ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Essential Insight of Direct Electron Transfer-Type Bioelectrocatalysis by Membrane-Bound d-Fructose Dehydrogenase with Structural Bioelectrochemistry
My Activity
  • Open Access
Research Article

Essential Insight of Direct Electron Transfer-Type Bioelectrocatalysis by Membrane-Bound d-Fructose Dehydrogenase with Structural Bioelectrochemistry
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Yohei Suzuki
    Yohei Suzuki
    Division of Applied Life Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
    More by Yohei Suzuki
  • Fumiaki Makino
    Fumiaki Makino
    Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
    JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Tokyo 196-8558, Japan
  • Tomoko Miyata
    Tomoko Miyata
    Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
  • Hideaki Tanaka
    Hideaki Tanaka
    Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
  • Keiichi Namba
    Keiichi Namba
    Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
    RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Suita, Osaka 565-0874, Japan
    RIKEN SPring-8 Center, Sayo, Hyogo 679-5198, Japan
    JEOL YOKOGUSHI Research Alliance Laboratories, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
  • Kenji Kano
    Kenji Kano
    Center for Advanced Science and Innovation, Kyoto University, Gokasho, Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan
    More by Kenji Kano
  • Keisei Sowa*
    Keisei Sowa
    Division of Applied Life Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
    *Email: [email protected]
    More by Keisei Sowa
  • Yuki Kitazumi
    Yuki Kitazumi
    Division of Applied Life Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
  • Osamu Shirai
    Osamu Shirai
    Division of Applied Life Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
    More by Osamu Shirai
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Catalysis

Cite this: ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 20, 13828–13837
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.3c03769
Published October 12, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Flavin adenine dinucleotide-dependent d-fructose dehydrogenase (FDH) from Gluconobacter japonicus NBRC3260, a membrane-bound heterotrimeric flavohemoprotein capable of direct electron transfer (DET)-type bioelectrocatalysis, was investigated from the perspective of structural biology, bioelectrochemistry, and protein engineering. DET-type reactions offer several benefits in biomimetics (e.g., biofuel cells, bioreactors, and biosensors) owing to their mediator-less configuration. FDH provides an intense DET-type catalytic signal; therefore, extensive research has been conducted on the fundamental principles and applications of biosensors. Structural analysis using cryo-electron microscopy and single-particle analysis has revealed the entire FDH structures with resolutions of 2.5 and 2.7 Å for the reduced and oxidized forms, respectively. The electron transfer (ET) pathway during the catalytic oxidation of d-fructose was investigated by using both thermodynamic and kinetic approaches. Structural analysis has shown the localization of the electrostatic surface charges around heme 2c in subunit II, and experiments using functionalized electrodes with a controlled surface charge support the notion that heme 2c is the electrode-active site. Furthermore, two aromatic amino acid residues (Trp427 and Phe489) were located in a possible long-range ET pathway between heme 2c and the electrode. Two variants (W427A and F489A) were obtained by site-directed mutagenesis, and their effects on DET-type activity were elucidated. The results have shown that Trp427 plays an essential role in accelerating long-range ET and triples the standard rate constant of heterogeneous ET according to bioelectrochemical analysis.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
  • nc licence
  • nd licence
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Oxidoreductases are enzymes that catalyze redox reactions in living organisms. They facilitate biological electron transfer (ET) and play essential roles in several biochemical events (e.g., photosynthesis, respiration, and nitrogen fixation). The variety of these enzymes is extensive, accounting for one-fourth of all enzymes. In contrast, oxidoreductases have been utilized in bioelectrocatalysts to realize a variety of biotechnologies, such as biosensors, biofuel cells, solar fuel production, carbon dioxide capture and utilization, and cofactor-regeneration systems. These systems are based on bioelectrocatalysis, which couples electrode and enzymatic reactions. (1−11)
Several metalloenzymes can communicate electronically with suitable electrodes without redox mediators to shuttle electrons between the enzyme and electrode. This phenomenon has been termed “direct electron transfer (DET)-type bioelectrocatalysis”. (12−25) Owing to the mediator-less configuration, the reaction can offer the following benefits in future bioelectrochemical technologies: (i) minimized overvoltage, (ii) low cost, (iii) simple design, (iv) high degree of design freedom, and (v) nontoxic and environmentally friendly properties. (12−25) The third-generation biosensors, which employ a principle of DET-type bioelectrocatalysis to detect the target substances, have been considered ideal and elegant. (26) They are helpful for health management (e.g., self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) or sweat sensing). (27−29) In many cases, DET-type enzymes have a catalytic site that catalyzes the redox reaction of the target substrate and an electrode-active site that communicates with an electrode. Metal cofactors (Ni, Fe, W, and Mo) and non-metallocofactors (such as flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) and pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ)) are known as catalytic sites, whereas heme moieties, iron–sulfur clusters, and other metal centers are generally known as electrode-active sites. (21,30,31)
Membrane-bound quinohemoproteins, flavohemoproteins, and metallohemoproteins have been actively studied as DET-type enzymes for the following reasons: (a) generation of clear catalytic signals, (b) potential as biosensors for organic substrates (such as sugars, alcohols, or aldehydes), (c) variety of mutants, and (d) no loss of cofactors through covalent bonding with an enzyme (in the case of flavohemoproteins and metallohemoproteins). (32) PQQ-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) (33) and molybdopterin-containing (Moco) aldehyde dehydrogenase (AlDH) (34) from Gluconobacter oxydans, PQQ-dependent ADH and AlDH from Gluconobacter sp.33, (35) FAD-dependent glucose dehydrogenase (BcGDH) from Burkholderia cepacia, (36) and FAD-dependent d-fructose dehydrogenase (FDH) from G. japonicus NBRC 3260 (37) are known as DET-type enzymes. They have a heterotrimeric structure with a large subunit that catalyzes substrate oxidation. The subunit containing three heme c moieties has a membrane anchor and is physiologically responsible for ET from the substrate to ubiquinone (UQ). (38,39) In addition, the small subunit plays a role in its expression. (40)
We discuss flavohemoproteins in more detail. BcGDH has been investigated for SMBG, and its mechanism and stability have been studied. (38) In addition, a partial three-dimensional (3D) structure of BcGDH, composed of large and small subunits (BcGDHγα), was elucidated (PDB ID: 6A2U). (41) The site-directed mutagenesis and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrum has indicated that three Cys residues in the Cys-rich region in the large subunit constitute the 3Fe-4S cluster (3Fe4S), which is thought to mediate the ET between FAD and heme c moieties. (42) Another partial 3D structure composed of large and small subunits and a truncated cytochrome subunit, leaving only one heme c moiety (BcGDHγα-trβ), was also elucidated (PDB ID: 8HDD) to support this discussion. (43) However, the overall structure of the membrane-bound subunit, including heme c moieties responsible for the electrode-active site, remains unknown. FDH is a particular enzyme with intense DET-type bioelectrocatalytic activity and has been extensively investigated from electrochemistry, protein engineering, and spectroscopy perspectives. (39) FDH comprises subunits I (67 kDa), II (51 kDa), and III (20 kDa). Subunit I contains a covalently bound FAD, and subunit II carries three heme c moieties from its N-terminus called hemes 1c, 2c, and 3c. (44,45) The redox potentials of hemes c in FDH and several variants were investigated using bioelectrochemical and spectroscopic methods. (46−48) The ET pathway of DET-type bioelectrocatalysis of FDH was examined with site-directed mutagenesis to replace the axial ligand of heme c and to delete the heme c moiety. (48−50) These studies have shown that the electron is transferred from the reduced FAD through heme 3c to heme 2c and then to the electrode; heme 1c does not seem to be involved in the reaction. (48−50) However, the entire 3D structure of FDH, as well as other membrane-bound quinohemoproteins, flavohemoproteins, and metallohemoproteins, remained unknown until our first discovery of the FDH structure reported in a preprint article in 2022. (51) Therefore, a quantitative discussion of their DET-type reaction was difficult.
In the present study, we aimed to elucidate the 3D structure of FDH using cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and single-particle image analysis. The ET pathway of the DET-type FDH reaction has been quantitatively discussed from the viewpoints of structural biology, bioelectrochemistry, and protein engineering. Structural analysis has shown the localization of electrostatic surface charges around heme 2c, and experiments using functionalized electrodes with a controlled surface charge have supported the idea that heme 2c is the electrode-active site. Focusing on aromatic residues that have been reported to enhance long-range ET, (52−57) we constructed variants in which the corresponding residues were each replaced with alanine. Based on the entire structure and the experimental results, we elucidated the enhancement of long-range ET by Trp427, which is located in the middle of the ET pathway from heme 2c to the electrode.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Cryo-EM Structures of FDH

Figure 1A shows the 3D structure of recombinant (native) FDH (rFDH) based on cryo-EM single-particle image analysis with a resolution of 2.5 Å (rFDH-R), which was retained in the reduced form with sodium dithionite. The structure of the FDH oxidized with potassium ferricyanide was also determined with a resolution of 2.7 Å (rFDH-O), and Figure S2 shows the superposition of their 3D structures. Because the root-mean-square deviation value is sufficiently small (0.19 Å), we concluded that the heterotrimeric structure and geometrical arrangement of cofactors in the enzyme were almost identical regardless of the redox equilibrium state. Although rFDH forms a dimer of heterotrimers in solution according to our previous study, (58) the cryo-EM maps after CTF refinement and 3D refinement with C1 symmetry covered the monomer of the heterotrimer that lacks the membrane-bound region at the C-terminus of subunit II (Figures S3 and S4). This is probably due to the structural flexibility of its membrane-bound regions, as inferred from the 3D variability analysis (Figure S5). We previously reported the first entire structure as a dimer of FDH (rFDH-D; Figure S6) in a preprint article in 2022. (51) The resolution of the map, in which two heterotrimers form a dimer through interaction with the membrane-bound regions solubilized by a surfactant (Triton X-100), was much lower (3.6 Å) than those in the present study due to a flexible dimer arrangement (Figure S7).

Figure 1

Figure 1. (A) Side view of the entire structure of FDH analyzed by cryo-EM (PDB ID: 8JEJ). The membrane-bound region is shown as a surface model (pale blue) with a superposition of structures in another class of FDH (PDB ID: 7W2J). (B) Geometrical arrangement of cofactors in a heterotrimer. FAD, 3Fe4S, hemes c, and UQ10 are colored magenta, yellow, red, and green, respectively. Bidirectional arrows show edge-to-edge distances between cofactors. (C) Top view of the entire structure of FDH showing the substrate binding pocket.

Figure 1B shows the edge-to-edge distances between the cofactors of rFDH-R. Three of the four sequential cysteine residues in subunit I (Cys885, Cys891, and Cys895) form the 3Fe-4S iron–sulfur cluster (3Fe4S) as in the case of BcGDH (41,42) (Figure S8A and B). Considering the reported limit of 14–20 Å for the long-range ET distance, (59,60) 3Fe4S serves as an ET relay between FAD and heme 3c. In addition, clear elongated densities were observed between heme 1c and the membrane-bound region in the 3D maps of both rFDH-R and rFDH-O (Figure S8C and D). Based on the physiological role of FDH, we considered that UQ10 was the most probable candidate for these densities. (61,62) Reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed on the organic extracts of the rFDH solutions, and the results confirmed the presence of UQ10 (Figure S9). UQ10 was quantified as 1% of the molar amount of rFDH, indicating that UQ10 bound weakly and partially to the enzymes. This is consistent with the relatively low resolution of the densities, and similar results have been confirmed in the case of ADH and AlDH from G. oxydans. (63) Furthermore, we confirmed a clear cavity around the FAD catalytic site in the top view of the structure (Figure 1C).
Various structural prediction techniques have been developed. For FDH, prediction using SWISS-MODEL (homology prediction tool) was conducted, and possible ET pathways were discussed. (64) AlphaFold2 is also a powerful predictive tool. (65) We compared the results of these prediction techniques with those of our structural analysis. Although the accuracy for subunits I and III was relatively good, the accuracy for subunit II and the heterotrimer was poor (Figures S10 and S11). These results indicate that the prediction accuracy of membrane-bound proteins remains insufficient and the present study provides essential findings in structural biology.
We now discuss the intramolecular ET in rFDH. The long-range ET rate constant (kET) can be expressed using eq 1, based on Marcus’ theory. (66)
kETk°exp(λ4RT+nFΔE2RT)exp(βΔd)
(1)
Here k° is the standard rate constant, λ is the reorganization energy, R is the gas constant, T is the absolute temperature, n is the electron number, F is the Faraday constant, ΔE°′ is the potential difference between the cofactors, β is the decay coefficient of the long-range ET (assumed to be 1.4 Å–1 for proteins in general), and Δd is the edge-to-edge distance between the cofactors. Based on the assumptions reported thus far, (66) eq 1 can be simplified to eq 2.
kET{kiikjjfexp(nFΔERT)}1/2SKAexp(βΔd)
(2)
Here kii and kjj are the self-exchange rate constants for the electron donor and acceptor (designated as i and j, respectively), S is the steric factor (≅0.1), and KA is the encounter equilibrium constant (≅0.4 M–1). (66) The f value in eq 2 is described in the Supporting Information (eq S1). The redox potentials of FAD and hemes c were based on previous studies. (47,67) For 3Fe4S, redox titration using EPR was performed to roughly estimate the redox potential (Figures S12 and S13). Moser et al. analyzed data obtained from many intramolecular ET reactions and found that the kET correlates well with Δd assuming β = 1.4 Å–1. (68) Figure 2 shows the thermodynamic and kinetic diagrams of intramolecular ET. Detailed descriptions of the ET rate constants are provided in the Supporting Information (Table S4). This prediction with a general value of β (1.4 Å–1) indicates that the ET process between FAD and 3Fe4S seems to be the rate-determining step. However, smaller β values have also been provided to ET in some proteins (e.g., β = 0.66 Å–1 for azurin, (69) β = 0.68 Å–1 for ruthenated cytochromes (70)). According to previous studies, aromatic residues accelerate long-range ET. (52−57) Although no aromatic amino acid residues were identified in the ET pathway downstream of 3Fe4S, Trp780 was found in the middle of the ET pathway between FAD and 3Fe4S (Figure S15). Accordingly, we hypothesized that Trp780 plays an essential role in the intramolecular ET. To further investigate the hypothesis, the following two studies will be necessary: (1) bioelectrochemical studies of site-directed variants focusing on Trp780 and (2) more accurate quantification of the self-exchange rate constants of the cofactors of FDH.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Thermodynamic and kinetic diagram of the intramolecular ET. Horizontal and vertical axes show the edge-to-edge distances between cofactors and their redox potentials, respectively. Arrows represent the ET rate constant predicted by eq 2.

Bioelectrochemical and Structural Elucidations of DET-Type Bioelectrocatalysis of FDH

Next, we discuss the ET pathway of DET-type bioelectrocatalysis in FDH from bioelectrochemical and structural perspectives. Previous studies have shown that heme 1c does not seem to be involved in the reaction and that heme 2c is the most likely electrode-active site. (48−50) The distance from the individual cofactors to the α-carbon of the amino acid residues on the enzyme surface indicates that hemes 2c and 1c are close to the enzyme surface (Figure S16). Furthermore, we attempted to calculate the electrostatic potential distribution on the rFDH surface using the PDB 2PQR web service (71) and PyMOL APBS plugin. (72) Figure 3A and B show the distribution of the surface charges at pH 4.5 and 6.0, respectively. Most of the rFDH surface was positively charged at pH 4.5, as inferred from the isoelectric point of rFDH (6.59 (73)). Interestingly, the negative charge was concentrated near heme 2c. The enzyme surface was less positive at pH 6.0. Based on this unique charge difference around heme 2c, we conducted electrochemical measurements using electrodes functionalized with different surface charges.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Electrostatic potential distributions of rFDH-R (PDB ID: 8JEJ) at (A) pH 4.5 and (B) pH 6.0 (blue, positive; red, negative) calculated using the PDB 2PQR web service and the PyMOL APBS plugin.

Glassy carbon (GC) electrodes were modified with multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) for electrochemical measurements. The charging current value at 0.15 V for each electrode ranged between 0.14 and 0.16 mA cm–2 (data not shown). Assuming the double-layer capacitance at 0.15 V is identical, we confirmed that the electroactive surface area did not vary significantly between the electrodes. The electrodes were functionalized with 1-pyrene methylamine (PyNH2) or 1-pyrene acetic acid (PyAA) (74) to investigate the differences between the positively and negatively charged electrodes (PyNH2/MWCNT/GCE and PyAA/MWCNT/GCE, respectively). We also investigated the effect of ionic strength on DET-type activity. The enzyme assay in solution indicated that FDH activity remained unchanged with the addition of up to 50 mM NaCl (Figure S17). Thus, 50 mM NaCl was added to the solution to investigate the effects of different ionic strengths on the DET-type reaction. Rotating disk linear sweep voltammograms (RDLSVs) were recorded at pH 4.5 and 6.0 in the presence of 0.2 M d-fructose (Figure S18). At pH 4.5, the DET-type bioelectrocatalytic current density for d-fructose oxidation was higher for PyNH2/MWCNT/GCE than for PyAA/MWCNT/GCE (Figure 4A). In the case of PyNH2/MWCNT/GCE, increasing the ionic strength by adding 50 mM NaCl decreased the limiting current density, indicating that the electrostatic attraction was suppressed (Figure S19A). By contrast, in the case of PyAA/MWCNT/GCE, an increase in ionic strength increased the current value, suggesting that the electrostatic repulsion was relaxed (Figure S19A). In addition, the current values were almost equal for both electrodes at the high ionic strength of 50 mM NaCl (Figure S19A). Therefore, we concluded that electrostatic interactions between the enzyme and electrode were responsible for the differences in the DET-type reactions. When the electrode surface is positively charged, an attractive electrostatic interaction occurs between the negatively charged region near heme 2c and the electrode surface, which induces a favorable orientation of rFDH in the DET-type reaction, with heme 2c facing the electrode surface. By contrast, the catalytic current was not significantly affected by the electrode surface charge at pH 6.0 (Figure 4B). This was probably due to an increase in the negative charge on other enzyme surfaces in addition to the region near heme 2c. Increasing the ionic strength of the buffer solution did not affect the limiting catalytic current at pH 6.0, either (Figure S19B). These results clearly indicate that heme 2c is the electrode-active site in the DET-type reaction of rFDH.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Background-subtracted RDLSVs of d-fructose oxidation at rFDH-adsorbed PyNH2/MWCNT/GCE (blue circles) and PyAA/MWCNT/GCE (red squares) in three-times-diluted McIlvaine buffer containing 0.2 M d-fructose at (A) pH 4.5 or (B) pH 6.0 under Ar-saturated conditions at 25 °C, ω = 4,000 rpm, and v = 20 mV s–1. Errors were evaluated using the Student’s t-distribution at a 90% confidence level (N = 5).

Characterization of Variants Being Focused on Aromatic Residues

In this section, we focus on aromatic amino acid residues that have been reported to enhance ET and discuss the origin of the intense DET-type activity of FDH. Two residues (Trp427 and Phe489) are located in the middle of the ET pathway from heme 2c to the top surface (Figure 5), whereas there are no aromatic amino acid residues around the other heme c moieties. To investigate the possible influence of these residues on the DET-type reaction, we constructed site-directed FDH variants in which either Trp427 or Phe489 was substituted with alanine (F489A or W427A FDH, respectively).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Aromatic residues on the shortest ET pathway from heme 2c to the top surface of FDH.

The variants were successfully constructed and purified. These enzymes showed specific activity and an optimal pH similar to those of rFDH (Figure S20). In addition, the oxygen consumption rates (vO2) of whole cells harboring pSHO13 (for rFDH), pYSF01 (for F489A FDH), or pYSF02 (for W427A FDH) were examined using d-fructose or d-glucose as an electron donor (Figures S21 and S22). No significant differences in vO2 were observed between these variants. Therefore, it can be inferred that no structural changes that would significantly alter the activity occurred in these variants.
We performed electrochemical measurements with these variants using uncharged electrodes to minimize the effects of specific electrostatic interactions. The aryl diazonium salt electro-reduction onto CNT has been widely used as a scaffold to obtain improved performance of DET-type bioelectrocatalysis. (75−77) MWCNT/GCEs modified with 2-aminoanthracene (2-ANT) diazonium were utilized for the measurements to elucidate the effect of aromatic residues. (77) Figure 6A shows RDLSVs of FDH-adsorbed 2-ANT/MWCNT/GCE recorded in three-times-diluted McIlvaine buffer (pH 4.5) at a rotating speed (ω) of 4000 rpm and a scan rate (v) of 20 mV s–1 in the presence of 0.2 M d-fructose. Clear DET-type catalytic waves corresponding to d-fructose oxidation were observed for all of the enzymatic electrodes. The F489A FDH-adsorbed electrode produced a similar catalytic wave approaching a limiting value at 0.5 V, which is nearly identical to rFDH. Therefore, Phe489 did not affect DET-type reactions. By contrast, the W427A FDH-adsorbed electrode showed a linearly increasing part, the so-called residual slope (78) of the steady-state wave. The catalytic current density at 0.5 V was reduced to approximately 35% of that of rFDH. This result indicates that Trp427 plays a crucial role in the DET-type reaction of rFDH. Kinetic analyses were performed in the next session to quantitatively evaluate the effect of ET acceleration between heme 2c and the electrode surface.

Figure 6

Figure 6. (A) RDLSVs of d-fructose oxidation at the FDH-adsorbed 2-ANT/MWCNT/GCE in three-times-diluted McIlvaine buffer (pH 4.5) containing 0.2 M d-fructose under Ar-saturated conditions at 25 °C, ω = 4,000 rpm, and v = 20 mV s–1 (1, rFDH (black); 2, F489A FDH (red); 3, W427A FDH (blue)). The inset shows normalized voltammograms for each catalytic current at 0.5 V. (B) Background-subtracted RDLSVs of d-fructose oxidation at rFDH (black circles), F489A FDH (red triangles), and W427A FDH (blue squares) adsorbed 2-ANT/MWCNT/GCEs. Dashed lines indicate refined curves estimated by non-linear regression analysis based on eq 3. Errors were evaluated using the Student’s t-distribution at a 90% confidence level (N = 4).

We also constructed two other variants (Δ1c-site FDH and W427A Δ1c-site FDH) to carefully consider the effect of heme 1c. In Δ1c-site FDH and W427A Δ1c-site FDH, the sequences of heme 1c binding site “CAACH”, in which two cysteines (Cys235 and Cys238) and a heme 1c were covalently linked, were replaced with “AAAAH” to eliminate the heme 1c moiety. The vO2 values of the whole cells harboring pYUF23 (for the Δ1c-siteFDH) and pYSF03 (for the W427A Δ1c-siteFDH) were also examined (Figures S21 and S22). The vO2values with d-fructose were much lower than those with d-glucose, suggesting that the fructose-oxidizing respiratory chains did not function in the two strains. Considering that the edge-to-edge distance between heme 2c and UQ10 is too far to transfer electrons (24 Å), these results demonstrated that Δ1c-site FDH and W427A Δ1c-site FDH did not possess a heme 1c moiety. The RDLSVs of the two variant-adsorbed 2-ANT/MWCNT/GCEs are shown in Figure S23. An accelerating effect in the DET-type reaction with Trp427 was also observed in the variants without heme 1c. These results support our hypothesis that heme 2c is the electrode-active site and that Trp427 plays an essential role in DET.

Bioelectrochemical Discussion on ET Acceleration by a Tryptophan Residue

As reported in previous studies with DET-type enzymes, the DET-type reaction provides the residual slope region on the voltammogram. (12−25) Thus, we estimated the kinetic parameters of the DET-type reaction at the FDH-adsorbed electrodes using a random orientation model. (78,79) In this model, jcat (steady-state catalytic current density of the DET-type reaction) is expressed as follows: (79)
jcat=jcat,limβΔx(1+η)ln|kmax°kc(1+η)+ηαkmax°kc(1+η)exp(βΔx)+ηα|
(3)
where jcat,lim is the limiting catalytic current density, kmax° is the standard rate constant of the heterogeneous ET at the closest approach in the best orientation of the enzyme, Δx is the difference in the distance between the closest and farthest approaches of the redox center of the electroactive enzyme, kc is the catalytic constant of the enzyme, and α is the transfer coefficient (0.5, in general). (68) η is defined as follows:
η=exp{nEFRT(EE°E)}
(4)
where nE is the number of electrons in the rate-determining step of the heterogeneous ET (1, in general), E is the electrode potential, and EE°′ is the formal potential of the electrode-active site. The background-subtracted catalytic currents were used for the analysis. Equation 3 was fitted to the steady-state catalytic waves using non-linear regression analysis in Gnuplot using kmax°/kc, βΔx, and jcat,lim as adjustable parameters by setting α = 0.5. The EE°′ value was set to 0.032 V based on the non-catalytic signal reported previously. (73)
We successfully analyzed the data for rFDH and F489A FDH with a good fit (Figure 6B). The refined data are summarized in Table 1. The limiting currents of the W427A FDH-adsorbed electrodes could not be determined experimentally, and it was not easy to precisely evaluate the amount of effective enzyme on the electrode. Accordingly, we performed the analysis by fixing either βΔx or jcat,lim, which contributes to the magnitude of the limiting current. We obtained a good fit for W427A FDH in the analysis at βΔx ≥ 20 Å (Figure 6B, Table S5). Although the values of βΔx and jcat,lim are mutually dependent, the value of kmax°/kc was not affected by βΔx under the conditions (βΔx ≥ 20 Å). Concerning kmax°/kc, the value for W427A FDH was approximately one-third of those for rFDH and F489A FDH. Because it is reasonable to assume the same kc for these variants, the acceleration effect of Trp427 is considered to have tripled the value of kmax°.
Table 1. Refined Parameters by the Non-linear Regression Analysis of Voltammogramsa
FDHkmax°/kcβΔxjcat,lim/mA cm–2
rFDH4.6 ± 0.29.7 ± 0.114 ± 1
F489A FDH4.2 ± 0.49.2 ± 0.311 ± 2
W427A FDH1.5 ± 0.2b27 ± 3b14b
a

Errors were evaluated from Student’s t-distribution at a 90% confidence level (N = 4).

b

Analytical result assuming jcat,lim = 14 mA cm–2

When we fixed βΔx = 9.7 based on the analytical result of rFDH, the fitting curve for W427A FDH-adsorbed electrodes showed a sigmoidal character (Figure S24). This characteristic is not consistent with the linear characteristics obtained in the experiments. In addition to kc, similar effective amounts of adsorbed enzyme can be reasonably assumed for these variants. Thus, the jcat,lim value (5 ± 1 mA cm–2) obtained when fixing βΔx at 9.7, which is quite smaller than that for rFDH, is also not acceptable (Table S5). Accordingly, this result suggests that βΔx of W427A FDH is larger than that of rFDH. Because Δx can be assumed to be identical among site-directed variants, the apparent β value in the long-range ET pathway from heme 2c to the electrode (approximately 10–14 Å) is also suppressed by Trp427.
Finally, the two different pathways for intramolecular ET and DET of FDH are shown in Scheme 1. In solution, intramolecular ET proceeds in the order from FAD, 3Fe4S, heme 3c, heme 2c, heme 1c, and UQ10 to the respiratory chain. By contrast, in the DET-type reaction, the ET route branches off from heme 2c and the electrons from the substrates are transferred to FAD, 3Fe4S, heme 3c, heme 2c, and the electrode in this order.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Illustration of the Intramolecular ET and DET Pathways in rFDH, W427A FDH, and F489A FDH

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In this study, we clarified the 3D structure of FDH using cryo-EM and single-particle image analysis. This is the first study to report the entire structures of membrane-bound flavohemoproteins, quinohemoproteins, and metallohemoproteins capable of DET-type bioelectrocatalysis. Long-range ET kinetics through FAD, 3Fe4S, and hemes 3c, 2c, and 1c were examined based on Marcus’ theory. In addition, heme 2c is identified as the electrode-active site in the DET-type reaction of FDH from structural biology and bioelectrochemical viewpoints. Furthermore, the ET rate between heme 2c and the electrode decreases significantly when Trp427 is substituted with alanine. Kinetic analysis of steady-state catalytic waves has revealed that Trp427 triples the value of kmax° in the ET. These findings provide vital information for searching for critical elements for DET-type reactions and a reasonable explanation for the outstanding DET-type activity of FDH. A previous study also reported that the “double-tryptophan” variant, which was constructed by the substitution with Trp, enhanced the intramolecular ET. (52) The appropriate mutation of aromatic residues to accelerate ET between an enzyme and an electrode will be a novel way to create new DET-type enzymes and innovative biomimetics.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.3c03769.

  • Experimental section, detailed explanations of analytical models, cryo-EM analysis, biochemical assays, structure of rFDH-R, detection of UQ10, EPR analysis, and additional electrochemical data (PDF)

Accession Codes

Cryo-EM structures were deposited in the Protein Data Bank for rFDH-R (PDB ID: 8JEJ), rFDH-O (PDB ID: 8JEK) and rFDH-D (PDB ID: 7W2J and 7WSQ).

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Yohei Suzuki - Division of Applied Life Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
    • Fumiaki Makino - Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, JapanJEOL Ltd., Akishima, Tokyo 196-8558, Japan
    • Tomoko Miyata - Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
    • Hideaki Tanaka - Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
    • Keiichi Namba - Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, JapanRIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Suita, Osaka 565-0874, JapanRIKEN SPring-8 Center, Sayo, Hyogo 679-5198, JapanJEOL YOKOGUSHI Research Alliance Laboratories, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
    • Kenji Kano - Center for Advanced Science and Innovation, Kyoto University, Gokasho, Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4667-7020
    • Yuki Kitazumi - Division of Applied Life Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
    • Osamu Shirai - Division of Applied Life Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This research was supported by the Platform Project for Supporting Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (Basis for Supporting Innovative Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (BINDS)) from AMED under Grant JP22ama121003 to K.N., JSPS KAKENHI Grant JP21H01961 to Y.K., JSPS KAKENHI Grant JP22K14831 to K.S., and FY 2022 Kusunoki 125 of Kyoto University 125th Anniversary Fund to K.S. This study was supported in-part by the Program for the Development of Next-generation Leading Scientists with Global Insight (L-INSIGHT), sponsored by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan. We express our gratitude to Mr. Hirou Kaku, Mr. Koryu Ou, and Mr. Yasuyuki Hamano for their financial support. We thank Dr. Hideto Matsuoka of the Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University for his technical assistance with the EPR measurements. We would also like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for the English language editing.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 79 other publications.

  1. 1
    Willner, I.; Katz, E.; Willner, B. Electrical Contact of Redox Enzyme Layers Associated with Electrodes: Routes to Amperometric Biosensors. Electroanalysis 1997, 9 (13), 965977,  DOI: 10.1002/elan.1140091302
  2. 2
    Habermüller, K.; Mosbach, M.; Schuhmann, W. Electron-Transfer Mechanisms in Amperometric Biosensors. Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem. 2000, 366 (6–7), 560568,  DOI: 10.1007/s002160051551
  3. 3
    Barton, S. C.; Gallaway, J.; Atanassov, P. Enzymatic Biofuel Cells for Implantable and Microscale Devices. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104 (10), 48674886,  DOI: 10.1021/cr020719k
  4. 4
    Bartlett, P. N. Bioelectrochemistry: Fundamentals, Experimental Techniques and Applications; John Wiley & Sons, 2008.  DOI: 10.1002/9780470753842 .
  5. 5
    Cosnier, S.; Gross, A. J.; Le Goff, A.; Holzinger, M. Recent Advances on Enzymatic Glucose/Oxygen and Hydrogen/Oxygen Biofuel Cells: Achievements and Limitations. J. Power Sources 2016, 325, 252263,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.133
  6. 6
    Zhao, C. E.; Gai, P.; Song, R.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, J. J. Nanostructured Material-Based Biofuel Cells: Recent Advances and Future Prospects. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46 (5), 15451564,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CS00044D
  7. 7
    Mano, N.; De Poulpiquet, A. O2 Reduction in Enzymatic Biofuel Cells. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118 (5), 23922468,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00220
  8. 8
    Xiao, X.; Xia, H. Q.; Wu, R.; Bai, L.; Yan, L.; Magner, E.; Cosnier, S.; Lojou, E.; Zhu, Z.; Liu, A. Tackling the Challenges of Enzymatic (Bio)Fuel Cells. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119 (16), 95099558,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00115
  9. 9
    Chen, H.; Simoska, O.; Lim, K.; Grattieri, M.; Yuan, M.; Dong, F.; Lee, Y. S.; Beaver, K.; Weliwatte, S.; Gaffney, E. M.; Minteer, S. D. Fundamentals, Applications, and Future Directions of Bioelectrocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120 (23), 1290312993,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00472
  10. 10
    Bollella, P.; Katz, E. Enzyme-Based Biosensors: Tackling Electron Transfer Issues. Sensors (Switzerland) 2020, 20 (12), 3517,  DOI: 10.3390/s20123517
  11. 11
    Kano, K.; Shirai, O.; Kitazumi, Y.; Sakai, K.; Xia, H.-Q. Enzymatic Bioelectrocatalysis; Springer, 2021.  DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-8960-7
  12. 12
    Ghindilis, A. L.; Atanasov, P.; Wilkins, E. Enzyme-Catalyzed Direct Electron Transfer: Fundamentals and Analytical Applications. Electroanalysis 1997, 9 (9), 661674,  DOI: 10.1002/elan.1140090902
  13. 13
    Ferapontova, E. E. Direct Peroxidase Bioelectrocatalysis on a Variety of Electrode Materials. Electroanalysis 2004, 16 (13–14), 11011112,  DOI: 10.1002/elan.200403003
  14. 14
    Shleev, S.; Tkac, J.; Christenson, A.; Ruzgas, T.; Yaropolov, A. I.; Whittaker, J. W.; Gorton, L. Direct Electron Transfer between Copper-Containing Proteins and Electrodes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2005, 20 (12), 25172554,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2004.10.003
  15. 15
    Léger, C.; Bertrand, P. Direct Electrochemistry of Redox Enzymes as a Tool for Mechanistic Studies. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108 (7), 23792438,  DOI: 10.1021/cr0680742
  16. 16
    Falk, M.; Blum, Z.; Shleev, S. Direct Electron Transfer Based Enzymatic Fuel Cells. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 82, 191202,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.133
  17. 17
    Karyakin, A. A. Principles of Direct (Mediator Free) Bioelectrocatalysis. Bioelectrochemistry 2012, 88, 7075,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2012.05.001
  18. 18
    Sarauli, D.; Xu, C.; Dietzel, B.; Schulz, B.; Lisdat, F. A Multilayered Sulfonated Polyaniline Network with Entrapped Pyrroloquinoline Quinone-Dependent Glucose Dehydrogenase: Tunable Direct Bioelectrocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2 (21), 31963203,  DOI: 10.1039/C4TB00336E
  19. 19
    Milton, R. D.; Minteer, S. D. Direct Enzymatic Bioelectrocatalysis: Differentiating between Myth and Reality. J. R. Soc. Interface 2017, 14 (131), 20170253,  DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0253
  20. 20
    Jenner, L. P.; Butt, J. N. Electrochemistry of Surface-Confined Enzymes: Inspiration, Insight and Opportunity for Sustainable Biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2018, 8, 8188,  DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.03.021
  21. 21
    Yates, N. D. J.; Fascione, M. A.; Parkin, A. Methodologies for “Wiring” Redox Proteins/Enzymes to Electrode Surfaces. Chem. - A Eur. J. 2018, 24 (47), 1216412182,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201800750
  22. 22
    Bollella, P.; Gorton, L.; Antiochia, R. Direct Electron Transfer of Dehydrogenases for Development of 3rd Generation Biosensors and Enzymatic Fuel Cells. Sensors (Switzerland) 2018, 18 (5), 1319,  DOI: 10.3390/s18051319
  23. 23
    Evans, R. M.; Siritanaratkul, B.; Megarity, C. F.; Pandey, K.; Esterle, T. F.; Badiani, S.; Armstrong, F. A. The Value of Enzymes in Solar Fuels Research-Efficient Electrocatalysts through Evolution. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48 (7), 20392052,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CS00546J
  24. 24
    Mazurenko, I.; Hitaishi, V. P.; Lojou, E. Recent Advances in Surface Chemistry of Electrodes to Promote Direct Enzymatic Bioelectrocatalysis. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020, 19, 113121,  DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2019.11.004
  25. 25
    Smutok, O.; Kavetskyy, T.; Katz, E. Recent Trends in Enzyme Engineering Aiming to Improve Bioelectrocatalysis Proceeding with Direct Electron Transfer. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2022, 31, 100856,  DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100856
  26. 26
    Heller, A. Electrical Wiring of Redox Enzymes. Acc. Chem. Res. 1990, 23 (5), 128134,  DOI: 10.1021/ar00173a002
  27. 27
    Gao, W.; Emaminejad, S.; Nyein, H. Y. Y.; Challa, S.; Chen, K.; Peck, A.; Fahad, H. M.; Ota, H.; Shiraki, H.; Kiriya, D.; Lien, D. H.; Brooks, G. A.; Davis, R. W.; Javey, A. Fully Integrated Wearable Sensor Arrays for Multiplexed in situ Perspiration Analysis. Nature 2016, 529 (7587), 509514,  DOI: 10.1038/nature16521
  28. 28
    Bruen, D.; Delaney, C.; Florea, L.; Diamond, D. Glucose Sensing for Diabetes Monitoring: Recent Developments. Sensors (Switzerland) 2017, 17 (8), 1866,  DOI: 10.3390/s17081866
  29. 29
    Teymourian, H.; Barfidokht, A.; Wang, J. Electrochemical Glucose Sensors in Diabetes Management: An Updated Review (2010–2020). Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49 (21), 76717709,  DOI: 10.1039/D0CS00304B
  30. 30
    Datta, S.; Mori, Y.; Takagi, K.; Kawaguchi, K.; Chen, Z. W.; Okajima, T.; Kuroda, S.; Ikeda, T.; Kano, K.; Tanizawa, K.; Mathews, F. S. Structure of a Quinohemoprotein Amine Dehydrogenase with an Uncommon Redox Cofactor and Highly Unusual Crosslinking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98 (25), 1426814273,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.241429098
  31. 31
    Liu, J.; Chakraborty, S.; Hosseinzadeh, P.; Yu, Y.; Tian, S.; Petrik, I.; Bhagi, A.; Lu, Y. Metalloproteins Containing Cytochrome, Iron-Sulfur, or Copper Redox Centers. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114 (8), 43664369,  DOI: 10.1021/cr400479b
  32. 32
    Takeda, K.; Nakamura, N. Direct Electron Transfer Process of Pyrroloquinoline Quinone-Dependent and Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide-Dependent Dehydrogenases: Fundamentals and Applications. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2021, 29, 100747,  DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100747
  33. 33
    Ikeda, T.; Kobayashi, D.; Matsushita, F.; Sagara, T.; Niki, K. Bioelectrocatalysis at Electrodes Coated with Alcohol Dehydrogenase, a Quinohemoprotein with Heme c Serving as a Built-in Mediator. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1993, 361 (1–2), 221228,  DOI: 10.1016/0022-0728(93)87058-4
  34. 34
    Adachi, T.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O.; Kano, K. Direct Electron Transfer-Type Bioelectrocatalysis by Membrane-Bound Aldehyde Dehydrogenase from Gluconobacter Oxydans and Cyanide Effects on its Bioelectrocatalytic Properties. Electrochem. Commun. 2021, 123, 106911,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2020.106911
  35. 35
    Treu, B. L.; Arechederra, R.; Minteer, S. D. Bioelectrocatalysis of Ethanol via PQQ-Dependent Dehydrogenases Utilizing Carbon Nanomaterial Supports. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2009, 9 (4), 23742380,  DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2009.SE33
  36. 36
    Kakehi, N.; Yamazaki, T.; Tsugawa, W.; Sode, K. A Novel Wireless Glucose Sensor Employing Direct Electron Transfer Principle Based Enzyme Fuel Cell. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 22 (9–10), 22502255,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2006.11.004
  37. 37
    Ikeda, T.; Matsushita, F.; Senda, M. Amperometric Fructose Sensor Based on Direct Bioelectrocatalysis. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1991, 6 (4), 299304,  DOI: 10.1016/0956-5663(91)85015-O
  38. 38
    Okuda-Shimazaki, J.; Yoshida, H.; Sode, K. FAD Dependent Glucose Dehydrogenases - Discovery and Engineering of Representative Glucose Sensing Enzymes -. Bioelectrochemistry 2020, 132, 107414,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2019.107414
  39. 39
    Adachi, T.; Kaida, Y.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O.; Kano, K. Bioelectrocatalytic Performance of D-Fructose Dehydrogenase. Bioelectrochemistry 2019, 129, 19,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2019.04.024
  40. 40
    Yamaoka, H.; Ferri, S.; Sode, M. F. K. Essential Role of the Small Subunit of Thermostable Glucose Dehydrogenase from Burkholderia cepacia. Biotechnol. Lett. 2004, 26 (22), 17571761,  DOI: 10.1007/s10529-004-4582-0
  41. 41
    Yoshida, H.; Kojima, K.; Shiota, M.; Yoshimatsu, K.; Yamazaki, T.; Ferri, S.; Tsugawa, W.; Kamitori, S.; Sode, K. X-Ray Structure of the Direct Electron Transfer-Type FAD Glucose Dehydrogenase Catalytic Subunit Complexed with a Hitchhiker Protein. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Struct. Biol. 2019, 75, 841851,  DOI: 10.1107/S2059798319010878
  42. 42
    Shiota, M.; Yamazaki, T.; Yoshimatsu, K.; Kojima, K.; Tsugawa, W.; Ferri, S.; Sode, K. An Fe-S Cluster in the Conserved Cys-Rich Region in the Catalytic Subunit of FAD-Dependent Dehydrogenase Complexes. Bioelectrochemistry 2016, 112, 178183,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2016.01.010
  43. 43
    Okuda-Shimazaki, J.; Yoshida, H.; Lee, I.; Kojima, K.; Suzuki, N.; Tsugawa, W.; Yamada, M.; Inaka, K.; Tanaka, H.; Sode, K. Microgravity environment grown crystal tructure information based engineering of direct electron transfer type glucose dehydrogenase. Commun. Biol. 2022, 5, 1334,  DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-04286-9
  44. 44
    Ameyama, M.; Shinagawa, E.; Matsushita, K.; Adachi, O. D-Fructose Dehydrogenase of Gluconobacter Industrius: Purification, Characterization, and Application to Enzymatic Microdetermination of D-Fructose. J. Bacteriol. 1981, 145 (2), 814823,  DOI: 10.1128/jb.145.2.814-823.1981
  45. 45
    Kawai, S.; Goda-Tsutsumi, M.; Yakushi, T.; Kano, K.; Matsushita, K. Heterologous Overexpression and Characterization of a Flavoprotein-Cytochrome c Complex Fructose Dehydrogenase of Gluconobacter Japonicus NBRC3260. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79 (5), 16541660,  DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03152-12
  46. 46
    Kawai, S.; Yakushi, T.; Matsushita, K.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O.; Kano, K. The Electron Transfer Pathway in Direct Electrochemical Communication of Fructose Dehydrogenase with Electrodes. Electrochem. commun. 2014, 38, 2831,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2013.10.024
  47. 47
    Suzuki, Y.; Sowa, K.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O. The Redox Potential Measurements for Heme Moieties in Variants of D-Fructose Dehydrogenase Based on Mediator-Assisted Potentiometric Titration. Electrochemistry 2021, 89, 337339,  DOI: 10.5796/electrochemistry.21-00044
  48. 48
    Hibino, Y.; Kawai, S.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O.; Kano, K. Mutation of Heme c Axial Ligands in D-Fructose Dehydrogenase for Investigation of Electron Transfer Pathways and Reduction of Overpotential in Direct Electron Transfer-Type Bioelectrocatalysis. Electrochem. commun. 2016, 67, 4346,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2016.03.013
  49. 49
    Hibino, Y.; Kawai, S.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O.; Kano, K. Construction of a Protein-Engineered Variant of D-Fructose Dehydrogenase for Direct Electron Transfer-Type Bioelectrocatalysis. Electrochem. commun. 2017, 77, 112115,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2017.03.005
  50. 50
    Kaida, Y.; Hibino, Y.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O.; Kano, K. Ultimate Downsizing of D-Fructose Dehydrogenase for Improving the Performance of Direct Electron Transfer-Type Bioelectrocatalysis. Electrochem. Commun. 2019, 98, 101105,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2018.12.001
  51. 51
    Suzuki, Y.; Makino, F.; Miyata, T.; Tanaka, H.; Namba, K.; Kano, K.; Sowa, K.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O. Structural and Bioelectrochemical Elucidation of Direct Electron Transfer-Type Membrane-Bound Fructose Dehydrogenase. ChemRxiv 2022,  DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-d7hl9
  52. 52
    Farver, O.; Skov, L. K.; Young, S.; Bonander, N.; Karlsson, B.; Vanngard, T. G.; Pecht, I. Aromatic Residues May Enhance Intramolecular Electron Transfer in Azurin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119 (23), 54535454,  DOI: 10.1021/ja964386i
  53. 53
    Shih, C.; Museth, A. K.; Abrahamsson, M.; Blanco-Rodriguez, A. M.; Di Bilio, A. J.; Sudhamsu, J.; Crane, B. R.; Ronayne, K. L.; Towrie, M.; Vlček, A.; Richards, J. H.; Winkler, J. R.; Gray, H. B. Tryptophan-Accelerated Electron Flow through Proteins. Science (80-.). 2008, 320 (5884), 17601762,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1158241
  54. 54
    Takematsu, K.; Williamson, H.; Blanco-Rodríguez, A. M.; Sokolová, L.; Nikolovski, P.; Kaiser, J. T.; Towrie, M.; Clark, I. P.; Vlček, A.; Winkler, J. R.; Gray, H. B. Tryptophan-Accelerated Electron Flow across a Protein-Protein Interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (41), 1551515525,  DOI: 10.1021/ja406830d
  55. 55
    Takematsu, K.; Williamson, H. R.; Nikolovski, P.; Kaiser, J. T.; Sheng, Y.; Pospíšil, P.; Towrie, M.; Heyda, J.; Hollas, D.; Záliš, S.; Gray, H. B.; Vlček, A.; Winkler, J. R. Two Tryptophans Are Better Than One in Accelerating Electron Flow through a Protein. ACS Cent. Sci. 2019, 5 (1), 192200,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00882
  56. 56
    Sarhangi, S. M.; Matyushov, D. V. Theory of Protein Charge Transfer: Electron Transfer between Tryptophan Residue and Active Site of Azurin. J. Phys. Chem. B 2022, 126 (49), 1036010373,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c05258
  57. 57
    Olloqui-Sariego, J. L.; Zakharova, G. S.; Poloznikov, A. A.; Calvente, J. J.; Hushpulian, D. M.; Gorton, L.; Andreu, R. Influence of Tryptophan Mutation on the Direct Electron Transfer of Immobilized Tobacco Peroxidase. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 351, 136465,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136465
  58. 58
    Sugimoto, Y.; Kawai, S.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O.; Kano, K. Function of C-Terminal Hydrophobic Region in Fructose Dehydrogenase. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 176, 976981,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.142
  59. 59
    Winkler, J. R.; Gray, H. B. Electron Flow through Metalloproteins. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114 (7), 33693380,  DOI: 10.1021/cr4004715
  60. 60
    Page, C. C.; Moser, C. C.; Chen, X.; Dutton, P. L. Natural Engineering Principles of Electron Tunnelling in Biological Oxidation-Reduction. Nature 1999, 402 (6757), 4752,  DOI: 10.1038/46972
  61. 61
    Matsushita, K.; Kobayashi, Y.; Mizuguchi, M.; Toyama, H.; Adachi, O.; Sakamoto, K.; Miyoshi, H. A Tightly Bound Quinone Functions in the Ubiquinone Reaction Sites of Quinoprotein Alcohol Dehydrogenase of an Acetic Acid Bacterium, Gluconobacter Suboxydans. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2008, 72 (10), 27232731,  DOI: 10.1271/bbb.80363
  62. 62
    Yakushi, T.; Matsushita, K. Alcohol Dehydrogenase of Acetic Acid Bacteria: Structure, Mode of Action, and Applications in Biotechnology. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 86 (5), 12571265,  DOI: 10.1007/s00253-010-2529-z
  63. 63
    Adachi, T.; Miyata, T.; Makino, F.; Tanaka, H.; Namba, K.; Kano, K.; Sowa, K.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O. Experimental and Theoretical Insights into Bienzymatic Cascade for Mediatorless Bioelectrochemical Ethanol Oxidation with Alcohol and Aldehyde Dehydrogenases. ACS. Catal. 2023, 13, 79557965,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.3c01962
  64. 64
    Bollella, P.; Hibino, Y.; Kano, K.; Gorton, L.; Antiochia, R. The Influence of pH and Divalent/Monovalent Cations on the Internal Electron Transfer (IET), Enzymatic Activity, and Structure of Fructose Dehydrogenase. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410 (14), 32533264,  DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-0991-0
  65. 65
    Jumper, J.; Evans, R.; Pritzel, A.; Green, T.; Figurnov, M.; Ronneberger, O.; Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Bates, R.; Žídek, A.; Potapenko, A.; Bridgland, A.; Meyer, C.; Kohl, S. A. A.; Ballard, A. J.; Cowie, A.; Romera-Paredes, B.; Nikolov, S.; Jain, R.; Adler, J.; Back, T.; Petersen, S.; Reiman, D.; Clancy, E.; Zielinski, M.; Steinegger, M.; Pacholska, M.; Berghammer, T.; Bodenstein, S.; Silver, D.; Vinyals, O.; Senior, A. W.; Kavukcuoglu, K.; Kohli, P.; Hassabis, D. Highly Accurate Protein Structure Prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 2021, 596 (7873), 583589,  DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
  66. 66
    Marcus, R. A.; Sutin, N. Electron transfers in chemistry and biology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Bioenerg. 1985, 811 (3), 265322,  DOI: 10.1016/0304-4173(85)90014-X
  67. 67
    Lowe, H.J.; Clark, W. M. Studies on Oxidation-Reduction. XXIV. Oxidation-Reduction Potentials of Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide. J. Biol. Chem. 1956, 221 (2), 983992,  DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)65211-1
  68. 68
    Moser, C. C.; Keske, J. M.; Warncke, K.; Farid, R. S.; Dutton, P. L. Nature of Biological Electron Transfer. Nature 1992, 355 (6363), 796802,  DOI: 10.1038/355796a0
  69. 69
    Farver, O.; Skov, L. K.; Pascher, T.; Karlsson, B. G.; Nordling, M.; Lundberg, L. G.; Vaenngaard, T.; Pecht, I. Intramolecular Electron Transfer in Single-Site-Mutated Azurins. Biochemistry 1993, 32 (28), 73177322,  DOI: 10.1021/bi00079a031
  70. 70
    Beratan, D. N.; Onuchic, J. N.; Betts, J. N.; Bowler, B. E.; Gray, H. B. Electron-Tunneling Pathways in Ruthenated Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112 (22), 79157921,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00178a011
  71. 71
    Dolinsky, T. J.; Nielsen, J. E.; McCammon, J. A.; Baker, N. A. PDB2PQR: An Automated Pipeline for the Setup of Poisson-Boltzmann Electrostatics Calculations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32 (Web Server), W665W667,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh381
  72. 72
    Baker, N. A.; Sept, D.; Joseph, S.; Holst, M. J.; McCammon, J. A. Electrostatics of Nanosystems: Application to Microtubules and the Ribosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98 (18), 1003710041,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.181342398
  73. 73
    Bollella, P.; Hibino, Y.; Kano, K.; Gorton, L.; Antiochia, R. Highly Sensitive Membraneless Fructose Biosensor Based on Fructose Dehydrogenase Immobilized onto Aryl Thiol Modified Highly Porous Gold Electrode: Characterization and Application in Food Samples. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90 (20), 1213112136,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03093
  74. 74
    Bocanegra-Rodríguez, S.; Molins-Legua, C.; Campíns-Falcó, P.; Giroud, F.; Gross, A. J.; Cosnier, S. Monofunctional Pyrenes at Carbon Nanotube Electrodes for Direct Electron Transfer H2O2 Reduction with HRP and HRP-Bacterial Nanocellulose. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 187, 113304,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113304
  75. 75
    Blanford, C. F.; Heath, R. S.; Armstrong, F. A. A Stable Electrode for High-Potential, Electrocatalytic O2 Reduction Based on Rational Attachment of a Blue Copper Oxidase to a Graphite Surface. Chem. Commun. 2007, (17), 17101712,  DOI: 10.1039/b703114a
  76. 76
    Meredith, M. T.; Minson, M.; Hickey, D.; Artyushkova, K.; Glatzhofer, D. T.; Minteer, S. D. Anthracene-Modified Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as Direct Electron Transfer Scaffolds for Enzymatic Oxygen Reduction. ACS Catal. 2011, 1 (12), 16831690,  DOI: 10.1021/cs200475q
  77. 77
    Bollella, P.; Hibino, Y.; Kano, K.; Gorton, L.; Antiochia, R. Enhanced Direct Electron Transfer of Fructose Dehydrogenase Rationally Immobilized on a 2-Aminoanthracene Diazonium Cation Grafted Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Based Electrode. ACS Catal. 2018, 8 (11), 1027910289,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b02729
  78. 78
    Léger, C.; Jones, A. K.; Albracht, S. P. J.; Armstrong, F. A. Effect of a Dispersion of Interfacial Electron Transfer Rates on Steady State Catalytic Electron Transport in [NiFe]-Hydrogenase and Other Enzymes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106 (50), 1305813063,  DOI: 10.1021/jp0265687
  79. 79
    Sugimoto, Y.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O.; Kano, K. Effects of Mesoporous Structures on Direct Electron Transfer-Type Bioelectrocatalysis: Facts and Simulation on a Three-Dimensional Model of Random Orientation of Enzymes. Electrochemistry 2017, 85 (2), 8287,  DOI: 10.5796/electrochemistry.85.82

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 10 publications.

  1. Zhanzhi Liu, Xuehong Guo, Ying Xu, Jing Wu. Thermostability Enhancement of Tagatose 4-Epimerase through Protein Engineering and Whole-Cell Immobilization. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2025, 73 (2) , 1449-1457. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.4c08630
  2. Filippo Silveri, Flavio Della Pelle, Annalisa Scroccarello, Paolo Bollella, Giovanni Ferraro, Eole Fukawa, Yohei Suzuki, Keisei Sowa, Luisa Torsi, Dario Compagnone. Exploiting CO2 laser to boost graphite inks electron transfer for fructose biosensing in biological fluids. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2024, 263 , 116620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2024.116620
  3. Yohei Suzuki, Keisei Sowa, Yuki Kitazumi, Osamu Shirai. Enhancement of direct electron transfer by aromatic thiol modification with truncated d-fructose dehydrogenase. Electrochimica Acta 2024, 502 , 144804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2024.144804
  4. Yirong Zhang, Sha Yang, Yang Yang, Ji‐Chang Ren, Christopher J. Butch, Lin Wang, Wei Liu. Rapid Prediction of Energy Level Alignment and Conductance of Single‐Molecule Junctions Through Intramolecular Dipole Moment. Advanced Functional Materials 2024, 34 (40) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202403836
  5. Keisei Sowa, Junko Okuda-Shimazaki, Eole Fukawa, Koji Sode. Direct Electron Transfer–Type Oxidoreductases for Biomedical Applications. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 2024, 26 (1) , 357-382. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-110222-101926
  6. Eole FUKAWA, Yohei SUZUKI, Keisei SOWA. Third-Generation Biosensor Design and Optimization by Enzyme Engineering. Denki Kagaku 2024, 92 (2) , 98-102. https://doi.org/10.5796/denkikagaku.24-FE0011
  7. Zhengyang Shan, Charlotte Uldahl Jansen, Murat Nulati Yesibolati, Xiaomei Yan, Katrine Qvortrup, Jens Ulstrup, Xinxin Xiao. The effect of number of layers of nanoporous gold films on their electrochemical behaviour. Electrochimica Acta 2024, 489 , 144233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2024.144233
  8. Eole Fukawa, Yohei Suzuki, Taiki Adachi, Tomoko Miyata, Fumiaki Makino, Hideaki Tanaka, Keiichi Namba, Keisei Sowa, Yuki Kitazumi, Osamu Shirai. Structural and electrochemical elucidation of biocatalytic mechanisms in direct electron transfer-type D-fructose dehydrogenase. Electrochimica Acta 2024, 490 , 144271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2024.144271
  9. Umberto CONTALDO, Anne de POULPIQUET, Ievgen MAZURENKO, Elisabeth LOJOU. Electrode Nanopatterning for Bioelectroanalysis and Bioelectrocatalysis. Electrochemistry 2024, 92 (2) , 022005-022005. https://doi.org/10.5796/electrochemistry.23-68150
  10. Javad B. M. Parambath, Ahmad A. L. Ahmad, Ahmed A. Mohamed. Application of Microbial Electrochemical Technologies as Biosensors for the Detection of Inorganic Water Pollutants. 2024, 83-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74636-9_4

ACS Catalysis

Cite this: ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 20, 13828–13837
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.3c03769
Published October 12, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Article Views

2364

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (A) Side view of the entire structure of FDH analyzed by cryo-EM (PDB ID: 8JEJ). The membrane-bound region is shown as a surface model (pale blue) with a superposition of structures in another class of FDH (PDB ID: 7W2J). (B) Geometrical arrangement of cofactors in a heterotrimer. FAD, 3Fe4S, hemes c, and UQ10 are colored magenta, yellow, red, and green, respectively. Bidirectional arrows show edge-to-edge distances between cofactors. (C) Top view of the entire structure of FDH showing the substrate binding pocket.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Thermodynamic and kinetic diagram of the intramolecular ET. Horizontal and vertical axes show the edge-to-edge distances between cofactors and their redox potentials, respectively. Arrows represent the ET rate constant predicted by eq 2.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Electrostatic potential distributions of rFDH-R (PDB ID: 8JEJ) at (A) pH 4.5 and (B) pH 6.0 (blue, positive; red, negative) calculated using the PDB 2PQR web service and the PyMOL APBS plugin.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Background-subtracted RDLSVs of d-fructose oxidation at rFDH-adsorbed PyNH2/MWCNT/GCE (blue circles) and PyAA/MWCNT/GCE (red squares) in three-times-diluted McIlvaine buffer containing 0.2 M d-fructose at (A) pH 4.5 or (B) pH 6.0 under Ar-saturated conditions at 25 °C, ω = 4,000 rpm, and v = 20 mV s–1. Errors were evaluated using the Student’s t-distribution at a 90% confidence level (N = 5).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Aromatic residues on the shortest ET pathway from heme 2c to the top surface of FDH.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. (A) RDLSVs of d-fructose oxidation at the FDH-adsorbed 2-ANT/MWCNT/GCE in three-times-diluted McIlvaine buffer (pH 4.5) containing 0.2 M d-fructose under Ar-saturated conditions at 25 °C, ω = 4,000 rpm, and v = 20 mV s–1 (1, rFDH (black); 2, F489A FDH (red); 3, W427A FDH (blue)). The inset shows normalized voltammograms for each catalytic current at 0.5 V. (B) Background-subtracted RDLSVs of d-fructose oxidation at rFDH (black circles), F489A FDH (red triangles), and W427A FDH (blue squares) adsorbed 2-ANT/MWCNT/GCEs. Dashed lines indicate refined curves estimated by non-linear regression analysis based on eq 3. Errors were evaluated using the Student’s t-distribution at a 90% confidence level (N = 4).

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Illustration of the Intramolecular ET and DET Pathways in rFDH, W427A FDH, and F489A FDH
  • References


    This article references 79 other publications.

    1. 1
      Willner, I.; Katz, E.; Willner, B. Electrical Contact of Redox Enzyme Layers Associated with Electrodes: Routes to Amperometric Biosensors. Electroanalysis 1997, 9 (13), 965977,  DOI: 10.1002/elan.1140091302
    2. 2
      Habermüller, K.; Mosbach, M.; Schuhmann, W. Electron-Transfer Mechanisms in Amperometric Biosensors. Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem. 2000, 366 (6–7), 560568,  DOI: 10.1007/s002160051551
    3. 3
      Barton, S. C.; Gallaway, J.; Atanassov, P. Enzymatic Biofuel Cells for Implantable and Microscale Devices. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104 (10), 48674886,  DOI: 10.1021/cr020719k
    4. 4
      Bartlett, P. N. Bioelectrochemistry: Fundamentals, Experimental Techniques and Applications; John Wiley & Sons, 2008.  DOI: 10.1002/9780470753842 .
    5. 5
      Cosnier, S.; Gross, A. J.; Le Goff, A.; Holzinger, M. Recent Advances on Enzymatic Glucose/Oxygen and Hydrogen/Oxygen Biofuel Cells: Achievements and Limitations. J. Power Sources 2016, 325, 252263,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.133
    6. 6
      Zhao, C. E.; Gai, P.; Song, R.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, J. J. Nanostructured Material-Based Biofuel Cells: Recent Advances and Future Prospects. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46 (5), 15451564,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CS00044D
    7. 7
      Mano, N.; De Poulpiquet, A. O2 Reduction in Enzymatic Biofuel Cells. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118 (5), 23922468,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00220
    8. 8
      Xiao, X.; Xia, H. Q.; Wu, R.; Bai, L.; Yan, L.; Magner, E.; Cosnier, S.; Lojou, E.; Zhu, Z.; Liu, A. Tackling the Challenges of Enzymatic (Bio)Fuel Cells. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119 (16), 95099558,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00115
    9. 9
      Chen, H.; Simoska, O.; Lim, K.; Grattieri, M.; Yuan, M.; Dong, F.; Lee, Y. S.; Beaver, K.; Weliwatte, S.; Gaffney, E. M.; Minteer, S. D. Fundamentals, Applications, and Future Directions of Bioelectrocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120 (23), 1290312993,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00472
    10. 10
      Bollella, P.; Katz, E. Enzyme-Based Biosensors: Tackling Electron Transfer Issues. Sensors (Switzerland) 2020, 20 (12), 3517,  DOI: 10.3390/s20123517
    11. 11
      Kano, K.; Shirai, O.; Kitazumi, Y.; Sakai, K.; Xia, H.-Q. Enzymatic Bioelectrocatalysis; Springer, 2021.  DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-8960-7
    12. 12
      Ghindilis, A. L.; Atanasov, P.; Wilkins, E. Enzyme-Catalyzed Direct Electron Transfer: Fundamentals and Analytical Applications. Electroanalysis 1997, 9 (9), 661674,  DOI: 10.1002/elan.1140090902
    13. 13
      Ferapontova, E. E. Direct Peroxidase Bioelectrocatalysis on a Variety of Electrode Materials. Electroanalysis 2004, 16 (13–14), 11011112,  DOI: 10.1002/elan.200403003
    14. 14
      Shleev, S.; Tkac, J.; Christenson, A.; Ruzgas, T.; Yaropolov, A. I.; Whittaker, J. W.; Gorton, L. Direct Electron Transfer between Copper-Containing Proteins and Electrodes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2005, 20 (12), 25172554,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2004.10.003
    15. 15
      Léger, C.; Bertrand, P. Direct Electrochemistry of Redox Enzymes as a Tool for Mechanistic Studies. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108 (7), 23792438,  DOI: 10.1021/cr0680742
    16. 16
      Falk, M.; Blum, Z.; Shleev, S. Direct Electron Transfer Based Enzymatic Fuel Cells. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 82, 191202,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.133
    17. 17
      Karyakin, A. A. Principles of Direct (Mediator Free) Bioelectrocatalysis. Bioelectrochemistry 2012, 88, 7075,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2012.05.001
    18. 18
      Sarauli, D.; Xu, C.; Dietzel, B.; Schulz, B.; Lisdat, F. A Multilayered Sulfonated Polyaniline Network with Entrapped Pyrroloquinoline Quinone-Dependent Glucose Dehydrogenase: Tunable Direct Bioelectrocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2 (21), 31963203,  DOI: 10.1039/C4TB00336E
    19. 19
      Milton, R. D.; Minteer, S. D. Direct Enzymatic Bioelectrocatalysis: Differentiating between Myth and Reality. J. R. Soc. Interface 2017, 14 (131), 20170253,  DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0253
    20. 20
      Jenner, L. P.; Butt, J. N. Electrochemistry of Surface-Confined Enzymes: Inspiration, Insight and Opportunity for Sustainable Biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2018, 8, 8188,  DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.03.021
    21. 21
      Yates, N. D. J.; Fascione, M. A.; Parkin, A. Methodologies for “Wiring” Redox Proteins/Enzymes to Electrode Surfaces. Chem. - A Eur. J. 2018, 24 (47), 1216412182,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201800750
    22. 22
      Bollella, P.; Gorton, L.; Antiochia, R. Direct Electron Transfer of Dehydrogenases for Development of 3rd Generation Biosensors and Enzymatic Fuel Cells. Sensors (Switzerland) 2018, 18 (5), 1319,  DOI: 10.3390/s18051319
    23. 23
      Evans, R. M.; Siritanaratkul, B.; Megarity, C. F.; Pandey, K.; Esterle, T. F.; Badiani, S.; Armstrong, F. A. The Value of Enzymes in Solar Fuels Research-Efficient Electrocatalysts through Evolution. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48 (7), 20392052,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CS00546J
    24. 24
      Mazurenko, I.; Hitaishi, V. P.; Lojou, E. Recent Advances in Surface Chemistry of Electrodes to Promote Direct Enzymatic Bioelectrocatalysis. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020, 19, 113121,  DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2019.11.004
    25. 25
      Smutok, O.; Kavetskyy, T.; Katz, E. Recent Trends in Enzyme Engineering Aiming to Improve Bioelectrocatalysis Proceeding with Direct Electron Transfer. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2022, 31, 100856,  DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100856
    26. 26
      Heller, A. Electrical Wiring of Redox Enzymes. Acc. Chem. Res. 1990, 23 (5), 128134,  DOI: 10.1021/ar00173a002
    27. 27
      Gao, W.; Emaminejad, S.; Nyein, H. Y. Y.; Challa, S.; Chen, K.; Peck, A.; Fahad, H. M.; Ota, H.; Shiraki, H.; Kiriya, D.; Lien, D. H.; Brooks, G. A.; Davis, R. W.; Javey, A. Fully Integrated Wearable Sensor Arrays for Multiplexed in situ Perspiration Analysis. Nature 2016, 529 (7587), 509514,  DOI: 10.1038/nature16521
    28. 28
      Bruen, D.; Delaney, C.; Florea, L.; Diamond, D. Glucose Sensing for Diabetes Monitoring: Recent Developments. Sensors (Switzerland) 2017, 17 (8), 1866,  DOI: 10.3390/s17081866
    29. 29
      Teymourian, H.; Barfidokht, A.; Wang, J. Electrochemical Glucose Sensors in Diabetes Management: An Updated Review (2010–2020). Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49 (21), 76717709,  DOI: 10.1039/D0CS00304B
    30. 30
      Datta, S.; Mori, Y.; Takagi, K.; Kawaguchi, K.; Chen, Z. W.; Okajima, T.; Kuroda, S.; Ikeda, T.; Kano, K.; Tanizawa, K.; Mathews, F. S. Structure of a Quinohemoprotein Amine Dehydrogenase with an Uncommon Redox Cofactor and Highly Unusual Crosslinking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98 (25), 1426814273,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.241429098
    31. 31
      Liu, J.; Chakraborty, S.; Hosseinzadeh, P.; Yu, Y.; Tian, S.; Petrik, I.; Bhagi, A.; Lu, Y. Metalloproteins Containing Cytochrome, Iron-Sulfur, or Copper Redox Centers. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114 (8), 43664369,  DOI: 10.1021/cr400479b
    32. 32
      Takeda, K.; Nakamura, N. Direct Electron Transfer Process of Pyrroloquinoline Quinone-Dependent and Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide-Dependent Dehydrogenases: Fundamentals and Applications. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2021, 29, 100747,  DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100747
    33. 33
      Ikeda, T.; Kobayashi, D.; Matsushita, F.; Sagara, T.; Niki, K. Bioelectrocatalysis at Electrodes Coated with Alcohol Dehydrogenase, a Quinohemoprotein with Heme c Serving as a Built-in Mediator. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1993, 361 (1–2), 221228,  DOI: 10.1016/0022-0728(93)87058-4
    34. 34
      Adachi, T.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O.; Kano, K. Direct Electron Transfer-Type Bioelectrocatalysis by Membrane-Bound Aldehyde Dehydrogenase from Gluconobacter Oxydans and Cyanide Effects on its Bioelectrocatalytic Properties. Electrochem. Commun. 2021, 123, 106911,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2020.106911
    35. 35
      Treu, B. L.; Arechederra, R.; Minteer, S. D. Bioelectrocatalysis of Ethanol via PQQ-Dependent Dehydrogenases Utilizing Carbon Nanomaterial Supports. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2009, 9 (4), 23742380,  DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2009.SE33
    36. 36
      Kakehi, N.; Yamazaki, T.; Tsugawa, W.; Sode, K. A Novel Wireless Glucose Sensor Employing Direct Electron Transfer Principle Based Enzyme Fuel Cell. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 22 (9–10), 22502255,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2006.11.004
    37. 37
      Ikeda, T.; Matsushita, F.; Senda, M. Amperometric Fructose Sensor Based on Direct Bioelectrocatalysis. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1991, 6 (4), 299304,  DOI: 10.1016/0956-5663(91)85015-O
    38. 38
      Okuda-Shimazaki, J.; Yoshida, H.; Sode, K. FAD Dependent Glucose Dehydrogenases - Discovery and Engineering of Representative Glucose Sensing Enzymes -. Bioelectrochemistry 2020, 132, 107414,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2019.107414
    39. 39
      Adachi, T.; Kaida, Y.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O.; Kano, K. Bioelectrocatalytic Performance of D-Fructose Dehydrogenase. Bioelectrochemistry 2019, 129, 19,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2019.04.024
    40. 40
      Yamaoka, H.; Ferri, S.; Sode, M. F. K. Essential Role of the Small Subunit of Thermostable Glucose Dehydrogenase from Burkholderia cepacia. Biotechnol. Lett. 2004, 26 (22), 17571761,  DOI: 10.1007/s10529-004-4582-0
    41. 41
      Yoshida, H.; Kojima, K.; Shiota, M.; Yoshimatsu, K.; Yamazaki, T.; Ferri, S.; Tsugawa, W.; Kamitori, S.; Sode, K. X-Ray Structure of the Direct Electron Transfer-Type FAD Glucose Dehydrogenase Catalytic Subunit Complexed with a Hitchhiker Protein. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Struct. Biol. 2019, 75, 841851,  DOI: 10.1107/S2059798319010878
    42. 42
      Shiota, M.; Yamazaki, T.; Yoshimatsu, K.; Kojima, K.; Tsugawa, W.; Ferri, S.; Sode, K. An Fe-S Cluster in the Conserved Cys-Rich Region in the Catalytic Subunit of FAD-Dependent Dehydrogenase Complexes. Bioelectrochemistry 2016, 112, 178183,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2016.01.010
    43. 43
      Okuda-Shimazaki, J.; Yoshida, H.; Lee, I.; Kojima, K.; Suzuki, N.; Tsugawa, W.; Yamada, M.; Inaka, K.; Tanaka, H.; Sode, K. Microgravity environment grown crystal tructure information based engineering of direct electron transfer type glucose dehydrogenase. Commun. Biol. 2022, 5, 1334,  DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-04286-9
    44. 44
      Ameyama, M.; Shinagawa, E.; Matsushita, K.; Adachi, O. D-Fructose Dehydrogenase of Gluconobacter Industrius: Purification, Characterization, and Application to Enzymatic Microdetermination of D-Fructose. J. Bacteriol. 1981, 145 (2), 814823,  DOI: 10.1128/jb.145.2.814-823.1981
    45. 45
      Kawai, S.; Goda-Tsutsumi, M.; Yakushi, T.; Kano, K.; Matsushita, K. Heterologous Overexpression and Characterization of a Flavoprotein-Cytochrome c Complex Fructose Dehydrogenase of Gluconobacter Japonicus NBRC3260. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79 (5), 16541660,  DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03152-12
    46. 46
      Kawai, S.; Yakushi, T.; Matsushita, K.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O.; Kano, K. The Electron Transfer Pathway in Direct Electrochemical Communication of Fructose Dehydrogenase with Electrodes. Electrochem. commun. 2014, 38, 2831,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2013.10.024
    47. 47
      Suzuki, Y.; Sowa, K.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O. The Redox Potential Measurements for Heme Moieties in Variants of D-Fructose Dehydrogenase Based on Mediator-Assisted Potentiometric Titration. Electrochemistry 2021, 89, 337339,  DOI: 10.5796/electrochemistry.21-00044
    48. 48
      Hibino, Y.; Kawai, S.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O.; Kano, K. Mutation of Heme c Axial Ligands in D-Fructose Dehydrogenase for Investigation of Electron Transfer Pathways and Reduction of Overpotential in Direct Electron Transfer-Type Bioelectrocatalysis. Electrochem. commun. 2016, 67, 4346,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2016.03.013
    49. 49
      Hibino, Y.; Kawai, S.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O.; Kano, K. Construction of a Protein-Engineered Variant of D-Fructose Dehydrogenase for Direct Electron Transfer-Type Bioelectrocatalysis. Electrochem. commun. 2017, 77, 112115,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2017.03.005
    50. 50
      Kaida, Y.; Hibino, Y.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O.; Kano, K. Ultimate Downsizing of D-Fructose Dehydrogenase for Improving the Performance of Direct Electron Transfer-Type Bioelectrocatalysis. Electrochem. Commun. 2019, 98, 101105,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2018.12.001
    51. 51
      Suzuki, Y.; Makino, F.; Miyata, T.; Tanaka, H.; Namba, K.; Kano, K.; Sowa, K.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O. Structural and Bioelectrochemical Elucidation of Direct Electron Transfer-Type Membrane-Bound Fructose Dehydrogenase. ChemRxiv 2022,  DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-d7hl9
    52. 52
      Farver, O.; Skov, L. K.; Young, S.; Bonander, N.; Karlsson, B.; Vanngard, T. G.; Pecht, I. Aromatic Residues May Enhance Intramolecular Electron Transfer in Azurin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119 (23), 54535454,  DOI: 10.1021/ja964386i
    53. 53
      Shih, C.; Museth, A. K.; Abrahamsson, M.; Blanco-Rodriguez, A. M.; Di Bilio, A. J.; Sudhamsu, J.; Crane, B. R.; Ronayne, K. L.; Towrie, M.; Vlček, A.; Richards, J. H.; Winkler, J. R.; Gray, H. B. Tryptophan-Accelerated Electron Flow through Proteins. Science (80-.). 2008, 320 (5884), 17601762,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1158241
    54. 54
      Takematsu, K.; Williamson, H.; Blanco-Rodríguez, A. M.; Sokolová, L.; Nikolovski, P.; Kaiser, J. T.; Towrie, M.; Clark, I. P.; Vlček, A.; Winkler, J. R.; Gray, H. B. Tryptophan-Accelerated Electron Flow across a Protein-Protein Interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (41), 1551515525,  DOI: 10.1021/ja406830d
    55. 55
      Takematsu, K.; Williamson, H. R.; Nikolovski, P.; Kaiser, J. T.; Sheng, Y.; Pospíšil, P.; Towrie, M.; Heyda, J.; Hollas, D.; Záliš, S.; Gray, H. B.; Vlček, A.; Winkler, J. R. Two Tryptophans Are Better Than One in Accelerating Electron Flow through a Protein. ACS Cent. Sci. 2019, 5 (1), 192200,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00882
    56. 56
      Sarhangi, S. M.; Matyushov, D. V. Theory of Protein Charge Transfer: Electron Transfer between Tryptophan Residue and Active Site of Azurin. J. Phys. Chem. B 2022, 126 (49), 1036010373,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c05258
    57. 57
      Olloqui-Sariego, J. L.; Zakharova, G. S.; Poloznikov, A. A.; Calvente, J. J.; Hushpulian, D. M.; Gorton, L.; Andreu, R. Influence of Tryptophan Mutation on the Direct Electron Transfer of Immobilized Tobacco Peroxidase. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 351, 136465,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136465
    58. 58
      Sugimoto, Y.; Kawai, S.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O.; Kano, K. Function of C-Terminal Hydrophobic Region in Fructose Dehydrogenase. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 176, 976981,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.142
    59. 59
      Winkler, J. R.; Gray, H. B. Electron Flow through Metalloproteins. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114 (7), 33693380,  DOI: 10.1021/cr4004715
    60. 60
      Page, C. C.; Moser, C. C.; Chen, X.; Dutton, P. L. Natural Engineering Principles of Electron Tunnelling in Biological Oxidation-Reduction. Nature 1999, 402 (6757), 4752,  DOI: 10.1038/46972
    61. 61
      Matsushita, K.; Kobayashi, Y.; Mizuguchi, M.; Toyama, H.; Adachi, O.; Sakamoto, K.; Miyoshi, H. A Tightly Bound Quinone Functions in the Ubiquinone Reaction Sites of Quinoprotein Alcohol Dehydrogenase of an Acetic Acid Bacterium, Gluconobacter Suboxydans. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2008, 72 (10), 27232731,  DOI: 10.1271/bbb.80363
    62. 62
      Yakushi, T.; Matsushita, K. Alcohol Dehydrogenase of Acetic Acid Bacteria: Structure, Mode of Action, and Applications in Biotechnology. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 86 (5), 12571265,  DOI: 10.1007/s00253-010-2529-z
    63. 63
      Adachi, T.; Miyata, T.; Makino, F.; Tanaka, H.; Namba, K.; Kano, K.; Sowa, K.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O. Experimental and Theoretical Insights into Bienzymatic Cascade for Mediatorless Bioelectrochemical Ethanol Oxidation with Alcohol and Aldehyde Dehydrogenases. ACS. Catal. 2023, 13, 79557965,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.3c01962
    64. 64
      Bollella, P.; Hibino, Y.; Kano, K.; Gorton, L.; Antiochia, R. The Influence of pH and Divalent/Monovalent Cations on the Internal Electron Transfer (IET), Enzymatic Activity, and Structure of Fructose Dehydrogenase. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410 (14), 32533264,  DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-0991-0
    65. 65
      Jumper, J.; Evans, R.; Pritzel, A.; Green, T.; Figurnov, M.; Ronneberger, O.; Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Bates, R.; Žídek, A.; Potapenko, A.; Bridgland, A.; Meyer, C.; Kohl, S. A. A.; Ballard, A. J.; Cowie, A.; Romera-Paredes, B.; Nikolov, S.; Jain, R.; Adler, J.; Back, T.; Petersen, S.; Reiman, D.; Clancy, E.; Zielinski, M.; Steinegger, M.; Pacholska, M.; Berghammer, T.; Bodenstein, S.; Silver, D.; Vinyals, O.; Senior, A. W.; Kavukcuoglu, K.; Kohli, P.; Hassabis, D. Highly Accurate Protein Structure Prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 2021, 596 (7873), 583589,  DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
    66. 66
      Marcus, R. A.; Sutin, N. Electron transfers in chemistry and biology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Bioenerg. 1985, 811 (3), 265322,  DOI: 10.1016/0304-4173(85)90014-X
    67. 67
      Lowe, H.J.; Clark, W. M. Studies on Oxidation-Reduction. XXIV. Oxidation-Reduction Potentials of Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide. J. Biol. Chem. 1956, 221 (2), 983992,  DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)65211-1
    68. 68
      Moser, C. C.; Keske, J. M.; Warncke, K.; Farid, R. S.; Dutton, P. L. Nature of Biological Electron Transfer. Nature 1992, 355 (6363), 796802,  DOI: 10.1038/355796a0
    69. 69
      Farver, O.; Skov, L. K.; Pascher, T.; Karlsson, B. G.; Nordling, M.; Lundberg, L. G.; Vaenngaard, T.; Pecht, I. Intramolecular Electron Transfer in Single-Site-Mutated Azurins. Biochemistry 1993, 32 (28), 73177322,  DOI: 10.1021/bi00079a031
    70. 70
      Beratan, D. N.; Onuchic, J. N.; Betts, J. N.; Bowler, B. E.; Gray, H. B. Electron-Tunneling Pathways in Ruthenated Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112 (22), 79157921,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00178a011
    71. 71
      Dolinsky, T. J.; Nielsen, J. E.; McCammon, J. A.; Baker, N. A. PDB2PQR: An Automated Pipeline for the Setup of Poisson-Boltzmann Electrostatics Calculations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32 (Web Server), W665W667,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh381
    72. 72
      Baker, N. A.; Sept, D.; Joseph, S.; Holst, M. J.; McCammon, J. A. Electrostatics of Nanosystems: Application to Microtubules and the Ribosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98 (18), 1003710041,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.181342398
    73. 73
      Bollella, P.; Hibino, Y.; Kano, K.; Gorton, L.; Antiochia, R. Highly Sensitive Membraneless Fructose Biosensor Based on Fructose Dehydrogenase Immobilized onto Aryl Thiol Modified Highly Porous Gold Electrode: Characterization and Application in Food Samples. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90 (20), 1213112136,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03093
    74. 74
      Bocanegra-Rodríguez, S.; Molins-Legua, C.; Campíns-Falcó, P.; Giroud, F.; Gross, A. J.; Cosnier, S. Monofunctional Pyrenes at Carbon Nanotube Electrodes for Direct Electron Transfer H2O2 Reduction with HRP and HRP-Bacterial Nanocellulose. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 187, 113304,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113304
    75. 75
      Blanford, C. F.; Heath, R. S.; Armstrong, F. A. A Stable Electrode for High-Potential, Electrocatalytic O2 Reduction Based on Rational Attachment of a Blue Copper Oxidase to a Graphite Surface. Chem. Commun. 2007, (17), 17101712,  DOI: 10.1039/b703114a
    76. 76
      Meredith, M. T.; Minson, M.; Hickey, D.; Artyushkova, K.; Glatzhofer, D. T.; Minteer, S. D. Anthracene-Modified Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as Direct Electron Transfer Scaffolds for Enzymatic Oxygen Reduction. ACS Catal. 2011, 1 (12), 16831690,  DOI: 10.1021/cs200475q
    77. 77
      Bollella, P.; Hibino, Y.; Kano, K.; Gorton, L.; Antiochia, R. Enhanced Direct Electron Transfer of Fructose Dehydrogenase Rationally Immobilized on a 2-Aminoanthracene Diazonium Cation Grafted Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Based Electrode. ACS Catal. 2018, 8 (11), 1027910289,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b02729
    78. 78
      Léger, C.; Jones, A. K.; Albracht, S. P. J.; Armstrong, F. A. Effect of a Dispersion of Interfacial Electron Transfer Rates on Steady State Catalytic Electron Transport in [NiFe]-Hydrogenase and Other Enzymes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106 (50), 1305813063,  DOI: 10.1021/jp0265687
    79. 79
      Sugimoto, Y.; Kitazumi, Y.; Shirai, O.; Kano, K. Effects of Mesoporous Structures on Direct Electron Transfer-Type Bioelectrocatalysis: Facts and Simulation on a Three-Dimensional Model of Random Orientation of Enzymes. Electrochemistry 2017, 85 (2), 8287,  DOI: 10.5796/electrochemistry.85.82
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.3c03769.

    • Experimental section, detailed explanations of analytical models, cryo-EM analysis, biochemical assays, structure of rFDH-R, detection of UQ10, EPR analysis, and additional electrochemical data (PDF)

    Accession Codes

    Cryo-EM structures were deposited in the Protein Data Bank for rFDH-R (PDB ID: 8JEJ), rFDH-O (PDB ID: 8JEK) and rFDH-D (PDB ID: 7W2J and 7WSQ).


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.