ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Hydrogen-Assisted Thermal Treatment of Electrode Materials for Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitors
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Energy, Environmental, and Catalysis Applications

Hydrogen-Assisted Thermal Treatment of Electrode Materials for Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitors
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Matteo Gentile
    Matteo Gentile
    BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, Italy
    Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milano 20133, Italy
  • Sebastiano Bellani*
    Sebastiano Bellani
    BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, Italy
    *Email: [email protected]
  • Marilena I. Zappia
    Marilena I. Zappia
    BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, Italy
  • Agnese Gamberini
    Agnese Gamberini
    BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, Italy
  • Valentina Mastronardi
    Valentina Mastronardi
    BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, Italy
  • Matteo Abruzzese
    Matteo Abruzzese
    BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, Italy
  • Luca Gabatel
    Luca Gabatel
    BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, Italy
    Department of Mechanical, Energy, Management and Transport Engineering - DIME, Università di Genova, Via all’Opera Pia 15, Genova 16145, Italy
    More by Luca Gabatel
  • Lea Pasquale
    Lea Pasquale
    Materials Characterization Facility, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, Genova 16163, Italy
    More by Lea Pasquale
  • Sergio Marras
    Sergio Marras
    Materials Characterization Facility, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, Genova 16163, Italy
  • Ahmad Bagheri
    Ahmad Bagheri
    Graphene Laboratories, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, Genoa 16163, Italy
    Center for Advancing Electronics Dresden (CFAED) & Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden 01062, Germany
  • Hossein Beydaghi
    Hossein Beydaghi
    BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, Italy
  • Evie L. Papadopoulou
    Evie L. Papadopoulou
    BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, Italy
  • Guglielmo Lanzani
    Guglielmo Lanzani
    Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milano 20133, Italy
    Center for Nano Science and Technology @PoliMi, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Pascoli 70/3, Milano 20133, Italy
  • Francesco Bonaccorso*
    Francesco Bonaccorso
    BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, Italy
    Graphene Laboratories, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, Genoa 16163, Italy
    *Email: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Cite this: ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 11, 13706–13718
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c18629
Published March 8, 2024

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The capacitance of electrode materials used in electrochemical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) is currently limited by several factors, including inaccessible isolated micropores in high-surface area carbons, the finite density of states resulting in a quantum capacitance in series to Helmholtz double-layer capacitance, and the presence of surface impurities, such as functional groups and adsorbed species. To unlock the full potential of EDLC active materials and corresponding electrodes, several post-production treatments are commonly proposed to improve their capacitance and, thus, the energy density of the corresponding devices. In this work, we report a systematic study of the effect of a prototypical treatment, namely H2-assisted thermal treatment, on the chemical, structural, and thermal properties of activated carbon and corresponding electrodes. By combining multiple characterization techniques, we clarify the actual origins of the improvement of the performance (e.g., > +35% energy density for the investigated power densities in the 0.5–45 kW kg–1 range) of the EDLCs based on treated electrodes compared to the case based on the pristine electrodes. Contrary to previous works supporting a questionable graphitization of the activated carbon at temperatures <1000 °C, we found that a “surface graphitization” of the activated carbon, detected by spectroscopic analysis, is mainly associated with the desorption of surface contaminants. The elimination of surface impurities, including adsorbed species, improves the surface capacitance of the activated carbon (CsurfAC) by +37.1 and +36.3% at specific currents of 1 and 10 A g–1, respectively. Despite the presence of slight densification of the activated carbon upon the thermal treatment, the latter still improves the cell gravimetric capacitance normalized on the mass of the activated carbon only (CgAC), e.g., + 28% at 1 A g–1. Besides, our holistic approach identifies the change in the active material and binder contents as a concomitant cause of the increase of cell gravimetric capacitance (Cg), accounting for the mass of all of the electrode materials measured for treated electrodes compared to pristine ones. Overall, this study provides new insights into the relationship between the modifications of the electrode materials induced by H2-assisted thermal treatments and the performance of the resulting EDLCs.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
  • nc licence
  • nd licence
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Electrochemical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) are energy storage systems that rely on the electric double-layer formation by means of ion adsorption and swapping of co-ions for counterions at the carbon electrode/electrolyte interfaces. (1) Consequently, basic mechanistic views consider a large specific surface area of electrode materials as a primary requirement to achieve large gravimetric energy densities. (2) In addition, the meso/microporosities of the electrodes must be properly balanced to ensure the access of the electrolyte ions to the pores, avoiding the presence of inaccessible isolated micropores (i.e., blocked pores). (2−4) Despite these general aspects, the capacitance of carbon electrodes also depends on other factors, (5) including: 1) the electronic properties of the carbonaceous materials, i.e., their density of states (DOS), determining their space-charge capacitance (CSC) (6−8) and the quantum capacitance (CQ); (9,10) 2) the electrolyte ions/electrode electron correlations, regulating the ion packing in the electrical double layer at high-specific surface area carbon/electrolyte interfaces; (10) 3) the electrical resistivity associated with the graphitization degree; (11) and 4) the presence of impurities, such as adsorbates, e.g., hydrocarbons (12,13) and water. (14) In this scenario and based on theory-driven guidelines, (8−10) carbon materials with controlled properties have been designed by means of specific syntheses or postproduction treatments to support the leading role of one or more of these factors (sometimes to the detriment of the others) in determining the electrode capacitance.
In this work, we attempt to elucidate the effects of a prototypical H2-assisted thermal treatment of carbonaceous materials (15−20) on capacitance-determining phenomena in electrodes based on commercially available activated carbon as the active material. Driven by previous studies, (17−22) a moderate temperature (≤1000 °C) thermal treatment of the electrode materials in a H2-rich atmosphere was specifically studied to enhance the cell gravimetric capacitance (Cg). Despite it not being the scope of this work, H2-assisted thermal treatment has also been for innovative active materials, including carbide-derived carbons and graphene derivatives, to remove synthesis-derived byproducts (e.g., halogens used for selective carbide etching). (23−25) The combination of compositional, thermal, structural, and gas physisorption characterizations indicates that the H2-assisted thermal treatment is responsible for a stable surface modification of the active materials. Such a modification involves the desorption of physiosorbed species and the stabilization of the active material surface by forming stable C–H bonds involving unsaturated carbons originating from the reduction of oxygen functionalities. Meanwhile, contrary to expectations from previous works, (19,20) no substantial structural modifications of active material take place in terms of graphitic order, even though the specific surface area reveals a densification process. Similar conclusions were also derived in previous studies on carbon nano-onions, whose capacitive properties were mainly attributed to defects such as dislocation, stacking faults, or atom vacancies located in the edges of graphitic structures. (18) In our case, the H2-assisted thermal treatment of the EDLC electrodes led to a significant enhancement of the Cg by 39.4% at 1 A g–1 (38.6% at 10 A g–1) that, despite everything, agrees with previous studies supporting the graphitization of the treated activated carbon. (19,20) More in detail, we show the stable removal of oxygen groups and surface impurities (i.e., “surface graphitization”) in the treated activated carbon surface capacitance of the activated carbon (CsurfAC), as expected for highly graphitic active materials, e.g., nanostructured graphite. (26) Even though a slight densification of the activated carbon occurs during the H2-assisted thermal treatment, the cell capacitance normalized on the mass of activated carbon only (CgAC) still increases compared to that of EDLCs based on untreated activated carbon. In addition, by systematically determining the amount of adsorbed species as well as the binder residues in the treated electrodes compared to pristine ones, it becomes evident that the Cg of EDLCs, accounting for the mass of all the electrode materials, increases because of the higher content of active materials in the thermally treated electrodes. Compared to previous studies, (19,20) this observation leads to a more truthful interpretation of the effect of H2-assisted thermal treatment on the EDLC performances.

Materials and Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Materials

Activated carbon powder (AB-520) was purchased from MTI Corp., while poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) and N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich. Pyrolytic graphite sheets (Graphite 1000 W mK–1) were purchased from Panasonic.

Materials Characterization

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was carried out with a Kratos Axis UltraDLD spectrometer, equipped with a monochromatic Al Kα source, operated at 20 mA and 15 kV. Specimens for the XPS measurements were prepared by pressing a few milligrams of powder onto Cu adhesive tape. Wide scans were carried out with an analysis area of 300 μm × 700 μm and a pass energy of 160 eV. High-resolution spectra were collected over the same analysis area at a pass energy of 10 eV. The C KLL Auger spectra were recorded at a pass energy of 40 eV with a step size of 0.1 eV. The Kratos charge neutralizer system was used on all specimens. Spectra have been charge-corrected to the C 1s peak at 284.5 eV for sp2 carbon (C═C) and were analyzed using CasaXPS software (version 2.3.25).
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on material powders with a TGA Q500 (TA Instruments, USA) thermogravimetric analyzer in both N2 and O2 flow from 25 to 870 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min–1.
Raman spectroscopy measurements were carried out on powders using a Renishaw inVia spectrometer using a 50× objective (numerical aperture 0.75) and a laser with a wavelength of 514.5 nm and an incident power of ∼5 mW. A total of 30 points per sample were measured to perform the statistical analysis of the data. OriginPro 2020 was used to perform Raman peak deconvolution and statistics.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements of material powders were carried out on a Malvern-PANalytical third-generation Empyrean X-ray powder diffractometer. The instrument was equipped with a 1.8 kW CuKα ceramic X-ray tube operating at 45 kV and 40 mA. The diffraction patterns were collected in the air at room temperature, in transmission geometry and 1D mode, using a Cu focusing mirror, a reflection-transmission spinner sample stage (rotation speed = 1 rps), and 7 mm thick mylar foil as the sample substrate.
Specific surface area and porosity measurements of the electrodes were carried out by N2 adsorption at 77 K and Ar adsorption at 87 K with an automated gas sorption analyzer (AutoSorb iQ, Quantachrome Instruments, USA). Prior to measurements, the powder samples were degassed in a vacuum at 250 °C for 4 h to remove any adsorbed species. The Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) surface area (SBET) was calculated from the N2 isotherms using the multipoint BET method, (27) considering equally spaced points in a relative pressure range, P/P0, from 0.05 to 0.30 with a correlation coefficient exceeding 0.999. The total pore volume (VT) was directly calculated from the volume of N2 held at the highest relative pressure (P/P0 = 0.99), and the micropore volume (VDR) was determined after the application of the Dubinin–Radushkevic (DR) equation (28) to the adsorption data up to P/P0 < 0.1. The quenched solid density functional theory (QSDFT) (29) (implemented into Quantachrome’s data reduction software) was applied to the Ar adsorption data using a slit-shape model to describe the pore size distribution (PSD) of the samples.
Zeta potential measurements were carried out with a Malvern Instruments Zeta Sizer Nano ZS system (Malvern, U.K.). The measurements for zeta potential of pristine and treated activated carbon were performed in water/acetonitrile (70:30 vol/vol) at 25 °C.

Electrodes Fabrication and H2-Assisted Thermal Treatment

Commercial activated carbon, few-layer graphene (FLG, BeDimensional S.p.A.), produced by wet-jet milling exfoliation of graphite, (30−34) and PVDF were mixed with an 80:10:10 weight ratio in NMP (1:3 solid/liquid weight content ratio) using a planetary centrifugal mixer until obtaining a homogenized slurry. (35−37) The as-produced slurry was subsequently deposited onto a pyrolytic graphite sheet by doctor blading using a MSK-AFA-H200A coater (MTI Corp.) and dried at 70 °C in a vacuum oven (Binder, VD 53-UL) overnight to remove solvent residues. In the resulting EDLC electrodes, the mass loading of the electrode materials was ∼4 mg cm–2 to be compatible with practical requirements, as recommended in ref (38). The H2-assisted thermal treatment of the electrode materials and the electrodes was conducted for 2 h at different temperatures (i.e., 500, 600, 700 and 800 °C, temperature ramp = 10 °C min–1) in a three-zone split furnace (PSC 12/600H, Lenton, Hope, UK). The pressure of the chamber was set to 20 Torr via a homemade valve-controlling system, keeping a 100 sccm flow of a H2:Ar 10:90 vol/vol gas mixture as controlled upstream through an array of mass flow controllers (1479A, MKS Instruments, Andover, MA, USA). After the treatment, the furnace was left to cool to room temperature.

Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitor Fabrication

The EDLCs were fabricated by stacking two electrodes in a Swagelok-type cell based on 316L stainless steel pistons, a polytetrafluoroethylene insulating body, and fluorelastomer sealing rings by using a glass fiber membrane (Whatman glass microfiber filter) as the separator. The electrolyte was formulated inside a N2-filled glovebox (MBRAUN UNIlab) by mixing tetraethylammonium-tetrafluoroborate (TEABF4) salts in acetonitrile to a 1 M concentration.

Electrochemical Characterization

Electrochemical measurements of the EDLCs were performed at room temperature using a potentiostat/galvanostat (VMP3, Biologic) station controlled via its own software. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were performed at various voltage scan rates, from 5 to 1000 mV s–1, after 10 preconditioning cycles at 100 mV s–1. Once the CVs were completed, galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) curves were collected at specific currents ranging from 0.05 to 50 A g–1. The Cg of the EDLCs was calculated from the GCD profiles as Cg = (I × td)/(ΔV × m), in which I is the applied current, td is the discharge time, ΔV is the voltage window, and m is the mass of the electrode materials of both electrodes. The energy and power density of the EDLCs were calculated using integral equations that consider the nonlinearity of the GCD profiles, as discussed in refs (35,39,and40).

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Relationship between Active Material Properties and Electrode Capacitance

The interfacial capacitance of the carbon electrode/electrolyte interface has been modeled by the series of different capacitances, C–1 = Cdiff–1 + CH–1 + CX–1, in which Cdiff is the capacitance of the diffusive layer of the electrical double layer, CH is the Helmholtz double-layer capacitance, and quantum/space-charge capacitance (CX) includes the CSC (6−8) and the CQ of the electrode active materials. (10) More in detail, the series between CH and Cdiff forms the electrical double-layer capacitance (CEDL). CX accounts for the variation of Fermi energy with charge accumulated in the electrode close to its surface (10) and is often considered the contribution limiting the overall capacitance of graphitic electrodes. (10) In single-layer graphene, CX is given by CQ as determined by the linear dispersion of the Dirac cone structure, leading to small capacitance near charge neutrality corresponding to the potential of zero charge and the characteristic “V shape” of the capacitance as a function of applied voltage. In multilayer graphene, CX has been modeled in ref (10) by coupling the Poisson–Schrodinger equations to consider both CQ and CSC. Even if CX increases with the number of graphene layers, the electrostatic correlation effects between the π-band electron Fermi liquid and ions in the Helmholtz layer can instead lead to an enhancement of the interface capacitance with a decreasing number of layers, as in the case of single-layer graphene. (10) Despite the advent of advanced graphene-based active materials, (41) the most common electrode material for EDLCs is activated carbon due to its high surface area, tunable porosity, and scalable synthesis by means of either thermal or chemical activation processes. (42) Activated carbon is composed of randomly oriented single-layer graphene and graphitic layers (e.g., few-/multilayer graphene) without exhibiting a long-range three-dimensional order. (43) Based on these general considerations and experimental studies from our group, (3,4,35) a mixture of activated carbon and single/few-layer graphene, produced by the wet-jet milling exfoliation method, (30−32) was used in this work as the highly conductive high-surface area carbon network.
Beyond the above-discussed capacitance contribution, although often neglected in consolidated capacitance models, surface impurities, including adsorbed species, such as hydrocarbons and water, can also form a dielectric layer on carbon materials, leading to an additional capacitance (Ci) limiting the overall C. (12,44) Figure 1a shows an electrical equivalent circuit that can be used for the carbon electrode/electrolyte interfacial region, including the capacitance contribution discussed above, which is schematized in Figure 1b. The circuit is similar to those reported in previous literature, (45) but it includes Ci, in series to CEDL2, given by the electrical double-layer formed at the impurities-covered electrode materials/electrolyte interface. The electrical resistivity associated with the graphitization degree of the carbon active materials has been also considered as a universal parameter regulating their CQ. (11) Importantly, the effect of the electrical resistivity on the overall C has also been observed in pioneering works on ordered graphitic materials with anisotropic electric properties, showing that the edge of graphite exhibits a C 1 order of magnitude higher than that of graphitic basal planes. (47,48) In this context, experimental studies reported moderate temperature (≤1000 °C) thermal treatments in H2-rich atmosphere to induce a graphitization of activated carbons, improving the overall Cg and the cyclic stability of the resulting EDLCs. (19,20) Furthermore, these treatments have been recently reported to improve the capacity and rate capability of graphene-like graphite anodes for Li-ion batteries. (15,16) Meanwhile, temperature-programmed reduction experiments revealed that activated carbons start reacting with H2 at a temperature higher than 400 °C, completing the reaction at ca. 800 °C. (22) Contrary to annealing in N2, the H2-assisted thermal treatment is effective not only for removing oxygen groups (e.g., COOH, C═O, and C–O–C) (49) but also for eliminating and stabilizing unsaturated carbon atoms by hydrogasification and forming C–H bonds (hydrogenation), respectively. (49) Thus, H2-assisted thermal treatment was selected in this work as a case treatment of electrode materials to enhance the electrochemical performances of carbon electrodes for EDCLs, with the aim of elucidating the role of the above-discussed phenomena that determine the performance of an EDCL (Figure 1c).

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) Electrical modeling of the electrode/electrolyte interface, including various capacitances contributing to the overall interfacial capacitance. The capacitance associated with the impurity-free electrode material/electrolyte interface is modeled as CEDL1, while the capacitance of the impurity-covered electrode material/electrolyte is represented by CEDL2. Beyond the capacitance terms associated with the dielectric layer of surface impurities, i.e., Ci and CX, the electrical equivalent circuit includes the leakage resistance (RLEAK) associated with self-discharge processes. Other impedance elements completing the modeling of the whole EDLC (e.g., ZW, CC/E, RC/E, etc...) are discussed in the relevant literature. (45,46) (b) Sketch of the Dirac cone electronic structure of the graphene, the Helmholtz double-layer, and dielectric layer atop active materials determining CQ, CH, and Ci, respectively. (c) Sketch of the furnace used for H2-assisted thermal treatment of electrode materials, which were initially supposed to undergo graphitization and/or cleaning processes.

Chemical, Structural, and Electrochemical Characterization of the Electrode Materials

As detailed in the Materials and Methods section, the active materials of the EDLC electrodes were obtained by mixing commercial activated carbon with FLG, produced by wet-jet milling exfoliation of graphite, (30−32) and PVDF binder, following the procedures reported in our previous studies. (3,4,35)
The material weight ratio of activated carbon, FLG, and PVDF was 80:10:10. Despite this, the electrode formulation has a limited weight content of active material (80 wt % vs. > 90 wt % used in commercial EDLCs) and is not intended for high-energy density EDLCs. It has been used in this work to assess the effects of the H2-assisted thermal treatment on electrode materials commonly established for EDLC applications. (3,4,35) The effects of H2-assisted thermal treatment on the surface chemistry of the electrode materials were evaluated by XPS measurements. Hereafter, untreated samples are named pristine, while H2-500 °C, H2-600 °C, H2-700 °C, and H2-800 °C indicate the samples thermally treated in a H2:Ar 90:10 vol/vol mixture (flow rate = 100 sccm) at 500, 600, 700, and 800 °C, respectively. The survey spectra of the investigated electrode materials (Figure S1) exhibit characteristic peaks for C 1s, O 1s, and F 1s arising from active and/or conductive materials (activated carbon, graphene, and carbon black) and PVDF. The atomic content (at. %) of C, O, and F is reported in Figure 2a and Table S1. The at. % of O and F are significantly reduced after H2-assisted thermal treatments, which consequently increases the at. % of C. Also, the at. % of O and F decreases with increasing temperature of the thermal treatment from 500 to 800 °C. At the highest temperature of 800 °C, F is completely removed via the formation of volatile HF, (50,51) and the at % of O is as low as 0.7. This preliminary analysis indicates that the H2-assisted thermal treatment effectively decomposes the binder and, more importantly, eliminates surface impurities. The latter may include either functional groups or amorphous carbon, which, in turn, may be linked to the presence of adsorbed carbonaceous species, e.g., hydrocarbons (adventitious carbon). (12,13) High-resolution C 1s, O 1s, and F 1s XPS spectra were then acquired, as shown in Figure S2 for a pristine sample, to evaluate the at % of the functionalities based on the detected elements. The C 1s spectra were deconvoluted into nine peaks at 283.7 ± 0.2 eV, 284.5 ± 0.2 eV, 285.0 ± 0.2 eV, 286.5 ± 0.2 eV, 287.9 ± 0.2 eV, 288.9 ± 0.2 eV, 289.3 ± 0.2 eV, 290.0 ± 0.2 eV, and 290.9 ± 0.2 eV. These peaks correspond to C vacancies, C═C (sp2-hybridized carbon), C–C (sp3-hybridized carbon), C–O (hydroxyl), C═O (carbonyl), O═C–O (carboxyl), R–(CO)–O–(CO)–R, R-O–(CO)–O-R, and the π–π* satellite peak, respectively. (52,53) Their atom %, with respect to C, is reported in Table S2. The spectra of the pristine, H2-500 °C and H2-600 °C samples comprise four additional peaks associated with the PVDF binder and located at 285.9 ± 0.2 eV (attributed to the CH2 group), 290.5 ± 0.2 eV (CF2–CH2), 291.5 ± 0.2 eV (CF2–CF2), and 292.8 ± 0.2 eV (CF3). (53,54) Figure 2b shows the at % of C-based functionalities, referred to as the sum of the contents of detected elements, evidencing that the at. % of components associated with PVDF gradually decreases with increasing temperature up to 600 °C and approaches 0 at. % for H2-700 °C and H2-800 °C samples. The latter samples show the highest contents of sp2-hybridized C (C═C) (68.3 and 69.5 at. %, respectively) and the lowest content of sp3-hybridized C (C–C) (4.8 and 5.1 at. %, respectively). The O 1s spectra of the investigated samples were deconvoluted into four main components, the main two corresponding to C═O (531.3 ± 0.2 eV) and the O–C═O/–OH (533.4 ± 0.2 eV) groups (Figure S2). The two peaks at 535.4 ± 0.2 and 538.0 ± 0.2 eV, labeled O–Fa and O–Fb, respectively, and featured by pristine, H2-500 °C, and H2-600 °C samples, are assigned to O bonded to a highly electronegative F to form O–F bonds. (55,56) This consequently results in the appearance of two peaks in the corresponding F 1s spectra at 691.0 ± 0.2 and at 693.2 ± 0.2 eV, labeled F–Oa and F–Ob (Figure S2). (56) The other two components in the F 1s spectra, at 687.5 ± 0.2 and at 689.0 ± 0.2 eV, assigned to CF2 and CF2–CF2 groups, respectively, are associated with the PVDF. (54,56) Furthermore, the O-based functionalities derived from the O 1s spectra are reported in Table S3, while Figure 2c shows the at. % of the O-based groups referred to as the sum of the contents of detected elements. Clearly, the O-based groups are progressively removed with the increase of the annealing temperature. In order to determine the at. % of C sp2 and sp3, we have used the parameter D, defined as the energy distance between the minimum and maximum of the first derivatives of the X-ray excited Auger spectra (XAES C KLL). (53,54,57,58) In detail, the linear interpolation of the parameter D values for graphite and diamond allows for evaluation of the C sp2/sp3 at. % in carbon materials, in which, qualitatively, the higher the parameter D, the higher the at. % of C sp2. (53,54,57,58) As shown in Figure 2d, parameter D increases from 20.8 eV for the pristine sample up to 22.4 eV for H2-800 °C, indicating that, at the surface of the electrode materials, the content of sp2-hybridized C increases with increasing annealing temperature. In previous studies, (59) parameter D values between 21.5 and 23.1 eV have been ascribed to “clean” graphite obtained by cleaving pyrolithic graphite under ultrahigh vacuum conditions. Following exposure to ambient conditions, the parameter D values of pyrolytic graphite decreased, indicating possible surface contamination. Noteworthily, the information depth (ID), i.e., the thickness of the layer from which a given percentage (P) of the detected signal electrons originates, ID (P = 99%) for C KLL Auger electrons (<4 nm) is more than two times smaller than that of C 1s photoelectrons (∼9.7 nm for Al Kα X-rays). (57) Therefore, parameter D can be more sensitive to surface contamination compared to the C 1s signal. Table S4 reports the C sp2 at. % deduced from the analysis of parameter D according to the linear interpolation proposed by Lascovich et al. (who measured parameter D values of 13.2 eV and 23.1 eV for diamond and graphite, respectively). (57,58) Hereafter, we show, in agreement with literature, (60) that surface graphitization may also be associated with the removal of adsorbed species (e.g., hydrocarbons), which may instead remain in the pristine sample even when subjected to the ultrahigh vacuum (∼10–10 Torr) of the XPS chamber. (60)

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Elemental composition of the electrode materials before and after H2-assisted thermal treatment at various temperatures (from 500 to 800 °C). (b) C and (c) O functionalities at. % (normalized on the overall C and at. %, respectively) of the investigated electrode materials. The data have been estimated from the analysis of the XPS spectra (wide scan, C 1s, and O 1s spectra). (d) First derivative of the XAES C KLL spectra (parameter D) of the investigated electrode materials.

Based on the XPS results, TGA measurements were performed to further assess the effects of the H2-assisted thermal treatment on the activated carbon, under either N2 or O2 flow, determining the weight losses attributed to adsorbed species, functional groups, and carbon decomposition. Figure 3a shows the thermographs measured under a N2 flow for the investigated samples. The weight loss at temperatures inferior to 100 °C is ascribed to the loss of adsorbed water (moisture). (61) The weight loss occurring above 100 °C is due to the decomposition/volatilization of oxygen functionalities (62) and nongraphitic carbons, (63) as well as to the desorption of adsorbed species, e.g., hydrocarbons in the 100–600 °C temperature range. (64) The pristine sample shows a high adsorbed water content (∼13.7%), which was reduced to less than 3% after the H2-assisted thermal treatments. Clearly, in preparing an electrode material mixture, the presence of moisture in the pristine material may cause underweight issues with the activated carbon, leading to an electrode composition different from the targeted one, as discussed later. In addition, the pristine sample shows significant weight loss associated with the elimination of oxygen functionalities or adsorbed species (11.9% at 310 °C). This weight loss is almost negligible in the treated samples, in agreement with the oxygen removal observed by XPS analysis. Figure 3b shows the thermographs of the investigated materials measured under an O2 flow. The weight losses are associated with adsorbed water elimination (<100 °C), decomposition of oxygen functionalities, and desorption of adsorbed species such as hydrocarbons (≥100 °C, typically less than 500 °C) and carbon combustion (typically >350 °C). (61,64,65) The weight loss associated with adsorbed water is 16.3%, higher than the one observed under N2 flow. In the treated samples, the weight loss associated with adsorbed water elimination is less than 2%. Between 100 and 450 °C, the pristine sample shows weight losses attributed to the elimination of oxygen functionalities and adsorbed species. These weight losses are not observed in the treated samples. Importantly, H2-assisted thermal treatment stabilizes reactive sites by forming stable C–H bonds, (49) which impede subsequent adsorption processes in ambient conditions. The TGA data also show a weight gain of the treated samples at temperatures between 180 and 420 °C (inset panel of Figure 3b), suggesting that O2 can react with reactive unsaturated C atoms. (22,49) The latter is likely formed by reductive deoxygenation processes induced by H2-assisted thermal treatments. However, this weight increase is less than 1%, confirming that H2-assisted thermal treatment stabilizes reactive sites by forming stable C–H bonds. (49)

Figure 3

Figure 3. TGA curves measured in (a) N2 and (b) O2 for activated carbons before (pristine) and after H2-assisted thermal treatments at various temperatures (H2-500 °C, H2-600 °C, H2-700 °C, and H2-800 °C).

Notably, in the C 1s XPS spectrum (Figure 2b), C–H bonds exhibit the same binding energy as the C–C bonds, impeding reliable quantification. Previous studies supported the idea that the carbon surface resulting from H2-assisted thermal treatment shows stable basic properties, contrasting subsequent adsorption processes in ambient conditions. (49) A pronounced carbon combustion is observed at temperatures above 450 °C, similar to highly defective graphitic samples, including activated carbons. (65) The kinetics of the combustion reaction are faster for treated samples. This is consistent with experimental studies on graphene derivatives. (62,65) XRD and Raman spectroscopy measurements were carried out to further evaluate the structural changes of the electrode materials after various H2-assisted thermal treatments. Considering the microporous morphology of the activated carbon, the removal of oxygen functionalities should be inevitably associated with structural changes, as shown in previous studies on graphitic structures. (15) According to other works, (19,20) H2-assisted treatment could allow a low-temperature graphitization of porous carbons, whose porosity would increase at temperatures below 1000 °C. The use of an H2-rich reductive atmosphere was considered the key in avoiding the reduction of surface area and porosity that takes place during graphitization processes in inert gases. (19,20) In principle, the use of H2 for the synthesis of porous graphitic structures renders unnecessary the complex multistep processes involving sacrificial templates, such as polymers, nanostructured oxides (e.g., SiO2, MgO, and ZnO), (66,67) layered hydroxydes, (68) and salts, which hinder the densification of carbons during their graphitization. (69) Also, H2 may catalyze the graphitization processes at low-temperature, (19,20) without requiring the use of metal (e.g., Ni, Fe, Co, and Mo)-based catalysts, (70,71) which then require purification steps for their removal. However, the effect of H2-assisted thermal treatments on the structure of carbon materials is still under debate, and other experimental studies have supported negligible differences between pristine and H2-treated activated carbons. (72) Figure 4a shows the Raman spectra measured for the pristine and thermally treated samples. In all samples, the spectra show distinct peaks located at ca. 1343 and 1599 cm–1, corresponding to the D and G bands of nonordered graphitic structures in the activated carbon. (43,73) In general, the G peak corresponds to the in-plane bond-stretching motion of the pairs of C atoms in sp2 configuration with E2g symmetry (E2g optical mode at the Brillouin zone center). (74−77) This mode occurs at all sp2 sites, and not only for the atoms located in the 6-fold aromatic C rings. (74−77) The D peak is a breathing mode of sp2 rings with A1g symmetry and refers to a defective graphitic material, where defect-induced double resonance Raman scattering processes involve the electronic π–π* transitions. (74−76) Based on the interpretation of the G and D peaks, the ratio between the intensity of the D and G peaks (I(D)/I(G)) can be used to approximately evaluate the graphitization degree of porous carbons, including activated carbon. (75,76) As shown in Figure 4b, the H2-assisted treatment of the samples slightly decreases the I(D)/I(G), from 1.19 to a minimum of 1.07 for the annealing temperature of 600 °C, suggesting a negligible increase in the graphitization degree of the treated activated carbon compared to the pristine one. This seems to be in contrast with our XPS analysis (Figure 2d), which, however, is more sensitive to the sample surface as well as to amorphous species.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Structural characterization of the activated carbon before (pristine) and after the H2-assisted thermal treatments at various temperatures (H2-500 °C, H2-600 °C, H2-700 °C, and H2-800 °C). (a) Raman spectra and (b) I(D)/I(G) vs. annealing temperature plot measured for the investigated samples. (c) XRD patterns measured for the investigated samples. (d) N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms measured for the investigated electrode materials, before (pristine) and after H2-assisted thermal treatments at various temperatures (H2-500 °C, H2-600 °C, H2-700 °C, and H2-800 °C). The inset panel shows the PSD, calculated by applying QSDFT to the Ar adsorption data at 87 K, for the investigated electrode materials.

In agreement with the Raman spectroscopy data, analysis of the XRD patterns of the investigated samples reveals similar patterns, regardless of the thermal treatment process (Figure 4c). More in detail, the XRD patterns exhibit two main reflection peaks at 2θ of 23.8 and 43.8°, which are attributed to (002) and (100) reflections of graphitic domains, respectively. From the broadening of the (100) peak, the mean lateral size of the graphitic domains (La) can be estimated, while the number of graphene sheets in the domains (N) is correlated to the width of the (002) peak. (78)
Pioneering work showed that, in activated carbons, the decrease in La is correlated to an increase in their capacitance. (43) Thus, it has been suggested that defects located at the edges of the graphitic domains have a significant capacitance contribution. (18) However, the diffractograms of the investigated samples do not present any difference that would indicate structural modifications of the starting activated carbon after H2-assisted thermal treatment, which may instead be expected by the interpretation of the XPS and TGA data. To further evaluate the effects induced by the H2-assisted thermal treatment on the properties of the electrode materials, N2 adsorption measurements at 77 K were carried out to estimate the surface area, total pore volume, and micro- and mesopore volumes of the investigated EDLC electrodes. The estimation of the micropore size in the samples was carried out by Ar adsorption at 87 K. (29) In fact, Ar adsorption in narrow carbon micropores takes place at a higher relative pressure compared to N2 due to a weaker effective adsorption potential, i.e., the absence of specific interactions between Ar and the activated carbon surface. (29) Table S5 lists the main parameters extrapolated by the N2/Ar adsorption data. Figure 4d compares the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms for the investigated electrode materials. Based on the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) classification, all the isotherms can be classified as Type I with a narrow micropore size distribution. (29,79) The Brunauer SBET of the investigated electrode materials decreases from 1924 m2 g–1 in the pristine sample to a minimum value of 1752 m2 g–1 for H2-700 °C (Table S5). The SBET trend is different from those reported in previous studies on carbonaceous active materials treated in a H2-rich atmosphere. The superior electrochemical performance of the treated materials compared to native ones was attributed both to an SBET increase and surface graphitization. (19,20) In our case, the densification of the treated materials is reasonably associated with the elimination of oxygen functionalities, followed by the formation of C–H bonds. The PSD curves of the investigated electrode materials (Figure 4d, inset), obtained by applying the QSDFT to the Ar adsorption data at 87 K, indicate that the samples exhibit a microporous structure without remarkable changes in the size of the micropores. As summarized in Table S5, the VT and the VDR obtained from the N2 adsorption data, as well as the micropore volume (Vt) and the average micropore width (L) obtained from the Ar adsorption data, decrease after the H2-assisted thermal treatments, which is consistent with the trend observed for SBET. The slight discrepancy observed between VT and Vt (lower values for Vt) is likely due to different pore-filling mechanisms of the adsorptive for N2 and Ar adsorbents, as associated with adsorption of Ar on a carbonaceous surface weaker than that of N2. (29)
The combination of our chemical, thermal, structural, and gas adsorption characterizations supports the fact that the H2-assisted thermal treatment is effective in removing surface impurities, which are mainly adsorbed species. The latter has been determined in previous studies, (44) and the rapid kinetics of their adsorption on an ideally flat graphitic surface lead to saturated coverage over an hour-time scale. (60,80) The presence of defective graphitic structures, such as those exhibited by activated carbon, can further accelerate the contaminant adsorption processes. (80) However, the porous morphology of activated carbon can significantly slow down the contaminant absorption/desorption kinetics. Consequently, the readsorption of atmospheric contaminants onto treated activated carbons may be prevented on a day-time scale. The elimination of oxygen groups by a H2-assisted treatment does not substantially alter the structural properties of the activated carbon, even though the introduction of C–H bonds can stabilize the surface chemistry by impeding subsequent adsorption processes in ambient conditions, (49) as evidenced by both XPS and TGA analyses.
Zeta potential measurements of pristine and treated activated carbon (H2-700 °C) were carried out to evaluate their surface charge. In the water/acetonitrile (70:30 vol/vol), the pristine sample shows a negative zeta potential (−24.8 mV), which turns positive after H2-assisted thermal treatment (12 mV), indicating a basic surface. The latter is likely associated with Lewis basic sites assigned to π electron-rich graphitic regions, (22) in accordance with our XPS analysis. Notably, despite the effects induced by the H2-assisted thermal treatment, contact angle measurements with a prototypical organic electrolyte (1 M TEABF4 in acetonitrile, as studied hereafter) showed optimal wettability for both pristine and treated electrodes. The electrolyte drops completely spread out on the surface of the electrodes, meaning contact angles of 0°.
To further illustrate the effects of the H2-assisted thermal treatment on the electrochemical behavior of the electrode materials in EDLCs based on 1 M TEABF4 in acetonitrile as the electrolyte, CV and GCD measurements were carried out on symmetric EDLCs based on pristine and treated electrodes (hereafter named similarly to the material samples, i.e., pristine, H2-500 °C, H2-600 °C, H2-700 °C, and H2-800 °C). Figure 5a shows the CV curves measured for the investigated EDCLs at a voltage scan rate of 500 mV s–1. The quasi-rectangular shape of the CV curves confirms the capacitive behavior of the EDLCs. Importantly, the H2-assisted thermal treatments increase the capacitive current of the EDLCs, with maximum values recorded for H2-700 °C. In general, the current density of the EDLCs increases with increasing voltages, leading to the appearance of the so-called butterfly-shaped CV curves commonly shown for devices based on active carbonaceous materials. (10,11) This effect, resulting in the characteristic “V shape” of the CQ as a function of voltage, is generally attributed to the potential-dependent DOS of graphitic materials, i.e., their charge carrier density increases with the position of the Fermi level within the DOS (electrochemical doping). (10,11) Nevertheless, similar effects may also originate from the dielectric layer made of surface impurities, including adsorbed species, leading to Ci. (12,44) Importantly, the effects of the adsorbed species on the capacitance of the activated carbon have been scarcely reported, (12,44) even though they may form a dielectric layer that may limit the overall capacitance of the active materials. Figure 5b reports the GCD profiles measured for the EDLCs at a specific current of 1 A g–1. The triangular shape of the profiles further confirms the capacitive behavior of the EDLCs. The highest discharge time was recorded for the H2-700 °C electrode, which is consistent with our CV analysis. Figure 5c shows the Cg measured for the EDLCs as a function of the specific current, as calculated from the GCD curves. All the devices show excellent rate capabilities, indicating low internal areal resistance (<0.9 Ω cm2). The latter, corresponding to the equivalent series resistance (ESR) multiplied by the electrode geometric area, was estimated by the voltage drops (Vdrop) at the initial stage of charge and discharge, being associated with the resistive losses, i.e., Vdrop = 2I × ESR, where I is the applied current. Figure 5d shows the energy density vs. power density plot (i.e., Ragone plot) extrapolated from the GCD data. The H2-700 °C electrode showed the highest energy density and the best rate capability among the investigated EDCLs, reaching energy densities of 17.2 and 10.6 W h kg–1 at the power density of 1.2 and 40.2 kW kg–1, respectively. These energy densities represent an improvement of 36.9 and 47.3%, respectively, compared to those measured for EDLC based on pristine electrodes. By increasing the temperature of the H2-assisted thermal treatment to 800 °C, the rate capability of the resulting EDLC decreased compared to the optimal case (H2-700 °C). This behavior is likely due to the worsening of the adhesion of the electrode materials to the graphitic substrate used as the current collector, even causing, in some cases, the entire delamination of the electrode material coating. The electrochemical results indicate that the H2-assisted thermal treatment at the optimal temperature, i.e., 700 °C, is an effective route to improve the overall performance of the EDLCs, in accordance with previous works. (19)

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a) CV curves (voltage scan rate = 500 mV s–1) and (b) GCD profiles (specific current = 1 A g–1) measured for the investigated ELDCs (pristine, H2-500 °C, H2-600 °C, H2-700 °C, and H2-800 °C). (c) Cg of the investigated EDLCs as a function of the specific current (data extrapolated from the analysis of the GCD profiles). (d) Ragone plots measured for the investigated EDLCs.

At first instance, this behavior could be associated with an increase in the electrochemical performances of the active materials, i.e., activated carbon. However, this deduction may be simplistic since it does not consider that the percentage content of active materials in the final electrode formulation significantly increases after the H2-assisted treatment. In fact, the PVDF binder is decomposed at high temperatures and lost in the form of volatile products, as shown by our XPS analysis (F atom % = 0 for H2-700 °C and H2-800 °C samples). As shown in the literature, PVDF undergoes thermal degradation at temperatures higher than 500 °C, initiated by the carbon–hydrogen scission, which is followed by H–X elimination (dehydrohalogenation) (50,51) and complex reactions, e.g., polyaromatization. (20,50,51) A second degradation mechanism, namely homolytic scission, originated from the backbone scission with the formation of halogenated or oxygenated compounds, monomers, H–F, and other alkyl radicals. (50,51) In an inert atmosphere, these degradation processes lead to PVDF weight losses higher than 70% at temperatures higher than 500 °C. (50) Also, the presence of adsorbed species in pristine activated carbon can result in an underestimation of the weight of activated carbon during the formulation of the corresponding slurries used for electrode preparation. Consequently, the content of the activated carbon in the electrode is reduced from the targeted value of 85.0 to 76.2 wt %, assuming a content of adsorbed water of 13.7 wt %, as estimated by TGA in N2. In this case, the actual PVDF content would be ∼11.6%. If adsorbed carbonaceous species are also considered and their content is estimated at around 16.2 wt % from TGA N2 (excluding reduction of functionalities present on the activated carbon), the activated carbon content can deviate further from the targeted value of 80.0 wt %, decreasing to 71.6 wt %, while leading to a PVDF content of ∼14.2%. In addition, according to literature studies, (50,51) it is reasonable to assume that, after the H2-assisted thermal treatment, ∼80% of the initial PVDF content is lost in the form of volatile products in the most performant electrodes, i.e., H2-700 °C.
Figure 6a shows the gravimetric capacitances for pristine and H2-700 °C EDCLs obtained by normalizing the cell capacitance on the total mass of the activated carbon only (metric hereafter referred to as CgAC) as a function of the specific current, calculated considering two cases: (1) 13.7 wt % of adsorbed water in the pristine activated carbon powder, removed after the H2-assisted thermal treatment together with 80 wt % of PVDF; (2) 29.9 wt % of various adsorbed species (including water and carbonaceous species) in the pristine activated carbon powder, removed after the H2-assisted thermal treatment together with 80 wt % of PVDF. These data support that the H2-assisted treatment effectively increases CgAC (e.g., by ∼+28% at 1 A g–1 for case 2), as expected from the elimination of the double layer of surface impurities associated with Ci (limiting the overall C). (12,44) The similar rate capability of the EDLCs may be associated with similar PSDs of the corresponding electrodes (see the inset panel of Figure 4d), which also exhibited similar electrical resistivities (Figure S3). According to previous work, (11) the removal of surface impurities (including oxygen functionalities and adsorbed species), leading to “surface graphitization”, should improve the CsurfAC, calculated as CsurfAC = 4 × CgAC/SBET (CgAC values herein taken from case 2). Figure 6b shows the CsurfAC in pristine and H2-700 °C EDLCs. Importantly, these data reveal that H2-assisted thermal treatment improves the CsurfAC by 37.1 and 36.3% at the specific currents of 1 and 10 A g–1, respectively. Overall, by focusing on the specific performance of the activated carbon, our analysis indicates that the improvement of the electrochemical performances of the treated electrodes compared to the pristine ones is actually associated with 1) the higher content of active materials, being most of the binder content volatilized and moisture and contaminants desorbed during the H2-assisted thermal treatment; and 2) the higher CsurfAC as a consequence of the elimination of the dielectric layer made of surface impurities (thus, the canceling of Ci contribution). In the overall EDLC CgAC, the CsurfAC improvement is counterbalanced by a slight densification of the AC, expressed as a decrease of its SBET. However, the trade-off between “surface graphitization” and densification effects still results in a significant increase of the CgAC after the thermal treatment.

Figure 6

Figure 6. (a) CgAC of the pristine and H2-700 °C EDLCs as a function of the specific current. Case 1 refers to data calculated considering 13.7 wt % of adsorbed water in the pristine activated carbon powder and the removal of 80 wt % of PVDF after the H2-assisted thermal treatment. Case 2 refers to data calculated assuming 29.9 wt % of adsorbed species (including water and carbonaceous species) in the pristine activated carbon powder and the removal of 80 wt % of PVDF after the H2-assisted thermal treatment. (b) Comparison between CsurfAC of pristine and H2-700 °C EDLCs at 1 and 10 A g–1.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In summary, we have systematically evaluated the effect of the H2-assisted thermal treatment, performed at temperatures ranging from 500 to 800 °C, on the properties of the carbonaceous electrode materials, aiming at determining possible correlations of their surface chemistry and structural characteristics with the electrochemical performances of the corresponding EDLCs using conventional organic electrolytes (1 M TEABF4 in acetonitrile). This study was inspired by previous reports, (17−20) reporting contradictory conclusions regarding the effects of H2-assisted thermal treatment and calling for a systematic study to clarify controversial aspects. We show that, by optimizing the temperature of the H2-assisted thermal treatment of the electrodes, the resulting EDLCs can achieve an enhancement of the energy density higher than 35% for power densities in the 0.5–45 kW kg–1 range. The combination of multiple characterization techniques, including compositional, thermal, and structural characterizations, allows us to clarify the actual origins of this remarkable EDLC performance improvement. The removal of surface impurities, including adsorbed species, significantly improves the CsurfAC. The trade-off between chemical (“surface graphitization”) and structural (densification) effects upon the thermal treatment still results in a significant increase in the CgAC. Besides, as proved by an accurate calculation of the actual contents of the electrode materials, the increase of the active material and the decrease of the binder contents are also primary causes of the increase of Cg after the thermal treatment of the electrodes. Overall, our study sheds light on the effects of the H2-assisted thermal treatment on activated carbon-based electrodes for EDLCs, clarifying the origin of discordant conclusions reported in the previous literature.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.3c18629.

  • Supplementary XPS, electrical resistivity and gas physisorption measurements, and analyses of electrode materials and electrodes (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Sebastiano Bellani - BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, Italy Email: [email protected]
    • Francesco Bonaccorso - BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, ItalyGraphene Laboratories, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, Genoa 16163, ItalyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7238-9420 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Matteo Gentile - BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, ItalyDipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milano 20133, Italy
    • Marilena I. Zappia - BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, Italy
    • Agnese Gamberini - BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, Italy
    • Valentina Mastronardi - BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, Italy
    • Matteo Abruzzese - BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, Italy
    • Luca Gabatel - BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, ItalyDepartment of Mechanical, Energy, Management and Transport Engineering - DIME, Università di Genova, Via all’Opera Pia 15, Genova 16145, Italy
    • Lea Pasquale - Materials Characterization Facility, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, Genova 16163, ItalyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3919-8873
    • Sergio Marras - Materials Characterization Facility, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, Genova 16163, Italy
    • Ahmad Bagheri - Graphene Laboratories, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, Genoa 16163, ItalyCenter for Advancing Electronics Dresden (CFAED) & Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden 01062, Germany
    • Hossein Beydaghi - BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, Italy
    • Evie L. Papadopoulou - BeDimensional S.p.A., Via Lungotorrente Secca 30R, Genova 16163, ItalyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5959-9730
    • Guglielmo Lanzani - Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milano 20133, ItalyCenter for Nano Science and Technology @PoliMi, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Pascoli 70/3, Milano 20133, Italy
  • Author Contributions

    M.G. and S.B. contributed equally. Matteo Gentile: conceptualized the idea and led laboratory research. Sebastiano Bellani: conceptualized the idea, carried out electrochemical characterizations and corresponding data analysis, supervised research activities, acquired funding, and wrote the draft of the manuscript. Marilena Zappia, Agnese Gamberini, Valentina Mastronardi, Matteo Abruzzese, Luca Gabatel, Ahmad Bagheri, Hossein Beydaghi, and Evie L. Papadopoulou performed Raman, TGA, contact angle, zeta potential, and electrochemical characterizations. Lea Pasquale carried out XPS and gas physisorption measurements and corresponding data analyses. Sergio Marras carried out XRD measurements and corresponding data analysis. Guglielmo Lanzani supervised research activities and acquired funding. Francesco Bonaccorso supervised research activities and acquired funding. The manuscript was written through the contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

  • Funding

    This project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 881603-GrapheneCore3, the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 813036, the European Union’s SENSIBAT project under grant agreement no. 957273, the European Union’s GREENCAP Horizon Europe research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 101091572 and the European Union’s 2D-PRINTABLE Horizon Europe research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 694101.

  • Notes
    The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): S.B., M.I.Z., A.G., V.M., M.A., L.G., A.B., H.B., E.L.P. and F.B. are employees of BeDimensional S.p.A., a company that is commercializing 2D materials.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We thank the Electron Microscopy and Material Characterization facilities for their support in XRD data acquisition.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 80 other publications.

  1. 1
    Forse, A. C.; Merlet, C.; Griffin, J. M.; Grey, C. P. New Perspectives on the Charging Mechanisms of Supercapacitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (18), 57315744,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b02115
  2. 2
    Lobato, B.; Suárez, L.; Guardia, L.; Centeno, T. A. Capacitance and Surface of Carbons in Supercapacitors. Carbon 2017, 122, 434445,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.083
  3. 3
    Garakani, M. A.; Bellani, S.; Pellegrini, V.; Oropesa-Nuñez, R.; Castillo, A. E. D. R.; Abouali, S.; Najafi, L.; Martín-García, B.; Ansaldo, A.; Bondavalli, P.; Demirci, C.; Romano, V.; Mantero, E.; Marasco, L.; Prato, M.; Bracciale, G.; Bonaccorso, F. Scalable Spray-Coated Graphene-Based Electrodes for High-Power Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitors Operating over a Wide Range of Temperature. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 34, 111,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.08.036
  4. 4
    Bellani, S.; Martín-García, B.; Oropesa-Nuñez, R.; Romano, V.; Najafi, L.; Demirci, C.; Prato, M.; Del Rio Castillo, A. E.; Marasco, L.; Mantero, E.; D’Angelo, G.; Bonaccorso, F. Ion Sliding” on Graphene: A Novel Concept to Boost Supercapacitor Performance. Nanoscale Horiz. 2019, 4 (5), 10771091,  DOI: 10.1039/C8NH00446C
  5. 5
    Wu, J. Understanding the Electric Double-Layer Structure, Capacitance, and Charging Dynamics. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122 (12), 1082110859,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00097
  6. 6
    Barbieri, O.; Hahn, M.; Herzog, A.; Kötz, R. Capacitance Limits of High Surface Area Activated Carbons for Double Layer Capacitors. Carbon 2005, 43 (6), 13031310,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.01.001
  7. 7
    Hahn, M.; Baertschi, M.; Barbieri, O.; Sauter, J.-C.; Kötz, R.; Gallay, R. Interfacial Capacitance and Electronic Conductance of Activated Carbon Double-Layer Electrodes. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2004, 7 (2), A33,  DOI: 10.1149/1.1635671
  8. 8
    Gerischer, H. An Interpretation of the Double Layer Capacity of Graphite Electrodes in Relation to the Density of States at the Fermi Level. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89 (20), 42494251,  DOI: 10.1021/j100266a020
  9. 9
    Luryi, S. Quantum Capacitance Devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1988, 52 (6), 501503,  DOI: 10.1063/1.99649
  10. 10
    Ji, H.; Zhao, X.; Qiao, Z.; Jung, J.; Zhu, Y.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, L. L.; MacDonald, A. H.; Ruoff, R. S. Capacitance of Carbon-Based Electrical Double-Layer Capacitors. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5 (1), 3317,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4317
  11. 11
    Weingarth, D.; Zeiger, M.; Jäckel, N.; Aslan, M.; Feng, G.; Presser, V. Graphitization as a Universal Tool to Tailor the Potential-Dependent Capacitance of Carbon Supercapacitors. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4 (13), 1400316,  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201400316
  12. 12
    Duignan, T. T.; Zhao, X. S. Impurities Limit the Capacitance of Carbon-Based Supercapacitors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123 (7), 40854093,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b12031
  13. 13
    Tolman, N. L.; Mukai, J. M.; Wang, S.; Zito, A.; Luo, T.; Liu, H. The Effect of Physical Adsorption on the Capacitance of Activated Carbon Electrodes. Carbon 2019, 150, 334339,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.05.005
  14. 14
    Wang, H.; Yoshio, M. Effect of Water Contamination in the Organic Electrolyte on the Performance of Activated Carbon/Graphite Capacitors. J. Power Sources 2010, 195 (1), 389392,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.097
  15. 15
    Inamoto, J.; Matsuo, Y.; Katsumi, M.; Uchida, S.; Ishikawa, M.; Masuyama, T.; Tsukamoto, K.; Sato, Y. Effect of Hydrogen-Gas Treatment on the Local Structure of Graphene-like Graphite. Carbon 2020, 163, 162168,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.03.016
  16. 16
    Matsuo, Y.; Taninaka, J.; Hashiguchi, K.; Sasaki, T.; Cheng, Q.; Okamoto, Y.; Tamura, N. Effect of Oxygen Contents in Graphene like Graphite Anodes on Their Capacity for Lithium Ion Battery. J. Power Sources 2018, 396, 134140,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.06.022
  17. 17
    Takeuchi, M.; Maruyama, T.; Koike, K.; Mogami, A.; Oyama, T.; Kobayashi, H. Non-Porous Carbon for a High Energy Density Electric Double Layer Capacitor. Electrochemistry 2001, 69 (6), 487492,  DOI: 10.5796/electrochemistry.69.487
  18. 18
    Moussa, G.; Matei Ghimbeu, C.; Taberna, P.-L.; Simon, P.; Vix-Guterl, C. Relationship between the Carbon Nano-Onions (CNOs) Surface Chemistry/Defects and Their Capacitance in Aqueous and Organic Electrolytes. Carbon 2016, 105, 628637,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.05.010
  19. 19
    Hu, W.; Sun, X. N.; Xu, D.; Xiao, Z. H.; Chen, X. Y. Microporous Carbon Materials by Hydrogen Treatment: The Balance of Porosity and Graphitization upon the Capacitive Performance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56 (25), 72537259,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b01626
  20. 20
    Qin, T.; Shi, Z.; Li, M.; Wang, C. Effect of Reduction Heat Treatment in H2 Atmosphere on Structure and Electrochemical Properties of Activated Carbon. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2015, 19 (5), 14371446,  DOI: 10.1007/s10008-015-2767-1
  21. 21
    Zhong, Z.; Aika, K. Effect of Hydrogen Treatment of Active Carbon as a Support for Promoted Ruthenium Catalysts for Ammonia Synthesis. Chem. Commun. 1997, (13), 12231224,  DOI: 10.1039/a702273e
  22. 22
    Oliveira, L. C. A.; Silva, C. N.; Yoshida, M. I.; Lago, R. M. The Effect of H2 Treatment on the Activity of Activated Carbon for the Oxidation of Organic Contaminants in Water and the H2O2 Decomposition. Carbon 2004, 42 (11), 22792284,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.05.003
  23. 23
    Malmberg, S.; Arulepp, M.; Tarasova, E.; Vassiljeva, V.; Krasnou, I.; Krumme, A. Electrochemical Evaluation of Directly Electrospun Carbide-Derived Carbon-Based Electrodes in Different Nonaqueous Electrolytes for Energy Storage Applications. C 2020, 6, 59,  DOI: 10.3390/c6040059
  24. 24
    Malmberg, S.; Arulepp, M.; Savest, N.; Tarasova, E.; Vassiljeva, V.; Krasnou, I.; Käärik, M.; Mikli, V.; Krumme, A. Directly Electrospun Electrodes for Electrical Double-Layer Capacitors from Carbide-Derived Carbon. J. Electrost. 2020, 103, 103396,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elstat.2019.103396
  25. 25
    Rose, M.; Korenblit, Y.; Kockrick, E.; Borchardt, L.; Oschatz, M.; Kaskel, S.; Yushin, G. Hierarchical Micro- and Mesoporous Carbide-Derived Carbon as a High-Performance Electrode Material in Supercapacitors. Small 2011, 7 (8), 11081117,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201001898
  26. 26
    Gomibuchi, E.; Ichikawa, T.; Kimura, K.; Isobe, S.; Nabeta, K.; Fujii, H. Electrode Properties of a Double Layer Capacitor of Nano-Structured Graphite Produced by Ball Milling under a Hydrogen Atmosphere. Carbon 2006, 44 (5), 983988,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.10.006
  27. 27
    Brunauer, S.; Emmett, P. H.; Teller, E. Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938, 60 (2), 309319,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01269a023
  28. 28
    Dubinin, M. M. Fundamentals of the Theory of Adsorption in Micropores of Carbon Adsorbents: Characteristics of Their Adsorption Properties and Microporous Structures. Carbon 1989, 27 (3), 457467,  DOI: 10.1016/0008-6223(89)90078-X
  29. 29
    Silvestre-Albero, J.; Silvestre-Albero, A.; Rodríguez-Reinoso, F.; Thommes, M. Physical Characterization of Activated Carbons with Narrow Microporosity by Nitrogen (77.4K), Carbon Dioxide (273K) and Argon (87.3K) Adsorption in Combination with Immersion Calorimetry. Carbon 2012, 50 (9), 31283133,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.09.005
  30. 30
    Del Rio Castillo, A. E.; Pellegrini, V.; Ansaldo, A.; Ricciardella, F.; Sun, H.; Marasco, L.; Buha, J.; Dang, Z.; Gagliani, L.; Lago, E.; Curreli, N.; Gentiluomo, S.; Palazon, F.; Prato, M.; Oropesa-Nuñez, R.; Toth, P. S.; Mantero, E.; Crugliano, M.; Gamucci, A.; Tomadin, A.; Polini, M.; Bonaccorso, F. High-Yield Production of 2D Crystals by Wet-Jet Milling. Mater. Horiz. 2018, 5 (5), 890904,  DOI: 10.1039/C8MH00487K
  31. 31
    Bellani, S.; Petroni, E.; Del Rio Castillo, A. E.; Curreli, N.; Martín-García, B.; Oropesa-Nuñez, R.; Prato, M.; Bonaccorso, F. Scalable Production of Graphene Inks via Wet-Jet Milling Exfoliation for Screen-Printed Micro-Supercapacitors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29 (14), 1807659,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201807659
  32. 32
    Beydaghi, H.; Abouali, S.; Thorat, S. B.; Del Rio Castillo, A. E.; Bellani, S.; Lauciello, S.; Gentiluomo, S.; Pellegrini, V.; Bonaccorso, F. 3D Printed Silicon-Few Layer Graphene Anode for Advanced Li-Ion Batteries. RSC Adv. 2021, 11 (56), 3505135060,  DOI: 10.1039/D1RA06643A
  33. 33
    Levchenko, S.; Marangon, V.; Bellani, S.; Pasquale, L.; Bonaccorso, F.; Pellegrini, V.; Hassoun, J. Influence of Ion Diffusion on the Lithium-Oxygen Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes-Graphene Substrate. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15 (33), 3921839233,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c05240
  34. 34
    Zappia, M. I.; Mastronardi, V.; Bellani, S.; Zuo, Y.; Bianca, G.; Gabatel, L.; Gentile, M.; Bagheri, A.; Beydaghi, H.; Drago, F.; Ferri, M.; Moglianetti, M.; Pompa, P. P.; Manna, L.; Bonaccorso, F. Graphene vs. Carbon Black Supports for Pt Nanoparticles: Towards next-Generation Cathodes for Advanced Alkaline Electrolyzers. Electrochim. Acta 2023, 462, 142696,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.142696
  35. 35
    Eredia, M.; Bellani, S.; Zappia, M. I.; Gabatel, L.; Galli, V.; Bagheri, A.; Beydaghi, H.; Bianca, G.; Conticello, I.; Pellegrini, V.; Bonaccorso, F. High-Energy Density Aqueous Supercapacitors: The Role of Electrolyte PH and KI Redox Additive. APL Mater. 2022, 10 (10), 101102,  DOI: 10.1063/5.0106932
  36. 36
    Bagheri, A.; Bellani, S.; Beydaghi, H.; Eredia, M.; Najafi, L.; Bianca, G.; Zappia, M. I.; Safarpour, M.; Najafi, M.; Mantero, E.; Sofer, Z.; Hou, G.; Pellegrini, V.; Feng, X.; Bonaccorso, F. Functionalized Metallic 2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenide-Based Solid-State Electrolyte for Flexible All-Solid-State Supercapacitors. ACS Nano 2022, 16 (10), 1642616442,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c05640
  37. 37
    Najafi, M.; Bellani, S.; Galli, V.; Zappia, M. I.; Bagheri, A.; Safarpour, M.; Beydaghi, H.; Eredia, M.; Pasquale, L.; Carzino, R.; Lauciello, S.; Panda, J.-K.; Brescia, R.; Gabatel, L.; Pellegrini, V.; Bonaccorso, F. Carbon- α-Fe2O3 Composite Active Material for High-Capacity Electrodes with High Mass Loading and Flat Current Collector for Quasi-Symmetric Supercapacitors. Electrochem 2022, 3 (3), 463478,  DOI: 10.3390/electrochem3030032
  38. 38
    Gogotsi, Y.; Simon, P. True Performance Metrics in Electrochemical Energy Storage. Science 2011, 334 (6058), 917918,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1213003
  39. 39
    Laheäär, A.; Przygocki, P.; Abbas, Q.; Béguin, F. Appropriate Methods for Evaluating the Efficiency and Capacitive Behavior of Different Types of Supercapacitors. Electrochem. Commun. 2015, 60, 2125,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2015.07.022
  40. 40
    Noori, A.; El-Kady, M. F.; Rahmanifar, M. S.; Kaner, R. B.; Mousavi, M. F. Towards Establishing Standard Performance Metrics for Batteries, Supercapacitors and Beyond. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48 (5), 12721341,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CS00581H
  41. 41
    Pomerantseva, E.; Bonaccorso, F.; Feng, X.; Cui, Y.; Gogotsi, Y. Energy Storage: The Future Enabled by Nanomaterials. Science 2019, 366 (6468), eaan8285  DOI: 10.1126/science.aan8285
  42. 42
    Zhang, L. L.; Zhao, X. S. Carbon-Based Materials as Supercapacitor Electrodes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38 (9), 25202531,  DOI: 10.1039/b813846j
  43. 43
    Qu, D. Studies of the Activated Carbons Used in Double-Layer Supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2002, 109 (2), 403411,  DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00108-8
  44. 44
    Hurst, J. M.; Li, L.; Liu, H. Adventitious Hydrocarbons and the Graphite-Water Interface. Carbon 2018, 134, 464469,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.020
  45. 45
    Kang, J.; Wen, J.; Jayaram, S. H.; Yu, A.; Wang, X. Development of an Equivalent Circuit Model for Electrochemical Double Layer Capacitors (EDLCs) with Distinct Electrolytes. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 115, 587598,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.11.002
  46. 46
    Gamby, J.; Taberna, P. L.; Simon, P.; Fauvarque, J. F.; Chesneau, M. Studies and Characterisations of Various Activated Carbons Used for Carbon/Carbon Supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2001, 101 (1), 109116,  DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00707-8
  47. 47
    Randin, J.-P.; Yeager, E. Differential Capacitance Study on the Basal Plane of Stress-Annealed Pyrolytic Graphite. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1972, 36 (2), 257276,  DOI: 10.1016/S0022-0728(72)80249-3
  48. 48
    Kim, T.; Lim, S.; Kwon, K.; Hong, S.-H.; Qiao, W.; Rhee, C. K.; Yoon, S.-H.; Mochida, I. Electrochemical Capacitances of Well-Defined Carbon Surfaces. Langmuir 2006, 22 (22), 90869088,  DOI: 10.1021/la061380q
  49. 49
    Menéndez, J. A.; Phillips, J.; Xia, B.; Radovic, L. R. On the Modification and Characterization of Chemical Surface Properties of Activated Carbon: In the Search of Carbons with Stable Basic Properties. Langmuir 1996, 12 (18), 44044410,  DOI: 10.1021/la9602022
  50. 50
    de Jesus Silva, A. J.; Contreras, M. M.; Nascimento, C. R.; da Costa, M. F. Kinetics of Thermal Degradation and Lifetime Study of Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride) (PVDF) Subjected to Bioethanol Fuel Accelerated Aging. Heliyon 2020, 6 (7), e04573  DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04573
  51. 51
    Zulfiqar, S.; Zulfiqar, M.; Rizvi, M.; Munir, A.; McNeill, I. C. Study of the Thermal Degradation of Polychlorotrifluoroethylene, Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride) and Copolymers of Chlorotrifluoroethylene and Vinylidene Fluoride. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1994, 43 (3), 423430,  DOI: 10.1016/0141-3910(94)90015-9
  52. 52
    Stobinski, L.; Lesiak, B.; Zemek, J.; Jiricek, P. Time Dependent Thermal Treatment of Oxidized MWCNTs Studied by the Electron and Mass Spectroscopy Methods. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258 (20), 79127917,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.04.127
  53. 53
    Morgan, D. J. Comments on the XPS Analysis of Carbon Materials. C 2021, 7, 51,  DOI: 10.3390/c7030051
  54. 54
    Gieu, J.-B.; Winkler, V.; Courrèges, C.; El Ouatani, L.; Tessier, C.; Martinez, H. New Insights into the Characterization of the Electrode/Electrolyte Interfaces within LiMn2O4/Li4Ti5O12 Cells, by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Scanning Auger Microscopy and Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5 (29), 1531515325,  DOI: 10.1039/C7TA02529G
  55. 55
    Bartnik, A.; Lisowski, W.; Sobczak, J.; Wachulak, P.; Budner, B.; Korczyc, B.; Fiedorowicz, H. Simultaneous Treatment of Polymer Surface by EUV Radiation and Ionized Nitrogen. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 2012, 109 (1), 3943,  DOI: 10.1007/s00339-012-7243-5
  56. 56
    Wijaya, O.; Hartmann, P.; Younesi, R.; Markovits, I. I. E.; Rinaldi, A.; Janek, J.; Yazami, R. A Gamma Fluorinated Ether as an Additive for Enhanced Oxygen Activity in Li-O2 Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3 (37), 1906119067,  DOI: 10.1039/C5TA03439F
  57. 57
    Lesiak, B.; Kövér, L.; Tóth, J.; Zemek, J.; Jiricek, P.; Kromka, A.; Rangam, N. C Sp2/Sp3 Hybridisations in Carbon Nanomaterials - XPS and (X)AES Study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 452, 223231,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.269
  58. 58
    Lascovich, J. C.; Scaglione, S. Comparison among XAES, PELS and XPS Techniques for Evaluation of Sp2 Percentage in a-C:H. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1994, 78 (1), 1723,  DOI: 10.1016/0169-4332(94)90026-4
  59. 59
    Lesiak, B.; Zemek, J.; Houdkova, J.; Kromka, A.; Jóźwik, A. Electron Spectra Line Shape Analysis of Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite and Nanocrystalline Diamond. Anal. Sci. 2010, 26 (2), 217222,  DOI: 10.2116/analsci.26.217
  60. 60
    Li, Z.; Wang, Y.; Kozbial, A.; Shenoy, G.; Zhou, F.; McGinley, R.; Ireland, P.; Morganstein, B.; Kunkel, A.; Surwade, S. P.; Li, L.; Liu, H. Effect of Airborne Contaminants on the Wettability of Supported Graphene and Graphite. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12 (10), 925931,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3709
  61. 61
    Farivar, F.; Yap, P. L.; Hassan, K.; Tung, T. T.; Tran, D. N. H.; Pollard, A. J.; Losic, D. Unlocking Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) in the Fight against “Fake Graphene” Materials. Carbon 2021, 179, 505513,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.04.064
  62. 62
    Strzemiecka, B.; Voelkel, A.; Donate-Robles, J.; Martín-Martínez, J. M. Assessment of the Surface Chemistry of Carbon Blacks by TGA-MS, XPS and Inverse Gas Chromatography Using Statistical Chemometric Analysis. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 316, 315323,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.174
  63. 63
    Cataldo, F. A Study on the Theraml Stability to 1000°C of Various Carbon Allotropes and Carbonaceous Matter both under Nitrogen and in Air. Fullerenes, Nanotubes Carbon Nanostruct. 2002, 10 (4), 293311,  DOI: 10.1081/FST-120016451
  64. 64
    Jahandar Lashaki, M.; Hashisho, Z.; Phillips, J. H.; Crompton, D.; Anderson, J. E.; Nichols, M. Mechanisms of Heel Buildup during Cyclic Adsorption-Desorption of Volatile Organic Compounds in a Full-Scale Adsorber-Desorber. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 400, 124937,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124937
  65. 65
    Losic, D.; Farivar, F.; Yap, P. L.; Karami, A. Accounting Carbonaceous Counterfeits in Graphene Materials Using the Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) Approach. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93 (34), 1185911867,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02662
  66. 66
    Fuertes, A. B.; Alvarez, S. Graphitic Mesoporous Carbons Synthesised through Mesostructured Silica Templates. Carbon 2004, 42 (15), 30493055,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.06.020
  67. 67
    Díez, N.; Sevilla, M.; Fuertes, A. B. Synthesis Strategies of Templated Porous Carbons beyond the Silica Nanocasting Technique. Carbon 2021, 178, 451476,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.03.029
  68. 68
    Yan, J.; Wang, Q.; Wei, T.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, M.; Jing, X.; Fan, Z. Template-Assisted Low Temperature Synthesis of Functionalized Graphene for Ultrahigh Volumetric Performance Supercapacitors. ACS Nano 2014, 8 (5), 47204729,  DOI: 10.1021/nn500497k
  69. 69
    Yoon, S. B.; Chai, G. S.; Kang, S. K.; Yu, J.-S.; Gierszal, K. P.; Jaroniec, M. Graphitized Pitch-Based Carbons with Ordered Nanopores Synthesized by Using Colloidal Crystals as Templates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127 (12), 41884189,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0423466
  70. 70
    O̅ya, A.; O̅tani, S. Catalytic Graphitization of Carbons by Various Metals. Carbon 1979, 17 (2), 131137,  DOI: 10.1016/0008-6223(79)90020-4
  71. 71
    Hunter, R. D.; Ramírez-Rico, J.; Schnepp, Z. Iron-Catalyzed Graphitization for the Synthesis of Nanostructured Graphitic Carbons. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10 (9), 44894516,  DOI: 10.1039/D1TA09654K
  72. 72
    Tee, E.; Tallo, I.; Thomberg, T.; Jänes, A.; Lust, E. Steam and Carbon Dioxide Co-Activated Silicon Carbide-Derived Carbons for High Power Density Electrical Double Layer Capacitors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165 (10), A2357A2364,  DOI: 10.1149/2.1261810jes
  73. 73
    Bokobza, L.; Bruneel, J.-L.; Couzi, M. Raman Spectra of Carbon-Based Materials (from Graphite to Carbon Black) and of Some Silicone Composites. C 2015, 1, 7794,  DOI: 10.3390/c1010077
  74. 74
    Wu, J.-B.; Lin, M.-L.; Cong, X.; Liu, H.-N.; Tan, P.-H. Raman Spectroscopy of Graphene-Based Materials and Its Applications in Related Devices. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47 (5), 18221873,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CS00915H
  75. 75
    Ferrari, A. C.; Basko, D. M. Raman Spectroscopy as a Versatile Tool for Studying the Properties of Graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8 (4), 235246,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.46
  76. 76
    Pimenta, M. A.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M. S.; Cançado, L. G.; Jorio, A.; Saito, R. Studying Disorder in Graphite-Based Systems by Raman Spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9 (11), 12761290,  DOI: 10.1039/B613962K
  77. 77
    Dresselhaus, M. S.; Dresselhaus, G.; Hofmann, M. Raman Spectroscopy as a Probe of Graphene and Carbon Nanotubes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 2008, 366 (1863), 231236,  DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2007.2155
  78. 78
    Langford, J. I.; Wilson, A. J. C. Scherrer after Sixty Years: A Survey and Some New Results in the Determination of Crystallite Size. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1978, 11 (2), 102113,  DOI: 10.1107/S0021889878012844
  79. 79
    Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A. V.; Olivier, J. P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K. S. W. Physisorption of Gases, with Special Reference to the Evaluation of Surface Area and Pore Size Distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87 (9–10), 10511069,  DOI: 10.1515/pac-2014-1117
  80. 80
    Kozbial, A.; Li, Z.; Sun, J.; Gong, X.; Zhou, F.; Wang, Y.; Xu, H.; Liu, H.; Li, L. Understanding the Intrinsic Water Wettability of Graphite. Carbon 2014, 74, 218225,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.03.025

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 3 publications.

  1. Sadam Hussain, Manzar Sohail, Nadia Shahzad, Geoffrey Will, Anthony P. O’Mulane, Ahmed Abdala, Ibrahim A. Alnaser, Mohammad Rezaul Karim, Md Abdul Wahab. Single Precursor-Derived Sub-1 nm MoCo Bimetallic Particles Decorated on Phosphide–Carbon Nitride Framework for Sustainable Hydrogen Generation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2025, 17 (3) , 4728-4743. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c12577
  2. Ahmad Bagheri, Sebastiano Bellani, Hossein Beydaghi, Zhiyong Wang, Ahiud Morag, Marilena I. Zappia, Jaya‐Kumar Panda, Samaneh Vaez, Valentina Mastronardi, Agnese Gamberini, Sanjay Balkrishna Thorat, Matteo Abruzzese, Lea Pasquale, Renhao Dong, Minghao Yu, Xinliang Feng, Francesco Bonaccorso. Coexistence of Redox‐Active Metal and Ligand Sites in Copper‐Based Two‐Dimensional Conjugated Metal–Organic Frameworks as Active Materials for Battery‐Supercapacitor Hybrid Systems. ChemSusChem 2025, 18 (4) https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202401454
  3. Ahmad Bagheri, Somayeh Taghavi, Sebastiano Bellani, Pejman Salimi, Hossein Beydaghi, Jaya‐Kumar Panda, Marilena Isabella Zappia, Valentina Mastronardi, Agnese Gamberini, Sanjay Balkrishna Thorat, Matteo Abruzzese, Lea Pasquale, Mirko Prato, Michela Signoretto, Xinliang Feng, Francesco Bonaccorso. Venice’s macroalgae-derived active material for aqueous, organic, and solid-state supercapacitors. Chemical Engineering Journal 2024, 496 , 153529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.153529

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Cite this: ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 11, 13706–13718
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c18629
Published March 8, 2024

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Article Views

839

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (a) Electrical modeling of the electrode/electrolyte interface, including various capacitances contributing to the overall interfacial capacitance. The capacitance associated with the impurity-free electrode material/electrolyte interface is modeled as CEDL1, while the capacitance of the impurity-covered electrode material/electrolyte is represented by CEDL2. Beyond the capacitance terms associated with the dielectric layer of surface impurities, i.e., Ci and CX, the electrical equivalent circuit includes the leakage resistance (RLEAK) associated with self-discharge processes. Other impedance elements completing the modeling of the whole EDLC (e.g., ZW, CC/E, RC/E, etc...) are discussed in the relevant literature. (45,46) (b) Sketch of the Dirac cone electronic structure of the graphene, the Helmholtz double-layer, and dielectric layer atop active materials determining CQ, CH, and Ci, respectively. (c) Sketch of the furnace used for H2-assisted thermal treatment of electrode materials, which were initially supposed to undergo graphitization and/or cleaning processes.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) Elemental composition of the electrode materials before and after H2-assisted thermal treatment at various temperatures (from 500 to 800 °C). (b) C and (c) O functionalities at. % (normalized on the overall C and at. %, respectively) of the investigated electrode materials. The data have been estimated from the analysis of the XPS spectra (wide scan, C 1s, and O 1s spectra). (d) First derivative of the XAES C KLL spectra (parameter D) of the investigated electrode materials.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. TGA curves measured in (a) N2 and (b) O2 for activated carbons before (pristine) and after H2-assisted thermal treatments at various temperatures (H2-500 °C, H2-600 °C, H2-700 °C, and H2-800 °C).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Structural characterization of the activated carbon before (pristine) and after the H2-assisted thermal treatments at various temperatures (H2-500 °C, H2-600 °C, H2-700 °C, and H2-800 °C). (a) Raman spectra and (b) I(D)/I(G) vs. annealing temperature plot measured for the investigated samples. (c) XRD patterns measured for the investigated samples. (d) N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms measured for the investigated electrode materials, before (pristine) and after H2-assisted thermal treatments at various temperatures (H2-500 °C, H2-600 °C, H2-700 °C, and H2-800 °C). The inset panel shows the PSD, calculated by applying QSDFT to the Ar adsorption data at 87 K, for the investigated electrode materials.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (a) CV curves (voltage scan rate = 500 mV s–1) and (b) GCD profiles (specific current = 1 A g–1) measured for the investigated ELDCs (pristine, H2-500 °C, H2-600 °C, H2-700 °C, and H2-800 °C). (c) Cg of the investigated EDLCs as a function of the specific current (data extrapolated from the analysis of the GCD profiles). (d) Ragone plots measured for the investigated EDLCs.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. (a) CgAC of the pristine and H2-700 °C EDLCs as a function of the specific current. Case 1 refers to data calculated considering 13.7 wt % of adsorbed water in the pristine activated carbon powder and the removal of 80 wt % of PVDF after the H2-assisted thermal treatment. Case 2 refers to data calculated assuming 29.9 wt % of adsorbed species (including water and carbonaceous species) in the pristine activated carbon powder and the removal of 80 wt % of PVDF after the H2-assisted thermal treatment. (b) Comparison between CsurfAC of pristine and H2-700 °C EDLCs at 1 and 10 A g–1.

  • References


    This article references 80 other publications.

    1. 1
      Forse, A. C.; Merlet, C.; Griffin, J. M.; Grey, C. P. New Perspectives on the Charging Mechanisms of Supercapacitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (18), 57315744,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b02115
    2. 2
      Lobato, B.; Suárez, L.; Guardia, L.; Centeno, T. A. Capacitance and Surface of Carbons in Supercapacitors. Carbon 2017, 122, 434445,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.083
    3. 3
      Garakani, M. A.; Bellani, S.; Pellegrini, V.; Oropesa-Nuñez, R.; Castillo, A. E. D. R.; Abouali, S.; Najafi, L.; Martín-García, B.; Ansaldo, A.; Bondavalli, P.; Demirci, C.; Romano, V.; Mantero, E.; Marasco, L.; Prato, M.; Bracciale, G.; Bonaccorso, F. Scalable Spray-Coated Graphene-Based Electrodes for High-Power Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitors Operating over a Wide Range of Temperature. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 34, 111,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.08.036
    4. 4
      Bellani, S.; Martín-García, B.; Oropesa-Nuñez, R.; Romano, V.; Najafi, L.; Demirci, C.; Prato, M.; Del Rio Castillo, A. E.; Marasco, L.; Mantero, E.; D’Angelo, G.; Bonaccorso, F. Ion Sliding” on Graphene: A Novel Concept to Boost Supercapacitor Performance. Nanoscale Horiz. 2019, 4 (5), 10771091,  DOI: 10.1039/C8NH00446C
    5. 5
      Wu, J. Understanding the Electric Double-Layer Structure, Capacitance, and Charging Dynamics. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122 (12), 1082110859,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00097
    6. 6
      Barbieri, O.; Hahn, M.; Herzog, A.; Kötz, R. Capacitance Limits of High Surface Area Activated Carbons for Double Layer Capacitors. Carbon 2005, 43 (6), 13031310,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.01.001
    7. 7
      Hahn, M.; Baertschi, M.; Barbieri, O.; Sauter, J.-C.; Kötz, R.; Gallay, R. Interfacial Capacitance and Electronic Conductance of Activated Carbon Double-Layer Electrodes. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2004, 7 (2), A33,  DOI: 10.1149/1.1635671
    8. 8
      Gerischer, H. An Interpretation of the Double Layer Capacity of Graphite Electrodes in Relation to the Density of States at the Fermi Level. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89 (20), 42494251,  DOI: 10.1021/j100266a020
    9. 9
      Luryi, S. Quantum Capacitance Devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1988, 52 (6), 501503,  DOI: 10.1063/1.99649
    10. 10
      Ji, H.; Zhao, X.; Qiao, Z.; Jung, J.; Zhu, Y.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, L. L.; MacDonald, A. H.; Ruoff, R. S. Capacitance of Carbon-Based Electrical Double-Layer Capacitors. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5 (1), 3317,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4317
    11. 11
      Weingarth, D.; Zeiger, M.; Jäckel, N.; Aslan, M.; Feng, G.; Presser, V. Graphitization as a Universal Tool to Tailor the Potential-Dependent Capacitance of Carbon Supercapacitors. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4 (13), 1400316,  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201400316
    12. 12
      Duignan, T. T.; Zhao, X. S. Impurities Limit the Capacitance of Carbon-Based Supercapacitors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123 (7), 40854093,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b12031
    13. 13
      Tolman, N. L.; Mukai, J. M.; Wang, S.; Zito, A.; Luo, T.; Liu, H. The Effect of Physical Adsorption on the Capacitance of Activated Carbon Electrodes. Carbon 2019, 150, 334339,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.05.005
    14. 14
      Wang, H.; Yoshio, M. Effect of Water Contamination in the Organic Electrolyte on the Performance of Activated Carbon/Graphite Capacitors. J. Power Sources 2010, 195 (1), 389392,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.097
    15. 15
      Inamoto, J.; Matsuo, Y.; Katsumi, M.; Uchida, S.; Ishikawa, M.; Masuyama, T.; Tsukamoto, K.; Sato, Y. Effect of Hydrogen-Gas Treatment on the Local Structure of Graphene-like Graphite. Carbon 2020, 163, 162168,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.03.016
    16. 16
      Matsuo, Y.; Taninaka, J.; Hashiguchi, K.; Sasaki, T.; Cheng, Q.; Okamoto, Y.; Tamura, N. Effect of Oxygen Contents in Graphene like Graphite Anodes on Their Capacity for Lithium Ion Battery. J. Power Sources 2018, 396, 134140,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.06.022
    17. 17
      Takeuchi, M.; Maruyama, T.; Koike, K.; Mogami, A.; Oyama, T.; Kobayashi, H. Non-Porous Carbon for a High Energy Density Electric Double Layer Capacitor. Electrochemistry 2001, 69 (6), 487492,  DOI: 10.5796/electrochemistry.69.487
    18. 18
      Moussa, G.; Matei Ghimbeu, C.; Taberna, P.-L.; Simon, P.; Vix-Guterl, C. Relationship between the Carbon Nano-Onions (CNOs) Surface Chemistry/Defects and Their Capacitance in Aqueous and Organic Electrolytes. Carbon 2016, 105, 628637,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.05.010
    19. 19
      Hu, W.; Sun, X. N.; Xu, D.; Xiao, Z. H.; Chen, X. Y. Microporous Carbon Materials by Hydrogen Treatment: The Balance of Porosity and Graphitization upon the Capacitive Performance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56 (25), 72537259,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b01626
    20. 20
      Qin, T.; Shi, Z.; Li, M.; Wang, C. Effect of Reduction Heat Treatment in H2 Atmosphere on Structure and Electrochemical Properties of Activated Carbon. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2015, 19 (5), 14371446,  DOI: 10.1007/s10008-015-2767-1
    21. 21
      Zhong, Z.; Aika, K. Effect of Hydrogen Treatment of Active Carbon as a Support for Promoted Ruthenium Catalysts for Ammonia Synthesis. Chem. Commun. 1997, (13), 12231224,  DOI: 10.1039/a702273e
    22. 22
      Oliveira, L. C. A.; Silva, C. N.; Yoshida, M. I.; Lago, R. M. The Effect of H2 Treatment on the Activity of Activated Carbon for the Oxidation of Organic Contaminants in Water and the H2O2 Decomposition. Carbon 2004, 42 (11), 22792284,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.05.003
    23. 23
      Malmberg, S.; Arulepp, M.; Tarasova, E.; Vassiljeva, V.; Krasnou, I.; Krumme, A. Electrochemical Evaluation of Directly Electrospun Carbide-Derived Carbon-Based Electrodes in Different Nonaqueous Electrolytes for Energy Storage Applications. C 2020, 6, 59,  DOI: 10.3390/c6040059
    24. 24
      Malmberg, S.; Arulepp, M.; Savest, N.; Tarasova, E.; Vassiljeva, V.; Krasnou, I.; Käärik, M.; Mikli, V.; Krumme, A. Directly Electrospun Electrodes for Electrical Double-Layer Capacitors from Carbide-Derived Carbon. J. Electrost. 2020, 103, 103396,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elstat.2019.103396
    25. 25
      Rose, M.; Korenblit, Y.; Kockrick, E.; Borchardt, L.; Oschatz, M.; Kaskel, S.; Yushin, G. Hierarchical Micro- and Mesoporous Carbide-Derived Carbon as a High-Performance Electrode Material in Supercapacitors. Small 2011, 7 (8), 11081117,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201001898
    26. 26
      Gomibuchi, E.; Ichikawa, T.; Kimura, K.; Isobe, S.; Nabeta, K.; Fujii, H. Electrode Properties of a Double Layer Capacitor of Nano-Structured Graphite Produced by Ball Milling under a Hydrogen Atmosphere. Carbon 2006, 44 (5), 983988,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.10.006
    27. 27
      Brunauer, S.; Emmett, P. H.; Teller, E. Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938, 60 (2), 309319,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01269a023
    28. 28
      Dubinin, M. M. Fundamentals of the Theory of Adsorption in Micropores of Carbon Adsorbents: Characteristics of Their Adsorption Properties and Microporous Structures. Carbon 1989, 27 (3), 457467,  DOI: 10.1016/0008-6223(89)90078-X
    29. 29
      Silvestre-Albero, J.; Silvestre-Albero, A.; Rodríguez-Reinoso, F.; Thommes, M. Physical Characterization of Activated Carbons with Narrow Microporosity by Nitrogen (77.4K), Carbon Dioxide (273K) and Argon (87.3K) Adsorption in Combination with Immersion Calorimetry. Carbon 2012, 50 (9), 31283133,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.09.005
    30. 30
      Del Rio Castillo, A. E.; Pellegrini, V.; Ansaldo, A.; Ricciardella, F.; Sun, H.; Marasco, L.; Buha, J.; Dang, Z.; Gagliani, L.; Lago, E.; Curreli, N.; Gentiluomo, S.; Palazon, F.; Prato, M.; Oropesa-Nuñez, R.; Toth, P. S.; Mantero, E.; Crugliano, M.; Gamucci, A.; Tomadin, A.; Polini, M.; Bonaccorso, F. High-Yield Production of 2D Crystals by Wet-Jet Milling. Mater. Horiz. 2018, 5 (5), 890904,  DOI: 10.1039/C8MH00487K
    31. 31
      Bellani, S.; Petroni, E.; Del Rio Castillo, A. E.; Curreli, N.; Martín-García, B.; Oropesa-Nuñez, R.; Prato, M.; Bonaccorso, F. Scalable Production of Graphene Inks via Wet-Jet Milling Exfoliation for Screen-Printed Micro-Supercapacitors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29 (14), 1807659,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201807659
    32. 32
      Beydaghi, H.; Abouali, S.; Thorat, S. B.; Del Rio Castillo, A. E.; Bellani, S.; Lauciello, S.; Gentiluomo, S.; Pellegrini, V.; Bonaccorso, F. 3D Printed Silicon-Few Layer Graphene Anode for Advanced Li-Ion Batteries. RSC Adv. 2021, 11 (56), 3505135060,  DOI: 10.1039/D1RA06643A
    33. 33
      Levchenko, S.; Marangon, V.; Bellani, S.; Pasquale, L.; Bonaccorso, F.; Pellegrini, V.; Hassoun, J. Influence of Ion Diffusion on the Lithium-Oxygen Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes-Graphene Substrate. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15 (33), 3921839233,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c05240
    34. 34
      Zappia, M. I.; Mastronardi, V.; Bellani, S.; Zuo, Y.; Bianca, G.; Gabatel, L.; Gentile, M.; Bagheri, A.; Beydaghi, H.; Drago, F.; Ferri, M.; Moglianetti, M.; Pompa, P. P.; Manna, L.; Bonaccorso, F. Graphene vs. Carbon Black Supports for Pt Nanoparticles: Towards next-Generation Cathodes for Advanced Alkaline Electrolyzers. Electrochim. Acta 2023, 462, 142696,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.142696
    35. 35
      Eredia, M.; Bellani, S.; Zappia, M. I.; Gabatel, L.; Galli, V.; Bagheri, A.; Beydaghi, H.; Bianca, G.; Conticello, I.; Pellegrini, V.; Bonaccorso, F. High-Energy Density Aqueous Supercapacitors: The Role of Electrolyte PH and KI Redox Additive. APL Mater. 2022, 10 (10), 101102,  DOI: 10.1063/5.0106932
    36. 36
      Bagheri, A.; Bellani, S.; Beydaghi, H.; Eredia, M.; Najafi, L.; Bianca, G.; Zappia, M. I.; Safarpour, M.; Najafi, M.; Mantero, E.; Sofer, Z.; Hou, G.; Pellegrini, V.; Feng, X.; Bonaccorso, F. Functionalized Metallic 2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenide-Based Solid-State Electrolyte for Flexible All-Solid-State Supercapacitors. ACS Nano 2022, 16 (10), 1642616442,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c05640
    37. 37
      Najafi, M.; Bellani, S.; Galli, V.; Zappia, M. I.; Bagheri, A.; Safarpour, M.; Beydaghi, H.; Eredia, M.; Pasquale, L.; Carzino, R.; Lauciello, S.; Panda, J.-K.; Brescia, R.; Gabatel, L.; Pellegrini, V.; Bonaccorso, F. Carbon- α-Fe2O3 Composite Active Material for High-Capacity Electrodes with High Mass Loading and Flat Current Collector for Quasi-Symmetric Supercapacitors. Electrochem 2022, 3 (3), 463478,  DOI: 10.3390/electrochem3030032
    38. 38
      Gogotsi, Y.; Simon, P. True Performance Metrics in Electrochemical Energy Storage. Science 2011, 334 (6058), 917918,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1213003
    39. 39
      Laheäär, A.; Przygocki, P.; Abbas, Q.; Béguin, F. Appropriate Methods for Evaluating the Efficiency and Capacitive Behavior of Different Types of Supercapacitors. Electrochem. Commun. 2015, 60, 2125,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2015.07.022
    40. 40
      Noori, A.; El-Kady, M. F.; Rahmanifar, M. S.; Kaner, R. B.; Mousavi, M. F. Towards Establishing Standard Performance Metrics for Batteries, Supercapacitors and Beyond. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48 (5), 12721341,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CS00581H
    41. 41
      Pomerantseva, E.; Bonaccorso, F.; Feng, X.; Cui, Y.; Gogotsi, Y. Energy Storage: The Future Enabled by Nanomaterials. Science 2019, 366 (6468), eaan8285  DOI: 10.1126/science.aan8285
    42. 42
      Zhang, L. L.; Zhao, X. S. Carbon-Based Materials as Supercapacitor Electrodes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38 (9), 25202531,  DOI: 10.1039/b813846j
    43. 43
      Qu, D. Studies of the Activated Carbons Used in Double-Layer Supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2002, 109 (2), 403411,  DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00108-8
    44. 44
      Hurst, J. M.; Li, L.; Liu, H. Adventitious Hydrocarbons and the Graphite-Water Interface. Carbon 2018, 134, 464469,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.020
    45. 45
      Kang, J.; Wen, J.; Jayaram, S. H.; Yu, A.; Wang, X. Development of an Equivalent Circuit Model for Electrochemical Double Layer Capacitors (EDLCs) with Distinct Electrolytes. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 115, 587598,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.11.002
    46. 46
      Gamby, J.; Taberna, P. L.; Simon, P.; Fauvarque, J. F.; Chesneau, M. Studies and Characterisations of Various Activated Carbons Used for Carbon/Carbon Supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2001, 101 (1), 109116,  DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00707-8
    47. 47
      Randin, J.-P.; Yeager, E. Differential Capacitance Study on the Basal Plane of Stress-Annealed Pyrolytic Graphite. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1972, 36 (2), 257276,  DOI: 10.1016/S0022-0728(72)80249-3
    48. 48
      Kim, T.; Lim, S.; Kwon, K.; Hong, S.-H.; Qiao, W.; Rhee, C. K.; Yoon, S.-H.; Mochida, I. Electrochemical Capacitances of Well-Defined Carbon Surfaces. Langmuir 2006, 22 (22), 90869088,  DOI: 10.1021/la061380q
    49. 49
      Menéndez, J. A.; Phillips, J.; Xia, B.; Radovic, L. R. On the Modification and Characterization of Chemical Surface Properties of Activated Carbon: In the Search of Carbons with Stable Basic Properties. Langmuir 1996, 12 (18), 44044410,  DOI: 10.1021/la9602022
    50. 50
      de Jesus Silva, A. J.; Contreras, M. M.; Nascimento, C. R.; da Costa, M. F. Kinetics of Thermal Degradation and Lifetime Study of Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride) (PVDF) Subjected to Bioethanol Fuel Accelerated Aging. Heliyon 2020, 6 (7), e04573  DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04573
    51. 51
      Zulfiqar, S.; Zulfiqar, M.; Rizvi, M.; Munir, A.; McNeill, I. C. Study of the Thermal Degradation of Polychlorotrifluoroethylene, Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride) and Copolymers of Chlorotrifluoroethylene and Vinylidene Fluoride. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1994, 43 (3), 423430,  DOI: 10.1016/0141-3910(94)90015-9
    52. 52
      Stobinski, L.; Lesiak, B.; Zemek, J.; Jiricek, P. Time Dependent Thermal Treatment of Oxidized MWCNTs Studied by the Electron and Mass Spectroscopy Methods. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258 (20), 79127917,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.04.127
    53. 53
      Morgan, D. J. Comments on the XPS Analysis of Carbon Materials. C 2021, 7, 51,  DOI: 10.3390/c7030051
    54. 54
      Gieu, J.-B.; Winkler, V.; Courrèges, C.; El Ouatani, L.; Tessier, C.; Martinez, H. New Insights into the Characterization of the Electrode/Electrolyte Interfaces within LiMn2O4/Li4Ti5O12 Cells, by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Scanning Auger Microscopy and Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5 (29), 1531515325,  DOI: 10.1039/C7TA02529G
    55. 55
      Bartnik, A.; Lisowski, W.; Sobczak, J.; Wachulak, P.; Budner, B.; Korczyc, B.; Fiedorowicz, H. Simultaneous Treatment of Polymer Surface by EUV Radiation and Ionized Nitrogen. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 2012, 109 (1), 3943,  DOI: 10.1007/s00339-012-7243-5
    56. 56
      Wijaya, O.; Hartmann, P.; Younesi, R.; Markovits, I. I. E.; Rinaldi, A.; Janek, J.; Yazami, R. A Gamma Fluorinated Ether as an Additive for Enhanced Oxygen Activity in Li-O2 Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3 (37), 1906119067,  DOI: 10.1039/C5TA03439F
    57. 57
      Lesiak, B.; Kövér, L.; Tóth, J.; Zemek, J.; Jiricek, P.; Kromka, A.; Rangam, N. C Sp2/Sp3 Hybridisations in Carbon Nanomaterials - XPS and (X)AES Study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 452, 223231,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.269
    58. 58
      Lascovich, J. C.; Scaglione, S. Comparison among XAES, PELS and XPS Techniques for Evaluation of Sp2 Percentage in a-C:H. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1994, 78 (1), 1723,  DOI: 10.1016/0169-4332(94)90026-4
    59. 59
      Lesiak, B.; Zemek, J.; Houdkova, J.; Kromka, A.; Jóźwik, A. Electron Spectra Line Shape Analysis of Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite and Nanocrystalline Diamond. Anal. Sci. 2010, 26 (2), 217222,  DOI: 10.2116/analsci.26.217
    60. 60
      Li, Z.; Wang, Y.; Kozbial, A.; Shenoy, G.; Zhou, F.; McGinley, R.; Ireland, P.; Morganstein, B.; Kunkel, A.; Surwade, S. P.; Li, L.; Liu, H. Effect of Airborne Contaminants on the Wettability of Supported Graphene and Graphite. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12 (10), 925931,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3709
    61. 61
      Farivar, F.; Yap, P. L.; Hassan, K.; Tung, T. T.; Tran, D. N. H.; Pollard, A. J.; Losic, D. Unlocking Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) in the Fight against “Fake Graphene” Materials. Carbon 2021, 179, 505513,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.04.064
    62. 62
      Strzemiecka, B.; Voelkel, A.; Donate-Robles, J.; Martín-Martínez, J. M. Assessment of the Surface Chemistry of Carbon Blacks by TGA-MS, XPS and Inverse Gas Chromatography Using Statistical Chemometric Analysis. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 316, 315323,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.174
    63. 63
      Cataldo, F. A Study on the Theraml Stability to 1000°C of Various Carbon Allotropes and Carbonaceous Matter both under Nitrogen and in Air. Fullerenes, Nanotubes Carbon Nanostruct. 2002, 10 (4), 293311,  DOI: 10.1081/FST-120016451
    64. 64
      Jahandar Lashaki, M.; Hashisho, Z.; Phillips, J. H.; Crompton, D.; Anderson, J. E.; Nichols, M. Mechanisms of Heel Buildup during Cyclic Adsorption-Desorption of Volatile Organic Compounds in a Full-Scale Adsorber-Desorber. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 400, 124937,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124937
    65. 65
      Losic, D.; Farivar, F.; Yap, P. L.; Karami, A. Accounting Carbonaceous Counterfeits in Graphene Materials Using the Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) Approach. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93 (34), 1185911867,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02662
    66. 66
      Fuertes, A. B.; Alvarez, S. Graphitic Mesoporous Carbons Synthesised through Mesostructured Silica Templates. Carbon 2004, 42 (15), 30493055,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.06.020
    67. 67
      Díez, N.; Sevilla, M.; Fuertes, A. B. Synthesis Strategies of Templated Porous Carbons beyond the Silica Nanocasting Technique. Carbon 2021, 178, 451476,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.03.029
    68. 68
      Yan, J.; Wang, Q.; Wei, T.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, M.; Jing, X.; Fan, Z. Template-Assisted Low Temperature Synthesis of Functionalized Graphene for Ultrahigh Volumetric Performance Supercapacitors. ACS Nano 2014, 8 (5), 47204729,  DOI: 10.1021/nn500497k
    69. 69
      Yoon, S. B.; Chai, G. S.; Kang, S. K.; Yu, J.-S.; Gierszal, K. P.; Jaroniec, M. Graphitized Pitch-Based Carbons with Ordered Nanopores Synthesized by Using Colloidal Crystals as Templates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127 (12), 41884189,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0423466
    70. 70
      O̅ya, A.; O̅tani, S. Catalytic Graphitization of Carbons by Various Metals. Carbon 1979, 17 (2), 131137,  DOI: 10.1016/0008-6223(79)90020-4
    71. 71
      Hunter, R. D.; Ramírez-Rico, J.; Schnepp, Z. Iron-Catalyzed Graphitization for the Synthesis of Nanostructured Graphitic Carbons. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10 (9), 44894516,  DOI: 10.1039/D1TA09654K
    72. 72
      Tee, E.; Tallo, I.; Thomberg, T.; Jänes, A.; Lust, E. Steam and Carbon Dioxide Co-Activated Silicon Carbide-Derived Carbons for High Power Density Electrical Double Layer Capacitors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165 (10), A2357A2364,  DOI: 10.1149/2.1261810jes
    73. 73
      Bokobza, L.; Bruneel, J.-L.; Couzi, M. Raman Spectra of Carbon-Based Materials (from Graphite to Carbon Black) and of Some Silicone Composites. C 2015, 1, 7794,  DOI: 10.3390/c1010077
    74. 74
      Wu, J.-B.; Lin, M.-L.; Cong, X.; Liu, H.-N.; Tan, P.-H. Raman Spectroscopy of Graphene-Based Materials and Its Applications in Related Devices. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47 (5), 18221873,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CS00915H
    75. 75
      Ferrari, A. C.; Basko, D. M. Raman Spectroscopy as a Versatile Tool for Studying the Properties of Graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8 (4), 235246,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.46
    76. 76
      Pimenta, M. A.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M. S.; Cançado, L. G.; Jorio, A.; Saito, R. Studying Disorder in Graphite-Based Systems by Raman Spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9 (11), 12761290,  DOI: 10.1039/B613962K
    77. 77
      Dresselhaus, M. S.; Dresselhaus, G.; Hofmann, M. Raman Spectroscopy as a Probe of Graphene and Carbon Nanotubes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 2008, 366 (1863), 231236,  DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2007.2155
    78. 78
      Langford, J. I.; Wilson, A. J. C. Scherrer after Sixty Years: A Survey and Some New Results in the Determination of Crystallite Size. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1978, 11 (2), 102113,  DOI: 10.1107/S0021889878012844
    79. 79
      Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A. V.; Olivier, J. P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K. S. W. Physisorption of Gases, with Special Reference to the Evaluation of Surface Area and Pore Size Distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87 (9–10), 10511069,  DOI: 10.1515/pac-2014-1117
    80. 80
      Kozbial, A.; Li, Z.; Sun, J.; Gong, X.; Zhou, F.; Wang, Y.; Xu, H.; Liu, H.; Li, L. Understanding the Intrinsic Water Wettability of Graphite. Carbon 2014, 74, 218225,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.03.025
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.3c18629.

    • Supplementary XPS, electrical resistivity and gas physisorption measurements, and analyses of electrode materials and electrodes (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.