ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Glyme Solvent Decomposition on Spinel Cathode Surface in Magnesium Battery
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Letter

Glyme Solvent Decomposition on Spinel Cathode Surface in Magnesium Battery
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Wenchong Zhou
    Wenchong Zhou
    Research Center for Energy and Environmental Materials (GREEN), National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS), 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan
  • Chenchao Xu
    Chenchao Xu
    Research Center for Energy and Environmental Materials (GREEN), National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS), 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan
    More by Chenchao Xu
  • Bo Gao
    Bo Gao
    Research Center for Energy and Environmental Materials (GREEN), National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS), 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan
    State Key Laboratory of Automobile Materials of Ministry of Education, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130012, People’s Republic of China
    More by Bo Gao
  • Masanobu Nakayama
    Masanobu Nakayama
    Department of Advanced Ceramics, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso, Showa, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8555, Japan
  • Shunsuke Yagi
    Shunsuke Yagi
    Institute of Industrial Science (IIS), The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8505, Japan
  • Yoshitaka Tateyama*
    Yoshitaka Tateyama
    Research Center for Energy and Environmental Materials (GREEN), National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS), 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan
    *E-mail: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Energy Letters

Cite this: ACS Energy Lett. 2023, 8, 10, 4113–4118
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c01084
Published September 11, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The cathode performance is critical for developing a magnesium rechargeable battery, and spinel oxides MgM2O4 (M = Mn/Fe/Co) show promise. However, (de)magnesiation and oxidative electrolyte decomposition are major issues. In this study, we investigated the microscopic mechanisms of dimethoxyethane (DME) oxidative decomposition on MgM2O4 using density functional theory calculations. The study shows that demagnesiation promotes decomposition, and DME is most likely to decompose on MgMn2O4 during charging compared to that on MgFe2O4 and MgCo2O4. Density of states analysis reveals that the experimentally observed reactivity of MgMn2O4 is due to the closeness in energy between the highest occupied molecular orbital of DME and the valence band maximum of MgMn2O4. Moreover, the fragmentation of DME occurs first, making oxidation easier. The oxidation potential order, Mn (3.05 V) < Co (3.27 V) < Fe (3.59 V), observed in the cyclic voltammograms, matches the calculated charge potentials, which has a certain effect on the DME decomposition.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
  • nc licence
  • nd licence
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society
Rechargeable batteries are essential for renewable energy technology, and high-performance devices require batteries with high energy density, low cost, and high safety. Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been widely used because of their long cycle life and high energy density, (1) but the safety issues, high cost and limited volume energy density (up to 693 Wh/L) hinder large-scale application in stationary powers. (2) Magnesium rechargeable batteries (MRBs) have a divalent nature of Mg2+ ions and a potentially high volume energy density (7666 Wh/L) using magnesium metal anode. (3) The raw material costs are low due to abundant magnesium in the earth crust. In addition, the magnesium metal anode hardly forms dendrites, ensuring good stability and safety. Therefore, MRBs are promising alternatives to LIBs.
In 2000, Aurbach et al. fabricated a prototype MRB in which Chevrel-phase Mo6S8 was used as cathode. (3) With the high mobility of Mg2+ ions, Mo6S8 exhibited excellent room temperature cyclability. However, low operating voltage (1.0–1.2 V vs Mg/Mg2+) and limited capacity (∼75 mAh g–1) restricted its further development. The oxides as cathode materials were found to show higher voltages and capacities than sulfides. (4−13) Spinel transition metal oxides MgM2O4 (M = Mn/Fe/Co) are particularly promising due to their high potentials (over 2.5 V vs Mg/Mg2+), good stability, and large specific capacities (up to 241 mAh g–1). (10) Recently, there has been a significant surge in interest regarding the migration of Mg2+ ions, the electrochemistry of spinel transition metal oxides, and the reversible deposition and stripping of Mg in inorganic nonaqueous electrolytes. (14−19)
However, high potential cathodes are likely to cause electrolyte decomposition. (20) Tetraglyme has been experimentally reported to exhibit an oxidative potential of 3.8 V vs Mg/Mg2+, (20) while 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) or monoglyme demonstrates anodic stability at 3.1 V vs Mg/Mg2+. (21) Our density functional theory (DFT) calculations with polarized continuum medium model showed that the oxidation energies of DME, diglyme, and triglyme are around −7.4, −6.8, and −6.7 eV vs. Evac., respectively, which correspond to 5.4, 4.8, and 4.7 V vs. Mg/Mg2+. In this sense, glyme still has reasonable stability against oxidation (electron extraction). The desolvation energies of Mg2+ in organic electrolyte solvents are notably high, primarily due to its double positive charge, distinguishing it from Li+ and Na+ ions. (22) With spinel oxide cathodes, the cyclic voltammograms showed that the onset voltage of the oxidation (anodic) current for MgM2O4 follows the order Mn (3.05 V) < Co (3.27 V) < Fe (3.59 V) (vs Mg/Mg2+). (20) This difference in anodic behavior may be due to the oxidative decomposition of the glyme electrolyte as well as demagnesiation during charging, but the relationship is unclear. Especially, the mechanism of electrolyte decomposition on spinel MgM2O4 surfaces has not yet been established.
In this study, we employed DFT calculations to investigate the electrolyte decomposition on transition metal oxide surfaces. We identified the most stable surfaces based on surface energies and compared the adsorption energies of both molecular and dissociated DME on these surfaces. Charging potentials at initial states of charge were also calculated, and electronic properties were analyzed by using Bader charges and projected density of states (PDOS). By analyzing the bonding of MgM2O4 and the oxidative decomposition of DME, we provided new insights that explain the anodic current behavior of MRBs.
Before the surface investigation, we first examined the bulk properties of spinel MgM2O4. The unit cells of Mg8Mn16O32 and Mg8Fe16O32 are shown in Figure 1a,b. The structure of MgMn2O4 is tetragonal (space group, I41/amd) with lattice parameters a = bc due to Jahn–Teller (JT) distortion. The spinel MgFe2O4 and MgCo2O4 oxides belong to the same space group, Fd3m with cubic symmetry. Glyme solvents are promising electrolytes for MRBs due to their reduction stability. Considering reducing the computational cost, we chose DME as the adsorbate, as it is the smallest representative of glymes, and the obtained physics can be transferred to larger glymes, which are commonly used in the experiments. The decomposition of DME was modeled by cutting Cα–O or Cβ–O bonds within DME as shown in Figure 1c. Representative molecular and dissociated adsorption structures are denoted in Figures 1d,e, and Figure 1f exhibits the supercell configuration of DME on the MgMn2O4 surface.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Spinel oxide unit cells (a) Mg8Mn16O32 and (b) Mg8Fe16O32 with lattice parameters and Wyckoff positions denoted. Illustrations of (c) DME molecule with two carbon atoms labeled according to their locations at primary – CH3 (Cα) and secondary – CH2– (Cβ) sites, (d) molecular adsorption, (e) dissociated adsorption, and (f) supercell configuration of DME on the MgMn2O4 surface.

More discussion of bulk properties can be found in Section S1 in the Supporting Information (SI). As denoted, the present calculation conditions reproduce well the structural (Table S1) and electronic or spin (Figure S1) properties of bulk MgM2O4. In addition, the strong orbital hybridization between the O2– and the M3+ (Figures S2 and S3), as well as the Bader charge analysis (Table S2), suggests coexistence of the ionic and covalent bonding nature inside MgM2O4 and the covalent bonds in spinel MgMn2O4 and MgCo2O4 are stronger than those in MgFe2O4. On the contrary, the greater accumulation of negative charges on O2– in MgFe2O4 leads to strong electrostatic attraction between the Mg2+ and the O2–.
Based on bulk calculations, we constructed the (100), (110) and (111) surfaces for MgM2O4 (M = Mn/Fe/Co), and additional (001) and (101) surfaces for MgMn2O4. For more information about surface modeling, refer to Section S2 (Figures S4 and S5). Upon surface investigation, we found that the (001) orientation for MgMn2O4 and the (100) orientation for both MgFe2O4 and MgCo2O4 are the most stable among various low-index orientations (Table S3). Furthermore, the surface turned out to be reconstructed. For example, the Mg2+ ions in the topmost layer of MgFe2O4 Fd3m prefer the 16c sites instead of the 8a sites in the space group Fd3m, as shown in Figure 2a,b. MgMn2O4 (space group: I41/amd) and MgCo2O4 (space group: Fd3m) surfaces showed the same reconstruction behavior. As described in Section S3, this reconstruction significantly stabilizes the surface due to fewer O2– anions around Mg2+ cations at 8a sites, which promotes their movement to 16c sites in the O-rich region. A recent theoretical study also found this surface reconstruction. (23) In addition, we observed that the M-O sublayer reconstruction is unfavorable under the present calculation conditions (Figure S6).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Surface reconstruction of the MgFe2O4 surface. The topmost layer of Mg2+ ions at 8a sites in the initially cleaved system (a) moved to the 16c sites after relaxation (b). The local layers are indicated by dashed boxes in the side views. The most stable surface structures of (c) MgMn2O4, (d) MgFe2O4, and (e) MgCo2O4 are shown.

The anodic behavior of spinel oxides depends on the transition metal they contain, which may result from the oxidative decomposition of the glyme electrolyte as well as demagnesiation during charging. (20) To understand their relationship, we first analyzed the decomposition and adsorption on the surfaces of these oxides. Section S4 contains detailed information about the adsorption calculation (Figure S7 and S8 and Table S4). Figure 3a shows the overall calculated molecular and dissociated adsorption energies, denoted as Ead,mol and Ead,dis respectively. The optimized configurations of all considered adsorption modes are shown in Figure S9. As denoted, adsorption at the surface Mg2+ site is always preferred because of high deficiency of the O2– anions on the surface (Figure S10). The negative molecular adsorption energies for all adsorption modes of spinel oxide surface Mg1M2O4 (Ead,mol = −1.03 eV for Mn, – 1.13 eV for Fe, and −0.51 eV for Co) suggest that DME molecules are likely to adsorb spontaneously. As a representative decomposition model (Figure S11), we kept the Mg–ODME bonding models for dissociated adsorption energies Ead,dis. All the Ead,dis values (Ead,dis = −0.24 eV for Mn, – 0.83 eV for Fe, 0.13 eV for Co) are higher than the Ead,mol, indicating that molecular adsorption is more stable and dominant.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Molecular and dissociated adsorption energies of DME with adsorption modes marked by numbers 1–6 on the surfaces of (a) stoichiometric surface Mg1M2O4 and (b) demagnesiated surface Mg0.9375M2O4. (c) Charging potentials (unit in V) vs Mg/Mg2+ of transition metal oxides MgxM2O4 (x = 0.875 and 0.75). (d) Energy diagram of reconstructed surfaces.

It is often stated that stoichiometric surfaces are less reactive. To evaluate the reactivity upon demagnesiation or charging, which involves Mg2+ extraction and the production of active oxygen, we calculated the same adsorption energies, in Figure 3b, for the chosen MgM2O4 surfaces with one Mg vacancy on the surface. The surface under charging significantly changed the adsorption behavior for the three surfaces, particularly for MgMn2O4 on which the dissociated adsorption (Ead,dis = −0.68 eV) becomes more favorable than the molecular adsorption (Ead,mol = −0.59 eV). On the other hand, the MgFe2O4 and MgCo2O4 still keep the molecular adsorption dominant (Ead,mol = −1.22 eV for Fe, – 0.84 eV for Co; Ead,dis = −1.02 eV for Fe, – 0.56 eV for Co). In addition, the Bader charges on Mg, Mn, Fe, and Co atoms on the surface are +1.66, + 1.6, + 1.7, and +1.35, respectively. The more positive charge of the Fe atoms leads to larger electrostatic attraction with the O of DME, thus more favorable adsorption on MgFe2O4 surfaces.
To further investigate the demagnesiation upon charging, Figure 3c compares the calculated charging potentials (in volts) of the spinel oxides MgxM2O4 (x = 0.875 and 0.75). The calculation details are elaborated on in Section S5. The average potential of 3.47 V for MgMn2O4 is close to the measured potential of 3.4 V in a previous study. (10) We obtained an ascending order of charging potentials, MgMn2O4 (3.85 V) < MgCo2O4 (4.08 V) < MgFe2O4 (4.19 V), indicating the less stability of Mg2+ in MgMn2O4 than in MgFe2O4 and MgCo2O4, consistent with one previous experimental and theoretical work. (10) Further analysis of the Bader charge and electronic structure reveals that the negative charge accumulation of O2– and the spin multiplicity of transition metal cations are responsible for the observed charging potentials (Figure S12 in Section S6). Regarding possible defect chemistry, we explored the formation of surface oxygen vacancies (Figure S13) and their effects on structures and adsorption energies, which are discussed in Section S7.
In previous work, the electron transfer between the electrolyte and spinel cathodes was analyzed based on the position of the valence band maximum (VBM) in the energy band diagram, (20,24) whereas the surface reconstruction was not considered. For comparison, we analyzed the energy band diagram (Figure 3d) based on the electronic states shown in Figures S14 and S15 of Section S8. Tables S5–S8 provide a comprehensive description of their spin states. With respect to the vacuum level, the VBM in MgMn2O4 is lower than those in the other oxides, which is consistent with the oxidation reactivity of oxides. On the other hand, the calculated DME ionization potential in solution (about −7.54 eV vs vacuum level, or ∼5.54 V vs Mg/Mg2+) suggests that direct charge transfer from the electrolyte to the oxides is not possible. Therefore, the argument based on band positions needs more consideration, and surface catalytic chemistry based on explicit decomposition modeling is more essential.
The higher tendency of DME to decompose on MgMn2O4 compared with MgFe2O4 is attributed to the surface electronic states of these spinel oxides, as shown in the PDOS plots (Figures 4, S16, and S17). If we assume that charging is a trigger for the subsequent process, the electrons in the valence band maximum region are extracted, generating the hole. Therefore, the relationship between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of DME and the VBMs of the spinel oxides is more relevant even in the fully discharged case. For molecular adsorption, the HOMO of DME is close in energy with the VBM of MgMn2O4, suggesting possible charge transfer from DME to MgMn2O4, which supports the observed reactivity of MgMn2O4. (20,24) However, for MgFe2O4 and MgCo2O4, the HOMO of DME remains distant from the VBM of oxides. In the cases of dissociated adsorptions, the HOMOs of the dissociated DME are located near the Fermi levels for all oxides (Figures 4 and S16d–f)), indicating easier charge transfer from the decomposed fragments compared with molecular DME.

Figure 4

Figure 4. PDOSs of molecular and dissociated DME on Mg0.9375Mn2O4, Mg0.9375Fe2O4 and Mg0.9375Co2O4 surfaces, with the Fermi levels indicated by the vertical dashed lines.

We further investigated two pathways for the oxidative decomposition of DME: Path 1 involves fragmentation followed by oxidation, while Path 2 involves oxidation preceding fragmentation. The reaction energy profiles from hybrid functional calculations support the PDOS results, with direct oxidation requiring higher energy (7.8 eV) than oxidation of decomposition products (6.5 or 5.4 eV) (Figure S18). These oxidation energies exceed the absolute values of conduction band minimums of the considered transition metal oxide surfaces (MgMn2O4: 4.4 eV; MgFe2O4: 4.2 eV; MgCo2O4: 5.0 eV), indicating less favorable direct oxidation and the crucial role of transition metal oxide surfaces. For decomposition, DME exhibits a significantly higher energy (3.9 eV) than in the presence of transition metal oxides (MgMn2O4: 0.8 eV; MgFe2O4: 0.32 eV; MgCo2O4: 0.64 eV), highlighting the strong catalytic effect of oxides.
In conclusion, we used DFT calculations to investigate the oxidative decomposition of DME on the spinel oxide surfaces. Our findings reveal that the decomposition of the electrolyte is mainly determined by surface catalytic chemistry rather than direct charge transfer. Among the spinel oxides, the MgMn2O4 has the highest tendency for DME decomposition under demagnesiation, followed by MgCo2O4 and MgFe2O4. The electronic state analysis indicates that the HOMO of DME is close in energy with the VBM of MgMn2O4, which explains the observed reactivity of MgMn2O4. We found that the decomposition of the electrolyte is related to the demagnesiation reaction of the spinel oxides. During the oxidative decomposition of DME on MgM2O4, the process can be described as follows: surface electrons of MgM2O4 are transported to the current collector, and Mg2+ ions are extracted from the electrolyte during charging. The covalent bonding between O and Mn facilitates electron transport to the collector on the MgMn2O4 surface compared to the less covalent-like Fe–O bonding in MgFe2O4. The oxidation potential order, Mn (3.05 V) < Co (3.27 V) < Fe (3.59 V), observed in the cyclic voltammograms matches the calculated charge potentials. On the charged surface, the decomposed DME fragments can readily undergo charge transfer. Our proposed catalytic decomposition mechanism sheds light on the anodic behavior of these oxides and provides insights for surface control.

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) was used for calculations with a plane-wave basis set and the projector augmented wave method. (25) The Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof functional described the electron exchange-correlation, (26) while the GGA + U method with U parameters of 4.64 eV for Mn, 5.3 eV for Fe, and 4.91 eV for Co was used to treat the d-electrons following previous works. (27,28) The DFT-D3 method was included to account for van der Waals interactions. (29) An energy cutoff of 500 eV was enough for convergence (Figure S19). Additional computational details can be found in Section S9.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c01084.

  • Bulk properties, surface calculation and reconstruction, adsorption calculation, charge potential, oxygen vacancy effect, electronic property of surface, more computational details (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Wenchong Zhou - Research Center for Energy and Environmental Materials (GREEN), National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS), 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan
    • Chenchao Xu - Research Center for Energy and Environmental Materials (GREEN), National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS), 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan
    • Bo Gao - Research Center for Energy and Environmental Materials (GREEN), National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS), 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, JapanState Key Laboratory of Automobile Materials of Ministry of Education, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130012, People’s Republic of ChinaOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1183-656X
    • Masanobu Nakayama - Department of Advanced Ceramics, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso, Showa, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8555, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5113-053X
    • Shunsuke Yagi - Institute of Industrial Science (IIS), The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8505, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1675-650X
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers JP19H05815, by MEXT as “Program for Promoting Research on the Supercomputer Fugaku” grant number JPMXP1020200301 and Data Creation and Utilization Type Material Research and Development Project grant number JPMXP1121467561, as well as by JST COI-NEXT grant number JPMJPF2016 and the JST ALCA-SPRING grant number JPMJAL1301. We also thank Dr. Akiko Kagatsume for her computational support. C.X. thanks the financial support from the grant JPMXP1020200104. The calculations were performed on the supercomputers at NIMS (Numerical Materials Simulator) and the supercomputer Fugaku at the RIKEN through the HPCI System Research Project (project ID: hp220177).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 29 other publications.

  1. 1
    Kim, T.; Park, J.; Chang, S. K.; Choi, S.; Ryu, J. H.; Song, H. The Current Move of Lithium Ion Batteries towards the next Phase. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2 (7), 860872,  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201200028
  2. 2
    Thackeray, M. M.; Wolverton, C.; Isaacs, E. D. Electrical Energy Storage for Transportation─Approaching the Limits of, and Going beyond, Lithium-Ion Batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5 (7), 78547863,  DOI: 10.1039/c2ee21892e
  3. 3
    Aurbach, D.; Lu, Z.; Schechter, A.; Gofer, Y.; Gizbar, H.; Turgeman, R.; Cohen, Y.; Moshkovich, M.; Levi, E. Prototype Systems for Rechargeable Magnesium Batteries. Nature 2000, 407 (6805), 724727,  DOI: 10.1038/35037553
  4. 4
    Taniguchi, K.; Gu, Y.; Katsura, Y.; Yoshino, T.; Takagi, H. Rechargeable Mg Battery Cathode TiS3 with d-p Orbital Hybridized Electronic Structures. Appl. Phys. Express 2016, 9 (1), 011801,  DOI: 10.7567/APEX.9.011801
  5. 5
    Wang, M.; Han, J.; Liu, W.; Kamiko, M.; Yagi, S. Energy Storage Mechanism of Monocrystalline Layered FePS3 and FePSe3 as Active Materials for Mg Batteries and Pseudocapacitors. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 883, 160822,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160822
  6. 6
    Orikasa, Y.; Masese, T.; Koyama, Y.; Mori, T.; Hattori, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Okado, T.; Huang, Z.-D.; Minato, T.; Tassel, C. High Energy Density Rechargeable Magnesium Battery Using Earth-Abundant and Non-Toxic Elements. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4 (1), 5622,  DOI: 10.1038/srep05622
  7. 7
    NuLi, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, J.; Wang, J. Electrochemical Intercalation of Mg2+ in 3D Hierarchically Porous Magnesium Cobalt Silicate and Its Application as an Advanced Cathode Material in Rechargeable Magnesium Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21 (33), 1243712443,  DOI: 10.1039/c1jm10485c
  8. 8
    Hatakeyama, T.; Li, H.; Okamoto, N. L.; Shimokawa, K.; Kawaguchi, T.; Tanimura, H.; Imashuku, S.; Fichtner, M.; Ichitsubo, T. Accelerated Kinetics Revealing Metastable Pathways of Magnesiation-Induced Transformations in MnO2 Polymorphs. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33 (17), 69836996,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c02011
  9. 9
    Hatakeyama, T.; Okamoto, N. L.; Shimokawa, K.; Li, H.; Nakao, A.; Uchimoto, Y.; Tanimura, H.; Kawaguchi, T.; Ichitsubo, T. Electrochemical Phase Transformation Accompanied with Mg Extraction and Insertion in a Spinel MgMn2O4 Cathode Material. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21 (42), 2374923757,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CP04461B
  10. 10
    Okamoto, S.; Ichitsubo, T.; Kawaguchi, T.; Kumagai, Y.; Oba, F.; Yagi, S.; Shimokawa, K.; Goto, N.; Doi, T.; Matsubara, E. Intercalation and Push-Out Process with Spinel-to-Rocksalt Transition on Mg Insertion into Spinel Oxides in Magnesium Batteries. Adv. Sci. 2015, 2 (8), 1500072,  DOI: 10.1002/advs.201500072
  11. 11
    Shimokawa, K.; Atsumi, T.; Harada, M.; Ward, R. E.; Nakayama, M.; Kumagai, Y.; Oba, F.; Okamoto, N. L.; Kanamura, K.; Ichitsubo, T. Zinc-Based Spinel Cathode Materials for Magnesium Rechargeable Batteries: Toward the Reversible Spinel-Rocksalt Transition. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7 (19), 1222512235,  DOI: 10.1039/C9TA02281C
  12. 12
    Sun, X.; Bonnick, P.; Duffort, V.; Liu, M.; Rong, Z.; Persson, K. A.; Ceder, G.; Nazar, L. F. A High Capacity Thiospinel Cathode for Mg Batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9 (7), 22732277,  DOI: 10.1039/C6EE00724D
  13. 13
    Kolli, S. K.; Van der Ven, A. Elucidating the Factors That Cause Cation Diffusion Shutdown in Spinel-Based Electrodes. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33 (16), 64216432,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01668
  14. 14
    Johnson, I. D.; Mistry, A. N.; Yin, L.; Murphy, M.; Wolfman, M.; Fister, T. T.; Lapidus, S. H.; Cabana, J.; Srinivasan, V.; Ingram, B. J. Unconventional Charge Transport in MgCr2O4 and Implications for Battery Intercalation Hosts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144 (31), 1412114131,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c03491
  15. 15
    Bayliss, R. D.; Key, B.; Sai Gautam, G.; Canepa, P.; Kwon, B. J.; Lapidus, S. H.; Dogan, F.; Adil, A. A.; Lipton, A. S.; Baker, P. J. Probing Mg Migration in Spinel Oxides. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32 (2), 663670,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02450
  16. 16
    Sai Gautam, G.; Canepa, P.; Urban, A.; Bo, S.-H.; Ceder, G. Influence of Inversion on Mg Mobility and Electrochemistry in Spinels. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29 (18), 79187930,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02820
  17. 17
    Kwon, B. J.; Yin, L.; Roy, I.; Leon, N. J.; Kumar, K.; Kim, J. J.; Han, J.; Gim, J.; Liao, C.; Lapidus, S. H. Facile Electrochemical Mg-Ion Transport in a Defect-Free Spinel Oxide. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34 (8), 37893797,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c00237
  18. 18
    Canepa, P.; Gautam, G. S.; Malik, R.; Jayaraman, S.; Rong, Z.; Zavadil, K. R.; Persson, K.; Ceder, G. Understanding the Initial Stages of Reversible Mg Deposition and Stripping in Inorganic Nonaqueous Electrolytes. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27 (9), 33173325,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00389
  19. 19
    Canepa, P.; Sai Gautam, G.; Hannah, D. C.; Malik, R.; Liu, M.; Gallagher, K. G.; Persson, K. A.; Ceder, G. Odyssey of Multivalent Cathode Materials: Open Questions and Future Challenges. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117 (5), 42874341,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00614
  20. 20
    Han, J.; Yagi, S.; Takeuchi, H.; Nakayama, M.; Ichitsubo, T. Catalytic Mechanism of Spinel Oxides for Oxidative Electrolyte Decomposition in Mg Rechargeable Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9 (46), 2640126409,  DOI: 10.1039/D1TA08115B
  21. 21
    Doe, R. E.; Han, R.; Hwang, J.; Gmitter, A. J.; Shterenberg, I.; Yoo, H. D.; Pour, N.; Aurbach, D. Novel, Electrolyte Solutions Comprising Fully Inorganic Salts with High Anodic Stability for Rechargeable Magnesium Batteries. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50 (2), 243245,  DOI: 10.1039/C3CC47896C
  22. 22
    Okoshi, M.; Yamada, Y.; Yamada, A.; Nakai, H. Theoretical Analysis on De-Solvation of Lithium, Sodium, and Magnesium Cations to Organic Electrolyte Solvents. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013, 160 (11), A2160,  DOI: 10.1149/2.074311jes
  23. 23
    Kaneko, T.; Fujihara, Y.; Kobayashi, H.; Sodeyama, K. First-Principles Study of the Reconstruction of MgM2O4 (M= Mn, Fe, Co) Spinel Surface. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 613, 156065,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.156065
  24. 24
    Han, J.; Yagi, S.; Takeuchi, H.; Nakayama, M.; Ichitsubo, T. Control of Electrolyte Decomposition by Mixing Transition Metal Ions in Spinel Oxides as Positive Electrode Active Materials for Mg Rechargeable Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126 (45), 1907419083,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c06443
  25. 25
    Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From Ultrasoft Pseudopotentials to the Projector Augmented-Wave Method. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59 (3), 17581775,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758
  26. 26
    Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 38653868,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
  27. 27
    Zhou, F.; Cococcioni, M.; Marianetti, C. A.; Morgan, D.; Ceder, G. First-Principles Prediction of Redox Potentials in Transition-Metal Compounds with LDA+ U. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70 (23), 235121,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.235121
  28. 28
    Guo, H.; Durham, J. L.; Brady, A. B.; Marschilok, A. C.; Takeuchi, E. S.; Takeuchi, K. J.; Liu, P. Essential Role of Spinel MgFe2O4 Surfaces during Discharge. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167 (9), 090506,  DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ab7f89
  29. 29
    Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A Consistent and Accurate Ab Initio Parametrization of Density Functional Dispersion Correction (DFT-D) for the 94 Elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132 (15), 154104,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3382344

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 7 publications.

  1. Kevin Leung. Toward Establishing the Principles of Electronic Structure Modeling of Battery Interfaces. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2025, 129 (17) , 7991-8003. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5c00616
  2. Reona Iimura, Hiroto Watanabe, Toshihiko Mandai, Itaru Honma, Hiroaki Imai, Hiroaki Kobayashi. An Electrically Conductive CuMn2O4 Ultrananospinel Cathode for Room-Temperature Magnesium Rechargeable Batteries. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2024, 7 (12) , 5308-5314. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.4c01211
  3. Reona Iimura, Shiori Kawasaki, Takashi Yabu, Shinnosuke Tachibana, Kazuya Yamaguchi, Toshihiko Mandai, Kazuaki Kisu, Naoto Kitamura, Zhirong Zhao‐Karger, Shin‐ichi Orimo, Yasushi Idemoto, Masaki Matsui, Maximilian Fichtner, Itaru Honma, Tetsu Ichitsubo, Hiroaki Kobayashi. Ultrasmall α ‐MnO 2 with Low Aspect Ratio: Applications to Electrochemical Multivalent‐Ion Intercalation Hosts and Aerobic Oxidation Catalysts. Small 2025, 21 (7) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202411493
  4. Miao Tian, Zhitao Wang, Hui Ying Yang, Song Chen. Great impetus of microscopic theoretical analyses for the advancement of magnesium-based batteries. Energy Storage Materials 2025, 74 , 103918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2024.103918
  5. Can‐Wen Yu, Zi‐Qiang Chen, Hong‐Yi Xu, Ting Ouyang, Zhao‐Qing Liu. Construction of Surface Ru oct ─O─Co oct Units With Optimized Co oct Spin States for Enhanced Oxygen Reduction and Evolution. Small 2024, 20 (47) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202405865
  6. Zhenzhen Yang, Jiyu Cai, Evelyna Wang, Maksim Sultanov, Lihong Gao, Xianyang Wu, Chen Liao, Zonghai Chen, Jianguo Wen, Lynn Trahey, Brian J. Ingram. Electrochemical reactivity and passivation of organic electrolytes at spinel MgCrMnO 4 cathode interfaces for rechargeable high voltage magnesium-ion batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2024, 12 (33) , 22220-22232. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4TA03765K
  7. Tomoaki KANEKO, Yui FUJIHARA, Toshihiko MANDAI, Hiroaki KOBAYASHI, Keitaro SODEYAMA. Ether Molecule Decomposition on MgM2O4 (M = Mn, Fe, Co) Spinel Surface: A First-principles Study. Electrochemistry 2024, 92 (2) , 027003-027003. https://doi.org/10.5796/electrochemistry.23-00087

ACS Energy Letters

Cite this: ACS Energy Lett. 2023, 8, 10, 4113–4118
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c01084
Published September 11, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Article Views

2246

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Spinel oxide unit cells (a) Mg8Mn16O32 and (b) Mg8Fe16O32 with lattice parameters and Wyckoff positions denoted. Illustrations of (c) DME molecule with two carbon atoms labeled according to their locations at primary – CH3 (Cα) and secondary – CH2– (Cβ) sites, (d) molecular adsorption, (e) dissociated adsorption, and (f) supercell configuration of DME on the MgMn2O4 surface.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Surface reconstruction of the MgFe2O4 surface. The topmost layer of Mg2+ ions at 8a sites in the initially cleaved system (a) moved to the 16c sites after relaxation (b). The local layers are indicated by dashed boxes in the side views. The most stable surface structures of (c) MgMn2O4, (d) MgFe2O4, and (e) MgCo2O4 are shown.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Molecular and dissociated adsorption energies of DME with adsorption modes marked by numbers 1–6 on the surfaces of (a) stoichiometric surface Mg1M2O4 and (b) demagnesiated surface Mg0.9375M2O4. (c) Charging potentials (unit in V) vs Mg/Mg2+ of transition metal oxides MgxM2O4 (x = 0.875 and 0.75). (d) Energy diagram of reconstructed surfaces.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. PDOSs of molecular and dissociated DME on Mg0.9375Mn2O4, Mg0.9375Fe2O4 and Mg0.9375Co2O4 surfaces, with the Fermi levels indicated by the vertical dashed lines.

  • References


    This article references 29 other publications.

    1. 1
      Kim, T.; Park, J.; Chang, S. K.; Choi, S.; Ryu, J. H.; Song, H. The Current Move of Lithium Ion Batteries towards the next Phase. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2 (7), 860872,  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201200028
    2. 2
      Thackeray, M. M.; Wolverton, C.; Isaacs, E. D. Electrical Energy Storage for Transportation─Approaching the Limits of, and Going beyond, Lithium-Ion Batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5 (7), 78547863,  DOI: 10.1039/c2ee21892e
    3. 3
      Aurbach, D.; Lu, Z.; Schechter, A.; Gofer, Y.; Gizbar, H.; Turgeman, R.; Cohen, Y.; Moshkovich, M.; Levi, E. Prototype Systems for Rechargeable Magnesium Batteries. Nature 2000, 407 (6805), 724727,  DOI: 10.1038/35037553
    4. 4
      Taniguchi, K.; Gu, Y.; Katsura, Y.; Yoshino, T.; Takagi, H. Rechargeable Mg Battery Cathode TiS3 with d-p Orbital Hybridized Electronic Structures. Appl. Phys. Express 2016, 9 (1), 011801,  DOI: 10.7567/APEX.9.011801
    5. 5
      Wang, M.; Han, J.; Liu, W.; Kamiko, M.; Yagi, S. Energy Storage Mechanism of Monocrystalline Layered FePS3 and FePSe3 as Active Materials for Mg Batteries and Pseudocapacitors. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 883, 160822,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160822
    6. 6
      Orikasa, Y.; Masese, T.; Koyama, Y.; Mori, T.; Hattori, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Okado, T.; Huang, Z.-D.; Minato, T.; Tassel, C. High Energy Density Rechargeable Magnesium Battery Using Earth-Abundant and Non-Toxic Elements. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4 (1), 5622,  DOI: 10.1038/srep05622
    7. 7
      NuLi, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, J.; Wang, J. Electrochemical Intercalation of Mg2+ in 3D Hierarchically Porous Magnesium Cobalt Silicate and Its Application as an Advanced Cathode Material in Rechargeable Magnesium Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21 (33), 1243712443,  DOI: 10.1039/c1jm10485c
    8. 8
      Hatakeyama, T.; Li, H.; Okamoto, N. L.; Shimokawa, K.; Kawaguchi, T.; Tanimura, H.; Imashuku, S.; Fichtner, M.; Ichitsubo, T. Accelerated Kinetics Revealing Metastable Pathways of Magnesiation-Induced Transformations in MnO2 Polymorphs. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33 (17), 69836996,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c02011
    9. 9
      Hatakeyama, T.; Okamoto, N. L.; Shimokawa, K.; Li, H.; Nakao, A.; Uchimoto, Y.; Tanimura, H.; Kawaguchi, T.; Ichitsubo, T. Electrochemical Phase Transformation Accompanied with Mg Extraction and Insertion in a Spinel MgMn2O4 Cathode Material. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21 (42), 2374923757,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CP04461B
    10. 10
      Okamoto, S.; Ichitsubo, T.; Kawaguchi, T.; Kumagai, Y.; Oba, F.; Yagi, S.; Shimokawa, K.; Goto, N.; Doi, T.; Matsubara, E. Intercalation and Push-Out Process with Spinel-to-Rocksalt Transition on Mg Insertion into Spinel Oxides in Magnesium Batteries. Adv. Sci. 2015, 2 (8), 1500072,  DOI: 10.1002/advs.201500072
    11. 11
      Shimokawa, K.; Atsumi, T.; Harada, M.; Ward, R. E.; Nakayama, M.; Kumagai, Y.; Oba, F.; Okamoto, N. L.; Kanamura, K.; Ichitsubo, T. Zinc-Based Spinel Cathode Materials for Magnesium Rechargeable Batteries: Toward the Reversible Spinel-Rocksalt Transition. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7 (19), 1222512235,  DOI: 10.1039/C9TA02281C
    12. 12
      Sun, X.; Bonnick, P.; Duffort, V.; Liu, M.; Rong, Z.; Persson, K. A.; Ceder, G.; Nazar, L. F. A High Capacity Thiospinel Cathode for Mg Batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9 (7), 22732277,  DOI: 10.1039/C6EE00724D
    13. 13
      Kolli, S. K.; Van der Ven, A. Elucidating the Factors That Cause Cation Diffusion Shutdown in Spinel-Based Electrodes. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33 (16), 64216432,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01668
    14. 14
      Johnson, I. D.; Mistry, A. N.; Yin, L.; Murphy, M.; Wolfman, M.; Fister, T. T.; Lapidus, S. H.; Cabana, J.; Srinivasan, V.; Ingram, B. J. Unconventional Charge Transport in MgCr2O4 and Implications for Battery Intercalation Hosts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144 (31), 1412114131,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c03491
    15. 15
      Bayliss, R. D.; Key, B.; Sai Gautam, G.; Canepa, P.; Kwon, B. J.; Lapidus, S. H.; Dogan, F.; Adil, A. A.; Lipton, A. S.; Baker, P. J. Probing Mg Migration in Spinel Oxides. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32 (2), 663670,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02450
    16. 16
      Sai Gautam, G.; Canepa, P.; Urban, A.; Bo, S.-H.; Ceder, G. Influence of Inversion on Mg Mobility and Electrochemistry in Spinels. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29 (18), 79187930,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02820
    17. 17
      Kwon, B. J.; Yin, L.; Roy, I.; Leon, N. J.; Kumar, K.; Kim, J. J.; Han, J.; Gim, J.; Liao, C.; Lapidus, S. H. Facile Electrochemical Mg-Ion Transport in a Defect-Free Spinel Oxide. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34 (8), 37893797,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c00237
    18. 18
      Canepa, P.; Gautam, G. S.; Malik, R.; Jayaraman, S.; Rong, Z.; Zavadil, K. R.; Persson, K.; Ceder, G. Understanding the Initial Stages of Reversible Mg Deposition and Stripping in Inorganic Nonaqueous Electrolytes. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27 (9), 33173325,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00389
    19. 19
      Canepa, P.; Sai Gautam, G.; Hannah, D. C.; Malik, R.; Liu, M.; Gallagher, K. G.; Persson, K. A.; Ceder, G. Odyssey of Multivalent Cathode Materials: Open Questions and Future Challenges. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117 (5), 42874341,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00614
    20. 20
      Han, J.; Yagi, S.; Takeuchi, H.; Nakayama, M.; Ichitsubo, T. Catalytic Mechanism of Spinel Oxides for Oxidative Electrolyte Decomposition in Mg Rechargeable Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9 (46), 2640126409,  DOI: 10.1039/D1TA08115B
    21. 21
      Doe, R. E.; Han, R.; Hwang, J.; Gmitter, A. J.; Shterenberg, I.; Yoo, H. D.; Pour, N.; Aurbach, D. Novel, Electrolyte Solutions Comprising Fully Inorganic Salts with High Anodic Stability for Rechargeable Magnesium Batteries. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50 (2), 243245,  DOI: 10.1039/C3CC47896C
    22. 22
      Okoshi, M.; Yamada, Y.; Yamada, A.; Nakai, H. Theoretical Analysis on De-Solvation of Lithium, Sodium, and Magnesium Cations to Organic Electrolyte Solvents. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013, 160 (11), A2160,  DOI: 10.1149/2.074311jes
    23. 23
      Kaneko, T.; Fujihara, Y.; Kobayashi, H.; Sodeyama, K. First-Principles Study of the Reconstruction of MgM2O4 (M= Mn, Fe, Co) Spinel Surface. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 613, 156065,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.156065
    24. 24
      Han, J.; Yagi, S.; Takeuchi, H.; Nakayama, M.; Ichitsubo, T. Control of Electrolyte Decomposition by Mixing Transition Metal Ions in Spinel Oxides as Positive Electrode Active Materials for Mg Rechargeable Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126 (45), 1907419083,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c06443
    25. 25
      Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From Ultrasoft Pseudopotentials to the Projector Augmented-Wave Method. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59 (3), 17581775,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758
    26. 26
      Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 38653868,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
    27. 27
      Zhou, F.; Cococcioni, M.; Marianetti, C. A.; Morgan, D.; Ceder, G. First-Principles Prediction of Redox Potentials in Transition-Metal Compounds with LDA+ U. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70 (23), 235121,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.235121
    28. 28
      Guo, H.; Durham, J. L.; Brady, A. B.; Marschilok, A. C.; Takeuchi, E. S.; Takeuchi, K. J.; Liu, P. Essential Role of Spinel MgFe2O4 Surfaces during Discharge. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167 (9), 090506,  DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ab7f89
    29. 29
      Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A Consistent and Accurate Ab Initio Parametrization of Density Functional Dispersion Correction (DFT-D) for the 94 Elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132 (15), 154104,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3382344
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c01084.

    • Bulk properties, surface calculation and reconstruction, adsorption calculation, charge potential, oxygen vacancy effect, electronic property of surface, more computational details (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.