ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES
RETURN TO ISSUEPREVResearch ArticleNEXT

Cascading g-C3N4 and Peroxygenases for Selective Oxyfunctionalization Reactions

Cite this: ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 8, 7409–7417
Publication Date (Web):July 9, 2019
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b01341

Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND.

  • Open Access

Article Views

4634

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (2 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Peroxygenases are very interesting catalysts for specific oxyfunctionalization chemistry. Instead of relying on complicated electron transport chains, they rely on simple hydrogen peroxide as the stoichiometric oxidant. Their poor robustness against H2O2 can be addressed via in situ generation of H2O2. Here we report that simple graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) is a promising photocatalyst to drive peroxygenase-catalyzed hydroxylation reactions. The system has been characterized by outlining not only its scope but also its current limitations. In particular, spatial separation of the photocatalyst from the enzyme is shown as a solution to circumvent the undesired inactivation of the biocatalyst. Overall, very promising turnover numbers of the biocatalyst of more than 60.000 have been achieved.

Selective oxyfunctionalization of nonactivated sp3 carbon–hydrogen bonds is a challenge in organic synthesis. Catalysts exhibiting both high oxidation potential and high selectivity are rarely found. (1) In this respect, so-called unspecific peroxygenases (UPOs), next to the established P450 monooxygenases and some other nonheme-monooxygenases, (2) have attracted considerable interest. (3−5) Monooxygenases generate their catalytically active species through reductive activation of molecular oxygen. For this, monooxygenases rely on complex electron transport chains delivering the reducing equivalents from NAD(P)H to the monooxygenases’ active sites. This complicates their practical use. Furthermore, quite frequently, a significant portion of the reducing equivalents is uncoupled into a futile reaction with molecular oxygen, thereby wasting valuable reducing equivalents and generating hazardous reactive oxygen species. (6)
UPOs do not rely on the aforementioned electron transport chains but rather use simple H2O2 as the oxidant. This makes UPOs very attractive from a preparative point-of-view. H2O2, however, is also a potent inhibitor of peroxygenases as already small excesses oxidatively inactivate the prosthetic heme group. (7) Generating H2O2 in situ through catalytic reduction of O2 is the most common approach to alleviate the inactivation issue. (8) In essence, these systems provide H2O2 at rates that enable efficient peroxygenase activity while minimizing the H2O2-related inactivation. These methods comprise a range of chemical, (9−15) electrochemical, (16−21) enzymatic, (22−26) and photocatalytic (27−34) approaches.
The latter is particularly interesting as it, in principle, enables using light energy to access simple sacrificial electron donors to drive the reduction of O2 to H2O2. To make light energy available for this reaction, a photosensitizer (or photocatalyst) is necessary. Both homogeneously dissolved molecular and semiconductor-based solid material photocatalysts have been evaluated. While the first often suffer from issues of photobleaching and inactivation, the latter excel by their high robustness and reusability. So far, mainly TiO2-based semiconductor photocatalysts have been evaluated to promote peroxygenase-catalyzed oxyfunctionalization reactions.
Therefore, we set out to investigate a broader set of (in)organic photocatalyst systems (35) to promote peroxygenase-catalyzed reactions (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Photoenzymatic Hydroxylation of Ethyl Benzene Combining Heterogeneous Photocatalysts for the Reductive Activation of O2 to H2O2 with a Peroxygenase-Catalyzed Oxyfunctionalization Reaction
We chose the selective hydroxylation of ethylbenzene to (R)-1-phenyl ethanol catalyzed by the peroxygenase from Agrocybe aegerita (rAaeUPO) as the model reaction. (36−39)
In a first set of experiments, we evaluated several reported and/or commercially available heterogeneous photocatalysts (Figure 1) with respect to their ability to form H2O2; particularly, we investigated their performance in the envisioned photoenzymatic cascade transforming ethylbenzene to (R)-1-phenyl ethanol (Figure 1). It is worth mentioning that in the absence of the photocatalysts or light, no product formation was observed. In the absence of rAaeUPO, upon prolonged reaction times, traces of racemic product and the overoxidation product were observed in some cases.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Performance of several heterogeneous photocatalysts to promote rAaeUPO-catalyzed oxyfunctionalization, forming phenyl ethanol (blue) and the overoxidation product acetophenone (red), in absence (left) or presence (right) of methanol. Conditions: 5 mg mL–1 heterogeneous catalyst, 50 mM ethylbenzene, 0 or 250 mM methanol, and 100 nM rAaeUPO in a 100 mM phosphate buffer at pH 7, 30 °C and stirring at 300 rpm. Illumination by an Osram 200W light bulb for 30 min. Reactions were performed in independent duplicates. 1: Au-BiVO4; (40)2: Co3O4 (quantum dots); (41)3: Co4(H2O)2(W9O34)2; (42)4: Pt-TiO2 (Rutile); (43)5: MnO (on Faujasite); (44)6: Co-TiO2; (45)7: MnO (nanowires); (46)8: Ir@SiO2; 9: Fe2O3; (47)10: g-C3N4; 11: ZnO (nanoclusters). (48)

Almost all heterogeneous photocatalysts tested enabled the desired reaction both in the presence and absence of an extra electron donor (methanol). However, reaction rates tended to be significantly lower in experiments where methanol was absent. In the absence of methanol, it may be assumed that water was the primary reductant. (49) As water oxidation is thermodynamically more challenging than methanol oxidation, this explains the generally lower product formation rates in the absence of methanol. In some cases, significant amounts of acetophenone were found along with the desired (R)-1-phenyl ethanol. We attribute this to the oxidation of the desired product by the photocatalysts. (50) Platinum loaded titanium oxide (Pt-TiO2) and graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) stood out in terms of product formation rate. For reasons of ease of preparation, we further focused on g-C3N4 as photocatalyst. Furthermore, g-C3N4 has previously been reported to be highly selective for H2O2 over other (partially reduced) reactive oxygen species. (51)
Figure 2 shows the overall product formation of g-C3N4 using either water (blue), methanol (red), or formate (green) as sacrificial electron donor to promote the photoenzymatic hydroxylation of ethylbenzene. Assumptions made to obtain the bar-graphs can be found in the experimental section.

Figure 2

Figure 2. g-C3N4 as photocatalyst to promote rAaeUPO-catalyzed hydroxylation of ethylbenzene in the absence of external electron donors (blue), or 250 mM methanol (red) or 250 mM formate (green). (A) Time course of (R)-1-phenyl ethanol formation and (B) time course of acetophenone formation. From these time courses, parameters such as reaction rate (C), rAaeUPO inactivation rate (D), maximal product concentration (E), and selectivity (F) were calculated. General conditions: [rAaeUPO] = 100 nM, [ethylbenzene] = 50 mM, [g-C3N4] = 5 mg mL–1, KPi buffer pH 7.0 (100 mM), 30 °C, magnetic stirring at 600 rpm, illumination by an Osram 200W light bulb. Reactions were performed in independent duplicates.

From a conceptual and an environmental point-of-view, water would have been the most desirable source of reducing equivalents. However, this system fell back in terms of catalytic rate and selectivity compared with the use of methanol or formate as sacrificial electron donor. In comparative experiments, illuminating g-C3N4 in phosphate buffer gave negligible H2O2 formation rates (<1.0 μM h–1), which more than doubled to 2.0 (±0.02) μM min–1 upon addition of formate. Similar observations have been made before for TiO2. (52) Since g-C3N4 is not an efficient water oxidation catalyst, (52) other molecules are more likely to serve as reductants in the g-C3N4-catalyzed reduction of O2. Both ethylbenzene and phenyl ethanol can be oxidized by g-C3N4. (50) This was evident from the lower optical purity of phenyl ethanol and the increased overoxidation to acetophenone.
Another interesting effect of formate was that the robustness of the overall reaction was significantly higher than when using methanol or no sacrificial electron donor. We attribute this to the hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of formate (vide infra). Methanol oxidation proceeds via methoxy radicals, which again may be assumed to have a detrimental influence on the stability of the biocatalyst. (29)
Overall, formate proved to be a suitable sacrificial electron donor for the reaction. We therefore systematically investigated the factors influencing the activity, selectivity, and robustness of the formate-driven photoenzymatic reaction system.
Increasing the concentration of formate had a positive effect on the reaction rate, selectivity, and robustness of the overall system (Figure 3). Hence, we concluded that the photocatalytic oxidation of formate is the overall rate-limiting step in the reaction scheme.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Influence of the formate concentration on the performance of the photoenzymatic hydroxylation of ethylbenzene. (A) Time course of (R)-1-phenyl ethanol formation and (B) time course of acetophenone formation. From these time courses, parameters such as reaction rate (C), rAaeUPO inactivation rate (D), maximal product concentration (E), and selectivity (F) were calculated. [HCO2] = 0 mM (black), 50 mM (green), 100 mM (red), 250 mM (blue) or 500 mM (purple). General conditions: [rAaeUPO] = 100 nM, [ethylbenzene] = 50 mM, [g-C3N4] = 5 mg mL–1, KPi buffer pH 7.0 (100 mM), 30 °C, magnetic stirring at 600 rpm, illumination by an Osram 200W light bulb. Reactions were performed in independent duplicates.

The concentration of the biocatalyst also had a significant influence on the robustness of the overall reaction but hardly influenced the initial product formation rate (Figure 4). This supports our assumption that the photocatalytic H2O2 formation was rate-limiting and that undesired rAaeUPO-inactivation by the photocatalyst represented the major undesired side reaction. Incubation of g-C3N4 with rAaeUPO in the darkness did not result in a significant inactivation of the biocatalyst (Figure S10), suggesting that photocatalytically generated reactive oxygen species are responsible for the enzyme inactivation observed (vide infra).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Influence of the rAaeUPO concentration on the performance of the photoenzymatic hydroxylation of ethylbenzene. A: time course of (R)-1-phenyl ethanol formation and B: time course of acetophenone formation. From these time courses, parameters such as reaction rate (C), rAaeUPO inactivation rate (D), maximal product concentration (E) and selectivity (F) were calculated. [rAaeUPO] = 20 nM (black), 50 nM (red), 100 nM (blue), 200 nM (green) or 500 nM (purple). General conditions: [NaHCO2] = 250 mM, [ethylbenzene] = 50 mM, [g-C3N4] = 5 mg mL–1, KPi buffer pH 7.0 (100 mM), 30 °C, magnetic stirring at 600 rpm, illumination by an Osram 200W light bulb. Reactions were performed in independent duplicates.

Next, we systematically varied the concentration of the photocatalyst (Figure 5). Very much to our surprise, the anticipated positive correlation between g-C3N4 concentration and H2O2 formation rate was less pronounced than expected. Moreover, rAaeUPO inactivation even decreased at higher g-C3N4 concentrations.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Influence of the g-C3N4 concentration on the performance of the photoenzymatic hydroxylation of ethylbenzene. (A) Time course of (R)-1-phenyl ethanol formation and (B) time course of acetophenone formation. From these time courses, parameters such as reaction rate (C), rAaeUPO inactivation rate (D), maximal product concentration (E) and selectivity (F) were calculated. [g-C3N4] = 1 mg mL–1 (black), 2.5 mg mL–1 (red), 5 mg mL–1 (blue), 10 mg mL–1 (green), or 15 mg mL–1 (purple). General conditions: [NaHCO2] = 250 mM, [ethylbenzene] = 50 mM, [rAaeUPO] = 100 nM, KPi buffer pH 7.0 (100 mM), 30 °C, magnetic stirring at 600 rpm, illumination by an Osram 200W light bulb. Reactions were performed in independent duplicates.

The most likely explanation for this observation is a self-shading effect of g-C3N4 (already at a photocatalyst concentration of 1 mg mL–1, the reaction mixture was turbid). Hence, because of a decreased light penetration at elevated photocatalyst concentrations, the majority of the photocatalyst remains inactive neither contributing to H2O2 generation nor to inactivating the biocatalyst.
The overall rate of the reaction was highest at neutral to slightly alkaline pH values (Figure S6). Currently, we are lacking a plausible explanation for this observation as the H2O2 generation rate of g-C3N4 was reported to be largely pH-independent, (53) whereas the highest activity of rAaeUPO may be expected in slightly acidic media. (39) Similar trends have been observed before for TiO2, (54) suggesting that the pH-dependency of the complex O2-reduction mechanism may play an important role here. (54)
Also the morphology of the g-C3N4 catalyst had a significant influence on the overall reaction rate as well as the rAaeUPO inactivation rate. The form of g-C3N4 used so far are the so-called g-C3N4 sheets, obtained from calcination of urea. (55) Further thermal treatment process leads to so-called amorphous g-C3N4, exhibiting a higher surface area. (56) A preparation with lower specific surface area (bulk g-C3N4) was obtained by starting the synthesis from melamine instead of urea (Figure S1). In line with our previous observations that the photocatalytic H2O2 generation is overall rate-limiting, we also observed a correlation between surface area and overall reaction rate (Figure 6). The same, however, was also true for the inactivation rate of rAaeUPO, which increased with increasing surface area.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Influence of g-C3N4 morphology on the photoenzymatic hydroxylation of ethylbenzene. (A) Time course of (R)-1-phenyl ethanol formation and (B) time course of acetophenone formation. From these time courses, parameters such as reaction rate (C), rAaeUPO inactivation rate (D), maximal product concentration (E), and selectivity (F) were calculated. Amorphous g-C3N4(black), g-C3N4 sheets (red), or g-C3N4 bulk (green). Reaction conditions: [NaHCO2] = 250 mM, [ethylbenzene] = 50 mM, [g-C3N4] = 5 mg mL–1, [rAaeUPO] = 100 nM, KPi buffer pH 7.0 (100 mM), 30 °C, magnetic stirring at 600 rpm, illumination by an Osram 200W light bulb. Reactions were performed in independent duplicates.

To evaluate the synthetic potential of the proposed photoenzymatic oxyfunctionalization system, we performed the reaction at semipreparative scale (Figure S7). To compensate for the high volatility of the starting material and the inactivation of the biocatalyst, both were replenished at intervals (see SI for details of the experimental procedure). In this experiment, 16.9 mM of essentially pure (97.8% ee) (R)-1-phenyl ethanol accumulated in the reaction mixture. From this, 42 mg of the desired product was isolated. Admittedly, this is not yet a practical protocol for the synthesis of (R)-1-phenyl ethanol. Especially, the high volatility of the reagents caused significant losses in the mass balance, which will have to be addressed in future, via improved experimental setups (circumventing the evaporation issue). Nevertheless, a respectable turnover number of more than 21 000 for the biocatalyst was obtained in this experiment.
The major bottleneck of the current system is its poor robustness; generally within 24 h, accumulation of (R)-1-phenyl ethanol ceased, which we attribute to the inactivation of the biocatalyst. As mentioned above, hydroxyl radicals may be assumed to be the primary products of g-C3N4-catalyzed water photo-oxidations. Indeed, using the spin trap method, (57) we could confirm the occurrence of hydroxyl radicals (Figure 7). The short lifetime of ·OH in aqueous media (58) suggests their predominant occurrence at the photocatalyst surface. We therefore also investigated whether g-C3N4 showed a tendency to absorb the biocatalyst. Indeed, we found that rAaeUPO and other proteins absorbed significantly to the polar surface of g-C3N4 (Figure 7). (59) Here they are exposed to locally high concentrations of hydroxyl radicals, which sufficiently explains the rather poor robustness of the photoenzymatic reactions so far. As mentioned above, the absorption per se did not result in inactivation of rAaeUPO (Figure S10).

Figure 7

Figure 7. Investigating the molecular reasons for the decreased rAaeUPO-stability under process conditions. (A) Detection of hydroxyl radicals formed by irradiated g-C3N4 using the spin-trap method. Signals marked with a star (★) are assigned to the oxidation product of DMPO, 5,5-dimethyl-2-oxopyrroline-1-oxyl (DMPOX). Signals marked with diamonds (◆) belong to the spin adduct DMPO–OH. (B) Protein in solution before (blue) or after (red) incubation with g-C3N4 in the dark, for bovine serum albumin (BSA) or rAaeUPO.

We hypothesized that spatial separation of rAaeUPO from the photocatalyst may enhance the stability of the enzyme under reaction conditions. Therefore, we tested this hypothesis by placing rAaeUPO into a dialysis bag, thereby preventing its direct contact with the photocatalyst (Figure 8). Here, the UPO and g-C3N4 are contained, while both ethylbenzene as H2O2 could pass the membrane.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Time course of the photoenzymatic hydroxylation of ethylbenzene to (R)-1-phenyl ethanol (black) and overoxidation to acetophenone (red) using the dialysis bag approach. Conditions: 10 mL of reaction solution equally divided inside and outside the dialysis bag (20 kDa cutoff). Inside the bag: [NaHCO2] = 250 mM, [ethylbenzene] = 50 mM, [rAaeUPO] = 100 nM, KPi buffer pH 7.0 (100 mM). Outside the bag: [NaHCO2] = 250 mM, [ethylbenzene] = 50 mM, [g-C3N4] = 5 mg mL–1, KPi buffer pH 7.0 (100 mM). The reaction was performed once at room temperature while stirring at 600 rpm. The reaction solution was illuminated by a LIGHTNINGCURE spot light (Hamamatsu) at 50% intensity with an UV filter.

To our delight, physically separating the biocatalyst from the photocatalyst had the desired effect of stable product accumulation for more than 4 days. Compared with the previous experiments, this corresponds to an improvement by more than 4 times. However, this improvement came at the expense of a significantly decreased reaction rate, which is most likely to be attributed to diffusion limitations for the substrates over the dialysis membrane (Figure S4).
Overall, in this contribution we have expanded the scope of photoenzymatic oxyfunctionalization reactions to a broader range of heterogeneous photocatalysts. g-C3N4 appeared to be a good alternative to the established TiO2-based photocatalysts. Total turnover numbers of over 60.000 have been achieved for the rAaeUPO. The major limitations identified in this study were (1) the relatively low specific H2O2-generation rate of the photocatalysts and (2) the undesired inactivation of the biocatalysts at the photocatalyst surface. The first limitation can be addressed by further optimizing the catalyst and light intensity. The catalyst can be improved by chemically modifying the g-C3N4 (e.g., doping with donor- or acceptor-type dopants may be successful). (60) Some preliminary results using KOH- (61) or Co2O3-modified (62) g-C3N4 indeed demonstrated that doping can significantly influence the H2O2-generation activity. Further systematic studies will validate this approach.
The second limitation (i.e., the oxidative inactivation of the biocatalyst by surface-borne reactive oxygen species) can be alleviated by physical separation. To circumvent the massive diffusion limitations observed in this double-heterogeneous reaction system, a linear plug-flow reactor concept may prove to be beneficial.

Experimental Section

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Catalysts Preparation

rAaeUPO was produced by heterologous expression in Pichia pastoris performed following a previously reported procedure. (38)
g-C3N4 was synthesized either from urea or melamine as starting compound by heating it up in a furnace to 550 °C (heat ramp: 5 °C min–1). In a typical procedure, from 10 g of urea, approximately 0.5 g of g-C3N4 sheets was obtained, whereas from 10 g of melamine, approximately 2 g of g-C3N4 bulk was obtained. Amorphous g-C3N4 was synthesized by further calcination of g-C3N4 sheets to 620 °C under an inert argon atmosphere. (63)
All other photocatalysts were either commercially available or prepared following literature procedures.

Reaction Setup

Unless stated differently, reactions were performed in 4 mL glass vials. Two milliliter reaction mixtures were stirred at 600 rpm using a small stirring magnet (6 mm). The vials were placed around an incandescent white light bulb (Osram, 205W Halolux Ceram) at a distance of approximately 1 cm. The water bath was continuously cooled at 30 °C. Reaction mixtures generally contained 5 mg mL–1 g-C3N4, 100 nM rAaeUPO, and 50 mM ethylbenzene in a 100 mM KPi buffer at pH 7.0. Sacrificial electron donors were added to a concentration of 250 mM. Before use, the g-C3N4 was dispersed via sonication in 1 mL of the phosphate buffer. Samples were taken using a syringe and needle, keeping the reactors closed and preventing evaporation of the ethylbenzene. The reaction mixture (200 μL) was taken and extracted with an aliquot of ethyl acetate containing 5 mM octanol as internal standard. The mixtures were intensively mixed for 10 s, centrifuged for 2 min, and the organic phase was dried over magnesium sulfate and subsequently analyzed via achiral CG chromatography (CP-WAX 52 CB). Optical purities were determined using chiral GC (CP-Chirasil-Dex CB).

Scale-Up Reaction

A 24 mL reaction, divided over 2 mL samples, was illuminated 80 h for increased product titers. The reaction was performed at 30 °C in a KPi buffer (100 mM, pH 7.0) containing ethylbenzene (50 mM), g-C3N4 (5 mg mL–1), rAaeUPO (100 nM), and sodium formate (250 mM). rAaeUPO (100 nM) was added to the reaction every 12 h, and the ethylbenzene was replenished by adding 50 mM extra substrate after 36 h. At the end of the reaction, the compound was extracted with ethyl acetate, dried with MgSO4, and purified under reduced pressure at room temperature, also evaporating remaining substrate. The purity of the product was determined by 1H NMR, while optical purity was determined using chiral GC (CP-Chirasil-Dex CB). NMR spectra were recorded on an Agilent 400 spectrometer in CDCl3. Chemical shifts are given in ppm with respect to tetramethylsilane. Coupling constants are reported as J-values in Hz (s: singlet. d: doublet. t: triplet. q: quartet. m: multiplet. br: broad). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.40–7.26 (m, 5H), 4.91 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 1.82 (br s, 1H, −OH), 1.51 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 128.5, 127.5, 125.4, 70.4, 25.10.

Data Manipulation

As the reaction rate, the initial formation rate of phenyl ethanol was taken, considering at least three data points. To estimate the enzyme deactivation rate, the following formula was used:
With:
The reaction selectivity was calculated by dividing the maximum amount of phenyl ethanol reached by the total amount of product formed in that same point in time.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b01341.

  • Preparation of the catalysts, reaction setup, analytical data, and additional results (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Morten M. C. H. van Schie - Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, 2629HZ Delft, The Netherlands Email: [email protected]
    • Frank Hollmann - Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, 2629HZ Delft, The NetherlandsOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-4821-756X Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Wuyuan Zhang - Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, 2629HZ Delft, The NetherlandsOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-3182-5107
    • Florian Tieves - Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, 2629HZ Delft, The Netherlands
    • Da Som Choi - Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 335 Science Road, Daejeon 305-701, Republic of Korea
    • Chan Beum Park - Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 335 Science Road, Daejeon 305-701, Republic of KoreaOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-0767-8629
    • Bastien O. Burek - DECHEMA Forschungsinstitut, Theodor-Heuss-Allee 25, 60486 Frankfurt am Main, GermanyOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-2180-7458
    • Jonathan Z. Bloh - DECHEMA Forschungsinstitut, Theodor-Heuss-Allee 25, 60486 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    • Isabel W. C. E. Arends - University of Utrecht, Faculty of Science, Budapestlaan 6, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands
    • Caroline E. Paul - Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, 2629HZ Delft, The NetherlandsOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-9920
    • Miguel Alcalde - Department of Biocatalysis, Institute of Catalysis, CSIC, 28049 Madrid, SpainOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-6780-7616
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We thank The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research for financial support through a VICI grant (No. 724.014.003) and by the European Union Project H2020-BBI-PPP-2015-2-720297-ENZOX2. CEP acknowledges a VENI grant (No. 722.015.011).

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 63 other publications.

  1. 1
    Roduner, E.; Kaim, W.; Sarkar, B.; Urlacher, V. B.; Pleiss, J.; Gläser, R.; Einicke, W.-D.; Sprenger, G. A.; Beifuß, U.; Klemm, E.; Liebner, C.; Hieronymus, H.; Hsu, S.-F.; Plietker, B.; Laschat, S. Selective Catalytic Oxidation of C-H Bonds with Molecular Oxygen. ChemCatChem 2013, 5, 82112,  DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201200266
  2. 2
    Dong, J.; Fernández-Fueyo, E.; Hollmann, F.; Paul, C.; Pesic, M.; Schmidt, S.; Wang, Y.; Younes, S.; Zhang, W. Biocatalytic Oxidation reactions - a Chemist’s Perspective. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 92389261,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201800343
  3. 3
    Wang, Y.; Lan, D.; Durrani, R.; Hollmann, F. Peroxygenases en route to becoming dream catalysts. What are the Opportunities and Challenges?. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2017, 37, 19,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.10.007
  4. 4
    Martínez, A. T.; Ruiz-Dueñas, F. J.; Camarero, S.; Serrano, A.; Linde, D.; Lund, H.; Vind, J.; Tovborg, M.; Herold-Majumdar, O. M.; Hofrichter, M.; Liers, C.; Ullrich, R.; Scheibner, K.; Sannia, G.; Piscitelli, A.; Pezzella, C.; Sener, M. E.; Kılıç, S.; van Berkel, W. J. H.; Guallar, V.; Lucas, M. F.; Zuhse, R.; Ludwig, R.; Hollmann, F.; Fernández-Fueyo, E.; Record, E.; Faulds, C. B.; Tortajada, M.; Winckelmann, I.; Rasmussen, J.-A.; Gelo-Pujic, M.; Gutiérrez, A.; del Río, J. C.; Rencoret, J.; Alcalde, M. Oxidoreductases on their way to Industrial Biotransformations. Biotechnol. Adv. 2017, 35, 815831,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.06.003
  5. 5
    Hofrichter, M.; Ullrich, R. Oxidations Catalyzed by Fungal Peroxygenases. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2014, 19, 116125,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.01.015
  6. 6
    Holtmann, D.; Hollmann, F. The Oxygen Dilemma: A Severe Challenge for the Application of Monooxygenases?. ChemBioChem 2016, 17, 13911398,  DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201600176
  7. 7
    Valderrama, B.; Ayala, M.; Vazquez-Duhalt, R. Suicide Inactivation of Peroxidases and the Challenge of Engineering More Robust Enzymes. Chem. Biol. 2002, 9, 555565,  DOI: 10.1016/S1074-5521(02)00149-7
  8. 8
    Burek, B. O. O.; Bormann, S.; Hollmann, F.; Bloh, J.; Holtmann, D. Hydrogen peroxide Driven Biocatalysis. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 32323249,  DOI: 10.1039/C9GC00633H
  9. 9
    Paul, C. E.; Churakova, E.; Maurits, E.; Girhard, M.; Urlacher, V. B.; Hollmann, F. In situ formation of H2O2 for P450 Peroxygenases. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 56925696,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.05.074
  10. 10
    Hollmann, F.; Schmid, A. Towards [Cp*Rh(bpy)(H2O)]2+-promoted P450 Catalysis: Direct Regeneration of CytC. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2009, 103, 313315,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2008.11.005
  11. 11
    Karmee, S. K.; Roosen, C.; Kohlmann, C.; Lütz, S.; Greiner, L.; Leitner, W. Chemo-Enzymatic Cascade Oxidation in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide/Water Biphasic Media. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 10521055,  DOI: 10.1039/b820606f
  12. 12
    Ranganathan, S.; Sieber, V. Recent Advances in the Direct Synthesis of Hydrogen Peroxide Using Chemical Catalysis—A Review. Catalysts 2018, 8, 379,  DOI: 10.3390/catal8090379
  13. 13
    Ranganathan, S.; Zeitlhofer, S.; Sieber, V. Development of a Lipase-Mediated Epoxidation Process for Monoterpenes in Choline Chloride-based Deep Eutectic Solvents. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 25762586,  DOI: 10.1039/C7GC01127J
  14. 14
    Ranganathan, S.; Sieber, V. Development of Semi-Continuous Chemo-Enzymatic Terpene Epoxidation: Combination of Anthraquinone Autooxidation and the Lipase-Mediated Epoxidation Process. React. Chem. Eng. 2017, 2, 885895,  DOI: 10.1039/C7RE00112F
  15. 15
    Ranganathan, S.; Tebbe, J.; Wiemann, L.; Sieber, V. Optimization of the Lipase Mediated Epoxidation of Monoterpenes using the Design of Experiments-Taguchi Method. Process Biochem. 2016, 51, 14791485,  DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2016.07.005
  16. 16
    Kohlmann, C.; Lütz, S. Electroenzymatic Synthesis of Chiral Sulfoxides. Eng. Life Sci. 2006, 6, 170174,  DOI: 10.1002/elsc.200620907
  17. 17
    Lutz, S.; Steckhan, E.; Liese, A. First Asymmetric Electroenzymatic Oxidation Catalyzed by a Peroxidase. Electrochem. Commun. 2004, 6, 583587,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2004.04.009
  18. 18
    Horst, A. E. W.; Bormann, S.; Meyer, J.; Steinhagen, M.; Ludwig, R.; Drews, A.; Ansorge-Schumacher, M.; Holtmann, D. Electro-Enzymatic Hydroxylation of Ethylbenzene by the Evolved Unspecific Peroxygenase of Agrocybeaegerita. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2016, 133, S137S142,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2016.12.008
  19. 19
    Holtmann, D.; Krieg, T.; Getrey, L.; Schrader, J. Electroenzymatic Process to Overcome Enzyme Instabilities. Catal. Commun. 2014, 51, 8285,  DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2014.03.033
  20. 20
    Getrey, L.; Krieg, T.; Hollmann, F.; Schrader, J.; Holtmann, D. Enzymatic Halogenation of the Phenolic Monoterpenes Thymol and Carvacrol with Chloroperoxidase. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 11041108,  DOI: 10.1039/C3GC42269K
  21. 21
    Krieg, T.; Huttmann, S.; Mangold, K.-M.; Schrader, J.; Holtmann, D. Gas Diffusion Electrode as Novel Reaction System for an Electro-Enzymatic Process with Chloroperoxidase. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 26862689,  DOI: 10.1039/c1gc15391a
  22. 22
    Pereira, P. C.; Arends, I.; Sheldon, R. A. Optimizing the Chloroperoxidase-Glucose Oxidase System: The Effect of Glucose Oxidase on Activity and Enantioselectivity. Process Biochem. 2015, 50, 746751,  DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2015.02.006
  23. 23
    Tieves, F.; Willot, S. J.-P.; van Schie, M. M. C. H.; Rauch, M. C. R.; Younes, S. H. H.; Zhang, W.; Dong, J.; de Santos, P. G.; Robbins, J. M.; Bommarius, B.; Alcalde, M.; Bommarius, A.; Hollmann, F. Formate Oxidase (FOx) from Aspergillus oryzae: One Catalyst to Promote H2O2-Dependent Biocatalytic Oxidation Reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 78737877,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201902380
  24. 24
    Pesic, M.; Willot, S. J.-P.; Fernández-Fueyo, E.; Tieves, F.; Alcalde, M.; Hollmann, F. Multienzymatic in situ Hydrogen Peroxide Generation Cascade for Peroxygenase-Catalysed Oxyfunctionalisation Reactions. Z. f. Naturforsch. C 2019, 74, 101104,  DOI: 10.1515/znc-2018-0137
  25. 25
    Ma, Y.; Li, P.; Li, Y.; Willot, S. J.-P.; Zhang, W.; Ribitsch, D.; Choi, Y. H.; Zhang, T.; Verpoorte, R.; Hollmann, F.; Wang, Y. Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents as Multifunctional Media for the Valorisation of Agricultural Wastes. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 13101315,  DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201900043
  26. 26
    Ni, Y.; Fernández-Fueyo, E.; Baraibar, A. G.; Ullrich, R.; Hofrichter, M.; Yanase, H.; Alcalde, M.; van Berkel, W. J. H.; Hollmann, F. Peroxygenase-Catalyzed Oxyfunctionalization Reactions Promoted by the Complete Oxidation of Methanol. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 798801,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201507881
  27. 27
    Willot, S. J. P.; Fernández-Fueyo, E.; Tieves, F.; Pesic, M.; Alcalde, M.; Arends, I. W. C. E.; Park, C. B.; Hollmann, F. Expanding the Spectrum of Light-Driven Peroxygenase Reactions. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 890894,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b03752
  28. 28
    Zhang, W.; Fernández-Fueyo, E.; Ni, Y.; van Schie, M.; Gacs, J.; Renirie, R.; Wever, R.; Mutti, F. G.; Rother, D.; Alcalde, M.; Hollmann, F. Selective Aerobic Oxidation Reactions using a Combination of Photocatalytic Water Oxidation and Enzymatic Oxyfunctionalizations. Nat. Catal. 2018, 1, 5562,  DOI: 10.1038/s41929-017-0001-5
  29. 29
    Zhang, W.; Burek, B. O.; Fernández-Fueyo, E.; Alcalde, M.; Bloh, J. Z.; Hollmann, F. Selective Activation of C-H Bonds by Cascading Photochemistry with Biocatalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1545115455,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201708668
  30. 30
    Choi, D. S.; Ni, Y.; Fernández-Fueyo, E.; Lee, M.; Hollmann, F.; Park, C. B. Photoelectroenzymatic Oxyfunctionalization on Flavin-Hybridized Carbon Nanotube Electrode Platform. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 15631567,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03453
  31. 31
    Churakova, E.; Kluge, M.; Ullrich, R.; Arends, I.; Hofrichter, M.; Hollmann, F. Specific Photobiocatalytic Oxyfunctionalization Reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1071610719,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201105308
  32. 32
    Gulder, T.; Seel, C. J. Biocatalysis Fueled by Light: On the Versatile Combination of Photocatalysis and Enzymes. ChemBioChem 2019,  DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201800806 .
  33. 33
    Seel, C. J.; Králík, A.; Hacker, M.; Frank, A.; König, B.; Gulder, T. Atom-Economic Electron Donors for Photobiocatalytic Halogenations. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 39603963,  DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201800886
  34. 34
    Schmermund, L.; Jurkaš, V.; Özgen, F. F.; Barone, G. D.; Büchsenschütz, H. C.; Winkler, C. K.; Schmidt, S.; Kourist, R.; Kroutil, W. Photo-Biocatalysis: Biotransformations in the Presence of Light. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 41154144,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b00656
  35. 35
    Goldstein, S.; Aschengrau, D.; Diamant, Y.; Rabani, J. Photolysis of Aqueous H2O2: Quantum Yield and Applications for Polychromatic UV Actinometry in Photoreactors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 74867490,  DOI: 10.1021/es071379t
  36. 36
    Ullrich, R.; Hofrichter, M. The Haloperoxidase of the Agaric Fungus AgrocybeaegeritaHydroxylates Toluene and Naphthalene. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 62476250,  DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.10.014
  37. 37
    Ullrich, R.; Nüske, J.; Scheibner, K.; Spantzel, J.; Hofrichter, M. Novel Haloperoxidase from the Agaric Basidiomycete AgrocybeaegeritaOxidizes Aryl Alcohols and Aldehydes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 45754581,  DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4575-4581.2004
  38. 38
    Molina-Espeja, P.; Ma, S.; Mate, D. M.; Ludwig, R.; Alcalde, M. Tandem-Yeast Expression System for Engineering and Producing Unspecific Peroxygenase. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2015, 73–74, 2933,  DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2015.03.004
  39. 39
    Molina-Espeja, P.; Garcia-Ruiz, E.; Gonzalez-Perez, D.; Ullrich, R.; Hofrichter, M.; Alcalde, M. Directed Evolution of Unspecific Peroxygenase from Agrocybeaegerita. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 34963507,  DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00490-14
  40. 40
    Hirakawa, H.; Shiota, S.; Shiraishi, Y.; Sakamoto, H.; Ichikawa, S.; Hirai, T. Au Nanoparticles Supported on BiVO4: Effective Inorganic Photocatalysts for H2O2Production from Water and O2 under Visible Light. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 49764982,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b01187
  41. 41
    Shi, N.; Cheng, W.; Zhou, H.; Fan, T.; Niederberger, M. Facile Synthesis of Monodisperse Co3O4Quantum Dots with Efficient Oxygen Evolution Activity. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 13381340,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CC08179J
  42. 42
    Yin, Q. S.; Tan, J. M.; Besson, C.; Geletii, Y. V.; Musaev, D. G.; Kuznetsov, A. E.; Luo, Z.; Hardcastle, K. I.; Hill, C. L. A Fast Soluble Carbon-Free Molecular Water Oxidation Catalyst Based on Abundant Metals. Science 2010, 328, 342345,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1185372
  43. 43
    Priebe, J. B.; Radnik, J.; Lennox, A. J. J.; Pohl, M. M.; Karnahl, M.; Hollmann, D.; Grabow, K.; Bentrup, U.; Junge, H.; Beller, M.; Bruckner, A. Solar Hydrogen Production by Plasmonic Au-TiO2Catalysts: Impact of Synthesis Protocol and TiO2Phase on Charge Transfer Efficiency and H2Evolution Rates. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 21372148,  DOI: 10.1021/cs5018375
  44. 44
    Najafpour, M. M.; Pashaei, B. Nanoscale Manganese Oxide within Faujasite Zeolite as an Efficient and Biomimetic Water Oxidizing Catalyst. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 1015610160,  DOI: 10.1039/c2dt30891f
  45. 45
    Maeda, K.; Ishimaki, K.; Okazaki, M.; Kanazawa, T.; Lu, D.; Nozawa, S.; Kato, H.; Kakihana, M. Cobalt Oxide Nanoclusters on Rutile Titania as Bifunctional Units for Water Oxidation Catalysis and Visible Light Absorption: Understanding the Structure-Activity Relationship. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 61146122,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b15804
  46. 46
    Boppana, V. B. R.; Jiao, F. Nanostructured MnO2: an Efficient and Robust Water Oxidation Catalyst. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 89738975,  DOI: 10.1039/c1cc12258d
  47. 47
    Idris, A.; Hassan, N.; Mohd Ismail, N. S.; Misran, E.; Yusof, N. M.; Ngomsik, A.-F.; Bee, A. Photocatalytic Magnetic Separable Beads for Chromium (VI) Reduction. Water Res. 2010, 44, 16831688,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.11.026
  48. 48
    Hamid, B. A. S.; Teh, S. J.; Lai, C. W. Photocatalytic Water Oxidation on ZnO: A Review. Catalysts 2017, 7, 93,  DOI: 10.3390/catal7030093
  49. 49
    Kim, H. W.; Ross, M. B.; Kornienko, N.; Zhang, L.; Guo, J.; Yang, P.; McCloskey, B. D. Efficient Hydrogen Peroxide Generation using Reduced Graphene Oxide-Based Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysts. Nature Catal. 2018, 1, 282290,  DOI: 10.1038/s41929-018-0044-2
  50. 50
    Zhang, W.; Bariotaki, A.; Smonou, I.; Hollmann, F. Visible-Light-Driven Photooxidation of Alcohols using Surface-Doped Graphitic Carbon Nitride. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 20962100,  DOI: 10.1039/C7GC00539C
  51. 51
    Shiraishi, Y.; Kanazawa, S.; Sugano, Y.; Tsukamoto, D.; Sakamoto, H.; Ichikawa, S.; Hirai, T. Highly Selective Production of Hydrogen Peroxide on Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g-C3N4) Photocatalyst Activated by Visible Light. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 774780,  DOI: 10.1021/cs401208c
  52. 52
    Burek, B. O.; Timm, J.; Bahnemann, D. W.; Bloh, J. Z. Kinetic Effects and Oxidation Pathways of Sacrificial Electron Donors on the Example of the Photocatalytic Reduction of Molecular Oxygen to Hydrogen Peroxide over Illuminated Titanium Dioxide. Catal. Today 2019, 335, 354364,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.12.044
  53. 53
    Li, S.; Dong, G.; Hailili, R.; Yang, L. L.; Li, Y.; Wang, F.; Zeng, Y.; Wang, C. Effective Photocatalytic H2O2Production under Visible Light Irradiation at g-C3N4Modulated by Carbon Vacancies. Appl. Catal., B 2016, 190, 2635,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.004
  54. 54
    Burek, B. O.; de Boer, S. R.; Tieves, F.; Zhang, W.; van Schie, M.; Bormann, S.; Alcalde, M.; Holtmann, D.; Hollmann, F.; Bahnemann, D. W.; Bloh, J. Z., Photoenzymatic Hydroxylation of Ethylbenzene Catalyzed by Unspecific Peroxygenase: Origin of Enzyme Inactivation and the Impact of Light Intensity and Temperature. ChemCatChem 2019,  DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201900610 .
  55. 55
    Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, C. A Comparison of Graphitic Carbon Nitrides Synthesized from Different Precursors through Pyrolysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2017, 332, 3244,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.08.005
  56. 56
    Kang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Yin, L.-C.; Kang, X.; Liu, G.; Cheng, H.-M. An Amorphous Carbon Nitride Photocatalyst with Greatly Extended Visible-Light-Responsive Range for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 45724577,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201501939
  57. 57
    Dvoranová, D.; Barbieriková, Z.; Brezová, V. Radical Intermediates in Photoinduced Reactions on TiO2 (an EPR Spin Trapping Study). Molecules 2014, 19, 17279,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules191117279
  58. 58
    Buxton, G. V.; Greenstock, C. L.; Helman, W. P.; Ross, A. B. Critical Review of Rate Constants for Reactions of Hydrated Electrons, Hydrogen Atoms and Hydroxyl Radicals (· OH/· O- in Aqueous Solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 513886,  DOI: 10.1063/1.555805
  59. 59
    Hu, R.; Wang, X.; Dai, S.; Shao, D.; Hayat, T.; Alsaedi, A. Application of Graphitic Carbon Nitride for the Removal of Pb(II) and Aniline from Aqueous Solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 260, 469477,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.09.013
  60. 60
    Moon, G.-H.; Fujitsuka, M.; Kim, S.; Majima, T.; Wang, X.; Choi, W. Eco-Friendly Photochemical Production of H2O2 through O2 Reduction over Carbon Nitride Frameworks Incorporated with Multiple Heteroelements. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 28862895,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03334
  61. 61
    Hu, S.; Li, F.; Fan, Z.; Wang, F.; Zhao, Y.; Lv, Z. Band gap-tunable potassium doped graphitic carbon nitride with enhanced mineralization ability. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 10841092,  DOI: 10.1039/C4DT02658F
  62. 62
    Zhang, H.; Tian, W.; Zhou, L.; Sun, H.; Tade, M.; Wang, S. Monodisperse Co3O4Quantum Dots on Porous Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Enhanced Visible-Light-Driven Water Oxidation. Appl. Catal., B 2018, 223, 29,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.03.028
  63. 63
    Son, E. J.; Lee, Y. W.; Ko, J. W.; Park, C. B. Amorphous Carbon Nitride as a Robust Photocatalyst for Biocatalytic Solar-to-Chemical Conversion. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 25452552,  DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05487

Cited By

This article is cited by 59 publications.

  1. Chung Hyun Lee, Jinhyun Kim, Chan Beum Park. Z-Schematic Artificial Leaf Structure for Biosolar Oxyfunctionalization of Hydrocarbons. ACS Energy Letters 2023, 8 (6) , 2513-2521. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00587
  2. Hassan Sepehrmansourie, Hassan Alamgholiloo, Mohammad Ali Zolfigol, Nader Noroozi Pesyan, Milad Mohammadi Rasooll. Nanoarchitecting a Dual Z-Scheme Zr-MOF/Ti-MOF/g-C3N4 Heterojunction for Boosting Gomberg–Buchmann–Hey Reactions under Visible Light Conditions. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2023, 11 (8) , 3182-3193. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c04810
  3. Qianqian Shen, Chen Zhang, Lei Chen, Boqiang Huang, Yunsong Yu, Zaoxiao Zhang, Wuyuan Zhang. Characterization of Pt/g-C3N4-Catalyzed Methanol Oxidation to Drive Peroxygenase-Catalyzed Oxyfunctionalization of Hydrocarbons. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2022, 10 (37) , 12156-12164. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c02608
  4. Hideaki Kawana, Toru Miwa, Yuki Honda, Toshiki Furuya. Sustainable Approach for Peroxygenase-Catalyzed Oxidation Reactions Using Hydrogen Peroxide Generated from Spent Coffee Grounds and Tea Leaf Residues. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (23) , 20259-20266. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c02186
  5. Hao Cheng, Jun Cheng, Lei Wang, Hangxun Xu. Reaction Pathways toward Sustainable Photosynthesis of Hydrogen Peroxide by Polymer Photocatalysts. Chemistry of Materials 2022, 34 (10) , 4259-4273. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c00936
  6. Wenxin Wei, Francesca Mazzotta, Ingo Lieberwirth, Katharina Landfester, Calum T. J. Ferguson, Kai A. I. Zhang. Aerobic Photobiocatalysis Enabled by Combining Core–Shell Nanophotoreactors and Native Enzymes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (16) , 7320-7326. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c00576
  7. Hui Chen, Tianhua Tang, Christian A. Malapit, Yoo Seok Lee, Matthew B. Prater, N. Samali Weliwatte, Shelley D. Minteer. One-Pot Bioelectrocatalytic Conversion of Chemically Inert Hydrocarbons to Imines. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (9) , 4047-4056. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c13063
  8. Jingshan Jia, Qian Huo, Dong Yang, Yiying Sun, Songping Zhang, Shihao Li, Jiafu Shi, Zhongyi Jiang. Granum-Inspired Photoenzyme-Coupled Catalytic System via Stacked Polymeric Carbon Nitride. ACS Catalysis 2021, 11 (15) , 9210-9220. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c01555
  9. Fabio Tonin, Florian Tieves, Sébastien Willot, Anouska van Troost, Remco van Oosten, Stefaan Breestraat, Sander van Pelt, Miguel Alcalde, Frank Hollmann. Pilot-Scale Production of Peroxygenase from Agrocybe aegerita. Organic Process Research & Development 2021, 25 (6) , 1414-1418. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.1c00116
  10. Patricia Gomez de Santos, Sofia Lazaro, Javier Viña-Gonzalez, Manh Dat Hoang, Israel Sánchez-Moreno, Anton Glieder, Frank Hollmann, Miguel Alcalde. Evolved Peroxygenase–Aryl Alcohol Oxidase Fusions for Self-Sufficient Oxyfunctionalization Reactions. ACS Catalysis 2020, 10 (22) , 13524-13534. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c03029
  11. Yonghai Liu, Yang Yu, Chengyu Sun, Yiwei Fu, Zhiguo Mang, Lei Shi, Hao Li. Transition-Metal Free Chemoselective Hydroxylation and Hydroxylation–Deuteration of Heterobenzylic Methylenes. Organic Letters 2020, 22 (20) , 8127-8131. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.0c03108
  12. Jie Xiao, Xianlong Liu, Lun Pan, Chengxiang Shi, Xiangwen Zhang, Ji-Jun Zou. Heterogeneous Photocatalytic Organic Transformation Reactions Using Conjugated Polymers-Based Materials. ACS Catalysis 2020, 10 (20) , 12256-12283. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c03480
  13. Bo Yuan, Durga Mahor, Qiang Fei, Ron Wever, Miguel Alcalde, Wuyuan Zhang, Frank Hollmann. Water-Soluble Anthraquinone Photocatalysts Enable Methanol-Driven Enzymatic Halogenation and Hydroxylation Reactions. ACS Catalysis 2020, 10 (15) , 8277-8284. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c01958
  14. Jaeho Yoon, Jinhyun Kim, Florian Tieves, Wuyuan Zhang, Miguel Alcalde, Frank Hollmann, Chan Beum Park. Piezobiocatalysis: Ultrasound-Driven Enzymatic Oxyfunctionalization of C–H Bonds. ACS Catalysis 2020, 10 (9) , 5236-5242. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c00188
  15. Eirik G. Kommedal, Camilla F. Angeltveit, Leesa J. Klau, Iván Ayuso-Fernández, Bjørnar Arstad, Simen G. Antonsen, Yngve Stenstrøm, Dag Ekeberg, Francisco Gírio, Florbela Carvalheiro, Svein J. Horn, Finn Lillelund Aachmann, Vincent G. H. Eijsink. Visible light-exposed lignin facilitates cellulose solubilization by lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases. Nature Communications 2023, 14 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36660-4
  16. Pascal Püllmann, Dominik Homann, Tobias A. Karl, Burkhard König, Martin J. Weissenborn. Light‐Controlled Biocatalysis by Unspecific Peroxygenases with Genetically Encoded Photosensitizers. Angewandte Chemie 2023, 3 https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202307897
  17. Pascal Püllmann, Dominik Homann, Tobias A. Karl, Burkhard König, Martin J. Weissenborn. Light‐Controlled Biocatalysis by Unspecific Peroxygenases with Genetically Encoded Photosensitizers. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2023, 70 https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202307897
  18. Xi Cheng, Bruna Palma, Heng Zhao, Hongguang Zhang, Jiu Wang, Zhangxin Chen, Jinguang Hu. Photoreforming for Lignin Upgrading: A Critical Review. ChemSusChem 2023, 24 https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202300675
  19. Yukai Sheng, , . Light-driven cofactor-free hydroxylation driven by P450 BM3@g-C3N4. 2023, 70. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2687669
  20. Piera De Santis, Deborah Wegstein, Bastien O. Burek, Jacqueline Patzsch, Miguel Alcalde, Wolfgang Kroutil, Jonathan Z. Bloh, Selin Kara. Robust Light Driven Enzymatic Oxyfunctionalization via Immobilization of Unspecific Peroxygenase. ChemSusChem 2023, 60 https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202300613
  21. Xuewu Deng, Xiaobing Zheng, Feifei Jia, Cuiyao Cao, Haolei Song, Yanjun Jiang, Yunting Liu, Guanhua Liu, Shijie Li, Lihui Wang. Unspecific peroxygenases immobilized on Pd-loaded three-dimensional ordered macroporous (3DOM) titania photocatalyst for photo-enzyme integrated catalysis. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2023, 330 , 122622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122622
  22. Dianelis T. Monterrey, Andrea Menés-Rubio, Merve Keser, David Gonzalez-Perez, Miguel Alcalde. Unspecific peroxygenases: The pot of gold at the end of the oxyfunctionalization rainbow?. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 2023, 41 , 100786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100786
  23. Joana C. Lopes, Tânia Moniz, Maria J. Sampaio, Cláudia G. Silva, Maria Rangel, Joaquim L. Faria. Efficient synthesis of imines using carbon nitride as photocatalyst. Catalysis Today 2023, 418 , 114045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2023.114045
  24. Michael E. Runda, Sandy Schmidt. Light-driven bioprocesses. Physical Sciences Reviews 2023, Article ASAP.
  25. Jinhyun Kim, Chan Beum Park. Collaborative catalysis for solar biosynthesis. Trends in Chemistry 2023, 5 (2) , 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2022.11.005
  26. Chul-Ho Yun, Jinhyun Kim, Frank Hollmann, Chan Beum Park. Light-driven biocatalytic oxidation. Chemical Science 2022, 13 (42) , 12260-12279. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SC03483B
  27. Renzhi Xiong, Changcun Tang, Kunjiao Li, Jiabao Wan, Weifeng Jia, Yanhe Xiao, Baochang Cheng, Shuijin Lei. Plasmon photothermal-promoted solar photocatalytic hydrogen production over a CoCr 2 O 4 /g-C 3 N 4 heterojunction. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2022, 10 (42) , 22819-22833. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TA05712C
  28. Eirik G. Kommedal, Fredrikke Sæther, Thomas Hahn, Vincent G. H. Eijsink. Natural photoredox catalysts promote light-driven lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase reactions and enzymatic turnover of biomass. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2022, 119 (34) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2204510119
  29. Zhenfu Wang, Yang Hu, Songping Zhang, Yan Sun. Artificial photosynthesis systems for solar energy conversion and storage: platforms and their realities. Chemical Society Reviews 2022, 51 (15) , 6704-6737. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CS01008E
  30. Sarah Bierbaumer, Luca Schmermund, Alexander List, Christoph K. Winkler, Silvia M. Glueck, Wolfgang Kroutil. Synthesis of Enantiopure Sulfoxides by Concurrent Photocatalytic Oxidation and Biocatalytic Reduction. Angewandte Chemie 2022, 134 (17) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202117103
  31. Sarah Bierbaumer, Luca Schmermund, Alexander List, Christoph K. Winkler, Silvia M. Glueck, Wolfgang Kroutil. Synthesis of Enantiopure Sulfoxides by Concurrent Photocatalytic Oxidation and Biocatalytic Reduction. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2022, 61 (17) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202117103
  32. Bastien O. Burek, Ayad W. H. Dawood, Frank Hollmann, Andreas Liese, Dirk Holtmann. Process Intensification as Game Changer in Enzyme Catalysis. Frontiers in Catalysis 2022, 2 https://doi.org/10.3389/fctls.2022.858706
  33. Liza Sarma, Garima Mann, Anupama Datta, Meganathan Thirumal. Fabrication of tailored rod-shaped carbon nitride, g-C 3 N 4 , decorated with MoSe 2 flowers for the catalytic reduction of nitrophenol, organic dye degradation and biocompatibility studies. New Journal of Chemistry 2022, 46 (11) , 5137-5149. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NJ06135F
  34. Jinhyun Kim, Trang Vu Thien Nguyen, Yong Hwan Kim, Frank Hollmann, Chan Beum Park. Lignin as a multifunctional photocatalyst for solar-powered biocatalytic oxyfunctionalization of C–H bonds. Nature Synthesis 2022, 1 (3) , 217-226. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-022-00035-2
  35. Yao Liu, Guangzhao Wang, Yunfei Li, Peng Du, Xuefang Lan, Sung Heum Park, Jinsheng Shi, Yongchao Ma. The biopolymer-assisted synthesis of assembled g-C 3 N 4 open frameworks with electron delocalization channels for prompt H 2 production. Catalysis Science & Technology 2022, 12 (4) , 1368-1377. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CY02181H
  36. Zaixiang Xu, Yang Li, Yongyong Cao, Renfeng Du, Zhikang Bao, Shijie Zhang, Fangjun Shao, Wenkai Ji, Jun Yang, Guilin Zhuang, Shengwei Deng, Zhongzhe Wei, Zihao Yao, Xing Zhong, Jianguo Wang. Trace water triggers high-efficiency photocatalytic hydrogen peroxide production. Journal of Energy Chemistry 2022, 64 , 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2021.03.055
  37. Kexin Li, Qingyuan Yang, Pengpeng Zhang, Wuyuan Zhang. Research Progress of Peroxygenase-Catalyzed Reactions Driven by in-situ Generation of H 2 O 2. Chinese Journal of Organic Chemistry 2022, 42 (3) , 732. https://doi.org/10.6023/cjoc202108052
  38. Nan Yang, Yao Tian, Mai Zhang, Xiting Peng, Feng Li, Jianxun Li, Yi Li, Bei Fan, Fengzhong Wang, Hao Song. Photocatalyst-enzyme hybrid systems for light-driven biotransformation. Biotechnology Advances 2022, 54 , 107808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107808
  39. Shaohua Zhang, Shusong Liu, Yiying Sun, Shihao Li, Jiafu Shi, Zhongyi Jiang. Enzyme-photo-coupled catalytic systems. Chemical Society Reviews 2021, 50 (24) , 13449-13466. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CS00392E
  40. Wanying Liang, Rui Zhu, Xinglong Li, Jin Deng, Yao Fu. Heterogeneous photocatalyzed acceptorless dehydrogenation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural upon visible-light illumination. Green Chemistry 2021, 23 (17) , 6604-6613. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1GC01286J
  41. Yuanying Li, Bo Yuan, Zhoutong Sun, Wuyuan Zhang. C–H bond functionalization reactions enabled by photobiocatalytic cascades. Green Synthesis and Catalysis 2021, 2 (3) , 267-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gresc.2021.06.001
  42. Derik Wilbers, Joseph Brehm, Richard J. Lewis, Jacqueline van Marwijk, Thomas E. Davies, David J. Morgan, Diederik J. Opperman, Martha S. Smit, Miguel Alcalde, Athanasios Kotsiopoulos, Susan T. L. Harrison, Graham J. Hutchings, Simon J. Freakley. Controlling product selectivity with nanoparticle composition in tandem chemo-biocatalytic styrene oxidation. Green Chemistry 2021, 23 (11) , 4170-4180. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0GC04320F
  43. Youyu Duan, Yang Wang, Liyong Gan, Jiazhi Meng, Yajie Feng, Kaiwen Wang, Kai Zhou, Cong Wang, Xiaodong Han, Xiaoyuan Zhou. Amorphous Carbon Nitride with Three Coordinate Nitrogen (N3 C ) Vacancies for Exceptional NO x Abatement in Visible Light. Advanced Energy Materials 2021, 11 (19) https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202004001
  44. . Photocatalytic and Biocatalytic Cascade Transformations. 2021, 313-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527814268.ch7
  45. Hannah L. Wapshott-Stehli, Amy M. Grunden. In situ H2O2 generation methods in the context of enzyme biocatalysis. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2021, 145 , 109744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2021.109744
  46. Luca Schmermund, Susanne Reischauer, Sarah Bierbaumer, Christoph K. Winkler, Alba Diaz‐Rodriguez, Lee J. Edwards, Selin Kara, Tamara Mielke, Jared Cartwright, Gideon Grogan, Bartholomäus Pieber, Wolfgang Kroutil. Chromoselective Photocatalysis Enables Stereocomplementary Biocatalytic Pathways**. Angewandte Chemie 2021, 133 (13) , 7041-7045. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202100164
  47. Luca Schmermund, Susanne Reischauer, Sarah Bierbaumer, Christoph K. Winkler, Alba Diaz‐Rodriguez, Lee J. Edwards, Selin Kara, Tamara Mielke, Jared Cartwright, Gideon Grogan, Bartholomäus Pieber, Wolfgang Kroutil. Chromoselective Photocatalysis Enables Stereocomplementary Biocatalytic Pathways**. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2021, 60 (13) , 6965-6969. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202100164
  48. Fatma Feyza Özgen, Michael E. Runda, Sandy Schmidt. Photo‐biocatalytic Cascades: Combining Chemical and Enzymatic Transformations Fueled by Light. ChemBioChem 2021, 22 (5) , 790-806. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202000587
  49. Jiyong Bian, Xiaoqiang An, Wei Jiang, Ruiping Liu, Chengzhi Hu, Huijuan Liu. Defect-enhanced activation of carbon nitride/horseradish peroxidase nanohybrids for visible-light-driven photobiocatalytic water purification. Chemical Engineering Journal 2021, 408 , 127231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127231
  50. Rui Zhu, Gongyu Zhou, Jia-nan Teng, Wanying Liang, Xinglong Li, Yao Fu. Metal-free photocatalytic aerobic oxidation of biomass-based furfural derivatives to prepare γ-butyrolactone. Green Chemistry 2021, 23 (4) , 1758-1765. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0GC04234J
  51. Jingjun Li, Baohui Ren, Xuyan Yan, Peixian Li, Shuiying Gao, Rong Cao. Visible-light-mediated aerobic oxidation of toluene via V2O5@CN boosting benzylic C(sp3) H bond activation. Journal of Catalysis 2021, 395 , 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2021.01.002
  52. Xueying Qiu, Yin Zhang, Yanfei Zhu, Chang Long, Lina Su, Shaoqin Liu, Zhiyong Tang. Applications of Nanomaterials in Asymmetric Photocatalysis: Recent Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities. Advanced Materials 2021, 33 (6) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202001731
  53. Celine Eidenschenk, Lionel Cheruzel. Ru(II)-diimine complexes and cytochrome P450 working hand-in-hand. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 2020, 213 , 111254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2020.111254
  54. Da Som Choi, Jinhyun Kim, Frank Hollmann, Chan Beum Park. Solar‐Assisted eBiorefinery: Photoelectrochemical Pairing of Oxyfunctionalization and Hydrogenation Reactions. Angewandte Chemie 2020, 132 (37) , 16020-16024. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202006893
  55. Da Som Choi, Jinhyun Kim, Frank Hollmann, Chan Beum Park. Solar‐Assisted eBiorefinery: Photoelectrochemical Pairing of Oxyfunctionalization and Hydrogenation Reactions. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2020, 59 (37) , 15886-15890. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202006893
  56. Xiaoqiang Huang, Mingfeng Cao, Huimin Zhao. Integrating biocatalysis with chemocatalysis for selective transformations. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 2020, 55 , 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.02.004
  57. Myohwa Ko, Le Thanh Mai Pham, Young Jin Sa, Jinwoo Woo, Trang Vu Thien Nguyen, Jae Hyung Kim, Dongrak Oh, Pankaj Sharma, Jungki Ryu, Tae Joo Shin, Sang Hoon Joo, Yong Hwan Kim, Ji-Wook Jang. Unassisted solar lignin valorisation using a compartmented photo-electro-biochemical cell. Nature Communications 2019, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13022-7
  58. Rick C. Betori, Catherine M. May, Karl A. Scheidt. Combined Photoredox/Enzymatic C−H Benzylic Hydroxylations. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2019, 58 (46) , 16490-16494. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201909426
  59. Rick C. Betori, Catherine M. May, Karl A. Scheidt. Combined Photoredox/Enzymatic C−H Benzylic Hydroxylations. Angewandte Chemie 2019, 131 (46) , 16642-16646. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201909426
  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Photoenzymatic Hydroxylation of Ethyl Benzene Combining Heterogeneous Photocatalysts for the Reductive Activation of O2 to H2O2 with a Peroxygenase-Catalyzed Oxyfunctionalization Reaction

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Performance of several heterogeneous photocatalysts to promote rAaeUPO-catalyzed oxyfunctionalization, forming phenyl ethanol (blue) and the overoxidation product acetophenone (red), in absence (left) or presence (right) of methanol. Conditions: 5 mg mL–1 heterogeneous catalyst, 50 mM ethylbenzene, 0 or 250 mM methanol, and 100 nM rAaeUPO in a 100 mM phosphate buffer at pH 7, 30 °C and stirring at 300 rpm. Illumination by an Osram 200W light bulb for 30 min. Reactions were performed in independent duplicates. 1: Au-BiVO4; (40)2: Co3O4 (quantum dots); (41)3: Co4(H2O)2(W9O34)2; (42)4: Pt-TiO2 (Rutile); (43)5: MnO (on Faujasite); (44)6: Co-TiO2; (45)7: MnO (nanowires); (46)8: Ir@SiO2; 9: Fe2O3; (47)10: g-C3N4; 11: ZnO (nanoclusters). (48)

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. g-C3N4 as photocatalyst to promote rAaeUPO-catalyzed hydroxylation of ethylbenzene in the absence of external electron donors (blue), or 250 mM methanol (red) or 250 mM formate (green). (A) Time course of (R)-1-phenyl ethanol formation and (B) time course of acetophenone formation. From these time courses, parameters such as reaction rate (C), rAaeUPO inactivation rate (D), maximal product concentration (E), and selectivity (F) were calculated. General conditions: [rAaeUPO] = 100 nM, [ethylbenzene] = 50 mM, [g-C3N4] = 5 mg mL–1, KPi buffer pH 7.0 (100 mM), 30 °C, magnetic stirring at 600 rpm, illumination by an Osram 200W light bulb. Reactions were performed in independent duplicates.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Influence of the formate concentration on the performance of the photoenzymatic hydroxylation of ethylbenzene. (A) Time course of (R)-1-phenyl ethanol formation and (B) time course of acetophenone formation. From these time courses, parameters such as reaction rate (C), rAaeUPO inactivation rate (D), maximal product concentration (E), and selectivity (F) were calculated. [HCO2] = 0 mM (black), 50 mM (green), 100 mM (red), 250 mM (blue) or 500 mM (purple). General conditions: [rAaeUPO] = 100 nM, [ethylbenzene] = 50 mM, [g-C3N4] = 5 mg mL–1, KPi buffer pH 7.0 (100 mM), 30 °C, magnetic stirring at 600 rpm, illumination by an Osram 200W light bulb. Reactions were performed in independent duplicates.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Influence of the rAaeUPO concentration on the performance of the photoenzymatic hydroxylation of ethylbenzene. A: time course of (R)-1-phenyl ethanol formation and B: time course of acetophenone formation. From these time courses, parameters such as reaction rate (C), rAaeUPO inactivation rate (D), maximal product concentration (E) and selectivity (F) were calculated. [rAaeUPO] = 20 nM (black), 50 nM (red), 100 nM (blue), 200 nM (green) or 500 nM (purple). General conditions: [NaHCO2] = 250 mM, [ethylbenzene] = 50 mM, [g-C3N4] = 5 mg mL–1, KPi buffer pH 7.0 (100 mM), 30 °C, magnetic stirring at 600 rpm, illumination by an Osram 200W light bulb. Reactions were performed in independent duplicates.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Influence of the g-C3N4 concentration on the performance of the photoenzymatic hydroxylation of ethylbenzene. (A) Time course of (R)-1-phenyl ethanol formation and (B) time course of acetophenone formation. From these time courses, parameters such as reaction rate (C), rAaeUPO inactivation rate (D), maximal product concentration (E) and selectivity (F) were calculated. [g-C3N4] = 1 mg mL–1 (black), 2.5 mg mL–1 (red), 5 mg mL–1 (blue), 10 mg mL–1 (green), or 15 mg mL–1 (purple). General conditions: [NaHCO2] = 250 mM, [ethylbenzene] = 50 mM, [rAaeUPO] = 100 nM, KPi buffer pH 7.0 (100 mM), 30 °C, magnetic stirring at 600 rpm, illumination by an Osram 200W light bulb. Reactions were performed in independent duplicates.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Influence of g-C3N4 morphology on the photoenzymatic hydroxylation of ethylbenzene. (A) Time course of (R)-1-phenyl ethanol formation and (B) time course of acetophenone formation. From these time courses, parameters such as reaction rate (C), rAaeUPO inactivation rate (D), maximal product concentration (E), and selectivity (F) were calculated. Amorphous g-C3N4(black), g-C3N4 sheets (red), or g-C3N4 bulk (green). Reaction conditions: [NaHCO2] = 250 mM, [ethylbenzene] = 50 mM, [g-C3N4] = 5 mg mL–1, [rAaeUPO] = 100 nM, KPi buffer pH 7.0 (100 mM), 30 °C, magnetic stirring at 600 rpm, illumination by an Osram 200W light bulb. Reactions were performed in independent duplicates.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Investigating the molecular reasons for the decreased rAaeUPO-stability under process conditions. (A) Detection of hydroxyl radicals formed by irradiated g-C3N4 using the spin-trap method. Signals marked with a star (★) are assigned to the oxidation product of DMPO, 5,5-dimethyl-2-oxopyrroline-1-oxyl (DMPOX). Signals marked with diamonds (◆) belong to the spin adduct DMPO–OH. (B) Protein in solution before (blue) or after (red) incubation with g-C3N4 in the dark, for bovine serum albumin (BSA) or rAaeUPO.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8. Time course of the photoenzymatic hydroxylation of ethylbenzene to (R)-1-phenyl ethanol (black) and overoxidation to acetophenone (red) using the dialysis bag approach. Conditions: 10 mL of reaction solution equally divided inside and outside the dialysis bag (20 kDa cutoff). Inside the bag: [NaHCO2] = 250 mM, [ethylbenzene] = 50 mM, [rAaeUPO] = 100 nM, KPi buffer pH 7.0 (100 mM). Outside the bag: [NaHCO2] = 250 mM, [ethylbenzene] = 50 mM, [g-C3N4] = 5 mg mL–1, KPi buffer pH 7.0 (100 mM). The reaction was performed once at room temperature while stirring at 600 rpm. The reaction solution was illuminated by a LIGHTNINGCURE spot light (Hamamatsu) at 50% intensity with an UV filter.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 63 other publications.

    1. 1
      Roduner, E.; Kaim, W.; Sarkar, B.; Urlacher, V. B.; Pleiss, J.; Gläser, R.; Einicke, W.-D.; Sprenger, G. A.; Beifuß, U.; Klemm, E.; Liebner, C.; Hieronymus, H.; Hsu, S.-F.; Plietker, B.; Laschat, S. Selective Catalytic Oxidation of C-H Bonds with Molecular Oxygen. ChemCatChem 2013, 5, 82112,  DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201200266
    2. 2
      Dong, J.; Fernández-Fueyo, E.; Hollmann, F.; Paul, C.; Pesic, M.; Schmidt, S.; Wang, Y.; Younes, S.; Zhang, W. Biocatalytic Oxidation reactions - a Chemist’s Perspective. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 92389261,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201800343
    3. 3
      Wang, Y.; Lan, D.; Durrani, R.; Hollmann, F. Peroxygenases en route to becoming dream catalysts. What are the Opportunities and Challenges?. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2017, 37, 19,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.10.007
    4. 4
      Martínez, A. T.; Ruiz-Dueñas, F. J.; Camarero, S.; Serrano, A.; Linde, D.; Lund, H.; Vind, J.; Tovborg, M.; Herold-Majumdar, O. M.; Hofrichter, M.; Liers, C.; Ullrich, R.; Scheibner, K.; Sannia, G.; Piscitelli, A.; Pezzella, C.; Sener, M. E.; Kılıç, S.; van Berkel, W. J. H.; Guallar, V.; Lucas, M. F.; Zuhse, R.; Ludwig, R.; Hollmann, F.; Fernández-Fueyo, E.; Record, E.; Faulds, C. B.; Tortajada, M.; Winckelmann, I.; Rasmussen, J.-A.; Gelo-Pujic, M.; Gutiérrez, A.; del Río, J. C.; Rencoret, J.; Alcalde, M. Oxidoreductases on their way to Industrial Biotransformations. Biotechnol. Adv. 2017, 35, 815831,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.06.003
    5. 5
      Hofrichter, M.; Ullrich, R. Oxidations Catalyzed by Fungal Peroxygenases. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2014, 19, 116125,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.01.015
    6. 6
      Holtmann, D.; Hollmann, F. The Oxygen Dilemma: A Severe Challenge for the Application of Monooxygenases?. ChemBioChem 2016, 17, 13911398,  DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201600176
    7. 7
      Valderrama, B.; Ayala, M.; Vazquez-Duhalt, R. Suicide Inactivation of Peroxidases and the Challenge of Engineering More Robust Enzymes. Chem. Biol. 2002, 9, 555565,  DOI: 10.1016/S1074-5521(02)00149-7
    8. 8
      Burek, B. O. O.; Bormann, S.; Hollmann, F.; Bloh, J.; Holtmann, D. Hydrogen peroxide Driven Biocatalysis. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 32323249,  DOI: 10.1039/C9GC00633H
    9. 9
      Paul, C. E.; Churakova, E.; Maurits, E.; Girhard, M.; Urlacher, V. B.; Hollmann, F. In situ formation of H2O2 for P450 Peroxygenases. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 56925696,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.05.074
    10. 10
      Hollmann, F.; Schmid, A. Towards [Cp*Rh(bpy)(H2O)]2+-promoted P450 Catalysis: Direct Regeneration of CytC. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2009, 103, 313315,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2008.11.005
    11. 11
      Karmee, S. K.; Roosen, C.; Kohlmann, C.; Lütz, S.; Greiner, L.; Leitner, W. Chemo-Enzymatic Cascade Oxidation in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide/Water Biphasic Media. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 10521055,  DOI: 10.1039/b820606f
    12. 12
      Ranganathan, S.; Sieber, V. Recent Advances in the Direct Synthesis of Hydrogen Peroxide Using Chemical Catalysis—A Review. Catalysts 2018, 8, 379,  DOI: 10.3390/catal8090379
    13. 13
      Ranganathan, S.; Zeitlhofer, S.; Sieber, V. Development of a Lipase-Mediated Epoxidation Process for Monoterpenes in Choline Chloride-based Deep Eutectic Solvents. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 25762586,  DOI: 10.1039/C7GC01127J
    14. 14
      Ranganathan, S.; Sieber, V. Development of Semi-Continuous Chemo-Enzymatic Terpene Epoxidation: Combination of Anthraquinone Autooxidation and the Lipase-Mediated Epoxidation Process. React. Chem. Eng. 2017, 2, 885895,  DOI: 10.1039/C7RE00112F
    15. 15
      Ranganathan, S.; Tebbe, J.; Wiemann, L.; Sieber, V. Optimization of the Lipase Mediated Epoxidation of Monoterpenes using the Design of Experiments-Taguchi Method. Process Biochem. 2016, 51, 14791485,  DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2016.07.005
    16. 16
      Kohlmann, C.; Lütz, S. Electroenzymatic Synthesis of Chiral Sulfoxides. Eng. Life Sci. 2006, 6, 170174,  DOI: 10.1002/elsc.200620907
    17. 17
      Lutz, S.; Steckhan, E.; Liese, A. First Asymmetric Electroenzymatic Oxidation Catalyzed by a Peroxidase. Electrochem. Commun. 2004, 6, 583587,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2004.04.009
    18. 18
      Horst, A. E. W.; Bormann, S.; Meyer, J.; Steinhagen, M.; Ludwig, R.; Drews, A.; Ansorge-Schumacher, M.; Holtmann, D. Electro-Enzymatic Hydroxylation of Ethylbenzene by the Evolved Unspecific Peroxygenase of Agrocybeaegerita. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2016, 133, S137S142,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2016.12.008
    19. 19
      Holtmann, D.; Krieg, T.; Getrey, L.; Schrader, J. Electroenzymatic Process to Overcome Enzyme Instabilities. Catal. Commun. 2014, 51, 8285,  DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2014.03.033
    20. 20
      Getrey, L.; Krieg, T.; Hollmann, F.; Schrader, J.; Holtmann, D. Enzymatic Halogenation of the Phenolic Monoterpenes Thymol and Carvacrol with Chloroperoxidase. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 11041108,  DOI: 10.1039/C3GC42269K
    21. 21
      Krieg, T.; Huttmann, S.; Mangold, K.-M.; Schrader, J.; Holtmann, D. Gas Diffusion Electrode as Novel Reaction System for an Electro-Enzymatic Process with Chloroperoxidase. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 26862689,  DOI: 10.1039/c1gc15391a
    22. 22
      Pereira, P. C.; Arends, I.; Sheldon, R. A. Optimizing the Chloroperoxidase-Glucose Oxidase System: The Effect of Glucose Oxidase on Activity and Enantioselectivity. Process Biochem. 2015, 50, 746751,  DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2015.02.006
    23. 23
      Tieves, F.; Willot, S. J.-P.; van Schie, M. M. C. H.; Rauch, M. C. R.; Younes, S. H. H.; Zhang, W.; Dong, J.; de Santos, P. G.; Robbins, J. M.; Bommarius, B.; Alcalde, M.; Bommarius, A.; Hollmann, F. Formate Oxidase (FOx) from Aspergillus oryzae: One Catalyst to Promote H2O2-Dependent Biocatalytic Oxidation Reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 78737877,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201902380
    24. 24
      Pesic, M.; Willot, S. J.-P.; Fernández-Fueyo, E.; Tieves, F.; Alcalde, M.; Hollmann, F. Multienzymatic in situ Hydrogen Peroxide Generation Cascade for Peroxygenase-Catalysed Oxyfunctionalisation Reactions. Z. f. Naturforsch. C 2019, 74, 101104,  DOI: 10.1515/znc-2018-0137
    25. 25
      Ma, Y.; Li, P.; Li, Y.; Willot, S. J.-P.; Zhang, W.; Ribitsch, D.; Choi, Y. H.; Zhang, T.; Verpoorte, R.; Hollmann, F.; Wang, Y. Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents as Multifunctional Media for the Valorisation of Agricultural Wastes. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 13101315,  DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201900043
    26. 26
      Ni, Y.; Fernández-Fueyo, E.; Baraibar, A. G.; Ullrich, R.; Hofrichter, M.; Yanase, H.; Alcalde, M.; van Berkel, W. J. H.; Hollmann, F. Peroxygenase-Catalyzed Oxyfunctionalization Reactions Promoted by the Complete Oxidation of Methanol. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 798801,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201507881
    27. 27
      Willot, S. J. P.; Fernández-Fueyo, E.; Tieves, F.; Pesic, M.; Alcalde, M.; Arends, I. W. C. E.; Park, C. B.; Hollmann, F. Expanding the Spectrum of Light-Driven Peroxygenase Reactions. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 890894,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b03752
    28. 28
      Zhang, W.; Fernández-Fueyo, E.; Ni, Y.; van Schie, M.; Gacs, J.; Renirie, R.; Wever, R.; Mutti, F. G.; Rother, D.; Alcalde, M.; Hollmann, F. Selective Aerobic Oxidation Reactions using a Combination of Photocatalytic Water Oxidation and Enzymatic Oxyfunctionalizations. Nat. Catal. 2018, 1, 5562,  DOI: 10.1038/s41929-017-0001-5
    29. 29
      Zhang, W.; Burek, B. O.; Fernández-Fueyo, E.; Alcalde, M.; Bloh, J. Z.; Hollmann, F. Selective Activation of C-H Bonds by Cascading Photochemistry with Biocatalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1545115455,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201708668
    30. 30
      Choi, D. S.; Ni, Y.; Fernández-Fueyo, E.; Lee, M.; Hollmann, F.; Park, C. B. Photoelectroenzymatic Oxyfunctionalization on Flavin-Hybridized Carbon Nanotube Electrode Platform. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 15631567,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03453
    31. 31
      Churakova, E.; Kluge, M.; Ullrich, R.; Arends, I.; Hofrichter, M.; Hollmann, F. Specific Photobiocatalytic Oxyfunctionalization Reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1071610719,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201105308
    32. 32
      Gulder, T.; Seel, C. J. Biocatalysis Fueled by Light: On the Versatile Combination of Photocatalysis and Enzymes. ChemBioChem 2019,  DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201800806 .
    33. 33
      Seel, C. J.; Králík, A.; Hacker, M.; Frank, A.; König, B.; Gulder, T. Atom-Economic Electron Donors for Photobiocatalytic Halogenations. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 39603963,  DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201800886
    34. 34
      Schmermund, L.; Jurkaš, V.; Özgen, F. F.; Barone, G. D.; Büchsenschütz, H. C.; Winkler, C. K.; Schmidt, S.; Kourist, R.; Kroutil, W. Photo-Biocatalysis: Biotransformations in the Presence of Light. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 41154144,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b00656
    35. 35
      Goldstein, S.; Aschengrau, D.; Diamant, Y.; Rabani, J. Photolysis of Aqueous H2O2: Quantum Yield and Applications for Polychromatic UV Actinometry in Photoreactors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 74867490,  DOI: 10.1021/es071379t
    36. 36
      Ullrich, R.; Hofrichter, M. The Haloperoxidase of the Agaric Fungus AgrocybeaegeritaHydroxylates Toluene and Naphthalene. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 62476250,  DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.10.014
    37. 37
      Ullrich, R.; Nüske, J.; Scheibner, K.; Spantzel, J.; Hofrichter, M. Novel Haloperoxidase from the Agaric Basidiomycete AgrocybeaegeritaOxidizes Aryl Alcohols and Aldehydes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 45754581,  DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4575-4581.2004
    38. 38
      Molina-Espeja, P.; Ma, S.; Mate, D. M.; Ludwig, R.; Alcalde, M. Tandem-Yeast Expression System for Engineering and Producing Unspecific Peroxygenase. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2015, 73–74, 2933,  DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2015.03.004
    39. 39
      Molina-Espeja, P.; Garcia-Ruiz, E.; Gonzalez-Perez, D.; Ullrich, R.; Hofrichter, M.; Alcalde, M. Directed Evolution of Unspecific Peroxygenase from Agrocybeaegerita. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 34963507,  DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00490-14
    40. 40
      Hirakawa, H.; Shiota, S.; Shiraishi, Y.; Sakamoto, H.; Ichikawa, S.; Hirai, T. Au Nanoparticles Supported on BiVO4: Effective Inorganic Photocatalysts for H2O2Production from Water and O2 under Visible Light. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 49764982,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b01187
    41. 41
      Shi, N.; Cheng, W.; Zhou, H.; Fan, T.; Niederberger, M. Facile Synthesis of Monodisperse Co3O4Quantum Dots with Efficient Oxygen Evolution Activity. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 13381340,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CC08179J
    42. 42
      Yin, Q. S.; Tan, J. M.; Besson, C.; Geletii, Y. V.; Musaev, D. G.; Kuznetsov, A. E.; Luo, Z.; Hardcastle, K. I.; Hill, C. L. A Fast Soluble Carbon-Free Molecular Water Oxidation Catalyst Based on Abundant Metals. Science 2010, 328, 342345,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1185372
    43. 43
      Priebe, J. B.; Radnik, J.; Lennox, A. J. J.; Pohl, M. M.; Karnahl, M.; Hollmann, D.; Grabow, K.; Bentrup, U.; Junge, H.; Beller, M.; Bruckner, A. Solar Hydrogen Production by Plasmonic Au-TiO2Catalysts: Impact of Synthesis Protocol and TiO2Phase on Charge Transfer Efficiency and H2Evolution Rates. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 21372148,  DOI: 10.1021/cs5018375
    44. 44
      Najafpour, M. M.; Pashaei, B. Nanoscale Manganese Oxide within Faujasite Zeolite as an Efficient and Biomimetic Water Oxidizing Catalyst. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 1015610160,  DOI: 10.1039/c2dt30891f
    45. 45
      Maeda, K.; Ishimaki, K.; Okazaki, M.; Kanazawa, T.; Lu, D.; Nozawa, S.; Kato, H.; Kakihana, M. Cobalt Oxide Nanoclusters on Rutile Titania as Bifunctional Units for Water Oxidation Catalysis and Visible Light Absorption: Understanding the Structure-Activity Relationship. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 61146122,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b15804
    46. 46
      Boppana, V. B. R.; Jiao, F. Nanostructured MnO2: an Efficient and Robust Water Oxidation Catalyst. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 89738975,  DOI: 10.1039/c1cc12258d
    47. 47
      Idris, A.; Hassan, N.; Mohd Ismail, N. S.; Misran, E.; Yusof, N. M.; Ngomsik, A.-F.; Bee, A. Photocatalytic Magnetic Separable Beads for Chromium (VI) Reduction. Water Res. 2010, 44, 16831688,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.11.026
    48. 48
      Hamid, B. A. S.; Teh, S. J.; Lai, C. W. Photocatalytic Water Oxidation on ZnO: A Review. Catalysts 2017, 7, 93,  DOI: 10.3390/catal7030093
    49. 49
      Kim, H. W.; Ross, M. B.; Kornienko, N.; Zhang, L.; Guo, J.; Yang, P.; McCloskey, B. D. Efficient Hydrogen Peroxide Generation using Reduced Graphene Oxide-Based Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysts. Nature Catal. 2018, 1, 282290,  DOI: 10.1038/s41929-018-0044-2
    50. 50
      Zhang, W.; Bariotaki, A.; Smonou, I.; Hollmann, F. Visible-Light-Driven Photooxidation of Alcohols using Surface-Doped Graphitic Carbon Nitride. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 20962100,  DOI: 10.1039/C7GC00539C
    51. 51
      Shiraishi, Y.; Kanazawa, S.; Sugano, Y.; Tsukamoto, D.; Sakamoto, H.; Ichikawa, S.; Hirai, T. Highly Selective Production of Hydrogen Peroxide on Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g-C3N4) Photocatalyst Activated by Visible Light. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 774780,  DOI: 10.1021/cs401208c
    52. 52
      Burek, B. O.; Timm, J.; Bahnemann, D. W.; Bloh, J. Z. Kinetic Effects and Oxidation Pathways of Sacrificial Electron Donors on the Example of the Photocatalytic Reduction of Molecular Oxygen to Hydrogen Peroxide over Illuminated Titanium Dioxide. Catal. Today 2019, 335, 354364,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.12.044
    53. 53
      Li, S.; Dong, G.; Hailili, R.; Yang, L. L.; Li, Y.; Wang, F.; Zeng, Y.; Wang, C. Effective Photocatalytic H2O2Production under Visible Light Irradiation at g-C3N4Modulated by Carbon Vacancies. Appl. Catal., B 2016, 190, 2635,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.004
    54. 54
      Burek, B. O.; de Boer, S. R.; Tieves, F.; Zhang, W.; van Schie, M.; Bormann, S.; Alcalde, M.; Holtmann, D.; Hollmann, F.; Bahnemann, D. W.; Bloh, J. Z., Photoenzymatic Hydroxylation of Ethylbenzene Catalyzed by Unspecific Peroxygenase: Origin of Enzyme Inactivation and the Impact of Light Intensity and Temperature. ChemCatChem 2019,  DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201900610 .
    55. 55
      Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, C. A Comparison of Graphitic Carbon Nitrides Synthesized from Different Precursors through Pyrolysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2017, 332, 3244,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.08.005
    56. 56
      Kang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Yin, L.-C.; Kang, X.; Liu, G.; Cheng, H.-M. An Amorphous Carbon Nitride Photocatalyst with Greatly Extended Visible-Light-Responsive Range for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 45724577,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201501939
    57. 57
      Dvoranová, D.; Barbieriková, Z.; Brezová, V. Radical Intermediates in Photoinduced Reactions on TiO2 (an EPR Spin Trapping Study). Molecules 2014, 19, 17279,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules191117279
    58. 58
      Buxton, G. V.; Greenstock, C. L.; Helman, W. P.; Ross, A. B. Critical Review of Rate Constants for Reactions of Hydrated Electrons, Hydrogen Atoms and Hydroxyl Radicals (· OH/· O- in Aqueous Solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 513886,  DOI: 10.1063/1.555805
    59. 59
      Hu, R.; Wang, X.; Dai, S.; Shao, D.; Hayat, T.; Alsaedi, A. Application of Graphitic Carbon Nitride for the Removal of Pb(II) and Aniline from Aqueous Solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 260, 469477,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.09.013
    60. 60
      Moon, G.-H.; Fujitsuka, M.; Kim, S.; Majima, T.; Wang, X.; Choi, W. Eco-Friendly Photochemical Production of H2O2 through O2 Reduction over Carbon Nitride Frameworks Incorporated with Multiple Heteroelements. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 28862895,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03334
    61. 61
      Hu, S.; Li, F.; Fan, Z.; Wang, F.; Zhao, Y.; Lv, Z. Band gap-tunable potassium doped graphitic carbon nitride with enhanced mineralization ability. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 10841092,  DOI: 10.1039/C4DT02658F
    62. 62
      Zhang, H.; Tian, W.; Zhou, L.; Sun, H.; Tade, M.; Wang, S. Monodisperse Co3O4Quantum Dots on Porous Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Enhanced Visible-Light-Driven Water Oxidation. Appl. Catal., B 2018, 223, 29,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.03.028
    63. 63
      Son, E. J.; Lee, Y. W.; Ko, J. W.; Park, C. B. Amorphous Carbon Nitride as a Robust Photocatalyst for Biocatalytic Solar-to-Chemical Conversion. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 25452552,  DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05487
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b01341.

    • Preparation of the catalysts, reaction setup, analytical data, and additional results (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect