ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Chemical Proteomics Maps Brain Region Specific Activity of Endocannabinoid Hydrolases
My Activity
  • Open Access
  • Editors Choice
Articles

Chemical Proteomics Maps Brain Region Specific Activity of Endocannabinoid Hydrolases
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Department of Molecular Physiology, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
Department of Bio-organic Synthesis, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
§ Plateforme de Chimie Analytique, NeuroCentre INSERM U862, Bordeaux, France
Open PDFSupporting Information (5)

ACS Chemical Biology

Cite this: ACS Chem. Biol. 2017, 12, 3, 852–861
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.6b01052
Published January 20, 2017

Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The biosynthetic and catabolic enzymes of the endocannabinoids tightly regulate endocannabinoid-mediated activation of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor. Monitoring the activities of these endocannabinoid hydrolases in different brain regions is, therefore, key to gaining insight into spatiotemporal control of CB1 receptor-mediated physiology. We have employed a comparative chemical proteomics approach to quantitatively map the activity profile of endocannabinoid hydrolases in various mouse brain regions at the same time. To this end, we used two different activity-based probes: fluorophosphonate-biotin (FP-biotin), which quantifies FAAH, ABHD6, and MAG-lipase activity, and MB108, which detects DAGL-α, ABHD4, ABHD6, and ABHD12. In total, 32 serine hydrolases were evaluated in the frontal cortex, hippocampus, striatum, and cerebellum. Comparison of endocannabinoid hydrolase activity in the four brain regions revealed that FAAH activity was highest in the hippocampus, and MAGL activity was most pronounced in the frontal cortex, whereas DAGL-α was most active in the cerebellum. Comparison of the activity profiles with a global proteomics data set revealed pronounced differences. This could indicate that post-translational modification of the endocannabinoid hydrolases is important to regulate their activity. Next, the effect of genetic deletion of the CB1 receptor was studied. No difference in the enzymatic activity was found in the cerebellum, striatum, frontal cortex, and hippocampus of CB1 receptor knockout animals compared to wild type mice. Our results are in line with previous reports and indicate that the CB1 receptor exerts no regulatory control over the basal production and degradation of endocannabinoids and that genetic deletion of the CB1 receptor does not induce compensatory mechanisms in endocannabinoid hydrolase activity.

Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society

The endocannabinoid system consists of the cannabinoid type 1 and 2 (CB1 and CB2) receptors, lipid messengers termed endocannabinoids, and the hydrolytic enzymes responsible for the biosynthesis and catabolism of these lipid signaling molecules. 2-Arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) and anandamide (AEA) are the two main endocannabinoids. (1) The CB1 receptor has a relatively high expression in the central nervous system, while the CB2 receptor is more abundant in immune cells. The CB1 receptor is among the most abundant G-protein coupled receptors in the brain and modulates a wide variety of signaling events, including inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity, stimulation of ERK activation, closure of voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels, and opening of K+ channels. (2, 3) Activation of the CB1 receptor is associated with multiple physiological processes, such as energy balance, learning and memory, pain sensation, and neuro-inflammation. (4-7) Unlike classical polar neurotransmitters, which are stored in presynaptic vesicles, 2-AG and AEA are synthesized “on-demand” from postsynaptic membranes and act as retrograde messengers activating presynaptic CB1 receptors, thereby modulating neurotransmitter release. This implies that the biosynthetic and catabolic machinery of the endocannabinoids tightly regulates CB1 receptor activation. (8)
Several biosynthetic and catabolic endocannabinoid hydrolases control 2-AG and AEA levels (Figure 1). Diacylglycerol lipase-α and -β (DAGL-α and DAGL-β) are the main enzymes producing 2-AG. They display a tissue specific distribution and studies using mice with congenital deletion of DAGL-α or DAGL-β have identified DAGL-α as the primary enzyme responsible for the biosynthesis of 2-AG in the brain. (9, 10) α,β-Hydrolase-domain-containing protein 6 and 12 (ABHD6 and ABHD12) and monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) inactivate 2-AG by hydrolysis to give arachidonic acid (AA) and glycerol. MAGL is responsible for the bulk hydrolysis of 2-AG, while ABHD6 and ABHD12 play a more distinct role in specific cell populations. (11)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Biosynthetic and catabolic pathways of 2-AG and AEA.

The biosynthetic pathways toward AEA appear to be more complex compared with those of 2-AG. (4, 6)N-arachidonoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine (NArPE) is a key intermediate in AEA biosynthesis. NArPE can be converted via multiple phospholipase-dependent pathways to AEA: (a) hydrolysis by N-acylphosphatidylethanolamine-phospholipase D (NAPE-PLD), a metallo-β-lactamase, producing AEA and a phosphatidic acid in one step (12) and (b) phospholipase A2 (PLA2) and α,β-hydrolase domain-containing protein 4 (ABHD4) mediated conversion to lyso-NArPE, followed by the action of an unknown lysophospholipase D (PLD). Of note, lyso-NArPE can also be converted in a two-step sequence by ABHD4 to glycerophospho-AEA (GP-AEA) and subsequently hydrolyzed to AEA by glycerophosphodiesterase 1 or 4 (GDE1 or GDE4); (13, 14) (c) in macrophages, NArPE serves as a substrate for an unidentified phospholipase C yielding phospho-AEA. Hydrolysis of the phosphate group by the phosphatases, PTPN22 or SHIP1, provides AEA. (15, 16) The enzymatic inactivation of AEA is less complex and is primarily mediated by fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), which hydrolyses AEA toward arachidonic acid and ethanolamine. (4, 17)
The ability to monitor the activity of the different endocannabinoid hydrolases in various brain regions is key to gaining insight in spatiotemporal control of CB1 receptor activation and its physiological role. The existence of a feedback mechanism in anterograde neurotransmitter systems through presynaptic “autoreceptors” to control the release of the neurotransmitters has led to the hypothesis that such an autoregulatory mechanism could also be present in retrograde systems, such as the endocannabinoid system. (18-20) Previous studies have investigated the effect of CB1 receptor modulation on basal endocannabinoid levels. Several studies observed changes in AEA and/or 2-AG levels, (21-25) whereas others did not. (18, 26) Interestingly, Maccarrone et al. found that the endocannabinoid system of CB1 knockout mice adapted with age by upregulating AEA catabolism. (23, 24) Recently, Belluomo et al. reported that the MAGL inhibitor JZL-195 reduced 2-AG accumulation rates in the frontal cortex of mice lacking the CB1 receptor in glutamatergic neurons and an increase of 2-AG accumulation under the same conditions in mice with congenital deletion of the CB1 receptor in astrocytes. (18) In addition, chronic elevation of 2-AG levels by genetic deletion of MAGL or repeated administration of JZL184 led to CB1 receptor desensitization. (27) These observations suggest the existence of crosstalk between the CB1 receptor and the endocannabinoid regulatory machinery. The pre- and postsynaptic autoregulatory mechanisms controlling endocannabinoid levels are, however, poorly understood.
Changes in bulk endocannabinoid levels do not reveal which biosynthetic or catabolic pathways are responsible for the regulation of CB1 activity. (18, 26) To this end, the activity of each hydrolytic enzyme should be studied. Over the years, a brain region and cell type resolved map of the molecular distribution of endocannabinoid hydrolases has been generated by in situ hybridization and global proteomics. (28-30) These studies provided a detailed understanding of the molecular composition of the endocannabinoid system in different brain regions at the mRNA and protein level. However, actual enzymatic activity does not always correlate with mRNA and protein levels in specific brain regions due to post-transcriptional and post-translational processes. (31, 32) The activity of DAGL-α is, for example, regulated by CaMKII-mediated phosphorylation, and MAGL activity can be modulated by sulfenylation of specific cysteines. (33, 34) Consequently, it is important to measure actual enzyme activity in the various brain regions.
Conventional enzyme activity assays rely on radiolabeled substrates and LC/MS-based methods. (35) These assays are expensive and time-consuming and measure the activity of one enzyme at a time. Others and we have recently applied comparative activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) and chemoproteomics to measure serine hydrolase activity in complex proteomes. (36-39) ABPP is a technique pioneered by Cravatt et al., which relies on active site directed chemical probes that react, in a mechanism based fashion, with the catalytic nucleophile of targeted enzymes. The probe establishes a covalent bond with the catalytically active protein and therefore reports on the abundance of active enzymes. Activity-based probes (ABPs) generally have a fluorescent or biotin reporter group for visualization and identification, respectively. (36) Many enzymes regulating brain endocannabinoid levels, including MAGL, DAGL, FAAH, ABHD4, ABHD6, and ABHD12, belong to the serine hydrolase family; therefore they have conserved structural features, which allow for their targeting by specific ABPs, such as FP-TAMRA and MB064. Here, we have used ABPP to map the relative activity of endocannabinoid hydrolases in different brain regions, such as cerebellum, frontal cortex, hippocampus, and striatum. We applied this method to investigate the existence of an autoregulatory feedback mechanism of the CB1 receptor on the endocannabinoid hydrolase activity by comparing the brains of CB1 receptor knockout mice versus wild-type mice.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Gel-based Brain Region Comparison

Previously, a β-lactone (MB064) and fluorophosphonate (FP-TAMRA) were applied as tools to study the selectivity of the DAGL inhibitors LEI104, LEI105, and DH376. (38, 40) The use of two ABPs extends the range of enzymes, because the probes have orthogonal warheads and different recognition elements, leading to a different interaction profile. Here, both ABPs were used to map brain region dependent activity of endocannabinoid hydrolases by comparative ABPP. Global assessment of serine hydrolase activity across four different brain regions was performed using a gel-based assay. Membrane and soluble proteomes from mouse cerebellum, frontal cortex, hippocampus, or striatum were incubated with MB064 (250 nM) or FP-TAMRA (500 nM) and resolved on SDS-PAGE, and the in-gel fluorescence was analyzed. Coomassie staining was used as a protein loading control. Using MB064, nine intense bands were identified in the membrane fractions of the mouse brain regions, and the identity of endocannabinoid hydrolase bands could be established using reference inhibitors and KO tissue as previously reported. (38, 40)
In this manner, the bands at 120 kDa, 45 kDa, and 35 kDa were ascribed to DAGL-α, ABHD12, and ABHD6, respectively. FP-TAMRA labeled FAAH (64 kDa), MAGL (35 and 38 kDa), and ABHD6 (35 kDa). All identified endocannabinoid proteins were present in the four brain regions, but several hydrolases demonstrated pronounced region-dependent activity (Figure 2). For example, DAGL-α activity was ∼3 times higher in the cerebellum compared to the frontal cortex, hippocampus, and striatum (Figure 2A,B). Interestingly, the fluorescent protein band corresponding to DAGL-α in the cerebellum was shifted toward a higher molecular weight compared to the hippocampus, striatum, and frontal cortex. This could indicate that DAGL-α carries a post-translational modification. The activity of ABHD12 was similar in all four brain regions, while the activity of ABHD6 was ∼25% higher in the cerebellum compared to the frontal cortex, hippocampus, and the striatum. The fluorophosphonate-based ABP revealed the activity of FAAH to be ∼2 times higher in the frontal cortex and the hippocampus compared to the cerebellum and striatum. The signals of MAGL and ABHD6 as measured with this activity-based probe are overlapping and could not be quantified independently (Figure 2C).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Gel-based mapping of brain region dependent hydrolase activity. (A) Activity-based protein profiling with MB064 in four mouse brain regions. (B) Quantification of endocannabinoid hydrolase activity as determined with MB064 (mean ± SD; n = 3). (C) Activity-based protein profiling with FP-TAMRA in four mouse brain regions. (D) Quantification of FAAH activity as measured with ABP FP-TAMRA (mean ± SD; n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed by means of two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparisons test (*P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001; C = cerebellum, F = frontal cortex, H = hippocampus, S = striatum). Integrated band intensity is corrected for protein loading (coomassie).

Chemoproteomic Brain Region Comparison

To analyze the relative activities in depth, ABPP was coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry. This methodology enables direct identification of the enzymes and provides a more accurate quantification by avoiding band overlap and yields a broader range of hydrolases due to a higher sensitivity. Membrane and soluble proteomes from cerebellum, hippocampus, frontal cortex, or striatum were separately incubated with MB108 or FP-biotin, biotinylated versions of MB064 and FP-TAMRA, respectively. Targeted enzymes were enriched by avidin chromatography, followed by on-bead digestion using sequencing grade trypsin. Tryptic peptides from different brain regions were isotopically labeled by reductive dimethylation with deuterated or nondeuterated formaldehyde. After 1:1 mixing of the differentially labeled brain regions, samples were measured by high resolution MS/MS and analyzed using Maxquant software (a schematic overview of the chemoproteomic workflow is given in Figure 3A). (41)

Figure 3

Figure 3. Brain region dependent chemoproteomic mapping of relative hydrolase activity. (A) Schematic representation of the chemoproteomic workflow. (B) Heat map of relative enzyme activity as measured by a fluorophosphonate (FP)-based activity-based probe conjugated to a biotin reporter tag (FP-biotin) and a β-lactone-based activity-based probe conjugated to a biotin reporter tag (MB108). Data are calculated from the mean ratios of the comparison between cerebellum and striatum, frontal cortex and striatum, and cerebellum and hippocampus. Each comparison was performed in three biological replicates. The relative enzyme activity in the brain region in which the serine hydrolase displayed highest activity was set to 100%. (C) Correlation graph for enzymes detected by both MB108 and FP-biotin. (D) Endocannabinoid regulating enzymes show significant difference between the studied brain regions (mean ± SEM; n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed by means of two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparisons test (* P ≤ 0.05; ** P ≤ 0.01; *** P ≤ 0.001; **** P ≤ 0.0001) (C = cerebellum, F = frontal cortex, H = hippocampus, S = striatum).

Using this chemoproteomic methodology, the relative activity of 33 different serine hydrolases was quantified in all brain regions, including DAGL-α, FAAH, ABHD12, MAGL, ABHD6, and ABHD4 (see Figure 3 for a heat map). Eleven enzymes reacted with both probes. A high correlation was found between the quantified enzymatic activities for each probe (Pearson’s correlation of 0.86 (P < 0.0001)), indicating that probe-independent protein activity was measured (Figure 3). The fluorophosphonate-based ABP targeted 14 unique proteins, including MAGL and FAAH, whereas the β-lactone-based ABP MB108 targeted seven unique proteins including ABHD4, ABHD12, and DAGL-α. ABHD4 showed an equal activity across all brain regions, while FAAH had the highest activity in the hippocampus and frontal cortex. The activity of DAGL-α in the cerebellum was ∼2-fold higher compared to the striatum, hippocampus, and frontal cortex. Interestingly, MAGL activity was lowest in the cerebellum. The results from the chemoproteomic analysis were in line with the gel-based ABPP method, except for ABHD6, which is likely to be caused by band overlap in the gel-based assay. Further detailed analysis showed that overall relative enzymatic activities followed the same trends as observed for the protein abundance derived from a global proteomics data set published by Sharma et al. (29) (Supporting Figure 1). However, several pronounced differences were detected. These different intensity profiles for activity and protein abundance may suggest that protein activity is regulated by post-translational modifications. For example, the activity of ABHD12 was equally distributed over the four brain regions, while ABHD12 abundance in the hippocampus was twice as high as in the cerebellum, frontal cortex and striatum. These different profiles might be explained by a down regulation of ABHD12 activity in the hippocampus. DAGL-α activity was highest in the cerebellum, while its relative activity in the frontal cortex was 47.2 ± 8.6%, 64.6 ± 9.0% in the hippocampus and 36.3 ± 5.4% in the striatum. In contrast, global proteomics data showed the highest abundance of DAGL-α in the hippocampus, while less than 30% was found in the cerebellum, frontal cortex, and striatum. To investigate this apparent discrepancy, we have performed a Western blot analysis to check the DAGL-α protein levels in the four brain regions of our mice. We observed relatively high DAGL-α abundance in the cerebellum (Supporting Figure 2), which matched the relative activity as measured with our ABPP method.
Many other serine hydrolases were detected next to the endocannabinoid hydrolases (Figure 3). Marked differences in activity between the brain regions were observed for some of these enzymes. For example, acetylcholinesterase (ACHE), which is responsible for acetylcholine hydrolysis, showed over 10-fold activity in the striatum compared to the other three brain regions. ABHD16A, which is a phosphatidylserine lipase producing lyso-phosphatidyl-serine, (42) demonstrated ∼2-fold increased activity in the cerebellum compared to other brain regions. Platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PLA2G7), which cleaves the sn-2 acetyl of acetyl-glyceryl-ether-phosphorylcholine, showed an approximate 3-fold higher activity in the cerebellum compared to the other brain regions. (43)

Comparison of CB1+/+ and CB1–/– Brain Regions

Next, the regulatory control of the CB1 receptor over basal production and degradation of endocannabinoids was investigated. To this end, the enzymatic activity of hydrolases involved in endocannabinoid biosynthesis and degradation in the cerebellum, hippocampus, frontal cortex, and striatum of CB1 receptor knockout mice was compared to their wild-type counterparts. Fluorescent scanning of gels from ABPP experiments using MB064 and FP-TAMRA did not reveal any difference in labeling patterns in the brain regions (Figure 4).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Gel based CB1+/+ vs CB1–/– comparison. Study of enzyme activity in CB1+/+ and CB1–/– mouse brain regions as measured by two activity based probes (MB064 and TAMRA-FP, n = 3). No difference in enzyme activity between CB1–/– and CB1+/+ was observed.

To investigate in depth the effect of CB1 receptor deletion on serine hydrolase activity, the chemoproteomic assay in the four mouse brain regions was performed. The relative activities of 36 different hydrolases were detected and quantified (Figure 5). No difference in the enzymatic activity of the 2-AG biosynthetic enzyme (DAGL-α) and the 2-AG catabolic enzymes ABHD6, ABHD12, and MAGL was observed in the cerebellum, frontal cortex, hippocampus, or striatum. Nor were any changes observed in ABHD4 and FAAH activities.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Comparison of enzyme activity in CB1+/+ and CB1–/– mouse brain regions. Log2 ratio of enzyme activity in CB1–/– brain regions compared to CB1+/+ (mean ± SD). Activity is measured by activity-based proteomics using FP-biotin (10 μM) and MB108 (10 μM). Combined data from both activity based probes (n = 4 for each brain region). Statistical analysis by means of one-way ANOVA, each CB1 WT/KO ratio was compared to a Log2 ratio of 0; subsequently the p values were subjected to Benjamini Hochberg correction. Setting the false discovery rate at 10%.

Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The enzymes responsible for endocannabinoid biosynthesis and degradation tightly regulate endocannabinoid CB1 receptor activation. A fluorescence and chemoproteomic ABPP assay was employed to quantify the activity of hydrolases in the cerebellum, hippocampus, striatum, and frontal cortex to gain more insight in the spatiotemporal control of CB1 receptor-mediated physiology. ABPP relies on the mechanism-based formation of a covalent bond between the ABP and the catalytic nucleophile of its target enzyme. Therefore, the abundance of only active enzymes is monitored by ABPP. The gel-based fluorescence assay has a relatively short experimental time (∼3h) and has the ability to retrieve information on differences in protein migration on SDS-PAGE caused by, e.g., phosphorylation, glycosylation, or proteolysis. The chemoproteomic methodology is complementary and directly reports on the identity and activity of a large number of enzymes in parallel in their native environment with all post-translational modifications in place.
Previous studies have indicated the importance of analyzing different brain regions when studying the endocannabinoid system. Endocannabinoid levels have been shown to vary between brain regions. Moreover, the CB1 receptor and the endocannabinoid regulatory machinery do not present a homogeneous expression across brain regions. (1, 26, 29, 44) These variations are confirmed in the comparative ABPP approach using cerebellum, hippocampus, frontal cortex, and striatum. Significant differences were found in the enzyme activity of DAGL-α, MAGL, ABHD6, and FAAH between different brain regions. For instance, the highest FAAH activity was observed in the hippocampus, which is in line with previous reports indicating that the hippocampus has the highest FAAH expression levels, highest AEA levels, and turnover rate compared to other brain regions. (18, 21, 26) These observations suggest that AEA has an important physiological role in the hippocampus, such as providing “on demand” CB1 receptor-dependent neuroprotection against excitotoxicity. (45) Next to its role as an endocannabinoid, AEA functions also as an endogenous agonist of the TRPV1 ion channel. (46) It could be envisioned that FAAH not only terminates CB1 receptor signaling but also limits TRPV1 signaling by AEA in the hippocampus. In this respect, it would be interesting to investigate whether TRPV1 mediates crosstalk between AEA and 2-AG biosynthesis as was previously observed in the striatum. (47) Of note, FAAH does not only inactivate AEA but uses a wide range of long chain fatty acid amides as substrates. The physiological role of these endogenous signaling lipids is poorly understood, but the hippocampus would be an excellent brain region in which to investigate their biological role.
DAGL-α activity was ∼2 fold higher in the cerebellum compared to the frontal cortex, striatum, and hippocampus. The activity of MAGL in the cerebellum was only 23.3 ± 11% of the total MAGL activity in the frontal cortex. In addition, no relative compensatory activity of ABHD6 and ABHD12 was observed in the cerebellum (Figure 2). Yet, 2-AG levels are not substantially higher in the cerebellum. (21, 26, 48) This may suggest that 2-AG levels and CB1 receptor activity are controlled by MAGL, rather than by 2-AG biosynthesis, or that other catabolic pathways, such as oxidative catabolism, could play a role in this brain region.
Comparison of the activity-based proteomics data with protein expression values from the literature showed an overall correlation. For several enzymes (e.g., ABHD16A, ABHD10, ABHD12), however, the activity profile did not match the protein abundance profile as reported in a global proteomics data set. (29) This may indicate that the activity of these proteins is regulated by post-translational modifications or could result from differences in the protein expression due to variation in age and mouse species analyzed in the various studies (as observed with DAGL-α).
Previous studies have investigated the effect of CB1 receptor modulation by pharmacological or genetic means on endocannabinoid levels. (18, 21-26) Here, this question was revisited, and the ABPP-methodology was employed to study the effect of genetic deletion of the CB1 receptor on endocannabinoid hydrolase activity in various brain regions. No significant differences in the activity of endocannabinoid biosynthetic and catabolic enzymes between CB1 KO and WT brain regions were observed. These results are in line with previous reports. (26, 18) Yet, it cannot be excluded that specific CB1 receptor populations might increase production and/or degradation while others might decrease it, leading to a lack of change when removing all these receptor populations. In support of this hypothesis is the observation that within the frontal cortex the turnover of 2-AG is decreased and increased in mutant mice lacking CB1 receptors on principal neurons (possibly glutamatergic) and on astrocytes, respectively. (18)
Of note, the applied technique has several limitations. The total enzyme activity is measured by an end point measurement using a covalent inhibitor. Therefore, small changes in the KM as a result of post-translational modifications are difficult to monitor by ABPP. Additionally, although the proteomics assay is capable of detecting a wide array of hydrolases that play an important role in regulation of endocannabinoid signaling, this methodology is not compatible with enzymes that do not form a covalent intermediate with their substrate, such as the β-metallo-lactamase NAPE-PLD. Importantly, other mechanisms that regulate endocannabinoid signaling, such as the putative endocannabinoid transporter proteins and oxidative metabolism of endocannabinoids toward eicosanoids, are not taken into account by the ABPP-method.
In conclusion, we have employed an ABPP method that can measure the activity of six different enzymes with endocannabinoid hydrolase activity in their native setting in a single experiment. This methodology was used to map endocannabinoid hydrolase activity in the cerebellum, striatum, frontal cortex, and cerebellum. This revealed brain region specific differences in endocannabinoid hydrolase activity. The method was applied to study the effect of genetic deletion of the CB1 receptor in these brain regions. The results indicate that the CB1 does not exert regulatory control over the basal production and degradation of endocannabinoids and that genetic deletion of the CB1 receptor does not induce any compensatory mechanism in endocannabinoid hydrolase activity.

Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Animals

The experiments were conducted in strict compliance with European directives and French laws on animal experimentation (authorization number C33 12024 to F.C. from the French Ministry of Agriculture). The experiments were conducted on brains of male CB1 WT and KO mice that were sacrificed at the age of 8–9 weeks. The mice were bred at the NeuroCentre INSERM U862.

Preparation of Mouse Tissue Proteome

The mouse brain regions, hippocampus, striatum, cerebellum, and frontal cortex, were slowly thawed on ice. The thawed mouse brain regions were dounce homogenized in cold (4 °C) pH 7.2 lysis buffer A (20 mM HEPES at pH 7.2, 2 mM DTT, 1 mM MgCl2, 25 U/mL Benzonase) and incubated for 5 min on ice. The suspension was centrifuged (2500g, 3 min, 4 °C) to remove debris. The supernatant was collected and subjected to ultracentrifugation (100.000g, 45 min, 4 °C, Beckman Coulter, Type Ti70 rotor). This yielded the membrane fraction as a pellet and the cytosolic fraction in the supernatant. The supernatant was collected, and the membrane fraction was suspended in storage buffer (20 mM HEPES at pH 7.2, 2 mM DTT). The total protein concentration was determined with Quick Start Bradford assay (Biorad) or Qubit protein assay (Invitrogen). Membranes and supernatant fractions were both diluted to a total protein concentration of 0.5 mg mL–1 and were used directly or flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in aliquots at −80 °C until use.

Activity-based Protein Profiling

Mouse hippocampus, striatum, cerebellum, or frontal cortex (0.5 mg mL–1) were incubated with activity-based probe MB064 (250 nM) or TAMRA-FP (500 nM) for 20 min. At room temperature, Laemlli buffer was added to quench the protein activity, and the mixture was allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 min before the samples were loaded and resolved on SDS page gel (10% acrylamide). The gels were scanned using a ChemiDoc MP system (Cy3 settings, 605/50 filter) and analyzed using Image lab 4.1. After fluorescent scanning, the gels were stained with a coomassie staining solution. After destaining, the gels were scanned, and protein loading was quantified using image lab 4.1. Gel fluorescence intensities were corrected for protein abundance (loading control).

Proteomics

Proteomics experiments were performed in a similar fashion to those reported previously. (38) A detailed protocol is given in the Supporting Information.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis for mouse brain WT versus CB1 knockout screen was performed. For proteins identified by both probes, the normalized ratios from Maxquant were combined for further analysis. Using GraphPad Prism 7.0 software, the binary logarithm of each ratio was compared to 0 with one-way ANOVA. The resulting p values were subjected to a Benjamini–Hochberg correction, setting the false discovery rate at 10% (q = 0.1). Briefly, the p values of all quantifiable hits were ordered from lowest to highest, and the Benjamini–Hochberg statistic was calculated as q * (position in the list) divided by the number of tests. Subsequently, the proteins for which the p value is smaller than the BH statistic are controlled for an FDR of q* 10%.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.6b01052.

  • Supporting Table 1 (XLSX)

  • Supporting Table 2 (XLSX)

  • Supporting Table 3 (XLSX)

  • Supporting Table 4 (XLSX)

  • Supporting Methods, Supporting Figures 1 and 2, Supporting Tables 1 and 2 (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Mario van der Stelt - Department of Molecular Physiology, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Marc P. Baggelaar - Department of Molecular Physiology, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The NetherlandsOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-9784-6250
    • Annelot C. M. van Esbroeck - Department of Molecular Physiology, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
    • Eva J. van Rooden - Department of Molecular Physiology, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
    • Bogdan I. Florea - Department of Bio-organic Synthesis, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
    • Herman S. Overkleeft - Department of Bio-organic Synthesis, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
    • Giovanni Marsicano - Plateforme de Chimie Analytique, NeuroCentre INSERM U862, Bordeaux, France
    • Francis Chaouloff - Plateforme de Chimie Analytique, NeuroCentre INSERM U862, Bordeaux, France
  • Author Contributions

    Contributed equally

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 48 other publications.

  1. 1
    Mechoulam, R. and Parker, L. A. (2013) The endocannabinoid system and the brain Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 21 47 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143739
  2. 2
    Dalton, G. D. and Howlett, A. C. (2012) Cannabinoid CB1 receptors transactivate multiple receptor tyrosine kinases and regulate serine/threonine kinases to activate ERK in neuronal cells Br. J. Pharmacol. 165, 2497 2511 DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01455.x
  3. 3
    Howlett, A. C., Barth, F., Bonner, T. I., Cabral, G., Casellas, P., Devane, W. A., Felder, C. C., Herkenham, M., Mackie, K., Martin, B. R., Mechoulam, R., and Pertwee, R. G. (2002) International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of cannabinoid receptors Pharmacol. Rev. 54, 161 202 DOI: 10.1124/pr.54.2.161
  4. 4
    Ahn, K., McKinney, M. K., and Cravatt, B. F. (2008) Enzymatic pathways that regulate endocannabinoid signaling in the nervous system Chem. Rev. 108, 1687 1707 DOI: 10.1021/cr0782067
  5. 5
    Di Marzo, V. (2011) Endocannabinoid signaling in the brain: biosynthetic mechanisms in the limelight Nat. Neurosci. 14, 9 15 DOI: 10.1038/nn.2720
  6. 6
    Piomelli, D. (2014) More surprises lying ahead. The endocannabinoids keep us guessing Neuropharmacology 76 (B) 228 234 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.07.026
  7. 7
    Pacher, P., Batkai, S., and Kunos, G. (2006) The endocannabinoid system as an emerging target of pharmacotherapy Pharmacol. Rev. 58, 389 462 DOI: 10.1124/pr.58.3.2
  8. 8
    Di Marzo, V., Bifulco, M., and De Petrocellis, L. (2004) The endocannabinoid system and its therapeutic exploitation Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 3, 771 784 DOI: 10.1038/nrd1495
  9. 9
    Gao, Y., Vasilyev, D. V., Goncalves, M. B., Howell, F. V., Hobbs, C., Reisenberg, M., Shen, R., Zhang, M. Y., Strassle, B. W., Lu, P., Mark, L., Piesla, M. J., Deng, K., Kouranova, E. V., Ring, R. H., Whiteside, G. T., Bates, B., Walsh, F. S., Williams, G., Pangalos, M. N., Samad, T. A., and Doherty, P. (2010) Loss of retrograde endocannabinoid signaling and reduced adult neurogenesis in diacylglycerol lipase knock-out mice J. Neurosci. 30, 2017 2024 DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5693-09.2010
  10. 10
    Tanimura, A., Yamazaki, M., Hashimotodani, Y., Uchigashima, M., Kawata, S., Abe, M., Kita, Y., Hashimoto, K., Shimizu, T., Watanabe, M., Sakimura, K., and Kano, M. (2010) The Endocannabinoid 2-Arachidonoylglycerol Produced by Diacylglycerol Lipase alpha Mediates Retrograde Suppression of Synaptic Transmission Neuron 65, 320 327 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.021
  11. 11
    Murataeva, N., Straiker, A., and Mackie, K. (2014) Parsing the players: 2-arachidonoylglycerol synthesis and degradation in the CNS Br. J. Pharmacol. 171, 1379 1391 DOI: 10.1111/bph.12411
  12. 12
    Di Marzo, V., Fontana, A., Cadas, H., Schinelli, S., Cimino, G., Schwartz, J. C., and Piomelli, D. (1994) Formation and inactivation of endogenous cannabinoid anandamide in central neurons Nature 372, 686 691 DOI: 10.1038/372686a0
  13. 13
    Sun, Y. X., Tsuboi, K., Okamoto, Y., Tonai, T., Murakami, M., Kudo, I., and Ueda, N. (2004) Biosynthesis of anandamide and N-palmitoylethanolamine by sequential actions of phospholipase A2 and lysophospholipase D Biochem. J. 380, 749 756 DOI: 10.1042/bj20040031
  14. 14
    Tsuboi, K., Okamoto, Y., Rahman, I. A., Uyama, T., Inoue, T., Tokumura, A., and Ueda, N. (2015) Glycerophosphodiesterase GDE4 as a novel lysophospholipase D: a possible involvement in bioactive N-acylethanolamine biosynthesis Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1851, 537 548 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2015.01.002
  15. 15
    Liu, J., Wang, L., Harvey-White, J., Huang, B. X., Kim, H. Y., Luquet, S., Palmiter, R. D., Krystal, G., Rai, R., Mahadevan, A., Razdan, R. K., and Kunos, G. (2008) Multiple pathways involved in the biosynthesis of anandamide Neuropharmacology 54, 1 7 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2007.05.020
  16. 16
    Rahman, I. A. S., Tsuboi, K., Uyama, T., and Ueda, N. (2014) New players in the fatty acyl ethanolamide metabolism Pharmacol. Res. 86, 1 10 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2014.04.001
  17. 17
    Cravatt, B. F., Giang, D. K., Mayfield, S. P., Boger, D. L., Lerner, R. A., and Gilula, N. B. (1996) Molecular characterization of an enzyme that degrades neuromodulatory fatty-acid amides Nature 384, 83 87 DOI: 10.1038/384083a0
  18. 18
    Belluomo, I., Matias, I., Pernegre, C., Marsicano, G., and Chaouloff, F. (2015) Opposite control of frontocortical 2-arachidonoylglycerol turnover rate by cannabinoid type-1 receptors located on glutamatergic neurons and on astrocytes J. Neurochem. 133, 26 37 DOI: 10.1111/jnc.13044
  19. 19
    Starke, K., Gothert, M., and Kilbinger, H. (1989) Modulation of neurotransmitter release by presynaptic autoreceptors Physiol. Rev. 69, 864 989
  20. 20
    Langer, S. Z. (1997) 25 years since the discovery of presynaptic receptors: present knowledge and future perspectives Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 18, 95 99 DOI: 10.1016/S0165-6147(96)01034-6
  21. 21
    Di Marzo, V., Breivogel, C. S., Tao, Q., Bridgen, D. T., Razdan, R. K., Zimmer, A. M., Zimmer, A., and Martin, B. R. (2000) Levels, metabolism, and pharmacological activity of anandamide in CB1 cannabinoid receptor knockout mice: Evidence for non-CB1, non-CB2 receptor-mediated actions of anandamide in mouse brain J. Neurochem. 75, 2434 2444 DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0752434.x
  22. 22
    Di Marzo, V., Berrendero, F., Bisogno, T., Gonzalez, S., Cavaliere, P., Romero, J., Cebeira, M., Ramos, J. A., and Fernandez-Ruiz, J. J. (2000) Enhancement of anandamide formation in the limbic forebrain and reduction of endocannabinoid contents in the striatum of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol-tolerant rats J. Neurochem. 74, 1627 1635 DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0741627.x
  23. 23
    Maccarrone, M., Attina, M., Bari, M., Cartoni, A., Ledent, C., and Finazzi-Agro, A. (2001) Anandamide degradation and N-acylethanolamines level in wild-type and CB1 cannabinoid receptor knockout mice of different ages J. Neurochem. 78, 339 348 DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00413.x
  24. 24
    Maccarrone, M., Valverde, O., Barbaccia, M. L., Castane, A., Maldonado, R., Ledent, C., Parmentier, M., and Finazzi-Agro, A. (2002) Age-related changes of anandamide metabolism in CB1 cannabinoid receptor knockout mice: correlation with behaviour Eur. J. Neurosci. 15, 1178 1186 DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.01957.x
  25. 25
    Bequet, F., Uzabiaga, F., Desbazeille, M., Ludwiczak, P., Maftouh, M., Picard, C., Scatton, B., and Le Fur, G. (2007) CB1 receptor-mediated control of the release of endocannabinoids (as assessed by microdialysis coupled with LC/MS) in the rat hypothalamus Eur. J. Neurosci. 26, 3458 3464 DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05900.x
  26. 26
    Leishman, E., Cornett, B., Spork, K., Straiker, A., Mackie, K., and Bradshaw, H. B. (2016) Broad impact of deleting endogenous cannabinoid hydrolyzing enzymes and the CB1 cannabinoid receptor on the endogenous cannabinoid-related lipidome in eight regions of the mouse brain Pharmacol. Res. 110, 159 172 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.04.020
  27. 27
    Schlosburg, J. E., Blankman, J. L., Long, J. Z., Nomura, D. K., Pan, B., Kinsey, S. G., Nguyen, P. T., Ramesh, D., Booker, L., Burston, J. J., Thomas, E. A., Selley, D. E., Sim-Selley, L. J., Liu, Q. S., Lichtman, A. H., and Cravatt, B. F. (2010) Chronic monoacylglycerol lipase blockade causes functional antagonism of the endocannabinoid system Nat. Neurosci. 13, 1113 1119 DOI: 10.1038/nn.2616
  28. 28
    Kang, H. J., Kawasawa, Y. I., Cheng, F., Zhu, Y., Xu, X. M., Li, M. F., Sousa, A. M. M., Pletikos, M., Meyer, K. A., Sedmak, G., Guennel, T., Shin, Y., Johnson, M. B., Krsnik, Z., Mayer, S., Fertuzinhos, S., Umlauf, S., Lisgo, S. N., Vortmeyer, A., Weinberger, D. R., Mane, S., Hyde, T. M., Huttner, A., Reimers, M., Kleinman, J. E., and Sestan, N. (2011) Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain Nature 478, 483 489 DOI: 10.1038/nature10523
  29. 29
    Sharma, K., Schmitt, S., Bergner, C. G., Tyanova, S., Kannaiyan, N., Manrique-Hoyos, N., Kongi, K., Cantuti, L., Hanisch, U. K., Philips, M. A., Rossner, M. J., Mann, M., and Simons, M. (2015) Cell type- and brain region-resolved mouse brain proteome Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1819 1831 DOI: 10.1038/nn.4160
  30. 30
    Lein, E. S., Hawrylycz, M. J., Ao, N., Ayres, M., Bensinger, A., Bernard, A., Boe, A. F., Boguski, M. S., Brockway, K. S., Byrnes, E. J., Chen, L., Chen, L., Chen, T. M., Chi Chin, M., Chong, J., Crook, B. E., Czaplinska, A., Dang, C. N., Datta, S., Dee, N. R., Desaki, A. L., Desta, T., Diep, E., Dolbeare, T. A., Donelan, M. J., Dong, H. W., Dougherty, J. G., Duncan, B. J., Ebbert, A. J., Eichele, G., Estin, L. K., Faber, C., Facer, B. A., Fields, R., Fischer, S. R., Fliss, T. P., Frensley, C., Gates, S. N., Glattfelder, K. J., Halverson, K. R., Hart, M. R., Hohmann, J. G., Howell, M. P., Jeung, D. P., Johnson, R. A., Karr, P. T., Kawal, R., Kidney, J. M., Knapik, R. H., Kuan, C. L., Lake, J. H., Laramee, A. R., Larsen, K. D., Lau, C., Lemon, T. A., Liang, A. J., Liu, Y., Luong, L. T., Michaels, J., Morgan, J. J., Morgan, R. J., Mortrud, M. T., Mosqueda, N. F., Ng, L. L., Ng, R., Orta, G. J., Overly, C. C., Pak, T. H., Parry, S. E., Pathak, S. D., Pearson, O. C., Puchalski, R. B., Riley, Z. L., Rockett, H. R., Rowland, S. A., Royall, J. J., Ruiz, M. J., Sarno, N. R., Schaffnit, K., Shapovalova, N. V., Sivisay, T., Slaughterbeck, C. R., Smith, S. C., Smith, K. A., Smith, B. I., Sodt, A. J., Stewart, N. N., Stumpf, K. R., Sunkin, S. M., Sutram, M., Tam, A., Teemer, C. D., Thaller, C., Thompson, C. L., Varnam, L. R., Visel, A., Whitlock, R. M., Wohnoutka, P. E., Wolkey, C. K., Wong, V. Y., Wood, M., Yaylaoglu, M. B., Young, R. C., Youngstrom, B. L., Feng Yuan, X., Zhang, B., Zwingman, T. A., and Jones, A. R. (2007) Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain Nature 445, 168 176 DOI: 10.1038/nature05453
  31. 31
    Vogel, C. and Marcotte, E. M. (2012) Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 227 232 DOI: 10.1038/nrg3185
  32. 32
    Kobe, B. and Kemp, B. E. (1999) Active site-directed protein regulation Nature 402, 373 376 DOI: 10.1038/46478
  33. 33
    Dotsey, E. Y., Jung, K. M., Basit, A., Wei, D., Daglian, J., Vacondio, F., Armirotti, A., Mor, M., and Piomelli, D. (2015) Peroxide-Dependent MGL Sulfenylation Regulates 2-AG-Mediated Endocannabinoid Signaling in Brain Neurons Chem. Biol. 22, 619 628 DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.04.013
  34. 34
    Shonesy, B. C., Wang, X., Rose, K. L., Ramikie, T. S., Cavener, V. S., Rentz, T., Baucum, A. J., 2nd, Jalan-Sakrikar, N., Mackie, K., Winder, D. G., Patel, S., and Colbran, R. J. (2013) CaMKII regulates diacylglycerol lipase-alpha and striatal endocannabinoid signaling Nat. Neurosci. 16, 456 463 DOI: 10.1038/nn.3353
  35. 35
    Bisogno, T., Howell, F., Williams, G., Minassi, A., Cascio, M. G., Ligresti, A., Matias, I., Schiano-Moriello, A., Paul, P., Williams, E. J., Gangadharan, U., Hobbs, C., Di Marzo, V., and Doherty, P. (2003) Cloning of the first sn1-DAG lipases points to the spatial and temporal regulation of endocannabinoid signaling in the brain J. Cell Biol. 163, 463 468 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200305129
  36. 36
    Cravatt, B. F., Wright, A. T., and Kozarich, J. W. (2008) Activity-based protein profiling: from enzyme chemistry to proteomic chemistry Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77, 383 414 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.101304.124125
  37. 37
    Niphakis, M. J. and Cravatt, B. F. (2014) Enzyme inhibitor discovery by activity-based protein profiling Annu. Rev. Biochem. 83, 341 377 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035708
  38. 38
    Baggelaar, M. P., Chameau, P. J., Kantae, V., Hummel, J., Hsu, K. L., Janssen, F., van der Wel, T., Soethoudt, M., Deng, H., den Dulk, H., Allara, M., Florea, B. I., Di Marzo, V., Wadman, W. J., Kruse, C. G., Overkleeft, H. S., Hankemeier, T., Werkman, T. R., Cravatt, B. F., and van der Stelt, M. (2015) Highly Selective, Reversible Inhibitor Identified by Comparative Chemoproteomics Modulates Diacylglycerol Lipase Activity in Neurons J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 8851 8857 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b04883
  39. 39
    Liu, Y., Patricelli, M. P., and Cravatt, B. F. (1999) Activity-based protein profiling: the serine hydrolases Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 14694 14699 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.26.14694
  40. 40
    Baggelaar, M. P., Janssen, F. J., van Esbroeck, A. C., den Dulk, H., Allara, M., Hoogendoorn, S., McGuire, R., Florea, B. I., Meeuwenoord, N., van den Elst, H., van der Marel, G. A., Brouwer, J., Di Marzo, V., Overkleeft, H. S., and van der Stelt, M. (2013) Development of an activity-based probe and in silico design reveal highly selective inhibitors for diacylglycerol lipase-alpha in brain Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 52, 12081 12085 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201306295
  41. 41
    Cox, J. and Mann, M. (2008) MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367 1372 DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1511
  42. 42
    Kamat, S. S., Camara, K., Parsons, W. H., Chen, D. H., Dix, M. M., Bird, T. D., Howell, A. R., and Cravatt, B. F. (2015) Immunomodulatory lysophosphatidylserines are regulated by ABHD16A and ABHD12 interplay Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 164 171 DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.1721
  43. 43
    Long, J. Z. and Cravatt, B. F. (2011) The metabolic serine hydrolases and their functions in mammalian physiology and disease Chem. Rev. 111, 6022 6063 DOI: 10.1021/cr200075y
  44. 44
    Herkenham, M., Lynn, A. B., Little, M. D., Johnson, M. R., Melvin, L. S., de Costa, B. R., and Rice, K. C. (1990) Cannabinoid receptor localization in brain Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 1932 1936 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.5.1932
  45. 45
    Marsicano, G., Goodenough, S., Monory, K., Hermann, H., Eder, M., Cannich, A., Azad, S. C., Cascio, M. G., Gutierrez, S. O., van der Stelt, M., Lopez-Rodriguez, M. L., Casanova, E., Schutz, G., Zieglgansberger, W., Di Marzo, V., Behl, C., and Lutz, B. (2003) CB1 cannabinoid receptors and on-demand defense against excitotoxicity Science 302, 84 88 DOI: 10.1126/science.1088208
  46. 46
    van der Stelt, M., Trevisani, M., Vellani, V., De Petrocellis, L., Schiano Moriello, A., Campi, B., McNaughton, P., Geppetti, P., and Di Marzo, V. (2005) Anandamide acts as an intracellular messenger amplifying Ca2+ influx via TRPV1 channels EMBO J. 24, 3026 3037 DOI: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600784
  47. 47
    Maccarrone, M., Rossi, S., Bari, M., De Chiara, V., Fezza, F., Musella, A., Gasperi, V., Prosperetti, C., Bernardi, G., Finazzi-Agro, A., Cravatt, B. F., and Centonze, D. (2008) Anandamide inhibits metabolism and physiological actions of 2-arachidonoylglycerol in the striatum Nat. Neurosci. 11, 152 159 DOI: 10.1038/nn2042
  48. 48
    Buczynski, M. W. and Parsons, L. H. (2010) Quantification of brain endocannabinoid levels: methods, interpretations and pitfalls Br. J. Pharmacol. 160, 423 442 DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00787.x

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 34 publications.

  1. Karine Mardon, Jayendra Z. Patel, Juha R. Savinainen, Damion H. R. Stimson, Caitlin R. M. Oyagawa, Natasha L. Grimsey, Mary-anne Migotto, Grace F. M. Njiru, Brett R. Hamilton, Gary Cowin, Jari Yli-Kauhaluoma, Wim Vanduffel, Idriss Blakey, Rajiv Bhalla, Christopher Cawthorne, Sofie Celen, Guy Bormans, Kristofer J Thurecht, Muneer Ahamed. Utilizing PET and MALDI Imaging for Discovery of a Targeted Probe for Brain Endocannabinoid α/β-Hydrolase Domain 6 (ABHD6). Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 66 (1) , 538-552. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01485
  2. Jeroen M. Punt, Daan van der Vliet, Mario van der Stelt. Chemical Probes to Control and Visualize Lipid Metabolism in the Brain. Accounts of Chemical Research 2022, 55 (22) , 3205-3217. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00521
  3. Giulia Bononi, Tiziano Tuccinardi, Flavio Rizzolio, Carlotta Granchi. α/β-Hydrolase Domain (ABHD) Inhibitors as New Potential Therapeutic Options against Lipid-Related Diseases. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 64 (14) , 9759-9785. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00624
  4. Roeland Vanhoutte, Merel A. T. van de Plassche, Steven H. L. Verhelst. Rapid Solid-Phase Construction of Serine Hydrolase Probes Results in Selective Activity-Based Probes for Acyl Protein Thioesterases-1/2. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 63 (20) , 11845-11853. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01043
  5. Łukasz Joachimiak, Katarzyna M. Błażewska. Phosphorus-Based Probes as Molecular Tools for Proteome Studies: Recent Advances in Probe Development and Applications. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 61 (19) , 8536-8562. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00249
  6. Camilla Di Meo, Daniel Tortolani, Sara Standoli, Francesca Ciaramellano, Beatrice Clotilde Angelucci, Annamaria Tisi, Salam Kadhim, Eric Hsu, Cinzia Rapino, Mauro Maccarrone. Cannabinol modulates the endocannabinoid system and shows TRPV1 ‐mediated anti‐inflammatory properties in human keratinocytes. BioFactors 2025, 51 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.2122
  7. Simar Singh, Kaylin J. Ellioff, Michael R. Bruchas, Benjamin B. Land, Nephi Stella. Analgesic Properties of Next-Generation Modulators of Endocannabinoid Signaling: Leveraging Modern Tools for the Development of Novel Therapeutics. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 2024, 391 (2) , 162-173. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.124.002119
  8. Haixia Long, Zihao Chen, Xinli Xu, Qianwei Zhou, Zhaolin Fang, Mingqi Lv, Xu-Hua Yang, Jie Xiao, Hui Sun, Ming Fan. Elucidating genetic and molecular basis of altered higher-order brain structure-function coupling in major depressive disorder. NeuroImage 2024, 297 , 120722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120722
  9. Pierangela Ciuffreda, Ornella Xynomilakis, Silvana Casati, Roberta Ottria. Fluorescence-Based Enzyme Activity Assay: Ascertaining the Activity and Inhibition of Endocannabinoid Hydrolytic Enzymes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024, 25 (14) , 7693. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147693
  10. William P. Chappell, Natalie Schur, James A. Vogel, Glenn M. Sammis, Patrick R. Melvin, Nicholas D. Ball. Poison to promise: The resurgence of organophosphorus fluoride chemistry. Chem 2024, 10 (6) , 1644-1654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2024.04.008
  11. M. Á. Luján, Y. Kim, L. Y. Zhang, J. F. Cheer. Cannabinoid-based Pharmacology for the Management of Substance Use Disorders. 2024https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2024_551
  12. Michael S. Malamas, Manjunath Lamani, Shrouq I. Farah, Khadijah A. Mohammad, Christina Yume Miyabe, Girija Rajarshi, Simiao Wu, Nikolai Zvonok, Honrao Chandrashekhar, JodiAnne Wood, Alexandros Makriyannis. Design and Synthesis of Highly Potent and Specific ABHD6 Inhibitors. ChemMedChem 2023, 18 (21) https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.202100406
  13. Mauro Maccarrone, Vincenzo Di Marzo, Jürg Gertsch, Uwe Grether, Allyn C. Howlett, Tian Hua, Alexandros Makriyannis, Daniele Piomelli, Natsuo Ueda, Mario van der Stelt. Goods and Bads of the Endocannabinoid System as a Therapeutic Target: Lessons Learned after 30 Years. Pharmacological Reviews 2023, 75 (5) , 885-958. https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.122.000600
  14. Zhiwei Xue, Lei Ye, Jianwei Ge, Zhen Lan, Xinxin Zou, Chenglu Mao, Xinyu Bao, Linjie Yu, Yun Xu, Xiaolei Zhu. Wwl70-induced ABHD6 inhibition attenuates memory deficits and pathological phenotypes in APPswe/PS1dE9 mice. Pharmacological Research 2023, 194 , 106864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106864
  15. Ana Bernal‐Chico, Vanja Tepavcevic, Andrea Manterola, Carmen Utrilla, Carlos Matute, Susana Mato. Endocannabinoid signaling in brain diseases: Emerging relevance of glial cells. Glia 2023, 71 (1) , 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.24172
  16. Exequiel O. J. Porta, Jaime A. Isern, Karunakaran Kalesh, Patrick G. Steel. Discovery of Leishmania Druggable Serine Proteases by Activity-Based Protein Profiling. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022, 13 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.929493
  17. Jie Mei, Ruilin Guo, Fan Zhang, Haiyan Zhang, Xinping Yang, Boyang Yu, Jihua Liu, Xiufeng Liu. Identification of bioactive natural products using yeast:Application to monoacylglycerol lipase inhibitor extraction from Corydalis Rhizoma. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 2022, 149 , 112798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112798
  18. Liting Deng, Katie Viray, Simar Singh, Ben Cravatt, Nephi Stella. ABHD6 Controls Amphetamine-Stimulated Hyperlocomotion: Involvement of CB 1 Receptors. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research 2022, 7 (2) , 188-198. https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2021.0066
  19. Haofuzi Zhang, Xin Li, Dan Liao, Peng Luo, Xiaofan Jiang. Alpha/Beta-Hydrolase Domain-Containing 6: Signaling and Function in the Central Nervous System. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2021, 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.784202
  20. Hong Zhang, Austin A. Lipinski, Erika Liktor-Busa, Angela F. Smith, Aubin Moutal, Rajesh Khanna, Paul R. Langlais, Tally M. Largent-Milnes, Todd W. Vanderah. The Effects of Repeated Morphine Treatment on the Endogenous Cannabinoid System in the Ventral Tegmental Area. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2021, 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.632757
  21. Shirley Alteba, Anna Portugalov, Cecilia J. Hillard, Irit Akirav. Inhibition of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase (FAAH) During Adolescence and Exposure to Early Life Stress may Exacerbate Depression-like Behaviors in Male and Female Rats. Neuroscience 2021, 455 , 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.12.022
  22. Shirley Alteba, Tomer Mizrachi Zer-Aviv, Adi Tenenhaus, Gilad Ben David, Jacob Adelman, Cecilia J. Hillard, Ravid Doron, Irit Akirav. Antidepressant-like effects of URB597 and JZL184 in male and female rats exposed to early life stress. European Neuropsychopharmacology 2020, 39 , 70-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.08.005
  23. Hui Deng, Weimin Li. Therapeutic potential of targeting α/β-Hydrolase domain-containing 6 (ABHD6). European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 198 , 112353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112353
  24. Silvano Presciuttini, Giancarlo Carli, Enrica L. Santarcangelo. HYPNOTIZABILITY-RELATED FAAH C385A POLYMORPHISM: POSSIBLE ENDOCANNABINOID CONTRIBUTION TO SUGGESTION-INDUCED ANALGESIA. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 2020, 68 (1) , 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2020.1682254
  25. Annelot C. M. van Esbroeck, Vasudev Kantae, Xinyu Di, Tom van der Wel, Hans den Dulk, Anna F. Stevens, Simar Singh, Alexander T. Bakker, Bogdan I. Florea, Nephi Stella, Herman S. Overkleeft, Thomas Hankemeier, Mario van der Stelt. Identification of α,β-Hydrolase Domain Containing Protein 6 as a Diacylglycerol Lipase in Neuro-2a Cells. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 2019, 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2019.00286
  26. Andrea Ruiz-Calvo, Raquel Bajo-Grañeras, Irene B. Maroto, Debora Zian, Gernot F. Grabner, Elena García-Taboada, Eva Resel, Rudolf Zechner, Robert Zimmermann, Silvia Ortega-Gutiérrez, Ismael Galve-Roperh, Luigi Bellocchio, Manuel Guzmán. Astroglial monoacylglycerol lipase controls mutant huntingtin-induced damage of striatal neurons. Neuropharmacology 2019, 150 , 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2019.03.027
  27. Jessica K. Cao, Joshua Kaplan, Nephi Stella. ABHD6: Its Place in Endocannabinoid Signaling and Beyond. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 2019, 40 (4) , 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2019.02.002
  28. Zeeshan Hamid, Maria Summa, Andrea Armirotti. A Swath Label-Free Proteomics insight into the Faah−/− Mouse Liver. Scientific Reports 2018, 8 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30553-z
  29. Anthony L. Berger, Angela M. Henricks, Janelle M. Lugo, Hayden R. Wright, Collin R. Warrick, Martin A. Sticht, Maria Morena, Itziar Bonilla, Sarah A. Laredo, Rebecca M. Craft, Loren H. Parsons, Pedro R. Grandes, Cecilia J. Hillard, Matthew N. Hill, Ryan J. McLaughlin. The Lateral Habenula Directs Coping Styles Under Conditions of Stress via Recruitment of the Endocannabinoid System. Biological Psychiatry 2018, 84 (8) , 611-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.04.018
  30. Gabriela Seabra, Ana Caroline B. Falvella, Paul C. Guest, Daniel Martins‐de‐Souza, Valéria de Almeida. Proteomics and Lipidomics in the Elucidation of Endocannabinoid Signaling in Healthy and Schizophrenia Brains. PROTEOMICS 2018, 18 (18) https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201700270
  31. Eva J. van Rooden, Annelot C. M. van Esbroeck, Marc P. Baggelaar, Hui Deng, Bogdan I. Florea, André R. A. Marques, Roelof Ottenhoff, Rolf G. Boot, Herman S. Overkleeft, Johannes M. F. G. Aerts, Mario van der Stelt. Chemical Proteomic Analysis of Serine Hydrolase Activity in Niemann-Pick Type C Mouse Brain. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2018, 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00440
  32. Eva J van Rooden, Bogdan I Florea, Hui Deng, Marc P Baggelaar, Annelot C M van Esbroeck, Juan Zhou, Herman S Overkleeft, Mario van der Stelt. Mapping in vivo target interaction profiles of covalent inhibitors using chemical proteomics with label-free quantification. Nature Protocols 2018, 13 (4) , 752-767. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2017.159
  33. Sebastiaan T. A. Koenders, Berend Gagestein, Mario van der Stelt. Opportunities for Lipid-Based Probes in the Field of Immunology. 2018, 283-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/82_2018_127
  34. Gaetano Terrone, Alberto Pauletti, Alessia Salamone, Massimo Rizzi, Bianca R. Villa, Luca Porcu, Mark J. Sheehan, Edward Guilmette, Christopher R. Butler, Justin R. Piro, Tarek A. Samad, Annamaria Vezzani. Inhibition of monoacylglycerol lipase terminates diazepam‐resistant status epilepticus in mice and its effects are potentiated by a ketogenic diet. Epilepsia 2018, 59 (1) , 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13950

ACS Chemical Biology

Cite this: ACS Chem. Biol. 2017, 12, 3, 852–861
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.6b01052
Published January 20, 2017

Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

5436

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Biosynthetic and catabolic pathways of 2-AG and AEA.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Gel-based mapping of brain region dependent hydrolase activity. (A) Activity-based protein profiling with MB064 in four mouse brain regions. (B) Quantification of endocannabinoid hydrolase activity as determined with MB064 (mean ± SD; n = 3). (C) Activity-based protein profiling with FP-TAMRA in four mouse brain regions. (D) Quantification of FAAH activity as measured with ABP FP-TAMRA (mean ± SD; n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed by means of two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparisons test (*P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001; C = cerebellum, F = frontal cortex, H = hippocampus, S = striatum). Integrated band intensity is corrected for protein loading (coomassie).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Brain region dependent chemoproteomic mapping of relative hydrolase activity. (A) Schematic representation of the chemoproteomic workflow. (B) Heat map of relative enzyme activity as measured by a fluorophosphonate (FP)-based activity-based probe conjugated to a biotin reporter tag (FP-biotin) and a β-lactone-based activity-based probe conjugated to a biotin reporter tag (MB108). Data are calculated from the mean ratios of the comparison between cerebellum and striatum, frontal cortex and striatum, and cerebellum and hippocampus. Each comparison was performed in three biological replicates. The relative enzyme activity in the brain region in which the serine hydrolase displayed highest activity was set to 100%. (C) Correlation graph for enzymes detected by both MB108 and FP-biotin. (D) Endocannabinoid regulating enzymes show significant difference between the studied brain regions (mean ± SEM; n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed by means of two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparisons test (* P ≤ 0.05; ** P ≤ 0.01; *** P ≤ 0.001; **** P ≤ 0.0001) (C = cerebellum, F = frontal cortex, H = hippocampus, S = striatum).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Gel based CB1+/+ vs CB1–/– comparison. Study of enzyme activity in CB1+/+ and CB1–/– mouse brain regions as measured by two activity based probes (MB064 and TAMRA-FP, n = 3). No difference in enzyme activity between CB1–/– and CB1+/+ was observed.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Comparison of enzyme activity in CB1+/+ and CB1–/– mouse brain regions. Log2 ratio of enzyme activity in CB1–/– brain regions compared to CB1+/+ (mean ± SD). Activity is measured by activity-based proteomics using FP-biotin (10 μM) and MB108 (10 μM). Combined data from both activity based probes (n = 4 for each brain region). Statistical analysis by means of one-way ANOVA, each CB1 WT/KO ratio was compared to a Log2 ratio of 0; subsequently the p values were subjected to Benjamini Hochberg correction. Setting the false discovery rate at 10%.

  • References


    This article references 48 other publications.

    1. 1
      Mechoulam, R. and Parker, L. A. (2013) The endocannabinoid system and the brain Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 21 47 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143739
    2. 2
      Dalton, G. D. and Howlett, A. C. (2012) Cannabinoid CB1 receptors transactivate multiple receptor tyrosine kinases and regulate serine/threonine kinases to activate ERK in neuronal cells Br. J. Pharmacol. 165, 2497 2511 DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01455.x
    3. 3
      Howlett, A. C., Barth, F., Bonner, T. I., Cabral, G., Casellas, P., Devane, W. A., Felder, C. C., Herkenham, M., Mackie, K., Martin, B. R., Mechoulam, R., and Pertwee, R. G. (2002) International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of cannabinoid receptors Pharmacol. Rev. 54, 161 202 DOI: 10.1124/pr.54.2.161
    4. 4
      Ahn, K., McKinney, M. K., and Cravatt, B. F. (2008) Enzymatic pathways that regulate endocannabinoid signaling in the nervous system Chem. Rev. 108, 1687 1707 DOI: 10.1021/cr0782067
    5. 5
      Di Marzo, V. (2011) Endocannabinoid signaling in the brain: biosynthetic mechanisms in the limelight Nat. Neurosci. 14, 9 15 DOI: 10.1038/nn.2720
    6. 6
      Piomelli, D. (2014) More surprises lying ahead. The endocannabinoids keep us guessing Neuropharmacology 76 (B) 228 234 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.07.026
    7. 7
      Pacher, P., Batkai, S., and Kunos, G. (2006) The endocannabinoid system as an emerging target of pharmacotherapy Pharmacol. Rev. 58, 389 462 DOI: 10.1124/pr.58.3.2
    8. 8
      Di Marzo, V., Bifulco, M., and De Petrocellis, L. (2004) The endocannabinoid system and its therapeutic exploitation Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 3, 771 784 DOI: 10.1038/nrd1495
    9. 9
      Gao, Y., Vasilyev, D. V., Goncalves, M. B., Howell, F. V., Hobbs, C., Reisenberg, M., Shen, R., Zhang, M. Y., Strassle, B. W., Lu, P., Mark, L., Piesla, M. J., Deng, K., Kouranova, E. V., Ring, R. H., Whiteside, G. T., Bates, B., Walsh, F. S., Williams, G., Pangalos, M. N., Samad, T. A., and Doherty, P. (2010) Loss of retrograde endocannabinoid signaling and reduced adult neurogenesis in diacylglycerol lipase knock-out mice J. Neurosci. 30, 2017 2024 DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5693-09.2010
    10. 10
      Tanimura, A., Yamazaki, M., Hashimotodani, Y., Uchigashima, M., Kawata, S., Abe, M., Kita, Y., Hashimoto, K., Shimizu, T., Watanabe, M., Sakimura, K., and Kano, M. (2010) The Endocannabinoid 2-Arachidonoylglycerol Produced by Diacylglycerol Lipase alpha Mediates Retrograde Suppression of Synaptic Transmission Neuron 65, 320 327 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.021
    11. 11
      Murataeva, N., Straiker, A., and Mackie, K. (2014) Parsing the players: 2-arachidonoylglycerol synthesis and degradation in the CNS Br. J. Pharmacol. 171, 1379 1391 DOI: 10.1111/bph.12411
    12. 12
      Di Marzo, V., Fontana, A., Cadas, H., Schinelli, S., Cimino, G., Schwartz, J. C., and Piomelli, D. (1994) Formation and inactivation of endogenous cannabinoid anandamide in central neurons Nature 372, 686 691 DOI: 10.1038/372686a0
    13. 13
      Sun, Y. X., Tsuboi, K., Okamoto, Y., Tonai, T., Murakami, M., Kudo, I., and Ueda, N. (2004) Biosynthesis of anandamide and N-palmitoylethanolamine by sequential actions of phospholipase A2 and lysophospholipase D Biochem. J. 380, 749 756 DOI: 10.1042/bj20040031
    14. 14
      Tsuboi, K., Okamoto, Y., Rahman, I. A., Uyama, T., Inoue, T., Tokumura, A., and Ueda, N. (2015) Glycerophosphodiesterase GDE4 as a novel lysophospholipase D: a possible involvement in bioactive N-acylethanolamine biosynthesis Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1851, 537 548 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2015.01.002
    15. 15
      Liu, J., Wang, L., Harvey-White, J., Huang, B. X., Kim, H. Y., Luquet, S., Palmiter, R. D., Krystal, G., Rai, R., Mahadevan, A., Razdan, R. K., and Kunos, G. (2008) Multiple pathways involved in the biosynthesis of anandamide Neuropharmacology 54, 1 7 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2007.05.020
    16. 16
      Rahman, I. A. S., Tsuboi, K., Uyama, T., and Ueda, N. (2014) New players in the fatty acyl ethanolamide metabolism Pharmacol. Res. 86, 1 10 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2014.04.001
    17. 17
      Cravatt, B. F., Giang, D. K., Mayfield, S. P., Boger, D. L., Lerner, R. A., and Gilula, N. B. (1996) Molecular characterization of an enzyme that degrades neuromodulatory fatty-acid amides Nature 384, 83 87 DOI: 10.1038/384083a0
    18. 18
      Belluomo, I., Matias, I., Pernegre, C., Marsicano, G., and Chaouloff, F. (2015) Opposite control of frontocortical 2-arachidonoylglycerol turnover rate by cannabinoid type-1 receptors located on glutamatergic neurons and on astrocytes J. Neurochem. 133, 26 37 DOI: 10.1111/jnc.13044
    19. 19
      Starke, K., Gothert, M., and Kilbinger, H. (1989) Modulation of neurotransmitter release by presynaptic autoreceptors Physiol. Rev. 69, 864 989
    20. 20
      Langer, S. Z. (1997) 25 years since the discovery of presynaptic receptors: present knowledge and future perspectives Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 18, 95 99 DOI: 10.1016/S0165-6147(96)01034-6
    21. 21
      Di Marzo, V., Breivogel, C. S., Tao, Q., Bridgen, D. T., Razdan, R. K., Zimmer, A. M., Zimmer, A., and Martin, B. R. (2000) Levels, metabolism, and pharmacological activity of anandamide in CB1 cannabinoid receptor knockout mice: Evidence for non-CB1, non-CB2 receptor-mediated actions of anandamide in mouse brain J. Neurochem. 75, 2434 2444 DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0752434.x
    22. 22
      Di Marzo, V., Berrendero, F., Bisogno, T., Gonzalez, S., Cavaliere, P., Romero, J., Cebeira, M., Ramos, J. A., and Fernandez-Ruiz, J. J. (2000) Enhancement of anandamide formation in the limbic forebrain and reduction of endocannabinoid contents in the striatum of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol-tolerant rats J. Neurochem. 74, 1627 1635 DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0741627.x
    23. 23
      Maccarrone, M., Attina, M., Bari, M., Cartoni, A., Ledent, C., and Finazzi-Agro, A. (2001) Anandamide degradation and N-acylethanolamines level in wild-type and CB1 cannabinoid receptor knockout mice of different ages J. Neurochem. 78, 339 348 DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00413.x
    24. 24
      Maccarrone, M., Valverde, O., Barbaccia, M. L., Castane, A., Maldonado, R., Ledent, C., Parmentier, M., and Finazzi-Agro, A. (2002) Age-related changes of anandamide metabolism in CB1 cannabinoid receptor knockout mice: correlation with behaviour Eur. J. Neurosci. 15, 1178 1186 DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.01957.x
    25. 25
      Bequet, F., Uzabiaga, F., Desbazeille, M., Ludwiczak, P., Maftouh, M., Picard, C., Scatton, B., and Le Fur, G. (2007) CB1 receptor-mediated control of the release of endocannabinoids (as assessed by microdialysis coupled with LC/MS) in the rat hypothalamus Eur. J. Neurosci. 26, 3458 3464 DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05900.x
    26. 26
      Leishman, E., Cornett, B., Spork, K., Straiker, A., Mackie, K., and Bradshaw, H. B. (2016) Broad impact of deleting endogenous cannabinoid hydrolyzing enzymes and the CB1 cannabinoid receptor on the endogenous cannabinoid-related lipidome in eight regions of the mouse brain Pharmacol. Res. 110, 159 172 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.04.020
    27. 27
      Schlosburg, J. E., Blankman, J. L., Long, J. Z., Nomura, D. K., Pan, B., Kinsey, S. G., Nguyen, P. T., Ramesh, D., Booker, L., Burston, J. J., Thomas, E. A., Selley, D. E., Sim-Selley, L. J., Liu, Q. S., Lichtman, A. H., and Cravatt, B. F. (2010) Chronic monoacylglycerol lipase blockade causes functional antagonism of the endocannabinoid system Nat. Neurosci. 13, 1113 1119 DOI: 10.1038/nn.2616
    28. 28
      Kang, H. J., Kawasawa, Y. I., Cheng, F., Zhu, Y., Xu, X. M., Li, M. F., Sousa, A. M. M., Pletikos, M., Meyer, K. A., Sedmak, G., Guennel, T., Shin, Y., Johnson, M. B., Krsnik, Z., Mayer, S., Fertuzinhos, S., Umlauf, S., Lisgo, S. N., Vortmeyer, A., Weinberger, D. R., Mane, S., Hyde, T. M., Huttner, A., Reimers, M., Kleinman, J. E., and Sestan, N. (2011) Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain Nature 478, 483 489 DOI: 10.1038/nature10523
    29. 29
      Sharma, K., Schmitt, S., Bergner, C. G., Tyanova, S., Kannaiyan, N., Manrique-Hoyos, N., Kongi, K., Cantuti, L., Hanisch, U. K., Philips, M. A., Rossner, M. J., Mann, M., and Simons, M. (2015) Cell type- and brain region-resolved mouse brain proteome Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1819 1831 DOI: 10.1038/nn.4160
    30. 30
      Lein, E. S., Hawrylycz, M. J., Ao, N., Ayres, M., Bensinger, A., Bernard, A., Boe, A. F., Boguski, M. S., Brockway, K. S., Byrnes, E. J., Chen, L., Chen, L., Chen, T. M., Chi Chin, M., Chong, J., Crook, B. E., Czaplinska, A., Dang, C. N., Datta, S., Dee, N. R., Desaki, A. L., Desta, T., Diep, E., Dolbeare, T. A., Donelan, M. J., Dong, H. W., Dougherty, J. G., Duncan, B. J., Ebbert, A. J., Eichele, G., Estin, L. K., Faber, C., Facer, B. A., Fields, R., Fischer, S. R., Fliss, T. P., Frensley, C., Gates, S. N., Glattfelder, K. J., Halverson, K. R., Hart, M. R., Hohmann, J. G., Howell, M. P., Jeung, D. P., Johnson, R. A., Karr, P. T., Kawal, R., Kidney, J. M., Knapik, R. H., Kuan, C. L., Lake, J. H., Laramee, A. R., Larsen, K. D., Lau, C., Lemon, T. A., Liang, A. J., Liu, Y., Luong, L. T., Michaels, J., Morgan, J. J., Morgan, R. J., Mortrud, M. T., Mosqueda, N. F., Ng, L. L., Ng, R., Orta, G. J., Overly, C. C., Pak, T. H., Parry, S. E., Pathak, S. D., Pearson, O. C., Puchalski, R. B., Riley, Z. L., Rockett, H. R., Rowland, S. A., Royall, J. J., Ruiz, M. J., Sarno, N. R., Schaffnit, K., Shapovalova, N. V., Sivisay, T., Slaughterbeck, C. R., Smith, S. C., Smith, K. A., Smith, B. I., Sodt, A. J., Stewart, N. N., Stumpf, K. R., Sunkin, S. M., Sutram, M., Tam, A., Teemer, C. D., Thaller, C., Thompson, C. L., Varnam, L. R., Visel, A., Whitlock, R. M., Wohnoutka, P. E., Wolkey, C. K., Wong, V. Y., Wood, M., Yaylaoglu, M. B., Young, R. C., Youngstrom, B. L., Feng Yuan, X., Zhang, B., Zwingman, T. A., and Jones, A. R. (2007) Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain Nature 445, 168 176 DOI: 10.1038/nature05453
    31. 31
      Vogel, C. and Marcotte, E. M. (2012) Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 227 232 DOI: 10.1038/nrg3185
    32. 32
      Kobe, B. and Kemp, B. E. (1999) Active site-directed protein regulation Nature 402, 373 376 DOI: 10.1038/46478
    33. 33
      Dotsey, E. Y., Jung, K. M., Basit, A., Wei, D., Daglian, J., Vacondio, F., Armirotti, A., Mor, M., and Piomelli, D. (2015) Peroxide-Dependent MGL Sulfenylation Regulates 2-AG-Mediated Endocannabinoid Signaling in Brain Neurons Chem. Biol. 22, 619 628 DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.04.013
    34. 34
      Shonesy, B. C., Wang, X., Rose, K. L., Ramikie, T. S., Cavener, V. S., Rentz, T., Baucum, A. J., 2nd, Jalan-Sakrikar, N., Mackie, K., Winder, D. G., Patel, S., and Colbran, R. J. (2013) CaMKII regulates diacylglycerol lipase-alpha and striatal endocannabinoid signaling Nat. Neurosci. 16, 456 463 DOI: 10.1038/nn.3353
    35. 35
      Bisogno, T., Howell, F., Williams, G., Minassi, A., Cascio, M. G., Ligresti, A., Matias, I., Schiano-Moriello, A., Paul, P., Williams, E. J., Gangadharan, U., Hobbs, C., Di Marzo, V., and Doherty, P. (2003) Cloning of the first sn1-DAG lipases points to the spatial and temporal regulation of endocannabinoid signaling in the brain J. Cell Biol. 163, 463 468 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200305129
    36. 36
      Cravatt, B. F., Wright, A. T., and Kozarich, J. W. (2008) Activity-based protein profiling: from enzyme chemistry to proteomic chemistry Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77, 383 414 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.101304.124125
    37. 37
      Niphakis, M. J. and Cravatt, B. F. (2014) Enzyme inhibitor discovery by activity-based protein profiling Annu. Rev. Biochem. 83, 341 377 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035708
    38. 38
      Baggelaar, M. P., Chameau, P. J., Kantae, V., Hummel, J., Hsu, K. L., Janssen, F., van der Wel, T., Soethoudt, M., Deng, H., den Dulk, H., Allara, M., Florea, B. I., Di Marzo, V., Wadman, W. J., Kruse, C. G., Overkleeft, H. S., Hankemeier, T., Werkman, T. R., Cravatt, B. F., and van der Stelt, M. (2015) Highly Selective, Reversible Inhibitor Identified by Comparative Chemoproteomics Modulates Diacylglycerol Lipase Activity in Neurons J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 8851 8857 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b04883
    39. 39
      Liu, Y., Patricelli, M. P., and Cravatt, B. F. (1999) Activity-based protein profiling: the serine hydrolases Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 14694 14699 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.26.14694
    40. 40
      Baggelaar, M. P., Janssen, F. J., van Esbroeck, A. C., den Dulk, H., Allara, M., Hoogendoorn, S., McGuire, R., Florea, B. I., Meeuwenoord, N., van den Elst, H., van der Marel, G. A., Brouwer, J., Di Marzo, V., Overkleeft, H. S., and van der Stelt, M. (2013) Development of an activity-based probe and in silico design reveal highly selective inhibitors for diacylglycerol lipase-alpha in brain Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 52, 12081 12085 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201306295
    41. 41
      Cox, J. and Mann, M. (2008) MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367 1372 DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1511
    42. 42
      Kamat, S. S., Camara, K., Parsons, W. H., Chen, D. H., Dix, M. M., Bird, T. D., Howell, A. R., and Cravatt, B. F. (2015) Immunomodulatory lysophosphatidylserines are regulated by ABHD16A and ABHD12 interplay Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 164 171 DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.1721
    43. 43
      Long, J. Z. and Cravatt, B. F. (2011) The metabolic serine hydrolases and their functions in mammalian physiology and disease Chem. Rev. 111, 6022 6063 DOI: 10.1021/cr200075y
    44. 44
      Herkenham, M., Lynn, A. B., Little, M. D., Johnson, M. R., Melvin, L. S., de Costa, B. R., and Rice, K. C. (1990) Cannabinoid receptor localization in brain Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 1932 1936 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.5.1932
    45. 45
      Marsicano, G., Goodenough, S., Monory, K., Hermann, H., Eder, M., Cannich, A., Azad, S. C., Cascio, M. G., Gutierrez, S. O., van der Stelt, M., Lopez-Rodriguez, M. L., Casanova, E., Schutz, G., Zieglgansberger, W., Di Marzo, V., Behl, C., and Lutz, B. (2003) CB1 cannabinoid receptors and on-demand defense against excitotoxicity Science 302, 84 88 DOI: 10.1126/science.1088208
    46. 46
      van der Stelt, M., Trevisani, M., Vellani, V., De Petrocellis, L., Schiano Moriello, A., Campi, B., McNaughton, P., Geppetti, P., and Di Marzo, V. (2005) Anandamide acts as an intracellular messenger amplifying Ca2+ influx via TRPV1 channels EMBO J. 24, 3026 3037 DOI: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600784
    47. 47
      Maccarrone, M., Rossi, S., Bari, M., De Chiara, V., Fezza, F., Musella, A., Gasperi, V., Prosperetti, C., Bernardi, G., Finazzi-Agro, A., Cravatt, B. F., and Centonze, D. (2008) Anandamide inhibits metabolism and physiological actions of 2-arachidonoylglycerol in the striatum Nat. Neurosci. 11, 152 159 DOI: 10.1038/nn2042
    48. 48
      Buczynski, M. W. and Parsons, L. H. (2010) Quantification of brain endocannabinoid levels: methods, interpretations and pitfalls Br. J. Pharmacol. 160, 423 442 DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00787.x
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.6b01052.

    • Supporting Table 1 (XLSX)

    • Supporting Table 2 (XLSX)

    • Supporting Table 3 (XLSX)

    • Supporting Table 4 (XLSX)

    • Supporting Methods, Supporting Figures 1 and 2, Supporting Tables 1 and 2 (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.