an areal capacity of 1–5 mAh cm–2 were used for testing symmetric Zn∥Zn and MoO2@Zn∥MoO2@Zn cells. The Zn∥Cu, MoO2@Zn∥Cu, and MoO2@Zn∥MoO2@Cu half cells were prepared to evaluate the Coulombic efficiencies with Cu as a working electrode (diameter of 15 mm). Full cells were assembled by using bare Zn or MoO2@Zn anodes and VO2 cathodes. The mass loading of VO2 on the cathode is in the range of 1.4–2.1 mg cm–2. The full cells were cycled between 0.2 and 1.6 V vs Zn2+/Zn. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves were conducted on an electrochemical workstation (BioLogic, SP–300). Tafel plots and chronoamperometry (CA) curves were also performed under an electrochemical workstation (BioLogic, SP–300) with a three-electrode system including bare Zn or MoO2@Zn (1 cm × 1 cm) as working electrode, Pt wire as counter electrode, and saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as a reference electrode. The Tafel plots were recorded with a potential range of −0.3 to 0.3 V vs open circuit voltage (OCV) of the system at a scan rate of 1 mV s–1. An overpotential of −150 mV vs Zn2+/Zn was applied for testing CA curves. An optical microscope system (Keyence VHX–7000) recorded the homemade transparent cells’ plating/stripping process under an electrochemical workstation (Gamry Interface 5000E). To determine the activation energy (Ea) of the Zn deposition process, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests of symmetric cells at different temperatures were carried out with the amplitude of 5 mV in the frequency range from 1 MHz to 0.05 Hz using a potentialstat (BioLogic VSP). The charge transfer resistance (Rct) was obtained by fitting the EIS curves with the modified Randles equivalent circuit model by using EC-Lab software. Then, eq 1 was used to calculate the Ea values, according to the Arrhenius equation:
1Rct=AeEa/RT
(1)
where Rct is the charge transfer resistance obtained from the EIS spectra, R is the gas constant, and T is the thermodynamic temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The MoO2 was prepared by the thermal reduction of the hydrothermally synthesized MoO3 precursor in a H2/N2 atmosphere. The morphology changes from MoO3 to MoO2 can be observed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM), as shown in Figures 1a and S1. After the thermal treatment, MoO3 nanobelts are converted to MoO2 nanoplates, favorable for the rapid diffusion of metal ions. (31) The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern shows that MoO3 was reduced to MoO2 at 650 °C (Figure 1b). There are high index diffraction peaks observed at 2θ ≈ 26.5°, 37.5°, and 54.0° associated with reflection planes (1̅11), (2̅11), and (2̅22) of MoO2, which are similar to the previous report. (32) The sharp peaks show that the obtained monoclinic MoO2 from the reduction process possesses a high crystallinity. Further, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis is used to verify the reduction of MoO3 to MoO2. The XPS survey spectra reveal the presence of Mo and O elements in both the MoO3 and MoO2 samples (Figure S2). A pair of peaks corresponding to Mo6+ are found in the XPS spectrum of Mo 3d in MoO3 (Figure 1c). Also, Figure 1c illustrates that the Mo 3d region of MoO2 contains three components, Mo6+, Mo5+, and Mo4+, consistent with the previous report. (33) The multivalent Mo in MoO2 indicates the reduction of MoO3 to MoO2. On the other hand, the O 1s spectrum of MoO3 exhibits the prominent peak at 531.1 eV, which corresponds to lattice oxygen (O2–), and the other two peaks (532.3 and 533.5 eV) are attributed to surface absorbed species (OH, O) (Figure 1d). (34) It is observed that the characteristic peaks of Mo6+ and the entire O 1s peak of MoO2 shifts to a lower level compared to that of MoO3, indicating that the coordination environment of Mo with O has changed (Figure 1c,d). (34) XPS results indicate that MoO2 may contain a mixture of Mo oxidation states between +6 and +4. This electronic configuration achieves a large electrical conductivity due to the concentration of free carriers, which effectively improves the electrochemical properties. (25)

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) SEM image of synthesized MoO2. (b) Corresponding XRD patterns of MoO3 and MoO2. XPS spectra of MoO3 and MoO2 in (c) Mo 3d and (d) O 1s spectrum. (e) Mo K-edge XANES spectra of the synthesized MoO3 and MoO2 with the reference spectra of MoO3, MoO2, and Mo. (f) EPR spectra of MoO3 and MoO2 and background signals from the Dewar.

X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) measurement is then performed in the Mo K-edge region for the as-prepared MoO3 and MoO2 samples to confirm the reduction of MoO3 to MoO2. A comparison of the X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectra of MoO3 and MoO2 is shown in Figure 1e. Accordingly, the XANES spectrum of the as-prepared MoO3 shows the pre-edge absorption at ≈20004.2 eV, almost identical to the reference MoO3 (≈20004.9 eV), suggesting a similar structure to orthorhombic α-MoO3. (35) The pre-edge is associated with the electronic transition from 1s to 4d in systems with tetragonal symmetry, such as MoO3, and is not observed in MoO2 because Mo is coordinated by regular octahedra. (36) The pre-edge peak of the synthesized-MoO2 is significantly reduced, and the absorption edge shifts to lower energy, resulting in a spectrum closely resembling monoclinic MoO2. (36) The reason is that a phase transition occurs from orthorhombic α-MoO3 with a distorted octahedral geometry to symmetric HyMoO3–x suboxide with low-valence Mo atoms. (36) These results indicate the reduction of Mo6+ ions in MoO3 to lower oxidation states (Mo5+, Mo4+) in MoO2 due to the removal of oxygen and accompanied by partial reduction. This spectral change is consistent with both XRD and Mo 3d XPS results. Additionally, MoO3 shows a broad electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) peak at g = 1.954 (Figure 1f), which corresponds to EPR active Mo5+ centers/species. The hyperfine coupling/splitting corresponds to Mo isotopes with I = 5/2 (natural abundance) is not resolved. (37) However, no EPR signal was observed for the MoO2 sample. This result suggests that this sample contains more than one ferromagnetic cluster/domain, which is due to the ferroelectric/metallic materials of MoO2 in nature. (38) The magnetic interaction between the centers leads to ferromagnetic coupling and the metallic nature of the materials. The metallic nature of the materials did not allow the microwave to pass through the samples in the EPR cavity and dampened the resonance condition. Therefore, the MoO2 sample showed no EPR signal.
A MoO2 layer was then coated on polished Zn foil (MoO2@Zn) by a facile doctor-blade method. Figure 2a shows MoO2@Zn maintaining identical crystallographic orientation as bare Zn foil with characteristic peaks of MoO2 at 2θ ≈ 26.5° and 37.6°. While the original bare Zn has several ridges and holds on the surface (Figure S3), MoO2@Zn demonstrates a surface densely covered with MoO2 nanoplates with a thickness of 20 μm shown in the SEM images and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping (Figure 2b–d). The electrochemical stability of Zn in 1 M ZnSO4 is then investigated, focusing on the effects of the MoO2 coating and Tw80 electrolyte additive, as 1 M ZnSO4 is more industrially relevant than costly zinc triflate and other high-concentration electrolytes. The symmetric cells were assembled to evaluate the cycling stability of Zn plating/stripping at different current densities and capacities. Figure 2e exhibits the long-term cycling of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn symmetric cells with and without Tw80 electrolyte additives at 1 mA cm–2 for 1 mAh cm–2. In a blank ZnSO4 electrolyte, the Zn symmetric cell maintains a short lifespan for less than 50 h, while the MoO2@Zn symmetric cell exhibits improved stability for ca. 100 h. Despite the longer lifetime of symmetric cells provided by MoO2@Zn electrodes compared with bare Zn electrodes, the cycle life has not been significantly improved. With the addition of 1 mM Tw80 in the ZnSO4 electrolyte, the Zn symmetric cell shows excellent stability up to 4000 h. Nevertheless, the bare Zn electrodes remain directly in contact with water in the electrolyte, resulting in a possibility of HER forming or corrosion, which would adversely affect cell performance. Interestingly, the MoO2@Zn symmetric cell with the Tw80 electrolyte additive achieves an extended cycle life of 6000 h. It is observed that bare Zn and MoO2@Zn electrodes show an obvious Zn dendrite after 50 cycles in the blank ZnSO4 electrolyte (Figure S4a,d), while no apparent dendrites are observed on the surface of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn in ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte after 50 cycles (Figure S4b,e). As exhibited in the XRD pattern (Figure S4c), a prominent peak at 2θ ≈ 8.07° and other peaks at 2θ ≈ 16.22° and 24.44° of Zn4SO4(OH)6·xH2O (ZSOH) are observed for the bare Zn electrode after 50 cycles in blank ZnSO4 electrolyte, while applying the MoO2 coating layer could reduce the ZSOH intensity peaks (Figure S4f). On the other hand, no obvious ZSOH could be found on the XRD patterns of both electrodes in the ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte after 50 cycles. Based on the results, MoO2 alone can slightly prevent the formation of byproducts, whereas combining MoO2@Zn with the Tw80 additive can significantly inhibit corrosion. Therefore, the combination of using the MoO2 coating layer incorporating the Tw80 additive can ensure the stability of Zn electrodes.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn. SEM images of MoO2@Zn at the (b) cross-section and (c) surface with (d) corresponding EDS mapping. (e) Cycling performance of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn symmetric cells using ZnSO4 and ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolytes at 1 mA cm–2–1 mAh cm–2. (f) Rate performance of symmetric cells using ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte. (g) Cycling performance of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn symmetric cells using ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte at a high current density–capacity of 5 mA cm–2–5 mAh cm–2. (h) Voltage profiles of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn symmetric cells with ZnSO4 electrolyte containing Tw80 additive for testing under alternate 10 continuous stripping/plating cycles and 10 h resting.

Figure S5 compares the voltage profile between bare Zn and MoO2@Zn symmetric cells in the ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte. In the initial cycle, the voltage hysteresis of two cells displays the same value (∼110 mV). As the cycle number increased, the voltage of the MoO2@Zn symmetric cell remains relatively stable, while the voltage of the bare Zn cell slightly drops after 100 cycles. At cycle 2001, a slight drop to 95.8 mV could be observed in the MoO2@Zn cell, and the bare Zn cell shows a polarization. Moreover, the rate performance of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn symmetric cells using ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte is evaluated at different current densities from 1 to 10 mA cm–2 with a fixed capacity of 1 mAh cm–2 (Figure 2f). A sudden short circuit occurs in the Zn symmetric cell when the current density is increased to 10 mA cm–2. In contrast, the MoO2@Zn symmetric cell exhibits excellent performance even at 10 mA cm–2. Afterward, when the current density is returned to 1 mA cm–2, the MoO2@Zn symmetric cell shows an excellent reversible stability of 3000 h with prominent resilience. The MoO2@Zn symmetric cells also demonstrate higher stability than Zn symmetric cells when the current density increases to 5 mA cm–2 (Figure 2g) and 10 mA cm–2 (Figure S6) at a fixed capacity of 5 mAh cm–2. These results indicate the great protective effect of the Tw80 additive and MoO2 coating on Zn electrodes. Furthermore, the shelving and restoring abilities of symmetric cells with bare Zn and MoO2@Zn anodes containing ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte are also compared by alternate cycling and resting evaluation (Figure 2h). The symmetric cell of MoO2@Zn is stable for 3000 h with an average overpotential of 110 mV. Conversely, the bare Zn anode produces an apparent fluctuation in the polarization voltage, which culminates in cell failure after 320 h. When switching between cycling and resting conditions, the MoO2@Zn electrode shows a stable voltage response, indicating excellent corrosion resistance and resilience. Thus, the MoO2@Zn anode using the ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte additive extensively stabilizes the Zn electrode and ensures a prolonged life for the cell. Table S1 compared our work’s test conditions and electrochemical performance with those previously reported by others, indicating that the MoO2@Zn electrode with Tw80-assisted electrolyte delivers superior and competitive performance at a wide range of current density-capacity in symmetric cells.
To verify the effect of Tw80 on regulating the electrode–electrolyte interface, experiments using MoO2@Zn symmetric cells were conducted. With a fixed concentration of 1 mM Tw80, the concentration of ZnSO4 is increased to 2 M to explore the effect of the salt concentration on the system. According to Figure S7a, the lifespan of the MoO2@Zn symmetric cell using 2 M ZnSO4 shows a stability performance of over 1000 h, six times less than that of the cell using 1 M ZnSO4. It is known that increasing the electrolyte concentration could result in a decrease in solvent molecules surrounding the Zn2+ ions, altering the solvation structures and the transport of cations and anions. (39,40) Increased concentrations also increase the viscosity of the solution, leading to a decrease in the ionic conductivity in the electrolyte. These reasons could account for the shorter performance of symmetric cells using 2 M ZnSO4 than that using 1 M ZnSO4. A further investigation on Tw80 concentration is explored to verify the optimization of Tw80 concentration varied from 0.5 to 10 mM (0.5Tw80 to 10Tw80) using MoO2@Zn symmetric cells at 5 mA cm–2–5 mAh cm–2. As shown in Figure S7b, the MoO2@Zn symmetric cell using ZnSO4+1Tw80 exhibits exceptional stability for 705 h. With a slight decrease in Tw80 content to 0.5 mM, the cell also performs well at 650 h. However, the lifespan of cells significantly decreases as the concentration of Tw80 increases to 5 and 10 mM. Figure S8 demonstrates the XRD patterns at the plating (P) and stripping (S) states of MoO2@Zn symmetric cells using different Tw80 concentrations after 100 cycles. At the plating state, the cell using 1 mM Tw80 shows the highest intensity of the MoO2 characteristic peak at 2θ ≈ 26.2°, meaning that the MoO2 coating on the Zn surface maintains a more incredible amount compared to the other cells. In addition, the formation of ZSOH byproduct is discovered at the stripping state. Although ZSOH is discovered in all cells, the cell using 1 mM Tw80 demonstrates the smallest amount of ZSOH. The reason is that a lower concentration (0.5 mM) may not sufficiently suppress water-induced corrosion because of the uncontrollable nucleation process caused by the partially covered Zn foil and incompletely complexed Zn2+ ions. (39) Nevertheless, excessive Tw80 additives (5 and 10 mM) could result in increasing voltage hysteresis. A high energy barrier may exist for Zn deposition due to the smaller ionic conductivity and an adsorption layer caused by the excess Tw80 content. (19) Thus, the content of additives in the electrolyte should be as small as possible to prevent deterioration of the energy density. Figure S9 shows the corresponding morphology of the MoO2@Zn electrode by using different Tw80 concentrations after cycling. After 100 cycles, the MoO2@Zn electrode using 1 mM Tw80 maintains a dense MoO2 coating layer on the surface. However, for other electrodes using 0.5, 5, and 10 mM Tw80, some Zn or ZSOH flakes appear on the top surface. Consequently, 1 M ZnSO4 incorporating 1 mM Tw80 is optimal for the stability of Zn electrodes.
MoO2 was selected due to its excellent chemical stability in mildly acidic electrolytes and relatively high electronic conductivity. To better understand the unique effects of combining the MoO2-coating layer and Tw80 electrolyte additive on the electrochemical performance improvement, TiO2, and WO2 were chosen as the alternative coating materials on Zn anodes in the presence of the Tw80 additive. The stability of symmetric cells of TiO2 and WO2 coated Zn was conducted at high current densities of 5 mA cm–2 and 10 mA cm–2 with a fixed areal capacity of 5 mAh cm–2 using the ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte, as shown in Figure S10. The cycling stability of TiO2@Zn and WO2@Zn symmetric cells at both current densities is inferior to that of MoO2@Zn symmetric cells. Furthermore, TiO2@Zn cells seem to show a higher polarization. Although both have good chemical stability in acidic solutions, TiO2 is a semiconductor with relatively low electrical conductivity at room temperature, while WO2 is an analogue of MoO2 with relatively high electrical conductivity among metal oxides. (41,42) The low electrical conductivity of TiO2 may not effectively help to make the electric field distribution uniform over the coated Zn surface and thus leads to lower stability and higher polarization at high current densities. The chemistries of MoO2 and WO2 have many similarities, however, WO2 is less stable in acidic solutions than MoO2. (43) Therefore, the relatively high electrical conductivity of WO2 can reduce the coated cell polarization but cannot ensure high cycling stability. Therefore, in this work, MoO2 has the unique features of high chemical stability and relatively high electrical conductivity, which makes MoO2 a promising coating material when combined with the use of the Tw80 additive. Also, MoO2 is known for its good electrical conductivity, which makes it potentially useful in battery applications. (23,24,44) The effect of the electrical conductivity of MoO2 on Zn anode protection was evaluated by comparing the electrical conductivities of MoO2 and MoO3 and the electrochemical stability of Zn anodes coated with them. The MoO2 pellet shows a conductivity range of 23–24 S cm–1 at room temperature, while the MoO3 pellet exhibits a conductivity of less than 3.26 × 10–13 S cm–1. This result is consistent with the finding that MoO2 has a metallic conducting property with a high electrical conductivity, while MoO3 has a semiconductor property with a low electrical conductivity. (45) Similar to other conductive coating materials for Zn anodes, the conductive MoO2 coating may homogeneously regulate Zn2+ flux and maintain a stable electric field on Zn anode surface to optimize Zn plating/stripping processes. (7,16,17) The electrochemical stabilities of MoO3 and MoO2-coated Zn symmetric cells are compared. As shown in Figure S11, the MoO3@Zn symmetric cell shows higher polarization and a much shorter cycling lifetime than the MoO2@Zn counterpart.
The extent of reduction of the MoO2 coating layer also plays a crucial role in the electrochemical stability of Zn. Symmetric cells MoO2@Zn with different reduction times (1, 4, 8, and 12 h) were assembled with ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte to investigate their electrochemical performances. The symmetric cell using MoO2(4 h)@Zn delivers the highest stability at 1 mA cm–2 and 5 mA cm–2 (Figure S12). Figure S13a illustrates that reduced MoO2 at 1 h exhibits the mixture of MoO3 and MoO2 phases. With the increase in reduction time, the MoO2 phase becomes dominant, and the characteristic peaks of MoO3 are reduced (at 4, 8, and 12 h). Meanwhile, EPR results show that MoO2 samples at longer reduction times also contain more than one ferromagnetic cluster/domain similar to MoO2(4 h), demonstrating that different thermal reduction treatment time could change the oxygen coordination of Mo5+ center/site in MoO2 (Figure S13b). Also, the morphology of MoO2 becomes more coarsened with increasing reduction time (Figures 1a and S13c–e). The increased agglomeration results in a decreased surface area of the reduced MoO2, leading to the reduction of electrochemical performance. (46) As a result, symmetric cells of MoO2(4 h)@Zn exhibit the most prolonged cycling stability at both low and high current densities, suggesting excellent reversibility of Zn plating/stripping. It is proposed that MoO2(4 h) is optimal for both high capacity and stable cyclability, attributed to the smallest crystallite size or the lowest crystalline nature. Therefore, despite the dominant phase of MoO2(8 h) and MoO2 (12 h) being MoO2, the symmetric cells exhibit a higher overpotential and shorter stability than MoO2(4 h), implying that the tailored surface structure could affect the energy barrier for the Zn2+ ions against desolvation and deposition. (47) This will be discussed later.
To explore the interfacial reactions that result in the formation of byproduct and dendrite, the phases of cycled electrodes at plating and stripping states after longer cycling were examined using XRD. As exhibited in the XRD pattern (Figure 3a), a prominent peak at 2θ ≈ 8.07° and other peaks at 2θ ≈ 16.22° and 24.44° of ZSOH are also discovered at plated and stripped forms of bare Zn electrode after 500 cycles. Conversely, no obvious peaks of ZSOH are observed at the plating state of MoO2@Zn, while weak ZSOH peaks at 2θ ≈ 8.07°, 12.23°, and 24.44° are detected at the stripping state (Figure 3b). XRD analysis reveals significant differences between cycled Zn electrodes and MoO2@Zn electrodes in the crystallographic orientation after plating. While the plated MoO2@Zn electrode shows the dominance of the (002) plane to form Zn deposits with horizontal orientation preferentially, the plated bare Zn electrode exhibits the (101) crystal facet exposure and significantly increased the (100) plane, which is easy to form dendrite deposition. (48) It is also observed that the dominance of (101) orientation for the pristine MoO2@Zn sample (Figure 2a) is preserved after the complete stripping of the MoO2@Zn electrode, which suggests that the Zn plating/stripping process is highly reversible. (15)

Figure 3

Figure 3. XRD patterns of cycled (a) bare Zn and (b) MoO2@Zn electrodes at plating (P) and stripping (S) states. SEM images and EDS analysis after cycling for 500 cycles at the plating state of (c) bare Zn and (d) MoO2@Zn. SEM images and EDS analysis after cycling for 500 cycles at stripping state of (e) bare Zn and (f) MoO2@Zn. The cells were cycled in a ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte.

SEM morphology analysis of cycled electrodes also confirms the hypothesis based on the XRD results. As shown in Figure S3, the inherent surface defects of bare Zn, such as holes, are detrimental to the Zn plating/stripping stability since they can capture hydrogen gas generated from corrosion, thereby promoting the HER, and inducing the inhomogeneous local electric field due to the high surface energy and inhomogeneity. Consequently, several flakes appear on the surface of the bare Zn anode after 500 cycles, indicating uneven Zn plating and stripping (Figure 3c,e). In contrast, these protrusions are not evident on the surface of the MoO2@Zn electrodes (Figure 3d,f). The EDS elemental maps display that Mo and the O elements dominate the MoO2@Zn after cycling, while the surface of bare Zn anode after cycling contains S elements (14:21 at. %) arising from ZSOH. Thus, the MoO2 coating layer serves as a stable protective layer on Zn surface to minimize the direct contact between Zn electrodes and the electrolyte and suppress side reactions.
The exchange current density (i0) values of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn in different electrolytes were explored via the Tafel plots to determine the regulation of Zn2+ ion kinetics. (49) Note that a low i0 suggests the suppressed corrosion and Zn plating-stripping kinetics simultaneously, as both involve the similar electrochemical Zn redox reactions. (50) Therefore, a proper i0 is preferred to achieve the trade-off. As shown in Figures 4a and S14, the addition of Tw80 can lower i0 values for bare Zn and MoO2@Zn, suggesting that Tw80, as a corrosion inhibitor, can restrain the corrosion of Zn. On the other hand, the MoO2 coating layer can increase i0 in both electrolytes (ZnSO4 and ZnSO4+1Tw80), suggesting that MoO2 can improve the electrochemical redox kinetics of electrolyte–anode interface which is favorable for plating and stripping of Zn anodes. (51) Therefore, the combination of Tw80 and MoO2 coating can help to achieve a balance between inhibiting corrosion and ensuring sufficient electrochemical redox kinetics of the electrolyte–anode interface. To investigate the stability of electrodes in the electrolytes under resting conditions, bare Zn and MoO2@Zn plates were immersed in aqueous ZnSO4-based electrolytes with or without Tw80 to reveal the corrosion inhibition capability of the coating layer combined with Tw80 (Figure S15). Upon soaking in electrolyte for 30 days, the MoO2@Zn surface in blank ZnSO4 is severely corroded as evidenced by the color change from brown to white, while the surface of MoO2@Zn in ZnSO4+1Tw80 is negligibly changed (Figure S16).

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Tafel plots of MoO2@Zn electrodes in blank ZnSO4 and ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolytes. (b) CA curves of MoO2@Zn electrodes in blank ZnSO4 and ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolytes. (c) Calculated activation energy of Zn2+ desolvation of different MoO2 coating layers via the Arrhenius equation. Voltage-capacity profiles of (d) Zn||Cu, (e) MoO2@Zn||Cu, and (f) MoO2@Zn||MoO2@Cu half cells. Coulombic efficiency of (g) Zn||Cu, MoO2@Zn||Cu in blank ZnSO4 electrolyte and (h) Zn||Cu, MoO2@Zn||Cu, and MoO2@Zn||MoO2@Cu half cells in ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte.

CA curves are further analyzed to determine changes in reaction kinetics when Zn2+ is deposited under a constant overpotential of −150 mV. In a blank ZnSO4 electrolyte, the CA curve of MoO2@Zn exhibits an initial decrease in the cathodic current density in the first seconds and then shows the increase of the current density with the cathodic Zn deposition time (Figure 4b). This initial decrease (minus sign only represents the cathodic current direction) is caused due to the formation of a depletion layer close to the working electrode. (52,53) Then, the continuous increase of the current density is due to the increased surface area caused by the growth of deposited Zn. The results imply that only the MoO2-coating layer could not fully hinder the dendritic formation of electrodeposited Zn. On the other hand, a smaller initial current density is observed for bare Zn, and the current density increases over time in blank ZnSO4 electrolyte (Figure S17a), indicating that Zn dendrites are forming and gradually growing on the surface of the Zn anode. (54,55) Moreover, bare Zn in ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte (Figure S17b) shows an initial decrease and later increase in current density similar to MoO2@Zn in blank ZnSO4 electrolyte, indicating that only the Tw80 additive could not fully impede Zn dendrites. However, the current density of MoO2@Zn in ZnSO4-containing Tw80 electrolyte decreases in a few seconds and then demonstrates a steady current–time behavior (Figures 4b and S17b), (54,56,57) confirming the promotion of uniform Zn deposition and effective inhibition of Zn dendrite growth in the plating process of Zn2+ ions by combining the MoO2 coating layer and Tw80 electrolyte additive.
Additionally, the influences of the MoO2 coating layer and Tw80 additive on the Zn anode interfaces were evaluated. Contact angle measurements were conducted to examine the effects of the MoO2 coating and Tw80 additive on the wettability of Zn. Figure S18a illustrates that the bare Zn exhibited a relatively large contact angle of 87.8° in a ZnSO4 solution. The addition of Tw80 in ZnSO4 solution reduced the contact angle to 47.9° (Figure S18b), enhancing the hydrophilicity of the Zn surface. Thus, Tw80, as a nonionic surfactant, can help to improve the surface wettability between Zn electrode and electrolyte, (58) which may assist in the uniform distribution of Zn2+ ions. Meanwhile, the MoO2 coating layer plays a more pronounced role in significantly reducing the contact angle to almost 0° in the solutions with and without Tw80 (Figure S18c,d), making the coated Zn surface superhydrophilic in the electrolyte possibly by enhancing the surface roughness or heterogeneity. (59,60) It has been reported that the electrode wettability plays a role in the final Zn deposition pattern and high surface hydrophilicity will result in more uniform Zn2+ flux across the surface of MoO2@Zn anodes, contributing to homogeneous Zn nucleation and growth. (61) Consequently, the MoO2 coating provides improved electrolyte–anode interfaces and hence enhances Zn2+ transport kinetics.
Furthermore, MoO2 coating can significantly enhance surface hydrophilicity to improve the wetting of electrolyte on the Zn electrode, which is beneficial for reducing the desolvation energy of hydrated Zn ions. (61) To determine the activation energy of Zn2+ desolvation under the protection of diverse MoO2 coatings, EIS measurements of diverse MoO2@Zn symmetric cells in ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte were conducted at the temperature range from 30 to 60 °C. At a given temperature, the EIS curves show that the charge-transfer resistance (Rct) increased with the extended reduction time of MoO2 (Figure S19a–c), suggesting improved charge transfer kinetics in the MoO2(4 h)@Zn cells. Based on the Arrhenius equation (Supporting Information), the desolvation activation energy (Ea) can be obtained. The calculated activation energy (Ea) of Zn2+ desolvation with MoO2(4 h)@Zn is lower than that of MoO2(8 h)@Zn and MoO2(12 h)@Zn in 1 M ZnSO4 with Tw80 (Figure 4c). The reduced Ea of MoO2(4 h)@Zn demonstrates that MoO2(4 h) coating layer can facilitate rapid Zn2+ desolvation and enhance Zn2+ transfer and deposition kinetics. (11−13) Additionally, adding the Tw80 additive reduces Rct in MoO2@Zn symmetric cells (Figure S19a,d). Moreover, a slight decrease in the Ea value is observed in both bare Zn and MoO2-coated Zn based symmetric cells with the addition of Tw80 in the electrolyte, while the MoO2 coating layer can further decrease the Ea value (Figure S20). The combination of the MoO2 coating layer and Tw80 additive can lower the activation energy of Zn2+ desovlation, enhance the Zn deposition, and thus facilitate the desolvation-reduction process of hydrated Zn ions. (12,13)
The Zn∥Cu half cells are used to investigate the electrochemical reversibility of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn in the ZnSO4+Tw80 electrolyte. As shown in Figure S21, the initial nucleation overpotential increased from 0.1997 to 0.2696 V after being coated with MoO2. A higher nucleation overpotential indicates that the MoO2 coating layer reduces the transfer kinetics of Zn2+ ions, which is beneficial for refining deposited particles and achieving uniform Zn deposition, consistent with previous reports. (40,62) The Coulombic efficiency is also examined to evaluate the reversibility of Zn plating/stripping. The CE values of Zn||Cu, MoO2@Zn||Cu, and MoO2@Zn||MoO2@Cu cells using ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolytes are investigated to evaluate the sustainability of the anode behavior by measuring Zn plating/stripping at 1 mA cm–2. Figure 4d–f shows the voltage profiles of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn anodes. In the initial cycles of the plating/stripping process, a lattice fitting phase (or reshaped Zn coordination) would occur, resulting in relatively low CE. (15) At different cycles, the voltage profiles of Zn||Cu cells exhibit significant jitter (Figure 4d) because of the nonuniform reshaping of the surface and the formation of “dead Zn” on Cu foil. (15) Also, MoO2@Zn||Cu and MoO2@Zn||MoO2@Cu cells demonstrate stable voltage profiles at increasing cycle numbers (Figure 4e,f), suggesting an enhancement of surface protection for the plating/stripping process. Therefore, the MoO2 coating layer substantially enhances the CE.
A comparison of CE between blank ZnSO4 and ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolytes is also conducted to verify the effect of the Tw80 additive on enhancing the reversibility and stability of Zn plating/stripping (Figure 4g,h). The CE of the bare Zn electrode in blank ZnSO4 electrolyte quickly decays after 88 cycles, indicating the irregular Zn deposition on Cu foil. On the stable cyclability of bare Zn could be maintained over 118 cycles with the Tw80 additive in ZnSO4 electrolyte, which is attributed to the effective regulation of Tw80 on Zn plating/stripping processes. Moreover, while the CE of MoO2@Zn cell with ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte remains stable over 500 cycles, the cell using blank ZnSO4 electrolyte remains relatively stable for 150 cycles and then continuously fluctuates in the following cycles, possibly due to the dendrite formation, byproducts, and other side reactions. As demonstrated by XRD patterns, characteristic peaks of Zn metal can be observed after deposition on Cu foil (Figure S22). The results show that the Zn deposit in ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte has a higher intensity ratio of (002) peak to (101) peak, I(002)/I(101) than that in blank ZnSO4 electrolytes (1.69 and 1.03), which indicates that the ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte facilitates a preferential orientation of Zn (002) plane. (63) Due to this change in texture orientation, the Zn deposited on the electrodes in the ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte will be more homogeneous and flatter. Thus, the Tw80 additive can help stabilize the CE.
In situ optical microscopy was further employed on transparent cells to investigate the protective effect of the Tw80 additive and MoO2 layer on the plating and stripping of the Zn anodes. The fabricated transparent cell is shown in Figure S23. The transparent cells are plated for 30 min and then stripped for 30 min at 2 mA cm–2. In a blank ZnSO4 electrolyte, numerous Zn nuclei are unevenly distributed on the edge and surface of bare Zn foil after 10 min (Figure 5a and Video S1). It took 30 min for the small protrusion to grow into a prominent Zn dendrite at the exact location. Meanwhile, severe corrosion signs are observed on the Zn surface, and their areas increase as the plating duration increases. In the subsequent stripping process, dendrite growth and corrosion continuously occur on the electrode edge and surface, especially in the area adjacent to the Zn dendrites. According to these observations, the bare Zn electrode using a blank ZnSO4 electrolyte exhibits uneven electrodeposition, high corrosion, and weak reversibility. For the bare Zn electrode in a ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte, dark spots exist on the surface after 10 min, and their sizes increase as plating proceeds, demonstrating that dendrite growth could occur on the electrode surface (Figure 5b and Video S2). There are also signs of corrosion on the surface of the bare Zn electrode. Besides, the bare Zn electrode surface becomes brighter during the subsequent stripping process, resulting in continuously ununiform Zn dissolution. However, the edge of bare Zn using ZnSO4+1Tw80 maintains a smooth and flat shape during the plating/stripping process, indicating that the Tw80 additive can support diminishing dendrite growth. The MoO2@Zn electrode is also plated/stripped in blank ZnSO4 electrolyte, showing that the surface is almost as smooth as the initial process, and very few dendrites could be observed at the edge after plating/stripping for 30 min (Figure 5c and Video S3). On the contrary, no apparent dendrite growth and corrosion are observed on the MoO2@Zn electrode using ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte, benefiting from the induced uniform deposition effect of MoO2 coating (Figure 5d and Video S4). All of the above results confirm that the combination of MoO2 coating with Tw80 additive has synergistic protection on Zn electrodes, effectively homogenizing Zn nucleation and suppressing dendrite growth.

Figure 5

Figure 5. In situ optical microscope observation of Zn plating/stripping process for bare Zn using (a) blank ZnSO4 electrolyte and (b) ZnSO4 containing Tw80 electrolyte at 2 mA cm–2 for 30 min. In situ optical microscope observation of Zn plating/stripping process for MoO2@Zn electrodes using (c) blank ZnSO4 electrolyte and (d) ZnSO4 containing Tw80 electrolyte at 2 mA cm–2 for 30 min.

A detailed mechanism for the contribution of the Tw80 additive and MoO2 coating to the regulation of Zn2+ ions deposition behavior is presented in Figure 6. It is noticeable that bare Zn foil in an aqueous electrolyte is unstable during the plating/stripping process. According to the “tip effect”, anode surfaces become rough during the initial nucleation process owing to the deposition of Zn2+ ions. (64) Due to the principle of minimizing surface energy and exposed surface area, Zn2+ ions adsorbed on the surface tend to diffuse laterally along the surface and generate Zn dendrites. With repeated plating cycles, the Zn2+ ions are preferably deposited on the initial dendrites, causing an inhomogeneous electric field distribution. Thus, considerable harmful Zn dendrites are formed on the anode surface (Figure 6a). Since the Zn2+ ions are coordinated with H2O molecules in ZnSO4 aqueous solution, hydride Zn2+ ions ([Zn(H2O)6]2+) are the main form of Zn2+ ions in the solution, which provides a high desolvation energy of Zn2+ ions. (64) However, [Zn(H2O)6]2+ ions could result in a deprotonation process, creating OH and H+. The produced H+ ions cause the HER on the surface of the anode because of its higher redox potential compared with that of Zn deposition. The generated OH ions incorporate H2O molecules to induce corrosion and increase the local pH value by passivating the anode surface to form byproducts (ZSOH). These factors would result in inferior cycling performance and low CEs of ZIBs. Also, the above-mentioned results indicate that only MoO2 coatings cannot completely enhance long-term stability for the following reasons: (1) A single MoO2 coating layer cannot effectively and durably inhibit corrosion, and (2) it is not an ideally hermetical coating layer that can eliminate electrolyte penetration and corrosion, which may not fully prevent the formation of byproducts and HER.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Schematic diagrams of Zn2+ ions deposition behaviors in aqueous electrolytes (a) bare Zn in blank ZnSO4 electrolyte, (b) bare Zn in blank ZnSO4 containing Tw80 electrolyte, and (c) MoO2-coated Zn in ZnSO4 electrolyte containing Tw80 electrolyte. (d) XANES spectra of MoO2@Zn electrodes after plating and stripping in ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte.

An effective electrolyte additive for stabilizing the Zn/electrolyte interface is introduced in this work by using Tw80, which is a low-cost and nonionic surfactant. Notably, the Tw80 additive provides promising inhibitors against Zn corrosion in a sulfate solution. (27,28) First, hydrophilic groups in Tw80 (Figure S24) can form strong hydrogen bonds with water molecules, thereby decreasing the solvation interaction between Zn2+ ions and H2O molecules and facilitating the desolvation process of hydrated Zn2+ ions. (9) Second, the hydrophobic alkyl chains in Tw80 have a negative inductive effect, leading to the increase of electron density at the oxygen atom along the alkyl chain, thus stabilizing the interaction between Zn and O (on Tw80) and mitigating H2O contact with the anode to enhance the protection efficiency. (27) In the corrosion field, the surfactant like Tw80, as a corrosion inhibitor, makes its hydrophilic portion adsorbed on the metal/metal oxide surface and a second layer (or multiple layers) may form with their hydrophobic tail adjacent to each other in an increased concentration, which can decrease the interfacial tension at the solid–water interface and contact angle and thus enhance the wettability. (58,65) Based on results of contact angle measurement and EIS under different temperatures (Figures S18–S20), Tw80 can also slightly increase surface hydrophilicity to reduce the desolvation energy of hydrated Zn ions. Thus, Tw80 can act as a corrosion inhibitor to prevent Zn corrosion and side reactions (Figure 6b). Although the Tw80 additive is an effective corrosion inhibitor, dendrites, HER, and byproducts could gradually develop on the bare Zn surface due to the direct contact between the electrolyte and electrode surface. Then, polarization linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) was performed to further examine the effect of the MoO2 coating layer and Tw80 additive on suppressing HER. Figure S25 shows the LSV curves of bare Zn in blank ZnSO4 electrolyte, and MoO2@Zn in ZnSO4 electrolyte without Tw80 and with Tw80. The MoO2 coating layer can slightly increase the hydrogen evolution overpotential, thereby retarding the HER during cycling in blank ZnSO4. In addition, the overpotential apparently increases when the MoO2 coating layer is combined with the Tw80 additive, indicating that the combination of MoO2@Zn and Tw80 additive is most effective in suppressing HER. Therefore, the combination of the MoO2 coating layer and the Tw80 additive can synergistically work to significantly prevent corrosion and side reactions for stabilizing Zn (Figure 6c).
To study the redox behavior of MoO2 on protective Zn electrode, Mo K-edge XANES spectra were collected for cycled MoO2@Zn electrodes at 5 mA cm–2 after the first cycle at both plating/stripping processes (Figure 6d). It is observed that during cycling, the absorption edge of XANES spectra of MoO2@Zn electrodes exhibits similar properties except for a slight energy position shift, implying no change in the structure. Specifically, during plating, the edge position shifts to the lower energy suggesting the slightly reduced Mo valence, possibly because MoO2 may accommodate a small quantity of Zn2+, similar to the reported Li+ insertion into the MoO2 lattice. (66) After the stripping, the XANES spectrum demonstrates a slight shift of the absorption edge to a higher energy position closer to the initial state (MoO2), implying a recovery of the Mo valence state. (66) This result indicates a redox reversibility of Mo in the MoO2 coating layer during the Zn2+ insertion (plating) and extraction (stripping) processes in MoO2. This mechanism of Zn2+ insertion/extraction into/from MoO2 may differ from that of MoO3 conversion in LIBs. (66,67) The Zn-ion storage process for MoO2 is similar to that of previously reported MoOx for Zn2+ storage, (67) as follows:
MoO2+xZn2++2xeZnxMoO2
(2)
The MoO2 coating layer with slight Zn2+ accommodation capability may help to make the Zn2+ concentration field more homogeneously distributed in the vicinity of the Zn anode and avoid a large concentration gradient, which may facilitate the uniform deposition of Zn.
To further investigate the advantages of the MoO2 coating layer and Tw80 additive on Zn anode protection, full cells were assembled by using VO2 as cathodes. The characterizations of VO2 are displayed in Figure S26. A nanorod morphology of VO2 is observed in the SEM image. The XRD pattern matches well with the standard card (PDF no. 00–031–1438), confirming the monoclinic phase and purity of the synthesized VO2. As shown in Figure 7a, the CV curves at 0.1 mV s–1 for the full cell with bare Zn and MoO2@Zn anodes in blank ZnSO4 and ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolytes are compared within a voltage window of 0.2–1.6 V versus Zn2+/Zn. All cells exhibit two pairs of reduction and oxidation peaks, suggesting a two-step Zn2+ ion intercalation and deintercalation reactions mechanism during the charge/discharge process, which has been previously reported. (68,69) The CV curves of the four samples have no considerable difference in the shape, suggesting that the addition of the Tw80 electrolyte additive and MoO2 coating layer has no significant effect on the intercalation/deintercalation processes. When Tw80 is added to the Zn∥VO2 cell, the peaks are shifted (Figure S27a). However, the CV curves of MoO2@Zn∥VO2 cells in different electrolytes are almost overlapped, which implies that the redox reaction of the VO2 cathode is not affected by the coating layer (Figure S27b). Additionally, MoO2@Zn∥VO2 cells in different electrolytes demonstrate lower potential separation and higher response current than bare Zn anode (Figure 7a), indicating better reversibility and electrochemical activity, which may be due to the faster kinetics of Zn2+ intercalation and weaker side reactions. (70) Figure 7b displays the cycling performance of Zn∥VO2 and MoO2@Zn∥VO2 full cells with blank ZnSO4 and ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolytes at a current density of 1 A g–1. The cell using the MoO2@Zn anode in ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte shows the best cycling stability with an initial discharge capacity of 228.3 mAh g–1 and capacity retention of 85.2% after 300 cycles, while the capacity retention decreases rapidly to 39.9% after cycling for the cell with a bare Zn anode. In contrast, the capacity of Zn∥VO2 cell in blank ZnSO4 drops to <10 mAh g–1 after 210 cycles and the MoO2@Zn∥VO2 cell exhibits a capacity retention of 34.8% after 300 cycles. The galvanostatic charge/discharge profiles (GCD) of full cells are shown in Figures 7c,d and S28. Likewise, the full cells with ZnSO4 and ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolytes display a similar charge/discharge behavior. The cells using ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte can sustain a much longer cycle lifespan and much better stability than those using a blank ZnSO4 electrolyte. The results demonstrate that the combination of the MoO2@Zn anode and Tw80 electrolyte additive could prolong the lifetime of Zn∥VO2 full cells.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Zn∥VO2 and MoO2@Zn∥VO2 full cells performance with (a) CV curves at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s–1. (b) Long-term cycling performance at 1 A g–1. GCD curves of different cycles of Zn∥VO2 and MoO2@Zn∥VO2 full cells using (c) ZnSO4 and (d) ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolytes at a current density of 1 A g–1. (e) Rate performance from 0.5–10 A g–1. (f) Cycling stability at a high current density of 5 A g–1.

Additionally, the rate performance of the full cell with the MoO2@Zn anode is superior to that of the cell with the bare Zn anode in different electrolytes as the current density increases from 1 to 10 A g–1 (Figure 7c). Even at a high current density of 10 A g–1, the MoO2@Zn∥ZnSO4+1Tw80∥VO2 full cell demonstrates a large initial capacity of 171.4 mAh g–1, while Zn∥ ZnSO4+1Tw80∥VO2 and MoO2@Zn∥ZnSO4∥VO2 show the capacity below 100 mAh g–1 and the capacity of Zn∥ZnSO4∥VO2 is less than 50 mAh g–1. Upon long-term cycling at a current density of 5 A g–1, the MoO2@Zn∥ZnSO4+1Tw80∥VO2 cell maintains outstanding performance with a high retained capacity of 105.6 mAh g–1 and superior capacity retention of 82.4% after 1000 cycles (Figure 7d). Conversely, the specific capacity of the Zn∥ZnSO4+1Tw80∥VO2 cell is reduced to 57.7 mAh g–1, corresponding to a capacity retention of 57.3%. At 5 A g–1, Zn∥VO2 and MoO2@Zn∥VO2 cells using blank ZnSO4 display the same electrochemical performance trend for 1000 cycles. However, the capacity retention of these full cells drops quickly to 59.3% and 31.2%, respectively. Significantly increasing the current density to 10 A g–1, the MoO2@Zn∥VO2 cell in the Tw80-assisted electrolyte system maintains an exceptionally stable performance (Figure S29). Overall, the outstanding electrochemical performances of the Zn anodes can be attributed to the effective inhibition of corrosion, HER, and dendrite formation in the presence of the MoO2 layer incorporating Tw80 electrolyte additive.

4. Conclusion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In summary, this work proposed a new approach to developing a highly stable Zn anode by combining a surface coating layer and an electrolyte additive. The combination of MoO2 coating layer and the Tw80 additive can synergistically work to significantly prevent corrosion and side reactions. It can also reduce the desolvation energy of hydrated Zn ions during cycling, promoting uniform Zn2+ stripping/plating and improving the cell electrochemical performances. Benefiting from the dual synergistic effects of the MoO2 coating layer and Tw80 additive, the MoO2@Zn anode exhibits excellent electrochemical stability in a 1 M ZnSO4 electrolyte. The MoO2@Zn anode shows ultralong cycling stability in symmetric cells over 6000 h at 1 mA cm–2 for 1 mAh cm–2. The symmetric cells also show long-term stability over 705 h, even at a high current density of 5 mA cm–2 and areal capacity of 5 mAh cm–2. Especially, the full cells exhibit a high capacity of 105.6 mAh g–1 after 1000 cycles with outstanding rate performance (171.4 mAh g–1 at 10 A g–1). This work provides a method of combining the artificial coating layer and electrolyte additive to stabilize Zn for high-performance aqueous ZIBs.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.3c08474.

  • Experimental section; SEM images of synthesized MoO3 and bare Zn electrode; XPS survey spectra of MoO3 and MoO2; voltage profiles of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn symmetric cells at different cycles; cycling performance of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn symmetric cells under high current density, MoO2@Zn symmetric cells with different electrolytes, MoO3@Zn and different MoO2@Zn symmetric cells; characterization of MoO2@Zn electrodes after cycling with different electrolytes (SEM images and XRD results); characterization of different MoO2 (SEM images and XRD, EPR results); contact angles of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn with different electrolytes; optical images of MoO2@Zn soaking in different electrolytes and corresponding XRD patterns and SEM images; EIS spectra at different temperatures, calculated activation energy, Tafel plots, CA curves of different electrodes in different electrolytes; XRD results of bare Cu foils after Zn deposition in different electrolytes and corresponding peak intensity ratio; digital image of transparent cell using for optical in situ microscope observation; structure of Tween 80; characterization of the VO2 cathode (SEM image and XRD result) and corresponding electrochemical performance of Zn∥VO2 and MoO2@Zn∥VO2 full cells in different electrolytes (PDF)

  • Video S1: In situ optical microscope testing of bare Zn electrode in blank ZnSO4 electrolyte (MP4)

  • Video S2: In situ optical microscope testing of MoO2@Zn electrode in blank ZnSO4 electrolyte (MP4)

  • Video S3: In situ optical microscope testing of bare Zn electrode in ZnSO4-containing Tween 80 electrolyte (MP4)

  • Video S4: In situ optical microscope testing of MoO2@Zn electrode in ZnSO4-containing Tween 80 electrolyte (MP4)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
  • Authors
    • Nhat Anh Thieu - Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8274-6882
    • Xiujuan Chen - Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5921-3487
    • Qingyuan Li - Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4296-9747
    • Qingsong Wang - Bavarian Center for Battery Technology (BayBatt), Department of Chemistry, University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstrasse 30, 95447 Bayreuth, GermanyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5879-8009
    • Murugesan Velayutham - In Vivo Multifunctional Magnetic Resonance Center, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United StatesDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-9751-538X
    • Zane M. Grady - Energy and Environmental Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7610-8905
    • Xuemei Li - Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0008-8978-7757
    • Wenyuan Li - Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8853-225X
    • Valery V. Khramtsov - In Vivo Multifunctional Magnetic Resonance Center, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United StatesDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6187-5546
    • David M. Reed - Energy and Environmental Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7012-9841
  • Author Contributions

    N.A.T. and W.L. contributed equally to this work. N.A.T.: Designed the experiments and methodology, synthesized materials, conducted material characterizations and electrochemical measurements, analyzed the data, prepared the figures, wrote the original draft of manuscript, revised the finalized manuscript. W.L.: Conceived the idea, designed the experiments and methodology, prepared the experimental setups, carried out the sample synthesis, material characterization, and electrochemical measurements, analyzed the data, prepared the figures, wrote the original draft of manuscript, revised and polished the manuscript, contributed to the funding acquisition, led and supervised the whole research activity planning and execution, managed and coordinated the project. X.C.: Carried out material characterizations and electrochemical measurements, reviewed, edited, and commented on the manuscript. Q.L.: Contributed to the synchrotron XAS sample preparation and analyzed the XAS data, reviewed and commented on the manuscript. Q.W.: Carried out the synchrotron XAS characterization, contributed to the XAS data analysis and visualization, reviewed and commented on the manuscript. M.V.: Carried out the EPR measurement, analyzed the EPR data, contributed to writing of the EPR discussion section and data presentation, reviewed and commented on the manuscript. Z.M.G.: Carried out the EIS measurement at different temperatures and contact angle testing, analyzed the EIS data, contributed to preparation of EIS figures and writing of the EIS discussion section, reviewed and commented on the manuscript. X.L.: Carried out the electrical conductivity measurement and analyzed the data, reviewed the manuscript. W.L.: Prepared the conductivity testing setup, carried out the electrical conductivity measurement and analyzed the data, reviewed the manuscript. V.V.K.: Provided the EPR resources, reviewed the manuscript. D.M.R.: Provided the electrochemical measurement resources, contributed to the funding acquisition, reviewed and commented on the manuscript. X.L.: Supervised the whole research activity planning and execution, managed and coordinated the project, provided the electrochemical measurement resources, contributed to the funding acquisition, reviewed and commented on the manuscript. X.L.: Led and supervised the whole research activity planning and execution, acquired the funding, administered the project, reviewed and commented on the manuscript.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The work was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Electricity (OE), under contract DE-AC06-76LO1830 through Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (No. 539057). We thank the Manager of OE Energy Storage Program, Dr. Imre Gyuk, for the support and technical guidance. Parts of this research were carried out at PETRA III (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, DESY, Hamburg, Germany) and assistance from Dr. Edmund Welter is gratefully acknowledged. Beamtime was allocated for proposal I-20221092. We acknowledge the use of the WVU Shared Research Facilities. We thank Dr. Xuefei Gao who was at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for technical discussion of Tween 80 properties. We also thank Guy Cordonier and Dr. Konstantinos A. Sierros at West Virginia University for their assistance with contact angle measurements.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 70 other publications.

  1. 1
    Chen, X.; Li, W.; Reed, D.; Li, X.; Liu, X. On Energy Storage Chemistry of Aqueous Zn-Ion Batteries: From Cathode to Anode. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2023, 6, 33,  DOI: 10.1007/s41918-023-00194-6
  2. 2
    Chen, X.; Li, W.; Zeng, Z.; Reed, D.; Li, X.; Liu, X. Engineering Stable Zn-MnO2 Batteries by Synergistic Stabilization between the Carbon Nanofiber Core and Birnessite-MnO2 Nanosheets Shell. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 405, 126969  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126969
  3. 3
    Thieu, N. A.; Li, W.; Chen, X.; Hu, S.; Tian, H.; Tran, H. N. N.; Li, W.; Reed, D. M.; Li, X.; Liu, X. An Overview of Challenges and Strategies for Stabilizing Zinc Anodes in Aqueous Rechargeable Zn-Ion Batteries. Batteries 2023, 9, 41,  DOI: 10.3390/batteries9010041
  4. 4
    Li, W.; Tian, H.; Ma, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Gao, X. Low-Temperature Water Electrolysis: Fundamentals, Progress, and New Strategies. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 55985644,  DOI: 10.1039/D2MA00185C
  5. 5
    Dong, N.; Zhang, F.; Pan, H. Towards the Practical Application of Zn Metal Anodes for Mild Aqueous Rechargeable Zn Batteries. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 82438252,  DOI: 10.1039/D2SC01818G
  6. 6
    Dai, L.; Wang, T.; Jin, B.; Liu, N.; Niu, Y.; Meng, W.; Gao, Z.; Wu, X.; Wang, L.; He, Z. γ-Al2O3 Coating Layer Confining Zinc Dendrite Growth for High Stability Aqueous Rechargeable Zinc-Ion Batteries. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 427, 127813  DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127813
  7. 7
    Xie, S.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Zhou, Y.; Dang, Z.; Rong, J.; Dong, L. Stable Zinc Anodes Enabled by Zincophilic Cu Nanowire Networks. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022, 14, 39,  DOI: 10.1007/s40820-021-00783-4
  8. 8
    Jin, Y.; Han, K. S.; Shao, Y.; Sushko, M. L.; Xiao, J.; Pan, H.; Liu, J. Stabilizing Zinc Anode Reactions by Polyethylene Oxide Polymer in Mild Aqueous Electrolytes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2003932  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202003932
  9. 9
    Zhou, M.; Chen, H.; Chen, Z.; Hu, Z.; Wang, N.; Jin, Y.; Yu, X.; Meng, H. Nonionic Surfactant Coconut Diethanol Amide Inhibits the Growth of Zinc Dendrites for More Stable Zinc-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 75907599,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.2c01048
  10. 10
    Qian, Y.; Meng, C.; He, J.; Dong, X. A Lightweight 3D Zn@Cu Nanosheets@activated Carbon Cloth as Long-Life Anode with Large Capacity for Flexible Zinc Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2020, 480, 228871  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228871
  11. 11
    Xie, S.; Li, Y.; Dong, L. Stable Anode-Free Zinc-Ion Batteries Enabled by Alloy Network-Modulated Zinc Deposition Interface. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 76, 3240,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.08.040
  12. 12
    Wang, Z.; Dong, L.; Huang, W.; Jia, H.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, Y.; Fei, B.; Pan, F. Simultaneously Regulating Uniform Zn2+ Flux and Electron Conduction by MOF/rGO Interlayers for High-Performance Zn Anodes. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021, 13, 73,  DOI: 10.1007/s40820-021-00594-7
  13. 13
    Li, Y.; Peng, X.; Li, X.; Duan, H.; Xie, S.; Dong, L.; Kang, F. Functional Ultrathin Separators Proactively Stabilizing Zinc Anodes for Zinc-Based Energy Storage. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2300019  DOI: 10.1002/adma.202300019
  14. 14
    Kang, L.; Cui, M.; Jiang, F.; Gao, Y.; Luo, H.; Liu, J.; Liang, W.; Zhi, C. Nanoporous CaCO3 Coatings Enabled Uniform Zn Stripping/Plating for Long-Life Zinc Rechargeable Aqueous Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1801090  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201801090
  15. 15
    Chen, X.; Li, W.; Hu, S.; Akhmedov, N. G.; Reed, D.; Li, X.; Liu, X. Polyvinyl Alcohol Coating Induced Preferred Crystallographic Orientation in Aqueous Zinc Battery Anodes. Nano Energy 2022, 98, 107269  DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107269
  16. 16
    Cui, M.; Xiao, Y.; Kang, L.; Du, W.; Gao, Y.; Sun, X.; Zhou, Y.; Li, X.; Li, H.; Jiang, F.; Zhi, C. Quasi-Isolated Au Particles as Heterogeneous Seeds To Guide Uniform Zn Deposition for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 64906496,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.9b01063
  17. 17
    Zhang, N.; Huang, S.; Yuan, Z.; Zhu, J.; Zhao, Z.; Niu, Z. Direct Self-Assembly of MXene on Zn Anodes for Dendrite-Free Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 28612865,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202012322
  18. 18
    Wang, A.; Zhou, W.; Huang, A.; Chen, M.; Chen, J.; Tian, Q.; Xu, J. Modifying the Zn Anode with Carbon Black Coating and Nanofibrillated Cellulose Binder: A Strategy to Realize Dendrite-Free Zn-MnO2 Batteries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 577, 256264,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.05.102
  19. 19
    Xu, J.; Lv, W.; Yang, W.; Jin, Y.; Jin, Q.; Sun, B.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, T.; Zheng, L.; Shi, X.; Sun, B.; Wang, G. In Situ Construction of Protective Films on Zn Metal Anodes via Natural Protein Additives Enabling High-Performance Zinc Ion Batteries. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 1139211404,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c05285
  20. 20
    Zhao, X.; Dong, N.; Yan, M.; Pan, H. Unraveling the Interphasial Chemistry for Highly Reversible Aqueous Zn Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 40534060,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c19022
  21. 21
    Kim, H.-S.; Cook, J.-B.; Lin, H.; Ko, J.-S.; Tolbert, S.-H.; Ozolins, V.; Dunn, B. Oxygen Vacancies Enhance Pseudocapacitive Charge Storage Properties of MoO3-x. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 454462,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat4810
  22. 22
    Jung, Y.-S.; Lee, S.; Ahn, D.; Dillon, A.-C.; Lee, S.-H. Electrochemical Reactivity of Ball-Milled MoO3-y as Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2009, 188, 286291,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.125
  23. 23
    Wang, B.; Yan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, M.; Yang, Y.; Li, C. C. In Situ Carbon Insertion in Laminated Molybdenum Dioxide by Interlayer Engineering Toward Ultrastable “Rocking-Chair” Zinc-Ion Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2102827  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202102827
  24. 24
    Zhu, Y.; Ji, X.; Cheng, S.; Chern, Z.-Y.; Jia, J.; Yang, L.; Luo, H.; Yu, J.; Peng, X.; Wang, J.; Zhou, W.; Liu, M. Fast Energy Storage in Two-Dimensional MoO2 Enabled by Uniform Oriented Tunnels. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 90919099,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b03324
  25. 25
    Wang, H.; Li, T.; Hashem, A. M.; Abdel-Ghany, A. E.; El-Tawil, R. S.; Abuzeid, H. M.; Coughlin, A.; Chang, K.; Zhang, S.; El-Mounayri, H.; Tovar, A.; Zhu, L.; Julien, C. M. Nanostructured Molybdenum-Oxide Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries: An Outstanding Increase in Capacity. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 13,  DOI: 10.3390/nano12010013
  26. 26
    Zhou, Y.; Geng, C. A MoO2 Sheet as a Promising Electrode Material: Ultrafast Li-Diffusion and Astonishing Li-Storage Capacity. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 105402  DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/aa56d0
  27. 27
    Hazazi, O. A. Water Soluble Non-Toxic Organic Zinc Corrosion Inhibitors in Acidic Solution. Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett. 2015, 4, 965978
  28. 28
    Bawazeer, T. M.; Defrawy, A. M. E.; El-Shafei, A. A. Corrosion Inhibition of Zinc in Sodium Sulphate Solution Using Nonionic Surfactants of Tween Series: Experimental and Theoretical Study. Colloids Surf. A 2017, 520, 694700,  DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.02.025
  29. 29
    Wang, D.-Y.; Nie, B.-L.; Li, H.-J.; Zhang, W.-W.; Wu, Y.-C. Anticorrosion Performance of Grape Seed Proanthocyanidins Extract and Tween-80 for Mild Steel in Hydrochloric Acid Medium. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 331, 115799  DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.115799
  30. 30
    Li, Z.; Ganapathy, S.; Xu, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Sarilar, M.; Wagemaker, M. Mechanistic Insight into the Electrochemical Performance of Zn/VO2 Batteries with an Aqueous ZnSO4 Electrolyte. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1900237  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201900237
  31. 31
    Liu, X.; Yang, J.; Hou, W.; Wang, J.; Nuli, Y. Highly Reversible Lithium-ions Storage of Molybdenum Dioxide Nanoplates for High Power. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 26212624,  DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201500574
  32. 32
    Kumar Sen, U.; Shaligram, A.; Mitra, S. Intercalation Anode Material for Lithium Ion Battery Based on Molybdenum Dioxide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 1431114319,  DOI: 10.1021/am503605u
  33. 33
    Han, X.; Gerke, C. S.; Banerjee, S.; Zubair, M.; Jiang, J.; Bedford, N. M.; Miller, E. M.; Thoi, V. S. Strategic Design of MoO2 Nanoparticles Supported by Carbon Nanowires for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Nitrogen Reduction. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 32373243,  DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01857
  34. 34
    Luo, Z.; Miao, R.; Huan, T. D.; Mosa, I. M.; Poyraz, A. S.; Zhong, W.; Cloud, J. E.; Kriz, D. A.; Thanneeru, S.; He, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ramprasad, R.; Suib, S. L. Mesoporous MoO3–x Material as an Efficient Electrocatalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Reactions. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600528  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201600528
  35. 35
    Li, J.; Ye, Y.; Ye, L.; Su, F.; Ma, Z.; Huang, J.; Xie, H.; Doronkin, D. E.; Zimina, A.; Grunwaldt, J. D.; Zhou, Y. Sunlight Induced Photo-Thermal Synergistic Catalytic CO2 Conversion: Via Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance of MoO3–x. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 28212830,  DOI: 10.1039/C8TA10922B
  36. 36
    Kuwahara, Y.; Mihogi, T.; Hamahara, K.; Kusu, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Yamashita, H. A Quasi-Stable Molybdenum Sub-Oxide with Abundant Oxygen Vacancies That Promotes CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 99029915,  DOI: 10.1039/D1SC02550C
  37. 37
    Kuwahara, Y.; Mihogi, T.; Hamahara, K.; Kusu, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Yamashita, H. A Quasi-Stable Molybdenum Sub-Oxide with Abundant Oxygen Vacancies That Promotes CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 99029915,  DOI: 10.1039/D1SC02550C
  38. 38
    Thakur, P.; Cezar, J. C.; Brookes, N. B.; Choudhary, R. J.; Prakash, R.; Phase, D. M.; Chae, K. H.; Kumar, R. Direct Observation of Oxygen Induced Room Temperature Ferromagnetism in MoO2 Thin Films by X-Ray Magnetic Circular Dichroism Characterizations. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 062501  DOI: 10.1063/1.3080679
  39. 39
    Xie, K.; Ren, K.; Sun, C.; Yang, S.; Tong, M.; Yang, S.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Q. Toward Stable Zinc-Ion Batteries: Use of a Chelate Electrolyte Additive for Uniform Zinc Deposition. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 41704178,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.1c03558
  40. 40
    Li, T. C.; Lim, Y.; Li, X. L.; Luo, S.; Lin, C.; Fang, D.; Xia, S.; Wang, Y.; Yang, H. Y. A Universal Additive Strategy to Reshape Electrolyte Solvation Structure toward Reversible Zn Storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2103231  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202103231
  41. 41
    Ben-Dor, L.; Shimony, Y. Crystal structure, magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of pure and NiO-doped MoO2 and WO2. Mater. Res. Bull. 1974, 9, 837844,  DOI: 10.1016/0025-5408(74)90120-2
  42. 42
    Kaiser, F.; Simon, P.; Burkhardt, U.; Kieback, B.; Grin, Y.; Veremchuk, I. Spark Plasma Sintering of Tungsten Oxides WOx (2.50 ≤ x ≤ 3): Phase Analysis and Thermoelectric Properties. Crystals 2017, 7, 271,  DOI: 10.3390/cryst7090271
  43. 43
    Horkans, J.; Shafer, M. W. An Investigation of the Electrochemistry of a Series of Metal Dioxides with Rutile-Type Structure MoO2, WO2, ReO2, RuO2, OsO2, and IrO2. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1977, 124, 1202,  DOI: 10.1149/1.2133528
  44. 44
    Ma, J.; Fu, J.; Niu, M.; Quhe, R. MoO2 and Graphene Heterostructure as Promising Flexible Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Carbon 2019, 147, 357363,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.03.006
  45. 45
    De Melo, O.; González, Y.; Climent-Font, A.; Galán, P.; Ruediger, A.; Sánchez, M.; Calvo-Mola, C.; Santana, G.; Torres-Costa, V. Optical and Electrical Properties of MoO2 and MoO3 Thin Films Prepared from the Chemically Driven Isothermal Close Space Vapor Transport Technique. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2019, 31, 295703  DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/ab18e2
  46. 46
    Enneti, R. K.; Wolfe, T. A. Agglomeration during Reduction of MoO3. Int. J. Refract. Metals Hard. Mater. 2012, 31, 4750,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2011.09.004
  47. 47
    Zhang, S.; Wang, G.; Jin, J.; Zhang, L.; Wen, Z.; Yang, J. Self-Catalyzed Decomposition of Discharge Products on the Oxygen Vacancy Sites of MoO3 Nanosheets for Low-Overpotential Li-O2 Batteries. Nano Energy 2017, 36, 186196,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.038
  48. 48
    Du, W.; Yan, J.; Cao, C.; Li, C. C. Electrocrystallization Orientation Regulation of Zinc Metal Anodes: Strategies and Challenges. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 52, 329354,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.07.046
  49. 49
    Wu, Z.; Li, M.; Tian, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhang, S.-J.; Sun, C.; Li, C.; Kiefel, M.; Lai, C.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, S. Cyclohexanedodecol-Assisted Interfacial Engineering for Robust and High-Performance Zinc Metal Anode. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022, 14, 110,  DOI: 10.1007/s40820-022-00846-0
  50. 50
    He, X.; Bresser, D.; Passerini, S.; Baakes, F.; Krewer, U.; Lopez, J.; Mallia, C. T.; Shao-Horn, Y.; Cekic-Laskovic, I.; Wiemers-Meyer, S.; Soto, F. A.; Ponce, V.; Seminario, J. M.; Balbuena, P. B.; Jia, H.; Xu, W.; Xu, Y.; Wang, C.; Horstmann, B.; Amine, R.; Su, C.-C.; Shi, J.; Amine, K.; Winter, M.; Latz, A.; Kostecki, R. The Passivity of Lithium Electrodes in Liquid Electrolytes for Secondary Batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6, 10361052,  DOI: 10.1038/s41578-021-00345-5
  51. 51
    Wang, X.; Meng, J.; Lin, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, S.; Wang, Y.; Pan, A. Stable Zinc Metal Anodes with Textured Crystal Faces and Functional Zinc Compound Coatings. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2106114  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202106114
  52. 52
    Rana, A.; Thakare, A.; Kumar, N.; Mukherjee, B.; Torris, A.; Das, B.; Ogale, S.; Banerjee, A. Mitigating Dendrite Formation on a Zn Electrode in Aqueous Zinc Chloride by the Competitive Surface Chemistry of an Imidazole Additive. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 2309323103,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c01310
  53. 53
    Mitha, A.; Yazdi, A. Z.; Ahmed, M.; Chen, P. Surface Adsorption of Polyethylene Glycol to Suppress Dendrite Formation on Zinc Anodes in Rechargeable Aqueous Batteries. ChemElectroChem. 2018, 5, 24092418,  DOI: 10.1002/celc.201800572
  54. 54
    Jian, Q.; Wan, Y.; Lin, Y.; Ni, M.; Wu, M.; Zhao, T. A Highly Reversible Zinc Anode for Rechargeable Aqueous Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 5265952669,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c15628
  55. 55
    Shi, W.; Song, Z.; Wang, J.; Li, Q.; An, Q. Phytic Acid Conversion Film Interfacial Engineering for Stabilizing Zinc Metal Anode. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 137295  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.137295
  56. 56
    Zhu, J.; Deng, W.; Yang, N.; Xu, X.; Huang, C.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yuan, X.; Hu, J.; Li, C.; Li, R. Biomolecular Regulation of Zinc Deposition to Achieve Ultra-Long Life and High-Rate Zn Metal Anodes. Small 2022, 18, 2202509  DOI: 10.1002/smll.202202509
  57. 57
    Su, T.-T.; Wang, K.; Shao, C.-Y.; Le, J.-B.; Ren, W.-F.; Sun, R.-C. Surface Control Behavior toward Crystal Regulation and Anticorrosion Capacity for Zinc Metal Anodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 2004020052,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c22477
  58. 58
    Zhu, Y.; Free, M. L.; Woollam, R.; Durnie, W. A Review of Surfactants as Corrosion Inhibitors and Associated Modeling. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2017, 90, 159223,  DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.006
  59. 59
    Dong, N.; Zhao, X.; Yan, M.; Li, H.; Pan, H. Synergetic Control of Hydrogen Evolution and Ion-Transport Kinetics Enabling Zn Anodes with High-Areal-Capacity. Nano Energy 2022, 104, 107903  DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107903
  60. 60
    Zhou, W.; Chen, M.; Tian, Q.; Chen, J.; Xu, Z.; Wong, C.-P. Cotton-Derived Cellulose Film as a Dendrite-Inhibiting Separator to Stabilize the Zinc Metal Anode of Aqueous Zinc Ion Batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 44, 5765,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.10.002
  61. 61
    Zhang, Y.; Chen, P.; Li, M.; Li, S.; Yue, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xie, S.; Zhou, W. Highly Reversible, Dendrite-Free and Low-Polarization Zn Metal Anodes Enabled by a Thin SnO2 Layer for Aqueous Zn-Ion Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 1433314344,  DOI: 10.1039/D3TA01415K
  62. 62
    Wang, T.; Xi, Q.; Li, Y.; Fu, H.; Hua, Y.; Shankar, E. G.; Kakarla, A. K.; Yu, J. S. Regulating Dendrite-Free Zinc Deposition by Red Phosphorous-Derived Artificial Protective Layer for Zinc Metal Batteries. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2200155  DOI: 10.1002/advs.202200155
  63. 63
    Wang, M.; Wu, X.; Yang, D.; Zhao, H.; He, L.; Su, J.; Zhang, X.; Yin, X.; Zhao, K.; Wang, Y.; Wei, Y. A Colloidal Aqueous Electrolyte Modulated by Oleic Acid for Durable Zinc Metal Anode. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 451, 138589  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.138589
  64. 64
    Cao, Z.; Zhuang, P.; Zhang, X.; Ye, M.; Shen, J.; Ajayan, P. M. Strategies for Dendrite-Free Anode in Aqueous Rechargeable Zinc Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2001599  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202001599
  65. 65
    Li, X. H.; Deng, S. D.; Fu, H.; Mu, G. N. Inhibition Action of Tween-80 on the Corrosion of Cold Rolled Steel in Sulfuric Acid. Mater. Corros. 2009, 60, 969976,  DOI: 10.1002/maco.200905217
  66. 66
    Shin, S.; Yoon, J.; Kim, E.; Yoon, W.-S.; Shin, H. High Capacity and Reversibility of Oxygen-Vacancy-Controlled MoO3 on Cu in Li-Ion Batteries: Unveiling Storage Mechanism in Binder-Free MoO3–x Anodes. Energy Technol. 2020, 8, 1901502  DOI: 10.1002/ente.201901502
  67. 67
    Wang, S.; Lu, S.; Yang, X.; Liu, X. Pseudocapacitive MoOx Anode Material with Super-High Rate and Ultra-Long Cycle Properties for Aqueous Zinc Ion Batteries. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2021, 882, 115033  DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115033
  68. 68
    Ding, J.; Du, Z.; Gu, L.; Li, B.; Wang, L.; Wang, S.; Gong, Y.; Yang, S. Ultrafast Zn2+ Intercalation and Deintercalation in Vanadium Dioxide. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800762  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201800762
  69. 69
    Deka Boruah, B.; Mathieson, A.; Park, S. K.; Zhang, X.; Wen, B.; Tan, L.; Boies, A.; De Volder, M. Vanadium Dioxide Cathodes for High-Rate Photo-Rechargeable Zinc-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2100115  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202100115
  70. 70
    Li, G.; Wang, X.; Lv, S.; Wang, J.; Dong, X.; Liu, D. Long-Life and Low-Polarization Zn Metal Anodes Enabled by a Covalent Triazine Framework Coating. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 450, 138116  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.138116

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 5 publications.

  1. Hyun-Woo Kim, Eunyoung Cho, Myung-Jun Kwak, Jeongin Lee, Hosik Lee, Chihyun Hwang, Hyun-Kon Song. Porphyrinic N 4 channels of zinc ions for the electrochemical reversibility of zinc plating/stripping. Materials Horizons 2025, 3 https://doi.org/10.1039/D4MH01088D
  2. Xueqing Hu, Bastola Narayan, Nibagani Naresh, Iman Pinnock, Yijia Zhu, Xiaopeng Liu, Tianlei Wang, Bing Li, Ivan P. Parkin, Buddha Deka Boruah. Ferroelectric Interfaces for Dendrite Prevention in Zinc‐Ion Batteries. Small 2024, 20 (49) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202403555
  3. Mengjuan Chen, Yimeng Cui, Wenfeng Liu, Zhenpu Shi, Hongyu Dong, Hongyun Yue, Zhaoxia Cao, Zhansheng Lu, Shuting Yang, Yanhong Yin. Ti 4 O 7 coating creates a highly stable Zn anode for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers 2024, 11 (15) , 4748-4756. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4QI00808A
  4. Liansheng Li, Chun Chen, Pengyu Meng, Yijie Zhang, Qinghua Liang. A Water‐Insoluble Yttrium‐Based Complex as Dual‐Ionic Electrolyte Additive for Stable Aqueous Zinc Metal Batteries. Advanced Functional Materials 2024, 17 https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202406965
  5. Songhe Zheng, Jianping Chen, Ting Wu, Ruimin Li, Xiaoli Zhao, Yajun Pang, Zhenghui Pan. Rational Design of Ni-Doped V2O5@3D Ni Core/Shell Composites for High-Voltage and High-Rate Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. Materials 2024, 17 (1) , 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17010215

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Cite this: ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 48, 55570–55586
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c08474
Published November 21, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

2051

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (a) SEM image of synthesized MoO2. (b) Corresponding XRD patterns of MoO3 and MoO2. XPS spectra of MoO3 and MoO2 in (c) Mo 3d and (d) O 1s spectrum. (e) Mo K-edge XANES spectra of the synthesized MoO3 and MoO2 with the reference spectra of MoO3, MoO2, and Mo. (f) EPR spectra of MoO3 and MoO2 and background signals from the Dewar.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn. SEM images of MoO2@Zn at the (b) cross-section and (c) surface with (d) corresponding EDS mapping. (e) Cycling performance of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn symmetric cells using ZnSO4 and ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolytes at 1 mA cm–2–1 mAh cm–2. (f) Rate performance of symmetric cells using ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte. (g) Cycling performance of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn symmetric cells using ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte at a high current density–capacity of 5 mA cm–2–5 mAh cm–2. (h) Voltage profiles of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn symmetric cells with ZnSO4 electrolyte containing Tw80 additive for testing under alternate 10 continuous stripping/plating cycles and 10 h resting.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. XRD patterns of cycled (a) bare Zn and (b) MoO2@Zn electrodes at plating (P) and stripping (S) states. SEM images and EDS analysis after cycling for 500 cycles at the plating state of (c) bare Zn and (d) MoO2@Zn. SEM images and EDS analysis after cycling for 500 cycles at stripping state of (e) bare Zn and (f) MoO2@Zn. The cells were cycled in a ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) Tafel plots of MoO2@Zn electrodes in blank ZnSO4 and ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolytes. (b) CA curves of MoO2@Zn electrodes in blank ZnSO4 and ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolytes. (c) Calculated activation energy of Zn2+ desolvation of different MoO2 coating layers via the Arrhenius equation. Voltage-capacity profiles of (d) Zn||Cu, (e) MoO2@Zn||Cu, and (f) MoO2@Zn||MoO2@Cu half cells. Coulombic efficiency of (g) Zn||Cu, MoO2@Zn||Cu in blank ZnSO4 electrolyte and (h) Zn||Cu, MoO2@Zn||Cu, and MoO2@Zn||MoO2@Cu half cells in ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. In situ optical microscope observation of Zn plating/stripping process for bare Zn using (a) blank ZnSO4 electrolyte and (b) ZnSO4 containing Tw80 electrolyte at 2 mA cm–2 for 30 min. In situ optical microscope observation of Zn plating/stripping process for MoO2@Zn electrodes using (c) blank ZnSO4 electrolyte and (d) ZnSO4 containing Tw80 electrolyte at 2 mA cm–2 for 30 min.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Schematic diagrams of Zn2+ ions deposition behaviors in aqueous electrolytes (a) bare Zn in blank ZnSO4 electrolyte, (b) bare Zn in blank ZnSO4 containing Tw80 electrolyte, and (c) MoO2-coated Zn in ZnSO4 electrolyte containing Tw80 electrolyte. (d) XANES spectra of MoO2@Zn electrodes after plating and stripping in ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolyte.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Zn∥VO2 and MoO2@Zn∥VO2 full cells performance with (a) CV curves at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s–1. (b) Long-term cycling performance at 1 A g–1. GCD curves of different cycles of Zn∥VO2 and MoO2@Zn∥VO2 full cells using (c) ZnSO4 and (d) ZnSO4+1Tw80 electrolytes at a current density of 1 A g–1. (e) Rate performance from 0.5–10 A g–1. (f) Cycling stability at a high current density of 5 A g–1.

  • References


    This article references 70 other publications.

    1. 1
      Chen, X.; Li, W.; Reed, D.; Li, X.; Liu, X. On Energy Storage Chemistry of Aqueous Zn-Ion Batteries: From Cathode to Anode. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2023, 6, 33,  DOI: 10.1007/s41918-023-00194-6
    2. 2
      Chen, X.; Li, W.; Zeng, Z.; Reed, D.; Li, X.; Liu, X. Engineering Stable Zn-MnO2 Batteries by Synergistic Stabilization between the Carbon Nanofiber Core and Birnessite-MnO2 Nanosheets Shell. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 405, 126969  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126969
    3. 3
      Thieu, N. A.; Li, W.; Chen, X.; Hu, S.; Tian, H.; Tran, H. N. N.; Li, W.; Reed, D. M.; Li, X.; Liu, X. An Overview of Challenges and Strategies for Stabilizing Zinc Anodes in Aqueous Rechargeable Zn-Ion Batteries. Batteries 2023, 9, 41,  DOI: 10.3390/batteries9010041
    4. 4
      Li, W.; Tian, H.; Ma, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Gao, X. Low-Temperature Water Electrolysis: Fundamentals, Progress, and New Strategies. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 55985644,  DOI: 10.1039/D2MA00185C
    5. 5
      Dong, N.; Zhang, F.; Pan, H. Towards the Practical Application of Zn Metal Anodes for Mild Aqueous Rechargeable Zn Batteries. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 82438252,  DOI: 10.1039/D2SC01818G
    6. 6
      Dai, L.; Wang, T.; Jin, B.; Liu, N.; Niu, Y.; Meng, W.; Gao, Z.; Wu, X.; Wang, L.; He, Z. γ-Al2O3 Coating Layer Confining Zinc Dendrite Growth for High Stability Aqueous Rechargeable Zinc-Ion Batteries. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 427, 127813  DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127813
    7. 7
      Xie, S.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Zhou, Y.; Dang, Z.; Rong, J.; Dong, L. Stable Zinc Anodes Enabled by Zincophilic Cu Nanowire Networks. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022, 14, 39,  DOI: 10.1007/s40820-021-00783-4
    8. 8
      Jin, Y.; Han, K. S.; Shao, Y.; Sushko, M. L.; Xiao, J.; Pan, H.; Liu, J. Stabilizing Zinc Anode Reactions by Polyethylene Oxide Polymer in Mild Aqueous Electrolytes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2003932  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202003932
    9. 9
      Zhou, M.; Chen, H.; Chen, Z.; Hu, Z.; Wang, N.; Jin, Y.; Yu, X.; Meng, H. Nonionic Surfactant Coconut Diethanol Amide Inhibits the Growth of Zinc Dendrites for More Stable Zinc-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 75907599,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.2c01048
    10. 10
      Qian, Y.; Meng, C.; He, J.; Dong, X. A Lightweight 3D Zn@Cu Nanosheets@activated Carbon Cloth as Long-Life Anode with Large Capacity for Flexible Zinc Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2020, 480, 228871  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228871
    11. 11
      Xie, S.; Li, Y.; Dong, L. Stable Anode-Free Zinc-Ion Batteries Enabled by Alloy Network-Modulated Zinc Deposition Interface. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 76, 3240,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.08.040
    12. 12
      Wang, Z.; Dong, L.; Huang, W.; Jia, H.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, Y.; Fei, B.; Pan, F. Simultaneously Regulating Uniform Zn2+ Flux and Electron Conduction by MOF/rGO Interlayers for High-Performance Zn Anodes. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021, 13, 73,  DOI: 10.1007/s40820-021-00594-7
    13. 13
      Li, Y.; Peng, X.; Li, X.; Duan, H.; Xie, S.; Dong, L.; Kang, F. Functional Ultrathin Separators Proactively Stabilizing Zinc Anodes for Zinc-Based Energy Storage. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2300019  DOI: 10.1002/adma.202300019
    14. 14
      Kang, L.; Cui, M.; Jiang, F.; Gao, Y.; Luo, H.; Liu, J.; Liang, W.; Zhi, C. Nanoporous CaCO3 Coatings Enabled Uniform Zn Stripping/Plating for Long-Life Zinc Rechargeable Aqueous Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1801090  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201801090
    15. 15
      Chen, X.; Li, W.; Hu, S.; Akhmedov, N. G.; Reed, D.; Li, X.; Liu, X. Polyvinyl Alcohol Coating Induced Preferred Crystallographic Orientation in Aqueous Zinc Battery Anodes. Nano Energy 2022, 98, 107269  DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107269
    16. 16
      Cui, M.; Xiao, Y.; Kang, L.; Du, W.; Gao, Y.; Sun, X.; Zhou, Y.; Li, X.; Li, H.; Jiang, F.; Zhi, C. Quasi-Isolated Au Particles as Heterogeneous Seeds To Guide Uniform Zn Deposition for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 64906496,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.9b01063
    17. 17
      Zhang, N.; Huang, S.; Yuan, Z.; Zhu, J.; Zhao, Z.; Niu, Z. Direct Self-Assembly of MXene on Zn Anodes for Dendrite-Free Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 28612865,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202012322
    18. 18
      Wang, A.; Zhou, W.; Huang, A.; Chen, M.; Chen, J.; Tian, Q.; Xu, J. Modifying the Zn Anode with Carbon Black Coating and Nanofibrillated Cellulose Binder: A Strategy to Realize Dendrite-Free Zn-MnO2 Batteries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 577, 256264,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.05.102
    19. 19
      Xu, J.; Lv, W.; Yang, W.; Jin, Y.; Jin, Q.; Sun, B.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, T.; Zheng, L.; Shi, X.; Sun, B.; Wang, G. In Situ Construction of Protective Films on Zn Metal Anodes via Natural Protein Additives Enabling High-Performance Zinc Ion Batteries. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 1139211404,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c05285
    20. 20
      Zhao, X.; Dong, N.; Yan, M.; Pan, H. Unraveling the Interphasial Chemistry for Highly Reversible Aqueous Zn Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 40534060,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c19022
    21. 21
      Kim, H.-S.; Cook, J.-B.; Lin, H.; Ko, J.-S.; Tolbert, S.-H.; Ozolins, V.; Dunn, B. Oxygen Vacancies Enhance Pseudocapacitive Charge Storage Properties of MoO3-x. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 454462,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat4810
    22. 22
      Jung, Y.-S.; Lee, S.; Ahn, D.; Dillon, A.-C.; Lee, S.-H. Electrochemical Reactivity of Ball-Milled MoO3-y as Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2009, 188, 286291,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.125
    23. 23
      Wang, B.; Yan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, M.; Yang, Y.; Li, C. C. In Situ Carbon Insertion in Laminated Molybdenum Dioxide by Interlayer Engineering Toward Ultrastable “Rocking-Chair” Zinc-Ion Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2102827  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202102827
    24. 24
      Zhu, Y.; Ji, X.; Cheng, S.; Chern, Z.-Y.; Jia, J.; Yang, L.; Luo, H.; Yu, J.; Peng, X.; Wang, J.; Zhou, W.; Liu, M. Fast Energy Storage in Two-Dimensional MoO2 Enabled by Uniform Oriented Tunnels. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 90919099,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b03324
    25. 25
      Wang, H.; Li, T.; Hashem, A. M.; Abdel-Ghany, A. E.; El-Tawil, R. S.; Abuzeid, H. M.; Coughlin, A.; Chang, K.; Zhang, S.; El-Mounayri, H.; Tovar, A.; Zhu, L.; Julien, C. M. Nanostructured Molybdenum-Oxide Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries: An Outstanding Increase in Capacity. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 13,  DOI: 10.3390/nano12010013
    26. 26
      Zhou, Y.; Geng, C. A MoO2 Sheet as a Promising Electrode Material: Ultrafast Li-Diffusion and Astonishing Li-Storage Capacity. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 105402  DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/aa56d0
    27. 27
      Hazazi, O. A. Water Soluble Non-Toxic Organic Zinc Corrosion Inhibitors in Acidic Solution. Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett. 2015, 4, 965978
    28. 28
      Bawazeer, T. M.; Defrawy, A. M. E.; El-Shafei, A. A. Corrosion Inhibition of Zinc in Sodium Sulphate Solution Using Nonionic Surfactants of Tween Series: Experimental and Theoretical Study. Colloids Surf. A 2017, 520, 694700,  DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.02.025
    29. 29
      Wang, D.-Y.; Nie, B.-L.; Li, H.-J.; Zhang, W.-W.; Wu, Y.-C. Anticorrosion Performance of Grape Seed Proanthocyanidins Extract and Tween-80 for Mild Steel in Hydrochloric Acid Medium. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 331, 115799  DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.115799
    30. 30
      Li, Z.; Ganapathy, S.; Xu, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Sarilar, M.; Wagemaker, M. Mechanistic Insight into the Electrochemical Performance of Zn/VO2 Batteries with an Aqueous ZnSO4 Electrolyte. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1900237  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201900237
    31. 31
      Liu, X.; Yang, J.; Hou, W.; Wang, J.; Nuli, Y. Highly Reversible Lithium-ions Storage of Molybdenum Dioxide Nanoplates for High Power. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 26212624,  DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201500574
    32. 32
      Kumar Sen, U.; Shaligram, A.; Mitra, S. Intercalation Anode Material for Lithium Ion Battery Based on Molybdenum Dioxide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 1431114319,  DOI: 10.1021/am503605u
    33. 33
      Han, X.; Gerke, C. S.; Banerjee, S.; Zubair, M.; Jiang, J.; Bedford, N. M.; Miller, E. M.; Thoi, V. S. Strategic Design of MoO2 Nanoparticles Supported by Carbon Nanowires for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Nitrogen Reduction. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 32373243,  DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01857
    34. 34
      Luo, Z.; Miao, R.; Huan, T. D.; Mosa, I. M.; Poyraz, A. S.; Zhong, W.; Cloud, J. E.; Kriz, D. A.; Thanneeru, S.; He, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ramprasad, R.; Suib, S. L. Mesoporous MoO3–x Material as an Efficient Electrocatalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Reactions. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600528  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201600528
    35. 35
      Li, J.; Ye, Y.; Ye, L.; Su, F.; Ma, Z.; Huang, J.; Xie, H.; Doronkin, D. E.; Zimina, A.; Grunwaldt, J. D.; Zhou, Y. Sunlight Induced Photo-Thermal Synergistic Catalytic CO2 Conversion: Via Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance of MoO3–x. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 28212830,  DOI: 10.1039/C8TA10922B
    36. 36
      Kuwahara, Y.; Mihogi, T.; Hamahara, K.; Kusu, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Yamashita, H. A Quasi-Stable Molybdenum Sub-Oxide with Abundant Oxygen Vacancies That Promotes CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 99029915,  DOI: 10.1039/D1SC02550C
    37. 37
      Kuwahara, Y.; Mihogi, T.; Hamahara, K.; Kusu, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Yamashita, H. A Quasi-Stable Molybdenum Sub-Oxide with Abundant Oxygen Vacancies That Promotes CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 99029915,  DOI: 10.1039/D1SC02550C
    38. 38
      Thakur, P.; Cezar, J. C.; Brookes, N. B.; Choudhary, R. J.; Prakash, R.; Phase, D. M.; Chae, K. H.; Kumar, R. Direct Observation of Oxygen Induced Room Temperature Ferromagnetism in MoO2 Thin Films by X-Ray Magnetic Circular Dichroism Characterizations. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 062501  DOI: 10.1063/1.3080679
    39. 39
      Xie, K.; Ren, K.; Sun, C.; Yang, S.; Tong, M.; Yang, S.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Q. Toward Stable Zinc-Ion Batteries: Use of a Chelate Electrolyte Additive for Uniform Zinc Deposition. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 41704178,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.1c03558
    40. 40
      Li, T. C.; Lim, Y.; Li, X. L.; Luo, S.; Lin, C.; Fang, D.; Xia, S.; Wang, Y.; Yang, H. Y. A Universal Additive Strategy to Reshape Electrolyte Solvation Structure toward Reversible Zn Storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2103231  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202103231
    41. 41
      Ben-Dor, L.; Shimony, Y. Crystal structure, magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of pure and NiO-doped MoO2 and WO2. Mater. Res. Bull. 1974, 9, 837844,  DOI: 10.1016/0025-5408(74)90120-2
    42. 42
      Kaiser, F.; Simon, P.; Burkhardt, U.; Kieback, B.; Grin, Y.; Veremchuk, I. Spark Plasma Sintering of Tungsten Oxides WOx (2.50 ≤ x ≤ 3): Phase Analysis and Thermoelectric Properties. Crystals 2017, 7, 271,  DOI: 10.3390/cryst7090271
    43. 43
      Horkans, J.; Shafer, M. W. An Investigation of the Electrochemistry of a Series of Metal Dioxides with Rutile-Type Structure MoO2, WO2, ReO2, RuO2, OsO2, and IrO2. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1977, 124, 1202,  DOI: 10.1149/1.2133528
    44. 44
      Ma, J.; Fu, J.; Niu, M.; Quhe, R. MoO2 and Graphene Heterostructure as Promising Flexible Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Carbon 2019, 147, 357363,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.03.006
    45. 45
      De Melo, O.; González, Y.; Climent-Font, A.; Galán, P.; Ruediger, A.; Sánchez, M.; Calvo-Mola, C.; Santana, G.; Torres-Costa, V. Optical and Electrical Properties of MoO2 and MoO3 Thin Films Prepared from the Chemically Driven Isothermal Close Space Vapor Transport Technique. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2019, 31, 295703  DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/ab18e2
    46. 46
      Enneti, R. K.; Wolfe, T. A. Agglomeration during Reduction of MoO3. Int. J. Refract. Metals Hard. Mater. 2012, 31, 4750,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2011.09.004
    47. 47
      Zhang, S.; Wang, G.; Jin, J.; Zhang, L.; Wen, Z.; Yang, J. Self-Catalyzed Decomposition of Discharge Products on the Oxygen Vacancy Sites of MoO3 Nanosheets for Low-Overpotential Li-O2 Batteries. Nano Energy 2017, 36, 186196,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.038
    48. 48
      Du, W.; Yan, J.; Cao, C.; Li, C. C. Electrocrystallization Orientation Regulation of Zinc Metal Anodes: Strategies and Challenges. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 52, 329354,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.07.046
    49. 49
      Wu, Z.; Li, M.; Tian, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhang, S.-J.; Sun, C.; Li, C.; Kiefel, M.; Lai, C.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, S. Cyclohexanedodecol-Assisted Interfacial Engineering for Robust and High-Performance Zinc Metal Anode. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022, 14, 110,  DOI: 10.1007/s40820-022-00846-0
    50. 50
      He, X.; Bresser, D.; Passerini, S.; Baakes, F.; Krewer, U.; Lopez, J.; Mallia, C. T.; Shao-Horn, Y.; Cekic-Laskovic, I.; Wiemers-Meyer, S.; Soto, F. A.; Ponce, V.; Seminario, J. M.; Balbuena, P. B.; Jia, H.; Xu, W.; Xu, Y.; Wang, C.; Horstmann, B.; Amine, R.; Su, C.-C.; Shi, J.; Amine, K.; Winter, M.; Latz, A.; Kostecki, R. The Passivity of Lithium Electrodes in Liquid Electrolytes for Secondary Batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6, 10361052,  DOI: 10.1038/s41578-021-00345-5
    51. 51
      Wang, X.; Meng, J.; Lin, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, S.; Wang, Y.; Pan, A. Stable Zinc Metal Anodes with Textured Crystal Faces and Functional Zinc Compound Coatings. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2106114  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202106114
    52. 52
      Rana, A.; Thakare, A.; Kumar, N.; Mukherjee, B.; Torris, A.; Das, B.; Ogale, S.; Banerjee, A. Mitigating Dendrite Formation on a Zn Electrode in Aqueous Zinc Chloride by the Competitive Surface Chemistry of an Imidazole Additive. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 2309323103,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c01310
    53. 53
      Mitha, A.; Yazdi, A. Z.; Ahmed, M.; Chen, P. Surface Adsorption of Polyethylene Glycol to Suppress Dendrite Formation on Zinc Anodes in Rechargeable Aqueous Batteries. ChemElectroChem. 2018, 5, 24092418,  DOI: 10.1002/celc.201800572
    54. 54
      Jian, Q.; Wan, Y.; Lin, Y.; Ni, M.; Wu, M.; Zhao, T. A Highly Reversible Zinc Anode for Rechargeable Aqueous Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 5265952669,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c15628
    55. 55
      Shi, W.; Song, Z.; Wang, J.; Li, Q.; An, Q. Phytic Acid Conversion Film Interfacial Engineering for Stabilizing Zinc Metal Anode. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 137295  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.137295
    56. 56
      Zhu, J.; Deng, W.; Yang, N.; Xu, X.; Huang, C.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yuan, X.; Hu, J.; Li, C.; Li, R. Biomolecular Regulation of Zinc Deposition to Achieve Ultra-Long Life and High-Rate Zn Metal Anodes. Small 2022, 18, 2202509  DOI: 10.1002/smll.202202509
    57. 57
      Su, T.-T.; Wang, K.; Shao, C.-Y.; Le, J.-B.; Ren, W.-F.; Sun, R.-C. Surface Control Behavior toward Crystal Regulation and Anticorrosion Capacity for Zinc Metal Anodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 2004020052,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c22477
    58. 58
      Zhu, Y.; Free, M. L.; Woollam, R.; Durnie, W. A Review of Surfactants as Corrosion Inhibitors and Associated Modeling. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2017, 90, 159223,  DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.006
    59. 59
      Dong, N.; Zhao, X.; Yan, M.; Li, H.; Pan, H. Synergetic Control of Hydrogen Evolution and Ion-Transport Kinetics Enabling Zn Anodes with High-Areal-Capacity. Nano Energy 2022, 104, 107903  DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107903
    60. 60
      Zhou, W.; Chen, M.; Tian, Q.; Chen, J.; Xu, Z.; Wong, C.-P. Cotton-Derived Cellulose Film as a Dendrite-Inhibiting Separator to Stabilize the Zinc Metal Anode of Aqueous Zinc Ion Batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 44, 5765,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.10.002
    61. 61
      Zhang, Y.; Chen, P.; Li, M.; Li, S.; Yue, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xie, S.; Zhou, W. Highly Reversible, Dendrite-Free and Low-Polarization Zn Metal Anodes Enabled by a Thin SnO2 Layer for Aqueous Zn-Ion Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 1433314344,  DOI: 10.1039/D3TA01415K
    62. 62
      Wang, T.; Xi, Q.; Li, Y.; Fu, H.; Hua, Y.; Shankar, E. G.; Kakarla, A. K.; Yu, J. S. Regulating Dendrite-Free Zinc Deposition by Red Phosphorous-Derived Artificial Protective Layer for Zinc Metal Batteries. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2200155  DOI: 10.1002/advs.202200155
    63. 63
      Wang, M.; Wu, X.; Yang, D.; Zhao, H.; He, L.; Su, J.; Zhang, X.; Yin, X.; Zhao, K.; Wang, Y.; Wei, Y. A Colloidal Aqueous Electrolyte Modulated by Oleic Acid for Durable Zinc Metal Anode. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 451, 138589  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.138589
    64. 64
      Cao, Z.; Zhuang, P.; Zhang, X.; Ye, M.; Shen, J.; Ajayan, P. M. Strategies for Dendrite-Free Anode in Aqueous Rechargeable Zinc Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2001599  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202001599
    65. 65
      Li, X. H.; Deng, S. D.; Fu, H.; Mu, G. N. Inhibition Action of Tween-80 on the Corrosion of Cold Rolled Steel in Sulfuric Acid. Mater. Corros. 2009, 60, 969976,  DOI: 10.1002/maco.200905217
    66. 66
      Shin, S.; Yoon, J.; Kim, E.; Yoon, W.-S.; Shin, H. High Capacity and Reversibility of Oxygen-Vacancy-Controlled MoO3 on Cu in Li-Ion Batteries: Unveiling Storage Mechanism in Binder-Free MoO3–x Anodes. Energy Technol. 2020, 8, 1901502  DOI: 10.1002/ente.201901502
    67. 67
      Wang, S.; Lu, S.; Yang, X.; Liu, X. Pseudocapacitive MoOx Anode Material with Super-High Rate and Ultra-Long Cycle Properties for Aqueous Zinc Ion Batteries. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2021, 882, 115033  DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115033
    68. 68
      Ding, J.; Du, Z.; Gu, L.; Li, B.; Wang, L.; Wang, S.; Gong, Y.; Yang, S. Ultrafast Zn2+ Intercalation and Deintercalation in Vanadium Dioxide. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800762  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201800762
    69. 69
      Deka Boruah, B.; Mathieson, A.; Park, S. K.; Zhang, X.; Wen, B.; Tan, L.; Boies, A.; De Volder, M. Vanadium Dioxide Cathodes for High-Rate Photo-Rechargeable Zinc-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2100115  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202100115
    70. 70
      Li, G.; Wang, X.; Lv, S.; Wang, J.; Dong, X.; Liu, D. Long-Life and Low-Polarization Zn Metal Anodes Enabled by a Covalent Triazine Framework Coating. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 450, 138116  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.138116
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.3c08474.

    • Experimental section; SEM images of synthesized MoO3 and bare Zn electrode; XPS survey spectra of MoO3 and MoO2; voltage profiles of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn symmetric cells at different cycles; cycling performance of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn symmetric cells under high current density, MoO2@Zn symmetric cells with different electrolytes, MoO3@Zn and different MoO2@Zn symmetric cells; characterization of MoO2@Zn electrodes after cycling with different electrolytes (SEM images and XRD results); characterization of different MoO2 (SEM images and XRD, EPR results); contact angles of bare Zn and MoO2@Zn with different electrolytes; optical images of MoO2@Zn soaking in different electrolytes and corresponding XRD patterns and SEM images; EIS spectra at different temperatures, calculated activation energy, Tafel plots, CA curves of different electrodes in different electrolytes; XRD results of bare Cu foils after Zn deposition in different electrolytes and corresponding peak intensity ratio; digital image of transparent cell using for optical in situ microscope observation; structure of Tween 80; characterization of the VO2 cathode (SEM image and XRD result) and corresponding electrochemical performance of Zn∥VO2 and MoO2@Zn∥VO2 full cells in different electrolytes (PDF)

    • Video S1: In situ optical microscope testing of bare Zn electrode in blank ZnSO4 electrolyte (MP4)

    • Video S2: In situ optical microscope testing of MoO2@Zn electrode in blank ZnSO4 electrolyte (MP4)

    • Video S3: In situ optical microscope testing of bare Zn electrode in ZnSO4-containing Tween 80 electrolyte (MP4)

    • Video S4: In situ optical microscope testing of MoO2@Zn electrode in ZnSO4-containing Tween 80 electrolyte (MP4)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.