ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Mechanically Triggered Release of Functionally Diverse Molecular Payloads from Masked 2-Furylcarbinol Derivatives
My Activity
  • Open Access
Research Article

Mechanically Triggered Release of Functionally Diverse Molecular Payloads from Masked 2-Furylcarbinol Derivatives
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Central Science

Cite this: ACS Cent. Sci. 2021, 7, 7, 1216–1224
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.1c00460
Published July 14, 2021

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Polymers that release functional small molecules in response to mechanical force are appealing targets for drug delivery, sensing, catalysis, and many other applications. Mechanically sensitive molecules called mechanophores are uniquely suited to enable molecular release with excellent selectivity and control, but mechanophore designs capable of releasing cargo with diverse chemical functionality are limited. Here, we describe a general and highly modular mechanophore platform based on masked 2-furylcarbinol derivatives that spontaneously decompose under mild conditions upon liberation via a mechanically triggered reaction, resulting in the release of a covalently installed molecular payload. We identify key structure–property relationships for the reactivity of 2-furylcarbinol derivatives that enable the mechanically triggered release of functionally diverse molecular cargo with release kinetics being tunable over several orders of magnitude. In particular, the incorporation of an electron-donating phenoxy group on the furan ring in combination with an α-methyl substituent dramatically lowers the activation barrier for fragmentation, providing a highly active substrate for molecular release. Moreover, we find that phenoxy substitution enhances the thermal stability of the mechanophore without adversely affecting its mechanochemical reactivity. The generality and efficacy of this molecular design platform are demonstrated using ultrasound-induced mechanical force to trigger the efficient release of a broad scope of cargo molecules, including those bearing alcohol, phenol, alkylamine, arylamine, carboxylic acid, and sulfonic acid functional groups.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
  • nc licence
  • nd licence
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Synopsis

Polymers that release small molecules under mechanical force are desirable targets for a wide range of applications. We report a highly effective platform for mechanically triggered molecular release.

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Polymers that release functional molecules in response to a specific stimulus are desirable for a variety of applications including sensing, catalysis, self-healing, and targeted drug delivery. (1−3) Mechanically triggered release is a particularly appealing target. To this end, several different approaches have been demonstrated, including physically entrapped payloads within a polymeric matrix, (4) dissociation of supramolecular assemblies, (5,6) and the use of fluid-filled microcapsules (7) or vascular networks (8) embedded within a material that release their payload after being ruptured. Recently, the use of mechanical force as an external stimulus to drive covalent chemical transformations has emerged as an attractive strategy. (9) Force is typically transduced via polymer chains to mechanically sensitive molecules known as mechanophores that respond in a chemoselective fashion, resulting in a productive chemical reaction. (10,11) In the context of targeted drug delivery, for example, ultrasound is capable of penetrating deep within biological tissues to stimulate mechanochemical transformations noninvasively with spatial and temporal precision. (12) In light of these advantages, the field of polymer mechanochemistry has attracted significant interest for the design of autonomous materials that respond innately to mechanically dynamic environments, (3) as well as abundant opportunities to advance the fundamental understanding of mechanochemical reactivity, which is underdeveloped in comparison to other areas of organic chemistry. (13)
Several mechanophores have been designed to achieve the mechanically triggered release of functional organic molecules, although the scope of molecules that can be released is still relatively limited. Moore and Craig have designed mechanophores based on gem-dichlorocyclopropane motifs that undergo mechanochemical rearrangement reactions with subsequent release of HCl. (14,15) Boydston has developed mechanophores based on a flex-activation manifold demonstrating release of a benzyl furfuryl ether molecule via a mechanically induced cycloelimination reaction (16,17) and the release of N-heterocyclic carbenes. (18) Notably, each approach uses a judiciously designed mechanophore to release a specific compound upon mechanical activation, which consequently limits the scope of molecules that can be released. Small-molecule release has also been achieved through the mechanically triggered heterolytic scission and subsequent depolymerization of poly(o-phthalaldehyde) to regenerate its constituent monomers. (19,20) Finally, Herrmann and Göstl have introduced an elegant mechanophore design that relies on the mechanically activated reduction (21,22) of a chain-centered disulfide unit and ensuing 5-exo-trig cyclization to release an alcohol attached via a β-carbonate linker. (5,23) While the release of several different alcohols has been successfully demonstrated using this disulfide mechanophore platform, it is susceptible to nonspecific activation via chemical reduction or thiol exchange and the cargo scope appears to be somewhat limited, as indicated by the low release efficiency observed for amine payloads. (24)
In 2019, our group reported a strategy for molecular release via a mechanically triggered cascade reaction in which a mechanochemical retro-Diels–Alder reaction unveils an unstable furfuryl carbonate motif that subsequently decomposes under mild conditions to release its molecular payload. The mechanically triggered release of the fluorescent probe 7-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin was demonstrated to occur efficiently at room temperature with a half-life (t1/2) on the order of 1 h following mechanical activation (Scheme 1a). (25) The α-methyl group on the furfuryl carbonate was a key structural feature that enabled relatively fast release of hydroxycoumarin, presumably due to stabilization of the developing positive charge in the transition state leading to the secondary furfuryl cation intermediate. (26,27) This general strategy relies on the concept of mechanically gated reactivity, (28) in which the mechanochemical reaction is decoupled from the ultimate functional response, and follows our earlier conceptualization of mechanically gated photoswitching. (29) This paradigm offers a powerful approach for the design of highly modular systems, as the mechanochemical behavior of the mechanophore and the functional properties of the masked intermediate can be controlled independently. While the molecular design strategy is promising, our first-generation mechanophore is nevertheless limited to the release of phenols and a more general platform capable of releasing functionally diverse molecular cargo on reasonable time scales is desired.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Mechanically Triggered Molecular Release via a Retro-Diels–Alder/Fragmentation Cascade
Here we investigate the effect of substitution on the reactivity of 2-furylcarbinol derivatives, identifying structure–activity relationships (SAR) that enable the mechanically triggered release of functionally diverse molecular payloads from a second-generation mechanophore platform (Scheme 1b). Using density functional theory (DFT) calculations to guide molecular design, we demonstrate that the rate of molecular release is significantly modulated by varying the substitution of the 2-furylcarbinol scaffold. In particular, substitution at the 3-position of the furan ring with an electron-donating phenoxy group, combined with an α-methyl substituent, renders a highly reactive substrate for molecular release. Masked 2-furylcarbinol derivatives are incorporated into polymers and activated using ultrasound to achieve the mechanically triggered release of alkyl/aryl alcohols and amines and further extended to cargo molecules containing carboxylic acid and sulfonic acid functional groups conjugated to the mechanophore via carboxylate and sulfonate linkages.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Furfuryl carbonates decompose in polar protic media by the mechanism depicted in Scheme 1a via a putative furfuryl cation intermediate. (30) Primary furfuryl carbonates possessing only an alkyl group at the 5-position of the furan ring are relatively unreactive and decompose slowly at room temperature; however, installation of an additional α-methyl group significantly reduces the activation barrier for carbonate fragmentation. (25) While this substitution pattern is sufficient to enable the release of a phenolic cargo molecule with a half-life of approximately 1 h, the rate of fragmentation is still prohibitively slow for alcohol- and amine-derived furfuryl carbonates and carbamates, respectively. For example, preliminary kinetic studies performed on a small-molecule model compound reveal that the release of a primary alcohol from our earlier furfuryl carbonate substrate occurs with a half-life of approximately 4 days, or nearly 100× slower than the release of hydroxycoumarin (Figure S1). We reasoned that the addition of an electron-donating substituent (31) at the 3-position of the furan would further suppress the activation barrier for fragmentation since this substituent is in resonance with the furfuryl carbocation, potentially enabling the efficient release of even more challenging payloads such as amines (32) under mild conditions.
To test this hypothesis, we first computed the activation energies for fragmentation of a series of model primary and secondary furfuryl carbonate (FC1(O)FC4(O)) and furfuryl carbamate (FC1(NH)FC4(NH)) substrates with varying substitution at the 3-position of the furan ring (Figure 1). Activation energies were calculated using DFT at the M06-2X/6-311+G** level of theory using a polarizable continuum model to simulate a polar solvent environment (see the Supporting Information for details). For the furfuryl carbonate series, α-methyl substitution reduces the activation energy for fragmentation by 3.2–3.8 kcal/mol relative to the primary furfuryl carbonate substrates. Similarly, the addition of an electron-donating phenoxy substituent at the 3-position of the furan ring lowers the computed activation energies by 3.7–4.3 kcal/mol. Significantly, the combination of α-methyl and 3-phenoxy substitution on FC1(O) results in a computed activation energy of 18.3 kcal/mol, suggesting a nearly instantaneous reaction at room temperature. These values indicate that the half-life for reaction of FC1(O) is nearly 5 orders of magnitude shorter than that of the unsubstituted primary furfuryl carbonate represented by FC4(O) and approximately 500× shorter than that of our originally reported secondary furfuryl carbonate substrate depicted by FC3(O). A similar trend in reactivity is observed for the furfuryl carbamate model series; however, calculated activation energies are 5.5–7.6 kcal/mol higher for the furfuryl carbamates in comparison to the analogous furfuryl carbonate substrates in all cases. The higher activation energies calculated for the furfuryl carbamate series are consistent with experimentally determined reaction kinetics for different self-immolative spacers, (33) which suggest that the more electron withdrawing carbonate leaving group is able to better stabilize the partial negative charge on the oxygen atom of the fragmenting C–O bond in the transition state relative to a carbamate leaving group. The activation energies calculated for furfuryl carbamates FC2(NH)FC4(NH) suggest that decomposition of similarly substituted substrates occurs on time scales that are impractical for triggered release. For furfuryl carbamate model FC1(NH), however, the combination of α-methyl and 3-phenoxy substitution significantly reduces the activation barrier to 23.8 kcal/mol, which approaches the activation energy calculated for our first-generation furfuryl carbonate and suggests that the release of challenging amine-based molecular payloads may be accessible on reasonable time scales.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Substituent effects on the reactivity of 2-furylcarbinol derivatives. (a) Structures of model furfuryl carbonates (X = O) and furfuryl carbamates (X = NH) with varying substitution patterns, and (b) corresponding activation energies for fragmentation of the α-C–O bond calculated at the M06-2X/6-311+G** level of density functional theory.

To validate the computational predictions, we synthesized fluorogenic furfuryl carbamate model compound 1 containing α-methyl and 3-phenoxy substituents and investigated its reactivity experimentally (Figure 2a). The coumarin payload exhibits a fluorescence turn-on after release, allowing the reaction to be conveniently monitored using photoluminescence (PL), in addition to NMR spectroscopy. The addition of methanol to a room-temperature solution of 1 in acetonitrile-d3 (19 μM, 3:1 MeCN/MeOH) triggers decomposition and results in clean conversion to aminocoumarin 3 and furfuryl methyl ether 4, as evidenced by NMR spectroscopy (Figure 2b). The formation of furfuryl methyl ether 4 is consistent with the transient formation of a furfuryl cation intermediate that is intercepted by methanol. Interestingly, when the reaction is performed at significantly higher concentrations, another set of peaks was observed in the 1H NMR spectra corresponding to the formation of a side product that was identified to be the furfuryl amine derived from nucleophilic attack of the furfuryl cation intermediate by liberated aminocoumarin 3 (Figures S2 and S3). A similar reaction was not observed for the furfuryl carbonate studied previously, highlighting the increased nucleophilicity of the amine cargo. Importantly, however, this furfuryl amine side product is formed in <2% yield in reactions with a substrate concentration of 19 μM, which is similar to the concentration of mechanophores in typical ultrasonication experiments (vide infra). These results confirm that at these relatively low substrate concentrations, the reaction depicted in Figure 2a is sufficiently descriptive. The kinetics of furfuryl carbamate decomposition were further studied by monitoring the conversion of starting material and the generation of aminocoumarin 3 as a function of time using NMR and PL spectroscopy, respectively (Figure 2c). Furfuryl carbamate 1 is fully converted to products in approximately 5 h, with a concomitant increase in fluorescence corresponding to the generation of aminocoumarin 3 (Figure S4). The data from both time course experiments were fitted to first-order rate expressions, providing half-lives of t1/2 = 34 and 45 min from NMR and PL measurements, respectively. In direct contrast, secondary furfuryl carbamate model compound 2, which does not contain a 3-phenoxy substituent but is otherwise identical to our previously reported furfuryl carbonate that is active toward phenol release, (25) is completely unreactive under the same conditions (Figure 2c and Figure S5). The striking difference in decomposition behavior between model compounds 1 and 2 highlights the effect of an electron-donating phenoxy substituent on the furan ring and supports the molecular design for a second-generation mechanophore platform enabling the molecular release of previously inaccessible payloads.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Characterization of the decomposition reactions of model furfuryl carbamates 1 and 2. (a) Decomposition of 1 in MeCN/MeOH (3:1) at room temperature generates fluorescent aminocoumarin 3 and furfuryl methyl ether 4 via a putative furfuryl cation intermediate; (b) partial 1H NMR spectra (400 MHz, CDCl3) demonstrating the clean conversion of 1 to products ([1]0 = 19 μM); (c) time course experiments following the conversion of furfuryl carbamates 1 and 2 by NMR spectroscopy (in 3:1 MeCN-d3/MeOH; [1]0 = 14 mM; [2]0 = 14 mM) and the generation of aminocoumarin 3 by photoluminescence spectroscopy (3:1 MeCN/MeOH; λex = 365 nm; λem = 424 nm; [1]0, [2]0 = 7.6 μM).

We next synthesized a series of furan–maleimide Diels–Alder adducts serving as masked furfuryl carbonates/carbamates with varying substitution and incorporated them into polymers to study their mechanochemical behavior. Polymers containing a chain-centered mechanophore are mechanically activated in solution using ultrasonication, which produces elongational forces that are maximized near the chain midpoint. (34) The synthesis of polymers containing a masked phenoxy-substituted secondary furfuryl carbonate/carbamate is illustrated in Scheme 2, while details for the synthesis of polymers containing a masked phenoxy-substituted primary furfuryl carbonate/carbamate (1°, 3-OPh) as well as a secondary furfuryl carbonate/carbamate without a phenoxy substituent (2°, 3H) matching our first-generation molecular design are provided in the Supporting Information. Starting from 3-bromofurfural, a phenoxy group was installed via a nucleophilic substitution reaction with phenol, followed by Grignard addition and protection to yield furfuryl silyl ether 6. Next, a formylation reaction and subsequent desilylation with TBAF yielded 2,3,5-trisubstituted furfuryl alcohol 7. Reduction of the aldehyde with sodium borohydride and a [4 + 2] cycloaddition reaction with a prefunctionalized maleimide dienophile in a two-step sequence furnished an isomeric mixture of Diels–Alder adducts, from which endo diastereomer (±)-7 was isolated by silica gel chromatography. Esterification of the primary alcohol proceeded with reasonable selectivity using α-bromoisobutyryl bromide to give the modular bis-initiator (±)-9 containing a secondary alcohol for cargo attachment. The precursor bis-initiator (±)-9 was then conveniently elaborated to carbonate (±)-10(O) and carbamate (±)-10(NH) containing fluorogenic coumarin payloads via a reaction with the corresponding chloroformate or isocyanate, respectively. After cargo installation, the bis-initiators were employed in the controlled radical polymerization of methyl acrylate with Cu wire/Me6TREN in DMSO (35) to afford poly(methyl acrylate) (PMA) polymers PMA-1(O) and PMA-1(NH) containing a chain-centered mechanophore. An analogous synthetic approach enabled the preparation of chain-centered polymers PMA-2(X) (1°, 3-OPh) and PMA-3(X) (2°, 3-H) with differing mechanophore substitution. The structure of each polymer is illustrated in Scheme 3 along with the number-average molecular weight (Mn), which was determined to be in the range 94.7–102 kDa with Đ ≤ 1.06 by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) monitored with refractive index and multiangle light scattering detectors. In addition, chain-end functional control polymers were synthesized similarly by starting from the masked furfuryl carbonates/carbamates containing a single α-bromo ester initiating group (see the Supporting Information for details).

Scheme 2

Scheme 2. Synthesis of Poly(methyl acrylate) (PMA) Polymers Containing a Chain-Centered Mechanophore with α-Methyl/Phenoxy Substitution and a Fluorogenic Coumarin Payload

Scheme 3

Scheme 3. Ultrasound-Induced Mechanical Activation of Substituted Mechanophores and Release of Fluorescent Hydroxycoumarin or Aminocoumarin Cargoa

aĐ = 1.03–1.06 for all polymers.

Prior to evaluating their molecular release behavior, we sought to investigate how substitution of the 2-furylcarbinol derivatives affects the mechanochemical and thermal properties of the Diels–Alder adducts. First, DFT calculations were performed on truncated models of each carbamate-functionalized mechanophore using the constrained geometries simulate external force (CoGEF) method, (36) which is a simple and reliable computational technique for predicting mechanochemical reactivity. (37) The mechanical elongation of each furan–maleimide adduct results in a predicted retro-[4 + 2] cycloaddition reaction to produce the expected furfuryl carbamate and maleimide fragments with nearly identical energy–displacement profiles (Figure S6). The calculated rupture force (Fmax) is essentially the same regardless of substitution, which occurs at 4.0–4.1 nN and suggests similar mechanochemical activity of each mechanophore that is primarily dictated by pulling geometry. (38−40) In contrast to the predicted mechanochemical invariability, however, the addition of a phenoxy group leads to a pronounced increase in the thermal stability of the Diels–Alder adduct, which has been observed previously for cycloadducts derived from 3-alkoxyfurans and ascribed to a reduction in the energetic penalty for loss of furan aromaticity. (41,42) Heating a solution of (±)-9 in toluene-d8 at 70 °C results in <2% cycloelimination after 5 h, while the same conditions lead to approximately 46% reversion of the analogous Diels–Alder adduct without the phenoxy substituent (Figure S7). At room temperature, phenoxy-substituted mechanophore (±)-9 is stable indefinitely in toluene-d8 in comparison to the slow, but detectable reversion of the compound with no phenoxy group, as monitored over several months using 1H NMR spectroscopy (Figure S8). The improved thermal stability of the phenoxy-substituted mechanophores in combination with the predicted mechanochemical activity being similar to that of our originally reported masked furfuryl carbonate mechanophore renders this second-generation molecular design an attractive platform for mechanically triggered release.
The mechanically triggered release of hydroxycoumarin or aminocoumarin from PMA-1(X)PMA-3(X) in 3:1 MeCN/MeOH was evaluated using pulsed ultrasonication (1 s on/1 s off, 8–10 °C, 20 kHz, 8.2 W/cm2), and the effect of substitution on the rate of coumarin release from the mechanically liberated 2-furylcarbinol derivatives was measured using photoluminescence spectroscopy (Scheme 3). Each polymer solution was subjected to 60 min of ultrasonication (“on” time), warmed to room temperature, and then fluorescence was monitored over time. Kinetic data for the release of hydroxycoumarin from PMA-1(O)PMA-3(O) are illustrated in Figure 3a, while the data for release of aminocoumarin from PMA-1(NH)PMA-3(NH) are illustrated in Figure 3b. For clarity and to account for slight differences in average polymer molecular weight and dispersity that influence the extent of mechanophore conversion during ultrasonication, (43−45) the initial fluorescence intensity (t = 0) is subtracted from each measurement and the data are normalized to emphasize the relative rates of molecular release (see the Supporting Information for additional details). The fluorescence emission from solutions of PMA-1(O) and PMA-2(O) reached a maximum prior to the first measurement and remained essentially constant over time, indicating that the release of hydroxycoumarin from both primary and secondary furfuryl carbonates containing a 3-phenoxy substituent completed nearly instantaneously upon formation (t1/2 < 5 min). These results are contrasted by the release of hydroxycoumarin from mechanically activated PMA-3(O) containing our first-generation mechanophore, which occurs steadily and predictably over several hours postactivation. Fitting the time-dependent photoluminescence data for release of hydroxycoumarin from PMA-3(O) to a first-order rate expression gives an estimated half-life for decomposition of the 3H secondary furfuryl carbonate of 46 min (average of two trials).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Mechanically triggered release of (a) hydroxycoumarin and (b) aminocoumarin from polymers as a function of mechanophore substitution. Polymer solutions (2 mg/mL in 3:1 MeCN/MeOH) were sonicated for 60 min (“on” time), warmed to room temperature, and the release of coumarin cargo from the mechanically liberated 2-furylcarbinol derivatives was monitored by photoluminescence spectroscopy. PL parameters: λex = 330 nm, λem = 378 nm (hydroxycoumarin); λex = 365 nm, λem = 424 nm (aminocoumarin). The initial PL intensity was subtracted from each measurement and the data were normalized to the plateau value. For PMA-3(NH), the data were normalized assuming 36% mechanophore activation; the black dashed line represents a first-order reaction with a half-life of 240 days.

The release of aminocoumarin from mechanically activated PMA-1(NH)PMA-3(NH) provides an even clearer demonstration of the effect of substitution on the kinetics of furfuryl carbamate decomposition, with reaction half-lives spanning 4 orders of magnitude (Figure 3b). The time-dependent photoluminescence of the sonicated solution of PMA-1(NH) is described by a first-order rate expression and reaches a maximum intensity after approximately 4 h postactivation, corresponding to the release of aminocoumarin with an average half-life of 41 min from two replicate experiments. This remarkably fast release from the furfuryl carbamate containing both α-methyl and 3-phenoxy substituents is consistent with the substantially diminished activation energy calculated by DFT for corresponding model substrate FC1(NH). In comparison, the release of aminocoumarin from mechanically activated PMA-2(NH) containing a masked primary furfuryl carbamate with a 3-phenoxy substituent is over 200× slower with an average half-life of 6.5 days, again highlighting the stabilizing effect of the α-methyl substituent identified previously. For PMA-3(NH) containing a chain-centered mechanophore analogous to our first-generation molecular design with an α-methyl substituent and no phenoxy group, only 8% release of aminocoumarin was observed after 30 days postactivation. This calculation assumes a mechanophore conversion of 36% as determined previously for our original masked furfuryl carbonate under nearly identical conditions. (25) The time-dependent photoluminescence data for release of aminocoumarin from PMA-3(NH) fall on the line for a first-order reaction with a half-life of approximately 240 days. It is worth noting that the yield of hydroxycoumarin or aminocoumarin released from each polymer studied, with the exception of PMA-3(NH), was 34–39% relative to the mechanophore concentration in each experiment, which is consistent with the anticipated mechanophore conversion after a relatively short exposure to ultrasound (Table S1).
The results above illustrate the ability to control the rate of mechanically triggered release by fine-tuning the molecular structure of the furan–maleimide mechanophore, and in particular, highlight the potential for releasing diverse chemical payloads from masked secondary 2-furylcarbinol derivatives containing a 3-phenoxy group. Therefore, we sought to further investigate the scope of molecular cargo that can be effectively released upon mechanical activation of the second-generation mechanophore (Scheme 4). Starting again from modular bis-initiator precursor (±)-9 containing a secondary alcohol, a variety of molecular cargo were installed via different functional group connectivity and the mechanophores were incorporated into polymers following the same protocol as before (Table S2; see the Supporting Information for additional details). In addition to the hydroxycoumarin (phenol) and aminocoumarin (arylamine) payloads attached via carbonate and carbamate groups, respectively, four other cargo molecules were installed, including those bearing alcohol, alkylamine, carboxylic acid, and sulfonic acid functional groups. Conjugation of the alcohol and alkylamine functional cargo molecules was achieved using carbonate and carbamate spacers, respectively, where a decarboxylation step is required for molecular release similar to the coumarin-based phenol and arylamine payloads. On the other hand, cargo molecules bearing carboxylic acid and sulfonic acid functional groups were conjugated directly to the mechanophore substrate through carboxylate and sulfonate linkages. Each payload molecule was chosen to be strongly absorbing in the UV region to facilitate the characterization of their release using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) equipped with a UV detector. For each derivative, a corresponding chain-end functional control polymer was also synthesized and evaluated under the same conditions to confirm the mechanical origin of molecular release (Table S3). (9)

Scheme 4

Scheme 4. Scope of Mechanically Triggered Cargo Release from the Second-Generation Mechanophore with α-Methyl/Phenoxy Substitutiona

aValues of percent release and half-lives are averages from two replicate experiments. Percent release is reported relative to the initial mechanophore concentration and does not account for incomplete mechanophore conversion after 60 min of ultrasonication. The values of percent release were determined by HPLC.

bHalf-life for cargo release was measured by photoluminescence spectroscopy.

cHalf-life for cargo release was measured by HPLC.

Similar to the kinetic studies performed above and following the same ultrasonication procedures, solutions of each polymer (2.0 mg/mL in 3:1 MeCN/MeOH) were subjected to pulsed ultrasonication (60 min “on” time) and then payload release from the mechanically liberated 2-furylcarbinol derivative was monitored at room temperature by HPLC and quantified using an internal standard (see the Supporting Information for details). The identity of each cargo molecule, the average half-life and yield of payload release measured from two replicate experiments, and the values of Mn and Đ of the parent chain-centered polymers are summarized in Scheme 4. Similar to hydroxycoumarin, the mechanically triggered release of 1-pyrenebutanol was sufficiently rapid such that it was complete prior to the first HPLC measurement (t1/2 < 30 min). Release of 1-pyrenemethylamine from the corresponding furfuryl carbamate occurred with a moderate half-life of 4.2 h, albeit approximately 6× slower than the release of aminocoumarin. The difference in release kinetics between the alkyl- and arylamines is ascribed to the difference in pKa values of the conjugate acids, (33) with the aniline derivative being a better leaving group. The second-generation mechanophore design not only enables the successful release of alcohols and amines via carbonate and carbamate linkages but is also capable of effecting the release of payloads incorporating carboxylic acid and sulfonic acid functional groups conjugated to the mechanophore via carboxylate and sulfonate linkages. The mechanically triggered release of 1-pyrenebutanoic acid proceeded with a half-life of approximately 28 h, while the release of 2-naphthalenesulfonic acid was complete before the first HPLC measurement (t1/2 < 30 min). Again, this trend is consistent with the significantly lower pKa value of the sulfonic acid in comparison to the carboxylic acid, reflecting the relative stabilities of sulfonate and carbonate leaving groups. The mechanically triggered release of organic acids enabled by this second-generation platform significantly expands upon the limited repertoire of mechanophores that generate HCl (14,15) and is also highly modular in nature owing to the generality of the mechanophore design.
The percent release for each cargo molecule determined by HPLC is reported in Scheme 4 relative to the initial concentration of the mechanophore. It is important to note, however, that only a fraction of mechanophores is converted after 60 min of ultrasonication, which again is expected to be ∼36% based on the experimental conditions and the average molecular weight of the polymers (Mn ≈ 100 kDa). (25) As demonstrated previously, increasing the sonication time to 150 min results in 64% release of hydroxycoumarin from PMA-3(O). (25) Among other factors, (46) the rate of mechanophore activation is particularly sensitive to the length of the attached polymer chains, with longer chains producing faster mechanochemical reactions. (44,45) Here the duration of ultrasonication was selected on the basis of experimental expediency. With the exception of the alkylamine cargo, the yields for payload release after 60 min of ultrasonication are within the range of 33–41%. These results suggest that payload release from the mechanochemically generated 2-furylcarbinol derivative in each case is highly efficient. Release of the alkylamine plateaus at approximately 8%, and we tentatively attribute the reduced yield to a reaction between the amine and polymer-bound furfuryl cation intermediate, similar to the side reaction observed in the decomposition of model compound 1 at relatively high concentrations. In this case, the enhanced nucleophilicity of the alkylamine is anticipated to promote this reaction pathway to a greater extent in comparison to aminocoumarin. On the other hand, the higher yield of 41% measured for the release of both organic acid payloads is consistent with the slightly higher average molecular weight of those polymers, which results in increased mechanophore conversion during the same period of ultrasonication. Finally, we note that payload release was not observed from any of the chain-end functional control polymers under identical experimental conditions (see the Supporting Information for details), confirming that molecular release from polymers bearing a chain-centered mechanophore was indeed triggered by mechanical force. (9)

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We have demonstrated the mechanically triggered release of functionally diverse small molecules with tunable release kinetics from a second-generation mechanophore platform. The mechanophore design leverages a mechanically triggered cascade reaction in which mechanochemical activation of a furan–maleimide Diels–Alder adduct reveals an unstable 2-furylcarbinol derivative that spontaneously decomposes under mild conditions to release a covalently bound payload molecule. Using DFT calculations to guide the molecular design, we have identified key structure–property relationships for the reactivity of 2-furylcarbinol derivatives that enable significant advancements over an earlier mechanophore design, which was limited to the release of phenolic cargo molecules with relatively slow release kinetics. The incorporation of an electron-donating 3-phenoxy substituent on the furan heterocycle reduces the activation barrier for fragmentation of the furfuryl C–O bond, through the putative resonance stabilization of the developing positive charge in the transition state leading to the furfuryl cation intermediate. Moreover, phenoxy substitution was found to enhance the thermal stability of the Diels–Alder mechanophore without adversely affecting its mechanochemical reactivity. Changing the substitution on the masked 2-furylcarbinol derivatives allows the rates of molecular release to be varied by several orders of magnitude, while the combination of α-methyl and 3-phenoxy substitution results in a highly active substrate for the triggered release of functionally diverse molecular payloads. Starting from a modular mechanophore initiator, a variety of molecular cargoes were conveniently installed and then incorporated into polymers by controlled radical polymerization. The mechanically triggered release of functionally diverse cargo molecules bearing alkyl/aryl alcohols and amines as well as carboxylic acid and sulfonic acid functional groups was demonstrated using ultrasonication, exhibiting fast rates of release and high reaction efficiencies. The generality and efficacy of the mechanophore design make it a promising platform for the mechanically triggered release of a wide variety of functional molecules to address applications in catalysis, sensing, drug delivery, and other areas.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscentsci.1c00460.

  • Experimental details, synthetic procedures, DFT calculations, fluorescence and HPLC data, and NMR spectra (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This research was supported by Caltech and the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation through a Beckman Young Investigator Award. We thank the Center for Catalysis and Chemical Synthesis of the Beckman Institute at Caltech and the CCE Multiuser Mass Spectrometry Laboratory for access to equipment.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 46 other publications.

  1. 1
    Swager, T. M. Sensor Technologies Empowered by Materials and Molecular Innovations. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 42484257,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201711611
  2. 2
    Roth, M. E.; Green, O.; Gnaim, S.; Shabat, D. Dendritic, Oligomeric, and Polymeric Self-Immolative Molecular Amplification. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 13091352,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00372
  3. 3
    Patrick, J. F.; Robb, M. J.; Sottos, N. R.; Moore, J. S.; White, S. R. Polymers with autonomous life-cycle control. Nature 2016, 540, 363370,  DOI: 10.1038/nature21002
  4. 4
    Lee, K. Y.; Peters, M. C.; Mooney, D. J. Controlled Drug Delivery from Polymers by Mechanical Signals. Adv. Mater. 2001, 13, 837839,  DOI: 10.1002/1521-4095(200106)13:11<837::AID-ADMA837>3.0.CO;2-D
  5. 5
    Huo, S.; Zhao, P.; Shi, Z.; Zou, M.; Yang, X.; Warszawik, E.; Loznik, M.; Göstl, R.; Herrmann, A. Mechanochemical bond scission for the activation of drugs. Nat. Chem. 2021, 13, 131139,  DOI: 10.1038/s41557-020-00624-8
  6. 6
    Küng, R.; Pausch, T.; Rasch, D.; Göstl, R.; Schmidt, B. M. Mechanochemical Release of Non-Covalently Bound Guests from a Polymer-Decorated Supramolecular Cage. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 1362613630,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202102383
  7. 7
    White, S. R.; Sottos, N. R.; Geubelle, P. H.; Moore, J. S.; Kessler, M. R.; Sriram, S. R.; Brown, E. N.; Viswanathan, S. Autonomic healing of polymer composites. Nature 2001, 409, 794797,  DOI: 10.1038/35057232
  8. 8
    Toohey, K. S.; Sottos, N. R.; Lewis, J. A.; Moore, J. S.; White, S. R. Self-healing materials with microvascular networks. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 581585,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat1934
  9. 9
    Li, J.; Nagamani, C.; Moore, J. S. Polymer Mechanochemistry: From Destructive to Productive. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 21812190,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00184
  10. 10
    Beyer, M. K.; Clausen-Schaumann, H. Mechanochemistry: The Mechanical Activation of Covalent Bonds. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 29212948,  DOI: 10.1021/cr030697h
  11. 11
    Caruso, M. M.; Davis, D. A.; Shen, Q.; Odom, S. A.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.; Moore, J. S. Mechanically-Induced Chemical Changes in Polymeric Materials. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 57555798,  DOI: 10.1021/cr9001353
  12. 12
    Kim, G.; Lau, V. M.; Halmes, A. J.; Oelze, M. L.; Moore, J. S.; Li, K. C. High-intensity focused ultrasound-induced mechanochemical transduction in synthetic elastomers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2019, 116, 1021410222,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1901047116
  13. 13
    Akbulatov, S.; Boulatov, R. Experimental polymer mechanochemistry and its interpretational frameworks. ChemPhysChem 2017, 18, 14221450,  DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201601354
  14. 14
    Diesendruck, C. E.; Steinberg, B. D.; Sugai, N.; Silberstein, M. N.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.; Braun, P. V.; Moore, J. S. Proton-Coupled Mechanochemical Transduction: A Mechanogenerated Acid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1244612449,  DOI: 10.1021/ja305645x
  15. 15
    Lin, Y.; Kouznetsova, T. B.; Craig, S. L. A Latent Mechanoacid for Time-Stamped Mechanochromism and Chemical Signaling in Polymeric Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 99103,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b12861
  16. 16
    Larsen, M. B.; Boydston, A. J. Flex-Activated” Mechanophores: Using Polymer Mechanochemistry To Direct Bond Bending Activation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 81898192,  DOI: 10.1021/ja403757p
  17. 17
    Larsen, M. B.; Boydston, A. J. Successive Mechanochemical Activation and Small Molecule Release in an Elastomeric Material. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 12761279,  DOI: 10.1021/ja411891x
  18. 18
    Shen, H.; Larsen, M. B.; Roessler, A.; Zimmerman, P.; Boydston, A. J. Mechanochemical Release of N-heterocyclic Carbenes from Flex-Activated Mechanophores. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 13559,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202100576
  19. 19
    Diesendruck, C. E.; Peterson, G. I.; Kulik, H. J.; Kaitz, J. A.; Mar, B. D.; May, P. A.; White, S. R.; Martínez, T. J.; Boydston, A. J.; Moore, J. S. Mechanically triggered heterolytic unzipping of a low-ceiling-temperature polymer. Nat. Chem. 2014, 6, 623628,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1938
  20. 20
    Peterson, G. I.; Boydston, A. J. Kinetic Analysis of Mechanochemical Chain Scission of Linear Poly(phthalaldehyde). Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2014, 35, 16111614,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.201400271
  21. 21
    Wiita, A. P.; Ainavarapu, S. R. K.; Huang, H. H.; Fernandez, J. M. Force-dependent chemical kinetics of disulfide bond reduction observed with single-molecule techniques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103, 72227227,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0511035103
  22. 22
    Dopieralski, P.; Ribas-Arino, J.; Anjukandi, P.; Krupicka, M.; Marx, D. Unexpected mechanochemical complexity in the mechanistic scenarios of disulfide bond reduction in alkaline solution. Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 164170,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2632
  23. 23
    Shi, Z.; Song, Q.; Göstl, R.; Herrmann, A. Mechanochemical activation of disulfide-based multifunctional polymers for theranostic drug release. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 1668,  DOI: 10.1039/D0SC06054B
  24. 24
    Shi, Z. Ultrasound-mediated activation of drugs. Ph.D. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, 2021. https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/814605 (accessed 2021-05-07).
  25. 25
    Hu, X.; Zeng, T.; Husic, C. C.; Robb, M. J. Mechanically Triggered Small Molecule Release from a Masked Furfuryl Carbonate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 1501815023,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b08663
  26. 26
    Hay, M. P.; Sykes, B. M.; Denny, W. A.; O’Connor, C. J. Substituent effects on the kinetics of reductively-initiated fragmentation of nitrobenzyl carbamates designed as triggers for bioreductive prodrugs. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, (19), 27592770,  DOI: 10.1039/a904067f
  27. 27
    Mosey, R. A.; Floreancig, P. E. Versatile approach to α-alkoxy carbamate synthesis and stimulus-responsive alcohol release. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 79807985,  DOI: 10.1039/c2ob26571k
  28. 28
    Wang, J.; Kouznetsova, T. B.; Boulatov, R.; Craig, S. L. Mechanical gating of a mechanochemical reaction cascade. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13433,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13433
  29. 29
    Hu, X.; McFadden, M. E.; Barber, R. W.; Robb, M. J. Mechanochemical Regulation of a Photochemical Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 1407314077,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b09628
  30. 30
    Fan, B.; Trant, J. F.; Hemery, G.; Sandre, O.; Gillies, E. R. Thermo-responsive self-immolative nanoassemblies: direct and indirect triggering. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 1206812071,  DOI: 10.1039/C7CC06410A
  31. 31
    Schmid, K. M.; Jensen, L.; Phillips, S. T. A Self-Immolative Spacer That Enables Tunable Controlled Release of Phenols under Neutral Conditions. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 43634374,  DOI: 10.1021/jo300400q
  32. 32
    Nichol, M. F.; Clark, K. D.; Dolinski, N. D.; Read de Alaniz, J. Multi-stimuli responsive trigger for temporally controlled depolymerization of self-immolative polymers. Polym. Chem. 2019, 10, 49144919,  DOI: 10.1039/C9PY00301K
  33. 33
    Alouane, A.; Labruère, R.; Le Saux, T.; Schmidt, F.; Jullien, L. Self-Immolative Spacers: Kinetic Aspects, Structure-Property Relationships, and Applications. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 74927509,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201500088
  34. 34
    Berkowski, K. L.; Potisek, S. L.; Hickenboth, C. R.; Moore, J. S. Ultrasound-Induced Site-Specific Cleavage of Azo-Functionalized Poly(ethylene glycol). Macromolecules 2005, 38, 89758978,  DOI: 10.1021/ma051394n
  35. 35
    Nguyen, N. H.; Rosen, B. M.; Lligadas, G.; Percec, V. Surface-Dependent Kinetics of Cu(0)-Wire-Catalyzed Single-Electron Transfer Living Radical Polymerization of Methyl Acrylate in DMSO at 25 °C. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 23792386,  DOI: 10.1021/ma8028562
  36. 36
    Beyer, M. K. The mechanical strength of a covalent bond calculated by density functional theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 73077312,  DOI: 10.1063/1.481330
  37. 37
    Klein, I. M.; Husic, C. C.; Kovács, D. P.; Choquette, N. J.; Robb, M. J. Validation of the CoGEF Method as a Predictive Tool for Polymer Mechanochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 1636416381,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c06868
  38. 38
    Konda, S. S. M.; Brantley, J. N.; Varghese, B. T.; Wiggins, K. M.; Bielawski, C. W.; Makarov, D. E. Molecular Catch Bonds and the Anti-Hammond Effect in Polymer Mechanochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1272212729,  DOI: 10.1021/ja4051108
  39. 39
    Robb, M. J.; Kim, T. A.; Halmes, A. J.; White, S. R.; Sottos, N. R.; Moore, J. S. Regioisomer-Specific Mechanochromism of Naphthopyran in Polymeric Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1232812331,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b07610
  40. 40
    Stevenson, R.; De Bo, G. Controlling Reactivity by Geometry in Retro-Diels-Alder Reactions under Tension. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1676816771,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b08895
  41. 41
    Boutelle, R. C.; Northrop, B. H. Substituent Effects on the Reversibility of Furan-Maleimide Cycloadditions. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 79948002,  DOI: 10.1021/jo201606z
  42. 42
    Foster, R. W.; Benhamou, L.; Porter, M. J.; Bučar, D.-K.; Hailes, H. C.; Tame, C. J.; Sheppard, T. D. Irreversible endo-Selective Diels-Alder Reactions of Substituted Alkoxyfurans: A General Synthesis of endo-Cantharimides. Chem. - Eur. J. 2015, 21, 61076114,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201406286
  43. 43
    Kryger, M. J.; Munaretto, A. M.; Moore, J. S. Structure-Mechanochemical Activity Relationships for Cyclobutane Mechanophores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1899218998,  DOI: 10.1021/ja2086728
  44. 44
    May, P. A.; Munaretto, N. F.; Hamoy, M. B.; Robb, M. J.; Moore, J. S. Is Molecular Weight or Degree of Polymerization a Better Descriptor of Ultrasound-Induced Mechanochemical Transduction?. ACS Macro Lett. 2016, 5, 177180,  DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00855
  45. 45
    Schaefer, M.; Icli, B.; Weder, C.; Lattuada, M.; Kilbinger, A. F. M.; Simon, Y. C. The Role of Mass and Length in the Sonochemistry of Polymers. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 16301636,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b02362
  46. 46
    Lenhardt, J. M.; Black Ramirez, A. L.; Lee, B.; Kouznetsova, T. B.; Craig, S. L. Mechanistic Insights into the Sonochemical Activation of Multimechanophore Cyclopropanated Polybutadiene Polymers. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 63966403,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01677

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 49 publications.

  1. Cijun Zhang, Tatiana B. Kouznetsova, Boyu Zhu, Liam Sweeney, Max Lancer, Ivan Gitsov, Stephen L. Craig, Xiaoran Hu. Advancing the Mechanosensitivity of Atropisomeric Diarylethene Mechanophores through a Lever-Arm Effect. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2025, 147 (3) , 2502-2509. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c13480
  2. Hui Hu, Lvjiang Meng, Yang Zhou, Yujing Chen, Yecheng Zhou, Bin Xi, Yuanchao Li. Mechanochemical Release of 9,10-Diphenylanthracene via Flex-Activation of Its 1,4-Diels–Alder Adduct. ACS Macro Letters 2025, 14 (1) , 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.4c00766
  3. Xuancheng Fu, Xiaoran Hu. Ultrasound-Controlled Prodrug Activation: Emerging Strategies in Polymer Mechanochemistry and Sonodynamic Therapy. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2024, 7 (12) , 8040-8058. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.4c00150
  4. Chuanjiang He, Yu Zhou, Junlin Chen, Rostislav Vinokur, Fabian Kiessling, Andreas Herrmann. Ultrasonic Control of Protein Splicing by Split Inteins. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2024, 146 (39) , 26947-26956. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c08207
  5. Peng Liu, Yu-Ling Tseng, Liang Ge, Tian Zeng, Doron Shabat, Maxwell J. Robb. Mechanically Triggered Bright Chemiluminescence from Polymers by Exploiting a Synergy between Masked 2-Furylcarbinol Mechanophores and 1,2-Dioxetane Chemiluminophores. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2024, 146 (32) , 22151-22156. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c07592
  6. Ilya Sterin, Anna Tverdokhlebova, Evgeny Katz, Oleh Smutok. Time-Separated Pulse Release–Activation of an Enzyme from Alginate–Polyethylenimine Hydrogels Using Electrochemically Generated Local pH Changes. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024, 16 (22) , 28222-28229. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c05273
  7. Yunyan Sun, William J. Neary, Xiao Huang, Tatiana B. Kouznetsova, Tetsu Ouchi, Ilia Kevlishvili, Kecheng Wang, Yingying Chen, Heather J. Kulik, Stephen L. Craig, Jeffrey S. Moore. A Thermally Stable SO2-Releasing Mechanophore: Facile Activation, Single-Event Spectroscopy, and Molecular Dynamic Simulations. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2024, 146 (15) , 10943-10952. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c02139
  8. Tian Zeng, Liam A. Ordner, Peng Liu, Maxwell J. Robb. Multimechanophore Polymers for Mechanically Triggered Small Molecule Release with Ultrahigh Payload Capacity. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2024, 146 (1) , 95-100. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c11927
  9. James R. Hemmer, Viola Bauernfeind, Chris Rader, Manuel Petroselli, Christoph Weder, José Augusto Berrocal. Triarylmethane Mechanophores Enable Full-Visible Spectrum Mechanochromism. Macromolecules 2023, 56 (21) , 8614-8622. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.3c01521
  10. Kamil Suwada, Alice Weng Ieong, Hei Lok Herman Lo, Guillaume De Bo. Furan Release via Force-Promoted Retro-[4+2][3+2] Cycloaddition. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (38) , 20782-20785. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c08771
  11. Zijian Huo, Kasey F. Watkins, Brandon C. Jeong, Antonia Statt, Jennifer E. Laaser. Preferential Mechanochemical Activation of Short Chains in Bidisperse Triblock Elastomers. ACS Macro Letters 2023, 12 (9) , 1213-1217. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.3c00366
  12. Xuancheng Fu, Boyu Zhu, Xiaoran Hu. Force-Triggered Atropisomerization of a Parallel Diarylethene to Its Antiparallel Diastereomers. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (29) , 15668-15673. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c03994
  13. Ankita Das, Ayan Datta. Designing Site Specificity in the Mechanochemical Cargo Release of Small Molecules. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (24) , 13484-13490. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c05116
  14. Bo Xu, Hezhen Wang, Zixiong Luo, Jiping Yang, Zhijian Wang. Multi-material 3D Printing of Mechanochromic Double Network Hydrogels for On-Demand Patterning. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2023, 15 (8) , 11122-11130. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c22564
  15. Evan M. Lloyd, Jafer R. Vakil, Yunxin Yao, Nancy R. Sottos, Stephen L. Craig. Covalent Mechanochemistry and Contemporary Polymer Network Chemistry: A Marriage in the Making. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (2) , 751-768. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c09623
  16. Corey C. Husic, Xiaoran Hu, Maxwell J. Robb. Incorporation of a Tethered Alcohol Enables Efficient Mechanically Triggered Release in Aprotic Environments. ACS Macro Letters 2022, 11 (8) , 948-953. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.2c00344
  17. Yunyan Sun, William J. Neary, Zachary P. Burke, Hai Qian, Lingyang Zhu, Jeffrey S. Moore. Mechanically Triggered Carbon Monoxide Release with Turn-On Aggregation-Induced Emission. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (3) , 1125-1129. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c12108
  18. Miancheng Zou, Pengkun Zhao, Shuaidong Huo, Robert Göstl, Andreas Herrmann. Activation of Antibiotic-Grafted Polymer Brushes by Ultrasound. ACS Macro Letters 2022, 11 (1) , 15-19. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.1c00645
  19. Brooke A. Versaw, Tian Zeng, Xiaoran Hu, Maxwell J. Robb. Harnessing the Power of Force: Development of Mechanophores for Molecular Release. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (51) , 21461-21473. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c11868
  20. Sonja Storch, Davide Campagna, Simay Aydonat, Robert Göstl. Mechanochemical generation of nitrogen-centred radicals for the formation of tertiary amines in polymers. RSC Mechanochemistry 2025, 50 https://doi.org/10.1039/D4MR00099D
  21. Sumit Mittal, Rongsheng E. Wang, Robert Ros, Alison E. Ondrus, Abhishek Singharoy. Molecular dynamics model of mechanophore sensors for biological force measurement. Heliyon 2025, 11 (1) , e41178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41178
  22. Maocheng Zuo, Rong Xiao, Fangxue Du, Chong Cheng, Raul D. Rodriguez, Lang Ma, Bihui Zhu, Li Qiu. Ultrasound-activated mechanochemical reactions for controllable biomedical applications. Smart Materials in Medicine 2024, 5 (4) , 461-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smaim.2024.09.001
  23. Cijun Zhang, Xuancheng Fu, Xiaoran Hu. Harnessing the Conformer/Atropisomer-Dependent Photochromism of Diarylethene Photoswitches and Forcing a Diarylethene Atropisomer to Its Configurational Diastereomers with Polymer Mechanochemistry. Synlett 2024, 35 (14) , 1601-1608. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1751536
  24. Xiaolong Chen, Hang Shen, Zhengbiao Zhang. Polymer Mechanochemistry on Reactive Species Generated from Mechanochemical Reactions †. Chinese Journal of Chemistry 2024, 42 (12) , 1418-1432. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjoc.202300660
  25. Bo Xu, Jin Yang, Yinghe Yang, Jiping Yang, Zhijian Wang. Mechanochromic Hydrogel Fibers with Multiple Fluorescent Colors. Macromolecular Rapid Communications 2024, 45 (11) https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.202400030
  26. Elena Ermini, Annalaura Brai, Elena Cini, Federica Finetti, Giuseppe Giannini, Daniele Padula, Lucrezia Paradisi, Federica Poggialini, Lorenza Trabalzini, Paola Tolu, Maurizio Taddei. A novel bioresponsive self-immolative spacer based on aza-quinone methide reactivity for the controlled release of thiols, phenols, amines, sulfonamides or amides. Chemical Science 2024, 15 (16) , 6168-6177. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SC01576B
  27. Daniele Padula. A Computational Perspective on the Reactivity of π ‐spacers in Self‐Immolative Elimination Reactions. Chemistry – An Asian Journal 2024, 19 (7) https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.202400010
  28. Yu-Ling Tseng, Tian Zeng, Maxwell J. Robb. Incorporation of a self-immolative spacer enables mechanically triggered dual payload release. Chemical Science 2024, 15 (4) , 1472-1479. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SC06359C
  29. Hao‐Chun Chang, Min‐Chieh Liang, Van‐Sieu Luc, Chelsea Davis, Chia‐Chih Chang. Mechanochemical Reactivity of a 1,2,4‐Triazoline‐3,5‐dione‐Anthracene Diels‐Alder Adduct. Chemistry – An Asian Journal 2024, 19 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.202300850
  30. Zhiyuan Shi, Yong Hu, Xin Li. Polymer mechanochemistry in drug delivery: From controlled release to precise activation. Journal of Controlled Release 2024, 365 , 259-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.10.042
  31. Qunfeng Fu, Siyong Shen, Pengwei Sun, Zhi Gu, Yifei Bai, Xianglin Wang, Zhibo Liu. Bioorthogonal chemistry for prodrug activation in vivo. Chemical Society Reviews 2023, 52 (22) , 7737-7772. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CS00889K
  32. Molly E. McFadden, Ross W. Barber, Anna C. Overholts, Maxwell J. Robb. Naphthopyran molecular switches and their emergent mechanochemical reactivity. Chemical Science 2023, 14 (37) , 10041-10067. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SC03729K
  33. Yuxing Yao, Molly E. McFadden, Stella M. Luo, Ross W. Barber, Elin Kang, Avinoam Bar-Zion, Cameron A. B. Smith, Zhiyang Jin, Mark Legendre, Bill Ling, Dina Malounda, Andrea Torres, Tiba Hamza, Chelsea E. R. Edwards, Mikhail G. Shapiro, Maxwell J. Robb. Remote control of mechanochemical reactions under physiological conditions using biocompatible focused ultrasound. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2023, 120 (39) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2309822120
  34. Fan Yang, Ting Geng, Hang Shen, Yan Kou, Guanjun Xiao, Bo Zou, Yulan Chen. Mechanochemical Release of Fluorophores from a “Flex‐activated” Mechanophore. Angewandte Chemie 2023, 135 (39) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202308662
  35. Fan Yang, Ting Geng, Hang Shen, Yan Kou, Guanjun Xiao, Bo Zou, Yulan Chen. Mechanochemical Release of Fluorophores from a “Flex‐activated” Mechanophore. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2023, 62 (39) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202308662
  36. Niamh Willis-Fox, Erica Watchorn-Rokutan, Etienne Rognin, Ronan Daly. Technology pull: scale-up of polymeric mechanochemical force sensors. Trends in Chemistry 2023, 5 (6) , 415-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2023.02.005
  37. Robin Küng, Anne Germann, Marcel Krüsmann, Louisa P. Niggemann, Jan Meisner, Matthias Karg, Robert Göstl, Bernd M. Schmidt. Mechanoresponsive Metal‐Organic Cage‐Crosslinked Polymer Hydrogels. Chemistry – A European Journal 2023, 29 (18) https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202300079
  38. Manuel Cardosa-Gutierrez, Guillaume De Bo, Anne-Sophie Duwez, Francoise Remacle. Bond breaking of furan–maleimide adducts via a diradical sequential mechanism under an external mechanical force. Chemical Science 2023, 14 (5) , 1263-1271. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SC05051J
  39. Bo Xu, Zixiong Luo, Rui Xiao, Zhijian Wang, Jiping Yang. Hybrid Phenol‐Rhodamine Dye Based Mechanochromic Double Network Hydrogels with Tunable Stress Sensitivity. Macromolecular Rapid Communications 2022, 43 (23) https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.202200580
  40. Deniz Yildiz, Robert Göstl, Andreas Herrmann. Sonopharmacology: controlling pharmacotherapy and diagnosis by ultrasound-induced polymer mechanochemistry. Chemical Science 2022, 13 (46) , 13708-13719. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SC05196F
  41. Maya L. Milrod, Brian H. Northrop. Computational investigation of cycloadditions between cyclopentadiene and tropone-3,4-dimethylester. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry 2022, 20 (43) , 8443-8453. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2OB01623K
  42. Xingyue Ji, Zhiyuan Zhong. External stimuli-responsive gasotransmitter prodrugs: Chemistry and spatiotemporal release. Journal of Controlled Release 2022, 351 , 81-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.09.026
  43. Sally Nijem, Ying Song, Rony Schwarz, Charles E. Diesendruck. Flex-activated CO mechanochemical production for mechanical damage detection. Polymer Chemistry 2022, 13 (27) , 3986-3990. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2PY00503D
  44. Mingjun Xuan, Christian Schumacher, Carsten Bolm, Robert Göstl, Andreas Herrmann. The Mechanochemical Synthesis and Activation of Carbon‐Rich π ‐Conjugated Materials. Advanced Science 2022, 9 (19) https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202105497
  45. Miancheng Zou, Pengkun Zhao, Jilin Fan, Robert Göstl, Andreas Herrmann. Microgels as drug carriers for sonopharmacology. Journal of Polymer Science 2022, 60 (12) , 1864-1870. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.20210874
  46. Hang Shen, Yunzheng Cao, Miaojiang Lv, Qinxin Sheng, Zhengbiao Zhang. Polymer mechanochemistry for the release of small cargoes. Chemical Communications 2022, 58 (31) , 4813-4824. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CC00147K
  47. Sarah M. Zeitler, Progyateg Chakma, Matthew R. Golder. Diaryliodonium salts facilitate metal-free mechanoredox free radical polymerizations. Chemical Science 2022, 13 (14) , 4131-4138. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SC00313A
  48. Robin Küng, Robert Göstl, Bernd M. Schmidt. Release of Molecular Cargo from Polymer Systems by Mechanochemistry. Chemistry – A European Journal 2022, 28 (17) https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202103860
  49. Tian Zeng, Xiaoran Hu, Maxwell J. Robb. 5-Aryloxy substitution enables efficient mechanically triggered release from a synthetically accessible masked 2-furylcarbinol mechanophore. Chemical Communications 2021, 57 (85) , 11173-11176. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CC04886D

ACS Central Science

Cite this: ACS Cent. Sci. 2021, 7, 7, 1216–1224
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.1c00460
Published July 14, 2021

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Article Views

6609

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Mechanically Triggered Molecular Release via a Retro-Diels–Alder/Fragmentation Cascade

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Substituent effects on the reactivity of 2-furylcarbinol derivatives. (a) Structures of model furfuryl carbonates (X = O) and furfuryl carbamates (X = NH) with varying substitution patterns, and (b) corresponding activation energies for fragmentation of the α-C–O bond calculated at the M06-2X/6-311+G** level of density functional theory.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Characterization of the decomposition reactions of model furfuryl carbamates 1 and 2. (a) Decomposition of 1 in MeCN/MeOH (3:1) at room temperature generates fluorescent aminocoumarin 3 and furfuryl methyl ether 4 via a putative furfuryl cation intermediate; (b) partial 1H NMR spectra (400 MHz, CDCl3) demonstrating the clean conversion of 1 to products ([1]0 = 19 μM); (c) time course experiments following the conversion of furfuryl carbamates 1 and 2 by NMR spectroscopy (in 3:1 MeCN-d3/MeOH; [1]0 = 14 mM; [2]0 = 14 mM) and the generation of aminocoumarin 3 by photoluminescence spectroscopy (3:1 MeCN/MeOH; λex = 365 nm; λem = 424 nm; [1]0, [2]0 = 7.6 μM).

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2. Synthesis of Poly(methyl acrylate) (PMA) Polymers Containing a Chain-Centered Mechanophore with α-Methyl/Phenoxy Substitution and a Fluorogenic Coumarin Payload

    Scheme 3

    Scheme 3. Ultrasound-Induced Mechanical Activation of Substituted Mechanophores and Release of Fluorescent Hydroxycoumarin or Aminocoumarin Cargoa

    aĐ = 1.03–1.06 for all polymers.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Mechanically triggered release of (a) hydroxycoumarin and (b) aminocoumarin from polymers as a function of mechanophore substitution. Polymer solutions (2 mg/mL in 3:1 MeCN/MeOH) were sonicated for 60 min (“on” time), warmed to room temperature, and the release of coumarin cargo from the mechanically liberated 2-furylcarbinol derivatives was monitored by photoluminescence spectroscopy. PL parameters: λex = 330 nm, λem = 378 nm (hydroxycoumarin); λex = 365 nm, λem = 424 nm (aminocoumarin). The initial PL intensity was subtracted from each measurement and the data were normalized to the plateau value. For PMA-3(NH), the data were normalized assuming 36% mechanophore activation; the black dashed line represents a first-order reaction with a half-life of 240 days.

    Scheme 4

    Scheme 4. Scope of Mechanically Triggered Cargo Release from the Second-Generation Mechanophore with α-Methyl/Phenoxy Substitutiona

    aValues of percent release and half-lives are averages from two replicate experiments. Percent release is reported relative to the initial mechanophore concentration and does not account for incomplete mechanophore conversion after 60 min of ultrasonication. The values of percent release were determined by HPLC.

    bHalf-life for cargo release was measured by photoluminescence spectroscopy.

    cHalf-life for cargo release was measured by HPLC.

  • References


    This article references 46 other publications.

    1. 1
      Swager, T. M. Sensor Technologies Empowered by Materials and Molecular Innovations. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 42484257,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201711611
    2. 2
      Roth, M. E.; Green, O.; Gnaim, S.; Shabat, D. Dendritic, Oligomeric, and Polymeric Self-Immolative Molecular Amplification. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 13091352,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00372
    3. 3
      Patrick, J. F.; Robb, M. J.; Sottos, N. R.; Moore, J. S.; White, S. R. Polymers with autonomous life-cycle control. Nature 2016, 540, 363370,  DOI: 10.1038/nature21002
    4. 4
      Lee, K. Y.; Peters, M. C.; Mooney, D. J. Controlled Drug Delivery from Polymers by Mechanical Signals. Adv. Mater. 2001, 13, 837839,  DOI: 10.1002/1521-4095(200106)13:11<837::AID-ADMA837>3.0.CO;2-D
    5. 5
      Huo, S.; Zhao, P.; Shi, Z.; Zou, M.; Yang, X.; Warszawik, E.; Loznik, M.; Göstl, R.; Herrmann, A. Mechanochemical bond scission for the activation of drugs. Nat. Chem. 2021, 13, 131139,  DOI: 10.1038/s41557-020-00624-8
    6. 6
      Küng, R.; Pausch, T.; Rasch, D.; Göstl, R.; Schmidt, B. M. Mechanochemical Release of Non-Covalently Bound Guests from a Polymer-Decorated Supramolecular Cage. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 1362613630,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202102383
    7. 7
      White, S. R.; Sottos, N. R.; Geubelle, P. H.; Moore, J. S.; Kessler, M. R.; Sriram, S. R.; Brown, E. N.; Viswanathan, S. Autonomic healing of polymer composites. Nature 2001, 409, 794797,  DOI: 10.1038/35057232
    8. 8
      Toohey, K. S.; Sottos, N. R.; Lewis, J. A.; Moore, J. S.; White, S. R. Self-healing materials with microvascular networks. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 581585,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat1934
    9. 9
      Li, J.; Nagamani, C.; Moore, J. S. Polymer Mechanochemistry: From Destructive to Productive. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 21812190,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00184
    10. 10
      Beyer, M. K.; Clausen-Schaumann, H. Mechanochemistry: The Mechanical Activation of Covalent Bonds. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 29212948,  DOI: 10.1021/cr030697h
    11. 11
      Caruso, M. M.; Davis, D. A.; Shen, Q.; Odom, S. A.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.; Moore, J. S. Mechanically-Induced Chemical Changes in Polymeric Materials. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 57555798,  DOI: 10.1021/cr9001353
    12. 12
      Kim, G.; Lau, V. M.; Halmes, A. J.; Oelze, M. L.; Moore, J. S.; Li, K. C. High-intensity focused ultrasound-induced mechanochemical transduction in synthetic elastomers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2019, 116, 1021410222,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1901047116
    13. 13
      Akbulatov, S.; Boulatov, R. Experimental polymer mechanochemistry and its interpretational frameworks. ChemPhysChem 2017, 18, 14221450,  DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201601354
    14. 14
      Diesendruck, C. E.; Steinberg, B. D.; Sugai, N.; Silberstein, M. N.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.; Braun, P. V.; Moore, J. S. Proton-Coupled Mechanochemical Transduction: A Mechanogenerated Acid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1244612449,  DOI: 10.1021/ja305645x
    15. 15
      Lin, Y.; Kouznetsova, T. B.; Craig, S. L. A Latent Mechanoacid for Time-Stamped Mechanochromism and Chemical Signaling in Polymeric Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 99103,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b12861
    16. 16
      Larsen, M. B.; Boydston, A. J. Flex-Activated” Mechanophores: Using Polymer Mechanochemistry To Direct Bond Bending Activation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 81898192,  DOI: 10.1021/ja403757p
    17. 17
      Larsen, M. B.; Boydston, A. J. Successive Mechanochemical Activation and Small Molecule Release in an Elastomeric Material. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 12761279,  DOI: 10.1021/ja411891x
    18. 18
      Shen, H.; Larsen, M. B.; Roessler, A.; Zimmerman, P.; Boydston, A. J. Mechanochemical Release of N-heterocyclic Carbenes from Flex-Activated Mechanophores. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 13559,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202100576
    19. 19
      Diesendruck, C. E.; Peterson, G. I.; Kulik, H. J.; Kaitz, J. A.; Mar, B. D.; May, P. A.; White, S. R.; Martínez, T. J.; Boydston, A. J.; Moore, J. S. Mechanically triggered heterolytic unzipping of a low-ceiling-temperature polymer. Nat. Chem. 2014, 6, 623628,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1938
    20. 20
      Peterson, G. I.; Boydston, A. J. Kinetic Analysis of Mechanochemical Chain Scission of Linear Poly(phthalaldehyde). Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2014, 35, 16111614,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.201400271
    21. 21
      Wiita, A. P.; Ainavarapu, S. R. K.; Huang, H. H.; Fernandez, J. M. Force-dependent chemical kinetics of disulfide bond reduction observed with single-molecule techniques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103, 72227227,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0511035103
    22. 22
      Dopieralski, P.; Ribas-Arino, J.; Anjukandi, P.; Krupicka, M.; Marx, D. Unexpected mechanochemical complexity in the mechanistic scenarios of disulfide bond reduction in alkaline solution. Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 164170,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2632
    23. 23
      Shi, Z.; Song, Q.; Göstl, R.; Herrmann, A. Mechanochemical activation of disulfide-based multifunctional polymers for theranostic drug release. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 1668,  DOI: 10.1039/D0SC06054B
    24. 24
      Shi, Z. Ultrasound-mediated activation of drugs. Ph.D. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, 2021. https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/814605 (accessed 2021-05-07).
    25. 25
      Hu, X.; Zeng, T.; Husic, C. C.; Robb, M. J. Mechanically Triggered Small Molecule Release from a Masked Furfuryl Carbonate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 1501815023,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b08663
    26. 26
      Hay, M. P.; Sykes, B. M.; Denny, W. A.; O’Connor, C. J. Substituent effects on the kinetics of reductively-initiated fragmentation of nitrobenzyl carbamates designed as triggers for bioreductive prodrugs. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, (19), 27592770,  DOI: 10.1039/a904067f
    27. 27
      Mosey, R. A.; Floreancig, P. E. Versatile approach to α-alkoxy carbamate synthesis and stimulus-responsive alcohol release. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 79807985,  DOI: 10.1039/c2ob26571k
    28. 28
      Wang, J.; Kouznetsova, T. B.; Boulatov, R.; Craig, S. L. Mechanical gating of a mechanochemical reaction cascade. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13433,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13433
    29. 29
      Hu, X.; McFadden, M. E.; Barber, R. W.; Robb, M. J. Mechanochemical Regulation of a Photochemical Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 1407314077,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b09628
    30. 30
      Fan, B.; Trant, J. F.; Hemery, G.; Sandre, O.; Gillies, E. R. Thermo-responsive self-immolative nanoassemblies: direct and indirect triggering. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 1206812071,  DOI: 10.1039/C7CC06410A
    31. 31
      Schmid, K. M.; Jensen, L.; Phillips, S. T. A Self-Immolative Spacer That Enables Tunable Controlled Release of Phenols under Neutral Conditions. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 43634374,  DOI: 10.1021/jo300400q
    32. 32
      Nichol, M. F.; Clark, K. D.; Dolinski, N. D.; Read de Alaniz, J. Multi-stimuli responsive trigger for temporally controlled depolymerization of self-immolative polymers. Polym. Chem. 2019, 10, 49144919,  DOI: 10.1039/C9PY00301K
    33. 33
      Alouane, A.; Labruère, R.; Le Saux, T.; Schmidt, F.; Jullien, L. Self-Immolative Spacers: Kinetic Aspects, Structure-Property Relationships, and Applications. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 74927509,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201500088
    34. 34
      Berkowski, K. L.; Potisek, S. L.; Hickenboth, C. R.; Moore, J. S. Ultrasound-Induced Site-Specific Cleavage of Azo-Functionalized Poly(ethylene glycol). Macromolecules 2005, 38, 89758978,  DOI: 10.1021/ma051394n
    35. 35
      Nguyen, N. H.; Rosen, B. M.; Lligadas, G.; Percec, V. Surface-Dependent Kinetics of Cu(0)-Wire-Catalyzed Single-Electron Transfer Living Radical Polymerization of Methyl Acrylate in DMSO at 25 °C. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 23792386,  DOI: 10.1021/ma8028562
    36. 36
      Beyer, M. K. The mechanical strength of a covalent bond calculated by density functional theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 73077312,  DOI: 10.1063/1.481330
    37. 37
      Klein, I. M.; Husic, C. C.; Kovács, D. P.; Choquette, N. J.; Robb, M. J. Validation of the CoGEF Method as a Predictive Tool for Polymer Mechanochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 1636416381,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c06868
    38. 38
      Konda, S. S. M.; Brantley, J. N.; Varghese, B. T.; Wiggins, K. M.; Bielawski, C. W.; Makarov, D. E. Molecular Catch Bonds and the Anti-Hammond Effect in Polymer Mechanochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1272212729,  DOI: 10.1021/ja4051108
    39. 39
      Robb, M. J.; Kim, T. A.; Halmes, A. J.; White, S. R.; Sottos, N. R.; Moore, J. S. Regioisomer-Specific Mechanochromism of Naphthopyran in Polymeric Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1232812331,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b07610
    40. 40
      Stevenson, R.; De Bo, G. Controlling Reactivity by Geometry in Retro-Diels-Alder Reactions under Tension. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1676816771,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b08895
    41. 41
      Boutelle, R. C.; Northrop, B. H. Substituent Effects on the Reversibility of Furan-Maleimide Cycloadditions. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 79948002,  DOI: 10.1021/jo201606z
    42. 42
      Foster, R. W.; Benhamou, L.; Porter, M. J.; Bučar, D.-K.; Hailes, H. C.; Tame, C. J.; Sheppard, T. D. Irreversible endo-Selective Diels-Alder Reactions of Substituted Alkoxyfurans: A General Synthesis of endo-Cantharimides. Chem. - Eur. J. 2015, 21, 61076114,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201406286
    43. 43
      Kryger, M. J.; Munaretto, A. M.; Moore, J. S. Structure-Mechanochemical Activity Relationships for Cyclobutane Mechanophores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1899218998,  DOI: 10.1021/ja2086728
    44. 44
      May, P. A.; Munaretto, N. F.; Hamoy, M. B.; Robb, M. J.; Moore, J. S. Is Molecular Weight or Degree of Polymerization a Better Descriptor of Ultrasound-Induced Mechanochemical Transduction?. ACS Macro Lett. 2016, 5, 177180,  DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00855
    45. 45
      Schaefer, M.; Icli, B.; Weder, C.; Lattuada, M.; Kilbinger, A. F. M.; Simon, Y. C. The Role of Mass and Length in the Sonochemistry of Polymers. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 16301636,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b02362
    46. 46
      Lenhardt, J. M.; Black Ramirez, A. L.; Lee, B.; Kouznetsova, T. B.; Craig, S. L. Mechanistic Insights into the Sonochemical Activation of Multimechanophore Cyclopropanated Polybutadiene Polymers. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 63966403,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01677
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscentsci.1c00460.

    • Experimental details, synthetic procedures, DFT calculations, fluorescence and HPLC data, and NMR spectra (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.