ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Theoretical Approach To Predict the Stability of Supported Single-Atom Catalysts
My Activity
  • Open Access
Research Article

Theoretical Approach To Predict the Stability of Supported Single-Atom Catalysts
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Ya-Qiong Su
    Ya-Qiong Su
    Laboratory of Inorganic Materials & Catalysis, Schuit Institute of Catalysis, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    More by Ya-Qiong Su
  • Yifan Wang
    Yifan Wang
    Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Catalysis Center for Energy Innovation, University of Delaware, 221 Academy Street, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States
    More by Yifan Wang
  • Jin-Xun Liu
    Jin-Xun Liu
    Laboratory of Inorganic Materials & Catalysis, Schuit Institute of Catalysis, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    More by Jin-Xun Liu
  • Ivo A.W. Filot
    Ivo A.W. Filot
    Laboratory of Inorganic Materials & Catalysis, Schuit Institute of Catalysis, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  • Konstantinos Alexopoulos
    Konstantinos Alexopoulos
    Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Catalysis Center for Energy Innovation, University of Delaware, 221 Academy Street, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States
  • Long Zhang
    Long Zhang
    Laboratory of Inorganic Materials & Catalysis, Schuit Institute of Catalysis, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    More by Long Zhang
  • Valerii Muravev
    Valerii Muravev
    Laboratory of Inorganic Materials & Catalysis, Schuit Institute of Catalysis, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  • Bart Zijlstra
    Bart Zijlstra
    Laboratory of Inorganic Materials & Catalysis, Schuit Institute of Catalysis, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  • Dionisios G. Vlachos*
    Dionisios G. Vlachos
    Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Catalysis Center for Energy Innovation, University of Delaware, 221 Academy Street, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States
    *E-mail: [email protected]
  • Emiel J.M. Hensen*
    Emiel J.M. Hensen
    Laboratory of Inorganic Materials & Catalysis, Schuit Institute of Catalysis, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    *E-mail: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Catalysis

Cite this: ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 4, 3289–3297
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b00252
Published March 5, 2019

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Heterogeneous single-atom catalysts involve isolated metal atoms anchored to a support, displaying high catalytic performance and stability in many important chemical reactions. We present a general theoretical framework to establish the thermodynamic stability of metal single atoms and metal nanoparticles on a support in the presence of adsorbates. As a case study, we establish for Pt–CeO2 the CO partial pressure and temperature range within which Pt single atoms are more stable than Pt nanoparticles. Density functional theory and kinetic Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that Pt atoms doped into the CeO2 surface exhibit a very high CO oxidation activity and thermodynamic stability in comparison to models involving Pt single atoms on terraces and steps of CeO2. An intermediate CO adsorption strength is important to explain a high activity. Our work provides a systematic strategy to evaluate the stability and reactivity of single atoms on a support.

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Supported metal catalysts are extensively used in exhaust gas cleanup because of their high catalytic activity for CO and hydrocarbon oxidation and NOx reduction. (1−3) The size of the supported metal nanoparticles (NPs) is often decisive for the catalytic performance. (4−6) Due to their highly undercoordinated nature, supported metal single-atom catalysts (SACs) can display a very high catalytic activity. SACs are rapidly becoming a new frontier in heterogeneous catalysis. (7−9) Besides the low coordination number of the catalytic metal atom, the support usually plays an important role in the catalytic cycle, akin to noninnocent ligands in homogeneous catalysts. (10,11)
In environmental catalysis, ceria is one of the most used supports, because it can reversibly store oxygen atoms and also because it strongly interacts with transition metals, leading to a large metal–support interface. (12,13) Generally, single atoms (SAs) are more mobile on a support than NPs and, thus, prone to agglomeration. (14−16) SA stabilization on oxide supports is therefore of critical importance for the design of SACs. The preparation and performance of Pt SAs on ceria have recently been extensively studied. (1,8,17−19) Experimental and theoretical data also emphasize the role of surface defects in ceria, such as steps and cation vacancies, for trapping of Pt SAs. (1,8,18) Alternatively, Pt SAs can also strongly interact with the less stable CeO2(100) surface by coordinating to four surface oxygen atoms in a square-planar configuration. (8,19) Another aspect of highly dispersed supported metal systems is the strong adsorption of reactants that can lead to the breakup and dispersion of metal clusters and nanoparticles into SAs. (20−25) For instance, Berko et al. observed by scanning tunneling microscopy a very rapid disintegration of TiO2-supported Rh NPs of 1–2 nm to atomically dispersed Rh at 300 K and a pressure of 10–1 mbar CO. (22)
On the basis of binding energies computed by density functional theory (DFT), we develop a theoretical framework that forms the basis for constructing condition-dependent stability diagrams of supported metal SAs with respect to supported metal NPs in the presence of CO. The influence of CO coverage and lateral interactions is also taken into account. This leads to predictions about the stability of NPs and a critical size below which the supported NPs will disperse into SAs in the presence of CO at given conditions. We employ this methodology to predict the stability of Pt SAs on stoichiometric CeO2(111), stepped CeO2(111), defective CeO2(111), and CeO2(100) surfaces. Finally, we compute potential energy diagrams for CO oxidation by Pt SAs for several of these cases. CO oxidation rates are predicted by graph-theoretical kinetic Monte Carlo (GT-kMC) simulations. (26)

Computational Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Density Functional Theory (DFT)

We carried out spin-polarized DFT calculations as implemented in the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP). (27) The ion–electron interactions are represented by the projector-augmented wave (PAW) method (28) and the electron exchange-correlation by the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) with the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) exchange-correlation functional. (29) The Kohn–Sham valence states were expanded in a plane-wave basis set with a cutoff energy of 400 eV. The Ce(5s,5p,6s,4f,5d), O(2s,2p), Pd(4d5s), and C(2s,2p) electrons were treated as valence states. The DFT+U approach was used, in which U is a Hubbard-like term describing the on-site Coulombic interactions. (30) This approach improves the description of localized states in ceria, where standard LDA and GGA functionals fail. For Ce, a value of U = 4.5 eV was adopted, which was calculated self-consistently by Fabris et al. (31) using the linear response approach of Cococcioni and de Gironcoli (32) and is within the 3.0–6.0 eV range that results in the localization in Ce 4f orbitals of the electrons left upon oxygen removal from ceria. (33)
For Pt/CeO2(111), we use a periodic ceria slab with a (4 × 4) surface unit cell. For Brillouin zone integration, a 1 × 1 × 1 Monkhorst–Pack mesh was used. The bulk equilibrium lattice constant (5.49 Å) previously calculated at the PBE+U level (U = 4.5 eV) was used. (34) The CeO2(111) slab model consists of three Ce–O–Ce layers (48 Ce and 96 O atoms) and a vacuum gap of 15 Å. The atoms in the bottom layer were frozen to their bulk positions, and only the top two Ce–O–Ce layers were relaxed. The climbing image nudged-elastic band (CI-NEB) algorithm (35,36) was used to identify the transition states in the elementary reaction steps of CO oxidation. A frequency analysis was performed to confirm that each transition state has only a single imaginary frequency in the direction of the reaction coordinate. The total energy difference was less than 10–4 eV, and the relaxation convergence criterion was set at 0.05 eV/Å.

Graph-Theoretical Kinetic Monte Carlo (GT-kMC)

The DFT-calculated energetics and vibrational frequencies were input in the GT-kMC framework as implemented in the software package Zacros. (37) In this approach, participating species and elementary steps are represented as graphs.
For nonactivated adsorption as employed in this work, we assume an early 2D gas-like transition state. The rate constants of adsorption and desorption are calculated as (26,38,39)
(1)
(2)
here h is Planck’s constant, kB is Boltzmann’s constant, T is the temperature, Px is the partial pressure of a species x, Ast is the area of an adsorption site, m is the molecular mass of the adsorbent, is the gas adsorption energy, and q is the partition function for gas-phase species and adsorbates (computed using statistical mechanical expressions). For each surface reaction, the rate constants were calculated by transition state theory in an Arrhenius form, (40) yielding
(3)
and
(4)
where kfwd (krev) is the rate constant of the forward (reverse) elementary reaction step, kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature, and h is Planck’s constant. Q, QR, and QP are the quasi-partition functions of the transition, reactant, and product states, respectively. Finally, () is the activation energy for configuration σ in the forward (backward) direction. Other inputs to the software include the operating conditions (temperature, pressure, and gas-phase composition), a lattice structure, energetics of each surface species, and the reaction mechanism parametrized by eqs 14. (26,41) We did not take into account lateral interactions, because we only consider dispersed single Pt atoms and their neighboring sites, as such interactions between adsorbates are irrelevant. The GT-kMC supports site-dependent chemistry. Three types of sites were considered in each unit cell including a Pt atom, to which CO can adsorb, and two oxygen vacancy sites, where O2 can adsorb and dissociate (see Supporting Information).
The chemical master equation describes the time evolution of the probability pi(t) of finding the system in a particular state i (42)
(5)
where denotes the propensity of the system going from state i to j, which is related to the rate constants of the microscopic events. (43,44) Solving the chemical master equation numerically is often impractical due to the large number of possible states. Instead, the kMC framework solves the chemical master equation stochastically. At each instant, the possible next events on the lattice are identified by solving subgraph isomorphism problems given the current lattice configurations. The probability of a queue of events is generated, and one event is chosen proportional to its probability (26)
(6)
where t is the current time and τi is the time increment between the current time t and the next event i. The time increment is generated stochastically for all possible events at time t following an exponential distribution
(7)
here u is a random number sampled from the uniform distribution between 0 and 1. These times are stored in a priority queue in the form of a binary heap structure. The event i with the smallest occurrence time occurs next. Next, the lattice and simulation time are updated. The procedure is repeated until the stopping criteria are reached. In practice, to reduce stochastic noise, multiple independent trajectories generated using different random seeds are run in parallel and averaged. Given a long enough simulation time, steady-state properties such as average surface species coverages, turnover frequency (TOF), and reaction orders can be obtained.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Stability of Supported NPs and SAs

The driving force for sintering of supported metal catalysts is the reduction in surface free energy of the active metal phase. Metals usually cannot be kept in atomic dispersion on a support, because a metal adatom usually does not bind strong enough to the support. (14) The cohesive energy is typically used to account for the strength of metallic bonds in NPs. Its absolute value decreases when particles become smaller, indicative of the weaker metallic bonds in NPs compared to bulk metal. When a nanoparticle is placed on a support, the total energy is lowered by the interactions with a part of the metal atoms that form the interface. However, the influence of the support on the total energy is minor for particles with more than 20 atoms, and we can use the cohesive energy of the corresponding free NP in vacuum as a first approximation as demonstrated for Pd NPs on CeO2(111). (14) In order to compare stabilities, this cohesive (or binding) energy per metal atom for the supported NP system can be compared to the binding energy of a single metal adatom placed on a support. We develop our approach for Pt on the most stable CeO2(111) surface. The resulting expressions for the binding energies of ceria-supported Pt NPs and a ceria-supported single Pt atom, Pt1/CeO2(111), are
(8)
and
(9)
where , , , andare the energies of a free single Pt atom, a free Pt NP, the CeO2(111) slab, and the Pt1/CeO2(111) model, respectively, and n is the number of Pt atoms in a NP. The binding energy for a free metal NP of n atoms scales with n–1/3 (Figure S1). (45,46) We compute a binding energy of 3.21 eV for a single Pt atom on the most stable CeO2(111) termination, which is close to the earlier reported value of 3.30 eV. (8)
Adsorbates like CO stabilize a supported single Pt adatom more than a Pt NP because of the stronger adsorption of CO to a single metal atom and also because only a fraction of the Pt atoms in a NP is covered by CO, shown in Figure 1. The binding energy of a single Pt atom with adsorbed CO as a function of temperature (T) and pressure (P) is given by
(10)
in which μ is the chemical potential of CO in the gas phase at temperature T and a CO partial pressure P with respect to a reference state of CO in the gas phase at standard conditions. Here, we ignored the contribution of vibrational entropy of the adsorbed CO to the binding energy of a single Pt atom or Pt NPs. The vibrational entropy contribution to the free energy is less than 0.03 eV for CO adsorption on the metal surface. (47−50) The computed adsorption energy of CO on Pt1/CeO2(111), , is −3.45 eV. Accordingly, we can rewrite eq 10 as
(11)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the relative stability of Pt SAs and NPs on CeO2 in the presence of adsorbed CO molecules.

CO adsorption also stabilizes a supported Pt NP. The stabilization will depend on the number of available surface Pt atoms and the CO coverage at a certain T and P. Therefore, we evaluate the binding energy per Pt atom for such a system by taking into account that m CO adsorbs to a NP containing n Pt atoms at a given temperature and pressure
(12)
here, is the average CO adsorption energy obtained from the DFT-computed data
(13)
Thus, the binding energy of a CO-covered Pt NP can be expressed in terms of the binding energy of the free Pt NP and a correction for the adsorption of CO. This correction term can be computed in the following manner by taking the chemical potential of CO molecules into account
(14)
where ω(n) = N/n, i.e., the ratio between the number of surface Pt sites to which CO can adsorb (N) and the total number of Pt atoms (n) and θ = m/N, i.e., the surface coverage at given temperature and pressure.
As we will show below, ω(n) depends strongly on the particle size
(15)
in which is the binding energy of Pt bulk (6.40 eV) extrapolated from Figure S1, is the surface energy of Pt NPs, and Aatom = A/N is the area of a surface atom of Pt. The detailed derivation of eq 15 is in the Supporting Information. To compute the surface energy of Pt NPs, we use the Wulff construction to estimate that sufficiently large NPs consist of 65% (111) and 35% (100) facets. The explicitly calculated binding energy of Pt bulk is 6.37 eV, in accordance with the extrapolated value of 6.40 eV. Accordingly, we neglect the more reactive atoms at the edges and corners. The surface free energy is then the weighted surface energy based on DFT-computed values.
Equation 15 can be generally used for the prediction of the dispersion of free metal NPs. For the supported NPs considered in our study, we assume that one of the surface facets of the cuboctahedra NPs (predicted by the Wulff theorem) forms an interface with the CeO2(111) support. In this way, we can determine ω(n) as a function of n for the nonwetting case. The deviation between ω(n) for free and supported NPs is relatively small. We also considered the case of partial wetting in which one-half of the Wulff shape is visible in a Winterbottom approach. (51) This partial wetting case results in a lower ω(n) for given n (Figure S3). Nevertheless, ω(n) depends much less on the wetting degree than on n.
On the basis of these assumptions for the surface energy and ω(n) we can write the correction term as
(16)
in which f1 and f2 are the fractions of the NP surface occupied by (111) and (100) facets. The binding energy per Pt atom for our Ptn/CeO2(111) system at a given temperature and pressure is then given by
(17)
The coverage dependence of the CO adsorption energy for the Pt(111) and Pt(100) surface facets was evaluated by DFT calculations of CO adsorption in a (3 × 3) surface unit cell and fitted with polynomial functions (Figure 2a). At a given T and P, the corresponding coverage of CO can be determined by (21)
(18)
where is the differential adsorption energy of CO molecules on a particular facet (here, either the (111) or the (100) facet). As an example, Figure 2b shows the CO coverage on Pt(111) facets as a function of T and P. These predictions compare well with available experimental data for single-crystal Pt(111) data. (52−54)

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Computed CO adsorption energy on Pt(111) and Pt(100) facets as a function of the CO coverage and (b) CO coverage at given temperature and CO partial pressure for Pt(111).

We can now determine n, T, and P for which a Pt NP with n Pt atoms covered with m CO is equally or less stable than a CO-covered single Pt atom located on CeO2(111)
(19)
We depict the results in Figure 3a in which the isolines represent this condition for a given n. Figure 3a predicts that, at a typical condition of low-temperature CO oxidation (PCO = 10–5 atm, T = 100 °C), Pt(CO) can be dislodged from Pt NPs of up to ∼150 atoms on the CeO2(111) terrace. Particles larger than this critical size will not break up to form Pt SAs. With increasing CO partial pressure, Pt SAs can compete with larger Pt NP. The reason is that the higher coverage of CO on the Pt NPs means that the larger number of Pt–CO bonds can increasingly outweigh the Pt–Pt interactions in the Pt NP. If, on the other hand, the temperature is raised, the CO coverage will decrease and Pt NP will become increasingly favored over single Pt(CO) species (e.g., T > 300 °C). It can explain some experimental observations that CO induces sintering of metal adatoms on oxide supports at extremely low CO pressure and/or high temperature. (55)Figure 3b and Figure S4 show how these predictions are affected by the wetting of the CeO2(111) surface by the Pt NPs. Clearly, the main trends remain very similar, while increasing wetting leads to a lower dispersion and a lower stability of Pt NPs.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Critical size diagrams of the supported Pt NPs with respect to the thermodynamic stability as a function of temperature and CO partial pressure relative to isolated Pt SAs (a) on the terrace of CeO2(111) with nonwetting and (b) wetting, (c) on the step-edges of CeO2(111), and (d) on the terrace of CeO2(100). Gray area relates to Pt NPs with less than 38 atoms, which were not considered in this study.

It is important to emphasize that these predictions refer to the thermodynamic stability of an isolated Pt–carbonyl species in comparison to CO-covered Pt NPs. In experiment, the size of the NPs is determined by many factors including the preparation and activation (reduction) method. (56) The dislodgement of a Pt–carbonyl species from a supported Pt NP will involve overcoming a kinetic barrier. For instance, the activation barrier for dislodging a Pt atom from CeO2-supported Pt4 is 2.46 eV. This barrier decreases to 0.45 eV when a CO is adsorbed to the dislodging Pt atom. When the Pt4 cluster is covered by 4 CO, the cluster will spontaneously break up into 4 Pt(CO) SA species (Figure S5). The activation barrier for dislodging a Pt atom from a Pt8 cluster amounts to 2.14 and 0.61 eV in the absence and presence of CO, respectively (Figure S6). Therefore, these results demonstrate that dislodgement of Pt atoms in the presence of CO is feasible at typical reaction conditions.
The computed frequency of the CO stretching vibration for the Pt(CO) SA on CeO2(111) is 2047 cm–1. Notably, this value is significantly different from the typical frequencies of linearly adsorbed CO on Pt(111) and Pt(100), which are 2090 and 2080 cm–1, respectively. (57−60) Bazin et al. observed a CO feature at 2046 cm–1 and attributed this to linear CO adsorption on a Pt atom at the Pt–CeO2 interface in Pt/CeO2. (61) Teschner and co-workers also reported that linear CO adsorption leads to the strongest adsorption at the Pt–CeO2 boundary and a vibrational frequency of 2054 cm–1. (62) Therefore, we speculate that these signals should be attributed to dislodged Pt(CO). We also refer to related IR studies of CO adsorption on oxide-supported Pt catalysts. (63,64)
The binding energy of a Pt atom at the ceria step edge is much higher (5.54 eV) than that on CeO2(111) (3.21 eV). This leads to a higher propensity of ceria step-edge sites to break up Pt NP, as shown in Figure 3c. These results show that atomically dispersed Pt can be stabilized on a ceria step edge over a much wider range of conditions than on the CeO2(111) surface. (18) The finding that this stability extends to high temperature and low CO coverage can explain why ceria-supported small Pt NPs are atomically dispersed at high temperatures, where kinetic barriers for atom dislodgement from Pt NPs can be easily overcome. (1,18) On the basis of the similar stability of Pt(CO) complexes on the CeO2(111) step and CeO2(100), we predict that Pt SAs can also be stabilized over a wide range of conditions on the more open CeO2(100) surface (Figure 3d), in agreement with experimental observations. (65)
Pd doping in the CeO2(111) surface has recently been explored in the context of stable CO and CH4 oxidation catalysis. (66)Figure 4c–f shows similar structures for a Pt atom doped in the CeO2(111) surface. Pt-dop-I contains an octahedral Pt atom obtained by placing a Pt atom on a Ce vacancy (ΔE = −4.04 eV with respect to bulk Pt). (67) Pt-dop-II represents a slightly less stable structure (ΔE = +0.36 eV) in which Pt is located in a square-planar coordination between 4 lattice oxygens. Whereas removal of a surface oxygen from Pt-dop-I is endothermic (ΔE = 1.75 eV), forming an O vacancy (VO) on Pt-dop-II is exothermic (Pt-dop-II-VO, ΔE = −0.35 eV). Removing a further oxygen from Pt-dop-II-VO is unfavorable (ΔE = 1.23 eV), however. Notably, Figure 4d–f shows that the local geometry around Pt in Pt-dop-II is very similar to that of a Pt atom at a step edge to which two excess O atoms are bound (Figure 4b). (8) A phase diagram of these doped structures depicted in Figure 4g predicts that, under typical CO oxidation conditions, Pt-dop–II-VO is a thermodynamically stable structure.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Pt SAs located at a CeO2(111) step before (a) and after (b) O2 dissociation, and (c–f) doped into the CeO2(111) surface (color code: white, Ce; gray, irrelevant O; red, relevant O; black, C; blue, Pt). (g) Ab initio-determined phase diagram of the Pt-doped CeO2(111) surface.

CO Oxidation

Having established the conditions under which isolated Pt1(CO) complexes are stable on the CeO2(111) terrace and step edges, we will now compare the rate of CO oxidation on different isolated Pt species. We also explored alternative locations of a Pt SA doped into the CeO2(111) surface. Co-adsorption of O2 on isolated Pt(CO) is unfavorable (Eads = 0.08 eV). This implies that CO oxidation via a conventional Langmuir–Hinshelwood (LH) mechanism is unlikely. Therefore, we explored a Mars–van Krevelen (MvK) mechanism involving lattice O atoms of the ceria support. (1,17,68)Figure 5 shows the potential energy surface for CO oxidation. It is shown that the rate-limiting step on Pt1/CeO2(111) and Pt1O2/step is CO2 desorption, which costs energy of 2.38 and 1.31 eV to produce an oxygen vacancy, respectively, while for CO oxidation by Pt-dop-II-VO, the CO2 desorption is much easier and requires an energy barrier of 0.97 eV for CO2 formation. Notably, CO adsorption can cause dynamic hopping of Pt dopants from subsurface to surface as well as Pd. (66)

Figure 5

Figure 5. CO oxidation pathways by Pt SAs on CeO2(111), on stepped CeO2(111), and doped in the CeO2(111) surface.

Next, we employed the GT-kMC simulations to determine the catalytic performance of these candidate sites in CO oxidation. The lattice for these kinetic Monte Carlo simulations consists of 100 Pt SA on ceria lattice consisting of 10 × 10 unit cells. Each cell contains 1 Pt atom and 2 empty sites accommodating O atoms. The steady-state turnover frequencies (TOF) and occupation of the states along the potential energy surface expressed in terms of fractional coverages are reported in Figure 6. The total pressure is set to 0.1 atm and the CO-to-O2 ratio to 2.

Figure 6

Figure 6. (a) Arrhenius plot of the rate of CO oxidation on three types of Pt SA on ceria. (b–d) Steady-state coverages of dominant surface states of Pt SAs on CeO2(111) during CO oxidation (p = 0.1 atm, CO/O2 ratio = 2).

Figure 6a shows the CO oxidation rates of the different Pt SAs supported on ceria as a function of the temperature. The Pt-dop-II-VO site is much more reactive than the Pt1O2/step model, while the Pt1/CeO2(111) is nearly inactive for CO oxidation under practical conditions. Recently, Datye and co-workers also suggested that atomically dispersed Pt on step edges of CeO2 exhibits low low-temperature CO oxidation activity. (18) Our study alternatively suggests that Pt atoms doped into the surface can be very active for CO oxidation.
Further insight can be obtained by inspecting the dominant surface states (also known as MARI, most abundant reaction intermediate) during CO oxidation in Figure 6b–d. For Pt1O2/step, the dominant state is CO adsorbed on Pt1O/step at all temperatures tested, indicating strong CO adsorption. In the Pt1/CeO2(111) model, strong CO adsorption results in the CO-adsorbed state on Pt1O/CeO2(111) being the MARI at high temperatures and adsorbed CO2 at low temperatures. On Pt-dop-II-VO, at high temperatures (T > 600 K), the system is in the initial state Int0 (Pt-dop-II-VO), where CO oxidation becomes rate limiting. Reaction orders were also computed and emphasize that CO reaction orders are zero when the MARI is a CO-adsorbed state and unity for an empty surface (Figure S16). This discussion is further supported by a degree of rate control analysis (Figure S18). Overall, we find that strong CO adsorption leads to higher barriers for CO oxidation. Moderate CO bonding of a Pt atom embedded in the CeO2(111) surface is therefore preferred to achieve high CO oxidation activity.

Conclusion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We developed a novel methodology to determine the thermodynamic stability difference between supported metal SAs and NPs in the presence of adsorbates at a given pressure and temperature. As an example, we investigated under which conditions Pt(CO) complexes may be more stable than (partially) CO-covered Pt NPs on CeO2 surface. The constructed stability diagrams show that isolated Pt(CO) may be expected to form on the terrace and step and doping sites of CeO2(111). In general, the thermodynamic propensity for dislodgement increases with lower temperature and higher CO coverage. Kinetically, CO coverage facilitates the disruption of Pt–Pt bonds. Further investigation of CO oxidation reactivity demonstrates that doping of Pt in the CeO2(111) surface presents the highest CO oxidation turnover rate among the SA models. This is mainly because CO strongly binds to a Pt SA located on the stoichiometric CeO2 surface or Pt1O on a ceria step-edge site, resulting in low activity. The moderate CO binding suggests the importance of a Sabatier optimum for CO oxidation for Pt SAs on CeO2. The herein developed single-atom thermodynamic concept can be generally applied for supported metal catalysts. This study provides deeper insight into the stability and activity of SACs and establishes a useful concept facilitating the rational design of SACs with high stability and catalytic activity.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b00252.

  • Derivation of the dispersion formula; critical size diagrams of supported Pt NPs and frequency analyses of CO bound to Pt facets; kinetic data of Pt atom dislodging from Pt4 and Pt8 supported on CeO2(111); DFT-determined catalytic cycles of CO oxidation and GT-kMC data (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
  • Authors
    • Ya-Qiong Su - Laboratory of Inorganic Materials & Catalysis, Schuit Institute of Catalysis, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The NetherlandsOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-5581-5352
    • Yifan Wang - Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Catalysis Center for Energy Innovation, University of Delaware, 221 Academy Street, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States
    • Jin-Xun Liu - Laboratory of Inorganic Materials & Catalysis, Schuit Institute of Catalysis, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The NetherlandsOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-7499-4197
    • Ivo A.W. Filot - Laboratory of Inorganic Materials & Catalysis, Schuit Institute of Catalysis, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    • Konstantinos Alexopoulos - Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Catalysis Center for Energy Innovation, University of Delaware, 221 Academy Street, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States
    • Long Zhang - Laboratory of Inorganic Materials & Catalysis, Schuit Institute of Catalysis, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    • Valerii Muravev - Laboratory of Inorganic Materials & Catalysis, Schuit Institute of Catalysis, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    • Bart Zijlstra - Laboratory of Inorganic Materials & Catalysis, Schuit Institute of Catalysis, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The NetherlandsOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-4040-6545
  • Author Contributions

    Y.S., Y.W., and J.L.: These authors contributed equally.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The authors acknowledge financial support for the research from The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) through a Vici grant and Nuffic funding. Supercomputing facilities were provided by NWO. This work has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant no. 686086 (Partial-PGMs). K.A., Y.W., and D.G.V. acknowledge support for the GT-KMC studies from the Catalysis Center for Energy Innovation, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Award No. DE-SC0001004. Y.W. acknowledges also support from the Ferguson fellowship.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 68 other publications.

  1. 1
    Nie, L.; Mei, D.; Xiong, H.; Peng, B.; Ren, Z.; Hernandez, X. I. P.; DeLaRiva, A.; Wang, M.; Engelhard, M. H.; Kovarik, L. Activation of Surface Lattice Oxygen in Single-Atom Pt/CeO2 for Low-Temperature CO Oxidation. Science 2017, 358, 14191423,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aao2109
  2. 2
    Qiao, B.; Wang, A.; Yang, X.; Allard, L. F.; Jiang, Z.; Cui, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, T. Single-Atom Catalysis of CO Oxidation Using Pt1/FeOx. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 634641,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1095
  3. 3
    Nolte, P.; Stierle, A.; Jin-Phillipp, N.; Kasper, N.; Schulli, T.; Dosch, H. Shape Changes of Supported Rh Nanoparticles During Oxidation and Reduction Cycles. Science 2008, 321, 16541658,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1160845
  4. 4
    Liu, L.; Corma, A. Metal Catalysts for Heterogeneous Catalysis: From Single Atoms to Nanoclusters and Nanoparticles. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 49815079,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00776
  5. 5
    Nesselberger, M.; Roefzaad, M.; Fayçal Hamou, R.; Ulrich Biedermann, P.; Schweinberger, F. F.; Kunz, S.; Schloegl, K.; Wiberg, G. K.; Ashton, S.; Heiz, U. The Effect of Particle Proximity on the Oxygen Reduction Rate of Size-Selected Platinum Clusters. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 919924,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3712
  6. 6
    Turner, M.; Golovko, V. B.; Vaughan, O. P.; Abdulkin, P.; Berenguer-Murcia, A.; Tikhov, M. S.; Johnson, B. F.; Lambert, R. M. Selective Oxidation with Dioxygen by Gold Nanoparticle Catalysts Derived from 55-Atom Clusters. Nature 2008, 454, 981983,  DOI: 10.1038/nature07194
  7. 7
    Wang, A.; Li, J.; Zhang, T. Heterogeneous Single-Atom Catalysis. Nature Rev. Chem. 2018, 2, 6581,  DOI: 10.1038/s41570-018-0010-1
  8. 8
    Dvořák, F.; Farnesi Camellone, M.; Tovt, A.; Tran, N. D.; Negreiros, F. R.; Vorokhta, M.; Skála, T.; Matolínová, I.; Mysliveček, J.; Matolín, V. Creating Single-Atom Pt-Ceria Catalysts by Surface Step Decoration. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10801,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10801
  9. 9
    Yang, X. F.; Wang, A.; Qiao, B.; Li, J.; Liu, J.; Zhang, T. Single-Atom Catalysts: A New Frontier in Heterogeneous Catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 17401748,  DOI: 10.1021/ar300361m
  10. 10
    Grützmacher, H. Cooperating Ligands in Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 18141818,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200704654
  11. 11
    Boyer, J. L.; Rochford, J.; Tsai, M. K.; Muckerman, J. T.; Fujita, E. Ruthenium Complexes with Non-Innocent Ligands: Electron Distribution and Implications for Catalysis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010, 254, 309330,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.09.006
  12. 12
    Cargnello, M.; Jaén, J. D.; Garrido, J. H.; Bakhmutsky, K.; Montini, T.; Gámez, J. C.; Gorte, R.; Fornasiero, P. Exceptional Activity for Methane Combustion over Modular Pd@CeO2 Subunits on Functionalized Al2O3. Science 2012, 337, 713717,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1222887
  13. 13
    Bruix, A.; Rodriguez, J. A.; Ramírez, P. J.; Senanayake, S. D.; Evans, J.; Park, J. B.; Stacchiola, D.; Liu, P.; Hrbek, J.; Illas, F. A New Type of Strong Metal–Support Interaction and the Production of H2 through the Transformation of Water on Pt/CeO2(111) and Pt/CeOx/TiO2(110) Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 89688974,  DOI: 10.1021/ja302070k
  14. 14
    Su, Y. Q.; Liu, J. X.; Filot, I. A. W.; Hensen, E. J. M. Theoretical Study of Ripening Mechanisms of Pd Clusters on Ceria. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 94569462,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03555
  15. 15
    Negreiros, F. R.; Fabris, S. Role of Cluster Morphology in the Dynamics and Reactivity of Subnanometer Pt Clusters Supported on Ceria Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 2101421020,  DOI: 10.1021/jp506404z
  16. 16
    Hansen, T. W.; DeLaRiva, A. T.; Challa, S. R.; Datye, A. K. Sintering of Catalytic Nanoparticles: Particle Migration or Ostwald Ripening?. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 17201730,  DOI: 10.1021/ar3002427
  17. 17
    Wang, C.; Gu, X. K.; Yan, H.; Lin, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, D.; Li, W. X.; Lu, J. Water-Mediated Mars–Van Krevelen Mechanism for CO Oxidation on Ceria-Supported Single-Atom Pt Catalyst. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 887891,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02685
  18. 18
    Jones, J.; Xiong, H.; DeLaRiva, A. T.; Peterson, E. J.; Pham, H.; Challa, S. R.; Qi, G.; Oh, S.; Wiebenga, M. H.; Hernández, X. I. P. Thermally Stable Single-AtomPlatinum-on-Ceria Catalysts via Atom Trapping. Science 2016, 353, 150154,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf8800
  19. 19
    Bruix, A.; Lykhach, Y.; Matolínová, I.; Neitzel, A.; Skála, T.; Tsud, N.; Vorokhta, M.; Stetsovych, V.; Ševčíková, K.; Mysliveček, J. Maximum Noble Metal Efficiency in Catalytic Materials: Atomically Dispersed Surface Platinum. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1052510530,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201402342
  20. 20
    Liu, J. C.; Wang, Y. G.; Li, J. Toward Rational Design of Oxide-Supported Single-Atom Catalysts: Atomic Dispersion of Gold on Ceria. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 61906199,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b01602
  21. 21
    Ouyang, R.; Liu, J. X.; Li, W. X. Atomistic Theory of Ostwald Ripening and Disintegration of Supported Metal Particles under Reaction Conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 17601771,  DOI: 10.1021/ja3087054
  22. 22
    Berkó, A.; Solymosi, F. Adsorption-Induced Structural Changes of Rh Supported by TiO2(110)-(1× 2): an STM Study. J. Catal. 1999, 183, 91101,  DOI: 10.1006/jcat.1998.2368
  23. 23
    Goldsmith, B. R.; Sanderson, E. D.; Ouyang, R.; Li, W. X. CO-and NO-Induced Disintegration and Redispersion of Three-Way Catalysts Rhodium, Palladium, and Platinum: An ab Initio Thermodynamics Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 95889597,  DOI: 10.1021/jp502201f
  24. 24
    Suzuki, A.; Inada, Y.; Yamaguchi, A.; Chihara, T.; Yuasa, M.; Nomura, M.; Iwasawa, Y. Time Scale and Elementary Steps of CO-Induced Disintegration of Surface Rhodium Clusters. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 47954799,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200352318
  25. 25
    Berko, A.; Szökő, J.; Solymosi, F. Effect of CO on the Morphology of Pt Nanoparticles Supported on TiO2(110)-(1× n).. Surf. Sci. 2004, 566, 337342,  DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2004.05.065
  26. 26
    Stamatakis, M.; Vlachos, D. G. A Graph-Theoretical Kinetic Monte Carlo Framework for on-Lattice Chemical Kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 214115,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3596751
  27. 27
    Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Ab initio Molecular-Dynamics Simulation of the Liquid-Metal–Amorphous-Semiconductor Transition in Germanium. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1994, 49, 14251,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251
  28. 28
    Blöchl, P. E. Projector Augmented-Wave Method. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1994, 50, 17953,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953
  29. 29
    Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation mMade Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
  30. 30
    Dudarev, S.; Botton, G.; Savrasov, S.; Humphreys, C.; Sutton, A. Electron-Energy-Loss Spectra and the Structural Stability of Nickel Oxide: An LSDA+ U study. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1998, 57, 1505,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505
  31. 31
    Fabris, S.; de Gironcoli, S.; Baroni, S.; Vicario, G.; Balducci, G. Reply to “Comment on ‘Taming Multiple Valency with Density Functionals: A Case Study of Defective Ceria’. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 72, 237102,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.237102
  32. 32
    Cococcioni, M.; De Gironcoli, S. Linear Response Approach to the Calculation of the Effective Interaction Parameters in the LDA+ U Method. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 71, 035105,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.035105
  33. 33
    Castleton, C.; Kullgren, J.; Hermansson, K. Tuning LDA+ U for Electron Localization and Structure at Oxygen Vacancies in Ceria. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127, 244704,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2800015
  34. 34
    Da Silva, J. L.; Ganduglia-Pirovano, M. V.; Sauer, J.; Bayer, V.; Kresse, G. Hybrid Functionals Ppplied to Rare-Earth Oxides: The Example of Ceria. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2007, 75, 045121,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.045121
  35. 35
    Henkelman, G.; Jónsson, H. Improved Tangent Estimate in the Nudged Elastic Band Method for Finding Minimum Energy Paths and Saddle Points. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 99789985,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1323224
  36. 36
    Sheppard, D.; Terrell, R.; Henkelman, G. Optimization Methods for Finding Minimum Energy Paths. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 134106,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2841941
  37. 37
    Stamatakis, M. Zacros: Advanced Lattice-KMC Simulation Made Easy; http://www.e-lucid.com/i/software/material_modelling/Zacros.html.
  38. 38
    Reuter, K.; Scheffler, M. First-Principles Kinetic Monte Carlo Simulations for Heterogeneous Catalysis: Application to the CO Oxidation at RuO2(110). Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2006, 73, 045433,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.045433
  39. 39
    Pineda, M.; Stamatakis, M. Beyond Mean-Field Approximations for Accurate and Computationally Efficient Models of on-Lattice Chemical Kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 147, 024105,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4991690
  40. 40
    Eyring, H. The Activated Complex in Chemical Reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 1935, 3, 107115,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1749604
  41. 41
    Piccinin, S.; Stamatakis, M. CO Oxidation on Pd (111): a First-Principles-Based Kinetic Monte Carlo Study. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 21432152,  DOI: 10.1021/cs500377j
  42. 42
    Peleš, S.; Munsky, B.; Khammash, M. Reduction and Solution of the Chemical Master Equation using Time Scale Separation and Finite State Projection. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 204104,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2397685
  43. 43
    Stamatakis, M.; Vlachos, D. G. Unraveling the Complexity of Catalytic Reactions via Kinetic Monte Carlo simulation: Current Status and Frontiers. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 26482663,  DOI: 10.1021/cs3005709
  44. 44
    Stamatakis, M.; Vlachos, D. G. Equivalence of on-Lattice Stochastic Chemical Kinetics with the Well-Mixed Chemical Master Equation in the Limit of Fast Diffusion. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2011, 35, 26022610,  DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.05.008
  45. 45
    Boyer, L.; Broughton, J. Statics and Dynamics of Icosahedrally Twinned and Single-Crystal FCC Clusters. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1990, 42, 11461,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.11461
  46. 46
    Vlachos, D. G.; Schmidt, L. D.; Aris, R. Structures of Small Metal Clusters. i. Low Temperature Behavior. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 68806890,  DOI: 10.1063/1.462582
  47. 47
    Beniya, A.; Isomura, N.; Hirata, H.; Watanabe, Y. Low Temperature Adsorption and Site-Conversion Process of CO on the Ni(111) Surface. Surf. Sci. 2012, 606, 18301836,  DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2012.07.026
  48. 48
    Ge, Q.; King, D. Surface Diffusion Potential Energy Surfaces from First Principles: CO Chemisorbed on Pt{110}. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 94619464,  DOI: 10.1063/1.480275
  49. 49
    Abild-Pedersen, F.; Andersson, M. CO Adsorption Energies on Metals with Correction for High Coordination Adsorption Sites–A Density Functional Study. Surf. Sci. 2007, 601, 17471753,  DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2007.01.052
  50. 50
    Feibelman, P. J.; Hammer, B.; Nørskov, J. K.; Wagner, F.; Scheffler, M.; Stumpf, R.; Watwe, R.; Dumesic, J. The CO/Pt (111) Puzzle. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 40184025,  DOI: 10.1021/jp002302t
  51. 51
    Winterbottom, W. Equilibrium Shape of a Small Particle in Contact with a Foreign Substrate. Acta Metall. 1967, 15, 303310,  DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(67)90206-4
  52. 52
    Longwitz, S. R.; Schnadt, J.; Vestergaard, E. K.; Vang, R. T.; Lægsgaard, E.; Stensgaard, I.; Brune, H.; Besenbacher, F. High-Coverage Structures of Carbon Monoxide Adsorbed on Pt(111) Studied by High-Pressure Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 1449714502,  DOI: 10.1021/jp0492218
  53. 53
    Ertl, G.; Neumann, M.; Streit, K. Chemisorption of CO on the Pt(111) Surface. Surf. Sci. 1977, 64, 393410,  DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(77)90052-8
  54. 54
    Kruse Vestergaard, E. K.; Thostrup, P.; An, T.; Lægsgaard, E.; Stensgaard, I.; Hammer, B.; Besenbacher, F. Comment on “High Pressure Adsorbate Structures Studied by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: CO on Pt(111) in Equilibrium with the Gas Phase. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 259601,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.259601
  55. 55
    Parkinson, G. S.; Novotny, Z.; Argentero, G.; Schmid, M.; Pavelec, J.; Kosak, R.; Blaha, P.; Diebold, U. Carbon Monoxide-Induced Adatom Sintering in a Pd–Fe3O4 Model Catalyst. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 724728,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3667
  56. 56
    Teschner, D.; Wootsch, A.; Pozdnyakova-Tellinger, O.; Kröhnert, J.; Vass, E.; Hävecker, M.; Zafeiratos, S.; Schnörch, P.; Jentoft, P.; Knop-Gericke, A. Partial Pressure Dependent in Situ Spectroscopic Study on the Preferential CO Oxidation in Hydrogen (PROX) over Pt/ceria Catalysts. J. Catal. 2007, 249, 318327,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2007.05.010
  57. 57
    Wadayama, T.; Todoroki, N.; Yamada, Y.; Sugawara, T.; Miyamoto, K.; Iijama, Y. Oxygen Reduction Reaction Activities of Ni/Pt(111) Model Catalysts Fabricated by Molecular Beam Epitaxy. Electrochem. Commun. 2010, 12, 11121115,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.05.042
  58. 58
    Heyden, B. E.; Bradshaw, A. M. The Adsorption of CO on Pt(111) Studied by Infrared-Reflection-Adsorption Spectroscopy. Surf. Sci. 1983, 125, 787802,  DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6028(83)80060-0
  59. 59
    McCrea, K.; Parker, J. S.; Chen, P.; Somorjai, G. Surface Structure Sensitivity of High-Pressure CO Dissociation on Pt(557), Pt(100) and Pt(111) Using Sum Frequency Generation Surface Vibrational Spectroscopy. Surf. Sci. 2001, 494, 238250,  DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01469-8
  60. 60
    Gajdoš, M.; Eichler, A.; Hafner, J. CO Adsorption on Close-Packed Transition and Noble Metal Surfaces: Trends from ab initio Calculations. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2004, 16, 1141,  DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/16/8/001
  61. 61
    Bazin, P.; Saur, O.; Lavalley, J.; Daturi, M.; Blanchard, G. FT-IR Study of CO Adsorption on Pt/CeO2: Characterisation and Structural Rearrangement of Small Pt Particles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 187194,  DOI: 10.1039/b414159h
  62. 62
    Pozdnyakova-Tellinger, O.; Teschner, D.; Kröhnert, J.; Jentoft, F. C.; Knop-Gericke, A.; Schlögl, R.; Wootsch, A. Surface Water-Assisted Preferential CO Oxidation on Pt/CeO2 Catalyst. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 54265431,  DOI: 10.1021/jp0669862
  63. 63
    Ding, K.; Gulec, A.; Johnson, A. M.; Schweitzer, N. M.; Stucky, G. D.; Marks, L. D.; Stair, P. C. Identification of Active Sites in CO Oxidation and Water-Gas Shift over Supported Pt Catalysts. Science 2015, 350, 189192,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aac6368
  64. 64
    Moses-DeBusk, M.; Yoon, M.; Allard, L. F.; Mullins, D. R.; Wu, Z.; Yang, X.; Veith, G.; Stocks, G. M.; Narula, C. K. CO Oxidation on Supported Single Pt Atoms: Experimental and ab initio Density Functional Studies of CO Interaction with Pt atom on θ-Al2O3(010) Surface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1263412645,  DOI: 10.1021/ja401847c
  65. 65
    Wu, T.; Pan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Miao, Z.; Zhang, B.; Li, J.; Yang, X. Investigation of the Redispersion of Pt Nanoparticles on Polyhedral Ceria Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 24792483,  DOI: 10.1021/jz500839u
  66. 66
    Su, Y. Q.; Filot, I. A. W.; Liu, J. X.; Hensen, E. J. M. Stable Pd-Doped Ceria Structures for CH4 Activation and CO Oxidation. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 7580,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b03295
  67. 67
    Su, Y. Q.; Liu, J. X.; Filot, I. A. W.; Zhang, L.; Hensen, E. J. M. Highly Active and Stable CH4 Oxidation by Substitution of Ce4+ by two Pd2+ Ions in CeO2(111). ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 65526559,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b01477
  68. 68
    Kopelent, R.; van Bokhoven, J. A.; Szlachetko, J.; Edebeli, J.; Paun, C.; Nachtegaal, M.; Safonova, O. V. Catalytically Active and Spectator Ce3+ in Ceria-Supported Metal Catalysts. Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 88528855,  DOI: 10.1002/ange.201503022

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 102 publications.

  1. Yaqi Qu, Hualiang An, Xinqiang Zhao, Yanji Wang. Noble Metal-Coated Cu Nanoparticle Catalysts for Selective Hydrogenation of Nitrobenzene: Modifying Properties of Noble Metal. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2024, 7 (16) , 19457-19465. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.4c03340
  2. Sampyo Hong, Duy Le, Wei Tan, Shaohua Xie, Fudong Liu, Talat S. Rahman. Rate-Determining Steps in CO Oxidation on Pt Single Atom Sites on CeO2 Surfaces. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2024, 128 (32) , 13422-13431. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c00723
  3. Giovanni Di Liberto, Livia Giordano, Gianfranco Pacchioni. Predicting the Stability of Single-Atom Catalysts in Electrochemical Reactions. ACS Catalysis 2024, 14 (1) , 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.3c04801
  4. Mina Taleblou, Matteo Farnesi Camellone, Stefano Fabris, Simone Piccinin. CO Oxidation over Platinum Nanoclusters: Unraveling the Role of the Cluster Size and the Supporting Surface. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2023, 127 (43) , 21132-21149. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c05714
  5. Jonas Amsler, Philipp N. Plessow, Felix Studt, Tomáš Bučko. Anharmonic Correction to Free Energy Barriers from DFT-Based Molecular Dynamics Using Constrained Thermodynamic Integration. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2023, 19 (9) , 2455-2468. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00169
  6. Chuanmin Ding, Qingqing Gu, Li-Juan Yu, Shaocheng Zhang, Yafeng Zhang, Zili Ma, Yuanyuan Meng, Hengxuan Zhang, Tao Wang, Junwen Wang, Lichao Ma, Gangsen Li, Bing Yang, Tao Zhang. Reversible Transformation and Distribution Determination of Diverse Pt Single-Atom Species. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (4) , 2523-2531. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c12106
  7. Tao Ban, Xi-Yang Yu, Hao-Zhe Kang, Zheng-Qing Huang, Jun Li, Chun-Ran Chang. Design of SA-FLP Dual Active Sites for Nonoxidative Coupling of Methane. ACS Catalysis 2023, 13 (2) , 1299-1309. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.2c04479
  8. Jeremy Hu, Eun Mi Kim, Michael J. Janik, Konstantinos Alexopoulos. Hydrogen Activation and Spillover on Anatase TiO2-Supported Ag Single-Atom Catalysts. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2022, 126 (17) , 7482-7491. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c01670
  9. Wantong Zhao, Zun Guan, Debao Li, Baojun Wang, Maohong Fan, Riguang Zhang. Syngas Conversion to C2 Species over WC and M/WC (M = Cu or Rh) Catalysts: Identifying the Function of Surface Termination and Supported Metal Type. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14 (17) , 19491-19504. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c02217
  10. Alexandre C. Foucher, Shengsong Yang, Daniel J. Rosen, Jennifer D. Lee, Renjing Huang, Zhiqiao Jiang, Francisco G. Barrera, Kelly Chen, George G. Hollyer, Cynthia M. Friend, Raymond J. Gorte, Christopher B. Murray, Eric A. Stach. Synthesis and Characterization of Core-Shell Cu-Ru, Cu-Rh, and Cu-Ir Nanoparticles. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (17) , 7919-7928. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c02538
  11. Baljeet Singh, Manoj B. Gawande, Arun D. Kute, Rajender S. Varma, Paolo Fornasiero, Peter McNeice, Rajenahally V. Jagadeesh, Matthias Beller, Radek Zbořil. Single-Atom (Iron-Based) Catalysts: Synthesis and Applications. Chemical Reviews 2021, 121 (21) , 13620-13697. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00158
  12. Gerhard R. Wittreich, Geun Ho Gu, Daniel J. Robinson, Markos A. Katsoulakis, Dionisios G. Vlachos. Uncertainty Quantification and Error Propagation in the Enthalpy and Entropy of Surface Reactions Arising from a Single DFT Functional. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (33) , 18187-18196. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c04754
  13. Yubing Lu, Shulan Zhou, Chun-Te Kuo, Deepak Kunwar, Coogan Thompson, Adam S. Hoffman, Alexey Boubnov, Sen Lin, Abhaya K. Datye, Hua Guo, Ayman M. Karim. Unraveling the Intermediate Reaction Complexes and Critical Role of Support-Derived Oxygen Atoms in CO Oxidation on Single-Atom Pt/CeO2. ACS Catalysis 2021, 11 (14) , 8701-8715. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c01900
  14. Jonas Amsler, Philipp N. Plessow, Felix Studt, Tomáš Bučko. Anharmonic Correction to Adsorption Free Energy from DFT-Based MD Using Thermodynamic Integration. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2021, 17 (2) , 1155-1169. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01022
  15. Youchao Kong, Di Liu, Haoqiang Ai, Kin Ho Lo, Shuangpeng Wang, Hui Pan. Theoretical Screening of Single Atoms Supported on Two-Dimensional Nb2CN2 for Nitrogen Fixation. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2020, 3 (11) , 11274-11281. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c02380
  16. Yifan Wang, Ya-Qiong Su, Emiel J. M. Hensen, Dionisios G. Vlachos. Finite-Temperature Structures of Supported Subnanometer Catalysts Inferred via Statistical Learning and Genetic Algorithm-Based Optimization. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (10) , 13995-14007. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c06472
  17. Zhaozhuo Yu, Hongguo Wu, Yan Li, Yufei Xu, Hu Li, Song Yang. Advances in Heterogeneously Catalytic Degradation of Biomass Saccharides with Ordered-Nanoporous Materials. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2020, 59 (39) , 16970-16986. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c01625
  18. Kang Rui Garrick Lim, Albertus D. Handoko, Srinivasa Kartik Nemani, Brian Wyatt, Hai-Ying Jiang, Junwang Tang, Babak Anasori, Zhi Wei Seh. Rational Design of Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Carbide/Nitride (MXene) Hybrids and Nanocomposites for Catalytic Energy Storage and Conversion. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (9) , 10834-10864. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c05482
  19. Jonas Amsler, Bidyut B. Sarma, Giovanni Agostini, Gonzalo Prieto, Philipp N. Plessow, Felix Studt. Prospects of Heterogeneous Hydroformylation with Supported Single Atom Catalysts. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (11) , 5087-5096. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b12171
  20. Xin Liu, Meng Xu, Lingyun Wan, Hongdan Zhu, Kexin Yao, Roberto Linguerri, Gilberte Chambaud, Yu Han, Changgong Meng. Superior Catalytic Performance of Atomically Dispersed Palladium on Graphene in CO Oxidation. ACS Catalysis 2020, 10 (5) , 3084-3093. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b04840
  21. Yucong Huang, Jingjing Xiong, Zhigang Zou, Zhongxin Chen. Emerging Strategies for the Synthesis of Correlated Single Atom Catalysts. Advanced Materials 2025, 37 (2) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202312182
  22. Kehao Zhang, Yuran Han, Beibei Wang, Huanhuan Shi, Hailong Wang, Shixiang Gao, Qingguo Huang. Tailoring of orderly CeO2/Pt loaded Ti4O7 reactive electrochemical membranes for efficient electrooxidation of antimicrobial dichlorophen. Chemical Engineering Journal 2024, 496 , 153969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.153969
  23. Dongyuan Liu, Houyu Zhu, Xiaoxiao Gong, Yucheng Fan, Zhennan Liu, Xiaohan Li, Xin Wang, Wen Zhao, Hao Ren, Wenyue Guo. Boosting CO oxidation performance via reaction-induced single-atom active site: DFT and microkinetic investigation of a unified CO oxidation mechanism on Gd-doped ceria supported copper catalysts. Journal of Rare Earths 2024, 358 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jre.2024.09.015
  24. Zeyi Zhang, Wei Wu, Suhao Chen, Zichen Wang, Yangyang Tan, Wei Chen, Fei Guo, Runzhe Chen, Niancai Cheng. Directed Dual Charge Pumping Tunes the d ‐Orbital Configuration of Pt Cluster Boosting Hydrogen Evolution Kinetic. Small 2024, 20 (22) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202307135
  25. Dongyuan Liu, Houyu Zhu, Xiaoxiao Gong, Saifei Yuan, Hao Ma, Ping He, Yucheng Fan, Wen Zhao, Hao Ren, Wenyue Guo. Understanding and controlling the formation of single-atom site from supported Cu10 cluster by tuning CeO2 reducibility: Theoretical insight into the Gd-doping effect on electronic metal-support interaction. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2024, 661 , 720-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2024.01.174
  26. Tao Ban, Xi-Yang Yu, Hai-Kuo Tian, Zheng-Qing Huang, Chun-Ran Chang. One-step conversion of methane and formaldehyde to ethanol over SA-FLP dual-active-site catalysts: A DFT study. Chinese Chemical Letters 2024, 35 (4) , 108549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108549
  27. Laihao Liu, Tiankai Chen, Zhongxin Chen. Understanding the Dynamic Aggregation in Single‐Atom Catalysis. Advanced Science 2024, 11 (13) https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202308046
  28. Cheoulwoo Oh, Chulwan Lim, Man Ho Han, Kwan-Young Lee, Jae-Young Choi, Keun Hwa Chae, Hyung-Suk Oh, Woong Hee Lee. Observing N in Co-Nx-C during cathodic reaction via operando X-ray spectroscopy. Applied Surface Science 2024, 648 , 158991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.158991
  29. Liping Liu, Coogan B. Thompson, Tianyou Mou, Ayman M. Karim, Hongliang Xin. Elucidation of site structures and CO oxidation kinetics of the Ir1/TiO2 single-atom catalyst. Chem Catalysis 2024, 4 (2) , 100900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.checat.2024.100900
  30. Haoyu Liu, Yanran Cui, Minglu Zhu, Yugang Fu, Yue Sun, Zhen Meng, Bo Peng, Lei Nie. Incorporation of Ag on stable Pt/CeO2 for low-temperature active and high-temperature stable CO oxidation catalyst. Molecular Catalysis 2024, 553 , 113704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2023.113704
  31. Shedrack G. Akpe, Sun Hee Choi, Hyung Chul Ham. First-principles study on the design of nickel based bimetallic catalysts for xylose to xylitol conversion. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2023, 26 (1) , 352-364. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CP03503D
  32. Giovanni Di Liberto, Gianfranco Pacchioni. Modeling Single‐Atom Catalysis. Advanced Materials 2023, 35 (46) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202307150
  33. Xinyi Duan, Yu Han, Beien Zhu, Yi Gao. Modelling of metal nanoparticles’ structures and dynamics under reaction conditions. Materials Today Catalysis 2023, 3 , 100032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcata.2023.100032
  34. Wei Liu, Yiwen Zhang, Mengyan Wang, Hui Sheng, Ben Wang, Huafang Li, Yanxia Zhao, Liguo Wang, Guozhu Chen, Zhongpeng Wang. The coupling synergy of active Pt species and oxygen vacancy induced by PtCu for enhanced performance towards the removal of NO and CO. Journal of Catalysis 2023, 426 , 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2023.07.005
  35. Weijie Yang, Binghui Zhou, Liugang Chen, Ruiyang Shi, Hao Li, Xiaoshuo Liu, Zhengyang Gao. Coordination engineering for single-atom catalysts in bifunctional oxidation NO and mercury. Fuel 2023, 349 , 128751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128751
  36. Shiyan Cao, Sulei Hu, Wei-Xue Li. First-principles thermodynamics study of CO/OH induced disintegration of precious metal nanoparticles on TiO2(110). Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics 2023, 36 (4) , 411-418. https://doi.org/10.1063/1674-0068/cjcp2207111
  37. XueQian Xiao, Xiao Hu, Qiming Liu, Yuling Zhang, Guo-Jun Zhang, Shaowei Chen. Single-atom nanozymes as promising catalysts for biosensing and biomedical applications. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers 2023, 10 (15) , 4289-4312. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3QI00430A
  38. Yingchong Huang, Shuxuan Liu, Tuyuan Zhu, Chunyan Zhou, Zhanguo Jiang, Xuehui Gao. Electrocatalytic Meralorganic Frameworks and OER Based on Metal-organic Frameworks and their Structure. 2023, 86-128. https://doi.org/10.2174/9789815136029123010005
  39. Juwon Kim, Danwon Lee, Chihyun Nam, Jinkyu Chung, Bonho Koo, Namdong Kim, Jongwoo Lim. Energy material analysis via in-situ/operando scanning transmission x-ray microscopy: A review. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 2023, 266 , 147337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elspec.2023.147337
  40. Dong Yun Shin, Dong-Hee Lim. DFT investigation into efficient transition metal single-atom catalysts supported on N-doped graphene for nitrate reduction reactions. Chemical Engineering Journal 2023, 468 , 143466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.143466
  41. Xiaoming Zhang, Zhangxun Xia, Huanqiao Li, Shansheng Yu, Suli Wang, Gongquan Sun. Structure evolution and durability of Metal-Nitrogen-Carbon (M = Co, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ir) based oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalyst: A theoretical study. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2023, 640 , 170-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.02.103
  42. Shedrack G. Akpe, Sun Hee Choi, Hyung Chul Ham. Direct C–C bond scission of xylitol to ethylene and propylene glycol precursors using single-atom catalysts (SACs) anchored on MgO. APL Materials 2023, 11 (5) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0146265
  43. Leilei Wang, Hengwei Wang, Junling Lu. Local chemical environment effect in single-atom catalysis. Chem Catalysis 2023, 3 (4) , 100492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.checat.2022.100492
  44. Yong Wu, Huimin Guo, Xin Liu, Changgong Meng. Evolution of Graphene Supported Ru N (N=1–4) Clusters in CO Atmosphere: A First‐Principles Investigation. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry 2023, 26 (9) https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.202200719
  45. Yu Yin, Lei Shi, Shu Zhang, Xiaoguang Duan, Jinqiang Zhang, Hongqi Sun, Shaobin Wang. Two−dimensional nanomaterials confined single atoms: New opportunities for environmental remediation. Nano Materials Science 2023, 5 (1) , 15-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoms.2022.07.001
  46. Eunji Kang, Jungwoo Choi, Hyuk Choi, Jieun Yun, Ju Hyeok Lee, Mi Yoo, Chunjoong Kim, Hyuck Mo Lee, Hyun You Kim. Gold single-atoms confined at the CeO x -TiO 2 interfaces with enhanced low-temperature activity toward CO oxidation. Nanotechnology 2023, 34 (4) , 045703. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ac9b61
  47. Zhuochun Huang, Yingying Cao, Dandan Chen, Li-Long Zhang, Hu Li. Mechanistic insight into surface oxygen species of the polyoxometalate-supported Pd single-atom catalysts for highly efficient CO oxidation. Molecular Catalysis 2023, 534 , 112802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2022.112802
  48. Xilin Zhang, Wenli Kang, Xiaodong Li, Qianqian Peng, Zongxian Yang, Weichao Wang. A density functional theory study of the CO oxidation on Pt1 supported on PtX2 (X = S, Se, Te). Applied Surface Science 2023, 609 , 155341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155341
  49. Mingzhi Wang, Yige Zhang, Zhuangzhuang Wu, Yanping Zheng, Zhaohui Zhou, Weizheng Weng. Redox dynamics of platinum species on CeO2 during CO oxidation reaction. Chemical Engineering Journal 2022, 450 , 138171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.138171
  50. Wei Tan, Shaohua Xie, Duy Le, Weijian Diao, Meiyu Wang, Ke-Bin Low, Dave Austin, Sampyo Hong, Fei Gao, Lin Dong, Lu Ma, Steven N. Ehrlich, Talat S. Rahman, Fudong Liu. Fine-tuned local coordination environment of Pt single atoms on ceria controls catalytic reactivity. Nature Communications 2022, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34797-2
  51. Ping Yan, Song Shu, Xian Shi, Jianjun Li. Promotion effect of Au single-atom support graphene for CO oxidation. Chinese Chemical Letters 2022, 33 (11) , 4822-4827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2022.01.032
  52. Hai-Cai Huang, Ting-Ting Wang, Jun Li, Jing Chen, Yuxiang Bu, Shi-Bo Cheng. A strain-engineered self-intercalation Ta9Se12 based bifunctional single atom catalyst for oxygen evolution and reduction reactions. Applied Surface Science 2022, 602 , 154378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154378
  53. Haotian Zhang, Siyuan Fang, Yun Hang Hu. Recent advances in single-atom catalysts for CO oxidation. Catalysis Reviews 2022, 64 (3) , 491-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01614940.2020.1821443
  54. Zhongxin Chen, Jia Liu, Ming Joo Koh, Kian Ping Loh. Single‐Atom Catalysis: From Simple Reactions to the Synthesis of Complex Molecules. Advanced Materials 2022, 34 (25) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202103882
  55. Qi Wang, Juhui Gong, Heng Zhang, Qi-Yuan Fan, Lei Xue, Jinfang Wu, Jiaxin Li, Yan Wang, Ze Liu, Rui Gao, Shanghong Zeng. Co-promotion of two-type active sites: PtCu single-atom alloy and copper-ceria interface for preferential oxidation of CO. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2022, 306 , 121117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121117
  56. Huimin Liu, Yuqiao Li, Xavier Djitcheu, Lequan Liu. Recent advances in single-atom catalysts for thermally driven reactions. Chemical Engineering Science 2022, 255 , 117654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2022.117654
  57. Baisong Chang, Liqin Zhang, Shaolong Wu, Ziyan Sun, Zhen Cheng. Engineering single-atom catalysts toward biomedical applications. Chemical Society Reviews 2022, 51 (9) , 3688-3734. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CS00421B
  58. Doan Pham Minh, Philippe Serp. Introduction to Supported Metal Single Atom Catalysis. 2022, 1-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527830169.ch1
  59. Lu Chen, Xin-Ping Wu, Xue-Qing Gong. Unique catalytic mechanisms of methanol dehydrogenation at Pd-doped ceria: A DFT+U study. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2022, 156 (13) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0085913
  60. M. Pineda, M. Stamatakis. Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations for heterogeneous catalysis: Fundamentals, current status, and challenges. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2022, 156 (12) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0083251
  61. Yang Mu, Tingting Wang, Jian Zhang, Changgong Meng, Yifu Zhang, Zongkui Kou. Single-Atom Catalysts: Advances and Challenges in Metal-Support Interactions for Enhanced Electrocatalysis. Electrochemical Energy Reviews 2022, 5 (1) , 145-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-021-00124-4
  62. Ya-Qiong Su, Yan-Yang Qin, Tiantian Wu, De-Yin Wu. Structure sensitivity of ceria-supported Au catalysts for CO oxidation. Journal of Catalysis 2022, 407 , 353-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2022.02.008
  63. Yuxing Xu, Bei Li, Jiafei Zhang, Ge Bai, Xiaolong Zhang, Qinglan Hao, Yahao Wang, Xiaoshun Zhou, Botao Teng, Xingchen Liu. Exploration of Metal-Molecule interaction of subnanometric heterogeneous catalysts via simulated Raman spectrum. Applied Surface Science 2022, 579 , 152194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.152194
  64. Huimin Liu, Qinglei Liu, Yarong Wang, Yongfei Wang, Shulei Chou, Zhizhi Hu, Zhiqiang Zhang. Bifunctional carbon-based cathode catalysts for zinc-air battery: A review. Chinese Chemical Letters 2022, 33 (2) , 683-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.07.038
  65. Priyanka Aggarwal, Debasish Sarkar, Kamlendra Awasthi, Prashanth W. Menezes. Functional role of single-atom catalysts in electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution: Current developments and future challenges. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2022, 452 , 214289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214289
  66. Albert Bruix. Activating catalysts by adsorbate-induced reconstructions. Nature Catalysis 2022, 5 (2) , 84-85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-022-00742-1
  67. Subhajit Sarkar, Ashmita Biswas, Ramendra Sundar Dey. Oxygen reduction reaction by non-noble metal-based catalysts. 2022, 205-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88508-9.00005-7
  68. Min Chen, Jianhua Chen, Chuncheng Chen, Changbin Zhang, Hong He. Distinct photocatalytic charges separation pathway on CuOx modified rutile and anatase TiO2 under visible light. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2022, 300 , 120735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120735
  69. Jiaojiao Zhao, Yurong He, Fei Wang, Yusen Yang, Wentao Zheng, Chunfang Huo, Haijun Jiao, Yong Yang, Yongwang Li, Xiaodong Wen. A recyclable CoGa intermetallic compound catalyst for the hydroformylation reaction. Journal of Catalysis 2021, 404 , 244-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2021.09.031
  70. Shedrack G. Akpe, Sun Hee Choi, Hyung Chul Ham. Conversion of cyclic xylose into xylitol on Ru, Pt, Pd, Ni, and Rh catalysts: a density functional theory study. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2021, 23 (46) , 26195-26208. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CP04660H
  71. Gopal K. Dixit, Manish Kumar, Ankita Katiyar, Antonius P. J. Jansen, Alexander P. van Bavel, Ravi Agrawal, Prathamesh M. Shenai, Varadharajan Srinivasan. Unraveling the activity of iron carbide clusters embedded in silica for thermocatalytic conversion of methane. Catalysis Science & Technology 2021, 11 (22) , 7398-7411. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CY01229K
  72. Cheng Yang, Zongyan Zhao, Qingju Liu. Mechanistic insight into the dispersion behavior of single platinum atom on monolayer g-C3N4 in single-atom catalysts from density functional theory calculations. Applied Surface Science 2021, 566 , 150697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150697
  73. M.A. Salaev, A.A. Salaeva, T.S. Kharlamova, G.V. Mamontov. Pt–CeO2-based composites in environmental catalysis: A review. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2021, 295 , 120286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120286
  74. Yan‐Yang Qin, Ya‐Qiong Su. A DFT Study on Heterogeneous Pt/CeO 2 (110) Single Atom Catalysts for CO Oxidation. ChemCatChem 2021, 13 (17) , 3857-3863. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202100643
  75. Junwei Chen, Zuqiao Ou, Haixin Chen, Shuqin Song, Kun Wang, Yi Wang. Recent developments of nanocarbon based supports for PEMFCs electrocatalysts. Chinese Journal of Catalysis 2021, 42 (8) , 1297-1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63736-6
  76. Ilya Yu. Titov, Viktor S. Stroylov, PolinaV. Rusina, Igor V. Svitanko. Preliminary modelling as the first stage of targeted organic synthesis. Russian Chemical Reviews 2021, 90 (7) , 831-867. https://doi.org/10.1070/RCR5012
  77. Andrei I. Boronin, Elena M. Slavinskaya, Alberto Figueroba, Andrey I. Stadnichenko, Tatyana Yu. Kardash, Olga A. Stonkus, Elizaveta A. Fedorova, Valerii V. Muravev, Valery A. Svetlichnyi, Albert Bruix, Konstantin M. Neyman. CO oxidation activity of Pt/CeO2 catalysts below 0 °C: platinum loading effects. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2021, 286 , 119931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.119931
  78. Valery Muravev, Giulia Spezzati, Ya-Qiong Su, Alexander Parastaev, Fu-Kuo Chiang, Alessandro Longo, Carlos Escudero, Nikolay Kosinov, Emiel J. M. Hensen. Interface dynamics of Pd–CeO2 single-atom catalysts during CO oxidation. Nature Catalysis 2021, 4 (6) , 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-021-00621-1
  79. Ting‐Hsun Yang, Po‐Chun Han, I‐Ta Wang, Celine H. Chen, M. A. Majeed Khan, Cheng‐Yen Wen, Kevin C.‐W. Wu. Water‐Based Synthesis of Gold Single Atoms‐Embedded, Metal–Organic Frameworks‐Derived Nanoporous Carbon Nanoparticles with Enhanced Reduction Ability. Advanced Materials Interfaces 2021, 8 (8) https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202001638
  80. Baljeet Singh, Vikas Sharma, Rahul P. Gaikwad, Paolo Fornasiero, Radek Zbořil, Manoj B. Gawande. Single‐Atom Catalysts: A Sustainable Pathway for the Advanced Catalytic Applications. Small 2021, 17 (16) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202006473
  81. Bu-Tong Li, Jiao-Jiao Jiang, Lu-Lin Li, Ju Peng. Thermal stability and detonation character of nitroso-substituted derivatives of cubane. Molecular Physics 2021, 119 (6) , e1834157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2020.1834157
  82. Ya-Qiong Su, Long Zhang, Yifan Wang, Jin-Xun Liu, Valery Muravev, Konstantinos Alexopoulos, Ivo A. W. Filot, Dionisios G. Vlachos, Emiel J. M. Hensen. Stability of heterogeneous single-atom catalysts: a scaling law mapping thermodynamics to kinetics. npj Computational Materials 2020, 6 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-020-00411-6
  83. Lulu Li, Xin Chang, Xiaoyun Lin, Zhi-Jian Zhao, Jinlong Gong. Theoretical insights into single-atom catalysts. Chemical Society Reviews 2020, 49 (22) , 8156-8178. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS00795A
  84. Zhongxin Song, Lei Zhang, Kieran Doyle‐Davis, Xianzhu Fu, Jing‐Li Luo, Xueliang Sun. Recent Advances in MOF‐Derived Single Atom Catalysts for Electrochemical Applications. Advanced Energy Materials 2020, 10 (38) https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202001561
  85. Zhongxin Song, Ya‐Nan Zhu, Hanshuo Liu, Mohammad Norouzi Banis, Lei Zhang, Junjie Li, Kieran Doyle‐Davis, Ruying Li, Tsun‐Kong Sham, Lijun Yang, Alan Young, Gianluigi A. Botton, Li‐Min Liu, Xueliang Sun. Engineering the Low Coordinated Pt Single Atom to Achieve the Superior Electrocatalytic Performance toward Oxygen Reduction. Small 2020, 16 (43) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202003096
  86. Sikai Wang, Ning Yan. X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy: An Indispensable Tool to Study Single-Atom Catalysts. Synchrotron Radiation News 2020, 33 (5) , 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08940886.2020.1812354
  87. Minttu M. Kauppinen, Marko M. Melander, Karoliina Honkala. First-principles insight into CO hindered agglomeration of Rh and Pt single atoms on m -ZrO 2. Catalysis Science & Technology 2020, 10 (17) , 5847-5855. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CY00413H
  88. Francis Doherty, Hui Wang, Ming Yang, Bryan R. Goldsmith. Nanocluster and single-atom catalysts for thermocatalytic conversion of CO and CO 2. Catalysis Science & Technology 2020, 10 (17) , 5772-5791. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CY01316A
  89. Bolin Wang, Yuxue Yue, Chunxiao Jin, Jinyue Lu, Saisai Wang, Lu Yu, Lingling Guo, Rongrong Li, Zhong-Ting Hu, Zhiyan Pan, Jia Zhao, Xiaonian Li. Hydrochlorination of acetylene on single-atom Pd/N-doped carbon catalysts: Importance of pyridinic-N synergism. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2020, 272 , 118944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118944
  90. Haoxiang Xu, Daojian Cheng. First-principles-aided thermodynamic modeling of transition-metal heterogeneous catalysts: A review. Green Energy & Environment 2020, 5 (3) , 286-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2020.07.006
  91. Butong Li, Lulin Li, Ting Luo. Theoretical exploration about the thermal stability and detonation properties of nitro-substituted hypoxanthine. Journal of Molecular Modeling 2020, 26 (6) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-020-04391-8
  92. Ya-Qiong Su, Long Zhang, Valery Muravev, Emiel J.M. Hensen. Lattice oxygen activation in transition metal doped ceria. Chinese Journal of Catalysis 2020, 41 (6) , 977-984. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63468-6
  93. Mi Yoo, Young-Sang Yu, Hyunwoo Ha, Siwon Lee, Jin-Seok Choi, Sunyoung Oh, Eunji Kang, Hyuk Choi, Hyesung An, Kug-Seung Lee, Jeong Young Park, Richard Celestre, Matthew A. Marcus, Kasra Nowrouzi, Doug Taube, David A. Shapiro, WooChul Jung, Chunjoong Kim, Hyun You Kim. A tailored oxide interface creates dense Pt single-atom catalysts with high catalytic activity. Energy & Environmental Science 2020, 13 (4) , 1231-1239. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EE03492G
  94. Maksim Kulichenko, Nikita Fedik, Dmitry Steglenko, Ruslan M. Minyaev, Vladimir I. Minkin, Alexander I. Boldyrev. Periodic F-defects on the MgO surface as potential single-defect catalysts with non-linear optical properties. Chemical Physics 2020, 532 , 110680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2020.110680
  95. Jingyue Liu. Single-atom catalysis for a sustainable and greener future. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 2020, 22 , 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.01.004
  96. Ning Cao, Mao Fei Ran, Yanyan Feng, Wei Chu, Chengfa Jiang, Wenjing Sun, Congmei Chen. Density functional theory study of N-doping effect on the stability and activity of Pd/NCNT catalysts for heck reaction. Applied Surface Science 2020, 506 , 144960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144960
  97. Qiang Wan, Victor Fung, Sen Lin, Zili Wu, De-en Jiang. Perovskite-supported Pt single atoms for methane activation. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2020, 8 (8) , 4362-4368. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA11712A
  98. Weijie Yang, Mingliang Zhao, Xunlei Ding, Kai Ma, Chongchong Wu, Ian D. Gates, Zhengyang Gao. The effect of coordination environment on the kinetic and thermodynamic stability of single-atom iron catalysts. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2020, 22 (7) , 3983-3989. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CP05349B
  99. Huijing Xiang, Wei Feng, Yu Chen. Single‐Atom Catalysts in Catalytic Biomedicine. Advanced Materials 2020, 32 (8) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201905994
  100. Zhuole Lu, Shwetank Yadav, Chandra Veer Singh. Predicting aggregation energy for single atom bimetallic catalysts on clean and O* adsorbed surfaces through machine learning models. Catalysis Science & Technology 2020, 10 (1) , 86-98. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CY02070E
Load all citations

ACS Catalysis

Cite this: ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 4, 3289–3297
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b00252
Published March 5, 2019

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND.

Article Views

8910

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the relative stability of Pt SAs and NPs on CeO2 in the presence of adsorbed CO molecules.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) Computed CO adsorption energy on Pt(111) and Pt(100) facets as a function of the CO coverage and (b) CO coverage at given temperature and CO partial pressure for Pt(111).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Critical size diagrams of the supported Pt NPs with respect to the thermodynamic stability as a function of temperature and CO partial pressure relative to isolated Pt SAs (a) on the terrace of CeO2(111) with nonwetting and (b) wetting, (c) on the step-edges of CeO2(111), and (d) on the terrace of CeO2(100). Gray area relates to Pt NPs with less than 38 atoms, which were not considered in this study.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Pt SAs located at a CeO2(111) step before (a) and after (b) O2 dissociation, and (c–f) doped into the CeO2(111) surface (color code: white, Ce; gray, irrelevant O; red, relevant O; black, C; blue, Pt). (g) Ab initio-determined phase diagram of the Pt-doped CeO2(111) surface.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. CO oxidation pathways by Pt SAs on CeO2(111), on stepped CeO2(111), and doped in the CeO2(111) surface.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. (a) Arrhenius plot of the rate of CO oxidation on three types of Pt SA on ceria. (b–d) Steady-state coverages of dominant surface states of Pt SAs on CeO2(111) during CO oxidation (p = 0.1 atm, CO/O2 ratio = 2).

  • References


    This article references 68 other publications.

    1. 1
      Nie, L.; Mei, D.; Xiong, H.; Peng, B.; Ren, Z.; Hernandez, X. I. P.; DeLaRiva, A.; Wang, M.; Engelhard, M. H.; Kovarik, L. Activation of Surface Lattice Oxygen in Single-Atom Pt/CeO2 for Low-Temperature CO Oxidation. Science 2017, 358, 14191423,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aao2109
    2. 2
      Qiao, B.; Wang, A.; Yang, X.; Allard, L. F.; Jiang, Z.; Cui, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, T. Single-Atom Catalysis of CO Oxidation Using Pt1/FeOx. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 634641,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1095
    3. 3
      Nolte, P.; Stierle, A.; Jin-Phillipp, N.; Kasper, N.; Schulli, T.; Dosch, H. Shape Changes of Supported Rh Nanoparticles During Oxidation and Reduction Cycles. Science 2008, 321, 16541658,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1160845
    4. 4
      Liu, L.; Corma, A. Metal Catalysts for Heterogeneous Catalysis: From Single Atoms to Nanoclusters and Nanoparticles. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 49815079,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00776
    5. 5
      Nesselberger, M.; Roefzaad, M.; Fayçal Hamou, R.; Ulrich Biedermann, P.; Schweinberger, F. F.; Kunz, S.; Schloegl, K.; Wiberg, G. K.; Ashton, S.; Heiz, U. The Effect of Particle Proximity on the Oxygen Reduction Rate of Size-Selected Platinum Clusters. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 919924,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3712
    6. 6
      Turner, M.; Golovko, V. B.; Vaughan, O. P.; Abdulkin, P.; Berenguer-Murcia, A.; Tikhov, M. S.; Johnson, B. F.; Lambert, R. M. Selective Oxidation with Dioxygen by Gold Nanoparticle Catalysts Derived from 55-Atom Clusters. Nature 2008, 454, 981983,  DOI: 10.1038/nature07194
    7. 7
      Wang, A.; Li, J.; Zhang, T. Heterogeneous Single-Atom Catalysis. Nature Rev. Chem. 2018, 2, 6581,  DOI: 10.1038/s41570-018-0010-1
    8. 8
      Dvořák, F.; Farnesi Camellone, M.; Tovt, A.; Tran, N. D.; Negreiros, F. R.; Vorokhta, M.; Skála, T.; Matolínová, I.; Mysliveček, J.; Matolín, V. Creating Single-Atom Pt-Ceria Catalysts by Surface Step Decoration. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10801,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10801
    9. 9
      Yang, X. F.; Wang, A.; Qiao, B.; Li, J.; Liu, J.; Zhang, T. Single-Atom Catalysts: A New Frontier in Heterogeneous Catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 17401748,  DOI: 10.1021/ar300361m
    10. 10
      Grützmacher, H. Cooperating Ligands in Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 18141818,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200704654
    11. 11
      Boyer, J. L.; Rochford, J.; Tsai, M. K.; Muckerman, J. T.; Fujita, E. Ruthenium Complexes with Non-Innocent Ligands: Electron Distribution and Implications for Catalysis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010, 254, 309330,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.09.006
    12. 12
      Cargnello, M.; Jaén, J. D.; Garrido, J. H.; Bakhmutsky, K.; Montini, T.; Gámez, J. C.; Gorte, R.; Fornasiero, P. Exceptional Activity for Methane Combustion over Modular Pd@CeO2 Subunits on Functionalized Al2O3. Science 2012, 337, 713717,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1222887
    13. 13
      Bruix, A.; Rodriguez, J. A.; Ramírez, P. J.; Senanayake, S. D.; Evans, J.; Park, J. B.; Stacchiola, D.; Liu, P.; Hrbek, J.; Illas, F. A New Type of Strong Metal–Support Interaction and the Production of H2 through the Transformation of Water on Pt/CeO2(111) and Pt/CeOx/TiO2(110) Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 89688974,  DOI: 10.1021/ja302070k
    14. 14
      Su, Y. Q.; Liu, J. X.; Filot, I. A. W.; Hensen, E. J. M. Theoretical Study of Ripening Mechanisms of Pd Clusters on Ceria. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 94569462,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03555
    15. 15
      Negreiros, F. R.; Fabris, S. Role of Cluster Morphology in the Dynamics and Reactivity of Subnanometer Pt Clusters Supported on Ceria Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 2101421020,  DOI: 10.1021/jp506404z
    16. 16
      Hansen, T. W.; DeLaRiva, A. T.; Challa, S. R.; Datye, A. K. Sintering of Catalytic Nanoparticles: Particle Migration or Ostwald Ripening?. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 17201730,  DOI: 10.1021/ar3002427
    17. 17
      Wang, C.; Gu, X. K.; Yan, H.; Lin, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, D.; Li, W. X.; Lu, J. Water-Mediated Mars–Van Krevelen Mechanism for CO Oxidation on Ceria-Supported Single-Atom Pt Catalyst. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 887891,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02685
    18. 18
      Jones, J.; Xiong, H.; DeLaRiva, A. T.; Peterson, E. J.; Pham, H.; Challa, S. R.; Qi, G.; Oh, S.; Wiebenga, M. H.; Hernández, X. I. P. Thermally Stable Single-AtomPlatinum-on-Ceria Catalysts via Atom Trapping. Science 2016, 353, 150154,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf8800
    19. 19
      Bruix, A.; Lykhach, Y.; Matolínová, I.; Neitzel, A.; Skála, T.; Tsud, N.; Vorokhta, M.; Stetsovych, V.; Ševčíková, K.; Mysliveček, J. Maximum Noble Metal Efficiency in Catalytic Materials: Atomically Dispersed Surface Platinum. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1052510530,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201402342
    20. 20
      Liu, J. C.; Wang, Y. G.; Li, J. Toward Rational Design of Oxide-Supported Single-Atom Catalysts: Atomic Dispersion of Gold on Ceria. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 61906199,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b01602
    21. 21
      Ouyang, R.; Liu, J. X.; Li, W. X. Atomistic Theory of Ostwald Ripening and Disintegration of Supported Metal Particles under Reaction Conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 17601771,  DOI: 10.1021/ja3087054
    22. 22
      Berkó, A.; Solymosi, F. Adsorption-Induced Structural Changes of Rh Supported by TiO2(110)-(1× 2): an STM Study. J. Catal. 1999, 183, 91101,  DOI: 10.1006/jcat.1998.2368
    23. 23
      Goldsmith, B. R.; Sanderson, E. D.; Ouyang, R.; Li, W. X. CO-and NO-Induced Disintegration and Redispersion of Three-Way Catalysts Rhodium, Palladium, and Platinum: An ab Initio Thermodynamics Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 95889597,  DOI: 10.1021/jp502201f
    24. 24
      Suzuki, A.; Inada, Y.; Yamaguchi, A.; Chihara, T.; Yuasa, M.; Nomura, M.; Iwasawa, Y. Time Scale and Elementary Steps of CO-Induced Disintegration of Surface Rhodium Clusters. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 47954799,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200352318
    25. 25
      Berko, A.; Szökő, J.; Solymosi, F. Effect of CO on the Morphology of Pt Nanoparticles Supported on TiO2(110)-(1× n).. Surf. Sci. 2004, 566, 337342,  DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2004.05.065
    26. 26
      Stamatakis, M.; Vlachos, D. G. A Graph-Theoretical Kinetic Monte Carlo Framework for on-Lattice Chemical Kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 214115,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3596751
    27. 27
      Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Ab initio Molecular-Dynamics Simulation of the Liquid-Metal–Amorphous-Semiconductor Transition in Germanium. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1994, 49, 14251,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251
    28. 28
      Blöchl, P. E. Projector Augmented-Wave Method. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1994, 50, 17953,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953
    29. 29
      Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation mMade Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
    30. 30
      Dudarev, S.; Botton, G.; Savrasov, S.; Humphreys, C.; Sutton, A. Electron-Energy-Loss Spectra and the Structural Stability of Nickel Oxide: An LSDA+ U study. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1998, 57, 1505,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505
    31. 31
      Fabris, S.; de Gironcoli, S.; Baroni, S.; Vicario, G.; Balducci, G. Reply to “Comment on ‘Taming Multiple Valency with Density Functionals: A Case Study of Defective Ceria’. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 72, 237102,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.237102
    32. 32
      Cococcioni, M.; De Gironcoli, S. Linear Response Approach to the Calculation of the Effective Interaction Parameters in the LDA+ U Method. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 71, 035105,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.035105
    33. 33
      Castleton, C.; Kullgren, J.; Hermansson, K. Tuning LDA+ U for Electron Localization and Structure at Oxygen Vacancies in Ceria. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127, 244704,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2800015
    34. 34
      Da Silva, J. L.; Ganduglia-Pirovano, M. V.; Sauer, J.; Bayer, V.; Kresse, G. Hybrid Functionals Ppplied to Rare-Earth Oxides: The Example of Ceria. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2007, 75, 045121,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.045121
    35. 35
      Henkelman, G.; Jónsson, H. Improved Tangent Estimate in the Nudged Elastic Band Method for Finding Minimum Energy Paths and Saddle Points. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 99789985,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1323224
    36. 36
      Sheppard, D.; Terrell, R.; Henkelman, G. Optimization Methods for Finding Minimum Energy Paths. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 134106,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2841941
    37. 37
      Stamatakis, M. Zacros: Advanced Lattice-KMC Simulation Made Easy; http://www.e-lucid.com/i/software/material_modelling/Zacros.html.
    38. 38
      Reuter, K.; Scheffler, M. First-Principles Kinetic Monte Carlo Simulations for Heterogeneous Catalysis: Application to the CO Oxidation at RuO2(110). Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2006, 73, 045433,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.045433
    39. 39
      Pineda, M.; Stamatakis, M. Beyond Mean-Field Approximations for Accurate and Computationally Efficient Models of on-Lattice Chemical Kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 147, 024105,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4991690
    40. 40
      Eyring, H. The Activated Complex in Chemical Reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 1935, 3, 107115,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1749604
    41. 41
      Piccinin, S.; Stamatakis, M. CO Oxidation on Pd (111): a First-Principles-Based Kinetic Monte Carlo Study. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 21432152,  DOI: 10.1021/cs500377j
    42. 42
      Peleš, S.; Munsky, B.; Khammash, M. Reduction and Solution of the Chemical Master Equation using Time Scale Separation and Finite State Projection. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 204104,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2397685
    43. 43
      Stamatakis, M.; Vlachos, D. G. Unraveling the Complexity of Catalytic Reactions via Kinetic Monte Carlo simulation: Current Status and Frontiers. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 26482663,  DOI: 10.1021/cs3005709
    44. 44
      Stamatakis, M.; Vlachos, D. G. Equivalence of on-Lattice Stochastic Chemical Kinetics with the Well-Mixed Chemical Master Equation in the Limit of Fast Diffusion. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2011, 35, 26022610,  DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.05.008
    45. 45
      Boyer, L.; Broughton, J. Statics and Dynamics of Icosahedrally Twinned and Single-Crystal FCC Clusters. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1990, 42, 11461,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.11461
    46. 46
      Vlachos, D. G.; Schmidt, L. D.; Aris, R. Structures of Small Metal Clusters. i. Low Temperature Behavior. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 68806890,  DOI: 10.1063/1.462582
    47. 47
      Beniya, A.; Isomura, N.; Hirata, H.; Watanabe, Y. Low Temperature Adsorption and Site-Conversion Process of CO on the Ni(111) Surface. Surf. Sci. 2012, 606, 18301836,  DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2012.07.026
    48. 48
      Ge, Q.; King, D. Surface Diffusion Potential Energy Surfaces from First Principles: CO Chemisorbed on Pt{110}. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 94619464,  DOI: 10.1063/1.480275
    49. 49
      Abild-Pedersen, F.; Andersson, M. CO Adsorption Energies on Metals with Correction for High Coordination Adsorption Sites–A Density Functional Study. Surf. Sci. 2007, 601, 17471753,  DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2007.01.052
    50. 50
      Feibelman, P. J.; Hammer, B.; Nørskov, J. K.; Wagner, F.; Scheffler, M.; Stumpf, R.; Watwe, R.; Dumesic, J. The CO/Pt (111) Puzzle. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 40184025,  DOI: 10.1021/jp002302t
    51. 51
      Winterbottom, W. Equilibrium Shape of a Small Particle in Contact with a Foreign Substrate. Acta Metall. 1967, 15, 303310,  DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(67)90206-4
    52. 52
      Longwitz, S. R.; Schnadt, J.; Vestergaard, E. K.; Vang, R. T.; Lægsgaard, E.; Stensgaard, I.; Brune, H.; Besenbacher, F. High-Coverage Structures of Carbon Monoxide Adsorbed on Pt(111) Studied by High-Pressure Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 1449714502,  DOI: 10.1021/jp0492218
    53. 53
      Ertl, G.; Neumann, M.; Streit, K. Chemisorption of CO on the Pt(111) Surface. Surf. Sci. 1977, 64, 393410,  DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(77)90052-8
    54. 54
      Kruse Vestergaard, E. K.; Thostrup, P.; An, T.; Lægsgaard, E.; Stensgaard, I.; Hammer, B.; Besenbacher, F. Comment on “High Pressure Adsorbate Structures Studied by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: CO on Pt(111) in Equilibrium with the Gas Phase. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 259601,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.259601
    55. 55
      Parkinson, G. S.; Novotny, Z.; Argentero, G.; Schmid, M.; Pavelec, J.; Kosak, R.; Blaha, P.; Diebold, U. Carbon Monoxide-Induced Adatom Sintering in a Pd–Fe3O4 Model Catalyst. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 724728,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3667
    56. 56
      Teschner, D.; Wootsch, A.; Pozdnyakova-Tellinger, O.; Kröhnert, J.; Vass, E.; Hävecker, M.; Zafeiratos, S.; Schnörch, P.; Jentoft, P.; Knop-Gericke, A. Partial Pressure Dependent in Situ Spectroscopic Study on the Preferential CO Oxidation in Hydrogen (PROX) over Pt/ceria Catalysts. J. Catal. 2007, 249, 318327,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2007.05.010
    57. 57
      Wadayama, T.; Todoroki, N.; Yamada, Y.; Sugawara, T.; Miyamoto, K.; Iijama, Y. Oxygen Reduction Reaction Activities of Ni/Pt(111) Model Catalysts Fabricated by Molecular Beam Epitaxy. Electrochem. Commun. 2010, 12, 11121115,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.05.042
    58. 58
      Heyden, B. E.; Bradshaw, A. M. The Adsorption of CO on Pt(111) Studied by Infrared-Reflection-Adsorption Spectroscopy. Surf. Sci. 1983, 125, 787802,  DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6028(83)80060-0
    59. 59
      McCrea, K.; Parker, J. S.; Chen, P.; Somorjai, G. Surface Structure Sensitivity of High-Pressure CO Dissociation on Pt(557), Pt(100) and Pt(111) Using Sum Frequency Generation Surface Vibrational Spectroscopy. Surf. Sci. 2001, 494, 238250,  DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01469-8
    60. 60
      Gajdoš, M.; Eichler, A.; Hafner, J. CO Adsorption on Close-Packed Transition and Noble Metal Surfaces: Trends from ab initio Calculations. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2004, 16, 1141,  DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/16/8/001
    61. 61
      Bazin, P.; Saur, O.; Lavalley, J.; Daturi, M.; Blanchard, G. FT-IR Study of CO Adsorption on Pt/CeO2: Characterisation and Structural Rearrangement of Small Pt Particles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 187194,  DOI: 10.1039/b414159h
    62. 62
      Pozdnyakova-Tellinger, O.; Teschner, D.; Kröhnert, J.; Jentoft, F. C.; Knop-Gericke, A.; Schlögl, R.; Wootsch, A. Surface Water-Assisted Preferential CO Oxidation on Pt/CeO2 Catalyst. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 54265431,  DOI: 10.1021/jp0669862
    63. 63
      Ding, K.; Gulec, A.; Johnson, A. M.; Schweitzer, N. M.; Stucky, G. D.; Marks, L. D.; Stair, P. C. Identification of Active Sites in CO Oxidation and Water-Gas Shift over Supported Pt Catalysts. Science 2015, 350, 189192,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aac6368
    64. 64
      Moses-DeBusk, M.; Yoon, M.; Allard, L. F.; Mullins, D. R.; Wu, Z.; Yang, X.; Veith, G.; Stocks, G. M.; Narula, C. K. CO Oxidation on Supported Single Pt Atoms: Experimental and ab initio Density Functional Studies of CO Interaction with Pt atom on θ-Al2O3(010) Surface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1263412645,  DOI: 10.1021/ja401847c
    65. 65
      Wu, T.; Pan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Miao, Z.; Zhang, B.; Li, J.; Yang, X. Investigation of the Redispersion of Pt Nanoparticles on Polyhedral Ceria Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 24792483,  DOI: 10.1021/jz500839u
    66. 66
      Su, Y. Q.; Filot, I. A. W.; Liu, J. X.; Hensen, E. J. M. Stable Pd-Doped Ceria Structures for CH4 Activation and CO Oxidation. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 7580,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b03295
    67. 67
      Su, Y. Q.; Liu, J. X.; Filot, I. A. W.; Zhang, L.; Hensen, E. J. M. Highly Active and Stable CH4 Oxidation by Substitution of Ce4+ by two Pd2+ Ions in CeO2(111). ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 65526559,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b01477
    68. 68
      Kopelent, R.; van Bokhoven, J. A.; Szlachetko, J.; Edebeli, J.; Paun, C.; Nachtegaal, M.; Safonova, O. V. Catalytically Active and Spectator Ce3+ in Ceria-Supported Metal Catalysts. Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 88528855,  DOI: 10.1002/ange.201503022
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b00252.

    • Derivation of the dispersion formula; critical size diagrams of supported Pt NPs and frequency analyses of CO bound to Pt facets; kinetic data of Pt atom dislodging from Pt4 and Pt8 supported on CeO2(111); DFT-determined catalytic cycles of CO oxidation and GT-kMC data (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.