ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img
RETURN TO ISSUEPREVResearch ArticleNEXT

Polymer–Magnetic Composite Fibers for Remote-Controlled Drug Release

Cite this: ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 18, 15524–15531
Publication Date (Web):April 12, 2018
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b04774

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

  • Open Access

Article Views

4564

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (3 MB)
Supporting Info (4)»

Abstract

An efficient method is reported, for the fabrication of composite microfibers that can be magnetically actuated and are biocompatible, targeting controlled drug release. Aqueous solutions of polyvinyl alcohol, incorporated with citric acid-coated Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), are subject to infusion gyration to generate 100–300 nm diameter composite fibers, with controllable MNP loading. The fibers are stable in polar solvents, such as ethanol, and do not show any leaching of MNPs for over 4 weeks. Using acetaminophen as an example, we demonstrate that this material is effective in immobilization and triggered release of drugs, which is achieved by a moving external magnetic field. The remote actuation ability, coupled with biocompatibility and lightweight property, renders enormous potential for these fibers to be used as a smart drug release agent.

1. Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Magnetically triggered release of active pharmaceutical ingredients is a rapidly growing area of research with applications targeted toward efficient, minimally invasive pathways of drug delivery. (1−4) Such studies usually involve the use of superparamagnetic nanoparticles, which are either functionalized as drug-carriers (5,6) or incorporated with polymers to produce composites in the form of membranes, (7) liposomes, (8−10) protein microspheres, (3) gels, (11) etc. These materials have become highly significant in the advancement of diagnosis and treatment of cancer and cardiovascular diseases, in addition to leading toward breakthroughs in regenerative medicine. (12−16) The magnetic component is typically activated via hyperthermia or chemical signals to trigger the release of the drug. (17,18) Actuation of the drug-carrying platform by an external magnetic field (i.e., magnetic actuation), however, remains scarcely explored but has enormous potential in biomedicine. (19,20) Such systems can potentially lead to remote-controlled, precise, and safer pathways of drug delivery and also pave the way for advances in the rapidly evolving field of microrobotics and for applications in medicine. (20−22)
Recent reports indicate that in vitro drug release, in particular, can be improved using conventional carrier systems such as mesoporous silica, in combination with magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) for triggered cargo release. (23−25) Such systems have great potential for the treatment of cancer and other related diseases. (26) These systems, however, need physical (e.g., thermal or light) or chemical (e.g., pH or redox changes) stimuli or enzymatic catalysis to initiate the release action, which require either invasive procedures or are limited in efficiency and controllability. In contrast, systems containing MNPs give rapid responses, with greater noninvasiveness, and can be easily controlled by external magnetic fields. MNPs also have the advantage of being easily integrated with organic components such as polymers to create composite materials with novel and improved capabilities. (12)
Polymer-based nanofibers have been investigated for a myriad of biomedical applications, including scaffolds for tissue engineering, materials for wound dressing, and vehicles for drug delivery. (27) Nanoscale fibers are of particular interest in biomedicine, as their morphology resembles biological tissue. They also have high surface area and surface energy and can be organized into porous hierarchical structures, which are highly desirable properties for cell and tissue adhesion as well as the adsorption of drug molecules. The physical structure of the fibers can be readily customized to adapt to different applications. In such instances, synthesis is mostly achieved via electrospinning. (28−30) This technique has been explored extensively to achieve hollow core–shell microparticle-encapsulated fibers. (31) Furthermore, materials used for fiber formation have been developed to facilitate the incorporation of fibers with biodegradable (32,33) and antibiotic properties (34) and even those that include living tissue. (35−37) Extensive progress has also been made in the scale-up of such materials targeting industrial applications. (38)
Despite the wealth of research conducted, such nanofibers have not yet, however, made it to the clinical trial stage of biomedical applications. This can be attributed to multiple factors, from mass production to long-term stability of the fibers in vivo. For example, electrospinning, which is the main synthesis method of fiber formation, poses many challenges to their sustained usage in medical applications. The lack of control over fiber diameter and pore sizes, as well as the random nonwoven nature of the fibers produced, causes difficulty in cell penetration, which is a key factor in sustained use of scaffolds for tissue engineering. (39,40) Although electrospinning is effective in producing microscale fibers, smaller diameters are difficult to obtain. (41) Attempts at customizing fiber morphology via this technique are complicated and lead to lower yields. (42) Moreover, electrospun fibers have inherently weaker mechanical strength than cast fibers, and the solvents and cross-linking agents involved in the process often lead to toxicity and noncompatibility in biological systems. (43)
Alternative spinning techniques have been developed to counteract some of the drawbacks of electrospinning. (44) These, however, are not without flaws themselves. Biospinning, for example, is a technique suitable for producing fibers with greater mechanical strength, such as scaffolds for tendons or bones. (45) Nevertheless, this method is hampered by high cost, difficulty in scale-up, longer production times, and lack of customizability. Melt spinning can create fibers by extruding a heated polymer through a spinneret with textural control for cell applications. (46,47) Yet, high energy costs, expensive equipment, and difficulty in producing cell-incorporating fibers are considerable impediments. The latter issue can be solved via an interfacial complexation process, to encapsulate cells, which is also cheaper; (48) despite this, limitations in scale-up and material and dimension control are significant disadvantages. Overall, a technique to produce such biocompatible fibers in a facile, fast, and cost-effective manner, with controllable sizes and the potential for scale-up, is highly desirable. If the above is also coupled with the ability of remote actuation, it can lead to significant advancements in drug delivery and tissue engineering.
The goal of this study is to demonstrate a magnetically actuated drug delivery system, based on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)–MNP fibers, generated via infusion gyration. The fibers are made of biocompatible components in order to target biomedical applications, specifically drug release. The ability of these fibers to be actuated via an external magnetic field is demonstrated, along with extensive characterization of their physicochemical properties. The release of controlled quantities of acetaminophen, via magnetic actuation of this material, is explored. Furthermore, the advantages and potential scope of application, beyond drug delivery, are discussed.

2. Experimental Section

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

All reagents and chemicals were used as received, without further modification.

2.1. Preparation of PVA and PVA–MNP Solutions

Three types of PVA polymer powder (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK), with different molecular weights, were taken in the following weight ratios to obtain three viscous solutions (Table 1): (1) PVA (363 170, 87–89% hydrolyzed), (2) PVA (363 138, 98–99% hydrolyzed), (3) PVA (363 065, 99+% hydrolyzed). The three solutions were made by mixing in the relevant weight of each type of PVA powder with distilled water and heating under magnetic stirring at 90 °C, for 5 h, to achieve homogeneous mixtures.
Table 1. Molecular Weights and Weight Ratios of PVA Polymers Used for Pure PVA and PVA–MNP Fiber Fabrication
PVA typemolecular weightweight %
113 000–23 00022
231 000–50 00010
3146 000–186 0007
Next, the three solutions were mixed in a volume ratio of 1:1:1, to make a total of 30 mL and magnetically stirred at ambient temperature (23 °C) for 24 h. This mixture was stored in sealed glass vials until use. All fiber samples used in this study consisted of the above mixture. Subsequently, this solution was mixed with 5% (w/w) Fe3O4 magnetic nanopowder (∼20 nm), coated with citric acid (see section 2.2 below), and vigorously vortexed for 5 min to obtain PVA–MNP solutions. Both the pure PVA and PVA–MNP solutions were then spun into fibers, according to the procedures described in section 2.3.

2.2. Citric Acid Coating of MNPs

MNPs were subject to acid coating prior to mixing with PVA, in order to ensure effective dispersion in the aqueous polymer solution. Citric acid (Sigma-Aldrich, ACS grade >99.8%) was dissolved in deionized water in a ratio of 0.5 mg/mL, at 90 °C for 1 h, under magnetic stirring. Then, the stirrer was removed, and a relevant weight of Fe3O4 MNPs (US Research Nanomaterials, Inc., 20 nm) was added to the solution and mixed for another 1 h. Afterward, the acid-coated MNPs were precipitated by placing a magnet under the bottom of the vessel, and the solution was decanted. The collected MNPs were then washed twice, with 100 mL of deionized water, and dried at 80 °C in an oven, for 3 h or until a constant weight was obtained.

2.3. Fabrication of Fibers

The fibers were fabricated using a previously reported (49) in-house built experimental setup, using the principle of infusion gyration (Figure 1; also see Supporting Information Video S1). The device consists of a hollow aluminum rotary vessel, 25 mm in height and 60 mm in diameter, and contains 20 small round orifices. Each orifice is of 0.5 mm in diameter and lies along the central circumference of the cylindrical vessel. The vessel is connected to and powered by a dc motor and a speed controller, which can provide variable speeds of rotation. The rotational speed was fixed at 36 000 rpm for this study. The top of the vessel contains a removable cap, with a rotary joint connected to a lead. The other tip of the lead is connected to a syringe pump (PHD 4400 Programmable Syringe Pump, Harvard Apparatus). The flow rate of the solution to the vessel is tuned via the syringe pump and was held at 4 mL/min during this study. A stationary steel mesh was placed 120 mm away from the rotating vessel to help collect the fibers. The solutions consisting of either PVA or MNPs containing PVA were spun at ambient conditions of 23 °C and ∼40% relative humidity. After the spinning was completed, all samples were transferred to sealed containers for further characterization.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Making polymer-based fibers via infusion gyration. (A) Schematic diagram of the spinning process. (B) High-speed camera image of the spinning cylinder showing fiber formation.

2.4. Characterization of PVA and PVA–MNP Fibers

Fiber samples were observed under a Nikon Eclipse ME 600 optical microscope, fitted with a MicroPublisher 3.3 RTV, 3.3 megapixel CCD Color-Bayer Mosaic, Real Time Viewing camera (Media Cybernetics, Marlow, UK). Size and morphology of the fibers were analyzed using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) with a JEOL JSM6310F instrument. All samples were coated with carbon prior to imaging, using a Quorum K975X turbo-pumped thermal evaporator (Quorum Technologies Ltd., East Sussex, UK). Chemical characterization was achieved via FTIR spectroscopy, with a Bruker VERTEX 70 instrument. An INCA X-sight EDAX system (Oxford Instruments) was used with Hitachi S-3400N for EDX (energy-dispersive X-ray) spectroscopy for surface elemental analysis. Stability of the composite fibers was studied by immersing in an absolute ethanol solution for 4 weeks, followed by testing for Fe3O4 leaching via UV–vis spectroscopy, using an Agilent Technologies Cary 4000 UV–vis spectrophotometer.

2.5. Magnetic Actuation and Characterization

Magnetic actuation of the MNP-containing fibers was achieved using commercial neodymium magnets (emagnets UK, EP336, 20 mm dia × 5 mm, N42, NiCuNi plated, 1.4 T), in air and in ethanol. The fibers effectively responded to the external magnetic field while contained in glass vials open to air or in glass vials containing absolute ethanol. The fibers could also easily be guided in a channel containing ethanol. Magnetization measurements were performed using a Quantum Design MPMS SQUID-VSM magnetometer. Samples were weighed and mounted within polycarbonate holders and subsequently measured (±1 T, 796 kA m–1, at 300 K).

2.6. Drug Release Experiments

Drug release experiments were conducted in absolute ethanol medium, with acetaminophen (Sigma-Aldrich, analytical standard) as a model drug. For each experiment, 5.0 mg of acetaminophen was transferred on to 60.0 mg of magnetic fibers. The fibers were wetted with three drops of absolute ethanol, prior to transfer of acetaminophen on to them. In order to ensure that the drug was effectively immobilized in the fiber network, the acetaminophen powder was spread throughout and pressed against the fibers with a spatula. This system was then transferred to a glass vial containing 10.0 mL of absolute ethanol. Both control experiments and actuation experiments were conducted in duplicate, to measure the release of acetaminophen into the solution with time. For the actuation experiments, the fiber–drug system was continuously moved via four stacked external magnets (see section 2.5). Samples of 500 μL of the ethanol solute were taken out from the system, first after every 1 min, up to 5 min, and then at every 5 min, for a total period of 30 min. Subsequently, the samples were analyzed via UV–vis spectrophotometry, to determine the concentration of acetaminophen released via magnetic actuation. The 500 μL taken out for sampling was replaced with new ethanol each time, in order to keep a total constant volume of 10 mL of ethanol throughout the experiment. The same procedure was followed to conduct control experiments, with the exception of the magnetic actuation.
The concentration of acetaminophen released into the solution was measured via ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectrophotometry at a characteristic absorbance wavelength of 248 nm. UV–vis spectroscopy was carried out using the absorbance mode of a BioTek Synergy H1 multidetection reader. These measurements were compared to a calibration curve, and the acetaminophen concentrations of the experimental samples were determined by the Beer–Lambert law.

3. Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

3.1. PVA and PVA–MNP Fibers via Infusion Gyration

Spinning of polymer solutions through micro-orifices under high pressure and speed is a technique recently optimized to mass-produce nanofibers. (49,50) This technology was extended to include nanoparticles (51) and protein (52)-containing polymer solutions to generate composite fibers. In the latter, (52) the flow rate, rather than pressure, was controlled during gyration; this is called infusion gyration. Here, this method was used to successfully generate fibers consisting of PVA polymer and PVA–MNP.
The morphology of the fibers was studied using optical and scanning electron microscopies. Optical microscopy revealed a fiber matrix containing small amounts of beads distributed in the matrix, for both pure PVA (Supporting Information, Figure S1A) and PVA–MNP (Figure 2A,B) samples. These beads were observed to be hollow structures via SEM and could arise from a combination of factors, such as the rheological properties of the polymer solution together with the spinning speed and pressure. (53) Fibers made from both PVA and PVA–MNP appeared to have a distribution of 100–300 nm in diameter (Figure 2C,D and Supporting Information, Figure S1B). The incorporation of Fe3O4 MNPs into the fibers was visualized via EDX dot mapping, which revealed that the iron oxide powder was distributed homogeneously on the fibers (Figure 2E,F).

Figure 2

Figure 2. PVA–MNP fibers (5% (w/w)). (A,B) Optical microscopy images, (C,D) SEM images, and (E,F) SEM dot mapping: the red dots indicate the presence of Fe in fibers.

Chemical composition of the fibers was analyzed using FTIR and EDX. Examination of the FTIR peaks allowed the identification of all typical peaks for PVA and citric acid (Figure 3A). These include the broad peaks at 3300 cm–1 from the stretching mode of inter- and intramolecular hydrogen bonds of O–H; 2920 and 2850 cm–1 from the C–H vibrational mode of alkyl groups; 1735 cm–1 from the stretching mode of C═O of the carbonyl groups; 1085 cm–1 from the C–O–C stretching mode; a shoulder at ∼1141 cm–1 from C–O stretching of crystalline PVA; and 1242 cm–1 from the symmetric stretching mode of citric acid. (54−56)

Figure 3

Figure 3. Characterization of chemical composition and magnetic content of the PVA–MNP fibers. (A) FTIR spectrum, (B) elemental analysis using EDX, (C) area of fiber sample subject to EDX analysis, and (D) mass magnetization behavior of the MNP–PVA fiber sample.

However, the characteristic vibrational bands of Fe3O4 usually found at 634, 582, and 397 cm–1, characteristic of magnetite, (57) were not discernible via the instrument used. The presence of surface Fe was successfully detected using EDX and was found to be in the range of 5–10% of atomic weight for different samples (Figure 3B,C).
In order to correctly quantify the amount of MNPs loaded on to the fibers, the material was subject to superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) analysis. It was found that the fibers were composed of 4.9% magnetic component by weight (due to Fe3O4 MNPs), as determined by the fraction of the mass magnetization for the PVA–MNP fibers (M = 2.6 A m2 kg–1) and the pure MNPs (M = 53.8 A m2 kg–1) (Figure S3 and Figure 3D). Because the polymer solution fed to the spinning apparatus consisted of 5% of MNPs by weight, this shows that the process of infused gyration is highly effective in generating fibers with minimal loss of the magnetic material. This observation, coupled with the previously investigated efficacy of the gyration process, (52) renders potential for scaled up production of magnetic fibers using this technique.

3.2. Controlled Release of Acetaminophen via Magnetic Actuation of PVA–MNP Fibers

The ability to release controlled quantities of drugs via application of an external stimulus onto the carrier platform is a highly advantageous feature for drug delivery. This was successfully demonstrated by the controlled release of acetaminophen loaded on the PVA–MNP fibers, via an external magnetic field. Absolute ethanol was chosen as the medium for these experiments, in which the magnetic fibers were stable. UV–vis experiments conducted on the supernatant of PVA–MNP fibers stored in absolute ethanol for 4 weeks showed no traces of Fe3O4 leaching (Supporting Information Figure S2). Acetaminophen was chosen as a model drug for this study due to its high solubility in ethanol (58) and its characteristic UV–vis absorption. (59) This drug was effectively immobilized onto the PVA–MNP fibers (Figure 4A), following which the drug–fiber system was transferred to an absolute ethanol medium and studied for the release of acetaminophen with time, both with and without magnetic actuation (Figure 4B,C and Supporting Information Videos S2 and S3). Separate experiments were conducted in duplicate, for the control (i.e., without actuation) and actuated studies. Samples were taken out at relevant time intervals and subject to UV–vis analysis. The ethanol volume was kept constant for all samples throughout the study by replacing the sampling volume.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Drug release experiments using magnetic fibers. (A) Loading of acetaminophen onto the fibers, (B) control experiment without any actuation, and (C) fiber–drug system actuated via an external magnet.

Acetaminophen has strong UV absorption with a prominent peak at 243 nm and a broad shoulder at around 290 nm, in water. (60) In absolute ethanol, these peaks were observed at 248 and 295 nm, respectively (Figure 5A). A calibration curve for acetaminophen was obtained using standard solutions and was used to determine the concentration of its quantities released during the control and actuation experiments of the acetaminophen-loaded fiber system. On the basis of the above results, the concentration and the cumulative % of acetaminophen released were plotted against time (Figures S4 and 5B, respectively).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Use of magnetic fibers for controlled release of acetaminophen with and without magnetic actuation. (A) Chemical structure and UV–vis absorption spectrum of acetaminophen, (B) cumulative weight percentages of acetaminophen released with time. Here, the control experiment represents the equivalent release of acetaminophen without magnetic (or any other type of) actuation. (C) Effect of magnetic actuation on drug release with time: the difference between actuated and nonactuated cumulative release curves. (D) Ratio of acetaminophen release from actuated and nonactuated fibers.

It was evident that the magnetically actuated fiber system released significantly more acetaminophen with time, compared to the nonactuated system. For the actuated samples, a rapid release of acetaminophen was observed during the first 5 min, followed by a gradual increase, up to 15 min, following which the release plateaued until the end of the experiment, at 30 min. This behavior is consistent with a “burst-release” mechanism. (61) About 50% of the drug was released within 2–3 min and over 90% by the end of 15 min of actuation. No statistically significant further increase in release concentration is observed over the 15–30 min time frame. This may be because further drug release is restricted due to the strong adsorption or possible entrapment of remaining drug within the fiber matrix. It is also noteworthy that, because the drug release is triggered by movement (i.e., magnetic actuation), we are unable to ensure that the acetaminophen concentration is homogeneous throughout the test solution. This may result in greater differences in duplicate experiments conducted for actuated samples compared to the controls, bringing about larger experimental errors for the former. In contrast, the control samples released significantly lower amounts of drug during the first 5 min, followed by a slower gradual increase in drug release over the next 20 min, and finally showed a slight decrease during the last 5 min. This behavior can be attributed to simple diffusion of the immobilized acetaminophen from the fiber network.
The difference between the cumulative % of acetaminophen released over time from the actuated and nonactuated fibers, for the 5–30 min time frame, is depicted in Figure 5C. By the end of the first 5 min, there is a stark difference of about 71% of acetaminophen release between the two types of samples. This amounts to approximately 28 times higher drug release from actuated fibers compared to a nonactuated sample, as depicted by the ratios in Figure 5D. This is followed by steadily decreasing ratios of release up to 15 min, and by the end of the 30 min study period, about twice as much acetaminophen continues to release via magnetic actuation, compared to diffusion. The above is clear evidence that remote magnetic actuation can bring about significant changes in both an absolute and a relative sense, for the release of drugs from PVA–MNP fibers.
On the basis of the above results, it is evident that the PVA–MNP fibers are capable of fast drug release during smaller time scales and slower, consistent drug release over time, via magnetic actuation. This novel, biocompatible, cost-effective, and controllable technique has the potential to be used clinically, as an effective tool for triggered drug release. Application of this mode of drug delivery is particularly attractive in wound care due to several reasons: (1) it can be used in the community by tissue viability nurses, (2) repeated drug delivery can be effected, without necessarily changing or removing the dressings, and (3) chemical debridement of wounds (as opposed to surgical debridement for which one needs an anesthetic, theater time, and, often, a physician to conduct the procedure) can be carried out if the relevant drug is incorporated into the PVA–MNP fibers. Moreover, there is increasingly a focus to move the management of wound care into the community, which achieves two important NHS objectives: (a) it relieves hospital bed pressures and (b) patients can be managed in the convenience of their own homes and are not subjected to the challenges of being an inpatient.
This technology also has potential applications for “site-specific” treatment due to its customizable properties. For example, the sensitivity of magnetic actuation of the fibers, namely, the minimum depth and distance from the magnetic source needed for actuation, can be improved by increasing either the MNP concentration or the power of the magnet. Then, the material can possibly be applied in treatment of atherosclerotic plaque in the carotid artery or, in simpler terms, for prevention of a stroke. In this instance, the magnetic fibers could be administered intravenously, and then the magnetic actuation could be directed to the carotid artery in the neck so that the drug would be released only at this specific site. If deeper penetration of the magnetic force can be achieved safely, then one could envisage widening the portfolio of use within the body in a number of conditions, for example, acute conditions such as sepsis and chronic diseases, such as inflammation in arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, and in a range of oncological therapies.

4. Conclusions

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

PVA nanofibers incorporating 5% (w/w) of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles were successfully and reproducibly prepared by infusion gyration. The fibers were shown to be stable when stored in ethanol, without any leaching of MNPs. The magnetic particles impart sufficient magnetization to the fibers to support actuation via external magnets. Acetaminophen was used to successfully demonstrate controlled drug release using the PVA–MNP fibers, when subject to magnetic actuation, bringing about over 90% cumulative release in 15 min. Compared to nonactuated controls, the magnetic fibers showed approximately 71% more release of the drug within 5 min, in absolute terms, and nearly 28 times higher release, in relative terms. This is promising for applications of this technology as an efficient remote-controlled method for drug delivery. The above, coupled together with facile, cost-effective material synthesis, with proven ability to scale up, offers attractive opportunities in clinical application of the magnetic fibers.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b04774.

  • SEM images of pure PVA fibers; MNP leaching studies for PVA–MNP fibers conducted via UV–vis absorbance of supernatant solutions; mass magnetization behavior of both pure MNP (M = 2.6 A m2 kg–1) and 5% MNP–PVA fiber (M = 53.8 A m2 kg–1) samples; and concentration of acetaminophen released with time (PDF)

  • High-speed camera video showing fiber formation during the infusion gyration process (ZIP)

  • Procedure for magnetic actuation of fibers loaded with acetaminophen (ZIP)

  • Transportation of the magnetic fibers along a tube using magnetic actuation, demonstrating the scope of actuation (ZIP)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Authors
  • Authors
    • Ayomi S. Perera - Centre for Nature Inspired Engineering  and  Department of Chemical Engineering, , and , University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, U.K.Orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-040X
    • Siqi Zhang - Department of Mechanical Engineering, , and , University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, U.K.
    • Shervanthi Homer-Vanniasinkam - Department of Mechanical Engineering, , and , University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, U.K.
  • Funding

    The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (UK) is gratefully acknowledged for support of gyratory forming work (grants EP/L023059/1 and EP/N034228/1) and for a “Frontier Engineering” award, EP/K038656/1.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable contributions from Justin Siefker and Michele Lynch of the Department of Chemical Engineering, UCL, for assistance with FTIR and UV–vis experiments, Dr. Paul Southern of the UCL Healthcare Biomagnetics Laboratory for SQUID analysis, and Dr. Tom Gregory of the UCL Institute of Archaeology for SEM and EDX.

Abbreviations

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

PVA

polyvinyl alcohol

MNPs

magnetic nanoparticles

dc

direct current

EDX

energy-dispersive X-ray

Mw

molecular weight

UV–vis

ultraviolet–visible

SQUID

superconducting quantum interference device

FESEM

field emission scanning electron microscope

FTIR

Fourier transform infrared

NHS

National Health Service (UK)

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 61 other publications.

  1. 1
    Ulbrich, K.; Holá, K.; Šubr, V.; Bakandritsos, A.; Tuček, J.; Zbořil, R. Targeted Drug Delivery with Polymers and Magnetic Nanoparticles: Covalent and Noncovalent Approaches, Release Control, and Clinical Studies. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 53385431,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00589
  2. 2
    Wang, Y.; Kohane, D. S. External triggering and triggered targeting strategies for drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17020,  DOI: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.20
  3. 3
    Chandna, A.; Batra, D.; Kakar, S.; Singh, R. A review on target drug delivery: magnetic microspheres. J. Acute Dis. 2013, 2, 189195,  DOI: 10.1016/s2221-6189(13)60125-0
  4. 4
    Arruebo, M.; Fernández-Pacheco, R.; Ibarra, M. R.; Santamaría, J. Magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nano Today 2007, 2, 2232,  DOI: 10.1016/s1748-0132(07)70084-1
  5. 5
    Jurgons, R.; Seliger, C.; Hilpert, A.; Trahms, L.; Odenbach, S.; Alexiou, C. Drug loaded magnetic nanoparticles for cancer therapy. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2006, 18, S2893,  DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/18/38/s24
  6. 6
    Perera, A. S. Sustainable Magnetic Nanocatalysts in Heterogeneous Catalysis. Magnetic Nanomaterials: Applications in Catalysis and Life Sciences; Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017; Chapter 4, pp 99119.
  7. 7
    Hoare, T.; Timko, B. P.; Santamaria, J.; Goya, G. F.; Irusta, S.; Lau, S.; Stefanescu, C. F.; Lin, D.; Langer, R.; Kohane, D. S. Magnetically Triggered Nanocomposite Membranes: A Versatile Platform for Triggered Drug Release. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 13951400,  DOI: 10.1021/nl200494t
  8. 8
    Oliveira, H.; Pérez-Andrés, E.; Thevenot, J.; Sandre, O.; Berra, E.; Lecommandoux, S. Magnetic field triggered drug release from polymersomes for cancer therapeutics. J. Controlled Release 2013, 169, 165170,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.01.013
  9. 9
    Lee, J.-H.; Ivkov, R.; Blumenthal, R. Magnetically Triggered Drug Release from Liposome Embedded Gel. J. Nanomed. Biother. Discovery 2014, 4, 130136,  DOI: 10.4172/2155-983x.1000130
  10. 10
    Bi, H.; Ma, S.; Li, Q.; Han, X. Magnetically triggered drug release from biocompatible microcapsules for potential cancer therapeutics. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 32693277,  DOI: 10.1039/c5tb02464a
  11. 11
    Hoare, T.; Timko, B. P.; Santamaria, J.; Goya, G. F.; Irusta, S.; Lau, S.; Stefanescu, C. F.; Lin, D.; Langer, R.; Kohane, D. S. Magnetically-triggered Nanocomposite Membranes: a Versatile Platform for Triggered Drug Release. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 13951400,  DOI: 10.1021/nl200494t
  12. 12
    Veiseh, O.; Gunn, J. W.; Zhang, M. Design and fabrication of magnetic nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery and imaging. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2010, 62, 284304,  DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.11.002
  13. 13
    Gobbo, O. L.; Sjaastad, K.; Radomski, M. W.; Volkov, Y.; Prina-Mello, A. Magnetic Nanoparticles in Cancer Theranostics. Theranostics 2015, 5, 12491263,  DOI: 10.7150/thno.11544
  14. 14
    Sun, C.; Lee, J.; Zhang, M. Magnetic Nanoparticles in MR Imaging and Drug Delivery. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2008, 60, 12521265,  DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.018
  15. 15
    Qureshi, A.; Gurbuz, Y.; Niazi, J. H. Biosensors for cardiac biomarkers detection: A review. Sens. Actuators, B 2012, 171, 6276,  DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2012.05.077
  16. 16
    Gao, Y.; Lim, J.; Teoh, S.-H.; Xu, C. Emerging translational research on magnetic nanoparticles for regenerative medicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 63066329,  DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00322e
  17. 17
    Hergt, R.; Dutz, S.; Müller, R.; Zeisberger, M. Magnetic particle hyperthermia: nanoparticle magnetism and materials development for cancer therapy. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2006, 18, S2919,  DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/18/38/s26
  18. 18
    Pankhurst, Q. A.; Thanh, N. T. K.; Jones, S. K.; Dobson, J. Progress in applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2009, 42, 224001,  DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/22/224001
  19. 19
    Fusco, S.; Huang, H.-W.; Peyer, K. E.; Peters, C.; Häberli, M.; Ulbers, A.; Spyrogianni, A.; Pellicer, E.; Sort, J.; Pratsinis, S. E.; Nelson, B. J.; Sakar, M. S.; Pané, S. Shape-Switching Microrobots for Medical Applications: The Influence of Shape in Drug Delivery and Locomotion. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 68036811,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b00181
  20. 20
    Temel, F. Z.; Yesilyurt, S. Magnetically actuated micro swimming of bio-inspired robots in mini channels. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics , 13–15 April 2011, 2011; Vol. 2011, pp 342347.
  21. 21
    Xu, T.; Yu, J.; Yan, X.; Choi, H.; Zhang, L. Magnetic Actuation Based Motion Control for Microrobots: An Overview. Micromachines 2015, 6, 13461364,  DOI: 10.3390/mi6091346
  22. 22
    Floyd, S.; Pawashe, C.; Sitti, M. An untethered magnetically actuated micro-robot capable of motion on arbitrary surfaces. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , 19–23 May 2008, 2008; Vol. 2008, pp 419424.
  23. 23
    Thomas, C. R.; Ferris, D. P.; Lee, J.-H.; Choi, E.; Cho, M. H.; Kim, E. S.; Stoddart, J. F.; Shin, J.-S.; Cheon, J.; Zink, J. I. Noninvasive Remote-Controlled Release of Drug Molecules in Vitro Using Magnetic Actuation of Mechanized Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1062310625,  DOI: 10.1021/ja1022267
  24. 24
    Singh, R. K.; Patel, K. D.; Kim, J.-J.; Kim, T.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Shin, U. S.; Lee, E.-J.; Knowles, J. C.; Kim, H.-W. Multifunctional Hybrid Nanocarrier: Magnetic CNTs Ensheathed with Mesoporous Silica for Drug Delivery and Imaging System. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 22012208,  DOI: 10.1021/am4056936
  25. 25
    Chen, J.-P.; Yang, P.-C.; Ma, Y.-H.; Tu, S.-J.; Lu, Y.-J. Targeted delivery of tissue plasminogen activator by binding to silica-coated magnetic nanoparticle. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 51375149,  DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s36197
  26. 26
    Mody, V. V.; Cox, A.; Shah, S.; Singh, A.; Bevins, W.; Parihar, H. Magnetic nanoparticle drug delivery systems for targeting tumor. Appl. Nanosci. 2014, 4, 385392,  DOI: 10.1007/s13204-013-0216-y
  27. 27
    Leung, V.; Ko, F. Biomedical applications of nanofibers. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2011, 22, 350365,  DOI: 10.1002/pat.1813
  28. 28
    Suwantong, O. Biomedical applications of electrospun polycaprolactone fiber mats. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2016, 27, 12641273,  DOI: 10.1002/pat.3876
  29. 29
    Liu, H.; Ding, X.; Zhou, G.; Li, P.; Wei, X.; Fan, Y. Electrospinning of nanofibers for tissue engineering applications. J. Nanomater. 2013, 2013, 111,  DOI: 10.1155/2013/495708
  30. 30
    Rodríguez, K.; Gatenholm, P.; Renneckar, S. Electrospinning cellulosic nanofibers for biomedical applications: structure and in vitro biocompatibility. Cellulose 2012, 19, 15831598,  DOI: 10.1007/s10570-012-9734-0
  31. 31
    Agarwal, S.; Wendorff, J. H.; Greiner, A. Use of electrospinning technique for biomedical applications. Polymer 2008, 49, 56035621,  DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.014
  32. 32
    Ashammakhi, N.; Ndreu, A.; Piras, A. M.; Nikkola, L.; Sindelar, T.; Jukola, H.; Harlin, A.; Gomes, M. E.; Neves, N. M.; Chiellini, E.; Chiellini, F.; Hasirci, V.; Redl, H.; Reis, R. L. Biodegradable nanomats produced by electrospinning: Expanding multifunctionality and potential for tissue engineering. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2007, 7, 862882,  DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2007.485
  33. 33
    Teo, W.-E.; He, W.; Ramakrishna, S. Electrospun scaffold tailored for tissue-specific extracellular matrix. Biotechnol. J. 2006, 1, 918929,  DOI: 10.1002/biot.200600044
  34. 34
    Hipler, U.-C.; Elsner, P.; Fluhr, J. W. Antifungal and antibacterial properties of a silver-loaded cellulosic fiber. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B 2006, 77, 156163,  DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30413
  35. 35
    Townsend-Nicholson, A.; Jayasinghe, S. N. Cell Electrospinning: a Unique Biotechnique for Encapsulating Living Organisms for Generating Active Biological Microthreads/Scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7, 33643369,  DOI: 10.1021/bm060649h
  36. 36
    Jayasinghe, S. N.; Irvine, S.; McEwan, J. R. Cell electrospinning highly concentrated cellular suspensions containing primary living organisms into cell-bearing threads and scaffolds. Nanomedicine 2007, 2, 555567,  DOI: 10.2217/17435889.2.4.555
  37. 37
    Yan, S.; Li, X.; Dai, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, B.; Lu, Y.; Shi, J.; Huang, P.; Gong, J.; Yao, Y. Electrospinning of PVA/sericin nanofiber and the effect on epithelial-mesenchymal transition of A549 cells. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2017, 79, 436444,  DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.048
  38. 38
    Persano, L.; Camposeo, A.; Tekmen, C.; Pisignano, D. Industrial Upscaling of Electrospinning and Applications of Polymer Nanofibers: A Review. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2013, 298, 504520,  DOI: 10.1002/mame.201200290
  39. 39
    Guimarães, A.; Martins, A.; Pinho, E. D.; Faria, S.; Reis, R. L.; Neves, N. M. Solving cell infiltration limitations of electrospun nanofiber meshes for tissue engineering applications. Nanomedicine 2010, 5, 539554,  DOI: 10.2217/nnm.10.31
  40. 40
    Martins, A.; Araújo, J. V.; Reis, R. L.; Neves, N. M. Electrospun nanostructured scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Nanomedicine 2007, 2, 929942,  DOI: 10.2217/17435889.2.6.929
  41. 41
    Zhang, Y.; Lim, C. T.; Ramakrishna, S.; Huang, Z.-M. Recent development of polymer nanofibers for biomedical and biotechnological applications. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 2005, 16, 933946,  DOI: 10.1007/s10856-005-4428-x
  42. 42
    Zafar, M.; Najeeb, S.; Khurshid, Z.; Vazirzadeh, M.; Zohaib, S.; Najeeb, B.; Sefat, F. Potential of Electrospun Nanofibers for Biomedical and Dental Applications. Materials 2016, 9, 73,  DOI: 10.3390/ma9020073
  43. 43
    Tamimi, E.; Ardila, D. C.; Haskett, D. G.; Doetschman, T.; Slepian, M. J.; Kellar, R. S.; Vande Geest, J. P. Biomechanical Comparison of Glutaraldehyde-Crosslinked Gelatin Fibrinogen Electrospun Scaffolds to Porcine Coronary Arteries. J. Biomech. Eng. 2015, 138, 011001,  DOI: 10.1115/1.4031847
  44. 44
    Tamayol, A.; Akbari, M.; Annabi, N.; Paul, A.; Khademhosseini, A.; Juncker, D. Fiber-based tissue engineering: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 669687,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.11.007
  45. 45
    Gosline, J. M.; Guerette, P. A.; Ortlepp, C. S.; Savage, K. N. The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function. J. Exp. Biol. 1999, 202, 32953303
  46. 46
    Gomes, M. E.; Azevedo, H. S.; Moreira, A. R.; Ellä, V.; Kellomäki, M.; Reis, R. L. Starch–poly(ε-caprolactone) and starch–poly(lactic acid) fibre-mesh scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications: structure, mechanical properties and degradation behaviour. J. Tissue Eng. Regener. Med. 2008, 2, 243252,  DOI: 10.1002/term.89
  47. 47
    Sinclair, K. D.; Webb, K.; Brown, P. J. The effect of various denier capillary channel polymer fibers on the alignment of NHDF cells and type I collagen. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 2010, 95, 11941202,  DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32941
  48. 48
    Wan, A. C. A.; Liao, I.-C.; Yim, E. K. F.; Leong, K. W. Mechanism of Fiber Formation by Interfacial Polyelectrolyte Complexation. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 70197025,  DOI: 10.1021/ma0498868
  49. 49
    Mahalingam, S.; Edirisinghe, M. Forming of Polymer Nanofibers by a Pressurised Gyration Process. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2013, 34, 11341139,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.201300339
  50. 50
    Mahalingam, S.; Raimi-Abraham, B. T.; Craig, D. Q. M.; Edirisinghe, M. Solubility–spinnability map and model for the preparation of fibres of polyethylene (terephthalate) using gyration and pressure. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 280, 344353,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.05.114
  51. 51
    Illangakoon, U. E.; Mahalingam, S.; Wang, K.; Cheong, Y.-K.; Canales, E.; Ren, G. G.; Cloutman-Green, E.; Edirisinghe, M.; Ciric, L. Gyrospun antimicrobial nanoparticle loaded fibrous polymeric filters. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2017, 74, 315324,  DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.001
  52. 52
    Zhang, S.; Karaca, B. T.; VanOosten, S. K.; Yuca, E.; Mahalingam, S.; Edirisinghe, M.; Tamerler, C. Coupling Infusion and Gyration for the Nanoscale Assembly of Functional Polymer Nanofibers Integrated with Genetically Engineered Proteins. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2015, 36, 13221328,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.201500174
  53. 53
    Hong, X.; Edirisinghe, M.; Mahalingam, S. Beads, beaded-fibres and fibres: Tailoring the morphology of poly(caprolactone) using pressurised gyration. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2016, 69, 13731382,  DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.071
  54. 54
    Mallapragada, S. K.; Peppas, N. A. Dissolution mechanism of semicrystalline poly(vinyl alcohol) in water. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 1996, 34, 13391346,  DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0488(199605)34:7<1339::aid-polb15>3.0.co;2-b
  55. 55
    Mansur, H. S.; Sadahira, C. M.; Souza, A. N.; Mansur, A. A. P. FTIR spectroscopy characterization of poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel with different hydrolysis degree and chemically crosslinked with glutaraldehyde. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2008, 28, 539548,  DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2007.10.088
  56. 56
    Bichara, L. C.; Lanús, H. E.; Ferrer, E. G.; Gramajo, M. B.; Brandán, S. A. Vibrational Study and Force Field of the Citric Acid Dimer Based on the SQM Methodology. Adv. Phys. Chem. 2011, 2011, 110,  DOI: 10.1155/2011/347072
  57. 57
    Cornell, R. M.; Schwertmann, U. The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurrences and Uses; Wiley, 2006.
  58. 58
    Granberg, R. A.; Rasmuson, Å. C. Solubility of Paracetamol in Pure Solvents. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1999, 44, 13911395,  DOI: 10.1021/je990124v
  59. 59
    Glavanović, S.; Glavanović, M.; Tomišić, V. Simultaneous quantitative determination of paracetamol and tramadol in tablet formulation using UV spectrophotometry and chemometric methods. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 2016, 157, 258264,  DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2015.12.020
  60. 60
    Behera, S.; Ghanty, S.; Ahmad, F.; Santra, S.; Banerjee, S. UV-Visible Spectrophotometric Method Development and Validation of Assay of Paracetamol Tablet Formulation. J. Anal. Bioanal. Tech. 2012, 3, 151157,  DOI: 10.4172/2155-9872.1000151
  61. 61
    Huang, X.; Brazel, C. S. On the importance and mechanisms of burst release in matrix-controlled drug delivery systems. J. Controlled Release 2001, 73, 121136,  DOI: 10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00248-6

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 58 publications.

  1. Danilo M. dos Santos, Daniel S. Correa, Eliton S. Medeiros, Juliano E. Oliveira, Luiz H. C. Mattoso. Advances in Functional Polymer Nanofibers: From Spinning Fabrication Techniques to Recent Biomedical Applications. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (41) , 45673-45701. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c12410
  2. Yanjing Yang, Yao He, Zhiwei Deng, Jiacheng Li, Jin Huang, Shian Zhong. Intelligent Nanoprobe: Acid-Responsive Drug Release and In Situ Evaluation of Its Own Therapeutic Effect. Analytical Chemistry 2020, 92 (18) , 12371-12378. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02099
  3. Jaber Keyvan Rad, Zeinab Alinejad, Samideh Khoei, Ali Reza Mahdavian. Controlled Release and Photothermal Behavior of Multipurpose Nanocomposite Particles Containing Encapsulated Gold-Decorated Magnetite and 5-FU in Poly(lactide-co-glycolide). ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering 2019, 5 (9) , 4425-4434. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00790
  4. Luoran Shang, Yunru Yu, Yuxiao Liu, Zhuoyue Chen, Tiantian Kong, Yuanjin Zhao. Spinning and Applications of Bioinspired Fiber Systems. ACS Nano 2019, 13 (3) , 2749-2772. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b09651
  5. Zahra Sayyar, Gholam Reza Mahdavinia, Alireza Khataee. Dual-drug (Curcumin/Ciprofloxacin) loading and release from chitosan-based hydrogels embedded with magnetic Montmorillonite/Hyaluronic acid for enhancing wound healing. Journal of Biological Engineering 2023, 17 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-023-00385-1
  6. Parinaz Jabbari, Gholam Reza Mahdavinia, Parisa Fathi Rezaei, Bagher Kazemi Heragh, Parisa Labib, Hessam Jafari, Shahrzad Javanshir. pH-responsive magnetic biocompatible chitosan-based nanocomposite carrier for ciprofloxacin release. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2023, 250 , 126228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126228
  7. Danli Zhou, Dong Zhang, Ming Zhang, Ting Lü, Jingang Huang, Hongting Zhao, Jun Lin. Efficient Treatment of PAH-Contaminated Water Using Magnetic-Modified Myriophyllum aquaticum Waste Biomass. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 2023, 234 (7) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06496-1
  8. Qian Li, Zhen Lu, Xiaojun Liu. Focusing and rotating magnetic nanoparticle clusters for fast ablation of thrombus. Journal of Materials Science 2023, 58 (19) , 8022-8033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08500-9
  9. Yingying Cai, Jinzhi Pan. Ropivacaine combined with MNP in mouse anesthesia. Applied Nanoscience 2023, 13 (5) , 3589-3598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-022-02734-w
  10. Aakanksha Mohan, Richa Singhal, Sutapa Roy Ramanan. A study on the effect of the collector properties on the fabrication of magnetic polystyrene nanocomposite fibers using the electrospinning technique. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2023, 140 (6) https://doi.org/10.1002/app.53461
  11. Gholam Reza Mahdavinia, Hamed Hoseinzadeh, Parisa Labib, Parinaz Jabbari, Alisa Mohebbi, Shahram Barzeger, Hessam Jafari. (Magnetic laponite/κ-carrageenan)@chitosan core–shell carrier for pH-sensitive release of doxorubicin. Polymer Bulletin 2023, 9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-023-04688-7
  12. Pratikshkumar R. Patel, Rathna Venkata Naga Gundloori. A review on electrospun nanofibers for multiple biomedical applications. Polymers for Advanced Technologies 2023, 34 (1) , 44-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.5896
  13. Ali Farzin, Nima Beheshtizadeh, Ahmad Vaez, Paniz Siminzar, Mohammad Varzandeh, Mahmoud Azami. Encapsulation: Controlled drug delivery. 2023, 149-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824345-9.00008-8
  14. Ateev Vohra, Prateek Raturi, Emran Hussain. Scope of using hollow fibers as a medium for drug delivery. 2023, 169-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-96117-2.00013-3
  15. Victoriya Popova, Elena Dmitrienko, Alexey Chubarov. Magnetic Nanocomposites and Imprinted Polymers for Biomedical Applications of Nucleic Acids. Magnetochemistry 2023, 9 (1) , 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry9010012
  16. Ayomi S. Perera, Richard J. Jackson, Reece M. D. Bristow, Chinyere A. White. Magnetic cryogels as a shape-selective and customizable platform for hyperthermia-mediated drug delivery. Scientific Reports 2022, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13572-9
  17. Mariana Acosta, Marvin D. Santiago, Jennifer A. Irvin. Electrospun Conducting Polymers: Approaches and Applications. Materials 2022, 15 (24) , 8820. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248820
  18. Stephen Strassburg, Kai Mayer, Thomas Scheibel. Functionalization of biopolymer fibers with magnetic nanoparticles. Physical Sciences Reviews 2022, 7 (10) , 1091-1117. https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2019-0118
  19. Stefan H. Bossmann, Macy M. Payne, Mausam Kalita, Reece M. D. Bristow, Ayda Afshar, Ayomi S. Perera. Iron-Based Magnetic Nanosystems for Diagnostic Imaging and Drug Delivery: Towards Transformative Biomedical Applications. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14 (10) , 2093. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14102093
  20. Pratikshkumar R. Patel, Amarnath Singam, Arun Dadwal, Rathna Venkata Naga Gundloori. Blend of neem oil based polyesteramide as magnetic nanofiber mat for efficient cancer therapy. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 2022, 75 , 103629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103629
  21. Ivana Jarak, Inês Silva, Cátia Domingues, Ana Isabel Santos, Francisco Veiga, Ana Figueiras. Nanofiber Carriers of Therapeutic Load: Current Trends. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022, 23 (15) , 8581. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158581
  22. Francesca Garello, Yulia Svenskaya, Bogdan Parakhonskiy, Miriam Filippi. Micro/Nanosystems for Magnetic Targeted Delivery of Bioagents. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14 (6) , 1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14061132
  23. Maria Nerantzaki, Aude Michel, Laurence Petit, Maylis Garnier, Christine Ménager, Nébéwia Griffete. Biotinylated magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles for cancer cell targeting and controlled drug delivery. Chemical Communications 2022, 58 (37) , 5642-5645. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CC00740A
  24. Shilu Zhu, Yin Chen, Guangli Liu, Haisheng Qian, Fuzhou Niu, Ying Wang, Yuliang Zhao, Tingting Luo, Runhuai Yang. External Field‐Driven Untethered Microrobots for Targeted Cargo Delivery. Advanced Materials Technologies 2022, 7 (5) https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202101256
  25. Devan L. Puhl, Divya Mohanraj, Derek W. Nelson, Ryan J. Gilbert. Designing electrospun fiber platforms for efficient delivery of genetic material and genome editing tools. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2022, 183 , 114161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2022.114161
  26. Amrendra K. Tiwari, Pavan K. Yadav, Keerti Mishra, Pankaj Kumar Singh, Manish K. Chourasia. Magnetic nanoparticles. 2022, 235-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85041-4.00018-4
  27. Paula I.P. Soares, João Paulo Borges. Recent advances in magnetic electrospun nanofibers for cancer theranostics application. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International 2021, 31 (6) , 835-844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2021.11.003
  28. Ziwei Zhang, Connor J.R. Wells, Gemma-Louise Davies, Gareth R. Williams. The effect of formulation morphology on stimuli-triggered co-delivery of chemotherapeutic and MRI contrast agents. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2021, 609 , 121155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121155
  29. Prina Mehta, Manoochehr Rasekh, Mohammed Patel, Ekhoerose Onaiwu, Kazem Nazari, I. Kucuk, Philippe B. Wilson, Muhammad Sohail Arshad, Zeeshan Ahmad, Ming-Wei Chang. Recent applications of electrical, centrifugal, and pressurised emerging technologies for fibrous structure engineering in drug delivery, regenerative medicine and theranostics. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2021, 175 , 113823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.033
  30. Hessam Jafari, Ziba Atlasi, Gholam Reza Mahdavinia, Somayeh Hadifar, Mohammad Sabzi. Magnetic κ-carrageenan/chitosan/montmorillonite nanocomposite hydrogels with controlled sunitinib release. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2021, 124 , 112042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112042
  31. Li Jingcheng, Vundrala Sumedha Reddy, Wanasinghe A. D. M. Jayathilaka, Amutha Chinnappan, Seeram Ramakrishna, Rituparna Ghosh. Intelligent Polymers, Fibers and Applications. Polymers 2021, 13 (9) , 1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13091427
  32. Hao-Ran Yu, Qing Shen. Fabrication, characterization and drug release behaviors of chitosan microfibers loaded with herbal or non-herbal drugs. The Journal of The Textile Institute 2021, 112 (4) , 676-682. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2020.1775033
  33. Sijie Zhou, Liangjun Xia, Zhuan Fu, Chunhua Zhang, Xiangyu Duan, Shiyu Zhang, Yunli Wang, Cailing Ding, Xin Liu, Weilin Xu. Purification of dye-contaminated ethanol-water mixture using magnetic cellulose powders derived from agricultural waste biomass. Carbohydrate Polymers 2021, 258 , 117690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117690
  34. Paula I.P. Soares, Joana Romão, Ricardo Matos, Jorge Carvalho Silva, João Paulo Borges. Design and engineering of magneto-responsive devices for cancer theranostics: Nano to macro perspective. Progress in Materials Science 2021, 116 , 100742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100742
  35. Kevser Kuşat, Sinan Akgöl. Advanced Functional Polymers for Biomedical Applications: Drug, Sensor, Diagnosis, and Prognosis. 2021, 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64410-9_10
  36. M. Samim, Aarzoo. Hyaluronic acid-magnetic nanocomposites for gene delivery. 2021, 311-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821230-1.00011-6
  37. Andreza M Ribeiro, Thais H. S. Flores-Sahagun. Application of stimulus-sensitive polymers in wound healing formulation. International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials 2020, 69 (15) , 979-989. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2019.1655744
  38. Sanaz Gholami, Sheyda Labbaf, Ahmad Kermanpur, Arezou Baharlou Houreh, Chaojie Luo, Mohan Edirisinghe, Mohammad‐Hossein Nasr Esfahani. Poly(Caprolactone)‐Poly( N ‐Isopropyl Acrylamide)‐Fe 3 O 4 Magnetic Nanofibrous Structure with Stimuli Responsive Drug Release. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 2020, 305 (9) https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.202000208
  39. Ioan Bica, Eugen Mircea Anitas. Graphene Platelets-Based Magnetoactive Materials with Tunable Magnetoelectric and Magnetodielectric Properties. Nanomaterials 2020, 10 (9) , 1783. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091783
  40. Ziwei Zhang, Connor J. R. Wells, Aaron M. King, Joseph C. Bear, Gemma-Louise Davies, Gareth R. Williams. pH-Responsive nanocomposite fibres allowing MRI monitoring of drug release. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 2020, 8 (32) , 7264-7274. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TB01033B
  41. Shuting Zhang, Peng Yu, Yi Zhang, Zequn Ma, Kaixuan Teng, Xiantong Hu, Limei Lu, Yihe Zhang, Yantao Zhao, Qi An. Remarkably Boosted Molecular Delivery Triggered by Combined Thermal and Flexoelectrical Field Dual Stimuli. ChemistrySelect 2020, 5 (22) , 6715-6722. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202000423
  42. Rajesh Vadlapatla, Zhijun Wang, Priyank Kumar, Nina Pavuluri. Use of Physical Approaches for Systemic Drug Delivery. 2020, 299-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54490-4_11
  43. Shadpour Mallakpour, Maryam Tukhani. Green organo-modification of cyclodextrin metal oxide hybrids: Characterization, properties, and applications. 2020, 379-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819539-0.00015-4
  44. Osama M. Darwesh, Sameh S. Ali, Ibrahim A. Matter, Tamer Elsamahy, Yehia A. Mahmoud. Enzymes immobilization onto magnetic nanoparticles to improve industrial and environmental applications. 2020, 481-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mie.2019.11.006
  45. Yazhen Wang, Zhen Shi, Yu Sun, Xueying Wu, Shuang Li, Shaobo Dong, Tianyu Lan. Preparation of amphiphilic magnetic polyvinyl alcohol targeted drug carrier and drug delivery research. Designed Monomers and Polymers 2020, 23 (1) , 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15685551.2020.1837442
  46. Elizabeth J. Bealer, Kyril Kavetsky, Sierra Dutko, Samuel Lofland, Xiao Hu. Protein and Polysaccharide-Based Magnetic Composite Materials for Medical Applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020, 21 (1) , 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21010186
  47. Xiang‐Yun Du, Qing Li, Guan Wu, Su Chen. Multifunctional Micro/Nanoscale Fibers Based on Microfluidic Spinning Technology. Advanced Materials 2019, 31 (52) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201903733
  48. Aitang Zhang, Kenward Jung, Aihua Li, Jingquan Liu, Cyrille Boyer. Recent advances in stimuli-responsive polymer systems for remotely controlled drug release. Progress in Polymer Science 2019, 99 , 101164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101164
  49. Ranjeetkumar Gupta, Ketan Pancholi, Rulston De Sa, Duncan Murray, Dehong Huo, Ghazi Droubi, Maggie White, James Njuguna. Effect of Oleic Acid Coating of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles on Properties of Magnetic Polyamide-6 Nanocomposite. JOM 2019, 71 (9) , 3119-3128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-019-03622-5
  50. Ruquan Zhang, Boya Zhang, Wenjun Dou, Ying Wu, Lei Luo. Preparation of Nano-Fe3O4/Nylon Composite Fabric with Magnetic Properties by Post Finishing Method. Fibers and Polymers 2019, 20 (7) , 1396-1403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-019-1242-5
  51. Suzana Natour, Anat Levi-Zada, Raed Abu-Reziq. Magnetic Polyurea Nano-Capsules Synthesized via Interfacial Polymerization in Inverse Nano-Emulsion. Molecules 2019, 24 (14) , 2663. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24142663
  52. Ayomi S. Perera, Marc-Olivier Coppens. Re-designing materials for biomedical applications: from biomimicry to nature-inspired chemical engineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2019, 377 (2138) , 20180268. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0268
  53. Kakarla Raghava Reddy, Pattubala Adinaraya Reddy, Chandragiri Venkata Reddy, Nagaraj P. Shetti, Bhatula Babu, Koutavarapu Ravindranadh, Muthukonda Venkatakrishnan Shankar, Madhava C. Reddy, Sarvesh Soni, Shivalingegowda Naveen. Functionalized magnetic nanoparticles/biopolymer hybrids: Synthesis methods, properties and biomedical applications. 2019, 227-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mim.2019.04.005
  54. Lei Jiang, Chen Su, Shan Ye, Jimin Wu, Zhongjie Zhu, Yanyi Wen, Rui Zhang, Wei Shao. Synergistic antibacterial effect of tetracycline hydrochloride loaded functionalized graphene oxide nanostructures. Nanotechnology 2018, 29 (50) , 505102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aae424
  55. Paige M. Price, Waleed E. Mahmoud, Ahmed A. Al-Ghamdi, Lyudmila M. Bronstein. Magnetic Drug Delivery: Where the Field Is Going. Frontiers in Chemistry 2018, 6 https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00619
  56. Jorge Fernández, Isabel A.C. Ribeiro, Victor Martin, Olatz L. Martija, Ester Zuza, Ana F. Bettencourt, Jose-Ramon Sarasua. Release mechanisms of urinary tract antibiotics when mixed with bioabsorbable polyesters. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2018, 93 , 529-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.08.008
  57. Md Musavvir Mahmud, Asma Perveen, Md Abdul Matin, M Tarik Arafat. Effects of binary solvent mixtures on the electrospinning behavior of poly (vinyl alcohol). Materials Research Express 2018, 5 (11) , 115407. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aadf1f
  58. Phoebe L. Heseltine, Jubair Ahmed, Mohan Edirisinghe. Developments in Pressurized Gyration for the Mass Production of Polymeric Fibers. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 2018, 303 (9) https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201800218
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Making polymer-based fibers via infusion gyration. (A) Schematic diagram of the spinning process. (B) High-speed camera image of the spinning cylinder showing fiber formation.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. PVA–MNP fibers (5% (w/w)). (A,B) Optical microscopy images, (C,D) SEM images, and (E,F) SEM dot mapping: the red dots indicate the presence of Fe in fibers.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Characterization of chemical composition and magnetic content of the PVA–MNP fibers. (A) FTIR spectrum, (B) elemental analysis using EDX, (C) area of fiber sample subject to EDX analysis, and (D) mass magnetization behavior of the MNP–PVA fiber sample.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Drug release experiments using magnetic fibers. (A) Loading of acetaminophen onto the fibers, (B) control experiment without any actuation, and (C) fiber–drug system actuated via an external magnet.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Use of magnetic fibers for controlled release of acetaminophen with and without magnetic actuation. (A) Chemical structure and UV–vis absorption spectrum of acetaminophen, (B) cumulative weight percentages of acetaminophen released with time. Here, the control experiment represents the equivalent release of acetaminophen without magnetic (or any other type of) actuation. (C) Effect of magnetic actuation on drug release with time: the difference between actuated and nonactuated cumulative release curves. (D) Ratio of acetaminophen release from actuated and nonactuated fibers.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 61 other publications.

    1. 1
      Ulbrich, K.; Holá, K.; Šubr, V.; Bakandritsos, A.; Tuček, J.; Zbořil, R. Targeted Drug Delivery with Polymers and Magnetic Nanoparticles: Covalent and Noncovalent Approaches, Release Control, and Clinical Studies. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 53385431,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00589
    2. 2
      Wang, Y.; Kohane, D. S. External triggering and triggered targeting strategies for drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17020,  DOI: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.20
    3. 3
      Chandna, A.; Batra, D.; Kakar, S.; Singh, R. A review on target drug delivery: magnetic microspheres. J. Acute Dis. 2013, 2, 189195,  DOI: 10.1016/s2221-6189(13)60125-0
    4. 4
      Arruebo, M.; Fernández-Pacheco, R.; Ibarra, M. R.; Santamaría, J. Magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nano Today 2007, 2, 2232,  DOI: 10.1016/s1748-0132(07)70084-1
    5. 5
      Jurgons, R.; Seliger, C.; Hilpert, A.; Trahms, L.; Odenbach, S.; Alexiou, C. Drug loaded magnetic nanoparticles for cancer therapy. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2006, 18, S2893,  DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/18/38/s24
    6. 6
      Perera, A. S. Sustainable Magnetic Nanocatalysts in Heterogeneous Catalysis. Magnetic Nanomaterials: Applications in Catalysis and Life Sciences; Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017; Chapter 4, pp 99119.
    7. 7
      Hoare, T.; Timko, B. P.; Santamaria, J.; Goya, G. F.; Irusta, S.; Lau, S.; Stefanescu, C. F.; Lin, D.; Langer, R.; Kohane, D. S. Magnetically Triggered Nanocomposite Membranes: A Versatile Platform for Triggered Drug Release. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 13951400,  DOI: 10.1021/nl200494t
    8. 8
      Oliveira, H.; Pérez-Andrés, E.; Thevenot, J.; Sandre, O.; Berra, E.; Lecommandoux, S. Magnetic field triggered drug release from polymersomes for cancer therapeutics. J. Controlled Release 2013, 169, 165170,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.01.013
    9. 9
      Lee, J.-H.; Ivkov, R.; Blumenthal, R. Magnetically Triggered Drug Release from Liposome Embedded Gel. J. Nanomed. Biother. Discovery 2014, 4, 130136,  DOI: 10.4172/2155-983x.1000130
    10. 10
      Bi, H.; Ma, S.; Li, Q.; Han, X. Magnetically triggered drug release from biocompatible microcapsules for potential cancer therapeutics. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 32693277,  DOI: 10.1039/c5tb02464a
    11. 11
      Hoare, T.; Timko, B. P.; Santamaria, J.; Goya, G. F.; Irusta, S.; Lau, S.; Stefanescu, C. F.; Lin, D.; Langer, R.; Kohane, D. S. Magnetically-triggered Nanocomposite Membranes: a Versatile Platform for Triggered Drug Release. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 13951400,  DOI: 10.1021/nl200494t
    12. 12
      Veiseh, O.; Gunn, J. W.; Zhang, M. Design and fabrication of magnetic nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery and imaging. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2010, 62, 284304,  DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.11.002
    13. 13
      Gobbo, O. L.; Sjaastad, K.; Radomski, M. W.; Volkov, Y.; Prina-Mello, A. Magnetic Nanoparticles in Cancer Theranostics. Theranostics 2015, 5, 12491263,  DOI: 10.7150/thno.11544
    14. 14
      Sun, C.; Lee, J.; Zhang, M. Magnetic Nanoparticles in MR Imaging and Drug Delivery. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2008, 60, 12521265,  DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.018
    15. 15
      Qureshi, A.; Gurbuz, Y.; Niazi, J. H. Biosensors for cardiac biomarkers detection: A review. Sens. Actuators, B 2012, 171, 6276,  DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2012.05.077
    16. 16
      Gao, Y.; Lim, J.; Teoh, S.-H.; Xu, C. Emerging translational research on magnetic nanoparticles for regenerative medicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 63066329,  DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00322e
    17. 17
      Hergt, R.; Dutz, S.; Müller, R.; Zeisberger, M. Magnetic particle hyperthermia: nanoparticle magnetism and materials development for cancer therapy. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2006, 18, S2919,  DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/18/38/s26
    18. 18
      Pankhurst, Q. A.; Thanh, N. T. K.; Jones, S. K.; Dobson, J. Progress in applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2009, 42, 224001,  DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/22/224001
    19. 19
      Fusco, S.; Huang, H.-W.; Peyer, K. E.; Peters, C.; Häberli, M.; Ulbers, A.; Spyrogianni, A.; Pellicer, E.; Sort, J.; Pratsinis, S. E.; Nelson, B. J.; Sakar, M. S.; Pané, S. Shape-Switching Microrobots for Medical Applications: The Influence of Shape in Drug Delivery and Locomotion. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 68036811,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b00181
    20. 20
      Temel, F. Z.; Yesilyurt, S. Magnetically actuated micro swimming of bio-inspired robots in mini channels. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics , 13–15 April 2011, 2011; Vol. 2011, pp 342347.
    21. 21
      Xu, T.; Yu, J.; Yan, X.; Choi, H.; Zhang, L. Magnetic Actuation Based Motion Control for Microrobots: An Overview. Micromachines 2015, 6, 13461364,  DOI: 10.3390/mi6091346
    22. 22
      Floyd, S.; Pawashe, C.; Sitti, M. An untethered magnetically actuated micro-robot capable of motion on arbitrary surfaces. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , 19–23 May 2008, 2008; Vol. 2008, pp 419424.
    23. 23
      Thomas, C. R.; Ferris, D. P.; Lee, J.-H.; Choi, E.; Cho, M. H.; Kim, E. S.; Stoddart, J. F.; Shin, J.-S.; Cheon, J.; Zink, J. I. Noninvasive Remote-Controlled Release of Drug Molecules in Vitro Using Magnetic Actuation of Mechanized Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1062310625,  DOI: 10.1021/ja1022267
    24. 24
      Singh, R. K.; Patel, K. D.; Kim, J.-J.; Kim, T.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Shin, U. S.; Lee, E.-J.; Knowles, J. C.; Kim, H.-W. Multifunctional Hybrid Nanocarrier: Magnetic CNTs Ensheathed with Mesoporous Silica for Drug Delivery and Imaging System. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 22012208,  DOI: 10.1021/am4056936
    25. 25
      Chen, J.-P.; Yang, P.-C.; Ma, Y.-H.; Tu, S.-J.; Lu, Y.-J. Targeted delivery of tissue plasminogen activator by binding to silica-coated magnetic nanoparticle. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 51375149,  DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s36197
    26. 26
      Mody, V. V.; Cox, A.; Shah, S.; Singh, A.; Bevins, W.; Parihar, H. Magnetic nanoparticle drug delivery systems for targeting tumor. Appl. Nanosci. 2014, 4, 385392,  DOI: 10.1007/s13204-013-0216-y
    27. 27
      Leung, V.; Ko, F. Biomedical applications of nanofibers. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2011, 22, 350365,  DOI: 10.1002/pat.1813
    28. 28
      Suwantong, O. Biomedical applications of electrospun polycaprolactone fiber mats. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2016, 27, 12641273,  DOI: 10.1002/pat.3876
    29. 29
      Liu, H.; Ding, X.; Zhou, G.; Li, P.; Wei, X.; Fan, Y. Electrospinning of nanofibers for tissue engineering applications. J. Nanomater. 2013, 2013, 111,  DOI: 10.1155/2013/495708
    30. 30
      Rodríguez, K.; Gatenholm, P.; Renneckar, S. Electrospinning cellulosic nanofibers for biomedical applications: structure and in vitro biocompatibility. Cellulose 2012, 19, 15831598,  DOI: 10.1007/s10570-012-9734-0
    31. 31
      Agarwal, S.; Wendorff, J. H.; Greiner, A. Use of electrospinning technique for biomedical applications. Polymer 2008, 49, 56035621,  DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.014
    32. 32
      Ashammakhi, N.; Ndreu, A.; Piras, A. M.; Nikkola, L.; Sindelar, T.; Jukola, H.; Harlin, A.; Gomes, M. E.; Neves, N. M.; Chiellini, E.; Chiellini, F.; Hasirci, V.; Redl, H.; Reis, R. L. Biodegradable nanomats produced by electrospinning: Expanding multifunctionality and potential for tissue engineering. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2007, 7, 862882,  DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2007.485
    33. 33
      Teo, W.-E.; He, W.; Ramakrishna, S. Electrospun scaffold tailored for tissue-specific extracellular matrix. Biotechnol. J. 2006, 1, 918929,  DOI: 10.1002/biot.200600044
    34. 34
      Hipler, U.-C.; Elsner, P.; Fluhr, J. W. Antifungal and antibacterial properties of a silver-loaded cellulosic fiber. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B 2006, 77, 156163,  DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30413
    35. 35
      Townsend-Nicholson, A.; Jayasinghe, S. N. Cell Electrospinning: a Unique Biotechnique for Encapsulating Living Organisms for Generating Active Biological Microthreads/Scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7, 33643369,  DOI: 10.1021/bm060649h
    36. 36
      Jayasinghe, S. N.; Irvine, S.; McEwan, J. R. Cell electrospinning highly concentrated cellular suspensions containing primary living organisms into cell-bearing threads and scaffolds. Nanomedicine 2007, 2, 555567,  DOI: 10.2217/17435889.2.4.555
    37. 37
      Yan, S.; Li, X.; Dai, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, B.; Lu, Y.; Shi, J.; Huang, P.; Gong, J.; Yao, Y. Electrospinning of PVA/sericin nanofiber and the effect on epithelial-mesenchymal transition of A549 cells. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2017, 79, 436444,  DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.048
    38. 38
      Persano, L.; Camposeo, A.; Tekmen, C.; Pisignano, D. Industrial Upscaling of Electrospinning and Applications of Polymer Nanofibers: A Review. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2013, 298, 504520,  DOI: 10.1002/mame.201200290
    39. 39
      Guimarães, A.; Martins, A.; Pinho, E. D.; Faria, S.; Reis, R. L.; Neves, N. M. Solving cell infiltration limitations of electrospun nanofiber meshes for tissue engineering applications. Nanomedicine 2010, 5, 539554,  DOI: 10.2217/nnm.10.31
    40. 40
      Martins, A.; Araújo, J. V.; Reis, R. L.; Neves, N. M. Electrospun nanostructured scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Nanomedicine 2007, 2, 929942,  DOI: 10.2217/17435889.2.6.929
    41. 41
      Zhang, Y.; Lim, C. T.; Ramakrishna, S.; Huang, Z.-M. Recent development of polymer nanofibers for biomedical and biotechnological applications. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 2005, 16, 933946,  DOI: 10.1007/s10856-005-4428-x
    42. 42
      Zafar, M.; Najeeb, S.; Khurshid, Z.; Vazirzadeh, M.; Zohaib, S.; Najeeb, B.; Sefat, F. Potential of Electrospun Nanofibers for Biomedical and Dental Applications. Materials 2016, 9, 73,  DOI: 10.3390/ma9020073
    43. 43
      Tamimi, E.; Ardila, D. C.; Haskett, D. G.; Doetschman, T.; Slepian, M. J.; Kellar, R. S.; Vande Geest, J. P. Biomechanical Comparison of Glutaraldehyde-Crosslinked Gelatin Fibrinogen Electrospun Scaffolds to Porcine Coronary Arteries. J. Biomech. Eng. 2015, 138, 011001,  DOI: 10.1115/1.4031847
    44. 44
      Tamayol, A.; Akbari, M.; Annabi, N.; Paul, A.; Khademhosseini, A.; Juncker, D. Fiber-based tissue engineering: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 669687,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.11.007
    45. 45
      Gosline, J. M.; Guerette, P. A.; Ortlepp, C. S.; Savage, K. N. The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function. J. Exp. Biol. 1999, 202, 32953303
    46. 46
      Gomes, M. E.; Azevedo, H. S.; Moreira, A. R.; Ellä, V.; Kellomäki, M.; Reis, R. L. Starch–poly(ε-caprolactone) and starch–poly(lactic acid) fibre-mesh scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications: structure, mechanical properties and degradation behaviour. J. Tissue Eng. Regener. Med. 2008, 2, 243252,  DOI: 10.1002/term.89
    47. 47
      Sinclair, K. D.; Webb, K.; Brown, P. J. The effect of various denier capillary channel polymer fibers on the alignment of NHDF cells and type I collagen. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 2010, 95, 11941202,  DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32941
    48. 48
      Wan, A. C. A.; Liao, I.-C.; Yim, E. K. F.; Leong, K. W. Mechanism of Fiber Formation by Interfacial Polyelectrolyte Complexation. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 70197025,  DOI: 10.1021/ma0498868
    49. 49
      Mahalingam, S.; Edirisinghe, M. Forming of Polymer Nanofibers by a Pressurised Gyration Process. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2013, 34, 11341139,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.201300339
    50. 50
      Mahalingam, S.; Raimi-Abraham, B. T.; Craig, D. Q. M.; Edirisinghe, M. Solubility–spinnability map and model for the preparation of fibres of polyethylene (terephthalate) using gyration and pressure. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 280, 344353,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.05.114
    51. 51
      Illangakoon, U. E.; Mahalingam, S.; Wang, K.; Cheong, Y.-K.; Canales, E.; Ren, G. G.; Cloutman-Green, E.; Edirisinghe, M.; Ciric, L. Gyrospun antimicrobial nanoparticle loaded fibrous polymeric filters. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2017, 74, 315324,  DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.001
    52. 52
      Zhang, S.; Karaca, B. T.; VanOosten, S. K.; Yuca, E.; Mahalingam, S.; Edirisinghe, M.; Tamerler, C. Coupling Infusion and Gyration for the Nanoscale Assembly of Functional Polymer Nanofibers Integrated with Genetically Engineered Proteins. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2015, 36, 13221328,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.201500174
    53. 53
      Hong, X.; Edirisinghe, M.; Mahalingam, S. Beads, beaded-fibres and fibres: Tailoring the morphology of poly(caprolactone) using pressurised gyration. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2016, 69, 13731382,  DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.071
    54. 54
      Mallapragada, S. K.; Peppas, N. A. Dissolution mechanism of semicrystalline poly(vinyl alcohol) in water. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 1996, 34, 13391346,  DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0488(199605)34:7<1339::aid-polb15>3.0.co;2-b
    55. 55
      Mansur, H. S.; Sadahira, C. M.; Souza, A. N.; Mansur, A. A. P. FTIR spectroscopy characterization of poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel with different hydrolysis degree and chemically crosslinked with glutaraldehyde. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2008, 28, 539548,  DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2007.10.088
    56. 56
      Bichara, L. C.; Lanús, H. E.; Ferrer, E. G.; Gramajo, M. B.; Brandán, S. A. Vibrational Study and Force Field of the Citric Acid Dimer Based on the SQM Methodology. Adv. Phys. Chem. 2011, 2011, 110,  DOI: 10.1155/2011/347072
    57. 57
      Cornell, R. M.; Schwertmann, U. The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurrences and Uses; Wiley, 2006.
    58. 58
      Granberg, R. A.; Rasmuson, Å. C. Solubility of Paracetamol in Pure Solvents. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1999, 44, 13911395,  DOI: 10.1021/je990124v
    59. 59
      Glavanović, S.; Glavanović, M.; Tomišić, V. Simultaneous quantitative determination of paracetamol and tramadol in tablet formulation using UV spectrophotometry and chemometric methods. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 2016, 157, 258264,  DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2015.12.020
    60. 60
      Behera, S.; Ghanty, S.; Ahmad, F.; Santra, S.; Banerjee, S. UV-Visible Spectrophotometric Method Development and Validation of Assay of Paracetamol Tablet Formulation. J. Anal. Bioanal. Tech. 2012, 3, 151157,  DOI: 10.4172/2155-9872.1000151
    61. 61
      Huang, X.; Brazel, C. S. On the importance and mechanisms of burst release in matrix-controlled drug delivery systems. J. Controlled Release 2001, 73, 121136,  DOI: 10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00248-6
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b04774.

    • SEM images of pure PVA fibers; MNP leaching studies for PVA–MNP fibers conducted via UV–vis absorbance of supernatant solutions; mass magnetization behavior of both pure MNP (M = 2.6 A m2 kg–1) and 5% MNP–PVA fiber (M = 53.8 A m2 kg–1) samples; and concentration of acetaminophen released with time (PDF)

    • High-speed camera video showing fiber formation during the infusion gyration process (ZIP)

    • Procedure for magnetic actuation of fibers loaded with acetaminophen (ZIP)

    • Transportation of the magnetic fibers along a tube using magnetic actuation, demonstrating the scope of actuation (ZIP)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect