ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Surface Chemistry of La0.99Sr0.01NbO4-d and Its Implication for Proton Conduction
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
    Research Article

    Surface Chemistry of La0.99Sr0.01NbO4-d and Its Implication for Proton Conduction
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    Department of Materials, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BP, United Kingdom
    *E-mail: [email protected], tel.: +44 (0)20 7594 6782.
    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (1)

    ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

    Cite this: ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 35, 29633–29642
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b04856
    Published August 18, 2017
    Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    Acceptor-doped LaNbO4 is a promising electrolyte material for proton-conducting fuel cell (PCFC) applications. As charge transfer processes govern device performance, the outermost surface of acceptor-doped LaNbO4 will play an important role in determining the overall cell performance. However, the surface composition is poorly characterized, and the understanding of its impact on the proton exchange process is rudimentary. In this work, the surface chemistry of 1 atom % Sr-doped LaNbO4 (La0.99Sr0.01NbO4-d, denoted as LSNO) proton conductor is characterized using LEIS and SIMS. The implication of a surface layer on proton transport is studied using the isotopic exchange technique. It has shown that a Sr-enriched but La-deficient surface layer of about 6–7 nm thick forms after annealing the sample under static air at 1000 °C for 10 h. The onset of segregation is found to be between 600 and 800 °C, and an equilibrium surface layer forms after 10 h annealing. A phase separation mechanism, due to the low solubility of Sr in LaNbO4, has been proposed to explain the observed segregation behavior. The surface layer was concluded to impede the water incorporation process, leading to a reduced isotopic fraction after the D216O wet exchange process, highlighting the impact of surface chemistry on the proton exchange process.

    Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b04856.

    • Calibration curves for XRF analysis, details of the deuterium exchange and associated SIMS data, analysis of SIMS crater depths as both a figure and tabulated data, details of the LEIS data analysis procedure, SIMS depth profiles at 450 °C, conductivity data (PDF)

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Citation Statements
    Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

    This article is cited by 7 publications.

    1. Alessandro Chiara, Francesco Giannici, Candida Pipitone, Alessandro Longo, Chiara Aliotta, Marianna Gambino, Antonino Martorana. Solid–Solid Interfaces in Protonic Ceramic Devices: A Critical Review. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (50) , 55537-55553. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c13092
    2. S. Balasundari, S. Jayasubramaniyan, M. Vithiya, P. A. Rayjada, N. Satyanarayana, T. Rani, P. Muralidharan. Enhanced proton conductivity in low-temperature sintered pristine and Ca-doped LaNbO4 nanocrystals synthesized via microwave hydrothermal method. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 2025, 36 (7) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-025-14512-9
    3. Nai Shi, Yun Xie, Moses Oludayo Tadé, Zongping Shao. Evolution and Reconstruction of Air‐Electrode Surface Composition in Reversible Protonic Ceramic Cells: Mechanisms, Impacts on Catalytic Performance, and Optimization Strategies – A Review. Advanced Materials 2025, 37 (11) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202416528
    4. Aleksandra Mielewczyk‐Gryń, Sebastian Wachowski, Kacper Dzierzgowski, Iga Szpunar, Judyta Strychalska‐Nowak, Tomasz Klimczuk, Mirosław Sawczak, Maria Gazda. Vibrational Properties of LaNb 0.8 M 0.2 O 4‐δ (M=As, Sb, V, and Ta). ChemPhysChem 2023, 24 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202200368
    5. Aleksandra Mielewczyk-Gryń, Sebastian Wachowski, Marta Prześniak-Welenc, Kacper Dzierzgowski, Anna Regoutz, David J. Payne, Maria Gazda. Water uptake analysis of acceptor-doped lanthanum orthoniobates. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 2019, 138 (1) , 225-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08208-6
    6. Jiajia Cui, Junkai Wang, Xiongwen Zhang, Guojun Li, Kai Wu, Yonghong Cheng, Jun Zhou. Enhanced oxygen reduction reaction through Ca and Co Co-doped YFeO3 as cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources 2019, 413 , 148-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.12.030
    7. Natalia M. Porotnikova, Vadim A. Eremin, Andrey S. Farlenkov, Edhem Kh. Kurumchin, Elena A. Sherstobitova, Dmitry I. Kochubey, Maxim V. Ananyev. Effect of AO Segregation on Catalytical Activity of La0.7A0.3MnO3±δ (A = Ca, Sr, Ba) Regarding Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Catalysis Letters 2018, 148 (9) , 2839-2847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-018-2456-7

    ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

    Cite this: ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 35, 29633–29642
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b04856
    Published August 18, 2017
    Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    1285

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.