ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Selective Small Molecule Induced Degradation of the BET Bromodomain Protein BRD4

View Author Information
College of Life Sciences, Division of Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery, University of Dundee, James Black Centre, Dow Street, Dundee, DD1 5EH, United Kingdom
*Phone: +44 (0)1382 386230. E-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: ACS Chem. Biol. 2015, 10, 8, 1770–1777
Publication Date (Web):June 2, 2015
https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.5b00216

Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

  • Open Access

Article Views

30200

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (4 MB)
Supporting Info (3)»

Abstract

The Bromo- and Extra-Terminal (BET) proteins BRD2, BRD3, and BRD4 play important roles in transcriptional regulation, epigenetics, and cancer and are the targets of pan-BET selective bromodomain inhibitor JQ1. However, the lack of intra-BET selectivity limits the scope of current inhibitors as probes for target validation and could lead to unwanted side effects or toxicity in a therapeutic setting. We designed Proteolysis Targeted Chimeras (PROTACs) that tether JQ1 to a ligand for the E3 ubiquitin ligase VHL, aimed at triggering the intracellular destruction of BET proteins. Compound MZ1 potently and rapidly induces reversible, long-lasting, and unexpectedly selective removal of BRD4 over BRD2 and BRD3. The activity of MZ1 is dependent on binding to VHL but is achieved at a sufficiently low concentration not to induce stabilization of HIF-1α. Gene expression profiles of selected cancer-related genes responsive to JQ1 reveal distinct and more limited transcriptional responses induced by MZ1, consistent with selective suppression of BRD4. Our discovery opens up new opportunities to elucidate the cellular phenotypes and therapeutic implications associated with selective targeting of BRD4.

The Bromo- and Extra-terminal (BET) family of proteins, including the ubiquitously expressed BRD2, BRD3, and BRD4 and the testis-specific BRDT, recruit transcriptional regulatory complexes to acetylated chromatin thereby controlling specific networks of genes involved in cellular proliferation and cell cycle progression. (1) Deregulation of BET protein activity, in particular BRD4, has been strongly linked to cancer and inflammatory diseases, making BET proteins attractive drug targets. (2) For example, RNAi screens have identified BRD4 as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukemia, (3) ovarian carcinoma, (4) and siRNA knock down of BRD4, but not of BRD2 or BRD3, induced upregulation of apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1), which protects from atherosclerosis progression and other inflammatory processes. (5) The silencing of BRD4 furthermore identified BRD4 as a target to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). (6) These results underscore the potential of targeting BRD4 as a therapeutic strategy and motivate further research in validating BRD4 as a drug target.
Crucial to the function of BET proteins are two highly homologous bromodomains that are present in their amino-terminal regions and direct recruitment to nucleosomes by binding to specific acetylated lysines (KAc) within histone tails. (7) Small molecule BET inhibitors, including the triazolodiazepine-based JQ1 (8) and I-BET762 (9) (Figure 1a) among others, (10-13) bind to the KAc-binding pocket of the bromodomains and disrupt interaction with histones, thereby displacing BET proteins and their associated transcriptional regulatory complexes from chromatin. BET inhibitors are highly potent (Kd ∼100 nM), cell-penetrant, and active in vivo against a range of solid, hematological, and other tumors, which has prompted compounds entering phase I clinical trials for cancer. (14-16) However, BET inhibitors show no selectivity for individual BET family members, thereby limiting their scope as chemical probes for validating the roles of individual BET targets in physiology and disease. To this end, chemical genetic strategies have been recently developed to engineer orthogonal selective BET bromodomain-ligand pairs. (17) While this approach has the advantage of enabling disruption at will of a single or more bromodomains, it requires a mutation to be introduced into the target protein. Therapeutically, the effects of BET inhibitors on different transcriptional pathways have raised concerns about the safety and tolerability of BET inhibitors in humans. Crucially, none of the inhibitors described to date is selective for binding BRD4 bromodomains over those of its paralogs BRD2 and BRD3.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Design, synthesis, and biophysical and biological evaluation of BET bromodomain PROTACs. (a) Chemical structures of BET-bromodomain inhibitors JQ1 and I-BET762 and binders of von Hippel-Lindau protein VHL-1 and VHL-2. (b) Scheme of the synthesis of PROTAC compounds MZ1–3 and cisMZ1; for detailed synthetic procedures see the Supporting Information. (c) Isothermal titration calorimetry data for titration of MZ1 into the individual members of the BET-bromodomain subfamily. Titrations were performed at 30 °C with a protein concentration of 15 μM and ligand concentration of 150 μM (entry 1–6). Titration of MZ1 and cisMZ1 into VBC at 25 °C with identical concentrations (entry 9, 12) and reverse titration of VBC protein (150 μM) into MZ3 (15 μM) at 25 °C (entry 10) were conducted. For ΔS and ΔG values, see the Supporting Information. (d) HeLa cells were treated with either siRNA targeting individual BET proteins or negative control siRNA 24 h prior to treatment with the compounds MZ1–3, cisMZ1, and JQ1 or vehicle control (0.01% DMSO) for an additional 24 h. Abundance of individual BET protein was analyzed by Western blotting using corresponding specific antibodies accordingly after SDS-PAGE. i, data from ref 8; ii, data from ref 26.

Small molecule chemical probes or inhibitors acting at the post-translational level hold several advantages for target validation over genetic techniques such as dominant-negative mutants or knockouts and RNAi knockdowns, including affording spatial and temporal control in a reversible fashion. A general limitation associated with conventional occupancy-driven target inhibition is that it often demands full target engagement, requiring sustained high concentration of a potent small molecule inhibitor over a prolonged time. This in turn enhances off-target effects and can lead to unwanted side effects or toxicity in a therapeutic setting. To provide an alternative small molecule approach that could address these issues, we hypothesized that it would be possible to design a molecule that can remove BET proteins entirely from the cell as opposed to just inhibit them, yielding new tools for studying BET bromodomain proteins and validating them as drug targets. In order to achieve intracellular BET-protein degradation, we applied a small molecule PROTAC (Proteolysis Targeting Chimera) approach. (18, 19) A PROTAC is a heterobifunctional compound that contains two ligands connected by a linker unit. One ligand binds an E3 ubiquitin ligase protein, while the other ligand binds to the target protein of interest, thereby bringing the ligase and the target in close proximity. This in turn triggers the polyubiquitination and subsequent proteasome-dependent degradation of the target. Proof-of-concept examples have been described where PROTACs were used to degrade the estrogen (20)- and androgen-receptor, (21) methionine aminopeptidase-2, (22) as well as the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. (23) However, all first-generation PROTACs included a peptidic moiety as the E3 ligase ligand. For example, a hydroxyproline-containing heptapeptide sequence ALA-Hyp-YIP from the transcription factor Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 alpha subunit (HIF-1α) has been widely used, (24) as this represents the minimal epitope for HIF-1α binding to the ubiquitously expressed E3 ligase von Hippel-Lindau protein (VHL). (25) The high peptidic nature of the first-generation PROTACs resulted in poor physicochemical properties such as low intracellular stability and poor cell permeability, which limited their applicability as chemical probes and their potential therapeutic development. To overcome these limitations here, we develop a nonpeptidic PROTAC approach that exploits our recently discovered and optimized drug-like VHL ligands (26) and show that it can be applied to target BET bromodomains and potently induce effective and selective degradation of BRD4.
We began by designing a series of PROTACs that would link together specific VHL ligands and BET bromodomain ligands. Recent work has established compounds VHL-1 and VHL-2 as strong binders with Kd values below 300 nM to VHL (Figure 1a). (26) Inspection of the protein–ligand crystal structures show that the methyl group of the terminal acetyl groups in compounds VHL-1 and VHL-2 is solvent exposed, and we therefore reasoned that it could provide a suitable connecting point for a linker (Figure S1). The BET inhibitor JQ1 (8) was chosen as the bromodomains-recruiting scaffold, and its t-butyl ester group was selected as a connecting point for a linker because it is solvent-exposed and not involved in key interaction with the BET bromodomains as revealed by cocrystal structures (Figure S1). Linkers with different lengths comprised of polyethylene glycol chains with either three or four ethylene glycol units were chosen to connect JQ1 with the VHL ligand. To achieve the desired ligands, a generally applicable two-step synthetic strategy was devised. First, the linker bearing a carboxylic acid at one end and an azide group at the other end was connected with the terminal free amine of the VHL ligand by a HATU-mediated amide bond formation. In the second step, reduction of the azide group to an amine and subsequent amide bond formation with the carboxylic acid of the ester-hydrolyzed JQ1 analogue afforded the desired PROTAC compounds MZ1, MZ2, MZ3, and cisMZ1 (Figure 1b).
To assess whether PROTAC molecules retained their binding to the target proteins VHL and BET bromodomains in a similar fashion as the parental ligands, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) experiments were performed (Figure 1; all ITC titrations are shown in the Supporting Information). MZ1, as a representative of all PROTAC molecules that share the same JQ1 moiety for binding bromodomains, was titrated into individual first and second bromodomains of BRD2, BRD3, and BRD4 (Figure 1c, entries 1−6). The measured binding affinities (Kd of 115–382 nM) and ΔH (−6.1 to −10.0 kcal/mol) compared well with those reported for unmodified JQ1 (8) (literature values for BRD4 bromodomains shown in Figure 1c, entries 7, 8), suggesting that JQ1 binding mode is conserved within the context of our PROTACs. Similarly, as binding to the VHL protein is crucial for the recruitment of target proteins to the E3 ligase, the binding of MZ1 and MZ3 to the VHL-ElonginB-ElonginC complex (VBC) was also quantified using ITC (Figure 1c, entries 9, 10). The measured affinities (Kd of 150 and 310 nM for MZ1 and MZ3, respectively) and ΔH (−6.9 and −4.9 kcal/mol, respectively) compared very closely to those of the parental unmodified ligands VHL-1 (Kd = 185 nM, ΔH = −5.5 kcal/mol, entry 11) and VHL-2 (Kd = 290 nM, ΔH = −5.3 kcal/mol). (26) As the stereochemistry of the hydroxyl group of the central hydroxyproline moiety is crucial for ligand binding to VHL, compound cisMZ1 was synthesized that is structurally identical to MZ1 except for a reversed stereocenter at the C-4 position bearing the hydroxyl group. As expected, cisMZ1 did not exhibit any measurable binding affinity for VHL in the ITC experiment (Figure 1c, entry 12) and thus was elected as a negative control compound in cellular assays.
To demonstrate that PROTACs are able to induce degradation of BET proteins, HeLa cells transfected with control siRNA were treated with 1 μM of compounds MZ1–3 alongside negative controls JQ1 and cisMZ1 for 24 h (Figure 1d). In parallel, HeLa cells with BRD2, BRD3, and BRD4 individually and separately silenced by transfection with the respective siRNA were treated with vehicle DMSO to compare the protein depletion effect of RNAi knockdown and PROTACs. BET protein abundance was evaluated by SDS-PAGE followed by Western blot using corresponding specific antibodies to probe for BRD2, BRD3 or BRD4, respectively. All three PROTAC compounds demonstrated complete removal of BRD4 with no detectable protein observed after 24 h of treatment. In contrast, removal of BRD2 and BRD3 was not complete after 24 h. MZ1 exhibited the highest efficacy among the three compounds. MZ2, which is structurally analogous to MZ1 except for a longer linker containing four PEG units, showed a weaker removal effect compared to MZ1. MZ3, containing an additional phenylalanine moiety between the linker and the VHL ligand, showed to be the least effective at removing BRD2 and BRD3. Together, the data demonstrate potent and effective degradation of BET proteins and suggested a preferential degradation effect on BRD4 over BRD2 and BRD3. The latter observation was unexpected given the parental compound JQ1 is a pan-BET inhibitor and our PROTACs bind with similar affinities to BET bromodomains. Nevertheless, the attractive opportunity to achieve single target selectivity prompted us to conduct further characterization.
To assess the compound dose- and time-dependent intracellular activities, HeLa cells were first treated with various concentrations of MZ1, MZ2, and MZ3 (Figure 2a). All three compounds showed concentration dependent BET removal activity with higher activity at higher concentrations. As in the initial experiment, MZ1 proved the most active compound, with more than 90% of all BET proteins being removed at compound concentration down to 1 μM. Remarkably, preferential removal of BRD4 over BRD2 and BRD3 was confirmed with all three compounds. Such preference is more prominent with treatment at lower concentrations, e.g., 0.1–0.5 μM. To study the activities of our PROTACs over time, HeLa cells were treated with 1 μM or 0.1 μM MZ1, and cellular BET protein levels were monitored in a time course experiment (Figure 2b for representative data with MZ1, see Figure S2 for additional data with other compounds and concentrations). Progressive removal of BET proteins over time was observed in all experimental setups, and BRD4 consistently exhibited the strongest and fastest reduction in protein level. Reassuringly, no BET protein degradation was observed in the presence of either DMSO or JQ1 (Figure S3) or cisMZ1 (Figure 3a). To verify whether the observation of preferential removal for BRD4 by our PROTACs can be observed in another cell line, the same study was carried out in U2OS osteosarcoma cells, and the same activity profile was observed (Figure S4). To visualize the BET protein degradation process, U2OS cells were transfected with a plasmid coding for a green fluorescent protein (GFP) tagged BRD4 protein, allowing fluorescence readout of BRD4 within the cell nuclei. Cells were induced to express GFP-BRD4 for 24 h and then were treated with either 5 μM MZ1 or 5 μM cisMZ1, and the fluorescence was observed over time. In the presence of the active compound MZ1, a complete depletion of the fluorescence signal was observed after just 3 h, whereas cisMZ1 caused no change in the fluorescence signal over the course of the experiment (Figure 2c, Figure S5 and Supporting Information videos a and b). These data confirmed that BRD4 is removed from the cell nuclei in a time dependent manner due to the presence of MZ1. Taken together, time and dose–response activity profiles revealed rapid and effective PROTAC-induced preferential degradation of BRD4 over BRD2 and BRD3.

Figure 2

Figure 2. PROTACs induce concentration- and time-dependent selective degradation of BRD4. (a) HeLa cells treated for 24 h with different concentrations of MZ1 (panel I), MZ2 (panel II), and MZ3 (panel III). The bands observed in the BRD4 short isoform lane at a high concentration of each compound are correlated to nonspecific binding. (b) Time dependent treatment over 36 h of HeLa cells with 1 μM (panel I) and 100 nM (panel II) of MZ1. (c) U2OS cells transfected with GFP-BRD4 were treated with either 5 μM of MZ1 or cisMZ1 over a time course of 4 h. BRD4 degradation over time was followed by live fluorescence imaging.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Mechanistic studies on PROTAC biological activity. (a) Time dependent treatment over 36 h of HeLa cells with 1 μM inactive compound cisMZ1. (b) HeLa cells treated with JQ1 or MZ1 at 1 μM in the absence or presence of the proteasome inhibitor MG132. (c) Time dependent treatment over 36 h of HeLa cells with 1 μM MZ1 observing the levels of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) protein. (d) HeLa cells treated with 100 μM CoCl2 as a hypoxia control or 0.1, 1, and 10 μM MZ1. (e) BRD4 protein levels were observed (panel I) with single treatment of MZ1 at t = 0 for 4 h and then exchange of media, (panel II) single treatment with MZ1 at t = 0 but no exchange of media, and (panel III) single treatment with 0.01% DMSO for 4 h and then exchange of media.

To gain mechanistic insights, the VHL and proteasome dependency of PROTAC-mediated protein degradation was first examined. cisMZ1 was unable to induce degradation of any of the BET proteins over time (Figure 3a), demonstrating that PROTAC efficacy is dependent on productive recruitment of VHL. Next, the reliance of the PROTAC-induced protein degradation on proteasome activity was assessed using proteasome inhibitor MG132. Treatment with MG132 completely abrogated MZ1-induced degradation of all BET proteins (compare lanes 3 and 6 in Figure 3b), establishing the expected proteasome-dependence of the approach. Interestingly, MG132 treatment in the absence of PROTAC showed no significant accumulation in BET protein levels, either alone or in combination with JQ1 (compare lanes 1 and 2 with 4 and 5 in Figure 3b, respectively), suggesting that basal proteasome activity level against BET proteins is negligible under those conditions and only becomes significant as a result of PROTAC treatment.
To further evaluate the biological activity of our compounds, we asked whether PROTAC treatment had any effect on the levels of its target E3 ligase (VHL) and on the level of HIF-1α, the natural substrate of VHL. VHL levels in the presence of MZ1 (1 μM) remained unaffected over the course of up to 36 h, thus indicating that the amount of E3 ligase is not influenced by MZ1 binding (Figure 3c). On the other hand, as the VHL ligand portions of our PROTACs occupy the same binding site on VHL that is used to recruit HIF-1α, PROTACs could block HIF-1α binding to VHL to an extent that it may lead to potential stabilization of HIF-1α within cells. For the approach herein described, this effect would not be desirable as up-regulation of HIF-1α transcriptional activity would confound the effects resulting from degradation of BET proteins and would be expected to result in induction of the hypoxic response, potentially giving rise to unwanted side effects. To assess whether any HIF-1α stabilization could be observed, HeLa cells were treated with MZ1 and with cobalt(II) chloride as a hypoxia mimicking positive control. Reassuringly, we could not observe any evidence of HIF-1α stabilization even at concentrations of MZ1 up to 10 μM, while clear HIF-1α stabilization is observed in the presence of CoCl2 (Figure 3d).
A number of non-BET potential off-targets of JQ1 have been recently reported, among which proteins DDB1 and RAD23B (hHR23b) were validated by proteome labeling and Western blotting. (27) To assess whether MZ1 causes degradation of these off-targets, protein levels were examined in HeLa cells treated with MZ1 at 1 μM and 100 nM over a time course of 36 h, and no degradation was observed (Figure S6). Next, to determine whether the removal of BET proteins by PROTAC treatment is reversible, and to establish how long it would take for cells to reverse the effect, we treated HeLa cells for 4 h with 1 μM of MZ1, removed the compound from the media, and then monitored protein levels over a period of 48 h. The washed cells showed detectable recovery of intracellular BRD4 only by 20 h after washout, while in the absence of the wash step, no protein could be detected even after 48 h (Figure 3e, see Figure S7 for the same experiment monitoring time-dependent levels of BRD2 and BRD3). Taken together, these results demonstrate that PROTAC-induced protein degradation is strictly dependent on binding to VHL, on proteasome activity, and does not interfere with the normal endogenous levels of both VHL and HIF-1α. Furthermore, the degradation effect is not only rapid but also sustained and long lasting even upon removal of the compound.
BET inhibitors such as JQ1 influence the expression of an assortment of genes. (28) Selective targeting of individual BET family members would be predicted to elicit distinct and more limited transcriptional responses, because the genome occupancy patterns of BET proteins are not identical. (29) To evaluate the functional consequences of removing BET proteins using PROTACs, and in particular of inducing selective degradation of BRD4 over BRD2 and BRD3, we next monitored the mRNA expression profiles of a selection of cancer-related genes which respond to JQ1 treatment and BET protein inhibition: MYC, P21, AREG, FAS, TYRO3, and FGFR1. The dependence of MYC and P21 expression on BRD4 activity is well characterized. MYC stimulates cell cycle progression and is constantly expressed upon misregulation in cancer, thus leading to continuous overexpression of downstream MYC-dependent genes. (30) In bone associated tumors (31) as well as leukemia and lymphoma cell lines, (32) JQ1 treatment or silencing of BRD4 resulted in downregulation of MYC. MYC represses transcription of the cell cycle CDK inhibitor P21, a tumor suppressor. (33) Downregulation of MYC and consequent derepression of P21 promotes cell cycle arrest. In contrast to the well characterized BRD4 dependency of MYC and P21, FAS, which encodes a proapoptotic protein belonging to the tumor necrosis factor receptor family, (34) is downregulated by depletion of BRD2, (35) while for the growth factors AREG and FGFR1 as well as the protein tyrosine kinase TYRO3 little is known about any BET protein specific regulation. However, these four genes are known to strongly respond to treatment with JQ1 (36) and therefore were included as a representative set of genes to compare between the pan-BET inhibitory effect caused by JQ1 and a selective BRD4 degradation caused by MZ1. Treatment with MZ1 at 100 nM for 24 h was chosen as this provided an optimal condition and the lowest effective concentration for achieving selective degradation of BRD4 over BRD2 and BRD3 and at the same time minimizing potential interference due to BET bromodomain inhibition (Figure 2a panel I and Figure 2b panel II). In addition, treatments with negative control compound VHL-1′ (Figure S8) lacking the JQ1 moiety, as well as with JQ1 itself, were also conducted to provide comparisons. Treatment of MZ1 resulted in down regulation of MYC, similar to JQ1, after 12 h (Figure S9), although MYC levels recovered after 24 h. Treatment with MZ1 and JQ1 resulted in similar upregulation of P21 and AREG both after 12 h (Figure S9) and 24 h (Figure 4a). Interestingly, in contrast to JQ1, which resulted in significant changes on FAS, TYRO3, and FGFR1, MZ1 showed more subtle and less significant effects on these genes relative to VHL-1′ (Figure 4a and Figure S9). We hypothesize that such differences observed in gene modulation may be the result of preferential degradation of BRD4 over the other two BET proteins caused by MZ1. To test this hypothesis, we suppressed individual BRD2, BRD3, or BRD4 genes using siRNA to mimic the protein removal effect (Figure S10) and analyzed the gene expression level of the target genes of interest (Figure 4b). While MYC, P21, and AREG levels were confirmed to be affected by suppression of BRD4, we found that FAS was downregulated upon suppression of BRD2 only but not BRD4 (Figure 4b), while FGFR1 is upregulated upon suppression of either BRD3 or BRD4. These results are consistent with preferential degradation of BRD4 over BRD2 and BRD3 by MZ1 and point to a more BRD4-selective pharmacological profile of MZ1 compared with pan-selective inhibitor JQ1.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Selective degradation of BRD4 leads to a differential response between JQ1 and MZ1 on selected genes. mRNA expression profiles of MYC, P21, AREG, FAS, FGFR1, and TYRO3 upon treatment with PROTAC MZ1 and JQ1 were compared. (a) HeLa cells were treated with 100 nM MZ1, VHL-1′, or JQ1 or 0.01% DMSO vehicle control (Veh.) for 24 h. (b) To mimic the protein removal effect, HeLa cells were transfected with siRNA targeting individual BRD2, BRD3, or BRD4 or negative control siRNA and were harvested after 48 h. Quantitative PCR was performed to analyze relative gene expression level of treated HeLa cells using target specific primers. Gene expression levels relative to GAPDH were normalized to control treatment. The data shown represent the mean ± SEM (n = 3 technical replicates) of one experiment. Statistical significance compared to the control was determined with two-tailed t tests: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and n.s. = not significant.

In summary, we report a small molecule PROTAC approach achieving rapid, effective, and prolonged intracellular degradation of BET bromodomain proteins. The PROTAC-induced protein degradation is dependent on binding to VHL, is reversed upon blocking proteasome activity, and does not interfere with the endogenous, physiological levels of VHL and of its natural substrate HIF-1α. All investigated compounds showed preferential degradation of BRD4 over BRD2 and BRD3 at low concentrations. The downstream gene expression pattern resulting from treatment with our potent and selective PROTAC MZ1 is similar to JQ1 inhibition for BRD4-dependent genes MYC, P21, and AREG but not for FAS, FGFR1, and TYRO3. Our results suggest a different pharmacological response resulting from selectively depleting BRD4 with MZ1 compared to inhibiting the whole BET protein subfamily with JQ1. Given that no preference for binding the bromodomains of BRD4 over the highly homologous bromodomains of BRD2 and BRD3 was observed by ITC within the context of the purified proteins, we speculate that the observed selectivity could arise from preferential and more efficient polyubiquitination of lysine residues on the surface of BRD4 compared to those of BRD2 and BRD3. Alternatively or in addition, preferential direct interaction or reduced steric constraints between VHL and BRD4 compared to BRD2/3 may occur as a result of PROTAC binding, triggering a more productive formation of a VHL:PROTAC:BRD4 ternary complex. Elucidation of the molecular basis for the BRD4-selective activity of PROTACs will warrant further mechanistic investigation in the future. Our findings demonstrating effective and selective degradation of BRD4 with a PROTAC approach open up unprecedented opportunities to study the downstream physiological and pathological consequences of BRD4 modulation. It will allow determination of whether more selective pharmacological perturbations of BET protein function will have improved therapeutic efficacy, potentially leading to more efficient and specific new drugs in the future. Finally, potent chemical probes that bind to human bromodomains outside the BET subfamily are beginning to emerge, (37) which could be similarly conjugated to a VHL ligand to induce selective intracellular degradation of their respective target bromodomain-containing proteins.

Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

For detailed descriptions of synthetic and biological methods, see the Supporting Information.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Additional figures, tables, materials and methods, and .avi videos. The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.5b00216.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
    • Alessio Ciulli - College of Life Sciences, Division of Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery, University of Dundee, James Black Centre, Dow Street, Dundee, DD1 5EH, United Kingdom Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Michael Zengerle - College of Life Sciences, Division of Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery, University of Dundee, James Black Centre, Dow Street, Dundee, DD1 5EH, United Kingdom
    • Kwok-Ho Chan - College of Life Sciences, Division of Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery, University of Dundee, James Black Centre, Dow Street, Dundee, DD1 5EH, United Kingdom
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This work was supported by awards to A.C. from the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC, grant BB/J001201/2 and David Phillips Fellowship BB/G023123/2) and the European Research Council (ERC, Starting Grant ERC-2012-StG-311460 DrugE3CRLs). Light microscopy is supported by a Wellcome Trust strategic award to the University of Dundee (097945/Z/11/Z). We thank P. Soares and S. Scaffidi for providing VHL ligand precursors, M. Ferguson, L. Guther and S. Damerow for providing access and assistance with the LI-COR Odyssey system, S. Swift and C. Thomson of the Dundee Imaging Facility for assistance with the light microscopy, and K. Airey of the Dundee MRC tissue culture facility for training and assistance. The University of Dundee and the authors have filed a patent application (GB1504314.4) related to the use of BET bromodomain targeting PROTACs to induce degradation of BET proteins.

Added in Proof

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Around the time the "Just Accepted" version of this paper was published online, two independent reports have come out online describing pan-BET selective PROTAC compounds dBET1 (DOI: 10.1126/science.aab1433) and ARV-825 (DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.05.009) that conjugate the same BET bromodomain recruiting ligand JQ1 to a ligand for a different E3 ligase, cereblon.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 37 other publications.

  1. 1
    Gallenkamp, D., Gelato, K. A., Haendler, B., and Weinmann, H. (2014) Bromodomains and their pharmacological inhibitors ChemMedChem. 9, 438 464
  2. 2
    Belkina, A. C. and Denis, G. V. (2012) BET domain co-regulators in obesity, inflammation and cancer Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 465 477
  3. 3
    Zuber, J., Shi, J., Wang, E., Rappaport, A. R., Herrmann, H., Sison, E. A., Magoon, D., Qi, J., Blatt, K., Wunderlich, M., Taylor, M. J., Johns, C., Chicas, A., Mulloy, J. C., Kogan, S. C., Brown, P., Valent, P., Bradner, J. E., Lowe, S. W., and Vakoc, C. R. (2011) RNAi screen identifies Brd4 as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukaemia Nature 478, 524 528
  4. 4
    Baratta, M. G., Schinzel, A. C., Zwang, Y., Bandopadhayay, P., Bowman-Colin, C., Kutt, J., Curtis, J., Piao, H., Wong, L. C., Kung, A. L., Beroukhim, R., Bradner, J. E., Drapkin, R., Hahn, W. C., Liu, J. F., and Livingston, D. M. (2015) An in-tumor genetic screen reveals that the BET bromodomain protein, BRD4, is a potential therapeutic target in ovarian carcinoma Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112, 232 237
  5. 5
    Chung, C.-W., Coste, H., White, J. H., Mirguet, O., Wilde, J., Gosmini, R. L., Delves, C., Magny, S. M., Woodward, R., Hughes, S. A., Boursier, E. V., Flynn, H., Bouillot, A. M., Bamborough, P., Brusq, J.-M. G., Gellibert, F. J., Jones, E. J., Riou, A. M., Homes, P., Martin, S. L., Uings, I. J., Toum, J., Clément, C. A., Boullay, A.-B., Grimley, R. L., Blandel, F. M., Prinjha, R. K., Lee, K., Kirilovsky, J., and Nicodeme, E. (2011) Discovery and characterization of small molecule inhibitors of the BET family bromodomains J. Med. Chem. 54, 3827 3838
  6. 6
    Khan, Y. M., Kirkham, P., Barnes, P. J., and Adcock, I. M. (2014) Brd4 is essential for IL-1β-induced inflammation in human airway epithelial cells PLoS One 9, e95051
  7. 7
    Filippakopoulos, P. and Knapp, S. (2012) The bromodomain interaction module FEBS Lett. 586, 2692 2704
  8. 8
    Filippakopoulos, P., Qi, J., Picaud, S., Shen, Y., Smith, W. B., Fedorov, O., Morse, E. M., Keates, T., Hickman, T. T., Felletar, I., Philpott, M., Munro, S., McKeown, M. R., Wang, Y., Christie, A. L., West, N., Cameron, M. J., Schwartz, B., Heightman, T. D., La Thangue, N., French, C. A., Wiest, O., Kung, A. L., Knapp, S., and Bradner, J. E. (2010) Selective inhibition of BET bromodomains Nature 468, 1067 1073
  9. 9
    Nicodeme, E., Jeffrey, K. L., Schaefer, U., Beinke, S., Dewell, S., Chung, C.-W., Chandwani, R., Marazzi, I., Wilson, P., Coste, H., White, J., Kirilovsky, J., Rice, C. M., Lora, J. M., Prinjha, R. K., Lee, K., and Tarakhovsky, A. (2010) Suppression of inflammation by a synthetic histone mimic Nature 468, 1119 1123
  10. 10
    Boi, M., Gaudio, E., Bonetti, P., Kwee, I., Bernasconi, E., Tarantelli, C., Rinaldi, A., Testoni, M., Cascione, L., Ponzoni, M., Mensah, A. A., Stathis, A., Stussi, G., Riveiro, M. E., Herait, P., Inghirami, G., Cvitkovic, E., Zucca, E., and Bertoni, F. (2015) The BET Bromodomain inhibitor OTX015 affects pathogenetic pathways in pre-clinical B-cell tumor models and synergizes with targeted drugs Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 1628 1638
  11. 11
    Gosmini, R., Nguyen, V. L., Toum, J., Simon, C., Brusq, J.-M. G., Krysa, G., Mirguet, O., Riou-Eymard, A. M., Boursier, E. V., Trottet, L., Bamborough, P., Clark, H., Chung, C.-W., Cutler, L., Demont, E. H., Kaur, R., Lewis, A. J., Schilling, M. B., Soden, P. E., Taylor, S., Walker, A. L., Walker, M. D., Prinjha, R. K., and Nicodeme, E. (2014) The discovery of I-BET726 (GSK1324726A), a potent tetrahydroquinoline ApoA1 up-regulator and selective BET bromodomain inhibitor J. Med. Chem. 57, 8111 8131
  12. 12
    Mirguet, O., Lamotte, Y., Donche, F., Toum, J., Gellibert, F., Bouillot, A., Gosmini, R., Nguyen, V. L., Delannée, D., Seal, J., Blandel, F., Boullay, A.-B., Boursier, E., Martin, S., Brusq, J.-M., Krysa, G., Riou, A., Tellier, R., Costaz, A., Huet, P., Dudit, Y., Trottet, L., Kirilovsky, J., and Nicodeme, E. (2012) From ApoA1 upregulation to BET family bromodomain inhibition: Discovery of I-BET151 Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22, 2963 2967
  13. 13
    McLure, K. G., Gesner, E. M., Tsujikawa, L., Kharenko, O. A., Attwell, S., Campeau, E., Wasiak, S., Stein, A., White, A., Fontano, E., Suto, R. K., Wong, N. C. W., Wagner, G. S., Hansen, H. C., and Young, P. R. (2013) RVX-208, an inducer of ApoA-I in humans, is a BET bromodomain antagonist PLoS One 8, e83190
  14. 14
    Cheng, Z., Gong, Y., Ma, Y., Lu, K., Lu, X., Pierce, L. A., Thompson, R. C., Müller, S., Knapp, S., and Wang, J. (2013) Inhibition of BET bromodomain targets genetically diverse glioblastoma Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 1748 1759
  15. 15
    Prinjha, R. K., Witherington, J., and Lee, K. (2012) Place your BETs: The therapeutic potential of bromodomains Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 33, 146 153
  16. 16
    Filippakopoulos, P. and Knapp, S. (2014) Targeting bromodomains: Epigenetic readers of lysine acetylation Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 13, 337 356
  17. 17
    Baud, M. G. J., Lin-Shiao, E., Cardote, T., Tallant, C., Pschibul, A., Chan, K.-H., Zengerle, M., Garcia, J. R., Kwan, T. T. L., Ferguson, F. M., and Ciulli, A. (2014) A bump-and-hole approach to engineer controlled selectivity of BET bromodomain chemical probes Science 346, 638 641
  18. 18
    Raina, K. and Crews, C. M. (2010) Chemical inducers of targeted protein degradation J. Biol. Chem. 285, 11057 11060
  19. 19
    Corson, T. W., Aberle, N., and Crews, C. M. (2008) Design and applications of bifunctional small molecules: Why two heads are better than one ACS Chem. Biol. 3, 677 692
  20. 20
    Cyrus, K., Wehenkel, M., Choi, E. Y., Swanson, H., and Kim, K. B. (2010) Two-headed PROTAC: An effective new tool for targeted protein degradation ChemBioChem. 11, 1531 1534
  21. 21
    Sakamoto, K. M., Kim, K. B., Verma, R., Ransick, A., Stein, B., Crews, C. M., and Deshaies, R. J. (2003) Development of Protacs to target cancer-promoting proteins for ubiquitination and degradation Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2, 1350 1358
  22. 22
    Sakamoto, K. M., Kim, K. B., Kumagai, A., Mercurio, F., Crews, C. M., and Deshaies, R. J. (2001) Protacs: Chimeric molecules that target proteins to the Skp1-Cullin-F box complex for ubiquitination and degradation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 8554 8559
  23. 23
    Lee, H., Puppala, D., Choi, E. Y., Swanson, H., and Kim, K. B. (2007) Targeted degradation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor by the PROTAC approach: A useful chemical genetic tool ChemBioChem. 8, 2058 2062
  24. 24
    Schneekloth, J. S., Fonseca, F. N., Koldobskiy, M., Mandal, A., Deshaies, R., Sakamoto, K., and Crews, C. M. (2004) Chemical genetic control of protein levels: Selective in vivo targeted degradation J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 3748 3754
  25. 25
    Hon, W.-C., Wilson, M. I., Harlos, K., Claridge, T. D. W., Schofield, C. J., Pugh, C. W., Maxwell, P. H., Ratcliffe, P. J., Stuart, D. I., and Jones, E. Y. (2002) Structural basis for the recognition of hydroxyproline in HIF-1 alpha by pVHL Nature 417, 975 978
  26. 26
    Galdeano, C., Gadd, M. S., Soares, P., Scaffidi, S., Van Molle, I., Birced, I., Hewitt, S., Dias, D. M., and Ciulli, A. (2014) Structure-guided design and optimization of small molecules targeting the protein-protein interaction between the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) E3 ubiquitin ligase and the hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) alpha subunit with in vitro nanomolar affinities J. Med. Chem. 57, 8657 8663
  27. 27
    Li, Z., Wang, D., Li, L., Pan, S., Na, Z., Tan, C. Y. J., and Yao, S. Q. (2014) “Minimalist” cyclopropene-containing photo-cross-linkers suitable for live-cell imaging and affinity-based protein labeling J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 9990 9998
  28. 28
    Shi, J. and Vakoc, C. R. (2014) The mechanisms behind the therapeutic activity of BET bromodomain inhibition Mol. Cell 54, 728 736
  29. 29
    Anders, L., Guenther, M. G., Qi, J., Fan, Z. P., Marineau, J. J., Rahl, P. B., Lovén, J., Sigova, A. A., Smith, W. B., Lee, T. I., Bradner, J. E., and Young, R. A. (2014) Genome-wide localization of small molecules Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 92 96
  30. 30
    Bretones, G., Delgado, M. D., and León, J. (2014) Myc and cell cycle control Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1849, 506 516
  31. 31
    Lamoureux, F., Baud’huin, M., Rodriguez Calleja, L., Jacques, C., Berreur, M., Rédini, F., Lecanda, F., Bradner, J. E., Heymann, D., and Ory, B. (2014) Selective inhibition of BET bromodomain epigenetic signalling interferes with the bone-associated tumour vicious cycle Nat. Commun. 5, 3511
  32. 32
    Mertz, J. A., Conery, A. R., Bryant, B. M., Sandy, P., Balasubramanian, S., Mele, D. A., Bergeron, L., and Sims, R. J. (2011) Targeting MYC dependence in cancer by inhibiting BET bromodomains Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 16669 16674
  33. 33
    Seoane, J., Le, H.-V., and Massagué, J. (2002) Myc suppression of the p21(Cip1) Cdk inhibitor influences the outcome of the p53 response to DNA damage Nature 419, 729 734
  34. 34
    Strasser, A., Jost, P. J., and Nagata, S. (2009) The many roles of FAS receptor signaling in the immune system Immunity 30, 180 192
  35. 35
    Hnilicová, J., Hozeifi, S., Stejskalová, E., Dušková, E., Poser, I., Humpolíčková, J., Hof, M., and Staněk, D. (2013) The C-terminal domain of Brd2 is important for chromatin interaction and regulation of transcription and alternative splicing Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 3557 3568
  36. 36
    Delmore, J. E., Issa, G. C., Lemieux, M. E., Rahl, P. B., Shi, J., Jacobs, H. M., Kastritis, E., Gilpatrick, T., Paranal, R. M., Qi, J., Chesi, M., Schinzel, A. C., McKeown, M. R., Heffernan, T. P., Vakoc, C. R., Bergsagel, P. L., Ghobrial, I. M., Richardson, P. G., Young, R. A., Hahn, W. C., Anderson, K. C., Kung, A. L., Bradner, J. E., and Mitsiades, C. S. (2011) BET bromodomain inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to target c-Myc Cell 146, 904 917
  37. 37
    Brand, M., Measures, A. M., Wilson, B. G., Cortopassi, W. A., Alexander, R., Höss, M., Hewings, D. S., Rooney, T. P. C., Paton, R. S., and Conway, S. J. (2015) Small molecule inhibitors of bromodomain–acetyl-lysine interactions ACS Chem. Biol. 10, 22 39

Cited By

This article is cited by 631 publications.

  1. Haibo Xie, Megan S. Bacabac, Min Ma, Eui-Jun Kim, Yidan Wang, Wenxin Wu, Lingjun Li, Wei Xu, Weiping Tang. Development of Potent and Selective Coactivator-Associated Arginine Methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) Degraders. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, Article ASAP.
  2. Bowen Zhang, Chang Liu, Zhenqian Yang, Sai Zhang, Xiaolin Hu, Baohu Li, Mei Mao, Xiao Wang, Zhuoyue Li, Shumin Ma, Siqi Zhang, Chong Qin. Discovery of BWA-522, a First-in-Class and Orally Bioavailable PROTAC Degrader of the Androgen Receptor Targeting N-Terminal Domain for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 66 (16) , 11158-11186. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00585
  3. Diego Garcia Jimenez, Maura Vallaro, Matteo Rossi Sebastiano, Giulia Apprato, Giulia D’Agostini, Paolo Rossetti, Giuseppe Ermondi, Giulia Caron. Chamelogk: A Chromatographic Chameleonicity Quantifier to Design Orally Bioavailable Beyond-Rule-of-5 Drugs. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 66 (15) , 10681-10693. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00823
  4. Can Zhao, Henian Wang, Wenhu Zhan, Xiaoqing Lv, Xiaodong Ma. Exploitation of Proximity-Mediated Effects in Drug Discovery: An Update of Recent Research Highlights in Perturbing Pathogenic Proteins and Correlated Issues. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 66 (15) , 10122-10149. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00079
  5. Jieyu Jin, Dong Wang, Guqin Shi, Jingxiao Bao, Jike Wang, Haotian Zhang, Peichen Pan, Dan Li, Xiaojun Yao, Huanxiang Liu, Tingjun Hou, Yu Kang. FFLOM: A Flow-Based Autoregressive Model for Fragment-to-Lead Optimization. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 66 (15) , 10808-10823. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c01009
  6. Ingo V. Hartung, Joachim Rudolph, Mary M. Mader, Monique P. C. Mulder, Paul Workman. Expanding Chemical Probe Space: Quality Criteria for Covalent and Degrader Probes. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 66 (14) , 9297-9312. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00550
  7. Andres Valdivia, Purav P. Vagadia, Guangxu Guo, Eilidh O’Brien, Daniela Matei, Gary E. Schiltz. Discovery and Characterization of PROTACs Targeting Tissue Transglutaminase (TG2). Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 66 (14) , 9445-9465. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01859
  8. Oluwatosin R. Ayinde, Chia Sharpe, Emily Stahl, Robert J. Tokarski II, James R. Lerma, Natarajan Muthusamy, John C. Byrd, James R. Fuchs. Examination of the Impact of Triazole Position within Linkers on Solubility and Lipophilicity of a CDK9 Degrader Series. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2023, 14 (7) , 936-942. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.3c00082
  9. Rongfan Tang, Zhe Wang, Sutong Xiang, Lingling Wang, Yang Yu, Qinghua Wang, Qirui Deng, Tingjun Hou, Huiyong Sun. Uncovering the Kinetic Characteristics and Degradation Preference of PROTAC Systems with Advanced Theoretical Analyses. JACS Au 2023, 3 (6) , 1775-1789. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.3c00195
  10. Jiantao Hu, Biao Hu, Fuming Xu, Mi Wang, Chong Qin, Donna McEachern, Jeanne Stuckey, Shaomeng Wang. Precise Conformational Control Yielding Highly Potent and Exceptionally Selective BRD4 Degraders with Strong Antitumor Activity. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 66 (12) , 8222-8237. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00520
  11. Christopher M. Stevens, Yaxian Zhou, Peng Teng, Lauren N. Rault, Yaxian Liao, Weiping Tang. Development of Oligomeric Mannose-6-phosphonate Conjugates for Targeted Protein Degradation. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2023, 14 (6) , 719-726. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.2c00479
  12. Ethan S. Toriki, James W. Papatzimas, Kaila Nishikawa, Dustin Dovala, Andreas O. Frank, Matthew J. Hesse, Daniela Dankova, Jae-Geun Song, Megan Bruce-Smythe, Heidi Struble, Francisco J. Garcia, Scott M. Brittain, Andrew C. Kile, Lynn M. McGregor, Jeffrey M. McKenna, John A. Tallarico, Markus Schirle, Daniel K. Nomura. Rational Chemical Design of Molecular Glue Degraders. ACS Central Science 2023, 9 (5) , 915-926. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.2c01317
  13. Zhen Wang, Jing Liu, He Chen, Xing Qiu, Ling Xie, H. Ümit Kaniskan, Xian Chen, Jian Jin, Wenyi Wei. Telomere Targeting Chimera Enables Targeted Destruction of Telomeric Repeat-Binding Factor Proteins. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (19) , 10872-10879. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c02783
  14. Nafsika Forte, Dustin Dovala, Matthew J. Hesse, Jeffrey M. McKenna, John A. Tallarico, Markus Schirle, Daniel K. Nomura. Targeted Protein Degradation through E2 Recruitment. ACS Chemical Biology 2023, 18 (4) , 897-904. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.3c00040
  15. Yuen Lam Dora Ng, Aleša Bricelj, Jacqueline A. Jansen, Arunima Murgai, Kirsten Peter, Katherine A. Donovan, Michael Gütschow, Jan Krönke, Christian Steinebach, Izidor Sosič. Heterobifunctional Ligase Recruiters Enable pan-Degradation of Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 66 (7) , 4703-4733. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01817
  16. Andrea G. Shergalis, Violeta L. Marin, David Y. Rhee, Sameera Senaweera, Rebecca L. McCloud, Judith A. Ronau, Charles W. Hutchins, Shaun McLoughlin, Kevin R. Woller, Scott E. Warder, Anil Vasudevan, Justin M. Reitsma. CRISPR Screen Reveals BRD2/4 Molecular Glue-like Degrader via Recruitment of DCAF16. ACS Chemical Biology 2023, 18 (2) , 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.2c00747
  17. Miquel Duran-Frigola, Marko Cigler, Georg E. Winter. Advancing Targeted Protein Degradation via Multiomics Profiling and Artificial Intelligence. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (5) , 2711-2732. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c11098
  18. Janet M. Sasso, Rumiana Tenchov, DaSheng Wang, Linda S. Johnson, Xinmei Wang, Qiongqiong Angela Zhou. Molecular Glues: The Adhesive Connecting Targeted Protein Degradation to the Clinic. Biochemistry 2023, 62 (3) , 601-623. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00245
  19. Huan Sun, Ka Yang, Xue Zhang, Yingxue Fu, Jay Yarbro, Zhiping Wu, Ping-Chung Chen, Taosheng Chen, Junmin Peng. Evaluation of a Pooling Chemoproteomics Strategy with an FDA-Approved Drug Library. Biochemistry 2023, 62 (3) , 624-632. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00256
  20. Bridget P. Belcher, Carl C. Ward, Daniel K. Nomura. Ligandability of E3 Ligases for Targeted Protein Degradation Applications. Biochemistry 2023, 62 (3) , 588-600. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00464
  21. Miao Chen, Ping Zhou, Yun Kong, Jingrui Li, Yan Li, Yao Zhang, Jie Ran, Jun Zhou, Yan Chen, Songbo Xie. Inducible Degradation of Oncogenic Nucleolin Using an Aptamer-Based PROTAC. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 66 (2) , 1339-1348. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01557
  22. Dacheng Ma, Qichen Yuan, Fei Peng, Victor Paredes, Hongzhi Zeng, Emmanuel C. Osikpa, Qiaochu Yang, Advaith Peddi, Anika Patel, Megan S. Liu, Zheng Sun, Xue Gao. Engineered PROTAC-CID Systems for Mammalian Inducible Gene Regulation. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (3) , 1593-1606. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c09129
  23. Alexander Hanzl, Eleonora Barone, Sophie Bauer, Hong Yue, Radosław P. Nowak, Elisa Hahn, Eugenia V. Pankevich, Anna Koren, Stefan Kubicek, Eric S. Fischer, Georg E. Winter. E3-Specific Degrader Discovery by Dynamic Tracing of Substrate Receptor Abundance. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (2) , 1176-1184. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c10784
  24. Ki Bum Hong, Hongchan An. Degrader–Antibody Conjugates: Emerging New Modality. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 66 (1) , 140-148. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01791
  25. Anand Divakaran, Cole R. Scholtz, Huda Zahid, Wenwei Lin, Elizabeth C. Griffith, Richard E. Lee, Taosheng Chen, Daniel A. Harki, William C. K. Pomerantz. Development of an N-Terminal BRD4 Bromodomain-Targeted Degrader. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2022, 13 (10) , 1621-1627. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.2c00300
  26. Diego García Jiménez, Matteo Rossi Sebastiano, Maura Vallaro, Valentina Mileo, Daniela Pizzirani, Elisa Moretti, Giuseppe Ermondi, Giulia Caron. Designing Soluble PROTACs: Strategies and Preliminary Guidelines. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 65 (19) , 12639-12649. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00201
  27. Chetan K. Chana, Pierre Maisonneuve, Ganna Posternak, Nicolas G.A. Grinberg, Juline Poirson, Samara M. Ona, Derek F. Ceccarelli, Pavel Mader, Daniel J. St-Cyr, Victor Pau, Igor Kurinov, Xiaojing Tang, Dongjing Deng, Weiren Cui, Wenji Su, Letian Kuai, Richard Soll, Mike Tyers, Hannes L. Röst, Robert A. Batey, Mikko Taipale, Anne-Claude Gingras, Frank Sicheri. Discovery and Structural Characterization of Small Molecule Binders of the Human CTLH E3 Ligase Subunit GID4. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 65 (19) , 12725-12746. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00509
  28. Natsuko Macabuag, William Esmieu, Perla Breccia, Rebecca Jarvis, Wesley Blackaby, Ovadia Lazari, Liudvikas Urbonas, Maria Eznarriaga, Rachel Williams, Annelieke Strijbosch, Rhea Van de Bospoort, Kim Matthews, Cole Clissold, Tammy Ladduwahetty, Huw Vater, Patrick Heaphy, Douglas G. Stafford, Hong-Jun Wang, John E. Mangette, George McAllister, Vahri Beaumont, Thomas F. Vogt, Hilary A. Wilkinson, Elizabeth M. Doherty, Celia Dominguez. Developing HDAC4-Selective Protein Degraders To Investigate the Role of HDAC4 in Huntington’s Disease Pathology. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 65 (18) , 12445-12459. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01149
  29. Wei Yan, Bo-Syong Pan, Jingwei Shao, Hui-kuan Lin, Hong-yu Li. Feasible Column Chromatography-Free, Multi-Gram Scale Synthetic Process of VH032 Amine, Which Could Enable Rapid PROTAC Library Construction. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (30) , 26015-26021. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c00245
  30. Alessandra Salerno, Francesca Seghetti, Jessica Caciolla, Elisa Uliassi, Eleonora Testi, Melissa Guardigni, Marinella Roberti, Andrea Milelli, Maria Laura Bolognesi. Enriching Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras with a Second Modality: When Two Are Better Than One. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 65 (14) , 9507-9530. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00302
  31. Jianyu Yan, Tengfei Li, Zhenyuan Miao, Pei Wang, Chunquan Sheng, Chunlin Zhuang. Homobivalent, Trivalent, and Covalent PROTACs: Emerging Strategies for Protein Degradation. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 65 (13) , 8798-8827. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00728
  32. Brandon Dale, Chris Anderson, Kwang-Su Park, H. Ümit Kaniskan, Anqi Ma, Yudao Shen, Chengwei Zhang, Ling Xie, Xian Chen, Xufen Yu, Jian Jin. Targeting Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by a Novel Proteolysis Targeting Chimera Degrader of Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2. ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science 2022, 5 (7) , 491-507. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsptsci.2c00100
  33. Ariamala Gopalsamy. Selectivity through Targeted Protein Degradation (TPD). Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 65 (12) , 8113-8126. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00397
  34. Jin Liu, Lin Yuan, Yong Ruan, Bulian Deng, Zicao Yang, Yichang Ren, Ling Li, Ting Liu, Huiting Zhao, Ruiyao Mai, Jianjun Chen. Novel CRBN-Recruiting Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras as Degraders of Stimulator of Interferon Genes with In Vivo Anti-Inflammatory Efficacy. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 65 (9) , 6593-6611. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01948
  35. Dongbo Lu, Caroline A. Foley, Shama V. Birla, Austin J. Hepperla, Jeremy M. Simon, Lindsey I. James, Nathaniel A. Hathaway. Bioorthogonal Chemical Epigenetic Modifiers Enable Dose-Dependent CRISPR Targeted Gene Activation in Mammalian Cells. ACS Synthetic Biology 2022, 11 (4) , 1397-1407. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.1c00606
  36. Dhanusha A. Nalawansha, Ke Li, John Hines, Craig M. Crews. Hijacking Methyl Reader Proteins for Nuclear-Specific Protein Degradation. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (12) , 5594-5605. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c00874
  37. Shi Shi, Yu Du, Yi Zou, Jing Niu, Zeyu Cai, Xiaonan Wang, Feihuang Qiu, Yi Ding, Gengchen Yang, Yunze Wu, Yungen Xu, Qihua Zhu. Rational Design for Nitroreductase (NTR)-Responsive Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs) Selectively Targeting Tumor Tissues. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 65 (6) , 5057-5071. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c02221
  38. Zhiqing Liu, Yi Li, Haiying Chen, Hsien-Tsung Lai, Pingyuan Wang, Shwu-Yuan Wu, Eric A. Wold, Paul G. Leonard, Sarah Joseph, Haitao Hu, Cheng-Ming Chiang, Allan R. Brasier, Bing Tian, Jia Zhou. Discovery, X-ray Crystallography, and Anti-inflammatory Activity of Bromodomain-containing Protein 4 (BRD4) BD1 Inhibitors Targeting a Distinct New Binding Site. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 65 (3) , 2388-2408. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01851
  39. Dhanushka Weerakoon, Rodrigo J. Carbajo, Leonardo De Maria, Christian Tyrchan, Hongtao Zhao. Impact of PROTAC Linker Plasticity on the Solution Conformations and Dissociation of the Ternary Complex. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2022, 62 (2) , 340-349. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01036
  40. Yifan Huang, Hiromasa Yokoe, Ai Kaiho-Soma, Kazunori Takahashi, Yusuke Hirasawa, Hiroshi Morita, Fumiaki Ohtake, Naoki Kanoh. Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Trivalent PROTACs Having a Functionalization Site with Controlled Orientation. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2022, 33 (1) , 142-151. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c00490
  41. Miyako Naganuma, Nobumichi Ohoka, Genichiro Tsuji, Haruna Tsujimura, Kenji Matsuno, Takao Inoue, Mikihiko Naito, Yosuke Demizu. Development of Chimeric Molecules That Degrade the Estrogen Receptor Using Decoy Oligonucleotide Ligands. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2022, 13 (1) , 134-139. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.1c00629
  42. Victoria G. Klein, Adam G. Bond, Conner Craigon, R. Scott Lokey, Alessio Ciulli. Amide-to-Ester Substitution as a Strategy for Optimizing PROTAC Permeability and Cellular Activity. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 64 (24) , 18082-18101. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01496
  43. Gaoqi Weng, Dan Li, Yu Kang, Tingjun Hou. Integrative Modeling of PROTAC-Mediated Ternary Complexes. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 64 (21) , 16271-16281. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01576
  44. Adam G. Bond, Conner Craigon, Kwok-Ho Chan, Andrea Testa, Athanasios Karapetsas, Rotimi Fasimoye, Thomas Macartney, J. Julian Blow, Dario R. Alessi, Alessio Ciulli. Development of BromoTag: A “Bump-and-Hole”–PROTAC System to Induce Potent, Rapid, and Selective Degradation of Tagged Target Proteins. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 64 (20) , 15477-15502. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01532
  45. Yalin Tu, Yameng Sun, Shuang Qiao, Yao Luo, Panpan Liu, Zhong-Xing Jiang, Yumin Hu, Zifeng Wang, Peng Huang, Shijun Wen. Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of VHL-Based EZH2 Degraders to Enhance Therapeutic Activity against Lymphoma. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 64 (14) , 10167-10184. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00460
  46. Troy A. Bemis, James J. La Clair, Michael D. Burkart. Unraveling the Role of Linker Design in Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 64 (12) , 8042-8052. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00482
  47. Nan Bai, Sven A. Miller, Grigorii V. Andrianov, Max Yates, Palani Kirubakaran, John Karanicolas. Rationalizing PROTAC-Mediated Ternary Complex Formation Using Rosetta. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2021, 61 (3) , 1368-1382. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01451
  48. Pan Tang, Jifa Zhang, Jie Liu, Cheng-Ming Chiang, Liang Ouyang. Targeting Bromodomain and Extraterminal Proteins for Drug Discovery: From Current Progress to Technological Development. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 64 (5) , 2419-2435. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01487
  49. Peter S. Dragovich, Thomas H. Pillow, Robert A. Blake, Jack D. Sadowsky, Emel Adaligil, Pragya Adhikari, Sunil Bhakta, Nicole Blaquiere, Jinhua Chen, Josefa dela Cruz-Chuh, Karen E. Gascoigne, Steven J. Hartman, Mingtao He, Susan Kaufman, Tracy Kleinheinz, Katherine R. Kozak, Liang Liu, Liling Liu, Qi Liu, Ying Lu, Fanwei Meng, Melinda M. Mulvihill, Aimee O’Donohue, Rebecca K. Rowntree, Leanna R. Staben, Steven T. Staben, John Wai, Jian Wang, BinQing Wei, Catherine Wilson, Jianfeng Xin, Zijin Xu, Hui Yao, Donglu Zhang, Hongyan Zhang, Hao Zhou, Xiaoyu Zhu. Antibody-Mediated Delivery of Chimeric BRD4 Degraders. Part 1: Exploration of Antibody Linker, Payload Loading, and Payload Molecular Properties. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 64 (5) , 2534-2575. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01845
  50. Peter S. Dragovich, Thomas H. Pillow, Robert A. Blake, Jack D. Sadowsky, Emel Adaligil, Pragya Adhikari, Jinhua Chen, Nicholas Corr, Josefa dela Cruz-Chuh, Geoffrey Del Rosario, Aaron Fullerton, Steven J. Hartman, Fan Jiang, Susan Kaufman, Tracy Kleinheinz, Katherine R. Kozak, Liling Liu, Ying Lu, Melinda M. Mulvihill, Jeremy M. Murray, Aimee O’Donohue, Rebecca K. Rowntree, William S. Sawyer, Leanna R. Staben, John Wai, Jian Wang, BinQing Wei, Wentao Wei, Zijin Xu, Hui Yao, Shang-Fan Yu, Donglu Zhang, Hongyan Zhang, Shenhua Zhang, Yongxin Zhao, Hao Zhou, Xiaoyu Zhu. Antibody-Mediated Delivery of Chimeric BRD4 Degraders. Part 2: Improvement of In Vitro Antiproliferation Activity and In Vivo Antitumor Efficacy. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 64 (5) , 2576-2607. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01846
  51. Cyrille S. Kounde, Edward W. Tate. Photoactive Bifunctional Degraders: Precision Tools To Regulate Protein Stability. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 63 (24) , 15483-15493. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01542
  52. Wenwei Lin, Yongtao Li, Jaeki Min, Jiuyu Liu, Lei Yang, Richard E. Lee, Taosheng Chen. Development of BODIPY FL Thalidomide As a High-Affinity Fluorescent Probe for Cereblon in a Time-Resolved Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Assay. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2020, 31 (11) , 2564-2575. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00507
  53. Michael L. Drummond, Andrew Henry, Huifang Li, Christopher I. Williams. Improved Accuracy for Modeling PROTAC-Mediated Ternary Complex Formation and Targeted Protein Degradation via New In Silico Methodologies. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2020, 60 (10) , 5234-5254. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00897
  54. Laura Goracci, Jenny Desantis, Aurora Valeri, Beatrice Castellani, Michela Eleuteri, Gabriele Cruciani. Understanding the Metabolism of Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs): The Next Step toward Pharmaceutical Applications. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 63 (20) , 11615-11638. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00793
  55. Chaoguo Cao, Jie Yang, Yong Chen, Peiting Zhou, Yingwei Wang, Wu Du, Lifeng Zhao, Yuanwei Chen. Discovery of SK-575 as a Highly Potent and Efficacious Proteolysis-Targeting Chimera Degrader of PARP1 for Treating Cancers. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 63 (19) , 11012-11033. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00821
  56. Victoria G. Klein, Chad E. Townsend, Andrea Testa, Michael Zengerle, Chiara Maniaci, Scott J. Hughes, Kwok-Ho Chan, Alessio Ciulli, R. Scott Lokey. Understanding and Improving the Membrane Permeability of VH032-Based PROTACs. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2020, 11 (9) , 1732-1738. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00265
  57. Duncan E. Scott, Timothy P. C. Rooney, Elliott D. Bayle, Tashfina Mirza, Henriette M. G. Willems, Jonathan H. Clarke, Stephen P. Andrews, John Skidmore. Systematic Investigation of the Permeability of Androgen Receptor PROTACs. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2020, 11 (8) , 1539-1547. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00194
  58. Mingliang Wang, Jianfeng Lu, Mi Wang, Chao-Yie Yang, Shaomeng Wang. Discovery of SHP2-D26 as a First, Potent, and Effective PROTAC Degrader of SHP2 Protein. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 63 (14) , 7510-7528. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00471
  59. Rebecca Beveridge, Dirk Kessler, Klaus Rumpel, Peter Ettmayer, Anton Meinhart, Tim Clausen. Native Mass Spectrometry Can Effectively Predict PROTAC Efficacy. ACS Central Science 2020, 6 (7) , 1223-1230. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c00049
  60. Bingqi Tong, Jessica N. Spradlin, Luiz F. T. Novaes, Erika Zhang, Xirui Hu, Malte Moeller, Scott M. Brittain, Lynn M. McGregor, Jeffrey M. McKenna, John A. Tallarico, Markus Schirle, Thomas J. Maimone, Daniel K. Nomura. A Nimbolide-Based Kinase Degrader Preferentially Degrades Oncogenic BCR-ABL. ACS Chemical Biology 2020, 15 (7) , 1788-1794. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.0c00348
  61. Ronen Gabizon, Amit Shraga, Paul Gehrtz, Ella Livnah, Yamit Shorer, Neta Gurwicz, Liat Avram, Tamar Unger, Hila Aharoni, Shira Albeck, Alexander Brandis, Ziv Shulman, Ben-Zion Katz, Yair Herishanu, Nir London. Efficient Targeted Degradation via Reversible and Irreversible Covalent PROTACs. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (27) , 11734-11742. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b13907
  62. Marı́a Maneiro, Nafsika Forte, Maria M. Shchepinova, Cyrille S. Kounde, Vijay Chudasama, James Richard Baker, Edward W. Tate. Antibody–PROTAC Conjugates Enable HER2-Dependent Targeted Protein Degradation of BRD4. ACS Chemical Biology 2020, 15 (6) , 1306-1312. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.0c00285
  63. Joshua N. Asiaban, Natalia Milosevich, Emily Chen, Timothy R. Bishop, Justin Wang, Yuxiang Zhang, Christopher J. Ackerman, Eric N. Hampton, Travis S. Young, Mitchell V. Hull, Benjamin F. Cravatt, Michael A. Erb. Cell-Based Ligand Discovery for the ENL YEATS Domain. ACS Chemical Biology 2020, 15 (4) , 895-903. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.0c00124
  64. Sayumi Yamazoe, Jeffrey Tom, Yue Fu, Wenqiong Wu, Liang Zeng, Changlei Sun, Qi Liu, Jie Lin, Kui Lin, Wayne J. Fairbrother, Steven T. Staben. Heterobifunctional Molecules Induce Dephosphorylation of Kinases–A Proof of Concept Study. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 63 (6) , 2807-2813. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01167
  65. Yuta Naro, Kristie Darrah, Alexander Deiters. Optical Control of Small Molecule-Induced Protein Degradation. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (5) , 2193-2197. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b12718
  66. Christopher R. Wellaway, Dominique Amans, Paul Bamborough, Heather Barnett, Rino A. Bit, Jack A. Brown, Neil R. Carlson, Chun-wa Chung, Anthony W. J. Cooper, Peter D. Craggs, Robert P. Davis, Tony W. Dean, John P. Evans, Laurie Gordon, Isobel L. Harada, David J. Hirst, Philip G. Humphreys, Katherine L. Jones, Antonia J. Lewis, Matthew J. Lindon, Dave Lugo, Mahnoor Mahmood, Scott McCleary, Patricia Medeiros, Darren J. Mitchell, Michael O’Sullivan, Armelle Le Gall, Vipulkumar K. Patel, Chris Patten, Darren L. Poole, Rishi R. Shah, Jane E. Smith, Kayleigh A. J. Stafford, Pamela J. Thomas, Mythily Vimal, Ian D. Wall, Robert J. Watson, Natalie Wellaway, Gang Yao, Rab K. Prinjha. Discovery of a Bromodomain and Extraterminal Inhibitor with a Low Predicted Human Dose through Synergistic Use of Encoded Library Technology and Fragment Screening. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 63 (2) , 714-746. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01670
  67. Caroline A. Foley, Frances Potjewyd, Kelsey N. Lamb, Lindsey I. James, Stephen V. Frye. Assessing the Cell Permeability of Bivalent Chemical Degraders Using the Chloroalkane Penetration Assay. ACS Chemical Biology 2020, 15 (1) , 290-295. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.9b00972
  68. Xin Han, Lijie Zhao, Weiguo Xiang, Chong Qin, Bukeyan Miao, Tianfeng Xu, Mi Wang, Chao-Yie Yang, Krishnapriya Chinnaswamy, Jeanne Stuckey, Shaomeng Wang. Discovery of Highly Potent and Efficient PROTAC Degraders of Androgen Receptor (AR) by Employing Weak Binding Affinity VHL E3 Ligase Ligands. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 62 (24) , 11218-11231. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01393
  69. Gang Xue, Kun Wang, Danli Zhou, Hanbing Zhong, Zhengying Pan. Light-Induced Protein Degradation with Photocaged PROTACs. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141 (46) , 18370-18374. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b06422
  70. Carl C. Ward, Jordan I. Kleinman, Scott M. Brittain, Patrick S. Lee, Clive Yik Sham Chung, Kenneth Kim, Yana Petri, Jason R. Thomas, John A. Tallarico, Jeffrey M. McKenna, Markus Schirle, Daniel K. Nomura. Covalent Ligand Screening Uncovers a RNF4 E3 Ligase Recruiter for Targeted Protein Degradation Applications. ACS Chemical Biology 2019, 14 (11) , 2430-2440. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.8b01083
  71. Jiuling Yang, Yangbing Li, Angelo Aguilar, Zhaomin Liu, Chao-Yie Yang, Shaomeng Wang. Simple Structural Modifications Converting a Bona fide MDM2 PROTAC Degrader into a Molecular Glue Molecule: A Cautionary Tale in the Design of PROTAC Degraders. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 62 (21) , 9471-9487. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00846
  72. Quanju Zhao, Chaowei Ren, Linyi Liu, Jinju Chen, Yubao Shao, Ning Sun, Renhong Sun, Ying Kong, Xinyu Ding, Xianfang Zhang, Youwei Xu, Bei Yang, Qianqian Yin, Xiaobao Yang, Biao Jiang. Discovery of SIAIS178 as an Effective BCR-ABL Degrader by Recruiting Von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) E3 Ubiquitin Ligase. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 62 (20) , 9281-9298. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01264
  73. Patrick Pfaff, Kusal T. G. Samarasinghe, Craig M. Crews, Erick M. Carreira. Reversible Spatiotemporal Control of Induced Protein Degradation by Bistable PhotoPROTACs. ACS Central Science 2019, 5 (10) , 1682-1690. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00713
  74. Philipp Ottis, Chiara Palladino, Phillip Thienger, Adrian Britschgi, Christian Heichinger, Marco Berrera, Alice Julien-Laferriere, Filip Roudnicky, Tony Kam-Thong, James R. Bischoff, Bruno Martoglio, Piergiorgio Pettazzoni. Cellular Resistance Mechanisms to Targeted Protein Degradation Converge Toward Impairment of the Engaged Ubiquitin Transfer Pathway. ACS Chemical Biology 2019, 14 (10) , 2215-2223. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.9b00525
  75. Hannah Tovell, Andrea Testa, Houjiang Zhou, Natalia Shpiro, Claire Crafter, Alessio Ciulli, Dario R. Alessi. Design and Characterization of SGK3-PROTAC1, an Isoform Specific SGK3 Kinase PROTAC Degrader. ACS Chemical Biology 2019, 14 (9) , 2024-2034. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.9b00505
  76. Ziqian Wang, Nianzhe He, Zongwei Guo, Cuili Niu, Ting Song, Yafei Guo, Keke Cao, Anhui Wang, Junjie Zhu, Xiaodong Zhang, Zhichao Zhang. Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras for the Selective Degradation of Mcl-1/Bcl-2 Derived from Nonselective Target Binding Ligands. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 62 (17) , 8152-8163. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00919
  77. James W. Papatzimas, Evgueni Gorobets, Ranjan Maity, Mir Ishruna Muniyat, Justin L. MacCallum, Paola Neri, Nizar J. Bahlis, Darren J. Derksen. From Inhibition to Degradation: Targeting the Antiapoptotic Protein Myeloid Cell Leukemia 1 (MCL1). Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 62 (11) , 5522-5540. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00455
  78. Xing Qiu, Ning Sun, Ying Kong, Yan Li, Xiaobao Yang, Biao Jiang. Chemoselective Synthesis of Lenalidomide-Based PROTAC Library Using Alkylation Reaction. Organic Letters 2019, 21 (10) , 3838-3841. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.9b01326
  79. Hannah Tovell, Andrea Testa, Chiara Maniaci, Houjiang Zhou, Alan R Prescott, Thomas Macartney, Alessio Ciulli, Dario R Alessi. Rapid and Reversible Knockdown of Endogenously Tagged Endosomal Proteins via an Optimized HaloPROTAC Degrader. ACS Chemical Biology 2019, 14 (5) , 882-892. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.8b01016
  80. Michael L. Drummond, Christopher I. Williams. In Silico Modeling of PROTAC-Mediated Ternary Complexes: Validation and Application. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2019, 59 (4) , 1634-1644. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00872
  81. Michael J. Roy, Sandra Winkler, Scott J. Hughes, Claire Whitworth, Michael Galant, William Farnaby, Klaus Rumpel, Alessio Ciulli. SPR-Measured Dissociation Kinetics of PROTAC Ternary Complexes Influence Target Degradation Rate. ACS Chemical Biology 2019, 14 (3) , 361-368. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.9b00092
  82. Johannes Popow, Heribert Arnhof, Gerd Bader, Helmut Berger, Alessio Ciulli, David Covini, Christian Dank, Teresa Gmaschitz, Peter Greb, Jale Karolyi-Özguer, Manfred Koegl, Darryl B. McConnell, Mark Pearson, Maria Rieger, Joerg Rinnenthal, Vanessa Roessler, Andreas Schrenk, Markus Spina, Steffen Steurer, Nicole Trainor, Elisabeth Traxler, Corinna Wieshofer, Andreas Zoephel, Peter Ettmayer. Highly Selective PTK2 Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras to Probe Focal Adhesion Kinase Scaffolding Functions. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 62 (5) , 2508-2520. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01826
  83. Yangbing Li, Jiuling Yang, Angelo Aguilar, Donna McEachern, Sally Przybranowski, Liu Liu, Chao-Yie Yang, Mi Wang, Xin Han, Shaomeng Wang. Discovery of MD-224 as a First-in-Class, Highly Potent, and Efficacious Proteolysis Targeting Chimera Murine Double Minute 2 Degrader Capable of Achieving Complete and Durable Tumor Regression. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 62 (2) , 448-466. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00909
  84. Vittoria Zoppi, Scott J. Hughes, Chiara Maniaci, Andrea Testa, Teresa Gmaschitz, Corinna Wieshofer, Manfred Koegl, Kristin M. Riching, Danette L. Daniels, Andrea Spallarossa, Alessio Ciulli. Iterative Design and Optimization of Initially Inactive Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs) Identify VZ185 as a Potent, Fast, and Selective von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) Based Dual Degrader Probe of BRD9 and BRD7. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 62 (2) , 699-726. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01413
  85. Philipp M. Cromm, Kusal T. G. Samarasinghe, John Hines, Craig M. Crews. Addressing Kinase-Independent Functions of Fak via PROTAC-Mediated Degradation. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2018, 140 (49) , 17019-17026. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b08008
  86. George M. Burslem, Jayoung Song, Xin Chen, John Hines, Craig M. Crews. Enhancing Antiproliferative Activity and Selectivity of a FLT-3 Inhibitor by Proteolysis Targeting Chimera Conversion. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2018, 140 (48) , 16428-16432. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b10320
  87. Olesya A. Kharenko, Reena G. Patel, S. David Brown, Cyrus Calosing, Andre White, Damodharan Lakshminarasimhan, Robert K. Suto, Bryan C. Duffy, Douglas B. Kitchen, Kevin G. McLure, Henrik C. Hansen, Edward H. van der Horst, Peter R. Young. Design and Characterization of Novel Covalent Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal Domain (BET) Inhibitors Targeting a Methionine. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 61 (18) , 8202-8211. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00666
  88. Kristin M. Riching, Sarah Mahan, Cesear R. Corona, Mark McDougall, James D. Vasta, Matthew B. Robers, Marjeta Urh, Danette L. Daniels. Quantitative Live-Cell Kinetic Degradation and Mechanistic Profiling of PROTAC Mode of Action. ACS Chemical Biology 2018, 13 (9) , 2758-2770. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.8b00692
  89. Christian Steinebach, Stefanie Lindner, Namrata D. Udeshi, Deepak C. Mani, Hannes Kehm, Simon Köpff, Steven A. Carr, Michael Gütschow, Jan Krönke. Homo-PROTACs for the Chemical Knockdown of Cereblon. ACS Chemical Biology 2018, 13 (9) , 2771-2782. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.8b00693
  90. Xavier Lucas, Inge Van Molle, Alessio Ciulli. Surface Probing by Fragment-Based Screening and Computational Methods Identifies Ligandable Pockets on the von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) E3 Ubiquitin Ligase. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 61 (16) , 7387-7393. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00842
  91. Chong Qin, Yang Hu, Bing Zhou, Ester Fernandez-Salas, Chao-Yie Yang, Liu Liu, Donna McEachern, Sally Przybranowski, Mi Wang, Jeanne Stuckey, Jennifer Meagher, Longchuan Bai, Zhuo Chen, Mei Lin, Jiuling Yang, Danya N. Ziazadeh, Fuming Xu, Jiantao Hu, Weiguo Xiang, Liyue Huang, Siwei Li, Bo Wen, Duxin Sun, Shaomeng Wang. Discovery of QCA570 as an Exceptionally Potent and Efficacious Proteolysis Targeting Chimera (PROTAC) Degrader of the Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal (BET) Proteins Capable of Inducing Complete and Durable Tumor Regression. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 61 (15) , 6685-6704. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00506
  92. Andrea Testa, Xavier Lucas, Guilherme V. Castro, Kwok-Ho Chan, Jane E. Wright, Andrew C. Runcie, Morgan S. Gadd, William T. A. Harrison, Eun-Jung Ko, Daniel Fletcher, Alessio Ciulli. 3-Fluoro-4-hydroxyprolines: Synthesis, Conformational Analysis, and Stereoselective Recognition by the VHL E3 Ubiquitin Ligase for Targeted Protein Degradation. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2018, 140 (29) , 9299-9313. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b05807
  93. Anastasia Amato, Xavier Lucas, Alessio Bortoluzzi, David Wright, Alessio Ciulli. Targeting Ligandable Pockets on Plant Homeodomain (PHD) Zinc Finger Domains by a Fragment-Based Approach. ACS Chemical Biology 2018, 13 (4) , 915-921. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.7b01093
  94. Mette Ishoey, Someth Chorn, Natesh Singh, Martin G. Jaeger, Matthias Brand, Joshiawa Paulk, Sophie Bauer, Michael A. Erb, Katja Parapatics, André C. Müller, Keiryn L. Bennett, Gerhard F. Ecker, James E. Bradner, Georg E. Winter. Translation Termination Factor GSPT1 Is a Phenotypically Relevant Off-Target of Heterobifunctional Phthalimide Degraders. ACS Chemical Biology 2018, 13 (3) , 553-560. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.7b00969
  95. Yanhong Jiang, Qiwen Deng, Hui Zhao, Mingsheng Xie, Longjian Chen, Feng Yin, Xuan Qin, Weihao Zheng, Yongjuan Zhao, Zigang Li. Development of Stabilized Peptide-Based PROTACs against Estrogen Receptor α. ACS Chemical Biology 2018, 13 (3) , 628-635. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.7b00985
  96. Nicola E. A. Chessum, Swee Y. Sharp, John J. Caldwell, A. Elisa Pasqua, Birgit Wilding, Giampiero Colombano, Ian Collins, Bugra Ozer, Meirion Richards, Martin Rowlands, Mark Stubbs, Rosemary Burke, P. Craig McAndrew, Paul A. Clarke, Paul Workman, Matthew D. Cheeseman, and Keith Jones . Demonstrating In-Cell Target Engagement Using a Pirin Protein Degradation Probe (CCT367766). Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 61 (3) , 918-933. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01406
  97. Stacey-Lynn Paiva, Sara R. da Silva, Elvin D. de Araujo, and Patrick T. Gunning . Regulating the Master Regulator: Controlling Ubiquitination by Thinking Outside the Active Site. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 61 (2) , 405-421. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01346
  98. Ryan P. Wurz, Ken Dellamaggiore, Hannah Dou, Noelle Javier, Mei-Chu Lo, John D. McCarter, Dane Mohl, Christine Sastri, J. Russell Lipford, and Victor J. Cee . A “Click Chemistry Platform” for the Rapid Synthesis of Bispecific Molecules for Inducing Protein Degradation. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 61 (2) , 453-461. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01781
  99. Bing Zhou, Jiantao Hu, Fuming Xu, Zhuo Chen, Longchuan Bai, Ester Fernandez-Salas, Mei Lin, Liu Liu, Chao-Yie Yang, Yujun Zhao, Donna McEachern, Sally Przybranowski, Bo Wen, Duxin Sun, and Shaomeng Wang . Discovery of a Small-Molecule Degrader of Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal (BET) Proteins with Picomolar Cellular Potencies and Capable of Achieving Tumor Regression. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 61 (2) , 462-481. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01816
  100. Matthias Schiedel, Daniel Herp, Sören Hammelmann, Sören Swyter, Attila Lehotzky, Dina Robaa, Judit Oláh, Judit Ovádi, Wolfgang Sippl, and Manfred Jung . Chemically Induced Degradation of Sirtuin 2 (Sirt2) by a Proteolysis Targeting Chimera (PROTAC) Based on Sirtuin Rearranging Ligands (SirReals). Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 61 (2) , 482-491. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01872
Load more citations
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Design, synthesis, and biophysical and biological evaluation of BET bromodomain PROTACs. (a) Chemical structures of BET-bromodomain inhibitors JQ1 and I-BET762 and binders of von Hippel-Lindau protein VHL-1 and VHL-2. (b) Scheme of the synthesis of PROTAC compounds MZ1–3 and cisMZ1; for detailed synthetic procedures see the Supporting Information. (c) Isothermal titration calorimetry data for titration of MZ1 into the individual members of the BET-bromodomain subfamily. Titrations were performed at 30 °C with a protein concentration of 15 μM and ligand concentration of 150 μM (entry 1–6). Titration of MZ1 and cisMZ1 into VBC at 25 °C with identical concentrations (entry 9, 12) and reverse titration of VBC protein (150 μM) into MZ3 (15 μM) at 25 °C (entry 10) were conducted. For ΔS and ΔG values, see the Supporting Information. (d) HeLa cells were treated with either siRNA targeting individual BET proteins or negative control siRNA 24 h prior to treatment with the compounds MZ1–3, cisMZ1, and JQ1 or vehicle control (0.01% DMSO) for an additional 24 h. Abundance of individual BET protein was analyzed by Western blotting using corresponding specific antibodies accordingly after SDS-PAGE. i, data from ref 8; ii, data from ref 26.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. PROTACs induce concentration- and time-dependent selective degradation of BRD4. (a) HeLa cells treated for 24 h with different concentrations of MZ1 (panel I), MZ2 (panel II), and MZ3 (panel III). The bands observed in the BRD4 short isoform lane at a high concentration of each compound are correlated to nonspecific binding. (b) Time dependent treatment over 36 h of HeLa cells with 1 μM (panel I) and 100 nM (panel II) of MZ1. (c) U2OS cells transfected with GFP-BRD4 were treated with either 5 μM of MZ1 or cisMZ1 over a time course of 4 h. BRD4 degradation over time was followed by live fluorescence imaging.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Mechanistic studies on PROTAC biological activity. (a) Time dependent treatment over 36 h of HeLa cells with 1 μM inactive compound cisMZ1. (b) HeLa cells treated with JQ1 or MZ1 at 1 μM in the absence or presence of the proteasome inhibitor MG132. (c) Time dependent treatment over 36 h of HeLa cells with 1 μM MZ1 observing the levels of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) protein. (d) HeLa cells treated with 100 μM CoCl2 as a hypoxia control or 0.1, 1, and 10 μM MZ1. (e) BRD4 protein levels were observed (panel I) with single treatment of MZ1 at t = 0 for 4 h and then exchange of media, (panel II) single treatment with MZ1 at t = 0 but no exchange of media, and (panel III) single treatment with 0.01% DMSO for 4 h and then exchange of media.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Selective degradation of BRD4 leads to a differential response between JQ1 and MZ1 on selected genes. mRNA expression profiles of MYC, P21, AREG, FAS, FGFR1, and TYRO3 upon treatment with PROTAC MZ1 and JQ1 were compared. (a) HeLa cells were treated with 100 nM MZ1, VHL-1′, or JQ1 or 0.01% DMSO vehicle control (Veh.) for 24 h. (b) To mimic the protein removal effect, HeLa cells were transfected with siRNA targeting individual BRD2, BRD3, or BRD4 or negative control siRNA and were harvested after 48 h. Quantitative PCR was performed to analyze relative gene expression level of treated HeLa cells using target specific primers. Gene expression levels relative to GAPDH were normalized to control treatment. The data shown represent the mean ± SEM (n = 3 technical replicates) of one experiment. Statistical significance compared to the control was determined with two-tailed t tests: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and n.s. = not significant.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 37 other publications.

    1. 1
      Gallenkamp, D., Gelato, K. A., Haendler, B., and Weinmann, H. (2014) Bromodomains and their pharmacological inhibitors ChemMedChem. 9, 438 464
    2. 2
      Belkina, A. C. and Denis, G. V. (2012) BET domain co-regulators in obesity, inflammation and cancer Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 465 477
    3. 3
      Zuber, J., Shi, J., Wang, E., Rappaport, A. R., Herrmann, H., Sison, E. A., Magoon, D., Qi, J., Blatt, K., Wunderlich, M., Taylor, M. J., Johns, C., Chicas, A., Mulloy, J. C., Kogan, S. C., Brown, P., Valent, P., Bradner, J. E., Lowe, S. W., and Vakoc, C. R. (2011) RNAi screen identifies Brd4 as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukaemia Nature 478, 524 528
    4. 4
      Baratta, M. G., Schinzel, A. C., Zwang, Y., Bandopadhayay, P., Bowman-Colin, C., Kutt, J., Curtis, J., Piao, H., Wong, L. C., Kung, A. L., Beroukhim, R., Bradner, J. E., Drapkin, R., Hahn, W. C., Liu, J. F., and Livingston, D. M. (2015) An in-tumor genetic screen reveals that the BET bromodomain protein, BRD4, is a potential therapeutic target in ovarian carcinoma Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112, 232 237
    5. 5
      Chung, C.-W., Coste, H., White, J. H., Mirguet, O., Wilde, J., Gosmini, R. L., Delves, C., Magny, S. M., Woodward, R., Hughes, S. A., Boursier, E. V., Flynn, H., Bouillot, A. M., Bamborough, P., Brusq, J.-M. G., Gellibert, F. J., Jones, E. J., Riou, A. M., Homes, P., Martin, S. L., Uings, I. J., Toum, J., Clément, C. A., Boullay, A.-B., Grimley, R. L., Blandel, F. M., Prinjha, R. K., Lee, K., Kirilovsky, J., and Nicodeme, E. (2011) Discovery and characterization of small molecule inhibitors of the BET family bromodomains J. Med. Chem. 54, 3827 3838
    6. 6
      Khan, Y. M., Kirkham, P., Barnes, P. J., and Adcock, I. M. (2014) Brd4 is essential for IL-1β-induced inflammation in human airway epithelial cells PLoS One 9, e95051
    7. 7
      Filippakopoulos, P. and Knapp, S. (2012) The bromodomain interaction module FEBS Lett. 586, 2692 2704
    8. 8
      Filippakopoulos, P., Qi, J., Picaud, S., Shen, Y., Smith, W. B., Fedorov, O., Morse, E. M., Keates, T., Hickman, T. T., Felletar, I., Philpott, M., Munro, S., McKeown, M. R., Wang, Y., Christie, A. L., West, N., Cameron, M. J., Schwartz, B., Heightman, T. D., La Thangue, N., French, C. A., Wiest, O., Kung, A. L., Knapp, S., and Bradner, J. E. (2010) Selective inhibition of BET bromodomains Nature 468, 1067 1073
    9. 9
      Nicodeme, E., Jeffrey, K. L., Schaefer, U., Beinke, S., Dewell, S., Chung, C.-W., Chandwani, R., Marazzi, I., Wilson, P., Coste, H., White, J., Kirilovsky, J., Rice, C. M., Lora, J. M., Prinjha, R. K., Lee, K., and Tarakhovsky, A. (2010) Suppression of inflammation by a synthetic histone mimic Nature 468, 1119 1123
    10. 10
      Boi, M., Gaudio, E., Bonetti, P., Kwee, I., Bernasconi, E., Tarantelli, C., Rinaldi, A., Testoni, M., Cascione, L., Ponzoni, M., Mensah, A. A., Stathis, A., Stussi, G., Riveiro, M. E., Herait, P., Inghirami, G., Cvitkovic, E., Zucca, E., and Bertoni, F. (2015) The BET Bromodomain inhibitor OTX015 affects pathogenetic pathways in pre-clinical B-cell tumor models and synergizes with targeted drugs Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 1628 1638
    11. 11
      Gosmini, R., Nguyen, V. L., Toum, J., Simon, C., Brusq, J.-M. G., Krysa, G., Mirguet, O., Riou-Eymard, A. M., Boursier, E. V., Trottet, L., Bamborough, P., Clark, H., Chung, C.-W., Cutler, L., Demont, E. H., Kaur, R., Lewis, A. J., Schilling, M. B., Soden, P. E., Taylor, S., Walker, A. L., Walker, M. D., Prinjha, R. K., and Nicodeme, E. (2014) The discovery of I-BET726 (GSK1324726A), a potent tetrahydroquinoline ApoA1 up-regulator and selective BET bromodomain inhibitor J. Med. Chem. 57, 8111 8131
    12. 12
      Mirguet, O., Lamotte, Y., Donche, F., Toum, J., Gellibert, F., Bouillot, A., Gosmini, R., Nguyen, V. L., Delannée, D., Seal, J., Blandel, F., Boullay, A.-B., Boursier, E., Martin, S., Brusq, J.-M., Krysa, G., Riou, A., Tellier, R., Costaz, A., Huet, P., Dudit, Y., Trottet, L., Kirilovsky, J., and Nicodeme, E. (2012) From ApoA1 upregulation to BET family bromodomain inhibition: Discovery of I-BET151 Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22, 2963 2967
    13. 13
      McLure, K. G., Gesner, E. M., Tsujikawa, L., Kharenko, O. A., Attwell, S., Campeau, E., Wasiak, S., Stein, A., White, A., Fontano, E., Suto, R. K., Wong, N. C. W., Wagner, G. S., Hansen, H. C., and Young, P. R. (2013) RVX-208, an inducer of ApoA-I in humans, is a BET bromodomain antagonist PLoS One 8, e83190
    14. 14
      Cheng, Z., Gong, Y., Ma, Y., Lu, K., Lu, X., Pierce, L. A., Thompson, R. C., Müller, S., Knapp, S., and Wang, J. (2013) Inhibition of BET bromodomain targets genetically diverse glioblastoma Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 1748 1759
    15. 15
      Prinjha, R. K., Witherington, J., and Lee, K. (2012) Place your BETs: The therapeutic potential of bromodomains Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 33, 146 153
    16. 16
      Filippakopoulos, P. and Knapp, S. (2014) Targeting bromodomains: Epigenetic readers of lysine acetylation Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 13, 337 356
    17. 17
      Baud, M. G. J., Lin-Shiao, E., Cardote, T., Tallant, C., Pschibul, A., Chan, K.-H., Zengerle, M., Garcia, J. R., Kwan, T. T. L., Ferguson, F. M., and Ciulli, A. (2014) A bump-and-hole approach to engineer controlled selectivity of BET bromodomain chemical probes Science 346, 638 641
    18. 18
      Raina, K. and Crews, C. M. (2010) Chemical inducers of targeted protein degradation J. Biol. Chem. 285, 11057 11060
    19. 19
      Corson, T. W., Aberle, N., and Crews, C. M. (2008) Design and applications of bifunctional small molecules: Why two heads are better than one ACS Chem. Biol. 3, 677 692
    20. 20
      Cyrus, K., Wehenkel, M., Choi, E. Y., Swanson, H., and Kim, K. B. (2010) Two-headed PROTAC: An effective new tool for targeted protein degradation ChemBioChem. 11, 1531 1534
    21. 21
      Sakamoto, K. M., Kim, K. B., Verma, R., Ransick, A., Stein, B., Crews, C. M., and Deshaies, R. J. (2003) Development of Protacs to target cancer-promoting proteins for ubiquitination and degradation Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2, 1350 1358
    22. 22
      Sakamoto, K. M., Kim, K. B., Kumagai, A., Mercurio, F., Crews, C. M., and Deshaies, R. J. (2001) Protacs: Chimeric molecules that target proteins to the Skp1-Cullin-F box complex for ubiquitination and degradation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 8554 8559
    23. 23
      Lee, H., Puppala, D., Choi, E. Y., Swanson, H., and Kim, K. B. (2007) Targeted degradation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor by the PROTAC approach: A useful chemical genetic tool ChemBioChem. 8, 2058 2062
    24. 24
      Schneekloth, J. S., Fonseca, F. N., Koldobskiy, M., Mandal, A., Deshaies, R., Sakamoto, K., and Crews, C. M. (2004) Chemical genetic control of protein levels: Selective in vivo targeted degradation J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 3748 3754
    25. 25
      Hon, W.-C., Wilson, M. I., Harlos, K., Claridge, T. D. W., Schofield, C. J., Pugh, C. W., Maxwell, P. H., Ratcliffe, P. J., Stuart, D. I., and Jones, E. Y. (2002) Structural basis for the recognition of hydroxyproline in HIF-1 alpha by pVHL Nature 417, 975 978
    26. 26
      Galdeano, C., Gadd, M. S., Soares, P., Scaffidi, S., Van Molle, I., Birced, I., Hewitt, S., Dias, D. M., and Ciulli, A. (2014) Structure-guided design and optimization of small molecules targeting the protein-protein interaction between the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) E3 ubiquitin ligase and the hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) alpha subunit with in vitro nanomolar affinities J. Med. Chem. 57, 8657 8663
    27. 27
      Li, Z., Wang, D., Li, L., Pan, S., Na, Z., Tan, C. Y. J., and Yao, S. Q. (2014) “Minimalist” cyclopropene-containing photo-cross-linkers suitable for live-cell imaging and affinity-based protein labeling J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 9990 9998
    28. 28
      Shi, J. and Vakoc, C. R. (2014) The mechanisms behind the therapeutic activity of BET bromodomain inhibition Mol. Cell 54, 728 736
    29. 29
      Anders, L., Guenther, M. G., Qi, J., Fan, Z. P., Marineau, J. J., Rahl, P. B., Lovén, J., Sigova, A. A., Smith, W. B., Lee, T. I., Bradner, J. E., and Young, R. A. (2014) Genome-wide localization of small molecules Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 92 96
    30. 30
      Bretones, G., Delgado, M. D., and León, J. (2014) Myc and cell cycle control Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1849, 506 516
    31. 31
      Lamoureux, F., Baud’huin, M., Rodriguez Calleja, L., Jacques, C., Berreur, M., Rédini, F., Lecanda, F., Bradner, J. E., Heymann, D., and Ory, B. (2014) Selective inhibition of BET bromodomain epigenetic signalling interferes with the bone-associated tumour vicious cycle Nat. Commun. 5, 3511
    32. 32
      Mertz, J. A., Conery, A. R., Bryant, B. M., Sandy, P., Balasubramanian, S., Mele, D. A., Bergeron, L., and Sims, R. J. (2011) Targeting MYC dependence in cancer by inhibiting BET bromodomains Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 16669 16674
    33. 33
      Seoane, J., Le, H.-V., and Massagué, J. (2002) Myc suppression of the p21(Cip1) Cdk inhibitor influences the outcome of the p53 response to DNA damage Nature 419, 729 734
    34. 34
      Strasser, A., Jost, P. J., and Nagata, S. (2009) The many roles of FAS receptor signaling in the immune system Immunity 30, 180 192
    35. 35
      Hnilicová, J., Hozeifi, S., Stejskalová, E., Dušková, E., Poser, I., Humpolíčková, J., Hof, M., and Staněk, D. (2013) The C-terminal domain of Brd2 is important for chromatin interaction and regulation of transcription and alternative splicing Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 3557 3568
    36. 36
      Delmore, J. E., Issa, G. C., Lemieux, M. E., Rahl, P. B., Shi, J., Jacobs, H. M., Kastritis, E., Gilpatrick, T., Paranal, R. M., Qi, J., Chesi, M., Schinzel, A. C., McKeown, M. R., Heffernan, T. P., Vakoc, C. R., Bergsagel, P. L., Ghobrial, I. M., Richardson, P. G., Young, R. A., Hahn, W. C., Anderson, K. C., Kung, A. L., Bradner, J. E., and Mitsiades, C. S. (2011) BET bromodomain inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to target c-Myc Cell 146, 904 917
    37. 37
      Brand, M., Measures, A. M., Wilson, B. G., Cortopassi, W. A., Alexander, R., Höss, M., Hewings, D. S., Rooney, T. P. C., Paton, R. S., and Conway, S. J. (2015) Small molecule inhibitors of bromodomain–acetyl-lysine interactions ACS Chem. Biol. 10, 22 39
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    Additional figures, tables, materials and methods, and .avi videos. The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.5b00216.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect