ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES
RETURN TO ISSUEPREVResearch ArticleNEXT

Rapid and Modular Assembly of Click Substrates To Assay Enzyme Activity in the Newborn Screening of Lysosomal Storage Disorders

  • Philipp Skrinjar
    Philipp Skrinjar
    Institute of Applied Synthetic Chemistry, Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien), 1060 Vienna, Austria
  • Markus Schwarz
    Markus Schwarz
    Institute of Applied Synthetic Chemistry, Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien), 1060 Vienna, Austria
    ARCHIMED Life Science GmbH, 1110 Vienna, Austria
  • Stefan Lexmüller
    Stefan Lexmüller
    Institute of Applied Synthetic Chemistry, Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien), 1060 Vienna, Austria
  • Thomas P. Mechtler
    Thomas P. Mechtler
    ARCHIMED Life Science GmbH, 1110 Vienna, Austria
  • Maximilian Zeyda
    Maximilian Zeyda
    Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Susanne Greber-Platzer
    Susanne Greber-Platzer
    Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • Joe Trometer
    Joe Trometer
    PerkinElmer, Diagnostics, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
    More by Joe Trometer
  • David C. Kasper
    David C. Kasper
    ARCHIMED Life Science GmbH, 1110 Vienna, Austria
  • , and 
  • Hannes Mikula*
    Hannes Mikula
    Institute of Applied Synthetic Chemistry, Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien), 1060 Vienna, Austria
    *E-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: ACS Cent. Sci. 2018, 4, 12, 1688–1696
Publication Date (Web):December 6, 2018
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.8b00668

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

  • Open Access

Article Views

2521

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (3 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Synthetic substrates play a pivotal role in the development of enzyme assays for medical diagnostics. However, the preparation of these chemical tools often requires multistep synthetic procedures complicating structural optimization and limiting versatility. In particular, substrates for enzyme assays based on tandem mass spectrometry need to be designed and optimized to fulfill the requirements to finally enable the development of robust diagnostic assays. In addition, isotope-labeled standards need to be prepared to facilitate accurate quantification of enzyme assay products. Here we report the development of a building block strategy for rapid and modular assembly of enzyme substrates using click chemistry as a key step. These click substrates are made up of a sugar moiety as enzyme responsive unit, a linker that can easily be isotope-labeled for the synthesis of internal standards, and a modifier compound that can readily be exchanged for structural optimization and analytical/diagnostic tuning. Moreover, the building block assembly eliminates the need for extensive optimization of different glycosylation reactions as it enables the divergent synthesis of substrates using a clickable enzyme responsive unit. The outlined strategy has been applied to obtain a series of synthetic α-l-iduronates and sulfated β-d-galactosides as substrates for assaying α-l-iduronidase and N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfate sulfatase, enzymes related to the lysosomal storage disorders mucopolysaccharidosis type I and type IVa, respectively. Selected click substrates were finally shown to be suitable to assay enzyme activities in dried blood spot samples from affected patients and random newborns.

Synopsis

Clickable building blocks can be used to rapidly access enzyme substrates and isotope-labeled standards for the LC-MS/MS-based assaying of enzyme activities in dried blood spot samples.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) are severe diseases, caused by genetic defects leading to a deficiency of lysosomal enzyme activity. The resulting progressive accumulation of macromolecular substrates is specific to each disorder and causes a gradual deterioration of cellular and tissue function. (1−3) Individual LSDs are considered as rare diseases with a round combined prevalence estimated at 1 per 7700 live births. (4) In contrast to general treatments for the symptoms of LSDs various therapeutic options have been developed dealing with the cause of the disease: (i) enzyme replacement therapy, (ii) chaperone-mediated enzyme enhancement, (iii) substrate reduction therapy, (iv) stem cell transplantation, and (v) hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy. (5−9) The development of those treatment options has led to an intense interest into newborn screening (NBS) of LSDs as early initiation of treatment often leads to a better outcome. (10) Different methods for NBS have been developed including (i) direct analysis of enzymatic activity, (ii) gene sequencing, (iii) direct measurement of enzyme abundance, and (iv) biomarker quantification. (10) While measurements of enzyme abundance and biomarker analysis are still at an early stage of development, and gene sequencing is limited by the lack of a complete list of pathogenic mutations, direct enzyme activity analysis has been extensively developed in recent years. (10) In their pioneering studies, Chamoles and co-workers assayed enzyme activities in rehydrated dried blood spots (DBS) using fluorometric and radiometric assays. (10−13) DBS analysis has several advantages over other methods as it requires only a few drops of blood, and samples can easily be sent in plastic envelopes at room temperature to other cities, countries, or specialized reference laboratories. (14)
Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) has been developed as a diagnostic platform for early detection and screening of genetic disorders and many countries have implemented newborn screening using MS/MS. (15) Pioneered by Gelb and co-workers, MS/MS was applied for the newborn screening of several LSDs. (16−24) Most importantly, MS/MS changed the paradigm of analyzing one analyte per disorder as it allows the analysis of multiple enzymes in a single DBS punch (multiplexing). Several multiplex assays have been developed in recent years. (17,19,22) To simplify sample cleanup before flow injection into the MS/MS instrument several groups interfaced ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography (UHPLC) with MS/MS. Two-dimensional chromatography (applying perfusion columns or turboflow online sample cleanup) was used to avoid the need for offline liquid–liquid and solid-phase extraction. (25−31)
In addition, fluorogenic substrates have been developed and used to assay several lysosomal enzymes. (11−14,32−41) Fluorometric methods that make use of digital microfluidics represent an emerging technology that is considered to be at least as effective as MS/MS for high-throughput screening of multiple LSDs. (42−44)
A key drawback in the development of enzyme assays (in particular MS/MS-based ones) is that the preparation of substrates often requires more than 10 synthetic steps. (10) Furthermore, as required for MS/MS methods, corresponding internal standards (in most cases isotope-labeled reference compounds of the assay products) need to be prepared. The labor- and cost-intensive development of substrates and internal standards impedes fast structural optimization (considering substrate stability, enzyme kinetics, MS ionization, in-source fragmentation, etc.) (26) with the aim to develop a robust assay. For instance, the development of improved substrates for the newborn screening of mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) types I, II, and VI has been reported in 2014, (17) thus almost a decade after the first described synthetic substrate for MPS I, (23) and 6 years after the first structural optimization (13 synthetic steps and additional 2 steps to obtain substrate and internal standard, respectively). (16)
Deficiency of glycosidases is related to several LSDs and thus receiving increasing interest. (1,2,45) The preparation of substrates for the development of glycosidase assays (Figure 1a) involves glycosylation as a key step, a reaction that is known to be notoriously difficult and thus requiring extensive optimization. (46) Hence, this further complicates the screening and optimization of substrate structures when using a linear (or convergent) synthetic sequence.

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) General concept of LC-MS/MS-based glycosidase assays. Glycosylated substrates are cleaved by the enzyme yielding the product (P) as analyte for subsequent analysis. An isotope-labeled internal standard (IS; here shown as deuterated product, P*) is required and used for quantification. (b) Divergent building block assembly of substrates using a single optimized glycosylation reaction and click chemistry to access a library of click substrates (CS). (c) Corresponding internal standards (IS) can easily be prepared using a single deuterated linker in combination with other building blocks.

In this light, we herein report the design of a strategy for the building block assembly of substrates using a click reaction as key step. A click tag is attached to a linker that can subsequently be conjugated to a library of compounds (modifiers) to tune the MS/MS properties of the final substrate. The sugar moiety is connected to a click aglycone using a single optimized glycosylation reaction, and the resulting building block is reacted with the clickable linker–modifier conjugates. This approach enables the divergent synthesis of click substrates (Figure 1b). Furthermore, a single deuterated linker can be used for facile preparation of the corresponding isotope-labeled internal standards (Figure 1c). While the click aglycone can be exchanged to optimize enzyme kinetics, variation of the sugar moiety leads to substrates for different enzyme assays using the same linker–modifier building blocks, which we finally show by the development of click substrates to assay a clinically relevant sulfatase. The versatility of this approach thus enables the synthesis, screening, and optimization of numerous substrates in short time. Individual building blocks can easily be exchanged without having to start a multistep synthesis from the beginning.

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

To develop and test the outlined strategy we started by focusing on substrates to assay α-L-iduronidase (IDUA). Deficiency of this lysosomal enzyme causes mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I). As discussed above several substrates to assay MPS I have been developed including fluorogenic compounds and substrates optimized for MS/MS. (11,13,16,17,23) It is noteworthy that we did not aim for structural optimization of MPS I substrates to improve currently used assays that have been gradually optimized in the past decade, but to evaluate the general applicability of our click strategy for the divergent synthesis of enzyme substrates. IDUA is a lysosomal hydrolase responsible for the degradation of the glycosaminoglycans heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate by cleaving an iduronic acid unit. (47) Hence, synthetic α-L-iduronidates are used to assay IDUA (Figure 2). Chemical glycosylation to afford α-l-iduronidates represents a challenging, not well-studied reaction, which makes these compounds an ideal target for the outlined click strategy.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Cleavage of α-l-iduronates by IDUA.

For the synthesis of a readily accessible linker methyl 4-formylbenzoate (1) was reduced with NaBH4 to afford 2a, which was converted to 3a in an Appel reaction. Reduction with LiAlH4 yielding 4a and subsequent introduction of an azide moiety via nucleophilic substitution afforded clickable linker 5a(Figure 3a). This synthesis could easily be modified by using deuteride reagents to obtain the isotope-labeled linker 5b. A library of modifier compounds was prepared and used in this study for the synthesis of selected click markers (CM1CM5) as shown in Figure 3a. Propargyl alcohol was used as a simple click aglycone and glycosylated by reaction with the known fluoroiduronyl donor 6 (17) to afford the clickable iduronate 7. Copper-catalyzed azide alkyne cycloaddition (click chemistry) (48−51) was used for the divergent synthesis of click substrates. Selected compounds CS1CS5 have been prepared via 812 (Figure 3b) by click reaction of 7 with CM1aCM5a. The corresponding internal standards IS1IS5 were prepared by reacting isotope-labeled click markers CM1bCM5b with propargyl alcohol to obtain different analytical sets (CS, IS) for further investigations and the development of LC-MS/MS-based enzyme assays. The same synthetic procedures were used to obtain the products (P1P5) of the enzymatic reactions (click of nonlabeled markers CM1aCM5a with propargyl alcohol). These compounds were used for the development and tuning of analytical methods (synthesis not shown; for detailed description see the Supporting Information).

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) Synthesis of nonlabeled and isotope-labeled azide-modified linkers 5a and 5b, respectively, and subsequent conjugation to modifier compounds (M) to obtain a library of click markers (CM). (b) Glycosylation of propargyl alcohol using iduronyl donor 6 and click assembly with CM1CM5 to afford click substrates CS1CS5. (c) Analytical sets of click substrates (CS) and corresponding internal standards (IS) for the development of LC-MS/MS-based α-l-iduronidase assays.

We have first used the click approach for the preparation of various substrates and internal standards applying chemically different modifier compounds. Selected compounds, including t-butylcarbonates (set 1), diethylcarbamates (set 2), and t-butyloxycarbonyl-protected (boc-protected) bis-carbamates (set 3), are shown in Figure 3c. These first generation sets were tested using recombinant human IDUA. Briefly, the substrates were reacted at a concentration of 1 mg/mL with increasing concentrations of pure IDUA (0, 25, 50, and 100 ng/mL) in IDUA assay buffer at pH 4.04 at 22 °C for 20 min. The isotope-labeled internal standards (IS) were added to the assay cocktail and used to quantify the product of the enzymatic cleavage of the click substrate. Enzymatic reactions were quenched by the addition of acetonitrile. Samples were centrifuged, and supernatants were diluted and analyzed by UHPLC-MS/MS, wherein mass spectrometric detection was performed using a triple quadrupole system operated in positive electrospray ionization (ESI) mode (for details see the Supporting Information). In these assays, we could show that the enzyme degrades all three substrates (CS1CS3) as indicated by a linear correlation of IDUA enzyme activity and concentration (Figure 4a).

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Enzyme assays using recombinant human α-l-iduronidase (IDUA) and sets 1–5 of click substrate (CS1CS5) and corresponding internal standard (IS1IS5) (calculated specific activities are shown in μmol per min and mg enzyme). (b) Analysis of dried blood spots (DBS) using CDC control cards (QCL, QCM, QCH = quality control low, medium, high). (c) Analysis of DBS of confirmed MPS I patients (n = 9, anonymized) and random newborns (n = 88, anonymized). [****p < 0.0001.]

Subsequently, analyses of dried blood spots (DBS) were performed using quality control cards provided by the CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention, USA). Briefly, DBS cards were punched (3.2 mm diameter), and each spot was extracted with PBS buffer. The extracts were incubated with the click substrates in assay buffer (pH 4.04) for 22 h at 37 °C followed by quenching with acetonitrile and centrifugation after complete precipitation. The supernatants were diluted and analyzed by UHPLC-MS/MS using the same method as for IDUA assays as described above (for details see the Supporting Information). Data for selected CS/IS sets is shown in Figure 4b. In contrast to assays using recombinant human IDUA, sets 1 and 2 gave only poor results in the DBS assay, while set 3 was shown to be applicable to discriminate between low (QCL), medium (QCM), and high (QCH) enzyme concentration in DBS (Figure 4b). In general, DBS analyses differ from enzyme assays in terms of complexity and, most importantly, incubation time due to the much lower enzyme concentration in DBS. While IDUA assays were used to test and show enzyme activity, DBS analyses were performed to test our substrates in a clinically more relevant setup. The poor performance of sets 1 and 2 clearly indicates the need for a robust, rapid, and modular method for substrate synthesis as it is difficult to predict the performance in DBS assays and LC-MS/MS in general (considering solubility, stability, ionization efficiency, chromatographic performance, etc.). Based on these results sets 4 and 5 have been prepared that differ from set 3 only in the carbon-chain length of the modifier (Figure 3c, second generation sets). UHPLC-MS/MS assays have been performed using IDUA (Figure 4a) and DBS controls (Figure 4b) affording results similar to those of set 3.
Analysis of enzyme activity in DBS obtained from randomly selected newborns and 9 confirmed MPS I patients using CS/IS sets 3, 4, and 5 shows that the activity of IDUA in the patient samples is below the activity observed for random newborns (Figure 4c). Similar results were obtained for all three sets (except a higher variation in IDUA activity when using set 5). Even though these substrates do not achieve activities as described for recently developed optimized substrates for MPS I screening, (17) the building block approach can be used for further optimization, e.g., by exchanging the click aglycone to improve the kinetics of the enzymatic cleavage reaction.
In general, the major advantage of the click approach is that many substrates can be prepared by changing a single building block without the need for new synthetic strategies or optimized protocols. In addition, the corresponding internal standards can easily be prepared by using a single isotope-labeled linker. Hence, a group of substrates and IS that differ only in the carbon-chain length of the modifier can be prepared by exchanging the modifier building block as shown for sets 3–5. To investigate if such a group of similar substrates can be applied for the simultaneous analysis of different DBS (different patients) using a single UHPLC run, we performed a triplex assay, wherein “triplex” stands for 3 different samples screened for the activity of the same enzyme. DBS analyses were carried out as described above using the CS/IS sets 3, 4, and 5. Subsequently, the three separately incubated samples were combined and analyzed using a single injection (Figure 5a). All substrates and the corresponding internal standards could be separated in a 5 min UHPLC run (Figure 5b). To enable direct and better comparison of the data we have analyzed each DBS using the three different CS/IS sets and combined these samples before LC-MS/MS analysis. As shown in Figure 5c, we have been able to achieve results almost equivalent to those of the singleplex assays (Figure 4c), even though a higher variation from single- to triplex was observed for set 5 (Figure 5d). These results clearly indicate the feasibility of the approach that can potentially be extended by using additional substrates.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a) Simultaneous analysis of three different samples using a single UHPLC-MS/MS run. (b) Chromatographic separation of CS/IS sets 3, 4, and 5 (including the products P3P5 of the corresponding enzyme assays) using a 5 min gradient. (c) Triplex assay of three combined DBS samples using CS/IS sets 3, 4, and 5 (affected, n = 8; random, n = 23; ****p < 0.0001). (d) Analyzed DBS samples (random) in triplex vs singleplex assays (n = 23). [S = substrate, P* = IS, P = product.]

In addition to structural tuning and divergent synthesis of substrate libraries, a variety of substrates to assay different enzymes can be prepared by exchanging the clickable sugar moiety (enzyme responsive unit) and using the same synthetic protocols for rapid click assembly with already available linker–modifier building blocks. To demonstrate this key advantage, we focused on the development of substrates to assay N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfate sulfatase (GALNS). Deficiency of GALNS leads to accumulation of chondroitin-6-sulfate and keratan sulfate causing the lysosomal storage disorder mucopolysaccharidosis type IVa (Morquio syndrome, Figure 6a). (52,53) GALNS has been assayed in dried blood spots to screen for MPS IVa using fluorometric and LC-MS/MS-based methods. (20,26,54−56)

Figure 6

Figure 6. (a) Deficiency of GALNS leads to accumulation of chondroitin-6-sulfate and keratan sulfate causing MPS IVa. (b) Click assembly of GALNS substrates and internal standards using clickable galactose derivatives and already available linker–modifier building blocks. (c) Synthesis of GALNS sets 6–8 of click substrates (CS6CS8) and corresponding internal standards (IS6IS8) using click markers CM3aCM5a and isotope-labeled CM3bCM5b, respectively. (d) Analysis of dried blood spots (DBS) using CDC control cards. (e) Analysis of DBS of confirmed affected patients (n = 9, anonymized) and random newborns (n = 116, anonymized). [****p < 0.0001.]

Similar to the overall strategy as outlined in Figure 1, we aimed to use clickable galactose building blocks to prepare sulfated click substrates and the respective nonsulfated internal standards by using already available click marker (CM) building blocks (linker, deuterated linker, modifier; Figure 6b). Starting from 1-O-propargyl-β-d-galactose (13, click galactose) we have prepared the sulfated galactose building block 14 by protecting group manipulations (TIPS-protection, acetylation, removal of TIPS) and chemical sulfation on C-6. Click assembly of the alkyne-modified galactose moieties 14 and 13 with click markers CM3aCM5a and CM3bCM5b, respectively, afforded click substrates CS6CS8, internal standards IS6IS8 (Figure 6c), and the non-isotope-labeled products P6P8 as reference compounds for tuning the MS instrument (see the Supporting Information).
These GALNS substrates were tested in DBS analyses using CDC control cards (similar to assaying IDUA in DBS as described above) showing that all three sets can be used to discriminate between low (QCL), medium (QCM), and high (QCH) enzyme concentration (Figure 6d). Moreover, sets 6–8 gave highly similar results showing independence of the assay from the length of the modifier. As the observed activities of >10 μM/h are significantly higher than or at least similar to previously reported data using MS/MS-based (20,26) or fluorometric methods, (54,55) we aimed to test our GALNS click substrates in a clinically more relevant setup. Therefore, we have analyzed DBS of 9 confirmed MPS IVa patients in comparison to randomly selected newborns (all anonymized). DBS cards were punched, and each spot was incubated in assay buffer (pH 4.04) containing substrate and internal standard for 22 h at 37 °C followed by quenching with acetonitrile and centrifugation. The supernatants were diluted and analyzed by UHPLC-MS/MS (see the Supporting Information). We obtained mean activities of 0.76 μM/h (affected patients) and 13.5 μM/h (random newborns), and thus an activity ratio (normal/affected) of >17 with a mean absolute difference of 12.7 μM/h between normal and affected newborns.
Not only could we thus show the modularity of the click approach by designing substrates for a different enzyme by changing a single building block, but we also expanded our strategy to the assaying of sulfatases by using a clickable sulfated sugar moiety.

Conclusions

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The presented approach for building block assembly of click substrates (CS) and corresponding internal standards (IS) was shown to be suitable for the divergent, versatile, and modular synthesis of chemical tools and the development of diagnostic LC-MS/MS-based enzyme assays. A library of substrates to screen for MPS I was prepared and investigated in enzyme assays and DBS analyses. Selected substrates have been shown to be suitable to determine the enzymatic activity in patient samples. By changing a single building block, we were able to show (i) rapid synthesis of a group of similar CS/IS sets for the simultaneous analysis of DBS using a single chromatographic run, and (ii) the development of MPS IVa substrates using a sulfated clickable galactose derivative and already available linker–modifier building blocks. These GALNS click substrates were evaluated using quality control cards and shown to be suitable to assay enzyme activities in dried blood spot samples from affected patients and random newborns.
Overall, we were able to demonstrate the advantages and further potential of the click approach and are thus convinced that this strategy will accelerate and contribute to the development of diagnostic tools, LC-MS/MS-based enzyme assays, and screening methods.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00668.

  • Synthesis, compound characterization (including copies of NMR spectra), detailed analytical methods, and materials (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Philipp Skrinjar - Institute of Applied Synthetic Chemistry, Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien), 1060 Vienna, Austria
    • Markus Schwarz - Institute of Applied Synthetic Chemistry, Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien), 1060 Vienna, AustriaARCHIMED Life Science GmbH, 1110 Vienna, Austria
    • Stefan Lexmüller - Institute of Applied Synthetic Chemistry, Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien), 1060 Vienna, Austria
    • Thomas P. Mechtler - ARCHIMED Life Science GmbH, 1110 Vienna, Austria
    • Maximilian Zeyda - Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
    • Susanne Greber-Platzer - Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
    • Joe Trometer - PerkinElmer, Diagnostics, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
    • David C. Kasper - ARCHIMED Life Science GmbH, 1110 Vienna, Austria
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We thank the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) for funding (Grant 838557). DBS quality control cards were kindly provided by the CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention, USA), including permission for their use in this and related studies. DBS samples of newborns were provided by the Medical University of Vienna and the Vienna General Hospital (Newborn Screening Program), and anonymized DBS samples of affected patients (non-newborns) were kindly provided by the University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz (Germany). The institutional ethics committee approved the study (EK 478/2009 and EK 1687/2014).

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 56 other publications.

  1. 1
    Futerman, A. H.; van Meer, G. The cell biology of lysosomal storage disorders. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5, 554565,  DOI: 10.1038/nrm1423
  2. 2
    Vellodi, A. Lysosomal storage disorders. Br. J. Haematol. 2005, 128, 413431,  DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05293.x
  3. 3
    Wang, R. Y.; Bodamer, O. A.; Watson, M. S.; Wilcox, W. R. Lysosomal storage diseases: diagnostic confirmation and management of presymptomatic individuals. Genet. Med. 2011, 13, 457484,  DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318211a7e1
  4. 4
    Meikle, P. J.; Hopwood, J. J.; Clague, A. E.; Carey, W. F. Prevalence of lysosomal storage disorders. JAMA 1999, 281, 249254,  DOI: 10.1001/jama.281.3.249
  5. 5
    Pastores, G. M. Therapeutic approaches for lysosomal storage diseases. Ther. Adv. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 1, 177188,  DOI: 10.1177/2042018810384429
  6. 6
    Desnick, R. J.; Schuchman, E. H. Enzyme replacement and enhancement therapies: lessons from lysosomal disorders. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002, 3, 954966,  DOI: 10.1038/nrg963
  7. 7
    Coutinho, M. F.; Santos, J. I.; Alves, S. Less is more: substrate reduction therapy for lysosomal storage disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1065,  DOI: 10.3390/ijms17071065
  8. 8
    Biffi, A. Hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy for storage disease: current and new indications. Mol. Ther. 2017, 25, 11551162,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.025
  9. 9
    Shihabuddin, L. S.; Cheng, S. H. Neural stem cell transplantation as a therapeutic approach for treating lysosomal storage diseases. Neurotherapeutics 2011, 8, 659667,  DOI: 10.1007/s13311-011-0067-8
  10. 10
    Gelb, M. H.; Scott, C. R.; Turecek, F. Newborn screening for lysosomal storage diseases. Clin. Chem. 2015, 61, 335346,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.225771
  11. 11
    Chamoles, N. A.; Blanco, M.; Gaggioli, D. Diagnosis of α-l-iduronidase deficiency in dried blood spots on filter paper: the possibility of newborn diagnosis. Clin. Chem. 2001, 47, 780781
  12. 12
    Chamoles, N. A.; Blanco, M.; Gaggioli, D.; Casentini, C. Gaucher and Niemann–Pick diseases—enzymatic diagnosis in dried blood spots on filter paper: retrospective diagnoses in newborn-screening cards. Clin. Chim. Acta 2002, 317, 191197,  DOI: 10.1016/S0009-8981(01)00798-7
  13. 13
    Chamoles, N. A.; Blanco, M. B.; Gaggioli, D.; Casentini, C. Hurler-like phenotype: enzymatic diagnosis in dried blood spots on filter paper. Clin. Chem. 2001, 47, 20982102
  14. 14
    Ceci, R.; Francesco, P.; Mucci, J.; Cancelarich, L.; Fossati, C.; Rozenfeld, P. Reliability of enzyme assays in dried blood spots for diagnosis of 4 lysosomal storage disorders. Adv. Biol. Chem. 2011, 1, 5864,  DOI: 10.4236/abc.2011.13008
  15. 15
    Garg, U.; Dasouki, M. Expanded newborn screening of inherited metabolic disorders by tandem mass spectrometry: Clinical and laboratory aspects. Clin. Biochem. 2006, 39, 315332,  DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2005.12.009
  16. 16
    Blanchard, S.; Sadilek, M.; Scott, C. R.; Turecek, F.; Gelb, M. H. Tandem mass spectrometry for the direct assay of lysosomal enzymes in dried blood spots: application to screening newborns for mucopolysaccharidosis I. Clin. Chem. 2008, 54, 20672070,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.115410
  17. 17
    Chennamaneni, N. K.; Kumar, A. B.; Barcenas, M.; Spacil, Z.; Scott, C. R.; Turecek, F.; Gelb, M. H. Improved reagents for newborn screening of mucopolysaccharidosis types I, II, and VI by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 45084514,  DOI: 10.1021/ac5004135
  18. 18
    Duffey, T. A.; Khaliq, T.; Scott, C. R.; Turecek, F.; Gelb, M. H. Design and synthesis of substrates for newborn screening of Maroteaux-Lamy and Morquio A syndromes. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 59945996,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.08.080
  19. 19
    Gelb, M. H.; Turecek, F.; Scott, C. R.; Chamoles, N. A. Direct multiplex assay of enzymes in dried blood spots by tandem mass spectrometry for the newborn screening of lysosomal storage disorders. J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 2006, 29, 397404,  DOI: 10.1007/s10545-006-0265-4
  20. 20
    Khaliq, T.; Sadilek, M.; Scott, C. R.; Turecek, F.; Gelb, M. H. Tandem mass spectrometry for the direct assay of lysosomal enzymes in dried blood spots: application to screening newborns for mucopolysaccharidosis IVA. Clin. Chem. 2011, 57, 128131,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.149880
  21. 21
    Li, Y.; Brockmann, K.; Turecek, F.; Scott, C. R.; Gelb, M. H. Tandem mass spectrometry for the direct assay of enzymes in dried blood spots: application to newborn screening for Krabbe disease. Clin. Chem. 2004, 50, 638640,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.028381
  22. 22
    Li, Y.; Scott, C. R.; Chamoles, N. A.; Ghavami, A.; Pinto, B. M.; Turecek, F.; Gelb, M. H. Direct multiplex assay of lysosomal enzymes in dried blood spots for newborn screening. Clin. Chem. 2004, 50, 17851796,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.035907
  23. 23
    Wang, D.; Eadala, B.; Sadilek, M.; Chamoles, N. A.; Turecek, F.; Scott, C. R.; Gelb, M. H. Tandem mass spectrometric analysis of dried blood spots for screening of mucopolysaccharidosis I in newborns. Clin. Chem. 2005, 51, 898900,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.047167
  24. 24
    Wolfe, B. J.; Ghomashchi, F.; Kim, T.; Abam, C. A.; Sadilek, M.; Jack, R.; Thompson, J. N.; Scott, C. R.; Gelb, M. H.; Turecek, F. New substrates and enzyme assays for the detection of mucopolysaccharidosis III (Sanfilippo Syndrome) types A, B, C, and D by tandem mass spectrometry. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 557564,  DOI: 10.1021/bc200609x
  25. 25
    Spáčil, Z.; Elliott, S.; Reeber, S. L.; Gelb, M. H.; Scott, C. R.; Tureček, F. Comparative triplex tandem mass spectrometry assays of lysosomal enzyme activities in dried blood spots using fast liquid chromatography: application to newborn screening of Pompe, Fabry, and Hurler diseases. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 48224828,  DOI: 10.1021/ac200417u
  26. 26
    Spacil, Z.; Tatipaka, H.; Barcenas, M.; Scott, C. R.; Turecek, F.; Gelb, M. H. High-throughput assay of 9 lysosomal enzymes for newborn screening. Clin. Chem. 2013, 59, 502511,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.189936
  27. 27
    la Marca, G.; Casetta, B.; Malvagia, S.; Guerrini, R.; Zammarchi, E. New strategy for the screening of lysosomal storage disorders: the use of the online trapping-and-cleanup liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 61136121,  DOI: 10.1021/ac900504s
  28. 28
    Kasper, D. C.; Herman, J.; De Jesus, V. R.; Mechtler, T. P.; Metz, T. F.; Shushan, B. The application of multiplexed, multi-dimensional ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry to the high-throughput screening of lysosomal storage disorders in newborn dried bloodspots. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 24, 986994,  DOI: 10.1002/rcm.4496
  29. 29
    Mechtler, T. P.; Stary, S.; Metz, T. F.; De Jesus, V. R.; Greber-Platzer, S.; Pollak, A.; Herkner, K. R.; Streubel, B.; Kasper, D. C. Neonatal screening for lysosomal storage disorders: feasibility and incidence from a nationwide study in Austria. Lancet 2012, 379, 335341,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61266-X
  30. 30
    Metz, T. F.; Mechtler, T. P.; Orsini, J. J.; Martin, M.; Shushan, B.; Herman, J. L.; Ratschmann, R.; Item, C. B.; Streubel, B.; Herkner, K. R.; Kasper, D. C. Simplified newborn screening protocol for lysosomal storage disorders. Clin. Chem. 2011, 57, 12861294,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.164640
  31. 31
    Gucciardi, A.; Legnini, E.; Di Gangi, I. M.; Corbetta, C.; Tomanin, R.; Scarpa, M.; Giordano, G. A column-switching HPLC-MS/MS method for mucopolysaccharidosis type I analysis in a multiplex assay for the simultaneous newborn screening of six lysosomal storage disorders. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2014, 28, 11311139,  DOI: 10.1002/bmc.3133
  32. 32
    He, W.; Voznyi, Y. V.; Boer, A. M.; Kleijer, W. J.; van Diggelen, O. P. A fluorimetric enzyme assay for the diagnosis of Sanfilippo disease type D (MPS IIID). J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 1993, 16, 935941,  DOI: 10.1007/BF00711508
  33. 33
    Karpova, E. A.; Voznyi, Y. V.; Keulemans, J. L. M.; Hoogeveen, A. T.; Winchester, B.; Tsvetkova, I. V.; van Diggelen, O. P. A fluorimetric enzyme assay for the diagnosis of sanfilippo disease type A (MPS IIIA). J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 1996, 19, 278285,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01799255
  34. 34
    Voznyi, Y. V.; Karpova, E. A.; Dudukina, T. V.; Tsvetkova, I. V.; Boer, A. M.; Janse, H. C.; van Diggelen, O. P. A fluorimetric enzyme assay for the diagnosis of Sanfilippo disease C (MPS III C). J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 1993, 16, 465472,  DOI: 10.1007/BF00710299
  35. 35
    Voznyi, Y. V.; Keulemans, J. L. M.; van Diggelen, O. P. A fluorimetric enzyme assay for the diagnosis of MPS II (Hunter disease). J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 2001, 24, 675680,  DOI: 10.1023/A:1012763026526
  36. 36
    van Diggelen, O. P.; Voznyi, Y. V.; Keulemans, J. L. M.; Schoonderwoerd, K.; Ledvinova, J.; Mengel, E.; Zschiesche, M.; Santer, R.; Harzer, K. A new fluorimetric enzyme assay for the diagnosis of Niemann–Pick A/B, with specificity of natural sphingomyelinase substrate. J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 2005, 28, 733741,  DOI: 10.1007/s10545-005-0105-y
  37. 37
    van Diggelen, O. P.; Zhao, H.; Kleijer, W. J.; Janse, H. C.; Poorthuis, B. J. H. M.; van Pelt, J.; Kamerling, J. P.; Galjaard, H. A fluorimetric enzyme assay for the diagnosis of Morquio disease type A (MPS IV A). Clin. Chim. Acta 1990, 187, 131139,  DOI: 10.1016/0009-8981(90)90339-T
  38. 38
    Gasparotto, N.; Tomanin, R.; Frigo, A. C.; Niizawa, G.; Pasquini, E.; Blanco, M.; Donati, M. A.; Keutzer, J.; Zacchello, F.; Scarpa, M. Rapid diagnostic testing procedures for lysosomal storage disorders: alpha-glucosidase and beta-galactosidase assays on dried blood spots. Clin. Chim. Acta 2009, 402, 3841,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2008.12.006
  39. 39
    Chien, Y.-H.; Chiang, S.-C.; Zhang, X. K.; Keutzer, J.; Lee, N.-C.; Huang, A.-C.; Chen, C.-A.; Wu, M.-H.; Huang, P.-H.; Tsai, F.-J.; Chen, Y.-T.; Hwu, W.-L. Early detection of Pompe disease by newborn screening is feasible: results from the Taiwan screening program. Pediatrics 2008, 122, e3945,  DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-2222
  40. 40
    Sista, R.; Eckhardt, A. E.; Wang, T.; Sellos-Moura, M.; Pamula, V. K. Rapid, single-step assay for Hunter syndrome in dried blood spots using digital microfluidics. Clin. Chim. Acta 2011, 412, 18951897,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.06.015
  41. 41
    Sista, R. S.; Eckhardt, A. E.; Wang, T.; Graham, C.; Rouse, J. L.; Norton, S. M.; Srinivasan, V.; Pollack, M. G.; Tolun, A. A.; Bali, D.; Millington, D. S.; Pamula, V. K. Digital microfluidic platform for multiplexing enzyme assays: implications for lysosomal storage disease screening in newborns. Clin. Chem. 2011, 57, 14441451,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.163139
  42. 42
    Millington, D. S.; Sista, R.; Eckhardt, A.; Rouse, J.; Bali, D.; Goldberg, R.; Cotten, M.; Buckley, R.; Pamula, V. Digital Microfluidics: A Future technology in the newborn screening laboratory?. Semin. Perinatol 2010, 34, 163169,  DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.12.008
  43. 43
    Millington, D. S.; Bali, D. M. Misinformation regarding tandem mass spectrometric vs fluorometric assays to screen newborns for LSDs. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2017, 11, 7273,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2017.04.009
  44. 44
    Millington, D.; Norton, S.; Singh, R.; Sista, R.; Srinivasan, V.; Pamula, V. Digital microfluidics comes of age: high-throughput screening to bedside diagnostic testing for genetic disorders in newborns. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2018, 18, 701712,  DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2018.1495076
  45. 45
    Cecioni, S.; Vocadlo, D. J. Carbohydrate bis-acetal-based substrates as tunable fluorescence-quenched probes for monitoring exo-glycosidase activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 83928395,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b01948
  46. 46
    Geyer, K.; Seeberger, P. H. Optimization of glycosylation reactions in a microreactor. Helv. Chim. Acta 2007, 90, 395403,  DOI: 10.1002/hlca.200790046
  47. 47
    Scott, H. S.; Anson, D. S.; Orsborn, A. M.; Nelson, P. V.; Clements, P. R.; Morris, C. P.; Hopwood, J. J. Human alpha-L-iduronidase: cDNA isolation and expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1991, 88, 96959699,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9695
  48. 48
    Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Click chemistry: diverse chemical function from a few good reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 20042021,  DOI: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010601)40:11<2004::AID-ANIE2004>3.0.CO;2-5
  49. 49
    Kolb, H. C.; Sharpless, K. B. The growing impact of click chemistry on drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today 2003, 8, 11281137,  DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02933-7
  50. 50
    Moses, J. E.; Moorhouse, A. D. The growing applications of click chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 12491262,  DOI: 10.1039/B613014N
  51. 51
    McKay, C. S.; Finn, M. G. Click chemistry in complex mixtures: bioorthogonal bioconjugation. Chem. Biol. 2014, 21, 10751101,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.09.002
  52. 52
    Peracha, H.; Sawamoto, K.; Averill, L.; Kecskemethy, H.; Theroux, M.; Thacker, M.; Nagao, K.; Pizarro, C.; Mackenzie, W.; Kobayashi, H.; Yamaguchi, S.; Suzuki, Y.; Orii, K.; Orii, T.; Fukao, T.; Tomatsu, S. Molecular genetics and metabolism, special edition: diagnosis, diagnosis and prognosis of Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2018, 125, 1837,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.05.004
  53. 53
    Khan, S.; Alméciga-Díaz, C. J.; Sawamoto, K.; Mackenzie, W. G.; Theroux, M. C.; Pizarro, C.; Mason, R. W.; Orii, T.; Tomatsu, S. Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA and glycosaminoglycans. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2017, 120, 7895,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2016.11.007
  54. 54
    Kumar, A. B.; Spacil, Z.; Ghomashchi, F.; Masi, S.; Sumida, T.; Ito, M.; Turecek, F.; Scott, C. R.; Gelb, M. H. Fluorimetric assays for N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfatase and arylsulfatase B based on the natural substrates for confirmation of mucopolysaccharidoses types IVA and VI. Clin. Chim. Acta 2015, 451, 125128,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.08.010
  55. 55
    Ullal, A. J.; Millington, D. S.; Bali, D. S. Development of a fluorometric microtiter plate based enzyme assay for MPS IVA (Morquio type A) using dried blood spots. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2014, 1, 461464,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2014.10.004
  56. 56
    Camelier, M. V.; Burin, M. G.; De Mari, J.; Vieira, T. A.; Marasca, G.; Giugliani, R. Practical and reliable enzyme test for the detection of Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA (Morquio Syndrome type A) in dried blood samples. Clin. Chim. Acta 2011, 412, 18051808,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.06.001

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 8 publications.

  1. Di Chen, Bo Zhang, Kui Kang, LiKun Li, Yuan Liao, Sheng Qing, YaNan Di. Development of a prognostic model for personalized prediction of colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) patient outcomes using methylation-driven genes. Journal of Applied Genetics 2023, 64 (4) , 713-721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-023-00778-4
  2. Hyun Gyu Hwang, Dae-Yeol Ye, Gyoo Yeol Jung. Biosensor-guided discovery and engineering of metabolic enzymes. Biotechnology Advances 2023, 69 , 108251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108251
  3. Kenichi Kato, Shunsuke Ohtani, Masayuki Gon, Kazuo Tanaka, Tomoki Ogoshi. Cyclic arrays of five pyrenes on one rim of a planar chiral pillar[5]arene. Chemical Science 2022, 13 (44) , 13147-13152. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SC04168E
  4. Ru Li, Xuan Zou, Pan Luan, Xiaokun Liu, Ning Wang, Qian Wang, Huashi Guan, Zhe Xu. Direct Determination of Enzymes in Dried Blood Spots by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography – Mass Spectrometry (HPLC-MS) for the Screening of Antithrombotic Agents. Analytical Letters 2022, 55 (14) , 2308-2324. https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2022.2053700
  5. Ruotong Li, Liping Tian, Qing Gao, Yuanfang Guo, Gaijie Li, Yulin Li, Meng Sun, Yan Yan, Qing Li, Wenying Nie, Hui Zou. Establishment of Cutoff Values for Newborn Screening of Six Lysosomal Storage Disorders by Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Frontiers in Pediatrics 2022, 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.814461
  6. Thamali Ayagama, Samuel J. Bose, Rebecca A. Capel, David A. Priestman, Georgina Berridge, Roman Fischer, Antony Galione, Frances M. Platt, Holger Kramer, Rebecca A.B. Burton. A modified density gradient proteomic-based method to analyze endolysosomal proteins in cardiac tissue. iScience 2021, 24 (9) , 102949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102949
  7. Markus Schwarz, Philipp Skrinjar, Michael J. Fink, Stefan Kronister, Thomas Mechtler, Panagiotis I. Koukos, Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin, David C. Kasper, Hannes Mikula. A click-flipped enzyme substrate boosts the performance of the diagnostic screening for Hunter syndrome. Chemical Science 2020, 11 (47) , 12671-12676. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SC04696E
  8. Thomas Wiesinger, Markus Schwarz, Thomas P. Mechtler, Sandra Liebmann-Reindl, Berthold Streubel, David C. Kasper. α-Mannosidosis - An underdiagnosed lysosomal storage disease in individuals with an ‘MPS-like’ phenotype. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 2020, 130 (2) , 149-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2020.04.001
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (a) General concept of LC-MS/MS-based glycosidase assays. Glycosylated substrates are cleaved by the enzyme yielding the product (P) as analyte for subsequent analysis. An isotope-labeled internal standard (IS; here shown as deuterated product, P*) is required and used for quantification. (b) Divergent building block assembly of substrates using a single optimized glycosylation reaction and click chemistry to access a library of click substrates (CS). (c) Corresponding internal standards (IS) can easily be prepared using a single deuterated linker in combination with other building blocks.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Cleavage of α-l-iduronates by IDUA.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a) Synthesis of nonlabeled and isotope-labeled azide-modified linkers 5a and 5b, respectively, and subsequent conjugation to modifier compounds (M) to obtain a library of click markers (CM). (b) Glycosylation of propargyl alcohol using iduronyl donor 6 and click assembly with CM1CM5 to afford click substrates CS1CS5. (c) Analytical sets of click substrates (CS) and corresponding internal standards (IS) for the development of LC-MS/MS-based α-l-iduronidase assays.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) Enzyme assays using recombinant human α-l-iduronidase (IDUA) and sets 1–5 of click substrate (CS1CS5) and corresponding internal standard (IS1IS5) (calculated specific activities are shown in μmol per min and mg enzyme). (b) Analysis of dried blood spots (DBS) using CDC control cards (QCL, QCM, QCH = quality control low, medium, high). (c) Analysis of DBS of confirmed MPS I patients (n = 9, anonymized) and random newborns (n = 88, anonymized). [****p < 0.0001.]

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (a) Simultaneous analysis of three different samples using a single UHPLC-MS/MS run. (b) Chromatographic separation of CS/IS sets 3, 4, and 5 (including the products P3P5 of the corresponding enzyme assays) using a 5 min gradient. (c) Triplex assay of three combined DBS samples using CS/IS sets 3, 4, and 5 (affected, n = 8; random, n = 23; ****p < 0.0001). (d) Analyzed DBS samples (random) in triplex vs singleplex assays (n = 23). [S = substrate, P* = IS, P = product.]

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. (a) Deficiency of GALNS leads to accumulation of chondroitin-6-sulfate and keratan sulfate causing MPS IVa. (b) Click assembly of GALNS substrates and internal standards using clickable galactose derivatives and already available linker–modifier building blocks. (c) Synthesis of GALNS sets 6–8 of click substrates (CS6CS8) and corresponding internal standards (IS6IS8) using click markers CM3aCM5a and isotope-labeled CM3bCM5b, respectively. (d) Analysis of dried blood spots (DBS) using CDC control cards. (e) Analysis of DBS of confirmed affected patients (n = 9, anonymized) and random newborns (n = 116, anonymized). [****p < 0.0001.]

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 56 other publications.

    1. 1
      Futerman, A. H.; van Meer, G. The cell biology of lysosomal storage disorders. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5, 554565,  DOI: 10.1038/nrm1423
    2. 2
      Vellodi, A. Lysosomal storage disorders. Br. J. Haematol. 2005, 128, 413431,  DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05293.x
    3. 3
      Wang, R. Y.; Bodamer, O. A.; Watson, M. S.; Wilcox, W. R. Lysosomal storage diseases: diagnostic confirmation and management of presymptomatic individuals. Genet. Med. 2011, 13, 457484,  DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318211a7e1
    4. 4
      Meikle, P. J.; Hopwood, J. J.; Clague, A. E.; Carey, W. F. Prevalence of lysosomal storage disorders. JAMA 1999, 281, 249254,  DOI: 10.1001/jama.281.3.249
    5. 5
      Pastores, G. M. Therapeutic approaches for lysosomal storage diseases. Ther. Adv. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 1, 177188,  DOI: 10.1177/2042018810384429
    6. 6
      Desnick, R. J.; Schuchman, E. H. Enzyme replacement and enhancement therapies: lessons from lysosomal disorders. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002, 3, 954966,  DOI: 10.1038/nrg963
    7. 7
      Coutinho, M. F.; Santos, J. I.; Alves, S. Less is more: substrate reduction therapy for lysosomal storage disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1065,  DOI: 10.3390/ijms17071065
    8. 8
      Biffi, A. Hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy for storage disease: current and new indications. Mol. Ther. 2017, 25, 11551162,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.025
    9. 9
      Shihabuddin, L. S.; Cheng, S. H. Neural stem cell transplantation as a therapeutic approach for treating lysosomal storage diseases. Neurotherapeutics 2011, 8, 659667,  DOI: 10.1007/s13311-011-0067-8
    10. 10
      Gelb, M. H.; Scott, C. R.; Turecek, F. Newborn screening for lysosomal storage diseases. Clin. Chem. 2015, 61, 335346,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.225771
    11. 11
      Chamoles, N. A.; Blanco, M.; Gaggioli, D. Diagnosis of α-l-iduronidase deficiency in dried blood spots on filter paper: the possibility of newborn diagnosis. Clin. Chem. 2001, 47, 780781
    12. 12
      Chamoles, N. A.; Blanco, M.; Gaggioli, D.; Casentini, C. Gaucher and Niemann–Pick diseases—enzymatic diagnosis in dried blood spots on filter paper: retrospective diagnoses in newborn-screening cards. Clin. Chim. Acta 2002, 317, 191197,  DOI: 10.1016/S0009-8981(01)00798-7
    13. 13
      Chamoles, N. A.; Blanco, M. B.; Gaggioli, D.; Casentini, C. Hurler-like phenotype: enzymatic diagnosis in dried blood spots on filter paper. Clin. Chem. 2001, 47, 20982102
    14. 14
      Ceci, R.; Francesco, P.; Mucci, J.; Cancelarich, L.; Fossati, C.; Rozenfeld, P. Reliability of enzyme assays in dried blood spots for diagnosis of 4 lysosomal storage disorders. Adv. Biol. Chem. 2011, 1, 5864,  DOI: 10.4236/abc.2011.13008
    15. 15
      Garg, U.; Dasouki, M. Expanded newborn screening of inherited metabolic disorders by tandem mass spectrometry: Clinical and laboratory aspects. Clin. Biochem. 2006, 39, 315332,  DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2005.12.009
    16. 16
      Blanchard, S.; Sadilek, M.; Scott, C. R.; Turecek, F.; Gelb, M. H. Tandem mass spectrometry for the direct assay of lysosomal enzymes in dried blood spots: application to screening newborns for mucopolysaccharidosis I. Clin. Chem. 2008, 54, 20672070,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.115410
    17. 17
      Chennamaneni, N. K.; Kumar, A. B.; Barcenas, M.; Spacil, Z.; Scott, C. R.; Turecek, F.; Gelb, M. H. Improved reagents for newborn screening of mucopolysaccharidosis types I, II, and VI by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 45084514,  DOI: 10.1021/ac5004135
    18. 18
      Duffey, T. A.; Khaliq, T.; Scott, C. R.; Turecek, F.; Gelb, M. H. Design and synthesis of substrates for newborn screening of Maroteaux-Lamy and Morquio A syndromes. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 59945996,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.08.080
    19. 19
      Gelb, M. H.; Turecek, F.; Scott, C. R.; Chamoles, N. A. Direct multiplex assay of enzymes in dried blood spots by tandem mass spectrometry for the newborn screening of lysosomal storage disorders. J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 2006, 29, 397404,  DOI: 10.1007/s10545-006-0265-4
    20. 20
      Khaliq, T.; Sadilek, M.; Scott, C. R.; Turecek, F.; Gelb, M. H. Tandem mass spectrometry for the direct assay of lysosomal enzymes in dried blood spots: application to screening newborns for mucopolysaccharidosis IVA. Clin. Chem. 2011, 57, 128131,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.149880
    21. 21
      Li, Y.; Brockmann, K.; Turecek, F.; Scott, C. R.; Gelb, M. H. Tandem mass spectrometry for the direct assay of enzymes in dried blood spots: application to newborn screening for Krabbe disease. Clin. Chem. 2004, 50, 638640,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.028381
    22. 22
      Li, Y.; Scott, C. R.; Chamoles, N. A.; Ghavami, A.; Pinto, B. M.; Turecek, F.; Gelb, M. H. Direct multiplex assay of lysosomal enzymes in dried blood spots for newborn screening. Clin. Chem. 2004, 50, 17851796,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.035907
    23. 23
      Wang, D.; Eadala, B.; Sadilek, M.; Chamoles, N. A.; Turecek, F.; Scott, C. R.; Gelb, M. H. Tandem mass spectrometric analysis of dried blood spots for screening of mucopolysaccharidosis I in newborns. Clin. Chem. 2005, 51, 898900,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.047167
    24. 24
      Wolfe, B. J.; Ghomashchi, F.; Kim, T.; Abam, C. A.; Sadilek, M.; Jack, R.; Thompson, J. N.; Scott, C. R.; Gelb, M. H.; Turecek, F. New substrates and enzyme assays for the detection of mucopolysaccharidosis III (Sanfilippo Syndrome) types A, B, C, and D by tandem mass spectrometry. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 557564,  DOI: 10.1021/bc200609x
    25. 25
      Spáčil, Z.; Elliott, S.; Reeber, S. L.; Gelb, M. H.; Scott, C. R.; Tureček, F. Comparative triplex tandem mass spectrometry assays of lysosomal enzyme activities in dried blood spots using fast liquid chromatography: application to newborn screening of Pompe, Fabry, and Hurler diseases. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 48224828,  DOI: 10.1021/ac200417u
    26. 26
      Spacil, Z.; Tatipaka, H.; Barcenas, M.; Scott, C. R.; Turecek, F.; Gelb, M. H. High-throughput assay of 9 lysosomal enzymes for newborn screening. Clin. Chem. 2013, 59, 502511,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.189936
    27. 27
      la Marca, G.; Casetta, B.; Malvagia, S.; Guerrini, R.; Zammarchi, E. New strategy for the screening of lysosomal storage disorders: the use of the online trapping-and-cleanup liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 61136121,  DOI: 10.1021/ac900504s
    28. 28
      Kasper, D. C.; Herman, J.; De Jesus, V. R.; Mechtler, T. P.; Metz, T. F.; Shushan, B. The application of multiplexed, multi-dimensional ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry to the high-throughput screening of lysosomal storage disorders in newborn dried bloodspots. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 24, 986994,  DOI: 10.1002/rcm.4496
    29. 29
      Mechtler, T. P.; Stary, S.; Metz, T. F.; De Jesus, V. R.; Greber-Platzer, S.; Pollak, A.; Herkner, K. R.; Streubel, B.; Kasper, D. C. Neonatal screening for lysosomal storage disorders: feasibility and incidence from a nationwide study in Austria. Lancet 2012, 379, 335341,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61266-X
    30. 30
      Metz, T. F.; Mechtler, T. P.; Orsini, J. J.; Martin, M.; Shushan, B.; Herman, J. L.; Ratschmann, R.; Item, C. B.; Streubel, B.; Herkner, K. R.; Kasper, D. C. Simplified newborn screening protocol for lysosomal storage disorders. Clin. Chem. 2011, 57, 12861294,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.164640
    31. 31
      Gucciardi, A.; Legnini, E.; Di Gangi, I. M.; Corbetta, C.; Tomanin, R.; Scarpa, M.; Giordano, G. A column-switching HPLC-MS/MS method for mucopolysaccharidosis type I analysis in a multiplex assay for the simultaneous newborn screening of six lysosomal storage disorders. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2014, 28, 11311139,  DOI: 10.1002/bmc.3133
    32. 32
      He, W.; Voznyi, Y. V.; Boer, A. M.; Kleijer, W. J.; van Diggelen, O. P. A fluorimetric enzyme assay for the diagnosis of Sanfilippo disease type D (MPS IIID). J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 1993, 16, 935941,  DOI: 10.1007/BF00711508
    33. 33
      Karpova, E. A.; Voznyi, Y. V.; Keulemans, J. L. M.; Hoogeveen, A. T.; Winchester, B.; Tsvetkova, I. V.; van Diggelen, O. P. A fluorimetric enzyme assay for the diagnosis of sanfilippo disease type A (MPS IIIA). J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 1996, 19, 278285,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01799255
    34. 34
      Voznyi, Y. V.; Karpova, E. A.; Dudukina, T. V.; Tsvetkova, I. V.; Boer, A. M.; Janse, H. C.; van Diggelen, O. P. A fluorimetric enzyme assay for the diagnosis of Sanfilippo disease C (MPS III C). J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 1993, 16, 465472,  DOI: 10.1007/BF00710299
    35. 35
      Voznyi, Y. V.; Keulemans, J. L. M.; van Diggelen, O. P. A fluorimetric enzyme assay for the diagnosis of MPS II (Hunter disease). J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 2001, 24, 675680,  DOI: 10.1023/A:1012763026526
    36. 36
      van Diggelen, O. P.; Voznyi, Y. V.; Keulemans, J. L. M.; Schoonderwoerd, K.; Ledvinova, J.; Mengel, E.; Zschiesche, M.; Santer, R.; Harzer, K. A new fluorimetric enzyme assay for the diagnosis of Niemann–Pick A/B, with specificity of natural sphingomyelinase substrate. J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 2005, 28, 733741,  DOI: 10.1007/s10545-005-0105-y
    37. 37
      van Diggelen, O. P.; Zhao, H.; Kleijer, W. J.; Janse, H. C.; Poorthuis, B. J. H. M.; van Pelt, J.; Kamerling, J. P.; Galjaard, H. A fluorimetric enzyme assay for the diagnosis of Morquio disease type A (MPS IV A). Clin. Chim. Acta 1990, 187, 131139,  DOI: 10.1016/0009-8981(90)90339-T
    38. 38
      Gasparotto, N.; Tomanin, R.; Frigo, A. C.; Niizawa, G.; Pasquini, E.; Blanco, M.; Donati, M. A.; Keutzer, J.; Zacchello, F.; Scarpa, M. Rapid diagnostic testing procedures for lysosomal storage disorders: alpha-glucosidase and beta-galactosidase assays on dried blood spots. Clin. Chim. Acta 2009, 402, 3841,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2008.12.006
    39. 39
      Chien, Y.-H.; Chiang, S.-C.; Zhang, X. K.; Keutzer, J.; Lee, N.-C.; Huang, A.-C.; Chen, C.-A.; Wu, M.-H.; Huang, P.-H.; Tsai, F.-J.; Chen, Y.-T.; Hwu, W.-L. Early detection of Pompe disease by newborn screening is feasible: results from the Taiwan screening program. Pediatrics 2008, 122, e3945,  DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-2222
    40. 40
      Sista, R.; Eckhardt, A. E.; Wang, T.; Sellos-Moura, M.; Pamula, V. K. Rapid, single-step assay for Hunter syndrome in dried blood spots using digital microfluidics. Clin. Chim. Acta 2011, 412, 18951897,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.06.015
    41. 41
      Sista, R. S.; Eckhardt, A. E.; Wang, T.; Graham, C.; Rouse, J. L.; Norton, S. M.; Srinivasan, V.; Pollack, M. G.; Tolun, A. A.; Bali, D.; Millington, D. S.; Pamula, V. K. Digital microfluidic platform for multiplexing enzyme assays: implications for lysosomal storage disease screening in newborns. Clin. Chem. 2011, 57, 14441451,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.163139
    42. 42
      Millington, D. S.; Sista, R.; Eckhardt, A.; Rouse, J.; Bali, D.; Goldberg, R.; Cotten, M.; Buckley, R.; Pamula, V. Digital Microfluidics: A Future technology in the newborn screening laboratory?. Semin. Perinatol 2010, 34, 163169,  DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.12.008
    43. 43
      Millington, D. S.; Bali, D. M. Misinformation regarding tandem mass spectrometric vs fluorometric assays to screen newborns for LSDs. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2017, 11, 7273,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2017.04.009
    44. 44
      Millington, D.; Norton, S.; Singh, R.; Sista, R.; Srinivasan, V.; Pamula, V. Digital microfluidics comes of age: high-throughput screening to bedside diagnostic testing for genetic disorders in newborns. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2018, 18, 701712,  DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2018.1495076
    45. 45
      Cecioni, S.; Vocadlo, D. J. Carbohydrate bis-acetal-based substrates as tunable fluorescence-quenched probes for monitoring exo-glycosidase activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 83928395,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b01948
    46. 46
      Geyer, K.; Seeberger, P. H. Optimization of glycosylation reactions in a microreactor. Helv. Chim. Acta 2007, 90, 395403,  DOI: 10.1002/hlca.200790046
    47. 47
      Scott, H. S.; Anson, D. S.; Orsborn, A. M.; Nelson, P. V.; Clements, P. R.; Morris, C. P.; Hopwood, J. J. Human alpha-L-iduronidase: cDNA isolation and expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1991, 88, 96959699,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9695
    48. 48
      Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Click chemistry: diverse chemical function from a few good reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 20042021,  DOI: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010601)40:11<2004::AID-ANIE2004>3.0.CO;2-5
    49. 49
      Kolb, H. C.; Sharpless, K. B. The growing impact of click chemistry on drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today 2003, 8, 11281137,  DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02933-7
    50. 50
      Moses, J. E.; Moorhouse, A. D. The growing applications of click chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 12491262,  DOI: 10.1039/B613014N
    51. 51
      McKay, C. S.; Finn, M. G. Click chemistry in complex mixtures: bioorthogonal bioconjugation. Chem. Biol. 2014, 21, 10751101,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.09.002
    52. 52
      Peracha, H.; Sawamoto, K.; Averill, L.; Kecskemethy, H.; Theroux, M.; Thacker, M.; Nagao, K.; Pizarro, C.; Mackenzie, W.; Kobayashi, H.; Yamaguchi, S.; Suzuki, Y.; Orii, K.; Orii, T.; Fukao, T.; Tomatsu, S. Molecular genetics and metabolism, special edition: diagnosis, diagnosis and prognosis of Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2018, 125, 1837,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.05.004
    53. 53
      Khan, S.; Alméciga-Díaz, C. J.; Sawamoto, K.; Mackenzie, W. G.; Theroux, M. C.; Pizarro, C.; Mason, R. W.; Orii, T.; Tomatsu, S. Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA and glycosaminoglycans. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2017, 120, 7895,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2016.11.007
    54. 54
      Kumar, A. B.; Spacil, Z.; Ghomashchi, F.; Masi, S.; Sumida, T.; Ito, M.; Turecek, F.; Scott, C. R.; Gelb, M. H. Fluorimetric assays for N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfatase and arylsulfatase B based on the natural substrates for confirmation of mucopolysaccharidoses types IVA and VI. Clin. Chim. Acta 2015, 451, 125128,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.08.010
    55. 55
      Ullal, A. J.; Millington, D. S.; Bali, D. S. Development of a fluorometric microtiter plate based enzyme assay for MPS IVA (Morquio type A) using dried blood spots. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2014, 1, 461464,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2014.10.004
    56. 56
      Camelier, M. V.; Burin, M. G.; De Mari, J.; Vieira, T. A.; Marasca, G.; Giugliani, R. Practical and reliable enzyme test for the detection of Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA (Morquio Syndrome type A) in dried blood samples. Clin. Chim. Acta 2011, 412, 18051808,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.06.001
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00668.

    • Synthesis, compound characterization (including copies of NMR spectra), detailed analytical methods, and materials (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect