ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Oxidation and Cross-Linking in the Curing of Air-Drying Artists’ Oil Paints

  • Silvia Pizzimenti
    Silvia Pizzimenti
    Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Via Giuseppe Moruzzi 13, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
  • Luca Bernazzani
    Luca Bernazzani
    Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Via Giuseppe Moruzzi 13, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
  • Maria Rosaria Tinè
    Maria Rosaria Tinè
    Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Via Giuseppe Moruzzi 13, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
  • Valérie Treil
    Valérie Treil
    Département de Chimie, Ecole normale supérieure de Lyon, 15 parvis René Descartes, Lyon 69342, France
  • Celia Duce*
    Celia Duce
    Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Via Giuseppe Moruzzi 13, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
    *Email: [email protected]
    More by Celia Duce
  • , and 
  • Ilaria Bonaduce*
    Ilaria Bonaduce
    Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Via Giuseppe Moruzzi 13, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
    *Email: [email protected]
Cite this: ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2021, 3, 4, 1912–1922
Publication Date (Web):March 16, 2021
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.0c01441

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0.
  • Open Access

Article Views

6123

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (2 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

In this study, the chemistry of air-drying artist’s oil paint curing and aging up to 24 months was studied. The objective is to improve our molecular understating of the processes that lead to the conversion of the fluid binder into a dry film and how this evolves with time, which is at the base of a better comprehension of degradation phenomena of oil paintings and relevant to the artists’ paint manufacturing industry. To this aim, a methodological approach based on thermogravimetric (TG) analysis, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), and analytical pyrolysis coupled with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (Py–GC–MS) was implemented. Model paintings based on linseed oil and safflower oil (a drying and a semidrying oil, respectively) mixed with two historically relevant pigments—lead white (a through drier) and synthetic ultramarine blue (a pigment often encountered in degraded painting layers)—were investigated. The oil curing under accelerated conditions (80 °C under air flow) was followed by isothermal TG analysis. The oxygen uptake profiles were fit by a semiempiric equation that allowed to study the kinetics of the oil oxidation and estimate oxidative degradation. The DSC signal due to hydroperoxide decomposition and radical recombination was used to monitor the radical activity over time and to evaluate the stability of peroxides formed in the paint layers. GC–MS was performed at 7 and 24 months of natural aging to investigate the noncovalently cross-linked fractions and Py–GC–MS to characterize the whole organic fraction of the model paintings, including the cross-linked network. We show that the oil–pigment combination may have a strong influence on the relative degree of oxidation of the films formed with respect to its degree of cross-linking, which may be correlated with the literature on the stability of painting layers. Undocumented pathways of oxidation are also highlighted.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0.
  • cc licence
  • by licence

1. Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Paint consists of finely divided pigment particles—the discontinuous phase—dispersed in an organic fluid binder—the continuous phase. When a drying oil, which is a plant oil made of triglycerides of polyunsaturated fatty acids, is used as the binder, the paint is an oil paint. (1) Despite the introduction of synthetic paints, oil paints are still vastly used by artists due to their working properties and to the optical quality of the paint films they produce. (2) Plant oils are also employed to produce high-solid and water-borne (WB) formulations used in protective and decorative coatings. (1,3−5)
Oil binders cure by the action of oxygen, and films are formed through chemical reactions that solidify and harden the oil. The curing of an oil paint is an autoxidative process (6,7) involving the formation of peroxide species, which evolve the following two main competitive phenomena—cross-linking and oxidation. (1,8−11) Cross-linking is fundamental for obtaining a durable film that keeps the pigment particles together and adherent to the support.
Much research has investigated lipid oxidation (8,9) in the context of food, (6,7,12−16) lipid biochemistry, (17,18) and air-drying paints intended for industrial applications and the do-it-yourself market. (1,19−21) The complexity of reactions taking place over time in air-drying artistic oil paint layers is still the focus of research, especially in relation to degradation phenomena in paintings. (8,10,22−30)
Although pigments undergo chemical modifications that have an impact visually on the painting, the weakest link in the paint durability is the film former: (1) chemical changes in the continuous phase are reflected in changes in the mechanical properties of the paint layer, thus affecting its stability, and its response to the external environment and conservation interventions.
In heritage science, it is well known that the degradation of the organic film in an oil paint is strongly dependent on both internal and external factors such as the oil type, (11,31−33) the pigment(s), (10,28−30,32−37) additive(s), (1,21,28) artistic practices, (11,23,29,30) environmental conditions, (26,29,30,38) and conservation practices. (39,40) The chemical nature of the changes occurring in the film former as a consequence of degradation is, in most cases, not fully understood at the molecular level. It was recently hypothesized that some degradation phenomena taking place in oil paintings—especially those produced with modern manufactured artists’ oil paints (2)—are related to the chemical nature of the oil cross-linked network and, in particular, to a low degree of polymerization and a high degree of oxidation. (10,23,25,31,41)
Unfortunately, the molecular characterization of the polymeric network formed in a paint film is still a big challenge from an analytical point of view. (10) However, a useful approach to improve our understanding of the chemical structure of an oil polymeric film is to characterize the process leading to its formation: the curing.
In this work, the chemistry of oil curing and aging up to 24 months was studied in model paintings. Linseed and safflower oils were selected as drying and semidrying oils, respectively. Of the drying oils, linseed oil is one of the most commonly used oils in artistic paints. (42) Safflower oil is a semidrying oil due to its relatively lower content of unsaturations. (27) In modern times, it has been introduced into manufactured oil paints, (2) synthetic air-drying binders (e.g., alkyd resins), and solvent-borne and WB formulations. (1) In fact, due to the low linolenic acid content, it tends to yellow less than oils with a similar iodine value. (27)
As a paint system involves the presence of a pigment together with the film former, we started our study by selecting two historically and artistically relevant pigments with different effects on the oil curing: lead white (LW) and synthetic ultramarine blue (UB). LW has been historically the most important of all white pigments (43) and the most common is a synthetic pigment (44)—2PbCO3·Pb(OH)2. (43) Lead, in lead-based pigments, reacts with acidic moieties in oil paints to form RCOO–Pb–OOCR bonds, which are believed to make the paint more durable by increasing the cross-linking density. (37,45) Lead ions act as through driers, (21) which are able to efficiently catalyze the paint curing and accelerate oxygen uptake and autoxidation. (21,28,46) Synthetic UB is a sulfur-containing sodium aluminum silicate. Its general formula is (NaCa)8[Al6Si6O24](SO4,S,Cl)2, (43) and the deep blue color of the pigment is due to the sulfur-containing radical anions inside the aluminosilicate framework. (47) When synthetic ultramarine is mixed with a drying oil, the oil film dries slowly. (42) Paint layers with synthetic UB may present a degradation issue, the “ultramarine sickness”, which results in a gray appearance and a loss of detail in the artwork. (48)
Via a free radical process, synthetic UB photocatalyzes the degradation of the oil binder when UV radiation is present, (36) and both natural and synthetic UB can act as aluminosilicate catalysts. (49) UB also catalyzes the photodegradation of polyethylene when added as a pigment. (50,51) Burnstock et al. reported that ultramarine paint layers in modern oil paintings often present an important conservation issue: the paint is disrupted when saliva and water are used in the cleaning practice. (35) This phenomenon, called water sensitivity, has been hypothesized to be related in some cases to the lack of a well cross-linked oil network. (10,32)
In this study, a multianalytical methodological approach was implemented to systematically characterize the conversion of the liquid oil paint into a dry film by monitoring the formation of radical species, the reactions taking place with oxygen, and the consequent formation of new molecules.
Our approach is based on isothermal thermogravimetric (TG) analysis to study the kinetics of the oil oxidation and estimate the oxidative degradation, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to monitor the presence of hydroperoxides and active radicals over time and to evaluate the stability of peroxides formed in the paint layers, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) to investigate the noncovalently cross-linked fractions, and analytical pyrolysis coupled with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (Py–GC–MS) to characterize the whole organic fraction of the model paintings, including the cross-linked network. The model paintings were analyzed periodically over the course of 2 years with a variable frequency depending on the technique and the stage of curing of the paints.
The final aim is to improve our understanding of the curing of artistic air-drying oil paints, the phenomena that occur in a paint film over time and to correlate them to the characteristics and stability of the paint film.

2. Experimental Section

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

2.1. Reagents

Methanol and water were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (purity 99%). Lauric acid, suberic acid, myristic acid, azelaic acid, sebacic acid, palmitic acid, oleic acid, stearic acid, and tridecanoic acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (purity 99%). Hexadecane acid isooctane, acetone, diethyl ether, and n-hexane were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (high-performance liquid chromatography grade). N,O-Bis(-trimethylsilyl)-trifluoroacetamide with 1% trimethylchlorosilane (purity 98.5%) and 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) (purity 99.9 %) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

2.2. Samples

Linseed oil and safflower oil were purchased from Maimeri (Milano, Italy). Synthetic UB and LW were purchased from Ferrario (Bologna, Italy) and Kremer (Germany), respectively. The systems analyzed in the present study were model oil paints and paintings created in the laboratory. Oil paints were prepared by mixing weighted amounts of drying oil and powdered pigment to obtain a workable impasto. Each oil paint was then used to prepare model oil paintings, casting the oil paints onto glass slides. The oil paintings were thus left to dry and cure under indoor laboratory conditions. Table 1 reports the detailed description of the oil paints.
Table 1. Description of Oil Paints
oil paintspigment(%)oil(%)
LWLOLW66linseed oil34
UBLOUB61linseed oil39
LWSOLW77safflower oil23
UBSOUB49safflower oil51

2.3. Drying Time

Paint drying, and in particular set-to-touch, dry-to-touch, and dry-hard-time, were measured according to ASTM D1640: standard test methods for drying, curing, or film formation of organic coatings at room temperature. The paints were cast on a glass slides to produce a homogeneous 0.45 mm wet film.

2.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis

A TA-Instruments thermobalance, model Q5000IR, was used for TG investigations and determination of the oxygen uptake under a constant air flow (25 mL/min) at 80 °C for 3000 min (2 days). The sample masses ranged between 6 and 9 mg. Temperature calibration was based on the Curie point of paramagnetic metals. A multipoint calibration with 5 Ci points from reference materials (Alumel, Ni, Ni 83% Co 17 %, Ni 63% Co 37%, and Ni 37% Co 63%) was performed. The oxygen uptake curves of the oil paints were normalized to the oil content. The fitting of the oxygen uptake curves was performed with the software OriginPro8.

2.5. Differential Scanning Calorimetry

DSC analyses were performed with a differential scanning calorimeter, Mettler Toledo DSC8222e, under constant nitrogen flow (80 mL/min) in the 30–300 °C temperature range, with a 10 °C/min heating rate. Samples (4–6 mg) were scratched from the cast of oil paint and placed in aluminum pans. DSC curves of the oil paint models were normalized to the oil content. Temperature and heat flow were calibrated using indium. The baseline was calibrated using two empty aluminum pans.

2.6. Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

For the GC–MS calibration, standard solutions of lauric acid (4.88 ppm), myristic acid (4.83 ppm), palmitic acid (4.95 ppm), oleic acid (4.78 ppm), stearic acid (4.97 ppm), azelaic acid (4.82 ppm), suberic acid (4.93 ppm), and sebacic acid (4.88 ppm) were prepared in acetone. Tridecanoic acid and hexadecane were used as internal standards for derivatization and injection. The samples’ weight ranged between 0.3 and 0.6 mg, and they were subject to alkaline hydrolysis, followed by acidification, extraction with an organic solvent, silylation, and GC–MS analysis. Details are reported elsewhere. (52) A gas chromatograph 6890 N GC system (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) coupled with a 5975 Mass Selective Detector (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) single quadrupole mass spectrometer was used. For the gas chromatographic separation, an HP-5ms fused silica capillary column (5%-diphenyl/95%-dimethyl polysiloxane, 30 m, 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 mm film thickness (J&W Scientific, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) with a deactivated silica precolumn (2 m, 0.32 mm i.d., (J&WScientific Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) was used. The PTV injector was used in split-less mode at 280 °C. The carrier gas was used in the constant flow mode (He, purity 99.995%) at 1.0 mL/min. The chromatographic oven was programmed as follows: initial temperature 80 °C, isothermal for 2 min; 10 °C/min up to 280 °C, and isothermal for 30 min. The MS transfer line temperature was 280 °C, the MS ion source temperature was 230 °C, and the MS quadrupole temperature was 150 °C. The mass spectrometer operated in electron impact (EI) positive mode (70 eV) with a scan range m/z 50–700. MS spectra were recorded both in TIC (total ion current) and single ion monitoring mode. Experiments were performed in triplicate.

2.7. Analytical Pyrolysis Coupled with Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry

The instrumentation consisted of a microfurnace multishot pyrolyzer EGA/Py-3030D (Frontier Lab) coupled to a gas chromatograph 6890 (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and to an Agilent 5973 Mass Selective Detector operating in EI mode at 70 eV. The split/split-less injector was used in split mode at 280 °C, with a split ratio 30:1. The chromatographic conditions were as follows: 50 °C isothermal for 2 min, 10 °C/min up to 280 °C and isothermal for 2 min, and 15 °C/min up to 300 °C and isothermal for 30 min. The carrier gas (He, purity 99.9995%) was used in the constant flow mode at 1.0 mL/min. The temperatures of the MS transfer line, MS ion source, and MS quadrupole were 280, 230, and 150 °C, respectively. The mass spectrometer was operated in EI positive mode (70 eV) with a scan range m/z 50–600. MS spectra were recorded in TIC mode. A total of 300 μg of the sample was placed in a pyrolysis cup and admixed to 5 μL HMDS used as a silylating agent for the in-situ derivatization of pyrolysis products. Analyses were performed in triplicate.

3. Results

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

3.1. Drying Time

The drying time of the model paintings were measured according to the ASTM D1640 method. Set-to-touch, dry-to-touch, and dry-hard-time data are reported in Table 2.
Table 2. Set-to-Touch-Time (TSTT), Dry-to-Touch-Time (TDTT), and Dry-Hard Time (TDH) in Hours of Model Paintings
model oil paintTSTT (h)TDTT (h)TDH (h)
LWLO6390134
UBLO213242284
LWSO112157207
UBSO234261305
As expected, for both oil binders, LW-based paint layers dry faster than those based on UB. Also, for both pigments, safflower oil-based paint layers dry slower than those based on linseed oil.

3.2. Thermogravimetric Analysis

The oil curing under accelerated conditions was followed by TG analysis. Fresh oils and paints were cured at 80 °C for 3000 min in a thermobalance under airflow, and the oxygen uptake curve was registered (Figures 1, S1, and S2 in the Supporting Information). The temperature was chosen to ensure reasonable analysis time, as done in other works. (8,53−55) Although artistic paint layers do not normally cure at 80 °C, the method is a valid tool to compare in a highly reproducible way the oxidative behavior of the different oil paints. Curves up to 500 min are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Oxygen uptake curves vs time of model oil paints. Curves are recorded under air flow at a constant temperature of 80 °C, and data are normalized for the oil content. (A) LO (solid gray line), LWLO (dashed and dotted light-blue line) and UBLO (dashed blue line); (B) SO (solid black line), LWSO (dashed and dotted red line), and UBSO (dashed pink line).

All the paints show a rapid oxygen uptake in the first 2 h, with a mass increase in the range 3–7% due to the initial addition of oxygen (Figures 1, S1, and S2 in the Supporting Information). (8,52,55) The mass increase is followed by a region where a mass loss is evident due to the decomposition of oxygenated compounds formed, with the evolution of relatively low-molecular weight molecules. (8,56) The curve shape is a balance between the two phenomena, and for this reason, its visual investigation does not allow a straightforward comparison between the different paints. To adress this, we propose here eq 1 as a qualitative and descriptive equation for the oxygen uptake profiles.
(1)
(A, B, q, λi, t0 fitting parameters). Although eq 1 is intended as a qualitative and descriptive equation, it should reflect the kinetics of the overall process and the parameters therein should be interpreted accordingly. The use of this equation implicitly assumes that each of the processes involved in the oxygen uptake profiles is a first-order (or pseudo-first-order) process. Under non-limiting oxygen conditions, as in our experiments, the oxygen consumption is defined as a pseudo-first-order reaction with respect to the substrate concentration. (57,58) The mass increase ascribed to the oxygen addition is hence described by a sigmoidal function 1/[1 + e–λ0(tt0)], which also allows to account for an induction time (if present). The two other exponential processes (e–λ1t and e–λ2t) are relative to mass losses. The mass loss can be associated with the evolution of different molecules including aldehydes and ketones and is generally ascribed to the exponential decomposition of hydroperoxides. (59,60) A descriptive equation with only one exponential to describe the mass loss was also tried but did not prove satisfactory (Figure S1 in Supporting Information). The meaning of the parameters should be as follows:
  • A is the overall mass loss

  • B is the asymptote of mass % curve for t that tends to infinity

  • λ0 is the apparent time constant for the oxygen uptake process

  • λ1, λ2 are the apparent time constants for the two main mass loss phenomena

  • q, (1 – q) are the relative weights of the two relevant processes that are responsible for the mass loss

  • t0 is the abscissa of the inflexion point of the sigmoidal function related to the induction time of the oxygen uptake process

The fitting parameters obtained are reported in Table 3 and the fitted curves in Figure S2 in the Supporting Information.
Table 3. Values of Parameters and Their Standard Error in Brackets; Χ2 and R2 Coefficients Obtained by Fitting the Oxygen Uptake Profiles with eq 1 for LO, LWLO, UBLO, SO, LWSO, and UBSO
model paintsABCqλ0 × 10 (min–1)λ1 × 102 (min–1)λ2 × 104 (min–1)t0 (min)Χ2 × 103R2
LO10.81398.5769.250.5990.4500.3924.3640.30.340.99987
 (0.004)(0.003) (<0.001)(<0.001)(<0.001)(0.01)(<0.1)  
LWLO5.65997.8363.470.3991.1040.7804.715.80.600.99933
 (0.004)(0.002) (<0.001)(0.003)(0.002)(0.01)(<0.1)  
UBLO9.6298.0797.180.5710.3280.3675.1362.41.330.99938
 (0.01)(0.005) (0.001)(0.001)(0.001)(0.02)(0.1)  
SO12.6195.3317.320.7280.2990.6306.2026.41.490.99935
 (0.02)(0.002) (<0.001)(0.001)(0.001)(0.02)(0.1)  
LWSO15.3191.9747.280.5970.7981.5004.950.93.860.99888
 (0.03)(0.004) (<0.001)(0.005)(0.005)(0.01)(0.1)  
UBSO20.9094.05713.630.7760.1280.5946.0887.33.980.99881
 (0.20)(0.004) (0.001)(<0.001)(0.003)(0.02)(0.8)  

3.2.1. Mass Uptake

λ0 and t0 values show that LW catalyzes the mass uptake both in linseed oil—in agreement with previous observations (28,46)—and safflower oil, as the apparent time constants are both about one order of magnitude bigger than those of the corresponding oils alone, and t0 values are one order of magnitude smaller. As far as UB-based paints are concerned, the one with linseed oil presents a similar apparent time constant and the same order of magnitude but the bigger value of t0, with respect to the oil alone, indicating that UB causes a small acceleration of the oxygen uptake in linseed oil. UBSO paint is the one that presents the lowest apparent time constant (1 order of magnitude smaller than the oil alone) and the biggest t0, resulting in the paint with the slowest oxygen uptake.
The C parameter in Table 3, estimated as C = A·[q·e(−λ1tonset) + (1 – q)·e(−λ2tonset)], allows us to estimate the mass of oxygen taken by the paint with time, without taking into consideration further reactions. If we compare the oils alone, LO and SO show similar values, with LO being slightly bigger than SO, in agreement with the iodine numbers of these oils. (61) Things change significantly when pigments are added. LW halves the amount of oxygen that is added to linseed oil, while very similar values are obtained in the case of safflower oil. UB reduces, although of a lower extent than LW, the amount of oxygen added to linseed oil but doubles the amount of oxygen added when safflower oil is concerned. Oxygen adds to alkyl radicals formed upon hydrogen abstraction, with formation of peroxyl radicals. Oxygen is also added in other possible reactions, including internal rearrangement, addition to double bonds, and recombination of peroxyl radicals. (10) The fact that LW reduces the amount of oxygen taken by the oil can be interpreted as a consequence of the evolution of unsaturated fatty acids through other reaction pathways—cross-linking—and a low occurrence of the abovementioned reactions of peroxyl radicals. (10) UB on the other hand, adds always more oxygen than LW (double), and in the case of safflower oil, also more than the oil alone. We can interpret this as a result of low evolution of polyunsaturated fatty acids through cross-linking and a high degree of oxidation. (10)

3.2.2. Mass Loss

The scission of alkoxy radicals deriving from the peroxidation of unsaturated triglyceride fatty acids has been long discussed, and it leads mainly to the formation of hydrocarbons, furans, and oxo- and hydroxy-fatty acids with a shorter chain length. (6,14,62) Among these, several are volatile molecules, and many of them can also further react to produce other oxo- and hydroxy-fatty acids with a shorter chain length. (6,14,62)
The fitting clearly shows that there are two phenomena (1 and 2) which are responsible for a mass loss, and each phenomenon must be intended as a combination of reactions which lead, among other things, to the formation of low-molecular-weight molecules. The two mass loss phenomena—1 and 2—are, respectively, the fastest and the slowest one. In the case of LW with linseed oil, the first mass loss phenomenon has a smaller weight than the second one (q), meaning that the mass loss occurring because of the first phenomenon leads to a smaller mass loss than the one due to the slower phenomenon. The opposite is true for all other paints.
The A values represent the total mass loss, observed as a consequence of both 1 and 2 phenomena. As the mass loss is a consequence of oxidative degradation, (8) which competes with cross-linking, a higher mass loss can be used as an index of a higher extent of lipid oxidation, as opposed to the lipid cross-linking. LW with linseed oil is the paint with the lowest mass loss. UB causes a higher mass loss in all paints, and SO-based paints have always a higher mass loss than LO-based paints.

3.3. Differential Scanning Calorimetry

The curing of the oil paints was monitored by DSC with a dynamic method under a nitrogen flow. (8,63,64) DSC analyses were performed on samples collected from the model paintings, starting from the time zero (t0) and then on regular time intervals up to 24 months (see Figures 2, S3 and S4 in the Supporting Information). Table 4 shows the extrapolated onset temperature (Tonset) and the maximum temperature (Tpeak) of the DSC profiles acquired. An endothermic effect above 200 °C was observed in the LW paint layers, due to pigment decomposition, but was not recorded as it was not relevant to this study.

Figure 2

Figure 2. DSC curves—normalized to the oil content—of model oil paintings recorded up to 24 months of natural aging. (A) LWLO (light blue line); (B) UBLO (blue line); (C) LWSO (red line); (D) UBSO (pink line).

Table 4. Onset Temperature Tonset (°C) and Maximum Temperature Tpeak (°C) Extrapolated from DSC Curves vs Curing Time of Model Oil Paintings
 LWLOUBLOLWSOUBSO
 Tonset (°C)Tpeak (°C)Tonset (°C)Tpeak (°C)Tonset (°C)Tpeak (°C)Tonset (°C)Tpeak (°C)
1 day95119  99129  
2 days90127  95127  
3 days9511610816297125115171
7 days91108921418710797138
9 days9111488140769885144
14 days9111197149699197144
1 month  100161  103154
2 months  110155  118146
3 months  125147  114136
4 months  122142  112142
5 months  120142  110132
6 months  117139  108129
7 months  102136  105125
24 months        
At the beginning, no signals were observed until the formation of peroxides and radical species occurred, at which point an (overall) exothermic heat effect appeared and changed with the sample age. The exothermic effect is due to different overlapping phenomena: the decomposition of peroxides and hydroperoxides, which is endothermic, and the recombination of radical species—those deriving from the peroxides and hydroperoxides decomposed, as well as other radicals species present in the paint film (such as R, RO, and ROO)—which is exothermic. (55,63,64) The area of the peak recorded is thus proportional to the sum of the number of broken peroxide bonds and free radical species present in a sample at a given time. When the exothermic signal decreases to almost zero, we can assume that the concentration of the active species is very low. (63−65) This does not necessarily mean that the chemical drying is complete, as double bonds might still be present, and thus susceptible to further reactions. In the temperature range observed, the evaporation (endothermic effect) of small volatile oxygenated products of oxidation can also be observed at higher temperatures, if not superimposed to the main exothermic peak.
The DSC curves of LW containing paint layers show similar shapes, and an exothermic heat effect in the temperature range 90–130 °C for LWLO and 70–135 °C for LWSO is observed. The maximum intensity is reached after 2 days in LWLO and after 3 days in LWSO (Figure 2A,C and, Table 4). The DSC curves of UB containing paint layers show similar shapes and an exothermic broader heat effect in the temperature range 70–190 °C, starting after 3 days and reaching the maximum value after 7 days (Figure 2B,D and Table 4). The delay in the peak appearance in UB-based paints confirms the results on the catalytic effect of LW and the retardant effect of UB on peroxide radical formation observed in the oxygen uptake curves.
The Tonset of the peak, indicating the starting temperature of peroxide decomposition, follows the trend: Tonset (LWLO) < Tonset (LO) < Tonset (UBLO) and Tonset (LWSO) < Tonset (SO) < Tonset (UBSO) (Figures S3 and 2, Tables 4, S1 and S2 in the Supporting Information). The DSC nonisothermal measurement can assess the thermal stability of the peroxides resulting from autoxidation. (65) The trend of Tonset values indicates that LW leads to the formation of less stable peroxides, while UB to more stable ones (Table 4).
Under experimental conditions adopted, active species (peroxides and free radicals) could not be detected after almost 2 months in LW-based paint layers, while for UB ones, a calorimetric signal was still present after 7 months. This indicates a catalytic effect of LW and a retardant effect of UB also on the cross-linking. This retardant effect of UB can also be linked to the observed stabilization of the peroxides operated by the pigment. The decomposition of hydroperoxides is considered to be the key rate-limiting step based on the fact that it is the only propagation step involving any significant activation energy. (12) If a peroxide is stabilized by UB, the activation energy for its decomposition becomes higher, and other reaction pathways (10,13,14) might become predominant.

3.4. Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

GC–MS analyses were performed at 7 and 24 months of natural aging, after saponification, hydrolysis, and derivatization, to investigate the fractions of the oil phase noncovalently cross-linked (through C–C and C–O–C bonds). The TICs (total ion chromatograms) are reported in Figures S5, S6, S7, and S8 in the Supporting Information. The compounds identified are listed in Table S3. Quantitative analyses of mono- and dicarboxylic acids were performed, and data are reported in Table 5.
Table 5. Characteristic Parameters Relative to Samples from Model Oil Paintings Analyzed by GC–MS after 7 and 24 Months of Natural Aginga
 P/SA/PO/S∑Dic. %
 7 m24 m7 m24 m7 m24 m7 m24 m
LWLO1.1 ± 0.01.6 ± 0.22.0 ± 0.02.1 ± 1.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.053.0 ± 5.658.7 ± 11.7
UBLO1.3 ± 0.11.7 ± 0.23.0 ± 0.51.8 ± 0.80.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.063.7 ± 3.856.3 ± 9.6
LWSO2.2 ± 0.43.0 ± 1.26.1 ± 1.01.3 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.081.1 ± 1.552.6 ± 2.8
UBSO2.0 ± 0.43.4 ± 1.13.1 ± 1.10.4 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.10.0 ± 0.067.4 ± 8.534.5 ± 9.4
a

Confidence intervals are reported, calculated at 95% confidence level. P/S: palmitic acid (hexadecanoic) to stearic acid (octadecanoic) ratio, A/P: azelaic acid (nonanedioic acid) to palmitic acid ratio, O/S: oleic acid ((9Z)-octadec-9-enoic acid) to stearic acid ratio, ∑Dic. %: sum (%) of the dicarboxylic acids – suberic acid (octanedioic acid), azelaic acid, and sebacic acid (decanedioic acid).

Most relevant, after 24 months of natural aging is the fact that in safflower-based paints, the relative content of azelaic acid is significantly decreased with respect to the values recorded after 7 months. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that such a decrease is observed. Azelaic and other dicarboxylic acids, formed by oxidation of (poly)unsaturated fatty acids, are considered final products of oxidation. (24) The data presented here clearly demonstrate that they are not, and there must be reaction pathways that lead to their decomposition into other reaction products. Such products were not identified in the chromatograms. A possible explanation is that these compounds, due to their low molecular weight, might have retention times lower than the solvent delay of the chromatographic run. Another possible explanation is that dicarboxylic acids might become covalently bound (through C–C and C–O–C bonds) to the cross-linked network. The fact that such decrease was not observed for linseed oil paints might mean that these reactions do not take place in linseed oil to a significant extent or that we have missed the point where the relative content of dicarboxylic acids reached a maximum and then decreased, which must have occurred before 7 months. Considering the faster kinetics of curing of linseed oil-based paints, this hypothesis is not to be excluded.
Hydroxyacids—intermediate products of oxidation (52)—were investigated and detected in all chromatograms and were identified by mass spectral interpretation and by comparison with the available literature. (66) α-Hydroxyacids and α-hydroxy di-acids ranging from 5 to 10 carbon atoms were detected both after 7 and 24 months in all samples (chromatographic profiles in Figures S5–S9, and Table S3, and mass spectra Figure S9–S18 in the Supporting Information). The formation of α-hydroxyacids and α-hydroxy di-acids ranging from 5 to 10 carbon atoms could be justified as the consequence of oxidation of double bonds followed by β-elimination, given the position of double bonds in oleic, linoleic, and linolenic acids. (7) α-Hydroxy hexadecanoic and α-hydroxyl octadecanoic acid (mass spectra in Figures S19 and S20 in the Supporting Information) were only detected at 24 months of natural aging. Their formation can only be ascribed to the oxidation of palmitic and stearic acid in position α and have never been reported, to the best of our knowledge, in the context of curing and autoxidation of glycerolipids.

3.5. Analytical Pyrolysis Coupled with Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry

Py–GC–MS enabled the investigation of the whole organic fraction of the paints, including the cross-linked network. The extracted ion chromatograms of m/z 129 ascribable to silylated carboxylic acid moieties obtained at 7 and 24 months of natural aging are shown in Figures 3 and S21. The complete list of the identified compounds is reported in Table S3.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Extracted ion pyrograms of m/z 129 of model oil paintings after 7 (7 m) and 24 months (24 m) of natural aging. In the insets, the chromatographic profiles of unsaturated fatty acids are reported. m/z 339: octadecenoic acid (oleic acid), m/z: 337: octadecadienoic acid (linoleic acid). As reference, the extract ion of octadecanoic acid (stearic acid) is reported (m/z: 341). (A) LWLO; (B) UBLO; (C) LWSO; (D) UBSO.

Pyrolytic profiles are strongly affected by the pigment nature. (25,67) It is thus in general not possible to compare pyrograms of samples containing different pigments, but the comparison between chromatographic profiles of samples collected from the same paint layers at different stages of aging is still possible. Short-chain linear carboxylic acids, saturated and ω-unsaturated, ranging from 6 to 12, and peaking at 8, are the products of pyrolysis of the cross-linked network. (55) LW-based paints at both 7 and 24 months of natural aging are quite similar, and only a slight increase in the relative intensity of the peaks ascribable to the pyrolysis of the cross-linked network is observable at longer curing times (Figure 3A,C). This suggests that the relative content of the cross-linked network is relatively increased with time, as expected of a curing oil paint film. The opposite, though, is observed in UB-based paints (Figure 3B,C), suggesting that the degradative oxidation of the cross-linked network is taking place.
In the pyrogram of UBLO, LWSO and UBSO unsaturated compounds were detected: high amounts of oleic acid)—which is significantly higher than in GC–MS chromatogram; trans-octadec-9-enoic acid; 8-hydroxydec-9-enoic acid; 8-hydroxyundec-10-enoic acid; and 9-hydroxyoctadec-12-enoic acid (the molecular structure was tentatively assigned based on the mass spectra reported in Figure S22 in the Supporting Information). Given their absence in the GC–MS chromatograms, these compounds must be ascribed to the pyrolysis of (unsaturated fatty) acids covalently bound (through C–C and C–O–C bonds) to the cross-linked network. UBLO and UBSO paints both present a thermal effect still after 24 months of curing, but LWSO did not present any thermal effect after 2 months (see DSC results and Figure 2). This confirms that although active radical species may be very low in abundance in paint layers, unsaturations may still be still present, available for further reactions.

4. Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

A scheme to summarize the principal findings is reported in Figure 4.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Summary of the principal results obtained in the study.

The thermal behavior of the paints and molecular profiles of the painting layers clearly confirm that the curing of oil paints is dependent on both the type of oil and the pigment.
Safflower oil, which is considered a semidrying oil, shows a very different behavior with respect to linseed oil. Oxidative degradative phenomena start earlier, and they are faster. Safflower oil is also more subject to reaction pathways lead by peroxyl radicals, which favor oxidation. (13,14) All these features can be correlated to the reactivity of bis-allylic positions and their lower content in linolenic acid—the main fatty acid in safflower oil, compared to linolenic acid—the main fatty acid of linseed oil. (10)
In a painting layer containing LW, after 7 months of natural curing, most active species are absent, or present at very low concentrations, especially in linseed oil-based paintings. It is well known that LW is a through drier, which catalyzes both the initiation and autoxidation in an oil paint. (28) TG and DSC data in the present study show that LW catalyzes the oxygen uptake to form peroxides—the initiation step of autoxidation reactions, in agreement with the observed behavior of other primary and through driers, (28,54) as well as the cross-linking and volatile formation and evolution. We showed for the first time that LW decreases the stability of the peroxides (DSC). This can be directly linked to the catalytic effect of LW both in the cross-linking reaction and volatile formation. All techniques used show that the effect of LW on the reactivity of polyunsaturated triglyceride fatty acids is oil-dependent, and double bond consumption is faster when a drying oil is used.
Synthetic UB was shown in this study to have a retardant effect on the oxygen uptake and radical peroxide formation respect with the oils alone and LW-based paints (TG and DSC). UB was proven to stabilize the peroxides formed upon oxygen uptake (DSC), affecting the curing kinetics and, possibly favoring alternative reaction pathways with respect to those typical of autoxidation reactions. (10,13,14) UB-based paint films are subject to a higher degree of oxidation than LW-based ones (GC–MS); the formation and evolution of volatile compounds are slower and continue for a longer time (TG, DSC), competing with the formation of a stable cross-linked network. This is also evident by analyzing the pyrolysis data, which show that the cross-linked network of UB model painting gets degraded with time, most likely to the advantage of oxidative degradation reactions. This observation is in agreement with the work of de la Rie et al., (36) which demonstrated the physical disruption of the oil binder UB-based paintings upon light aging. Moreover, it strongly supports the hypothesis that synthetic UB paint layers may commonly present water sensitivity, caused by a poorly established cross-linked network, and the presence of relatively high amounts of polar oxidized (relatively low molecular weight) species. (10,32)
Mass spectrometric data show that dicarboxylic acids formed upon curing (in safflower oil-based paints) reach a maximum and then decrease (GC–MS). Moreover, short α-hydroxy dicarboxylic acids (from 8 to 10 carbons) were detected both at 7 and 24 months of natural aging, and α-hydroxy hexadecanoic and octadecanoic acids were detected at 24 months of natural aging. This proves that oxidation in alpha to the carbonyl moiety can take place upon curing. These data are extremely interesting, as they confirm the hypothesis (10,13,14) that the reaction pathways involved in the curing of a drying oil are much more than those reported in the literature and include several possible paths for oxidative degradation, including the progressive oxidation of fatty acids in position α to the carbonyl moieties. This phenomenon has never been observed before, although recently, the hypothesis that the position α to the carbonyl moiety might be susceptible to oxidation in glycerolipids has been advanced, in relation to the formation, upon further oxidation, of oxalic acid. (10) Insoluble salts of oxalic acid are largely detected in aged oil paintings, (68,69) also in association with UB paints. (70) The presence in the painting films of α-hydroxyl hexadecanoic and octadecanoic acids, strongly supports this hypothesis, as further oxidation of the hydroxyl moiety would lead to oxoacetic acid, and, ultimately, to oxalic acid. Oxidation of carboxylic acids in alpha to carboxylic moieties upon curing contradicts two common assumptions normally made in the molecular analysis of artists’ oil painting layers. The first is that saturated fatty acids as palmitic and stearic acids are stable and are thus not subject to any reaction in the formation of a mature oil paint film (besides metal soap formation). The second is that the azelaic-to-palmitic acid ratio is as an index of the degree of oxidation of an oil paint.

5. Conclusions

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

In this study, a multianalytical approach was implemented in order to investigate the curing and maturing of air-drying artistic oil paints during 24 months of natural aging. The final aim is to improve our understanding of the curing of artistic air-drying oil paints, the phenomena that may take place in a paint film with time, and try to correlate them to the paint film characteristics and stability. The study was carried out on model paints based on linseed oil (a drying oil) and safflower oil (a semidrying oil) with two different pigments: LW, a through drier, and UB, which has been often correlated with degradation phenomena of modern oil paintings.
When in a painting layer, an oil—both drying and semidrying oil, is mixed with LW, the oil mobile phase converts quickly in a well cross-linked network and presents a relatively low degree of oxidation. Painting layers containing synthetic UB show a very different behavior, especially when a semidrying oil is used. On the whole, it is clear that increased levels of oxidative degradation occur in synthetic UB paintings in comparison to LW ones and significantly the more so when UB is used in combination with safflower oil. As a result, we can expect that an UB painting layer is less cross-linked than a LW-based one when other factors (oil type, additives, age, conservation conditions, etc.) are the same.
This tendency of UB to favor oxidative degradation over cross-linking may be related to documented conservation issues of ultramarine paining layers, from the loss of cohesion to the establishment of water sensitivity.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsapm.0c01441.

  • Experimental and fitted oxygen uptake profiles of linseed oil obtained by the equation with only one exponential and by eq 1; experimental and fitted oxygen uptake profiles of oils and model oil paints by eq 1; DSC curves of oils and model oil paints; Tonset, Tpeak of the normalized DSC curves for oils and model oil paints; list of compounds identified as trimethylsilyl derivatives in the chromatograms obtained by GC–MS and Py–GC–MS of model oil paints; total ion chromatograms obtained by GC–MS analysis of model oil paints; mass spectra of α- and β-hydroxyacids obtained with GC–MS; extracted ion pyrograms of m/z 129 of model oil paints; and mass spectra attributed to 8-hydroxydec-9-enoic acid, 8-hydroxyundec-10-enoic acid and 9-hydroxyoctadec-12-enoic acid obtained with Py–GC–MS (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Authors
  • Authors
    • Silvia Pizzimenti - Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Via Giuseppe Moruzzi 13, I-56124 Pisa, ItalyOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-6230-5681
    • Luca Bernazzani - Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Via Giuseppe Moruzzi 13, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
    • Maria Rosaria Tinè - Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Via Giuseppe Moruzzi 13, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
    • Valérie Treil - Département de Chimie, Ecole normale supérieure de Lyon, 15 parvis René Descartes, Lyon 69342, France
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This work was performed within the context of the JPI CMOP project: “Cleaning of Modern Oil Paints” (Heritage Plus Joint Call project 2015–2018).

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 70 other publications.

  1. 1
    Honzíček, J. Curing of Air-Drying Paints: A Critical Review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 1248512505,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02567
  2. 2
    Burnstock, A.; van den Berg, K. J. Twentieth century oil paint. The interface between science and conservation and the challenges for modern oil paint research. Issues in Contemporary Oil Paint; Springer, 2014; pp 119.
  3. 3
    Hofland, A. Alkyd resins: From down and out to alive and kicking. Prog. Org. Coat. 2012, 73, 274282,  DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2011.01.014
  4. 4
    Lindeboom, J. Air-drying high solids alkyd pants for decorative coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 1998, 34, 147151,  DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9440(98)00034-4
  5. 5
    Athawale, V. D.; Nimbalkar, R. V. Waterborne coatings based on renewable oil resources: an overview. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2011, 88, 159185,  DOI: 10.1007/s11746-010-1668-9
  6. 6
    Frankel, E. N. Lipid Oxidation; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, 2012.
  7. 7
    Shahidi, F. Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, Edible Oil and Fat Products: Processing Technologies; John Wiley & Sons, 2005; Vol. 5.
  8. 8
    Lazzari, M.; Chiantore, O. Drying and oxidative degradation of linseed oil. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1999, 65, 303313,  DOI: 10.1016/s0141-3910(99)00020-8
  9. 9
    Boon, J. J.; Peulvé, S.; van den Brink, O. F.; Duursma, M. C.; Rainford, D. In Molecular Aspects of Mobile and Stationary Phases in Aging Tempera and Oil Paint Films. Early Italian Paintings Techniques and Analysis, Symposium, Maastricht; Bakkenist, T., Hoppenbrouwers, R., Dubois, H., Eds.; Limburg Conservation Institute: Maastricht, 1996; pp 3556.
  10. 10
    Bonaduce, I.; Duce, C.; Lluveras-Tenorio, A.; Lee, J.; Ormsby, B.; Burnstock, A.; van den Berg, K. J. Conservation Issues of Modern Oil Paintings: A Molecular Model on Paint Curing. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 33973406,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00296
  11. 11
    Bayliss, S.; van den Berg, K. J.; Burnstock, A.; de Groot, S.; van Keulen, H.; Sawicka, A. An investigation into the separation and migration of oil in paintings by Erik Oldenhof. Microchem. J. 2016, 124, 974982,  DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2015.07.015
  12. 12
    Schaich, K. M. Lipid Oxidation: Theoretical Aspects. In Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 6 ed.; Shahidi, F., Ed.; Wiley, 2005; Vol. 1.
  13. 13
    Schaich, K. M. Challenges in Elucidating Lipid Oxidation Mechanisms: When, Where, and How Do Products Arise? In Lipid Oxidation; Logan, A., Nienaber, U., Pan, X., Eds.; AOCS Press, 2013; pp 152.
  14. 14
    Schaich, K. M. Lipid Oxidation: New Perspectives on an Old Reaction. In Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 7a ed.; Shahidi, F., Ed.; Wiley, 2020; Vol. 1, pp 172.
  15. 15
    Choe, E.; Min, D. B. Chemistry and Reactions of Reactive Oxygen Species in Foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2006, 46, 122,  DOI: 10.1080/10408390500455474
  16. 16
    Chang, C.; Wu, G.; Zhang, H.; Jin, Q.; Wang, X. Deep-fried flavor: characteristics, formation mechanisms, and influencing factors. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 14961514,  DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1575792
  17. 17
    Guéraud, F.; Atalay, M.; Bresgen, N.; Cipak, A.; Eckl, P. M.; Huc, L.; Jouanin, I.; Siems, W.; Uchida, K. Chemistry and biochemistry of lipid peroxidation products. Free Radical Res. 2010, 44, 10981124,  DOI: 10.3109/10715762.2010.498477
  18. 18
    Cheeseman, K. H.; Slater, T. F. An introduction to free radical biochemistry. Br. Med. Bull. 1993, 49, 481493,  DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072625
  19. 19
    Hage, R.; de Boer, J. W.; Maaijen, K. Manganese and Iron Catalysts in Alkyd Paints and Coatings. Inorganics 2016, 4, 11,  DOI: 10.3390/inorganics4020011
  20. 20
    Vangorkum, R.; Bouwman, E. The oxidative drying of alkyd paint catalysed by metal complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005, 249, 17091728,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.02.002
  21. 21
    Soucek, M. D.; Khattab, T.; Wu, J. Review of autoxidation and driers. Prog. Org. Coat. 2012, 73, 435454,  DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2011.08.021
  22. 22
    Baij, L.; Chassouant, L.; Hermans, J. J.; Keune, K.; Iedema, P. D. The concentration and origins of carboxylic acid groups in oil paint. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 3555935564,  DOI: 10.1039/c9ra06776k
  23. 23
    Bronken, I. A. T.; Boon, J. J. Hard dry paint, softening tacky paint, and exuding drips on composition (1952) by Jean-Paul Riopelle. Issues in Contemporary Oil Paint; Springer, 2014; pp 247262.
  24. 24
    Erhardt, D.; Tumosa, C. S.; Mecklenburg, M. F. Long-term chemical and physical processes in oil paint films. Stud. Conserv. 2005, 50, 143150,  DOI: 10.1179/sic.2005.50.2.143
  25. 25
    La Nasa, J.; Lee, J.; Degano, I.; Burnstock, A.; van den Berg, K. J.; Ormsby, B.; Bonaduce, I. The role of the polymeric network in the water sensitivity of modern oil paints. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3467,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-39963-z
  26. 26
    Modugno, F.; Di Gianvincenzo, F.; Degano, I.; van der Werf, I. D.; Bonaduce, I.; van den Berg, K. J. On the influence of relative humidity on the oxidation and hydrolysis of fresh and aged oil paints. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5533,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41893-9
  27. 27
    Tumosa, C. S.; Mecklenburg, M. F. Weight Changes on Oxidation of Drying and Semi-drying Oils, Collection Forum , 2003.
  28. 28
    Tumosa, C. S.; Mecklenburg, M. F. The influence of lead ions on the drying of oils. Stud. Conserv. 2005, 50, 3947,  DOI: 10.1179/sic.2005.50.supplement-1.39
  29. 29
    Van den Berg, K. J.; Bonaduce, I.; Burnstock, A.; Ormsby, B.; Scharff, M.; Carlyle, L.; Heydenreich, G.; Keune, K. Conservation of Modern Oil Paintings; Springer, 2019.
  30. 30
    Van den Berg, K. J.; Burnstock, A.; De Keijzer, M.; Krueger, J.; Learner, T.; De Tagle, A.; Heydenreich, G. Issues in Contemporary Oil Paint; Springer, 2014.
  31. 31
    Boon, J. J.; Hoogland, F. G. Investigating fluidizing dripping pink commercial paint on Van Hemert’s Seven-series works from 1990–1995. Issues in Contemporary Oil Paint; Springer, 2014; pp 227246.
  32. 32
    Lee, J.; Bonaduce, I.; Modugno, F.; La Nasa, J.; Ormsby, B.; van den Berg, K. J. Scientific investigation into the water sensitivity of twentieth century oil paints. Microchem. J. 2018, 138, 282295,  DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2018.01.017
  33. 33
    Fuster-López, L.; Izzo, F. C.; Piovesan, M.; Yusá-Marco, D. J.; Sperni, L.; Zendri, E. Study of the chemical composition and the mechanical behaviour of 20th century commercial artists’ oil paints containing manganese-based pigments. Microchem. J. 2016, 124, 962973,  DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2015.08.023
  34. 34
    Artesani, A. Zinc oxide instability in drying oil paint. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 255, 123640,  DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123640
  35. 35
    Burnstock, A.; van den Berg, K. J.; de Groot, S.; Wijnberg, L. An investigation of water-sensitive oil paints in twentieth-century paintings. Modern Paints Uncovered, London; Getty Conservation Institute London, 2006; pp 177188.
  36. 36
    de la Rie, E. R.; Michelin, A.; Ngako, M.; Del Federico, E.; Del Grosso, C. Photo-catalytic degradation of binding media of ultramarine blue containing paint layers: A new perspective on the phenomenon of ″ultramarine disease″ in paintings. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2017, 144, 4352,  DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.08.002
  37. 37
    Hermans, J. J.; Keune, K.; van Loon, A.; Corkery, R. W.; Iedema, P. D. Ionomer-like structure in mature oil paint binding media. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 9336393369,  DOI: 10.1039/c6ra18267d
  38. 38
    Silvester, G.; Burnstock, A.; Megens, L.; Learner, T.; Chiari, G.; van den Berg, K. J. A cause of water-sensitivity in modern oil paint films: the formation of magnesium sulphate. Stud. Conserv. 2014, 59, 3851,  DOI: 10.1179/2047058413y.0000000085
  39. 39
    Zumbühl, S. The Rate of Solvent Action on Modern Oil Paint. Conservation of Modern Oil Paintings; Springer, 2019; pp 465474.
  40. 40
    Sutherland, K. Solvent-extractable components of linseed oil paint films. Stud. Conserv. 2003, 48, 111135,  DOI: 10.1179/sic.2003.48.2.111
  41. 41
    Astefanei, A.; van den Berg, K. J.; Burnstock, A.; Corthals, G. Surface Acoustic Wave Nebulization-Mass Spectrometry as a New Tool to Investigate the Water Sensitivity Behavior of 20th Century Oil Paints. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2021, 32, 444454,  DOI: 10.1021/jasms.0c00272
  42. 42
    Mayer, R. Artist’s Handbook of Materials and Techniques: Revised and Updated; Viking Books, 1991.
  43. 43
    Roy, A. Artists’ Pigments. A Handbook of Their History and Characteristics; Archetype Publications Ltd., London, 1993; Vol. 2.
  44. 44
    Harley, R. D. Artists’ Pigments, c. 1600–1835, a study in English documentary sources; Camelot Press, 1982.
  45. 45
    Boon, J. J.; Hoogland, F.; Keune, K.; Parkin, H. M. Chemical processes in aged oil paints affecting metal soap migration and aggregation. AIC Paintings Specialty Group Postprints, Providence, Rhode Island , June 16–19, 2006; Vol. 19, pp 1623.
  46. 46
    White, R. E.; Thomas, P. S.; Phillips, M. R.; Wuhrer, R. A DSC study of the effect of lead pigments on the drying of cold pressed linseed oil. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2005, 80, 237239,  DOI: 10.1007/s10973-005-0642-5
  47. 47
    Booth, D. G.; Dann, S. E.; Weller, M. T. The effect of the cation composition on the synthesis and properties of ultramarine blue. Dyes Pigm. 2003, 58, 7382,  DOI: 10.1016/s0143-7208(03)00037-8
  48. 48
    von Pettenkofer, M. über ölfarbe und Conservirung der GemÄlde-Gallerien durch das Regenerations-Verfahren; Vieweg, 1870.
  49. 49
    Schnetz, K.; Gambardella, A. A.; van Elsas, R.; Rosier, J.; Steenwinkel, E. E.; Wallert, A.; Iedema, P. D.; Keune, K. Evidence for the catalytic properties of ultramarine pigment. J. Cult. Herit. 2020, 45, 2532,  DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2020.04.002
  50. 50
    Ogbobe, O.; Ossai, N. N. Effect of colour on the mechanical and chemical properties of naturally photooxidized high density polyethylene. Acta Polym. 1992, 43, 173176,  DOI: 10.1002/actp.1992.010430308
  51. 51
    Iwu, C. F.; Egbuhuzor, M. Oxidative Photodegradation of Colored LLDPE, ANTEC-Conference Proceedings , 2004; pp 35593563.
  52. 52
    Bonaduce, I.; Carlyle, L.; Colombini, M. P.; Duce, C.; Ferrari, C.; Ribechini, E.; Selleri, P.; Tiné, M. R. New Insights into the Ageing of Linseed Oil Paint Binder: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analytical Study. PLoS One 2012, 7, e49333  DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049333
  53. 53
    Bonaduce, I.; Carlyle, L.; Colombini, M. P.; Duce, C.; Ferrari, C.; Ribechini, E.; Selleri, P.; Tiné, M. R. A multi-analytical approach to studying binding media in oil paintings: Characterisation of differently pre-treated linseed oil by DE-MS, TG and GC/MS. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2012, 107, 10551066,  DOI: 10.1007/s10973-011-1586-6
  54. 54
    Dubrulle, L.; Lebeuf, R.; Thomas, L.; Fressancourt-Collinet, M.; Nardello-Rataj, V. Catalytic activity of primary and secondary driers towards the oxidation and hydroperoxide decomposition steps for the chemical drying of alkyd resin. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 104, 141151,  DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.12.018
  55. 55
    Tamburini, D.; Sardi, D.; Spepi, A.; Duce, C.; Tinè, M. R.; Colombini, M. P.; Bonaduce, I. An investigation into the curing of urushi and tung oil films by thermoanalytical and mass spectrometric techniques. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016, 134, 251264,  DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.10.015
  56. 56
    Frankel, E. N. Volatile lipid oxidation products. Prog. Lipid Res. 1983, 22, 133,  DOI: 10.1016/0163-7827(83)90002-4
  57. 57
    Hess, P. S.; O’Hare, G. A. Oxidation of linseed oil. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1950, 42, 14241431,  DOI: 10.1021/ie50487a044
  58. 58
    Labuza, T. P.; Dugan, L. R., Jr. Kinetics of lipid oxidation in foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1971, 2, 355405,  DOI: 10.1080/10408397109527127
  59. 59
    Chan, H. S. The mechanism of autoxidation. Autoxidation of Unsaturated Lipids; Academia Press, 1987.
  60. 60
    Ghnimi, S.; Budilarto, E.; Kamal-Eldin, A. The new paradigm for lipid oxidation and insights to microencapsulation of Omega-3 fatty acids. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 12061218,  DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12300
  61. 61
    Thomas, A.; Matthäus, B.; Fiebig, H. J. Fats and fatty oils. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley-VCH, 2000; pp 184.
  62. 62
    Xia, W.; Budge, S. M. Techniques for the Analysis of Minor Lipid Oxidation Products Derived from Triacylglycerols: Epoxides, Alcohols, and Ketones. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 735758,  DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12276
  63. 63
    Duce, C.; Bernazzani, L.; Bramanti, E.; Spepi, A.; Colombini, M. P.; Tiné, M. R. Alkyd artists’ paints: Do pigments affect the stability of the resin? A TG and DSC study on fast-drying oil colours. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2014, 105, 4858,  DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.03.035
  64. 64
    Ploeger, R.; Scalarone, D.; Chiantore, O. The characterization of commercial artists’ alkyd paints. J. Cult. Herit. 2008, 9, 412419,  DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2008.01.007
  65. 65
    Mallégol, J.; Gonon, L.; Commereuc, S.; Verney, V. Thermal (DSC) and chemical (iodometric titration) methods for peroxides measurements in order to monitor drying extent of alkyd resins. Prog. Org. Coat. 2001, 41, 171176,  DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9440(01)00144-8
  66. 66
    Eglinton, G.; Hunneman, D. H.; McCormick, A. Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric studies of long chain hydroxy acids.-III.1 The mass spectra of the methyl esters trimethylsilyl ethers of aliphatic hydroxy acids. A facile method of double bond location. Org. Mass Spectrom. 1968, 1, 593611,  DOI: 10.1002/oms.1210010413
  67. 67
    Chiavari, G.; Fabbri, D.; Prati, S. Effect of pigments on the analysis of fatty acids in siccative oils by pyrolysis methylation and silylation. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2005, 74, 3944,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2004.11.013
  68. 68
    Rosi, F.; Cartechini, L.; Monico, L.; Gabrieli, F.; Vagnini, M.; Buti, D.; Doherty, B.; Anselmi, C.; Brunetti, B. G.; Miliani, C. Tracking metal oxalates and carboxylates on painting surfaces by non-invasive reflection mid-FTIR spectroscopy. Metal Soaps in Art; Springer, 2019; pp 173193.
  69. 69
    Bordignon, F.; Postorino, P.; Dore, P.; Tabasso, M. L. The formation of metal oxalates in the painted layers of a medieval polychrome on stone, as revealed by micro-Raman spectroscopy. Stud. Conserv. 2008, 53, 158169,  DOI: 10.1179/sic.2008.53.3.158
  70. 70
    van Loon, A.; Gambardella, A. A.; Gonzalez, V.; Cotte, M.; De Nolf, W.; Keune, K.; Leonhardt, E.; de Groot, S.; Gaibor, A. N. P.; Vandivere, A. Out of the blue: Vermeer’s use of ultramarine in Girl with a Pearl Earring. Heritage Sci. 2020, 8, 25,  DOI: 10.1186/s40494-020-00364-5

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 19 publications.

  1. Ophélie Ranquet, Celia Duce, Giulia Caroti, Patrick Dietemann, Ilaria Bonaduce, Norbert Willenbacher. Tempera and Tempera Grassa─From Wet Paints to Solid Films. ACS Applied Polymer Materials 2023, 5 (7) , 4664-4677. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.3c00179
  2. Johan Bootsma, Wesley R. Browne, Jitte Flapper, Bas de Bruin. Photoactive Fe Catalyst for Light-Triggered Alkyd Paint Curing. JACS Au 2022, 2 (2) , 531-540. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.1c00579
  3. Ophélie Ranquet, Celia Duce, Emilia Bramanti, Patrick Dietemann, Ilaria Bonaduce, Norbert Willenbacher. A holistic view on the role of egg yolk in Old Masters’ oil paints. Nature Communications 2023, 14 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36859-5
  4. Silvia Pizzimenti, Luca Bernazzani, Celia Duce, Maria Rosaria Tinè, Ilaria Bonaduce. A versatile method to fingerprint and compare the oxidative behaviour of lipids beyond their oxidative stability. Scientific Reports 2023, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34599-6
  5. Silvia Russo, Laura Brambilla, Jean Baptiste Thomas, Edith Joseph. But aren’t all soaps metal soaps? A review of applications, physico-chemical properties of metal soaps and their occurrence in cultural heritage studies. Heritage Science 2023, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-00988-3
  6. Maxime Touffet, Paul Smith, Olivier Vitrac. A comprehensive two-scale model for predicting the oxidizability of fatty acid methyl ester mixtures. Food Research International 2023, 173 , 113289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113289
  7. Lyndi Kiple, Tyler Lee, Gillian Zavaglia, Tyler Meldrum. Characterization of molecular environments and chemical exchange in acrylic paints via single-sided NMR. Progress in Organic Coatings 2023, 183 , 107770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2023.107770
  8. Zhen Xu, Nuwayo Eric Munyaneza, Qikun Zhang, Mengqi Sun, Carlos Posada, Paul Venturo, Nicholas A. Rorrer, Joel Miscall, Bobby G. Sumpter, Guoliang Liu. Chemical upcycling of polyethylene, polypropylene, and mixtures to high-value surfactants. Science 2023, 381 (6658) , 666-671. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh0993
  9. Miarintsoa Michaële Ranarijaona, Sandratriniaina Hermann Rafanoela, Lydia Clarisse Herinirina, Marie Christine Duclos, Alban Léon Lavaud, Catherine Goux-Henry, Estelle Métay, Voahangy Ramanandraibe Vestalys, Marc Lemaire. CNSL oxyacetic derivatives, new bio-based binders for paint preparation. Green Materials 2023, 85 , 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgrma.23.00046
  10. Eugenia Geddes da Filicaia, Richard P. Evershed, David A. Peggie. Review of recent advances on the use of mass spectrometry techniques for the study of organic materials in painted artworks. Analytica Chimica Acta 2023, 1246 , 340575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2022.340575
  11. Arkadiusz Janas, Marion F. Mecklenburg, Laura Fuster-López, Roman Kozłowski, Patrick Kékicheff, Damien Favier, Cecil Krarup Andersen, Mikkel Scharff, Łukasz Bratasz. Shrinkage and mechanical properties of drying oil paints. Heritage Science 2022, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00814-2
  12. Silvia Pizzimenti, Francesca Saitta, Marco Signorelli, Maria Rosaria Tinè, Ilaria Bonaduce, Celia Duce, Dimitrios Fessas. Oil crystallization properties as an index for monitoring early stage curing of oil-based paints: DSC analysis on linseed oil systems. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 2022, 147 (19) , 10285-10292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-022-11227-5
  13. Martina Alunni Cardinali, Laura Cartechini, Marco Paolantoni, Costanza Miliani, Daniele Fioretto, Luciano Pensabene Buemi, Lucia Comez, Francesca Rosi. Microscale mechanochemical characterization of drying oil films by in situ correlative Brillouin and Raman spectroscopy. Science Advances 2022, 8 (26) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo4221
  14. Silvia Pizzimenti, Luca Bernazzani, Maria Rosaria Tinè, Celia Duce, Ilaria Bonaduce. Unravelling the effect of carbon black in the autoxidation mechanism of polyunsaturated oils. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 2022, 147 (9) , 5451-5462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-021-11165-8
  15. Lorenzo Vannoni, Silvia Pizzimenti, Giulia Caroti, Jacopo La Nasa, Celia Duce, Ilaria Bonaduce. Disclosing the chemistry of oil curing by mass spectrometry using methyl linoleate as a model binder. Microchemical Journal 2022, 173 , 107012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2021.107012
  16. Inez van der Werf, Klaas Jan van den Berg. Direct and Hyphenated Mass Spectrometry to Detect Glycerolipids and Additives in Paint. 2022, 181-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86865-9_7
  17. Francesca Nardelli, Francesca Martini, Judith Lee, Anna Lluvears-Tenorio, Jacopo La Nasa, Celia Duce, Bronwyn Ormsby, Marco Geppi, Ilaria Bonaduce. The stability of paintings and the molecular structure of the oil paint polymeric network. Scientific Reports 2021, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93268-8
  18. Anna Lluveras-Tenorio, Sibilla Orsini, Silvia Pizzimenti, Serena Del Seppia, Maria Perla Colombini, Celia Duce, Ilaria Bonaduce. Development of a GC–MS strategy for the determination of cross-linked proteins in 20th century paint tubes. Microchemical Journal 2021, 170 , 106633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2021.106633
  19. Federica Nardella, Celia Duce, Erika Ribechini. Analytical pyrolysis and thermal analysis to chemically characterise bitumen from Italian geological deposits and Neolithic stone tools. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 2021, 158 , 105262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105262
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Oxygen uptake curves vs time of model oil paints. Curves are recorded under air flow at a constant temperature of 80 °C, and data are normalized for the oil content. (A) LO (solid gray line), LWLO (dashed and dotted light-blue line) and UBLO (dashed blue line); (B) SO (solid black line), LWSO (dashed and dotted red line), and UBSO (dashed pink line).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. DSC curves—normalized to the oil content—of model oil paintings recorded up to 24 months of natural aging. (A) LWLO (light blue line); (B) UBLO (blue line); (C) LWSO (red line); (D) UBSO (pink line).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Extracted ion pyrograms of m/z 129 of model oil paintings after 7 (7 m) and 24 months (24 m) of natural aging. In the insets, the chromatographic profiles of unsaturated fatty acids are reported. m/z 339: octadecenoic acid (oleic acid), m/z: 337: octadecadienoic acid (linoleic acid). As reference, the extract ion of octadecanoic acid (stearic acid) is reported (m/z: 341). (A) LWLO; (B) UBLO; (C) LWSO; (D) UBSO.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Summary of the principal results obtained in the study.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 70 other publications.

    1. 1
      Honzíček, J. Curing of Air-Drying Paints: A Critical Review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 1248512505,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02567
    2. 2
      Burnstock, A.; van den Berg, K. J. Twentieth century oil paint. The interface between science and conservation and the challenges for modern oil paint research. Issues in Contemporary Oil Paint; Springer, 2014; pp 119.
    3. 3
      Hofland, A. Alkyd resins: From down and out to alive and kicking. Prog. Org. Coat. 2012, 73, 274282,  DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2011.01.014
    4. 4
      Lindeboom, J. Air-drying high solids alkyd pants for decorative coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 1998, 34, 147151,  DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9440(98)00034-4
    5. 5
      Athawale, V. D.; Nimbalkar, R. V. Waterborne coatings based on renewable oil resources: an overview. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2011, 88, 159185,  DOI: 10.1007/s11746-010-1668-9
    6. 6
      Frankel, E. N. Lipid Oxidation; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, 2012.
    7. 7
      Shahidi, F. Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, Edible Oil and Fat Products: Processing Technologies; John Wiley & Sons, 2005; Vol. 5.
    8. 8
      Lazzari, M.; Chiantore, O. Drying and oxidative degradation of linseed oil. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1999, 65, 303313,  DOI: 10.1016/s0141-3910(99)00020-8
    9. 9
      Boon, J. J.; Peulvé, S.; van den Brink, O. F.; Duursma, M. C.; Rainford, D. In Molecular Aspects of Mobile and Stationary Phases in Aging Tempera and Oil Paint Films. Early Italian Paintings Techniques and Analysis, Symposium, Maastricht; Bakkenist, T., Hoppenbrouwers, R., Dubois, H., Eds.; Limburg Conservation Institute: Maastricht, 1996; pp 3556.
    10. 10
      Bonaduce, I.; Duce, C.; Lluveras-Tenorio, A.; Lee, J.; Ormsby, B.; Burnstock, A.; van den Berg, K. J. Conservation Issues of Modern Oil Paintings: A Molecular Model on Paint Curing. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 33973406,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00296
    11. 11
      Bayliss, S.; van den Berg, K. J.; Burnstock, A.; de Groot, S.; van Keulen, H.; Sawicka, A. An investigation into the separation and migration of oil in paintings by Erik Oldenhof. Microchem. J. 2016, 124, 974982,  DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2015.07.015
    12. 12
      Schaich, K. M. Lipid Oxidation: Theoretical Aspects. In Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 6 ed.; Shahidi, F., Ed.; Wiley, 2005; Vol. 1.
    13. 13
      Schaich, K. M. Challenges in Elucidating Lipid Oxidation Mechanisms: When, Where, and How Do Products Arise? In Lipid Oxidation; Logan, A., Nienaber, U., Pan, X., Eds.; AOCS Press, 2013; pp 152.
    14. 14
      Schaich, K. M. Lipid Oxidation: New Perspectives on an Old Reaction. In Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 7a ed.; Shahidi, F., Ed.; Wiley, 2020; Vol. 1, pp 172.
    15. 15
      Choe, E.; Min, D. B. Chemistry and Reactions of Reactive Oxygen Species in Foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2006, 46, 122,  DOI: 10.1080/10408390500455474
    16. 16
      Chang, C.; Wu, G.; Zhang, H.; Jin, Q.; Wang, X. Deep-fried flavor: characteristics, formation mechanisms, and influencing factors. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 14961514,  DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1575792
    17. 17
      Guéraud, F.; Atalay, M.; Bresgen, N.; Cipak, A.; Eckl, P. M.; Huc, L.; Jouanin, I.; Siems, W.; Uchida, K. Chemistry and biochemistry of lipid peroxidation products. Free Radical Res. 2010, 44, 10981124,  DOI: 10.3109/10715762.2010.498477
    18. 18
      Cheeseman, K. H.; Slater, T. F. An introduction to free radical biochemistry. Br. Med. Bull. 1993, 49, 481493,  DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072625
    19. 19
      Hage, R.; de Boer, J. W.; Maaijen, K. Manganese and Iron Catalysts in Alkyd Paints and Coatings. Inorganics 2016, 4, 11,  DOI: 10.3390/inorganics4020011
    20. 20
      Vangorkum, R.; Bouwman, E. The oxidative drying of alkyd paint catalysed by metal complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005, 249, 17091728,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.02.002
    21. 21
      Soucek, M. D.; Khattab, T.; Wu, J. Review of autoxidation and driers. Prog. Org. Coat. 2012, 73, 435454,  DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2011.08.021
    22. 22
      Baij, L.; Chassouant, L.; Hermans, J. J.; Keune, K.; Iedema, P. D. The concentration and origins of carboxylic acid groups in oil paint. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 3555935564,  DOI: 10.1039/c9ra06776k
    23. 23
      Bronken, I. A. T.; Boon, J. J. Hard dry paint, softening tacky paint, and exuding drips on composition (1952) by Jean-Paul Riopelle. Issues in Contemporary Oil Paint; Springer, 2014; pp 247262.
    24. 24
      Erhardt, D.; Tumosa, C. S.; Mecklenburg, M. F. Long-term chemical and physical processes in oil paint films. Stud. Conserv. 2005, 50, 143150,  DOI: 10.1179/sic.2005.50.2.143
    25. 25
      La Nasa, J.; Lee, J.; Degano, I.; Burnstock, A.; van den Berg, K. J.; Ormsby, B.; Bonaduce, I. The role of the polymeric network in the water sensitivity of modern oil paints. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3467,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-39963-z
    26. 26
      Modugno, F.; Di Gianvincenzo, F.; Degano, I.; van der Werf, I. D.; Bonaduce, I.; van den Berg, K. J. On the influence of relative humidity on the oxidation and hydrolysis of fresh and aged oil paints. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5533,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41893-9
    27. 27
      Tumosa, C. S.; Mecklenburg, M. F. Weight Changes on Oxidation of Drying and Semi-drying Oils, Collection Forum , 2003.
    28. 28
      Tumosa, C. S.; Mecklenburg, M. F. The influence of lead ions on the drying of oils. Stud. Conserv. 2005, 50, 3947,  DOI: 10.1179/sic.2005.50.supplement-1.39
    29. 29
      Van den Berg, K. J.; Bonaduce, I.; Burnstock, A.; Ormsby, B.; Scharff, M.; Carlyle, L.; Heydenreich, G.; Keune, K. Conservation of Modern Oil Paintings; Springer, 2019.
    30. 30
      Van den Berg, K. J.; Burnstock, A.; De Keijzer, M.; Krueger, J.; Learner, T.; De Tagle, A.; Heydenreich, G. Issues in Contemporary Oil Paint; Springer, 2014.
    31. 31
      Boon, J. J.; Hoogland, F. G. Investigating fluidizing dripping pink commercial paint on Van Hemert’s Seven-series works from 1990–1995. Issues in Contemporary Oil Paint; Springer, 2014; pp 227246.
    32. 32
      Lee, J.; Bonaduce, I.; Modugno, F.; La Nasa, J.; Ormsby, B.; van den Berg, K. J. Scientific investigation into the water sensitivity of twentieth century oil paints. Microchem. J. 2018, 138, 282295,  DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2018.01.017
    33. 33
      Fuster-López, L.; Izzo, F. C.; Piovesan, M.; Yusá-Marco, D. J.; Sperni, L.; Zendri, E. Study of the chemical composition and the mechanical behaviour of 20th century commercial artists’ oil paints containing manganese-based pigments. Microchem. J. 2016, 124, 962973,  DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2015.08.023
    34. 34
      Artesani, A. Zinc oxide instability in drying oil paint. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 255, 123640,  DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123640
    35. 35
      Burnstock, A.; van den Berg, K. J.; de Groot, S.; Wijnberg, L. An investigation of water-sensitive oil paints in twentieth-century paintings. Modern Paints Uncovered, London; Getty Conservation Institute London, 2006; pp 177188.
    36. 36
      de la Rie, E. R.; Michelin, A.; Ngako, M.; Del Federico, E.; Del Grosso, C. Photo-catalytic degradation of binding media of ultramarine blue containing paint layers: A new perspective on the phenomenon of ″ultramarine disease″ in paintings. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2017, 144, 4352,  DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.08.002
    37. 37
      Hermans, J. J.; Keune, K.; van Loon, A.; Corkery, R. W.; Iedema, P. D. Ionomer-like structure in mature oil paint binding media. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 9336393369,  DOI: 10.1039/c6ra18267d
    38. 38
      Silvester, G.; Burnstock, A.; Megens, L.; Learner, T.; Chiari, G.; van den Berg, K. J. A cause of water-sensitivity in modern oil paint films: the formation of magnesium sulphate. Stud. Conserv. 2014, 59, 3851,  DOI: 10.1179/2047058413y.0000000085
    39. 39
      Zumbühl, S. The Rate of Solvent Action on Modern Oil Paint. Conservation of Modern Oil Paintings; Springer, 2019; pp 465474.
    40. 40
      Sutherland, K. Solvent-extractable components of linseed oil paint films. Stud. Conserv. 2003, 48, 111135,  DOI: 10.1179/sic.2003.48.2.111
    41. 41
      Astefanei, A.; van den Berg, K. J.; Burnstock, A.; Corthals, G. Surface Acoustic Wave Nebulization-Mass Spectrometry as a New Tool to Investigate the Water Sensitivity Behavior of 20th Century Oil Paints. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2021, 32, 444454,  DOI: 10.1021/jasms.0c00272
    42. 42
      Mayer, R. Artist’s Handbook of Materials and Techniques: Revised and Updated; Viking Books, 1991.
    43. 43
      Roy, A. Artists’ Pigments. A Handbook of Their History and Characteristics; Archetype Publications Ltd., London, 1993; Vol. 2.
    44. 44
      Harley, R. D. Artists’ Pigments, c. 1600–1835, a study in English documentary sources; Camelot Press, 1982.
    45. 45
      Boon, J. J.; Hoogland, F.; Keune, K.; Parkin, H. M. Chemical processes in aged oil paints affecting metal soap migration and aggregation. AIC Paintings Specialty Group Postprints, Providence, Rhode Island , June 16–19, 2006; Vol. 19, pp 1623.
    46. 46
      White, R. E.; Thomas, P. S.; Phillips, M. R.; Wuhrer, R. A DSC study of the effect of lead pigments on the drying of cold pressed linseed oil. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2005, 80, 237239,  DOI: 10.1007/s10973-005-0642-5
    47. 47
      Booth, D. G.; Dann, S. E.; Weller, M. T. The effect of the cation composition on the synthesis and properties of ultramarine blue. Dyes Pigm. 2003, 58, 7382,  DOI: 10.1016/s0143-7208(03)00037-8
    48. 48
      von Pettenkofer, M. über ölfarbe und Conservirung der GemÄlde-Gallerien durch das Regenerations-Verfahren; Vieweg, 1870.
    49. 49
      Schnetz, K.; Gambardella, A. A.; van Elsas, R.; Rosier, J.; Steenwinkel, E. E.; Wallert, A.; Iedema, P. D.; Keune, K. Evidence for the catalytic properties of ultramarine pigment. J. Cult. Herit. 2020, 45, 2532,  DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2020.04.002
    50. 50
      Ogbobe, O.; Ossai, N. N. Effect of colour on the mechanical and chemical properties of naturally photooxidized high density polyethylene. Acta Polym. 1992, 43, 173176,  DOI: 10.1002/actp.1992.010430308
    51. 51
      Iwu, C. F.; Egbuhuzor, M. Oxidative Photodegradation of Colored LLDPE, ANTEC-Conference Proceedings , 2004; pp 35593563.
    52. 52
      Bonaduce, I.; Carlyle, L.; Colombini, M. P.; Duce, C.; Ferrari, C.; Ribechini, E.; Selleri, P.; Tiné, M. R. New Insights into the Ageing of Linseed Oil Paint Binder: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analytical Study. PLoS One 2012, 7, e49333  DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049333
    53. 53
      Bonaduce, I.; Carlyle, L.; Colombini, M. P.; Duce, C.; Ferrari, C.; Ribechini, E.; Selleri, P.; Tiné, M. R. A multi-analytical approach to studying binding media in oil paintings: Characterisation of differently pre-treated linseed oil by DE-MS, TG and GC/MS. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2012, 107, 10551066,  DOI: 10.1007/s10973-011-1586-6
    54. 54
      Dubrulle, L.; Lebeuf, R.; Thomas, L.; Fressancourt-Collinet, M.; Nardello-Rataj, V. Catalytic activity of primary and secondary driers towards the oxidation and hydroperoxide decomposition steps for the chemical drying of alkyd resin. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 104, 141151,  DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.12.018
    55. 55
      Tamburini, D.; Sardi, D.; Spepi, A.; Duce, C.; Tinè, M. R.; Colombini, M. P.; Bonaduce, I. An investigation into the curing of urushi and tung oil films by thermoanalytical and mass spectrometric techniques. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016, 134, 251264,  DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.10.015
    56. 56
      Frankel, E. N. Volatile lipid oxidation products. Prog. Lipid Res. 1983, 22, 133,  DOI: 10.1016/0163-7827(83)90002-4
    57. 57
      Hess, P. S.; O’Hare, G. A. Oxidation of linseed oil. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1950, 42, 14241431,  DOI: 10.1021/ie50487a044
    58. 58
      Labuza, T. P.; Dugan, L. R., Jr. Kinetics of lipid oxidation in foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1971, 2, 355405,  DOI: 10.1080/10408397109527127
    59. 59
      Chan, H. S. The mechanism of autoxidation. Autoxidation of Unsaturated Lipids; Academia Press, 1987.
    60. 60
      Ghnimi, S.; Budilarto, E.; Kamal-Eldin, A. The new paradigm for lipid oxidation and insights to microencapsulation of Omega-3 fatty acids. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 12061218,  DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12300
    61. 61
      Thomas, A.; Matthäus, B.; Fiebig, H. J. Fats and fatty oils. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley-VCH, 2000; pp 184.
    62. 62
      Xia, W.; Budge, S. M. Techniques for the Analysis of Minor Lipid Oxidation Products Derived from Triacylglycerols: Epoxides, Alcohols, and Ketones. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 735758,  DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12276
    63. 63
      Duce, C.; Bernazzani, L.; Bramanti, E.; Spepi, A.; Colombini, M. P.; Tiné, M. R. Alkyd artists’ paints: Do pigments affect the stability of the resin? A TG and DSC study on fast-drying oil colours. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2014, 105, 4858,  DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.03.035
    64. 64
      Ploeger, R.; Scalarone, D.; Chiantore, O. The characterization of commercial artists’ alkyd paints. J. Cult. Herit. 2008, 9, 412419,  DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2008.01.007
    65. 65
      Mallégol, J.; Gonon, L.; Commereuc, S.; Verney, V. Thermal (DSC) and chemical (iodometric titration) methods for peroxides measurements in order to monitor drying extent of alkyd resins. Prog. Org. Coat. 2001, 41, 171176,  DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9440(01)00144-8
    66. 66
      Eglinton, G.; Hunneman, D. H.; McCormick, A. Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric studies of long chain hydroxy acids.-III.1 The mass spectra of the methyl esters trimethylsilyl ethers of aliphatic hydroxy acids. A facile method of double bond location. Org. Mass Spectrom. 1968, 1, 593611,  DOI: 10.1002/oms.1210010413
    67. 67
      Chiavari, G.; Fabbri, D.; Prati, S. Effect of pigments on the analysis of fatty acids in siccative oils by pyrolysis methylation and silylation. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2005, 74, 3944,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2004.11.013
    68. 68
      Rosi, F.; Cartechini, L.; Monico, L.; Gabrieli, F.; Vagnini, M.; Buti, D.; Doherty, B.; Anselmi, C.; Brunetti, B. G.; Miliani, C. Tracking metal oxalates and carboxylates on painting surfaces by non-invasive reflection mid-FTIR spectroscopy. Metal Soaps in Art; Springer, 2019; pp 173193.
    69. 69
      Bordignon, F.; Postorino, P.; Dore, P.; Tabasso, M. L. The formation of metal oxalates in the painted layers of a medieval polychrome on stone, as revealed by micro-Raman spectroscopy. Stud. Conserv. 2008, 53, 158169,  DOI: 10.1179/sic.2008.53.3.158
    70. 70
      van Loon, A.; Gambardella, A. A.; Gonzalez, V.; Cotte, M.; De Nolf, W.; Keune, K.; Leonhardt, E.; de Groot, S.; Gaibor, A. N. P.; Vandivere, A. Out of the blue: Vermeer’s use of ultramarine in Girl with a Pearl Earring. Heritage Sci. 2020, 8, 25,  DOI: 10.1186/s40494-020-00364-5
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsapm.0c01441.

    • Experimental and fitted oxygen uptake profiles of linseed oil obtained by the equation with only one exponential and by eq 1; experimental and fitted oxygen uptake profiles of oils and model oil paints by eq 1; DSC curves of oils and model oil paints; Tonset, Tpeak of the normalized DSC curves for oils and model oil paints; list of compounds identified as trimethylsilyl derivatives in the chromatograms obtained by GC–MS and Py–GC–MS of model oil paints; total ion chromatograms obtained by GC–MS analysis of model oil paints; mass spectra of α- and β-hydroxyacids obtained with GC–MS; extracted ion pyrograms of m/z 129 of model oil paints; and mass spectra attributed to 8-hydroxydec-9-enoic acid, 8-hydroxyundec-10-enoic acid and 9-hydroxyoctadec-12-enoic acid obtained with Py–GC–MS (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect