ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Ethene Dimerization on Zeolite-Hosted Ni Ions: Reversible Mobilization of the Active Site

  • Rasmus Yding Brogaard*
    Rasmus Yding Brogaard
    Department of Chemistry, Centre for Materials and Nanoscience (SMN), University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1033, Blindern, NO-0315 Oslo, Norway
    Center for Molecular Modeling (CMM), Ghent University, Tech Lane Ghent Science Park Campus A, Technologiepark 46, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium
    *E-mail: [email protected]
  • Mustafa Kømurcu
    Mustafa Kømurcu
    Department of Chemistry, Centre for Materials and Nanoscience (SMN), University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1033, Blindern, NO-0315 Oslo, Norway
  • Michael Martin Dyballa
    Michael Martin Dyballa
    Department of Chemistry, Centre for Materials and Nanoscience (SMN), University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1033, Blindern, NO-0315 Oslo, Norway
  • Alexandru Botan
    Alexandru Botan
    Department of Physics, Centre for Materials and Nanoscience (SMN), University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1033, Blindern, NO-0315 Oslo, Norway
  • Veronique Van Speybroeck
    Veronique Van Speybroeck
    Center for Molecular Modeling (CMM), Ghent University, Tech Lane Ghent Science Park Campus A, Technologiepark 46, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium
  • Unni Olsbye*
    Unni Olsbye
    Department of Chemistry, Centre for Materials and Nanoscience (SMN), University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1033, Blindern, NO-0315 Oslo, Norway
    *E-mail: [email protected]
    More by Unni Olsbye
  • , and 
  • Kristof De Wispelaere*
    Kristof De Wispelaere
    Center for Molecular Modeling (CMM), Ghent University, Tech Lane Ghent Science Park Campus A, Technologiepark 46, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium
    *E-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 6, 5645–5650
Publication Date (Web):May 22, 2019
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b00721

Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

  • Open Access

Article Views

5391

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (3 MB)
Supporting Info (2)»

Abstract

The active site in ethene oligomerization catalyzed by Ni-zeolites is proposed to be a mobile Ni(II) complex, based on density functional theory-based molecular dynamics (DFT-MD) simulations corroborated by continuous-flow experiments on Ni-SSZ-24 zeolite. The results of the simulations at operating conditions show that ethene molecules reversibly mobilize the active site as they exchange with the zeolite as ligands on Ni during reaction. Microkinetic modeling was conducted on the basis of free-energy profiles derived with DFT-MD for oligomerization on these mobile [(ethene)2-Ni-alkyl]+ species. The model reproduces the experimentally observed high selectivity to dimerization and indicates that the mechanism is consistent with the observed second-order rate dependence on ethene pressure.

Homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts are traditionally distinguished by the active site being either in solution or anchored on a support. However, recent works have revealed heterogeneous catalysts where the active sites are mobilized: selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides with ammonia in Cu-SSZ-13 zeolite (1) and with hydrocarbons in Ag-ZSM-5 zeolite, (2) reactant-mobilized protons in methanol to hydrocarbons conversion in H-ZSM-5, (3) and ethylene dimerization/hydrogenation on Rh sites in Y zeolite. (4) In this work, we present findings on a reaction, ethene oligomerization in Ni-SSZ-24 zeolite, that indicate that the active site is reversibly mobilized and anchored to the support during the catalytic cycle.
There is increasing interest in selective oligomerization of alkenes, and in particular heterogeneous catalysts for ethene dimerization, as it is both a fundamentally challenging topic of catalysis and a versatile reaction for the chemical industry, such as forming butene from biobased ethylene. (5) Ni-aluminosilicates have long been known as promising heterogeneous catalysts. (6) Intriguingly, they work without the alkylaluminoxane cocatalysts required for homogeneous and metal–organic framework (MOF)-based heterogeneous catalysts. (7) Nevertheless, there is accumulating evidence provided by us and others that the reaction follows the Cossee–Arlman mechanism (Scheme 1) (8−11) known from homogeneous catalysis. The three-dimensional structure of the Ni-aluminosilicates plays a central role in alkene oligomerization: experimental results show that dimer formation is first order in alkene pressure on Ni-silicaalumina (10,12) but second order in Ni-zeolites. (12,13) 1-Butene formation is also second order in mesoporous Ni-silicaalumina at low temperatures, where it was demonstrated that condensation of ethene in the pores stabilized catalytic activity. (14) These observations suggest that surrounding molecules can have a significant influence on alkene oligomerization in Ni-aluminosilicates, an influence we for the first time elucidate with molecular simulations mimicking operating conditions.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Cossee–Arlman Catalytic Cycle of Ethene Oligomerization in Ni(II) Cationic Complexes
We simulated ethene oligomerization in Ni-SSZ-24 using density-functional-theory-based molecular dynamics (DFT-MD) simulations and advanced free-energy sampling techniques. Such an approach has proven to account for the complexity of catalytic reactions at operating conditions by allowing for dynamic active sites and the influence of surrounding molecules. (3,15) The latter was found to be critical to investigate the nature of the active site in the presence of multiple ethene molecules. The computational results show a remarkable resemblance between the active sites in Ni-zeolites and homogeneous catalysts for alkene oligomerization, as ethene molecules reversibly mobilize the Ni site inside the zeolite pores. Continuous-flow experiments were conducted to verify the corresponding kinetic parameters predicted from theory. This leads us to predict that the active site within the Ni-zeolite dynamically crosses the border between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis throughout the reaction.
The computational part of this work takes its starting point in the Cossee–Arlman cycle, shown in Scheme 1, inferring that the Ni-ethyl species initially forms in situ by reaction between Ni(II) ions and ethene (Section S1). (11) We seek to unravel the dynamics of the active site at operating conditions by simulating the catalytic cycle in Ni-SSZ-24 zeolite with DFT-MD (see details in Computational and Experimental Methods), starting from the simplest Cossee–Arlman species [ethene-Ni-ethyl]+ surrounded by 2 ethene molecules in the micropore of the simulation cell (Section S2.2). This ethene loading corresponds to equilibrium at typical experimental conditions of 120 °C and 25 bar ethene pressure, (10,12) as evidenced by Grand Canonical Monte Carlo simulations (Section S3). We have investigated several reaction steps and obtain good agreement in the free-energy barriers of the few of these steps that were investigated in our previous work (Section S2.4). (8) We collected the free-energy profiles of the elementary steps that make up the most favorable pathways for ethene oligomerization in the diagram shown in Figure 1. Note that alkene adsorption/desorption in this diagram occurs from/to the zeolite pore encompassing the adsorbates. By using the equilibrium loading of two ethene molecules surrounding the [ethene-Ni-ethyl]+ species, we ensure that in this state the free energy of ethene in the pore is equivalent to that of gas phase ethene at 120 °C and 25 bar.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Free-energy diagram for ethene oligomerization pathways in Ni-SSZ-24 zeolite at 25 bar and 120 °C, based on free-energy profiles of elementary steps obtained with DFT-MD umbrella sampling simulations. The reference state is the equilibrium loading of ethene surrounding [ethene-Ni-ethyl]+, as discussed in the text. The numbers indicate intrinsic free energies of activation in kJ/mol. As indicated in the diagram, the [ethyl-Ni-butene]+ species can also be reached by ethene desorption; see Section S2.3 for a detailed discussion of how the diagram was constructed.

Remarkably, the catalytic cycle of oligomerization proceeds on mobile complexes. Such a species is created from [ethene-Ni-ethyl]+ by coordination of an additional ethene to Ni, thereby detaching the Ni complex from the ion-exchange position of the zeolite to create a mobile active site. The mobility is observed in the distribution of Ni–Al distances in Figure 2: the distribution is shifted toward larger values and is wider for the detached [(ethene)2-Ni-ethyl]+ than the anchored species. In the mobile species Ni can achieve its preferred square-planar coordination, realizing the maximal potential of the metal site by opening up a favorable pathway for C–C coupling (vide infra). Figure 2 shows the simulated free-energy profiles for coordination of ethenes on Ni-alkyl species originally anchored to the zeolite. The results show that [ethene-Ni-ethyl]+ is stabilized by coordination of up to two additional ethene molecules. In [(ethene)2-Ni-ethyl]+, one oxygen coordination is replaced by ethene and the second by an agostic bond with a β hydrogen of the ethyl group, creating a square planar coordination of Ni (Figure 2, right inset). The same is the case for the butyl analogue (Figure S8). This square-planar geometry is preferred for Ni as a d8 metal when coordinated to strong-field ligands, (16) such as alkyl and hydride. (17)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Free-energy profiles for ethene coordination to [ethene-Ni-ethyl]+ (left) and [ethene-Ni-butyl]+ (right) at 25 bar and 120 °C, derived from DFT-MD simulations. The left inset shows histograms of Ni–Al distances, illustrating that the doubly and triply ethene-coordinated Ni-ethyl species are detached from the framework and more mobile than their anchored counterpart. The associated charge-separation energy is estimated to 78 kJ/mol (Section S2.5). The right insets show snapshots from the simulations of the Ni-ethyl species, including the trajectories of the Ni (light blue) and the α alkyl C (dark blue) atoms (Figure S8 shows the butyl analogues).

The mobile Ni complexes resemble a homogeneous oligomerization catalyst in solution; the noncovalent interactions with the zeolite framework parallel the nondirectional stabilization by a solvent shell. However, the positively charged complex is tethered to the zeolite framework by the negative charge of the ion-exchange site. Note that there is a potential energy gain on formation of the [(ethene)2-Ni-ethyl]+ detached species (28 kJ/mol, Section S2.6.1). Ethene coordination thus counteracts the energy required to separate the positive Ni ion from the framework (78 kJ/mol, Figure 2). As complex formation is also favored in free energy (19 kJ/mol, Figure 2), the entropy loss of coordinating ethene is partly compensated by the configurational entropy of the mobile [(ethene)2-Ni-ethyl]+ complex; translation (Figure S9) and rotation (inset of Figure 2). This rotation may also explain why ethene coordination to [ethene-Ni-butyl]+ is favored in potential energy (38 kJ/mol, Section S2.6.1) but slightly disfavored in free energy (3 kJ/mol, Figure 2); the Ni-butyl species is bulkier than the ethyl analogue, limiting rotation in the zeolite micropore (Figure S8).
C–C coupling is the central reaction step in ethene oligomerization, which in the mobile species proceeds through migratory insertion of ethene in the Ni-alkyl bond. We find the intrinsic free-energy barrier in [(ethene)2-Ni-ethyl]+ to be significantly lower than in both the anchored [ethene-Ni-ethyl]+ species and the mobile [(ethene)3-Ni-ethyl]+ species (Table 1). We explain this trend using Hammond’s postulate (18) considering the structures shown in Figure 3; C–C coupling in [ethene-Ni-ethyl]+ is an endergonic reaction (Figure S11) leading to a large activation barrier with a late transition state that resembles a [Ni-butyl]+ product with a γ-agostic hydrogen bond. In [(ethene)2-Ni-ethyl]+, the reaction is exergonic (Figure S13), leading to a low activation barrier with an early transition state that resembles the reactant with the favorable square-planar coordination of Ni. In [(ethene)3-Ni-ethyl]+ the transition state (trigonal bipyramid) resembles neither the reactant (half trigonal bipyramid) nor the product ([(ethene)2-Ni-butyl]+, square planar) and is hence significantly higher in free energy than either state (Figure S14). The Ni-butyl analogues exhibit the same trend (Figures S11 and S13).
Table 1. Intrinsic Free-Energy Barriers (kJ/mol) of Ethene Desorption and C–C Coupling in [(ethene)x-Ni-ethyl]+ Species in SSZ-24 Zeolite, Obtained from DFT-MD Simulations at 120 °C (Sections S2.7 and S2.8)
 [ethene-Ni-ethyl]+[(ethene)2-Ni-ethyl]+[(ethene)3-Ni-ethyl]+
C–C coupling773776
ethene desorption725420

Figure 3

Figure 3. Snapshots from DFT-MD umbrella simulations of the initial (IS) and transition states (TS) of C–C coupling in [(ethene)x-Ni-ethyl]+ species in SSZ-24 zeolite. Planes of square and trigonal coordination are shown in blue and yellow, respectively.

Following C–C coupling, the reaction proceeds from [(ethene)2-Ni-butyl]+ via transfer of a β hydrogen of the butyl chain to form 1-butene, which subsequently desorbs. Like for C–C coupling, the hydrogen transfer has the lowest barrier in the mobile [(ethene)2-Ni-butyl]+ species (20 kJ/mol, Figures 1 and S21), as hydrogen is already involved in an agostic bond to Ni prior to reaction (see Ni-ethyl analogue in Figure 3). In contrast, the anchored [ethene-Ni-butyl]+ species undergoes a significant rearrangement to reach the transition state, reflected in a higher barrier (38 kJ/mol, Figures 1 and S18).
The last step toward dimerization is desorption of 1-butene. Analogously to ethene (Table 1), the 1-butene desorption barrier decreases with ethene coordination and is hence lowest in [(ethene)2-ethyl-Ni-1-butene]+ (Table S5). This can be explained by the late transition state of desorption: in this species, the 1-butene weakly interacts with the favored square-planar [(ethene)2-Ni-ethyl]+ (Figure S22). In the latter species, the catalytic cycle is closed.
In summary, we have used DFT-MD to predict that both ethene dimerization and trimerization are catalyzed by positively charged Ni complexes mobilized by ethene coordination. The transition states involved in butene formation are slightly lower in free energy than that for hexene formation (Figure 1), indicating a preference toward butene over higher oligomers. Indeed, when employing the free-energy profiles in a microkinetic model (Section S4), we obtain a rate of formation of 1-butene that is 2 orders of magnitude higher than that of 1-hexene (Section S4.3).
We now consider experimental results to verify our computational findings. Ethene oligomerization was investigated in continuous-flow experiments on Ni-SSZ-24 zeolite (see details in Computational and Experimental Methods). The catalyst achieves a selectivity of more than 98% to butenes at ethene pressures ranging from 4 to 26 bar (Section S5.3), in agreement with the computational result that the production rate of butene is 2 orders of magnitude higher than that of hexene as a representative of higher oligomers. Figure 4 shows that the rate of butene (and hexene) formation is second order in ethene pressure and that the apparent activation energy is virtually pressure-independent. These findings strongly suggest that the oligomerization mechanism is the same over a wide pressure range. The observed reaction order agrees with microkinetic modeling based on the free-energy profiles shown in Figure 1, where oligomerization occurs on mobile active sites. Note that a second order is only obtained from the model when [ethyl-Ni-alkene]+ species are the most abundant adsorbates, the catalyst resting states (Table S7, Section S4.3). We note that the predicted coverage of [ethyl-Ni-alkene]+ and hence the reaction order is sensitive to the free energy of these species (Table S7), which is associated with some uncertainty (Section S2.3). However, a zeolite-anchored [ethyl-Ni-alkene]+ resting state is consistent with recent experimental X-ray absorption data, which indicate that in the catalyst resting state in Ni-Beta zeolite, Ni is in tetrahedral coordination with oxygens in the first coordination shell. (11) In the context of resting states it is instructive to consider the concept of the energetic span introduced by Kozuch and Shaik: the largest free-energy difference between an adsorbate and a transition state along the catalytic cycle, corresponding to the apparent free energy of activation. (19) While being cautious about using the free energies from Figure 1 directly (Section S2.3), we derive an energetic span for butene formation of 71 kJ/mol between the [ethyl-Ni-butene]+ and the transition state of hydrogen transfer, which is in fairly good agreement with the 58 kJ/mol derived from the experiments (Section S5.3.1).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Results from continuous-flow experiments on ethene oligomerization in Ni-SSZ-24: (a) Arrhenius plot for butene formation at 4 and 26 bar ethene pressure, (b) reaction order of butene and hexene formation at 150 °C, and (c) butene isomer selectivity at 150 °C. All results were obtained at differential ethene conversions of 1–7%.

Finally, the experimental results indicate that both 1- and 2-butenes are primary products (Section S5.3), as was also observed on Ni-Beta. (11) This supports the Cossee–Arlman mechanism, as the [ethyl-Ni-butene]+ species can isomerize between 1- and 2-butene through β-hydrogen elimination on the Ni site prior to desorption (Figure S17), analogously to homogeneous catalysts. (20) Note also that 1-butene selectivity increases with pressure (Figure 4), contrary to what would be expected for isomerization at Brønsted acid sites, but paralleling the results of previous work by Agirrezabal-Telleria and Iglesia on mesoporous Ni-silicaalumina. (14) Interestingly, the same work demonstrated stabilization of catalytic activity at subambient temperatures when ethene condenses in the mesopores. (14) Such conditions likely favor coordination of multiple ethene molecules to form the mobile sites described here (Section S6). These sites may be involved in the stabilization, as they facilitate butene desorption over further oligomerization.
In conclusion, we have conducted an experimental and computational investigation of ethene oligomerization in Ni-SSZ-24 zeolite. The computational results allow us to make detailed predictions about the reaction at operating conditions; two ethene molecules adsorb on Ni-alkyl species, creating mobile active sites in the zeolite pores. The mobilization is reversible, as ethene dynamically exchanges with oxygens of the zeolite support as ligand on Ni during the reaction. Microkinetic modeling based on calculated free-energy profiles reproduces the experimentally observed relative production rate of butene over higher oligomers of 102. The model indicates that the proposed mechanism leads to a second-order rate dependence on ethene pressure as experimentally observed here and elsewhere. (12,14) An analogous mechanism may explain the second-order rate dependence observed in 1-butene dimerization. (13) Such reactant-mobilized active sites have also been observed in selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides with ammonia in Cu-SSZ-13 zeolite (1) and with hydrocarbons in Ag-ZSM-5, (2) in methanol to hydrocarbons conversion in H-ZSM-5, (3) and ethylene dimerization/hydrogenation on Rh sites in Y zeolite. (4) Together these works present materials that appear as hybrids between heterogeneous and homogeneous catalysts, highlighting an intriguing regime of catalysis (21) that likely extends beyond the examples known to date.

Computational and Experimental Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Density functional theory (DFT)-based Molecular Dynamics (DFT-MD) simulations were carried out with CP2K, (22) versions 2.6 and 3.0. (23) Energies and forces were calculated from DFT based on a mixed Gaussian and plane wave approach (24) using the revPBE functional (25) with Grimme D3 dispersion correction. (26) DFT-MD calculations were carried out nonspinpolarized, as our previous work determined the singlet state to be the most stable for the Ni(II) species investigated here. (8) The majority of the simulations employed a super cell constructed by repeating the AFI unit cell twice along the channel direction (1 × 1 × 2) and making one Si/Al substitution (Si/Al = 47), while a larger super cell (Si/Al = 72) was used in a few simulations (Figure S23). Enhanced free-energy sampling in the DFT-MD simulations was done using umbrella sampling (27,28) with quadratic potentials by interfacing CP2K with PLUMED 2. (29) Free-energy profiles of elementary reaction steps were computed from the output of umbrella simulations along collective variables, using the Weighted Histogram Analysis Method (WHAM). (27) Monte Carlo simulations were carried out using LAMMPS, (30) while microkinetic modeling was conducted with CatMAP. (31) Graphics of molecular structures from the DFT-MD simulations were created using POV-Ray 3.6 and VMD 1.9.1. (32)
The synthesis of SSZ-24 was conducted as described in literature. (33) The zeolite was ion-exchanged five consecutive times with 0.1 M Ni(NO3)2(aq), washed and calcined to form Ni-SSZ-24, Si/Al = 80, Ni/Al = 0.34. Kinetic experiments were carried out in a continuous-flow, fixed-bed, stainless steel reactor. Standard measurement conditions were 150 °C and 30 bar total pressure, P(ethene)=26 bar, P(inert)=4 bar, with a total flow rate of 30 mL/min (contact time at STP: 6.7 mgcat·min·mLethene–1). A small fraction of the effluent was analyzed on an online gas chromatograph. Carbon mass balances closed witin 2%. Further computational and experimental details can be found in the Supporting Information.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b00721.

  • Complete body of DFT-MD results, results of Monte Carlo simulations, setup and results of microkinetic modeling, additional experimental details and results (PDF)

  • CatMAP files (ZIP)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Rasmus Yding Brogaard - Department of Chemistry, Centre for Materials and Nanoscience (SMN), University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1033, Blindern, NO-0315 Oslo, NorwayCenter for Molecular Modeling (CMM), Ghent University, Tech Lane Ghent Science Park Campus A, Technologiepark 46, 9052 Zwijnaarde, BelgiumPresent Address: R.Y.B.: Haldor Topsøe A/S, Nymøllevej 55, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, DenmarkOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7882-9183 Email: [email protected]
    • Unni Olsbye - Department of Chemistry, Centre for Materials and Nanoscience (SMN), University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1033, Blindern, NO-0315 Oslo, NorwayOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3693-2857 Email: [email protected]
    • Kristof De Wispelaere - Center for Molecular Modeling (CMM), Ghent University, Tech Lane Ghent Science Park Campus A, Technologiepark 46, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Mustafa Kømurcu - Department of Chemistry, Centre for Materials and Nanoscience (SMN), University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1033, Blindern, NO-0315 Oslo, Norway
    • Michael Martin Dyballa - Department of Chemistry, Centre for Materials and Nanoscience (SMN), University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1033, Blindern, NO-0315 Oslo, NorwayOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8883-1145
    • Alexandru Botan - Department of Physics, Centre for Materials and Nanoscience (SMN), University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1033, Blindern, NO-0315 Oslo, Norway
    • Veronique Van Speybroeck - Center for Molecular Modeling (CMM), Ghent University, Tech Lane Ghent Science Park Campus A, Technologiepark 46, 9052 Zwijnaarde, BelgiumOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2206-178X
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This research was funded in part by the Research Council of Norway through the OLIGOM (224980) and CONFINE (250795) projects. R.Y.B. thanks the University of Oslo for the Young Scientist Mobility Grant. V.V.S. and R.Y.B acknowledge funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (consolidator ERC grant agreement No. 647755 - DYNPOR (2015-2020)). The work is also supported by the Research Board of Ghent University (BOF). The Norwegian Metacenter for High Performance Computing (NOTUR) and Prof. Stian Svelle are thanked for computing resources (nn4683k). Ghent University (Stevin Supercomputer Infrastructure) and the VSC (Flemish Supercomputer Center), funded by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), are also thanked for computational resources. K.D.W. is a fellow funded by the FWO (FWO16-PDO-047).

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 33 other publications.

  1. 1
    Paolucci, C.; Khurana, I.; Parekh, A. A.; Li, S.; Shih, A. J.; Li, H.; Di Iorio, J. R.; Albarracin-Caballero, J. D.; Yezerets, A.; Miller, J. T.; Delgass, W. N.; Ribeiro, F. H.; Schneider, W. F.; Gounder, R. Dynamic Multinuclear Sites Formed by Mobilized Copper Ions in NOx Selective Catalytic Reduction. Science 2017, 357, 898903,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aan5630
  2. 2
    Shibata, J.; Shimizu, K.-i.; Takada, Y.; Shichi, A.; Yoshida, H.; Satokawa, S.; Satsuma, A.; Hattori, T. Structure of Active Ag Clusters in Ag Zeolites for SCR of NO by Propane in the Presence of Hydrogen. J. Catal. 2004, 227, 367374,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.08.007
  3. 3
    Moors, S. L. C.; De Wispelaere, K.; Van der Mynsbrugge, J.; Waroquier, M.; Van Speybroeck, V. Molecular Dynamics Kinetic Study on the Zeolite-Catalyzed Benzene Methylation in ZSM-5. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 25562567,  DOI: 10.1021/cs400706e
  4. 4
    Serna, P.; Gates, B. C. Zeolite-Supported Rhodium Complexes and Clusters: Switching Catalytic Selectivity by Controlling Structures of Essentially Molecular Species. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 47144717,  DOI: 10.1021/ja111749s
  5. 5
    (a) Hulea, V. Toward Platform Chemicals from Bio-Based Ethylene: Heterogeneous Catalysts and Processes. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 32633279,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b04294 .
    (b) Nicholas, C. P. Applications of Light Olefin Oligomerization to the Production of Fuels and Chemicals. Appl. Catal., A 2017, 543, 8297,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2017.06.011
  6. 6
    Finiels, A.; Fajula, F.; Hulea, V. Nickel-based Solid Catalysts for Ethylene Oligomerization - a Review. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 24122426,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CY00305E
  7. 7
    (a) Canivet, J.; Aguado, S.; Schuurman, Y.; Farrusseng, D. MOF-Supported Selective Ethylene Dimerization Single-Site Catalysts Through One-Pot Postsynthetic Modification. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 41954198,  DOI: 10.1021/ja312120x .
    (b) Madrahimov, S. T.; Gallagher, J. R.; Zhang, G.; Meinhart, Z.; Garibay, S. J.; Delferro, M.; Miller, J. T.; Farha, O. K.; Hupp, J. T.; Nguyen, S. T. Gas-Phase Dimerization of Ethylene under Mild Conditions Catalyzed by MOF Materials Containing (bpy)NiII Complexes. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 67136718,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01604 .
    (c) Bernales, V.; League, A. B.; Li, Z.; Schweitzer, N. M.; Peters, A. W.; Carlson, R. K.; Hupp, J. T.; Cramer, C. J.; Farha, O. K.; Gagliardi, L. Computationally Guided Discovery of a Catalytic Cobalt-Decorated Metal-Organic Framework for Ethylene Dimerization. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 2357623583,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07362 .
    (d) Metzger, E. D.; Comito, R. J.; Hendon, C. H.; Dincă, M. Mechanism of Single-Site Molecule-Like Catalytic Ethylene Dimerization in Ni-MFU-4l. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 757762,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b10300 .
    (e) Liu, J.; Ye, J.; Li, Z.; Otake, K.-i.; Liao, Y.; Peters, A. W.; Noh, H.; Truhlar, D. G.; Gagliardi, L.; Cramer, C. J.; Farha, O. K.; Hupp, J. T. Beyond the Active Site: Tuning the Activity and Selectivity of a Metal-Organic Framework-Supported Ni Catalyst for Ethylene Dimerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 1117411178,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b06006
  8. 8
    Brogaard, R. Y.; Olsbye, U. Ethene Oligomerization in Ni-containing Zeolites: Theoretical Discrimination of Reaction Mechanisms. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 12051214,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01957
  9. 9
    Forget, S.; Olivier-Bourbigou, H.; Delcroix, D. Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Nickel-Catalyzed Olefin Oligomerization: Experimental Investigation for a Common Mechanistic Proposition and Catalyst Optimization. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 24082417,  DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201700348
  10. 10
    Toch, K.; Thybaut, J.; Marin, G. Ethene Oligomerization on Ni-SiO2-Al2O3: Experimental Investigation and Single-Event MicroKinetic Modeling. Appl. Catal., A 2015, 489, 292304,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.10.036
  11. 11
    Joshi, R.; Zhang, G.; Miller, J. T.; Gounder, R. Evidence for the Coordination-Insertion Mechanism of Ethene Dimerization at Nickel Cations Exchanged onto Beta Molecular Sieves. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 1140711422,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b03202
  12. 12
    Henry, R.; Komurcu, M.; Ganjkhanlou, Y.; Brogaard, R. Y.; Lu, L.; Jens, K.-J.; Berlier, G.; Olsbye, U. Ethene Oligomerization on Nickel Microporous and Mesoporous-Supported Catalysts: Investigation of the Active Sites. Catal. Today 2018, 299, 154163,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.04.029
  13. 13
    Ehrmaier, A.; Liu, Y.; Peitz, S.; Jentys, A.; Chin, Y.-H. C.; Sanchez-Sanchez, M.; Bermejo-Deval, R.; Lercher, J. Dimerization of Linear Butenes on Zeolite-Supported Ni2+. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 315324,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b03095
  14. 14
    Agirrezabal-Telleria, I.; Iglesia, E. Stabilization of Active, Selective, and Regenerable Ni-based Dimerization Catalysts by Condensation of Ethene within Ordered Mesopores. J. Catal. 2017, 352, 505514,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2017.06.025
  15. 15
    (a) Van Speybroeck, V.; De Wispelaere, K.; Van der Mynsbrugge, J.; Vandichel, M.; Hemelsoet, K.; Waroquier, M. First Principle Chemical Kinetics in Zeolites: the Methanol-to-Olefin Process as a Case Study. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 73267357,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CS00146J .
    (b) De Wispelaere, K.; Ensing, B.; Ghysels, A.; Meijer, E. J.; Van Speybroeck, V. Complex Reaction Environments and Competing Reaction Mechanisms in Zeolite Catalysis: Insights from Advanced Molecular Dynamics. Chem. - Eur. J. 2015, 21, 93859396,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201500473 .
    (c) De Wispelaere, K.; Wondergem, C. S.; Ensing, B.; Hemelsoet, K.; Meijer, E. J.; Weckhuysen, B. M.; Van Speybroeck, V.; Ruiz-Martínez, J. Insight into the Effect of Water on the Methanol-to-Olefins Conversion in H-SAPO-34 from Molecular Simulations and in Situ Microspectroscopy. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 19912002,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02139 .
    (d) De Wispelaere, K.; Vanduyfhuys, L.; Van Speybroeck, V. Modelling and Simulation in the Science of Micro- and Meso-Porous Materials; Elsevier, 2017; Chapter entitled Entropy Contributions to Transition State Modelling.
    (e) Li, G.; Pidko, E. A. The Nature and Catalytic Function of Cation Sites in Zeolites: a Computational Perspective. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 134156,  DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201801493
  16. 16
    Gray, H. B.; Ballhausen, C. J. A Molecular Orbital Theory for Square Planar Metal Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 260265,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00886a002
  17. 17
    Chatt, J.; Hayter, R. G. 167. Ligand Field Strengths of the Halide, Methyl, Phenyl, and Hydride Anions. J. Chem. Soc. 1961, 772774,  DOI: 10.1039/jr9610000772
  18. 18
    Hammond, G. S. A. Correlation of Reaction Rates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 334338,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01607a027
  19. 19
    Kozuch, S.; Shaik, S. How to Conceptualize Catalytic Cycles? The Energetic Span Model. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 101110,  DOI: 10.1021/ar1000956
  20. 20
    Ittel, S. D.; Johnson, L. K.; Brookhart, M. Late-Metal Catalysts for Ethylene Homo- and Copolymerization. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 11691204,  DOI: 10.1021/cr9804644
  21. 21
    Shamzhy, M.; Opanasenko, M.; Concepción, P.; Martínez, A. New Trends in Tailoring Active Sites in Zeolite-Based Catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 10951149,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CS00887F
  22. 22
    Hutter, J.; Iannuzzi, M.; Schiffmann, F.; VandeVondele, J. CP2K: Atomistic Simulations of Condensed Matter Systems. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2014, 4, 1525,  DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1159
  23. 23
    CP2K, version 3.0 or higher, the CP2K developers group. CP2K is freely available from http://www.cp2k.org.
  24. 24
    VandeVondele, J.; Krack, M.; Mohamed, F.; Parrinello, M.; Chassaing, T.; Hutter, J. Quickstep: Fast and Accurate Density Functional Calculations using a Mixed Gaussian and Plane Waves Approach. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2005, 167, 103128,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.014
  25. 25
    (a) Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 38653868,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 .
    (b) Zhang, Y.; Yang, W. Comment on “Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 890890,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.890
  26. 26
    (a) Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A Consistent and Accurate Ab Initio Parametrization of Density Functional Dispersion Correction (DFT-D) for the 94 Elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3382344 .
    (b) Grimme, S.; Ehrlich, S.; Goerigk, L. Effect of the Damping Function in Dispersion Corrected Density Functional Theory. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 14561465,  DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21759
  27. 27
    Kumar, S.; Rosenberg, J. M.; Bouzida, D.; Swendsen, R. H.; Kollman, P. A. The Weighted Histogram Analysis Method for Free-energy Calculations on Biomolecules. I. The method. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 10111021,  DOI: 10.1002/jcc.540130812
  28. 28
    Ensing, B.; Laio, A.; Parrinello, M.; Klein, M. L. A Recipe for the Computation of the Free Energy Barrier and the Lowest Free Energy Path of Concerted Reactions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 66766687,  DOI: 10.1021/jp045571i
  29. 29
    Tribello, G. A.; Bonomi, M.; Branduardi, D.; Camilloni, C.; Bussi, G. PLUMED 2: New Feathers for an Old Bird. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2014, 185, 604613,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.09.018
  30. 30
    Plimpton, S. Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 1995, 117, 119,  DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1995.1039
  31. 31
    Medford, A. J.; Shi, C.; Hoffmann, M. J.; Lausche, A. C.; Fitzgibbon, S. R.; Bligaard, T.; Nørskov, J. K. CatMAP: A Software Package for Descriptor-Based Microkinetic Mapping of Catalytic Trends. Catal. Lett. 2015, 145, 794807,  DOI: 10.1007/s10562-015-1495-6
  32. 32
    Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD - Visual Molecular Dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14, 3338,  DOI: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
  33. 33
    Kubota, Y.; Maekawa, H.; Miyata, S.; Tatsumi, T.; Sugi, Y. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Metallosilicate SSZ-24 from Metallosilicate Beta as Precursors. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2007, 101, 115126,  DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2006.11.037

Cited By

This article is cited by 47 publications.

  1. Veronique Van Speybroeck, Massimo Bocus, Pieter Cnudde, Louis Vanduyfhuys. Operando Modeling of Zeolite-Catalyzed Reactions Using First-Principles Molecular Dynamics Simulations. ACS Catalysis 2023, 13 (17) , 11455-11493. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.3c01945
  2. Qiang Zhang, Shiqin Gao, Jihong Yu. Metal Sites in Zeolites: Synthesis, Characterization, and Catalysis. Chemical Reviews 2023, 123 (9) , 6039-6106. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00315
  3. Nicholas R. Jaegers, Enrique Iglesia. Theoretical Assessment of the Mechanism and Active Sites in Alkene Dimerization on Ni Monomers Grafted onto Aluminosilicates: (Ni–OH)+ Centers and C–C Coupling Mediated by Lewis Acid–Base Pairs. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (11) , 6349-6361. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c13487
  4. Benjamin Yeh, Saumil Chheda, Steven D. Prinslow, Adam S. Hoffman, Jiyun Hong, Jorge E. Perez-Aguilar, Simon R. Bare, Connie C. Lu, Laura Gagliardi, Aditya Bhan. Structure and Site Evolution of Framework Ni Species in MIL-127 MOFs for Propylene Oligomerization Catalysis. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (6) , 3408-3418. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c10551
  5. Laura Löbbert, Saumil Chheda, Jian Zheng, Navneet Khetrapal, Julian Schmid, Ruixue Zhao, Carlo A. Gaggioli, Donald M. Camaioni, Ricardo Bermejo-Deval, Oliver Y. Gutiérrez, Yue Liu, J. Ilja Siepmann, Matthew Neurock, Laura Gagliardi, Johannes A. Lercher. Influence of 1-Butene Adsorption on the Dimerization Activity of Single Metal Cations on UiO-66 Nodes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (2) , 1407-1422. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c12192
  6. Yinan Xu, Nicole J. LiBretto, Guanghui Zhang, Jeffrey T. Miller, Jeffrey Greeley. First-Principles Analysis of Ethylene Oligomerization on Single-Site Ga3+ Catalysts Supported on Amorphous Silica. ACS Catalysis 2022, 12 (9) , 5416-5424. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c05936
  7. Zoya N. Lashchinskaya, Anton A. Gabrienko, Alexander A. Kolganov, Evgeny A. Pidko, Alexander G. Stepanov. Selective Dimerization of Ethene to 2-Butene on Zn2+-Modified ZSM-5 Zeolite. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2022, 126 (15) , 6570-6577. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c01101
  8. Elsa Koninckx, Rajamani Gounder, Joris W. Thybaut, Linda J. Broadbelt. Kinetic Modeling of Ethene Oligomerization on Bifunctional Nickel and Acid β Zeolites. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2022, 61 (11) , 3860-3876. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04105
  9. Arunima Saxena, Ravi Joshi, Ranga Rohit Seemakurthi, Elsa Koninckx, Linda J. Broadbelt, Jeffrey Greeley, Rajamani Gounder. Effect of Nickel Active Site Density on the Deactivation of Ni-Beta Zeolite Catalysts during Ethene Dimerization. ACS Engineering Au 2022, 2 (1) , 12-16. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsengineeringau.1c00014
  10. Benjamin Yeh, Stephen P. Vicchio, Saumil Chheda, Jian Zheng, Julian Schmid, Laura Löbbert, Ricardo Bermejo-Deval, Oliver Y. Gutiérrez, Johannes A. Lercher, Connie C. Lu, Matthew Neurock, Rachel B. Getman, Laura Gagliardi, Aditya Bhan. Site Densities, Rates, and Mechanism of Stable Ni/UiO-66 Ethylene Oligomerization Catalysts. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (48) , 20274-20280. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c09320
  11. Blake A. Johnson, John R. Di Iorio, Yuriy Román-Leshkov. Tailoring Distinct Reactive Environments in Lewis Acid Zeolites for Liquid Phase Catalysis. Accounts of Materials Research 2021, 2 (11) , 1033-1046. https://doi.org/10.1021/accountsmr.1c00146
  12. Bernard Whajah, Natalia da Silva Moura, Justin Blanchard, Scott Wicker, Karleigh Gandar, James A. Dorman, Kerry M. Dooley. Catalytic Depolymerization of Waste Polyolefins by Induction Heating: Selective Alkane/Alkene Production. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2021, 60 (42) , 15141-15150. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c02674
  13. Jenna L. Mancuso, Carlo A. Gaggioli, Laura Gagliardi, Christopher H. Hendon. Singlet-to-Triplet Spin Transitions Facilitate Selective 1-Butene Formation during Ethylene Dimerization in Ni(II)-MFU-4l. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (40) , 22036-22043. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c07658
  14. Keka Mandal, Yuntao Gu, Karl S. Westendorff, Sichi Li, Josh A. Pihl, Lars C. Grabow, William S. Epling, Christopher Paolucci. Condition-Dependent Pd Speciation and NO Adsorption in Pd/Zeolites. ACS Catalysis 2020, 10 (21) , 12801-12818. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c03585
  15. Christopher Paolucci, John R. Di Iorio, William F. Schneider, Rajamani Gounder. Solvation and Mobilization of Copper Active Sites in Zeolites by Ammonia: Consequences for the Catalytic Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides. Accounts of Chemical Research 2020, 53 (9) , 1881-1892. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00328
  16. H. Olivier-Bourbigou, P. A. R. Breuil, L. Magna, T. Michel, M. Fernandez Espada Pastor, D. Delcroix. Nickel Catalyzed Olefin Oligomerization and Dimerization. Chemical Reviews 2020, 120 (15) , 7919-7983. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00076
  17. Hend Omar Mohamed, Vijay K. Velisoju, Idoia Hita, Omar Abed, Rajesh K. Parsapur, Naydu Zambrano, Mohamed Ben Hassine, Natalia Morlanes, Abdul-Hamid Emwas, Kuo-Wei Huang, Pedro Castaño. Highly productive framework bounded Ni2+ on hierarchical zeolite for ethylene oligomerization. Chemical Engineering Journal 2023, 475 , 146077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.146077
  18. Katsuya Shimura, Shigehiro Yoshida, Hiroshi Oikawa, Tadahiro Fujitani. Impacts of Ni-Loading Method on the Structure and the Catalytic Activity of NiO/SiO2-Al2O3 for Ethylene Oligomerization. Catalysts 2023, 13 (9) , 1303. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13091303
  19. Yoonrae Cho, Allen G. Oliver, Jason C. Hicks. Localized structural and compositional effects on the kinetic performance of Ni-modified polyoxometalate catalysts for ethylene oligomerization. Applied Catalysis A: General 2023, 666 , 119391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2023.119391
  20. Yu Ling, Xiao Chen, Jipeng Meng, Chennan Wang, Chuang Li, Adam H. Clark, Bowen Du, Changhai Liang. Mechanochemical regulation of the nickel species coordination environment on Ni/Beta catalysts to enhance propylene dimerization. Applied Catalysis A: General 2023, 663 , 119289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2023.119289
  21. Benjamin Yeh, Saumil Chheda, Jian Zheng, Julian Schmid, Laura Löbbert, Ricardo Bermejo-Deval, Oliver Y. Gutiérrez, Johannes A. Lercher, Laura Gagliardi, Aditya Bhan. Validation of the Cossee–Arlman mechanism for propylene oligomerization on Ni/UiO-66. Catalysis Science & Technology 2023, 13 (14) , 4213-4222. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CY00570D
  22. Cailing Chen, Lingkun Meng, Mohammed R. Alalouni, Xinglong Dong, Zhi‐Peng Wu, Shouwei Zuo, Huabin Zhang. Ultra‐Highly Active Ni‐Doped MOF‐5 Heterogeneous Catalysts for Ethylene Dimerization. Small 2023, 19 (25) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202301235
  23. Siddarth H. Krishna, Anshuman Goswami, Yujia Wang, Casey B. Jones, David P. Dean, Jeffrey T. Miller, William F. Schneider, Rajamani Gounder. Influence of framework Al density in chabazite zeolites on copper ion mobility and reactivity during NOx selective catalytic reduction with NH3. Nature Catalysis 2023, 6 (3) , 276-285. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-023-00932-5
  24. Massimo Bocus, Samuel E. Neale, Pieter Cnudde, Véronique Van Speybroeck. Dynamic evolution of catalytic active sites within zeolite catalysis. 2023, 165-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823144-9.00012-1
  25. Matthias Betz, Constantin Fuchs, Thomas A. Zevaco, Ulrich Arnold, Jörg Sauer. Production of hydrocarbon fuels by heterogeneously catalyzed oligomerization of ethylene: Tuning of the product distribution. Biomass and Bioenergy 2022, 166 , 106595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106595
  26. Galiya Magazova, Yoonrae Cho, Jessica A. Muhlenkamp, Jason C. Hicks. Single-site, Ni-modified Wells–Dawson-type polyoxometalate for propylene dimerization. Catalysis Science & Technology 2022, 12 (19) , 5970-5981. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CY01065H
  27. Jian Zheng, Laura Löbbert, Saumil Chheda, Navneet Khetrapal, Julian Schmid, Carlo Alberto Gaggioli, Benjamin Yeh, Ricardo Bermejo-Deval, Radha Kishan Motkuri, Mahalingam Balasubramanian, John L. Fulton, Oliver Y. Gutiérrez, J. Ilja Siepmann, Matthew Neurock, Laura Gagliardi, Johannes A. Lercher. Metal-organic framework supported single-site nickel catalysts for butene dimerization. Journal of Catalysis 2022, 413 , 176-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2022.06.019
  28. Katsuya Shimura, Shigehiro Yoshida, Hiroshi Oikawa, Tadahiro Fujitani. Ethylene oligomerization over NiO /SiO2-Al2O3 catalysts prepared by a coprecipitation method. Molecular Catalysis 2022, 528 , 112478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2022.112478
  29. Yu Ling, Xiao Chen, Jipeng Meng, Changhai Liang. Identification of uniform high-density isolated Ni active sites on LTA zeolite for propylene dimerization. Applied Catalysis A: General 2022, 640 , 118661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2022.118661
  30. Katsuya Shimura, Shigehiro Yoshida, Hiroshi Oikawa, Tadahiro Fujitani. Preparation of NiO /SiO2–Al2O3 catalysts by a homogenous precipitation method and their catalytic activity for ethylene oligomerization. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 2022, 338 , 111955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.111955
  31. Gabriel V. S. Seufitelli, Jason J. W. Park, Phuong N. Tran, Anthony Dichiara, Fernando L. P. Resende, Rick Gustafson. The Role of Nickel and Brønsted Sites on Ethylene Oligomerization with Ni-H-Beta Catalysts. Catalysts 2022, 12 (5) , 565. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12050565
  32. Charlotte Vogt, Bert M. Weckhuysen. The concept of active site in heterogeneous catalysis. Nature Reviews Chemistry 2022, 6 (2) , 89-111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-021-00340-y
  33. Richard Caulkins, Ravi Joshi, Rajamani Gounder, Fabio H. Ribeiro. Effects of Ethene Pressure on the Deactivation of Ni‐Zeolites During Ethene Oligomerization at Sub‐ambient Temperatures. ChemCatChem 2022, 14 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202101478
  34. Remi Beucher, Vasile Hulea, Claudia Cammarano. Kinetic and mechanistic insights into Ni-AlKIT-6 catalyzed ethylene oligomerization. Reaction Chemistry & Engineering 2021, 7 (1) , 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RE00258A
  35. Yoonrae Cho, Jessica A. Muhlenkamp, Allen G. Oliver, Jason C. Hicks. Ethylene oligomerization on Ni 2+ single sites within lacunary defects of Wells Dawson polyoxometalates. Chemical Communications 2021, 57 (100) , 13772-13775. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CC05377A
  36. Alexander Søgaard, Ana Luíza de Oliveira, Nicola Taccardi, Marco Haumann, Peter Wasserscheid. Ga–Ni supported catalytically active liquid metal solutions (SCALMS) for selective ethylene oligomerization. Catalysis Science & Technology 2021, 11 (23) , 7535-7539. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CY01146D
  37. Gabriel V.S. Seufitelli, Jason J.W. Park, Phuong N. Tran, Anthony Dichiara, Fernando L.P. Resende, Rick Gustafson. Kinetics of ethylene oligomerization over Ni-H-Beta catalysts. Journal of Catalysis 2021, 401 , 40-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2021.07.008
  38. Elsa Koninckx, Pedro S.F. Mendes, Joris W. Thybaut, Linda J. Broadbelt. Ethylene oligomerization on nickel catalysts on a solid acid support: From New mechanistic insights to tunable bifunctionality. Applied Catalysis A: General 2021, 624 , 118296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2021.118296
  39. Siddarth H. Krishna, Casey B. Jones, Rajamani Gounder. Dynamic Interconversion of Metal Active Site Ensembles in Zeolite Catalysis. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering 2021, 12 (1) , 115-136. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-092120-010920
  40. Mustafa Kømurcu, Andrea Lazzarini, Gurpreet Kaur, Elisa Borfecchia, Sigurd Øien-Ødegaard, Diego Gianolio, Silvia Bordiga, Karl Petter Lillerud, Unni Olsbye. Co-catalyst free ethene dimerization over Zr-based metal-organic framework (UiO-67) functionalized with Ni and bipyridine. Catalysis Today 2021, 369 , 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2020.03.038
  41. Yingnan Dong, Hanyue Bai, Shanshan Li, Jian Tang, Wei Niu. Preparation and characterization of NiO/HY catalyst. Materials Express 2021, 11 (6) , 966-973. https://doi.org/10.1166/mex.2021.1987
  42. Jason S. Bates, Rajamani Gounder. Kinetic effects of molecular clustering and solvation by extended networks in zeolite acid catalysis. Chemical Science 2021, 12 (13) , 4699-4708. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SC00151E
  43. Daniyal Kiani, Jonas Baltrusaitis. Immobilization and activation of cobalt-amine catalyst on NH4OH-treated activated carbon for ethylene dimerization. Catalysis Today 2021, 365 , 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2020.04.062
  44. Pattreeya Panpian, Thi Tuong Vi Tran, Suwadee Kongparakul, Lalita Attanatho, Yoothana Thanmongkhon, Peifen Wang, Guoqing Guan, Narong Chanlek, Yingyot Poo-arporn, Chanatip Samart. Production of bio-jet fuel through ethylene oligomerization using NiAlKIT-6 as a highly efficient catalyst. Fuel 2021, 287 , 119831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119831
  45. Huarong Lei, Valentina Rizzotto, Anqi Guo, Daiqi Ye, Ulrich Simon, Peirong Chen. Recent Understanding of Low-Temperature Copper Dynamics in Cu-Chabazite NH3-SCR Catalysts. Catalysts 2021, 11 (1) , 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11010052
  46. Ravi Joshi, Arunima Saxena, Rajamani Gounder. Mechanistic insights into alkene chain growth reactions catalyzed by nickel active sites on ordered microporous and mesoporous supports. Catalysis Science & Technology 2020, 10 (21) , 7101-7123. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CY01186J
  47. Sara Moussa, Patricia Concepción, Maria A. Arribas, Agustín Martínez. The nature of active Ni sites and the role of Al species in the oligomerization of ethylene on mesoporous Ni-Al-MCM-41 catalysts. Applied Catalysis A: General 2020, 608 , 117831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2020.117831
  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Cossee–Arlman Catalytic Cycle of Ethene Oligomerization in Ni(II) Cationic Complexes

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Free-energy diagram for ethene oligomerization pathways in Ni-SSZ-24 zeolite at 25 bar and 120 °C, based on free-energy profiles of elementary steps obtained with DFT-MD umbrella sampling simulations. The reference state is the equilibrium loading of ethene surrounding [ethene-Ni-ethyl]+, as discussed in the text. The numbers indicate intrinsic free energies of activation in kJ/mol. As indicated in the diagram, the [ethyl-Ni-butene]+ species can also be reached by ethene desorption; see Section S2.3 for a detailed discussion of how the diagram was constructed.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Free-energy profiles for ethene coordination to [ethene-Ni-ethyl]+ (left) and [ethene-Ni-butyl]+ (right) at 25 bar and 120 °C, derived from DFT-MD simulations. The left inset shows histograms of Ni–Al distances, illustrating that the doubly and triply ethene-coordinated Ni-ethyl species are detached from the framework and more mobile than their anchored counterpart. The associated charge-separation energy is estimated to 78 kJ/mol (Section S2.5). The right insets show snapshots from the simulations of the Ni-ethyl species, including the trajectories of the Ni (light blue) and the α alkyl C (dark blue) atoms (Figure S8 shows the butyl analogues).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Snapshots from DFT-MD umbrella simulations of the initial (IS) and transition states (TS) of C–C coupling in [(ethene)x-Ni-ethyl]+ species in SSZ-24 zeolite. Planes of square and trigonal coordination are shown in blue and yellow, respectively.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Results from continuous-flow experiments on ethene oligomerization in Ni-SSZ-24: (a) Arrhenius plot for butene formation at 4 and 26 bar ethene pressure, (b) reaction order of butene and hexene formation at 150 °C, and (c) butene isomer selectivity at 150 °C. All results were obtained at differential ethene conversions of 1–7%.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 33 other publications.

    1. 1
      Paolucci, C.; Khurana, I.; Parekh, A. A.; Li, S.; Shih, A. J.; Li, H.; Di Iorio, J. R.; Albarracin-Caballero, J. D.; Yezerets, A.; Miller, J. T.; Delgass, W. N.; Ribeiro, F. H.; Schneider, W. F.; Gounder, R. Dynamic Multinuclear Sites Formed by Mobilized Copper Ions in NOx Selective Catalytic Reduction. Science 2017, 357, 898903,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aan5630
    2. 2
      Shibata, J.; Shimizu, K.-i.; Takada, Y.; Shichi, A.; Yoshida, H.; Satokawa, S.; Satsuma, A.; Hattori, T. Structure of Active Ag Clusters in Ag Zeolites for SCR of NO by Propane in the Presence of Hydrogen. J. Catal. 2004, 227, 367374,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.08.007
    3. 3
      Moors, S. L. C.; De Wispelaere, K.; Van der Mynsbrugge, J.; Waroquier, M.; Van Speybroeck, V. Molecular Dynamics Kinetic Study on the Zeolite-Catalyzed Benzene Methylation in ZSM-5. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 25562567,  DOI: 10.1021/cs400706e
    4. 4
      Serna, P.; Gates, B. C. Zeolite-Supported Rhodium Complexes and Clusters: Switching Catalytic Selectivity by Controlling Structures of Essentially Molecular Species. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 47144717,  DOI: 10.1021/ja111749s
    5. 5
      (a) Hulea, V. Toward Platform Chemicals from Bio-Based Ethylene: Heterogeneous Catalysts and Processes. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 32633279,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b04294 .
      (b) Nicholas, C. P. Applications of Light Olefin Oligomerization to the Production of Fuels and Chemicals. Appl. Catal., A 2017, 543, 8297,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2017.06.011
    6. 6
      Finiels, A.; Fajula, F.; Hulea, V. Nickel-based Solid Catalysts for Ethylene Oligomerization - a Review. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 24122426,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CY00305E
    7. 7
      (a) Canivet, J.; Aguado, S.; Schuurman, Y.; Farrusseng, D. MOF-Supported Selective Ethylene Dimerization Single-Site Catalysts Through One-Pot Postsynthetic Modification. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 41954198,  DOI: 10.1021/ja312120x .
      (b) Madrahimov, S. T.; Gallagher, J. R.; Zhang, G.; Meinhart, Z.; Garibay, S. J.; Delferro, M.; Miller, J. T.; Farha, O. K.; Hupp, J. T.; Nguyen, S. T. Gas-Phase Dimerization of Ethylene under Mild Conditions Catalyzed by MOF Materials Containing (bpy)NiII Complexes. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 67136718,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01604 .
      (c) Bernales, V.; League, A. B.; Li, Z.; Schweitzer, N. M.; Peters, A. W.; Carlson, R. K.; Hupp, J. T.; Cramer, C. J.; Farha, O. K.; Gagliardi, L. Computationally Guided Discovery of a Catalytic Cobalt-Decorated Metal-Organic Framework for Ethylene Dimerization. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 2357623583,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07362 .
      (d) Metzger, E. D.; Comito, R. J.; Hendon, C. H.; Dincă, M. Mechanism of Single-Site Molecule-Like Catalytic Ethylene Dimerization in Ni-MFU-4l. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 757762,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b10300 .
      (e) Liu, J.; Ye, J.; Li, Z.; Otake, K.-i.; Liao, Y.; Peters, A. W.; Noh, H.; Truhlar, D. G.; Gagliardi, L.; Cramer, C. J.; Farha, O. K.; Hupp, J. T. Beyond the Active Site: Tuning the Activity and Selectivity of a Metal-Organic Framework-Supported Ni Catalyst for Ethylene Dimerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 1117411178,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b06006
    8. 8
      Brogaard, R. Y.; Olsbye, U. Ethene Oligomerization in Ni-containing Zeolites: Theoretical Discrimination of Reaction Mechanisms. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 12051214,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01957
    9. 9
      Forget, S.; Olivier-Bourbigou, H.; Delcroix, D. Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Nickel-Catalyzed Olefin Oligomerization: Experimental Investigation for a Common Mechanistic Proposition and Catalyst Optimization. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 24082417,  DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201700348
    10. 10
      Toch, K.; Thybaut, J.; Marin, G. Ethene Oligomerization on Ni-SiO2-Al2O3: Experimental Investigation and Single-Event MicroKinetic Modeling. Appl. Catal., A 2015, 489, 292304,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.10.036
    11. 11
      Joshi, R.; Zhang, G.; Miller, J. T.; Gounder, R. Evidence for the Coordination-Insertion Mechanism of Ethene Dimerization at Nickel Cations Exchanged onto Beta Molecular Sieves. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 1140711422,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b03202
    12. 12
      Henry, R.; Komurcu, M.; Ganjkhanlou, Y.; Brogaard, R. Y.; Lu, L.; Jens, K.-J.; Berlier, G.; Olsbye, U. Ethene Oligomerization on Nickel Microporous and Mesoporous-Supported Catalysts: Investigation of the Active Sites. Catal. Today 2018, 299, 154163,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.04.029
    13. 13
      Ehrmaier, A.; Liu, Y.; Peitz, S.; Jentys, A.; Chin, Y.-H. C.; Sanchez-Sanchez, M.; Bermejo-Deval, R.; Lercher, J. Dimerization of Linear Butenes on Zeolite-Supported Ni2+. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 315324,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b03095
    14. 14
      Agirrezabal-Telleria, I.; Iglesia, E. Stabilization of Active, Selective, and Regenerable Ni-based Dimerization Catalysts by Condensation of Ethene within Ordered Mesopores. J. Catal. 2017, 352, 505514,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2017.06.025
    15. 15
      (a) Van Speybroeck, V.; De Wispelaere, K.; Van der Mynsbrugge, J.; Vandichel, M.; Hemelsoet, K.; Waroquier, M. First Principle Chemical Kinetics in Zeolites: the Methanol-to-Olefin Process as a Case Study. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 73267357,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CS00146J .
      (b) De Wispelaere, K.; Ensing, B.; Ghysels, A.; Meijer, E. J.; Van Speybroeck, V. Complex Reaction Environments and Competing Reaction Mechanisms in Zeolite Catalysis: Insights from Advanced Molecular Dynamics. Chem. - Eur. J. 2015, 21, 93859396,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201500473 .
      (c) De Wispelaere, K.; Wondergem, C. S.; Ensing, B.; Hemelsoet, K.; Meijer, E. J.; Weckhuysen, B. M.; Van Speybroeck, V.; Ruiz-Martínez, J. Insight into the Effect of Water on the Methanol-to-Olefins Conversion in H-SAPO-34 from Molecular Simulations and in Situ Microspectroscopy. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 19912002,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02139 .
      (d) De Wispelaere, K.; Vanduyfhuys, L.; Van Speybroeck, V. Modelling and Simulation in the Science of Micro- and Meso-Porous Materials; Elsevier, 2017; Chapter entitled Entropy Contributions to Transition State Modelling.
      (e) Li, G.; Pidko, E. A. The Nature and Catalytic Function of Cation Sites in Zeolites: a Computational Perspective. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 134156,  DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201801493
    16. 16
      Gray, H. B.; Ballhausen, C. J. A Molecular Orbital Theory for Square Planar Metal Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 260265,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00886a002
    17. 17
      Chatt, J.; Hayter, R. G. 167. Ligand Field Strengths of the Halide, Methyl, Phenyl, and Hydride Anions. J. Chem. Soc. 1961, 772774,  DOI: 10.1039/jr9610000772
    18. 18
      Hammond, G. S. A. Correlation of Reaction Rates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 334338,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01607a027
    19. 19
      Kozuch, S.; Shaik, S. How to Conceptualize Catalytic Cycles? The Energetic Span Model. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 101110,  DOI: 10.1021/ar1000956
    20. 20
      Ittel, S. D.; Johnson, L. K.; Brookhart, M. Late-Metal Catalysts for Ethylene Homo- and Copolymerization. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 11691204,  DOI: 10.1021/cr9804644
    21. 21
      Shamzhy, M.; Opanasenko, M.; Concepción, P.; Martínez, A. New Trends in Tailoring Active Sites in Zeolite-Based Catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 10951149,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CS00887F
    22. 22
      Hutter, J.; Iannuzzi, M.; Schiffmann, F.; VandeVondele, J. CP2K: Atomistic Simulations of Condensed Matter Systems. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2014, 4, 1525,  DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1159
    23. 23
      CP2K, version 3.0 or higher, the CP2K developers group. CP2K is freely available from http://www.cp2k.org.
    24. 24
      VandeVondele, J.; Krack, M.; Mohamed, F.; Parrinello, M.; Chassaing, T.; Hutter, J. Quickstep: Fast and Accurate Density Functional Calculations using a Mixed Gaussian and Plane Waves Approach. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2005, 167, 103128,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.014
    25. 25
      (a) Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 38653868,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 .
      (b) Zhang, Y.; Yang, W. Comment on “Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 890890,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.890
    26. 26
      (a) Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A Consistent and Accurate Ab Initio Parametrization of Density Functional Dispersion Correction (DFT-D) for the 94 Elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3382344 .
      (b) Grimme, S.; Ehrlich, S.; Goerigk, L. Effect of the Damping Function in Dispersion Corrected Density Functional Theory. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 14561465,  DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21759
    27. 27
      Kumar, S.; Rosenberg, J. M.; Bouzida, D.; Swendsen, R. H.; Kollman, P. A. The Weighted Histogram Analysis Method for Free-energy Calculations on Biomolecules. I. The method. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 10111021,  DOI: 10.1002/jcc.540130812
    28. 28
      Ensing, B.; Laio, A.; Parrinello, M.; Klein, M. L. A Recipe for the Computation of the Free Energy Barrier and the Lowest Free Energy Path of Concerted Reactions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 66766687,  DOI: 10.1021/jp045571i
    29. 29
      Tribello, G. A.; Bonomi, M.; Branduardi, D.; Camilloni, C.; Bussi, G. PLUMED 2: New Feathers for an Old Bird. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2014, 185, 604613,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.09.018
    30. 30
      Plimpton, S. Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 1995, 117, 119,  DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1995.1039
    31. 31
      Medford, A. J.; Shi, C.; Hoffmann, M. J.; Lausche, A. C.; Fitzgibbon, S. R.; Bligaard, T.; Nørskov, J. K. CatMAP: A Software Package for Descriptor-Based Microkinetic Mapping of Catalytic Trends. Catal. Lett. 2015, 145, 794807,  DOI: 10.1007/s10562-015-1495-6
    32. 32
      Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD - Visual Molecular Dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14, 3338,  DOI: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
    33. 33
      Kubota, Y.; Maekawa, H.; Miyata, S.; Tatsumi, T.; Sugi, Y. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Metallosilicate SSZ-24 from Metallosilicate Beta as Precursors. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2007, 101, 115126,  DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2006.11.037
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b00721.

    • Complete body of DFT-MD results, results of Monte Carlo simulations, setup and results of microkinetic modeling, additional experimental details and results (PDF)

    • CatMAP files (ZIP)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect