ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Meta-Isobutoxy Phenylboronic Acid for Nanoscale Multi-Stimuli-Responsive Low-Molecular-Weight Hydrogelator

Cite this: ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023, 6, 17, 16055–16064
Publication Date (Web):August 18, 2023
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c03259

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0.
  • Open Access

Article Views

582

Altmetric

-

Citations

-
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (7 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Hydrogelators generate hydrogels when dissolved in water, forming a network of interlocking chains on the nanoscale level. For their unique viscoelastic, mechanical, and swelling properties, these hydrogels have found various applications, such as water absorbent, biocompatible, and biodegradable scaffolds in tissue engineering and nanocarriers in drug delivery. When measuring the solubility of p-, m-, and o-isobutoxy derivatives of phenylboronic acid, we identified m-isobutoxyphenylboronic acid (PBA) as a low-molecular-weight hydrogelator, the first of which solely based on phenylboronic acid. At low concentrations, PBA gelated water into a network of cross-linked nanofibers combining amorphous and crystalline phases, as shown by electron and optical microscopy, rheometry, and differential scanning calorimetry and confirmed by small- and wide-angle X-ray scattering. By increasing the PBA concentration, we were able to tailor the elastic modulus (G′) of PBA hydrogels across 2 orders of magnitude, from 2.5 to 103 kPa. In turn, at a specific PBA concentration, we tuned their viscoelastic properties by adding urea, thereby adjusting the gelation temperature between 62 and 56 °C and G′ at body temperature between 63.4 and 30.4 kPa. Moreover, PBA hydrogels dissolved in response to various triggers (pH increase, H2O2 and cyclodextrin addition) and selectively absorbed dyes for liquid mixture separation. These findings demonstrate that PBA has a high potential as a biodegradable, multistimuli-responsive, low-molecular-weight hydrogelator for bioapplications.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0.
  • cc licence
  • by licence

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Hydrogels consist of major liquid (water) and minor solid (gelator) components with intermediate viscoelastic properties between solid and liquid and with a wide range of applications, particularly in biomedicine, thanks to their biocompatibility. (1) Among these applications, their potential uses as scaffolds in tissue engineering and as nanocarriers in drug delivery (2) stand out given the ability of hydrogels to provide structural support for cell division while mimicking tissues (3) and responding to external stimuli when releasing a drug, (4) respectively. Accordingly, these applications depend on the physical and chemical properties of the gelator and its biocompatibility.
Low-molecular-weight (LMW) gelators, in particular, can easily trigger reversible gelation because they consist of small organic molecules bound by noncovalent interactions. (5) In addition, LMW gelators are more easily biodegradable and often more biocompatible (6) than most classical polymer gelators. Many LMW gelators have a similar design (7) with small structural alterations specifically introduced to tune mechanical properties or to generate molecularly responsive properties (especially in small peptide gelators), (8) including responsiveness to light, (9) temperature, magnetic fields, (10) and chemical stimuli. (11,12) However, this approach is limited by the sensitivity of LMW gelators to structural changes, whereby extremely small changes, such as introducing a single functional group, can preclude their ability to gelate. Although the formation of nanofibers can be described as 1D aggregation, 1D intermolecular interactions have not been correlated with the ability to gelate. (13)
Hydrogels can also be utilized as chemical sensors with mechanical sol–gel responses. Modifying a gelator with a functional group reactive to specific stimuli can produce a gel sensitive to those stimuli with a sol–gel phase transition response. In particular, phenylboronic acids are sensitive to pH changes (acting as acid–base indicators) and to 1,2- or 1,3-diols (sensitivity toward sugars, including glucose and fructose) (14–16) or the fluoride anion. (17) Furthermore, the acid–base properties of phenylboronic acids can be easily tuned by substitutions on the benzene ring, resulting in pKa values ranging from 9.24 for p-methoxy- to 7.23 for p-nitro-substituted phenylboronic acid. (18) When a substituent stabilizes a tetrahedral boronate anion structure, such as B–N Wulff-type phenylboronic acid (Figure 1B), where nitrogen coordinates boron, pKa can reach values as low as 5.3. (19) Nitrogen may also be swapped for oxygen, leading to benzoxaborole (Figure 1C) with pKa = 7.3. (20) The pKa value close to physiological pH is highly desired for drug delivery purposes. Combining the functionality of phenylboronic acids and amphiphilic copolymers extends their use as nanoscale drug delivery systems. (14,21,22) However, studies on the toxicity and biocompatibility of PBA-based compounds have reported varying results. Therefore, the cytotoxicity and cell viability of these nanomaterials must be thoroughly evaluated before considering their practical applications in biomedical contexts. (23–26)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Arylboronic acids of interest: (A) 3-isobutoxyphenylboronic acid (PBA); (B) Wulff type acid; and (C) benzoxaborole.

In this context, we aimed to measure the solubility and dehydration and acid–base properties of a series of substituted phenylboronic acids. (27,28) As a result, we identified a new and simple LMW gelator, PBA pKa = 8.5, with a unique structure capable of gelating water at low concentrations. To analyze its mechanical properties and their variation as a function of the temperature, we used rheometry and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Furthermore, we studied the microscopic structure of PBA hydrogels by light microscopy and scanning and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). We also assessed the effect of urea on the viscoelastic properties of PBA hydrogels to test their tunability. Lastly, we examined the ability of PBA hydrogels to selectively absorb dyes for liquid mixture separation and the potential of PBA hydrogels as stimuli-responsive materials by testing various triggers (pH, H2O2, and CD) for the sol–gel transition.

Materials and Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Materials

PBA (molecular weight: 194.04 g/mol, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received), distilled water (used also for dilutions), ethanol (Penta, Czech Republic, 96%, for UV) hydrogen peroxide 30% hydrogen peroxide (Lach-Ner, Czech Republic, 30% p.a. nonstabilized), (2-hydroxypropyl)-β-cyclodextrin (Sigma-Aldrich, powder, estimated mol weight 1396 Da), sodium hydroxide (Penta, p.a.), hydrochloric acid (Lach-Ner, 35% p.a.), Congo red (Sigma-Aldrich, BioXtra, certified by the BSC), Fluorescein (Honeywell Fluka, Reag. Ph. Eur.), Methylene blue (Sigma-Aldrich, certified by the BSC), Nile red (Sigma-Aldrich, for microscopy grade), and urea (Sigma-Aldrich, ACS reagent >99–100%).

Methods

Gel Preparation

The PBA gelator was placed in sealed glass vials and heated to form a solution. The solution was cooled to room temperature to obtain a gel. The xerogels for TEM and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements were dried at room temperature in vacuum. The critical gelation concentration (CGC) was determined by measuring the minimum amount of gelator to form a stable gel at 25 °C. CGC under these conditions was 1.5 mg/mL.

Gels Preparation Doped with Urea for Rheometry

Three gel samples were prepared by dissolving 27 mg of PBA in 10 mL of boiling water, pipetting them to preweighted amounts of urea, and letting them cool freely to room temperature, leading to gels with a gelator concentration of 2.7 mg/mL and urea concentrations of 0, 3.5, and 10.4 mg/mL. A sample with 100 mg of urea per 3 mL of gel was prepared as well but did not solidify, even after cooling to 6 °C in a fridge overnight.

Capillary Microcalorimetry

Microcalorimetry measurements were performed on a Nano DSC microcalorimeter (TA Instruments-Waters LLC, New Castle, USA). The microcalorimeter consists of a 0.3 mL sample and reference platinum capillary cells. Three gel samples were prepared by dissolving 2.04, 2.70, and 3.54 mg of PBA per 1 mL of boiling water and letting them freely cool to room temperature. Before analysis, the samples were preheated to liquify the gel. The sample cell was filled by overfilling with ca. 0.6 mL of sample solution, and the reference cell was filled with deionized water. The measurements were performed under a constant pressure of 3 atm with the temperature span from 5 to 80 °C. For each sample, a series of two consecutive heating and cooling scans were performed to confirm reproducibility. After each sample, the cell was cleaned by flushing with 2 L of deionized water. All data were subtracted from the measurement of deionized water, which was performed on the same day.

Small-Angle X-ray Scattering and Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering

Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) experiments were performed using a pinhole camera (Molecular Metrology SAXS System) attached to a microfocused X-ray beam generator (Osmic Micro-Max 002) operating at 45 kV and 0.66 mA (30 W). The X-ray beam wavelength used was 0.154 nm. The camera was equipped with a multiwire gas-filled detector with an active area diameter of 20 cm (Gabriel design). Two experimental setups were used to cover the q range of 0.04–11 nm–1. Scattering vector q = (4πn/λ)sin(θ), where λ = 0.154 nm is the wavelength and θ is the angle between the incident X-ray beam and the detector measuring the scattered intensity. Glassy carbon samples, purchased from Rigaku Company (Japan), were used for calibration.
Wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) experiments were performed using a pinhole camera (Older Rigaku SMAX2000 upgraded by SAXSLAB/Xenocs) attached to a microfocused X-ray beam generator (Rigaku MicroMax 003) operating at 50 kV and 0.6 mA (30 W). The camera was equipped with a vacuum version of a Pilatus 300 K detector. The experimental setup covered a q range of 0.004–3 Å–1. The primary beam position and sample-to-detector distances were calibrated using a Si powder sample.

Scanning Electron Microscopy

The morphology of the nanofibrous hydrogel structure was also confirmed under a scanning electron microscope (FEGSEM MAIA3, Tescan, Czech Republic) operating at an acceleration voltage of 10 kV. A drop of liquid sample was placed on a freshly cleaved-off mica surface and left to completely dry at room temperature. Prior to SEM, a conductive thin Pt film was deposited on the sample surface using a Leica EM SCD 050 vacuum sputter coater. The sample was examined in high vacuum mode at a typical operating voltage of 10 keV. ImageJ software was used for image analysis.

Transmission Electron Microscopy

TEM micrographs were acquired using a JEOL NEOARM transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Japan) operating at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV and equipped with a TemCamXF416R 4k × 4k CMOS camera (TVIPS, Germany). The homogenized solid sample of xerogel was deposited on a copper TEM grid coated with a lacey amorphous carbon film. ImageJ software was used for image analysis.

Rheometry

Rheological experiments were performed on a strain-controlled ARES-G2 rheometer (from TA Instruments, USA), using a parallel plate fixture with a diameter of 25 mm and a gap of 1.0 mm.
Strain sweep tests were performed to find a range of deformation values where the deformations did not damage the physical network of the gels s follows: the monomer solutions were heated to 80 °C and stirred at this temperature for 10 min. Subsequently, they were loaded between the parallel plates of the rheometer, which were preheated to 80 °C. To prevent the gel samples from drying, the border layer of the rheology samples (placed between the parallel plates), which was exposed to the environment, was protected by applying a layer of silicon oil to the edge of the platelets. Thereafter, the sample was left to cool (by heat radiation only) to room temperature and to gelate (15 min of waiting time). Lastly, at T = const. = 30 °C, the oscillatory strain sweep experiment was started at a constant frequency of 1 Hz, whereas the deformation amplitude ranged from 2 × 10–3 to 500% (ascending values). The rheological results were evaluated, and the “safe” value of the deformation amplitude was chosen as 1/10 of the deformation amplitude, below which the dynamic modulus G′ started to be deformation-independent. This “safe” deformation amplitude (0.01%) was then used in the gelation tests.
The gelation process of the different PBA solutions was investigated as follows: the samples were loaded into the preheated rheometer plates as described above, but each measurement was performed immediately after sample installation. After the experiment started, the studied system was cooled exclusively via heat radiation (without blowing air). The rheological properties were recorded simultaneously with the directly measured temperature of the plates (embedded contact thermometer). The time-dependent dynamic shear storage modulus G′(t) and loss modulus G″(t) were assessed in oscillatory measurements at a frequency of 1 Hz and at a strain amplitude of 0.01% (which was previously determined as “safe” in the strain-sweep test, that is, found not to damage the physical cross-links in the gel─“linear deformation region”). Based on the values of the time-dependent sample temperature T(t), the rheology results were expressed as temperature-dependent moduli G′(T) and G″(T). The temperature of gelation was defined as the temperature of G′/G″ crossover (G′ is higher in the gel phase). Frequency sweep tests of the gels were performed at 30 °C, with the oscillatory deformation frequency ranging from 0.01 to 100 Hz. The deformation amplitude was kept constant at 0.01%.

Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy

The gels (concentration of PBA 2.25 mg/mL) stained with Nile red were analyzed under an IX83 confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an Ultra-Plan Apochromat objective (lens magnification 60×, NA 1.20, water immersion). The excitation light at 488 nm was delivered into a diffraction-limited spot, and the emitted fluorescence was collected by a dichroic mirror DM405/488/543/635; all measurements were performed at 23 ± 1 °C. The Olympus FV10-ASW software, version 4.2.3.6, was used for image acquisition, reconstruction, and z- and time-scanning.

Polarized Light Microscopy

The vial with a homogeneous PBA hydrogel was placed in a hot water bath for a few minutes to receive a clear solution. A drop of the solution was placed between two cover glasses and observed under a Nikon80i polarized light microscope (Nikon) equipped with a Linkam THMS 600/TMS 9. The sample was heated from room temperature to 88 °C at a rate of 2 °C/min. The nanofiber gel structure started to undergo sol transition at 85 °C.

Chemically Triggered Sol–Gel Transition Experiments

Gel samples were prepared by dissolving 22.5 mg of PBA in 10 mL of boiling water and pipetting 0.7 mL of solution with a micropipette with a plastic tip to every glass vial while still hot and letting them cool to room temperature, leading to a gel with 10 μmol of PBA gelator per vial (vials used in experiments were 2 mL). The following experiments were performed: (1) upon addition of 50 μL (1 equiv) of 0.2 M sodium hydroxide solution, the gel dissolved in 15 min. To this solution, 50 μL (1 equiv) of 0.2 M aqueous hydrochloric acid was added, which caused the immediate formation of a gel. (2) 20 μL (6 equiv) of 10% hydrogen peroxide solution was added, which caused the complete dissolution of the gel in approximately 1 h. (3) 20 mg (approximately 1.3 equiv) of solid (2-hydroxypropyl)-β-cyclodextrin was added, which caused the complete dissolution of the gel in approximately 1 h.

Dye Absorption by the Hydrogel

Gel samples were prepared by pipetting 0.3 mL of PBA solution in boiling water (2.5 mg/mL) and letting the solution cool to room temperature. After cooling, 0.5 mL of 0.1 mM solutions of Congo red and methylene blue were added to each of the two vials; the first photo was taken immediately after dye addition, and the second photo was taken after 2 h. Subsequently, 0.5 mL of hot PBA solution (2.5 mg/mL) was pipetted into each vial, which already contained 4.5 mg (1 equiv) of Congo red and 2 mg (1 equiv) of methylene blue. Additionally, 0.4 mg (0.2 equiv) and 0.2 mg (0.1 equiv) of methylene blue were added to different vials. Each vial was shaken while hot to ensure the complete dissolution of the dye, and the samples were then cooled to room temperature. To analyze the maximum dye absorption capacity, 0.3 mL of a methylene blue solution (0.4 mg/mL, 0.1 equiv) was added to a vial containing 0.3 mL of a PBA gel (2.5 mg/mL) sample. The vial was sealed, and after 24 h, the absorbance at 663 nm was measured after a 100-fold dilution of the starting solution (0.780) and the gel-absorbed solution (0.266). Considering the dilution volume, the binding capacity of the PBA gel under these conditions was 0.03 mol equiv of dye per PBA gelator. Gelation was observed in the solution with 1 mol equivalent of Congo red, in line with the absence of absorption of anionic dye by PBA due to the lack of interactions. In contrast, no gelation occurred in samples containing 0.2 mol equiv of cationic dye, methylene blue, or higher, but samples containing 0.1 mol equiv of methylene blue resulted in stable gels at room temperature.

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

In this study, we found that PBA easily self-assembles into multiresponsive hydrogels in aqueous solutions. As such, PBA is a paradigmatic example of a commercially available and easy-to-synthesize hydrogelator with a molecular weight much lower than that of most other phenylboronic acid-containing LMW hydrogelators. This is the first LMW gelator solely based on phenylboronic acid and without more prominent substituents (such as peptide (29–31) or fatty chain (32) based LMW gelators). Moreover, only the meta isomer of PBA lacks a crystal structure determined by single-crystal XRD.

PBA Hydrogels Show a Network of Cross-Linked Fibers with Amorphous and Crystalline Phases

Our SAXS measurements (Figures 2A and S1) showed scattering in the Porod regime [I(q) ∝ q–4] at a 0.04–1 nm–1 q range, corresponding to a 6–150 nm length scale, indicating scattering at flat interfaces between the PBA phase and the aqueous phase; that is, at the length scale 6–150 nm, the PBA phase was homogeneous.

Figure 2

Figure 2. SAXS (A) and WAXS (B) diffractograms of a 2.7 mg/mL PBA hydrogel sample, TEM (C,D) images of gelator crystalline and amorphous phases, respectively, SEM (E,F) images of the corresponding dried gel, and fluorescence confocal microscopy (G,H) images of the gel stained with Nile red (further experimental details on 2A-H in Supporting Information).

At shorter length scales, below 6 nm (q > 1 nm–1), scattering deviated from the Porod regime [I(q) ∝ q–2] at the high q limit. This deviation indicated that the PBA phase was amorphous but no longer homogeneous at those length scales. As such, the scattering in the corresponding q range was dominated by the contribution from the density fluctuations.
The scattering data could thus be fitted using the model composed of the power-law term for the low q region and the Ornstein–Zernike term for the high q region (details about the model and values of the fit parameters are available in Supporting Information). The WAXS measurement (Figure 2B) revealed several reflections, indicating crystalline domains. The degree of crystallinity, calculated as the ratio between the sum of the areas of the crystalline peaks and the whole area under the curve, was 52–53%, depending on whether the first intensive peak at q = 0.36 A–1 was counted or not. The estimated size of the crystalline domains was approximately 20 nm, according to the Scherrer equation. Because the crystallite size was much smaller than the size of the fibers, we can assume that the fibers were composed of small crystallites connected by the amorphous phase.
As expected, based on WAXS, we observed both crystalline (Figure 2C) and amorphous (Figure 2D) phases in high-resolution TEM images of PBA xerogel samples. Fourier transform (FT) analysis of the micrograph in Figure 2C (inset) was difficult because overlaying lamellar structures had various spatial orientations, albeit with periodical 1.1 and 1.5 nm spacings. Moreover, the 1.1 nm spacing matched the periodicity clearly visible in the lamellar structure of the crystal. This periodic 1.1 nm spacing had two maxima in FT, resulting from different in-plane crystal orientations, and was close to the 1.05 nm d-spacing observed by WAXS analysis.
On a larger scale, the fibrous morphology of the PBA hydrogel was confirmed by SEM. As shown in Figure 2E,F, the fibers varied in both thickness (10–400 nm) and spatial orientation, displaying branching (marked by yellow arrows in Figure 2E). At an even lower magnification, the microscopic structure of PBA hydrogels was further studied by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and polarized light microscopy. CLSM analysis of the PBA hydrogel stained with Nile red revealed a structure similar to that observed by SEM, but with fibers of variable thickness and with noticeable curving of the thicker fibers (Figure 2G,H). Although PBA is a LMW gelator, its fibers effectively absorbed the fluorescent dye without disturbing its structure.

PBA Hydrogels Are Formed by Spontaneous Precipitation from a Supersaturated Solution

The PBA hydrogel gradually dissolved in water as the temperature increased, and the density of the gelator network decreased during this dissolution, as determined by polarized light microscopy (Figure 3A). The DSC cooling (Figure 3C) curves showed that the gelation temperature in the undisturbed sample strongly depended on the gelator concentration c (31.4, 39.8, and 49.4 °C for 2.04, 2.70, and 3.54 mg/mL of PBA, respectively), as often reported for LMW gelators, but rarely explained. Among the exceptions, Ferry and Eldridge, (33) who studied gelation of gelatin, pointed out that the variation of the gel–sol transition temperature as a function of gelator concentration can be expressed using the van’t Hoff equation
lnc2c1=ΔHtR(1T21T1)
(1)
where T1 and T2 are the sol-to-gel phase transition temperatures at gelator concentrations c1 and c2, respectively, ΔHt is the transition enthalpy, and R is the gas constant. As previously show, eq 1 is also applicable to LMW gelators. (34) The resulting data provided a transition enthalpy ΔHt = −25.0 ± 0.8 kJ mol–1 (the plot of ln c vs T–1 is shown in Figure S2), corresponding to the formation of ca. 1 hydrogen bond per 1 gelator molecule. (33) Moreover, the calculated IR spectra of the PBA dimer more closely matched the measured IR spectra of the PBA gel than the IR spectra of the PBA unimer. This enhanced agreement provides convincing evidence of the crucial involvement of hydrogen bonds in the gel formation process (see Supporting Information Figure S3A,B).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Gradual dissolution of the PBA hydrogel with the increase in temperature under polarized light microscopy (A; left to right: 80, 86, 88 °C), heating (B) and cooling (C) DSC curves of the PBA hydrogel at different PBA concentrations, and cooling rheology of PBA hydrogels (D–G), showing the variation of the PBA hydrogel storage modulus (G′) as a function of temperature at different PBA (D) and urea (F) concentrations and the variation of the storage (G′) and loss (G″) moduli of the PBA hydrogel as a function of temperature at 2.70 mg/mL PBA (E) and 3.5 mg/mL urea (G).

Although the gelation temperature also varied with the concentration in the heating curves (Figure 3B), the heating and cooling curves differed in both gelation temperatures and shape (tailing).
The tails of the heating curves matched at all concentrations, most likely because the amount of the gelator that can be dissolved (and hence the absorbed heat) is limited by its solubility at a given temperature. Similar differences in the shape of DSC heating and cooling curves have been previously observed in supersaturated solutions (35) and undercooled melts. (36) Furthermore, other researchers have suggested that a gel prepared by cooling a solution is first in a supersaturated state, which then spontaneously crystallizes and/or precipitates as an amorphous mass, thereby yielding the gel. (37) We therefore hypothesize that the PBA gelator easily forms a supersaturated solution, which, at some critical point during cooling, precipitates as a mixture of amorphous and crystalline phases, favoring one-dimensional aggregation. In line with the above, eq 1 also describes the critical crystallization temperature of supersaturated solutions. (38)

Viscoelastic Properties of PBA Hydrogels Lie in the Range of Soft Tissues

Elastic moduli of the extracellular matrix vary widely between the brain (1–3 kPa), muscles (23–42 kPa), blood vessels (1.16–860 MPa), tendons (136–820 MPa), and bones (15–40 GPa); therefore, changing the elastic modulus of the gel is critical for different applications by mimicking the mechanical properties of different tissues and organs and facilitating cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, and differentiation. (39,40) Increasing the PBA concentration increases the storage modulus of the hydrogel over the whole range of temperatures below the gel point (Figure 3D,E). At higher temperatures, in the dissolved state of the gel, the graphs show a “noisy” region because the moduli are lower than the limit of detection of rheometry, which was thus disregarded. As expected, increasing the PBA concentration also led to a denser gelator network. This network consists of fiber-like microcrystallites connected by the amorphous solid phase of PBA (see Figure 2C,D). Combined, they act as elastic chains in a classical elastomer network. Hence, at higher concentrations, PBA yields stiffer elastic gels with a higher storage modulus (G′) (Figure 3D).
The curves of the loss modulus (G″) (Figure S4) display similar trends and shapes to those of the storage modulus (G′), albeit with lower values in the whole temperature range, as exemplified in Figure 3E. At higher PBA concentrations and therefore denser gels, the internal friction in and between PBA fibers also increases, thus increasing G″.
The comparison of the results from the DSC cooling and rheology experiments shows marked differences in gelation temperatures. Yet, the rates of temperature change differed only slightly between DSC and rheology. Based on the rheology data, measured as a cooling run (see the G′/G″ crossover example at 2.70 mg/mL PBA in Figure 3E and the crossover plots of the other samples in Figure S5), the gelation temperatures were 48.5, 62.5, and 64.8 °C at 2.04, 2.70, and 3.54 mg/mL PBA, respectively. In contrast, the DSC curves (Figure 3B,C) show transitions at 31.4, 39.8, and 49.4 °C in the cooling run (as peaks) and at 52, 58, and 64.5 °C (broader maxima) in the heating run. Nevertheless, in the DSC experiments, the samples remained undisturbed and hence in the state of a supersaturated solution. Conversely, in the rheology experiment, the samples were disturbed by mechanical oscillations, which triggered crystallization and thus prevented supersaturation. For these reasons, the gelation temperatures assessed by rheology in the cooling run are much closer to the gel-to-sol transition temperature determined in DSC heating curves, albeit not completely identical because DSC directly detects the heat of melting but not the mechanical reversal of gelation.
The fibers still exist during dissolution, whereas their mechanical network is already disconnected (see Figure 3A). By varying the PBA concentration, we were able to tune the moduli of the gels at physiological temperature (at 37 °C) by 2 orders of magnitude, from 2.5 to 103 kPa (Table S1). Considering this range, PBA hydrogels have a high potential for biomedical applications, including tissue scaffolds. To further test the tunability of PBA hydrogels, we assessed the effect of urea on the viscoelastic properties of these gels because urea is a well-known, nontoxic chaotropic agent.

Urea Decreases the Elastic and Loss Moduli of PBA Hydrogels

Adding urea to a PBA hydrogel changes its mechanical properties. At 33.3 mg/mL, urea prevented the formation of the gel even after cooling to 6 °C overnight in a refrigerator, whereas at lower concentrations, up to 10 mg/mL of urea, the PBA gel was formed at room temperature. Figure 3F shows the variation of the storage modulus of 2.7 mg/mL PBA gels doped with 0, 3.5, or 10.4 mg/mL urea as a function of temperature (for loss modulus see Figure S6). As in neat PBA, the loss modulus (G″) curves of these doped samples also displayed trends and shapes similar to those of G″ shown in Figure 3E (undoped sample) but lower values with increasing doping across the temperature range, as also shown for storage modulus in Figures 3F and S7. The PBA gelation temperatures were determined from rheology as the crossover points of storage and loss modulus, as explained in detail above (see example in Figure 3G; the plots of the crossovers of the remaining samples are shown in Figure S7). In urea-doped samples, the gelation temperatures were 62.6, 60.6, and 56 °C for 0, 3.5, and 10.4 mg/mL urea, respectively, highlighting a clear trend, that is, the decrease in gelation temperature with the increase in urea concentration (see Table S2 in Supporting Information). These changes in the physical properties and melting temperature of PBA hydrogels upon urea addition could be caused either by the chaotropic effect of urea, which can disrupt hydrogen bonding (via urea-PBA bridging), or by the lone electron pairs of urea (especially on the carbonyl O atom), which can interact with boron on PBA via donor–acceptor bonding. Nevertheless, further experimental research is needed to confirm these assumptions.
At body temperature, the storage moduli (G′) of the urea-doped hydrogels ranged from 63.4 to 30.4 kPa. Their values depended on the concentration of urea (Table S2 in Supporting Information). These findings underscore the possibility of tuning the viscoelastic properties of these hydrogels by external chemical stimuli, thereby opening up opportunities for preparing tissue scaffolds and modulating stem cell differentiation. (41,42)

Mechanical and Rheological Properties of the Gels at Room Temperature

Figure 4A shows the variation of the storage and loss moduli as a function of oscillation strain for representative urea-free samples (for samples with urea, see Figure S8A). The data indicate good stability (constancy of storage modulus G′) until a deformation amplitude of ca. 0.1%, whereas considerable stability persists until 1%, above which deformation a rapid mechanical destruction occurs. In the “nondestructive” deformation range from 0.002 to 1%, the loss modulus G″ gradually increases with the deformation amplitude, thus indicating an increasing contribution of disentanglement and friction of the interlocked fibers. Above the strain amplitude of 1%, as the gel is being mechanically destroyed, G″ rapidly decreases together with G′. The differences in trends between all samples were small, but the absolute values of the moduli (G′, G″) depended on the concentration of PBA and of the urea additive (as already discussed above). In view of the nearly identical trends in the destructive strain sweep tests, that is, of the nearly identical values of the deformation at break (1%), the moduli of the different gels can be directly correlated with gel strength, expressed as stress at break (=deformation_at_break * modulus) or as toughness (area below the deformation-dependent curve: stress = deformation * modulus). (43) The stiffest gels (higher G′) of the series were automatically also the strongest.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (A) Strain sweeps for networks at 30 °C with different concentrations of PBA; (B) variation of the storage modulus G′ and of the loss modulus G″ as a function of frequency at 30 °C, with deformation amplitude 0.01%, for samples with different concentrations of PBA. Data points in all graphs: G′: filled symbols; G″, open symbols.

Figure 4B illustrates the variation of the storage and loss moduli as a function of frequency of representative urea-free samples (for samples with urea, see Figure S8B). In the whole range from 0.01 to 100 Hz, the storage modulus G′ did not depended on the frequency and as always higher than G″. These results indicate that the material is neither in a transitioning state and nor solid-like. Lower frequencies were not studied because they would have required long experimental times, thus entailing a high risk of partial drying of the samples (and of “false modulus increase”) during the measurements. Given the low applied deformation amplitude, the data from 0.1 to 0.01 Hz were increasingly noisy. The loss modulus G″ steadily decreased with the increase in frequency, most likely because disentanglement and subsequent sliding (and friction) of interlocked fibers are more difficult at high frequencies.

PBA Hydrogels Respond to Multiple Chemical Stimuli

We assessed the sol–gel reactivity of PBA hydrogel samples to four chemical stimuli: (i) after adding 50 μL (1 equiv) of a 0.2 M NaOH solution, the gel dissolved within 15 min; (ii) after adding 50 μL (1 equiv) of a 0.2 M aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid to this solution, the gel formed again immediately, showing its chemically triggered reversible sol–gel transition; (iii) after adding 20 μL (6 equiv) of a 10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the gel irreversibly dissolved in approximately 1 h, as expected because arylboronic acids are known to react with hydrogen peroxide, producing phenol; (44) (iv) after adding 20 mg (approximately 1.3 equiv) of (2-hydroxypropyl)-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD), the gel also dissolved in approximately 1 h (Figure 5A), by forming a host–guest complex, as confirmed by NMR (Figure 6).

Figure 5

Figure 5. (A) Triggering the gel–sol transition of PBA by NaOH/HCl, H2O2, and CD. (B) Photos of selective absorption of Nile red and methylene blue at 0 and 2 h after adding dyes and mixtures of PBA and dyes of different molar equivalents at room temperature.

Figure 6

Figure 6. (A) 1H ROESY NMR spectrum of PBA/cyclodextrine complex, (B) detail of 1H ROESY NMR spectrum of interactions of PBA aromatic hydrogens with cyclodextrine and (C) 1H DOSY NMR spectrum confirming formation of host-guest complex (numbering corresponds to the proton assignments as indicated on the chemical structure of PBA and cyclodextrine).

In host–guest chemistry, β-cyclodextrin is a well-known compound for its ability to form complexes with small and relatively nonpolar molecules, such as ibuprofen, (45) solubilizing them. Introducing macromolecular cavities into gelators could provide them with host–guest responsiveness, but this approach remains challenging because LMW gelators tend to lose their gelating properties upon structural modifications. (46) In further research, by preparing soluble host–guest complexes of LMW gelators, we may prepare systems responsive to compounds capable of strongly interacting with cyclodextrin, thus releasing the gelator and gelating the solvent.

PBA Hydrogels Selectively Absorb Dyes

As a fraction of PBA was present in anionic form in PBA hydrogels, the hydrogel selectively absorbed the cationic dye methylene blue over the anionic dye Congo red. Figure 5B shows efficient uptake of methylene blue, which is accumulated in the gel near its surface. Confocal fluorescence microscopy (Figure S9) using the cationic fluorescent dye Nile red and the anionic fluorescent dye fluorescein showed a more detailed image of their distribution in the system: Nile red was absorbed efficiently, whereas fluorescein remained in solution and was not absorbed by the nanofibers. (36)

NMR Confirms the Formation of PBA/HP-β-CD Host–Guest Complexes

To confirm that adding 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin dissolves the gel through the formation of host–guest complexes, a sample prepared in D2O was analyzed by NMR (Figure 6). Because the peaks of PBA isobutoxy groups and hydrogens of HP-β-CD overlap, 1H shifts corresponding to PBA were assigned from H–H COSY. The ROESY spectra showed strong interactions of aromatic hydrogens with either PBA O–CH2 hydrogens (3.95 ppm) or HP-β-CD hydrogens. They also clearly showed interactions between all aromatic hydrogens of PBA and the internal hydrogen of the HP-β-CD cavity (3.75 ppm), corroborating the formation of the host–guest complex. Given the absence of any interaction between cyclodextrin hydrogens and isobutoxy CH hydrogens of PBA in ROESY, we assumed that the isobutoxy group was oriented outside of the cavity. Despite striking differences between the molar masses of PBA (194 g/mol) and HP-β-CD (approximately 1500 g/mol, depending on the degree of derivatization), diffusion ordered spectroscopy (DOSY) showed virtually identical diffusion coefficients, highlighting PBA binding to HP-β-CD. The decreased diffusion coefficient of PBA in HP-β-CD also indicated the formation of the host–guest complex.
These NMR findings contradict prior research on the complexation of phenylboronic acids with β-CD. In previous studies, the interactions of β-CD hydroxyl groups with boronic acid prevailed, and the formation of host–guest complexes was not shown by either rotating-frame Overhauser effect spectroscopy (ROESY) or DOSY. (47) Nevertheless, this discrepancy may be explained by cyclodextrin derivatization by 2-hydroxypropyl groups, which prevents interactions with sugar diols because they become inaccessible. Therefore, unlike previously published ROESY and DOSY data, our NMR findings confirm that PBA/HP-β-CD host–guest complexes are formed when adding 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin to a PBA gel.

Conclusions

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

PBA is a simple LMW gelator capable of gelating water at low concentrations into a network of cross-linked nanofibers with amorphous and crystalline phases as shown by electron microscopy and by SAXS and WAXS measurements. The viscoelastic properties of PBA hydrogels lie in the range of soft tissues, and the moduli of these gels can be tailored in a wide range of 2 orders of magnitude, from 2.5 to 103 kPa, by changing the concentration of PBA. Furthermore, adding urea, which is biocompatible, decreases the elastic and loss moduli of PBA hydrogels at a given concentration. In turn, increasing the urea concentration enables us to tune the gelation temperature between 62 and 56 °C and the elastic modulus G′ (at body temperature) between 63.4 and 30.4 kPa. Therefore, PBA has a high potential as a biodegradable, multistimuli-responsive, LMW hydrogelator for bioapplications, capable of selective absorption of cationic compounds, as shown for two cationic and two anionic dyes. The gelator can be dissolved by adding hydrogen peroxide, sodium hydroxide, and 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, thus demonstrating the host-guess stimuli-responsive properties of the PBA gelator.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsanm.3c03259.

  • Fit of the SAXS data and components of the used model, IR spectra, rheological data, and CLSM images (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Martin Orságh - Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Hlavova 2030, 128 00 Prague 2, Czech RepublicOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1145-6137
    • Beata Strachota - Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry AS CR, Heyrovsky Sq. 2, 162 00 Prague 6, Czech RepublicOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5163-9304
    • Ewa Pavlova - Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry AS CR, Heyrovsky Sq. 2, 162 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic
    • Jiří Pánek - Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry AS CR, Heyrovsky Sq. 2, 162 00 Prague 6, Czech RepublicOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5816-6298
    • Agnieszka Adamczyk-Woźniak - Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, Noakowskiego 3, 00-664 Warsaw, PolandOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0571-0197
    • Andrzej Sporzyński - Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, Noakowskiego 3, 00-664 Warsaw, PolandFaculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury, Oczapowskiego 8, 10-719 Olsztyn, PolandOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8405-3297
    • Paweł Leszczyński - Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, Noakowskiego 3, 00-664 Warsaw, Poland
    • Miroslav Štěpánek - Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Hlavova 2030, 128 00 Prague 2, Czech RepublicOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7636-7234
  • Author Contributions

    M.O. investigation, data curation, formal analysis, visualization, writing─original draft, and writing─review and editing; B.S. investigation, data curation, writing─original draft, and writing─review and editing; E.P. investigation; J.P. investigation; A.A.-W investigation; A.S. investigation; P.L. investigation; M.Š. investigation, data curation, writing─original draft, and writing─review and editing; M.U. conceptualization, methodology, data curation, visualization, resources, supervision, writing─original draft, writing─review and editing, project administration, and funding acquisition.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sport of the Czech Republic projects: LTAIN19078 within the Inter-Excellence Program and Operational Program Research, Development and Education: “Excellent Research Teams” (Project No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000417-CUCAM). The authors thank Dr. Carlos V. Melo for editing the manuscript.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 47 other publications.

  1. 1
    Naahidi, S.; Jafari, M.; Logan, M.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Bae, H.; Dixon, B.; Chen, P. Biocompatibility of Hydrogel-Based Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2017, 35 (5), 530544,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.05.006
  2. 2
    Li, J.; Mooney, D. J. Designing Hydrogels for Controlled Drug Delivery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1 (12), 16071,  DOI: 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.71
  3. 3
    Drury, J. L.; Mooney, D. J. Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering: Scaffold Design Variables and Applications. Biomaterials 2003, 24 (24), 43374351,  DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00340-5
  4. 4
    Sood, N.; Bhardwaj, A.; Mehta, S.; Mehta, A. Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels in Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering. Drug Deliv. 2016, 23 (3), 748770,  DOI: 10.3109/10717544.2014.940091
  5. 5
    Hanabusa, K.; Suzuki, M. Development of Low-Molecular-Weight Gelators and Polymer-Based Gelators. Polym. J. 2014, 46 (11), 776782,  DOI: 10.1038/pj.2014.64
  6. 6
    de Loos, M.; Feringa, B. L.; van Esch, J. H. Design and Application of Self-Assembled Low Molecular Weight Hydrogels. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 2005, 36153631,  DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.200400723
  7. 7
    Skilling, K. J.; Citossi, F.; Bradshaw, T. D.; Ashford, M.; Kellam, B.; Marlow, M. Insights into Low Molecular Mass Organic Gelators: A Focus on Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering Applications. Soft Matter 2014, 10 (2), 237256,  DOI: 10.1039/C3SM52244J
  8. 8
    Johnson, E. K.; Adams, D. J.; Cameron, P. J. Peptide Based Low Molecular Weight Gelators. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21 (7), 20242027,  DOI: 10.1039/C0JM03099F
  9. 9
    Roth-Konforti, M. E.; Comune, M.; Halperin-Sternfeld, M.; Grigoriants, I.; Shabat, D.; Adler-Abramovich, L. UV Light-Responsive Peptide-Based Supramolecular Hydrogel for Controlled Drug Delivery. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2018, 39 (24), 1800588,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.201800588
  10. 10
    Nowak, B. P.; Niehues, M.; Ravoo, B. J. Magneto-Responsive Hydrogels by Self-Assembly of Low Molecular Weight Peptides and Crosslinking with Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. Soft Matter 2021, 17 (10), 28572864,  DOI: 10.1039/D0SM02049D
  11. 11
    Ilic-Stojanovic, S.; Nikolic, L.; Nikolic, V.; Petrovic, S.; Stankovic, M.; Mladenovic-Ranisavljevic, I. Stimuli-Sensitive Hydrogels for Pharmaceutical and Medical Applications. Facta Univ., Ser.: Phys., Chem. Technol. 2011, 9 (1), 3756,  DOI: 10.2298/FUPCT1101037I
  12. 12
    Segarra-Maset, M. D.; Nebot, V. J.; Miravet, J. F.; Escuder, B. Control of Molecular Gelation by Chemical Stimuli. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (17), 70867098,  DOI: 10.1039/C2CS35436E
  13. 13
    Chen, J.; Kampf, J. W.; McNeil, A. J. Comparing Molecular Gelators and Nongelators Based on Solubilities and Solid-State Interactions. Langmuir 2010, 26 (16), 1307613080,  DOI: 10.1021/la102500u
  14. 14
    Matuszewska, A.; Uchman, M.; Adamczyk-Woźniak, A.; Sporzyński, A.; Pispas, S.; Kováčik, L.; Štěpánek, M. Glucose-Responsive Hybrid Nanoassemblies in Aqueous Solutions: Ordered Phenylboronic Acid within Intermixed Poly(4-Hydroxystyrene)- Block -Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Block Copolymer. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16 (12), 37313739,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01325
  15. 15
    Zhao, F.; Wu, D.; Yao, D.; Guo, R.; Wang, W.; Dong, A.; Kong, D.; Zhang, J. An Injectable Particle-Hydrogel Hybrid System for Glucose-Regulatory Insulin Delivery. Acta Biomater. 2017, 64, 334345,  DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.044
  16. 16
    Tao, N.; Li, G.; Liu, M.; Gao, W.; Wu, H. Preparation of Dual Responsive Low-Molecular-Weight Hydrogel for Long-Lasting Drug Delivery. Tetrahedron 2017, 73 (22), 31733180,  DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2017.04.051
  17. 17
    Wu, X.; Chen, X.-X.; Song, B.-N.; Huang, Y.-J.; Ouyang, W.-J.; Li, Z.; James, T. D.; Jiang, Y.-B. Direct Sensing of Fluoride in Aqueous Solutions Using a Boronic Acid Based Sensor. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50 (90), 1398713989,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CC04542D
  18. 18
    Martínez-Aguirre, M. A.; Villamil-Ramos, R.; Guerrero-Alvarez, J. A.; Yatsimirsky, A. K. Substituent Effects and PH Profiles for Stability Constants of Arylboronic Acid Diol Esters. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78 (10), 46744684,  DOI: 10.1021/jo400617j
  19. 19
    Brooks, W. L. A.; Deng, C. C.; Sumerlin, B. S. Structure–Reactivity Relationships in Boronic Acid–Diol Complexation. ACS Omega 2018, 3 (12), 1786317870,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02999
  20. 20
    Tomsho, J. W.; Pal, A.; Hall, D. G.; Benkovic, S. J. Ring Structure and Aromatic Substituent Effects on the p K a of the Benzoxaborole Pharmacophore. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3 (1), 4852,  DOI: 10.1021/ml200215j
  21. 21
    Vrbata, D.; Uchman, M. Preparation of Lactic Acid- and Glucose-Responsive Poly(ε-Caprolactone)- b -Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Block Copolymer Micelles Using Phenylboronic Ester as a Sensitive Block Linkage. Nanoscale 2018, 10 (18), 84288442,  DOI: 10.1039/C7NR09427B
  22. 22
    Vrbata, D.; Kereiche, S.; Kalíková, K.; Uchman, M. Stimuli-Responsive Multifunctional Micelles of ABC vs. ACB Triblock Terpolymers Using Reversible Covalent Bonding of Phenylboronic Acid: Controlled Synthesis, Self-Assembly and Model Drug Release. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 335, 116528,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116528
  23. 23
    Celenza, G.; Vicario, M.; Bellio, P.; Linciano, P.; Perilli, M.; Oliver, A.; Blazquez, J.; Cendron, L.; Tondi, D. Phenylboronic acid derivatives as validated leads active in clinical strains overexpressing KPC-2: a step against bacterial resistance. Chemmedchem 2018, 13, 713724,  DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.201700788
  24. 24
    Rit, T.; Ghosh, T.; Bhowmik, S.; Patidar, M. K.; Das, A. K. Dynamic Multicomponent Reactions-Directed Self-Assembled G-quadruplex Inherent Antibacterial Hydrogel. Langmuir 2023, 39 (18), 64666475,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00392
  25. 25
    Baker, S. J.; Ding, C. Z.; Akama, T.; Zhang, Y.-K.; Hernandez, V.; Xia, Y. Therapeutic potential of boron-containing compounds. Future Med. Chem. 2009, 1 (7), 12751288,  DOI: 10.4155/fmc.09.71
  26. 26
    Marasovic, M.; Ivankovic, S.; Stojkovic, R.; Djermic, D.; Galic, B.; Milos, M. In vitro and in vivo antitumour effects of phenylboronic acid against mouse mammary adenocarcinoma 4T1 and squamous carcinoma SCCVII cells. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2017, 32 (1), 12991304,  DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2017.1384823
  27. 27
    Adamczyk-Woźniak, A.; Kaczorowska, E.; Kredátusova, J.; Madura, I.; Marek, P. H.; Matuszewska, A.; Sporzyński, A.; Uchman, M. Dehydration of Ortho -Meta - and Para -Alkoxy Phenylboronic Acids to Their Corresponding Boroxines. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 2018 (13), 14921498,  DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201701485
  28. 28
    Sporzyński, A.; Leszczyński, P. Solubility of Phenylboronic Compounds in Water. Mediterr. J. Chem. 2017, 6 (5), 200,  DOI: 10.13171/mjc65/01711021733-sporzynsky
  29. 29
    Xu, L.; Hu, Y.; Liu, M.; Chen, J.; Huang, X.; Gao, W.; Wu, H. Gelation properties and glucose-sensitive behavior of phenylboronic acid based low-molecular-weight organogels. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 20792088,  DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2015.02.050
  30. 30
    Mandal, D.; Mandal, S. K.; Ghosh, M.; Das, P. K. Phenylboronic Acid Appended Pyrene-Based Low-Molecular-Weight Injectable Hydrogel: Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Release. Chem. ─Eur. J. 2015, 21, 1204212052,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201501170
  31. 31
    Gao, W.; Liang, Y.; Peng, X.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wu, H.; He, B. In situ injection of phenylboronic acid based low molecular weight gels for efficient chemotherapy. Biomaterials 2016, 105, 111,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.025
  32. 32
    He, J.; Hu, Y.; Wu, F.; He, B.; Gao, W. Control of MSC Differentiation by Tuning the Alkyl Chain Length of Phenylboroinc Acid Based Low-molecular-weight Gelators. J. Bionic Eng. 2018, 15, 682692,  DOI: 10.1007/s42235-018-0056-2
  33. 33
    Eldridge, J. E.; Ferry, J. D. Studies of the Cross-Linking Process in Gelatin Gels. III. Dependence of Melting Point on Concentration and Molecular Weight. J. Phys. Chem. 1954, 58 (11), 992995,  DOI: 10.1021/j150521a013
  34. 34
    Murata, K.; Aoki, M.; Suzuki, T.; Harada, T.; Kawabata, H.; Komori, T.; Ohseto, F.; Ueda, K.; Shinkai, S. Thermal and Light Control of the Sol-Gel Phase Transition in Cholesterol-Based Organic Gels. Novel Helical Aggregation Modes As Detected by Circular Dichroism and Electron Microscopic Observation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116 (15), 66646676,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00094a023
  35. 35
    Alhalaweh, A.; Alzghoul, A.; Bergström, C. A. Molecular Drivers of Crystallization Kinetics for Drugs in Supersaturated Aqueous Solutions. J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 108 (1), 252259,  DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.11.006
  36. 36
    Raina, S. A.; Van Eerdenbrugh, B.; Alonzo, D. E.; Mo, H.; Zhang, G. G. Z.; Gao, Y.; Taylor, L. S. Trends in the Precipitation and Crystallization Behavior of Supersaturated Aqueous Solutions of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs Assessed Using Synchrotron Radiation. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 104 (6), 19811992,  DOI: 10.1002/jps.24423
  37. 37
    Sangeetha, N. M.; Maitra, U. Supramolecular Gels: Functions and Uses. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34 (10), 821,  DOI: 10.1039/b417081b
  38. 38
    Schall, J. M.; Capellades, G.; Myerson, A. S. Methods for Estimating Supersaturation in Antisolvent Crystallization Systems. CrystEngComm 2019, 21 (38), 58115817,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CE00843H
  39. 39
    Yi, B.; Xu, Q.; Liu, W. An overview of substrate stiffness guided cellular response and its applications in tissue regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 15, 82102,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.005
  40. 40
    Jiao, T.; Rodney, J.; Clifton, G. L. C.; Hopkins, R. A. Measurements of the Effects of Decellularization on Viscoelastic Properties of Tissues in Ovine. Baboon, and Human Heart Valves. Tissue Eng., Part A 2012, 18, 423,  DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0677
  41. 41
    Charrier, E. E.; Pogoda, K.; Wells, R. G.; Janmey, P. A. Control of Cell Morphology and Differentiation by Substrates with Independently Tunable Elasticity and Viscous Dissipation. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 (1), 449,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-02906-9
  42. 42
    He, J.; Hu, Y.; Wu, F.; He, B.; Gao, W. Control of MSC Differentiation by Tuning the Alkyl Chain Length of Phenylboroinc Acid Based Low-Molecular-Weight Gelators. J. Bionic Eng. 2018, 15 (4), 682692,  DOI: 10.1007/s42235-018-0056-2
  43. 43
    Landel, R. F.; Nielsen, L. E. Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites, 2nd ed.; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, Basel, 1994; ISBN 0-8247-8964-4.
  44. 44
    Elumalai, V.; Hansen, J. H. A Scalable and Green One-Minute Synthesis of Substituted Phenols. RSC Adv. 2020, 10 (66), 4058240587,  DOI: 10.1039/D0RA08580D
  45. 45
    Pereva, S.; Nikolova, V.; Sarafska, T.; Angelova, S.; Spassov, T.; Dudev, T. Inclusion Complexes of Ibuprofen and β-Cyclodextrin: Supramolecular Structure and Stability. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1205, 127575,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.127575
  46. 46
    Qi, Z.; Malo de Molina, P.; Jiang, W.; Wang, Q.; Nowosinski, K.; Schulz, A.; Gradzielski, M.; Schalley, C. A. Systems Chemistry: Logic Gates Based on the Stimuli-Responsive Gel–Sol Transition of a Crown Ether-Functionalized Bis(Urea) Gelator. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3 (6), 2073,  DOI: 10.1039/c2sc01018f
  47. 47
    Kasprzak, A.; Borys, K. M.; Molchanov, S.; Adamczyk-Woźniak, A. Spectroscopic Insight into Supramolecular Assemblies of Boric Acid Derivatives and β-Cyclodextrin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 198, 294301,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.085

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Arylboronic acids of interest: (A) 3-isobutoxyphenylboronic acid (PBA); (B) Wulff type acid; and (C) benzoxaborole.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. SAXS (A) and WAXS (B) diffractograms of a 2.7 mg/mL PBA hydrogel sample, TEM (C,D) images of gelator crystalline and amorphous phases, respectively, SEM (E,F) images of the corresponding dried gel, and fluorescence confocal microscopy (G,H) images of the gel stained with Nile red (further experimental details on 2A-H in Supporting Information).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Gradual dissolution of the PBA hydrogel with the increase in temperature under polarized light microscopy (A; left to right: 80, 86, 88 °C), heating (B) and cooling (C) DSC curves of the PBA hydrogel at different PBA concentrations, and cooling rheology of PBA hydrogels (D–G), showing the variation of the PBA hydrogel storage modulus (G′) as a function of temperature at different PBA (D) and urea (F) concentrations and the variation of the storage (G′) and loss (G″) moduli of the PBA hydrogel as a function of temperature at 2.70 mg/mL PBA (E) and 3.5 mg/mL urea (G).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (A) Strain sweeps for networks at 30 °C with different concentrations of PBA; (B) variation of the storage modulus G′ and of the loss modulus G″ as a function of frequency at 30 °C, with deformation amplitude 0.01%, for samples with different concentrations of PBA. Data points in all graphs: G′: filled symbols; G″, open symbols.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (A) Triggering the gel–sol transition of PBA by NaOH/HCl, H2O2, and CD. (B) Photos of selective absorption of Nile red and methylene blue at 0 and 2 h after adding dyes and mixtures of PBA and dyes of different molar equivalents at room temperature.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. (A) 1H ROESY NMR spectrum of PBA/cyclodextrine complex, (B) detail of 1H ROESY NMR spectrum of interactions of PBA aromatic hydrogens with cyclodextrine and (C) 1H DOSY NMR spectrum confirming formation of host-guest complex (numbering corresponds to the proton assignments as indicated on the chemical structure of PBA and cyclodextrine).

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 47 other publications.

    1. 1
      Naahidi, S.; Jafari, M.; Logan, M.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Bae, H.; Dixon, B.; Chen, P. Biocompatibility of Hydrogel-Based Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2017, 35 (5), 530544,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.05.006
    2. 2
      Li, J.; Mooney, D. J. Designing Hydrogels for Controlled Drug Delivery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1 (12), 16071,  DOI: 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.71
    3. 3
      Drury, J. L.; Mooney, D. J. Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering: Scaffold Design Variables and Applications. Biomaterials 2003, 24 (24), 43374351,  DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00340-5
    4. 4
      Sood, N.; Bhardwaj, A.; Mehta, S.; Mehta, A. Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels in Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering. Drug Deliv. 2016, 23 (3), 748770,  DOI: 10.3109/10717544.2014.940091
    5. 5
      Hanabusa, K.; Suzuki, M. Development of Low-Molecular-Weight Gelators and Polymer-Based Gelators. Polym. J. 2014, 46 (11), 776782,  DOI: 10.1038/pj.2014.64
    6. 6
      de Loos, M.; Feringa, B. L.; van Esch, J. H. Design and Application of Self-Assembled Low Molecular Weight Hydrogels. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 2005, 36153631,  DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.200400723
    7. 7
      Skilling, K. J.; Citossi, F.; Bradshaw, T. D.; Ashford, M.; Kellam, B.; Marlow, M. Insights into Low Molecular Mass Organic Gelators: A Focus on Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering Applications. Soft Matter 2014, 10 (2), 237256,  DOI: 10.1039/C3SM52244J
    8. 8
      Johnson, E. K.; Adams, D. J.; Cameron, P. J. Peptide Based Low Molecular Weight Gelators. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21 (7), 20242027,  DOI: 10.1039/C0JM03099F
    9. 9
      Roth-Konforti, M. E.; Comune, M.; Halperin-Sternfeld, M.; Grigoriants, I.; Shabat, D.; Adler-Abramovich, L. UV Light-Responsive Peptide-Based Supramolecular Hydrogel for Controlled Drug Delivery. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2018, 39 (24), 1800588,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.201800588
    10. 10
      Nowak, B. P.; Niehues, M.; Ravoo, B. J. Magneto-Responsive Hydrogels by Self-Assembly of Low Molecular Weight Peptides and Crosslinking with Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. Soft Matter 2021, 17 (10), 28572864,  DOI: 10.1039/D0SM02049D
    11. 11
      Ilic-Stojanovic, S.; Nikolic, L.; Nikolic, V.; Petrovic, S.; Stankovic, M.; Mladenovic-Ranisavljevic, I. Stimuli-Sensitive Hydrogels for Pharmaceutical and Medical Applications. Facta Univ., Ser.: Phys., Chem. Technol. 2011, 9 (1), 3756,  DOI: 10.2298/FUPCT1101037I
    12. 12
      Segarra-Maset, M. D.; Nebot, V. J.; Miravet, J. F.; Escuder, B. Control of Molecular Gelation by Chemical Stimuli. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (17), 70867098,  DOI: 10.1039/C2CS35436E
    13. 13
      Chen, J.; Kampf, J. W.; McNeil, A. J. Comparing Molecular Gelators and Nongelators Based on Solubilities and Solid-State Interactions. Langmuir 2010, 26 (16), 1307613080,  DOI: 10.1021/la102500u
    14. 14
      Matuszewska, A.; Uchman, M.; Adamczyk-Woźniak, A.; Sporzyński, A.; Pispas, S.; Kováčik, L.; Štěpánek, M. Glucose-Responsive Hybrid Nanoassemblies in Aqueous Solutions: Ordered Phenylboronic Acid within Intermixed Poly(4-Hydroxystyrene)- Block -Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Block Copolymer. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16 (12), 37313739,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01325
    15. 15
      Zhao, F.; Wu, D.; Yao, D.; Guo, R.; Wang, W.; Dong, A.; Kong, D.; Zhang, J. An Injectable Particle-Hydrogel Hybrid System for Glucose-Regulatory Insulin Delivery. Acta Biomater. 2017, 64, 334345,  DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.044
    16. 16
      Tao, N.; Li, G.; Liu, M.; Gao, W.; Wu, H. Preparation of Dual Responsive Low-Molecular-Weight Hydrogel for Long-Lasting Drug Delivery. Tetrahedron 2017, 73 (22), 31733180,  DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2017.04.051
    17. 17
      Wu, X.; Chen, X.-X.; Song, B.-N.; Huang, Y.-J.; Ouyang, W.-J.; Li, Z.; James, T. D.; Jiang, Y.-B. Direct Sensing of Fluoride in Aqueous Solutions Using a Boronic Acid Based Sensor. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50 (90), 1398713989,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CC04542D
    18. 18
      Martínez-Aguirre, M. A.; Villamil-Ramos, R.; Guerrero-Alvarez, J. A.; Yatsimirsky, A. K. Substituent Effects and PH Profiles for Stability Constants of Arylboronic Acid Diol Esters. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78 (10), 46744684,  DOI: 10.1021/jo400617j
    19. 19
      Brooks, W. L. A.; Deng, C. C.; Sumerlin, B. S. Structure–Reactivity Relationships in Boronic Acid–Diol Complexation. ACS Omega 2018, 3 (12), 1786317870,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02999
    20. 20
      Tomsho, J. W.; Pal, A.; Hall, D. G.; Benkovic, S. J. Ring Structure and Aromatic Substituent Effects on the p K a of the Benzoxaborole Pharmacophore. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3 (1), 4852,  DOI: 10.1021/ml200215j
    21. 21
      Vrbata, D.; Uchman, M. Preparation of Lactic Acid- and Glucose-Responsive Poly(ε-Caprolactone)- b -Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Block Copolymer Micelles Using Phenylboronic Ester as a Sensitive Block Linkage. Nanoscale 2018, 10 (18), 84288442,  DOI: 10.1039/C7NR09427B
    22. 22
      Vrbata, D.; Kereiche, S.; Kalíková, K.; Uchman, M. Stimuli-Responsive Multifunctional Micelles of ABC vs. ACB Triblock Terpolymers Using Reversible Covalent Bonding of Phenylboronic Acid: Controlled Synthesis, Self-Assembly and Model Drug Release. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 335, 116528,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116528
    23. 23
      Celenza, G.; Vicario, M.; Bellio, P.; Linciano, P.; Perilli, M.; Oliver, A.; Blazquez, J.; Cendron, L.; Tondi, D. Phenylboronic acid derivatives as validated leads active in clinical strains overexpressing KPC-2: a step against bacterial resistance. Chemmedchem 2018, 13, 713724,  DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.201700788
    24. 24
      Rit, T.; Ghosh, T.; Bhowmik, S.; Patidar, M. K.; Das, A. K. Dynamic Multicomponent Reactions-Directed Self-Assembled G-quadruplex Inherent Antibacterial Hydrogel. Langmuir 2023, 39 (18), 64666475,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00392
    25. 25
      Baker, S. J.; Ding, C. Z.; Akama, T.; Zhang, Y.-K.; Hernandez, V.; Xia, Y. Therapeutic potential of boron-containing compounds. Future Med. Chem. 2009, 1 (7), 12751288,  DOI: 10.4155/fmc.09.71
    26. 26
      Marasovic, M.; Ivankovic, S.; Stojkovic, R.; Djermic, D.; Galic, B.; Milos, M. In vitro and in vivo antitumour effects of phenylboronic acid against mouse mammary adenocarcinoma 4T1 and squamous carcinoma SCCVII cells. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2017, 32 (1), 12991304,  DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2017.1384823
    27. 27
      Adamczyk-Woźniak, A.; Kaczorowska, E.; Kredátusova, J.; Madura, I.; Marek, P. H.; Matuszewska, A.; Sporzyński, A.; Uchman, M. Dehydration of Ortho -Meta - and Para -Alkoxy Phenylboronic Acids to Their Corresponding Boroxines. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 2018 (13), 14921498,  DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201701485
    28. 28
      Sporzyński, A.; Leszczyński, P. Solubility of Phenylboronic Compounds in Water. Mediterr. J. Chem. 2017, 6 (5), 200,  DOI: 10.13171/mjc65/01711021733-sporzynsky
    29. 29
      Xu, L.; Hu, Y.; Liu, M.; Chen, J.; Huang, X.; Gao, W.; Wu, H. Gelation properties and glucose-sensitive behavior of phenylboronic acid based low-molecular-weight organogels. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 20792088,  DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2015.02.050
    30. 30
      Mandal, D.; Mandal, S. K.; Ghosh, M.; Das, P. K. Phenylboronic Acid Appended Pyrene-Based Low-Molecular-Weight Injectable Hydrogel: Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Release. Chem. ─Eur. J. 2015, 21, 1204212052,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201501170
    31. 31
      Gao, W.; Liang, Y.; Peng, X.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wu, H.; He, B. In situ injection of phenylboronic acid based low molecular weight gels for efficient chemotherapy. Biomaterials 2016, 105, 111,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.025
    32. 32
      He, J.; Hu, Y.; Wu, F.; He, B.; Gao, W. Control of MSC Differentiation by Tuning the Alkyl Chain Length of Phenylboroinc Acid Based Low-molecular-weight Gelators. J. Bionic Eng. 2018, 15, 682692,  DOI: 10.1007/s42235-018-0056-2
    33. 33
      Eldridge, J. E.; Ferry, J. D. Studies of the Cross-Linking Process in Gelatin Gels. III. Dependence of Melting Point on Concentration and Molecular Weight. J. Phys. Chem. 1954, 58 (11), 992995,  DOI: 10.1021/j150521a013
    34. 34
      Murata, K.; Aoki, M.; Suzuki, T.; Harada, T.; Kawabata, H.; Komori, T.; Ohseto, F.; Ueda, K.; Shinkai, S. Thermal and Light Control of the Sol-Gel Phase Transition in Cholesterol-Based Organic Gels. Novel Helical Aggregation Modes As Detected by Circular Dichroism and Electron Microscopic Observation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116 (15), 66646676,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00094a023
    35. 35
      Alhalaweh, A.; Alzghoul, A.; Bergström, C. A. Molecular Drivers of Crystallization Kinetics for Drugs in Supersaturated Aqueous Solutions. J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 108 (1), 252259,  DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.11.006
    36. 36
      Raina, S. A.; Van Eerdenbrugh, B.; Alonzo, D. E.; Mo, H.; Zhang, G. G. Z.; Gao, Y.; Taylor, L. S. Trends in the Precipitation and Crystallization Behavior of Supersaturated Aqueous Solutions of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs Assessed Using Synchrotron Radiation. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 104 (6), 19811992,  DOI: 10.1002/jps.24423
    37. 37
      Sangeetha, N. M.; Maitra, U. Supramolecular Gels: Functions and Uses. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34 (10), 821,  DOI: 10.1039/b417081b
    38. 38
      Schall, J. M.; Capellades, G.; Myerson, A. S. Methods for Estimating Supersaturation in Antisolvent Crystallization Systems. CrystEngComm 2019, 21 (38), 58115817,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CE00843H
    39. 39
      Yi, B.; Xu, Q.; Liu, W. An overview of substrate stiffness guided cellular response and its applications in tissue regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 15, 82102,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.005
    40. 40
      Jiao, T.; Rodney, J.; Clifton, G. L. C.; Hopkins, R. A. Measurements of the Effects of Decellularization on Viscoelastic Properties of Tissues in Ovine. Baboon, and Human Heart Valves. Tissue Eng., Part A 2012, 18, 423,  DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0677
    41. 41
      Charrier, E. E.; Pogoda, K.; Wells, R. G.; Janmey, P. A. Control of Cell Morphology and Differentiation by Substrates with Independently Tunable Elasticity and Viscous Dissipation. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 (1), 449,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-02906-9
    42. 42
      He, J.; Hu, Y.; Wu, F.; He, B.; Gao, W. Control of MSC Differentiation by Tuning the Alkyl Chain Length of Phenylboroinc Acid Based Low-Molecular-Weight Gelators. J. Bionic Eng. 2018, 15 (4), 682692,  DOI: 10.1007/s42235-018-0056-2
    43. 43
      Landel, R. F.; Nielsen, L. E. Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites, 2nd ed.; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, Basel, 1994; ISBN 0-8247-8964-4.
    44. 44
      Elumalai, V.; Hansen, J. H. A Scalable and Green One-Minute Synthesis of Substituted Phenols. RSC Adv. 2020, 10 (66), 4058240587,  DOI: 10.1039/D0RA08580D
    45. 45
      Pereva, S.; Nikolova, V.; Sarafska, T.; Angelova, S.; Spassov, T.; Dudev, T. Inclusion Complexes of Ibuprofen and β-Cyclodextrin: Supramolecular Structure and Stability. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1205, 127575,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.127575
    46. 46
      Qi, Z.; Malo de Molina, P.; Jiang, W.; Wang, Q.; Nowosinski, K.; Schulz, A.; Gradzielski, M.; Schalley, C. A. Systems Chemistry: Logic Gates Based on the Stimuli-Responsive Gel–Sol Transition of a Crown Ether-Functionalized Bis(Urea) Gelator. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3 (6), 2073,  DOI: 10.1039/c2sc01018f
    47. 47
      Kasprzak, A.; Borys, K. M.; Molchanov, S.; Adamczyk-Woźniak, A. Spectroscopic Insight into Supramolecular Assemblies of Boric Acid Derivatives and β-Cyclodextrin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 198, 294301,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.085
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsanm.3c03259.

    • Fit of the SAXS data and components of the used model, IR spectra, rheological data, and CLSM images (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect